TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nullibicity Archive

View 24 posts and 199 comments by nullibicity on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
237

nullibicity/r/MensRights10/05/11 01:22 PM
69

nullibicity/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:10 PM
50

nullibicity/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:08 AM
49

nullibicity/r/MensRights18/07/10 06:24 PM
47

nullibicity/r/MensRights04/03/10 01:07 PM
38

nullibicity/r/MensRights17/04/10 01:53 AM
23

nullibicity/r/MensRights03/03/10 03:55 AM
18

nullibicity/r/MensRights01/07/10 01:47 PM
16

nullibicity/r/MensRights22/01/10 03:28 AM
15

nullibicity/r/MensRights05/12/08 04:40 AM
14

nullibicity/r/MensRights11/06/10 02:43 PM
14

nullibicity/r/MensRights04/04/10 07:38 PM
14

nullibicity/r/MensRights02/03/10 12:13 PM
14

nullibicity/r/MensRights16/03/09 07:50 PM
13

nullibicity/r/MensRights24/11/08 11:41 PM
13

nullibicity/r/MensRights24/06/10 01:37 PM
12

nullibicity/r/MensRights11/06/11 02:09 AM
10

nullibicity/r/MensRights15/04/10 07:57 PM
7

nullibicity/r/MensRights13/12/08 04:53 AM
6

nullibicity/r/MensRights07/02/09 08:43 PM
6

nullibicity/r/MensRights02/03/10 01:05 PM
2

nullibicity/r/MensRights31/12/08 01:23 AM
1

nullibicity/r/MensRights24/11/08 12:00 AM
0

nullibicity/r/MensRights31/12/08 09:15 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

Then why won't they get rid of Nazis?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/19 07:41 AM
210

Wait, what?! I thought, "Well, I guess it's okay to have separate phone numbers for female victims and male victims—better than nothing." And then I read further.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:51 AM
0

If, on the rare chance that she doesn't, well, that'll just give one false hope.
/r/seduction08/12/13 04:58 PM
-2

Because she has a boyfriend. Because you may lose control of your bodily functions. Because her boyfriend may be responsible for your losing control of your bodily functions.
/r/seduction08/12/13 02:37 PM
20

Surely Twitter accounts have thoroughly researched sources, and can cite them easily—oops, out of characters!
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:52 PM
10

Depends where you shove it.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:50 PM
3

Wow, that's way out of line with what I would expect to pay. For that price, they better guarantee all your dreams will come true almost immediately.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:53 AM
2

I remember making those in the origami phase of childhood -- how, no, I don't remember that. I could probably make a box or paper plane but that's about it.
/r/seduction24/04/13 07:30 PM
13

Here, have a crumpled ball.
/r/seduction24/04/13 01:36 PM
3

I believe that's for obscenity charges. Yes, those can still happen.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:13 PM
7

Who knows, but a lot of women seem to, or at least, that's a popular archetype.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:13 AM
1

But there's also an argument that not all individual desires are equally important, especially if they are damaging to other people and the larger community in the long run. Marriage is encouraged by the government supposedly because it confers benefits and creates stability.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:12 AM
1

Ah, okay. Yeah, you should try that, since you already made a connection. Don't wait too long for her to forget you!
/r/seduction05/08/12 12:38 PM
1

This is great, provided you can find girls your own age to talk to in a store. I almost never see anyone who isn't an elderly man or woman, or a stressed mother too busy trying to keep her kids together to talk. I guess most people buy everything online these days.
/r/seduction05/08/12 12:19 PM
1

I want to believe that it's fake. Who knows these days.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:07 PM
3

I never underestimate the ignorance of pro-circumcision people -- they're often serious.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 10:22 AM
2

Nice try, ALF.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:57 AM
4

Uh, what are you talking about? If you mean a trojan horse to get people thinking of males as worthy of human rights, you're right.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:47 AM
4

What part of being sentenced to time in prison implies that you may or may not be subjected to rape? How is that justice and not cruel and unusual punishment?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:22 AM
14

The problem is no one else does, amirite?
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:34 AM
2

Sure, they have the major magazines, but how many grocery stores have literary journals, obscure music magazines, thick fashion ad books, foreign magazines, and Playboy and Penthouse? Even the dedicated "newsstand" in my nearest mall has stripped down their magazines, no longer carrying the "adult" ones.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:01 PM
5

For some people, Barnes and Noble is the only place to browse current magazines. Amazon doesn't have that feature.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:54 PM
1

Is Deadmau5 an it?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:57 PM
12

For that video, crying is a correct response, coupled with furious anger.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:30 PM
5

There are adult men who still don't understand circumcision, or what they lost, or that certain reactions that they consider normal are the side effect of circumcision. I don't know if that was the case here, but it's not completely absurd to discover something about yourself years after an incident.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:52 PM
1

Ah, just checked on karmadecay.com -- should've known.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:12 AM
1

I think TwoX would appreciate this.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:30 AM
1

It was a different time. And yet, some people still have no problem with it.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 08:01 PM
1

Is it too much to ask to live the life you want to live, do the things you like to do and be attractive? Apparently so. "Being yourself" as the path to happiness is such nonsense, unless you think being alone makes you happy.
/r/seduction09/08/11 06:35 PM
0

This is what I'm getting at. How many times do we hear be authentic, be true to yourself? What if your true self is someone no one's attracted to? Then what are you supposed to do?
/r/seduction09/08/11 06:30 PM
2

So become a different person, then maybe someone will take an interest? What a wonderful lesson!
/r/seduction09/08/11 02:55 PM
51

Upvote for daring to ask how to work these situations, rather than the usual "Hey, look at this pathetic beta lol!"
/r/seduction04/08/11 02:03 AM
1

Investigations like this are for show, to show that authorities are trying to do something without actually doing something. They can go back to their constituents and say, "Well, we tried."
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:53 PM
3

Yes, "ladies" used to mean women with some sense of manners; there is no sense in which Sharon Osbourne is a lady in that clip.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:30 AM
2

Downvoters, please explain yourselves.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 02:42 AM
5

Umm... yeah, that girl? Not worth being a liar for.
/r/seduction07/07/11 01:00 AM
4

Yeah, but that requires work, man -- work is hard.
/r/seduction05/07/11 01:56 PM
3

Unfortunately, some MRAs are not so much pro men's rights as they are anti feminists.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 03:04 AM
5

Infant circumcision is the big qualm because they don't have a say in the matter; adults should have the right to permanently alter their genitals if they choose, but no one should choose to force a child to undergo a dangerous and unnecessary procedure, especially to fit some aesthetic ideal.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 03:03 AM
2

More Jews should speak out against circumcision. I read some Reform Jews no longer practice it. It is interesting that modern circumcision removes more tissue than the original version mandated.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 12:37 PM
7

It's supposed to crush your spirit enough to be a compliant corporate drone who doesn't question the status quo.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:31 PM
23

Getting used to double standards and nonsense doesn't mean we shouldn't point it out and protest it when we can.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:30 PM
3

This particular rage comic, however, is relevant here; crossposting relevant material is good for Reddit.
/r/MensRights30/03/11 01:43 AM
2

Turns out sunlight causes skin cancer. Better safe than sorry.
/r/seduction21/02/11 12:18 PM
-8

P.S. Some people you wave to will be gang members who will shoot you in response, or serial killers who will take your signal and follow you home to murder you later.
/r/seduction21/02/11 03:49 AM
3

If you want it to be okay to touch someone you just met, be attractive. Don't be unattractive.
/r/seduction21/02/11 03:43 AM
0

Wow, you must be a great catch to dismiss guys so easily.
/r/seduction24/01/11 03:39 AM
0

Good for you, sir. If only it were as simple as you say.
/r/seduction19/01/11 11:39 AM
2

No kidding. She could be perfectly nice, but just never got involved in relationships. The above paragraph makes it sound like all females are unstable wrecks until their first boyfriend breaks them in.
/r/seduction27/12/10 12:21 PM
2

Curious -- what tells you she's not worth the trouble?
/r/seduction27/12/10 03:10 AM
9

Who explicitly called you sexist? Just because you corrected a colleague who happens to be female does not make you sexist; he could've issued his phrase if the new hire were male. The situation you described all depends on how you handle it; you can gently help out a struggling colleague or you can rip control of a meeting out from under her. I would've probably done what you did, but also explained to your boss that, given that the employee is new, you naturally wanted to help her feel support…
/r/MensRights26/12/10 03:29 AM
4

You sound like a poor friend.
/r/seduction04/12/10 12:25 PM
11

Pics or it didn't happen.
/r/seduction28/11/10 12:44 PM
3

That's just cruel -- even more so if you are female.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 02:49 PM
2

Sex toys are illegal in some parts of the US even today.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 02:48 PM
8

Followed by stale stupid commentary about what we just saw by people who can no longer play the game -- it's the BEST part of sports, you know.
/r/MensRights15/09/10 11:22 AM
2

redditor for 20 hours Mad at a troll? No, just sad for you. Enjoy your downvotes.
/r/MensRights05/09/10 03:16 PM
2

The article was not about absentee fathers; it was about alimony. Further, it mentions that women sometimes pay alimony, and profiled one such case. I agree that parents should play a part in their children's lives, but that is irrelevant to the point of someone paying their ex-spouse money not meant for childcare.
/r/MensRights20/07/10 02:51 AM
1

But is it possible to get the benefits of marriage -- married men apparently live longer, for one thing -- without getting married?
/r/MensRights04/07/10 09:12 PM
2

I think male on male sexuality is seen as "disgusting" in a way that female on female sexuality isn't. Male sexuality in general is seen as disgusting, while all female sexuality, at least in Western societies, is seen as empowering.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 05:31 PM
1

I never knew this story then -- am I entitled to get angry now?
/r/MensRights01/07/10 02:03 AM
1

Thanks, that is actually informative.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 02:01 AM
0

I admit I didn't read through the huge amount of comments, but the writer's a troll, right? It's too over the top to be real, especially from this decade.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 02:02 AM
1

But you can feel shame about it, or at least not celebrate it, like some gold diggers do.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 03:06 AM
2

Note that you're telling this to a guy with low self-esteem who says he's never been on a date. Not putting any effort into doing something out of his ordinary routine probably isn't going to help him.
/r/seduction19/06/10 07:45 PM
1

What's the setting of the date? Have you ever gone to such a setting alone or with other people? Start from there.
/r/seduction19/06/10 07:16 PM
1

Women can go topless in some places in America.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 11:14 AM
2

You are in a rare situation.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 11:13 AM
-5

But I don't really have a sister, and I don't intend on actually buying anything. So you were going to lie? Wow.
/r/seduction08/06/10 12:59 PM
-5

Too bad I don't own any jeans.
/r/seduction01/06/10 08:45 PM
4

I'd like to think it's in the "too horrible to be true" category, but these days, who knows?
/r/MensRights18/05/10 02:52 AM
4

The latter are more accurately called misandrists, and besmirch the spirit of original feminism.
/r/MensRights13/05/10 10:41 AM
2

Or whatever I can find at my friend's party.
/r/MensRights07/05/10 07:46 PM
6

Right, there's nothing wrong giving a pointer to content relevant to a specific subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/05/10 08:31 PM
1

Except at the end of sentences.
/r/MensRights17/04/10 01:57 AM
2

Greek is far better than most shows on now.
/r/MensRights21/03/10 02:57 PM
21

Your attitude is part of the reason people mock male sexual harassment. Would you like it if you had to submit to a female you didn't find attractive in order to keep the only job you could get, and then as time goes on, she decides she's done with you and has you fired for sexually harassing her?
/r/MensRights04/03/10 04:21 PM
1

Yes, it is exasperating that in 2010 human rights are still denied.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 02:14 AM
5

The coverage seems biased against the bill; most of the comments don't help.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 04:06 AM
2

When cutting the hair on your temples becomes a permanent loss of healthy, functional tissue, you will have an argument. Right now, not so much.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 02:34 AM
0

Involuntary doesn't mean we can't do anything to stop it: environmental factors play some role; it makes sense that stresses on a mother can have an impact on whether her fetus survives.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 02:31 AM
5

Well, giving the evidence you've posted here and your posting history, the only thing insane about me seems to be that I'm trying to reason with a troll. I'm sorry I wasted my time with you.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 06:07 PM
11

I've seen all episodes but the last two. As I recall, it was eventually revealed he knew she was pregnant; the mother gave up the baby not knowing that the baby had a heart defect that made her unattractive to adoptive parents. Both of the biological parents showed up at the hearing on their own free will; because the daughter didn't have a job or residence, she was going to be sent back to foster care, but with the parents there, the judge made the decision to give them temporary custody -- une…
/r/MensRights02/03/10 06:01 PM
8

It's not my business per se, but it's definitely their business when someone alters their bodies without consent. I hope for your sake they forgive you.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:37 PM
3

The billions of men who live and have lived without being circumcised puts the burden of proof on you.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:02 PM
12

Well, for those who are jealous, let them choose whether to do it, knowing full well the risks and negligible benefits, when they are adults. You can't tattoo your kid -- how about not cutting off a body part either?
/r/MensRights02/03/10 05:00 PM
5

You only think it's a slippery slope because breast cutting is not common. What if by the time the kid reaches maturity, an HIV vaccine is available, or what if he never has sex? You cut him for no reason. Also, condoms are far, far better at preventing HIV than circumcision is. And I guess you're cool with some forms of female genital mutilation -- say, just trimming the clitoral hood -- since it has culture behind it?
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:59 PM
8

Where would you draw the line? Should parents cut off their daughter's breasts to prevent the 1 in 7 chance she'll develop breast cancer? Personally, I draw the line where you're removing healthy, irreplaceable tissue without the patient's consent based on a minuscule chance of preventing conditions that will probably not happen, and if they do, there are other ways of treating or preventing them.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:42 PM
14

Uh, did you even read the bill? To me, it appears to ban medically unnecessary circumcision on minors and others who do not consent to it. Your statement, while true, has nothing to do with this issue: the government already legislates what you can do with someone else's body (assault, murder, etc), so why can't it protect children from overzealous "doctors" and ignorant parents?
/r/MensRights02/03/10 02:28 PM
1

Check out the usual ignorant attacks in the comments -- although there are at least some reasonable people posting there.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 02:49 AM
1

Now's your chance, I guess?
/r/MensRights24/02/10 02:52 AM
3

Also, pray that the police believe that you are the victim.
/r/MensRights24/02/10 02:11 AM
8

Polygraphs should be off-limits for everyone, as they are at best meaningless and at worst complicit in getting innocent people convicted of crimes. They don't accurately identify liars, and anyone who advocates for them should be looked at as if he advocated phrenology or casting bones to determine guilt.
/r/MensRights24/02/10 02:10 AM
2

Heh, yeah. He should just realize that there is no hope, and love is a lie.
/r/seduction14/02/10 04:32 PM
1

I've read 1 in 4 for women, but who knows what the real number is.
/r/MensRights01/02/10 02:48 AM
6

One could argue circumcision is a sexual selfishness issue when someone says "Well I had it done to me and I still like sex" or "Girls like it better" as reasons to circumcise your son: Both are cases in which the boy's control over his own genitals is considered less important than the desires or beliefs of others.
/r/MensRights08/01/10 03:31 AM
0

Try withholding sex until he wises up.
/r/MensRights07/01/10 09:33 PM
3

And the media says he probably deserved it.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 01:53 AM
3

But the question remains whether women exist who will want you when you start being who you really are....
/r/MensRights06/01/10 01:49 AM
2

The wedding's off!
/r/MensRights19/12/09 09:32 PM
5

Hopefully she's joking.
/r/MensRights19/12/09 04:02 PM
2

And why is it okay to have a sex offender registry that stigmatizes people for life, but there's no arsonist registry, or drunk driver registry, or baked goods thief registry?
/r/MensRights17/12/09 11:44 PM
14

Biological differences were also once used to oppress women (and minorities for that matter). It wasn't too long ago that the majority would have said, "Men have the brains to vote and run for office, women don't. That's life and if you can't deal with it, go back to the kitchen." Justifying injustice by appealing to biological differences, real or imagined, is a cop-out.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 04:01 AM
3

Um, I think the blogger may be reading more into that than is present: sometimes an ad is just an ad, and some men prefer Asian women.
/r/MensRights21/11/09 12:45 PM
3

And neither was David Letterman, intentionally. As pointed out when that happened, most lame jokes about Palin's daughter assume the daughter in question is the one who got pregnant, because she's the most well-known one with the public. It would make no sense for him to joke about a daughter who has no notable public connection.
/r/MensRights21/11/09 12:40 PM
10

Eh, but there are dissenters, and then there are trolls. I am not familiar with any banned users or their posts, but if there are people who continually add nothing but conflict to every thread, I can see why one might ban them.
/r/MensRights10/11/09 09:44 PM
9

Hey y'all, let's stereotype based on one person's experience!
/r/MensRights03/11/09 09:51 PM
2

Depends if your wife is a princess, I reckon.
/r/MensRights26/10/09 02:16 AM
3

Of course they do -- life would be difficult, if not impossible, without objectification. Wouldn't you have to get to know everyone as a person otherwise?
/r/MensRights22/10/09 04:56 PM
7

What, that he doesn't want oral or anal cancer, or that he doesn't want to infect his partners? Yeah, who could comprehend such insanity?!
/r/MensRights16/10/09 03:15 AM
71

And so ends the tale of how the four-year-old went to war.
/r/MensRights08/10/09 07:53 PM
2

If you can't handle a circumcision as an adult, what are you doing forcing it on a defenseless little child who feels pain much more intensely? I agree with NurseLisa's comment.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 03:08 AM
4

Try being a man working stock in a women's clothing store. It could be worse, but every so often there is sexism, whether it be more physical labor expected, or jokes about how ignorant I am of fashion (it's not because I'm male; it's because I don't care), or the belief that I can see through closed fitting room doors and have no control over my sexual urges.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 10:33 PM
1

The responsibility of bearing and nurturing a child (up to a certain age) is not equally split between males and females, so you cannot expect the laws to be completely symmetrical in this respect. Maybe not bearing, but nurturing a child is the responsibility of both parents under the law, is it not? Once the child is born, why wouldn't the laws be symmetrical for both?
/r/MensRights29/08/09 02:30 AM
15

That's terrible and sexist, but on another note, is it not a crime if a "rapist" penetrates someone with a vibrator?
/r/MensRights20/08/09 11:30 AM
4

I wonder if those who killed Emmett Till also tried to justify their actions by saying he whistled. It's 2009 -- you shouldn't be able to get away with assault because the victim may or may not have whistled.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 10:02 PM
42

Sounds like more of the "female sexuality is fun and empowering, male sexuality is dirty and dangerous" myth. As cdwillis commented, the two scenarios reviewed aren't similar, and it's clear the writer is biased.
/r/MensRights17/08/09 12:47 PM
3

Isn't this just what life is? Some people never realize what you've realized; if it's any comfort, at least you're ahead of them in that you're aware.
/r/seduction10/08/09 08:23 PM
0

Women... clean house -- I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights09/08/09 12:37 AM
20

Would it be okay if women preferred men with their left eyes cut out? It's wrong to alter your -- and especially your child's -- body to fit the ignorant preference of someone you may not even meet.
/r/MensRights26/07/09 03:24 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that was a troll, as I couldn't figure out what was said in that huge run-on chunk of nonsense at the end.
/r/MensRights18/07/09 03:20 AM
9

Sorry, couldn't get to the blue parts because some annoying twit kept interrupting.
/r/seduction15/07/09 11:05 PM
6

Most? I would say not; this isn't a widespread practice.
/r/MensRights12/07/09 06:43 PM
6

The fuss is just because it may or may not be natural, doesn't mean it's something we should encourage or be proud of. Humans can overcome urges and social constructs. Should we just accept that people kill people because life is a competition?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 01:31 AM
11

Authorities: "Oh, that must be the husband's, since women don't like seeing child abuse."
/r/MensRights01/07/09 08:37 PM
11

The men's movement has to start in the home, by raising children to be aware of gender inequalities and to speak out against them.
/r/MensRights24/06/09 02:59 AM
4

Not only sexist, but stupid -- what, they're going to reject perfectly good-looking biscuits because they didn't come from a fast food restaurant?
/r/MensRights22/06/09 10:45 AM
5

Moreso than someone who revels in violence.
/r/MensRights19/06/09 11:49 AM
10

Bullies and douchebags.
/r/MensRights19/06/09 03:46 AM
5

I can't imagine being fond of anyone who likes to fight.
/r/MensRights19/06/09 03:46 AM
2

Perhaps you can use these books as teaching moments: Real animals don't talk or act like humans. Another difference is that human fathers can take care of their children as well as human mothers.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 12:07 PM
22

Stay classy, that acquaintance -- why even pretend to pay? Oh, because you don't want to show the guy that he's just a meal ticket? Yeah, save that until later on, when you've acquired enough from him to upgrade to a better income source.
/r/MensRights06/06/09 03:43 AM
3

Perhaps part of the solution is to know how infrequent kidnappings by strangers are, rather than by people the child knows. Don't assume that all men are kidnappers or pedophiles, and speak out against people who assume that.
/r/MensRights31/05/09 03:11 AM
3

They gain better lives for their fathers, brothers, boyfriends, husbands, and sons: all the males in their lives who deserve to have their rights as males and as humans respected.
/r/MensRights15/05/09 02:37 AM
2

Male, though I don't think that should validate or invalidate my comments. And you?
/r/MensRights30/04/09 11:28 PM
3

I'm sorry you lived a wild, jungle-like childhood; mine was pretty bad too but even then I could see that others had it far worse. I choose to believe some of that chaos could be mitigated by proper adult involvement and instruction. Have you ever read "Lord of the Flies"? Do you think that is a fairly accurate depiction of what would really happen in that situation? Yes, perhaps. This is why we don't let children rule; adults are needed to keep them in check. And by the way, I would say if you …
/r/MensRights30/04/09 08:47 PM
0

Yes, Ocin dared to disagree, a crime punished by anonymous downvotes that also add nothing to the "discussion" because few downvoters bother to comment on why they're downvoting.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 08:42 PM
3

Why do you have so little faith in males? By assuming the worst, you reaffirm the view that boys (and later men) are naturally violent animals, and society should treat them as such. We have civilization and education to guide children to be better than that.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 06:32 PM
1

I'm baffled by these downvotes; I can only guess it's because I dared to question that all little boys have the same interest in stereotypical "boy" things. If not, someone tell me.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 06:28 PM
-1

I hope when her boys are ready and interested, she lets them play football and watch GI Joe and buys them race cars to play with. "When"? How about "if"? Sure, she should allow these things if the kids show an interest, but, to build from what you've said, there is a lot to being a man, and it's more than fulfilling stereotypes.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 03:28 AM
3

And why can't it be that a male perpetrator is looking for the same type of relationship, rather than just sex?
/r/MensRights30/04/09 01:24 AM
1

True, that would have made it less ethically murky.
/r/MensRights09/04/09 02:53 AM
2

Yes, I've heard of spouses or girlfriends harvesting sperm from dead men, but a mother doing that sounds like a new one.
/r/MensRights08/04/09 08:40 PM
3

How do you know what his wishes were? I'm not disagreeing that the mother has problems (it's probably likely and understandable), but she may know more about his wishes than you do.
/r/MensRights08/04/09 08:38 PM
5

I wonder what would happen if all circumcised boys began suing their parents and doctors, claiming negligence by people who should have known better than to mutilate a defenseless child.
/r/MensRights29/03/09 10:02 AM
9

Um, I guess for you, the cake was not a lie. Sorry.
/r/MensRights18/03/09 01:11 AM
11

You know if it were women on the leash the ad would appear in the No Comment section of Ms. Magazine, where "offensive" ads are reprinted with addresses you're supposed to write complaint letters to.
/r/MensRights03/03/09 05:10 PM
6

Not all feminists hate men either.
/r/MensRights17/02/09 04:12 PM
5

The reason I would like to see this is because there would be a potential victim who actually exists, rather than a sting operation set up for tv ratings and to charge men with thought crimes against imaginary teenagers.
/r/MensRights13/02/09 08:50 PM
1

Only false by a matter of degrees, taking the logic of the comment and extending it to reveal how ridiculous said logic is.
/r/MensRights08/02/09 03:42 AM
2

Hulk smash double standard!
/r/MensRights01/02/09 09:12 PM
3

"If you were really sorry, you'd make amends."
/r/MensRights03/01/09 10:07 PM
1

Thanks, I only recently saw it on the front page of this reddit, and it's fixed now.
/r/MensRights01/01/09 02:08 AM
9

And why do you suppose it would hurt? Could it be that you're not meant to cut it off?
/r/MensRights22/12/08 04:06 AM
4

"If I ever have a son I don't think I would have him murdered but I think this decision should be left to the parents. Asking the government to ban more things is usually not a good idea."
/r/MensRights22/12/08 04:04 AM
10

I'd like to hear from the circumcision apologists on this one -- you know, the ones who dismiss the pain as insignificant.
/r/MensRights21/12/08 11:47 PM
4

How do you test for those standards, and how do you know the potential someone is truthful about not being a sociopath?
/r/MensRights14/12/08 01:38 PM
11

Disgusting. How can any educated person say something like that? People are afraid to say that kind of stuff anymore. Afraid, or too compassionate to think that killing off people because of their sex is a noble idea?
/r/MensRights06/12/08 07:52 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights06/12/08 02:23 AM
0

But women often look hot in jeans or shorts.
/r/MensRights06/12/08 02:23 AM
7

What man doesn't want to get dressed up enough to pass some arbitrary standard for the right to pay to be admitted to a dark, loud, crowded place that doesn't want him there?
/r/MensRights05/12/08 04:47 AM
3

Not everyone has the same coping ability; it would serve the public good if more people talked about this issue, because then boys might be more likely to get treatment if they need it, and they'd be less likely to become abusers themselves. Yes, I know not all who are abused go on to abuse others, but it is a risk factor.
/r/MensRights28/11/08 02:40 PM
2

In order for the cops or anyone to know if there have been multiple incidents, there must be a record, and if there's a record, it's quite likely that it will be used against the accused when he applies for certain jobs and perhaps other things that involve a background check. Cops sometimes have their own agendas and prejudices when it comes to domestic violence as well (e.g. the man must be guilty, women never lie or commit abuse).
/r/MensRights25/11/08 03:10 AM
3

If there is no evidence of wrongdoing, the record should be wiped -- end of story. What justice can there be when a guy has this hanging over his head just for dating a crazy sociopath?
/r/MensRights25/11/08 02:47 AM
1

I favor the National Gamete Donor Registry mentioned in this article, but for it to be effective, it should be mandatory.
/r/MensRights24/11/08 12:02 AM
6

Could this be true? It's structured perfectly to exude tragedy.
/r/MensRights23/11/08 06:21 PM
1

Is it worse for the child to feel genetically adrift with a nebulous history, or the donor who may be inconvenienced? I'm not sure, though in some cases getting to know a biological parent enriches both parties; sometimes finding that parent and knowing that they don't want to know you or they're not as great as you'd hoped provides closure as well.
/r/MensRights29/10/08 08:04 PM
1

Do you really think that sperm donations will decrease significantly if total anonymity isn't guaranteed, enough that it will affect supply? I posit that any donor who would demand total anonymity is perhaps not the sort of person who has thought out the consequences of donation, and therefore should not be a donor. Can you at least see the value of regulation, with a standard database that all licensed facilities would use? At least then one could see that Donor 92471 with such-and-such genetic…
/r/MensRights29/10/08 02:42 AM
2

I agree about the medical and racial facts, but why shouldn't they be allowed to know the sperm donor's identity? Would you at least allow them to know their half-siblings, so they don't end up having sex with them? It's a real possibility.
/r/MensRights28/10/08 10:33 PM
3

"...in bed?"
/r/MensRights28/10/08 12:41 PM
3

So this is how misogynists are born? I've certainly read of similar cases where daughters grow up to be misandrists because of what men (or one man) did to their mother.
/r/MensRights16/10/08 11:51 PM
2

Wow, software that helps you discriminate. What a concept.
/r/MensRights10/10/08 08:08 PM
7

Do you know how many men have been fooled into raising another man's child? The numbers are not insignificant; I saw one report putting it at 1 in 25. Yes, children need fathers and some men are glad to do so, but men should be able to give informed consent in that situation.
/r/MensRights10/10/08 04:08 PM
2

What if the kid has an inexplicable disease that would be explained if the doctors were able to genetically test the biological father?
/r/MensRights10/10/08 02:44 PM
7

All fathers should have a paternity test. You wouldn't get married without a prenuptial agreement; why would you accept an 18-year-long responsibility for a child without proof? Sometimes women lie, and if you find out years later, the law is usually not on your side.
/r/MensRights10/10/08 03:06 AM
7

Whether he's hot or not with women has no bearing on whether he's right to point out discrimination.
/r/MensRights30/09/08 05:22 PM
2

You raise an interesting question for which I don't have an answer. Keep asking such questions in spite of the inevitable downvotes.
/r/MensRights24/09/08 11:05 PM
2

This is not surprising. Of course there would be greater chance to pass on genetic infertility.
/r/MensRights21/09/08 04:39 PM
1

When he said that, I knew it would show up in this subreddit. I'm that good.
/r/MensRights29/08/08 10:40 PM
2

Well, O.J. was convicted in the civil trial, so the relatives were entitled to get money from him, though he said he had none. In this case, have any of the falsely accused sued her? If not, they should, and thus get whatever profit she makes from the book.
/r/MensRights25/08/08 12:31 PM
9

Is the title of the book going to be "If They Did It"? Why is she allowed to profit from ruining people's lives?
/r/MensRights24/08/08 11:02 PM
2

A sub's dream realized, I guess, though it is troubling that women would choose to be just as stubborn as some male rulers.
/r/MensRights15/08/08 09:23 PM
0

Don't you think it's misandry (and misogyny) when a culture decides genitals must be pixelated? Talk about self-hatred!
/r/MensRights08/08/08 02:12 AM
12

"Visual sexual aggression"?! Stop, just stop. Isn't this the same sort of nonsensical, trumped-up charge bigots used to lynch black men who may or may not have looked at a white woman? Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights08/08/08 02:05 AM
1

Things are changing, though. It seems like it's getting more acceptable for women to get hit for laughs on TV, as long as it doesn't look too painful.
/r/MensRights05/08/08 09:41 PM
29

People who make false rape claims are dangerous; other people should be warned about them, not so much to shame the perpetrator (surely they have no shame), but to protect the public.
/r/MensRights03/08/08 01:36 AM
1

At first I thought, "Why is this posted to this subreddit?" but then I read the comments.
/r/MensRights30/07/08 02:59 AM
-2

Not to be insensitive, but I wonder if the child is the result of rape. It could explain her attitude.
/r/MensRights28/07/08 06:31 PM
3

I hope the whole fake family disappears from the media soon.
/r/MensRights26/07/08 05:05 PM
1

Perhaps there's something in Asian diets or cultures that negates soy's effects?
/r/MensRights24/07/08 07:39 PM
2

Gosh, look at all those "citation needed" tags!
/r/MensRights21/07/08 08:25 PM
2

Death penalty.
/r/MensRights20/07/08 08:00 PM
2

Naw, he's just enthusiastic. You're free to submit, if he doesn't submit first.
/r/MensRights20/07/08 03:11 AM
1

How sad.
/r/MensRights18/07/08 03:50 AM
6

Gosh, that's a high percentage! We should therefore work toward what's clearly a public good by removing children from the care of these females, or at the very least, sternly look upon any woman with a child and let her know we are watching suspiciously, just like so many have done in regards to men who dare care for children.
/r/MensRights18/07/08 01:40 AM
5

it's so hard being a man these days.
/r/MensRights15/07/08 02:24 PM
1

Absolutely. A DNA test is not just for the father's benefit; the child should know who his biological father is (or is not) for a more complete medical history. Perhaps a test upon leaving the hospital could even identify baby switching before years pass and switching back would be more painful.
/r/MensRights13/07/08 02:57 AM
3

I think Spike was supposed to be that. I doubt they'd cover battered fathers, however.
/r/MensRights06/07/08 02:21 PM
3

Pathetic. This person must've had hundreds of husbands to make such a sweeping generalization. Or, judging by the content on the rest of the blog, it's more likely we're dealing with someone who doesn't think clearly.
/r/MensRights05/07/08 05:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter