TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

not-for-me19 Archive

View 1 post and 7 comments by not-for-me19 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Discussionnot-for-me19/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:22 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

See this is what I don’t get. An emotionally unhealthy person with another emotionally unhealthy person. Any emotionally healthy person wouldn’t choose an asshole. However, it’s when the girls complain about the guys they are with and are always talking bad yet still staying with them lies an issue. On another note, to go in with the mindset of people are only nice when they want something out of you is a really messed up viewpoint. I think most people that think like this forget that there’s mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:31 PM

The question is, would you be ok if the person you’re seeing isn’t okay with this and ends the relationship with you without you calling that person insecure/controlling/possessive? I have no problems with other people choosing to be in open relationships so as long as both people in the relationship consent, quite frankly it’s none of my damn business what other people do with their lives. Me being the monogamous person that I am both emotionally and physically, if a person that I’m seeing want…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:35 PM
1

Yeah and that is true. More standards you have less likely you are to have a lot of options. But I’ve seen a few relationships where people lower theirs and end up getting into one sided relationships and overlook the red flags and ultimately just end up being disrespected by people though and if they end up speaking up about it to their partner they get labeled controlling/possessive/insecure. At that point might as well just be single to begin with. This is sort of what I got from this post is…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 05:41 AM
1

Compromise is important yes. But, there are some things that aren’t worth compromising. If my only options are staying single or getting with someone that’s going to be a gold digger who would put minimal effort into a relationship, I’m staying single. There’s always going to be greener grass out there and I get some people aim too far high and ultimately fail in the end, but staying with someone who makes you completely miserable and who’s only into you because you have money or a place to stay…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 05:10 AM
3

I get that and that’s not what I’m implying. Maybe I’m reading it wrong or misunderstand what OP is saying but from what I’m reading it’s sounding like we should just accept and be with whoever regardless of who they are and having standards have become a bad thing. Yes, having standards does limit your options in the dating pool. The more standards you have the less options you’re going to have when it comes to dating. On the contrary, having no standards at all opens you up to people that will…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 01:04 AM
3

I would certainly say there’s a difference between standards and entitlement. Yes, we aren’t perfect. Yes, we aren’t all alike. However it’s reasonable to say that having low/no standards at all opens the doors up to getting someone who will take advantage of you like a gold digger or someone who will have NPD who will absolutely destroy your life. That’s why having standards are a good thing so you don’t get someone like that in your life. Also it’s been found consistently that relationships ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 12:07 AM
0

Huge difference between confidence and arrogance. The type of girl that OP described is textbook narcissism. These are the girls that besides their attractive looks will not be pleasant to be around and will most likely end up alone in life or with another person with narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 05:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter