TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

olimpiandacho Archive

View 3 posts and 146 comments by olimpiandacho on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I didn't mean about you, sorry if you took it that way. I meant in general in the sub regarding the same topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 06:31 PM
1

And when I say this about women with the same thing I get atacked and harassed for "oppressing" women. Double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 02:43 PM
7

Yeah I just get atacked every time I say it because women here want to hear what they want to hear and not the actual truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 11:36 PM
1

Your point about divorce has nothing to do with the discussion at all and it is about the parents of the person which is something he/she didn't influence and had nothing to do with unlike having lots of casual sex which is a choice. On Reddit you will most of the time hear what people think is polite to say or politically correct to say because of the group mentality and that's why people are acting like sleeping around is socially accepted behavior. And no,it isn't in the US/UK or any other fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 11:35 PM
2

But it is an important part of compatibility which is why it matters. It shows a person's values and how they view sex and relationships. Most of the men who don't care don't care much about long term relationships either and that's fine too because it's a choice but it is relevant info for someone looking for a long term partner. Men who care about this are those who care about the relationship lasting and vice versa also nothing wrong about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 09:05 PM
1

I don't even live in a third world country which is Africa and Middle East and whatever not else that would include. When did I ever say I was for limiting women's freedoms by laws or something extreme as that? Women have freedom in many more places than US all across Europe and Asia/most parts of South America. I agree I assumed wrongly you are one of the extreme feminist types when I should not have and I apologize for it. I only get angry because I don't like women most of them being feminist…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:57 PM
1

Different values, different people, it's just that lot of women here insult the men because they don't live up to their values and feel atacked by them. If it doesn't matter to you why belittle men for whome it does matter and that's lots of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:24 PM
1

Sure if you mean just a casual relationship but I assume this was about marriage or LTR and there men care because it matters to them. It doesn't matter for people who don't care about marriage or LTRs anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:19 PM
1

Yeah sure men are terrible but the women are great. Womens freedom is completely missunderstood and butchered by the man hating feminists btw. Also don't speak for "women" implying all women as most women wouldn't agree with your extremist views especially non American liberal ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:16 PM
1

I don't think any of them would go for some unattractive overweight American anyway and your "third world" implies middle east if you even know where to find it on a map which I have nothing to do with anyway. You are angry at me for telling the truth about men caring and projecting your racist/insulting views of men onto me. Women get treated way better in lots of places than US where they are seen as replaceable sex objects because of the consumerist culture there but you wouldn't know about i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 08:07 PM
-2

Yeah because most men in the first world who don't care are hideous physically and are happy with whatever they can get. Also "first world" is hell for men who are family oriented and relationships are a mess with divorce rates sky high and infidelity of the charts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:52 PM
0

An exception to the rule doesn't mean it isn't true. Almost all men and especially those who have the ability to chose absolutely do care about sexual history and women here get angry and start insulting them for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:48 PM
1

I know and I support that but the truth is that women will ignore it in many more cases then men will. I haven't said no woman cares but it's not nearly as many as the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:28 PM
3

It doesn't matter if women don't care about his past history. It matters for men not to women hence a lot of guys can get away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:18 PM
6

It's not small. It's impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:16 PM
2

You take it then,but don't complain and cry when no one wants you as their partner later. Even the most promiscuous of men still differentiate women into fuck only and relationship category. You are going to forever be the first one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 07:15 PM
1

I agree completely with this view as a male but it's not common for males.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 05:45 AM
2

Because men want to settle down with a woman they respect above all else. Men lose respect if she was too easy to hook up with them and with others before them especially. Men value the "hard to get" women and respect them much more than all others because it implies they have much more value and worth. An ideal woman is a woman no one else can have and it is ingrained in the brain of any man with a shred of testosterone in his body along with possessive instinct of not wanting to "share her". T…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 11:02 PM
2

So I read a bit further into it and found links with some info but overly detailed for a full read but considering some of the rules I read I am expecting a ban any moment because I am a male as said previously. Anyways before I get banned I just want to say thank God there are at least some women on Reddit who understand feminism works against them and being feminine is a virtue and the most desirable trait you can have,at least if I understood that right. Kind regards.
/r/RedPillWomen19/03/22 09:58 PM
2

Well you said yourself anything is fine and nothing can or should be judged which implies what values exactly? There is a good quote on this because it's true. "He who accepts everything stands for nothing".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 09:16 PM
3

I understand your point,thanks for the chat as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 09:10 PM
2

Your world view is for men and women to have no standards or behavior,no values and no shame. You just get angry when people actually have a value structure because you have none. Having no value structure absolves you of any responsibility in life of having any virtue whatsoever and you hate people who do because on their value structure you fall short.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 09:08 PM
2

My point was simply that this is something that men care about while women care about different things mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 09:00 PM
1

That is exactly how your world view sounds to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:56 PM
2

It shows sex for her is unemotional and she treats people and has treated them as despensable sexual objects and that is how she has been treated as well in return considering you had sex with them without being in a meaningful relationship. It's pointless to speak further on the subject as it is clear you simply have completely different values than I do and probably most men who care about this. Just find someone with same values who agrees with your point of view but don't hate on people who …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:52 PM
4

No. Only liberal America would be extinct and is going towards it with it's fertility rates masked by increased immigration. Not all women in the world are US liberals thankfully,in fact the vast vast majority are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:45 PM
3

I would not be surprised if you people started humping trees in the future considering how you don't understand anything about the world and consider it all social constructs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:38 PM
1

It doesn't matter how I see them because I am not a woman. It only matters how their potential partners sees it but I see them as unreliable and extremely high probability of cheating. Some women surprisingly are willing to put up with that if the man is good looking/wealthy enough but men are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:36 PM
6

Oh so now I understand why you don't understand it then. That is definitely not the right logic and not how men think but go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:30 PM
3

No they definitely are not taught that and the fact that you believe they are shows you consume media too uncritically. Because her pair bonding ability is diminished,she has demonstrated ability to separate sex from emotion and treat people coldly even in such intimate settings and the probability of her cheating is much greater the higher her "n number" as is proven by studies. Also a bad example for future children and shows her values don't measure up to that of men who care about marriage a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:28 PM
3

I do not hence I don't pursue or engage in such behavior or even when offered by women. It is for that reason. Such behavior however just treats them as such and feminists mistakenly believe it is empowering them but it's doing quite the opposite. In general the "harder to get" the woman is the more I respect and want her and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:25 PM
2

Because it is deemening and she is likely to be a bad life partner,bad spouse and a bad mother based on her past. Can't believe I have to explain this to people here. Are you really all so brainwashed by liberal politics you have to be taught things every child in Peru knows at 10 years old?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:18 PM
4

Never said they were.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:15 PM
1

Don't bother OP, it's an American sub with almost exclusively far left liberal women in it so you won't be able to explain it to them. Most people in the world know this instinctively though without having to "learn about this in college gender class".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:15 PM
5

Only a woman with a high body count would judge you for not having a high body count. From the comment however it appears you didn't have sex not because you didn't want to but couldn't and that is of course off-putting to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:12 PM
3

This is about LTR and marriage. If you don't care about this for the woman you will start a family with you have some thinking to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:09 PM
2

I defend having standards and I shame having no standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:03 PM
2

Okay, that's a fair but it is only relevant if the woman actually cares about this as much as the man does. I think most do not and this sub confirms it. I agree with you but men tend to have this standard for LTRs and women typically have other standards and many more but this one much less ( of low number of sexual partners ) .
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:00 PM
8

Well a guy who commits to a woman other men didn't want to commit to is clearly inferior,I don't know why you try to constantly shift the blame onto the man for having standards but if that makes you feel better I guess go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:55 PM
5

Maybe I was, it's irrelevant however because even if I was or wasn't I wouldn't be the one to commit to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:53 PM
-1

Angry about men not wanting to be with women of high n count as they call it here because you believe it is somehow a result of women's oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:49 PM
-2

No. No one complains. Men who have any self respect whatsoever simply would never be with a woman with a high body count period and you are angry over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:45 PM
6

You are so nice you will marry a woman who was rammed by 30 other men in college and after by guys clearly superior than you who used her as a despensable sex object. Your niceness didn't do you much good then.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:44 PM
5

This is a SIMP 101 response. You are only acting nice to virtue signal,this is why no one likes "nice guys".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:35 PM
1

I don't know the type women you hang out with but the ones I know want only long term partners and none has ever wanted to go have sex with loads of people so not exactly no other choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:23 PM
1

I believe you don't quite understand male/female social dynamics as well as you believe and just prescribe most of it to some kind of oppression and victimhood of women which is just not the case. I am not speaking of stone age when I say traditional. I mean people who value family over other things in life and it's not for "poor, uneducated populations" actually quite the opposite. Women have the power to dictate social dynamics not men and this is what you don't understand. Women have much mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 03:21 PM
2

I don't think this is much of an issue for women in the US as it is expected in your culture. In family oriented men it is important and it's not only that he has to compete although that is part of the reason but also that she is honestly seen as less valuable partner due to past sexual experience. Some women hate when this is said but for women more sexual history is devaluing as it implies she is easy or was easy to men she had sex with and for men more sex is increasing their value as he is …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:01 PM
1

How much one cares depends on the type of person he is. If he is a family oriented man he will care greatly and look for family values in a woman ( and having lots of past sexual partners is not it ) A woman can enjoy sex without doing it with many people ( a couple of men she has had lots of sex with within relationships but that split off due to some differences is not the same as tons of sex with lots of different men ) Keep in mind that this standard is even more harsh in more traditional so…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 01:50 PM
2

Because you wrote a comment about women being oppressed in a thread that asked why women who sleep with lots of men are seen as less valuable. That implies that you believe the answer is female oppression and from that I concluded your stance is defensive of such women and thought you meant that empowered women will be above such restraints. I don't understand how women defend this type of female behavior on certain subs yet in real life are almost exclusively the ones condemning it much more th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 04:03 AM
1

Hollywood actors are barely relevant examples of anything resembling real life though. If anything he proved for everyone what everyone knew already that women like Amber were only trouble and nothing but trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:37 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:36 AM
2

Empowerment is telling women to be promiscuous and be proud of it? If anything that is exactly the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:35 AM
1

And then you have the right to not want to be in a relationship with such men? What is the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:31 AM
3

How about her inability to form meaningful human connections with people displayed by her past sexual behavior,her view of sex and her probability of being unfaithful and a bad spouse? Yeah must be because of small pee pee,right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:22 AM
4

How did that work out for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:08 AM
3

Wow that is so wrong and superficial this is hurtful to read. Just seem like your own way of coping. You have demonstratated just with this comment alone you a terrible choice of a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:08 AM
3

Want for sex? Yes. Want for something serious? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:04 AM
5

This is definitely not the issue here. If I knew all the men she had sex with were absolutely inferior to me in every way it would if anything be even worse to me and it still would matter greatly. Men don't want to marry promiscuous women, why is that hard for this sub to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 02:00 AM
6

For a LTR or marriage most men do not want her and find it very oftputing. It's because we are not comfortable ( most men not all especially in US ) investing into someone emotionally who we know many other men have had sex with. It is just something that is so incredibly off-putting about it and just innate in our nature as a marker for a bad/low value partner probably. Some are more lenient on this others are not but no man is indifferent to the potential mates sexual history. It really does m…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 01:58 AM
12

Because chastity has always been through out history and all cultures a necessary virtue for women. You will get all sorth of feminist responses here but it is like that for obvious reasons. Before they come for me have all the sex you want but don't complain when most men don't want to have a relationship with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 01:45 AM
8

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 05:44 PM
4

Yeah but how is she seen as top of the food chain is what I don't understand. How does she get to have such high standards in something she lacks in? To me it's like poor people who only want to marry millionaires. I am tall and this doesn't concern me directly but I found it to be hypocritical always.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 11:38 AM
6

It's just when 5'0 girls only want do date 6'0 and up that's weird to me. How is a 5'8 guy not tall enough for you if you are a 5'0 girl? I like shorter girls as well but too much height difference can be a bad thing imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 11:25 AM
6

I agree but too much difference is weird imo. A midget girl with a 6'3 guy is crazy to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 11:00 AM
6

And why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 10:47 AM
1

No. Thank God.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 01:37 PM
6

I have never said within marriage. I have said within a relationship and it should count for men too. Having sex with people you barely know with no emotion or attachment and treating the person as despensable tool is disgusting. But for men it's not the same as for women societally speaking in terms of casual sex for obvious reasons and I don't understand how some here pretend it's not the case. I can't believe how cheap sex is in US tbh and that's not a good thing however people try to spin it…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 07:01 PM
12

I have been to the US couple of times. I am fairly attractive have been offered sex fairly regularly literally without the women even knowing me but that's disgusting to me even though I am male. I have never liked American women simply because they come across as really cheap. It's a horrible dystopian society imo with a lot of mentally ill people being culturally accepted. Good to make money but that's about it. Make money and run as far as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:31 PM
10

Fair enough. American women really have a bad rep all over the world. But what's normal there is definitely abnormal everywhere else in the world. I can't believe a self respecting man would marry a woman who has had "slut phases" well again at least outside of US that holds true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:23 PM
12

Again. Maybe in liberal circles of Canada and United States but for the most part they don't. I honestly pity men who live in the shallow liberal hook up culture of US.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:18 PM
12

You pulled percentages out of your ass. Most women definitely don't have casual sex except in liberal parts of some Western countries. Some do but not most,most don't do it outside of relationships. Your perception is skewed by Reddit being a mostly American liberal platform, that's a tiny minority of worlds population.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:09 PM
-2

Women are free to sleep around if they want but then should not blame men for appreciating them less. It is devaluing. A woman who sleeps around is a low value woman by definition no matter how she looks. Most men will have sex with her but will only use her for sex and nothing else. That's how all non liberal weed addict men see it across the world and myself included. Come at me now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 06:01 PM
1

Oh I agree. I thought you said men at 35 look bad because of age.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 03:03 PM
1

What do you mean about 35 not passing looks threshold? It's certainly not old if that's what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 02:55 PM
12

Plenty of women date older men ( within reason ) and a lot of them find slightly older men attractive when young. Also wouldn't say it's universal. Only men who take good care of themselves usually age well which is not most men in my opinion. It seems to me that what you said can only be an advantage not a disadvantage. Much narrower age range ? How ? If anything it's a wider dating range not narrower. It's only narrow if you only date 24 year olds no matter your own age.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 02:48 PM
5

I think that's black pillers. Red pillers are the ones saying money/status are everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:36 PM
5

Meant in terms od short term flings mostly not long term relationships for the "pass" comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:19 PM
9

That's what men think. For women it takes a lot more to be "above average".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:12 PM
8

Yeah you can still improve looks a lot even if you are ugly by having a good phisique and being clean well groomed,nihilism definitely is the worst thing possible. But still back to the point though,women like good looking men first and foremost ( shocker ! ).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:10 PM
11

True but usually it's the more attractive the man is to a woman physically the more room for error he has and he can afford to fail in other areas. If a man is just on the borderline of acceptance he would have to excel in everything else to pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:06 PM
1

It's just that I assumed all that can be paid easily working 35 hours a week but I forgot how expensive US is. I agree with you, didn't think of the US price problems when discussing this. I just assumed what you meant is " If you are not driving Mercedes and rich you are trash " .
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 05:02 PM
30

Let's be honest. It's just unattractive mens coping mechanism because facing reality that something they can't influence greatly is the most important factor in dating and success with women would be too depressing for them. Easier to think it's because they don't know the magic word formula which some YouTube guru is going to teach them to make them irresistible.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 04:57 PM
0

That's all assuming I am American which I am not. Also men usually are put off by overly ambitious women and usually the more successful the woman the less of a chance for her to find a partner because her bar is too high. What you are describing illustrates the failure of American economic system and not that 35 hrs a week is lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 04:54 PM
133

What I can't believe is that a lot of guys actually think women don't care about looks or find it not that important somehow. "Men are visual creatures" LoL yeah as if women are blind.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 04:46 PM
1

Well if you are so empowered and successful then why do you need money from a man? Nothing wrong with working 35 hours a week and playing playstation, relax. I personally despise American workaholic ( life is money ) mentality but it that's what makes you happy go for it. If all women wanted and went only for rich people then there would be a vast majority of women with no life partners unless they would settle for being a side thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 03:16 PM
1

She will only have high standards if she is getting lots of male attention which is unlikely and feels she can do that,otherwise she would adjust. No one has high standards without feeling they can get away with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 09:28 AM
0

She could probably hold on to a man though,just not very rich successful good looking man which is what she is looking for almost certainly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 09:44 PM
1

Agreed. Great advice. Given my analytical nature I way over analyze every mistake I make for months or more to get to the root of it and prevent it later. It is why a mistake hits my brain very hard and I try to act in a way to minimize them often but when I do make them they hit like a train.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 09:17 PM
2

How can the woman get the benefits of marriage/LTR with out one. She literally can't. She wants love,bonding,partner,to feel secure (not in terms of money but a stability) etc. How can a woman have these without LTRs. Not all men and women are heartless psychopaths that calculate everything logically with out emotion for monetary and other gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 09:07 PM
2

I wouldn't agree that women aren't pursuing relationships though and sex is not the main motivator of relationship in women. It is the primary motivator for most men but for women it's definitely not ( most women ).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:54 PM
5

Casual sex not being shamed doesn't meann it is what most women are looking for. Way more men look for casual sex than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:39 PM
1

Great comment. I have been guilty of doing that in one or two occasions where I initiated but not having experience in being the initiatior I way overdid it and was doing what you described. The reason was because me being the initiatior (friends friend,was talked into it) made me feel like I was not on a date but in an interrogation room or trial and I had to impress her because I was the one calling her out not vice versa. In retrospect I am ashamed of it but nothing to do about it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:37 PM
4

Yeah. They believe in the idea foolishly that you can pick out any woman and she will sleep with you if you say their magic words. I have friends like this, it's insufferable sometimes listening to them talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:21 PM
2

Who is "they"? Because I definitely agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:11 PM
1

I do not think it's women's fault. In fact I have made a point to the contract actually that it is mens fault and women behavior is reactionary to that behavior. I agree deciding if a man appeals to her is fine absolutely but a man should do the same and not just go for her regardless of how she is just cause she looks good or ok but that is what most men do. I don't think being good looking is enough and women usually want something extra appealing about the guy which separates him from others.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:59 PM
1

Very interesting commentary. I would say I am suspectible of falling in love easily but not of being desperate for sex at all. What do you mean about not having to earn attraction? I understand physical attraction is there or isn't but do you mean in terms of other things as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:45 PM
1

So slim women are minority but slim men are average? How did you figure that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:42 PM
2

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:32 PM
2

What I meant by this is that women don't only want looks they want looks and character and personality and other things while men want looks and that's it. So it's fairly common imo still.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:25 PM
3

I fully agree with you. No one finds being pathetic as attractive nor should they.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:51 PM
2

Understandable. Still in modern times mens bioogy seems to be shooting ourselves in the foot a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:33 PM
2

I'm 6'1/6'2 and been into natural bodybuilding since 12 and have a great phisique. Also have a "pretty" face or so I've been told a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:25 PM
5

Worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:20 PM
3

I should have said this because it's very important but I forgot. I am from Eastern Europe which is the most hypergamy society imaginable. US is much much better on this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:00 PM
5

True enough. Everything comes with benefits and drawbacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:57 PM
2

I agree and realise this. I just do not feel comfortable being in a subpar position of being the one who has revieled my attraction to them in the beginning thus giving her the power in the dynamic. I don't find it natural for me to be the chaser even though I am a male but I agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:56 PM
16

The reason women get to have high standards has a lot to do with men having low standards. It's connected imo. They would have lower standards if there weren't men lining up for them just because they are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:49 PM
2

I agree I do not think such a thing is possible in practice of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:48 PM
5

I disagree. Low standards imply being low value by definition and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:45 PM
3

I completely agree. It is honestly sad that it is being marketed as normal and expected in today's world. You can't even say anything against it without being accused of being "old fashioned". I mean what's hard to get about me not wanting to be with a girl who casually has sex with strangers? I'm mind-blown how that is considered normal behavior in today's society.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:49 PM
1

I was just being honest. I don't think that you can say wanting slim girls is being unrealistic because it is the norm everywhere except the US and a few other countries. I agree though that for someone to want that they have to have it themselves. A fat out of shape guy not wanting to date out of shape women is a bit hypocritical. A slim guy wanting to date slim girls and that being his only standard is not at all unrealistic or picky imo. Would you agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:47 PM
4

Well judging from my opinion and that of every guy I have ever known ever No. Pretty much the only standard even my least picky friends have for a girl is that she is not "fat" or "chubby" so your theory is completely off imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 11:15 PM
6

What he said is something every single male I have ever met and myself included agree on. Sorry to disappoint you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:56 PM
1

Men always see the rejection as personal because how else would you see it. Women would also see it that way but experience it less often because most men are less choosy and have no standards and so enable it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:51 PM
1

Influence what you can in terms of looks. Eat well and workout to keep appearance as good as you can. You will find women you want who were shy when younger and didn't have boyfriends. And yes society really doesn't care about men who aren't beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:46 PM
1

The majority of the population absolutely needs the value structure set out for them though otherwise they can't function. Religions have a good bonding element to them on the people and communities that adopt them and are somewhat necessary to keep it together at least in the cultural sense. You do not have to take everything literally but also should have respect for people who chose to do so. It has nothing to do with you being smart and they being stupid, it's just that you chose not to adop…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:29 PM
1

And purple haired liberal people with plethora of mental illnesses,always angry and bitter at the world are better company? Christians tend to have a better value structure and are more stable than atheistic nihilists. I used to think like you when I was 18, thankfully I realized I was wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 10:12 PM
1

I am not advocating religious laws just pointing at the mistakes of current culture. Replacing religion for nihilism has so far been a disaster though in the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:57 PM
1

Without consequence? Physical consequence? Yes. Mental consequence? No. Societal consequence? Absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:46 PM
2

I agree with you fully.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:42 PM
1

Studies and data prove you wrong though on all points. People having long term marital partners tend to be happier and more fulfilled. The more promiscuous the person is ( more previous sexual partners ) the higher chance of failed marriage and devorce. Religion was there for a reason and so were social norms to keep the society stable and operational. Abolishing that there has to be something to replace it and nothingness isn't it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:41 PM
2

I don't want any extremes but honestly think Muslim societies like Saudi Arabia will stand the test of time better than the current Western liberal one in the far future. There is just a boatload of problems building in the current culture and there's a lot of really unhappy people even though standards of life may be improving,seems to me the Western society is on a good way to self destruct. People were way less miserable before having way less than today.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:38 PM
2

Any argument about your points? Seems to me it's quite the opposite actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:26 PM
0

Well it's debatable how traditional they are in the real sense as the Western influence is heavy there as is everywhere. Most people in Russia for example although they would say are orthodox Christians mean that in the cultural sense and not literall way,same in the Balkans. But yes Eastern Europe has a big demographics problem as well and will need to fix it cause they can't afford to lose people,less so than the West at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 06:23 PM
1

It's not about friends circle when everything wider than the friend circle is pressured into that by the media and culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:41 PM
1

It is representative of society and social norms One show or not and it's definitely not just one show.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:40 PM
1

I haven't actually said it's everyone that does it just society at large meaning all the media outlets which have insane influence nowdays and more and more people encouraging it. I certainly didn't mean there is no one that isn't like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:28 PM
1

Capitalism is entirely based on the ever increasing populations though. That's why US is increasing immigration to combat the decline in birth rates. If it were to go down the system would soon collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:18 PM
5

May be a reactionary phase I agree. But extremes either way are not good.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:15 PM
3

Every single male that I know that encourages it cause they want to have casual sex still would never accept such a girl who does the same as a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:09 PM
7

Exactly my point. Normal and healthy behavior that benefits society is mocked and completely opposite one that destroys it is encouraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:07 PM
5

"If you accept everything you stand for nothing"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:05 PM
14

True but kinda hard not to when it's directly changing and influencing society and therefore me indirectly. I just want to live in a world where normal things that have been there for mileniums are encouraged like love,family and community. Americans say no,here have this sex obsessed money crazed society for everyone in the world annd if you don't like it you are the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:01 PM
1

You clearly don't understand social norms. No one is pushing you literally at gun point as no one has for more traditional roles before. It's implied and expected by society but you clearly don't understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:57 PM
2

There will definitely be either major wars or revolutions in that period because the state of society as is is extremely unstable and not sustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:55 PM
10

I haven't fallen into the trap though.I am against it, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:54 PM
4

People make fun of a religion but it's a value system that provides structure to the society when not taken to extremes. With out that structure societies collapse and I think that's happening in the West slowly but surely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:48 PM
5

Exactly how I feel about it but considering the influence they have on everything I am afraid it will soon be everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:38 PM
5

Not only does it not get attention but is apparently blatantly attacked even in this thread. People who are more promiscuous being angry at those who are not for judging them. I still don't understand what exactly is good about a person who has sex with the whole village? What value is in it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:28 PM
13

Yeah,how I feel about it. Kind of sad. However two times I have been in the US having met all sorts of cultures I have found non American Asian women to be much more LTR oriented and different from western women so I guess it's not everywhere that this is a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:17 PM
-1

Better to be healthy in a sick society than to adapt to it. At least how I feel about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:12 PM
1

Agreed,hence the point of my thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:11 PM
1

That's exactly how I always felt about it. I have always found it devaluing even though culturally for men it's not seen as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:02 PM
-2

Are you female? Do you not fear it destroying the chance of you getting in the long term relationship? Do you not want one?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 03:35 PM
1

It is something I have seen in general in every day life repeatedly and most of all over the internet pretty much universally. Would you say I am wrong and that is just my perception. Again, genuinely curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 03:31 PM
2

I can't believe anyone actually says there is anything good or normal about hookup culture. It is basically degenerate behavior normalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 10:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter