TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

owenrhys Archive

View 24 posts and 161 comments by owenrhys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
100

owenrhys/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:30 PM
75

owenrhys/r/MensRights18/01/14 03:28 PM
42

Questionowenrhys/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:05 AM
19

owenrhys/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:34 PM
12

owenrhys/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:08 AM
11

owenrhys/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:31 PM
10

Questionowenrhys/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:20 PM
9

owenrhys/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:11 AM
7

owenrhys/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:25 PM
5

owenrhys/r/MensRights24/01/14 11:26 PM
4

owenrhys/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:27 PM
3

Questionowenrhys/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:14 PM
2

owenrhys/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:47 PM
2

owenrhys/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:32 AM
2

owenrhys/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:08 AM
2

owenrhys/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:11 AM
2

owenrhys/r/MensRights17/09/14 02:09 PM
1

owenrhys/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:53 PM
1

Questionowenrhys/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:27 PM
1

owenrhys/r/MensRights06/01/15 04:37 AM
1

Men's Rights Newsowenrhys/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:19 PM
0

owenrhys/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:47 PM
0

Questionowenrhys/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:43 AM
0

owenrhys/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:30 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"New or young drivers are charged more, their age is something that they cannot affect" This gives people a choice though in that everyone will be every age at some point (unless of course they die) so it's still equality. It doesn't dicriminate based on how someone is born.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:13 PM
2

When you mentioned prisons that just sent my mind off on one because they're so filled with men so men's rights and the leftist attitude to crime and justice are so intertwined.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:25 PM
3

Yeah I could cut a few billion brain cells out and join the tory party I suppose... edit - billion
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:13 PM
2

Statistically you're right about men loosing out on higher education, but definitely not minority races. Male demographics and racial minority demographics suffer similar injustices. You shouldn't abandon rational politics just because it's also filled with nutters.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 08:51 AM
12

Yeah likewise.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:41 PM
3

Absolutely no response - which I'm not surprised about.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:03 PM
10

You are sort of right - but I really want to see the reaction, and the plus side this way is the honest amongst them will realise their own double standard. Why should I care how the defensive and angry react.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:04 PM
-2

Long- just type it yourself.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:03 PM
16

Well thank you farmer john!
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:42 PM
19

Unsurprisingly, no response yet.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:42 PM
1

I don't think that's fair. I'm far left and support men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 03:03 PM
146

This is how I've phrased in in a post to my ex colleges feminist society page. Should reveal to people their own double standards when they inevitably click the link. I wonder how many will sign... http://i.imgur.com/kB30cGc.png
/r/MensRights10/11/14 03:01 PM
1

So you give up because you genuinely can't respond. Love it!
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:00 AM
-1

My main point: The bottom line here is, for some reason - women are scared to walk in certain places at certain times because of catcalling. The vast majority of them find it unpleasant, and men who know this still do it, which says something about their attitude to women. Especially if you felt it strongly. I thought how scared you actually are didn't come into it at all?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:57 AM
0

Yet every single thing you've listed is what black people, particularly in poor urban areas say every fucking day. Refer to: "Just because I'm against something that is more commonly done by a certain race (and by the way I have no idea how common catcalling is by race) doesn't mean I'm a racist. If only white people commited murder, I'd still be against murder and that wouldn't make me racist." So what you are - is yet another sjw with no real world experience. Er no, I hate SJWs, and I have a …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:53 AM
-1

Could you answer my main point. Also you're wrong about the fear bit. I'm somewhat scared, somewhere in my mind of the day my parents die. That's not irrational but it is unlikely in the near future.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:50 AM
-1

I don't think the video is great, but I think catcalling is a very important discussion.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:46 AM
-2

I didn't say the fear was being attacked. Fear is subjective. You're also slightly misunderstanding irrationality. It is not completely irrational to fear something that is not likely to happen, depending on how scared you actually are. The bottom line here is, for some reason - women are scared to walk in certain places at certain times because of catcalling. The vast majority of them find it unpleasant, and men who know this still do it, which says something about their attitude to women.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:45 AM
0

I'm not demanding any race behaves likes another race. I'm equally against catcalling whether the person doing it is black, white, asian, mixed, hispanic etc. I'm certainly not a classist. I spend most of my time talking against the way class works, and agaisnt wealth inequality. Crime and these attitudes are more common in people of a lower class, because of the poverty they're in. Black people also suffer more from wealth inequality, because of systematic racism. Just because I'm against somet…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:42 AM
-1

About half actually. Elsewhere in this thread I did a list.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:37 AM
-7

It's fine to say have a nice day/how are you doing, but a lot of people also make sexual remarks and other intimidating things, which is not ok. edit - and again here. Downvotes because I say that intimidating people isn't ok.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:27 AM
-1

Ok explain to me in simple terms how I'm a racist.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:26 AM
-2

wat
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:26 AM
-2

can you provide a citation for that? Not irrational at all. In the video, two men actually followed the woman.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:25 AM
-2

What?! Oh my god what. Edit - ok you're trolling I get it
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:17 AM
-2

I can't do maths? What... I do feel I'm wasting my time because of the close minded fuckwits on this thread.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:17 AM
-5

Teach the young men doing this that it's not ok. Educate people that catcalling is not as harmless as it appears. In the long run, less poverty and also inequality by race would reduce catcalling.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:16 AM
-2

They're not irrational?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:15 AM
-5

No one's going to watch a 10 hour video of mostly her walking around. edit - how could anyone possible downvote this? Does anyone seriously disagree with me on this point? Eugh this is such a circlejerk, just like /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:14 AM
-4

Just because it's worse elsewhere doesn't mean it's not bad there. Saying no rarely works, and either way he shouldn't be following her for five freaking minutes.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:13 AM
-5

Ok I'm going to tell you then. I think all of these are not ok things to do/say: "smile. SMILE!" "Hey what's up girl, how you doin? Someone's acknowledging you for being beautiful. You should say thank you more" "God bless you mami... Damn" "Hey beautiful" "Hey baby" "Sexy, American Eagle" "Damn. DAMN" Both of the guys who followed "Damn how ya doin'?" "Hey look at that - I just saw 1000 dollars" "Damn girl" So about half of the things people said are unnacceptable. That's 50 intimadating/patron…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:36 AM
-2

Oh my god you're exceptionally stupid. Because she didn't tell them to 'fuck off' it's not harrassment? Is that a joke?! I give up with you.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:32 AM
-2

Staring at her ass saying 'damn' isn't sexual? Describing her ass as 'sexy' isn't sexual?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:31 AM
-6

She got 100 catcalls, only a few were included.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:31 AM
0

Ok well copy/paste this and tell me which ones are/aren't ok. "How you doin today? I guess not good" "smile. SMILE!" "Hey what's up girl, how you doin? Someone's acknowledging you for being beautiful. You should say thank you more" "God bless you mami... Damn" "Hey baby" "Hey beautiful" "How are you this morning" "Have a nice evening" "Nice." "Damn. DAMN" "Sexy, American Eagle" "Hello good morning, god bless you have a good day alright?" (follows for 5 minutes) "Damn how ya doin'?" "How ya doin …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:28 AM
-3

She was followed for 5 minutes, that is harrassment. If you want to call the rest catcalling, then fine. And did you seriously just call it the " 'to "? Are you 12?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:19 AM
-3

Saying hello/hi is fine but making sexual remarks is not ok. Probably hard to see winks in the video since they'd be walking the opposite way...
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:16 AM
-2

So your opinion is that women feeling intimidated consistently and being catcalled is not a problem?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:15 AM
-1

Do you think men should refrain from catcalling? edit - and here the downvoted are for.... asking a question?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:05 AM
-6

Just because it's not illegal, doesn't make it ok.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:03 AM
-2

Ok call it catcalling then. Still a big problem.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:00 AM
-4

Well in that video, she got harrassed 100 times in 10 hours. How often have you got harrassed as a man?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:59 AM
0

Well if you agree I'm not sure what you're doing in this sub. Very stupid comment. Harrasment is a big problem for women, I have an 2 sisters, and I live in one of the most liberal cities with little poverty. There are some stupid MRAs who think harrasment is actually 'nice' or isn't an issue, but they're completely wrong. Women find it intimidating and it's often rude, threatening or offensive. I'm here because I care about men's and women's issues.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:35 AM
-1

Ah. Who by? Do you have a link to the other subreddit where it was brigaded from? I agree with the top comment to be fair. It's just annoying I can't post the link again for a real discussion here
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:25 AM
0

Ok so I was wrong when I said the 'extreme' end of the DM readership. It's actually pretty common. And also the DM is a horrible paper...
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:39 AM
1

The average Guardian reader is not an 'insane sjw' - hell I read the Guardian. The DM on the other hand....
/r/MensRights29/10/14 02:31 AM
-1

That's not true - it attacks labour very frequently. This series it's got a special labour character and just this episode it did another honest subtitles of Ed Miliband. It's taken the piss of Labour (many times) far more than UKIP (I think twice). It does most definitely target big businesses and that's certainly a good thing. Tax avoidance in this country is a MASSIVE problem, and they've done very well to highlight that in funny ways. Again Israel (I think they've covered that about once, ma…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:38 AM
2

Exactly - it's easy to simplify it down to 'shop work' but clearly there are complex differences. For example, shop floor you get to sit down on checkouts and warehouse you have to spend time outside.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 08:02 PM
2

They're completely sepeparate jobs though, so it's not like everyone applpies and then people get put in each job.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:07 PM
3

They simply do not have a case. When you apply, you apply for either a warehouse job or a shop floor job (or something else). The warehouse job is less desirable so if you work that job you will get more money. There are no pay descrepancies on the shop floor or in the warehouse, the warehouse just has more men and the shop floor more women.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:57 PM
2

In the UK it's 16. I think that's right, though when I was 17 I would have happily shagged a 15 year old.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:02 PM
2

That would be the cdc nisvs 2010
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:46 AM
9

It does. It says that he undressed her and had intercourse with her - implying he 'did' it all. It also says she remained passive throughout the incident.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 02:00 AM
2

Just to point out - I have nothing against female police officers (or soldiers or firepeople) SO LONG as they're held to the same physical standards as men.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 09:33 AM
3

Look at all the other days, they are one and a half hour slots. It's clearly a typo.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:28 PM
3

I was linked to a post here about me after I got doxxed by some radical feminists (was involved in men's rights before though, I just didn't go on reddit).
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:18 PM
4

I think we as a subreddit should do more to support gay men.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:02 PM
0

Huh?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:37 AM
2

I can't remember - probably something to do with 'Blurred Lines'.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 11:21 PM
3

haha I was banned a LONG time ago in /r/feminism
/r/MensRights20/07/14 05:29 PM
1

Dude, get back in school - learn a bit before you open your greasy little mouth. How old actually are you? 13? 14? Grow the fuck up, listen before you speak. You are completely incorrect, because changing 'dad' to 'partner', does not cause any problems for men, but it does provide lesbian couples with the same inclusivity as heterosexual couples. As I have explained, the reason it's different for 'mum', is because the book is for mum and mums only. It's about the biological changes they should e…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:44 PM
2

No because there is 100% chance of a mum being involved but not an 100% chance of a dad being involved. Simple maths. Jeez I used to be an MRA, but assholes like you have killed the movement just like people have done with feminism. Someone says something you don't like and suddenly they're a 'anti-man'. You're so locked up in your own little bubble, it's cult like and terrifying. Get out more.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:10 PM
1

Lololol you're a proper little tard aren't you. I did not say lesbian mothers sould get special regard/treatment. If I thought that, I would have been advocating changing 'dad' to 'second mum'. Using partner includes EVERYONE of BOTH sexes, so avoids special treatment.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:01 PM
1

At what point did I say anything tantamount to believing inclusivity is only important when for women? Answer, I didn't.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:39 PM
1

No because that's unnecesary. In moderation, sometimes inclusivity is important. Like with parenting.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:26 PM
4

Forgetting offense, it doesn't make sense for lesbian partners to have 'dad'. Using 'partner' means the book will actually make sense to everyone reading it.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 01:37 PM
0

That's not what I'm saying, but if there can be an ammendment to a book to make it more inclusive (and this isn't taking anything away from dads), then that should be made.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 01:36 PM
3

When lesbian couples use a sperm donor, pretty much.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:12 AM
0

False comparison since men and women are biologically different. The involvement of sperm donors ends at the point it is given in to a clinic, this is a legal matter. The involvement of a surrogate is all the way up until the baby is actually born, and sometimes after. Mum is usually the term when talking about family, and mother is usually the term when talking about biology - those things are true. Don't really get your comment, and I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:03 AM
3

Lesbian couples usually use sperm donors. In the booklet, when it referred to 'dad', it will have been talking about things to do with caring for the pregnant woman etc. This doesn't mean the sperm donor, it means the partner.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:47 AM
4

That's a strawman argument, I'm not saying the word dad is universally offensive, I'm saying that using it in this handbook is going to cause offense to lesbian couples, and using the word partner is inclusive of everybody.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:45 AM
13

This is a book for someone with a baby in their belly - it has to be a woman. This book would be read BY THE SURROGATE. This isn't a book about preparing to have a child, it's about preparing to actually shit out a fucking baby. For gods sake, can't people read the damn link first?!
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:42 PM
-2

That 1 person was right. Perhaps lots of people saw it and thought it was offensive but couldn't be arsed to complain.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:40 PM
-5

Recognising the existence of lesbian couples is erasing the role of men in parenting? dude wat
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:15 PM
4

You would need to systematically study this. It just sounds like coincidence. Unless you're aware of them being open about allocating women places near their home for 'safety' or whatever, this doesn't sound like anything deliberate.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:49 PM
13

You're looking at it the wrong way. But I'll try to respond to your point - lets say (made up figures here), that 80% of mums are with a male partner, 15% are without a partner and 5% are with a same sex partner. Using 'dad' is inclusive to 80% of these people. Using 'partner' is inclusive to 85% of these people. Not mentioning the partner is only inclusive to 15% of these people. So clearly the best option by % inclusivity is 'partner'.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:43 PM
-21

A man has to be biologically inolved, but in the cases of sperm donors, the fact that the sperm happened to come from a certain man is where it ends. A lesbian woman needing a sperm is not going to be thinking about where the sperm came from. Also 'dad' is the term usually used when talking about family, 'father' when talking about biology.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:38 PM
0

Also bear in mind the people who were complaining about 'dad' being changed to 'partner' were saying it offended them so that was just about offence and being PC etc.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:31 PM
33

It's a pregnancy handbook for women. So the person reading will 100% be a woman, so there are no worries using 'mum'. However, since the partner of the woman reading may also be a woman (if they are lesbians), then 'dad' is not inclusive to them. Thats why it makes sense to remove 'dad' but not 'mum'.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:26 PM
44

This is a handbook for women having a baby. This means the partner may be a woman. So there may be no men involved. I think it's fair enough in my opinion. So long as they recognise the other party as 'partner'.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 06:24 PM
1

Why is an accusation worse?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:16 PM
1

Child molester maybe, but this isn't even an accusation of a crime. I would bet these women are being honest though. To go to that effort - if they just wanted to screw with him they could have done a much better job with a sexual assault accusation for example.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:16 PM
1

Nah by being disingenuous. It's obvious that having naked pictures/videos of yourself put into the public sphere is worse than having your name hung over a bridge for an hour. You are aware of that, but you just want to make a point about sexism. Classic MRA/feminist thing is to always try to frame it like it's as bad/worse for men/women.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:09 AM
-1

If your entire argument is one big insult then yes you're grasping at straws, but I just added 'twat' on top of my point, because you were in fact being a twat. It's very easy to identify people by their whole fucking bodies. A number of victims of revenge porn are identified and it destroys their lives. And in fact, it's more worrying with that because there could be other people with the same name if there's no picture. I clearly didn't intentionally miss the point of the first guy, I pointed …
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:59 AM
-2

Don't be a twat - the point is, his naked body is not being shared with the world.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:54 AM
2

Hardly.... This is completely different. They may be naming him, but they're not publishing photos/videos of him nude without consent.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:10 PM
1

Well arguably it's for both. They wouldn't employ the same system if, for example, the average conviction rate was 1 person per 1000 guilty and the false accusation rate was extremely low, we might not operate on an innocent until proven guilty basis.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:36 PM
1

My guess is based on the fact that I've trawled through these studies trying to find some legitimate reasoning that can suggest a decent figure. I didn't find one, but I did end up reading a lot about motive and demographics and that kind of thing. To put it in simple terms, there is more reason to falsely accuse someone of rape than other crimes, but there's no reason to suggest there is some kind of outbreak of false accusations recently, and hence the number is likely just above that of the a…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:34 PM
1

No you just sound like a retard - go eat some chicken it'll do you good (Y)
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:32 PM
1

If you think 'leftist' (is that a thing?) and feminist are the same then you're a fucktard. Kanin's famous study was just as shit as all the others - it didn't take into account so many factors like I dunno lying, which is exactly what he was testing for, and the sample size was minute and it's from a very long time ago. Get off your high horse - you sound like a 13 year old (and I really wouldn't be surprised if you said you actually were). Your semantics bore me, goodbye.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:31 PM
1

I don't live in the US, I live in the UK. I'm all for innocent until proven guilty - but that's the chosen system because we assume over time we'll get to the point where we can catch most criminals.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:29 PM
1

Well we were talking about different things then. I'm talking about both moral and legal innocence, you were just talking about legal innocence.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:17 PM
1

It is far more destructive TO the justice system - because of course the justice system works on the fairest way which is innocent until proven guilty. However, it is someone's personal opinion that if they were given the choice to imprison one innocent person or let 10 guilty people go free.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:12 PM
1

And there's plent to say it's less common - the point is, we can't fucking know, because it's one person's word against another's.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:10 PM
1

No but seriously, you've written so much shit in one sentence. Firsly leftist and feminist are not the same thing - I'm very left wing, I'm not a feminist (well I am as much as I'm an MRA - I'm egalitarian). Secondly to assume my political position just because I point out we can't fucking know the frequency of false accusations is dumb as. Finally, even if it was acceptable to assume where I stand based on that one point - the assumption wouldn't be that I'm a feminist, because they're usually …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:09 PM
1

My guess is you're a fucking retard?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:07 PM
1

You assumed that when I said: Just because no action is taken, it does NOT mean they're innoent. I was talking about someone being found not guilty. I wasn't though, I was talking about all the different stages - including before charge and before prosecution. Frequently, they believe a crime has occured - but decide not to press charges because there is not enough evidence.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:06 PM
1

I'd love to hear you say that to a real victim. I agree with that statement, but the original quote is mainly talking about the impact on others - and there will be undoubtedly a huge negative impact on the victim if the perp is found not guilty.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:02 PM
1

Repeat offenders tend to me men (you can look that up) Outside of prison, the large majority of rapists are male. You can't say it's pretty equal - that's true of DV, but not rape. Either way, my point still stands even if you remove the genders. Letting 10 criminals walk free pretty much guarantees that more people will be raped, so I don't see why that's so much better than falsely imprisoning someone.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:01 PM
-4

So that translates as "Oh it's fine, let em rape again - traumatising a man by letting him go to jail is much worse than letting a woman be brutally raped..."
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:16 AM
2

Any fucktard who spews any kind of bullshit along the lines of "__% of rape allegations are false", be that 2 or 80 percent, is not worth my fucking time. The vast majority of the time, we don't have a fucking clue whether it happened, so we can't know what percentage are false - and it's really fucking variable by country and region. Frankly I believe (educated guess) that it's probably around 16-18%, higher than the false accusations of other crimes, but not crazy common like 40%. And as someo…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:46 AM
0

You are incorrec there. Just because a court does not convict a person of a crime, does not mean they legally accept that it didn't happen (if that were the case, the accuser would be by definition, be found guilty of perjury), it means they cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that the crime occured. Furthermore, if the case reaches court, they can give a special verdict. That is WHY not having anonymity is such a problem, because unless the court finds the accuser guilty of false accusation, t…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:41 AM
-2

It is better to let 10 people who are guilty go then imprison 1 person who is innocent. That's an opinion, which I'm unsure of whether I agree with. I think it deliberately tries to mask the fact that letting guilty people go free has a terrible impact on the victim. It's not like letting ten guilty people go free isn't going to have less of a devastating impact on many people's lives than imprisoning 1 innocent man.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:35 AM
2

I completely agree with that - but OPs statement implied that all or most of those found not guilty, were innocent. We know that this is not the case - convicting rapists is very, very difficult.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:29 AM
6

I agree with anonymity for accused, but please can we stop saying this is a priority - this reinforces the stereotype of the MRA just 'fighting' feminism. Our priorities are more common and serious issues like suicide, homelessness and custody rights.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:02 PM
4

"There are far more innocent men named where no further action is taken" Just because no action is taken, it does NOT mean they're innoent.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:52 PM
2

I don't understand how they could possibly think women are more legally disadvantaged.....
/r/MensRights17/06/14 09:23 AM
0

I agree with you except for the To that I asked "where is an appropriate space to talk about circumcision?" And was told "nowhere." MR groups don't (always - there are a lot of misogynists around) actively say no one should/can talk about women's issues.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:51 AM
1

Sorry but I think he was terrible. We need to stop attacking feminism and just talk about the issues. He would have done much better off if he had just talked about the issues and not gone on a fat rant about feminism (which he's not actually correct about).
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:51 AM
9

TiTP?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:21 PM
-7

I'm pro anonymity for both parties - but I've gotta say you can't just call her a coward. It did mention she was crying after some time - so she obviously felt coerced. Probably some dickhead 'friend' tried to get her to go and press for a rape charge or whatever. She's clearly suffered.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:36 AM
1

Mortal enemy would be an improvement. Or friend of an acquaintance on fb if you prefer :P
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:05 PM
1

woh woah woah FRIEND?!
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:37 PM
1

I've posted what's happened since - and may post this thread on the comments section so she can maybe educate herself. I just hope she reads the survivor stories thread I linked her.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:11 PM
1

I did respond to that, but I'm not sure whether she's going to respond - this was a while ago. My latest : "Read those survivor stories yet? Everyone adjusts there behaviour at night. Men are far more likely to be involved in an attack. Everyone apart from the most huge of men is worried for their safety, I've walked through certain neighbourhoods with keys in my fingers before, but I talk to my female friends about this kind of stuff - and none of them are as concerned as you seem to be about t…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:54 PM
0

I know many feminists who don't think this way at all. This is very much the extremist side (funny one of them called me an extremist at a different point in the conversation).
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:48 PM
1

Once you get passed the first third of comments, it's no longer about that and about the MRM in general.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:17 AM
-11

People should bare in mind that this is not some petty fight - both of them want their child, of course. Those who are saying the mum is 'fake' crying, are not understanding that she is facing the prospect of losing her child somewhat.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:43 AM
2

Yeah I saw that too! The hypocrisy is astounding.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:05 PM
5

I think you're missing the point, the implication is that they only care about the wierd stalker-y bullshit when it's a woman on the recieving end.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:40 PM
1

You misunderstand the apex fallacy. That says that we can still be discriminated against despite filling most/many positions of power - and that we can't judge men as a whole by that top percentile. However, you said we need to reassert our power as men - when clearly it is men that hold the vast majority of positions of power. As for ad hominem - no it was a question, intended to demonstrate to you that I thought your logic and attitude was immature. That's a silly generalisation of feminists -…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:54 PM
3

How am I supposed to refute a sentence which is basically just slurs? "spur their mangina pets into violence" How old are you? 12? "reassert our power as men" ? Dude - we fill up government etc, we have a fair fucking bit of power. And what you think men should have more power than women?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:44 PM
3

Well that first part is not true.... not long ago women didn't even have the vote - they weren't considered worthy of democracy. And if you look at islamic countries now they're clearly the oppressed gender. That second paragraph is ludicrous. Why don't you go join RoK and get away from the MRA? They're about power, MRM is about equality.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:04 PM
2

Hahaha nice try but no - you used the dictionary definition as an argument against the more common use of the word - you can apply the same to 'feminism'.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:07 AM
1

Ok then so I guess you define feminism as "the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes."?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:00 AM
-6

You're well within your right - but it IS misogynistic, and it IS destroying the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:55 PM
0

Since it doesn't just mean 'to hate women' any more - basically "sexism against women". So that's from trying to control women's choices, to flat out saying you dislike the entire sex/gender.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:43 PM
-1

But it does if it's because she's a woman. AKA Criticises person A -> Person A turns out to be a woman -> Not misogyny Observes person A doing an activity -> Finds out person A is a woman -> Because of this, criticises person A -> IS misogyny
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:41 PM
-2

Men don't shave their legs/armpits - men don't need to shave their legs/armpits. Nor do women. The hygiene thing is a bare faced lie - it's about attraction.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:40 PM
1

Wow I didn't expect people to openly be misogynistic...
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:39 PM
2

So it's ok to shame women who choose not to shave? A woman (like a man) can have as much or as little sex as she or he wants.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:22 PM
-1

Shaving? Having sex?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:54 PM
1

They may be your values but they are misogynistic (or sexist if you'd prefer to call it that) values. Thinking a woman should be shamed for not shaving?! Jesus christ.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:53 PM
3

Oh christ - seriously?! Someone help me out here.... Saying that we should shame women for not shaving, owning cats, taking birth control, having sex, dating online, cutting her hair and partying. Seriously?! You don't see anything misogynistic about that?!
/r/MensRights15/04/14 07:00 PM
1

I think most of us are probably atheists, and probably largely liberal.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:09 PM
4

Is there a youtube link or any way of watching it from outside of the US? (I'm in the UK)
/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:53 PM
1

You're missing the point entirely - that's a whole show based around this kind of comedy. The problem is the reaction to violence against men/women on tv, particularly in advertising.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 01:35 PM
2

Why are these all on bodybuilding.com ?!
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:55 AM
1

If I were you I would make a post (not anonymously) explaining what happened, and explaining your situation. If you add in "false reports and throwing around baseless accusations only damage real rape victims lives as it makes it much more difficult to succesfully convict real rapists" that will keep the feminists on board. Just be as emotionally open and honest as possible, and make it categorically clear the accusations are baseless, and that you're personally offended and saddened by what has…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:11 PM
4

"Note that for self reporting, lifetime data is recognised as very unreliable" for what reason?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:05 PM
1

Not BBC shows, but Loose Women has an all women panel. Most BBC panel shows have either all-male or mixed panel shows.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:45 AM
1

I would definitely still call it patronizing. I would feel patronised in that situation, and he was condescending. He spoke down to her and then slagged her off for no obvious reason.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:20 PM
-2

PS which one was it? Maybe you should edit her out - she might feel misrepresented if she's gone to those lengths, and it an be pretty intimidating. Be the better person. EDIT- changed "I might edit her out" to "Maybe you should edit her out"
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:22 AM
-4

I'm just gonna throw this in here, I probably largely agree with you, but I thought you were condescending and patronizing to the woman at 2:58 who was being perfectly pleasant to you, you should seriously avoid that - you'll just piss people off.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:19 AM
1

True, but the adverstising campaign does not reflect this. To me, what you've ctrl-c+ctrl-v'd reads as 'boys can be victims too' which is still not quite the right attitude.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:37 PM
3

More info on that last bit?
/r/MensRights18/01/14 07:44 PM
2

Easier said than done. To change the this is abuse campaign you have to change the mentality of the people running it - not as simple as a few posters (and where do you find pictures of female teens abusing males in non copyrighted pictures etc?). I wrote an angry email way back when, and they just directed me to the FAQ.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 07:44 PM
5

How might a teenager in an abusive relationship get to this website though? From the tv adverts, all of which show males abusing females. I heard the FAQ was changed after complaints also. The campaign is sexist bulshit.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 04:56 PM
1

There's a feminist society at my college (I'm also 17 - living in Brighton). I worried too but they're almost all really great people! There was this one girl (who was part of the group of 4 who started it + run it) who banned me from the facebook page for saying I didn't think it was fair to call Robin Thicke a rape apologist etc and also who was horrible to this guy who asked why it's called feminism and not egalitarianism. That doesn't matter though because everyone thinks she's extreme anywa…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:08 AM
5

-It's called adopt a guy -It refers to men as 'products' -Men are effectively silenced -The logo is a women putting a man in a shopping cart -It's THE MOST POPULAR dating site in France. Think about all those points, it represents attitudes in society about men. The individual issue may not be a big deal, but it's a perfect representation of certain parts of society and that's why it should be noted.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 01:39 PM
1

Britain is a better place than Australia I'd say. You may have got rid of the last primeminster, but (and seriously how can you say PROUD conservative?!) now you've just got some misogynistic asshole in the position. You've not improved at all. I could explain why Britain is a really great place, but it would take me ages so I'm not going to.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:37 PM
24

If you deported every man because men commit 80% of crimes, women would then be, by definition, commiting 100% of crimes. So then by her logic she'd have to deport herself and all other women leaving no humans in sweden. That's progressive thinking right there!
/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:51 PM
9

It wouldn't be considered a joke if the genders were reversed, but it's not fair in this case to immediately expect foul play.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:07 PM
1

Facebook group, do a search.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 11:00 PM
1

Meaning? Men's rights UK is a great group. F4J are wonderful. Even this reddit is mostly great conversation.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:35 PM
2

Those who believe in a fair and equal society for men and women, and those who don't silence anyone with opposing views. Aka not AVFM.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:02 PM
3

In the past I've defended AVFM but recently I've seen them for what they are which is not part of the real MRM.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:26 PM
2

It's the mindsetof "He's an MRA so he MUST therefore be wrong".
/r/MensRights24/11/13 07:55 PM
2

Well I'm a 17 year old dude and (I think) she's an adult attorney in America so I think my method of dealing with this may have to not be using a legal battle.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 02:04 PM
2

Does this mean you would able to hypothetically do this to the @nametheproblem account?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:51 PM
9

Hi guys, it's Owen here (from this twitter). Cheers for all the supportive comments, they mean a lot. To clear a couple of small things up, it wasn't my dad on twitter, it was my brother. My dad and I don't get along and he is quite anti MRM (you don't choose your parents) so it was particularly touching to read "I'd be so proud if this were my son. He's handling this like a man." since I didn't get that vibe from him. He and may other people, even those who are good friends of mine and great pe…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter