TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neonroli47 Archive

View 26 posts and 245 comments by neonroli47 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
46

Scienceneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 03:59 PM
31

Conversationneonroli47/r/seduction04/04/22 03:53 AM
25

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 04:00 PM
25

Scienceneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 04:30 AM
23

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill05/06/22 08:12 PM
22

Question For Menneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 09:25 AM
19

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill29/09/20 07:41 PM
17

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill04/07/21 03:58 PM
16

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill17/04/20 09:52 PM
15

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill06/08/23 06:14 PM
15

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill24/06/21 03:11 PM
12

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill11/10/22 03:14 PM
10

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill28/02/22 12:24 AM
10

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill03/03/22 07:46 PM
9

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill03/04/22 02:28 PM
7

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill04/06/21 08:03 AM
6

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 09:37 PM
5

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 07:24 AM
3

Scienceneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 09:13 AM
3

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:12 PM
1

neonroli47/r/ExRedPill12/06/22 12:04 PM
1

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 10:38 PM
1

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 08:32 AM
1

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 09:56 AM
1

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 09:40 AM
0

Discussionneonroli47/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 03:04 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's not. It is said that most people are in a relationship with someone close to their age. There are a minority who prefer big age gaps. I don’t think anyone denies that.
/r/ExRedPill01/10/24 10:33 PM
1

Why are you looking at it this way? They apparently sexted, after she published an article on him. I doubt they talked about their politics once their correspondence turned personal. Rfk Jr. is known to be a womanizer. To the point it is said that his second wife killed herself after discovering his 30+ affairs. He is likely quite good at chatting up women. One source says he "love bombed" nuzzi. He even described himself as obsessed with women in this diary they found of him and seems to see hi…
/r/ExRedPill29/09/24 11:01 PM
16

Opportunism like this is not an exclusive female trait, you will find plenty of women say how they found out something about some other woman their boyfriend or husband liked and feel that they were the second, less shiny choice. Hell, you may do that too when you put yourself out there, where you don’t get the woman you have a crush on and "settle" on someone who you don’t feel as strongly about and rationalise by saying you still like xyz about her. You can see that as things simply not aligni…
/r/ExRedPill07/04/24 05:42 PM
2

I think the stuff said in the comments are too obvious. You see in their forums that they are generally told to hide their red pill associations. I think a broad indicator could be that if you bring up gender relations in convo, whether in terms of social commentary or just relationships, they will say things that tend towards supporting traditional conceptualization of men and women, it doesn’t have to be anything explicit like women belong in the kitchen, but like men work harder or women don’…
/r/ExRedPill26/03/24 07:56 AM
2

He has an website where he posts an article every week with different pre-set sections. One of them are quotes he likes and he quoted The Illimitable Man multiple times. ILM is one of the hardest shades of red you’ll find in the red pill blogosphere, putting forward one of the most unflattering portrayal of women you'll ever find from these people, he calls on men to be manipulative pretty directly(for example see his article where he espouses some 200 "maxims" and the ones on how to be machiave…
/r/ExRedPill25/03/24 06:55 PM
3

I kinda find it somewhat concerning how they incorporate the revelation that things like rough sex and bdsm exist into their sexual view propped up by power dynamic and struggle. If you look at the mainstream bdsm community for example, which, if you read through, you will find daily accounts of practitioners who indulges in power dynamics that are far more advanced than anything you ever see mentioned in TRP forums, to the point if you are not knowledgeable about kinks, you may think there is s…
/r/ExRedPill07/08/23 02:19 PM
3

My thoughts about this isn’t that complex. I always saw the drive to engage in sex, in whatever fashion is your preference, as the sex feeding your carnal desires. TRP is the first place where i read all these accounts and i feel like a major drive and certainly the most salient in terms of TRP perspective, is securing and keeping the relationship, that operates, what the TRPers themselves characterize as such, under a form of subconscious fear and anxiety, that they need to do this to keep the …
/r/ExRedPill07/08/23 12:14 PM
3

There is a sub on narcissistic abuse where people talk about their abusive partner/exes. It’s common to see this kind of discarding there, there were good times once, but then it devolves into a mess at the end and the abuser acts like there was never anything between them. Given that you describe cheating with multiple people at the beginning of this relationship and her still treating you poorly then, she probably never had much feelings towards you. You probably didn’t see it because you were…
/r/Divorce_Men04/07/23 03:17 AM
14

The article says Florida is one of seven states that has permanent alimony. So, most states don’t have that? I got the impression that after a certain period, permanent alimony is a given.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/23 12:40 AM
4

Maybe your daughter doesn’t?
/r/Divorce_Men24/06/23 09:29 PM
–

I see it less as an approach but rather opening myself up more and growing from a time when i was more closed off and had less to say. I have went out at least on an official first date with close to...idk around 70? Could be less. I am approaching my mid 20s. If you have fun conversation where your romantic intentions are made clear, i don’t see how waiting to text back would make much of a difference. You should definitely look for reciprocation. It's entirely boring pursuing someone who is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 02:16 PM
–

My experience of getting more attention had to do with being able to have more fun and interesting conversation rather than polite, dry, serious ones. In tems of waiting to text back, i text when i am free to, instead of being on top of it whenever i got a text. In terms of giving compliment and negging, i focus on giving compliments when i actually like something rather than giving out routine ones and i tease people but not with mindset of negging, i get teased back too! In terms of playing ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 07:09 AM
–

Again, just like with virgins, using an out of the left field sexual desire seems like needlessly pessimistic, specially one that has a media notoriety element to it. Overwhelmingly majority of relationships that form don’t happen that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 06:26 AM
–

I don’t really find my pool to be less than what i want. So, putting in the effort to faking stuff just seems taking extra stress.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 06:21 AM
1

Sorry, i forgot his name. I think what i said about people being multifaceted applies. I welcome you to head to the abusive relationships subreddit and read through the accounts of physical abuse, if you check their post history, you’ll inevitably find that things didn’t begin this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 01:23 PM
1

Henry who? Agreeable people are more likely to have a relationship to begin with. And i think you’re needlessly pessimistic if you’re using minority of virgins as a yardstick.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 12:50 PM
1

Interesting. Definitely not my experience. Can you elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 04:07 PM
1

Why fake it if i can just find someone i can vibe with? Faking it seems way more complicated and there will be people who will be compatible with me and those who wouldn’t, that's just life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 04:00 PM
1

It's surprising that something short lived that makes you feel bad and unfulfilled gives you more success. Being able to thrive in social settings is the most important factor in whether or not you find people interested in you in my experience, both in terms of personal and what i've seen in others.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 03:59 PM
1

Not really. The advice given to guys is not about sleeping around, it’s about how to get a girlfriend. Agreeableness is negatively correlated with the number of sexual partners for both men and women, but it is correlated with being in a relationship and happier relationship. Agreeableness is negatively correlated with commitment and positively correlated with sociosexuality(desire to sleep around), so it makes sense that disagreeable people will have a higher partner count. Agreeable people ten…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 03:57 PM
-1

I am sorry all you’ve known is dysfunctional people, but really, most relationships are not like this. A huge amount of women at that age have boyfriends, it would be weird to assume most of them follow this pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:38 AM
1

I find it kind of hard to believe that all your friends and you knew is interaction with women who sound like they have avoidant attachment style. The relationship i've seen aren’t like that at all save a few, but that's just life. I also think you’ll find that most relationships are not like that if you look outside of your particular social circle, to claim otherwise seems unrealistic. There are so many couples, it would be weird to assume most of them follow this particular pattern you descri…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:36 AM
1

As i've said, I used different not to censor myself, but to not be repetitive. I didn’t mean something as specific as goth culture by style, just that when people look at you, they can say that you’re well dressed, that much effort is needed. Sure, wealth have it’s advantage, but you can still have much success without spending that much money. If you’re fun company, that tends to make up for a lot of things. It brings in people who identify with it, yes, but that's the subject. It would be prem…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:31 AM
1

I did read it before, Scott Alexander actually did find people to date afterwards and is married now, he credited a mindset where he went about interacting with people without any expectations for that. Someone else is arguing for this in the thread. It’s another one of those opinions i don’t really get and they make me concerned. Wife beaters being with someone doesn’t happen in the context of them being a wife beater, that comes later. There are husband beaters too and recent research shows th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:08 AM
1

I meant normalized in the sense that it's not considered a sin anymore and lots of people do it. The context was that, the claim that this happen by a man being kind of a dick to woman sounds like a weird mindset to hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 05:03 AM
1

I am sure there are markets for different types of people. Not everyone will like everyone else. I know some people, both men and women, who are a bit more hardcore than your average people, they still have people who are interested. What perplexes me is the insistence that this is how it happens most of the time, because it’s quite a extraordinary claim to say that most of the time a woman has developed a liking for a man, he is being kind of a dick to her. That's clearly hyperbole and not how …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 04:59 AM
1

I am sure there are markets for different types of people. Not everyone will like everyone else. I know some people, both men and women, who are a bit more hardcore than your average people, they still have people who are interested. What perplexes me is the insistence that this is how it happens most of the time, because it’s quite a extraordinary claim to say that most of the time a woman has developed a liking for a man, he is being kind of a dick to her. That's clearly hyperbole and not how …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 04:59 AM
1

As i said, people are multifaceted. So, for the abusive people, if you think they were never nice and respectful towards their victims, that's what you end up implying, that the abused got attracted to the abusive/bad traits, which is why i mentioned looking through the testimonies in the abusive relationship sub. You'll find that these relationships start out well and later they turn abusive, by which time the abused has gotten attached. For example, love bombing is a term you will see again an…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 03:36 AM
1

In the relationship subs? Nothing of my own. I just find it fascinating to read, it gives me insights. You said rebound and being bored, in the scenario you described.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:46 AM
3

People are multifaceted. An abuser doesn’t have to be all around repulsive. There are also female abusers. I know that the recent stats about how men and women equally abuse each other is a very popular factoid in the pill subreddits. I don't really see the validity in finding existence of abusive relationship to be some kind of proof of people being generally attracted to abuse. There is a abusive relationship subreddit on reddit. If you go through that, you will find that most of these situati…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:45 AM
1

This reads like a very specific situation and...rebound and getting bored are certainly not a women only thing. I frequent all the relationship advice subs and that's certainly what i've seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:31 AM
3

That's just life? Some people, both men and women, have dysfunctional relationship history. That’s not most people, so why should one construct their viewpoint based on that? Other than to learn to not be with toxic people. I hear dysfunction in growing up is often the biggest factor influencing poor life choices, which certainly makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:27 AM
3

I don't even know what to say to you if you genuinely believe most hot women in relationship are being treated like garbage and think that that's perfect. The sentence itself should ring alarm bells.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:23 AM
1

Honestly from what i have seen about being an asshole to attract women, that seems way more exhausting and harder than actually learning to connect with someone and have fun. Also it seems rather premature to see men as either one of two opposing poles. I would argue that most women(and men) end up with your average good people. Most relationship aren’t toxic. Couples certainly argue but i don’t think that's necessary a sign of being toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:18 AM
1

That's also what i've seen. Some people just seem to have a lot of dysfunction in their lives, they also tend to not be your average responsible people either. So i guess that makes sense in a way. But yeah, most relationships, committed or casual happen in the context of two people being able to connect, not one of them playing games with the other. Thinking otherwise sounds like an extraordinary claim to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:08 AM
2

If you try to get someone by simply giving them gifts and act of service, that seems like something that is sure to fail. You need to build up a connection and see if they are interested first. I see this in men that have trouble making their intentions clear because of nervousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:04 AM
1

fellow human being way. I thought this was covered by all the platitudes about not coming on too strong. I am surprised to see that going in the absolute opposite direction is being marketed to frustrated men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:01 AM
2

Oh come on, plenty of hot women are in good relationships. I think there is even research that shows that the more attractive the women, the more likely they are to be in a relationship, which seems natural. I don't really get the perspective of thinking the hotties are all with bad partners, that reads like obvious hyperbole.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:00 AM
1

Most men who see action in school aren’t either arrogant assholes or a guy trying to get a girl's attention and failing. There are lots of normal students dating and finding their first intimate experience. That's what i've seen at least. A significant portion of high school student have their first intimate experience there, most of them logically can't be arrogant bullies(or mean girls).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:51 AM
2

Well everyone else seems to be responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:44 AM
0

Creeps exist and women tend to be more vigilant about their safety. But if you know social channels and know how to socialize, lots of people socialize everyday while knowing what is creepy behaviour and avoiding that. you don't need to arrest you development by worrying about how people will perceive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:43 AM
1

Why did you not just say sex? Is that an issue? I try to use different words to not be repetitive. They do getting fit, style, money/status and game are the things most men talk about if you ask for dating advice either from friends, male family or male dating spaces. The problem is that aside from getting fit and money/status, most of those methods are low ROI past a baseline point and even in the case of fitness and money, you need an insane amount of money for it to affect dating significantl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:32 AM
2

There's certainly a thing called coming on too strong, texting too frequently at the beginning, complimenting too frequently can feel like the other person is trying too hard when you’re just starting to get to know each other. I get the advice to slowly build up the connection, not this game with texting and negging. When i am vibing with a girl, if anything, things tend to turn more intimate as time passes. If they don’t show interest, i just back up. Sometimes i've seen that tend to get a "wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:19 AM
0

You don’t have to be hilarious, having a sense of humour enough to make someone laugh is enough and you can certainly get there if you socialize. I picked things up from interacting with other funny people. As for the violence part, i think that's more due to the fact that women are less likely to be involved in a life of violence and crime. They also get targeted less by other men, so the ones that do end up being close to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:10 AM
0

If you have your appearances in order, can have interesting conversation and can flirt, you can find people interested in you, you don't have to pay for it. Attractiveness does factor in how big of an appeal you have, that's just how attractiveness works. My more handsome friends get more attention than i do, but i can introduce myself and hold a conversation with a girl and that has always worked out well. I don’t really get the two extreme side perspective you’re talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 10:06 AM
4

The mass shooting incidences sullied the names of Incels and by association mgtow. Fds doesn’t have anything like that yet.
/r/Divorce_Men25/03/23 11:52 PM
1

I don’t think this logic holds up. Erotic Degradation exists as a BDSM kink and participants prefer if both are into it, that doesn’t make the kink not degradation. You can like the degradation aspect without it being so that you would like to see the other person uncomfortable.
/r/Male_Studies20/01/23 03:01 PM
3

Is it possible that this is due to sex? A lot of the 10+ year divorces of this type i think is due to sex. The wife doesn’t desire the husband anymore but has to keep things up in some way to make him happy. That creates an aversion towards intimacy and in the end their feelings are so depleted that running away seems easier.
/r/Divorce_Men24/12/22 02:43 PM
1

I don’t think it’s much of a revelation that these people lack empathy in the first place given the activity there. Being selfish is practically a motto. So i wouldn’t be surprised if they are capable.
/r/ExRedPill16/12/22 04:24 PM
12

I think lack of socialization among men is a big factor. So guys are more attached their marriages, because they can't imagine being lonely after leaving.
/r/Divorce_Men03/11/22 08:53 PM
7

I am not sure if comparing gay and lesbian marriage works here. Considering - 1. Lesbians getting married way too fast is basically a meme in the lesbian community. 2. A sizable portion of gay marriages are open.
/r/Divorce_Men03/11/22 08:35 PM
1

This sub is small and seems to have, on aggregate, considerably more contentious divorces described here compared to the larger divorce sub. Maybe that's the reason.
/r/Divorce_Men29/10/22 07:44 PM
1

In this context it means disingenuous. Content creators who pumps out ragebaits are often called that now.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:21 PM
1

Women resisting the narrative that men are hornier is resisting the narrative that women don’t want sex and how that connects to slut shaming. It has nothing to do with whatever perception women have about what luxury they can have with standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:25 AM
1

The effect is mostly in 40+ age range. Where's the wall, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 08:18 AM
2

I also think there is nothing wrong with logic in that paragraph. The point i was making was that, given the power tactics TRP promotes, saying that the highlighted portion is what TRP teachings boil down to, is misrepresenting TRP.
/r/ExRedPill12/10/22 07:16 AM
2

Read the next paragraph
/r/ExRedPill11/10/22 08:00 PM
1

I think given the amount of shorts her channel pumps out and timestamps she puts on her hours long podcasts (with oppositions who seems to be randoms picked off instagram) the titles of which are often more shocking than what is being said there and with the whole oneya and "whales" drama, she isn’t that standup of a human being and is a grifter.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 12:03 PM
1

Bruh, your post history is wild
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 04:40 PM
1

The more educated, the more it leans towards 90% I could not find the source for this even though lot of article has this factoid. Some articles mention a study by Rosenfeld, but that didn’t say this.
/r/Divorce_Men25/08/22 04:13 PM
1

This kinds of rationalizations make me wonder if people who think this way have much experience with relationships to begin with and whether they are just obsessively thinking about this from a place of a fundamental lack of belief in their own attractiveness. Husband/wife material doesn’t mean hookup material...not that they aren’t "fuckable". People generally don't get into relationship or marriage with someone they aren’t willing to get their freak on with. Specially if they've been around th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 08:59 PM
–

What should be enough for you to do for the most average girl to give you her attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 09:13 PM
1

The point i was trying to make wasn’t that women don’t show the kind of attachment that you mentioned, but that, that kind of behaviour isn’t particular to women. For example - go to the any of the infidelity subreddit and you will see no shortage of men, compared to women, that are trying to make things work. Even though being cheated on socially carries more of a slap to men/masculinity compared to women.
/r/ExRedPill18/07/22 08:06 PM
0

Haven’t you categorized women in the same way too? The ghosting women are attractive with interesting personality and the women who are just nice aren’t interesting.
/r/seduction14/07/22 04:59 AM
1

It’s portrayed as that they both know they are on rp forums. The wife's account portray him pretty badly, how he is being passive-aggressive about abortion, how he brazenly flirts with other woman in front of her.
/r/ExRedPill14/06/22 03:24 PM
2

He chimes in her posts too and had a bit of a row with RPW members. I am inclined to think this is real.
/r/ExRedPill12/06/22 03:48 PM
5

Every obvious and not obvious red flag can be summarized into - repeated pattern of uncaring behaviour specially after repeated conversation about it.
/r/Divorce_Men29/04/22 05:09 PM
1

You're rights, it’s actually less than 5/week. But that blog post is weirder by comparison. There were two graph that compared message received to attractiveness. One was percentage of messages recieved by attractiveness and another employed a message multiplier where they determined the amount of message the least attractive receive to be 1x. In the first graph, for men, average attractive men received a larger percentage of messages compared to most attractive men. But in the graph employing m…
/r/ExRedPill27/04/22 05:14 PM
1

This points towards highly skewed gender ratio on tinder (79% male). 61.9% and 4.5% is the percentage of like back. The researchers had 12 male and 12 female profiles each like 150 profile of the first 370+ profiles shown to each 24. Among those 12×150=1800 likes given by male profiles and 1800 like given by female profiles 4.5% and 61.9% got a like back.
/r/BlackPillScience27/04/22 11:17 AM
1

Those are the words you’re using...😒
/r/Divorce_Men27/04/22 05:02 AM
1

Of being selfish, self-absorbed and an asshole?
/r/Divorce_Men26/04/22 09:25 PM
1

As i asked dude, I am asking if you think most men and women are pos. No reason this question and your answer will incite any shit.
/r/Divorce_Men26/04/22 09:09 PM
1

You did use the word "rare" in your post and here you’re saying you’re focusing on women because you’re heterosexual and men too are assholes. So, what am i missing?
/r/Divorce_Men26/04/22 08:44 PM
1

You think most men and women are...pos?
/r/Divorce_Men26/04/22 08:31 PM
1

I checked the book Dataclysm by Christian Rudder, the author of that blog post and...that graph on how attractiveness correlates to message received for men is either wrong or was right for the time that post was written i.e 2009. Dataclysm came out in 2014 and the graph there is like this
/r/ExRedPill15/04/22 07:02 PM
1

First two experiments are the same in both studies. The third is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 03:07 PM
1

I was talking about the first experiment in both studies, you are probably talking about only one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 12:52 PM
1

The researchers wanted to study what kind of value in terms of sexual attractiveness do men and women ascribe to responsiveness, i.e how empathetically is someone responding to something you say. Both studies had three experiments. The first one was normal interaction, the next two in messenger and in the form of a face-to-face interview respectively in study 1 and both in messenger in study 2 and in both studies, in the last two experiments, the listeners were told how to respond. The result of…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 05:37 AM
1

The researchers wanted to study what kind of value in terms of sexual attractiveness do men and women ascribe to responsiveness, i.e how empathetically is someone responding to something you say. Both studies had three experiments. The first one was normal interaction, the next two in messenger and in the form of a face-to-face interview respectively in study 1 and both in messenger in study 2 and in both studies, in the last two experiments, the listeners were told how to respond.. The result o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 05:30 AM
1

The researchers used the scale in this study.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 05:15 AM
2

Responsiveness, not responsive desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 05:14 AM
1

In both the experiments i mention they had people just talk to each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 05:10 AM
1

Dolan made a mistake but there are lots of other study that shows a male advantage in marital happiness. As for health benefits, where did you find that men are more likely than women to marry unhealthier partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:44 PM
1

What is the difference between the conversations you have with your friend and thr ones you have with someone who you’re sexually interested in? What you said about men finding average women attractive, you’re not comparing two sides of the same coin here. What makes men erect and what women finds sexy works on wholly different levels.
/r/ExRedPill30/03/22 07:19 PM
1

I was surprised to learn that while she says that both men and women can be equally violent she still draws a distinction that based on her experience men tend to explode and hurt others and women tend to implode and hurt themselves.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:47 PM
1

You’ve written a lot of post about lies that feminism perpetrates about how society treated/treats men and women, so...why do you still identify as a feminist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/22 06:45 PM
2

Let's see if these creates new health issues like hormonal contraceptive does to women.
/r/Divorce_Men24/03/22 11:07 AM
1

I think there is a miscommunication here. By "fitness", the study meant number of surviving children, not health. What the study found is that pimbwe women who married multiple times had more surviving children than pimbwe men who married multiple times.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 03:37 PM
1

He got married this year btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 08:02 PM
2

I have. My surprise isn’t at that, my surprise is at the association with such a space that promotes such overtly low opinion of women.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/22 05:45 PM
1

Wouldn’t you say that beliefs about the "sanctity of life" and how religious fundamentalists tie that with abortion is somewhat different then the kind of overtly low opinion of "female nature" you see on RP, which makes some woman's association with RP more surprising?
/r/ExRedPill04/03/22 05:56 AM
1

You're right, there is an overlap. But there are religious spaces that support those that don't promote the overtly low opinion of women that you see in RP. That's what makes it surprising to me.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/22 05:53 AM
1

The women who don't support women's voting rights are social conservatives who don't want big government and sees women's voting and feminism as a vehicle for policies that drives government spending. Again, being against voting rights is demented but their gripes is with government. But even if traditional gender role beliefs overlap with RP, i find RP to be overtly hostile towards women to such a degree and promoting such a bad image of women that makes it surprising to me, that some women wou…
/r/ExRedPill04/03/22 05:50 AM
3

To me, that makes sense. They are religious and religion is against abortion so of course as lawmakers they will do that. This however...
/r/ExRedPill03/03/22 09:08 PM
2

He had a conversation with Warren Ferrell. There's a part there where he and ferrell talks about how women's attraction works in the context of marriage. I am paraphrasing but JP said something along the lines of -"We don't talk about this stuff but i've seen that when a man takes a status hit, he also takes an attraction hit". He is saying that if a women's partner loses some status in some way, she will be less attracted to him. This is basically what red pill is and what creates so much vitri…
/r/ExRedPill03/03/22 07:54 PM
1

I mean, i don’t need to, they are accounted for in sociology research and "never" is not something that is shown.
/r/Divorce_Men27/02/22 06:23 PM
1

Seems kinda reductionist...
/r/Divorce_Men27/02/22 12:05 PM
2

How so?
/r/Divorce_Men26/02/22 08:45 PM
1

This user has a 50 chapter description of how his relationship changed. The kind of elaborate activity you see in the account stretching back several years...i think this is legit. But there is explanation for what is happening here. His wife is a diagnosed bpd patient in a 24/7 d/s relationship with him. The structure of such relationship, if done carefully, can help such patient's mood issues. Also TRPers read a shit ton about being good at sex and there are a lot of legitimate advice in there…
/r/ExRedPill25/02/22 10:28 PM
2

Studies with larger sample sizes either don't find ovulatory shift hypothesis to be true or find it to be overblown.
/r/ExRedPill25/02/22 09:54 PM
1

The study measured both good genes and investment qualities, so "found" would be the right one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 06:03 PM
1

What's a whitepill?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:26 PM
1

It's a hypothesis that is essentially saying that sex is more pleasurable with good genes mate, which if true, can be seen as an indicator that the person you’re having sex with has good genes. while the replication study found that It's more good partners. The hypothesis still doesn’t say that female orgasm is a direct part of reproduction, which i am guessing is what you mean by vestigial.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 06:05 AM
1

Did you meant to say "found" instead of "measures"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:50 AM
1

The replication study controlled for a wide range of variables. One was just asking how much the sample found their partner attractive which as noted in the study can be subjective. They also controlled for more objective and socially accepted measures of masculinity, both physical and behavioral. My point is for the theory you’re talking about to be empirically validated, in a sample it should've shown both good genes and investment trait to have significant impact of something like female orga…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 08:59 PM
1

This isn’t about one person but a sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 08:23 PM
1

The studies analyze partnered sex with current partner or set of ex-partner where a distinction was made between easily achieving orgasm and it being not easy. Both good genes and investment traits were assessed and it seems in the replication study the investment traits are the only traits that accounted for significant difference in orgasm achievement. I would've thought both would be significant if your combination theory is to be validated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 07:42 PM
1

Women give more oral than receive apparently. Which i guess is not surprising. I keep hearing how porn is a very significant sex education vehicle for men and blowjobs are way more present in porn than cunnilingus.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/22 07:26 PM
1

The point is they still do get involved and more likely to than the general population and these people in no way representative of the whole people. Some people are more openly sexual and they find people like them, same for people who are long term.
/r/ExRedPill04/02/22 07:02 AM
1

Why are you taking half of the sentence? I haven’t. You said that in the previous para, than you disclosed what you discussed. I was pointing out what you said that you discuss. And how is that an emotional argument? That's my question actually. You’ve said - So when you hear these negative things about women someone that is very reductionist might say well if men aren't those things then what you're saying is men are better than women. Nope. That's an emotional argument. Several para before you…
/r/Divorce_Men16/01/22 05:08 PM
1

I am confused so as to why this - the cornerstone of red pill is men are better than women is an emotional argument given that - they hear us discussing female nature... We point out that women are fickle they tend to be impulsive they tend to be manipulative or at least disguise their true nature
/r/Divorce_Men15/01/22 12:39 PM
1

How is divorce settlement in a far more conservative country better than what happens in the west?
/r/Divorce_Men15/01/22 12:27 PM
1

Where did you get the idea that such girls don’t form relationship? They are actually more likely to be with someone. That kind of extroversion is positively correlated with more likeliness to be in a relationship. This is such a weird way to look at the issue of aging population, that that's driven mostly by girls posting on social media and not being on relationships. If social media is hampering relationships, it’s more so because of the fact that they take up the time that people would other…
/r/ExRedPill07/01/22 06:27 PM
2

Either she gets what she wants or the advice stands. So what is so disastrous about the very common dating advice given to women to not chase men again?
/r/ExRedPill04/01/22 06:00 PM
1

why do you want sources provided. It's standard practice to cite papers when citing data from them. Unless these weren’t from papers. You said something that's not what was found in research and a search of the subsequent papers that cited that 2015 papers doesn’t bring up any study that showed that the number has swung in the opposite direction, because there were no other similar study. Only one study of infidelity shows number that high and they were done on students. No study done on married…
/r/Divorce_Men01/01/22 05:04 AM
1

Could you cite the papers for these? I knew that women who earn more than their husbands were less likely to cheat and that It's reverse for husbands.
/r/Divorce_Men31/12/21 09:29 PM
1

Caroline norton was not a feminist, she was explicitly against the idea that the genders are equal and distanced herself from the feminist movement of her time. What happened to her was, her husband accused her of adultery and took her to court. It wasn’t proven and they were separated but not divorced. Because of the law of the time, after she was separated she couldn’t see her children. After some time, her youngest son died from an injury in his father's custody. That was what prompted her to…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 05:54 PM
1

I didn’t notice. Is there a study on divorce rate against physical attractiveness range? Attractive people are more likely to divorce
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/21 04:25 PM
1

GSS data said it did not show what blackpillers were pushing. When i first saw all the buzz about 80/20 i was searching around in google and accidentally stumbled upon an interview with the social scientist mentioned here...then i lost it and couldn’t find it anymore. I think this is a great answer against the cynicism rampant here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/21 04:08 PM
2

Not giving yourself way too much and not chase men is also one of the most common dating advice given to women, it’s even connected to their reputation and appeal. So what do you mean disastrous?
/r/ExRedPill28/12/21 03:31 PM
2

Up until age 50, at every age bracket, there are more single men than there are single women.
/r/ExRedPill27/12/21 06:34 PM
1

Once all profiles had been created, we wrote software to automatically register the profiles as available in a given location. The software then exhaustively retrieved all profiles within a 100 mile radius and clicked like for each one. Even if the most attractive men behaved the way you say, these curated profiles liked everyone indiscriminately. So likes would go to guys of all attractiveness, so on average, if guys liked back more, they also should have messaged more.
/r/ExRedPill02/11/21 02:26 PM
1

But it's still 50-50 a majority of women You see the issue here?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 10:52 PM
1

That's what i was referring to "babe" Women are not monolithic, there's significant representation of different aspirations. And if i am right in guessing that you got that number from gallup surveys, you will also see that in 2020 the preference (i repeat, preference) for women, whether mothers or otherwise, to work is the highest it’s ever been. So i was right to criticize you for unilaterally claiming what's good. And you know what, this is the least of the diatribes you were spewing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 12:30 PM
1

Again, you’re unilaterally claiming thoughts and actions that is not represented in vast majority of people as seen in the huge amounts of research in these stuff, only in these pockets of internet and among people like you do we find squabbling over these kind of ideas, so the outcomes you’re creating in your head doesn’t apply either. There are forums for people of different age groups, go ahead and ask them if they think like this, you’ll universally be called a nut.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 05:20 AM
1

Divorce and child decisions isn’t controlled by men, that's a ridiculous claim. Divorce is initiated by women more than men and married men and women don't differ in their wish for children. Your conceptualization of marriage is wack. Commitment, support is still something championed in marriage and relationship. The fact that we've normalized leaving a relationship if it’s not what you want doesn’t make relationships "larp". If anything, unhappy relationship would make that relationship insince…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 09:22 PM
1

Whether people are going to divorce or have kids is their decision to make and they make them. They are something to decide, not something that make marriage "larp", that's ridiculous. You are again making unilateral comments about what people should do, want and do in practice. As i said that's wrong in practice and fact as surveys shows. Women of this generation, whatever their station or age, want to work and have their own money more than previous generations. Though, of course you’ve decide…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/21 04:09 PM
1

So we can see that most people marry albeit at late twenties or early thirties rather than very early twenties like 5-6 decades ago, but you’ve decided...it's not real. This kind of self made arguments aren’t even arguments. So none of this about bringing up some "sour grape" argument (whatever that is), it's just that you’ve decided that you know what people want and what's actually happening despite what preferences and happenings we've repeatedly seen in surveys and stats. Cool i guess, just …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 12:26 PM
1

Marital habit has changed. People get married at different age than before. People have different attitude about marriage than before. Controlling for that, most people who want to get married do get married. A sizable number of women have always never married, even in the sixties, at any age close to 15-20% people were unmarried in both genders. But they are a minority. Most men and women has up until now, ended up marrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 12:07 PM
1

Most women (and men) marry. Stephanie coontz showed marriage rate hasn’t change so much as the age of marriage has shifted and you’ve again started with those absolutist statements about what people want and what's happening regarding money and sex. There are huge interest in these things and people are surveyed pretty regularly. No one who seriously looks at these stuff talks about it this way - They have to do anal, bdsm, group sex to keep a man interested. Wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 06:56 AM
1

No, that's not what you’ve listed, not even by half and certainly not how you’ve expanded on it in the thread. Yes, most women want marriage, children and a man who is financially secure. Most women have that and they also want to make their own money, having financial responsibility and they are okay with sex outside of marriage. While women are less sociosexual than men research into their sexuality don’t paint them as prude either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 06:02 AM
1

Making unilateral claim of what kind of life people want is wrong. It's wrong in practice and fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 08:03 PM
1

They won't. As i said you’re putting things in such absolutist terms that we can safely say this is not how women would think by default. Anyone who understands free will will understand this. I don’t know how you convinced yourself they all think this way. But you do seem to have convinced yourself to the point that you’re calling others "delusional" if they don’t think like you, so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 12:19 PM
2

I don't understand how someone can spent this much energy typing out these things and making these kind of content when it's apparent from the absolutist nature of the things said that this is not how people think, things work, whether by anecdote or research. I feel like i am looking at some social media version of esther villar.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 05:51 AM
1

In summary, taking into consideration what someone is wearing as a factor in determining whether an accusation is true is logically sound in terms of legal defence, because a correlation can be shown between revealing clothing and being open to sex?
/r/MensRights31/08/21 08:48 AM
1

You agreed how believing women will lose attraction because of men's shortcoming will give men insecurities. Insecurities give rise to anger. So, if you believe women are like that, given the implications of that, anger or misogynistic viewpoints are not "messed up", they are natural. Just like i said, that assumption about women is the mother of all things red pill.
/r/ExRedPill27/08/21 06:58 PM
1

You just described the red pill concept of coming out of "anger phase". This is literally the advice given on marriedredpill. Distrust in women doesn’t need to be anger laden, you see that in red pill gurus. Again, red pill is the natural conclusion of believing women lose attraction if you take a "status hit". The angry ramblings you see in the red pill sub isn’t all red pill is. If you see the posts of approved users, you will see that they exhibit a calm, calculated misogyny.
/r/ExRedPill26/08/21 10:29 PM
1

How is believing that women will "severely" lose attraction if you take a "status hit" not supposed make men who believe that insecure? And it does, you see that aplenty in the redpill subs. Like i said, this notion is the core of redpill and the kind of distrust they exhibit in women is just a natural conclusion, if you have this notion.
/r/ExRedPill26/08/21 09:49 PM
1

No, red pill would be the natural conclusion if you believe this.
/r/ExRedPill26/08/21 09:41 PM
1

How can you believe redpill is crap if you think this is real, this IS the red pill.
/r/ExRedPill26/08/21 09:33 PM
1

He is very aligned with core red pill ideas. You will probably find a snippet of his conversation with warren ferrel titled "why women prefer superman over clark kent". You will see that he says that how in marriage, if a man takes a "status hit", he takes a severe "attractiveness hit" and how that is very true and how no one wants to talk about it. This aligns perfectly with everything redpill says, this viewpoint in literally the source of everything redpill is.
/r/ExRedPill26/08/21 09:21 PM
1

if I slipped up once they'd make a big deal out of it or leave you have to literally put in 100% of the effort into a relationship, and the reward you get nowadays so mediocre rebuffed a lot at work when 'shooting my shot' Can you share some experiences please?
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:58 PM
1

Institution of family studies have an article on incels. Look it up. It says, in terms of casual sex, in both men and women, 20% have 60% of the sex. The factoid here that goes against red pill is, the percentage of sex that these "top men" are having haven’t changed through the years. Per redpill, because of dating apps, the percentage now should have been even more skewed towards minority of very handsome guys. That's not what they've found. Thus, whatever the change in total sexlessness, ther…
/r/ExRedPill15/08/21 03:24 PM
1

She wasn’t a suffragette, nor do i think you can call her a first wave feminist since she called the "doctrine of equality" "wild and ridiculous" on religious grounds. The extent of her social activism was to do with mother's custody rights.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:19 PM
0

Norton wasn’t a feminist. She specifically said she doesn’t agree with equality movement.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 03:09 PM
1

Hi, i saw this article of yours - https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/flzf5v/married_women_equity_jurisprudence_and_their/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share I was wondering if you had any further materials outside the three books and one article you mentioned. I tried to message you, but for some reason it’s not working
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/21 09:49 AM
1

I hear the demographic in dating apps is really skewed so i guess nothing else is possible.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 10:07 PM
1

That's rating pictures, the graph for sending messages tell a different story.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 02:49 PM
2

I think i remember reading somewhere that while the Y-Chromosome has regressed a lot, at present, it’s stable or even if it disappears it wouldn’t be that the human race will be only made of women and would die off without technological intervention. Also new research showed that embryos have both male and female reproductive tract until hormones take it towards being male or female. Also fathers can pass mtDNA.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 05:55 AM
1

disdain, evasion or vilification towards the topic of their sexuality Can you expand on that? Did you mean sexuality in general (ex - i like girls/i think that girl is cute) or these men's own sex life?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:02 AM
1

often made to be feel like eunuchs How?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 05:32 PM
1

What would be a high n count at that age? 15+? 30+?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 11:12 AM
–

Which would be wrong, researches about reported sexual desire shows that most people report high sexual desire in the beginning, then for women it slowly starts to go down. Which would mean losing desire for sex later is more common than not having desire in the beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:01 AM
1

This is something i find interesting. I think there was a scientist who categorized different kinds of loves and he called this one "Manic". It's the kind of love where someone really gets into our head and the love has a devotion aspect to it to quite a degree. I had this once. I think, for me, it how in some important ways, we were alike, which was different than how people around us generally were. Kinda made me think "made for each other" thoughts. She was also absolutely stunning in terms o…
/r/ExRedPill28/06/21 04:15 AM
1

12 years...that's a lot. Why did you two mutually break up?
/r/ExRedPill27/06/21 09:33 PM
1

I still love him, but have moved on to also love others Are you talking about love or remembrance?
/r/ExRedPill27/06/21 06:10 PM
1

All the study done on effects of breakup found this gender difference. I mentioned one.
/r/ExRedPill25/06/21 06:43 PM
1

I guess, since RP says most men aren’t alpha and men are more idealist, women experiencing more pain doesn’t make much sense.
/r/ExRedPill25/06/21 06:00 PM
1

Well...the study doesn’t mention alpha beta. The findings seem to be women feel more intense pain but engages in practices that helps them move on faster than men.
/r/ExRedPill25/06/21 01:27 PM
3

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1948550619876633 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259891475_Coping_with_Break-Ups_Rebound_Relationships_and_Gender_Socialization https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280564265_Quantitative_Sex_Differences_in_Response_to_the_Dissolution_of_a_Romantic_Relationship
/r/ExRedPill24/06/21 06:42 PM
1

How?
/r/ExRedPill24/06/21 03:32 PM
1

I don’t think so. The trend of lack of socialization and more time spent in other activities extend even into the age before sexual development. Teenagers are meeting with their own friends much less than before. I am sure it’s a two way street. But It's more likely that lack of socialization is more of a driver of sexlessness than the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 04:50 AM
1

One thing to consider, there are more female student than male (M=44.5%, W=55.5%)
/r/ExRedPill22/06/21 11:15 PM
1

Considering the number of comments on this thread and how the top comment went straight to pareto and also that you commented 2 days after this was posted. Nobody seems to have noticed this. You probably should write a post of your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:22 PM
1

Op is right. How morbidly obese women are doing has nothing to do with how average men are doing. Also the study you gave about weight, the differences in the different obese categories is insignificant, also obese I men had more partner than obese III women and mid healthy men. The whole study itself doesn’t show any resemblance to the fatalistic views you hear in these parts. Also, the mean age in that study was 37. Considering how small the differences are between the weight groups of women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 12:57 PM
1

It doesn’t, because this isn’t anywhere close to how he portrays himself and his life
/r/ExRedPill21/06/21 07:25 AM
1

What you’ve said here in your first comment sounds like a defining characteristic. That must have definite proof. What’s your reference in saying this? From what i know, there isn’t any proof to what you’re saying. Actually, the proof for the opposite exist. The traits that can be indicative of something like solipsism, for example - different measures of narcissism or lack of empathy, men have always scored higher in these measures. Not women.
/r/ExRedPill10/06/21 03:44 PM
1

Roy baumeister used a paper by jason wilder to make his point. That paper is invalid now. It was published in 2004. Then, the most recent male ancestor was thought to be younger than the most recent female ancestor. After a discovery in 2013 it's actually the reverse now.
/r/ExRedPill01/06/21 07:55 PM
2

I read a survey once that found out that almost twice as many men than women stayed with their cheating partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/21 05:16 PM
1

Right on.
/r/ExRedPill27/04/21 02:42 PM
1

I remember in an AMA, you said that red pill is something one trying to better himself can look into and warned against seeing it as "the way". Have you changed your mind and now think that it should be avoided?
/r/ExRedPill27/04/21 11:05 AM
2

Did Red Pill tactics help with that? Not really. I have bit of a different take on this. I think just saying that red pill doesn’t work misses the gravity of this phenomena even if we accept that one doesn’t need this kind of an attitude for love & attraction. I think you can summarize red pill into two words, "power dynamic". Everything they are told to do and be ultimately serves one purpose, creating a power dynamic where they are the dominant one. Now, Can that work, can you pull someone int…
/r/ExRedPill13/04/21 01:06 PM
1

Do you have any thoughts on how a question like this can be approached?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 07:12 PM
1

Definitely a framework can be subject to critique. That's how it works. So, what do you think the response to these 42 statements represent?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 07:11 PM
1

That's a good take. What would you say about how accurate something like this is in assessing someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:50 PM
1

love style are viewed as independent and exclusionary of each don't seem to be based on anything other than what came to John Lee's mind Aren’t these conceptualization of different parts of one's love style and not saying that a person is one or the other? If you see the method of the paper, how they use 42 statements, where a set of six analyze someones attitude about one Category, wouldn’t all 42 taken together give a complex view of what one's love attitude is like?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:46 PM
1

Based on the statements in the questionnaire, can you expand on what you think would be different today?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:25 PM
0

Can you expand on that? How would say assessing the response to the statements in the questionnaire unreliable in determining one's attitude about love?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:17 PM
-1

Reading the questionnaire, how would you say it's unreliable in finding the answer of the core question of the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:16 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/21 01:15 PM
1

So you're just going to be glib?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 04:10 PM
2

Tell me I'm wrong. Okay? Based on this article, one common theme seems to be the guy looking around for someone better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 04:05 PM
4

will cease all attraction to her boyfriend and now only want this higher value man. Not saying that it doesn’t happen at all but to give that as an example of how women in general behave...that's quite a hefty claim. What's your source? I guarantee you more than 50% of cheating by women happens when they start a new job. New group. New pecking order. New alpha Chad in the workplace she will crush on. Another hefty claim, now with numerical figures. What's your source?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:53 PM
3

gender-based psychological traits that contribute to hypergamy What are these? hypergamy pattern What does that look like? much of what it says likely has elements of truth Can you give some examples? What attracts men to women, and how they balance raw attraction with the other requirements of successful mating and family merging, is not symmetrical with what women do. There may be many similar elements, but there are many different ones too. So men are NOT hypergamous. Why women would be calle…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:23 PM
0

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:14 PM
0

apex fallacy I am clearly talking about unions where someone from the lower socioeconomic strata marries someone from the higher socioeconomic strata and not all men or all women. upper middle class and upper class men did/do because they are vying for status in these circles. Middle class and poor men (the vast majority of the male population) have nothing to gain by doing this. That doesn’t make sense. I mean, sure if you're a son of a rich businessmen who marries a princess, that's a status w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:14 PM
3

never date a woman who’s younger than you Do you mean older?
/r/ExRedPill27/03/21 06:12 PM
10

Looks is going to be one of your tickets inside the door, but personality is clearly also quite important, because that literally shows people what you are like. At present social climate, we don't just marry and that's it. We also mate short term. Looks tend to be relatively more consequential in short term mating, which doesn’t mean personality isn’t important or that looks doesn’t matter when you're considering something long term. Rather different situation shows people having different pref…
/r/ExRedPill26/03/21 01:43 PM
1

Hang on, the first graph's heading says it's showing stable marriage rate, but the y axis of the graph says it’s 30+ women who are sexually active. The divorce rate of women with 21+ partners using 2006-2008 nsfg data in the next two graphs shows a difference of about 20%. Are these graphs legit?
/r/ExRedPill23/03/21 05:44 PM
1

But, you take into account progresses in contraception, more connectivity through technology, i can't imagine a world with those where casual sex isn’t de-stigmatized...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 07:25 PM
1

Would you characterize yourself as a misanthrope?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 07:23 PM
3

It maps out what opinions people hold. That's something to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 07:21 PM
2

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:24 PM
2

But acceptance of casual sex (i.e sex outside of commitment) seems inevitable with prosperity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:24 PM
0

Not how people works tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:22 PM
2

There's fuckton of those here. Since the topics of this sub and the subs it's talking about contains a lot of "this is how things are and it's good/bad/whatever", i would say "how would you like things to be" is a legitimate question.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 05:21 PM
1

They use the term captain-first mate...something(dynamic?). The guy is the captain, the gal is the first mate, the family is the ship. So, there's a hierarchy in how they function as a family. The husband has more "power".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:46 AM
0

This is pretty standard stuff. People don't have the same trajectory in every connection or interaction or relationship they have. What's there to rethink?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 10:07 AM
0

But it's not how people work. You can and will have different kinds of connection with people that lead to different things, the same thing will have different outcomes. The person you had sex with within the least amount of time of knowing them among all the people you’ve ever had sex with, may not be the one who you have want to have a relationship with or marry and in most cases, for both men and women, that's what happens. Also one night stand, fwb, casual sex, early sex all leads to relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/21 09:20 AM
0

Sooo...now you're nice, respectful and know when to quit when a girl doesn’t show interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 10:05 AM
2

10%bf What's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 10:00 AM
1

If it's just not putting on a label, technically there's no difference, is there?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/21 09:59 AM
1

Hi, I remember your name from seeing a comment on a post about emotional labour on Askmen https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/6of412/men_of_ask_men_what_are_your_thoughts_on_the_idea/dkhevbk?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 These comment and the one on that askmen thread seemed opposing to me. Am i missing something or did you change your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 07:23 PM
1

I've seen a couple of people like you who says they are redpilled but they don't seem to believe in some concepts that are taken as fundamentals in the spaces where people follow and discuss red pill. For example, from above conversation, you seem to not believe in what red pill says about hypergamy and awalt. But if you look at all the places where red pilled discussions happens, these are like, pillar concepts. They don't believe that there are good women and bad women, but the whole womenkind…
/r/ExRedPill27/02/21 10:48 AM
1

I was just going to ask your reasonings.
/r/ExRedPill23/02/21 04:49 PM
1

how the way women are in the real world is not congruous with how society has told us they are. I would argue that calling that dehumanizing is a bit hyperbolic. Can you expand?
/r/ExRedPill23/02/21 07:04 AM
1

The idea knowing what I now know and still risking a relationship with a woman with so little upside is antithetical to my person. AFAIK, this idea is seen as "valid" in red pill. But most discussions there (the subreddit, affiliated blogs) is not about staying away from women but sleeping or having relationship (without marriage) with them and what they see as the optimal way to do that. This way is rooted in different versions of power play and is quite hierarchical, also there are quite radic…
/r/ExRedPill22/02/21 03:56 PM
1

I asked a similar question a while ago. After that i browsed through their blogs and this is what i understood. First an anecdote. Tomassi shared this video on his twitter feed where a little boy slaps the butt of a girl in his class and the girl turns around and kisses him. He said that he approves of this "alpha behaviour". A woman got into an argument with him saying that this shouldn’t be condoned and how he'd like it if his daughter was treated this way. Ironically, the woman is also red pi…
/r/ExRedPill22/02/21 09:13 AM
1

What kind of person Hang on! You’ve seen the "field reports" regarding dating and relationships in redpill subreddits, right? Also, how the head honchos of this movement promotes "game". Sexual strategy is a part of parcel of red pill and a huge amount of discourse there is centered around it. So, if it’s that accepted there, how can you say that's unhealthy and still defend red pill?
/r/ExRedPill22/02/21 08:08 AM
6

I smirked when he said his wife expected him to drive her to dates when they were dating. Imagine if a guy asked about a girl he is dating who asks him to drive her to dates in the asktrp sub, he would probably be told this is a shit test or something.
/r/ExRedPill01/02/21 05:49 PM
1

Will you please tell me how it is "significantly higher"? Cause the average difference between the least and most attractive man is 0.6 on a 1-100 scale (from the first table).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 07:38 PM
1

When participants were asked to answer the question of how likely they are to use condom on a scale of 1 to 100, the least attractive man scored 88.4 on average and the most attractive man scored 87.8 on average. How significant is this difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 06:33 PM
2

That share some core ideas about what drives attraction, positively or negatively and the goal is to be attractive to the other population. So, it's not contradictory to those core ideas about attraction, that one population is doing something that the other population is fundamentally told not to trust them to do, in the posts about "holding frame"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:59 AM
2

It seems antithetical that how the women's wing are showing empathy in a way that the men are told to be distrustful of and not "let their guard down".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:42 AM
1

Am i? Oh. The way i've seen men's pain talked about in a fatalistic way. How the concept of "good girl" is shunned in theoretical posts. Men are told to watch if they are showing any weakness in a quite detailed manner (i.e - everything that's been written about "holding frame"), not by average members, but by the endorsed and senior contributors, the blogs that are listed in the sidebar, people who are not in "angry phase" anymore. It seems antithetical that how the women's wing are showing emp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 07:38 AM
1

absurd standards women show What would be not an absurd standard and not a abysmally low standard? That's the question really. any standard Can you specify? You know people, you know what it takes to be a functional partner, you know what it takes to have a connection more than just functionality. What would that be?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 07:51 AM
1

That's having no standard. That's impossible. I was asking, assuming there being some kind of standard, what would that have to be like for men to not be disadvantaged?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:05 PM
2

If low hanging fruit was totally ignored or treated like shit, like unattractive less than mediocre men are Can you elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:04 PM
1

That's shortening the pool. Not really about what standard that can exist that won't disadvantage the present amount of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:01 PM
2

I think liking someone begets a kind of standard that the person you like passed. Your answer to what kind of standard won't disadvantage men seems to be men start having really high standards or women have abysmally low standard. Both seem kinda extreme. What would you say would be a reasonable standard to have that doesn’t disadvantage any of the genders?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 11:00 PM
2

So...you're saying men are disadvantaged because of the kind of standard they have?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 10:57 PM
1

Women ready to have sex with just about anyone. Dunno if that won't ruin the society. I mentioned that it's impossible that people won't have some kind of standard, the whole concept of liking someone begets a standard. So, your solution to men not being disadvantaged is women having no standard? Low value men have no sex drive Disadvantaged men won't be disadvantaged if they stopped dating? That doesn’t really leave any space to discuss there being a standard that won't disadvantage men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 10:55 PM
1

I can't see how your reply answers the question? Men's testosterone? How does diminishing that helps?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 09:44 PM
1

What are the things you were angry about that you’ve now accepted?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 11:54 PM
1

express in those words I don’t think this is about wording. The first article is from a man who is called the godfather of red pill. His blog contains articles that are much more radical than this. The next link in included in the subreddits mod approved posts. The kind of messaging boys receive is of course an important topic. But these ideas about relationships is a separate subject.
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 10:22 PM
1

I presumed we may not be pointing towards the same thing because you were talking about double standards and personal growth. Wouldn’t the "deferring authority", "women have no honour/ is childish" stuff in the links i've given be seen as toxic by most people?
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 09:34 PM
1

I don’t think we are talking about the same thing. The red pill i am talking about is this - https://lifelessons.co/personal-development/qualitiesrollotomassi/ Or this https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1tjcbg/ltr_game_maintaining_frame/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Is this what you're talking about?
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 07:18 PM
1

Overlap? As in, there are things you don’t agree with? What do you agree with? What do you don’t agree with?
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 07:03 PM
1

I meant red pill as in the red pill ideology of men and women's relationship, dating, marriage that kind of thing. Is that similar to MGTOW?
/r/ExRedPill05/10/20 12:17 PM
1

cheat on mommy with a higher SMV women, that you won’t love them if they don’t grow up attractive or that you’d fuck them if they were old enough is straight up unfathomably fucked. Hang on! They actually preach parenting this way???
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 10:20 PM
1

unlearn so many behaviors Can you elaborate?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 10:18 PM
1

What they describe female nature to be, that seems to be more elaborate than those characteristics, right? I mean, most women (and people) aren’t promiscuous and self harming. As for hedonistic, most women (and people) are not hedonistic enough for it to be a problem, are they? Much less a women-specific problem?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 10:15 PM
2

Oh, you meant parenting daughters wasn’t mentioned.
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 04:34 PM
1

Right
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 03:04 PM
1

I've seen talking to your kids like they are adults portrayed as a progressive approach. What you're saying kinda sounds like overdrive tho.
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 02:32 PM
2

does not talk about raising you daughter in ways that fit redpill. Isn’t that...contradictory? Also what does the book says about raising daughters?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 02:30 PM
3

No. I think he wrote something in his language, ran it through google translator and posted the translation.
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 08:49 AM
5

Is this a translation of something?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 04:24 AM
2

emotional incest, parentification Can you expand?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 04:22 AM
4

Can we just start there? Of course. I'm asking broad questions. I don’t expect you to cover absolutely everything. do discuss statistics fairly regularly though. Can you give examples of certain stats that are taken as proof of certain red pill stances? time has not proven us wrong yet in that specific case. How do you mean? Like, predictions were made that came true?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 04:09 AM
3

typically look at successful relationships What's the data source?
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 12:29 AM
4

Interesting. I am gonna ask you a bit of a broad question. "If" we are able to take an elaborate look all the couples, married or unmarried, in a relationship for a shorter or longer time, who are by and large happy with their relationship, happy with each other, how they treat each other, respect and love each other and have a (correct me if i am wrong, i've seen this to be particularly coveted among red pill adherents) satisfying sex life, have children who grow up to be the good, happy people…
/r/ExRedPill30/09/20 12:04 AM
3

I’ve never been taught that What were you thought tho? How does red pill parenting of daughters differ from gender equal parenting? What differences would you say a woman raised in a red pill household and a woman raised in a gender equal household would have?
/r/ExRedPill29/09/20 11:13 PM
5

What made you sure that there are enough divorces happening for what you define as frivolous reason (what are you defining as frivolous?) to make a case for female nature being fickle rather than there being fickle women or human being for that matter?
/r/ExRedPill02/09/20 09:06 PM
1

but surprisingly the pattern was reversed when they focused on particular sectors of society the pattern slightly reversed in lifetime data. Is this an age thing?
/r/MensRights18/06/20 07:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter