TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

optimuscrymez Archive

View 1 post and 724 comments by optimuscrymez on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Debateoptimuscrymez/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:03 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You don't seem to understand why male porn use fails to support your claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:46 AM
1

Yeah put the links down you clearly don't understand that they don't support you and are just offering speculation
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:44 AM
1

One quote does a trend make....to the fucktard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:41 AM
2

Do you enjoy slandering and attributing bad intentions when evidence and reason elude you? Hahaha not that you're seeking them out or anything. Indeed reality suggests that men on balance are not single because they want to be but because dating circumstances simply are not good.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:39 AM
1

30 percent is half of 60, math wiz. The article didn't say that and at this point you're just lying about the state of affairs. Do you like shilling for whatever woke mafia is paying you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:37 AM
2

Sure men at their horniest phase in life just randomly prefer being alone, as evidenced by the high rates of mental illness, loneliness, etc. My evidence is no doubt foreign to a bad faith handwaver such as yourself: reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:34 AM
2

Learned helplessness indeed would not be noteworthy to a sadist such as yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:28 AM
2

So another source agrees with my interpretation of the pew study regarding 30 percent of men not seeking out sex or relationships. And you offer an article with more speculation. Hint: why would young men rather watch porn? You're confusing effects with causes and somehow trying to shoehorn this into "they prefer being single." Grade: D-
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:28 AM
1

It doesn't say anything about your last assertion as argument. If half of the men who are single are not looking at all for sex or dates or anything, per PEW, then once again you're wrong regarding the first two assertions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:09 AM
2

Your article doesn't explain that. Your article speculates using the GSS.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 08:04 AM
2

I literally repeated the data. You then speculated about it. So many people (or bots) just lie lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:52 AM
1

I don't need to show you anything. You're here talking out of your ass not me. I brought Data.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:43 AM
2

There's always another level. If the 9 guy is friends with idk a 10 billionaire he will experience nothing but black pills. I don't think people understand the true raw power of money. And not money. I mean fuck you money. Put it this way, odds are higher than you think that the male super celebs praised for their chadliness sucked off some high level executive to get where they are. At that level it's not even about gay. It's about power. Just crazy insane power.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:42 AM
2

Lmfao@someone else spotting AI
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:09 AM
2

Chat gpt and bots have really infiltrated reddit lmao seeing as how it completely missed the mark on what soft guy represents Altho the soft guy content I've seen is fucking hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:09 AM
-1

I just told you what they look for. And no I don't have to prove the existence of a racial, looks, or wealth hierarchy. You dumpkopfs really do not understand the burden of proof. Add that to your homework along with "how to discuss without sounding like I flunked 101-level college courses"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:07 AM
5

Yeah unfortunately having a pack of goons is useful. I mean I always say on here that, if you're a decent looking guy who's a late bloomer or something, meet up groups are great. Tons of older women, competition is weak...very good sandbox. What you need are two or three other people who are much cooler than the competition but who also defer to you. The easiest way to gain leadership among men is to PROVIDE. Let me say that again. PROVIDE. This is why money is so useful. If you're the guy fundi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 07:05 AM
-1

I know that women tend to be very superficial and more relevant here, petty and juvenile If you don't understand how to discuss there are plenty of resources on Google for you. Read them sometime after recess.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:54 AM
0

This may shock you but one can not be in need and still understand what is needed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:47 AM
2

Ya bro, 30% not seeking or even looking for dates or sex.... ...and unless you're trying to include situationships as relationships single means not in a relationship But ya its their preference. Men of gen z especially are complaining of loneliness and that's your tonedeaf reply lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:35 AM
2

Except table 3...THE ACTUAL DATA. And the big takeaway is "Our results provided little support for the idea that people are drawn to how competent a person truly is." Which indeed is VERY MUCH my point. Funny, you somehow missed that nugget while trying to shore up your apparent statistical illiteracy with fluff statements from the authors.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:26 AM
3

"Lol ^ ya dude women on average will value the $300 a person dinner and the handmade pasta equally." We're In agreement that you can't read. They will not value both the same in favor of the money splashing date. .... You can start with table 3 of this one https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656621000507 Do you see how all the abilities have pretty much null effect?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:10 AM
6

Yeah just to show you how political this issue is, that article MISREPORTS the gini coefficients given by the Hinge engineer....mysteriously "The Gini coefficient for straight men on Hinge as calculated by Goldgeier is 0.542. This would place Hinge as having more wealth inequality than 93.5% of countries in the world. This value is similar to the Gini coefficient of 0.58 calculated for straight men on Tinder. The Gini coefficient for women is 0.376" https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/dating-ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:08 AM
-2

Read it again. That's not what I said. ... You can say what you want. If you'd like to maybe learn about the topic you insist on speaking about, Google can help you regarding peer reviewed research showing the factors that determine female dating decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:04 AM
1

Yeah sure when 60% of men 18-30 are single vs 30% of women. And half of those men simply have dropped out of looking for dates or sex altogether.... ....BECAUSE they're exercising that Sikk entitlement lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:03 AM
-4

Go read what I said again. Has nothing to do with whether or not one can make pasta and still get laid ... Sure dude. You're not a special snowflake. So yes its your race looks height or wallet.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:58 AM
1

Once again, men do have to endure terrible women who are usually ON THEIR LEVEL. It's not because she's hot though. And nope medicore men (relative to the woman) treating women like shit is a blip. A female 5 isn't letting a male 5, objectively do that. A 7? Yeah probably
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:56 AM
0

On the one hand there is truth here.... ...on the other hand, red pill and the entire community simply are imbeciles about the extreme power of wealth. Women are turned on by the status and power that comes from extreme wealth. Beautiful celebrity women tend to end up with.....shipping/oil heirs. Rather than other celebrities. Everything is just a cue for status. Wealth is the ultimate cue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:52 AM
-4

Lol ^ ya dude women on average will value the $300 a person dinner and the handmade pasta equally. More nonsense about personality. Dude your personality, hate to break it, is meaningless. You've never attracted anyone with it. Dudes who splash $$$$ aren't "striking out" much if ever. Do people on reddit enjoy creative writing or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:48 AM
2

Table 3 shows all objectively measured competencies having effectively null effect https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656621000507 And this is just one of many. So once again....TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL ELSE...women tell themselves a story about the feelings a hot guy makes them feel and project them onto the man. Which is why women are ridiculously easy to exploit, manipulate, abuse, etc. Because 1. They are superficial and 2. Blissfully unaware of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:38 AM
1

No. ONCE AGAIN since you can't read: those studies show 1. Women state priorities different from their actual priorities 2. Women value hotness to the exclusion of all else. As in no other quality matters. Literally NO OTHER QUALITY exerts any effect. And 3. Women generally agree on what is attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:23 AM
4

Yeah if a guy turns a woman on on sight the odds are pretty low of her "having boundaries." Never Said anything about her being in a relationship. You didn't really meet the point you just said some shit most anyone would say. Research shows that despite women SAYING THEY VALUE many different and varied qualities about men IN FACT the main dispositive factor relating to the man that matters = hotness. So plenty of evidence of women saying one thing when something else is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 05:16 AM
1

Oh women indeed choose and stay with men who treat them with utter contempt. That has nothing to do with what we are discussing. Mediocre men are not treating women on their level this way. Hope that helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:22 AM
1

If you had some wit this troll would be fun funny or at least emotionally engaging in one way or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:09 AM
1

You indeed can be an ignorant fucktard because that is what you are and I only would look like that to an ignorant fucktard. Up next: you demanding the sky being blue to be proved. Like a logic impaired fucktard
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:03 AM
1

The burden of proof is on the person making a claim challenging the status quo You saying: "I don't know shit about this topic" doesn't negate the status quo. So either Google it or stfu
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:59 AM
1

So you're not going to learn how to read? Figured. Fucktarded fucktard trying to fucktard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:57 AM
2

Lol it's just fun showing that not only are they stupid but their rhetoric is also bad. Leaving a record of that for posterity counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:56 AM
1

When you say the status quo isn't the status quo, that's a claim. It's also you being an ignorant fucktard on par with stating me saying "the sky is blue" is a claim with a burden attached.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:54 AM
-1

Reading comprehension isn't one of yours. Read what you read next time and understand why you are pretty much admitting you don't even understand basic syntax
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:49 AM
–

LMFAO YOU IMBECILE women's are FAR BETTER light years. Great you don't understand what a gini coefficient or what it means. Lol always the dumbest assclowns who are most eager to have opinions about shit they manifestly admit to not even knowing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:48 AM
-2

I'm not making a claim, dipshit. It's well settled research and data on par with the sky being blue You're just talking so far out of your ass you have no idea about the area and are confusing a foundational claim i.e. the status quo for a claim challenging the status quo. Yes I would be the president and you're still a fucktard reject for the obvious aforementioned reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:46 AM
-1

I understand you are ignorant of this topic you have an opinion of and do not understand basic discussion principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:45 AM
0

F tier "reasoning"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:41 AM
-2

Do you want a link for the earth not being flat and the sky being blue as well? You debate club rejects really need to learn what the burden of proof is. It's not knowing nothing about a topic and demanding a basic 101 education.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:40 AM
1

Nah that data is misleading because when you calculate the gini coefficients men sit at a mad Max thunderdome .54-7 and women sit at a western European social democracy .36 or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:24 AM
-2

All over google, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:23 AM
0

The evidence is legion. Google helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:34 AM
24

Online dating data showing a winner take all effect for male but not female matches. Women like only 4% of male profiles whereas as men like 40+% of women's or some such. The actual data suggests it's kind of more like 80/5 Top 20% is maybe good enough to show up as a blip and run thru some older women, single moms, etc.. This is about sex i.e. the level at which relatively fast, commitment free sex, is consistently possible for a man
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:32 AM
1

That's not what he said Learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:26 AM
–

Because I know that women behave predictably when turned on and it often contradicts their often lofty high minded values? Hohkay, chief. Ya wow holy shit I have an opinion you don't like therefore I'm a misogynist, novel. I feel sorry for you that the best you can do is resort to cheap rhetorical bullshit rather than meet the point head on. I even said hey, if you've actually been in relationships with two men you feel equal raw physical attraction to and treated one differently than the other …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:22 AM
1

YES you derailing moron. now as you have nothing of substance to add to this anecdote regarding FALSE allegations (real silent about that but zealous to pin me for something of course), be on your way
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:14 AM
2

Being confident MEANS ZERO for attracting women. Women do not care if you are confident or not regarding getting them into you. When a woman says you are needy what she means is that she does not like you that much and does not want to give you the attention you want from her. Women project their feelings about you into these evaluations. Never take them seriously...which is why.... Being confident MEANS EVERYTHING for acquiring new leads and qualifying them. Confidence is what allows you to eff…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:10 AM
-5

They really aren't People are conditioned to follow social scripts And they do Which is why women not understanding that they aren't growing and maturing insomuch as the guys they choose just don't excite them in the same way which makes self control easier makes sense. It's more depressing to hear that their pussies have been massaged and conditioned by culture to simply reward certain people differently and accord them different treatment based on very ugly social hierarchies. ^ This is why th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:02 AM
–

Stupid or cowardly...yes! I don't believe women about this because again I have first hand experience Ok you are free to believe that you would have mother Theresa self control and strong boundaries around a man who made you wet on sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:59 PM
–

Until it's time to own up to how women perpetuate the patriarchy they claim to hate so much but keep fucking the shit out of lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:35 PM
2

You mean like this study https://psychology.cornell.edu/news/women-told-more-white-lies-evaluations-men-study Or this study https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/12/2/44 Or this survey data https://www.cbsnews.com/news/author-women-lie-more-better-than-men/ Bur hey lets say all studies have found a small gender difference in deception with men being more likely to lie. Which of course doesn't mean women don't lie often, so nice red herring. That is to say obvious. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:13 PM
1

Who said I did?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:03 PM
1

Lol no breaking up with a guy isn't accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:03 PM
–

The truth often is appalling and "stupid" to women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:02 PM
–

Except no they don't
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:02 PM
1

Pointing out why what a woman is saying is illogical or reveals her ignorance regarding a topic isn't being shitty to women Women ARE THE MOST FREQUENT name callers and juvenile mudslingers here and never get called out Reporting them doesn't even do anything lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:34 PM
–

This is just bullshit. Any man who says ANYTHING negative about most anything but especially women in a mainstream space is ostracized.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:32 PM
–

Women are enlightened feminists until you mention that their sexual attraction has been conditioned to enforce hegemonic masculinity. The suddenly they throw their hands up and just can't even....
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:32 PM
–

Lol Ya because then women would have to deal with men doing to them what they do to men far more often...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:30 PM
-6

Lol Women tend to decide they had boundaries and that they in any way say no AFTER THE FACT. I remember one time this chick gave me a hummer in my car broad daylight not so long after meeting. Word got back to me she tried to put all this boundary bullshit onto me and portray herself as some kind of "almost SA" victim .... Which is why i was thankful I got her on my cellphone in the act and even caught her talking dirty, speaking unto the mic so to speak. What kind of idiot tries to say that aft…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:29 PM
–

Nope. ALL. No hot guy is 100% desirable to all women but for SURE whenever a woman has genuine desire for a man. That's a wrap. I guarantee these women you know who "aren't like this" most certainly are. They don't attain higher standards lmfao. No man at the level that truly excites them would ever tolerate their standards. All these women do is punish the men who WILL tolerate these standards. Like use your brain. If a 6 woman is treated like shit by (in her mind) a 10, there's a 0% chance tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:24 PM
-3

Are you daft? The change they make is in the men they choose, i.e. ones they are truly hot for vs ones they are meh for.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:18 PM
1

^ lol chat gpt shill here is malfunctioning
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:16 PM
1

^ another moron deliberately twisting reality No evidence that men do this
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:15 PM
–

The point is that your status quo dick sucking is obvious for what it is: blithe ignorance or sadistic shaming. Your last statement is beyond factually incorrect which reveals you haven't bothered to research the topic you've decided to talk out of your ass about...par for the PPD course!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:14 PM
-4

...the societal definition of handsome isn't the product of societal problems and historical unjust forces, of course not. women can't accept that their pussies are conditioned to enforce hegemonic masculinity, which is why they are being exploited more than ever before lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:12 PM
–

^ dumbest take possible
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:10 PM
–

You are 1000000% CORRECT THIS IS THE MATING CYCLE OF MOST WOMEN: STAGE ONE: SEX SLAVE (man/men attracted to) STAGE TWO: PROSTITUTE (man not attracted to but can extract from)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:09 PM
-3

Not really. No one learns that. Men just learn their level. Women rarely if ever learn anything Lol women get crazy jealous when they ACTUALLY DESIRE YOU So many people need to accept the extent of how much women lie. About everything. Consciously and unconsciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:07 PM
–

No it's his instinct and correct intuition that PEOPLE DO NOT CHANGE And women are not particularly great at introspection So no women don't do this. Women have a habit of thinking and saying x when they are doing y.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:05 PM
1

LMFAO ^ what nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:03 PM
1

Women don't learn lessons. That's the con.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:03 PM
–

They're derailing. Your INSTINCTS are sound and experience will only prove you right
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:02 PM
1

That's not what he's arguing. Stop missing the point to grand stand. Because women never get jealous of shit you have done for other women but not them right? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:02 PM
-2

Bro ignore them. Women holding you to a higher standard Simply aren't as attracted to you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:59 PM
–

BECAUSE I HAVE YET TO SEE IT I literally have engaged in behavior FAR WORSE so many times than whatever such individuals claimed to experience in the past and gotten away with it for an embarrassing amount of time. Women do not grow up mature or change. Ever. If they truly desire you, that's a wrap.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:58 PM
–

You're beyond wrong. These hypothetical women will open their legs the next time a man fitting that bill pays them attention. You know how many late 30s/early 40s so called mature women I've slayed on a boring Tuesday? Idk why ppl can't just admit how weak women are in the presence of men they TRULY find attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:56 PM
–

That's because ^ is the truth. People dont understand the types of things that can make a guy very attractive to receive that treatment. His race and his height are big factors here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:55 PM
–

Lol so women are the problem
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:46 PM
–

If they kiss a lot of ass Pass the arbitrary job interview Put up with not such a great sex life ... Love eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:45 PM
–

Lol the vast majority of women are mediocre and the point is that Said women likely let those men KNOW that in their mind they were settling i.e. treated them like shit
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:44 PM
1

I like leaving a record so that people can see
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:58 AM
2

I see so even if those preferences are shaped by cultural oppression there's no moral dimension. And interesting so if a woman is conditioned by her culture to prefer a violent man her consent is just a general pass on that attraction? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:27 AM
1

Yes people like you who don't understand biology asserting patent nonsense like "combination of x and y" when all things must be some combination of biology and culture is bullshit. Here, let's just say it's 50% oppression...do you concede then it still has moral implications? Do you concede that if it were 100% learned it'd be a moral issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:24 AM
1

Of course, sure attraction has nothing to do with those societal organizing forces lol Except many (most all) women have a racial preference....which isn't a biological category, i.e. learned. Like I said the issue is too complex for you so you ignore obvious complications
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:19 AM
1

It's irrelevant because your claim concerns female sexual attraction. And I don't care about it because it's irrelevant and makes no difference to the point. So once again just meet the point 👉 do you see the moral implications or not
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 06:32 AM
1

Gonna indeed take it as you detailing over something irrevelevant. Very common for those who can't meet the substantive points.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:52 AM
1

Just to confirm you in fact are derailing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:27 AM
1

A magazine article isn't a study. You can keep trying to assert your way into anything other than ignorance all you like. Oh you didn't say that only women with certain personality types do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:23 AM
1

Incorrect. If you can't be bothered to learn the basics of the topic you want to talk out of your ass about, your objection can be dismissed. Go learn about the burden of proof sometime 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:17 AM
–

Lol which must mean the opposite sock puppet
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:16 AM
1

You provided a picture of a headline, not the study. So....? And your imbecility regarding correlation is lmfao stupid. I guess that must mean someone who says the rooster crow makes the sun rise has some facts huh? My assertion is that 1 in 5 do so fairly often which they do and the fact that it's that high for just foodie calls indicates they use men for far more than that Good that you agree you saying only certain types of women did that was complete horseshit, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 05:15 AM
1

''Foodie Calls: When Women Date Men for a Free Meal (Rather Than a Relationship)' Please quote anything about personality in the title, furthermore, please reference me the extent to which they found the dark triad predicted previous foodie calls. Hint: correlation was pretty weak :) So again, no you're talking out of your ass regarding the personality types. Indeed, it is super embarrassing that you can't read. The fact that you're bending over backwards attempting to excuse women who have seve…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 04:46 AM
2

Ya...fairly often aka occasionally, quite often, very often. You have no facts about personality types you literally made that shit up. The fact is that a large percentage of women outright admit doing this for food. You want to handwave the obvious inference that they do it for much more
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:24 AM
1

Ya its cool you made a bunch of shit up and assumed the researchers didn't know what they were doing. How unsurprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:18 AM
1

Nope you are making shit up because you don't know anything about this topic and are trying to make basic education my burden when it's your responsibility. Like I Said google is your friend. If you were interested in the topic you would have researched it rather than posture to conceal your ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:15 AM
3

Ya you need to put up BASIC knowledge on a topic before yapping about it. Learn to Google or indeed stfu
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:09 AM
0

Ya sure I posted a graph showing otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:08 AM
0

So then you agree that those forces shape female attraction. And that's cool. There's currently 0 evidence of any "biological attraction." In fact the high heritability of many traits considered attractive suggests they aren't under selective pressure which means they likely are very plastic. So no, I'd say most all is yes conditional and arbitrary. Once again refer yourself to the previous research regarding female arousal, i.e. conditioning. So if a high degree at least of this sexual attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 11:04 PM
1

Lmao no this did not happen. You don't recover from someone legitimately laughing at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:58 PM
1

You're scared because you have good reason to be. When you're around a group and they want to get to know you.....It is abundantly clear without a word. If you're getting that feeling you're interpreting it correctly
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:57 PM
1

It only works if you have the right baseball card stats, if you're a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:56 PM
1

I'm 38 and lol it's so obvious that if socializing in person were so great people wouldn't be abandoning it to this degree. In person requires you to tolerate a lot of stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:55 PM
1

Women either ignore or are ignorant of how a man being undesirable echoes throughout his entire social life. In mixed coed spaces women tend to simply erase a good portion of men who would likely have thrived due to their positive qualities (humor/smarts/creativity) before....because of irrelevant superficial bullshit. There really aren't any male only spaces anymore.... There is no real separation. Sexless women Aka sexless by choice (most single by choice women definitely aren't sexless) aren'…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:41 PM
3

LARP Unless you started the relationship with her genuinely attracted to you she's not going to magically change it up for you
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:34 PM
0

Non sequitur response. Do you not believe those historical forces and female attraction are intertwined?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:32 PM
–

Again more braindead nonsense. Gee what if the conditions of female attraction cut along cultural oppression lines?. You know preferring white tall men via cultural transmission because of untold historical violence and tyranny. The arousal women feel per research has little relation to their stated arousal. Female sexuality is regulated to serve very oppressive exclusionary regimes.... ...yet per research female arousal can be conditioned, appears far more than women state in response to a wide…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:29 PM
3

Occasionally+ is fairly often. And no 1 in 5 women cannot be reduced to a personality disorder. Your entire argument hinges on "Occasionally" exploiting someone != exploiting someone fairly often. Which is moronic given the nature of the action. And you're ignoring the likelihood of women willing to exploit men for various other things like attention, etc. When they do so all the time. Like I said: brat take deliberate ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:24 PM
1

Lol Wow. Went right over your head. Your argument consistently is just you not understanding what is being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:19 PM
3

Lol google's not showing you what you want to see eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:17 PM
1

I'm not your research assistant. If you're interested in knowing anything about topics you discuss try google
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:23 PM
1

Of course you don't. Shocker.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:22 PM
2

except it is manifestly consistent with pretty much all the other data we have on OLD. so no, it isn't poor quality evidence. "For context"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:01 PM
1

Yes. the inability to imagine, for example, a black James bond = either you are stupid or engaging in bad faith. It's fine if you're an idiot just this conversation isn't for you, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:00 PM
1

Yeah unless you're going to spit actual effect sizes and correlations, put the links away. And the fact that you believe you are a walking IQ test is another feather in the 'rube' cap :) Here's a paper showing how laughably weak the correlation is between perception and actual IQ: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961208/#:\~:text=IQ%20significantly%20affects%20the%20perception,%2C%20%CE%B72%20%3D%200.036). Things like SAT and IQ are just our rudimentary attempts at quantifying this.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:58 PM
1

Because you are engaging in bad faith or are extremely dumb. Either way, too stupid to talk to any more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:49 PM
2

indeed, you are free to try and derail from the fact that YOU ARE WRONG. there is no issue. the facts are in the pic :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:48 PM
3

Oops, I'm sorry, nope. women back then didn't settle. you don't seem to understand that warped expectations can cause an individual to believe they are settling when in fact they likely are not. if you are a female 5 who is poor, a male 5 who is poor is NOT settling. it is YOUR delusion that makes you think as much. there you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:47 PM
0

based on the offers he gets from women and receptivity...yes :) lmao the denial of inconvenient reality on here is unreal
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:46 PM
0

if you cannot perform that function for yourself and actually are attempting to hold that as some kind of gotcha burden, then lol 1. point proven about the imbecility of people who want to have this discussion 2. more likely point shown about extreme dunderheaded bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:45 PM
0

<image> ppl like u need pictures. and this, despite more freedoms, more selective marriage, easier divorces, etc. DECREASING, not increasing happiness is what we see. except for black women fairly recently. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:43 PM
0

Wrong again buddy boyo. The super vast majority of genomic variation exists any given population, which means if your little wrong Evo speak were true we'd observe more variation between populations. Wrong part II mortality and life expectancy GREW with the dawn of civilization, only besting hunter gatherer rates some 150/200 years ago. Your bold claim about how much you can predict from an IQ test is wrong and bad reasoning. First the correlation between test and retest ~.8 which means that you…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 08:05 PM
–

LOL 'only occasionally.' So, once again, around 1 in 5 women (occassionally+) = fairly often. And no, you're still talking out of your ass attempting to handwave away 1 in 5 women engaging in exploitative behavior at least occasionally regarding free meals. And now you're going to pretend that (1) this is who admits to it and (2) this easily generalizes to attention/resources/emotional support/whatever But you're here to act like women don't engage in this shit with regularity and that men are j…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:45 PM
2

Massive inequality due to invented social labels yes. Most every quality you mentioned exhibits high heritability, from physical attractiveness, to height, to IQ, etc. So to people who understand evolutionary biology this indicates a high likelihood of low, if any, selective pressure. To a rube (yourseslf) this indicates some mystical evolutionary touchstone, because...again...rube. I have no doubt thanks to rubes like you who are statistically illiterate and can't understand why IQ is a DOA con…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:33 PM
–

It definitely is a thing regular women do, 1 in 5 admit to using men for free meals fairly often. You should stop talking out of your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:29 PM
4

Holy shit I just gave several examples including one in the last comment. People are irredeemably stupid when it comes to actually doing things to help other people socially lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:28 PM
0

I just gave one. Read what you read.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:27 PM
0

Buddy you don't think it's strange that 20 years ago research said this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7873718/ And suddenly now a flood of research seems to perfectly support a certain narrative? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:26 PM
-1

NO THEY WERE NOT Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:33 PM
0

Yeah stop talking out of your ass about marriage in prior eras. The truth is that THEY WERE HAPPIER than they have been since feminist liberation. I love this nonsensical narrative about women just being in misery pre the fem culture flip essentially telling women to be miserable lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:32 PM
–

^ very silly brat take that acts as though female preference is set in stone and just so happens to perfectly mirror the patriarchical regulation of female sexuality women allegedly rail against And women do want those other options because they exploit them for all manner of things, emotional support, social attention, free meals, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:30 PM
2

You can culturally condition people to accept a wider range of phenotypes. You know...like the body positivity movement THAT HAS INDEED BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL FOR WOMEN People like to imagine that we all aren't 1 step removed from dumb monkeys who do as we are told to do but sorry...that's the truth. It's super insane that women and some rube men will just throw their hands up in the air and wave 'em around becuase they just don't care (about human suffering) about this question when we literally …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:28 PM
2

Stupid cliche and wrong take. Dating inequality mostly arises from culturally learned mechanisms. If you really think women biologically can't fuck normal men, short men, etc. when they orgasm more often from rape and have been shown to be 1. Susceptible to pavlovian conditioning of their arousal 2. Aroused by much different stimuli than what they say they are aroused by...then you're a rube. Also the 80/20 thing misleads: <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:22 PM
–

I mean there are a lot of issues. Men generally are underrated and women especially white women are just....overrated to fucktardedly stupefying levels. Anyway why focus on bagging a so called timepiece? You can become a dimepiece (in the eyes of society) to get one or you can just tune society out and find someone who treats you well and who you think is attractive, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:19 PM
-1

So like, you deliberately not understanding what I said to rattle off some lame neenerneener? If you're not smart enough to have the discussion then don't start it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 06:14 PM
0

Except the OLD study showing men peak at 50. Evidence showing that age gap relationships older man younger woman are happier... There is no delusion. Women/the mainstream just are scrambling to push this bullshit these days
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:31 PM
-2

God people are so braindead about this and this :gee shucks what can be done:: Just shows how idk...dumb? People are. Here's a start, champ: show different types of men in the protagonist classic hero role. Off and running. People are stupid. They imitate what they see.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 04:26 PM
4

People underestimate just how much of a seismic shift has occurred in society. Forgetting even dating apps, the general undercurrent of misandry/anti-man is much much stronger than it ever was in the past. Women are openly disrespectful and in many cases seem to seek to emasculate men whenever they can. The irony being that women tend to wield a massive amount of social privilege they then shove at people as 'merit' to emasculate them. An extreme example was an extremely promiscuous woman I knew…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 10:20 PM
1

It'd only be tryhard if a simpleton, yourself for example, tried to emulate it. I'm glad and agree that it does seem like you can be an idiot all day. Every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:08 PM
1

They never were relevant regarding attracting women. Dating is starting to collapse for this very reason
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 03:24 PM
1

Resorting to asserting the effect you wish you had on anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 01:20 PM
3

You being mean to women did not make any difference in anything. You either had good pics or maybe the floor was the ceiling. The reason they seemed to lose interest is likely because you were attracting a lot of hard up women who just needed a release. Because I pursue fast sex in dating and thinking it is the current optimal strategy, I have a lot of experience with this. A fair percentage of women are just out to use you as a dildo. While the unwashed and mostly inexperienced mass of PPDsers …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 08:44 AM
1

You can't effectively deploy your chosen rhetorical gambit. Though. You just snarked yourself into an even dumber position: not understanding English
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 08:36 AM
1

18% is not a very small percentage. Keep sputtering the "does not compute" nonsense lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 12:14 AM
0

1 in 5 women is not a small percentage. Good you admit you're wrong via denial sarcasm. I understand that fucktards can be hacky fucktarded fucktards about this whole not talking out their ass thing as well. We're done here, it's not fee fees. It's your original statement was flat wrong now own it instead of trying to snark your way out of the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:22 PM
2

Yes I'm sure you think handwaving = discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 11:20 PM
1

LMFAO dude frequently or very frequently IS NOT THE CUT OFF for "fairly often" Bend over backwards more Ya of course you can't understand and are starting register the typical sperglord "does not compute" responses that typify the strategy I said u were and are deploying. Get better at it or use another one you're just coming off as deliberately ignorant
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:54 PM
1

Wow sick. Ur use of a meme instead of language and discussion is so persuasive. Oh wait...I mean, feminine.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:53 PM
3

"At least once." It wasn't a very small percentage who admitted to doing it fairly often. It doesn't matter to me because you're deploying the ignore how reality works let's look at the pen to paper and treat it as strict gospel when self report skews toward the social desirability bias. Not only that but by induction if they use men for meals they likely use them for other things as well....attention mainly. Are you seriously taking the position that the majority of women simply do not give a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 03:27 PM
0

That leash seems as long as their looks last. I.e. Depp only ran into trouble once his looks started fading
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:47 AM
6

A: And? They never suffer the consequences for remaining emotionally 15 years old for life Shit, the rest of your list really can be responded to in the same way B: YEAH so SCARY THAT THEYRE SURE TO EXPOSE TITS AND ASS LIBERALLY IN PUBLIC AMIRITE C: YEAH SO GUILTY AND PRESSURED THAT A THIRD OF WOMEN OPENLY ADMIT TO USING MEN FOR FREE MEALS AND DESPITE THIS PRESSURE THE SIMPS STILL AINT GETTING IT D: how are these dudes thirsty if the chicks are matching them? And lol ya bro women are matching wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:43 AM
–

This is not being a pussy 101 And you're wrong. Not a little entitled. MAXIMUM ENTITLED you need to behave as though you're the best thing ever to her from the jump. Why? In the words of the old school pickup dudes: make that ho say no. By acting like you're the best you immediately flick away all the bullshitters who are angling for you as some simp extraction farm. Last month I remember I had 2 dates planned for an evening. I left the first date maybe 5 minutes in (unfortunately just after we …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 10:41 AM
6

Lol what man truly likes CHASING women? Chasing != taking initiative planning meet ups and asking for them Chasing is essentially tolerating the now normalized disrespectful dating behavior women engage in toward their "maybe I'd settle for him" prospects.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 09:36 AM
-2

This such fantasy circle jerking The men who can easily date 20 year Olds at 45 or 50 usually are the ones who were always having an easy time with women i.e. The people women are unfair to aren't the payback mechanism here. So idk what ur doing with this post Unless the general message is you should never feel bad or sorry for a woman regarding her problems. Because buddy boyo she chose them and will choose them again in a heartbeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 08:16 AM
1

Usually it's how good looking the man is to the woman is the difference for that and every other strength as weakness
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 11:25 PM
4

It's biting satire because this is mainstream. There is a growing frustration with women from men. Women seem oblivious to it or don't think anything bad could possibly befall them because of it. More importantly men are realizing (SLOWLY) that male gender roles are bullshit and that behaviorally fulfilling them in a dating context does NOT make a woman feel anything more for you. Your race looks height and wallet do that. Your personality is meaningless. Which.... ...is freeing! It means that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:26 AM
1

Keep telling lies you need to believe to preserve the notion that you aren't an idiot. Which makes your talk about the gene pool hilariously ironic. And you calling me little is a little humorous since you'd have to stand on a chair to kiss my ass. But in all seriousness, character flaw needed to point out your obvious nonsense. Maybe get therapy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 05:45 AM
1

"Lmao" someone got triggered. Wow look at you, so unable to take your head out of your own ass that you'd rather keep screaming at the top of your lungs into your colon than self reflect The repulsive energy is :::calls out bullshit::: And dumb bullshitters like yourself hate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 05:34 AM
1

How about you pretend to be someone who doesn't talk out of their ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 05:07 AM
1

Um you keep rattling assumptions about me off that are fucktardly dumb. Hence your questions are irrelevant I'm tired of women believing that LYING and assuming things about people somehow is discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 05:05 AM
–

How's this for reading comprehension: it's a debate post and you didn't make a statement regarding female sexuality, you spoke out of your own ass and assumed raw condescension would carry the day as you're hoping these childish insults will now. My dear I have explained how and why my comment is relevant: you aren't smart enough to understand. Truly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:19 AM
2

You legitimately cannot comprehend it appears. Look forward to your upcoming hot takes on what it's like to be a black person, a Chinese astronaut, and most titillilatingly a smart person next. 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 05:23 AM
–

So do you not understand what a discussion is? Or what derailing is? Or what a non sequitur is? Of course not. You're having what is undoubtedly a normal tantrum when overwhelmed by adult speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 11:19 PM
–

Whoa who saw that coming first she infers I'm defensive and when I don't take the idiot bait she comes out with the U DONT GET LAYD Genuine question do all conversations above the middle school grade level piss you off this much?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 04:40 PM
–

Yeah go read a bio textbook and stop saying dumb shit about human nature
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 03:59 PM
1

Yes I'm sure I could not even begin to fail to understand what I could not possibly know comprehension of i.e. windbag snark in place of discussion You didn't have a point. You don't have experience from that perspective so your credibility is zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 03:58 PM
1

You sound passive aggressive. Me stating that your viewpoint is nonsensical is borne of the raw solipsism inherent within
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 03:56 PM
4

Some fucktard said something fucktarded. Who's defining potential? And who cares? Reaching your full potential sometimes comes with sacrifices that people don't want to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 01:35 PM
1

If the complaint is that the relationship dynamics suck, existing in a relationship would be meaningless...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 06:42 AM
2

Lol they are. I'm unsure how you engaging in it for 11 years is some kind of proof
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:51 AM
1

I'm not complaining. You made a statement that was incorrect. Sorry for your amnesia.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:49 AM
4

Never said I would
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:28 AM
9

I don't give a shit about that tbh. If shes........cute 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:28 AM
11

Lol And they don't care about those things either if they're attracted to you. Game theory optimal dating for a man is low effort because you sort the chicks who are actually hot for you from the "hmmmm maybe" women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:27 AM
–

Women who engage in this behavior are attention whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:25 AM
2

Nope. When I have an 8 back and my face is diced, you'd be surprised at how gross I can be and still pull And when I don't and the love handles come, no amount of style will compensate
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:25 AM
2

Translation: She is truly physically attracted to a vanishingly small subset of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:23 AM
3

People enjoy patting themselves on the ass for false reasons such as imagining they must be better than you to have landed a relationship. However you're wrong. A gf even a loving one won't change who you are or how the world treats you which is the source of most problems
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:22 AM
1

No. Usually after I fuck a woman she's cool with staying or leaving. But if you're sleeping with women who aren't that attracted to you then yeah that'll happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:21 AM
4

^ more nonsense Women have many reactions to being fucked "well." Like maybe you don't know what you're talking about or have experience in OPs arena?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:18 AM
1

It's sex. Not astrophysics. People who treat sex as a performance are pretty dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:16 AM
2

Mononormativity? Lmfao Poly = chick exploits less attractive man for emotional support while fucking guys she's actually attracted to who will never take her that seriously OR Masculine narc women exploiting multiple such men while also occasionally doing the above Keep deluding yourself about open relationships tho
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 05:15 AM
11

I did address it. You handwaved an entire element of courtship and the only way you could have such an imbecilic viewpoint is if you had zero experience in that role. Your comment says a lot about you. Anyone who dismisses a perspective they have no real experience isn't worth taking very seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:24 AM
-2

^ prime example of nonsensical word salad. Literally everyone in society has the opinions society has of every aspect of their being shoved onto them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:07 AM
-3

You didn't get the memo. Most of this pretzel logic word salad shaming sound byte stuff = you are not the man I would prefer to be sexual. in any way. you have no balls to me. women love being a good sexy slut lady for the right guy. Women just have confused their lack of attraction for a particular man with a cache of wokespeak and garbled philosophical principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 04:05 AM
24

The idea that dating should be some high effort job is what's moronic. Date: cheap lounge, maybe one drink. If she's too good for that she's just looking to use someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:17 AM
1

They don't go away. Plenty of women scoff low effort if there's no dinner or lavish night/activity planned as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:15 AM
18

No women call men low effort for their opening lines, first date plans, etc. Of course, yes women are long on wanting to assign men tasks while in a relationship too and shaming them for failing to comply
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:14 AM
24

Spoken like a party who doesn't actually put in said effort...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 03:13 AM
–

. In the end getting better with women is a skill that can be acquired through acquiring knowledge and hard work like any other skill in life. Yes, but not in the way PUA or you think. THERE IS NO PUA TECHNIQUE THAT MAKES WOMEN WHO ARE NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU...ATTRACTED TO YOU. ACCEPT THIS. YOUR BEHAVIOR HAS ALMOST NO RELEVANCE TO HER PUSSY BEING WET BEYOND THE BOUNDS OF NOT SHITTING YOUR PANTS IN PUBLIC. The ultimate game and way to get better with women? Playing. no. games. Be direct, be decisiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:00 AM
5

All relationships worth having pretty much start with sex relatively quickly, yes. This has always been the case. A woman who truly wants to fuck a guy will fuck him. No woman is a mother theresa saint of self-control who can nobly fight her primal urges for 10 dates. If by date 5 or so (IMOI 2024 date 2 should be the benchmark but whatever) she's still prim and proper the news is in: you're there to kiss her ass and give her money and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:51 AM
1

Here is a graph: https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/kW9B6T9laKg0C1O1jlJJRZ6yj30=/0x0:2405x1514/1120x0/filters:focal(0x0:2405x1514):format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19369925/Panel_5.png:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/19369925/Panel_5.png) All that career-focusing, dial-a-dude-tindering, IVF juicing, and clit-toy buzzing has really led to a utopia for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:46 AM
–

This take is so played and untrue. Women of nearly all ages have plenty of options. Of the set of dudes who will fuck them some percent of them will want/do more with them. You can scream at the sky all you want about how they betta reckonize whatever it is you think is true but they act like that because their circumstances reflect exactly that at them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:43 AM
–

Men don't care about marriage or kids...the main battleground is over pussy. Once the artificial womb arrives, even the "we need you less than you need us" dynamic will take a massive hit. Of course, the entire stance is stupid. Women made gains paid for and subsidized by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:39 AM
2

There are a ton of ugly dudes with decent looking girlfriends Not really. But hey let's go on the ride and assume we do see that and it's common. You're not really understanding the difference here. Let's say man A and man B are a 5 who want to date a 6. Man A is willing to wait 10 dates and get to know her and listen to her problems and go do things with her and buy her drinks. After 10 dates, they start dating. The relationship consists of sex mostly being determined by her, as in, a lot of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:51 AM
–

OP with the hot take of "moar self-control and DISCIPLINE boyos!" aka M A N U P pushes the offered dish of nonsense forward no thank you OP-sir We start off with supposition as history: After all, given the fact males on average have physically stronger bodies, apparently men are naturally evil-oriented, just because they can. Given x has a larger body size than y, x is therefore more evil-oriented. We're gonna stamp logic fail on that one. for it's assuming that the latter are more human and le…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 11:43 AM
1

LMFAO woman: society hates me because i'm old! man: why do you think that? woman: the amount of people kissing my ass on a daily basis has dropped at least 80%! man: .... ...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:20 AM
1

Dude. No. The kind of money that gets pussies wet is big baller shot caller money. Not 'great provider' money. Here, think of it like this. Women who are very destitute and who usually hang out with low lives and are always living in fear for their living conditions will, if they meet a guy from a different social class who 1. pays attention to them and 2. seems able to offer them some of his life of basic shelter and food security, will like clockwork fall in love and have the hots for said guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:19 AM
2

There's no singular problem. I think the structure of our society and how patriarchy operates virtually guarantees this "problem." Women are conditioned to reward men who best conform to patriarcal gender norms with their complete sexuality Despite feminism and whatever this has not changed. At all. The irony is that the "problem" is technically patriarchy. However Feminism doesn't really give a shit about actually dismantling the patriarchy, which is why they still avoid making women accountabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:09 AM
0

Silly take. I don't have issues attracting women I find attractive and yet I still retain many "objections" the so-called men in different stages have. It's not a simple misunderstanding. Women simply are irresponsible and avoid accountability for anything. It's annoying. Literally every conversational response by women to legitimate data-backed complaints or concerns by men can be boiled down to: but i don't wanna have to consider other people! whether it's invoking the rape dystopia in respons…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:03 AM
1

Idk I'm single by choice because I can get enjoyable sex pretty easily from cute partners. therefore, for me to tie myself to a woman in any material way, she's gotta be extraordinary. Whether you settle depends on how rigid and realistic your standards are. For example, a female 6, let's say to satisfy her primal hypergamy needs at least a 7, to refuse to date a 7 and hoping for the 8 to commit to her: she's not settling for the 7. She's realizing the best she can get. Taking the best you can g…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 06:59 AM
4

this topic and take is like the most discussed topic on here so who the shit are you kidding
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 06:45 AM
–

How rich is the second guy? So if the second guy is in the 10-20 mil+ category, he DOMINATES the first guy in RAW VISCERAL ATTRACTION. Why? Because his lifestyle with everything screams to a woman of normal status "I'm better than you" and trust this activates ye old hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 08:50 PM
1

1. Face. Lose weight and get lean so that whatever you have naturally pops. Whiten your teeth. I've seen people have some pretty insane success with: Fillers around their upper eyelids to make their eyes more "hunter" like Fillers to improve jaw and cheekbone structure Chin implants Nothing else is worth doing unless you maybe have 150k to drop on making yourself 6 inches taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 10:13 AM
1

Dude when you're facing a socially constructed standard of behavior that turns mainly on the value judgments of women and nothing else.... ....you're dealing with nonsense. The red pill guys feed into this with the "don't be a doormat" shit. Point blank: you being nice or not has no bearing on whether a woman is attracted to you. Remember that. Act as though NOTHING YOU DO will make any difference to that and you should be fine
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 10:11 AM
0

It's funny that you invoke apes in a conversation among humans. Now do your homework and note one of the largest differences between us and apes. The LOWER correlation between social status and reproductive success and the general fluidity of social status. So no you don't see a similar thing among humans. The 17 to 1 thing 1. Could be explained by agriculture not biology and 2. Is likely being misinterpreted (papers have been written about this)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:14 AM
-2

Dumb takes like this fail to realize that defining "best" is always arbitrary and with reference to some specific societal standards limited by time and place. If women were so picky they wouldn't be aroused by almost everything and orgasm so much from rape. ^ Based but fax. It's entirely social.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:12 AM
–

Finally. A legit based and hot take. 100% TRUE
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:09 AM
8

"I pretend like it's only hot women who are superficial why won't anyone take me seriously?"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:08 AM
5

Actually you're just not well versed in the topic You seem to be unaware about how stark the difference in sexual options each sex has.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:11 PM
7

"The female dating size (1864.7 guys) outnumbered the men’s (35.68 girls) in 52 to 1. •The most ranked women had a mating pool almost 16 times more larger than the most ranked men. • The medium-high women had a mating pool almost 223 times larger than the medium-high men. •The female medium category had a mating size almost 434 times larger than the male medium group. • The low-attractive man had no potential mate, while low-attractive woman got a mating pool of 940 men. • The low-attractive gir…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:09 PM
14

Not really. You're underestimating the sheer amount of interest even ugly women get....
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:05 PM
4

An ugly woman likely has more sexual options.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 11:05 PM
-3

I understand women. I don't hate them. I did. But I deal with them idk like they need to be dealt with for lack of a better term for it. There's not much to understand. Women play this game with every man: Fuck Marry (use/exploit) Kill Not many men get the first genuine sexual desire....consistently. All men need to AVOID all women who put them on the marry/bf/let's get to know each other box. ... Your personality means 0 in attraction. Your race height looks and bank account = 60% The other 40%…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 04:55 AM
-2

No you're trying to pseudoscience babble. Has nothing to do with breeding. Use your thinking cap. If women orgasm as much if not more often from random rape... ...and have been found to be sexually aroused by many stimuli contra their stated preferences per research... Female partner selection has nothing to do with anything biological or evolutionary. It's entirely cultural. So yes women via artificial societal intervention have shifted their preferences in most moronic fashion
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 04:15 AM
6

^ complete nonsense borne of culture hype Women who are single are FUCKING, so no the vast majority need men. Women are very interested in men: they all are desperate to land a "prize." Hence
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:48 AM
3

Looking good being the right race and height and having money is the most attractive thing a man can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 02:45 AM
-1

Your character is obvious from your comment. Your butthurt frothing is the telltale tuning fork ring of truth. Later.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:11 AM
-10

You responded by puffing yourself and ad hominem...yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:03 AM
-15

^ translation: butthurt rage ad hominem spew
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 04:57 AM
-16

^ translation: I'm extremely passive because I'm extremely scared of rejection
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 04:49 AM
3

So you understand that women now and then pay less in taxes than they take out. You then understand that men have and still are subsidizing women and their progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 03:34 AM
3

Men still are socially fiscally positive tax revenue. Women are still a net negative. What don't you understand
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 03:01 AM
2

Your solution is to presume the status quo is correct....WHOOOOOA far out. The fact that you can't see why your entire screed is clinically braindead is why you failed econ 101
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:59 AM
2

Please don't presume to understand evolution because you have gulped down social darwinism and just world bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:57 AM
1

No thanks. Your OP is self evidently imbecillic and is posted so often on here that the deficiencies are patently obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 02:16 AM
2

It's not a faulty argument. You're not smart enough to recognize that most all of the gains made by women in society have come on the backs of men. Women are a societal net negative regarding taxable income. So guess who subsidized the rise of women only to have them turn around and talk about who they didn't need?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:35 PM
1

Holy shit op has the radical idea of blaming men for everything. What a novel take including the "muh rationality" nonsense cribbed from econ 101 notes....a class OP clearly failed
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:32 PM
-1

Still wrong. Try again!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 06:33 PM
-3

Thanks for revealing you can't read. Only one "issue" was noted and it wasn't high standards. Can you spot the main idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 08:20 AM
1

In the moment it's fun. Maintaining contact and the general 'ship for many years can also be fun Idk ur age but ultimately it doesn't build anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 08:07 AM
-2

Sluts come in two varieties.... The bad Slut....who seeks validation through being sexual with men who meet her often sky high physical standards. And the good Slut....who legitimately can find a wide range of male.phenotypes attractive. Heroines them all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 05:50 AM
3

Oh ok. Yeah I know that study but I thought the number was higher than 7. But idk I don't rly think ppl are that prudish at all
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 02:18 AM
0

Because 7 is such a random number. At some point much sooner than most think the oats are sown, we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 02:14 PM
4

7th lol....I'm more like talking about triple digit shit
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 11:15 AM
11

Yes. News at 11 people project the fuck out of their lives. I'll be the first to say that sleeping around is dumb as a guy. You're not going to remember many of them. The only ones worth doing anything are the ones you have a real connection with. For sure my pair bonding ability is fucked. :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:52 AM
13

Woman does it: it's for her safety. Whether it's as mild as rudely ghosting someone or literally committing crimes such as defamation and doxxing, muh safety is the excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 05:53 AM
1

Garbage, doesn't concern real pairings.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 03:09 AM
1

Why do so many men ask so many questions to women that they already know the answers to? Especially when EMPIRICAL RESEARCH EXISTS. LOL TRP nor mainstream care much about actual research. Big huge data set reveals that there's an effect but it's far less significant than is claimed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546926/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:47 AM
10

Pro tip: seeking the middle and legitimizing both sides makes you look very intellectually daft when the real data simply does not agree with you. Anti-male bias present in society: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-61496-001?doi=1 Bias in favor of woman reproduced consistently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect Meanwhile the other side, is also true that society is mysoginistic and catters to men when it comes to relationships, Profoundly ignorant statement. Any boundar…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:46 AM
0

You're just asserting a bunch of shit sans much evidence i know. Go read a bio textbook please.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:17 PM
-1

Bro arguing that modern mating competition has anything to do with "good genes" is profoundly imbecelic. Go read a bio textbook.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:09 PM
-1

He sounds pretty dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:06 PM
-2

Silly pseudo science masquerading as fact-based. Wrong regarding "genetics" and wrong regarding evolution. So many people talk out of their ass about hard wiring. The only hard wired thing in people seems to be stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:05 PM
0

Any man who understands women doesn't hold the attention in very high regard
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:03 PM
1

This isn't true. The mainstream keeps pushing this bullshit hard when the opposite is true. If men gave so much of a shit they wouldn't be completely walking away from women in record numbers
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:02 PM
1

Anyone who uses the word cringe outs themselves as a social lemming. Maybe try seeing that remark for what it is: an expression of emotional immaturity and fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 09:01 PM
5

Women should do that first. This is how bad it is....society has been artificially redirected to provide women constant validation and they turn around and believe they are somehow enlightened and have intrinsic validation. Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:59 PM
4

People are so invested in pushing this men need women bullshit. It's funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:58 PM
1

^ simp speech. Ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:57 PM
1

Nope. This is a perversion. The opposite is true. Women derive their value from attention and validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:56 PM
4

Completely wrong and misunderstands what men are wanting
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:55 PM
1

A lot of this is nonsense. An unattractive psychopath isn't going to manipulate shit into the bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 05:24 AM
1

If he's attractive it's because they want to fuck him If he's not it's because they want to use him for emotional support. There is no middle ground
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 05:24 AM
1

The red pill's problem is that it does not offer a real solution (everyone should just be top 20% bro!), and the approach they take to the problem reveals it for what it is.... For such a group that fetishisizes alpha males its obvious it came from so called beta males. Their solution to women behaving unreasonably and making unrealistic demands? Appeasement of course: give them what they want. So the solution is terrible. The approach is terrible. However OP, where there's a will there's a way.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 12:52 AM
5

Society massively favors women and shits on men at this point. Here's an example https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna135778
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 09:49 PM
0

Looks = 1 standard Everything else is negotiable for women. As usual this thread is full of nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 04:31 PM
–

If you are a man and you are not more physically attractive than the woman and you are in a relationship the odds she feels like she settled on some level for you are HIGH Hence why being the bf in 2024 is a sucker's game
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 04:28 PM
4

I believe that as a society we feel the need to ignore the fact that we treat people differently based on how much we value them. Men learn this lesson quick, fast, and in a hurry. Women don't ever seem to think men treat them differently based just on how they feel about only them. Hence, a dude who's not into a chick = emotionally unavailable. Like he'd treat all women that way. A rise of emotionally unavailable men = more dudes aiming lower and dumpster diving to get easy sex from chicks they…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 06:50 AM
4

^ nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:58 AM
3

Emotionally unavailable men aren't selected for. If you disregard appearance (>90% of it), and have two men a woman's equally physically attracted to, the man who pays more attention will win. There's research consonant with this outlining behaviors that served to reinforce and increase attraction in the early stages of dating and vice versa. Emotionally unavailable people = people who don't care much about you. Modern society is funny in that basic shit gets blown up into mythical constructs. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:56 AM
1

You said men cheat more than women. They don't for the main demographic targeted by TRP content. You don't seem to understand social issues very well. Change is what precipitates attention. It is a real fact that you were wrong, got called out, and can't own it. You keep repeating shit that is irrelevant without responding to my substantive points. That was your last chance. Therefore you haven't because you can't. Convo over.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 11:20 AM
1

So yes YOU WERE WRONG. Your questions about the man cheating were addressed already and you didn't respond to the objection. And again, no sale on the "but both sides bro." One gender's behavior is behind the vast majority of the trend. OP mentioned those points in the service of indicating that social media was meaningfully exagerrating reality. It really isn't at this point. No one's mad. You just don't know anything about the topic and refuse to educate yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 05:24 AM
1

It's irrelevant. That's what you don't understand. Here's a basic concept...people have needs and romance/sexuality are part of those needs. There are people who have the skills to initiate and gain access to those things (usually men because of social norms and dynamics...but not many even then). And there are people who have no choice but to be passive. Again, mostly women. Unless you're trying to say gay people never found one another even in tough places or that certain gay people saw and ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:13 AM
1

I get it. If you had the skills.... ...that would not have been the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 12:59 AM
1

The skills they have. That you do not have.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 12:34 AM
1

And yet many gay people hooked up and found one another. Usually because one of them had the skills. You should acknowledge them one day.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 12:30 AM
1

Indeed you tried to attack me and instantly recognized that I was much wittier than you as well, so here we are with you chastising me for doing exactly what you did....but much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 12:03 AM
1

"The phrase “burden of proof” has to do with who it is who needs to back up his claims with evidence; the one who needs to prove what he is saying. The person who has the burden of proof is the one making a controversial claim. If the claim is noncontroversial, no argument, evidence, reasons, or proof, is necessary to have the claim accepted." https://voegelinview.com/the-burden-of-proof/ Figured you'd lie out your asshole to avoid the obvious: you don't know what you're talking about :) And see…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 11:34 PM
1

It isn't. But nice attempt at handwaving. Your second statement shows that philosophically, you don't know what you're talking about. As I said. And like I said. Hit the books a little harder and come back when your chops have advanced past "obviously wrong errors not-even-amateurs make." https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/15029 There's an article detailing your error. The burden of proof does not exist absent the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 11:21 PM
1

And you prove my point. You don't understand it. Here's a hint: If in some situation there is a proper presumption that something is true, anyone seeking to prove its opposite is said to bear the burden of proof https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095535899 Another hint: If I say the earth is round and you disagree. I have no burden to carry, either :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 10:54 PM
1

What did the lawyer say about that? Hmmm 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:57 PM
1

People here like lying to make themselves feel better about reality. Go for it dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:05 PM
1

The original image is. Now use your brain. Remember what the lawyer said? It doesn't matter what you blur on the original image, it's still revenge porn. You're wrong. And at this point just lying
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:04 PM
-1

And because you don't understand burden of proof and when it's appropriate as an objection and when it isn't, go brush up on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:03 PM
1

I'm almost 40. Slice it any way you want, even in your day PEOPLE WERE DOING IT. Again, notice how all you can do is bring up hypothetical possibilities and BAD FEELINGS WHOA that excuse risk taking? It's a very feminine thing. You don't have to be out to take action. That you can't even fathom the possibility is another strike against you having any skillset
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:02 PM
0

Nope. At all stages of the life cycle. Nice try tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:00 PM
2

Braindead OP. And yet... "For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level. Being unattractive reduced the probability of mating for males by between 15 and 17 points, depending on the models used, when compared to the more attractive group, and 10 points compared to those with an average attractiveness level. Being unattractive decreased the pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:45 PM
2

Your mind is a parody of a brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 11:15 AM
-2

I understand that you believe third string debate rhetorical tricks camoflouge well as discussion: they don't. What you mean to say is that you are ignorant of entry level undisputed knowledge in this area. It is not anyone's job to educate you on these facts, anymore that anyone has any sort of burden to prove the sky is blue. Congratulations on the ignorance. Sidenote, you're on the internet, home of all the world's information and easily searchable via Google. If you were interested, a search…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 09:10 AM
-6

This misses the mark. The key ingredient here is that women are a net negative for government revenue. The reason women have gained status and money is because the government mandated it through many policies. Those policies were paid for by men. Men are literally subsidizing the ability women have to "view people as disposable." Another theory I have that is consonant with many data points is that a greatly obscured fact about our society is that it is not men but women who primarily enforce a …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 08:28 AM
1

Ya either you're a bizarre freak outlier exception to men or you have some fairly common and obvious hangups. I know where my money's at
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 02:44 AM
1

Wow shocker two girls WHEN SCARED were unable to utilize a SKILLSET that required just that. 😎 And you bring up an example that demonstrates my point: they confront the issue and talk about it, its at least in the air. Living truth openly has fuck all to do with it. You don't get it. If you have the skills you will make it anywhere
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 02:00 AM
1

No one is offended. Are people offended when people say the earth is flat just because they go "nah its round?" too?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 01:58 AM
1

You could talk about it. You both chose not to. People were SOMEHOW picking up bi chicks back then. WOMEN, even. The vanishingly small percentage of them that have any notion of the skill set. And of course men were. You DIDNT WORK ANYTHING HOLY FUCK women are insane I can't even lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 01:37 AM
1

Nope. The same rules of engagement regarding picking up women haven't changed. The context of deploying the principles has but the same shit I learned at 16 is ironclad. Even for bi women. Even in niche spaces. Even many years ago. Do you know why you believe otherwise? Because you do not have a skillset.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 01:19 AM
1

In your single days then
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 01:09 AM
1

Yeah plenty of guys do that to avoid putting themselves out there. If half the girls in class sucked ur cock it'd get hard stop high horsing
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 01:08 AM
1

Ok so are you a super seducer with women, too? Just diving into casual panties with ease?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 12:57 AM
1

Really doesn't matter how they proposition. Do you not understand that if your fail rate is 1/3 or less with "les' fuck," other rates of failure are substantially lower. Yeah you mentally masturbating about shit that doesn't matter != skill. It isn't difficult for me to believe. I've turned down plenty of women. I've been with many women. You're wrong however about how it works. High quality is relative. A male 9 to you is high quality. To a female 9 he's average. And he's treated as such. So no…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 12:53 AM
3

Yeah it's not like REPLICATED research has demonstrated that ~75% of men will say yes at first contact "wanna fuck?" from women. No differences found by attractiveness of men. And this was from an average looking woman. But hey that's women for you. Even when the deck is stacked so high in their favor that they practically can't lose....they still want credit when they win lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 12:19 AM
1

Casual sex with minimal investment, yes. It manifestly is the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 12:04 AM
3

wow cool, so you've had social and sexual experiences. guess what, most autistic men haven't. You swim in a sea of dating and social privilege so deep it saves you from the true depth of struggle autism presents. Now, we're going to apply some of that stuff of men, logic ^TM, and figure out why men will often have to put up with behavior from women. Because women have more choice AND FAR MORE social protection. There are a small % of men widely desired and everyone else has to kiss ass and take …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 10:25 PM
2

You don't. A young woman who reached out to me interested in kindling something (27, cute, and oh yeah...engaged --- no not an open relationship) said something similar. she said she was really confident in her casual hookup skills because she's almost never failed to get her mark. Revealing herself to be a complete idiot, I ghosted.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 10:15 PM
1

Maybe it's some inbuilt eugenics measure I don't know It isn'lt. 1. Your role as a man isn't to select good genes. 2. You go on to list culture variant standards for attractiveness. I shit on women a lot for their 'NOTHING CAN BE DONE BOUT ATTRACTION LOL BIOLOGY' but men deserve to be double shit on for clinging to high standards they can't even meet. when in possession of a boner maximus potentialus. Bottom line, if only 1 in 50 women are "physically enough" for you. You're 1. bullshitting your…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 10:08 PM
1

As a 24 autistic F have you ever had sex or been in relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 10:02 PM
6

I'll be 40 in less than two years, so pretty old. Dating has objectively gotten much worse over the last 20 years. Usually what I've observed is that late bloomers may go through a small 'hoe' phase and come to realize the same crucial fact that any man with experience recognizes about women who have experience. A key ingredient in what makes youthful shenanigans fun is the fucking youth. Specifically stupidity and ignorance. If you are an adult waltzing around in a younger person's fantasy inte…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 06:20 PM
1

DM me
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 04:52 AM
1

You also don't know what it means. Add it to the list of assclownery you call discussion points
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 03:15 AM
1

What is the "porn" in revenge porn? revealing or sexually explicit images or videos of a person So despite your ridiculous attempts to pogo stick over common sense, you're still the wrongest wrong who ever wronged.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:06 PM
1

Here is that statement again: it doesn't matter what you blur out. I'm rooting for you to get it this time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:00 PM
1

(1) stating unsolicited dick pics per se are harassment when cyberflashing is legal in 48 states is lying about the law, implying that unsolicited dick pics in the vast majority of instances of mistaken sexual interest is sexual harassment is lying about the law (2) you're assuming that 99 out of 100 women in my experience who i've sent those pics to were "harassed" or "turned off," which is lying about my experiences and (3) see the rest of this thread for your various other silly victorian lie…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:59 PM
1

Maybe you don't understand what it doesn't matter what you blur out means. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:54 PM
1

You don't know the men to say anything about that. Anyone who uses x is insecure in a meaningful sense is culturally brainwashed and needs to mentally mature.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:06 PM
1

Translation: The wild wokester is triggered and shreiks in butthurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:04 PM
1

Not if we look at actual data regarding partners :) Do you like just making shit up or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:54 PM
1

Wtf does that have to do with anything He wouldn't be interested because she's old lmao you are so dense I believe you're an athlete
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 06:49 PM
1

You: each sex has x and y, most men are in x most women are in y Me: no not meaningfully, each sex has x but it appears as y for women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 05:03 PM
1

Wow you looked at irrelevant and incorrect data (in the 18-29 bracket i.e. young people). Male cheating isn't a growing issue in society. The levels have remained constant. Almost as if most men don't cheat and that it isn't a social issue or something. No dude you don't get to ask off my point questions that I just got done explaining were trivial and why they were trivial. Go look at the data I POINTED TO. Its hilarious that unsurprisingly you're not even familiar with those data sets yet you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:50 PM
1

You didn't say that. You said each sex has a friend and fuck zone. I said no not meaningfully. Then you came back and said that's what you said lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:39 PM
1

No they don't. Go look at those data sets. The content is popular because it resonates with the lived experience of many men. It's really annoying when these ivory tower OPs come in and dole out basic shit everyone knows about content to just imply most men are idiots and can't distinguish fantasy or hyperbole from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:36 PM
2

Dude it's not a hard point to get my point is that if the trend lines are correct and consonant with reality it's a trivial point. The OP is trying to make it seem like the content just has a weak correlation with reality which is false
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:19 PM
1

Which is focusing on it....especially when there's no need to do so. People are aware of outliers. Yeah sure if you treat exceptions as rules anything is possible. The friend zone only meaningfully applies to men just like the fuck zone only meaningfully applies to women. Only through misunderstanding what's being explored would you try to argue orherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 04:15 PM
1

Ya seems smart to focus on the .5% of cases...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:12 PM
1

The college athlete has no interest in a serious commitment....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:05 PM
1

If landing a hot babe cripples your drive to self improve you're discovering that 1. Your drive was motivated by self hatred and 2. This is how you are when you're happy with yourself and 3. From here in this state you can actually start to find drives that you truly enjoy So much self improvement bullshit is thrown at men here and elsewhere and it's really shorthand for you're not good enough something is wrong with you. Fuck that. If it's true that only 1 man for 17 women reproduced way back w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:57 PM
1

Oh so how women behave when they really are into a guy is forced and fake now lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:31 PM
1

Women tend to respond to the same types of behavior from men they're attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:19 PM
1

Yeah that's true. But the guys who really need to are.the ones who haven't demonstrated to.themsleves that someone they truly adore can adore.them back.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:17 PM
1

So you point to outliers, deny the existence of a problem, issue a categorically inapt platitude about being someone's cup of tea, talk out of your ass about dating apps and then lie about reality. Lol We're done here. All the guys complaining must be insecure because you who have never experienced what they have are sure they aren't actually experiencing it. Wokism is so evil lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:16 PM
1

I didn't. In my OP and just now I explained and further explained what the correct way to behave to keep women attracted and interested is. And that it isn't the same as treating a woman well. It seems like we're in a "tone" argument. Like you're desperate to say I contradicted myself because I said I was an asshole to someone. Yet you know that you can be highly attracted to someone who is not treating you well, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:11 PM
1

I talked about my relationships with some of them in this thread. You don't know what you're talking about. Like I said stop conflating your bullshit with my OP
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 12:00 PM
0

It looks like you are not designed to navigate grammar and syntax, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:58 AM
1

They didn't leave. Did you even read the OP? You're suffering from its never happened to you or for you so you can't believe it happened for other people. Stop putting your bullshit on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:54 AM
0

I'm telling people to play the lotto. Lottery winners exist do they not? And the odds are not even similar in favor of landing the hot woman. Ya they wouldn't be dating down. Women vary a lot more.than men in what they find very attractive. Matter of research.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:53 AM
1

You already stated what you mean by pull isn't what I mean in the OP....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:52 AM
1

They all did a ton of things for me. Unfortunately you're just making a bunch of excuses dude..hey that's fine but don't pass off what you did as you doing what I'm telling guys they should do in my OP because by your admission you haven't
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:34 AM
2

The feminine energy etc = she's actually into you..what don't you understand. And it's THE preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:33 AM
0

Until you entered the chat with this gem.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:32 AM
1

No the irony is that this dude DESPERATELY WANTS what I say in my OP....a truly hot woman who loves him truly romantically and sexually. Rather than just give up and say hot chicks all don't care...find one who does lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:31 AM
1

Yeah you're projecting a lot of your shortcomings onto beautiful women. No dude you failed to find women who had deep emotional and sexual connections with you and are confusing plastic hot thots with all hot women. Then you're equating my OP with drunk meaningless sex lol wtf no dude. If you're relying on alcohol and drugs and whatever else to do the job you're not doing anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:30 AM
1

Yeah so you say it's so easy to date hot chicks then say nonsense like they don't really care about you....which means no dude, it isn't easy to date hot chicks in the sense I mean in my OP where she FEELS CONNECTED TO YOU.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:28 AM
1

It isn't. Face tits ass thin. Without surgery you can only control being thin.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:25 AM
1

Yeah no women never very much enjoy the company of an aloof bad boy who doesn't treat them well. It's as if acting in a way that maintains or increases attraction is orthogonal to what sustains and maintains a healthy relationship or something. I'm convinced you don't know how to listen or enjoy feigning ignorance over easy to grasp concepts :)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:23 AM
1

^ example of someone brainwashed by culture and too ignorant to notice
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:20 AM
1

Young Boys are currently being fetishized by women in school districts across the nation. At any rate you waxing nonsensical about history doesn't make it so. The height preference isn't universal and is entirely absent in hunter gatherer tribes, i.e. where humans came from. At any rate people like what they are told to like
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:19 AM
1

No it's because culture amplifies one and not the other. The dunderheadedness of people will never cease to amaze
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:18 AM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170761/#:~:text=In%20age%2Dadjusted%20analyses%2C%20the,in%20risk%20of%20attempted%20suicide. They must be killing themselves at much higher rates because of all the love. Like your counter argument....are cartoons. Wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:16 AM
0

https://sports.yahoo.com/news/pornhub-survey-reveals-more-people-035959931.html?_fsig=eV3dmH8gb21EXrmobZMhOQ--#:~:text=Statistics%20show%20a%2047%25%20increase,year%20compared%20to%20previous%20years. Bruh chubby chasing is on the rise. That didn't come from nowhere
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:14 AM
1

^ the fact that you have to dream up victim blaming nonsense to describe a well documented phenomenon and prejudice just cements its existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:13 AM
1

Except it isn't. Women behave very similarly when they're actually into you sexually and romantically vs not. So just 1. She's into you + 2..she's hot enough = commitment Your original post also doesn't address what you mean by "what that feeling would be like."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:09 AM
1

Yeah I already said he can get his needs met with others if he has to as long as he still keeps taking the shots at the personal 10s. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:52 AM
0

I did act the correct way. Correct as in Aloof, cocky, i.e. all the things that people say to be and that women enjoy. I was attractive to them in a long term sense. That doesn't mean I treated them well. Two different concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:50 AM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/fig1_26241100 Maybe pictures will help. Do you see how there's much more variation in ratings among women? Even the guy rated a 1 had a SD in ratings of 10 (80 point scale) meaning that even for him somewhere out there way way out there is a woman who finds him super sexy (a rating of around 40 or so puts a guy in the top percentiles of mean female attractiveness ratings) And it's about bandwidth and time and self image. Getting rejected by a 5 feels worse tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:49 AM
1

Um....ya this is off topic so..
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:44 AM
1

I didn't lie at all. Here rather than assume you made some great point via snark EXPLAIN and clarify.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:44 AM
1

Yes and then they will probably get accepted. This seems to be a male female thing where women cannot imagine successful risk taking
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:37 AM
0

Let's say you allow yourself to believe in people making exceptions for all the right reasons. That you live in a place where that can and does happen every day. Still feel like you made a point of consequence beyond LOL BUT BAD THINGS COULD HAPPEN LOL (Which I already pre emptively addressed in the OP) You deluded yourself into thinking the good things in life don't exist and took life advice from bitter women on PPD. You're here saying women never find themselves so attracted to someone that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:34 AM
1

Idk but it seems like you're talking about two of them. Congrats you discovered people make mistakes when they're young. Wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:31 AM
1

Yes. My OP is not talking about social circle dynamics...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:30 AM
1

The female version of the friend zone is the fuck zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:19 AM
1

I'm not nofap. It happens occasionally. I don't have any view about porn or jerking off either way. I was noticing something you said and finding a commonality and noted the reason for it. Jesus relax.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:18 AM
1

Not really. It's just a whole nuanced topic that the OP isn't talking about which is what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:17 AM
1

Hot is not the same as attractive. Why? All she'll do is say no. It's so weird how many men care so much about what random women think....about anything lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:15 AM
1

Read the OP and read my comments. A 1 would be super happy with a 4. There are enough women to go around.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:14 AM
1

Yeah I understand them. The world is pretty mean to men. Especially now. But my advice isn't that crazy. Now my friend did lose his V to a solid 8 when he was like a 4 but like I said...reaching about that far is doable. It'll take effort. It's pretty easy to shoot your shot tbh. Just look at a girl and smile. That'll tell you all you need to know. Those dudes can start small. I remember good looking loser back in the day had a whole really well written guide to going out solo and it was a progr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:13 AM
1

Lol how many times do I have to say HOT TO THE MAN. A 1 will be joyous for a 4. And I said that if he needs to the dude can meet his needs with other women. As long as he never stops shooting for the stars.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:07 AM
4

I stopped watching porn at around 17 and I don't really jack off so you might be on to something. The natural libido really will get you off your ass and have you make things happen. Idk if I buy "making women feel good" or any actual personality trait having any impact at all on the interaction. I just play duck duck dick. Why try to spit game and manipulate the interaction when you can just move on and find someone who's just into you and with it from the jump? Having said that, I do know that…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:04 AM
1

I never said they had to wait for sex. Read the post read my comments. Go get your needs met with the easier odds....but NEVER STOP TAKING THE SHOTS at the ones you really want. I'm dealing with a generation that grew up with the office and is so afraid of being laughed at that they won't take any risks even though that's the very thing that it takes to win. Especially if you're an under dog. Female rejection is not a big deal. They're short and weak who cares. When did all of these high pitched…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:58 AM
1

What is fairly normal? Idk the point is that every man can be a hero if he's willing to be heroic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:54 AM
1

Men can, sure. Men aren't like women in that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:52 AM
2

Dude I've been with more women and dealt with more rejection than probably everyone on this board. The problem with cringe culture is that it makes men into women who are over concerned with social faux pas and awkward moments. They can do it if they're willing to go the distance for it. Combo of no simp boundaries and high standards. And not giving up. Realizing like I said that success could take YEARS.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:50 AM
0

Yeah that's because people are increasingly more socially anxious and risk averse...feminine in other words. If they paid attention to using what social power they had to help those beneath them rather than constantly trying to suckle at a power teet....maybe those people wouldn't be so socially stranded. Because this was 17 years ago now...different time. Changed a life. But he also put himself in social situations and weathered the storm and the teasing and always put his best foot forward too…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:46 AM
1

Not really. I'm not talking about marriage or even necessarily an LTR. Just "a hot woman exists out there who thinks you're super hot." Yeah wow hot "stay in your lane" take. And people wonder why men are becoming such wimps. Like the OP says a woman the man thinks is hot. A 1 would probably be very happy with a 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:42 AM
1

Yeah I have pictures of myself. No I'm not going to post it on a public reddit thread. ... Dude no. You need to learn long term thinking. In the short term minimizing risk works but erodes your self worth. In the long term holding out or continuing to take those shots has a better payoff.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:38 AM
-1

The title of the OP suggests otherwise. .... Um ya bro the HS chick wanted me for my money lmao. No dude you need to understand that women vary on what they personally find very attractive. Maybe a conventionally hot guy is in that box for 20/30% of women but a normal guy maybe 1% or less who knows. Point is they exist. I mean the first chick I was a real asshole toward tbh. Not a good story lol Another chick I never committed to so she moved on Another one we grew apart and she moved away Anoth…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:35 AM
1

If your friends have wildly different preferences than you do why are they your friends. That gets into social circle management beyond the scope of the OP
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:29 AM
1

Except when it does work and becomes worth it. I didn't say a guy couldn't if necessary get his needs met..just that he should never take his eye off the real goal. The first babe is like the first million.... the hardest one. My friend in HS was 5'4 a late bloomer, looked very similar to Michael Cera. Butt of a lot of jokes. Great guy whip smart. Well in college I noticed that a very hot woman: FOR WHATEVER REASON:: really had the hots for him. I orchestrated him losing his virginity. As in at …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:25 AM
2

Nope. Not attractive. Hot. To that man. It's not about increasing odds. The entire point is to overcome bad odds. It feels way better to do that. And the resulting increase in confidence is way more of an increase in odds. Idk some women think I'm beautiful others don't know I exist. I focus on the ones who think I'm the bees knees.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:24 AM
2

I mean but part of you liking someone is liking how they mesh with your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:22 AM
2

She wasn't famous at the time obviously, or a porn star. The difference is that my story is real...and spectacular :) Your first comment is nonsense. Men and women judge one another primarily on looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:20 AM
1

https://images.app.goo.gl/6FFkgC1CB6HpgTNZ9 Happens every day brah
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:17 AM
2

It won't be easy. They don't have to be the hottest woman objectively but ya hot to the guy. Looking at her has to give you good feelings. I didn't say it was easy. However every man can't be in the top x%. Much better to rely on the fact that outlier women ARE OUT THERE. If you just have the correct boundaries and only give your time to women who have high interest then focus on those women...eventually one will come along. Now do I think a 1 will only get good feelings from a 10? Fuck no. A 4 …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:10 AM
2

Lol it's too much effort to ask a girl out and block if she says anything but yes? Too much effort to have a simple 0/max one drink one hour or less first date. Too much effort to just escalate physically. ^ ANY of those three show more was the point lol Your method involves setting up a date without this screening and sitting through who knows what and waiting until the very end to ask an awkward question. The girl who says yes instantly is probably not going to mind splitting a check. Same wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:48 AM
5

I'll leave myself out of it ;) But of course. First hooking up with many partners fucks your pair bonding regardless of gender. Second, me and other guys I know were put on blast by the are we dating the same guy groups. Third, I've witnessed first hand the phenomenon of a very gl guy who was disliked because of his abrasive personality. I've seen rich dudes get divorce raped and minor celebrities get dicked around by women. I've never seen an exception to the rule of when a man goes after a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:45 AM
2

Dude no. There aren't many reasons the vast majority of the time. Go look at a lineup of the hottest women around....the closer she looks like that while also treating him like she's highly attracted to him, the easier commitment will be for her to get. And what feeling are you talking about....wanting a guy to commit to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:39 AM
1

No it wouldn't. Nowhere is sexual act defined as looking at a picture. Otherwise viewing porn would be a sexual act. Jerking off while watching is. Daydreaming about sex is not a sexual act for the same reason. You guys are falling all over yourselves to invert the English language, justify your own crimes, and pretend that cock doesn't arouse ANY women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:25 AM
2

Not as much as the stuff I listed does.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:21 AM
-1

Not any reason. All physical. Only thing you can change is your weight unless you want to get boob and face job. You asked how he could be turned on to commit. The answer: get hotter Longer answer: This all assumes that you have a decent level of femininity. But that involves being submissive and generally acting like he's a great guy and doing stuff for him to help him. Women typically naturally do this when they're highly attracted to you. Hence....the main reason
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:18 AM
1

This is so low on the list of ways to separate the good from the bad. The main way is to just ask her out as soon as possible on an app. Any guy they're legitimately excited about = where and when? Anything else...block. The date itself should just be at a chill place and mainly just you and her talking. Max one drink. Unless things progress to intimacy it shouldn't take more than an hour. Next way is to escalate touching on the date...hand holding, hand on thigh, etc. If she acts like you're a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:12 AM
1

No women wouldn't be open to more casual sex to more guys despite that because the reason they aren't boils down to 2 things How society conditions many women about sex What society tells women is acceptable and good to sleep with/have sexuality with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:10 AM
1

That's me tho
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 03:11 AM
1

You should speak to the manager
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:57 AM
0

I'm not here to give lessons in common sense to the deliberately obtuse and bigoted
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:28 AM
1

You don't seem very good with reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:20 AM
1

There is ONE REASON AND ONE REASON ALONE A MAN will not commit to a woman he is sleeping with: she's not hot enough. All right. 90%. Sometimes, even when they're really attracted to you, they're just too fucking insane to deal with on a regular basis and can only occupy a sitcom 22 minutes a week portion of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 02:01 AM
2

women don't want to respect themselves. they want men who are better than they are. this is the number one overriding lizard brain thought process. unfortunately for many brainwashed ppd men (and women) the inputs on what constitutes 'better than' are almost entirely cultural.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:59 AM
8

completely false
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:58 AM
1

This "reasoning" is always terrible. The real answer is this --- OP is attracting women he doesn't give much of a shit about, meaning yes, those women are abundant for him. Similarly for women. It doesn't matter how attractive you are as a man, a woman on your actual level simply will be a "challenge," "pain in the ass," "effort," whatever you want to call it. Because of how attraction and mating works for men and women, men attract/fuck down and sometimes across, and women are attracted to/fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:57 AM
14

Society is empirically gynocentric with an anti-male bias --- stronger than class and race: "Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was pro-women/anti-men bias, followed by smaller but nonetheless consistent pro-upper-class/anti-lower-class biases. By contrast, we observed less consistent effects of targets’ race, no effects of targets’ age, and no consistent interactions between target-level categories" https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-61496-001?doi=1 study methodology: "Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:30 AM
0

And many men who have boldly made an advance without requiring them to sign a consent form or directly ask to do x (including send a nude) because a lot of women are turned off by that. Only 25% of women even think that consent needs to be given at all stages of an actual sexual encounter. Only 12% of women strongly disagree that failing to say no is a sign of consent https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/1414/6117/4323/Consent_Survey.pdf You can keep trying to push your warped Victorian Misan…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:27 AM
1

Once again, I explained why you did no such thing. You ignored the other graph regarding female reply rate vs male attractiveness. Gosh I wonder why. Therefore, because men are the ones initiating the vast majority of all contact, female reply rates are almost linearly correlated with male attractiveness, what is happening...? Rather than talking with men 3 or 4 points above them, women are talking with men .5-1 point above them -- because those are the ones who will entertain them. Note how the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:19 AM
1

Doesn't matter..you made sure he could be identified and that people knew about the lewd nature of the image and spread it with thr purpose of damaging his reputation. Keep justifying your weird insane vigilante criminal behavior. It's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:37 PM
-2

Some women are thinking of men and their cocks. I know you can't conceive of a world or experience outside of your own because of solipsism and bigotry but I have hope...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:16 PM
1

"It doesn't matter what you blur out. If an angry girl can convince a prosecutor and a jury that the video is of her and you don't have a signed video release allowing you to publish it, you can expect to spend some significant time in jail." https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-it-illegal-to-post-a-video-on-social-media-of-a-5379192.html Shhh
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:13 PM
1

Please read my first comment to you to understand what this means because you didn't get it the first time
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:10 PM
1

You don't seem to understand the difference between a picture and genitals. You keep lying and assuming that few women are aroused by it and welcomed it, lying and confusing real life genitals with pixels, and confusing YOU HAVING A PERSONAL VIEWPOINT with OBJECTIVE MORAL REALITY. Standard bigotry
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:10 PM
1

yes you're lying about my experiences, lying about the law, and lying about pretty much anything else because gasp another point of view exists lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:08 PM
1

For whatever reason attorneys disagree with your dunderheaded attempt to evade reality. One writes: "It doesn't matter what you blur out. If an angry girl can convince a prosecutor and a jury that the video is of her and you don't have a signed video release allowing you to publish it, you can expect to spend some significant time in jail." https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/is-it-illegal-to-post-a-video-on-social-media-of-a-5379192.html But please keep showing the world how insane and hypocriti…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 11:07 PM
1

It is porn. You don't undo the sexually explicitly nature of the image by blurring out the genitals while making sure the individual can still be identified. DUCY? Of course not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:28 PM
0

Seriously. It's a fucking picture on a phone. The women here need to get over themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:41 PM
1

They're bigoted shitty people. To the core.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:40 PM
1

These chicks are seriously clown cuckoo
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:32 PM
2

Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:28 PM
1

^ complete nonsense Unsolicited dick pic = not illegal 48 states. If in romantic context i.e. dating app match, just not illegal. Sharing someone's nude images without consent to humiliate = illegal The chick said elsewhere she makes sure the dude can be identified by tats and other marks. PPD women are such disgusting hypocrites lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:28 PM
1

To who......you? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:40 AM
1

Lol bigot and now a strawmanning liar. 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:40 AM
1

So you commit a real crime in response. Super decent. Victorian PPD women
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:38 AM
1

Imagine being a bigot and so unable to comprehend a reality outside the one up my own ass that I can't recognize how hateful and spiteful I seem. Like lol I don't doubt whatever men reduce themselves to putting up with you ever felt sexually confident enough to do anything like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:37 AM
1

That you made sure he could be identified by .... LOL With the intent of causing harm. ^ literal still a crime
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:34 AM
1

LMFAO I understand you want to talk about shit that no one's talking about (sending pics to minors) because you are desperate to paint those who ARE DIFFERENT from you as EVIL Which is a way worse red flag. Quick question, burn any crosses lately, call the cops on mysterious dark skinned individuals walking into their own homes, or demanded to speak to the manager lately?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:33 AM
1

So you intentionally shared someone's nude photos without their consent for the purpose of causing them harm. ^ an actual crime Lmao You can't make this stupid shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:30 AM
-2

No just combating extreme sex negativity and outright bigotry :)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:27 AM
1

Porn != flashing
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:26 AM
2

Nope. Have always talked about unsolicited.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:25 AM
1

You're bigoted toward people who enjoy different things than you do including flashing. My disgusting behavior that many women have enjoyed? Do you like lying about reality and the experiences of others to make yourself feel better? Obviously the real world is a very scary place for you lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:21 AM
0

Lol what a stupid scenario to dream up. Apparently PPD is full of Victorians
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:19 AM
-4

You're now lying. Cyberflashing, i.e. sending unsolicited sexual pics is only illegal in two states. Keep your bigotry to yourself and learn to accept other people enjoy different things. How fucken difficult is that to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:18 AM
-1

Um even if the child catfishing as an adult on the other side consented and asked for the nudes the same consequences would apply so lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:05 AM
2

If they didn't ask yet they're unsolicited SO WHAT DO YOU MEAN? DO YOU MEAN THERE ARE INSTANCES where unsolciited dick pics are IMPLICTLY WELCOME? WHAAAAAAT
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:04 AM
-2

It's not lewd to send a pic of something. Lmfao you had to warp it to make it a minor even though no one even said anything about that. Good that you admit it isn't a crime especially not in the usual.context and that you were wrong. I guess you're one of the women who thinks bigotry and intolerance of men and women who think and do differently than they do is somehow progressive? Oh can't forget the stupid name calling as well. Because I've triggered you and you've forgotten how to respectfully…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 09:02 AM
-3

It's not sexual harassment in the first place especially if there's a sexual context for texting or sexual/romantic interaction occurring. You don't know anything about me or my experiences so stop trying to remark on them. And lmao at your advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:58 AM
-3

Yeah. You surmised its mainly used as a power play blah blah blah Based on nothing, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:55 AM
-2

You're my worst nightmare because you can't conceive of experiences outside your own and think saying rude things about people somehow vindicates your experience. Aka a bigot
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:53 AM
1

You obviously aren't if you're this faux upset about dick pics. What you mean to say is that people, men and women, who enjoy different things than you do you have a hard time accepting that without being bigoted. I understand. You sound great to deal with lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:47 AM
1

Look better. Look better. Get taller. But if you can't, look better Class over.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:37 AM
-3

What don't women find very upsetting in the right context? Being nice upsets them, for example 😎 it's legit the worst and means you're a manipulative POS. Like...we are reaching "the boy who cried wolf" with the faux outrage. It's pixels on a screen. Women tend to find things upsetting when men they don't have high sexual interest in do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:34 AM
1

It's pretty legit ngl But it's more if the girl just is highly sexually interested in you she's going to like it...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:31 AM
0

No. I only did that seldom. Lol way higher than 1% hit rate. Um there's no such thing as a natural pace. There's just what you're looking for and who's on the same page. Idk why you're assuming they'd all be ONS. It's more efficient as a man to sort women with high sexual interest first. Then from that group, pick someone you connect with and get along with. I'd prefer "yes love ur dick" girls to "let's talk about our shared interests for 3-10 dates and maybe possibly sex could happen" girls any…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:31 AM
-4

Your answer wasn't honest. You made several false claims. It should have begun and ended with your personal experience and preference. Everything else was wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:26 AM
-7

It's interesting to see people claim something that mostly isn't sexual harassment and definitely isn't in 48 states is sexual harassment. Sorry you've never matched with someone exchanged sexual chat and then nudes. Pixel pic != flashing. No you're refusing to acknowledge that sometimes women are turned on by men. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:23 AM
0

Ya if you have great abs and tats to frame the main piece it's goes great
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:21 AM
-10

Or other people have different experiences...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:20 AM
-1

No in real life. Duh. Jesus....
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:19 AM
2

It isn't different if the conversation is getting sexual but it hasn't been asked for: still unsolicited.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:18 AM
0

^ truth
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:16 AM
-8

Finally an honest answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:16 AM
-5

Definitely false. You're saying that no one who is well endowed has ever sent a cock pic which is just stupid. It isn't illegal in 48 states. I'm sure this and many other behaviors with 0 actual damage will become crimes over time though. Because people pretend pixels on a screen can cause them harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:15 AM
-11

Increasingly yes states are moving to criminalize them another symptom of a bloated, dumb late stage capitalist society. Only 1 or 2 states so far. Sending a picture of a penis != flashing your penis. It's a group of pixels on a screen that is easily blocked and removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:13 AM
-1

When it works it's pretty great. In the hey day of dating apps when I was just running around, literally could get a new girl every day or two using that method. You QUICKLY sort out the women who are dtf from the ones who aren't. As a man it makes much more sense to seek sex first and then relationship second.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:04 AM
1

^ this guy gets it Like the times it works it is HIGH REWARD
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:02 AM
1

Nope. Best case is you have sex. That people act like men are just sending all these cock pics and just it NEVER works is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 08:00 AM
-1

Of course I have. So have many other men. Men don't do stuff unless it works some % of the time for them. So yeah some women (ones who have issues with sex or aren't thinking you're sexy) will disappear. But if you're sending dick pics you're really not trying to deal with them anyway so...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:59 AM
-13

Patently false.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:57 AM
-14

Wouldn't really work on a porn quality dick tho
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:44 AM
-13

Use your head. The answer is YES. They are classic high risk high reward. First, if you're launching dick pics your goal in the immediate future is sex. Not many better ways to sort out which women are going to string you along i.e. not that sexually excited by you but see bf potential (you should be aggressively weeding these out anyway) from the ones who you "do it" for. Anyone who pretends otherwise is profoundly ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:43 AM
3

Women aren't willing to give unattractive men a chance. Nothing in the data shows that. Further, the attractiveness of the woman is increasingly irrelevant as to whether they're thinking they're giving an unattractive man "a chance." A 3 who gives a 4 "a chance," is delusional. And when women are "giving you a chance," it's painfully obvious and the "prove yourself to me" air is so condescending that I'm unsure how men even endure it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:41 AM
3

Genius most interactions are started by men, the proportion of female first send interactions is so small so as not to be worth considering. You're just seeing the fact that women are STILL CONSTRAINED by who is WILLING to talk with them. The female reply rate scaled up in step with male attractiveness so no, this interpretation about "well women actually are reaching out to normal guys" is silly and ignores context. Women don't need time to develop attraction at all. This is replicated research…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:14 AM
4

Women freely drop how they believe the vast majority of men unattractive. It's just funny that reversed, "that's extremely discouraging." Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:47 AM
1

It's not much different by age. Look up the stats
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:45 AM
1

Lmfao Women freely drop how gross they think most guys are in ALL COED environments....
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:43 AM
6

Mainly because quality man is socially defined as a man who has no issues with women. Plenty of men who have good amounts of "the stuff" like looks money or status do struggle to date women ON THEIR LEVEL. in fact, most do 😀 That's the key.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:40 AM
8

^ this kind of shit will become more and more common. People like to bleat about biology but it really isn't. It's cultural programming. Women aren't complicated. They want to be among x class/status in society and follow scripts THEY LEARNED.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:38 AM
7

That content generally shows women with.... Unrealistic standards and expectations No accountability Harsh views and treatment of men who "don't make the cut." The data is consonant with those trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:31 AM
6

I didn't edit it I said that the first time. Any situation where you're hanging out with a non-related to you woman who has 0 sexual interest in you is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:28 AM
0

Lmao People who think standards and attraction aren't overwhelmingly cultural are funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 04:39 AM
2

Hence I limited what I was talking about to that situation....?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 04:38 AM
1

Correct. This is why women like infiltrating male spaces because they can nullify any positive quality a man has, such as IQ for instance or just "being correct"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 03:59 AM
12

Female friends (where she does not find YOU sexually attractive) 99/100 are an extremely negative value proposition for a man. Women often use male platonic friends to meet their emotional needs, often while the guys they're banging won't meet them. It just doesn't do much for your social standing as a guy to have some woman around who views you as unsexy. Women treat men they do not find attractive with much less respect than men they do find attractive. I've literally seen a man who was on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 03:31 AM
3

Oh so all the data that more or less comports with a lot of the content is a strawman. Keep stringing together cliche shame sound bytes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:43 AM
6

You literally derailed from the main point because you can't respond to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 01:30 AM
1

You're saying something no one said, in other words. More derailment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 12:11 AM
1

It definitely is true mountains of data confirm it. And sorry you can't argue against reality with hypothetical (well men likely would do the same). So no not same thing and an insane derailment
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 11:40 PM
7

Yeah bro it's all fake. Data from dating apps is fake. Gss data is fake. Marriage trends are fake. Fertility ratios are fake. Men dropping out of dating is fake. Double the amount of men vs prior generations at 20 having never even been on a date is fake. Half of all men never having even bothered to approach a woman is fake. What will we make up next? As usual dumb OP finds a way to blame men for things. This time it's because they don't have "media literacy." Not that they relate to the media …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:23 PM
1

Always bad. The more cuddly and close you get to her the less she will respect you. Never seen an exception to this rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:20 PM
1

They don't do that in reality so way to rattle off an irrelevant shaming sound byte.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:19 PM
4

^ such a good answer
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 08:10 AM
11

20 years ago maybe your last paragraph was true but not really. Not today. If anything women have increased their public bitch shields 5000% There's a reason half of young men have never bothered....
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 08:09 AM
1

So when you're overwhelmed and outclassed you resort to lying. Nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 06:07 AM
1

Ya bro several studies have shown that most weight loss efforts are ineffective or not that effective in the long run. For whatever reason the researchers don't think it's because people are just lazy donut eating fat fucks. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)06374-8/fulltext You're denying the existence of a multi faceted problem in favor of blaming the individual. As I said before it's a tried and true and tiresome refrain identical to blaming the poor the disabled and everything…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 06:07 AM
3

That doesn't invalidate the other stat
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 11:32 PM
1

you equivocated by pretending you meant to say "get laid once in their life," versus what "getting laid" generally means: with any real consistency. Yeah bro, getting laid is so easy that 30% of young men at their horniest have completely walked away from any kind of dating or sex at all. It's so easy that nearly half of men under 20 have even been on a date. So sickeningly easy that half of men have never approached a woman and of the rest most haven't done so in over a year. You're just saying…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:08 PM
1

you made a claim. i understand that there is no support for your claim and you are now tossing out various other claims and reframes of the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:29 PM
1

are you illiterate? YES Look at you, derailing away because YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT THE MAIN ISSUE. Until you learn how to read and discuss on point rather than derail and dissemble (like a woman) when you "argue," no response forthcoming.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:28 PM
1

Your claim is that men can get laid consistently. They can't. You're shifting the goal posts and moving them around, now claiming single men don't want to consistently get laid via casual sex when about half of at least 18-29 year old men do. Yeah you claimed it was a small group of women having sex with men from that data. Now that you apparently realize that was a huge unsupported leap of logic you're here derailing and talking about a bunch of other shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:27 PM
2

dude without a doubt i have way more experience than you. learn how to discuss without trying to smear the people you're talking with. it just reveals your general inexperience
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:25 PM
1

It really isn't "quite a lot" over 20+ years. Yes, I understand the median. You don't seem to understand that your given values don't tell us if a small group of men is sleeping with a lot of women or vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:18 PM
6

Much fewer men are in a position to string women along than vice versa. It's pretty simple I don't know what you don't get. A third of women admit to using men for free meals, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 09:17 PM
7

No. They go on dates with women who don't like them much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 08:42 PM
3

Um 8 partners over decades isn't much at all. If you look at how many partners and how often single men have sex you'd see what I mean. And the data could be few men having sex with more women or vice versa there's not enough information from just median partner count. Yeah bro women are fucking and committing to everyone you cracked the case
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 08:40 PM
11

Men should read this because it's the truth. Women either LIKE YOU or NOT. The ones who like you will be easy to get on a date and easy to generally move things forward with. The ones who don't will not. Difficult women will always be difficult women for you, so don't entertain them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 08:27 PM
3

Anyone can get laid once in their lives, sure. Anyone can't get laid in the colloquial sense with any consistency. ... It means that whoever women are picking to fuck and commit to are what they consider high value.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 08:22 PM
2

Increasingly irrelevant as time goes on. The number of women with 10+ partners has quadrupled since the 1990a
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 08:12 PM
2

So you don't have anything relevant to say on topic. Bro you're the one who doesn't get anything you don't simp for as evidenced by your rabid bitterness
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 07:44 PM
3

Except anyone can't get laid. And among crackhead females I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 07:20 PM
2

You're butthurt because you're making a bunch of assumptions about me and using it to derail from the obvious fallacies. No sale. Go back to the drawing board.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 07:19 PM
4

Yeah rewrite this into something other than a butthurt ad hominem screed, gpt-tool
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 03:17 PM
3

That's why over a third of men under 30 in their sexual prime have given up on dating I'm sure. And why its projected that 45% of women will be single by 2030. Because there's so much abundance out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:26 PM
5

If women select them most then they are high value according to women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:23 PM
1

Easy. I know how many women I've been with. I know the rough distributions of attractiveness women I've been with. From that it's pretty easy to infer that if you're in a high percentile or break the meter, you must be on par with the bogeyman...I mean "chad." Yeah bro you just lived with these packs of Chads. And saw exactly what went down and how it all happened right up to him busting inside of her, right? And these women weren't just slutty women themselves for the most part? And they were a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:12 PM
1

Yeah no one's talking about shrugging shoulders and you're talking about different types of acts. A public health problem != crime problem. You seem to think shaming people for making choices their social and cultural environment are all but leading them into will.do much beyond further deteriorate their mental health. It's blaming individuals for systemic problems. Neo liberal nonsense. And just because comedians make us laugh doesn't mean what they say is actionable truth. They're not running …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 02:06 PM
1

Addictions and vices are also outgrowths of circumstances beyond an individuals control in many cases as well. We aren't in an Asian country so who gives a shit? Bill Burr is a comedian..he says funny things. For whatever reason we don't think comedians should run the country or set policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 01:37 PM
5

Nice derailment attempt. We're focusing on one specific type. It still remains true that you are MAKING UP A FLAW to justify a result. You keep tap dancing away from your fallacy by continually asserting that the flaw is a flaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 01:32 PM
0

I've been with more women than most "Chads." People who relate all these tales often over interpret things. Unless you're holding his dick whenever he's fucking you really don't know what's going on. Just like people who are duped by chadfishing experiments. Which prove dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 01:25 PM
6

Man so you have no clue how romantic rejection --- which has been shown to be on par with physical pain --- could be suffering and unsurprisingly fail to realize that the issue is you MAKING UP A FLAW not whether said flaw exerts an effect. Correct your mistakes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:58 PM
2

Yeah bootstraps thinking is so lame. Like you're invoking outliers who likely had advantages others didn't have in helping them fight their various battles. We'd solve more social problems if people weren't so eager to pat themselves on the ass and saddle up on the "look at how great I am and how much everyone else sucks cause I did/I know.people who x" high horse. Maybe you got lucky in some way. Literally if you're an outlier that's what happened. Nothing special about you but chance boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:55 PM
1

Um those were some bomb years for the net. The rise of social media amd swipe apps are what killed it
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:52 PM
1

Chad is more or less a meme. There's something way different that's happening. https://nuancepill.com/are-the-male-elite-enjoying-a-sexual-boomtime/ https://nuancepill.com/has-the-attractiveness-and-sex-partners-correlation-increased/ I actually think it's possible that the rise in ASD and just autistic traits in men could be exerting an effect...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:50 PM
1

On balance people are happier married than not but more importantly a culture that VALUES commitment rather than convenience being the purpose of a relationship creates happier relationships. Half of it is as a culture we have mindfucked ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:46 PM
1

Literally every stat that would identify a so called incel was here then.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:44 PM
1

Except if that were true then you wouldn't have the amount of 20 year old men who've never been on a date be more than double what it was back then.... And give me a break. Male beauty standards alone show that your take is wrong. Look at a teen beat or whatever circa 1980 vs the "new hot" teen heartthrobs now who now have steroid bodies. Night/day
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:36 PM
4

Yes a cause YOU MADE UP to explain the effect that turns out to be a FAILING among the victims. When you MAKE UP FAULTS of those suffering to EXPLAIN suffering you are engaging in just world fallacious thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:29 PM
1

Ridiculous. If women are only truly sexually attracted and therefore only capable of truly loving men who satisfy physical and maybe material hypergamy.... Men would be opportunistically hypogamous in search of authentically interested partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:25 PM
6

LMAO Just world fallacy = x happening is your fault because [whatever bullshit] i.e. you DESERVE IT and that therefore this result IS JUST
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:18 PM
6

People who have problems have no one to blame but themselves part X: nothing can ever be wrong with society. EVER.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 12:16 PM
1

Yeah you keep trying to assert yourself into everything when your actual statement demonstrates the opposite. We can. Your earlier statement regarding whether people are truly on their own is FALSE. And YOU don't want people to have any help. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:37 AM
1

You don't. Your answer went out of the way to miss the point. I don't have to. You're over here shouting your opinion about taxes to the world. Which is fine. Stop pretending you're doing anything but that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:34 AM
1

The only thing stupid is you not understanding, yet again, the comment. So you admit that institutions could help and that this is all about you whining about how YOU don't think they should. Not some law of society. Just your buttraging preference. Good.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:31 AM
1

Sure dude height and appearance and race and even income are just totally malleable and easy to change Can everyone also be a billionaire in your clown ass fictional world? The question is whether institutions can help people experiencing social issues or not. You know the answer is that they can. So asserting that it's impossible is just you saying that YOU would rather they not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:19 AM
1

You can't compare it because you live in a time after those battles have been won, yeah. Cultural understanding hasn't reached the point of understanding how superficial and fixed the qualities that determine dating success are, and because you're a social lemming can't conceive of that being possible. More assertions. Literally institutions respond to what people demand. So things could happen if enough people demanded it. You're completely ignorant of how society actually works it seems
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:10 AM
1

And you didn't understand the point regarding discrimination or disabilities. The point is that nimrods like you said the same thing way back when those were the issues being discussed. I never made a policy recommendation. I stated a fact: institutions and other people can help other people in most every area of life and your bootstraps take on this area, like most areas, is bullshit. You don't have empathy and you also don't have reading comprehension. Not holding my breath because your worldv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 10:03 AM
1

Yeah you keep asserting stuff based on nothing. Literally the same things were said about being disabled, discriminated against, and being poor :) You don't seem to understand much of how dating even works nor the fact that I certainly have more dating experience with hotter women than you. Because you don't know what empathy is. Its not that spot up your ass you're speaking from though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 09:58 AM
0

Yeah bro government programs don't exist to financially compensate people for various social ills....wait a minute... Yeah you keep asserting a social issue isn't a social issue based on nothing. Your line of thinking is the same as the people who argued against most every other social welfare program. Wrong and eventually erased by history. There's no such thing as self made bootstraps anything. People who believe in that atomic individualism stuff are stupendeously naive about society. Congrat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 09:53 AM
0

Yeah I get it you like asserting things. You said that no one but you can help you which is stupid in the social welfare state society. There are literally a ton of ways institutions and culture could help the situation. Like congrats on being deliberately braindead and unimaginative regarding issues others face.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 09:47 AM
0

Ya bro changing perceptions of people in popular media has no impact on how those phenotypes are perceived, financial compensation for all manner of social ails doesn't help those suffering from them.... Ignore reality more
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 09:39 AM
1

Total nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 06:53 AM
1

Seriously The sadistic pretzel logic...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 06:53 AM
0

^ complete bootstraps nonsense. At the end of the day MANY PEOPLE AND INSTITUTIONS could help others if so motivated. This quasi social darwinist bullshit needs to die
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 06:52 AM
1

OP is just a dime a dozen "blame men" for problems men face post. The asinine arrogance of just assuming huge swaths of men must have the "wrong mental attitude" always escapes these people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 06:51 AM
1

A blog post full of peer reviewed studies. Do you enjoy being a lying moron?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:19 PM
1

I just cited a source replete with peer reviewed research that refutes your central premise. You can't answer my question because you don't understand evolutionary biology or population genetics. Until you answer it, since I've asked several times, I'm not responding and treating it as an admission.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:08 PM
1

Nope. That study repeats a lot of falsehoods and just so stories. For instance, the preference for tall males is NOT a cultural universal. The ovulatory shift hypothesis has been debunked as well at this point. And the rest of the studies they refer to fail to offer ACTUAL BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF SELECTION.. There's a shit ton of evidence of height barely conferring any reproductive benefit that you seem predictably ignorant of. https://nuancepill.com/does-height-influence-mens-reproductive-succe…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 08:32 PM
1

you can't be bothered to have read what I've said several times and are currently engaged in a campaign to be as artificially clueless and unimaginative as possible....because you're a bad faither. Literally every single thing you've Said I've already responded to. Learn to read amd engage in good faith. ✌️
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:28 PM
1

You're claiming women prefer tall men because of sexual selection. A ridiculous claim with zero support. Please cite research demonstrating that this PREFERENCE was selected for :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:25 PM
2

I literally linked the poll. they literally are lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 09:20 AM
1

In other words, nothing I said was incorrect and rather than own up to that you'd rather keep bleating out your butthurt ass. You don't have the chops to talk with me, so wise decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 06:16 AM
1

You keep asserting things and equating that with understanding evolution. You obviously don't understand the concept I've asked you about multiple times which is why you don't understand why what you keep claiming is seriously unlikely Read a fucking book
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:33 AM
0

You didn't explain you derailed and just revealed that I make you feel intellectually insecure. Once again, explain with the rigor they taught you at the fake school you attended on the fake scholarship what exactly is wrong with the claim I have made.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:32 AM
2

Now you're lying. Good job.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:08 AM
0

Explain to me what is wrong with anything I've said. Guaranteed you can't if you also possess the skill of literacy. Which you obviously do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:07 AM
0

Obviously you forgot about your own barely concealed ignorance which anyone would know from such a stupid jab sans anything to back it up. In what other ways are you a poseur?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 04:44 AM
2

Looking at the percentage of women with 10+ partners now vs in 1990 doesn't require a crystal ball. It's not an extrapolation either. Like I said most of the neener neener muh stats losers here 1. Don't know stats in reality 2. Really don't understand induction which is the entire purpose of stats
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 02:38 AM
1

Yes you keep trying to assert yourself into an argument. Either show why the point I made regarding the GSS is incorrect or admit you're just talking out of your butthurt ass
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 02:35 AM
2

Evidence from evolutionary history: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7030936/ Evidence of your bias: "Rates vary between studies from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%, n = 17)." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1733152/ Yet you failed to include the 3.7% median as the percentage and opted for a number far lower. And again looking at our evolutionary origins suggests that the prevalence is likely underestimated for various reasons. Is it 10% I don't know. Maybe. But again, common …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 02:33 AM
1

Once again, do you understand why a high heritability indicates low selective pressure or do you not
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 02:24 AM
1

Go back and read what I said to avoid sounding like an idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 02:24 AM
2

Way too low of an estimation and you know it way to just leave out other studies....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:57 AM
3

No you bad faithers just choose to focus on anything but the main issue, i.e. paternity fraud being a very real problem
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:56 AM
1

This has been the only generalization I've made. You're a dunce part 2
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:47 AM
2

No it isn't misunderstanding anything you're confusing your own personal bias with someone making a reasonable inference. Like point blank the discrepancy there is unlikely to be explained by alimony not being awarded often. You're just talking out of your ass with speculation and hoping it makes a compelling case for the extreme disparity No sale.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:45 AM
2

No I'm not you dunce. The amount of women with 10+ partners has quadrupled since 1990. Christ you people are dense
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:25 AM
2

I asked you a question, do you have an answer? If you knew anything about genetics or selection you'd realize while high heritability indicates weak selection pressure. But you don't because you don't know anything about real science
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:24 AM
1

I already stated a million times what points are worth discussing but as usual you keep throwing your arms up and wondering how the topic can even be discussed as if you have no concept of it Your first semantic point about sensationalism is nonsensical when a 500% jump in the population, while not the same as it exceeding the male population, is in line with the general point: THERE ARE A TON OF FEMALE PSYCOPATHS So again being deliberately dunderheaded is a hallmark of you bad faithers
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 01:23 AM
1

ridiculous. now you have people who can't distinguish between a sensationalist title/headline and the main point of an article/discussion. can you even read this discussion i already said what the ratio was, for all the whining about not reading the study it's clear few commenters did either and no things can be more likely than not to be true even if we're not 100% certain. it's not entirely made up at all. rules have exceptions because they aren't 100% true DESPITE being generally true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 12:30 AM
3

correct, you don't know what you're talking about and can't do anything but talk in cliches. become something other than a mental abortion
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 12:03 AM
0

she isn't a candle in anything, she literally just got lit up in this thread for engaging in the same bullshit she's preaching against regarding the lesbian intimate partner violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 12:03 AM
1

dude points like this are so ridiculous. the main points brought up and argued about here i.e. like 80/20 casual sex, physical appearance being the main factor attached to a man/person that drives dating decisions, bias against men, etc. all are phenomena that have many many studies and replicated results supporting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 12:02 AM
0

which is a ridiculous point. unless you can point to some major breakthrough in therapy that woiuld lead us to believe that nowadays it works I'm unsure why the earlier data set shouldn't stand. spoiler: there's plenty of CURRENT data showing that, surprise surprise, THERAPY STILL ISN'T VERY EFFECTIVE. PERIOD.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 12:00 AM
1

this is all geekspeak for social science research does not come with the same degree of certitude as 6 sigma physics. great. who gives a shit acting like you can't infer anything from a .05 p interval is beyond braindead. especially when the particular effect is replicated or appears in several datasets. and the stat significant vs. effect size error was a hot take 10 years ago. not so much now
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:58 PM
–

do you like being an obvious shill or chat gpt butt boy?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:55 PM
1

CITE SPECIFICALLY WHAT LANGUAGE YOU READ IN THE REPORT THAT BACKS UP WHAT SHE SAID THEN :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:53 PM
2

exactly. I asked her twice to back herself up and mysteriously...SHE VANISHED because she's fucking wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:53 PM
3

You don't understand sexual seleciton or evolutionary biology either if you believe any criteria of current attraction exhibit evidence for being 'selected for.' For example, height. Height has a VERY HIGH heritability. DUCY this means it LIKELY WAS NOT SUBJECT TO MUCH SELECTION PRESSURE AT ALL? :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:46 PM
–

"The GSS a well regarded data set is shit and I don't care about topics I want to have strong opinions on." - You, dumb redditor.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:44 PM
2

more end running around common sense... 30% of marriages - some sources say 40% - have a wife earning more money than the husband. And marriages with a female breadwinner are 50% more likely to end in divorce Despite these statistics, 97% of alimony payers are men, only 3% are women. Methinks bias is very plausible here and in other instances where one examines the data At the turn of the century it definitely existed: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1419&context=lr Here's an …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:42 PM
3

well said these people can't see how hard they are bending backwards to ignore COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATIONS of clear data NOTE that the OP herself couldn't even produce what I asked for regarding the interpretation of her pet CDC report regarding "the marjority of lesbians report male perpretrators in intimate partner violence." She can't because it doesn't exist in the report which she obviously misread.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:28 PM
1

i know it's like you can't use google at all or find anything --- especially you, who just has failed to find pretty much anything regarding points you disagree with MYSTERIOUSLY. your butthurt rage is no substitute for discussion. wipe the froth off your lip and get literate
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:27 PM
1

here's a tissue for your ragetears
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:26 PM
2

dude when you refuse to educate yourself about the BASICS of a topic to where you're practically just talking out of your ass about it --- like the vast majority of people on here who argue against 'muh misogynist facts' are --- it's no one's obligation to introduce you to the wide world of literature and information regarding "the earth is round" level information. if there were any pretense to good faith, you'd all just use google and confirm the scores of data and research regarding the issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:25 PM
1

And then you have nonsense like this question, as if you SIMPLY CANNOT SEE THAT the amount of female psychopaths jumping 500% in a population is a topic worthy of discussion, despite the amount failing to exceed male psychopaths (by fairly slim margin). Hence, the post was deleted because people like you IGNORE fertile grounds for discussion in favor of rhetorical grabass neener neener bullshit :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:23 PM
2

The GSS results are not a rando's personal impressions. Congrats, you keep playing yourself and proving my point
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 11:21 PM
2

Yeah bro whining about someone failing to carry a burden of proof when they're talking about basic undisputed facts within a topic just demonstrates you don't know about burdens of proof or the topic. Congrats you played yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:56 PM
0

No, you're playing rhetorical grabass and pretending you can't type a few words into Google to remedy your ignorance on this topic. Like do you really think such chintzy gotcha tactics even come off as anything beyond petty?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:54 PM
2

Yeah bro a 500% jump in female psychopaths meaning that there are almost as many as men is way less interesting than there not being more than men. Lol ppl are so desperate to engage in bad faith
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 10:49 AM
0

It doesn't because you once again are ignorant of several other facts in the universe of this topic. Further, attempting to argue that a third of men who are at their raging horniest are literally NOT LOOKING FOR ANYTHING with women isn't close to giving up is just deliberately obtuse. What about the fact that half of men that age have NEVER approached a woman and that much of the rest haven't done so in the last year? Like I said. You're ignorant of the topic you're discussing and refuse to jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 10:33 AM
3

They're not looking for a relationship or casual dates i.e. yes that is giving up on dating. The percentage of men who are virgins is irrelevant to the main point There are multiple data points dude that support the general notion of men dropping out of dating. There's been no misinterpretation of the data, you just don't know much about the topic
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 10:02 AM
7

It's not a broad statement with no source. It's a 101 level fact from a recent PEW study. This is what I'm talking about. People don't educate themselves at all on these topics and then rather than just Google assume I made up this fact. Cue for belly aching about burdens of proof etc. Which itself is inapt in a context involving just basic propositions of the subject of discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:40 AM
1

No that's what you and the comments chose to focus on and hijack into the narrative for thr purpose of ignoring and destroying the real possibility of substantive discussion Congrats Ur all so smrt srs wow
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:30 AM
2

Yeah you're explaining a preference to play gotcha rather than take two common sense seconds to realize the study is worth discussing in his own right. Now answer my previous question.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:14 AM
5

I'm unsure the exact truth value of the statement but given that over a third of men 18-29 have completely dropped out of dating, as in, not even trying to date or fuck women, I'd say that female exclusionary high standards are a fairly plausible contributor
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:07 AM
1

The study doesn't say men are twice as psycho. I provided the ratio above. It's 1.2:1. I'm not ignoring anything. The general thrust of his point is CORRECT. More women than men are psycho vs. about as many women as men are psychopaths, WHEN the current understanding is that there are 6x as many male psychopaths as women simply isn't that big of a difference. Why do you keep wanting to avoid the fertile ground of discussion the study provides in favor of stupid gotcha bullshit? Does the fact tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 09:05 AM
–

First sentence derailment, second sentence ignores the point of contention, and the third sentence is more derailment. Prattling about me being clear beyond me making myself clear is obvious rhetorical grabassing. The thing you said that is risible is that it is reasonable, so referring to you saying that "no amount is good" is irrelevant. Fathers having kids outside their monogamous relationship is irrelevant to women LYING about the parentage of their child. They're two totally different issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:53 AM
–

Yeah but this general point has been confirmed by scores of data from swipe behavior on dating apps The problem with this sub is people toss common sense out the window and just niggle over irrelevant bullshit regarding a point. If you have many data sets showing an insane gini coefficient for men doing OLD (with a much more equitable one for women), then the fact that the OKC blog post is just a blog post is irrelevant. it mostly captured the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:49 AM
5

Because if you post something that is 80% true and the entire comments derail and choose to focus on the fact that it isn't 100% true, then its just a lot of bad faith. Since no one wanted to actually engage in substantive discussion, deletion would be appropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:47 AM
5

it's not meta research, dude. it's basic data on female partner counts over many decades. this is what I'm talking about. You don't know anything about the topic, so you're claiming I'm this lone wolf stringing together my own strands when I'm talking about a well observed trend. if you don't have faith in someone else's ability to research then why not research it yourself --- which is my point. Your last point is ridiculous. People who prefer to argue about the trees and refuse to even ponder …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:45 AM
2

Your second point is essentially my point for this thread. People here, especially those more in the mainstream/against so called "misogynist" facts of life refuse to just generally educate themselves on these topics and so will get pedantic over one particular study or data point while completely ignoring the mountain of research/data supporting the general point being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:43 AM
4

8% seems reasonable? Nearly 1 in 10 couples where the man is completely misled into supporting, raising, and bonding with a child who isn't his own is "reasonable?" Maybe I wasn't clear: https://nypost.com/2021/12/28/almost-1-in-10-moms-isnt-sure-who-fathered-their-baby-poll/ They lied about the paternity. No. It's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:41 AM
2

I'm not reading the study. I ctrl+F male perpretrator in the study and IT APPEARS NOWHERE IN THE INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE SECTION. There are several other data sets that manifestly demonstrate you're just wrong about this. You ignored my other point about the other data set I brought up, and you pre-emptively sidestepped the 2010 data which did account for male only perpretrators among lesbians and even factoring that in gives parity. Several studies have come to the same conclusion I have rega…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:20 AM
1

No it doesn't. There is a definition. There are tables. please quote the specific section and language of the study that backs you up
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:06 AM
-1

No I don't have to read the study. The tables are clear. The way the term is defined is clear. YOU are the one assuming that SOMEHOW intimate partner violence perpretrated by an intimate partner comes from someone OTHER than the intimate partner. In evidence, you offer SUPPOSITION. However, given the MOUNTAINS OF OTHER DATA that demonstrate a similar trend, i.e. dating violence in youths, etc. (if we exclude lesbians who became lesbians later in life and just focus on young lesbians, if what you…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 08:00 AM
0

Yeah, I already stated why they found a higher ratio.... And it is a scary thing if current methods and materials are underpowered in detecting malevolent individuals, wtf. And again, it really doesn't matter if there has been a literal "increase" or not. If there hasn't been an increase, that just means current social norms surrounding men and women are effectively shielding and protecting malevolent individuals. This is just bending over backwards to avoid the obvious overall correctitude of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:55 AM
2

Yes, it's true that data isn't always applicable everywhere. What isn't LIKELY true is that peer reviewed research likely can't be generalized, which assumes the researchers and the reviewers were all too stupid to realize that the study was pretty much USELESS :) And it's even less likely to be true is when SEVERAL STUDIES point to a trend. So no, conjuring up these weak and oblique (there's usually never any concrete rigor behind the objection, just vague references to how one can't generalize…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:46 AM
4

The point I just mentioned was supported by GSS trends regarding female sexual partner count. However, that data would be in the background while whatever misquoted single study would be in the foreground. The real problem is that most people on here don't bother to research the overall topic OP or whoever is talking about, which is why discussion gets bogged down in stupid third string debate "OH SEE U MADE THIS ERROR WITH THIS SINGLE STUDY HERE HAHA GOTCHA U FUKER!" whereas if people took a 5 …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:39 AM
-1

There's really no way to know. This poll taken generally in the UK has about 8% of women unsure about the paternity. So yeah, it's not 30% but.... .....still pretty bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:36 AM
4

Yeah but I just looked at the study in question --- the ratio of male: female went from 6:1 to 1.2:1... ....that's fucking huge. Like, it's hilarious how people are so desperate to shoot others down that like...even though there's not technically more psycho women than men, the amount literally increased 500% without any INCREASE in male psychopaths. But sure. Focus on the slight exaggeration. Seems smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:31 AM
2

Multiple people derailed and distracted from the C O R R E C T point of the study? That there are many male psychopaths or that there are more than women has never been disputed. So I'm unsure why there being more male psychopaths matters at all. Further, the FLEX comes from the fact that (just spitballing) that current society and social structure is so focused on behavior deemed abnormal with reference to masculine social norms rather than looking at different types of abnormal behavior that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:24 AM
0

Not really. Most of the time an adherent of BAD MISOGYNIST VIEW X will quote from a lone study a percentage that is maybe incorrect if analyzed, but only on an academic level of importance. The general thrust of the point is most often correct. A great example are all the speculations made regarding the so-called cock carousel and whatnot. I've never seen one that was bang-on accurate to the decimal or the particular point made by whatever study...but just looking at GSS data/sexual health data …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:22 AM
3

They are essentially misrepresenting the data to make the false claim that it isn't applicable so there's no real difference. Further, your picking at the lesbian intimate partner violence stat ignores the rough preponderance of evidence suggesting at minimum parity with heterosexual relationships when female perpretators are considered. They don't distinguish between male perpetrator + female prepretrator and male perpretrator alone. Due to the survey's structure involving PARTNER VIOLENCE, it …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:18 AM
1

Not really. If party A brings forward evidence, often multiple strands, and person B responds by just saying none of the evidence can generalize and has no counter evidence...they aren't playing it safe. They're being dunderheaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 06:48 AM
2

Yeah pretty much. If a woman can keep her hands off you for more than a date or two SHE IS NOT THAT PHYSICALLY ATTRACTED TO YOU. PERIOD. THE END.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 06:36 AM
2

Nice guy = man they are not attracted to who also is inoffensive Nice guy^tm = man they are not attracted to who is inoffensive and has the gall to want/desire/expect a loving romantic partner fuckboi = attractive man who often is honest about not wanting a relationship player = attractive man who is often dishonest about not wanting a relationship There are no attractive or unattractive male behaviors beyond the realm of shitting your pants, only attractive and unattractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 06:23 AM
7

Yes and no. A lot of times people are way too stringent regarding the ability to generalize results to a larger populous based on often chintzy pedantic "reasonings."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 06:21 AM
1

There's peer reviewed research showing that it doesn't matter in female dating decisions, that the perception of traits/abilities is the HALO effect, and that first impressions formed based in superficiality are extremely stubborn to change. Google it. It's so replicated that it's pretty much an earth is round point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 06:16 AM
12

+1 for "not braindead take" Seriously all the MUH INNATE BIOLOGY people strike me as extremely ignorant
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 04:28 AM
5

I didn't say successful was in first place. I said attractive. And yeah...there is something strange about punching and setting standards far beyond what one offers as a MINIMUM threshold. And yeah that's great about should. What is is what matters. Character simply is irrelevant to women. Even women who think it matters are largely riding on the halo effect
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:22 PM
8

We biologically are animals. And women consistently and pervasively do just that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:21 PM
7

Meh I don't blame women. Whatever it is a woman feels when she's truly attracted to a man must be quite the fucking drug because it elicits truly pathetic behavior. Like...even the hottest woman, sure I want to fuck her, but its strictly business. If anything I trust her less. With women its the complete opposite. I think women are dominated totally by the halo effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:33 PM
5

It shows up everywhere. Real life is no better. People form first impressions and fall all over themselves to confirm them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:31 PM
4

Female choosiness is an ironclad fact of the animal kingdom especially in species lower in sexual dimorphism. The double whammy is that no mate selection criteria including for attractiveness is "evolutionary." People like what they are told to like. Cultures run along generations and shared smaller culture runs even in families. We are Pavlov champions. ^ Lol most men don't get to fuck hot bitches who treat them like shit, that's not how it works you must mean simp over them. And even the last …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:28 PM
5

Pretty much all current standards do relate mainly to physical attractiveness and income. It's a matter of peer reviewed researched fact at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:23 PM
9

They're the wrong standards lol Like how much clearer can it get: Current fem standards---race looks height Lacking fem standards---character, personality DUCY there is much room to choose better and lower standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:21 PM
8

Braindead take. "Romantic compatibility" is such fugazi.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 08:08 PM
3

Therapy doesn't work for men because the world expects results from men, not half-baked coping strategies to "turn that frown upside down." As Glenngary Glenn Ross succinctly put it: nice guy, I don't give a shit. Good father? Fuck you. Go home and play with your kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 01:57 AM
2

Because fertility doesn't really drop that significantly and the dip in quality is pretty gradual. Honestly the hubbub about it seems to me largely driven by modern feminist "men and women are alike" narratives.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:56 PM
1

Your last sentence makes no fucking sense. Stop giving others the satisfaction of perceiving me in reddit 101 fallacy bullshit fashion i.e. "he say something I not like he MUST BE ANGREE LOL1!!1!1?" How about acting like an adult and learn to stop projecting your emotional response to the speaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:36 PM
-1

The runner up is JAPANESE, the third runner up is THREESOME and EBONY rounds out the top four for women. So no, just because women like to watch girl on girl (incidentally, the most searched for male pornstars by women were GAY) doesn't mean much. Women also get aroused by ANIMALS having sex as well, a factoid you left out from the study comparing female arousal of male-male and female-female scenes Honestly, it's so braindead to conclude that women --- who literally are turned on BY ANYTHING an…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 06:11 AM
1

Has nothing to do with what you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 04:36 AM
2

It's neither. Recently a study showed that all judgments women make of their potential partners attributes are almost entirely explained by the halo effect: self-proclaimed sapiosexual or not. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656621000507
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:24 AM
1

This is also silly reasoning. These people don't act violent and get status. They have status and therefore have more latitude to essentially be dickheads. Human behavior is so paint by numbers simple it's hard to watch people bumble around how random and superficial it all is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:22 AM
2

More Just worldly nonsense from a just worldy OP. Nope. Masculine/not-masculine behavior has 0 to do with attraction. Her mood/variance + his physical attractiveness = EVERYTHING. Stop spreading the personality myth. It's harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 02:21 AM
1

No need I've seen what you did here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 11:57 PM
1

Sure you aren't You're emotional enough to over interpret emotion into plain statements. Pathetic isn't a word said with any inflection. It's an accurate description of someone who would cling to a partner that beat them, robbed them, etc. Which women as a group regularly do. So no you're very much what I said. Reading emotions where there aren't any to appease butthurt women as you've done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 11:49 PM
1

Enjoy being a useful idiot for the mainstream
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 11:30 PM
1

You're implying that I said due to anger or hurt or whatever nonsense. And implying that the men who just tell the truth are doing so for the same reasons. Stop
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 10:14 PM
1

Not surprised you can't make sense of them. You made enough sense to call me a lot of names and labels tho. Like I said, standard childish immature behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:40 AM
–

Yeah bro satisfying the drive in ways that don't lead to procreation eliminates the drive to procreate. Wow you're so insightful
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:38 AM
1

Lol yeah keep deliberately missing the point. Pretty standard behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 06:36 AM
–

Yeah bro the base drive of all sex based lifeforms isn't important. Great analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:59 AM
–

Women like height because they are told to like height in various ways and means. There is no reason beyond that for any preference they have
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:55 AM
1

They are fact. I guess the way women actually behave is dangerous....because now everyone can see the truth. I agree lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:53 AM
1

You don't speak for me I meant what I said exactly as I said it. Women will tolerate worse treatment than you can imagine And single women are not usually celibate women. Please stop trying to assassinate my character and infer fucktarded nonsense about me because I speak plainly about reality
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:51 AM
–

I know I must not have been with a lot of women over the years. I must be a loser who has no idea what women like Lol Sorry that the truth hurts
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 05:44 AM
–

Because women are pathetic for men who meet their "standards." They will "remain single" rather than be with someone who doesn't. I put it in quotes because what remaining single means for a woman is that she is essentially some guy or groups of guys's fucktoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:46 PM
1

This is all wrong. For better or mostly worse women are, to a MAN (harhar), not even shallow. And most more or less have mental health issues. Romance is fiction made up by women to paper over their shallowness. They attach and cling to the dumbest things as meaningful so as to retcon some loser dicking them down on the regular into some misunderstood romantic. The healthiest romantic relationships are simply ones where the woman is using her active imagination to excuse and ignore the bare real…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:43 PM
–

Seriously. Most men really will never know. You have to fuck a good amount of women before you realize how borderline sociopathic women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:35 PM
4

Men do that shit all the time 😀 Men tell women to their faces about it all the time. 😀 Women will put up with that 😀 It's really funny. Men are clueless just how boot-lickingly pathetic women are for men who "meet their standards."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:29 PM
4

In a society built on slavery, classism, and aggressive propaganda spread by corporate interests, the question is whether dating is a free market. Lol. If you think current dating standards including physical ones arise from "the natural biology" of anything then you think imbecilic things. No it isn't free. AINEC.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:26 PM
1

I'm going to prepare my son the best I can but..... The future: https://youtu.be/dsx2vdn7gpY?si=lpb2Hee97jk0pQ8K
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 08:48 AM
1

And seeing as you don't understand either comprehension or basic reasoning, you're not worth talking to
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:45 AM
1

Since you love denial so much feel free to Google this stuff at any time
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 05:38 AM
1

Ya sure you are. What push came to shove? Do you not even understand the discussion? Of course you don't, which is why you think the question is relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:43 AM
1

No, studies have asked women how they've felt over many years. Sorry reality offends you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 04:39 AM
1

All I said is that they were happier then. I guess when women fight for what's best for them.... ....they end up making things worse for themselves But yes here i am running the fools errand of trying to get a modern woman to acknowledge empirically verified reality. 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:59 AM
1

Yeah reality seems to gaslight the fuck out of most modern women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:21 AM
1

No smart guy, women have FINANCIAL standards far BEYOND what it would take to live above poverty...lol christ
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:20 AM
1

Lol I'm sorry the fact that women were happier 60 years ago than they are today triggers you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:17 AM
-1

Yeah they are. And material and social conditions are shit for men these days. . And they're still happier than women 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:16 AM
1

Lol ok captain sockpuppet
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 03:14 AM
3

No you committing basic fallacies is not in any way on me
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 04:39 AM
8

Why did a black guy become president if racism exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 04:08 AM
7

If you have to ask brah you'll never know
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 02:08 AM
1

Ya u seem super happy....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:55 PM
1

I never said any of that. First correctly state my position, then maybe we'll talk. PS I made no comment on your personal state of happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:52 PM
-1

Unsurprising you have no clue what we're talking about. You ask that question and laugh but after over half a century one thing seems to be clear: women don't seem to know...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:47 PM
0

Ya no u outsmarted the researchers and the meta analyses they've done. Turns out their PhDs were useless to warn them of the 101 level stats confounders you've conjured up as if they're meaningful or something. Oh wait... Btw men are happier than women and the Gap is growing 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:45 PM
1

You're also missing the point. If Men are capable of withholding sex, it undercuts a lot of what you're saying about simple desire always controlling the decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:34 PM
0

Real hot take that assumes the people researching are imbeciles. Here's a thought, despite all of that and the troubles men face....Men are happier than women and the Gap between them is widening. Men must love climate change, pandemics, etc. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:33 PM
-1

FUCKING UGLY SLORES because it done come Thursday and you don't have any talent lined up, to the layman...or woman
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:13 PM
1

Yes you keep asserting that and assuming women don't just do it to get things they want as well. Speaking of men, THEY withhold sex sometimes as well. Your explanation is just insufficient for the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:11 PM
1

If it's the primary driver of all the behavior you're precluding other dominant causes....
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:56 PM
1

Yes which means you're excluding other categories of the behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:43 PM
-3

Trends in overall female happiness. Matter of empirical fact. "OH no."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 07:43 PM
–

This is such a silly way of thinking. You say TRP will lead to calamity without saying why then say the blue pill is more or less false when it counts and then recommend a balance??? Like even taking both statements as true that conclusion makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:45 PM
3

Women personally like men who look good + jibe with whatever permutation of weird superstitious prejudices are rattling around in her head that day. However all men struggle when going after their so called looksmatch. Ryan Gosling or not. It's just a fact of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:38 PM
0

women don't want the best for themselves in any real sense. They want what they're told to want and society bears the fallout. If they were seeking out the best for themselves they'd be happier. They are less happy than pre feminism. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:36 PM
3

An answer that isn't stupid. Good job. While the only factor within your control that matters is pretty much your looks, most of the outcome is down to variance. Variance + looks = your dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:34 PM
9

Yes. No man on earth goes 10 for 10. All men get rejected. You still get rejected if you dumpster dive, just much less. Again it's not just looks. It's also just randomness and a big part of that is HER. Where she's at in life her mood that day etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:32 PM
1

Yes you're suggesting that women do not purposefully withhold sex that instead they just are not aroused at all by their partner. You're wrong. While you're describing a class of sexual abstaining behavior it's not the entire picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:29 PM
2

Yeah no your theory of presuming women lack any delayed gratification acumen is incisive in its absurdity.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:20 PM
–

Omg well if a woman (or a man) SAID IT. It must be true. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:18 PM
2

It's not nuanced. And your syllogism is ridiculous because there a ton of examples that completely violate the "women trade up in money" hypergamy trope. But even if it was an iron law it's not about just finding someone who can make enough to escape poverty. Women have standards far beyond that. That isn't common sense. It's delusional entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:18 PM
8

Yes. Turns out women can be shitty morons like everyone else. Surprise!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:15 PM
26

Dude 20 years ago graduating HS vs today = literally mad max shit. My first serious gf was a slim pretty green eyed woman I just happened to chat at one day between classes. She liked me so she made sure to be there every time I had that break so we could talk...even though on one of the days she'd have to wait like 2 hours after her class let out and another day she didn't even have class. I finally noticed her romantically at the end of the semester when she glowed herself up a bit. ^ Shit wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:14 PM
7

This isn't your explanation it's probably the most cliche worn out sound byte out there. No shit the mainstream at large does not give two shits about men which is why they flock to a space for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:11 PM
1

Water is wet. But it's not that cut and dry. I'm going to do a post soon about what everyone gets wrong about the HVM concept and the kinds of people that primarily attracts. But yeah this is why you date to just screen in the women who let you play by the right rules and take out the trash ones who don't
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:09 PM
–

There is no such thing as nice guy entitlement. It's fugazi. Shit women made up to shame men for something new.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:07 PM
3

Hyoergamy doesn't just and even doesn't mainly refer to money. It refers in these spaces to women HOOKING UP with men significantly better than them and on that score it's mostly in the physical sense. As far as common sense. You literally just listed a bunch of shit that is culturally constructed and then pass it off as common sense. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:04 PM
–

It's funny how everything men do women have to come make their own version of it. Decentering from men mostly will = remain single while accepting "sharing" a guy who meets "my standards."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:03 PM
-1

This patently false. Women purposefully withhold sex from men all the time. You're treating it like a binary she either wants to or doesn't. Hate to break it to you but every time women fuck they aren't at the "omg dam bursting into panties" threshold. Literally women will task men in relationships and dole out sex as reward/punishment. I've straight up witnessed this in group texts and in second hand from various women I've been with.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 06:01 PM
5

This stupid line of discussion about nice guys needs to die. Bottom line, being kind to someone is a tried and true literal biological reproductive strategy seen throughout the animal kingdom....signaling high paternal investment.. Women don't say anything but they respond to men being nice. How do I know? Hi, you live in the west where most every social privilege women have comes upon mutual agreement between men to give it to them. Aka being nice
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:05 AM
3

There isn't any game theory benefit to actually being monogamous and committing to a woman in 2024. Outside of limited circumstances that don't apply 99% of the time of course
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:02 AM
0

Women can get dick easily Society encourages women to form friendships with one another involving a high degree of emotional closeness. Societal norms generally slant in favor of women with regard to social conduct. So it's a nice fat social subsidy. If you ever run across a woman who due to circumstance lacks those 3 things they are absolutely miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:54 PM
0

It could be much fairer if less cultural programming reinforced certain phenotypes and ultimately meaningless "status" symbols. Most of it isn't biological...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:51 PM
–

Holy shit you're not alone and were never alone woooooow never saw that coming. Just shhhh about things you don't know anything about from now on
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 08:37 PM
–

Oh are you completely alone and happy?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 08:21 PM
–

Yes you can absolutely callously make shit up about life to make yourself feel good
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 04:46 AM
1

It never was anything but self parody.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 09:23 PM
8

Bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 08:52 PM
5

You're being gaslit
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:49 AM
10

Go to therapy and fix the basic human need for connection Bang up idea. Should they pour robotussin on their loneliness, too? The rest is just nonsense. Be happy in circumstances that humans cannot attain happiness in, i.e. without connection Happy people attract happy people. False. Personality has nothing to do with attraction. Take it up with the mountains of research. Pathologizing an individual for systemic issues i.e. look inside yourself if you're playing a rigged game. Peychobabble gasli…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:49 AM
1

Man a lot of excuse making for women from this one....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:45 AM
1

Sure bro you're mad cool
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:45 AM
–

Yeah the gender ratio wasn't that bad 8 years ago 😀 Nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:44 AM
1

Oh I thought patriarchy oppressed women and constrained their choices to something unnatural. Now I guess women are free to just follow patriarchy because in reality there was no alternative. Tight.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:43 AM
1

It's common sense for people who can't accept experiences other than their own and in your cases its not even experience but a worldview. Do you like being a stooge for mainstream stupidity? Is it fun?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:29 AM
1

Lol like sure lol pay tons of gas money to go "sarge" a town away and lol like once your picture gets posted on a whisper network your name will be forthcoming lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:28 AM
1

You're wrong. You don't know what you don't know
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:26 AM
1

Lol more posturing like this dude hasn't fucked a fat or ugly chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:26 AM
1

Yes and they choose to reinforce patriarchy. 😀 Just an even more primitive form.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:25 AM
1

So you can't read and you can't take criticism on the merits. Lol I've fucked hotter women than you've imagined and more of them than you've dreamed. Shh, junior.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:23 AM
1

So feminism freed women to follow patriarchal concepts
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:35 AM
1

Lol this dude is a gen z baby and thinks he knows anything lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:26 AM
1

What you say doesn't matter the outcome has been decided
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:25 AM
1

.... LMFAO
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:24 AM
1

This OP is a classic stealth humblebrag status pump.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:23 AM
1

Dude lol! I know people who lost their jobs as the result of whisper networks reporting on their "CREEPY" AKA talking to random women at bars behavior. Like lol it's as if you're pushing a narrative no one buys anymore. Because like lol it's bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:21 AM
1

You're doing God's work here, boyo. These bullshitters need to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:20 AM
1

Braindead OP. Here's a concept for you guys who like to posture, when human beings complain about something...why not assume they know their experience better than you. Like in all my life getting laid in all sorts of places online and offline, I never was so dumb or arrogant to presume that THAT alone bestowed me with some special knowledge and that other men if they just did insert stupid trick here! they'd have the same results.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:19 AM
–

Indeed. The irony that feminism liberates women.... .....to become lifelong de facto concubines. Patriarchy: undefeated
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:01 AM
1

That you didn't get the point means me explicitly making it will also fly over your head
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 09:28 PM
-1

You're starting to ask questions that don't even make sense in the context of this conversation. I've long been adapted lol Idk you can look at one or 10 of the many studies on this via Google. Your questions aren't even relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 01:46 PM
-1

Yeah all your questions only make sense to someone who has 0 knowledge of stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 01:16 PM
-1

Yeah it's been done. Many studies parsing the variables underlying female mate choice, actually. Like I said. Learn basic stats. Might help
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 01:08 PM
5

No I wouldn't. The guys fucking thr 9s and 10s consistently tend to be GL + extraordinary status. But extraordinary status minimum for LTR typically. Any guy trying to date his looksmatch in 2024 is in for a nice helping of juice not worth the squeeze.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:28 PM
1

Ehhhhh Usually you'd need a large sample size, but the cultural and sexual deck is stacked SO HIGH in favor of women that YEAH pretty much if you a woman are chasing or pursuing a guy and he's giving you the cold shoulder like lol... Yeah men don't want to commit to women THEY CAN EASILY REPLACE.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:42 AM
1

Yeah those bullshit terms don't mean anything, just like attachment theory is bullshit. Literally they just aren't into you. Why? Because if I'm dating a chick and she's at the level where I could summon a woman like her to fuck quickly....I'm not going to be very "emotionally available." Because she can be replaced so easily
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:35 AM
1

LMFAO NO. INCORRECT. MAJOR LIES HERE.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:33 AM
0

^ this is probably one of the dumbest lines floated by women. Women assume or assert a man is only after sex when he brings up sex or is sexual before a woman has decided he is allowed to be a sexual being. It's nonsense. Just seems like one or three men have lied to you to get into your pants
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:33 AM
0

That's definitely not you or any other woman's standard. No one's buying that nonsense any more. I'm not sure why women repeat that stuff still. In reality it's likely a lot of superficial nonsense combined with ultimately petty prejudices. I also doubt no man has ever used you for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:29 AM
1

They kind of are if female dating criteria merely reflect oppressive ideologies, like racism, classism, etc. Which, by and large, they do. Usually when people refuse to associate with people based off culturally ingrained prejudice (where most female preferences come from -- men too, but most men aren't choosing) in any other life arena, we acknowledge that those who suffer from the alienation are victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:25 AM
0

There's literally a graph disconfirming this "argument." IIRC on tinder circa 8 years ago (so it's gotten worse) a man around the 80th percentile of attractiveness had a good chance of matching with women......in the 20th percentile. That means literally women refusing a man likely means he either is her equal or better, just not better enough 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:21 AM
1

Lol why would OP want the starfuckers?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:19 AM
4

Why are people here so immune to basic statistical thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:17 AM
9

Lol a handsome man does not have infinite options. It comes down to effort. If you're a male 9 then guess what? Snagging that female 9 will be a pain in the ass/involve effort. So a lot of GL guys do and I do too just pick a chick who's a bit below you and it's a much easier relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:16 AM
-1

Except attachment style stuff is mostly BS Literally a study showed that parental time away from child: the lynchpin of the whole theory, had 0 correlation with attachment style.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:14 AM
1

This is a good sign. The issues that men have been complaining about for decades have now reached a tipping point which is why we're seeing some pretty serious clamping down.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:10 AM
–

I find women attractive and nearly am at the point where I won't date one lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:08 AM
1

If you're a guy you have 2 options to not play fair. Money is fair. That's a clear quid pro quo. You can lie or you can eh....commit certain crimes. Lying isn't particularly effective unless she's attracted to you so....
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 08:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter