TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nastynuggets Archive

View 8 posts and 63 comments by nastynuggets on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

No, they're not. This is not helpful.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 09:14 PM
37

All right. I'll give you that many women have a submissive element to their sexuality that can sometimes be unhealthy and/or result in conflicting expectations for their male partners. But I'm not sure if this particular case is very instructive about their nature. Wanting to be murdered is a pretty rare fetish for both men and women. In fact, although they are also a minority, there are far more women that would much rather "dominate a beta male" rather than be "murdered by an alpha male". Furt…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 02:02 PM
1

Feminists can weasel out of the accusations that their movement is anti-male in the same way though, and we rightly call them on it. They will say things like "feminism isn't anti-male, you're just conflating patriarchy with men. Patriarchy hurts men too". This is a classic Mott and Bailey defense, where the motte is that all men are oppressors by nature, and the bailey is that it is only due to the patriarchal system that they oppress (as if they can wave away the implication that men designed …
/r/MensRights29/09/25 03:06 PM
-1

Careful. The MRA thesis that feminism is a movement that unfairly benefits women at the expense of men has negative implications about the moral character of women. I.e. creating and upholding a movement that condemns the other sex for your benefit does not reflect well on your sex. Very hard to avoid judgment and hate in victim advocacy movements.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 12:49 AM
2

The the basic, trivial type, even. If I were to pick a term for it, I don't know if I would even call it privilege, but I think the concept does have some merit. For example, if you are a man in tech support or the trades, people will have a certain level of assumed trust in your ability that they won't for a woman. This doesn't benefit all men, because not all men want to be in tech support or trades, and it usually has nothing to do with sexism, but reasonable stereotyping. However, many men c…
/r/MensRights26/08/25 10:34 AM
5

Interestingly, the same as true of the men's rights movement. We need to defend against degeneracy in the same way if we are to maintain the moral high ground.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:22 AM
4

Counterpoint: male privilege exists, but: not all men benefit from it, the reality is much more complex and nuanced female privilege exists in much the same way while male privilege is called out and challenged, female privilege is, generally speaking, not
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:17 AM
-2

Wait, hold on, guys. How exactly is this a bad thing? She seems to have compassion and understanding for why men would be intimidated by the dating world. That kind of willingness to look at the male experience without judgment is pretty fucking refreshing, given the general attitude of contempt.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 03:34 PM
2

All women? No.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 12:27 AM
2

You are right, the court system treats rape the same, but government crime statistics exclude being forced to penetrate. If a woman ties up a man, gives him viagra, and forces herself on him, he will not have been raped according to the official statistics in the USA. Before 2017, men could not be raped even if they were penetrated. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/rape https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/us/federal-rules-on-rape-statistics-criticized.h…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/21 11:37 PM
2

Except that rape has almost always been described as penetration legally, so all of our conceptions about the asymmetry of rape are based on data that presumes women cannot rape men with their vaginas.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/21 02:16 PM
13

So basically men hate men and women hate men. While this may be true, I don't think the respective murder rates are sufficient to say that. I do think they are good evidence that both men and women value men's life less than women's life. edit: this sub is overrun with concern trolls, so in case you were wondering I am pretty fully red pilled. Just want to have a discussion.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 12:53 PM
1

Yeah, I think I would. I'm not commenting on which is worse, but they are certainly in the same category. Of course, I am not talking about conscripted, WWI era soldiers, but modern soldiers that enlist by choice.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 03:25 AM
6

I think the comparison between certain "male jobs" and prostitution is apt: boxers, for example, trade mental acuity for money (brain scans show serious trauma from taking punches), just like a prostitute trades the use of her body for money. All that shit about economists being partiarchal about prostitution is garbage, however. If she looked at other feminists, she would find more anti-prostitution rhetoric than anywhere else. A DV shelter near me has the line "All prostitution is men's violen…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:49 AM
1

Apparently that hasn't happened in Scandinavia, despite years of structuring society to be as egalitarian as possible - in fact, gender differences have gotten BIGGER in countries that are more egalitarian. According to Jordan Peterson, the ratio is female to male nurses is 20:1, and the ratio of male to female engineers is 20:1 in Scandinavia.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:40 AM
2

Don't forget CAFE! (Is that what you ment by CARE?)
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:21 PM
1

Sensationalist title. They want to ban the use of the word 'man' when used generically in place of 'humanity'. I personally agree with them. Do I think this aspect of our language is symbolic of our oppression of women, and betrays our lack of respect for women's humanity? No, but it does sound weird to me to say 'mankind'.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 03:05 PM
11

Thank you. My wife stays at home and I work. It works wonderfully, because she appreciates that I make enough money to get us the life we want, and I appreciate that when I get home dinner is already made and the dishes are done, so we can just enjoy ourselves together.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:05 PM
1

Care to elaborate? Anything glaring would certainly help the cause. One of the things that made me decide to do this was going to the counseling services office and seeing 10 pamphlets offering support services for female victims of IPV but nothing for male victims. Also the poster of a bunch of women with the caption "Don't assault us - it's the law".
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:13 AM
3

I have been thinking a lot about how to "brand" the group, and what it's stated goals will be. Some groups take the approach of trying to be as offensive as possible, such as Men's Rights Edmonton, which received a ton of negative press for it's "don't be that girl" poster campaign. They would argue that negative press is still press, and helps raise awareness of the movement. Since my primary interest is in attracting people that are already sympathetic to the MRM, this approach does seem appea…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:56 PM
13

Not only am I prepared for feminist attempts to block the group, I am counting on them. Ryerson University's men's health group got a LOT of publicity when they tried and failed to get ratified...much of it quite positive. And even negative attention from feminism means that more MRAs will hear about the group, and non-feminists just might become curious enough to show up as well. At the end of the day, they can't stop people from meeting and talking.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:26 PM
-2

The thing is, I don't really believe that islam is the patriarchy...in the sense that it exists to control and subjugate women. Karen Straughan talks about how in Afghanistan where women aren't allowed to work, male child labour is a huge problem because boys are obligated to support their mothers and sisters. Doesn't sound like subjugation of women to me, just general backwardness. I also don't believe the narrative that islam = violence/oppression against women, even extreme islam. Sharia law …
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:34 PM
1

Perhaps a better way of putting it would be that both men and women were the victims of, or were "oppressed by", unfair gender roles. While true, saying women were oppressed usually implies that only women were oppressed (or mainly women were oppressed), and that they were oppressed by men, with which I completely disagree. Do we in fact disagree, or did I mistake your meaning?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 08:57 PM
1

Women have never been opressed. I happen to share this view. Care to discuss?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 03:33 PM
1

What kinds of views? Edit: I mean specifically?
/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:23 AM
1

Could you explain?
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:28 AM
1

Hmmm, fair enough. All I had was speculation anyway.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:23 AM
4

Those would be pretty impressive shoes.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:35 PM
1

Ok, fuck being tall, but would you rather be equivalently (as in as far from average height) short?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:32 PM
3

Are you serious? The evidence, or 'fact he is deriving', clearly does not come from the fictional movie, but from the fact that that fictional movie exists.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:30 PM
2

Are you sure that this is the way it works? A short guy who is more openly emotional is short and emotionally open, where as a tall guy who is emotionally open is at least tall. Are you sure the short people 'get away' with it? Is the expectation that they will be more emotional good for them or is it a part of the discrimination? (at least in a society that is still obsessed with the overly "malsculine", which is in itself a problem).
/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:24 PM
6

feminism chooses what 70 year old literature best suits its cause. I could show them posters urging men to sign up for world war 2 from the same era, which are just as damning, but they wouldn't even recognize it.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 05:26 PM
2

Aren't you the one that just posted about discrimination against men in parenting? Good on you, I hadn't actually thought much about that.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:16 AM
4

I disagree. Feminism has never been about equality. It was about alleviating the harmful effects of the female gender role on women while protecting the advantages of that role. It perpetrated this by convincing everybody that men had no problems with their gender role and blaming men for creating these gender roles which were supposedly only unfair towards women. We gave women the right to decide if their country goes to war (in the form voting rights), but even today we still require only of m…
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:40 AM
1

I love how GWW can invent a word and a couple weeks later it is part of the MR vernacular!
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:53 AM
3

Egalitarian feminism has never existed. Because if it did it wouldn't be egalitarian feminism, just egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:47 AM
4

It's the difference between saying "let's make arrangements in case things do not work out between us" and "I don't trust you enough to be sure you didn't cheat"
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:27 AM
3

ok, so what if, say, people decide that its better to have more white people in their club because its good for business? Should they be allowed to charge black people more?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 07:05 AM
3

Feminism was NEVER about equality. We cannot keep pretending that it was. The reality: feminism began as a movement advocating extension of male privileges to women, while avoiding or ignoring male responsibilities and it is still doing exactly that. If women EVER wanted equality, they would have campaigned to be drafted into the army at the same time they were campaigning for the right to vote. They did not, and they still do not. Throughout history, men AND women have made sacrifices, but it w…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:49 PM
3

This is why the show the boondocks is fantastic
/r/MensRights21/04/12 03:57 AM
3

You seem like a cool person. But enough chit chat. It the view of many MRAs that feminism is flawed beyond redemption from a theoretical perspective. This criticism challenges almost everything that we as a society accept about the history of gender roles, and a new theory is required if said criticism is to be taken seriously. A problem we often face is that since we have come, as a society to equate anti-feminism with misogyny, it is so hard to have any productive debate on the virtues and/or …
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:06 AM
1

Through its demonization of men, its fearmongering, and its false conception of history, feminism is absolutely by nature anti-male, even from a theoretical perspective. Let alone the anti-male legislation promoted by the movement (as opposed to academia)...no, I refuse to consider working with feminism. When they admit that they are wrong about patriarchy, rape culture, acknowledge the unfair burden placed on men throughout all of history, and renounce the name feminism, I too will throw away m…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:29 AM
1

And reciprocated in some way. Although really it depends on the situation. If she knew that they were going to be walking, she really should have just brought another pair of shoes.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:49 PM
2

in their defence, it had to be either the woman or the man given the dialogue, and choosing the man wouldn't be ideal either.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:27 PM
3

Men may take more risks on average, but there is no way to test if this is because of some evolutionary mechanism. Everything is caused by some evolutionary mechanism. And the mechanism girlwriteswhat suggests is not just her own idea or speculation.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:24 PM
3

didn't mean to link to the middle
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:51 AM
1

considering the nature of the law, I would argue that it does tell us quite a bit. Making sure that the genders are paid equally in the controlled environment of the workplace, where the flow of money is well documented, is very different from trying to completely eliminate racism.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:29 AM
22

A bit self serving to have the woman say the bit about chopping off part of the penis, since in reality it is society as a whole that promotes circumcision, including lots of dads. I still laughed though.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 02:46 AM
2

it doesn't prove anything, but it does provide strong evidence that the wage gap does not exist. The point is, if it was considered a problem 50 years ago to the extent that it was made illegal, and public opinion towards gender equality has only become more sympathetic since then, it is very, very hard to believe that any sort of gap exists today. But it doesn't matter anyway, since we already knew the wage gap was a myth. I honestly don't even feel the need to source that one any more.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:32 PM
5

I think a problem with all right's movements is that they lead to fanaticism. For example, in a women's studies program at a university, professors are constantly on the lookout for discrimination against women, reading about and thinking about problems for women, and talking with other people who are also looking for the same things. Every day spent there reinforces the feminist outlook on a deep intuitive level, until the entire world is seen through a kind of feminist "lens". I think the clos…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:12 PM
2

Out of curiosity, what about this thread has made you think that in particular?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:35 PM
6

Get over yourself. Yes, some of the concern is exaggerated, but this is what men AND women do and HAVE ALWAYS done since the beginning of time...get together and complain about the other sex. This isn't even really a men's rights thread, really, just a bunch of dudes venting. Seriously, the amount of times I have heard women complain about men, "all men want is sex, men are such assholes, all men cheat, you can't trust men"... If you are going to get so upset that you equate /r/mensrights with /…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:03 AM
1

You talk about women as being "subjugated into the lesser roles" women were generally subjugated to lesser roles of domestics, labourers, but not leaders in most cases. Throughout the entire history of civilization, 95% of the population has lived in what today we call extreme poverty. This is described as the condition of having barely or not enough resources to sustain survival. This means that 95% of people basically lived on subsistence farming, hunting, and manual labour. So, 95% of men wer…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:45 PM
3

Jeez, that would do the trick wouldn't it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:59 PM
2

The basic premise of the myth of male power can be summarized as follows: Women were treated as property. Men were expected to give up their lives for their property. Women and children first, anyone? based on simple knowledge of history That's my point. I realized that I had been taught this version of history, and upon reflection it really did not make sense. I highly highly recommend watching that video. The youtuber girlwriteswhat also has some great videos explaining the disadvantages of th…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:47 PM
0

I'm am fighting for a new look on history...one that recognizes both genders as victims of gender roles and neither as the sole oppressors of the other. I am fighting for recognition that men have not always been the 'privileged' sex. I am fighting for an acknowledgement that, almost in its entirety, feminism was wrong. Is that what goes on in TwoX as well then?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 03:59 AM
2

I stared at your comment for 10 minutes and I still have no idea if you were being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 11:59 PM
1

My aunt is a doctorate in women's health (feminist perspective). When we challenged her on the fact that men are the vast majority of workplace deaths, she said: "well that is because men are careless".
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:56 AM
0

Feminism teaches fallacies like patriarchy theory and rape culture. Feminism does NOT acknowledge the negative sides to the male gender role, or if it does it assumes it is simply men's fault and not worth their concern. Feminism demonizes men. You can be a women's rights activist and an men's rights activist, but you cannot be a feminist and a men's rights activist. So what are you, a feminist or an egalitarian?
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:54 AM
3

Good thing women will soon dominate business. Before, business was sexist because it was male dominated. Now its not sexist because...I mean...PATRIARCHY DID IT.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 12:30 AM
8

Seems to have worked out ok though, has't it. Proud of MR's reasonableness actually.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 02:14 AM
1

Totally agree. That feeling of being exploited is such a boner killer for me.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:02 AM
3

Everything can be explained in logical terms. "Love" is a way for romantics to justify attraction when they dont like the reasons logic provides them. Not that those reasons are always bad, if you just accept them. For example, I will admit that I will never fall in love with somebody I am not sexually attracted to, and it doesnt bug me. For me, love is just a feeling you get, like anger, contentment, exitement, and so on...not a state of being. I sometimes feel love when I hear the voice of a g…
/r/seduction29/05/11 05:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter