TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

orbitaldecayed Archive

View 2 posts and 912 comments by orbitaldecayed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

But wait - surely there are no differences between men and women. This is gender essentialism and therefore evil and wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/21 10:21 AM
1

Content? No. I wouldn't be 'content' unless she invented a new type of propulsion and had the sole patent. I might be concerned if she were not happy. What I wouldn't be, and I see this in some of the comments, is angry. I wouldn't 'disown' her. We have a great relationship and like most dads, worrying about my kids is a full time occupation. So if she were in a job that was looked down on by society, my concern would be that she might get bullied by said society. Or if she were in a job that pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/21 11:20 AM
1

Osteoporosis.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 09:34 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/21 09:04 AM
1

You don't think a man would be blamed if he didn't work? Blamed if he remains childless (In Italy you even get taxed more for not having kids, but only if you're a man).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/21 09:05 AM
0

Interesting that it's always 'forced' when we're discussing women, but always 'choice' when it's men. I'm forced to commute and work every hour of the day to support my family in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 04:38 PM
1

My point is the general situation is that it is women who are given the social latitude to consider work life balance, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:08 AM
1

It's a crucially important, high stress profession, that ought to be attracting hypercompetent individuals. Pay ought to be in line with that. At present it is not, as it not seen as crucially important.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:06 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:04 AM
1

Unfortunately the message young women are getting is that it is a complete nightmare with no redeeming features. At least that's what you see on social media. Only a very few of my female peers had kids, as they were fed a steady diet of negative propaganda about it, as opposed to the steady diet of positive propaganda before. I'm saying there's a middle ground here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/21 11:03 AM
1

How old are you? as a matter of interest? Have you had kids? Have you been married?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:43 PM
0

Staying home or taking a career backseat is a gendered expectation on women Sure is, or used to be. Not so much anymore. Massive societal investment (not just by women) in changing this underway for the last 50 years. Not so much when it comes to men. Men's gender roles are still rigidly enforced. As for 'pity points', do you mean intersectional feminism? Which is essentially a computer game played on Twitter for same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:39 PM
2

So there's 'real men' and not-real men now? Do women similarly come in real and imaginary flavours?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 12:37 PM
3

Most of them don't have any kids and have a radically incorrect idea of what its like raising kids. In the fifties it was pitched by society as a wonderful carefree existence. Now it's pitched by feminists as unending horror and indentured servitude. It's neither.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:20 AM
2

Exactly. Well said. Families are a team effort, not two people competing to be the more independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:18 AM
1

Not really true. The women is labelled a 'welfare queen' . But by and large the gendered expectation is that men will be the breadwinner. Feminists treat this like it's a bonus or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:14 AM
1

Hey honey, fuck this working 50 hrs a week to support the family. I've decided to be the primary carer, you go out and get a full time job and do the commute. Seeya.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:11 AM
5

Caveat: this is kind of a white collar/professional class thing, not talking about poor and working class single mothers who are breadwinners by default. Learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:09 AM
-1

It's a gendered expectation placed on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:07 AM
7

Au contraire, raising kids is extremely fulfilling, as are teaching and medicine. Teaching in the US doesn't pay enough, we're all aware of that - but it sure beats being a site labourer or a truck driver in terms of fulfilment. I can't think of anything more fulfilling than raising my kids even though for the longest time it's pretty much the same as working in a Zoo where the animals throw up a lot. People say 'it's hard' and yes, it is - but I'v never had a job that was 'easy'. I can see ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 11:01 AM
10

Yeah it's not as bad as but similar to the 'teach men not to rape' sort of approach. I think that it is more likely the professional non-professional women who write the 'think-pieces' that boil down to the sort of men-are-beasts feminism that annoy everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/21 10:55 AM
2

I'd agree. I'd say for some of these people, the fact that the women are prettier than them is the real complaint.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/21 08:57 AM
3

Sports is 100% objectification. Objectification isn't bad per se.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 03:26 PM
3

A little bit of what you fancy does you good. Too much of anything is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/21 03:25 PM
4

Wasn't implying it was forced. But you have to expect rational entities to behave rationally.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 02:47 PM
3

to keep 100% less.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:31 AM
1

Maybe wives encourage their husbands to earn more? Yes. Many of them demand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:30 AM
3

while his marriage counterpart has sex on tap at home. Lol. We're talking about marriage here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:27 AM
12

If you had the breath of choices an a reasonably attractive young woman often does, why would you? Reality tends to suit you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/21 09:01 AM
2

Haha, are you like 15 years old or 95? That's wrong, immaturely so, and also sexist and foolishly sentimental. Get a grip, my friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 08:45 PM
-2

You are talking about boys. The discussion is about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/21 02:54 PM
1

Yes: https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/women-now-control-more-than-half-of-us-personal-wealth-2015-4?r=US&IR=T Your link refers to wealth across the world. I said private wealth in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 08:53 AM
1

So essentially 'no fat chicks', but men. I would counter that perhaps superficiality is a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 11:45 AM
5

Problems like those did exist in the past. For example, in the founding of Rome. They were usually 'solved' by sacking and pillaging. Luckily sacking and pillaging is less common than it used to be, thanks to the very terrifying military technology and enormous standing armies countries tend to have these days. Of course if you happen to be in line for American 'regime change' then sacking and pillaging may be in your countries' near future.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 04:27 PM
1

"Those aren't real feminists'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/21 10:11 AM
1

I like your teacher selective service idea. Service guarantees citizenship! It's a fucksite better than forcing men to join the army. Probably scarier for them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 03:13 PM
1

Pretty much. I assume it's 75% lack of baseline interest in the work, coupled with the awkwardness of working in a single gender dominated profession and finally the social perception of doing another gender's 'job' - 'women's work' etc.. I wouldn't want to be a woman on a North Sea fishing vessel, anymore than I'd want to be a dude in a California kindergarten for broadly similar reasons. Feminists will likely tell you men in a female dominated profession are not at any risk of sexual harassmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/21 03:11 PM
3

https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2019/06/24/news/number-of-male-teachers-slumps-to-record-low-1647664/ Overall in 2006, there were 5,370 male teachers in the north's schools - 27.13 per cent. The proportion for primary schools alone was 16.3 per cent, about 1,300 teachers. Apart from a slight rise in 2015, the numbers have fallen every year since. The most up-to-date figures, which are for 2018/19, reveal the number dropped to 4,532 - 22.9 per cent. In primary schools, there we…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 06:05 PM
2

It is a high prestige job here. People do not devalue the job. It's nothing like the US. ​ "how many nuns run the schools in Ireland to boot?' ​ Not many. About the same number that are run by Christian brothers and other monkish sects. However those schools use lay teachers for the vast majority of staff as there simply aren't enough religious types under the age of 80 to teach anymore. The religion is dying out very quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:51 PM
1

I do think. At the same time it would benefit the kids greatly to have a more gender balanced workforce.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:48 PM
4

What can men do about women not WANTING to be engineers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:30 PM
4

But honestly, how many women actually want to be engineers?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:29 PM
3

In ireland teachers are the highest paid sector of the civil service. Great pensions, great pay and conditions and a very strong union, which makes that possible. Yet we have even fewer men taking part. In a few years there will be none. This concept of "it's the pay" is just flat wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:28 PM
1

There aren't more female engineers because women don't want to be engineers. The preference is clear. Yet we put huge resources into convincing them they ought to study engineering. Because diversity is seen as an unalloyed good. It may well be. Why don't we put similar resources into convincing men to be teachers in that case?. Incidentally in my country, teaching is extremely well paid - In fact per hour, teachers are the highest paid sector of the civil service, with great pensions. Yet every…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:22 PM
2

Here in Ireland 17.5 per cent of primary teachers are male. 76 percent of public school teachers were female. In Nursery / Kindergarten 100% of teachers are female and this has been the case for the last 13 years - zero male kindergarten teachers in the whole country.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:17 PM
1

I would say we are at the height of the women's movement now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 05:12 PM
1

Well Im 50 and in my lifetime I cant remember anytime it was acceptable for anyone to beat anyone. You kids have quite a distorted internet view of the recent past and such a paucity of education that the distant past is nothing more than a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/21 09:02 AM
1

Sorry, that's not how "point's" 'work'. Do you know that it's supposed to be short for a 'point of view' ? I most certainly do have a point of view. The level of literacy amongst supposedly educated Americans is frankly concerning. Women do not comprise half the legislators, What of it? Are they precluded from standing from office? Are voters precluded from voting for them should they do so? Men are not half the teachers. Teachers raise our young, inform their beliefs, foster their education. Is…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 08:40 PM
1

OP's point : wealthy and powerful If you dismiss that I'm not bothering to read the rest. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 08:36 PM
1

There are plenty of women occupying high office and in charge of business, moreover there are plenty of women in administrative roles that hold enormous power over individual lives, such as in teaching. "the positions of social power are irrefutably occupied by one gender" is demonstrably untrue. Positions of social power are quite obviously occupied by both genders with men predominating in the US. But it is not a totality of men or some kind of patriarchal tyranny. That is just a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 09:00 AM
1

OP's point was that "The overwhelming majority of wealthy and powerful people are men, though" And it is moving the goalposts somewhat to decide that now that I have mentioned that this is not the case for wealth, that wealth component no longer matters and all that matters is presumably the number of men in high government office. Since nothing prevents women from applying for these positions and since women are over half the electorate who make the choice, it follows that women are choosing no…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 08:57 AM
0

No men are proportionately in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 08:53 AM
1

No, beating your wife was never 'more or less' acceptable. This is propaganda. Also the amount of drinking was higher than today for sure, but again protestant propaganda regards any amount of regular drinking as 'alcoholism' and 'sinful'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 08:51 AM
-3

Fun fact, the temperance movement was full of shit. There was 'wife beating' of course, but these temperance assholes, hugely overplayed it and put it down to the working man and alcohol. It was basically a psyop that deployed huge amounts of propaganda to demonise working men, portraying them as 'ungodly' brutes who could not be trusted with booze. And we still buy in to their nasty class warfare distortions today. When you look at the outcomes, prohibition and the violence and carnage that wen…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 09:41 AM
15

51% of all private wealth in the US is owned by women. Overwhelming majority? not really. It used to be one time. But this is 2021, not 1921. Feminists live in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 09:30 AM
1

This dichotomy you've cleaved to, is a straightjacket.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/21 08:35 PM
2

A lot more than the average musician on Spotify in that case.
/r/MGTOW214/01/21 05:34 PM
1

"Men don't reward kindness." Bigotry
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 12:12 PM
1

I agree it "comes from both sexes and is a societal problem." but I take issue with your assertion about my assumptions. Nevertheless these are in fact sexist generalisations.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:56 PM
1

There seem to be a lot of vile morons on the redpill then Yathink? A lot of studies trotted out to support a tenuous conclusion actually support entirely different readings. In addition there are studies which conclude the opposite. If you are saying you are basing your conclusions on lifetime of deep experience with a vast number of men then I must on the basis of fairness, take you at your word.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:54 PM
1

"I don't get why men on PPD think that giving a truthful explanation is the best course of action." Do they? I think if you look again you will see that men only want to be treated fairly and with a modicum of dignity. After all, it is they who have ventured the approach and it is they who are at your mercy as it were. A rejection can be couched in terms that are neither a deliberate affront nor a misleading lie. My favourite is "Sorry, I'm not interested". The sorry is unnecessary as the woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:52 PM
3

Most men fight in self defence also. And women initiate more. A slap leads to another slap. Escalation leads to injury. I had one violent girlfriend who would slap me across the face in the manner of what she imagined was an aristocratic lady whose morals had been questioned. The slaps came more often and were always very painful. And in public, among friends. If I wanted to leave a party - slap. And laughter. I tolerated it at first, with warnings. Then when it became too much I told her we wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:45 PM
15

This implies you think my wife ought to cut my throat. Why so? Or do you care to rephrase that for clarity?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:38 PM
2

"Everyone here keep repeating they don't want a woman with a high N-count " Those "people" are vile morons if adults, but more likely just confused and impressionable boys who have been given false information. Which by the way is the same reasoning I put behind 99% of the so-called "feminist' rhetoric I see here which pathologises "men" based on the 2 asshole boys they've dated.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:37 PM
6

Agression and violence are not the same thing. CDC has the stats on domestic violence. It's 50/50 with women initiating more. Most violence is reciprocal - just idiots hitting each other. Problem is men are bigger and stronger and definitely not smarter or less 'emotional', so women come off worse. "Pretty sure a murder will land you in jail 99% of the time, woman or man." So we've moved from aggression all the way up to murder. Okay. A woman is vastly less likely to get a custodial sentence for…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:26 PM
1

"You aren't attractive or interesting" is rude and would make anyone angry. But a gentleman would merely note the lack of grace and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:22 PM
2

In my experience one of the 'most common' rejections is 'fuck off'. I've had quite a few encounters that go like this: in a bar, I walk over to a women, whose eyes have caught mine more than once. Plucking up my courage, I walk over. "Hi", I say. "Fuck off" she spits. And that's that. I walk away. She and her friends guffaw. One of the sassy friends will wave at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:20 PM
8

Is it 'defensive' for a black man to be upset with a clearly racist statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:16 PM
1

So you think men are dumb wild animals? Figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:14 PM
1

Any dog can bite. Are you afraid of all dogs? Even the cutest Labrador is 'capable of aggression'.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:14 PM
2

It’s a matter of personal opinion It's also a matter of bigotry. You may not like that that's how you are being perceived, but that really doesn't change the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:07 PM
2

That's because as men, we all have experience with women using social weapons like malicious falsehood. Men use them too, but in youth we more commonly use our fists - which teaches you to get along pretty quickly. Women also decry these tactics and are the first to tell you that their gender absolutely do this and that this sort of 'fighting' can be worse and cause more damage than the sort of fighting young men often engage in. Thus while sometimes a women's charge is dismissed as lying, it is…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:01 PM
2

'Traditional masculine roles' make violence towards women an extreme taboo.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:51 PM
2

If you would ask men you would find that practically every man has stories of women reacting violently or aggressively to rejection also.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:50 PM
5

"An accumulation of comments and responses like this are" sexist generalisations
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:49 PM
4

Men and women are equally likely to be violent. Men are more likely to be sanctioned by society for it, and men, being on average much stronger, are physically able to inflict more violence, when engaging in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:48 PM
5

Same case for men who are abused by women. It's usually some women they know that breaks a bottle over their head, or stabs them or pours boiling water over them, or has some other guy beat them into unconsciousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:46 PM
17

My friends ex-girlfriend cut her subsequent boyfriends' throat while he slept, killing him. I mean, lucky me, my wife still hasn't cut my throat!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:44 PM
2

And some men are serial killers too. Also Hitler was a man so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:40 PM
3

Believe me when I say, no women I have ever been turned down by has ever 'danced around' the topic. In fact some, not many, but some, have taken it as an occasion for some sort of primal revenge, and indeed have been loud, obnoxious and as calculatedly cruel as possible about it. Even though 'you women' don't like to admit it, men attempting a romantic advance are intimidated by women and it's not as if women are entirely unaware of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:39 PM
1

Men would apply for it more often in the first place if they had a greater chance of winning. For the most part, poorer men cannot afford adequate legal representation and are commonly told by said legal representation 'don't bother fighting it, it will cost a fortune and you will lose'. In addition, it's hardly a laughing matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 03:28 PM
1

Of course not. No original sin.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 04:22 PM
1

I think the only things that can be 'perfect' are mathematical proofs and fresh raspberries.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 04:20 PM
1

"Not if he mentally..." Ah thoughtcrime.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 04:11 PM
1

The phrasing and the sexist generalisation make the 'if' perfunctory. The best way to demonstrate would be by comparison: 'If a woman thinks men are just a wallet to be emptied, she's a goldigger.' 'If a woman thinks all men are rapists she's likely to be some stripe of feminist.' 'If a woman spends more than her salary on shoes she has only herself to blame when the rent is due and she cannot pay' Do not not see any problem with these sentences? And if so, does the 'if' absolve them of their se…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 04:05 PM
1

I gather you're not one who thinks skyscrapers are sexist. Good on you!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 03:56 PM
1

Mind you don't go blind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 03:30 PM
1

Okay, but I charge 170 euro per hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 03:29 PM
1

Well I'm talking about women making generalisations about men as if we were all expecting women to be young hot flexible porn stars, when the vast majority of us are not. I'm reflecting on the tendency for chauvinism to go unnoticed by its most ardent adherents, while they curse others for the same defect.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 03:28 PM
1

it's quite impossible to separate it from much of how we relate to others. No it isn't. I'm quite capable of separating my reproductive drive from how I relate to my friends, my family and particularly my aunt Adelheid.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 03:25 PM
1

You said 'zero resemblance to anything human" which is demonstrably untrue. The backpedaling is unnecessary. ​ On the other hand, there are those who take it too far the other way But there you go. Sometimes everything is phallic, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar - but a vibrator has 'zero resemblance to anything human'. A dick just can't win.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 03:22 PM
1

You could say the same thing about alcohol, gambling, or Netflix or even reading novels. We are never meant to have lives as interesting as those in Anna Karenina! It warps the mind! As a matter of fact, we are a species which has transcended our biology time and again. Referring to a clutch of anonymous addicts is as useful for understanding the pathology of a pastime as reading the Bible is to understand more about 'the sin of Onan'. This conversation smacks of American Puritanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:59 PM
1

Sex. What are you talking about? I suppose I'm also talking about negative generalisations and glib conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:54 PM
1

"The rough shape is the same," ​ "Vibrators are usually shaped roughly like penises" ​ You've contributed nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:52 PM
2

Male sexuality is demonised. Female sexuality was once feared but is now celebrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:48 PM
1

Agreed. The problem is consumerism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:47 PM
1

Men just don’t understand that the clitoris is the female ple Men do understand that. Just not the imaginary men you meet in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:45 PM
1

Could it be related to women's proclivity to shame men using penis size?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:43 PM
2

Are you a member of a church by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:42 PM
2

The male body doesn't lend itself as well to not getting off.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:41 PM
3

Sounds like some kind of 'death grip'.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:41 PM
0

death grip is an issue amongst men It isn't. Catastrophic climate change is though. And child custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:39 PM
1

Everything in moderation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:36 PM
2

Why are Americans so puritanical and absolutist?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:35 PM
2

If a women expects every man to be like the hypothetical man you describe, she's the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:33 PM
0

but there are men in their 20’s suffering from porn induced ED Are there though? To my mind it is one of a rather large number of perennial warnings about masturbation as old as time. A little bit of what you fancy does you good, too much of anything is bad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:31 PM
1

Also 'masturbation makes you go blind'.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:30 PM
1

Ask most normal men whether they have a 'favorite porn star' and you will find the same answer. Of course if you associate with boys rather than men, then one can hardly blame youth for the ready access to a stress-free alternative to sex, since access to sex is rather restricted, and the solicitation of sex - by the male of the species, furiously frowned upon. Perhaps you'd rather go back to the Victorian days of sexual repression? (but for men only of course). The fact that there are 'porn sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:23 PM
0

Vibrators are usually shaped roughly like penises. So 'zero resemblance' to 'anything human' is pure hyperbole. Not to mention realistic veiny dildos and the like
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 02:14 PM
1

And animals. And the environment. And want, poverty and privation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/21 08:58 AM
1

Men were cannon fodder and beasts of burden for most of history, and many still are. This is where post-pill emancipated society is generally falling down on gender equity. Not 'sexist air conditioning' so much as 'selective service'.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 11:13 AM
1

No, it is when ONLY males control political power and women are excluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 11:11 AM
1

In the narrow definition you are using you leave out a salient part: ​ "It's a political system that is dominated by men, in which women are largely excluded" This is not the case. Women are, in point of fact, encouraged, not excluded from taking part. Women have held and continue to hold high office in the United States. They are lawmakers, Supreme Court Justices and comprise 51% of management and professional personnel in the US while holding 51% of privately held wealth. It is inaccurate to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 11:06 AM
1

'Their turn' for what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 11:01 AM
1

The US is a Republic. For now. It has some patriarchal aspects to a small extent. But it is not a 'Patriarchy' - proper noun. Property can be owned by women. Women can vote. They can vote for a female leader. Women occupy high office and run corporations. Most purchasing decisions are made by women. 51% of the privately held wealth (and growing rapidly) in the US is owned by women (1). Women fill 52% of management, professional and related positions in the country (2). Women have better health a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 10:49 AM
1

- All presidents have been male In the US. This is not universally true. In fact even in many Muslim countries, there have been female heads of state and chief executives analogous to the office of the President in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 10:48 AM
2

Good thing men are biologically predisposed to support and protect women. It is noticeably not the other way around. This aggregate situation is framed as 'oppression' by today's feminists. I wonder if the majority of breadwinners would be women and if the majority of the armed forces, EMT, Roadside assistance and Law enforcement staff positions were filled by women, with majority women therefore incarcerated, homeless and dying younger as a result of the pressures placed upon them for a few dec…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/21 10:44 AM
1

Thats a fairly big assumption on your part. I think a lot of men have been in very abusive relationships, but some women don't want to hear it or don't accept it. The vast majority of men, intel or otherwise have experienced rejection over and over and over again. It's one of the main features of life as a man. And reading some of the FDS posts it seems like the majority of it is coming from young women who have had little experience of men other than rejection. Rejection is not the same as abus…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 04:45 PM
1

I'd like to believe you that it's just venting. But there's so much hostility towards men in general from Radfem propaganda seeping in to mainstream media that I think there's a lot of young women out there with really skewed perceptions about what the average man is like or what their lives are likely to be like when they grow up. Almost everyone is unlucky in love from time to time, men and women. And sure everyone vents from time to time when they get burned, but FDS and incels seem to take i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 11:02 AM
1

FDS is about achieving marriage Why would you want to get married to a ..man (Boo!) The rhetoric on FDS is 100% bigoted incel bilge and complaining that men exist. I can't believe there exists a single man on earth who would give any one of it's bovine members the time of day, much less get married to one of them, lol. God help the man that does get ensnared by one of these grasping, selfish harridans.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 10:29 AM
1

Oppressed or 'oppressed' ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 10:22 AM
3

I'm certainly not 'blaming women' for this. Whatever gave you that idea? In addition most of us here live in democracies not totalitarian regimes where those in power can exercise their will without regard to electoral dynamics and the 'will of the people'. In a kingdom a king can suit himself. An awful lot of people died so that we no longer live in kingdoms where a monarch can do as they please. The 'power to change things' is largely illusory unless the majority of the people and not just a v…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 12:40 PM
2

"Weak men are literally the worst thing that can happen to a society" ​ What are your thoughts on 'weak women'?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 11:40 AM
1

'Enforced monogamy' can be thought of as 'marriage culture'. It's like when your aunt says "so when are you getting married"? It is not forcing women to get married at the point of a gun, as many seem to have imagined. Why have so many cultures attempted to abolish polygyny? If our ancestors' environments were so polygynous, why is "socially imposed" monogamy—the moral and legal prohibition of polygyny—so common in modern societies? Or more accurately, why is it so common in the West? Most of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 11:34 AM
6

All those people could fit in one room. The underclass of poor men who commit suicide far more often than women, die on the job, far more often than women, languish in prison far more often than women, sleep rough far more often than women and yet at the same time are entirely invisible to misandrous feminists when they talk about 'the patriarchy' number in the many millions. So yeah, a handful of men can win, along with the handful of women at the top - but vast swathes of men are not winning a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 11:13 AM
1

Agreed, neither men nor women in the west are 'oppressed'. Now Black men in America are incarcerated in huge numbers and the policing of their communities does rise to the level of oppression to my mind. But 'sexist air conditioning' or catcalling or an inability to find a girlfriend - these make a mockery of the term 'oppression'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/20 09:04 AM
2

I mean porn is legalised prostitution. And plenty of countries have legalised prostitution without the world coming to an end. It's about time America put it's big boy pants on and deal with reality as it is instead of how some people wish it to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 05:08 PM
7

Porn is not a scourge anymore than 'drugs' are or 'gambling', but it needs far better regulation to prevent performers being abused or ripped off. People like their erotica, and not just degenerates. Witness the success of "Fifty shades of grey" or whatever its called. Where there's a market and a demand it should be regulated, not driven underground. Repressive victorian morals are more harmful, than hedonistic freedom which is regulated to ensure fairness and safety.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 09:43 AM
8

The content was evidence of criminal coercion and abuse. Glad it's been taken down. In general Pornhub is an awful company that steals content from professionals and turns a blind eye to rape and sexual abuse. Fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 09:39 AM
3

From personal experience: Policies are designed for rational adults who prefer better outcomes. In most countries, policy is dictated by irrational concerns, inaccurate worldview, distorted by gross corruption from big business and unyielding obstruction by single interest lobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:51 PM
8

It's so very American to use economics and market theory as analogies for relationships and romance. There's a lot more there than just supply and demand. It's useful to some extent, but the map is not the terrain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:44 PM
4

Or the woman in question has a high opinion of herself to the point of narcissism and putting men down is a way for her to feel empowered.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:39 PM
3

For the same reason men should be nicer?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:36 PM
3

To clarify for you - since you probably do not date as many heterosexual women as heterosexual men do, this is a wider trend. This is extremely common. A great many women do this very often. It is normalised and other women seem to see no problem with it, since - my theory is; putting a man down for any reason, intentionally hurting his feelings or damaging his reputation is a 'good thing' #menaretrash doncha know.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 12:35 PM
1

This is rape, per the new definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 08:53 AM
2

Whats caused it is a society that rejects physical risk taking. Our education systems are overwhelmingly staffed by women which gives kids a very lopsided view on life. Our governments have been taken over by a 'health and safety' mindset which is stultifying and overly risk averse. Parents are coddling chidden and raising them with very unrealistic understandings of risk. The effect is more pronounced for body than girls, as girls are getting massive amounts of affirmation by society whereas bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/20 09:51 AM
1

Don’t redpillers fall over themselves to explain how the most valuable thing to a woman is money? Not a red piller, but no, that's not my understanding at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 10:57 AM
1

It's all very sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/20 10:53 AM
2

There's nothing bleak about it, it's human nature. As I said, it is a primary motivator, but not the only motivator. Human beings are animals. We eat, we shit, we die etc. So other primary motivators are seeking safety and shelter, acquiring food and other resources. The urge to procreate is a driving force behind displays of sexual fitness. And one of those displays of sexual fitness is a display of ability / mastery. It is neither misandrist not bleak to recognise this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:26 AM
1

It seems to me you are the one trying to leverage tears in this debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:20 AM
1

I wish we had a society that required the use of General relativity equations in engineering more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/20 09:16 AM
2

"The idea that feminism has become a conservative, reactionary movement is interesting" Just one last point on this: Consider the rhetoric from 80's-90's "tough on crime" Republicans and the rhetoric from "tough on crime" Feminists. Their outgroups are different, but it's all minimum sentencing, guilty until proven innocent stuff. These kinds of feminists are hard to square with the idea that they are liberal or left leaning. When it comes to crimes that they believe predominantly affect women, …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 01:54 PM
6

Is this all down to some kind of upper-middle class white guilt and self-loathing? Those are the symptoms, but puritanical zeal would seem to be a counter-swing away from the hollow hedonism and apathetic approach of previous generations. Liberalism and and it's a-la-cart style morality and mysticism are being rejected by many in favour of a more authoritarian top-down dynamic on the left. Sexual politics is at the crux of these issues. Then on the right - increasingly you see a tendency towards…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 01:35 PM
-2

You're probably unaware how much they make. Having a country house and a place in the south of France does tend to "drop the panties" moreso than working in a 5 figure salary job. Like I said, they don't do it for the love of stats. Enjoyed the femsplanation though, thanks for explaining men's motivations to me, a man (with a place in the south of France).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 12:11 PM
-1

Were you replying to someone else? Only I wasn't making assertions about where the blame lies in this post, merely that the culture these days is in some way a mirror image of culture in the 1970's when women were portrayed by the media, movies and other cultural signifiers such as advertising as incompetent children in need of the guiding hand of a man. These days it's precisely the other way around. If blame is to be attributed, sure feminist arguments are at the root of this, but feminism is …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 11:24 AM
0

Attention from the opposite sex is the root reason behind why men seek to achieve. It's a primary motivator. Not one guy in a rock band picked up a guitar for his love for music. That comes after. Not one guy decided to become an actuarial accountant for the the love of stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:54 AM
3

Counterpoint: it reveals the true reality of their sexual worth to young attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:50 AM
4

I think birthrates would climb to the right level We require birthrates to drop precipitously if the human race is to have any sort of future. And it needs to happen now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:37 AM
14

They are as much victims of the culture that inflames female hypergamy and standards t The culture also demeans very male attributes as "toxic masculinity" which are often two-sided coins. Excessive macho crap is annoying and off-putting, but the flip side is strength, resourcefulness and confidence, which are attractive. Taciturnity and stoicism too, are derided as being 'emotionally incapable' - which they sometimes are, but they are also a signs of assuredness and self reliance. But the messa…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:35 AM
6

If there were some kind of mass male movement, like Greek Spartan style... fuck fair As near as I can make out, this is pretty much "the Red pill". It's overly simplistic and macho, but perhaps the doughy little boys who pass for men these days could do with a swift kick in the backside. It's pretty much what Jonathan Haight / Jordan Peterson have been prescribing for disaffected youth who have been overly cosseted and cloistered in their childhood. Peterson's message seems to resonate particula…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 10:26 AM
0

The video game character is based on Spartan women of the period, who like their brothers were forced to do extreme exercise, although they did not participate in combat. Also Spartans were very rich, slave owning people. I'd say apart from the combat gear, she's not far off.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 02:45 PM
1

Places like Ancient Greece had ready access to protein and the Spartans in particular just spent all day doing training. They had a higher quality of life than most people do today - as they lived on the backs of a slave class who did most of the toil for them. Sculpture of the time depicts godlike physiques. Of course these were the 1% of society. The rest of the people would have been nothing like as well fed or muscular. The Assasins Creed character is based on a Spartan woman, if I'm not mis…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 02:41 PM
1

If you look at Greek or Roman sculpture. Women had pretty much the same range of bodies as they do today. The men seemed on the whole, fitter and more muscular. And of course it's subjective and the artist may be depicting what they want the audience to see. But a lot of the work of the ancient masters is very realistic and true to life. In other places and times you would have variously, less healthy people and less access to protein etc. But In regards to the likes of the depiction of Cassandr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 02:38 PM
1

I was quoting the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 02:12 PM
1

Do you have a similar depth of empathy for the men who have suffered due to women's alarmist misandry? Nobody want's a radical feminist anyway and as you say, there's always the hand. Lot less stressful, less disparaging, hypercritical and less avaristic too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 02:10 PM
2

Yeah it is rude and offensive. And sexist and generalising. I was quoting another commenter but the "quotation" marks weren't available on the device I was using.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 02:05 PM
15

I wonder how many of these same men want to have relationships with women who have fed a steady diet of alarmism and propagandized misandry about men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 05:28 PM
27

Kids are raised with helicopter parents today, coddled and cosseted and not allowed to take risks or have adventures. Kids are kept indoors far more and parents have unrealistic ideas about risk. This stunts development and produces depressed kids. Add social media on top of that - especially for girls who tend to use mental bullying rather than physical, and you get a population of needy, infantile adults who cannot cope with adversity or the responsibilities of being a grown up. I know I'm an …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 05:25 PM
5

Many guys take drugs as a hobby, do not look attractive, or put effort into their looks, and seem to not be interested in a career. This is a coping mechanism. Risk averse society doesnt suit men. Geezers need excitement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/20 05:21 PM
13

Stats also show us that the majority of men do not pass on their genetic material on. So oops, someones' being telling porky pies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 04:57 PM
2

Lol okay. Point taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 04:55 PM
1

Your understanding of the Cold War is a little off. The Cold War lasted until basically until the fall of the Soviet Union. It had two crunch points, back in the 60's with the Cuban missile crisis and in the 80's with Ronald Reagans' terrifying provocations. I am referring to the latter era, but the immanency of nuclear destruction did not really exist back in the sixties. It came about in the 1980's when intercontinental ballistic missiles, as opposed to plane delivered bombs became the norm an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:58 PM
-2

He needs variety as often as he can get it. As his greed grows so does his desire. Lol. Your post is comically sexist. One day when you've grown up, you might come to the understanding that young men and older men are quite different in this regard. And as women age their greed and desire can grow to monstrous proportions also. And of course if you subscribe to this "humans are nothing but their primal instincts" theory of society then you must agree that in seeking financial support from her ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:25 PM
14

History does not show that. If you ever read Gibbons' History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, there is ample evidence that women were as enthusiastically given to the accumulation of illicit lovers as men, perhaps more so. When it comes to sexual intrigue, women are certainly the equal of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:20 PM
12

I know "CMV" is basically code for "argue with me and get nowhere" so I'm not sure I should even bother. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:17 PM
6

Hard pass. One women is more than enough thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 03:16 PM
1

Hardly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 02:33 PM
1

Agreed. And it's shameful. The Dems are not the only political party to abandon the working class man. Rightwing parties on the rise across Europe are sleazing their way into the vacuum left by traditional parties like the British Labour Party - now a middle class woke culture party far more concerned with pronouns than wages, and too busy sneering at "white van man" to be bothered asking him for his support.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 02:23 PM
1

And is that a politically competent strategy in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 01:49 PM
1

How does that work. Do women not vote? Do women only vote Democrat and never Republican and vice versa? Does voting reflect the totality of one's belief systems? Is everyone either a 'nazi or a 'communist' etc? US politics is a total shitshow. It's no wonder an outsider like Trump could make headway. Also Democrats, rather than court voters, actively tell them to get lost. We don't want your stinking white male votes! So what should be a slam dunk election after election always comes to nail bit…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 11:48 AM
1

There was this thing called the Cold War. May seem remote and insubstantial today but it loomed over us like climate change does today - only difference being the timeframe to apocalypse was 6 minutes not a hundred years. And it nearly happened several times. 4 billion buttholes were permanently clenched.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 09:05 AM
1

They say they are. Don't believe everything you read from faceless commenters on the internet with an axe to grind and ample reason to exaggerate or lie for social affirmation. Also see r/conservative for similar levels of agenda setting bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 09:03 AM
2

When confronted with facts and data you still refuse to believe hypergamy is more than a 'belief'? "Townsend (1989) surveyed medical students regarding their perception of how the availability of marriage partners changed as their educational careers advanced. Eighty-five percent of the women indicated that "As my status increases, my pool of acceptable partners decreases." In contrast, 90 percent of men felt that "As my status increases, my pool of acceptable partners increases." Townsend, J. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 05:20 PM
1

93% more likely to marry men with higher income than themselves. Does not prove your point. It proves my point that women still want higher earners. It proves that for 93% of women with more education than their partner - income is very important. Or do you think 93% is just an statistical fluke? Talk about missing the wood for the trees! You're missing the forest for a matchstick. And you're ignoring THAT part for some reason. ​ Imagine for a moment, the situation is reversed and men are 93% mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 11:57 AM
1

Also, the more educated the woman, the less likely she was to prefer a high earner. You guys just ignore that part for some reason I'm not sure you're reading it right. It doesn't say that in the graphic you linked. It says "in marriages where women had more education, women were 93% more likely to marry men with higher income than themselves. In the below section, where BOTH spouses have college education the effect ls less pronounced but these women are STILL 93% more likely to marry men with …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 11:27 AM
0

Yes it goes both ways. But the way you phrased it was sexist and disgusting. Also I'm not a robot, so your code will not work on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:58 AM
1

Gen Z grew up as latch key kids with the ever-present imminent threat of nuclear war. That's what fucked us up made made us apathetic and nihilistic as a generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:54 AM
1

Do you believe them? Seems like it's always 'my friend' or 'a girl I know". I'm sure there are some real creeps out there, but I think it's blown way out of proportion by a combination of social media bubbles and egging each other on to come up with more and more outrageous stories about men. Misandry is a pastime amongst young women now, it's encouraged and celebrated. Just look at subs like TWOX or FDS. Look at the killallmen and men-are-trash hashtags. You even see just casual pure misandry i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:47 AM
1

You are an outlier or and out and out liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:35 AM
2

. I think what you’ll see looking at that data is that there are still a ton of women who refuse to marry men who earn less ​ Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:34 AM
1

Statistics prove you wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:32 AM
2

Nope. Women still want higher earners and are more likely to divorce men who are househusbands. The so-called "gender pay gap" is a result of women's choices and demands on men, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:29 AM
0

"it's when a person's entitlement and ego tells him he should disregard his partner's feelings and wellbeing for his dick." Or when a person's entitlement and ego tells her she should disregard her partner's feelings and wellbeing for her cunt, no? Does that sound mean to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/20 09:27 AM
1

So do women. Women love a 'boytoy' when they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:26 PM
1

Are all women like that too?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:22 PM
3

Both sexes are able to change gender by sheer effort of will. The process takes a year and you can change as often as you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:18 PM
1

Yep the near term future is a lot fewer long term relationships. The longer term future is human dieback and living in caves for as long as they are habitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:15 PM
1

Why is it that men prefer to be the breadwinners... Selfless nobility. Chivalry. A desire to sacrifice themselves for others. and incur stress when their partners are their financial equal? Probably fear of being dumped, which can happen. But hardly any man is stressed if their partner makes the same or more. ​ Additionally, why is it that men prefer to be hypogamous? They don't. Men do not want to date down socially, which is what this would mean. Men just do not care whether the women they lov…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 05:08 PM
1

" It seems very uncommon to find men fantasizing about being dominated " ​ No, it isn't. Men fantasise about being dominated very frequently. It's an entire fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/20 05:07 PM
1

80/20 is nonsense as this article - with actual data clearly shows: https://ifstudies.org/blog/male-sexlessness-is-rising-but-not-for-the-reasons-incels-claim ​ However there has been a marked rise in sexlessness amongst young men, which - best guess is down to delayed marriages - which is down to a worse economy and men fairing worse in that economy. With a 40% and dropping proportion of men attending college that's going to continue for the foreseeable future.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:20 PM
13

"But I admit that there are women who prefer men being repressive with their emotions" ​ Lol, there sure are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 10:25 AM
1

With what, your inability to grasp the concept of luck?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 04:10 PM
5

Parenting is rewarding yes. It is ALSO a miserable slog. It's both! My job too, is rewarding. And a miserable slog.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 04:01 PM
2

It is a small percentage. A tiny minority. But you remember the bad ones of course. And you are more cautious about it afterward.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 03:54 PM
1

Well it is mostly men who die on the job.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 03:17 PM
1

Im not complaining. Im explaining it to you, because you obviously haven't a clue!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 03:16 PM
1

Look up the definition of luck in a dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 03:15 PM
1

"gender pay gap" says they don't... And Pew research... https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ft_18-05-01_fathersday_time/ Overall women are earning less than men. When will women 'step up' and close the earning gap? Stop looking for part time jobs and Flexi time, and really knuckle down? Start taking on the more dangerous work that pays more. For every 100 female workplace deaths, there are 1,160 male work deaths. Come on. Do your bit. No?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 03:13 PM
2

Do you think a dog's saliva is antibacterial - in the sense that their bacteria is less harmful than say e-coli? Hmm could be y'know.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:55 PM
2

I apologise - I didn't mean to imply You were generalising. Just that it happens frequently. I wouldn't even be on this forum if it were not for the level of negative sexist generalisations of men in the media and on social media. Which is probably why "other women just assume that SAHMs are lazy POSs who are to weak or too stupid to work full time". The level of vitriol and sexism directed at men in the media these days is equal to or greater than that directed at women back in the seventies. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:52 PM
3

Quick question: have you ever seen a kitchen floor after children have eaten there? If it was just me I'd vacuum twice a week and mop every other day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:41 PM
4

It may sound like that to you. But pardon my lack of interest in your non-professional opinion. If you haven't done it, you have no clue what you're talking about buddy. Some school age kids can dress themselves and brush their hair. My special needs kid can't. My other kid is 6. She can't do shit without help and supervision if you want to leave the house on time. Just a heads up: I optimised for efficiency every day and the daily routine is paired down to it's essentials. You do need to buy so…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:37 PM
4

If you're smart AND lucky. Not everyone gets the luck. I've met plenty of smart people - a lot smarter than I am, stuck in dead end jobs because they were cornered by adversity, happenstance and responsibility. Genius level musicians working in admin, stellar fashion designers making cookie cutter clothing for chains etc. Careers for the top third of people are one disappointment after another. There's only so many places at the tippy top, and to my mind, those at the summit are usually better a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 03:29 PM
2

Do women contribute equally to the financial burden of running a home? Because by your logic we should need more of them, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:27 AM
0

To this day men are the one mainly dealing with earning the money to many for the things that make having a home possible. And men are far more likely to die at work. 99% of workplace deaths are men. Because men have to do whatever it takes to support their family financially. We just don't moan about it all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:26 AM
0

There are actual statistics backing up men doing the bulk of the paid work - often dangerous, that pays for the mortgage and the other bills too. What of it? Are men making generalisations that women are being lazy for not earning enough? Hardly. And you seem to think men cannot plan events. That's a very strange generalisation. Your interlocutor is simply making the point that men take care of a lot of things women are not even aware of (but without moaning quite so much about it) , just as is …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:25 AM
3

I'd shake him awake And then he would have to drive in to work down a motorway on 1 hr sleep?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:18 AM
1

From what I can see a lot of stay at home moms ARE using tech to raise their kids - usually in the form of an Ipad. It's bad for them. But when you are time poor it's understandable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:17 AM
6

It takes around 12 hours a day. Rise at 6am. Prepare breakfast, lunches for school. Make sure schoolbags and notes etc are organised. Dress kids, find missing uniform stuff. Make sure hairs and teeth get brushed. Out the door with kids at 8:00 am into heavy traffic. Buy daily groceries on the way home. Home by 10:00. Clean up after breakfast. Vacuum and mop floors. Prepare lunch, and start prep for dinner. Laundry time. Now it's 12:30. Go get first kid. Give them lunch. Go get second kid. Give t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 11:08 AM
3

I know a lot of women who only want to stay at home because they think it's easier than getting a full time job. Also they are right for the most part. If you want the big bucks, you typically have to work very, very, very hard. Certainly a lot harder (and more consistently under severe pressure) than is necessary to maintain a well functioning home - and I've done both.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 10:56 AM
2

I did this for a while and ran a pretty smooth household. In hindsight I was being quite competitively 'house proud' and was cooking very fancy meals and so on to prove my competency. I have no issue being either breadwinner or "mister mom" but what I really don't like is when I shoulder the financial responsibility for the household - which can mean long hours and long commutes, suddenly I'm a bastard because 'gender pay gap' (and I've never seen a publication badger stay at home moms for not d…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 10:54 AM
6

What a sexist comment. Disgusting. I hope your husband sees this. I pity the man married to such a bigoted person.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 10:45 AM
1

Yes it is. It's a type of humour called sarcasm. Look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/20 10:43 AM
52

Why do you not want to take all the financial responsibility - as men have done for so long? Isn't that the feminist goal? Wouldn't that help to even out the 'gender pay gap'? Isn't a life of hard work and financial responsibility your ticket to power and privilege? How many guys do you think are worried that their girlfriend is unacceptably unambitious?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 02:50 PM
2

that shit is two a penny nowadays. ​ https://www.bookdepository.com/I-Hate-Men-Pauline-Harmange/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 02:41 PM
1

Feminists like to frame issues that affect women in ways that are anathema to men. ​ Example: Gender earning gap. Women take on jobs that require fewer hours, are less stressful, our require less education than men. They do it because they want a better work life balance, They do it because the responsibilities of dealing with family and kids falls more on their shoulders. However they frame it in this way: "Women today are essentially working for free until December because of the pay gap". You…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 09:00 AM
0

Ok Yank.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 08:48 AM
1

TIL American informal generational labels are "universal time keeping". Atomic clocks begone! Who do I think is trying to market generational labels? Why nobody. You've misunderstood, and not for the first time. These terms are used by the marketing function of large American consumer oriented firms to segment audiences, along with DINKy's etc. Thus 'marketing speak'. See? get it? There's always hope. I don't know where you get the notion that I think time has passed me by without my awareness. …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 05:15 PM
6

"Boomers' "Millennials', I'm not an American and I don't use that terminology, and I'm not 'trying to claim' anything - but it sounds rather a lot like second hand marketing speak. What is 'of age' supposed to mean. Of voting age? of military age? 'Nothing more cringe' eh? All of your language here is imprecise and compounded by cliches.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 04:35 PM
6

WHat's the 'current generation'? lol. I mean current for whom? You?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 02:56 PM
3

Here's anoitehr idea: Couples who raise a kid successfully charge the state 250,000 dollars for doing so and split it on the kids first cheque from an employer from which tax is deducted. Why should we be raising these damn kids for free!
/r/MensRights06/11/20 02:55 PM
5

What's 'very old' if you don't mind my asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 02:28 PM
0

Well I'm a property millionaire. So that's a ya, from me. Still have to work weekends.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 02:27 PM
1

The truth is that only 2-10% of rape claims are false. 2-10% is not 'rare' or 'very rare, it is common or very common. In fact I would say 2-10% is prevalent. Would you get on a plane with a 2-10% chance of crashing? Would you take a pill with 2-10% chance of life threatening side effects? Would you say that this mischaracterisation of yours of 2-10% being rare stems from your 'distain' or 'straight up hatred' of men? I don't believe so. I believe that you are the subject of a persuasive and sus…
/r/MensRights06/11/20 12:46 PM
1

Generally the advice men get about women is 'be yourself'. Which is fine, if the self you happen to be is physically impressive, confident, charming and direct. Alternative advice of the sort that says, you need to sort your shit out, my friend - will always prove more accurate, more reliable and therefore more popular with those who do not fit the aforementioned selfhood. In addition men have also been given some advice about women, which is that they swoon over sensitivity, emotional vulnerabi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 12:30 PM
92

I love her unintentional North Koreanisms, "Men can carry more bricks than women". Lol.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 03:03 PM
1

"In the Christian marriage it is about sacrifice. " So in the Muslim or Shinto Buddhist, or Jewish or atheist marriage it's not about sacrifice? I'm sorry but this is baloney, and I'm a Catholic. All marriage is supposed to be about reciprocal SUPPORT, which often includes self sacrifice but doesn't necessarily have to happen if everything manages to break well for the couple. I help and support my wife and she's supposed to help and support me, that's it.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 02:49 PM
1

We do need it. It's awesome. But it's broken.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:30 PM
1

It's a contract between 3 people. The 2 partners and the state. This is the crux of the problem.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:29 PM
1

More than half of all marriages end in divorce, women initiate divorce 80% of the time. Feminists will tell you it's the man's fault most of the time, however they entirely avoid talking about the perverse incentives set up, which mean among other things, that single parenthood and divorce is vastly more likely for lower earners than higher earners. Are lower earning men just shittier people? unlikely. So we have a systemic sexism issue here - systemic sexism disfavouring men in marriage. No mat…
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:27 PM
1

...Until it becomes one of the biggest curses.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:05 PM
1

precisely.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:04 PM
1

Solution is simple: only have relationships with rich girls who earn more.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 12:00 PM
1

You have marginally more rights with regards to your children married than unmarried. Protip: don't have children, don't get married, don't cohabitate - or if you do, make damn sure she earns more and has more assets and fewer debts going in to a prospective marriage.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 11:59 AM
6

Who would have better achieved a meaningful heritage? Immortal individuals like Mozart, Einstein, Dickens or the average father/mother? Meaningful heritage not worth much when you're in a pot or the ground. The material reason people have kids is to have companionship and help in old age. Beats the 'respect and admiration' of your peers any day, unless the former comes with a sizeable bank balance, which it often doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 10:40 AM
2

"It has a gendered term because its a phenomenon that happens to woman disproportionately with men. " MPR News Staff disputed the usefulness of the term.[35] Given its gender-specific nature and negative connotation, Lesley Kinzel described it as inherently biased, essentialist, dismissive, and a double standard.[36] In a 2016 Washington Post article, Cathy Young wrote that it is just one of a number of terms using "man" as a derogatory prefix, and that this convention is part of a "current cycl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 02:21 PM
1

These aren't 'facts'. These are entirely unsupported sexist opinions. 'Documented' means nothing unless you supply evidence of such documentation. Flat Earthers will tell you it's 'well documented' that the Earth is flat. I could equally suggest that you would be less 'upset' about things if you let go of the sexist generalisations, which only undermine your argument and make you seem a little unhinged, frankly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 01:17 PM
2

"It has a gendered term because its a phenomenon that happens to woman disproportionately with men. " Unless you can prove this, this is simply another of your sexist generalisations. For another thing, you are denying us even the ability to have a conversation about it by essentially declaring it off limits with your sexist 'mansplaining' comment as if no women is ever condescending. Or as if no man is ever the subject of online harassment. Ironically you are being extremely condescending here,…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 12:59 PM
2

No, it's an analogy. You can't disagree that in all cases all the time, only personal experience counts and outside perspective never counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 12:52 PM
2

He didn't say you were wrong about your life experience. He said you were wrong about the conclusions you were drawing from them. he was not and I am not disagreeing that you experience harassment. We disagree about your conclusions about the fundamental nature of that harassment. Mansplaining is a sexist term for condescending or patronising. Women are often also condescending. Neither of us were being condescending. Disagreement is not condescension. I can safely compare the toxicity I receive…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 03:55 PM
2

It's called an analogy. Have you never come across an analogy before? Why am I making an analogy? Because you don't seem to understand the point I'm making. The idea of analogy is to strip away the externalities and get to the concept. The concept being, a different perspective can be illuminating, regardless of personal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 03:50 PM
2

How can you know better then a person experiencing it what it is. In the abstract, very easily. Person A sees the sun go around the earth. Person A believes the sun revolves around the Earth. Person B lives on the moon. Person B does not have the EXPERIENCES of Person A. But Person B can clearly see that it is the Earth which spins on its axis which causes the perception of the Sun revolving around the earth. Person B communicates this information to Person A. Shut up you moonsplainer?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 02:12 PM
2

No you made a claim he was 'mansplaining'. The guy you replied to was asserting his opinion that the harassment you experience is not born out of special malice towards you for your gender. You call this 'mansplaining' as if he has no right to disagree with you because of his gender. You're being sexist. I think he does have a right to disagree with your assertion, even if he is not a woman himself. He MAY be wrong, I may be wrong about the root cause of the hostility - but your sexist objection…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 02:07 PM
1

This is great example of sexism. Trolls use whatever they think will hurt you the most. But don't womensplain to guys and tell them they don't get the similar amounts of harassment or often even worse. You have no idea. You ever get the Police breaking down your door because some dipshit called them to your house to mess with your head? I doubt it. How many death threats have you got? Do you know how many the average guy gets? Again, I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:30 PM
2

gaming at more serious levels is actively hostile towards woman. It's actively hostile to everyone. Women are often myopic when it comes to issues around hostility and imagine it's only themselves that have problems with jerks on the internet. Everyone gets these assholes screaming at them, absolutely everyone. And they use whatever they think will get a rise out of you the easiest. So if you are a woman they use misogynistic tactics. If gay, homophobic. If a man, they will play on your accent o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:22 PM
1

TBH Facebook is a video game.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 01:13 PM
3

Actually no, they’re not.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 03:28 PM
1

There’s no perhaps about it. They are not totalitarian. That description is completely wrong.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 08:37 PM
-1

The world health organisation is not a ‘totalitarian’ outfit, nor is the United Nations. I’m against extreme ignorance.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 05:32 PM
-4

You need to be ‘destroyed’ ye gobshite.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 01:22 PM
3

He’s said he would reinstate the ‘dear colleague’ letter.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 07:05 AM
2

Having read the article it seems that she was acquitted of murder on account of .... nothing.
/r/MensRights23/10/20 05:08 PM
2

This was a fake lie detector.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 07:20 AM
1

Everyone is a ‘slut’, or wants to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 07:17 AM
4

Not sure that’s the case. If women had to read men’s ‘signals’ rather than plain speaking I wonder if they’d have any better luck on average. coyness is the antithesis of communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 08:33 PM
1

He advertises just not in the usual way. Also as the shiny new toy, no brand awareness asvertising is necessary, similar to Ferrari.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 06:52 PM
3

Often times you can be getting them and be entirely unaware. Looking back on my youth, I was missing a lot of painfully obvious ‘signals’. My first girlfriend had to literally take my hand and explain that she found me very attractive and wanted to ‘go out’ with me. And even then I was like, ‘are you sure?’
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 06:49 PM
3

Yeah. They should make the men use a sifter ball or something. These 100 mile an hour serves that are impossible to return make for a dull game. Was much a better sport in the 70’s with wooden rackets.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 06:44 PM
2

Bawl her out and tell her its upsetting, degrading and demeaning. Tell her to wise up and cut out the bigotry or just fuck off out of your life. Tell her you don’t want to deal with sexists.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:46 PM
1

I think the answer is to tax them vastly more. And to harmonize corporate taxes for operations over a certain size throughout the OECD - and to tax stock options as income where such bonuses and renumeration go over 300,000 in value on the day of issue at 90%.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:35 PM
1

So I get paid the same as Meryl Streep? Or she gets paid the same as me? Does male model Ted get paid the same as Naomi Cambell?
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:31 PM
4

Women’s tennis is much better than men’s tennis to watch. Longer rallies etc. Men’s tennis is serve; ace, miss, ace, ace, miss, miss, return. Most of the time the ball is in the net or on the ground.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:28 PM
2

Thats already the case in the US
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:22 PM
1

If 2-10% of passenger aircraft journeys resulted in a crash would you consider that ‘rare’ and would you get on a plane? 2-10% is not rare at all, it’s very, very common. Also if all accusations are automatic convictions, then what’s to stop blackmailers?
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:19 PM
1

That’s not even a coherent sentence!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 07:07 PM
2

Can you actually tell the difference between parts of speech? Of course it’s pertinent. There’s a hell of a difference between drunk driver hits child and driver hits child. But neither is an excuse to hit children with a car. Maybe take up an adult literacy course.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:59 PM
2

It’s a bubble of a bubble, in a bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:29 PM
2

Did I say this was an excuse? Did I say that made it okay? Is pertinent information forbidden from being imparted? Do you have a learning disability yourself by any chance? If so I apologize.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:29 PM
1

What ‘excuse’? Who mentioned an ‘excuse’?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:26 PM
3

These particular women you are referring to are simply abject cowards. Normal women aren’t terrified of every man they see, meet or imagine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:20 PM
1

He had a learning disability. And yes a thickheaded dude would have knocked his face in. Unfortunately homophobia is still alive and well. But jail? That’s a symptom of mass hysteria.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 06:18 PM
4

Well ‘no dogs, no Irish’ wasn’t aimed at purple people, but Okay, racist American.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 06:11 PM
0

Yes
/r/MensRights19/10/20 11:22 AM
48

Racism and sexism towards white men, that’s why.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 11:20 AM
76

No, mansplaining. A man, Teaching ? We can’t have that!
/r/MensRights19/10/20 11:19 AM
1

In the old days, your dad would tell you these things. Or if not lay it out for you, you would see by his actions, what a man was supposed to be and do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/20 08:58 PM
10

from their website: "While early reports reveal more men are dying as a result of COVID-19, the health of women generally is adversely impacted through the reallocation of resources and priorities, including sexual and reproductive health services" ​ So while more men are dying, what's really at issue is women's health?
/r/MensRights14/10/20 02:57 PM
2

TIL men are somehow unaffected by climate change. Rejoice!
/r/MensRights14/10/20 02:51 PM
1

And when men leave women? It’s never because they are ‘worthless’ to use your rather heartless terminology?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 07:12 AM
2

Also it’s illegal and you can go to jail for a long time for rape. The idea that rape is tacitly accepted or condoned by society is insane.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 09:29 AM
2

‘Patronising’ is already gendered. ‘Patron’ is masculine. Pater means father in latin and greek. ‘Mansplaining’ is a feminist put down of men ( but feminism is only about equality of course and there is no element of bigotry whatsoever).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 07:45 AM
2

I guarantee you they all have talents one way or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 07:24 AM
5

Almost every man agrees with you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 07:13 AM
3

Do you think that this could possibly be related to the 60/40 split of women to men in college. Does the fact that this disparity is growing warrant any attention at all from feminists in terms of equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 06:40 AM
2

How dare they be awkward. I mean obviously they’ve deliberately chosen to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 06:26 AM
1

It’s perfectly fine to sympathise with women.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 08:51 AM
1

This sub skews older than most of reddit so were more reasonable. Youngun’s are hepped up on goofballs.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 06:27 PM
2

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:09 PM
3

Let’s put your anecdotal 1 on the scales over... here. And the 36708 gals who liked #killallmen in the last hour...here...
/r/MensRights02/10/20 09:58 PM
3

If ‘real feminists’ are all about equality, then we’re ‘real feminists’ and tall the other ‘feminists’ are not. Wouldn’t it just be easier and more accurate to say feminists hate and fear men? And are only interested in ‘equality’ if it means placing women above men?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 01:29 PM
1

If that’s the case the majority of people on this forum are ‘true feminists’ and the majority of people In r/feminism r/twoxchromosomes etc and on Twitter and Tumblr are not.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 01:23 PM
1

Kind of an old article, lol. Last updated in 1974.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 01:13 PM
1

BAh I thought I read ‘greater of two evils’ lol.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 01:10 PM
1

The whole patriarchy thing is a load of crap. The US for instance, is not a patriarchy, it is a Federal Republic with a universal franchise. They will say ‘oh well, I don’t mean a LITERAL patriarchy’. So they mean a metaphorical patriarchy. Oh no. Not the metaphorical patriarchy. Help.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 07:59 AM
1

Republican generals and former generals seem to think that’s DEFINITELY Trump.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 07:56 AM
2

Small voting blocks can have immense power if they act in concert, and are seen to do so. Acquiescing to radical misandrists is virtue signalling ‘I’m definately not old fashioned, I’m hip and trendy!’ People see through that shit eventually. And ‘the kids’ see through it first.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 07:53 AM
2

Thats what gets votes for now. That will change. People are getting tired of the pandering, it comes off as patronizing these days - even to women.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 07:50 AM
1

Trump is a con artist. He is dangerously incompetent and he is flirting with disaster with his statements about refusing to concede the election. As someone who thinks the US deserves a lot of comeuppance for destroying Iraq, please go ahead and vote for 4 more years of chaos.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:18 AM
1

This why graphic design is in such a professional decline
/r/MensRights28/09/20 09:15 PM
12

Its not worth commenting on a lady incel forum.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:47 PM
1

Women can not be charged with the crime of rape in the uk, unless they possess a penis.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 08:03 PM
3

People confuse 'rights' with privileges or expectations. Everyone has the more or less the same rights - which are a legal thing - except for selective service, which women do not have to register for. And abortion, since men cannot get pregnant. ​ When it comes to legal outcomes in the courts - especially family courts, women are far more often given preferential treatment over men - but this has nothing to do with 'rights'. It's the sexist idea that women need to be 'taken care of' and that wo…
/r/MensRights21/09/20 02:40 PM
3

Feminists tell you "it's INCREDIBLY rare, only 2-10%" So rare! First off 2% isn't 'incredibly' rare, it's incredibly common! Imagine 2% of all airline flights crashed! And 10% is a whoppingly large amount. But it could be even higher.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/20 12:32 PM
3

In the UK an accusation can ONLy be labelled false if the accuser admits it is false. If it is proven false but the accuser does not admit it, it does not go into the stats as a false accusation - according to this BBC documentary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/20 12:30 PM
1

"If it’s a collaborative effort of multiple countries, then it is by default bigger then any individual world goverment" What? No, not at all. This is faulty reasoning. The UN is not some effort to reproduce the governance of entire countries on the scale of individual governments. But you don't need to resort to inference you can simply look it up, it's not a mystery or a secret. The UN is an intragovernmental organisation, not a supranational government. It is a very large bureaucracy to be su…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:11 PM
1

It's some intern in New York.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:31 AM
-1

You're imagining the UN is some giant daddy world government. It's not - it's a collaborative effort. You gonna tell nuclear armed China they can't do something? good luck, but my guess is they will ignore you.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:30 AM
-3

I donlt think you have much of an idea of what comprises the United Nations organisation. The World Health organisation is part of the UN. The world food programme too. It's not just the security council. And the SC's dysfunction is largely down to the US abuse of it's veto power.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:28 AM
-7

You know, turning your head the other way when war crimes are committed? THat's silly. The UN security council is not some separate government with it's own independent army. The reason the UN usually does fuck all about war crimes is because either the US or Russia vetos any action. The UN IS the Security Council as far as most Americans seem to think, and it's job is actually just to prevent world war 3 by allowing the most warlike states to have a forum for diplomacy - which is 'talking'. So …
/r/MensRights10/09/20 10:24 AM
2

Troll account. Tweets porn etc.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 09:27 AM
3

Instead, Jackson thinks that America should set its sights on solving poverty and the homelessness crisis by redistributing wealth. “The top guys, the leading shareholders, the major corporations around here, if you took 10% of what they have, it wouldn’t change 1% of anything that goes on in their lives. There would still be the same lifestyle, their entire life. Right?” 50 said. “We wouldn’t even have a homeless issue. This is what the fight is about, the whole major issue… is between Democrat…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 03:18 PM
10

Okay spotty.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:11 PM
8

By the way there’s only one country where men can vote but women can’t. The Vatican. No go and finish your homework.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:10 PM
10

Okay, Teenage troll. You want to learn about men’s rights? Grow up and have kids. See what life is actually like when you aren’t having your every whim catered to. Sneering at the problems millions of human beings have isn’t a great look. But it does shriek ‘feminism’.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:08 PM
9

But you ‘hate all men’ no?
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:05 PM
14

This from someone who posts rants in r/teenagers like “I hate all men”?
/r/MensRights24/08/20 07:01 PM
7

There’s only one country where men can vote but women can’t..., the Vatican.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 06:44 PM
7

For a start he wasn’t accused of rape but of attempted rape. So there’s that. Secondly the other women Swetnick and Ramirez that came forward did not allege rape, but ‘sexual misconduct’. So I do not understand your insistance that we believe Kavanaugh to be a ‘rapist’. Based on what, exactly? And thirdly I don’t have a strong view either way for the main accusation from Ms Ford, but the idea that a woman can accuse a man decades after the fact of an attempted rape, with no evidence other than h…
/r/MensRights24/08/20 06:23 PM
1

What rights do you think women don't have? • Bodily integrity? • Right to be believed? • Fair treatment in various institutions? All these apply to men. There are people who live in our country today who were alive at a time when men couldn't vote either. And in the US, "Almost all male US citizens and male immigrants, who are 18 through 25, are required to register with Selective Service." This does not apply to women. What's your problem with Brett Kavanagh (apart from him being a scumbag repu…
/r/MensRights24/08/20 09:25 AM
1

when it comes to rape women get asked what we were wearing men get congratulated This is nonsense. Men go to jail for rape. And in jail, they usually get beaten or killed if the other inmates find out. Nobody asks women 'what they were wearing' except mouth breathing trash. Where do you get the idea that men are congratulated for rape? WTF?
/r/MensRights24/08/20 08:59 AM
7

Thats not what the word Patriarchy means.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:53 AM
-2

He wasn’t being aggressive.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:53 AM
-3

I agree, you were being civil.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:52 AM
6

I’m all for female empowerment. But it’s glaringly obvious that a substantial cohort of feminism are in it for the misandry and nothing else.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:50 AM
2

Hating the English and wanting to leave the UK? But, but but why?
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:47 AM
11

Not surprised the man-hating Guardian would pass this without any scrutiny. It’s become a mirror image of the Daily Mail with a similar level of unctuous fealty to their respective prevailing ideology.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:40 AM
-1

Yeah it’s not. It’s just a ‘fuck women’ post. Doesn’t belong here really.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:29 AM
2

In OECD countries neither men nor women are 'oppressed'. Not by any stretch of the imagination. Of course if you deliberately distort the definition of the word to mean 'must endure some unfair hardships from time to time', then every single person on earth is oppressed including billionaires. Muslim Uighers are oppressed. The Palestinians are oppressed. North Koreans are oppressed. Catcalling is not oppression. Circumcision is not oppression. Difficult to obtain abortions are not oppression. Un…
/r/MensRights20/08/20 11:19 AM
1

Well those dudes are probably just stupid kids. I don’t know how old you are, but I’m more than halfway through life. And what I’ve found is that being a decent person is good enough. Follow your better instincts, not some ideology that at it’s core is more about a redress of past grievances than a quest for a better future.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 07:45 AM
1

The Author of the second link there is Suzanna Walters. Suzanna Danuta Walters is the director of the Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program and professor of sociology at Northeastern University, Boston. And according to you, not a Feminist. The author of the third link there is Julie Bindel, who according to her wiki page, is an ‘English radical feminist writer and co-founder of the law-reform group Justice for Women’. But again according to you, she is not a feminist. You see the probl…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 10:09 PM
0

When it comes to the actions of a nation, particularly a democracy one may judge the attitudes of it’s voters collectively, no? And those attitudes have been very much found wanting by the majority of the planet. Your only remaining allies are the US Republican party. Kind of says it all. The Israeli left has been defeated and Mr Netanyahu has informed us that the occupation is ‘going on forever’. So that’s that for Ayelet Shaked’s ‘little snakes’ eh? A life of subjugation. You think I’m being u…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 03:32 PM
14

No the female teachers in this instance have given the boys grades, which were subsequently reduced by some faceless Whitehall bureaucrat based on an algorithm which apparently favors down grading boys and people in disadvantaged areas.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 03:23 PM
0

Thanks for the interest. Your nation is an appalling hotbed of the most savage tribal brutality in the modern world, so you’ll understand that I view your expertise on racism with little more than mirth and mild disgust.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 03:17 PM
1

No my comment does make sense, it’s just you disagree. Look hardly anyone is against women’s rights but there’s a pretty big gap between that and ‘the future is female’ or wanting to ‘destroy men as a class’: https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2016/09/suzanne-moore-why-i-was-wrong-about-men Or telling men en masse to step down from their jobs https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-cant-we-hate-men/2018/06/08/f1a3a8e0-6451-11e8-a69c-b944de66d9e7_story.html%3fo…
/r/MensRights17/08/20 03:05 PM
0

Is the old ‘anti-semite’ accusation simply too worn down to wheel out now? I’ll tell you who is a racist though, almost every single member of Likud. And anyone who voted for them.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 07:59 AM
1

Exactly. It doesn’t make sense. So I would conclude that the man hating idiots who identify as feminists are indeed feminists.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 07:57 AM
0

Yes lovely people, the Arabs.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:41 PM
0

My feeling is I lived and worked there long before you were born, mate.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:17 PM
1

Psst, condoms exist.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:13 PM
0

Lost any respect I had for Israeli politics and society? Yes.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:09 PM
0

I probably have. Be great to deduce it to nil.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:08 PM
1

What does it mean when the vast majority of feminists are not feminists, then?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 01:07 PM
1

Are we supposed to give wholehearted support for North Korea because Kim is a man? Fuck that noise. Israel is a oppressive ethnostate with some if the world’s worst atrocities and human rights records under it’s belt. Fuck Colgate / P+G for even trading with Israel.
/r/MensRights16/08/20 10:28 AM
1

When did the Palestinian airforce last level any of your highrise apartment buildings? Or hit your hospitals? Or drop white phosphorous on a school? Did they lay siege to an Israel city of over a million and deliberately reduce calories so as to induce malnutrition in the general population?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 10:21 AM
1

Well BLM is presumably about primarily black men getting murdered by the cops, so you would think it would center around black men, no? What’s even more telling is that you extrapolate from that and presume u/alatare wants EVERY non-feminist movement to center on men because of this one example. Why would you do that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/20 07:13 AM
3

Its just some guy having a pop at Peterson. So many non clinical psychologists gave so much to say on the subject of clinical psychology and how he is ‘wrong’ etc.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 08:02 AM
3

I’m more of an ‘ass man’.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 07:33 AM
3

The London Underground perpetuates rape culture. Stations are raped over and over again by phallic trains designed, engineered and built by men and for men. Each arrival and each departure is a victory for the Phallusocracy.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 10:01 PM
9

They must be warm and moist. Down with sexist airconditioning!
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:46 PM
2

Hilarious. Is there a sub for this specific flavor of comedy gold?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:45 PM
9

Cancer.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:41 PM
5

Everyone who lives in a house together must pull their weight. No exceptions. Put your clothes in the basket. Clean the toilet after you use it. After dinner, everyone pitch in. If someone is paying down money for the rent, the other better be contributing something else. Everybody fights, no-one quits.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:40 PM
41

To be honest I don’t find cannibalism ‘unthinkable’. I do find rape unthinkable. I wouldn’t rape someone. But in an ‘Alive’ situation? No hope of rescue? The dead are not coming back. Their bodies can help the survivors live. And also they are former professional athletes. Just saying. With some rosemary?
/r/MensRights08/07/20 08:34 PM
20

Only countries where the predominant religion demands it. The US is the only country that pretends its a hygiene issue.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 11:44 AM
78

Thats a total lie. Boys do not get infections from having foreskin. Not at all. Theres an entire continent of european men, twice as many as in the US. None of us are getting infections from remaining the way we were born. It’s hard to imagine anything more silly. How would the human race, or any animal evolve to have a critical flaw that requires surgery to fix? If early man was always getting penile infections then evolution would have removed the foreskin. It is arrant nonsense. American men:…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 07:20 AM
1

Contact Twitter and explain you need the tweet as it if evidence of criminal wrongdoing on her behalf...
/r/MensRights05/07/20 07:14 AM
3

He is a Morlock.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 10:20 AM
6

Great news. Smash the Murdoch empire.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 09:12 AM
5

"President Trump is there, and so am I". Urgh.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 03:35 PM
1

Feminism asserts than men and women are THE SAME, but women are superior in every single way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/20 01:02 PM
1

Pierce Morgan used to be editor of one Britains trashiest redtop tabloid newspapers. He is a risible character.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 01:11 PM
5

Her attitude seems to be that her kid is her own personal property - to deface or deform as she sees fit, and nit a human being with his own i dependent rights.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 01:06 PM
1

Men do pay more tax than women. As a cohort, men pay almost ALL the tax.
/r/PussyPass28/05/20 08:48 AM
4

That's a case for the police or the FBI.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 08:43 AM
11

I think it’s a reach to attribute it to Trump personally. I agree, a Clinton presidency would certainly not have allowed any of these reforms, and I would hazard a guess - have moved to ensure Universities were protected from lawsuits on the behalf of those falsely accused and given no due process. Perhaps by having the taxpayer settle on their behalf. For ‘equality’.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 04:51 PM
10

Trump has nothing to do with it? Apart from appointing DeVos
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 04:46 PM
2

Yep, thats what we’re doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 02:32 PM
1

It is of course relevant to the discussions of happiness in relationships. Because relationships are finite. And can end badly. And in ending badly can leave many people far, far worse off than had they ever had them. Heroin makes heroin addicts happy. It is entirely relevant to a discussion about heroin and the happiness it provides, to consider the less appealing aspects of what happens when you cannot afford the heroin, or want to stop taking the heroin. Or take too much of the heroin.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 01:53 PM
2

So you want to see better porn? I’m pretty sure it’s a free market. Similarly the vast majority of erotic fiction is aimed at women. With paperthin male characters who exist only to please women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 01:49 PM
2

For the women complaining about DB? That’s a likely component. What about the men complaining about a DB? Which is the majority of all married men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 01:47 PM
1

My point was relevant even if you choose not to consider it at all, even for ‘an eighth of a second’. I am rolling my eyes pretty hard at this stage tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 12:03 PM
3

Thanks, we’re out the other side now. Neither of us is interested in sex with the other. Maybe me even less than her now possibly. So at least theres ‘progress’, ha ha.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 12:02 PM
1

Stay on the topic then instead of having emotional fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 11:59 AM
1

I’m one of the people making another point. This is a forum. Perhaps you’d be happier talking to a wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 11:51 AM
1

You made your point. Other people are making other points.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 11:35 AM
14

Be precise in your speech. Saying ‘and stuff’ is not as good as reporting accurately what she actually said. Maybe tell the friend to take notes and report back. I’m assuming this won’t be a one-off.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 10:37 AM
1

But getting into a relationship that is more likely than not to end this way is bad for men. Its a gamble. A bad gamble.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 10:34 AM
1

For the women complaining about DB? That’s a likely component. What about the men complaining about a DB? Which is the majority of all married men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:35 AM
7

Women are forbidden from watching porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:31 AM
4

Easy to say if you don’t have a pile of kids and a mortgage.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:20 AM
1

If we don’t reduce earths population or at the very least slow the rate of growth drastically, there will be a rather nasty ecological collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:16 AM
1

Half of them stop being married. And its usually (70%) women initiating that. They tend to get the house, a stipend and the kids, while the man gets to sleep in his car and put a gun in his mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 07:07 AM
6

She is a multi-millionaire.
/r/PussyPass14/05/20 02:51 PM
5

There weren’t many of them working in marketing or telesales.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/20 09:47 AM
2

It does, in the US that's wrong. Abortion should be an absolute right in every state up to the second trimester. And it ought to be free.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 08:15 AM
1

What an arsehole. Why does anyone - even feminists support her? She's a fucking Nazi.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 10:15 AM
7

I can almost recite Karen's post from memory at this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 01:20 PM
2

I'm more interested in these rapid dogs. Just how fast are they?
/r/MensRights11/05/20 11:05 AM
1

Whats presented to us of the left are often people on the extremes and people with serious mental health issues. I don’t think they should be teaching anyone.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 12:04 PM
5

It made Trudeau an international laughing stock and caused damage to progressive politics everywhere. He’s a fucking idiot. And that Arab getup? Christ.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 11:45 AM
2

He meant to reply to the guy above you.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 11:43 AM
1

Causalties of ...other men. They will say. I mean if these fuckers want a gender war pitting men against women then I have to say, you and whose army, lady?
/r/MensRights09/05/20 11:42 AM
1

My whole family are military, so that shit would not fly with us I can tell you. I had to write to the newspapers when they started forcing a sly type of creationism into the primary schools disguised as religious study. Don’t put up with crap from educational authorities. They back down from this sort of septic shit when pushed, as most bullies do.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 11:39 AM
2

Well it's not like the west doesn't have it coming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/20 08:45 AM
9

Most of today’s pay gap in the U.S. is due to forces that push men and women onto different career tracks in the economy, not differences in experience and education, or other unexplained factors. Tah dah. Now do the workplace fatality gap. Personally, I would like to see women earning the majority of the money. The vast majority. It would be great. And I guarantee you in the event that did happen - and it might with the rate boys are being left behind in education, the complaint will be men are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/20 08:14 AM
15

So I take it you're happy the boy is dead. One less man in the world no?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 08:08 AM
2

Lol.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:15 PM
12

Yes I’ve never heard a woman talk loudly. I’m coining a new phrase: Jenny Eclair is a bollockswriter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/20 04:35 PM
3

There’s a lot of brainwashed grievance studies majors LARPing as journalists these days. A little more Seymour Hersh and a little less making articles out of Tweets.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:13 PM
13

Trumps supporters believe the mainstream media is against them (with some cause) and so it doesn't matter what they say about him, unfortunately. It's a dangerous situation to have - an executive with hugely expanded powers thanks to Bush, but with hugely diminished oversight on those powers thanks to an effectively neutralised fourth estate. America is ripe for a messy transition of power under those conditions.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:21 AM
13

Food eaten is soon forgotten.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/20 03:32 PM
6

Did she have any ideas on the ethnic makeup of these men? Done proportionally this would effectively mean the elimination of Jewish men, no?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 03:30 PM
1

But a lot of sheep will. Nazism didn't spring from the forehead of Drexler, it was a reaction to the emergence of Marxist parties, themselves a reaction to the poverty and destruction caused by WW1.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 09:32 AM
2

Exams consisted of tedious, long, methodical information write downs, no room for opinions, the longer the better usually Good. You can have opinions after you know what you're talking about. Education has swung too far away from knowing the material into having opinions about the material. Expertise and knowledge is being replaced with personal whimsy. ​ If you want to oppose the ever growing feminist agenda, there's only right wing parties that resonate. Agreed, and it's part of the reason ext…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 09:28 AM
4

Ive never heard anyone use the phrase, myself.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 11:12 AM
3

First actual men’s legal rights win Ive seen - ever.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:14 PM
6

What do you pass that off as though?
/r/MensRights01/05/20 06:13 PM
2

Oh yes. And Hillary too. And Biden. Cowards.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:15 AM
0

I don’t forgive people who go ‘woops my bad’ when it comes to that war. Any fucking rational adult could see what it was. In a just world Tucker and the rest of the Fox News crowd would be in prison along with all the neocons for crimes against humanity.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:13 AM
1

Why is why I prefaced my comment with the word, ‘correct’. Jesus, a little reading comprehension, please.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:08 AM
5

I watched him cheerlead the Iraq war, agree with torture and other peccadilloes. Some of us are older than you kid. This guy gets a special place in hell.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:44 PM
1

Correct, but FUCK that dude.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 06:44 PM
6

Good news in one way.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 06:42 PM
6

Ive been in that sub for a year or too, am left leaning myself and never found it to be ‘rightwing’.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/20 06:07 PM
23

Yes - the fact that the vast majority of men in Europe are not circumcised yet remain just as healthy if not healthier than US males. It's not so long ago that the surgeon general was telling people to smoke for the good of their lungs.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:07 AM
1

You liken men to ‘apes’, ‘snakes’ and ‘bears’ in your last few comments. What does that say about your hypocrisy? And this one guy makes an allusion to cars and now he’s ‘men’?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 09:53 AM
3

Its totally her sockpuppet,
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:16 PM
2

Lol obvious sock puppet is obvious. You really should get a hobby.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:14 PM
2

Police are men and men are bad, therefore police are bad. Menslib/radfem logic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/20 03:03 PM
2

You’re he’s a he? The genuflection before the altar of feminism is so extreme on that sub that it seems likely many of them are female radfems larping as men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/20 03:02 PM
1

They think enslaving men and having women rule over them like an old fashioned feudal society except with the genders flipped is ‘equality’.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 12:55 PM
-2

Well it's a rhetorical flourish, bu like the best of those, it's also literally true, unfortunately. I find the state of both places to be improveable based on the more favourable general conditions I find my compatriots in. I would add, for clarity, that those people who choose Alabama as a home and those who discover that this is their fate, take note that... its' not that much better anywhere else. And that other places are almost just as beautiful.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 06:42 PM
-8

yes.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 06:37 PM
-5

I don't think you mean the comment literally, or even completely seriously, but I do take your point - that those who aspire to a humble life should aspire to it from the start, less they mislead others into thinking they are saints. (Right? because Banks haha, they hate to see a balance someone might rob. And there's no bonus culture. Sleeeeeeeep). However, if women liked men, the way men like women, would you begrudge a young man the chance to enjoy himself with as many desirable women as he s…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre23/04/20 06:28 PM
-23

Alabama is a third world 'shithole country'. Its incompetent and racist rulers should be made an extremely violent example of. I spent some time there and I've lived in very poor countries in the Middle East. Alabama makes rural Egypt look like London's West End. I feel sorry for anyone who has to live under those conditions. They should send in the US army. Alabama needs liberating. Ive never seen a worse place for children to grow up apart from Gaza.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 04:53 PM
1

Harmful masculine pride seems to prevent many men from pursuing these types of solutions, though. ​ Absolutely, you've hit the nail on the head there. But with women's issues theres allowed to be a public dialogue to get at the root of harmful behaviours, such as staying with an abusive spouse. With men, such dialogue is repressed. Those who raise these kind of issues are scolded and ostracised and the whole thing is overly emotional and there's very little clearheaded thinking going on. A lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 04:27 PM
18

I can't afford a house (they are 800k) ​ Ever heard of a mortgage? Jesus christ. If you have a downpayment of 200k a mortgage application will be a walk in the park.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre23/04/20 11:43 AM
2

But large and obvious physiological differences between men and women obviously must stop at the exterior of the skull for some reason.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 08:27 AM
2

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 08:11 AM
2

Why is it a case of ‘comparison’ when it comes to mens issues? Why must we be silent? Believe it or not its a bit of a dichotomy when women tell men to be more articulate with emotional issues, but then call such articulation whining. You cannot have it both ways and claim any kind of legitimacy. And your ‘that’s about it’ triteness is an appalling indication of far you have dehumanized men in your own mind that you can so blithely dismiss the widespread and acute problems of suicide, incarcerat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 12:23 AM
2

Yeah that and suicide. Well that, suicide and having far fewer rights to your own children. Oh and homelessness. And I forgot; huge workplace fatality rates. But apart from this and a general hatred from society directed at boys from the time they can walk, mens issues are just about sexual inconvenience! (I’m guessing you’re 15).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:18 PM
3

‘Destruction’ oh women cause a pretty large amount of destruction let me tell you. Also harassment. And malicious gossip. And character assassination. And false rape claims that lead to lynchings and killings and imprisonment. And women do kill and abuse their partners very much more frequently than you seem to be aware of. Children are more likely to abused by a women than a man. Men are imperfect. And we know it. How about a little humility there madam?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:14 PM
2

What a strange argument. You are the product of a long line of men as well as women. You have no claim to the historic suffering of women any more than I have a claim to the suffering of men fighting in Normandy in WW2.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/20 07:10 PM
1

Your teacher is dead wrong on that 79 cents thing. She knows this but it trying to pass this falsehood off as fact to an impressionable young mind. This is abusive and I would raise a stink. It is illegal to pay women less than a man for the same work. If you add all the women’s salaries together and all the mens, the men come out ahead. But this is because for example, a Pilot gets paid more than an air steward, and more pilots are men, while more air stewards are women.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 07:55 AM
2

Not a fair comparison? But I didn’t make the comparison?
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:43 PM
1

The translation is garbled and not useful. A german translation would be great.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:38 PM
2

About a quarter million people get hit by lightning every year. That’s why prudent fellows don’t walk about in a thunderstorm holding a golf club aloft and acting like anyone who doesn’t is being grotesquely unfair to thunderstorms.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:35 AM
1

Women should stop divorcing their husbands, taking everything, and preventing from seeing their own kids out of spite and avarice.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 10:21 AM
2

I think she should spend her days in an asylum. And that US criminal sentencing is among the harshest in the world. Thus the manslaughter charge. Its evidence of the punitive nature of US jurisprudence, not leniency.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 09:27 AM
1

That doesn’t make any literal sense. Perhaps my language is foreign to you, or you are a poet of some kind.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 07:05 PM
-1

Are you at the age and or species where you shave yet?
/r/MensRights17/04/20 05:14 PM
-2

Welcome to didn't I tell you to fuck off? In the future, a one week pregnancy will be viable given similar advances in technology. In fact, in the future, a sperm will be viable all on its own and XX chromosonal data will be downloadable (and so will XY) from Piratebay. So I will be able to abort Adrienne Barbeau and mine's fetus's just to annoy you (they would grow up sexay) So that will mean, every time you wank over a picture of Jesus you'll be committing genocide. Will you still do it? I'm g…
/r/MensRights17/04/20 04:36 PM
1

I don't need to - posture, spinal compression, footwear. Jesus this isn't a physiological workup. It's an argument comrade, buck up. Edit: I agree with you in your broader point, that most men age like a fine milk. They get fat as the newly sedentary lifestyle of the 30s (due to getting a desk job for the most part) does not go hand in hand with a massive sudden decrease in caloric intake. Goes for both sexes. We generally keep our good skin for longer though. Men are so lucky with our wonderful…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 04:20 PM
1

Men get shorter with age? First I’ve heard of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/20 02:41 PM
1

Not guilty of murder by reason of insanity. Its probably correct, but its probably correct in a lit of men’s cases also. However the societal outrage if a man ‘got off’ with manslaughter in a case like this would be considerable,
/r/MensRights17/04/20 02:24 PM
-1

A fetus is not a baby. An animal is not a person. Therefore we can eat animals and abort fetuses. With some remorse. Now fuck off.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:35 AM
5

A giant serving of misandry in the comments there. TWOX is a hatesub. It ought to be quarantined.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 10:52 AM
2

Ahh, realistically that can go either way, depending on whether you will credit, ‘story is reported differently’ which is vastly more often the case with high profile political ones. These are almost always simple political hits. A ‘sex scandal’ has been the coup de grace of choice since the 1700’s
/r/MensRights14/04/20 08:43 PM
2

I don't believe any allegations about people that are (a) decades old and (b) consist entirely of one persons' eyewitness testimony with zero corroborating evidence and (c) just happen to be levelled during an election at one of the candidates. ​ Are people that gullible?
/r/MensRights14/04/20 01:51 PM
11

On feminist subs if you’re a man you get banned.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:50 PM
2

Check out her book about fancying underage boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 12:40 PM
2

Also Greer is a pedophile.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 09:35 AM
1

K still seems like sarcasm. Like ‘without evidence’? Sure this isn’t some Muslim version of Titania McGrath?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:59 PM
2

‘Domestic violence needs to stop’. Well, of course it does. So does murder. And burglary. What is the proposed solution? Ah there is none. Might I suggest a police force of some kind?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:11 AM
1

‘The burden of work falls predominantly on women!’ When will me step up and take more responsibility on!
/r/MensRights11/04/20 03:57 PM

Its just a straightforward feminism sub. It does not advocate for men's liberation at all.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:54 AM
4

Sounds intriguing. Or however that word is spelled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 11:33 PM
10

Yeah. It’s garbage. But its woke whiteman bad garbage. And the left own that stinker.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 07:15 PM
10

I might be seeing only the turds. Could you link some of their good stuff? Stupid people think the BBC is alternately hard Left, Hard Right , or Big Black Cocks. All I’ve ever seen of Vice is some okay stuff on Palestine and a frigates’ worth of kill whitey.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 07:14 PM
9

I clicked on the lab link. 8 women. Zero men. Problematic? Of course not. Vice? Is the worst magazine on earth. Its so bad it reads like is run by a cabal of nazi billionaires hiding out in Rio pushing stories so contrary to anyones experience that it discredits the left as a whole. Anyone who writes for Vice will be sharing a cell in journalism hell with the likes of Sean Hannity or Ann Coulter. I literally want to strangle these fucks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 05:53 PM
4

In another age they were called Nuns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 12:41 PM
52

We understand it’s awful either way. The target of the gloating is not the singer Adele, but the female supremacists who insist it’s a man’s world and loudly declaim Things Need to Change while being not simply timid about changing things like this - rather forcefully condemning people who say things like this are part of the Things That Need to Change. It’s schadenfreude for sure. But even schadenfreude ist etwas freundlich. Fuck, that took 3 edits and 2 languages to clarify.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 07:33 PM
4

Oh I think it’s more of a professional interest. Signaling that you are one of ‘the good guys’ in the hopes of currying favor with powerful and influential people. They take it too far of course and in doing so, demonstrate why sane rational, modern, highly educated Germans managed to nevertheless do what they did. Edit: this is not analogy for the rise of Hitler or anything. Just that throughout history you see anomalies where the great and the good nevertheless supported seemingly irreconcilab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 06:51 PM
2

The incel club is unpopular and not profitable. The feminism club is rather the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 06:00 PM
7

The worst of these intersectional feminists are men, particularly in journalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 05:58 PM
9

Intersectional feminism is rejected by the vast majority of women. It is embraced by a tranche of white middle class media men and women who use it to signal to each other that they are part of an upper caste, a sort of Brahmin identity. But even they don’t believe any of that shite. Also they feel they need to ‘lie the the other way’ to offset a backlash to ‘progress’. A small hard core of tattooed nose ring wearing, pink haired crusty types are true believers but nobody gives a damn what they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 05:47 PM
8

Ah, the Ubermensch is back.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 07:48 AM
9

And a monthly stipend to boot. It’s a wonderful life. For some.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 06:32 AM
9

Austria not Australia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 04:07 PM
11

Poor trolling attempt. Get back to your lego. Those space dragons won’t build themselves!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 12:54 PM
9

But thats against the code!
/r/MensRights02/04/20 12:31 PM
5

Feminism is a religion. Pointing out it often harms men (deliberately) is apostasy. Pointing out it has massive internal inconsistencies is heresy. Feminism can only and always be good. This the way. Men’s rights is often at cross purposes to feminism. This is heresy, and therefore all MRA’s are literally Hitler, hate women and are rightwing baby eaters. Politics is binary now. Macs are democrat. XBoxes are Republican. Ramen is Democrat. Beef is Republican . Mens rights is considered Republican,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 08:04 PM
2

She sounds like a hero.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 07:51 PM
4

Yes Trump is part of ‘the backlash’. Open misandry and gloating, hate filled op eds in the New York Times like ‘Why can’t we hate men?” By tenured professors of gender studies are doing more than an army of brown shirts ever could to secure The Twitter Fuhrer another term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 07:48 PM
2

Sadly it pulls a huge number of people to the right by a sort if default ‘enemy of my enemy is my friend’. Plutocrats are nobody’s friend. Allowing a plutocracy to flourish is good for nobody.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 07:44 PM
1

I don’t see the logic. A man having sex with zero lubrication is going to find it just as rough as a women with zero lubrication, skin is skin. Although I suppose it may be different in the states where so many men have penises damaged by keratinization through circumcision. Nasty business, that. But in the case of an uncircumcised man - that would hurt plenty.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 07:37 PM
2

We’ll agree to disagree on that.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:27 PM
5

Feminism is the enemy of men’s rights. They are fighting to curtail our human rights and are led by authoritarian power seekers who will use the pretext of caring about women to further undermine father’s rights and the rights of men in divorce, in academia, in education and in the law. It is entirely appropriate for us to keep a close eye in the machinations of this cryptofascist cult and it’s deeply cynical leaders.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 11:45 AM
0

No it isnt quite different from what I originally said. Wanker.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 10:30 PM
1

Oh it’s always been hateful sure. But now it’s worse and on top of that it’s arguing against their own supposed ideals and positions. At least the Nazis had a consistent ethos. The feminazis go around in circles. They still hate the Jews though - I mean men.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 05:02 PM
4

Does forced penetration involve more physical pain? Certainly so More pain than what? And how do you know?
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:41 PM
1

If anything this new wave of feminism is anti-feminist. The old feminists argued that men and women were and are the same in most respects. The new wave argue that women are good and men are evil. That women are weak and men are strong. That women need all sorts of help and men don't need any help. Take away the pink hair colouring and you have a bunch of 18th century puritans.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:39 PM
1

Really?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 07:06 AM
2

This isn’t the UN. It’s a US org. Also the UN ‘dictates’ nothing and is not a world government. Stop watching cartoons and read a book / the papers.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:14 PM
2

Its pepfar(us) not the UN.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:14 PM
2

Show me a single bureaucracy that is not in some way, corrupt. The US should be dismantled.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:13 PM
1

It’s PEPFAR, (US) not the UN.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:12 PM
5

This is PEPFAR, not the UN. It is a US governmental agency not the United Nations. Op needs to fix the heading.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:11 PM
10

Boko Harem
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:08 PM
5

Tsk your opinion is UNPOPULAR!
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:29 PM
4

Old joke: after seeing indecent proposal I asked my wife if she would have sex with Robert Redford for 1 million dollars. She said yes, but she’d need some time to come up with the money.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 07:16 PM
12

The women who write these things are immature and can’t cope with the responsibilities of adulthood.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:56 PM
2

The US teams of yesteryear.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 09:51 AM
-11

That’s no longer true. The US team is now pretty competent.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 09:21 AM
1

Have they tried turning it off and turning it on again?
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:59 PM
4

No man ever gets murdered because they are a man ​ Factually untrue. Men of military age are the first to be executed in wartime scenarios and invasions. Consider the fate of boys under Boko Harem and Girls. The girls are enslaved or forced to marry. The boys are killed outright.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 12:24 PM
4

Find another job. This woman will not let up on you now.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:42 PM
7

They’re basically a bunch of children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 09:48 AM
7

To clarify, when I say 'hilarious' I am being sarcastic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 12:45 PM
15

The media pretence that Tulsi Gabbard doesn't exist is hilarious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 11:45 AM
10

Man bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 10:57 PM
2

Pink Hair: beware.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 12:36 PM
1

Sure, why not. I can totally see feminist organizations lobbying for that. They would probably see it as ‘equality’.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 11:45 AM
2

David fucking Brooks can go and fuck himself.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre29/02/20 11:11 PM
1

Lol. Im a space billionaire.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 08:54 AM
1

I was an Eve Online pilot and FC. When we speak of cores, there are few harder. Still brought the bags in from the car for my missus. Even on cruiser combat roams. Edit: On reflection this is ultimately how we lost Syndicate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 10:42 PM
7

Really? Ed Sheeran's songwriting is above reproach? His appearance isn't the butt of millions of jokes? Get the fuck out of here with this crap. The lady doth protest too much.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 09:34 AM
6

How much farther can you go performing vapid pop? Does she think she's the fucking Beatles or something? Delusions of grandeur.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 09:32 AM
3

Yeah we're not a 'hate group' - that's propaganda. Sorry you got groped by that asshole. Some people have no boundries and think they can do what they like.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 09:30 AM
6

Google Helen Lewis.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 09:28 AM
23

Eh no, he's is totally being an asshole, lol. She only asked him to bring stuff in from the car. "I'm too busy playing computer games" is not an acceptable answer under any circumstances unless he is a professional gamer in a tournament match. Edit: fuck I’m a gamer. I know what I’m talking about. I’ve been FC on alarm clock ops in Eve Online back when Goons were the vanguard of online trolling. Bring in the bags from the car. Still wearing the headset. Give her a kiss. Decide the fate of thousa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 09:18 AM
5

Their trolling makes them look stupid. I like it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 08:43 PM
5

I wonder if the authors really are surprised or if it’s a kind of virtue signaling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 08:31 PM
1

Until she changes her mind.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:47 PM
3

They are young and exposed to a lot of pernicious propaganda generated by the feminism industry.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 01:04 PM
1

I am very skeptical whether the Salem witch trial can be transformed into something reasonable at this stage either, and for similar reasons. Metoo is a lynchmob. Fuck lynchmobs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 05:23 PM
14

Yep. It’s a very transparent piece of propaganda from the former Clinton machine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 10:14 PM
1

'worse' shape?
/r/MensRights20/02/20 04:30 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:45 AM
2

But 'the patriarchy'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 11:38 AM
3

She just writes fluff and has her knickers in a knot because she’s not John Banville. Pathetic saddo.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 11:00 AM
3

Also pirate queens were a thing.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 10:44 AM
12

MVP Of this thread.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 10:42 AM
14

"In stark contrast, men's striking underrepresentation in healthcare, early education, and domestic roles (HEED) has not increased, and even slightly decreased, between 1993 and 2013. Men remain particularly underrepresented in fields such as nursing (10%) and elementary education (14%), yet researchers, policy makers, and the general public seem far less concerned in efforts to promote greater gender balance in these careers."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 09:36 AM
1

Yep.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/20 12:03 PM
2

It could do with a bit more colour. Just sayin.
/r/MGTOW207/02/20 07:54 PM
9

They are feminist women pretending to be men. I mean that literally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 07:25 AM
3

I'll address it: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. There's no way the word thug has any explicit or implicit 'racial meaning' whatsoever, in any circumstances, despite any caveat. So that's my position on that word. And I feel it's more valid than yours, until such a time that the vast majority of people understand it to be always racially charged word in any circumstance. Otherwise, like I said before - you are going to be trying to communicate with an ever shrinking lexicon and reading the ab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/20 12:25 PM
3

Thugs" is an extremely racially-charged term This sort of speech policing is very contentious. You believe it's a racially charged term, but don't you think it's possible that a great many people do not? And isn't it possible that if you have a voluminous lexicon of 'racially charged' words in your inventory, that you are going to encounter a lot of false positives? What if I felt that 'innocent until proven guilty' was a phrase that definately marked you out as a closet misogynist, or even a cr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/20 11:56 AM
3

It's quite possible that there are far fewer 'racists' than ther Twitterati would have you believe. To go by Twitter every single white person in the entire world is at the very least, slightly racist - this is an article of faith with them. I understand their case, but think it's both untrue and very unhelpful for 'race' relations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/20 11:53 AM
2

Im not arguing your point. Im just a ... semiotic Nazi.
/r/MGTOW204/02/20 07:38 PM
9

female species Women are not a separate species.
/r/MGTOW204/02/20 05:43 PM
1

And it's why we can't do it anymore. You are talking about the US right? Plenty of non US capitalist countries out there building good infrastructure including high speed rail. The problem the US has is based more around the fact that private interests have entirely corrupted your political system to the point where it is no longer a functioning democracy. It's why CERN is in Switzerland and not Kentucky. I was in East Berlin in the 80's and the huge disparity between East and West Berlin was ob…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/20 09:13 AM
1

Yeah he includes a disclaimer about that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 08:47 AM
4

Bernie. He’s THE man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 08:22 AM
5

Saw it. Paints a very cheery picture of the war, ironically - as the lads were all mugging for the camera. Listen to Dan Carlins multi-part podcast about it.
/r/MGTOW202/02/20 08:17 AM
2

It’s ‘basically caught up’ means it hasn’t caught up, and my guess is, it never will. When the only way you can motivate your people is by threats, naturally some of the bright sparks will resentfully and undetectably refuse to participate. A system with only sticks cannot beat a system with both stick and carrot. The USSR’s failures were not down to poor luck in the leadership draw, rather a failure cascade which had its genesis in the same problem as above, and also a plethora of issues around…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 09:36 PM
4

My understanding is that when a USA’ian mentions ‘socialism’ they only ever mean Stalinism and not for instance, nanny state social democracy as practiced in for instance in Sweden or the Netherlands in contrast to the ‘fuck you, I’ve got mine’ capitalism of the US.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 10:54 AM
5

The USSR didn’t just have problems, it collapsed, it failed, it fell apart. China derives its lifeblood of new ideas, processes and technology from western sources. Absent that it would suffer the same fate. Capitalism in European countries where it is fairer, more constrained and wealth is more evenly distributed - is doing alright. It could always be improved of course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 09:59 AM
4

Sure, but its a static system that inevitably declines. Most capitalist ‘systems’ are really just the illusion of power and control over essentially chaotic systems. Total systems of state control - centrally planned economies where the state dictates most or all of the economic activity are - to use a rough computing analogy, ‘mechanical Turks’ and not really ‘alive’. There’s little or no invention or progress, just stasis, at best. And gradually it falls apart, because we are not smArt or capa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 09:23 AM
0

The money materialises in people’s bank accounts thanks to the magic of socialism! These communist feminists really never stop to think it through.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 07:43 AM
25

Heard you got quarantined, so thought I’d join. Hi.
/r/MGTOW31/01/20 05:58 PM
9

"posing the important questions that need to be asked" ​ Heres an important question: Why are you promoting hatespeech? If you're against the very concept of hatespeech, would you accept a similar Project with negative things to say about women?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:26 PM
2

Except statistical evidence DOES NOT show that it is more common and persistent when it's inflicted by men. It's the same man or woman. Yes it is more severe because men are stronger.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:14 PM
6

And by she...The guys a dude in women's clothing. 'Trans' is the word they're using this month.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:12 PM
1

Yes I find the whole argument not only worthless and risible but also bigoted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 09:07 AM
27

I think you have grounds for a suit against your employer.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:49 PM
2

That could easily be spun as sexual harassment. Are you mad?
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:46 PM
17

It's because you are a man.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:45 PM
7

File a complaint about HR with HR. Engage the services of a lawyer. They won't let up. They will henpeck you to death. You have to show teeth.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:44 PM
2

I'm actually impressed they didn't manage to shoehorn in an angle about how it's worse for women since they are left to pick up the pieces, as it were.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/20 12:35 PM
-1

Dunno but that's not my point. My point is they are not being serious. They are being jerks knowingly. So I wouldn't take it at all seriously.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:54 PM
1

Nebbish pedant.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:09 PM
0

You are aware that both Rogan and Maher are professional comedians right?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:46 PM
1

This is great.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/20 05:04 PM
1

Goid pist. Wouldn’t bother pisting anything to /r/mensilb it’s three feminists in a trenchcoat. They ban and censor everything that isn’t a recapitulation of their own man-hating ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/20 08:09 PM
5

You damn homophobe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/20 08:02 PM
5

There’s a lot of that sort of intellectual sorting. The more left wing the publication, the more they do it. It’s becoming a thing where ‘men’ are considered ‘rightwing’. The extreme leftists think ‘men’ are on the whole, against abortion for some reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/20 07:30 AM
2

Im amazed by that video. A huge audience of women watching a dating coach? Never would have thought that’s s thing. Oh and he seems pretty good actually!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/20 03:47 PM
3

Fair enough (but then what is the "it?" you speak of?). In any case what they mean is: a tyranny of men. There is no tyranny of men in the west. Case in point: Feminists point out a predominance of men "at the top". A few years back in the UK the Prime minister was a Women. The leader of the Scottish assembly was and is a woman. The Leader of the Welsh assembly was a women. The leaders of both major parties in Northern Ireland were and are women. The Head of the London Metropolitcan police was a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 11:30 AM
3

What THEY MEAN is a tyranny of men. There is no tyranny of men. Not in the US. Not in any OECD country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 11:18 AM
1

Ever notice the tiger family have tiger skin curtains?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 04:01 AM
3

Yes but at it’s core, is a militant hate group out for power and nothing else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 03:57 AM
11

There is no ‘patriarchy’.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 03:49 AM
1

Learn English.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 03:32 AM
1

Fuck your president, not everyone is an American. I hope he gets eaten by bears.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 06:55 AM
1

I don’t think service should GUARANTEE citizenship.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 06:50 AM
5

Thats the new feminist bullshit definition. Its autocratic rule of the father with property handed down through the patrilineal line. I mean two can play at this game. From now on ‘dictatorship’ means a system in which women often ‘dictate’ to men how they should live. Oh no! We live in a dictatorship! And that’s bad right? Because dictatorships are bad! What? You don’t agree that we live in a dictatorship? Oh silly you, you’re just using the centuries old commonly accepted definition of the wor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 09:13 AM
1

Report it right away. next thing you know she will be angling to get you fired or worse, one way or another.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:40 AM
4

Hey, but you have to admit, sometimes men can be 'very entertaining'. ​ I wonder if I wrote an article about women and their general faults, whether the Guardian would publish it? or perhaps they have none?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/20 11:09 AM
9

They are censorious buffoons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/20 09:55 PM
5

Intimidated by? Nope. Intelligent, educated, successful women are a lot more fun to talk to, usually.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 10:55 PM
2

Women are not a marginalized class of people. Lol what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 10:51 PM
3

DIVIDE and conquer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 04:55 PM
6

Absolutely. But the issue is very simple: double the workforce and you effectively halve the value of labour. The issue I have with articles like this is the assumption that worklife is preferable to homelife. That having 'a career' is better than having more time to spend at home with your kids. Is it fuck. It is maybe if you have a real actual career that is interesting and rewarding but virtually nobody has that. Office workers are by and large all interchangeable drones. The tiny percentage …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 02:23 PM
0

Just add kids. Or better yet, DON'T.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 01:10 PM
4

Incorrect headline. The suggestion is to lower the average working week to 39 hours for everyone. And yes, they anticipate it will benefit women on average more since on average they tend to do more domestic work. They inaccurately call it "demands placed on women", when for the most part the disparity in domestic hours worked is down to choice - women tend to choose jobs with shorter hours and more part time work as a better work life balance is more important to them than pure wages are to a m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 01:08 PM
2

Incorrect headline. The suggestion is to lower the average working week to 39 hours for everyone. And yes, they anticipate it will benefit women on average more since on average they tend to do more domestic work. They inaccurately call it "demands placed on women", when for the most part the disparity in domestic hours worked is down to choice - women tend to choose jobs with shorter hours and more part time work as a better work life balance is more important to them than pure wages are to a m…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:06 PM
1

Here's my opinion. It would take about one and a half million men to invade and take Iran. Casualty figures would look like Vietnam or worse. It's not a sane option. If the Iranians were smart they would take the same course of action the US has against Russia: Target US individuals economically, Specifically Trump. Target his Trump hotels and resorts around the world. Make their insurance unaffordable through threats and limited military action (without loss of life), so they have to close down…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/20 10:35 AM
5

Yeah how were her intentions in any way good? Her intentions were evil. Her actions were despicable. A classic feminist.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:48 PM
4

And another one. This rape hysteria of the past decade will have some fall out similar to the Satanic panic. Hopefully the innocent men wrongly accused by man hating feminists won't have to spend decades behind bars before people realise the extent of the bigotry on display in modern feminism and the depths they are prepared to go to to destroy men.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:47 PM
2

They hate men.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:43 PM
2

No. They're deadly serious.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:42 PM
6

Yes. Feminism is a bigoted movement dedicated to the destruction of men in order to further the power of Feminists. They hate women too btw.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:37 PM
5

SeaofBloodRedRoses Yes, they are.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:36 PM
3

America IS the world for most of them.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 11:48 AM
4

You’d be banned before that.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:04 AM
2

Sorry to hear that. Your family sound like they really need to open their horizons.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:02 AM
1

Because feminists have indoctrinated the population into a belief that men are evil.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 09:51 AM
1

Very interesting.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 09:46 AM
1

Most of us would love to know. Personally I blame feminism, which over time has demonised men entirely.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 09:22 AM
28

What are you proud of about it?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 09:18 AM
10

Classic toxic fragile masculinity or something
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:09 PM
1

That is s lot if money, but in terms if the gdp of the United States, its ballpark doable. Landing on the moon was impossible until it wasn’t.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:08 PM
2

I’m in the Yang gang and he’s just wrong on this. He’s still a cool guy.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:07 PM
2

Exactly. If women didn’t get pregnant, they’d have no use for large mammaries or uterus or ovaries. Or wide hips. Feminism lowers IQ, just like any other religion.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:06 PM
0

I still like him, he’s just wrong.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:03 PM
1

Well let’s just say all the misandrist not-really-a-feminist feminists tend to get opinion pieces regularly published at media outlets with national and international reach, while the true equality actual-feminist feminists, seem to get published nowhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/19 05:50 PM
1

It’s easy to believe because there’s overwhelming evidence it is true, while there’s precious little evidence that your ‘actual progressive feminists’ even exist, apart from you saying so. This is called pissing on someone’s head and telling them it’s raining.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/19 04:55 PM
1

Hold on, your previous post above makes it clear how you define feminism. The guy you responded to has a different definition, which he just gave you, and to my mind us just as valid. You then berate him for not caring about ‘equality’? Seems to me he does care about equality, and its the misandrists at Buzzfeed and similar ‘feminist’ outlets who do not.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/19 04:53 PM
6

Heh, I wonder how representative that survey was. But imagine even HAVING a survey where guys rate vaginas. How is that even not just porn?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:40 PM
4

Whats commonly understood by FGM usually is. It’s entirely irrelevant though. Murder is worse than theft. Should theft therefore be legal?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:37 PM
4

Your well thought out arguments should be made into a book so that others might hear of your genius. Get cracking!
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:14 PM
4

All unnecessary surgery is bad, if you don’t have a choice in the matter.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:11 PM
6

Here in Europe, nobody gets circumcised, except some orthodox Jews and devout Muslims. It’s a stupid barbaric, superstitious practice which is only widespread in the US, because it’s a stupid, barbaric, superstitious country. You’re welcome.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:09 PM
2

Have you tried atheism?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:05 PM
3

Yep. Same way we tell them that female circumcision is fucked and they’re not doing it in our countries unless they want their collars felt.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:04 PM
6

It never seems to occur to them that maybe it looks worse.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:02 PM
5

You’re right to feel that way.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 12:00 PM
8

Imagine you read tidbits out about guys preferring trimmed labia or something. These guys just prefer how it looks. Whatcha gonna do?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:58 AM
8

Ask her why she imagines your wife would appreciate it more as opposed to say, being horrified that you had mutilated sex organs.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:56 AM
6

As far as I know, babies can’t stay in the womb indefinitely, it’s not a choice. It’s certainly not a cosmetic procedure.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:54 AM
11

No that was Gawker. Buzzfeed is much worse.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 05:23 PM
3

Men are responsible for everything. But only the bad things. Men and women are the same. But women are better in every way. Newthink.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 02:26 PM
2

It was an accident.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:15 PM
1

The figures for men are still on the decline despite their efforts. Dealing with symptoms instead of causes never works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 02:10 PM
1

Amazing article from almost a decade ago demonstrates that affirmative action doesn’t work for men either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/19 02:08 PM
1

Hating men is 'funny' and popular.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:23 PM
2

She's just a kid, not Gandhi.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 11:18 AM
3

Some people have an excess of leisure time. But most of them as the lady says are probably 'cucked boyfriends'. Surprisingly 'incelish' speech from a 'lady'. But then again, feminists were the first incels.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 10:16 AM
11

Your opinion was the wrong kind of unpopular.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 10:10 AM
3

Ah, eugenics, the perfectly acceptable genocide.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:51 AM
2

It isn't and you're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:37 AM
5

Who can say anymore.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:34 AM
14

Michael Jackson has been associated with a lack of commitment to human spaceflight (by me, just now).
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:33 AM
3

Femininity has been associated with mass consumerism and the overproduction of unnecessary goods and overconsumption of scarce resources. Put simply, avaristic femininity is the number one threat to the environment. ​ So there. ​ Incidentally chemicals used in cosmetics are having a disproportionate effect on wildlife. Fragile femininity is poisoning the land, water and air with literally toxic compounds that also effect our hormonal systems. P-phenylenediamine found in lipsticks has long term t…
/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:30 AM
4

Yeah I read about a case where a tweenage boy and his girlfriend were exchanging explicit pics of each other. They were done for ‘distribution of child pornography’. The boy was placed on the sex offenders registry. He can’t live within a large distance of a school, meaning he basically can’t live in a city.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 08:29 AM
2

The reason there are fewer women in politics is that they don’t like the risk. Men are wired to take more risks and damn the consequences. If you were a sexist you could generalise and say women are ‘slacking off’ and they need to ‘step up’ and be counted. But to be fair, who in their right mind would get into politics? You could generalise again and say, women are smarter not to get involved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/19 07:30 AM
2

Misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/19 07:27 AM
0

He’s right about it being old fucks though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/19 07:26 AM
8

Wow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/19 09:50 AM
1

Lol I didn’t know that.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:47 AM
1

Are you really not aware of it? It was a national scandal. She had to resign. This was only last year. They had to reopen every single rape case under her tenure.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:20 PM
-1

But the party that facilitated CPS chief Alison Saunders to put hundreds of innocent men in prison can just carry on, no harm done?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:15 PM
-2

So a one-party system is what you want?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:09 PM
2

Waiting for it.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:22 PM
5

I think Corbyn is an honorable and wonderful man. Phillips is a hateful arsehole that makes the worst Tories look kind hearted.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:21 PM
4

Straight white men.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:20 PM
1

Right, she's got to get rid of ALL men.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:20 PM
1

Only when every Pm is a female forever, and they invent time travel to go back in the past and remove all the male PM's and replace them with Thatcher clones.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:19 PM
1

Jess Phillips is way ahead of you there.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:19 PM
-2

You think it's a great idea for the UK to have no functioning opposition party to hold government accountable? Okay.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:18 PM
2

Jesus, as if Labour didn't have enough problems. On the plus side, with Phillips in charge sneering at male suicide and sniggering at boys underachievement in schools, Labour will lose by an even bigger margin than yesterday and Jeremy Corbyn won't have 'largest Labour loss in history' as his epitaph.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:17 PM
6

This is violent assault, maybe GBH, but not murder. If it's murder then abortion is murder too (abortion isn't murder).
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:15 PM
4

Yeah agree entirely. The demonisation of 'famous' individuals is rampant and disquieting. It shows a enormous lack of maturity in our societies. That's part of the problem with the bigtime athiests - they give the population too much credit. A lot of people are fundamentally incapable of serious, nuanced thought - particularly on moral questions. You only have to look at evangelical Christians or anyone on Twitter, to see that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 12:13 PM
2

But when you go further into his material he seems to be promoting a mystical Jungian version of tradcon Christianity I think it's more of a reaction to the "let's throw everything out" tendency on the left, who argue for total revolution without an understanding of what they're likely to get. By rejecting the church entirely, the baby has been thrown out with the bathwater. I'm a pretty firm athiest but even I recognise that not everything about organised Christianity is harmful to society and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 10:02 AM
6

Basically it's: "unattractive men should be neither seen, nor heard".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/19 09:53 AM
1

I think Greta is awesome and well done to her. Any kid that cares that passionately about a subject and is willing to take action and suffer nototiety is to be commended. That she's managed to continue without stopping and despite an avalanche of rather pathetic criticism is remarkable.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 08:22 AM
0

Let's hear it so.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 08:19 AM
2

I would have chosen her too. By the way, "person of the year" is not equal to "best person of the year". Time's man of the year in 1938 was Adolf Hitler. In 1939 it was Joseph Stalin. They choose the person that's had the most impact.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 12:49 PM
1

To leftists in 2019, Men the world over are white and conservative and rapists. Progressives, their tribe, are exclusively female, black and virtuous beyond the imaginings of Christ. To them ALL men are anti abortion and ALL women are pro abortion. All men voted for Trump, all women voted for Hillary. Men have only ever added evil to the world, women only good. There is nothing good about society, nothing good about science, nothing good about any invention made by men or anything built by men. …
/r/MensRights12/12/19 12:24 PM
8

You’ll be looking for a long time, it’s a cult of mentally ill people. Literally mentally ill. The thinking behind most of it is disordered, extremely biased and betrays a cohort that is paranoid and psychotic. These ‘toxic’ people have hijacked a previously somewhat egalitarian social movement with straightforward aims and steered it towards a psycho-pathological extreme.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/19 10:10 AM
4

I second this important question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/19 08:32 PM
2

And he’s Damn right. Also on another note, fuck Israel.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:51 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:49 PM
1

To summarise: The author imagines men have no interior life. ​ God forbid, we didn't 'manage our feelings'.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 10:36 AM
1

What I'm referring to is Rome's tolerant and largely laisse faire attitude to religion pre Constantine and it's monotheistic and authoritarian outlook afterward. The Abrahamic faiths are one of few religious practices that abhor other religions explicitly: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me". Of course there's chasm between the teachings of the Christ specifically and the ecumenical teachings of Christianity as a whole. To my mind this probably stems from Constantine's possible use of Chri…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 10:14 AM
1

Change my view. And from what I’ve read, it was more like Christianity captured the Empire, ultimately.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 07:21 PM
3

Rome was more egalitarian before it adopted Christianity. CMV.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 04:50 PM
2

He probably was. Can't say for sure. Again you're missing the point. It is still technically 'sexual assault' whether he's into it or not. And if the genders were reversed, there WOULD be outcry. And this double standard needs to go for a number of reasons, not least the infantilising of women and the idea that men simply cannot be assaulted and are always 'up for it'.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:59 PM
2

Because he is a professional and he didn't want the occasion to appear uncomfortable and embarassing for anyone? Because he is not a snowflake who needs to immediately wear the cloak of 'victim' at every opportunity to garner support, praise and admiration? Because men are expected to 'suck it up'?
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:19 PM
6

By current definitions, he was literally 'sexually assaulted'. That doesn't necessarily make him a 'victim' as per your AdamChap's argument, nor does it mean he would necessarily give a shit about it. I've been technically 'raped' by my wife as per current (somewhat ludicrous) definitions based on 'ability to consent'. Do I consider myself a 'victim' of rape? no. Do I give a shit? no. I've been 'sexually assaulted' by drunk women lots of times. Again, not a victim and don't give a toss. They wer…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:13 PM
8

Nobody was saying that he was, that's not the point. The point is there is now the default outrage when a women - who might also be 'laughing through it' is sexualised even if she is clearly 'not a victim' and that this is an overreaction, infantilises women and should stop. I think that is a reasonable point to make. ​ "Of course women don't tend to feel the same as men about this" Well yeah. And it is hypocritical of them to do so. In fact, the ideological scripting of men's behaviour is comin…
/r/MensRights09/12/19 10:33 AM
2

Yeah that hit’s the nail on the head of my objection to this stuff and why I take it to heart. It’s like a part of the left have begun to the use the tactics of the right. After a while you can’t tell them apart.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/19 03:46 PM
2

Meh, no most people don’t even register this shit is going on.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 08:39 PM
8

Cool, the more the merrier. I usually stick to leftwingmaleadvocates but I'll give it a look. I'm probably being too hard on men's lib, it seems to have changed for the better a smidge, but for a while there it was fucking ridiculous. They still bandy about the phrase toxic masculinity though, which for me is a bigoted phrase that signals these men deep down are embarassed about being masculine.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:56 PM
1

Menslib is a feminiist sub that has little or no interest in 'Men's Liberation'. If you ask them, liberation, from what? They will say "The patriarchical norms of toxic maculinity" and then ban you for asking. It's about as manly as the stoning scene from the life of Brian.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:44 PM
1

Most women do not identify as feminists.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:40 PM
1

It's 3 feminists in a trenchcoat.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:39 PM
1

Enjoy your mutilated mickey son.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:13 PM
3

including better divorce options that don't ruin them financially ​ Exactly this. Most men in abusive marriages dare not divorce because they will be forced to leave their home and forced into indentured servitude to their abuser. And if they have children they know their abuser has a far greater chance of obtaining custody than they do, often placing their kids into mortal danger.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/19 02:40 PM
4

That would come off on its' own anyway, it's 'designed' to. Unlike foreskin, which is supposed to stay on.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 02:23 PM
9

Where I live we have showers and soap. Cutting off anatomy rather than cleaning it seems like overkill. Why not cut off your outer ears while you're at it? Those epicanthal folds collect dirt and sometimes lead to ear infections. Any infection can be fatal if left untreated. Seems to me a preoccupation with interfering with sexual organs in the interests of hygiene just masks the real reason, which is religious bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 01:10 PM
1

His forehead from the sound of him.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:28 AM
1

That must be some other Ireland you're thinking of. Northern Ireland maybe.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:27 AM
1

Rain.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:26 AM
20

Removing wisdom teeth is a surgical operation performed out of necessity to prevent pain and deformation of the jaw. Removing forseskin is entirely unncessary in most cases. Why are you looking for these analogies anyway? As a way to justify it? Why? It's a medically unnecessary surgery performed for aesthetic reasons that comes with complications and deprives the man of sensation and the ability to masturbate without using lubrication. No analogy needed - that's what it is. Now it's 2019 and ou…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:24 AM
8

Yeah I would guess. God hates masturbation for some reason. It riles him up. Makes him angry and abusive.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:11 AM
2

Very unfair to the girls. What an asshole. Imagine a math class: "girls you can just sit this problem out". Whither education? This is discrimination against both the girls and the boys.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:09 AM
154

Of course. Twitter is a very stupid organisation.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:01 AM
1

Those are poor analogies. Nails continue to grow. A pierced ear heals. Hair styling does not remove parts of the anatomy. It may be similar to ear or tail docking in Dogs. It is the removal of a small piece of anatomy. It will not grow back.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:00 AM
11

No. Not at all. It's purely a religious superstition.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:58 AM
2

Charlotte, look up in a dictionary, the word "analogy", it might clear up some things for you. Best wishes.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:57 AM
6

It is drawing parallels Most people are too stupid to understand this concept. It's amazing to me just how dumb so many people really are. Almost like a step-change in intelligence.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:54 AM
5

You know what? I bet that too. Huh.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:54 AM
1

Trump
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/19 07:51 AM
7

Are there any male gendered terms they use that don't make men seem like the problem? No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 04:03 PM
3

would personally advocate for a more carefully chosen word to describe the phenomenon, something like "masculinity policing". In the old days we called it "Machismo"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/19 04:03 PM
1

That's not what a Nazi is. A Nazi is literally a member of the NAZI (NAtionalsoZIalistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) party, an extreme right wing (Fascist) party in 1930's Germany. Colloquially it's a term of abuse used to defame right wing authoritarians who approve of violence or who hold extremely rigid and authoritarian views - shorthand for saying they are 'as bad as a Nazi'. Plenty of non-rightwing organisations and states have committed genocide - it's not unique to the NAZI party of Germ…
/r/MensRights03/12/19 03:29 PM
1

You tell 'em, Finland.Finland, findland, finland. Finland has it all.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:59 PM
1

I know what you mean to say, but I'm fairly sure you have more to learn about the tenets of National Socialism and the meaning of the word literally :)
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:56 PM
7

What they think is "how dare you conflate the two".
/r/MensRights02/12/19 02:52 PM
1

Town square in clowntown.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 09:52 AM
1

It’s not true. But also: without men, NOTHING would exist.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 09:49 AM
1

Throwing coins is assault.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 09:47 AM
-6

They threw coins at her. They got what they deserved, little shits.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 09:47 AM
35

Because she was rejected by just an average guy and that killed her self-esteem. Yup. That's how you get incels. Nothing to do with being male inherently, just a greater volume of men doing the asking and getting the teeth kicked in - emotionally speaking. If you're not that attractive, it's a hard world to find love and affection in.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre28/11/19 04:28 PM
1

Don't be stupid. The majority of women don't identify as feminists. The majority of women are great people, just like the majority of men.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:27 AM
7

Well if you're disabled they do. The Netherlands is what it looks like when adults run the country.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:18 AM
2

You're a child. Go rant somewhere else.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:10 PM
4

"The guy constantly spews feminist ideology " See, this is hyperbole, and it convinces nobody when you do that. The word "spews" is emotive and he doesn't contantly 'spew' anything, let alone "feminst ideology". If you have cogent arguments to make, make them by all means. But if you want to persuade anyone, avoid using rhetoric that just appeals to emotion. It does not work.
/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:04 PM
7

Yang isn't a 'feminist' and he's not saying that. Fuck this partisan post. US politics is a bullshit gameshow. On the flipside the feminst 'argument' that female homemakers 'work for free' is ludicrous. If you want to view things through that lens, those women are prostitutes who provide additional domestic services. Make these deadbeat dames pay tax on the 'benefit in kind' they receive from their working spouse. /s
/r/MensRights26/11/19 12:42 PM
2

If you look at nomadic tribes that were extant up till a few hundred years ago, you still see a lot of labour. It’s a different kind to crop growing labour, but it’s just as time consuming. When everything you need must be manufactured or cooked from scratch, you don’t have the luxury of leisure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 07:44 PM
1

Both genders worked, all the time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 02:47 PM
3

lol. "A newer body of research and theory, much of it created by women, has conjured a very different scenario" It's probably accurate for their sample size of 1 (n=1).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 02:46 PM
3

Men and women are more or less 'the same'. That's the only thing feminists get right. We're People. The variability between 2 different people in terms of morality, outlook etc is far greater than the variability between gender or skin colour or any other immutable genetic inheritance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 02:39 PM
6

Mass murder. Boys are killed by opposing forces fearing they might become grow up and harbour a grudge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 08:43 AM
5

Bit reductionist, but interesting perspective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/19 03:28 PM
1

Article answers the headline question with ‘hell yes’. There’s some boilerplate about how feminism is axiomatically good and must never be questioned, but overall great article.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:44 PM
3

What? This is mainstream.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:47 PM
8

Funnily enough most feminist groups are only too happy to reinforce certain gender stereotypes that suit them, namely that men are evil abusers and women are their helpless innocent victims.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 12:15 PM
4

In most organisations the square root of the employees do 50% of the work.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 10:55 AM
1

More muscles is hot on a man. It’s just as hot on a woman. Obviously you don’t want everyone looking like steroid abusing maniacs like 80’s Stallone and co.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 10:50 AM
4

I’m not going to see it because ‘Charlies Angels’ is sexist trash. I mean the premise is some billionaire has 3 sexy models working for him to sort out his crime issues. It’s the most ‘unwoke’ setup imaginable. What next, browbeating men for not buying enough Playboy subscriptions? Liz Banks is barking up the wrong tree here. Damn fine lady though. Great gams. Nyuck nyuck nyuck.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 10:43 AM
1

Why would they laugh? Where's the humour?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:29 PM
4

To be fair, I kinda gave a fuck about Kate Beckinsales gender. I liked it!
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:15 PM
14

Original TV 'Charlies Angels' was sexist bullshit. Why the fuck is it suddenly not sexist bullshit just because a woman is directing it? Charlies Angels absolutely does not count as "working women" are you kidding me? Try Cagney and Lacy. Nobody had a problem going to see Aliens, starring Sigourney Weaver. ​ Nobody wants a fucking lecture. Make a good film and they will come. Make a boring one and they won't. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:13 PM
3

Let's avoid playing the oppression olympics if we can. Here here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/19 11:29 AM
5

Women have mid life crises all the time. It's just not parodied as much. That "Eat, pray love" movie is based on a real thing. They dump the husband or boyfriend, blow up their lives and everyone around them and bugger off on a journey to "find themselves". I think buying a muscle car, doing coke and having a few panic attacks is probably less harmful. But the male mid life crisis has been commodified by industry. There's everything from Rogaine to Maserati looking for your cash. Women are alrea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/19 11:27 AM
2

A truthbomb, you know - an ontological munition.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:50 PM
5

More trans hate. More banning. Fewer positive and supportive posts. An overarching theory of history that does not reflect reality.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:42 PM
7

They would blame the 'patriarchical' court system, 'designed by men'. Of course the murderess would have been the victim of a 'patriarchical system' and any actions of hers would be entirely down to the abuse she suffered 'as a woman'.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 12:40 PM
2

Victoria Atkins has a lot of questions to answer. In general MP's are supposed to represent all their constituents, not just half of them.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:32 PM
1

Well I mean it is a higher proportion of female victims, that's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the use of the word 'overwhelmingly' which the stats office see as fair game since it's a subjective term and the minister is entitled to use it. I agree with them on that. I don't agree with the minister's emotive tone. She ought to be trying to impart information accurately, not slanting it to suit a misandrist agenda, which is what she is doing. Glad the MBC are making noise about it all the …
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:13 PM
2

nah just pointing out that it's a he and not a 'she'.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:09 PM
1

level 3Santipower-2 points· 8 months ago Have you apologized for occupying a space? I am a man and I have never done it. This is what I say, it's not common, but it can happen and that's not right
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:38 PM
1

He's a he.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:33 PM
2

My wife turns and tells me to do push-ups (a punishment we give our children). I get upset over this but end up doing them ​ What? Am I reading that right?
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:24 PM
1

I cant see that the complaint was 'upheld', rather the opposite. In their response, The UK Statistics Authority stated: “The phrase ‘overwhelming majority’ is a subjective statement. However, it may imply that a larger proportion of victims are female than the statistics show.” So, the statement is 'subjective' it it only 'may' imply the proportions are different. They are then thanked for their interest. Seems like a blow-off to me.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:20 PM
2

'only' 2-10% is a gigantic number of actual cases. Imagine if "only" 2-10% of cars had non-functional brakes.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:45 PM
-1

You're just of very low intelligence, would be my guess. Or you're a cunt. Or both.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:06 PM
-3

Way to not understand the concept of an analogy.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:02 PM
-1

Way to not understand the concept of an analogy.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:02 PM
7

Thats not a great argument. I mean people believe the Earth is round 'based on faith' too, since they haven't been to space. Likewise with evolution. But that 'faith' rests on mountains of verifiable evidence, whereas religious people believe their crap without any evidence at all.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:08 PM
10

lol you're dealing with fuckwits
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:04 PM
1

just a bigot. A lot of bigots can't see how awful they are.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 03:03 PM
1

thats's what I was trying and failing to say.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 09:25 AM
17

Until the double standard about men being awful and women being saints ends? Seems like things are moving briskly along to me.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:59 PM
-25

Men take more risks because on average, the median man is dumber than the median woman, Fact. Men also have more geniuses up at the top end.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:56 PM
12

Up to 30 women earn more than men. They are just as good at negotiating. But they have the option of being a stay at home mother without getting much flak for it. Imagine all the new dads demand simultaneously to be the primary carer. There would be war.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:55 PM
4

The only ‘sides’ involved here are large media conglomerates that make cash selling ads off rage bait. The ‘journalists’ are being paid mcWages to piss people off. And boy are they doing a good job.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:53 PM
1

That's true. And it's increasingly a problem.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:16 AM
1

It isn't.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:15 AM
1

They're leaving. But yeah even the UK is miles ahead of the US in quality of life. They have the National Health System, for one. And functioning public transport. And paid leave. But as I said, too much of the right wing Tory policy in the last decade has degraded those services appreciably.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 09:15 AM
-1

I don't live in the UK, it's far too similar to the US.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 02:59 PM
-2

Lol I have more rights in any EU country than a US citizen has in the states. Far more rights. My country will not 'continue to rot' as it is not 'rotting'. In fact our GDP per capita is higher than yours and we are over 20% wealthier on average. Enjoy living in your crime infested third world shithole. Over 20 million Americans belong to the bottom quintile of global wealth - poorer than sub saharan Africa! Ignorance is bliss, I guess.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 02:45 PM
5

Be like rappers, and compliment yourself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/19 02:35 PM
-2

Ask the 'socialists' in Belgium, The Netherlands, France, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Ireland, The United Kingdom, Italy, Austria how "wealth distribution" is going for them. The world’s 10 happiest countries 1 Finland 2 Denmark 3 Norway 4 Iceland 5 Netherlands 6 Switzerland 7 Sweden 8 New Zealand 9 Canada 10 Austria http://worldhappiness.report ​ Most Americans are as poor as shit. That golden shower that's 'trickling down' on you from your billionaires? That's not wealth. If you want to …
/r/MensRights05/11/19 02:31 PM
3

For some, the idea that ANY women would want to be full time mothers is anathema.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:14 AM
7

why should "half" of them be men? SHouldn't people have a choice? And what if more women, than men choose to stay at home and nurture their children? Hound them out of it with feminist disparagements about being a home maker? If being a home maker is as demeaning, degrading and unbearably tough and demanding as Feminists say, why do you expect men will be attracted to doing it? Do you think you could force men to do it? Hound them into it with feminist disparagements about men working to provide…
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:01 AM
-2

I wouldn't class that as adult interaction so much as being brainwashed by a vindictive cult.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:58 AM
4

It can be isolating if you don't have network of other mums to hang out with. Work can be isolating too, depending on the job.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:57 AM
8

Kids should have the luxury of being cared for by their own parents, as much as possible, period. Of course they should. Who are you arguing with? What are you angry about, specifically?
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:56 AM
6

There's this thing called school. Kids are only toddlers for a few years. And yes, it's tough. So is logging.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:53 AM
6

Or two people have the same name? It's a shame these articles never link to the 'studies' they cite. ​ Edit: Heres the study: https://www.routledge.com/Intimate-Partner-Violence-New-Perspectives-in-Research-and-Practice-1st/Bates-Taylor/p/book/9781138049000 ​ 1 review of said study: ‘This book is an important contribution to a contested and complex field. As a feminist researcher, I do hold to the importance of a gender based analysis of domestic abuse and intimate partner violence. I feel it is…
/r/MensRights05/11/19 10:36 AM
2

Sure the alcohol but not the class. They had no problem with wealthy people like themselves imbibing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 11:00 PM
3

I think there you've got an additional problem with the name of the new sub being badly thought out. 'True' off my chest sounds like "bullshit" off my chest... to me anyways. Should have gone for "offyourchest" or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 04:45 PM
5

Hey, I'm not joking. The only way to fight back against shitty mods is to ruin their sub by making a more sucessfull one with a similar name.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 04:30 PM
5

Just set up "askarealamerican" and suck all their posts away
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 04:08 PM
1

How's this new moral purity working out for everyone? Seems like most people don't like it. Katie Hill and her supporters thinks it's a 'double standard' for some reason. It's one standard and it's a bullshit standard that treats adults as if they were children.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:52 AM
6

When men commit familicide this is the reaction: https://www.newstatesman.com/glosswitch/2015/03/its-extreme-masculinity-not-love-or-despair-drives-father-kill-his-children
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:09 AM
2

It’s the most common sort of article written by pseudo feminist journalists. There’s hundreds of them every single day. Totally unremarkable. When you stand back from it all, it’s apalling of course. Imagine a man writing this piece about women? He’d be fired by the end of the afternoon.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 05:50 PM
2

Brave of her. The apalling double standard where people thing women should be able get away with things men cannot must end. #Mentoo. Well done, Katie, well done.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:17 PM
-2

You've got a lot to learn about not being a dick.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:14 PM
1

Should Muslims be 'held accountable' for other Muslims?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/19 04:16 PM
1

Men are even angrier right now. Watch out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/19 04:14 PM
2

Because it places the blame of an abstract thing like 'violence' on a gender. The issue here is blaming a group of people for the actions of some on an immutable group trait like ethnic grouping or religious affiliation. This is called bigotry. People don't like being subjected to bigotry - even men. The violence of societies, the war making etc all serve to protect societies from aggression or annihilation. The idea that everything is 'goodies' and 'baddies' is for children. Men who go to war d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/19 04:10 PM
9

Yes, to be clear, if men have power, that's always bad, no exceptions. If women have power, that's good and also, equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/19 03:55 PM
1

"What do you guys see as a positive model of masculinity that could be used to change the narrative surrounding men in our culture?" ​ Clint Eastwood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/19 03:00 PM
1

"Toxic Masculinity" is simply gender slander, disguised in pseudoscientific language. I prefer 'Macho bullshit'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/19 02:59 PM
6

It was a complete myth fostered by the Temperance movement (1920-1930's) The temperence movement was basically middle class white women being busybodies. It was a protofeminist movement and part of their propaganda was to stereotype working class men as wife beating drunks. https://www.jstor.org/stable/800763?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents The whole thing was a rotten scam. And the hairshirt hypocrites who dreamed it up were all swilling gin non stop. They even advocated and ultimately were succes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/19 02:50 PM
1

I would add, it probably really sucks to be a normal, decent woman who just wants a bit of dick right now, too.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 02:34 PM
0

I can't actually understand what you're trying to say. Hiring Ivanka to a state level position is not 'perverted' in any sexual sense. It is in a broadly moral sense.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 11:22 AM
45

THey claimed to be 'frozen with fear'. Fear of Louis CK. Right.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 10:05 AM
0

In fairness a sitting president shouldn't be appointing his own family members to state level positions in order to accrue millions of dollars at the expense of the prestige and integrity of the United States. If I was an American, I'd be out for blood over just that alone. And then he has the gall to point fingers at the Bidens? For fuck sake. He must think you're all a bunch of dummies. Maybe you are.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 10:00 AM
3

You seem upset.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 09:55 AM
10

With the greatest respect, Trump is a fucking idiot. There's no great conspiracy as to why Reddit is very one sided when it comes to Trump. Reddit is made up of people, and most people all over the whole world, think Trump is a moron, because of the things he says and does. It's got nothing to do with feminism or anything else. I have met dogs and cats smarter than Trump.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:28 PM
4

Yes, it's a catechism of cliche.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 10:57 AM
1

Well specifically it's being 'Patronizing'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/19 10:04 AM
4

On another note, a lot of feminist literature I read seems to be talking more about the "top 10"% of men yes, Apex fallacy. That's all they do. "Men run the world" instead of "The people who run the world are almost exclusively male".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/19 10:01 AM
1

"Who gave you leave to speak to me in so direct a manner, Madam? I shall have you whipped for your insolence!"
/r/MensRights30/10/19 09:47 AM
1

How Toxic.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 09:34 AM
3

Strange that she resigned so. Politicians needs to have thicker skin than that to be effective. Same goes for Al Franken.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/19 09:33 AM
6

"Toxic masculinity" is at fault for men not goiung to college. So they're claiming men are more "Toxicly masculine" now than in the past? And when there were no women in university? Presumably masculinity was at it's least "toxic"?
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:53 PM
8

I would have lost my shit. Jesus fucking christ.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:51 PM
8

No she had to. House ethics rules implemented last year ban members of Congress from engaging in sexual relationships with employees. Who implemented these new house ethics rules and why? Well guess. ​ Hoisted by her own petard, I'm afraid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 04:38 PM
2

Added my contribution.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 04:18 PM
1

I'd love to hear their reply.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 03:49 PM
3

Good luck in your studies.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:59 PM
2

Well good. Fuck corporations. I say they could do with a lot more women on board in that case.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:58 PM
6

I'm sure you do. However the same is absolutely true of male nursing students. The idea that it is only and ever a problem for women and men encounter zero problems is what we take issue with. It's become a cliche.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:56 PM
3

That video is bascially someone's fantasy of 1950's office culture brought into 2019. It has no bearing on reality. Like a lot of academia.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 03:53 PM
7

Must have been written by some grievance studies cabal. Very one sided. Could be titled: relationship issues for women in college. Constantly refers to ‘teens’ when they mean only one gender. Not an iota of help or interest in issues boys face. Just Appalling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/19 06:29 PM
1

‘Slept with’ 47 students? She must be very tired to do all that sleeping.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 05:19 PM
3

“You never experienced oppression” says the wealthy white lady to the Palestinian man. lol.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:59 PM
2

It presupposes that up until metoo women's rape reports were uniformly not taken seriously by police or anyone else. This is a false narrative.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:56 PM
1

Good left hook, dude should have kept his guard up.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:14 PM
1

Ah but the same issues affect leftwing political parties all over the world and throughout the last hundred years. And that includes systems that are not duopolies. Thats what makes the Monty Python sketch funny - because we recognise that these seemingly modern political problems are probably eternal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/19 01:21 PM
1

The reason the right ever wins politically is because of the tendency of the left to split and split and split. This is just another example of the Judean people's front, splitters!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/19 09:22 AM
2

One would hope he doesn't get any sort of prison sentence and instead some help, which he obviously needs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/19 09:13 AM
2

He's obviously in need of help, not incarceration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/19 09:12 AM
12

skin elasticity ​ You old romantic, you.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 10:37 AM
1

...is motivated to do what? be taller than you?
/r/MensRights11/10/19 10:35 AM
3

But I can assure you women are not choosing consciously to make less money*.”* I can assure you they are. Because hubby will pay the bills. His money is "ours' . My money, is mine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 08:47 AM
3

Prosecutors gotta prosecute. The family of the girl are stupid obviously. Probably a vindictive feminist indoctrinated mother who hates men. No problem with seeing this lad do 10 years for touching her arm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 08:42 AM
5

the girl being psychologically scarred and afraid to leave her home as a result of a mere touch on the arm and waist. Madness. It's like back in the Victorian times where women would end up dead because they would not accurately describe their symptoms to doctors. A pain in the lower regions would be described as a 'pain in my arm' and the doctor was supposed to 'infer' what the real issue was. Same prudish attitude and extreme aversion and fear of sexuality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 08:38 AM
6

There's no way in hell a young woman would get the same treatment in court if the roles were reversed. Decades of gender slander by feminists have resulted in men being treated inhumanely by courts. Fuck this and fuck them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 08:36 AM
1

What I mean, and what everyone here means by feminism, is that which pervades the media, the family courts, universities and other public institutions along with guilds like the association of american paychologists. It has a lexicon of Patriarchy and Mansplaining and Toxic Masculinity. It is the prevailing feminism of today. If you have a private feminism that is not like this, well good on ya. But thats like having a private fascism that isnt racist.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:49 PM
3

I think both parties are corrupt and cynical. But Trump is transparently unfit for office. I mean it’s shocking how bad he is.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:48 PM
5

They are only rating faces right?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:38 AM
2

I fought for equality by campaigning successfully to have abortion made legal in my country. I believe men and women need equal rights. Also feminism is cancerous. You just don't see what's going on with the attacks on men by feminists, because you are not a man and our social media world is very confining. Get out of your bubble, just for a little bit, and you will see that feminism at large has morphed into a hate group that actively works to reduce men's rights in the law and make our lives h…
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:23 AM
-2

Yes, but in 2019, how can you be a Republican?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:14 AM
35

They actually called Bernie supporters "Bernie Bros" to shame them for supporting a man and for...being men. They are still doing that.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:13 AM
4

Hmm, they left out ​ Feminism targets men.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 11:12 AM
4

non-physical violence is like non-adhesive glue.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 11:32 AM
1

I'm from Europe so from my point of view CNN is very right wing also!
/r/MensRights09/10/19 11:30 AM
1

I think it’s a wait and see. There may be some pushback on this. My own feeling is that we should ignore all this stuff, from the feminists and from the mra’s since a lot of it is just posturing. But feminists are demanding real sanctions on men spurred by their quotidian misandry. For trivial things like, the way men sit on public transport to more serious matters like child custody and allegations of sexual harassment. Therefore it’s necessary to push back against their excesses, if not for ou…
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:14 AM
6

When men go psycho there’s no excuse. Past abusive behaviour from their SO is not taken into account. I bet of you even suggested it, you’d be considered ‘an abuser’. Men’s violence always comes out of thin air, no mitigating factors need be addressed or examined. No sir.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:10 AM
11

They had the nerve to say ‘rape is overwhelmingly a crime committed by men on women’.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 09:06 AM
1

Yes, filed a complaint with the police and with CBS.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:57 AM
1

Several people have, that I’ve seen. Perhaps many more have. Why are you jumping to the conclusion that nobody has complained?
/r/MensRights09/10/19 08:42 AM
1

But she doesn’t say something as benign as ‘without’. Her says ‘imagine killing a certain number of men every week’. Killing. I think a court would have no compunction about incarcerating an ‘incel’ type young man who made such a statement on the radio about killing ‘a certain number of women every week’. Context does matter, but if we’re going to have hatespeech laws (and this is one reason why we shouldn’t) then they are meaningless if this does not count as hate speech.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:44 PM
2

Thats even more damning for her.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 12:35 PM
1

Doesnt mean anything. If I went on the radio and said Imagine killing all the Jews, I'd be taken off the air and charged and rightly so. People don't take raving loony pink haired feminists seriously (and rightly so), that's why she's free.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:54 AM
1

The logic is "men are bad". But, I thought feminism was "about equality" and that we are "the same"?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:53 AM
2

Advocating genocide is a crime under US code. 18 U.S. Code § 1091.Genocide (c)Incitement Offense.— Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. ​ You should call the cops on her. ​ ​ The Subsection a referenced is: ​ **(a)Basic Offense.—**Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, r…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:09 AM
5

"When SJWs use the word they mean people from groups with specific characteristics, rather than individual men who are marginalised" Indeed, they are racists, of the 'White man's burden' variety. Repulsive.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:05 AM
3

Perhaps. Although I’m astonished you don’t read it in the newspapers either, or see it implemented in government policies. Alison Saunders’ deplorable tenure as DPP for instance, if you happen to live in the UK.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/19 04:43 PM
2

Well, if he sued her, she could just pay him out of his own money...
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:14 PM
4

I’m trying to live my life and now having to deal with anti male bigotry. This is not helpful to anyone. And there’s a big difference between someone being ungrateful and having to live in a mcCarthyite world of suspicion, paranoia and bad faith between the genders. I’m the kind of person who gets asked to ‘mentor’ people. I love helping people out, and have done so many times in the past. But when it comes to helping out young women in the last few years, I now do so with extreme trepidation, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/19 11:31 AM
5

Not while the prevailing narrative in the media and consequently in government is that men are living high on the hog while the poor women toil in agony beneath our jackboots. Thats the source of all the rage here. Most guys would bend over backwards to help their sisters, but not if they are just going to receive a kick in the teeth instead of thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/19 08:27 AM
2

No it’s true, bit it’s missing the line at the bottom that reads “...because they work fewer hours and choose easier jobs that pay less”.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 08:19 AM
2

And Man City.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 08:18 AM
6

Believe it or not, women have the vote. Those CongressMen have their jobs because women voted for them, not because of some mysterious evil force called Patriarchy. Want a female Congress? Vote for it. Want a female President, vote for one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/19 08:11 AM
2

Let's all blame the victim.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:46 AM
1

Essentially, yes.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:28 AM
4

The dot dot dot means "why aren't we culling men"?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:27 AM
1

Finish the sentence "The Greens" you want a push to cull men, don't you.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:27 AM
11

Vastly less money is put into programs to treat cancers in men than in Women. Vastly less funding for male specific treatments in government programs. ​ From: The Report on the Advisory Committee on Research on Women’s Health ​ "in almost every category there is more female-focused NIH funding than male-focused NIH spending with the totals more than two to one in favor of females ($4.5 billion to $1.5 billion)" $180 million of NIH lung cancer funding was focused on women while just $318 thousand…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/19 11:09 AM
0

Hi. Go fuck yourself, sincerely.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 08:47 PM
-9

Well said. Screw those downvotes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 12:57 PM
1

Then you'll love this book where he "exposes" well known warmonger, Jimmy Carter. ​ It's called - and this is not a joke: "The Case Against Israel's Enemies: Exposing Jimmy Carter and Others Who Stand in the Way of Peace" ​ ​ https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DNKYBKE/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_taft_p1_i3
/r/MensRights03/10/19 12:52 PM
4

Obligatory "you are probably a neckbeard and live in your mom's basement" comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 12:40 PM
3

Thats a pity, because Dershowitz is a prick and we don’t need him on our side.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:55 PM
5

Pretty much. These days it's fashionable to bash men / whites, so they're all over that. But if it were fashionable to bash "The Jews' you can bet your bottom dollar they'd be first in line for that too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/19 04:18 PM
8

Almost all feminists are total sexists in my experience. Women and men are 'equal', according to them, but women are better than men at everything and also, nicer. And smarter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/19 02:22 PM
4

Content of character > biology
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/19 12:41 PM
1

Its being reported but there’s no social entrepreneurs trying to make capital out of it. I don’t know if that’s a good thing, or a sad thing.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 07:56 PM
8

pfft, men are just beasts of burden. They have no thoughts, no emotions. Why they simply exist to serve women. These brutes need to be put in their place.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 04:12 PM
0

I’m very’traditionally masculine’, and I couldn’t give a fuck about watching sports as a hobby. It seems nerdy to me. All the stats and shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/19 07:41 AM
6

I think the ‘sokal squared’ hoax made this point decisively. Grievance studies are fraudulent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/19 07:36 AM
1

what would you like America to do? ​ This is like an incompetent heart surgeon "hey what do you want me to do" after they've botched the operation. Well with that attitude? For a start, join the International Criminal Court and allow Cheney, Bush and co to stand trial for their warcrimes, including widespread use of torture and kidnapping EU citizens. That might make your actual allies take you more seriously, next time you see a wolf. For another, end all financial and military support for Isra…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 04:06 PM
1

Yes, the Taliban would have looked like puppets of the west, which is WHY they wanted the fig leaf - stop the bombing and they will hand him to a third party. This is a matter of record, not conjecture. "Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over" https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/14/afghanistan.terrorism5 Now then, you say: "Not only would Osama's extradition be but a drop in the ocean in regards to Islamic terrorism , it's not even true". So A, it is true. And B. Who said anyth…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:47 PM
1

Lo, do you know how ISIS came about in the first place? American Intervention in Iraq. You have obviously no idea what you're talking about. And the Taliban were no threat at all (to America) until you invaded Afghanistan. You were friends with the cunts. ​ And yes a gang of thugs. Don't thank me, thank Gen. Smedley Butler, USMC. ​ War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 03:33 PM
2

I'll respond to this in the childish spirit it was written. The US invaded Vietnam to prevent them becoming a communist nation. They became a communist nation. It seems almost any poorly armed peasant group can take on and beat the US military. Even Afghan farmers! The moral of the story is, don't try to throw your weight around. You guys don't know how to win a fight, even with every advantage given to you, and you get your fucking heads kicked in, again and again and again. It's embarassing re…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:37 PM
2

would feel the need to make a more substantial response the second time around. Would only make sense if the PNAC boys didn't subsequently invade Iraq. The decision to militarise the response to 911 was everything to do with their grand megalomaniacal plans for the middle east and nothing to do with a prudent or proportionate escalation. Bin Laden would have been delivered on a silver platter by the Taliban, with kind regards, had the US chosen to provide them with the fig leaf they asked for. R…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:27 PM
2

Agreed. She's just a misandrist. No better than a Nazi.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:19 PM
1

Oh those poor Nazis.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:18 PM
11

'Saving the world' from Afghan farmers? From Vietnamese peasants who just want to run their own country? From Iraqis, dying from American sanctions? Pull the other one. America is an empire, same as any other empire in history. The top American oligarchs use the polity and the armed forces as nothing more than a gang of thugs to keep global trade bent in their favour. I don't blame the soldiers or their commanders personally, but the cause they serve is theft and oppression, not liberty.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:17 PM
0

why else do we have military bases all around the world? To protect America's mercantile empire by threats and use of force. You're not the 'good guys' anymore. Haven't been, since Ike left office.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:12 PM
1

Simply put, soldiers do not set policy. Soldiers obey orders.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:10 PM
2

It literally does work like that.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:07 PM
2

It did, it fell by roughly half. It now takes 2 full time working people to afford a mortgage on a 3 bed home on the average industrial wage + 33%. In the 1970’s this was not the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 12:29 PM
4

Why do you think that? Jeff Bozo and co could make 1 tenth the profit and still make a fuckton of profit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 08:27 AM
2

You think the falling price of labour has had other major contributing factors?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 08:24 AM
2

Well, it wouldn’t be fair, would it?
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:20 AM
1

Do male players GO TO JAIL for twice as long also?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:05 PM
2

Theres also a doing less work gap in favor of women.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:04 PM
2

Well try put the original unreversed one up and report what you get...
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:49 PM
7

No no no false rape accusations are sooooo RARE, it’s as if they don’t even exist at all!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:45 PM
2

Just some sad lady trolling for compliments and 'you go, girl" type encouragement. They believe this sort of thing is 'activism'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/19 07:52 AM
1

True, they treated you like an adult, but they would have had to treat a woman like an infant. That's equality!
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:09 PM
1

there are strict boundaries in the customer/server relationship that both need to adhere to THere shouldn't be. This sort of thing is nonsense brought in by feminists to further their man hating agenda. There's no way in hell men should be copying their atrocious and childish behaviour.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 12:21 PM
0

For fuck sake. So what? She just said she liked you and that's it. She didn't press you on it, didn't grab you, didn't start stalking you. She's perfectly within her rights to say she finds you desireable. She said it in a bit of a crude manner, but not egregiously so. What do you want, a parade? ​ The Feminists ARE DEAD WRONG when they want serious repercussions just for hitting on someone, one time. Don't become like them man. It's twisted and it's against human nature.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 12:19 PM
2

Sure, just read about the Dickwolves.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 12:13 PM
1

Nobody gives a shit about periods except feminists.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 12:11 PM
3

Yep. He’ll come around like the rest of us did, eventually.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 07:44 PM
2

Oh thanks, I know - just interesting the way they go about their shitty business. This forum has a lot of whiney little shits, and I suspect, ignorant teenage boys posing as men, but it doesn’t do the ‘pruning’ I find so dishonest in other men’s subs - and other subs in general in fact. Lassie faire is a great policy for ‘moderation’ The whole concept of chatroom moderation was based on a presumption of a somewhat homogeneous computer literate culture. But internet culture is now The Culture, so…
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:02 PM
3

Post was removed.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:57 AM
3

You were both rapists. It's not too late to turn both of yourselves in, and demand the maximum penalty of each other. America's prison system needs more people in prison. Of course, only one of you will do time.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:38 AM
3

A feminist can still have empathy and respect for men They can but they do not. ​ Am I a feminist? ​ Not by the looks of it. You're an egalitarian. Congrats on being a decent human being.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:20 AM
17

My Career, my choice.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:17 AM
3

Wow. ​ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Republican_Army
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:04 PM
5

‘Treat me as you would any other man!’ Okay, let me call the ambulance first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/19 05:33 PM
1

You inserted yourself into this conversation. I’d say you have a lot of time to waste.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/19 08:09 AM
0

You voted for the guy whose incompetence destroyed a key component of US nuclear deterrence? I refer to Mattis’ incredible caveat “if it were legal” in reference to whether he would obey an order from Trump to launch nuclear weapons. Great job. Game theory be damned. NATO is also hugely weakened thanks to Trumps’ various blunderings and pronouncements undermining the principle of defense under article 5. Another own goal. If he was actually and literally Vladimir Putin’s puppet, he couldn’t have…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/19 09:38 PM
1

Sure, I agree. I'm just getting the feeling that "you belong in the kitchen" is being replaced with "Get OUT of the kitchen".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/19 10:14 AM
1

Since you seem to support Trump, it’s impossible to take your opining about the nature of our dreadful political leadership seriously. Only someone with the mental complexity of a child or a simpleton could support the man. How old are you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/19 05:35 AM
1

It does not logically follow, that absent or lesser paternity leave prevents women from obtaining employment, should they choose to do so. We cannot and should not be coercive in changing societal traditions, except in cases where they are inarguably harmful. The choice is there, that’s the important thing. And effective legal sanctions await those who would discriminate against employing women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 08:34 PM
1

Yes, but that’s been the case for nigh on 40 years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 08:23 PM
2

I’d vote for Darth Vader over... Kylo Ren.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 08:20 PM
5

Well I mean, you can’t blame them for that. One candidate is a polished, professional politician, the other is a game show host and buffoon. Aside from any other consideration, any reasonable voter ought to have dismissed Trump out of hand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:56 PM
5

The idea that only a ‘job’ working out of the home is acceptable, needs to die. If being a ‘stay at home mom’ is somehow demeaning to women, is it not therefore also demeaning to the men who do it? The truth is being a stay at home parent is a perfectly fine, valid, life-enriching thing to do, and the countervailing opinion, that the only path to fulfillment is being a good little worker bee, is flat wrong. Moreover, the push to get everyone involved in ‘productivity’ is killing the fucking plan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:49 PM
1

You’re fortunate. It went downhill a few years ago. Articles whining about ‘privilege’ of one form or another, navel gazing and irrelevant pop- culture theorizing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:39 PM
8

No, TYT, were very much for Bernie over Hillary, as I recall.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/19 07:36 PM
4

No billionaire of any stripe should have more of a say than any other voter. This is the concept of a democracy, all citizens get an equal say. The fact that that is obviously not the case, speaks to a need for political reform. Also, it is crass and coarsening to celebrate the death of a human being in the public discourse. A ‘free’ press needs to respect ethical behavior. To not do so, abuses that freedom. I think we need reform in the media to guide it back towards the values of a ‘fourth est…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/19 10:52 AM
1

'a few' according to them.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 11:30 AM
3

And those STEM subjects in which men are outnumbered. For instance, applied Biology, Pharmacy, Medicine, etc.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:41 AM
1

Wendell, I'm not content.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 09:34 AM
7

This is 'the backlash'. I hate the backlash. Now we're going to have the equivalent of male feminists seriously as opposed to sarcastically, complaining about womansplaining, shebagging and 'sexist air-conditioning'. Christ on a bike.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/19 01:56 PM
2

I have. They complain that because the woman carries the child to term, they DESERVE maternity leave and fathers DO NOT.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/19 05:53 PM
2

Sarcasm, no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/19 05:51 PM
2

Feminists have succeeded in emancipating women from gendered expectations. MensRights, as I see it is an attempt to do the same for men. However, any and all attempt to argue for gendered issues that men face in public life are usually met with open hostility and accusations of misogyny by people who call themselves feminists. In addition, feminist activists have put in place negative gender expectations for men through things like The Violence Against Women Act, the Duluth Model and in the fami…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 04:31 PM
6

but that's the wrong kind of equality!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/19 04:06 PM
34

I can understand her frustration. But this stands out: "I meet men in a proffesional (sic) setting, but I am never asked out on dates" I mean are you surprised? What man is willing to jeopardize their job or even career asking a colleague out on a date in 2019? Sure, most people would not consider it sexual harassment, but some definitely do. And if you step on that landmine, you will not be given the benefit of the doubt. In the past a great many people met like minded people with similar or co…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/19 03:42 PM
11

'society' already does this.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/19 11:12 AM
1

Diamonds are a bad investment. If you want an alternative to cash, try gold.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:43 PM
1

It was outdated, certainly in the 90's. It's come back into vogue - I don't know when, but certainly a concept like 'manspreading' would not have been entertained by feminists 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:35 AM
1

More likely, but still a very small minority of women because of 1-5. I've met women who regard themselves as 'feminists' and they have each been in their own special way, total arseholes who hate men and bore normal people to death with their inane, bigoted ideas. Bigots are pretty much all alike. Everything is the outgroup's fault. As a 'heavily educated liberal' it's getting harder to defend 'our side' against the rabble of various authoritarian bigots who have popped up recently claiming to …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 09:31 AM
3

It's a documented fact Millenials and Gen Z are having less sex for a variety of reasons (financial being the reported main one), but among them is men being more 'reserved' when it comes to the ladies.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 03:14 PM
3

Back in my day women and girls just shamed the 'nerds' for being unattractive. It's the same thing today, but wrapped up in a holier-than-thou moralism, which is really shitty. On the other hand some of these guys are agressively idiotic and deserve the abuse they get - they go looking for it, so they can complain about it. And then you have the actual fucking terrorists...
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:57 PM
1

'biased', not 'bias'
/r/MensRights25/07/19 11:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter