TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

northseaview Archive

View 1 post and 191 comments by northseaview on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
81

educationnorthseaview/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/21 05:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Slavery was imposed through a white supremacist ideology and establishment power and black people were an oppressed class of slaves, under the Atlantic slave trade. Other forms of slavery have and do exist. Patriarchy as a form of establishment male power to subjugate women has never existed. Women are not and have never been an oppressed class or caste, and indeed compared to men have generally been protected and privileged.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:06 AM
12

There is no such statement in the article. Please provide a credible reference or cease this smearing of the Green position. The Labour Party already have a policy to end prison for women and along with the Tories and Reform are extremely misandrist. If the Greens are also misandrist this hardly distinguishes them in such a field.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 10:29 AM
4

Gamma bias. Look it up. Misandry should be challenged explicitly. "All men" and "most men" and "always a man" misandrist statements are false. Period. No need to plead reward for being society's work horses. Even if we are not useful we deserve humanity.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 05:41 AM
0

Nazis do not support men. They seek to dupe the gullible by focusing blame on "other" men. They are pro-rich. Most men are working class, need trade union rights, employment protection, better pay and holiday entitlement, socially funded healthcare, affordable housing. When it comes to specific male issues we should oppose conscription, stop wars and especially genocide, reduce the prison population and improve drug and mental health programs, end homelessness, improve access to education, .... …
/r/MensRights17/02/26 08:08 AM
13

Conscription is extreme violence. Incarceration, execution, corporal punishment are extreme forms of violence reserved mainly for males. Pedo smeering is inducement to violence even murder and reserved for male targets. Misandry is much more violent and pervasive and enforced at state level. Misogyny is rare and only perpetrated by individuals.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 03:23 PM
10

This ignores made to penetrate, which is equivalent rates to rape, with male victims overwhelming majority and female perps.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 03:17 PM
2

The fault is not the existence of the UN nor most of its constitution, but its composition and its context. It is made up of countries whose government and social structure are run by a small rich and powerful elite, who support feminism, war and exercise hypocrisy. Such a body should exist and not be unduly controlled by the US empire and a few powerful states. If the countries that comprise the UN are fixed, it may function better.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 11:28 AM
2

Definition of left is highly subjective and in the US it is basically nonexistent, with left commonly referring to liberal who are effectively right wing. Socialists have been infiltrated by feminism as well as neo liberal stooges during the postwar boom so absorb a lot of their anti male shit. However politics left or right are entirely independent of gender politics and it would be a mistake to subordinate male issues to any political agenda. Support from the left can be gained by emphasizing …
/r/MensRights18/01/26 10:32 AM
1

None of the replies yet offer any evidence. I have seen reports of studies that find active participation of fathers is associated with increased empathy in their children, which would suggest they have empathy. Formation of empathy requires some common experience to feel a connection, such that overcoming trauma, injury, pain would enable, more commonly experienced by males. But I have no sources without a deep dive. Maybe if you have time answer your own question and post the sources.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 10:44 AM
1

It is misandrist to assume men are only motivated by getting sex and thereby cannot be trusted. Your comments are dripping with the same insinuations. I do not care what sexual preferences people exercise, other than that they be with consenting adults. But giving in to a woman's demands is the submissiveness that matters to men's welfare and attractiveness. Male feminists more likely do not believe they have a right to assert their views or needs. I regard them as victims as well as adversaries…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 05:42 AM
5

Voting either for Republicans or Democrats is an act of self harm. They both represent the rich, imperialist, elite with a programme to continue and accelerate the transfer of wealth from the working class and toss you into the meat grinders. Vote for the most pro working class candidates and more importantly get politically active, to oppose these ghouls at every turn.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 05:27 AM
2

I'm referring to the indoctrination of feminist men. Why women are attracted to whoever I have little interest. Thanks for alerting me that my comment is ambiguous.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 05:00 AM
4

More misandry from so-called MRAs. Being a feminist is not beneficial to sexual selection. It impedes any chance of making advances without feeling themselves predatory. Also being submissive is deeply unattractive to many women. They do so because the indoctrination has worked and they believe it is right. How self-serving or not is arbitrary as it is with any group of people. Stop attacking the people and attack the ideology and the behaviours.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 04:40 AM
11

No. You do not improve relations between demographics by keeping them apart. The should however be more single sex spaces for men and more acceptance of male privacy.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 08:23 AM
5

The misandrist US law professor is entirely consistent. She wants to ensure no woman is discouraged from making an accusation, whether true or false. Feminist law advocates have consistently tried to strip away presumption of innocence and means of defence in sexual crimes. In a systemically misandrist society they understand that although these could also undermine the few women accused similarly that in practice such prosecutions predominantly affect men. They also are unconcerned how this aff…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/25 08:01 AM
13

Some Feminism has adopted the cloak, or aesthetic of Marxism, by framing gender relations in terms of oppressor and oppressed classes, but devoid of the materialist foundation on which capitalist and working class are defined. In fact it is worse, because the designation of which gender may be the oppressor is counter to any material analysis of the social and economic status of men and women across multiple times and societies. By any objective measure 90% of men are economically and socially d…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 05:28 AM
9

In most jurisdictions false allegations are not a crime. Wasting police time or perverting the course of justice would apply but are generally quite mild punishment compared to the criminal impact on the victim. Private suit for damages are the only recourse of the victim.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:25 PM
36

Women are more likely to instigate murder by proxy than engage in it themselves. Violence is correlated with poverty, alienation and social anxiety, so would naturally be more common amongst men, who more commonly suffer discrimination. As can be seen when comparing underprivileged social groups on any other metric - race, poverty, education.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:17 PM
6

You start off from false premises. Patriarchy as defined by feminism does not exist and has not existed. She is benefitting from the enforcement of male gender roles. What male entitlement? This is another false feminist trope, which feminist men are not guilty of, but make the mistake of occasionally making advances that are used to victimise them. Rare case of behavior that could be deemed male entitlement are not condoned widely.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 09:31 AM
21

You still have a lot to unlearn. No feminist has ever fought for gender equality. They have only ever fought for female privilege and against men's rights. There has been no time in history when being male has been a privilege for 90%. There have been gender roles, but these mostly protected women and cost men, with some pros and cons either way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 04:54 AM
40

Simply replace all the comments about male drivers with black drivers and see just how fucked up are those excuses for discriminating against male drivers.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:52 PM
4

What about fatherly instincts? Parents typically would choose to spend more time with their kids and in past rural economies fathers did. She gets to sit at home while he works.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 03:47 PM
6

That's not what I observe. There are many.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 07:21 PM
3

She is a right wing tradecon grifter. Made sympathetic interviews with white supremacist. Attitudes are let's appreciate men for their servant role and get women back into the homemaker leech role. Men should be masculine. Not interested in anything she has to say.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 05:11 AM
10

Feminism is damaging because it hurts men and boys, not because it reduces the birth rate. The burden on the young is not the elderly but the rich, who extract most of our labour output (big tech spends only 1% of its revenue on wages) as profit. Labour is diverted to marketing, the war machine, financial extraction services, and social media click baiting algorithms. If this labour was devoted to housing, infrastructure, social and healthcare, the elderly would need less care and receive more a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/25 05:29 AM
5

Her earlier videos are good introductions into the men's rights space but over the last four or five years she has segwayed into the tradcon right-wing cul-de-sac and adds no value or insights of merit and can even be considered derailing
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:32 AM
5

Please do not validate the false 2-10% assertion by calling it standard. It is completely invented. Any actual stats on false accusations of sex crimes yield the lower bound at 10%
/r/MensRights28/07/25 04:32 PM
13

What the fuck is a top 1% male? Sounds like you have no place in a men's rights soace
/r/MensRights22/07/25 12:30 PM
17

In practice it is the hatred of the oppressed which is most commonly justified, precisely because the oppressors control the forming of opinion. It was the villains who were despised not the lords, the slaves, the immigrants, the unemployed, etc. Only looking back does the sheriff of Nottingham or the slave owner appear the villain once their hegemony is over and it is safe for the new ruling class to hate these past tyrants. That hatred of males is so sanctioned is precisely evidence of their o…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 06:43 AM
8

While insults and abusive conditioning add to men's isolation and low esteem real discrimination explains the higher incidence of suicide: victimization by family and criminal courts, unemployment, underemployment or lack of promotion, homelessness, violence, and so on.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 06:20 AM
1

First, it isn't "modern" feminists, it's all feminists and many/most women, because the privileged status of women tends to encourage a solipsistic outlook and sense of entitlement. Second, very few issues are women's issues, because most issues that cause problems for women cause more problems for men or are addressed by society to the benefit of women, but not for men. Third, I do derail feminist talking points, which given point two, are attack fronts against the rights and welfare of men. Fo…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:55 AM
1

Misandry is so ingrained into the culture that you could become very lonely very quickly. I would challenge the misandry openly. Depending on how they or others respond I would determine whether to exclude them going forward.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:19 AM
3

Except this is not guaranteed. While the sensitivity of the glans is harmed, the damage to remaining nerve endings can make orgasm very unpredictable and unanticipated and reduce pleasure and control. Also, why should you unnaturally delay your pleasure? The woman's orgasm is completely unrelated to yours. Many women do not come from penetration, so other stimulation would be required anyway.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:05 PM
3

Firstly, you conflate misandry with women's treatment of men, when all the examples you give of women treating men is societal behavior common amongst men and enforced by the establishment. There are women who do not share these attitudes, although misandry is more likely to align with their prejudice and to benefit them. Framing it as men against women unnecessarily strengthens women's bias and fails to challenge misandrist complacency in men. Secondly, you should ALWAYS challenge the lie of hi…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 09:41 AM
1

It hasn't surged; compared to men an increase of 57% on 5% compares with 22% on 95%. The male prison population has therefore surged by almost 8 times faster than the female prison population. The misandry continues, just a little slower.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 06:40 AM
-1

White (in general) men do not oppress and abuse brown (in general) women. Oppression, such as it exists, applies to class, national or ethnic groups, and colonial countries (yes they still exist in a modern form). To the extent oppression exists in relation to gender, this applies mostly to men by the state in conscription, penal law, educational exclusion and discrimination. Men also experience wage exploitation to a greater extent. Abuse applies across all demographics, and is disproportionate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 08:38 AM
12

Legalized male infant genital mutilation, conscription, homelessness, false arrest, false imprisonment, ...
/r/MensRights25/01/25 02:34 PM
6

I know feminists with whom I can agree on issues unrelated to gender, such as war, genocide, class politics, racism and all sorts. In my view they hold such views independently of their adherence to feminism and only due to their bias and misperceptions about actual gender relations do they believe feminism is at all consistent with their world view on other issues. I oppose feminism because it is rooted in female supremacism. Patriarchy does not exist in the feminist interpretation as a system …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 03:05 PM
4

The increased prevalence and depth of male loneliness is a product of female hypergamy and the reduced status of men due to difficulties in employment, housing and incomes for men. You could oppose the discrimination against men in education, recruitment and in the workplace. You could challenge misandry in the rental market, service provision, criminal justice system and media. You could challenge the gender roles women impose on men, of expecting higher earnings, princess treatment, emotional …
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:59 PM
1

Masturbation is a healthy activity and trying to suppress your sexual pleasure is unhealthy and misguided. That you think marriage is healthy is delusional. You are surrendering to the servitude of gender relations enforced by marriage while rejecting the positives of gender relations which are sexual pleasure and intimacy. Your priorities are backwards.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:01 AM
1

Without looking into the sources for the 7% and 25% conviction rates, if they use the same methodology, I expect the Indian data suggests a hugely higher rate of false imprisonment, since the UK has been forced to release and review a large number due to abuse of process to boost conviction rates. Are the rates based on the number of prosecutions, the number of arrests, the number of reports filed, self reporting? Do they exclude cases proven to be false accusations, or withdrawn accusations?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:46 AM
1

I am not disputing that racism in the west willingly embraces the trope of rape infested India, and regional and religious sectarianism on the part of Indian politicians motivates them to use the rape threat narrative to exaggerate its incidence. Indian feminists take advantage of the narrative and misandry to divert resources away from general social programmes towards themselves and to enact more misandry into law. Wikipedia is a resource and in the table supports your conclusion, but uses fem…
/r/MensRights20/12/24 06:36 AM
5

I think a case can e made for a need for gender balance in some occupations, where statistical differences in how men women approach problems can make it desirable to have an even partipation in the role so that solutions that may suit people with different needs are more likely to be available. I think this would apply to roles such as teaching, psychology, law, media and personnel management. (I won't adopt the neoliberal newspeak HR, the workforce is not human resources, but people). It does …
/r/MensRights18/12/24 08:42 PM
1

Yes, sorry. That is a perfectly reasonable reason to include the demographic information. I was just being over sensitive right wingers trying to push the race agenda in where it doesn't belong.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 08:21 PM
1

True. The anti male bias is objectively irrefutable. I am detecting a right winger shoe horning the great replacement theory and detracting from the primary issue of societal misandry. Just read the reply below. Sounds like L was being over sensitive.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 08:20 PM
9

Unsurprisingly this wiki page does a poor job of adequately comparing rape across countries. In its table England has the second highest rate of rapes per 100000, about 117, Pakistan 92 and India only 0.9. Syria and Ukraine, which have had war zones since 2014, record less than 1. So how are these statistics compiled, reported to police, self-report, conviction? In their next section the state in the UK rape is a significant problem but in the Ukraine it is a major problem. In the section on the…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:39 PM
-1

Not sure why you felt the need to include "middle aged" or "white". I'm pretty sure both of those characteristics mitigate against your guilt of being male. Young men and non-white men I'm sure typically attract more negative treatment.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 11:04 PM
2

People seem not to recognize irony
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:27 PM
22

Sperm donation is a personal risk, whatever the financial inducements, because governments keep changing retrospectively whether and when children can have information shared about the donor and whether child support can be enforced. Refusal to donate to spite feminism is futile, because men will do do unaware of the risk.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 04:16 PM
-17

Many national funding bodies provide statistics on the gender of applicants and successful candidates. Typically the rate of successful grants are higher for female applicants. I assume this is because women have better grant proposals rather than any bias in the funding committees.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 09:37 PM
31

A common tactic of feminists is to co-opt the victim identity of genuinely marginalized, disadvantaged or oppressed groups. Hence women and LGBT, or racial minorities and women. But this goes deeper than feminism. Men are automatically deemed potential combants, so anyone wanting to guarantee agreement that victims include the innocent state women and children. We must continue to challenge this mindset nonetheless.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 09:56 AM
-2

There are lists of the dead with names and age. The peak age group is around 9 or so not 16. And yes a 15 year old with an AK is still a 15 year old. That 70 years of occupation, brutality and impoverishment means they pick up an AK rather than a football or a gamepad does not make them a legitimate target of genocide.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 09:41 AM
7

I think paying a living wage to all their employees, so they don't have to live on food stamps would be more important. Paying a higher rate of tax than their employees and handing back all the corporate welfare checks would be another positive move.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:05 PM
4

If you and others do not push back against this discrimination it will continue and get worse. When people are challenged on their bigotry they sometimes begin to change and can even become part of the solution.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:13 PM
1

u/PhilMitchell83 u/men_are_human u/EyeisBloke @Firebird_psych u/ian_mcnicholl u/GreensonAlex
/r/MensRights20/11/24 06:33 AM
1

Feminism has not been a civil rights movement, it is a misandrist and female supremacist ideology. The rights that women have not had that men had were not won by feminism, but by class struggle, such as the chartist movement for the working class vote, foundation of the welfare state, etc. The civil rights movement was about gaining rights for black people that were denied them, the same cannot be said about feminism.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 05:32 AM
6

There is no such thing as patriarchy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 09:25 PM
3

It doesn't sound like supporting women instead of men, more like demonising men and supporting misandry merchants.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:49 PM
0

I've been using they or them in this context since childhood and I am much older than 20
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:05 AM
3

You have missed male infant genital mutilation which is legal in all countries. You also miss discrimination against boys in the education system and in employment recruitment and management practices. Discrimination against men with respect to violence, crime and punishment has been historical. This has been enforced by gender norms for practical and cultural reasons which may have existed, but certainly no longer apply. Feminism is a gaslighting hate ideology, which takes advantage of the gyno…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 08:15 AM
1

Equity definition is fair share. Do you mean equality of opportunity vs equality of outcome, or does your equality exclude fairness? Right wingers emphasise opposition to equality of outcome vs opportunity, because this assists their desire to protect the wealthy from higher taxation or redistribution. It also enables blaming the poor for their own lack of effort or intelligence. Capitalism is a process which rewards the wealthy by the unpaid labour of their employees and so increases unequal ou…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 06:24 AM
2

1 yes, 2 abolish, but no gender discrimination on recruitment or role, 3 yes, 4 yes, 5 yes and I would support increased investment in education and facilities for people from disadvantaged backgrounds to overcome barrier to entry, such as free school meals, wifi, and PC access and additional learning support where needed.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 06:10 AM
18

On point 3 feminism has not run its course, because this implies it had a valid trail to follow in the first place. Feminism has always been a deeply chauvinistic, female supremacist and misandrist ideology. Forged in a highly gynocentric society it highlighted only disadvantage to women from gender norms and advantages to men, while blaming men for these cases due to the alleged power of men (patriarchy). It has misinterpreted historical roles, ignoring the suffering of the vast majority of men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 05:55 AM
1

I would vote Jill Stein. I can't say any candidate is pro male and doubt electoral politics will change that very much. Her platform however is most beneficial to large numbers of men because it is pro labour and anti war, men being most victim to homelessness, war, workplace deaths, etc. Opposing the corporate monopoly on government and boosting jobs and infrastructure spending is pro male. The greens are a mixed bunch, including many toxic feminists I'm sure, but Stein has tended to stock to c…
/r/MensRights01/07/24 05:36 AM
6

The rather widely shared episode of the View with Sharon Osbourne and the all female panel and audience in histerics at a victim having his penis cutoff and blended is convincing evidence. Then the audience laughing at a male victim of domestic violence on Jeremy Vine.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 12:59 PM
2

Let's try: Forced infant/childhood genital mutilation - legal everywhere Conscription/draft - enforced on men in many countries especially in war Ukraine/Russia Arrest/conviction/incarceration bias enforcement against men, UK policy explicitly discourages custody for women Discrimination in education exclusion, corporal punishment, downgrading, female only schemes schoarship.... Try harder
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:20 AM
4

First, masturbating while watching porn is quite a common impulse even if you are sexually active and attracted to your spouse. It is personal and the control of your sexuality without reference to another person's needs, preferences or judgements is very low effort and unstressful. Nobody is harmed by this behaviour, unless it takes over too much of your time or attention. Fixating on particular women, either in real life, your past and in the media is potentially damaging to your motivation, y…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 06:01 PM
-7

What the fuck are you genocide apologists doing infecting a men's rights space? Young men and women are very prominent in protesting the genocide, because their brains have not yet been atrophied by decades of exposure to neoliberal imperialist propaganda. This is not a gendered issue, but a human rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 05:02 AM
62

No. Have you ever watched a western in which the restless cowboy turns up to work for the widowed or daughter farm/ranch owner? Women owned slave plantations. If they had money, property or a business they could open a bank account. As banking became more widespread amongst the working classes it first was restricted to salaried staff with regular incomes, but later was encouraged among cash paid wage earners. Without an income it would be difficult to open an account, and applied to many stay a…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:47 PM
2

Sounds interesting. Worth sharing a link
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:34 PM
2

I'll treat people as people. If they are clearly disabled or carrying/pushing a load I'll help. But I have spent too many times holding a door open waiting for someone to put a hand out to take over while streams of entitled 20 something women walk by with their empty arms folded and without so much as a glance. Now I wait until they are close enough to reach out a hand and let go. In my experience guys do not do this.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:26 AM
5

Your premise that men set up society is false. A horse doesn't decide how to use a field just because it pulled the plough. In any case the people with the power are not the ones who do the work, but the ones who reap the benefits.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 04:20 PM
16

Wrong. 99% of men's problems are not of their own making. Avoiding politics will not remove the systemic discrimination and misandry.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 09:30 AM
26

How can you not have an opinion either way whether to sexually mutilate a healthy infant?
/r/MensRights08/04/24 05:11 PM
9

You seem confused as if you believe there is a male privilege or some kind of patriarchy. There are know privileges courtesy of being a man. The patriarchy is an ideological invention by a hate movement that is fictional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 07:55 PM
9

The elites would coopt the issue to promote trad con values to keep marriages together and ensure men have to pay for their wives and children and not welfare. They would put more women in jail rather than reduce the male prison population. They would promote masculism and draft men to fight in toxic wars, but reduce maternity and other welfare benefits to pay for the military. They would cut female education programmes, but not boost male leaning education. The elites are not your friends.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 08:12 AM
2

Where is your evidence that men use violence more than women or that women are psychologically superior? Women enjoy social dominance in a gynocentric society, which enables the use of emotional and social manipulation with ideological confirmation. They can also exercise violence often without repercussions due to societal and legal backing.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 07:21 PM
29

Poor analogy. Unlike blacks women have never been at the back of the bus.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 04:29 PM
2

A common refrain during my childhood was "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me". Not necessarily true. The effects of social ostracism and judicial and economic sanction from slander can be much worse.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 07:56 PM
24

You do not understand communism. You do not understand the difference between big government (the state) representing the capitalist class and social ownership of the means of production. You conflate gynocentrism, which is independent of class structure, and the indifference the state has to the welfare of low status men. Divorce laws in the US are motivated by reducing the burden on the state (the wealthy) by placing it on men. Mandated child support by men is also motivated by reducing the st…
/r/MensRights23/02/24 11:53 AM
6

How is murder a deserved punishment for rape?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:33 PM
11

Says the Daily Mail who backed Thatcher every step of the way to blame fathers not taking responsibility in order to cut welfare. The CSA (child support agency) was primarily motivated by neoliberal shrink the state ideology and an easy win, because it based low status males, a popular target both for feminists and neocons. The daily mail likes to highlight male hostile policies on one page as it fits the antifeminist culture war agenda while bashing low income men on another page, especially mi…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:34 AM
4

Seemingly? You think they aren't conscripted or they are all willing? Why conscript the volunteers? Where is there any doubt?
/r/MensRights02/02/24 10:29 PM
20

Please name a beneficial right men have that women do not. I qualify the right, because feminists often complain that women do not have the right to fight in the military, utterly dishonest when in reality it is a privilege not to be conscripted. The two rights you cite are false. Women are far safer walking alone at night. Men are over 70% victims of violent crime and much more so due to strangers. Regarding date rape, this is only if you frame rape as penetration by a penus. If you include for…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:24 AM
1

Unfair treatment does nor equate to misogyny. Many gender roles are predicated on protecting and esteeming women. Do some bigots underestimate women's capability? Yes and those same people often also underestimate their culpability. Very few people hate women, and are typically damaged individuals whose attitudes are not tolerated by society at large and the state. Disdain and distrust of men, particularly low status men, is widespread and reinforced by society and the state. Such people are typ…
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:53 AM
9

Your framing is wrong from the first sentence. Misogyny is isolated and not systematic. Often behaviour or remarks are construed as misogynist when they are not, may be actually gynocentric like chivalry or even misandrist. In contrast misandry is pervasive, enforced by the state through the penal code, discrimination in education and work and the mass media. You already no the examples, I merely do not concede that misogyny exists anywhere on the same scale or has the same consequences and supp…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 03:53 PM
1

The first issue of consent is not whether the woman is drunk, but whether she is too drunk to consent. There should be a very strict explicit legal standard at which this can be established beyond reasonable doubt. It must be clear that the woman could not reasonably offer consent and that the man could not reasonably believe she was consenting. Being falling over drunk is not a sufficient condition to render her incapable of being willing and knowingly consenting. Many people in such a state en…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 08:31 AM
2

The report is referenced in the link given by the OP, but relates only to sexual violence, not all IPV violence. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs/nisvsReportonSexualIdentity.pdf again covers sexual violence, but by sexual orientation. Shows only lifetime estimates, which are less reliable than past 12 month estimates. I am not an American and the layout of reports on the CDC website are difficult to navigate.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 09:56 AM
5

Maybe this is it, although it is his daughter https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O15dxrBNuAQ&pp=ygUQS29yZWFuIGZhdGhlciBhZA%3D%3D
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:18 AM
6

https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf
/r/MensRights04/01/24 05:35 AM
9

Not really. It's a legal document which allows nonconventional couple to legally registered without confusion. Where the father is present they will still be called dad by the people that matter.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 09:49 PM
59

When a Nazi calls an Arian a jew lover they are not being anti Arian, they are being antisemitic. Similarly when a man hater calls a woman a man lover or pickme they are being misandrist not misogynist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 09:19 AM
1

Nazism hurt Arians too and catholics too. Wish we could return to the good old days of the Kaiser when the world respected Germans and Arians were attracted only to good jews and good jews were respected. Feminism is a hate ideology against men. Among its faults isn't that it releases women from your tradcon gender roles, but that it enforces tradcon gender roles only onto men so long as they benefit some women and demonises all male behaviour irrespective of whether it is tradcon or not.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 09:30 AM
2

It is not AI. It is not programmed. It reproduces sources from the Internet and reproduces an amalgamation of common responses relevant to the topic. All it reflects is the current zeitgeist.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:07 AM
5

I would also note that crime incidents are generally associated with poverty and disadvantage. This is likely also true of crime perpetration and victimisation in men. Finding out who does the crime is only part of the story. Why do they do it and how can we stop it is more important and more interesting.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 04:24 PM
3

Your y axis is very subjective. Why do you claim physical violence is more serious than psychological. Agree murder is incontravertible, but people could be tormented into suicide. Physical violence can be very severe yet still lead to a full recovery, including the emotional impact. Some psychological abuse can remain extremely damaging for the victim years later. The degree to which any kind of victimisation is taken seriously also depends on the gender of the victim regardless of type. For ex…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 04:21 PM
8

It is sexual assault and battery effecting grievous bodily harm. If it ain't broke don't fix (break) it.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 11:02 AM
9

Subscribed due to your recommendation. Thanks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/23 05:12 PM
7

Given the choices listed are liberal or conservative, this is obviously a US post, so the labels are actually pseudonyms for Democrat or Republican. These are both right wing, pro-capitalist, pro-imperialist parties, so how individual working class children identify with one or the other tells us very little about their motivation, philosophy or standing. If anything the Republicans reflect the anti-imperialist anti-establishment aspirations of the working class better than the Democrats, such t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/23 07:26 AM
2

I support wealth taxes, which may include land taxes, as an effective way of reclaiming unearned income from the rich and using it for the the wealth creators and those in need (the working class). Increased taxes on corporate wealth and bank deposits over $1m should also be used as the majority of the rich do not primarily hold their wealth in land. The lack of housing in most wealthy countries is not due to lack of housing but control of the empty stock by a rich minority. Limits on home owner…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/23 06:52 AM
1

To start with: these are not the same feminists. The prohibitionists are dead now and different women made up with the Duluth attack. Using the contrary arguments of one group of feminists to point out hypocrisy in the arguments of a different group of feminists is flawed. First establishthat the second group support or accept the premise of the former. Further: feminists are misandrist and will make any argument that penalises men, even if it hurts (some) women. Feminists are women's advocates …
/r/MensRights31/07/23 07:11 AM
1

If you think the militarization of the police has anything to do with gender wars, you are missing the real divide in our society. The police are there to protect property and the power of the wealthy, and control an increasingly alienated and impoverished working class. Sure, there are laws and law enforcers with explicit bias in favour of women, or gamma bias, which reflect the cultural norms regardless of class, but that can be policed without the military.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 06:07 AM
3

I have long been a socialist and an egalitarian. I never bought into patriarchy theory, and in fact met a man-hating feminist quite young that convinced me that feminism had nothing in common with socialism. Nonetheless I did swallow the women have been discriminated throughout history hegemony, common in socialist circles and society in general. Despite this I noticed the common discrimination against men and treatment as cannon fodder bad guys and punchbags. Eventually I saw blogs and videos t…
/r/MensRights15/07/23 11:51 AM
2

This has a closing date of Jan 2022. Any idea how it is working out? A little skeptical with it being employment within the Women and Gender Equity Center. Also mentions masculine identifying over and over, not men. Are they going to spend all their efforts on overcoming the disabilities associated with being masculine, rather than addressing the discrimination applying for being men, masculine or not?
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:59 AM
2

I'm guessing you live in the US. No employer in a civilised society would boast about 14 weeks maternity leave. Some "inquired". How about demand. Are you familiar with trade unions? Time to organise and become active and demand paid leave for holidays, sickness and family care. While your on join a workers party and ditch the right wing duopoly of Democrats and Republicans. It's hard to know how you can expect men's rights when you do not even have human rights of health care, housing, childcar…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 04:29 AM
116

He is a trad con who believes men should be good little servants and must be useful to have value. He defends all hierarchy as natural and justified, because they exist in most animal species. He ignores that the hierarchy in our society is more determined by class privilege and power, and condemns 90% of men to toil and low status irrespective of whether they clean their room. He wants to define masculinity by tradcon standards and is dismissive of males who do not express masculinity. He wants…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 09:48 AM
13

Best economy in 80 years? For who? Between the 1940s and middle 70s many working class families could live on a single income. Since Reagan real wages have stagnated while productivity has soared. This is not a Republican vs Democrat issue, but a neoliberal agenda which both parties embrace to enrich their donors at the expense of the masses. Under Trump homelessness increased, real wages stagnated, welfare for the masses was cut while welfare for corporations increased. Corporate welfare alread…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 10:54 AM
33

Not going to happen. Trump is pro big business and isn't going to oppose a huge cash cow for the bloated US private health care industry. Whereas trans reassignment surgery is very niche and sufficiently marginalised to throw to the lions on behalf of his conservative base without much consequence for big business. Even more marginal with respect to minors. It is worth pushing the point you are making into the debate, but it will surprise me if it gets much engagement from the MSM, who are loyal…
/r/MensRights29/04/23 07:57 AM
5

I expect the authors of the questions have default assumption that women are affected worst, but I ticked my answers based on my own perception. I hope you answered anyway, especially the four text boxes at the end, where we can really challenge their perceptions.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 06:37 AM
5

Thanks for sharing. My priorities were 1 end discrimination against boys and men in education, 2 end discrimination and bias against boys and men in criminal justice system, 3 equal parental leave for fathers and default shared parenting. It is well worth submitting a response and I'm sure other priorities can be suggested.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 06:34 AM
17

I disagree with your interpretation. It is a masculine norm to "bottle up" emotions or alternatively to adopt stoicism. This is a masculine norm in that, in traditional gender roles, it is more commonly required by men to manage their emotions so that they can competently deal with some crisis, danger or hard labour. There is nothing inherently male about stoicism and a woman can of course adopt this trait if required. She would be exercising a masculine behaviour, but does not make her a man, j…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/23 06:31 PM
7

You have experienced much death at such an early age, which likely has you suffering from bereavement, both literally and in an emotional sense with respect to your ex-girlfriend. At your age I also found it hard to give up on failed relationships or even unrequited love, which could endure for years with women I new. In particular the loss of someone's love could be harder to process than a death. Death is final an non negotiable, but I could always bargain with love and hope for reconciliation…
/r/MenSupportMen08/03/23 03:15 AM
5

Yes, and of course with the same logic it is perfectly reasonable to have white only spaces, or at least exclude black people, who are statistically more likely to be violent (at least in countries where they are over represented in the poor deprived demographics). No, your misandry is showing. I don't see how listening to music is something women do inherently different to men, or trans women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 10:58 AM
19

Best wishes that you find resolution. If you live in UK try Mankind Initiative support for male victims of domestic abuse https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.mankind.org.uk/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiXxemT1JD9AhUJQvEDHYmZAK8QFnoECAAQAg&usg=AOvVaw37kJ5PofGtVzmUx_styXh1 and even if you don't, they may havesome good advice.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:58 PM
2

No. Only the more challenges you overcome, learning understanding and confidence in your resilience. The homeless are not primarily destitute through a lack of challenges, but an excess.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 06:55 AM
4

Me too is a vigilante tool, which has no interest in natural justice. It was around for a few years reflecting a desperate cry for attention by some poor marginalised women. When it suited some rich and powerful group agenda, they co-opted it and amplified it with state and mainstream resources as a weapon in their infighting. The damage done to innocent victims was of no concern. You could try a men too, and of course it can help raise awareness and provide motivation and anecdotes for change. …
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:48 AM
4

Number 3 appears to be convoluted. I would break it down into: Innocent until proven guilty Anonimity for both or neither victim and defendent if the crime is deemed sensitive. Equal sentencing and prosecution standards. Equal treatment and protection from violence and sexual abuse in prison. All laws to be written and applied gender neutral. Presumption of 50/50 parenting in family court. 6->1 criminalise genital cutting of minors. 7->2 a right to equality in education from nursery to universit…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:22 AM
3

A shield for men and citycrusher make good MRA content on You Tube. The like of the Honey Badgers, Karen Straughan, Dr Randomercam went a bit alt-right/tradcon and their content has become uninteresting and not very informative. Paul Elam got a bit boring making conservative commentary vids with Janice Fiamenco. His old videos are better and he has recently reuploaded many recently to an ear for men. Another excellent resource is William Collins. Unfortunately, he also has recently become a bit …
/r/MensRights19/01/23 03:55 PM
2

This is shown without need to access Murdoch media in this thread https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/104opf6/domestic_abuse_service_overhauled_after_male/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights07/01/23 09:14 AM
21

As commented by someone in a related post, the issue is not that Tate is being demeaned for the size of his penis, of which most of us have no knowledge. It is that men with smaller penises are demeaned as less worthy, irrespective of their actual merit. This is misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 08:08 AM
10

You may be better advised to comment on the company's twitter feed, which they likely have, with details of your complaint. These feeds are public and in my experience often yield a more rapid response than emails and phone calls. Good luck.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 06:43 PM
21

On what basis do you argue misogyny is systemic. There are isolated individuals both men and women who are hostile to women, but these are a tiny minority and certainly are subject to societal and legal condemnation. You rightly point out some of the examples of discrimination against men, but not necessarily misandric. However there are examples of systemic misandry: criminal codes and punishments which are gendered against males, infant circumcision, mass murders of males in wars and pogroms w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 08:51 PM
1

Even if it was not gendered these behaviours should not be illegal, unless they are part of a persistent pattern that could reasonable be deemed wilful harrassment. However, making laws gender neutral does not stop them being applied in a biased anti male manner. Drink driving is genderless, but I understand all the imprisoned offenders in the UK have been male or at least hugely disproportionately
/r/MensRights10/12/22 06:39 AM
4

I mean she does not challenge the conception that women are uniquely disadvantaged, whether that be due to capitalism or patriarchy, which concedes ground to the feminists for their false narrative to poison the discourse between socialists. The relations between men and women are multidimensional, but any impartial measure of the bulk of the population would recognise that men are often at the bottom of the hierarchy with housing, victims of violence, torture, imprisonment, homelessness, injury…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/22 05:12 AM
6

Thanks for the post. I haven't read her entire article, but from the first couple of paragraphs she fails to challenge the concept of women's oppression as something separate from the oppression of a class. I wish however this sort of criticism of patriarchy theory and feminism in general was more common in socialist discourse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/22 08:04 AM
3

Not quite. Words are a collective tool, which have meaning not only to the user or the target. This is why they are an effective form of attack. If the target values the opinion of the user then a derogatory slur will hurt, valid or not. But even if the target disdains the user, it will matter how they are then perceived by the community and the sanction can harm in many ways from emotional and social status to economic and criminal sanction. So words do matter and are not just under the control…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:22 AM
7

Not really. Their definitions of abuse include penetration and rape, but not forced envelopment. Other definitions are gender neutral, but they exclude any definitions which could only be female perpetrated or only male victim. And the linked page is completely erasing male victims of female abuse
/r/MensRights09/11/22 02:23 AM
11

90% homeless are men. Let's vote for a party that removes rent controls, reduces social housing, allows the rich to monopolise land ownership. Injured and killed at work 90% male. Let's vote for a party that removes health and safety regulations. Most dependant on working for living: men. Let's vote for a party opposed to trade unions.... See where I'm going?
/r/MensRights06/11/22 06:32 AM
2

Thanks for the link. This looks like a very interesting resource for data and policy analysis.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 08:04 AM
2

This is the correct starting point. Given we are considering a manifesto there should then be a set of timely objectives and policies that are relevant today and throughout the world or specific to countries or communities to implement those rights in relation to men.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 10:12 AM
4

Thanks. This is a commercial Web site with an interest in promoting the procedure and yet they emphasise it is regarded as a "permanent" sterilisation. They do say it is reversible but do not discuss its effectiveness. They do however say this would require more intrusive surgery than the vasectomy and would not normally be covered by medical insurance. This is not by your own source a recommended solution to contraception for men who want to be parents at some point.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:14 PM
2

Please offer sources for your assertion. I have seen contrary sources that vasectomy reversal is unreliable and diminishes with age and length after vasectomy
/r/MensRights18/09/22 02:07 PM
4

Blacklisted
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:27 PM
3

Demonising a demographic based on immutable characteristics is classic divide and conquer employed by elites. Feminists continually derail class solidarity and displace class action with meaningless tokenism. They increase the exploitation of poor working class men. They employ unproven antiscientific beliefs, and promote traditional gender norms so long as they benefit women or hurt men
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:14 PM
74

Above all it is not his choice. It is the son's choice. If the son wants the 'benefits' of circumcision at the risks and trauma, he can choose to do so when he is 18 or an adult.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 08:40 AM
3

Having not seen it for a while I would suggest Mrs Doubtfire, though as with many on your list it includes a lot of hostility to males, including the father having to disguise himself as a woman to be able to see his kids. Peter Strauss 'men don't tell' male victim of dv. Scent of a woman for the respect of male bonding and character not the woman worship. Flawless. Portrayal of male bonding and freedom to express masculinity outside gender norms It's a wonderful life James Stewart
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/22 04:56 AM
3

You are conflating probability and conditional probability. Assuming stats above are true and men are both killer and victim in other context then men would be more likely to kill the partner than women. What you could say I'd that given someone is a murderer, a woman's victim is more likely than a man's to be her intimate partner. Ipv victims by suicide might mean men would more often be fatal victims of ipv. But this is not included in such stats.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 05:53 AM
3

Yes I understood you. My point about using gender neutral wasn't a dig at you, but a criticism of HR converting them to placate perceived female objection to sharing them with men. I often have to tour the building looking for an empty male or gender neutral toilet passing empty female toilets, which I sometimes use anyway
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:28 PM
15

Very similar situation in my computer science workplace. Recently many of the gender neutral single use toilets were split into male or female, so halfing the number of toilets available to Ken in a 80 20 workplace. Personally I see no reason not to use gender neutral in these single cubicle spaces. We don't have male and female toilets at home.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:09 PM
-4

Help. I've fallen into a pro-life tradcon subsubreddit. Aaagh. Pro marriage, pro you are stuck with a child you didn't choose? How does this support men's rights?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:12 AM
7

Child support should be abolished. Parents should have shared custody and make voluntary allowances to consider the best interests of the child. Where a parent is struggling financially, social welfare should be adequate to eliminate poverty.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:56 PM
5

The contrapoints take down is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKXKXaO4iNI&t=1832s, but I am not sure if this is the one where he highlights the methods of suicide. This is the video which deals with suicide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiUfaGZAs5o, but he made a few videos on the topic and another might be the one, in which he discusses how statistics on suicide attempts can include self harm.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 11:46 AM
32

Both assertions are simply not true. The YouTube channel 'a shield for men' I think does a reasonable take down of the methods assertion, showing numerous references from various countries that the methods are similar between men and women. From his play list it is not obvious which video, but his debunk of contrapoints would be a good starting point. Regarding suicide attempts, the problem is typical conflating of self harming with suicide attempts, similar to lumping in catcalling with rape an…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:31 AM
12

The first question you should ask yourself is what would you do if the DNA test indicated you are not the father. Would you want a divorce? Would you want to be the father of the child, either as a couple or separated? What role would you expect of the biological father? How would your wife react to you seeking a DNA test? Would you discuss it with her beforehand? Given you are married, and the child is way past abortion there is no justification to seek a test before birth. So, now, you need to…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:10 AM
1

I think resolving male issues should be raised from third to first, but I agree with all five objectives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/22 04:40 PM
-1

Given you identify horseplay among pets as natural, and I at least am not aware that female pets are any less rough than male pets, girls must therefore be socialised not to exercise this behaviour. Thus adult women are constructed to be more fragile and this is socially sanctioned. Both boys and girls should be encouraged to exercise the full range of healthy behaviours and the consequent character development.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 07:20 AM
2

I agree with your point. An act of violence can be any behaviours that materially damage the target. We are social, economic and political agents. Consider the action of a false accusation, which in isolation is only the use of words, spoken or written. However in the social context it can be extremely violent, with consequences including economic ruin, loss of liberty through imprisonment, isolation due to stigma, death by state execution or vigilantism, white knights. It is not irrelevant to i…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:03 AM
1

I never said anybody "needs" to send nude photos, nor that it is justified. Assuming it does not extend to harrassment or bullying as I explained, presumably the media must be delivered by some platform. A complaint to the platform might yield sanction in the form of suspensions or service restrictions and of course most clients offer the option of blocking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 08:57 PM
16

Sending someone a picture is rarely harmful in of itself. It is a minor irritation, which can be releived instantly via a delete button. It should not be criminalised and certainly not receive jail time. Where it can be injurious is when it is part of a prolonged or targeted form of harrassment or bullying. In which case the bullying should be the crime and not the individual acts. A prosecution would need to make the case that the behaviours could reasonably be evidence of an intent to demean o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 07:35 AM
23

When applied to infants and minors it is unconditionally an assault inflicting grievous bodily harm and serious sexual assault. It is extremely rare that it could be considered medically necessary for children or adults for which a less invasive and damaging medical alternative is not available. Adults who choose to mutilate their sexual tissue for aesthetic or cultural reasons are misguided but entitled to choose what to do with their bodies.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 12:59 PM
163

Ask them if they're offering.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:51 PM
6

This is a good suggestion. Homelessness, infant genital cutting, bias in the criminal courts. Anything which is irrefutable evidence of systemic discrimination. Avoid social attitudes, dating, misandry, which can seem trivial like manspreading or catcalling. Good luck.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 08:17 PM
1

I don't think you can claim for doing stuff for your shared household needs. You're resonsible for taking care of your needs and those of your kin, even if you have differing views as to what those needs should be. However, by 14 you should certainly have an allowance, not as a reward, but in order for you to learn how to budget and grow independence.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 03:07 PM
6

Identity politics are poison to the class struggle. However, it is supportive of class struggle to oppose discrimination on the basis of race, sex, nationality or religion or other immutable characteristics. If infant circumcision is legal for boys, it does not deflect from class struggle to demand it be outlawed. If a black is not permitted to sit in a bus it does not deflect from class struggle to demand they be free to do so. If an illegal immigrant is refused minimum wage it does not deflect…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 08:32 PM
4

"a few decades ago when men's superiority was more blatently enforced" This is a false feminist narrative. There was no such time and most men's rights advocates reject this historical revisionism. Men have always been subject to strict and harmful gender roles, some worse than those applied to women, and while women have been freed of many of their gender role restrictions, this has been less so for men. MRAs in general seek to free men of harmful gender roles not keep them as wage slaves and e…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 07:38 AM
4

Only that regarding interpartner violence lesbians are the highest risk category and gay men the lowest, based on UK government stats
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:15 PM
7

Very good. So testosterone does not necessarily make men more competitive nor aggressive, rather more resilient, which is beneficial in the face of a competitor or an aggressor. My experience of people shows men and women are relatively similar in expressions of anger, violence and hostility. In general men express this more often in situations where they can face disadvantages, such as sport, relationships with women and crowd conflict, such as strikes, team support or demonstrations opposed by…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:46 AM
44

It is complex. Consider the evidence that the spread of the distribution of males in measurement of most attributes or behaviour is wider. This will place more men at the extreme antisocial end of the spectrum than women. This could have a biological root in the reduced risk to reproduction of testing genetic mutation more in males. It could also have a social driver, if our treatment of males is more harsh. Then more men would be driven to high achievement to seek acceptance and more males woul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 08:32 AM
8

I mean that the powers that be fail to respond to the difficulties boys are having in education or the lack of male teachers. While if it were girls being left behind it would be a major crisis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 02:47 PM
23

I would include education drop out, exclusion and performance rates, and failure to respond
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 04:37 AM
5

The laws are not responsible for this. The laws reflect the societal bias. They also of course reinforce and amplify the punishment of men and enable male victimisation.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:34 PM
3

You do not need to advocate violence. You advocate revolution, i.e., expropriation of capital, democratic organisation of the means of production and all other social institutions. In response the state and their agents will likely launch violent and nonviolent reactions. You advocate and prepare defence against these reactions. This may include plans to neutralise armed forces and police forces, preferably by appealing to our common interests, but if necessary forcibly disarming and detaining a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 08:32 AM
7

It isn't about TV. Politically killing men who oppose US imperialism is celebrated. It could be Germans, black Africans in Tarzan, Japanese soldiers, any enemy can be killed with impunity in a drama, so long as they are male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 12:06 PM
24

Not sure it is true that media discourages all forms of violence except female on male violence. It is celebrated where males are an outgroup, such as Taliban, Iraqi conscript army, or the sodomy of Gaddafi by bayonet. Prison rape is also often accepted as an element of male punishment, as if removal of liberty is insufficient retribution in itself. Rob Ager does a very good analysis of Private Ryan as a pro-war movie, in which violence against the enemy is relished, while violence against US tr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 06:58 AM
8

Given he is in school, he could mention higher exclusion and drop out rates from school, lower pass rates at 16, lower enrollment rates at university, and studies showing gender bias in coursework assessment by teachers, vs blind tests.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:37 AM
11

CityCrusher video critiquing the Wall Street Journal article on the record low proportion of men in US universities
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/21 06:01 AM
2

First of all men do not have as many rights as women. Men do not have the right not to be conscripted, in the many countries that still do so, nor not to register for the draft. Men have less reproductive rights, they cannot choose whether to be a parent independent of a woman's choices, but can be obligated by force of law to pay for a child for many years that they may not want. Women can give a child up after birth with no further obligation. There is more. Men do not have the same rights to …
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:45 PM
87

Republicans are also anti male and both parties are anti working class. Time to support a party that will promote medicare for all, increase the minimum wage, stop the wars, end homelessness, support unions and tax the rich. If you can find a candidate that is pro male, good luck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/21 04:49 AM
5

This video includes a very good analysis of emotional labour, and makes a compelling case that men in fact do the vast majority of unpaid (or compelled uncompensated) emotional labour. https://youtu.be/VJHf3dPiTxk - a very good youtuber, who unfortunately has been inactive for a few years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/21 05:51 AM
1

Cannot vote. Adding "any system of equality" makes the question meaningless as there are infinite options.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 06:38 AM
8

Not sure it is men's advocates responsibility to advance women, but unlike feminists and traditionalists I do not think they should stop advocating for women, because we have it covered. However, mras promote the concept that women are not vulnerable nor discriminated against in most of society, so they can act with confidence and aspire, rather than wander around in fear or with a chip on their shoulder. Mras advocate for more parental and caring opportunities for men, freeing women from the 'b…
/r/MensRights13/01/21 08:37 PM
1

None of the above
/r/MensRights09/01/21 08:16 AM
9

The situation for many men is muslim majority countries is also extremely bad. Feminism is a female advocacy ideology of false misandrist premises like patriarchy theory with female oppression for the collective benefit of males, and female victim, female pedestal fetishes. Such ideology is harmful and thus should not exist, but like religions and many bad political ideas, Feminists should have the right to hold these beliefs and express them. On the other hand women in all countries have many r…
/r/MensRights08/01/21 01:05 PM
3

Except when there is a conflict between two parties there is a zero sum outcome. Some disputes can be between people of alternate gender. For example in child custody or child support disputes more time or money can be at the expense of the other. Currently, in parental autonomy the woman's right to choose is at the expense of the man's right to choose. And in legal applications reducing gendered discrimination can negatively impact the other gender. The right to a fair trial in rape accusations…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/21 07:17 AM
6

Agreed. Responded similarly before I read your comment.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 06:49 AM
2

Respect for their comfort, their needs and their nurture. Unless you are a sociopath why would you not? We may have a semantic issue. Respect incorporates civility, patience, empathy and other mutually beneficial relationships, it also includes esteem and obedience. Esteem and obedience should have to be earned, and I do not expect to show my infant obedience nor esteem.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 06:46 AM
3

'Getting in my face' would be one of those actions that should lose my respect. Depending on power relations it may elicit fear or contempt, but that is not respect. I think civility is an example of respect. As is esteem. The latter must be earned, although in our society it is not always earned fairly, but the former should be the default entitlement until you earn its withdrawal by your actions.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 06:38 AM
18

In a healthy community everyone is worthy of respect on first acquaintance. The loss of respect should be earned by your actions and interactions. Only a sick society would have a default of disrespecting its citizens. Do you not respect your babies? They can hardly have earned it.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 09:16 PM
15

Male only conscription to the Finnish army is obviously sexist against both genders. I would not argue it is due to misandry or misogyny, but it clearly hurts men more in terms of loss of liberty, physical and emotional stress and has benefits to the male victims in terms of fitness and overcoming adversity. It infantilises women, but gives them a head start in education and employment. But to consider this 'benevolent sexism' against women is to misframe a negative imposition on men. A more mis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/21 11:32 AM
2

I suspect you may be being unfairly misinterpreted. I assume you refer to the medical use of adult foreskins after surgery, rather than their use to the adult and their partners when still attached 🤔
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/20 08:56 AM
3

A quick look at their execs and board at on the line, who actually provide the services, didn't raise any red flags. Amongst their funding partners 1800respect definitely use both genders as examples of sexual abuse victims, so perhaps they are balanced. Mensline do not specifically mention domestic violence as a mens issue, although they mention help with relationships.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 09:47 AM
0

OK, had to look it up first as not familiar with it. And as I suspected, it is feminism not Marxism. If you are talking about university, then yes Feminism is taught in many arts and social science courses, but that is not Marxism, which explains history and struggle in terms of economic class relations. Marxism is probably taught in a few less common courses at a minority of universities and may also be misrepresented in many feminist and postmodern studies. It is not taught in schools, where c…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 06:19 PM
4

As with many matters in gender relations, the expression is obviously sexist, but its use is not necessarily a bad thing. That depends on context. That the expression is short hand for a set of behaviours we expect of one gender and not of the other reflects a harmful sexism towards both genders, particularly males. Masculine and feminine traits can be harmful or beneficial to the individual or to their community depending also on context. Manning up is often a positive trait, in that it encoura…
/r/MensRights17/11/20 06:33 AM
12

Marxism is not being taught in schools. You are delusional. Men can be masculine or feminine as long as they are healthy and have a fulfilling life.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 08:41 PM
4

Firstly, Snowden, Assange and Manning are heroes, who should be exalted around the world for exposing war crimes and abuse of power by the most powerful. Your use of cross dresser as a slur on top of this completely inverted view of the bigger issues makes you the mockery, not your target. I do suspect the optics of persecuting a trans woman contributed to the decision to release her, which would not have happened if she hadn't transitioned. However, the state will happily overlook the bad optic…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 09:10 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is a loaded expression, especially in the absence of any serious consideration of toxic femininity. In any case gender roles have positive and negative expression and consequences. Each role can also be negative or positive depending on context. More importantly to address the main question, the reason both genders kill men most is gynocentrism. From infancy we are taught to protect and respect women and girls and defer to their interests. Many men in anger will act out violenc…
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:33 PM
-1

You are seriously deluded if you think Marxists have ever had any power or influence in the UK Labour Party, or that any policy of any Labour Government (including 1945, which brought the NHS and welfare state, old age pensions) has ever threatened the interests of the ruling class. Margaret Thatcher introduced the national curriculum, which has undermined boys achievement at school, the Child Maintenance Service, which has demonized fathers and impoverished many, destroyed manufacturing to defe…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 08:08 AM
2

I would repeat the experiment and make sure the question is actually visible in the post. I assumed it was just a poll to find the gender identification of the sub community. So my response at least is erroneous data.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 07:49 AM
19

Not sure about left and right, as there are many self proclaimed lefties who I regard as nothing of the sort. I am a socialist, by which I mean the fundamental crisis facing society is the control of the economy and this politics by the less than 0.1% of the world richest people. Unemployment, poverty, homelessness, healthcare inequality, the rise of racism, identity politics and failure to address climate change can all be traced to the inability to use the world's resources to solve those issu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 03:09 PM
2

Cannot read the options - don't fit on the line
/r/MensRights09/09/20 05:32 PM
5

She strikes me as an anti-feminist. Her self-proclaimed feminism may be a convenient cloak to bash the faux left by criticising the woke positions of the corporatist liberal establishment from a conservative point of view. Any support for the interests of men coincide with bashing feminism. Find any examples of her advocating for public funding to house the homeless, provide refuges for abused men, paid parental leave for fathers, or taxpayers support for childcare instead of squeezing maintenan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/20 08:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter