TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

otterlyclueless Archive

View 2 posts and 688 comments by otterlyclueless on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

False Accusationotterlyclueless/r/MensRights12/06/20 02:50 PM
7

Legal Rightsotterlyclueless/r/MensRights22/05/20 04:28 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You're arguing that one is not wrong because the other one is more wrong? They are both in the wrong. It doesn't matter how much at this point because they both did something they were not supoosed to do.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:24 PM
7

Looksmaxx is something I have only ever heard from MLMs and other beauty schemes.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/21 03:33 PM
1

.7 % meet that at 9 inches, .1% exceed 9. I wonder the likelihood of someone meeting all her standards.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/11/21 01:39 PM
2

Do bugs count as vegan? Honestly the Oymyakon diet is more the thing for people I know.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/21 11:40 PM
2

They are his companies and he did nothing to stop it shows a tacit approval. That's all that's needed to show it. He did nothing to stop it or discourage it. For years. And apparently still ongoing. He is promoting that culture.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:22 AM
2

https://www.law360.com/articles/569123/spacex-workers-launch-3rd-suit-allege-racist-policies https://www.npr.org/2021/10/05/1043336212/tesla-racial-discrimination-lawsuit There is also the fact that he grew up in and his family profited from apartheid.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:11 AM
1

Yeah, it's a bunch of rich people messing with each other.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 04:15 AM
1

I agree with you there. It should be open to the public. I just don't agree with his engaging with them over this. It's entirely publicity on both sides even if he is right with asking for transparency. I understand why they don't do it, even though it should be public.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 04:08 AM
2

I don't think they fear it more than just don't care about having it displayed everywhere. It never looks good to display that you are paying warlords and terrorists to leave shipments alone. It's wrong, but happens because it's easier than sending troops in (especially with the reception UN troops get in the area - they are not nice to locals) I'm not saying they are right. Both musk and the world food bank are in the wrong with this. The world food bank was definitely doing propaganda with the…
/r/MensRights03/11/21 03:49 AM
-39

His requirement is the thing. He knows it will not be agreed to since the UN is responsible to governments not a private citizen. When you donate to an organization, you get no say in how it is spent. That's the whole thing about donating. I'm quite rational in that both musk and the UN are wrong here.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:55 PM
-69

No, he won't donate regardless. He says so for the publicity and the fact that a fail will make him look better. He is the bad guy for myriads of reasons no matter what's going on. This is the least of it. Edit: I see the musk worshippers are out in force today.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:49 PM
-4

He didn't murder them with words. He responded to bait that should have been ignored, not responded to with attention.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:25 PM
5

He did not create paypal. At all. That claim alone is enough to say you don't know about his companies. He had $180 million from the sale and all of it went into Telsa and SpaceX. Not his ex-wife It's not economical compared to nuclear rockets whoch have been useable (though not used) since the 60s He didn't think of jack shit. He fires you for saying no or calking out illegal practices at his company. He is a racist piece of shit. Reusable rockets were debated in the 50s and were not economical…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:23 PM
-1

Did I say he tweeted it himself? He was responding to the statement that 2% of the wealth of the world's wealthiest could solve world hunger. The statement from the UN did not say timeframes, just monetary value. It's misleading and propaganda for sure, but so is his response to it.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:18 PM
-4

He just did this for publicity. 6 billion could make a huge impact, but it will take time and that is something no one wants to accept. It will take years to solve hunger issues around the world. The food supply is only a fraction of the issue. Some places will refuse all help as well and that would be turned against the UN for not doing enough even if refused.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 02:45 PM
-4

What products did he create? He didn't create paypal, he bough into Tesla, actual engineers built spacex (and we have better tech than spacex that the government refuses to use). So what did he make? Nothing. He just rants on social media and sells shit to easily duped people.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 02:43 PM
7

It references misogyny but denies misandry as well. The APA is terrible for references as they are extremely biased. That quote you are using is even referring to masculinity as inherently toxic.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 02:33 PM
-72

He gave that condition knowing it wouldn't happen so he would not have to follow through on a promise. He's still a terrible person and a terrible role model for anyone. He made that offer only because they said it would only take 2% of his wealth to fix world hunger. He just wants to prove that they can't do it and then claim he could have solved it himself.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 02:27 PM
1

WWII movie?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/11/21 02:11 AM
1

It took a deep dive into the sub to really see how much they really believe it. I hope it was started as satire, but it is definitely not anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 04:06 AM
5

MagesVsMatriarchy is making fun of witchesvpatriarchy. They really do believe in it. They have posts about it and will adamantly defend anything that could remotely be related to witchcraft. I've been in arguments with a few (unfortunately). They really believe that some 'patriarchy' rules the world. It's weird. It should be satire but it's definitely run by people serious about it.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 04:02 AM
4

Unfortunately, there are too many on that sub that treat it more seriously than anything else in their lives. It's not satire.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 03:53 AM
2

This doesn't belong here.
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/21 12:53 PM
3

I've been told I'm marriage material and asked by multiple women 'how are you not married yet? ' Then they say no to a date.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/21 04:25 AM
19

Yeah, she doesn't realize she is not as valuable to him as he is to her. How would she know she offers what he is looking for? Also, her grammar is terrible and is a red flag for me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 01:36 PM
2

What country?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/10/21 03:09 PM
6

7th commenter down is great: Most attractive person until this comment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/21 09:17 PM
1

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20140905-the-women-with-super-human-vision Some women have tetrachromancy where all other humans have trichromancy or less. There are links to it on the webpage. And no, if your brain doesn't process it, you don't see it. Light entering your eyes isn't seeing it, your brain must process it before it gets seen. There are also studies that show an education in colors and their words actually helps with color blindness. Which just show words matter more than you t…
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:24 AM
1

You don't comprehend the study. The very act of it not being a part of the culture or language means it does not exist to them. They don't see it at all. They see a different color entirely as that is how their language processes it. Same thing for other studies that tried to show the existence of impossible colors like blue-yellow or red-green. The people couldn't say what color they saw, saying it was a color they had never seen before. But when asked to make the color on a color swatch, they …
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:15 AM
1

Not so at all. The research clearly shows they cannot see the color blue. They showed them different color squares and they could not tell the one blue square from the green squares. Edit: https://www.intelligentliving.co/humans-didnt-see-blue/
/r/MensRights26/10/21 01:32 AM
11

The issue is in language. It has only been recently that people have started claiming gender and sex are different. They mean the same thing for different purposes. Inanimate objects have gender (such as language), living beings have a sex. Using men or women is a gendered term that refers to actual sex of a person. Edit: you can look up the research into how creating new words/concepts actually changes perception or realization of things. The particular research into the color blue is a good ex…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:53 AM
22

Has someone told her that it depends on the woman? Like any man will see the same women as either a relationship or hook up potential. It's on her for which one she fosters and projects. The visuals in that video almost distracted from the rest of the content completely. That may be why, but I can make no assumptions on that. And she never even mentioned if she had anyone in the friendzone or not.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/10/21 10:57 PM
11

That she calls a relationship conversation emotional labor is telling.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/10/21 10:53 PM
2

It can take a mere 10 seconds for unconsciousness and a minute to die for the right chokes.
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/21 06:02 AM
4

Female teachers have been shown to have a bias with grading girls' work higher for the same quality as a boy's. It's almost nonexistent for a male teacher to do so (still there if I recall, just significantly less).
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 10:14 PM
23

I don't even think I made it far enough in the video to hear her say that. She blamed patriarchy and her opinion lost all value. I agree though. Using those terms is a complete dealbreaker.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 10:09 PM
3

Women aren't reported. Plenty of stories of men getting laughed at or ignored when they bring up a sexual assault against them by a woman.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:06 PM
4

Entertainingly, you can report them to the reddit admins for brigading for banning you for your participation in another sub like that.
/r/AntiFeminists22/10/21 10:05 PM
1

There are tons of comments on that post that insult the OP for saying a woman can abuse a man or calling her a pickme for siding with men. Hell, there are a ton of comments on it that state they know the situation better than OP and that the other people just don't want to hang out.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/21 10:01 PM
18

It's not so easy to do for most. Reading her comments, she pointed out the men don't believe they could find as attractive of a woman again. They deserve support but need to be taught to stand up for themselves and leave their abusers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/10/21 09:30 PM
2

WvP is almost as toxic and terrible as FDS. They are crazy and misandrist in that sub
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:25 PM
3

Men make up more do to reporting. When surveys are conducted anonymously, it shows an equal amount between genders for things like domestic violence and the gape around sexual assault/rape is narrowed to a small margin of difference. The reporting is biased, so the analysis of the data will be more biased.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:23 PM
3

It's only the case in countries that word their laws so women can not rape. In the UK, women can legally bot rape a man. So the government statistics of most countries is biased before any analysis can be done.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:21 PM
11

Women sleep more than men. And as I said the men I know are responsible for all of their housework and actual work. I know several single dads that have to do everything for their kids and work and home Edit: you are making shit up and have all the evidence saying you are wrong.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:08 PM
11

All the men I know are on 24/7 call even without families. That's double so for the ones that are single fathers
/r/MensRights22/10/21 09:04 PM
26

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Pick%20me Basically, the term is supposed to mean a woman who puts other women down to make herself look better to men. Though in most contexts, it is the third definition on the site that is used (even if the person saying it denies it)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/10/21 07:08 PM
89

There is a recent post on a confessions type subreddit with a wife venting about friends being abused by their wives/gfs and the number of pickme comments is insane. Like a woman criticizing another woman somehow immediately makes her a pickme and invalidates her statement. They attacked her husband over it as well, like he must be the problem if they are being abused. It was so gross to read those comments
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/10/21 05:57 PM
2

I just did the math for the numbers cited in the study (rounded a little) and the difference between men and women 'unpartnered' is only 1.8 million men more than women. Which is not in lome with the ratio of men to women (at those ages it should be close to 103:100 but this number is about 109:100) my math seems off but I'm not sure The overall number isn't much but the totals are 21,204,300 men to 19,375,200 women 'unpartnered'
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:15 PM
2

This data is skewed by their misinterpretation of the data “Unpartnered” refers to adults who are neither married nor living with an unmarried partner. “Single” is used interchangeably with unpartnered in this report. That's from the study they reference in the article. The first link in the article leads to the study and it doesn't show the same conclusion that the article claims.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:59 PM
3

Their argument was a generalization that men tend to have the higher paying job in a relationship. Not always true but it seems to be a factor that many women look for. Or that they refuse to date a man with less education than them.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:51 PM
1

It drastically changes during their study timeframe. From 103 men down to 98 men to 100 women.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:49 PM
2

This analysis uses decennial census and American Community Survey data to examine the single, 25- to 54-year-old U.S. population and compare it with adults who are either married or living with an unmarried partner. Though the decennial census has collected information on marital status for many decades, it was not until the 1990 census that unmarried partners of the household head were distinguished from roommates and housemates. The breadth and detail of census data facilitates an examination …
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:42 PM
3

It refutes your claim of equal rates of graduation.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:38 PM
1

More women than men overall in the US. Men outnumber women from 20-34 by 103 to 100. 35-39 it is 101 to 100. From 40 and up, it starts at 99 to 100 and the gap increases after that.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:38 PM
1

The men to women ratio in the US is 98 to 100 More women than men. More men than women until age 40 (decreases every age group)
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:35 PM
3

The US is 98 men to 100 women average across the board. Up until 40ish, men outnumber women on average (from birth it's 105 men to 100 women)
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:33 PM
3

Women graduate significantly more in college than men. The ratio is at best 60-40 women to men graduating college
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:24 PM
1

What's your job?
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:22 PM
3

The study makes different claims only one of which states married or cohabiting. All other statements used single (i.e. Not dating).
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:18 PM
1

They frowned upon writing left handed back in the day due to the perception that writing left handed would smear the ink used when writing. Writing materials used to be a lot more expensive and rare until the last couple of centuries. It was a hold over from those times.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 03:23 PM
4

I bet they have no idea how it actually helps. 'believed' is used for almost every claim they say it helps with.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:03 PM
11

How about the 28% false rape accusations. You have absolutely no empathy for those falsely accused.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:01 AM
17

Well, there's quite a few that have been accused of it when they never committed any. I've seen someone get accused of sexual assault just because she didn't like that he was dating someone new. She got him kicked out of the military off nothing more than her word.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 02:45 AM
18

So you like being called a sex offender for being male then?
/r/MensRights19/10/21 02:36 AM
10

Just call it men's studies or gender studies (and focus it on men's issues).
/r/MensRights19/10/21 02:26 AM
8

Report them for bridaging to the admins. It counts as brigading to ban someone for participating in another reddit page when they have never interacted with the one banning them. Report to the admins. The more it happens, the more likely they get banned from reddit. Not that being banned from there matters, just the utility of using their pre-emptive ban to ban their page.
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/21 06:49 PM
3

https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/redpillwomen For a quick analysis of overlapping users.
/r/RedPillWomen17/10/21 05:52 PM
2

I really think it depends on the specific country and where the focus of my job is. Although allies do make it easier, it still causes hiccups with everything.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/21 05:30 PM
2

I've looked into international dating but my job would have issues with it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/21 05:04 PM
1

I don't like cars becayse they wreck the ecosystem they are around if outside and they tend to be more detructive than most dogs inside. Plus, the research into toxoplamosis is showing it has serious health effects for life and cats are a major spreader of it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/21 01:32 PM
124

Whoever wrote that article is disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 02:29 AM
1

That is a no true scotsman fallacy. Feminism embraces those that spout misandry and hate and promote all the anti-male propaganda. And femiinism has never been about equality. It was started to elevate white women over minorities. The founders of feminism were ardent racists and sexists.
/r/AntiFeminists17/10/21 01:43 AM
3

There is a book 'the five love languages' that you could read. Encourage him to read it as well or make a game of taking the language quiz together to find out his language as well.
/r/RedPillWomen16/10/21 10:36 PM
1

True. The book Starship Troopers says two kids max without citizenship.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:47 PM
6

This post made me look farther into the law than divorce laws. SC is pretty good on that end after stopping common law marriage. If you bought something before marriage, it is exempt from being split per the divorce here. They give you a timeline to refute after signing the presumption of paternity forms but it's only 60 days. You never have to sign. I will keep up with it now. I never considered beyond a pre-nup before but kids will get a pre-nup wrecked in court still.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 11:01 PM
11

I hope so. I would never want to pay child support for someone else's kids.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 10:40 PM
5

Report them to reddit admins for blocking you without ever posting/commenting on their sub. It counts as brigading when they do that and can get them banned from reddit.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:21 PM
10

Couldn't get past her voice. It was too grating.
/r/AntiFeminists15/10/21 09:16 PM
1

In starship troopers? Because the main character's parents weren't citizens, just civilians.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:56 PM
4

They aren't married, she has no legal claim to it. Even in most states that allow common law marriage, the house was purchased before he knew her. She can't claim it from him. Plus, from reading the first part, his mom still lives there. She has more a claim to it that the ex.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 08:10 PM
3

Even after signing in some states. SC allows up to 60 days to refute parentage even after signing the birth certificate.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 08:07 PM
21

Never married. It doesn't matter at that point. Legally, her name is nowhere attached and no marriage certificate to say it was obtained after the marriage. After a common law marriage comment on here, I looked it up. Quite a few states say a house purchased before marriage is legally not a marriage asset so it is not liable during a divorce. But they weren't even married, so she has no legal claim to the house.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 08:04 PM
3

Common law marriages aren't recognized in many states. The total as of 2021 is 8 states allow them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 08:00 PM
10

It's going to get worse for relationships in the future. Statistically, single parenthood has been increasingly and while many claim there are no issues with it, the research into the effects of single parents on relationships is telling. Having only a single parent wrecks the ability to form healthy attachments and relationships later in life. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2010.00169/full
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 07:56 PM
11

If he signed the birth certificate as the father, he would have to pay child support until it is removed (shouldn't take too long to do so) but I don't think she could sue him for child support before parentage is proven/disproven. So yeah, he probably will not have to pay any.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 07:40 PM
3

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/common-law-marriage-states Here are the states that do common law marriages. My state is unfortunately one of them. However, the divorce laws here allow at fault divorce for cheating that denies all alimony to the cheater. No physical proof beyond needing to reasonably assume opportunity to cheat necessary. Edit: apparently my state no longer accepts common law marriage as of 2019. And any formed before then need a written document signed by both …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/21 06:49 PM
2

Her language could be gifts as that is how she might feel loved, but it is reciprocal. She would have to learn your language and use it as well. The easy way to tell is if she defaults to gifts or not to show she cares. If she never does, it's probably not her love language.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:36 AM
5

Synopsis please. It's almost an hour long
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:30 AM
1

They're from blatantmisogyny. A troll would be better.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 07:35 PM
2

Says yhe feminist from Blatantmisogyny. Your point is invalid as soon as you describe it as pedophilia to shave.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 07:34 PM
3

And yet physical evidence disproves you completely. Actual evidence shows feminists fighting against equality in laws. Feminism is not for equality. Period.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 06:10 PM
2

Feminism already demands paragraph one. They call people out like paragraph two but only to promote and congratulate instead of rebuking them for doing so. Feminists only support feminine men to insult all other men. If they can't do so, they start insulting the feminine men. And the last paragraph, feminists will defend those women publicly and insult them in private. They never follow their own (apparently their own) supposed beliefs. They exist only to tear down everyone else.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:21 PM
3

Their actions are 100% against this though. No argument can say otherwise. Feminism fights against any rights for men.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:13 PM
4

Men can get breast cancer. It's rare but possible. And women shame them terribly for it.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 12:09 PM
3

What site?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/10/21 11:58 AM
3

I agree with you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/21 07:52 PM
1

Dash cams aren't typically filming 24/7. And filming while driving is different than leaving a camera running in a turned off car.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 03:01 PM
0

They are in a parking garage. Not outside.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 03:00 PM
1

Unfortunately for that argument, yes there is. A private location is grounds for expectation of privacy. The only cameras shoupd be from the company im charge of the parking area, not a random tesla you did not consent to.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 02:58 PM
-1

That wasn't a dashcam. And I was referring to the states that have two party consent. Dashcams are whioe driving on roads. Parking places can be privately owned, hence expectation of privacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 02:43 PM
-3

Dashcams are in use while driving. Roads are public. Not all parking places are public property.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 02:35 PM
-3

That entirely depends on where they are. Some parking places count as private property and would qualify as expectation of privacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 02:18 PM
-20

These cameras would be illegal in two party consent states.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 01:41 PM
8

Vasectomies are reversible. There's a chance it doesn't work but they are more reversible than a woman getting her tubes tied. Edit: but vasalgel is a significantly better option than a vasectomy since there is no risk reversing it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/21 12:56 PM
8

You're not here for any discussion. You have comments on your profile saying men get off on abusing women. You're more sick than the majority we call out on here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/10/21 12:53 PM
5

Is anyone else going to mention the currently blonde but only using pictures without her current haircolor? I don't think you get all that time to take care of dyed hair in prison. Those are old photos.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/21 09:46 PM
3

At 14, under the age of consent, it is rape even if the kid consented. Statutory rape is a crime. Even at 18, if she was his teacher, it's statutory rape since she would have an authority position over him.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/21 01:28 PM
3

The other issue is that the US soccer association that pays the women's salaries does not pay salaries to the men. They pay per diem and bonuses but the regular pay for the men come from their soccer clubs. They were only paid if they participated in a game. The women are paid by the association and not their own soccer clubs. They were also paid even if they didn't play, even if just on the roster the association paid then.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/21 03:57 PM
1

Never been so happy to see childfree until that list. At least many won't have kids it seems. Edit: and what is going on in North Carolina? 5.25 North Carolina That's quite high for being a location subreddit. Edit2: searching up redpillwomen on there has FDS as one of the absolute highest ones but not the reverse.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 03:40 PM
2

They would tell you no anyways. Reddit use by a man is a complete dealbreaker for them. I'm guessing they realize that their hate is anathema to any man of quality.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 03:38 PM
1

I also owe an apology. I jumped to being defensive. You are right. Using your salary as a superiority thing is atrocious.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 03:27 PM
2

It's not new. It might seem that way now because of the media, but it's always been a thing.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 03:07 PM
2

As soon as you say patriarchal, your argument is invalid. No such thing as the patriarchy
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 03:06 PM
1

What the hell are you talking about. I'm referring to 15% of the entire population of the US (both men and women) make at least 6 figures. Not that 15% of men do or that only 15% of women do.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:54 PM
1

Domestic violence by women against men is greater than the amount with men against women.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:51 PM
1

This is why people are told not to help anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:49 PM
1

It's even worse when race is brought into getting a Nobel Prize. The people who decide the award are biased beyond saving the award. It needs to go.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:45 PM
1

When only 15% make 6 figures or more, it's still a big deal.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:44 PM
3

r/exFDS
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:34 PM
2

I need to disinfect my phone and its memory of that.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:27 PM
2

Just report to the reddit admins (reddit.com/report) Technically, banning you for participating in another sub is brigading (as long as you broke no other rules) and can get their mods and sub in trouble.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:26 PM
4

Just a minor correction: 'reign of terror' not 'rain of terror'
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:12 PM
3

That's very hopeful of you. I haven't managed that. Although, there is an exFDS community on Reddit you can look at and see what worked on them.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 02:08 PM
5

Your responding to someone from FDS.
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 01:57 PM
11

Watcha show or movie with a promiscuous woman and bring it up then. An offhand comment about her opinion of that character and their actions will separate it from her so she will be more honest than directly asking. Also, asking her friends (not necessarily her close friend that will cover for her, but other friemds that she probably forgot to make sure never to day anything)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/10/21 03:11 AM
2

But then you are stuck with one of the crazier ones.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:56 PM
1

I was merely pointing out that their absolute statement shouldn't be an absolute. It is very rare but we have seen cases of cancer in them.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:21 PM
1

I'm saying that right now they can opylt out of parental rights but not child support. Even if you never knew you had a child, they can sue you for not paying child support.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 09:19 PM
1

With current laws, you can give up parental rights but you are still on the hook for child support.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 03:04 PM
1

You are arguing a fallacy. The other commenter is right and you are wrong in this. There is no oppression because of what you claim. And more men are raped than women. But feminism prevents the laws from being updated to properly report rape of men.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:58 PM
1

Most don't apparently. Since there are plenty of campaigns by feminists to deny rape law changes to protect male victims or include definitions to show men can be raped.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:52 PM
3

Unfortunately, feminists have fought hard to remove or reduce any punishment to women for the same crimes. Going so far as to campaign to deny changes to rape laws to prevent women from being accused of being rapists and remove male victims from protections.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:47 PM
2

There is a point to egalitarianism. We can be different, do different things, but still be equal. Equality of opportunity is egalitarian. Even if you completely support and agree with traditional roles, it doesn't make anyone less than equal. Hence egalitarian.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:39 PM
5

You have comments in WvP. You're automatically from that sub then. They ban anyone who doesn't agree with them, so you having a comment there means you are in agreement with them.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:36 PM
2

If it is a ban evasion sub, report it to the actual reddit admins. Reddit.com/report
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:34 PM
4

And? You're from an extremely misandrist hate sub. You hold no power here.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:33 PM
3

Many have realized years later that it messed them up psychologically. It can take years before effects are shown. Most men internalize and hide the damage until they can't anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/21 02:19 PM
125

r/thathappened
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/21 02:11 PM
3

Doesn't matter. She has a position of authority over the student. Immediately labeled as statutory rape even if consent since the position imploes undue coercion to consent even if unwanted.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/21 02:09 PM
3

If under the age of consent or in of one has a position of authority over the other person (i.e. Teacher-student) it is rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/21 02:07 PM
4

Not at all. I've seen it even in the military where women are selected by virtue of being a woman for special assignments and awards.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/21 02:00 PM
6

Nope. Women are encouraged to enter male dominated fields and most women refuse to choose most of the same fields as men.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/21 01:42 PM
1

There are tons of noncombat military jobs that need to be done. Ober 70% of the draftees during Vietnam dod not serve in combat. They did all the back end support.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:17 PM
2

It passed the House. About two weeks before the Senate votes on it though.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 01:15 PM
0

Those same studies acknowledge it is not a zero chance. It is significantly lower than humans but not zero.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:51 PM
5

Who says they have zero chance of cancer? And being marine animals, they don't have pressure in only one direction, they have the benefit of not having to fight gravity every second.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:43 PM
1

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32796941 A few Koreans might be like this guy
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:48 PM
1

Bullshit. They have significantly more rights than men do.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/21 03:42 PM
1

Then expel all misandrists from the movement publicly. But feminism won't do that. They'll claim it's a joke when they push the killallmen trash on social media. Feminism is inherently anti-male and against equality. And the founders are extremely racist as well.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/21 03:38 PM
1

They changed it to three children even after the two child policy wasn't working. The 3-child policy is still a fail for them.
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/21 03:30 PM
3

https://divorce.lovetoknow.com/Divorce_Statistics_and_Living_Together It's also in the time frame that is least likely for it to be a risk.
/r/RedPillWomen03/10/21 12:50 PM
1

That sounds like an amazing idea.
/r/RedPillWomen03/10/21 12:43 PM
5

The newest studies agree with you: https://divorce.lovetoknow.com/Divorce_Statistics_and_Living_Together Cohabitation before marriage being a risk factor is dependent on when before marriage. If after engagement but before marriage, it is not a risk factor, but before engagement it is. That was an interesting study to read up on.
/r/RedPillWomen03/10/21 12:43 PM
1

If I may, the second study says it took age and a few other factors into account before saying it reduced the chance of divorce. The bare statistics of marriage and divorce show a general decline of the marriage rate and that millenials as a generation are divorcing less but also marrying less. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/marriages-and-divorces.html
/r/RedPillWomen03/10/21 12:32 PM
2

Unfortunately, that's near impossible. What we could advocate for is a periodic review of the support for misuse of funds and seeing if the amount needs to be updated. (I know this could come back and bite some people but the value of being able to reduce payments if they are spending the money on themselves instead of the kids is worth it to me)
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:08 PM
2

I know it does. It's not the only thing I am advocating for. We need to change the verbage to be completely gender neutral as well.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:04 PM
2

Yeah, the newest budget bill in the US is piloting 'pay per mile' taxes on vehicles. It's going to suck for truck drivers.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:47 PM
5

I've been thinking about starting a petition on the White House website. It's better than change.org since the president has to address the petition if it reaches a certain number of signatures. I need to figure out exactly what I want to put in it though. Most likely about federal laws needing to include 'forced to penetrate' into their rape laws.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 02:37 PM
5

I'm not sure that's a cat or dog. It looks more like a reptile (makes it even worse).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/21 02:27 PM
5

I don't think that's a cat. It's probably a reptile (most likely a snake). Makes it worse
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/10/21 02:26 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/piasle/z/hezk0gw Sorry, I typed it all out in another comment that I linked.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 02:52 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/contact Select "message the admins" Or: https://www.reddit.com/report If you don't see the right option to report on the second one, use the first one.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/21 03:48 PM
2

Just keep reporting it every time you see a hate post to the reddit admins. The normal reporting methods go to the page mods. We need to report to the admins.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/21 03:42 PM
1

If you have never been to that sub and you're blocked, you can report that sub to reddit for brigading (banning people pre-emptively for participating in another sub counts as brigading). It's a legit reportable action that can get their entire sub in trouble.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/21 03:33 PM
2

As Diddle pointed out, you need to figure out what your strengths are and what positive things you have going for you. I would say therapy should help some.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/21 04:10 PM
2

Why do you even think you're automatically inferior?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/21 03:55 PM
5

Yeah, no. Your profile suggests you are here to troll or get a rise out of people here.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/21 03:22 PM
1

Bad bot
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:55 PM
1

Feminism started long before the CIA.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:51 PM
2

The so called founders of feminism mailed bombs to people. That's textbook terrorism.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:50 PM
1

Peer reviewed means jack shit for those studies. Most peer review just checks for glaring math errors. You need to be better and not buy into feminist propaganda that is anti-male. Seriously, hating yourself is bad and feminism encourages hate against men. They don't even push for equality. They spread lies and propaganda without wanting to do anything but put men down.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:36 PM
1

Loking into it, she might not be a real judge but handles child support cases. Googling judge vonda comes up with two different vondas. One is a real judge (going through some legal trouble of her own) and a lawyer who handles child support cases.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:27 PM
3

The left doesn't care about inequality either. Only so far as to convince people to vote for them so they keep power. They don't actually care about solving any issues.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:13 PM
2

They say keep your legs closed because it is your own responsibility to not get pregnant if you don't want to be. It is not on who you have sex with to not get you pregnant but entirely on yourself. Any argument against that is denying your own agency and responsibility. Denying either means you don't get the privileges that come with that responsibility.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:12 PM
3

No such thing as male privilege. Your argument loses all credibility upon using those words.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:08 PM
3

Report the sub to the admins for brigading. Just lioe certain other feminist subs, they auto ban you for posting in any male centric sub.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:04 PM
1

Babies grown without eggs are more viabke than babies grown without sperm. The technology to make a baby artificially is benefitting men more than women since the bone marrow babies that previous research has hinted at are not viable babies. The babies made without an egg cell from a women have been viable in the last couple of years.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 02:02 PM
1

The UK seems to be more biased but it just makes it easier to tell the bias in comparison to other countries.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 01:50 PM
1

Did you see my comment about women leaders doing more emotional labor? They claim it makes them better leaders.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:59 PM
2

I just read an article claimong women do twice as much work as men do as eladers because they do emotional labor for their employees. Ot never says which employees though so I am betting it is the women under them and not the men. The men are just expected to manage all that themselves. It's absolutely ridiculous to claim women are better leaders for doing more emotional labor and not the rest of leadership requirements.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:41 PM
2

That's terrible. It's been proven over and over that after a certain number of hours of work, your ability to do anywhere near your best is gone. For mental jobs, it's 6 hours before brain burnout for the day. After that, you get progressively worse and worse mental ability every hour after. 16 hour days are not good for anyone.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 07:00 PM
1

I think they were being sarcastic
/r/MensRights28/09/21 06:18 PM
9

That's phimosis and it should go away by puberty. If it doesn't, stretching exercises make it go away for almost everyone else. Very rarely is circumcision necessary to get rid of it.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 05:17 PM
2

Every time I see that, I put in my info. I get 1.4 % Apparently, I'm a good catch.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/21 04:25 PM
6

At least they have called it what it is. Most articles or groups would have said 'a sexual relationship' or 'seduced' instead of the actual term it was.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/21 03:04 PM
2

I like your username
/r/RedPillWives28/09/21 02:10 PM
4

I have noticed the woman being the one to talk about those encounters more than the man.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/21 01:44 PM
3

Maybe your cats aren't trying hard enough
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/09/21 02:20 PM
5

As far as I was aware, isn't 24k real gold?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/09/21 12:20 AM
14

China has just outlawed feminizing men in entertainment media (I'm assuming that includes ads as it includes all actors)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/09/21 12:17 AM
2

False accusation rate is on average 28%. That is significant. And indisputable.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 07:52 PM
1

A single word is all it takes to get a man arrested and permanently banished in society. Women will do all they can to not have someone check their accusation and just believe them. I've seen an entire office ruined by one person doing that outside of work. That's more power than than physically being bigger.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 07:43 PM
1

That's not true at all.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:44 PM
3

I dislike the phrase 'whatever he wants'. I'm not meaning you are wrong, just that when that phrase is used about sex, it puts all of the onus on the man to be good at sex and know what she wants. Then she gets mad he doesn't do exactly what she wants. It's a communication issue that is instigated by that phrase as men hear that phrase differently then women mean it.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:43 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202103/why-men-need-feel-desired This might answer your question
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:40 PM
4

China is having a serious problem with men not wanting to work or start families. Enough to start blocking all entertainment media that doesn't portray men in masculine father roles. They can't get people to have more than one kid still. Even after removing the one child policy
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:42 PM
7

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/202103/why-men-need-feel-desired The responses about their SO's making the men feel like a walking penis is apt here. Men and women are more than just a body.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:27 PM
13

The other way yo look at it is if a woman was eyeing you, it doesn't give permission to touch her. Same here. Eye candy is eye candy. Not hand candy.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/21 04:17 PM
1

Changes every month? It's typically a set amount set by income in the US. If it was a percentage with some verifiable proof it was spent on the kids, I would have no issue with it. It's only supposed to help pay for the kids, not completely pay for everything for them. Edit: I understand the paying for experiences and other things like that. No issues with those (I agree with your assessment). I just want some record to show it is meant for something for the kid. Which is hard to enforce or prov…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/21 03:02 PM
8

They were understood to mean the exact same up until identity politics took off less than a decade ago. People misconstrue them being different when they mean the same but usage is different. Language is gendered, people have a sex. I don't understand how people don't get that.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/21 02:30 PM
1

The per diem issue would have been solved regardless. It was just that the men had a more recent contract negotiation so they had a more up to date number. The women's team would have been updated to the same number no matter what.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/21 02:14 PM
29

I've never had a man call me a misandrist for holdong the door. Women have called me a misogynist for holding the door for them though. Your example is terrible. Interfering with a mugging will most likely get the person hurt.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:21 PM
2

That is a terrible take. Is was implying you were not worth respect for not dying in their place. Or the pre-WWI movement of feminism where they mailed bombs to people. No defense of feminism will ever be justified for the acts of terrorism committed by them.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:31 PM
2

Even in WWII? It's been an issue forever that women ridicule a man not willing to die for them or their beliefs. Their goals? What goals were solved during WWI? Or even WWII? No feminist causes were successful during either war.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:12 PM
1

https://borgenproject.org/human-trafficking-in-the-netherlands/ Even legalization causes issues that aren't resolved easily.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:43 PM
1

Most places have you prepay for time or services requested.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:40 PM
0

It's the opposite. More sex trafficking if legal. https://borgenproject.org/human-trafficking-in-the-netherlands/ Legalization increased demand but not supply. Which increased trafficking to increase supply.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:40 PM
2

War requires many other support roles than fighting. Medical is a big one. A lot of those who refused to fight or could not fight helped with medical. Many health studies were done of them to improve the supplies and such that the troops were provided. That did not stop the white feather movement of both world wars though. Almost entirely a movement of women to insult and belittle men for not dying.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:35 PM
1

It's already been passed, so the courts are now able to determine if it constitutional. Previous rulings are only precedent. It can influence but should not be an absolute.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:28 PM
2

What I don't get is why the conscientious objectors in WWII aren't talked about in school. They did help the war effort in other ways than fighting. (many volunteered for medical studies or experiments or helped industry at home) I know that the feminists of that time ridiculed and belittled anyone not willing to fight and die in WWI and II though. So it might not be taught to hide the negatives of feminism of the era.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 01:56 PM
0

IQ tests or anything similar are ok if only compared within their same culture and community. Different cultures can't use the same tests effectively.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 01:51 PM
1

Studies have shown that a child's math preference or skill is derived from the father figure in their life.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 01:49 PM
1

Can't tell if you are saying that the legislatures pushed for gay marriage in the US and not that the Supreme Court struck down anti-gay marriage laws so that no state could Constitutionly outlaw them.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 01:30 PM
1

This is a good take. Thank you
/r/MensRights22/09/21 12:16 PM
1

While I agree with your second sentence, how does free market capitalism help this situation?
/r/MensRights22/09/21 12:11 PM
2

I'm a little biased with this, but if I found out a friend was cheating on their spouse, I would tell them. I might wait for more proof, but they deserve to know.
/r/RedPillWomen21/09/21 04:21 PM
1

The last Kaiser of Germany.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/09/21 12:55 PM
1

That is a unique description. I'll save it for later re-use if you don't mind
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/21 08:18 PM
3

I view it as a privacy thing. Why have a stranger go through my stuff? Where I work, all cleaners and maintenance personnel have to be escorted to do their job. I can't not do that at home with someone cleaning or working in my house. Plus, the cleaning takes maybe a couple of hours a week at most for me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/21 01:37 PM
2

You can make an assumption based on her verbage. She states 'live with them' not 'live together' or 'they live with her' so the assumption is she lives in their house. She also says 'even in two income households' implying the relationship only has one provider and she would have stated she paid a portion of bill or living expensives if she did. Those assumptions are based entirely on how she said what she said, which is important. With no other context, we can make that assumption until she mak…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/21 01:24 PM
1

I would upvote multiple times if I could.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/09/21 01:19 PM
1

Can you PM me a link to the original post? I want to read the comments. Please and Thank you
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:24 AM
1

I think you spelled it correctly. I'm always thrown off by that terrible rule. My ex wanted it all the time. Then complained I couldn't keep it up and basically told me that I am not a man because I am not always horny and wanting sex.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 12:39 AM
1

I'm not really disagreeing with you. Just saying women can want sex just as much. The sexual attraction and desire are different. I fully agree that men and women should celebrate their differences more.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 09:22 PM
1

Then don't have sex. Period. End of story. It takes two to make a baby and is entirely her choice to not use protection or make sure the man does.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:23 PM
1

Women want sex just as much as men, just not as noticeable since women are not visual like men are. How many literotica novels are marketed to men?
/r/MensRights15/09/21 07:22 PM
11

There is a r/pussypass sub you could post it to.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/21 06:50 PM
1

28% provably false on average The actual range is between 10 and 41% being objectively false. Feminists campaigned against the military's sexual assualt investigation techniques in the 80s/90s that showed around 40% provably false in the military. They tried to expand it to civilian circuits before the campaign to shut it down.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 06:28 PM
0

Dense... A small tiny fraction of a thing does not make it correct. Accuracy is important and stating handling finances in place of spending money is a misnomer. Handling finances is the gaining and spending of money. Not just spending. Women spend more. A piece of handling finances. That's like saying all watches are rolexes because a fraction of watches are rolexes.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 06:23 PM
0

Handling finances is more than just spending money. Women are the biggest consumers in the economy. That's spending money not handling finances.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 06:13 PM
1

The number of false reports is about 28% of all reports. 28% is not miniscule.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 06:09 PM
1

The most recent studies have it on average of 28% of false allegations.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 06:07 PM
2

Oh, that wonderful tale. A parody insulting the senators of rome by implying they were all women in disguise.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:38 PM
1

That's because the sex toy market is almost completely marketed to women.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:32 PM
1

An old roommate of mine did that same thing with his wife. Told her he could go longer without sex than she could. She proved him right.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:28 PM
1

Abortion is not a right. It is at best a privilege, it is most definitely not a right.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:11 PM
2

What perks? Women have way more benefits in society than men.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:09 PM
0

It's not the handling of finances they asked about. Women tend to spend more money than men. Consumer market is heavily women.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 05:06 PM
6

FIFA pays bonuses, not US soccer. If FIFA gives more to men, it is not on the US to take their pay and redistribute it to non-players. The men don't get paid if they don't play. The women get paid just being on the roster.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 03:33 PM
3

In a strange defense of the last point, it's been something my brother pointed out. His wife will tidy up and say that was cleaning but when he cleans he means that he dusted and vacuumed/swept and that sort of thing. It's talking at cross-purposes to each other.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/09/21 01:34 PM
2

More reported. The key word is reported. History is written by people and they focus on what they want.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/21 02:02 PM
8

Especially since at least 28% of all accusations count as unfounded or false https://www.cmrlink.org/issues/full/unfounded-sex-assault-charges-trending-up-in-dod-reports
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/21 01:30 PM
3

I was permabanned from politics for saying that. They claimed it was 'phobia' as if I have a fear
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/21 10:25 PM
1

The most recent stats are from 2016, I think.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/21 05:02 PM
1

I was called all sorts of things for even suggesting that a woman is mostly responsible for getting herself pregnant.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/09/21 03:49 PM
5

I agree with you. Methodology changes by sex but not the inclination.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/21 07:15 PM
11

Same is true for mass attacks. Men typically do the mass shooting, but women are more likely to mass poison. It skews the analysis of mass murderers as poisonsers tend to not be noticed by the public as much.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/21 05:29 PM
18

I got banned from there for saying pre-nups are not universally protected and enforced.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/21 05:02 PM
28

Most caught serial killers are men.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/21 05:00 PM
1

As long as you realize where you can grow and actively work on being better than you were before, there is no reason to put yourself down.
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/21 03:24 PM
1

If she is who I think, she has a son. I feel so bad for that kid. She will not be a good mom to him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/09/21 08:14 PM
2

I get weird looks saying voice is important to me.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/08/21 08:50 PM
1

The report that openly stated there was no evidence of collusion? No legal recourse without evidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/21 12:51 AM
12

She couldn't even say what went wrong on the date. Just the red flag before it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/21 10:02 PM
1

There used to be a net positive for anxiety and depression, even ADHD. But with modern tech, it is not beneficial anymore.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/08/21 09:29 PM
9

My ex wanted to move to Spain. Your comment would explaon why she really liked it there. She would fit in.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 07:11 PM
1

Love the username
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 06:55 PM
1

I was banned from that third one for saying prenups are not perfect. Many judges throw them out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/21 06:43 PM
1

If you have not already read it, the book 'the five love languages' by gary chapman should help. If you follow some of the advice in that book, just be aware it can take quite some time to show an impact but it will.
/r/RedPillWomen04/08/21 10:12 PM
1

I wish to upvote this twice.
/r/RedPillWives04/08/21 10:07 PM
3

That second paragraph is just upsetting. She definitely only cares about being taken care of and not about him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 09:26 PM
3

You have to be really bad for your parents to say something like that.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 09:09 PM
7

I don't know if that is worse than an old coworker that I worked with years ago. She said upwards of 20 half/step siblings. How do you even keep track of them all?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 09:00 PM
1

Alright, I get that you're against marriage, but please use up to date statistics. The average first marriage lasts 8 years now. And the divorce rate is in the mid 30s percent. Millennials are marrying less but staying married longer.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre04/08/21 04:35 AM
3

Also, avoid being friends with divorced singles as it increases your likelihood of divorcing
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre04/08/21 04:30 AM
6

This just reminds me of another reddit thread. A guy found out his (now ex) fiance was having an affair with his dad. That would have been even worse if she had gotten pregnant by him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 04:24 AM
7

I was going to ask about that. She seems to old to have a healthy kid.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/21 04:18 AM
3

If only I met someone like you while I was in Europe. So many eerie places and haunted places to visit. And the Kutna Hora. The most respectful creepy place I've ever been. It's not as much fun by yourself and no one else wanted to go.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/21 08:55 PM
1

Yeah, I've known several women who loved to ballroom/latin dance and they were so positive and energetic about it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/08/21 08:35 PM
1

The economic status of the couple is also a huge factor. The likelihood of divorce in the top 33% is barely over 30%, while the bottom 33% have over a 70% divorce rate. And education makes a large difference as well as age when married. People tend to be overly cynical over the average without taking all factors into account. We don't have the best numbers for marriage or divorce due to our methods of gathering the data. But we have newer data as the CDC keeps track of it and publishes it yearly
/r/RedPillWives02/08/21 08:06 PM
1

While I did not cite my 39%, that is the newest divorce rate average. It had lowered since that article. I used that one because no other source had nearly that much data compiled.
/r/RedPillWives02/08/21 07:36 PM
0

Part of it is the inaccurate statistics. Marriage and divorce rates are drastically different between generations. The current divorce rate overall is at worst 39% and at best 1.6% (16.9 divorces per thousand marriages, although I think that one is just the number per year and not overall) Here is a great source for most of that info compiled: https://www.wf-lawyers.com/divorce-statistics-and-facts/# I'm a guy so I can't speak for other reasons why but the false statistics stand out to me as a b…
/r/RedPillWives02/08/21 07:01 PM
1

What sub?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 11:59 PM
10

Is it bad I want to see that argument used in court?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 11:49 PM
2

The way she described the conversation leading to that was weird. Like she assumed date when he did not say it was.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 07:43 PM
2

He never said it was a date, though. She made the assumption it was.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 07:42 PM
5

You forgot the part where she admits she probably fucked up by telling both offers no.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/07/21 02:49 AM
2

I couldn't get past the tattoo. At least it looks like a cleavage tattoo.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/21 09:46 PM
5

They ask because depending on what country and the school, it means debt without any further context.
/r/RedPillWomen22/07/21 09:35 PM
1

I asked OP about that. How do you even measure 'not scorned'?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 05:13 PM
1

What does she mean by 'not low' and 'not scorned'? They sound out of context. Edit: farther down 'not low' is explained but I still don't get 'not scorned'
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/21 04:57 PM
11

It's gotten more noticeable due to online dating. I've only met a few that demanded it in person.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/21 03:59 AM
6

I've got first hand experience with that. Thankfully, I broke it off before it went to far. Still out 10k though. I know it's not as bad as others, I'm just glad I came to my senses before it got worse.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/21 02:54 AM
1

Children who end up in a single parent family as the result of the death of one parent do not have the same poor outcomes as children raised by single parents due to a divorce or out of wedlock birth. This may be because death, unlike divorce or out-of-wedlock childbearing, is more likely to be a random event, not connected to the attributes or temperaments of the parents. The lesser disadvantages for children ending up in a single parent family as the result of the death of one parent may refle…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/21 09:26 PM
2

I should really read that. It's on a long list to read.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/21 08:59 PM
2

You put this very well. Your grandma is a wise woman.
/r/RedPillWives17/07/21 08:40 PM
5

I've never heard that before. Learned something new today
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 03:49 AM
1

That's unfortunately true.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 03:46 AM
2

I've had an extremely lengthy debate over this quote and the modern versions of both of them are only about 10-15 years difference in time. In Arabic culture, the phrase is 'blood is thicker than milk' meaning bonds forged by blood are stronger than the ties of the same mother.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 03:39 AM
1

https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec05/stepfamily There is a difference.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 03:03 AM
2

I used to know a girl like that. Tequila made her clothes fall of. The number of guys that approached me about her at the bar she frequented to tell me that was astounding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 02:39 AM
1

Love the username!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/21 02:32 AM
2

There's a family guy episode about that. It's funny every time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/21 09:11 PM
1

What's your full flair?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/21 08:57 PM
1

Even worse if you look up Eriksonian hypnosis. Basically, making up stories to indirectly try to make you do something. Which is what she is doing in her profile anyways.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/21 08:25 PM
3

I agree completely. Another excellent comment from you.
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/21 04:44 PM
3

First, there will always be contradictions. No one always knows exactly what they want/need. It sounds like contradictions due to being opposites but realize we want something in the middle. Second, no one 'needs' someone else. We want or desire to have someone else in our lives. Hopefully, the person we want has a positive impact on our lives. I want to add personally, cooking just by myself and only for myself is boring. It's way better to share a meal and cook together. As for men going for t…
/r/RedPillWomen08/07/21 04:50 PM
3

I wish more women had that mentality. I've thankfully been finding it more and more.
/r/RedPillWomen08/07/21 04:41 PM
3

Fellow Carolinian?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/21 12:16 PM
6

Karat is also used for rings. It's for gold purity. So she's asking for a 3K gold ring (even is she meant carat).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/21 06:46 PM
11

She's asking for a 3K ring which is around $200 or less. Karat is for gold purity. Carat is for diamonds.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/21 06:44 PM
6

She used karat instead of carat. She wants a 3 karat gold ring apparently. No diamonds mentioned.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/21 06:41 PM
8

As Pelosi has stated. A glass of water with a D next to it could get elected in her district.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/07/21 05:11 PM
1

Damn. 500k a year is the top .6% That's almost 12 times the median US income and 8 times the average. That's a lot of money to go through so quickly.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/07/21 04:34 PM
1

I've seen the international dating sites for eastern Europe. So many are only on there because guys in their home country won't date them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/07/21 03:22 PM
1

South Carolina puts a divorce on the fast track if your spouse cheats. 90 days instead of a year long process and no alimony to the cheater.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/07/21 11:05 AM
1

It's from longer ago than I thought. I stumbled across it only recently, though. It's archived. https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/aaz0eo/i_think_the_glorification_of_single_mothers_is
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/21 06:10 PM
2

I've been searching for it and can't find it anymore. I'll look harder for it. It depends on when. If you are early in the relationship (even married for a few years) it is the woman failed to vet properly. If the man leaves after you've been together for a while (or after the kids have gotten older). It is on him. But the comments on that post were trying to blame men for not wanting kids or being deadbeat fathers when it's like you chose to have sex with him. Not his fault you chose him for se…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/21 08:35 PM
1

I can't link it directly here due to the rules.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/21 04:41 PM
5

There is a post in unpopular opinion about this. The comment section was abysmal though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/21 04:40 PM
3

There was a post I think on unpopular opinion that was saying it is her fault for bad decisions in guys and the comments were crazy. 3/4 of the comments were saying it cannot be the woman's fault and that it is men that are wrong for not wanting kids.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/06/21 04:35 PM
4

Have you read 'the surrendered wofe' or 'the empowered wife' by Laura Doyle? The women over at redpillwives reference it often for marriage help.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 04:47 PM
2

I love your username.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 02:10 PM
3

Him saying he doesn't have feelings anymore could be that he is trying to convince himself of it.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 02:01 PM
3

Most of us don't care about the 'formal' education of a degree. Yes, we want a woman who is intelligent, but you don't need a degree for that. We are more likely to look at the relationships in your life and your outlook as deciding factors than your education level. That said, I know of plenty that will look for that for appearances, not because they really care themselves.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 01:58 PM
9

I'd prefer this over someone who only got a degree to get one.
/r/RedPillWomen25/06/21 01:49 PM
4

The friends thing is rarely out of the blue. The same nonverbal cues that make you appear warm and open invite people to approach you. It's a double-edged sword.
/r/RedPillWomen24/06/21 09:04 PM
1

Goals right here.
/r/RedPillWives24/06/21 08:46 PM
3

Those have been on my reading list for a long time. I need to read through a ton of books.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/06/21 01:37 PM
1

Some of them might not, but I've come across way too many them in the wild for it to not be serious for many on that sub. The way they defend it is just as bad as a cult.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/06/21 03:23 AM
1

That site is terrible and misleading like the one used by luscious. It blatantly cites the wage gap as if it is undisputed and a fact that women are paid significantly less.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/06/21 06:31 PM
3

It is a study. It was self-administered online for amost 7,000 of the only 10,000 people they referenced for it.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/06/21 06:25 PM
1

That study is misleading. The single category it cites as anyone not married, in a relationship, or co-habiting.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre22/06/21 06:20 PM
2

World of Warcraft
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 04:59 PM
38

South Carolina has a great law about that. If you want to fast track divorce here, you just have to show evidence of potential infidelity. Doesn't mean it happened just that reasonable chance it could have and the cheater loses all chance for alimony and most other monetary benefits they might have gotten. Even if you are legally separated, any romantic relationship with someone other than the spouse counts. So if she filed for divorce and met someone during the year separation, it still counts …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 04:55 PM
1

Who is the interviewer? She is dating one of the hosts of a podcast she keeps appearing on. It would explain a lot here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 01:41 PM
3

After a quick google search, it says she was in prison at 16. And did hard drugs before then, at least she claims heroin before she went to prison.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 01:02 PM
3

People don't want to acknowledge that relationships take work. They just want the Hollywood ending and that never shows past the wedding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 12:27 AM
6

Suspiciously specific for the last one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 12:22 AM
2

Anyone else see the 'duty dating' article at the bottom of the page? It uses some of the same stock photos (laziness right there) and basically is just telling women to accept every date invitation they receive. The exact opposite of most of the other articles.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 12:18 AM
3

You are right, but many don't want to put in the work to do it themselves.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/06/21 12:02 AM
2

It's the average that gets referenced. It will vary but health/lifestyle and genetics play a big part in it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/21 08:35 PM
0

A lot of federal jobs only require a degree. It does not matter in what field. (it's damn terrible as they are not supposed to require degrees anymore unless it is absolutely needed for the job)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/21 04:24 PM
1

That is a great response and very detailed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/21 04:17 PM
1

Don't use dryer sheets for certain things. Like do not use them when you dry sheets or towels.
/r/RedPillWives21/06/21 04:12 PM
1

That's a wonderful username
/r/RedPillWomen19/06/21 03:55 PM
6

You have said this way better than I could.
/r/RedPillWomen16/06/21 02:03 AM
2

Why would you consider those not of high admiration?
/r/RedPillWomen16/06/21 01:29 AM
1

https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/editorial/bs-ed-1205-maryland-school-rankings-20181204-story.html https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/03/30/baltimore-city-public-schools-promoted-student-with-013-gpa-while-spending-a-14-billion-budget/?sh=4f29abac63dc#:~:text=EDT%20%7C5%2C733%20views-,Baltimore%20City%20Public%20Schools%20Promoted%20Student%20With%200.13,Spending%20A%20%241.4%20Billion%20Budget&text=A%20Baltimore%20mom%20recently%20learned,three%20years%20of%20high%20school. …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/21 10:17 AM
3

Alright, there is something wrong with the first two studies. Though I won't refute the results, the studues are limited. The first one is only in Baltimore, MD (education issues and demographics are going to be biased there). Not the best place for a diverse study due to demographics and the second study was specifically about african american women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/21 02:40 AM
10

I'm not trying to refute your point but the data from the US differs. 41% of single fathers have a cohabiting significant partner but only 16% of single mothers do. https://www.lackeypllc.com/blog/2019/november/single-fathers-single-mothers-and-child-custody-/#:~:text=The%20census%20data%20reports%20found,a%20mediator%20or%20the%20court.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/21 02:26 AM
3

It"s less denial and more that statistics back up more white people having issues with cops than black. The statistics are taken from the cop end though, so percentage of black population stopped is probably worse but what is seen is overall numbers. The media blows every interaction between cops and minority groups out of proportion.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/06/21 02:29 AM
3

For most guys, it should not be a red flag. But it depends on why they got divorced and if you actively work to prevent the same issues in your relationship.
/r/RedPillWomen12/06/21 03:48 AM
1

I don't get the 'listens to future' one. I'm at least 9 of these. Thankfully. Y'all can have her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/06/21 03:58 PM
2

The water reference is about astrology. She mentions more than most as she says placements so she is referring to the whole chart and not just sun signs like most.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/06/21 03:56 PM
4

Try meetup.com or church groups. Meetup lets you find groups with similar interests.
/r/RedPillWomen07/06/21 02:43 AM
8

Losing your kids before you is terrible. But the viking thing is good. I'm torn between a funeral pyre or being turned into a diamond.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/06/21 12:36 AM
1

Thank you! Examples for you... To me at least, it's the soft, breathy whisper when you're really happy and close. Or the sound you make when you fully relax in someone's arms. Not the best examples but I hope they help a little.
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/21 11:20 PM
3

I'll confirm the cooing and purring part. At least, it can be very attractive depending on the situation.
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/21 08:39 PM
3

Context please. The title does not match the post. She says he needs to put in effort but never says anything about her side except to say it is her loss or what she brought to the table.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/06/21 04:19 PM
8

Read "How to win friends and influence people" by Dale Carnegie. It goes over a lot of different ways to get along with people and resolve issues. Most of it boils down to giving the other person a way to save face and back out. Lead with 'I feel' or 'it comes across as' statements instead of 'you always' or 'you never'. And always follow up a statement with a clarifying question that summarizes what you think they mean without accusing them. Such as 'you feel X when Y happens, is that right?
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/21 02:09 PM
1

Don't say "when you do X, I feel Y". Phrase it as "I feel X when Y happens". Do not imply it is him, just the action and it will alleviate most defensive responses.
/r/RedPillWomen02/06/21 11:48 AM
4

How does your mom know that man?
/r/RedPillWomen28/05/21 11:06 AM
2

Dancing is fun. I'm a guy and ballroom dancing is definitely one if the first things I look into when I go somewhere new.
/r/RedPillWives22/05/21 07:17 PM
3

I'm glad you're both happily married. Twenty years ago and they still hold it against you? He must have been devastated when you broke up. Still not an excuse, though. They've never tried to patch their friendship?
/r/RedPillWives21/05/21 09:38 PM
5

That's how a good friend of mine met his wife.
/r/RedPillWives21/05/21 08:05 PM
1

Share them if asked but letting him know should be fine for many.
/r/RedPillWomen21/05/21 10:14 AM
2

Not at all. The only social media like thing I would recommend is Meetup and that is only to find groups that share interests/hobbies. It's not meant for endless online but meeting up with people in person.
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/21 12:45 AM
3

This is amazing advice whether you are a man or woman
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/21 12:42 AM
5

I see from a previous post, you don't want your own children. That will put a damper on a lot of men since most of us want our own kids. What qualities are you looking for in a man?
/r/RedPillWives18/05/21 04:54 PM
1

3rd wave is the current one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/05/21 06:47 PM
18

Ask her about Gamestop
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/21 07:00 PM
1

I had to look it up: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=HB10
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/21 06:09 PM
1

What country if I may ask?
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/21 10:11 PM
2

For agreeable or warm, are you naturally positive towards people? As in seeing them positively? When you want to play devil's advocate, ask yourself what benefit it really brings to the discussion. Does it really enhance the conversation? Is it important enough to warrant a counterview? And if you decide to do so, know that you will need to find something you and he will agree about or have a constructive conversation about.
/r/RedPillWives13/05/21 10:08 PM
2

It's a bit late now but I will remember for next year.
/r/RedPillWomen10/05/21 10:55 PM
9

I'm never sure about saying happy mother's day to a friend. My own mom does not like someone not family saying it to her but I think I should say it to any mother I am friends with.
/r/RedPillWomen10/05/21 10:35 PM
4

I appreciate you posting these.
/r/RedPillWomen10/05/21 10:33 PM
5

I would write into the agreement about not having people over all the time. Don't specify just the boyfriend.
/r/RedPillWomen09/05/21 01:07 AM
2

When you say she is moving in with you, is there a written agreement between you two?
/r/RedPillWomen09/05/21 12:48 AM
12

It's not expressed properly. It should be said as men are wired to look at other women. It does not mean men lust after other women. For reference, I'm a man.
/r/RedPillWomen07/05/21 06:43 PM
13

That is very specific
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/05/21 11:50 PM
8

SC It is just the alimony though. It does not impact child support or the property division.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 11:20 PM
20

I'm glad my state has strict alimony laws. If she cheated, she would get 0 alimony. And the bar to prove cheating is low. Like only needing strong suspicion low.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/05/21 09:52 PM
1

Have you tried to look for a long term relationship with someone in Australia?
/r/RedPillWomen05/05/21 01:54 PM
3

I'd like to find something like that, too.
/r/RedPillWomen05/05/21 01:21 AM
1

Read the book "How to win friends and influence people" by dale carnegie.
/r/RedPillWomen04/05/21 07:43 PM
1

That is some confidence you have. I would love to be that confident.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre02/05/21 11:21 AM
1

I'm curious, do you get any hate from women from FDS for the pickme sub?
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre01/05/21 06:31 PM
2

I do security and that is depressing to hear. But I do the security management side of things
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/04/21 06:08 PM
14

I'd love a woman like that.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre20/04/21 11:57 PM
2

Her anthem is enough to say pass. No other data needed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/04/21 11:43 PM
15

I see I'm not the only one that noticed her first descriptor is cancer. And not the astrological sign either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/04/21 05:47 PM
2

I'm struggling to find things to do I enjoy. I ised to love to read and now I can hardly force myself to do so. And covid ruined my other hobbies since I can't meet up with groups again yet.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/21 05:51 PM
4

Ok. I thought I waited long enough and built up a nice nest egg until my first gf wrecked all that. Was 28 and had to start saving all over again.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 10:55 PM
1

How old are you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 10:52 PM
1

They don't compete though. Enneagram is for trauma while the MBTI is for how you process/view information. You can have many different personalities under the auspice of a single MBTI type as it is how you process the world around you (not who you are as a person) and the enneagram is how you coped with issues and how that affects you now. For context, I'm a man.
/r/RedPillWomen07/04/21 12:41 AM
2

This stuff is why I get frustrated whenever I see the comments or posts about needing to make 6 figures to be successful. I don't make as much as I want, but it is enough and lets me do what I want to do. Success is however you define it.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/21 12:03 AM
8

We found Krieger
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/21 01:40 AM
5

It's pretty funny in english, as well
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/03/21 09:48 PM
2

Yeah, people will post about getting a ban message from there without ever visiting that sub.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 10:24 AM
3

You'd be banned from there and called a pickmeisha for posting in there. They ban anyone who has posted in a pro-men sub.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/21 10:32 PM
11

Yeah, true green eyes are only in 2% of the population.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/03/21 12:00 PM
5

Their post on AHS has been removed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/21 09:55 PM
3

That's because they actively discourage relationships.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/21 10:40 PM
1

Unfortunately no. I have a plan though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/21 01:09 AM
1

I've looked into ASU. It's close to 30k tuition a year.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/03/21 01:03 AM
1

I misread the ABET site. It was EE tech. Oh, well. At least that crosses of another college for me to consider.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/21 10:54 PM
2

She probably wrote it when she was 18 and has not updated it since she turned 19.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/03/21 03:18 AM
3

EE I did not consider EE technology for online at all. https://www.abet.org/ Edit: I triple checked my own link and it is EE tech. Apparently I misread when I went through it months ago.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 11:19 PM
12

That's awesome. Thank you for your service. I guess this means I need to work on my fashion style and work out more. I missed getting LASIK in the military due to the doctors lying about me being qualified for it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 05:22 PM
4

I really wish the manosphere would make up for him. What do you mean?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 05:02 PM
–

Sadly, DeVry is only one of three places that offer an EE degree fully online that is ABET accredited.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 04:56 PM
–

How did you go from a 4 to an 8?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 04:54 PM
6

I don't know why #9 but I'm glad I served. Y'all can have this one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/03/21 03:38 AM
4

It's on my list to read. Way too many books to go through on that list.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/21 08:24 PM
4

What book is that reference in?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/21 07:57 PM
1

Do you onow the median amount? It should be a better indicator than average when there are several that make an extreme amount more and skew the average.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/03/21 07:48 PM
3

Her anthem is all I needed to to say pass.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/21 10:32 AM
13

Please don't profane such a great word
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/21 03:55 AM
3

So she is the female version of Good Luck Chuck?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/02/21 10:50 PM
2

They are just parodying what many misandrists would say. I'm sorry you went through all of that. I don't honestly know what to do or say in this situation other than that.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 04:34 AM
3

https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/what-are-positive-masculinity-norms-study/#:~:text=Since%20then%2C%20researchers%20have%20identified,of%20humor%2C%20and%20male%20heroism.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 03:15 AM
3

Who said excusable? All I said was it is both nature and nurture.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 11:14 PM
3

I was not trying to contradict you. At least, I did not mean to come across that way. I was only adding about the physical differences that are caused by the hormone difference.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 08:44 PM
3

Only a part. Nature is a significant factor as well.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 08:41 PM
2

That would be a nurture influence on the difference, not a caise but a contributing factor to the issues.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 06:16 PM
2

Honestly, that is more a nature thing. Estrogen and testosterone do different things for the body. Women live longer due to the differences as well. Estrogen is an anti-inflammatory which has a lot of health benefits for recovery from injury or damage. Testosterone assists with growth. Primarily muscle and bone and their strength. Here are two articles on their effects on the brain and development: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879914/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17178554/#:~…
/r/MensRights21/02/21 06:15 PM
1

Every time I see a post on twox, it is filled with misandry comments and is most of the time anti-male itself. Every time. If you can't see it, then you have no business commenting over here.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 05:29 PM
7

Zero fucks given
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/21 10:34 PM
4

What's the rest of your flair?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/21 04:32 AM
3

Let's just say some people take 'dog lover' too far
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/21 03:54 AM
1

Every time you say straight, you affirm my argument. There was already a term. No new one needed. World population is majority women, not men.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 11:04 PM
1

No word is necessary to describe the normal in that manner. It is identity politics that care enough to demand terms for everything and change meanings when it is unnecessary. You already sound like someone who tries to force people to use latinx. Which is not accurate as the language is gendered naturally.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 08:15 PM
2

I did because I am counting lack of it as counting.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 02:40 AM
7

It's a made up term to describe the normal or majority group of people used as a derogatory term.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 02:28 AM
2

How did you get that particular flair?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/02/21 11:01 PM
5

You can pay a couple hundred dollars for a professional to do the background check for you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/02/21 12:18 PM
2

I'm so glad I work in an office by myself. I was crazy laughing at that imagery.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/02/21 09:13 PM
7

Love your flair!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/21 10:28 PM
3

This is a very healthy and loving relationship. I want that kind of communication in my future relationship.
/r/RedPillWives02/02/21 04:07 PM
4

Apple products are more privacy minded and so are harder to get useable data from without their permission.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/01/21 10:38 PM
5

I cackled reading this. Thanks
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/01/21 10:16 PM
2

Most women I meet the old-fashioned way, I work with so. i am apprehensive about dating them. Although it does give you a good idea of who they are first.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/21 01:13 PM
8

Yes
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/01/21 05:49 PM
13

Pick me-isha
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/21 11:39 PM
10

Every company I have applied to has stated no photos or personal info on the resume or it gets discarded without consideration.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/21 06:47 PM
3

It's why I site the site Elena's Models. Not allowed to post pictures of your kids and if she has kids, it is specified in the info required by questions (and also if they want kids or not)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/21 12:09 AM
5

You should be able to find a mental health or apppintment line number for whatever base he is stationed at and set up an appointment for both of you. Reach out to his leadership if you can to get them onboard for making sure he is there. I know not all bases will accept dependents at the on-base care, but that is the better one to get him to go to. If you are religious, reach out to the chaplain corps on base as well. Not specifically for religion, but they will sometimes do a couples retreat th…
/r/RedPillWives14/01/21 03:18 AM
4

This is suspiciously specific
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/01/21 12:02 AM
8

Word of the day... Pulchritudinously Means physical attractiveness* for those unbothered to look it up or get it from context. *brought to you by Merriam-Webster
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 01:55 AM
4

What the hell does she mean by NSA? I don't think the agency wants anything with her either.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/01/21 01:47 AM
3

What country if I may ask?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:41 AM
9

FOMO?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/01/21 11:39 AM
10

You're right. The issue is making it your personality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/21 02:30 AM
49

Drinking is overrated.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/01/21 02:08 AM
5

In the US, a verbal contract is not enforceable over a certain amount. At least where I am, it is $500. So no verbal deal over that amount.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/21 08:56 PM
3

Female is not improper. It is more accurate than women in most contexts and is used in scholarly and scientific articles for accuracy. It is up the the female to prove she is a girl or woman. Not on us for using the term for either until proven otherwise. Edit: in most contexts, proper english is the correct way to use the language. Any other use is improper or slang which makes a language more difficukt for non-native speakers
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/21 04:07 PM
2

We shoupd just say non-male instead of female and see how they react
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/21 03:55 PM
3

The females in the linked post want to be called 'Ladies' I had to fight the urge to point out that Lady has a very specific connotation for class and being refined which don't fit many people at all.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/21 03:39 PM
2

Female is a noun as well. And can be properly used as such. Straight from Merriam-Webster: noun Collegiate Definition 1a: a female person : a woman or a girl b: an individual of the sex that is typically capable of bearing young or producing eggs
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/01/21 03:37 PM
1

Goals right here.
/r/RedPillWives31/12/20 05:50 PM
1

I love your username
/r/RedPillWives31/12/20 05:47 PM
2

I'm proud to say I have never actually heard that song.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre30/12/20 11:56 PM
1

That's why it is supposed to be protected. Not left open without even password protection on a closed intranet. That is on the IT or medical who fucked up there.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/20 11:16 PM
5

I love that flair
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/12/20 10:23 PM
3

Your link does not work
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/12/20 10:11 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/12/20 12:29 AM
9

Wha do you mean by free use or CNC?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/12/20 10:36 PM
15

My hatred of Spain gets new justification.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/20 02:13 AM
2

It specifies dating but dating and being in a relationship are not the same.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 11:25 AM
2

Ok
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 03:53 AM
1

True. I just wanted to clarify the context. This is super depressing to learn about.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 03:52 AM
2

This is why I lock my phone with uber complicated passwords. Had friends who woupd crack weak security on my phome for fun so learned how to make it crazy hard to access.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 03:15 AM
3

Don't tell that to the FDS cult. They will demand a marriage proposal every day just to reject it.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 03:05 AM
1

The FDS poster's username is apt. Inanna is who they all aspire to be. And fail at. Inanna was spurned by Gilgamesh and so sends a monster to ruin the lives of all humanity until Enkiddo dies. Sumerian mythology is a fun read.
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 02:57 AM
1

Explain this a little please. It looks like it should add up to 100% but does not so what metric are they using for the percentages?
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 02:39 AM
2

For real, I've been trying to figure out what that meant for a while.. thank you
/r/AntiFeminists24/12/20 02:37 AM
1

It's about women dating to only get what they want from men. In a very negative and toxic manner. Like if a woman cares about her partner or likes him for more than money, she would be banned from that sub for being a 'pickmeisha' as that sub calls them.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:40 AM
2

r/lgbdropthet It got banned though
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:33 AM
7

You can get hard even in a coma. It is only physical stimulation needed.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:27 AM
1

I wonder the reaction if we did this for international women's day?
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:46 AM
2

Taking all major factors into account, there is no gap. Single women with no chikdren make more than men their age and experience level do. Only once multiple kids are in the equation do guys make any significant amount more and that disappears almost entirely as soon as you take into account that mothers take more time off for their kids than dads typically do.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:28 AM
2

We need to write more stories for this
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:22 AM
1

How did what trigger him? I read the article you linked and it did a poor job explaining what triggered him.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 12:52 AM
3

International men's day came first
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:12 AM
2

Then we should start promoting the help the victims of women mentality on international women's day
/r/MensRights20/11/20 11:19 AM
2

Good luck to him. I hope he gets full custody. We don't need any more kids being brought up to hate a parent for no reason.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 11:10 AM
1

It's not a men's right issue. That I agree with. It is something most dads want though. Even if not much time.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 03:09 PM
8

We do, the laws/judges in most countries don't agree with us.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:32 AM
3

Coldness? I have yet to see any coldness when dealing with any other man than one I would consider an enemy in any other context.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:21 AM
2

I don't believe one was made. One of the people invited to form a council for women and girls complained that one was not being formed.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 12:53 AM
1

Record their 'jokes' and when they go to lecture you, play the recording back. Every time they try to start lecturing.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 12:36 AM
1

The part that is even more counterintuitive is that it is the father that helps the son learn to cope and manage his emotions. Here are the stats on growing up without a father : 90% of runaways/homeless kids are from a fatherless home 63% of youth suicides 71% of high school dropouts 85% of kids with behavior disorders 75% of adolescents in chemical/drug abuse centers come from fatherless homes Daughters of single parents without a Father involved are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 711%…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 12:31 AM
1

That is brainwashing propaganda levels of insanity requirement.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 02:31 PM
3

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/special-person-day-fathers-day-change-campaign-dr-red-ruby-scarlet-parents-children-one-parent-a7917681.html
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:39 PM
1

https://www.divorcemag.com/blog/why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men#:~:text=A%202015%20study%20by%20the,even%20higher%20rate%3A%2090%25.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:36 PM
1

It says that in the Boy Crisis. For a better example: https://www.divorcemag.com/blog/why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men#:~:text=A%202015%20study%20by%20the,even%20higher%20rate%3A%2090%25. Realized I replied to the wrong comment
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:35 PM
1

Wow. So you don't understand how to see from another person's point of view? I am not assuming everyone else. I am imagining one person who would be offended at something not being exact how she wants it to be would react.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 06:11 PM
0

How so? By placing myself in someone else's position and seeing how they could potentially see it? I don't care if it is a man or woman who does my hair
/r/MensRights29/10/20 03:03 PM
1

Oh.. Her daughter. I misread it as his daughter. No arguement with your point
/r/MensRights29/10/20 03:01 PM
1

I did not mean that if you got that from my comment. I meant it as her denying that a man could do the job.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 12:51 PM
1

I meant her as in the one she goes to for her hair, not necessarily one she owns.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 05:07 AM
2

That would be hilarious to me. Especially the reaction of the feminist upon seeing that guy in her hair salon.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:21 AM
1

They do. Ten years of the military proved that to me. That is the literal sense though. It couod be meant metaphorically
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:17 AM
4

Yosaf was right to say what he said. She was in the wrong completely and then tried to project (gaslight?) onto him. He wants a good role model for his daughter. She is not it.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 01:10 AM
2

I would check out the book The Boy Crisis. Warren Farrel has several good points about families and fatherhood backed by research. Fatherless children are more likely to make less money, commit crimes, commit suicide, die younger, and have health problems. He cites a study that accouned for all other factors other than being fatherless. Ethnicity was accounted for and really showed how strongly having a father in your life helps your future regardless of race. Males are more likely to commit sui…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 12:56 AM
3

It's about the same as the civilian world. At least in the US. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/10/is-sexual-assault-really-an-epidemic/
/r/MensRights27/10/20 01:16 PM
1

Love latin: Carpe Vinum
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre26/10/20 09:07 PM
1

Here is a link to the explaination of the US's emergency stockpile: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/03/fact-check-did-obama-administration-deplete-n-95-mask-stockpile/5114319002/ I will give credit and say I did not know that the stockpile has been around since the early 90's and barely updated. It looks like both Bush and Obama used a lot of the reserves up without replenishing them. I will not refute the part with trump gutting the task force. I don't know the full story …
/r/MensRights23/09/20 03:33 AM
1

Link does not work for me.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 01:17 AM
1

Trump did not gut them initially. The supploes people were claiming he got rid of was used up under obama and never replaced.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 01:13 AM
1

The wheel of time is such a good series. And Robert Jordan was a grea man to meet.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 01:03 AM
2

What's the book?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 11:28 PM
3

Really? So much for fairness in science
/r/MensRights31/07/20 07:10 PM
2

It!'s just like a post from TwoX about getting tubes tued requiring a husband's signature and claiming the reverse does not requure the wife's. It does, and I have never heard of the wife needing a signature to get tubes tied before. This post ended up in the popular posts.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 07:06 PM
1

Never split. Warren buffet has said he will never split the shares of his company.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/20 02:11 AM
6

Right!? Apollonia Ponti gives great advice for dating and relationships. She really does like telling men about what shit tests a woman will try and how to pass them or recognize them and move on from her.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre21/07/20 05:15 AM
2

'clean start'?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/20 05:09 AM
1

Anyone willing to bet she would be an FDS woman if she was on Reddit?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/07/20 05:07 AM
1

What's up with the insane distances in all of these profiles. Almost all of them seem to be 6000+ miles away. Are you actively looking for them?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/07/20 05:24 AM
1

+3 for the Burgle reference.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/20 07:06 PM
82

At least she got 11 years, even with her 'not remembering the incident' and being a mother.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 09:23 PM
3

New? What is new about this behavior?
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/20 11:14 AM
5

That does not fit the victim culture narrative. In all seriousness, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 12:04 AM
1

Only FDS to go. As far as I know
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/20 04:27 PM
5

Only approved posters can see content on it now. It seems they don't want to be banned like black pill feminism was.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/20 09:45 PM
1

The dad is definitely NTA in this. He did go about it the wrong way but his daughter needs to have her sexism corrected. There is no excuse for hatred of an entire group based on something they cannot change. No one else has control of her actions other than her. Every comment on that post blames an outside thing for her behavior when it is entirely within her responsibility to act properly.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 12:58 PM
1

May we get more of your reasoning? Or more specifics?
/r/MensRights22/06/20 11:46 AM
4

Their account is mainly about cuckolding. Nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 05:50 PM
6

Don't get what you are trying to say
/r/MensRights20/06/20 05:49 PM
32

If I ever meet any woman who is part of that sub or pink pill feminism, I know to stay the fuck away from such women.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 05:44 PM
2

Just report it to the reddit admins. It worked with black pill feminism.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 05:32 PM
1

Don't engage the troll. Just report for violating the rules and move on.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 10:30 AM
15

Link to article please
/r/MensRights19/06/20 02:11 AM
10

Whoever said that does not understand people. Everyone is encouraged to soften their statements like that so the message is received better.
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/20 11:35 PM
3

Signed
/r/MensRights16/06/20 11:36 AM
1

There is an option for rude, vulgar, or offensive.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 04:42 AM
–

just report all of their posts on https://www.reddit.com/report and go about your day.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 02:14 AM
18

Technically, any child born that way would be the same as a baby born from incest
/r/MensRights15/06/20 12:53 PM
1

How is it interesting?
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/20 05:18 PM
8

That's not the point. They are leaving the option of punishment open for something he did not commit.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 08:50 PM
1

I don't live in England but after reading that link, it does say to contact CMS yourself about setting up an arrangement. EDIT: one of your other posts has comments about a DNA test. Have you gotten that done?
/r/MensRights12/06/20 07:34 PM
1

What does FBA stand for?
/r/MensRights12/06/20 07:25 PM
3

Tl;dr for the article: A general was removed from his position over allegations for abuse of his girlfriend. She had broken her arm and the army CID had taken that incident and claims by his ex-wife of abuse to investigate him for domestic abuse. No evidence was found to corroborate the claims but the army is still holding open the possibility of punishment even though he has been proven innocent. He was not present when his girlfriend broke her arm.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 02:54 PM
3

The poster even mentions it is a parody of a post.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/20 10:17 AM
4

Someone has tried to tell me that same line before. It does not work that way at all.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/20 04:21 AM
2

Most of us one here are not advocates for anything illegal, we just want to support each other. So if someone says something on here without any disputing facts, we will be supportive. I am not condoning his actions, just that many men do not get the support from the system that they need so we try to do so. I hope things get better for you, OP.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:10 AM
1

Most of us have no idea what the penal codes mean for what he did. Could you elaborate? EDIT: cover up his name and case number and post it please. Most people are not aware of specific laws or the nuances of them.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 02:03 AM
8

Well, the next time someone tries to talk about international women's day, here is a list of the alternative holidays for the same day: Check your batteries day Girls write now day National be nasty day National peanut clusters day National proofreading day
/r/MensRights09/06/20 01:57 AM
1

That I did not know. Thanks, stranger for informing me. Although I was just being sarcastic with my previous comment.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 02:43 AM
1

Nice name censoring
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:33 PM
11

Welcome to our community! We try to be as understanding as possible with any questions.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 01:18 AM
3

I realize that. Just report it everytime an article shows up like that and enough reports will get an action, even if only to get us to stop.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/20 03:34 PM
3

Just report the sub as a hate sub to the admins
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/20 03:28 PM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:39 PM
2

What does NAWALT mean? Or even AWALT? The sidebar does not explain beyond saying don't do it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/20 06:45 AM
2

Good bot
/r/MensRights02/06/20 02:23 PM
3

There are several feminist subs on Reddit that are quite serious in their belief to kill all men (or just 90% in some cases). EDIT: I am not arguing that it is satire, just that some feminist groups have taken it literally.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 12:26 PM
18

The #killallmen hashtag being popular is proof that many feminists want to do that to men.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 06:31 PM
1

I know, right?
/r/MensRights30/05/20 03:09 PM
3

I'm so glad it says satire above the title.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/20 03:26 AM
9

She has a son. I feel so bad for him.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 02:25 AM
3

Yes, that is the overall goal. Even if we keep getting flooded with misogynists or trolls.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:42 AM
3

We want to end the bias in legal or societal values that are heavily geared towards benefitting women over men. Feminism seems to masquerade as equality and really just wants all of the perks and benefits of equality without the consequences or responsibility of equality.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:35 AM
2

You should do your own research whenever you read any article that claims certain facts.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:26 AM
11

Check out the original leaders of feminism in the early 1900s. They were very anti-male toxic then too
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:25 AM
2

Thank you and all the ladies on that sub
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/20 03:15 PM
2

I admit that the subreddit name would have turned me away without any context. But I am following it now. I would love to know how it feels to be spoiled.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/20 01:27 PM
1

It won't open for me
/r/MensRights22/05/20 03:25 PM
0

This does not have anything to do with this sub
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:41 AM
4

So many awesome parents in those comments
/r/MensRights21/05/20 12:59 AM
2

Now I want to see a picture of the 'dirty' couch
/r/MensRights18/05/20 12:05 PM
2

I can't open that article
/r/MensRights18/05/20 11:22 AM
1

I'm interested in participating
/r/MensRights17/05/20 11:27 AM
5

Not the right sub for this
/r/MensRights04/05/20 01:54 PM
5

r/pussypassdenied is more appropriate
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:01 AM
8

Not really the right sub for this
/r/MensRights26/04/20 12:58 AM
12

Where is she getting her information from? Because the law and reality are very different
/r/MensRights20/04/20 10:04 PM
9

The original poster of that calls herself a praying mantis
/r/MensRights18/04/20 04:06 PM
1

Friends with each other or friends with you? That does make a difference because the second guy is niceguy material and that is not condoned by most of us. How long were those relationships and did you have certain relationship conversations with them?
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:51 AM
2

Not a big deal. It is just unusual. I wonder why it would not let you post there. Cheating is never justified so I will offer no excuses for them. People will jump through mental gymnastics to justify themselves doing it, though. Are you basing your statement off two ex-boyfriends?
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:10 AM
3

That is true.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 02:03 AM
10

Not the right sub for this question, r/relationship_advice would be better. That said, you displayed boundaries and enforced them when crossed which is a universally sought after trait (at least according to all my reading on similar subjects) People (not just men) cheat when they feel like the relationship is not fulfilling their needs.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 01:58 AM
17

That sub is supposed to be a sub for making fun of the 'not like the other girls' posts that appear in social media. That particular post seems to be blaming men for girls acting that way. It's not our fault that girls do this. Their behavior is their responsibility.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:49 PM
36

Her mentioning Dr. Seuss as a therapist makes me believe she is lacking in the very department that I want in a SO.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:03 AM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:07 AM
1

Please don't go close enough to do that with a ten foot pole.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 02:39 AM
1

May I get a link to the original video? (The one that they are playing in the corner) I've seen it before but don't remember who made it.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 01:26 AM
8

That she did. But the always naked thing was definitely a part of it. (No issue with nakedness normally, just a giant window facing the street did not give privacy in that room and she insisted on being naked where the public (i.e. kids) could easily see her.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:05 AM
30

The roles reversed are me and my ex. She would throw off her clothes as soon as she walked in the door. (I lived in a first floor apartment with a wall-sized window). It took my upstairs neighbor's daughter walking by the window before she would listen about being nude all the time at home.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 01:00 AM
5

Not at all what I expected. The group she 'infiltrates' is the red pill women group from Reddit. It's not like their goals are secret or anything.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 01:39 PM
7

Did you read the comments hidden by downvotes (the replies to those comments are definitely saying women are better than men at leadership)
/r/MensRights17/03/20 04:07 AM
124

A good chunk of the comments on it are people just trying to say that as women, they are better leaders than men. That's the issue with it.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 01:21 AM
1

What movie?
/r/MensRights12/03/20 05:04 PM
4

Great video.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:33 PM
2

Translated Tl;Dr please and thank you
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:30 PM
6

I thought I was weird for this exact thing.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 12:17 PM
1

That sounds very informative but I don't have an Instagram
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:24 PM
9

That is all pre trial. It does not say anything about a verdict/sentencing. Only being charged.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:57 AM
11

DNA proof that she did it and she still says it never happened.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:11 PM
2

Please fix the spelling.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:15 AM
2

I read one comment using the term LVM and realized that that sub is just as bad as FDS
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:41 AM
3

Context is in the comments on the cross-post
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:26 AM
52

The comments from a CPS investigator in that article are spot on. Victims don't always support prosecuting their abusers. That does not mean that the abuser should not be sent to trial.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 01:02 PM
13

It actually calls it a heinous crime in the article. And she pled guilty so she will probably have to register as a sex offender (article doesn't say) so no more teaching for her regardless. I do agree she got off way too easy for what she did.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:51 PM
1

You sound like a keeper to me.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:43 PM
3

It even says rape in the article. The headline is misleading garbage.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:16 PM
4

Lord is a term for a man. It would be landlady if it was a woman.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:50 AM
3

Only 800 signatures to go!
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:54 AM
14

She replied to several comments on her original post (post now deleted) but the comments are still on her profile. Everyone told her YTA even feminists which is saying something about her.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:15 AM
3

So much satisfaction to see the plea for funding at the bottom of the article and ignore it.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 08:04 PM
2

The father got custody of the son to make sure it gets done.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 10:46 PM
2

They should test the injection that has been approved in India. It needs to be available everywhere.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:31 PM
5

Agreed. I was just trying to get the other commenter to explain.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:35 PM
14

I admit I skimmed the list but I am not getting your point. I agree with you. The article is still blaming men though for the last two by saying it is the man's fault for not doing what the woman wants. Please explain if I am not getting it.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 03:57 PM
4

Interesting article
/r/MensRights05/02/20 03:54 PM
24

It basically claims self-defense for everything but the last one
/r/MensRights05/02/20 03:51 PM
5

It's not that cheap to put cameras around an entire house. At least high quality cameras that would not be easy to spot and avoid acting out in front of.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:24 AM
2

I completely agree. It's interesting to read marriage advice from married divorce attorneys about stuff like that. It's eye opening to see.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:49 AM
10

Ok. It sounds like you should talk to your parents about your aunt's behavior. You don't deserve to be treated how she is treating you. If that does not work, them I would suggest getting out of the house as soon as possible and never associated with the aunt's family again.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:41 PM
2

How old are you?
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:39 PM
5

If you have to fly cross-country to visit all the time, I understand the guy's perspective. My extended family is a continent away and we all understand the difficulty of visiting often, we make do with what we have. He is not an asshole, IMO.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:38 PM
1

That subreddit is atrocious to me. So many people arguing just to argue.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:10 PM
2

True. I guess I follow Ron Swanson's money hiding methods
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:46 PM
5

That is definitely always rule #1.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:42 PM
10

I'm wondering why the discussion about kids was not done before marriage. Don't marry someone who does not agree with you about having kids/number of kids/how to raise them. It only leads to worse problems. Do you know if a pre- or post- nup could cover that?
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:41 PM
23

Read through some comments. Too toxic to continue reading
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:38 PM
5

Scary. Trying to get rid of due process.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:09 PM
5

That's kinda funny but not a genius move. Would have been better to bury it or convert to gold.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:02 PM
4

Loved this video.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 08:58 PM
6

I checked out FDS and there are no posts about her being the abuser. They have completely ignored it.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:17 PM
2

A part of that is the current social environment we tolerate. A lot of kids pick that up from parents behavior.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:16 PM
3

If we wrote one about treating women how we treat female dogs, they would try to take us to court.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 02:13 PM
7

That video is eye opening. My plan of starting my own country is getting to be a better idea all the time.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:32 PM
2

Honestly, I am still confused about it some. Books only say what to do but not the details I need to be better at physical intimacy
/r/MensRights01/02/20 02:45 AM
7

Thank you. I will definitely do that the next time I see some insanity from FDS. It needs to be banned.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:52 AM
19

I still don't know how to report that sub on mobile. The amount of hate on that sub is terrible.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 11:34 PM
2

All of the comments on the right side are cringy to me.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 07:28 AM
3

Those are interesting articles. Thanks for them.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 03:49 PM
2

If you look at other ancient cultures, Sparta and Athens are the two main ones I will mention. Most of the mysogyny claims from history are due to Athens and the similarly cultured cities in Greece. Women married young and had no rights to property or voice in government. They were forced to dress in extra layers to hide themselves from the public. Spartan women were treated very different than that. They were married way older than most cultures at the time (18 minimum, usually early 20s) and w…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 03:25 PM
1

The second version of Modesty you are referring to is more akin to humility.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:05 PM
1

I added some more to my previous comment.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:03 PM
3

So many of their comments were so negative. And hypocritical, if a man was not modest, they would attack him for sexual assault or harassment. Modesty is about being attractive for your personality. Highlighting your physical features like some people do is basically saying you have no interest or personality. When the feminists claim shame about it, they are basically saying that they have nothing positive about themselves outside of a physical feature. Look at nature and how males react to fem…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:47 PM
2

I just noticed that. It did not even occur to me about the pun.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 07:26 PM
3

www.noharmm.org/boysmaysue.htm for Australia https://www.arclaw.org for America
/r/MensRights23/01/20 05:32 PM
1

I am looking up for for the US but as of now, I have law offices in Canada and Australia that say yes, you can sue for circumcision.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 05:19 PM
1

The homepage has all the links to cases on it. I am not going to post every single link on there in the comments.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:51 PM
2

Check out the Stella awards for the ones that have won.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:49 PM
1

https://stellaawards.com It's all real cases of stupid lawsuits that won. I would look for more right now but internet is terrible where I am.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:38 PM
1

Even so, I did mention I have others.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 04:17 PM
9

Can we get a tl:dr for those of us who don't have an account on that site?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:11 PM
7

I have more examples for other countries (at least Canada)
/r/MensRights23/01/20 01:45 PM
30

Yes, yes you can. www.cirp.org/news/mndnewswire04-29-03/ EDIT : I could not find the article for my original claim so it is now this one.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 01:34 PM
1

No one wants to see unexpected dick pics
/r/MensRights23/01/20 05:22 AM
1

Thanks for the heads up, kind redditor
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:31 AM
1

She's not even that pretty. And seriously, boundaries need to be in place at the start. No spending my money until marriage and pre-nup before that as well.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 03:27 AM
3

I know, right? Although I have found several that were broken.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:24 AM
2

Did not realize that.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:05 PM
2

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-35650616 For a little bit of explanation on the caste system. This is just one example. Anyone outside of their caste is anathema to them. And depending on the religion of the people involved, being touched with the bottom of a shoe is an insult akin to saying you are worth less than the dirt I walk on.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:46 PM
2

India is fucked up. They still have a caste system that encourages abuse against those lower in caste than you.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:14 PM
5

No issue at all in any picture of her using a pump. It must be her hand that is the issue not the pump.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 09:59 PM
1

'rational' how many people (regardless of sex) are rational?
/r/MensRights22/01/20 02:59 PM
7

If that is allowed, please post in this sub about it. It would rule out moving to the UK for good.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:55 AM
1

I would hit back. Harder. Consequences worth it if I get randomly slapped
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:47 AM
41

That author needs to be banned from ever getting an article published on any platform. Holy **** insanity.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:35 AM
1

She should not keep custody of her kids.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 08:21 AM
5

The article states that heart attacks are misdiagnosed in women. A quick internet search and every site I saw gave the different symptoms for both and the statistics for each. Men are more likely to have heart attacks earlier in life which is why it is probably focused on more for men.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:07 PM
1

I don't know the ages for this. No article was linked and most of the comments had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:57 AM
2

It depends on the age of the son. Still wrong, just if the son was of age then it is a different issue.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:49 AM
8

That's why I worded my welcome the way I did
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:46 PM
212

Welcome u/exotic4412 Everyone who supports mens' rights is welcome here. We all look forward to the input you can provide in our discussions.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 12:10 PM
1

Well, time to shame my state until they get better. SC and its not quite 28%
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:05 AM
2

Subbed
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:11 PM
3

I don't know whether this is a good or bad thing.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:07 PM
0

Sadly, yes. No candidate is a good choice this time around.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:03 PM
2

I think this is either a bit or a troll. Every post I have looked at so far in this subreddit has the exact same comment from them
/r/MensRights16/01/20 04:57 PM
10

I scrolled trough the comments and just damn. My favorite one was complaining about men not asking her out, either. Had to resist commenting that she is doing it to herself by being on that sub.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:34 AM
6

He was groomed for a year before that.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:32 PM
25

At least she lost her teaching license and has to register as a sex offender
/r/MensRights13/01/20 12:02 AM
1

The last link under the rule is the one I am referring to. Plus there have been recent posts on that sub about dating multiple men at the same time until they are proposed to. It is just saying that unless you are older and have been married for a while then nothing you say is worth anything. Younger people look for different things than older people do, so saying that any advice from a single guy is just preference and worthless is not inclusive or beneficial at all. Even if it is not meant tha…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/20 05:17 PM
1

Have you read all of the links under #9 for their rules? That's the section I am getting my statement from.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/20 04:07 PM
1

The r/red pill women sub states sonething similar in their rules if you read them. Stating that men cannot help a woman get a man or that no man is worthy of their love.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/01/20 03:41 PM
1

Interesting article
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:39 PM
1

What does sjw mean?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/19 02:18 AM
2

Space piracy is an inclusive crime, you know
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/19 02:15 AM
1

A similar lesson cost me $10000
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/19 01:51 AM
16

The US figures of abuse for men show 48.8% have been abused. More than women at 48.3%.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:49 PM
75

We need to petition to get the judge removed.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 09:48 PM
1

You did not read what I wrote. I said that is the standard that they do not. And never said proud either. I said fun to point out as it shows the difference in cultures worldwide and that every group has different standards so people's complaints about relationships in their cultures need to look at other cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:08 PM
1

The comments under that are no where near any sort of usefulness. Most of it is common sense and up to individuals. I've lived in several countries and every one of them has different standards for what is attractive for guys or girls. A few of them had very low cleanliness standards for people. You just keep trying to force YOUR standards on everyone else. It's also fun to point out that there are regions of the world where the only standards for men are no drug/alcohol abuse and no partner abu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:04 PM
2

Nice Scott pilgrim reference
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 08:09 PM
1

Totally stealing the 'played videogames with more character than you' as an insult
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 07:03 PM
3

I was told by a former male stripper that women get rough and touchy with the stripper whether permitted or not (he reported scratches and needing a guard to prevent him from getting injured during performances) but you can't touch a female stripper without explicit consent or it gets you charged with sexual assault
/r/MensRights08/12/19 06:10 PM
1

Link to that video please
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:20 PM
1

If you read the about section on it, there are even worse. And private ones, too.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:15 PM
2

How do you even report a sub? I've come across a few that would make you want real eyebleach
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:03 PM
1

There's even worse ones down that rabbit hole. And private so no one can see their disturbing ideas.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 04:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter