TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

patcomen Archive

View 208 posts and 463 comments by patcomen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2543

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:41 PM
1632

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights08/06/18 11:50 AM
568

patcomen/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:30 PM
488

Fathers/Custodypatcomen/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:15 AM
479

False Accusationspatcomen/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:39 AM
298

patcomen/r/PussyPass02/08/14 02:14 AM
272

patcomen/r/PussyPass31/07/14 03:43 PM
221

patcomen/r/PussyPass04/08/14 05:32 PM
200

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:58 AM
196

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights12/03/20 05:28 PM
195

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights26/05/18 11:01 PM
183

False Accusationspatcomen/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:32 PM
168

patcomen/r/PussyPass06/08/14 02:22 PM
166

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:05 PM
165

patcomen/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:42 AM
164

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:27 AM
158

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights12/06/18 07:02 PM
148

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:11 AM
142

patcomen/r/MensRights25/12/14 07:12 PM
121

patcomen/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:20 AM
118

patcomen/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:50 AM
107

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:43 PM
106

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights14/03/20 06:06 PM
103

patcomen/r/MensRights16/12/16 12:46 PM
102

patcomen/r/PussyPass30/07/14 07:31 AM
102

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:36 AM
93

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:13 AM
89

False Accusationspatcomen/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:04 AM
84

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights25/07/20 09:34 PM
82

patcomen/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:47 AM
81

patcomen/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:42 PM
79

patcomen/r/PussyPass01/08/14 04:26 AM
75

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:09 AM
75

patcomen/r/MensRights19/12/14 11:45 AM
74

Outragepatcomen/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:41 AM
73

Outragepatcomen/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:07 PM
72

Healthpatcomen/r/MensRights20/03/20 05:58 PM
70

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:33 PM
70

Generalpatcomen/r/MensRights16/10/18 12:31 AM
67

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights26/03/17 12:41 PM
66

Misleading Titlepatcomen/r/PussyPass31/12/14 02:32 AM
66

Marriage/Divorcepatcomen/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:53 AM
66

patcomen/r/MensRights11/12/16 02:56 PM
65

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:26 PM
59

False Accusationspatcomen/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:08 AM
58

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:19 PM
58

patcomen/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:16 PM
57

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights08/06/18 02:38 AM
57

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:53 PM
56

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:13 PM
53

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:06 PM
46

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:39 PM
45

patcomen/r/MensRights06/11/16 07:24 PM
45

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:05 PM
44

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:43 PM
44

Marriage/Childrenpatcomen/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:41 PM
43

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights25/11/17 02:12 AM
43

patcomen/r/MensRights26/12/14 03:28 PM
41

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights14/03/20 12:59 AM
39

patcomen/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:28 PM
39

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights16/07/20 08:05 PM
39

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:05 PM
38

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:04 PM
37

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:49 AM
37

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights18/04/17 10:50 PM
37

patcomen/r/MensRights27/12/16 12:33 PM
36

Generalpatcomen/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:41 PM
36

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:16 PM
35

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:40 PM
34

patcomen/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:26 PM
34

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:08 AM
34

patcomen/r/MensRights22/01/17 06:32 PM
33

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:43 AM
32

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:47 PM
32

Healthpatcomen/r/MensRights20/03/20 04:44 PM
31

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:20 AM
30

patcomen/r/MensRights02/03/16 10:41 AM
30

patcomen/r/MensRights09/03/17 10:18 PM
30

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights03/07/15 10:48 PM
30

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:55 PM
30

Healthpatcomen/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:00 AM
29

patcomen/r/MensRights17/11/16 03:25 PM
28

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights11/06/20 01:34 PM
28

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights02/06/18 03:54 PM
27

patcomen/r/MensRights25/09/16 12:32 PM
27

patcomen/r/MensRights12/11/16 12:28 AM
26

patcomen/r/MensRights03/10/16 02:39 PM
26

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights26/10/18 09:53 PM
26

patcomen/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:10 PM
25

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:09 PM
25

Marriage/Childrenpatcomen/r/MensRights19/12/19 09:39 PM
25

patcomen/r/MensRights04/09/16 03:55 PM
24

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights23/03/20 01:10 PM
23

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:20 AM
23

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights25/04/17 12:36 PM
23

patcomen/r/MensRights01/01/17 05:05 PM
23

patcomen/r/MensRights08/10/16 04:45 PM
22

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights21/01/16 12:23 PM
22

patcomen/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:48 AM
21

patcomen/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:31 PM
21

patcomen/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:48 AM
21

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights10/07/20 11:45 PM
21

Healthpatcomen/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:33 PM
20

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:09 PM
19

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights25/07/20 08:43 PM
19

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights03/10/15 03:49 AM
19

patcomen/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:27 PM
19

patcomen/r/MensRights06/02/17 02:05 PM
18

patcomen/r/MensRights07/11/16 09:49 AM
18

patcomen/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:10 PM
18

patcomen/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:13 AM
18

patcomen/r/MensRights11/10/16 09:52 AM
17

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights28/10/18 12:47 PM
16

patcomen/r/MensRights02/10/16 12:02 AM
16

patcomen/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:08 AM
16

Healthpatcomen/r/MensRights25/03/20 08:05 PM
16

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights11/06/15 11:35 AM
15

patcomen/r/MensRights11/08/14 10:33 AM
15

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:53 PM
14

patcomen/r/MensRights05/11/16 09:53 PM
14

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:49 AM
13

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights15/12/17 11:59 AM
13

patcomen/r/MensRights14/11/16 10:26 AM
13

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights19/05/15 10:17 AM
13

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights11/06/20 09:44 AM
13

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:26 AM
12

patcomen/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:34 PM
12

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:40 AM
12

patcomen/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:43 PM
12

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:40 AM
12

patcomen/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:28 PM
11

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:17 PM
11

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:01 PM
11

Eastern Culturepatcomen/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:32 AM
10

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights08/06/20 07:37 PM
10

patcomen/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:55 PM
10

patcomen/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:53 PM
10

Progresspatcomen/r/MensRights30/07/20 06:19 PM
10

patcomen/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:56 PM
10

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights18/06/18 11:08 AM
9

patcomen/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:47 AM
9

patcomen/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:09 PM
9

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights23/11/16 07:45 PM
9

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights10/03/18 06:07 PM
9

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:40 AM
9

patcomen/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:16 AM
9

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights25/09/18 02:28 AM
9

patcomen/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:59 PM
8

patcomen/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:37 AM
8

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights15/04/18 02:29 AM
8

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:43 PM
8

Generalpatcomen/r/MensRights24/07/20 07:44 PM
7

Healthpatcomen/r/MensRights01/03/20 11:45 AM
7

Generalpatcomen/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:39 PM
7

patcomen/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:59 PM
7

patcomen/r/MensRights03/08/14 03:38 AM
7

Activism/Supportpatcomen/r/MensRights04/06/20 05:36 PM
7

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights13/06/18 02:36 PM
7

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:40 AM
7

patcomen/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:27 AM
7

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights11/10/15 09:56 AM
6

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights18/07/15 08:44 PM
6

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:26 PM
6

patcomen/r/MensRights01/02/17 05:59 PM
6

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:03 AM
6

False Accusationpatcomen/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:34 AM
6

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:49 PM
6

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:45 PM
6

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:21 PM
5

patcomen/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:44 AM
5

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights15/10/18 11:47 PM
5

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:32 PM
5

patcomen/r/MensRights05/12/16 03:46 PM
5

patcomen/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:28 PM
4

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:20 PM
4

patcomen/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:41 PM
4

Opinionpatcomen/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:59 AM
4

patcomen/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:07 PM
4

patcomen/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:36 AM
4

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights24/11/16 02:09 PM
3

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:18 PM
3

patcomen/r/PussyPass13/08/14 11:29 AM
3

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights23/12/16 04:17 AM
3

patcomen/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:53 PM
3

patcomen/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:49 PM
3

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:45 PM
3

patcomen/r/MensRights25/09/18 01:56 AM
2

patcomen/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:27 PM
2

patcomen/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:26 PM
2

patcomen/r/MensRights06/06/18 11:40 AM
2

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:15 PM
1

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights14/03/20 06:03 PM
1

Discriminationpatcomen/r/MensRights30/12/17 06:45 AM
1

patcomen/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:41 AM
1

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:56 PM
1

Feminismpatcomen/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:27 AM
1

patcomen/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:13 AM
1

Fathers/Custodypatcomen/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:11 PM
1

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:11 PM
1

Edu./Occu.patcomen/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:26 PM
1

Social Issuespatcomen/r/MensRights24/10/15 01:45 PM
0

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:25 PM
0

Questionspatcomen/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:10 PM
0

patcomen/r/MensRights16/11/16 07:07 PM
0

Newspatcomen/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:18 AM
0

Legal Rightspatcomen/r/MensRights03/06/20 11:28 AM
0

patcomen/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:40 PM
0

Questionpatcomen/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:33 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

From the newspaper - The Australian - in March 2021 - Sexual assault survivor and advocate Grace Tame has told protesters at Hobart’s March 4 Justice rally that evil thrives in silence and it’s time for “making noise”. The Hobart resident, who was 15 when she was raped by her 58-year-old teacher, told the throngs gathered that the fear of doing nothing must outweigh the fear of doing something. “Evil thrives in silence,” Ms Tame told the crowd during a speech that roused thunderous applause and …
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:26 PM
38

From the newspaper The Australian on March 15, 2021, quoting Tame: Sexual assault survivor and advocate Grace Tame has told protesters at Hobart’s March 4 Justice rally that evil thrives in silence and it’s time for “making noise”. The Hobart resident, who was 15 when she was raped by her 58-year-old teacher, told the throngs gathered that the fear of doing nothing must outweigh the fear of doing something. “Evil thrives in silence,” Ms Tame told the crowd during a speech that roused thunderous …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/21 05:25 PM
1

I agree. I don't think I have an easy answer to your point, except to say that my decision is based on putting in a career in public schools while watching the system collapse and push men away. I was left with my pinkie trying to hold back a tsunami of feminism.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 06:56 PM
3

Yes. Thank you. I am a poet, a teacher, and a men's rights activist.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 06:13 PM
2

That sounds like the schools I went to 50 years ago. Nothing's changed? What I meant by guy is a way of learning and experiencing, not just the penis (though it is important too since we are talking about sociobiology). For me, guy is a masculine way of seeing the world and interacting with others - this particular way of being is not validated in public schools in the U.S. any longer, even if socially among peers it might be (that's nature).
/r/MensRights27/07/20 12:05 PM
3

This is good news. However, I have seen the occasional "feminist science" type field popping up. It may be a way of appeasing some feminists.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 02:46 PM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:19 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:19 AM
1

Yes, I have experienced this situation.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:18 AM
1

This seems to have been a programmatic and generational endeavor that will have consequences on men for at least fifty years before recovery.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:18 AM
1

I see this with the feminists I have worked with - they blindly go with it without a realization to its destructive consequences - but mainly because so many men support it.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:17 AM
2

I think it's okay to be a sensitive guy. But that's not what the schools have been nurturing. They are nurturing the sensitive, but not the guy.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:15 AM
2

This story is an eye-opener!
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:12 AM
2

This is brilliant! Thank you for all these resources. I'm headed in the right direction.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:11 AM
3

I can't imagine where education goes from here. I'm not sure even STEM has a chance.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:09 AM
2

The system, no matter how well-intended, is rigged in favor of mothers.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 08:46 PM
1

It seems to have mandatory holding periods for men based on the flimsiest accusation.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 10:55 PM
1

Thanks for your support. I'm working on it now, probably will be published in four months (fall). The working title is America Without Manhood.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 10:18 AM
3

Yes. Let me post them here - above.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 05:56 PM
2

Excellent points. Men most often are stuck with the rubbish and disasters of society, women with the domesticated and clean.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:03 PM
2

Pulsar, that's a great point. Racism and misogyny are both used to grant victimization to minorities and women. Misandry, however, is fine and dandy.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:02 PM
5

I notice the same. Women seem unable to avoid some physical intimacy with one another.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:00 PM
9

Holding men responsible for their own victimization might be acceptable if women did the same. But as you say, women do not. Furthermore, the blame game does not work well when dealing with an invisible enemy like COVID-19. And yet feminists are cheering on the scenario that more men are dying of COVID-19. This approach also validates your point - that is, feminists see men as deserving more COVID-19 deaths because we are "bad."
/r/MensRights28/05/20 11:42 AM
1

This is just a speculation - my guess is (based on anecdotal evidence of male friends) that nicotine has either a increased effect or decreased effect on testosterone in men. Either way, the effect is important physically and psychologically. Again, speculatively, I wonder if men are calmed (lower testosterone) or excited (higher testosterone) by the nicotine. Both effects can be important to why men might smoke.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:46 PM
3

I see what you're saying - men are actually being taken seriously by our health systems and by media. I guess I'm concerned about how men got here to begin with, and why that isn't more fully explained. I am sure it has to do with the strong data that shows males have a weaker immune system in life and that men (wittingly or unwittingly) take on more risk in life.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 12:29 PM
11

This is a health issue that situates men in higher mortality rates than women. That's the most important reason. If men's rights involves "social justice," then health conditions and diseases on a gender disparity scale should be considered.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 09:44 PM
1

If construction wants women workers, list the reasons. I'd like to hear them. I doubt that they exist.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:33 PM
2

It doesn't matter that men also work at home, or that men do the most dangerous jobs outside the home, or that family work is not the same as business or state work. Essentially, feminist media, like NYT, prefer the capitalization of family and children. Okay. After you put women (and men) to work, but not as private citizens, but as public workers, and let the state pay for it, women (and men) will have much less power over their families. We can see this fact already in socialist countries.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:37 PM
2

So silly. The opinion is chock full of claims against men without evidence, then indignant defenses why female leaders should not have the same scrutiny of male leaders because they are female.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 11:14 AM
2

I agree that it is how one begins to define the term "masculinity," and for feminists and now psychologists the term is viewed as emotionally toxic. But let's turn it around. Even with their definition of traditional males not showing emotion, they have failed to see the rewards, only the risks.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 02:48 PM
4

Worldwide marriage for women is a high reward package deal: Escape from parental care, regular paycheck from spouse, sudden social status via spouse, and insurance against spouse leaving without some kind of economic support. Marriage for men is a high risk deal by comparison: Loss of liberty, submission to female, immediate breadwinner, forced socializing, and open pocketbook into the future if divorced.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 03:02 PM
3

Sex or gender is already part of it. The killer is identified as a "man." I guess if you wanted to avoid any gender reference, we would never talk about the differences of the perpetrator and victims. But we do talk about gender differences - for legal and political reasons.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:54 PM
6

And if the shooter were a woman? ​ Would we send only women in? And where would these women be?
/r/MensRights28/10/18 01:51 PM
1

Perhaps you're right. But most men I know are not going to be taken seriously if they tried to pull this stunt. Warren turned this stunt into a Harvard professorship.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 01:15 AM
1

Racially fluid - that's good!
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:25 PM
1

Hey bro!
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:24 PM
1

Good point! ​ But the irony is still relevant, especially given that men could never pull off what Warren is allowed to do as a female.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:24 PM
1

Yep. Probably colonists. I'm a 1% bad minority!
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:22 PM
1

Left cannibalism.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 03:03 PM
6

The story refers to the professor as "he."
/r/MensRights13/06/18 01:15 AM
5

Bait-and-switch.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:57 PM
9

By the way, it is worth noticing the comments (now closed) for this opinion.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:44 PM
1

I agree that men are physically more able to be on the front line, but that's if men are willing (or forced) to be there.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 06:25 PM
3

Funny. Obviously, for now, men cannot do childbirth. But in terms of military, some 14%+ of active duty personnel are female .
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:45 PM
5

The psychosocial projection of motherhood as omnipotent is clearly the Earth cult of the passive-aggressive physical and social womb/tomb in open defiance against the "sky god" omnipotence of active-aggressive Zeus/God, heroism, heaven, war, industry, high technology, space travel, etc.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 01:43 PM
2

And for many of those other wives, who are fortunate enough to greet a returning veteran spouse (who may be all messed up), simply accuse him of adultery or domestic violence and get rid of him.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:40 PM
1

Thanks. Edits made.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:31 PM
3

I agree. By the way, the active duty military is only 85.5% male.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:30 PM
8

You're right that front line troops are disproportionately male. But the active duty military is 85.5% male. That's a problem too. Women are obviously not ever going to be represented equally there since they will be as disposable as men. Warren Farrell argues that "Wars will not end via female leaders but when men's lives are no more disposable than women's" (in The Myth of Male Power 126). Sociobiology indicates the bias against men as disposable. The question is whether women can really be as…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:28 PM
16

Thank you for bringing up this point. Females represent 14% of active duty military personnel. So it is worth looking at the ratios - and clearly they do not end up in harm's way at the rate that males do.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:17 PM
12

Here's the link to Northeastern University Office of Equity and Compliance. Two relevant policies are below. It looks like even a visitor can make a complaint. It would helpful to find a student, alum, or staff member to make a complaint. Northeastern University Title IX Policy: Northeastern University is committed to providing equal opportunity to its students and employees, and to eliminating discrimination when it occurs. In furtherance of this commitment, Northeastern University strictly pro…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:39 PM
17

This is just hate speech. Assuming anyone can find reasons to hate another group of people, here are variations of Walters' We have every right to hate you [men]. We have every right to hate you women. We have every right to hate you blacks. We have every right to hate you disabled. We have every right to hate you children. We have every right to hate you academics.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:03 PM
15

IRONY In a Muslim society, she would be at least censored or at worst imprisoned or executed. In our Western society (patriarchal), she has the right to speak freely about her disgust of men.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:49 PM
2

I'm trying to find the source for your claim. Maybe I'm missing it in my Google searches.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:22 PM
3

Terrible. So sorry.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:20 PM
7

And such self-loathing liberal guilt catches up with many WASPs and is I think a contributor to self-harm and suicide.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:19 PM
8

I am almost 60. I know what you're talking about in terms of the economy. I don't have special needs children. But I am very much with you, and for that reason need to say that I hope you will keep on going - not because you and I are being screwed, but because we are better than those who screw and scorn men.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:31 PM
9

In the world, men are killing themselves at an alarmingly higher rate than women are - anywhere from 300% to 500% more. See this link: Men Killing Themselves.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:57 PM
10

i'm interested. what signs did you sense?
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:41 PM
21

Ditto.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:13 PM
9

This word is used all of the time! But I have heard it for years, since I was a kid growing up in the sixties. It smacks of privilege for females - moms, wives, sisters, aunts, grandmothers, and other women have used it with me to get out of situations they do not like or to make me feel like I was being aggressive or offensive. I am interested about when the "uncomfortable" response became government and/or corporate policy because that's where it is now in sexual harassment laws. As a son, I w…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:11 PM
41

CNN remembers him kindly, but no mention exactly why he took his life. At the end of the article, CNN avoids the real problem of male suicide and offers only this general problem: Suicide is a growing problem in the United States. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a survey Thursday showing suicide rates increased by 25% across the United States over nearly two decades ending in 2016. Twenty-five states experienced a rise in suicides by more than 30%, the government repo…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 12:00 PM
2

Feminists, as political cannibals, operate under the law of goddess and child dyad (see Erich Neumann's Great Mother hypothesis) whereby their own "father" figures become targets of rage - a reason for seeing sibling societies emerge that challenge and attempt to destroy patriarchies. Such prophetic signs are here today, as women and youth join hand-in-hand as SJWs.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:45 PM
2

Young men are almost always treated more harshly than young women - when it comes to law enforcement. North Charleston is known for being hyperactive in going after black men.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:44 PM
2

The entire thing may turn out to be symbolic anyway - if the deadline for ratification sticks (which was 1980 something).
/r/MensRights02/06/18 04:07 PM
4

Yes and no. I notice that my female students enjoy participating in STEM classes where their friends are involved. And if they like the teacher, that's a plus. These human relationships enhance their interest in STEM. But no in terms of just buying into STEM as a thought process (absent any human relationships). So yes on the social, and no on the domain of thinking.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:32 AM
31

My friends in the business community are definitely saying the same. Of course they won't say it in public, but they will in private. Currently it is a sort of cautionary approach anytime a male businessman hires a female.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:10 PM
1

I hadn't thought of the hipsters until you said that. YEAH.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 04:18 PM
1

Yes, back to the past for the postmodern feminist - since the virtuous lady appeals as she is never to be traumatized by the grease and sweat of industry, nor the injuries and deaths of war, nor the sexual aggressiveness of men. And yet, I don't see the switch to Victorian dress yet. My view is that these new Victorians want Victorianism without ever giving up the sexually provocative attire and cosmetics of the modern age. The contradiction is beyond absurd.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:23 PM
3

Unwittingly, or perhaps intentionally in some cases, feminists (upper middle and upper class American women) are returning to Victorian sexuality, without the severity of Victorian dress. Put another way, American women control fashion and sexual tastes. And men are to blame for letting them.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:32 PM
2

Two comments: The ratio of male to female rises exponentially as IQ advances from average to genius. Higher educational institutions began changing their criteria for entrance a decade ago, prioritizing compliance and classroom grades over intelligence scores. This shift in enrollment criteria has had the most dramatic effect on increasing the number of women in U.S. colleges. Along with quotas, many schools that traditionally enrolled a disproportionately number of males now enroll closer to 50…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:27 AM
4

And yet the more I read about the debate surrounding circumcision, particularly in the wake of increasing anti-Semitism throughout the world, the happier I am that I did it. Despite the growing belief among many mothers that male circumcision is brutal and unnecessary, I'm happy that I circumcised my son, and I don't regret for one second that I did it. Not only selfish, but also very stupid, scary, regressive, and tribal.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 01:31 AM
1

What is a "lesser charge of obscenity"?
/r/MensRights27/04/17 12:30 AM
2

Females are stupid. Or as Jack Nicholson's character Melvin Udall says about creating female characters in As Good as It Gets: "I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability."
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:44 PM
1

Thanks! You've provided new directions for my research. I'm sure you're right about records not kept because of the wrist-slapping of females versus handcuffing/jailing of men.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 10:57 PM
2

While I agree with you that it is the political climate of the university (with ideological guidance) leading the student body and alums down this road, I wonder if the panic isn't important as a condition generated by these pathetic types of people.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:09 PM
1

Thanks! Excellent help!
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:56 PM
1

The flip side of ancient Greek masculinity - without the philosophy, math and science.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:43 PM
3

Of course. But they are not mentioned as deserving due process. Only women and children. Male citizens or not are lumped as usual in the category of deplorables.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:50 PM
2

And only 1.4% of white Americans owned slaves in U.S. history.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 12:10 AM
2

I've been hearing about this phenomenon for the past month - something like being sent to the dog house. But totally a matter of irrational psychic projection on the part of spouses and partners.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 06:08 PM
2

You're probably correct. I think the employer has "at will" right to fire at any time since the contract is from semester to semester.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:38 AM
3

Thank you. I can't believe how ridiculous universities have become - with safe spaces, trigger warnings, sex harassment cases, and rape culture.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:37 AM
2

Yep. I've told him that. He did ask for a reason from a supervisor, but he was told that his job was part time and the department did not need him now. He even asked about the future, but the supervisor suggested he find work elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:33 AM
1

Humor is easy to miss here. My fault. The point is that the article and issue are treated as real, as serious. The article unwittingly (in a kind of self-parody) reveals that it is not.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:31 PM
2

"Science has shown that that's just not true" Yes and no. The science says nothing about social constructiion, but it does address chromosomes and sex hormones. Most of which say we are male and female with deviations.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 07:56 PM
6

What school? Just curious.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:30 PM
2

witness human female primate behavior = Hillary during second debate with Trump did not come to defend Bill when he was attacked
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:13 PM
1

After the university's press release reports the false accusation, it provides this disclaimer: The University’s Title IX Office and Women and Gender Resource Center provide services to anyone who is a victim of sexual assault, harassment, exploitation, violence and abuse. This case should not discourage anyone who has been affected by any of these crimes to report the incident to the appropriate authorities. No mention of discouraging false claims.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 11:56 AM
2

The Guardian reports 13%.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:40 PM
15

I never felt like Clinton was interested in men, especially working class men. The rhetoric of the sex accuser against Trump resonated with men in the end. And even college-educated men like myself reconsidered and went with Trump.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 01:29 PM
1

It's a wonder that he did not have more luck given that California's white male population will soon be a minority, if not already. My guess is that no matter how few white males there are, as long as the feminist Leftist agenda stands without a national debate, white males will suffer. They could be only 10% of the population and still the devils.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 01:27 PM
2

Co-ed changed everything, starting in the 19th century.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:52 PM
3

But a god who advantages matriarchy, not patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:52 PM
2

Yep. It was evidently a Title IX investigation/mediation process or EOP process.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:51 PM
1

Sage advice. I will share with him.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:50 PM
17

So true about the females on campuses, where they dominate at 60% of students. By the way, I will have to find it, but I read about a couple of guys who were kicked out of a college somewhere else because they were accused of showing an "aroused state" under their pants (i.e. having hard-ons yet fully dressed).
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:50 PM
8

I've advised him to leave, but he wants to stay and fight.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:46 PM
7

Exactly. With such odds, nobody would go to college. Just look at the odds of dying in a plane accident - 1 in 767,000 per year. And still some people won't fly because the risk is still too high.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 08:05 PM
2

This is good.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:31 PM
1

Forcing a male into violence and competition without his explicit agreement to join is unacceptable in my book. But I find that kind of force only in the extreme. On the other hand, there are so many well-established masculine roles that use non-violence and non-competition every day - such as parents, siblings, friends, teachers, ministers, counselors, physicians, engineers, etc.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:39 PM
1

I reject the ad hominem attack on masculinity by feminists who use "toxic" even to describe an extreme kind of masculinity. Male aggression or male competition cannot be described as "toxic" and unacceptable without setting up a new binary that makes nonviolence or non-competition the only virtue (healthy and acceptable). The holistic perspective embraces all aspects of masculinity with an understanding that there is a time or situation for every expression of competition or cooperation.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:58 AM
1

My guess is it depends on how social construction operates. For instance, who is doing the gender construction? Pretty sure that feminists will argue that men produce these "toxic masculinity" constructs. And even if the rarest female displays it, she should be forgiven since she has been victimized by it. But men cannot be forgiven since they are ultimately responsible for creating these despicable constructs. Which brings me to an important question - WHY SHOULD WE EVER ANY LONGER CARE WHAT FE…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 10:57 PM
0

Women have rights. Men do not. A return to matriarchal society.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:26 PM
1

You're absolutely right. Politics is the art of compromise. That's called real politik. As a thirty-something liberal American then who supported Clinton reluctantly, no Democrat was going to get elected president at the time without Perot and other compromises. The economic revolution of Reagan had morphed into its adolescence and was in full hormonal phase. Mondale and Dukakis before, and others after them - none of them were ever going to beat the Republicans then.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:05 AM
2

Never any proof. First, that's her allegation and it was never proved in court. In fact, the court threw her case out. Second, you assume because someone settles that there's truth in the case. Not always true - especially in politically-ideologically driven cases such as this one against the U.S. President. Settlement only came because Jones and her lawyers took the case to very conservative 8th District Court for an appeal (or to enemies of Clinton).
/r/MensRights21/01/16 10:00 PM
0

I agree that Clinton's history is about much more than a BJ from an intern - the only president in modern history to balance the federal budget and leave behind a surplus - among other successes.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:51 PM
2

He paid her for attempting to maintain his status and because he could pay that amount. She was paid because she and her lawyers used the Clinton-Jones sexual relationship as a witch hunt to force a settlement.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:49 PM
4

Because the term is alleged and in my opinion stupidly used by feminists.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:08 PM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:36 PM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:09 PM
-8

The woman brought criminal charges before without enough evidence. When will women be responsible for their decisions?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 04:21 PM
1

In this world at this time, and until men's full rights are recognized, stay away from kids.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 10:38 PM
2

Freedom of speech has always been an ideal, never real - limited by the values of people at any time. And as more societies adopt the feminist march to condemn all wrongs to women and blame men, sustaining openness and inquiry is off the table.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:29 PM
6

Have we really come to this - only two credible ways to find the truth? Video footage Word of a woman
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:28 PM
1

I think that's right although there is the phenomenological too. I know two men (friend and family member) who have had their prostate taken out because of cancer. They both talk about the feelings of loss, especially for the first two years after the surgery when sex was almost out of the question. Both felt bodily and psychologically less masculine even though they both said they could intellectually separate themselves from the loss. I think that our biological sexuality is more powerful than…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:14 AM
2

in fact, more equal than men
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:17 AM
1

Incredibly, here is an anti-Western anti-due-process remark from a Berkeley Law School Human Rights Center official about having evidence: "it may codify an entrenched attitude that women need to have corroborating evidence to be believed,” says Mr. Hiatt of the Berkeley Law School. “We have to be a little sad that we live in a world where something like this is necessary.”
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:16 PM
8

“As a parent of a child at this school, I am horrified and outraged!" As an American citizen and a man, I am horrified and outraged that males, not females, must sign up for selective service in the U.S. at age 18 years old, or be punished.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 01:15 AM
1

thank you for this historical resource - i had heard of bax, but had not seen this work.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 08:42 PM
1

Retreat from interaction with female heads. Don't trust them.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:41 AM
2

The problem with housework that women want help with is that it is endless with women. Always another chore, project, etc.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 10:30 PM
3

I did what you did - but only once - then left the female therapist. I do nothing now in which I have a female over me personally or advising me professionally. If my department hires a female chair, and it has before, I retreat. She chases, but I offer nothing. In a word, I do not trust women.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 10:28 PM
3

After teaching for 25 years at the middle school and high school levels, this stupidity takes the cake. No wonder my students continue growing more socially awkward (even girls, although they are doing better in this situation).
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:07 PM
7

Yeah. Circumcision is our Judeo-Christian-American answer for fixing boys.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:03 PM
4

Thanks. Then this plan is clearly about letting men die. Originally, I thought the article suggested funding for prevention.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 10:40 PM
12

From Healthline: It is easier to contract HIV from sex with a male than from sex with a female. For females having unprotected sex with a male, the vaginal and anal membranes are much more likely to tear, leaving an easier way for HIV to invade the body. Men who have sex with men are especially at risk for contracting HIV because the rectal membrane is delicate and prone to tearing during sex. So what actually does the Obama Admin argument mean by spending $300 million to achieve a 25% reduction…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:39 PM
2

The oppressors are females and the men they use to overpower other men for protection and for power.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:25 PM
1

Well done, Jonathan! And I hope to help out again.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:47 AM
5

Talk with the National Coalition of Men in San Diego. They like to help men in these situations, including suing.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:05 AM
5

Not Kelly. Don Lemon is making the argument, using Kelly as ammo. Let's see if Kelly defends Trump's freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:28 PM
3

Perot marginalized third party helped Clinton. Trump marginalized third party will help Clinton.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:27 PM
2

The feminist logic is obvious in the video from CNN - not from Kelly, but from Don Lemon. CNN is attacking Trump.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:55 AM
2

The psychological effect of labia-altering to effectively produce a smoothly creased vagina is simple: merchandise the prepubescent pussy.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 09:25 AM
1

I'm sorry, but that is the most silly reason for taking this down I could imagine. Men's rights and masculinity are unconnected. Did you not read the blog post where it talks about men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:39 PM
1

they're rules for the media arm of the Democratic Party Have a [nice] day I can agree with these two statements.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:20 PM
0

You're focusing on the perpetrator, not the victim. True, we love to go after illegals. That's our thing - avoid our own hugely disturbing violence on ourselves, particularly men.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:47 PM
0

Where do you come up with these rules for national media? Do you make this stuff up to support a hierarchy of silence? Let's say you're right about how national news works, one would suspect that you're not really on the side of men's rights here. Men are rarely given the decency of being treated as victims in our mainstream news. But we are treated as the perpetrators all the time. Most news is about victims is about women and children - it sells because we see women and children as victims.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:39 PM
-1

Thank you. You've made my point. Avoid our real problems by projecting onto the world outside America. Not only does our media focus more on crimes committed against women, but it is more concerned with sensational "immigrant crimes," although much less likely than the much higher number of crimes by our own citizens.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 05:37 AM
1

Also no word about this man shot and killed in SF on June 30 - why? Potrero man shot and killed
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:22 AM
1

What about this news yesterday? SF man seriously injured in attack by two men
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:20 AM
1

Where's the national news today? Woman in SF stabs 60-year-old man in chest today
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:17 AM
7

The worst part is that the female student is offended that she was "admonished" about false allegations. Read harassment.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:49 PM
3

Welcome to my world, being a man.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:07 PM
1

The BOJ page on the 2003 Rape Elimination Act offers lots of data about sex between prisoners and sex between guard/staff-prisoners.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:41 PM
37

It shows you the generosity men have. Gem.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:06 PM
2

This is the most sensitive part of the male body. Sensitivity. Male sensitivity. For society an oxymoron. To become male again, we must return to sensitivity.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:40 AM
4

Nice work!
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:21 PM
4

Just as important is why do the media listen to them, companies hire them, and political parties fear them?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:21 PM
2

Excellent! But one connection could be made to the Henry Louis Gates incident at Harvard, namely that security guards and police have too much power and work from false assumptions of guilt most of the time.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:19 PM
2

Incredible story. I have read so many recently like this one. But for Will Self, an amazing writer, to have this happen helps our cause. But he must get at the source of the problem - the feminists.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:19 PM
1

Male disposability. Black male disposability. American police brutality. Vicious system of men killing men. For what?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:23 AM
2

This is beyond what you should have to go through to get your classes. Sexual oppression pure and simple.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:56 PM
5

Your experience is similar to a private college handing over its control to the church - to enter you must sign the creed and orient yourself to its doctrines. But in this case, the church or religion is feminism. You have provided another disturbing example of how publicly funded money is being hijacked by ideological fascism - i.e. feminism that continues to expand its reaches into all universities and corporations, and now into the military.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:54 PM
2

Jonathan, I've sent you contact information. Just let me know. I'm finishing my PhD in language theory and have 25 years teaching experience at K-12. So my research and my practical sides are full with stories of how education and other social structures have shifted major and minor elements to disadvantage boys.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:55 AM
1

Of course this article strikes at the roots of men's rights - and at many levels - but most specifically at the social and archetypal relationship between mother and son that philosophers, literary writers, cultural critics, and social scientists have been exploring for over 2,500 years. This relationship is sacred whereas the relationship between father and child has been repeatedly beaten down in Western civilization over the last 50 years. Without this relationship (mother/child), the path to…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 05:02 PM
2

“There's no happy ending to these cases,” said Rutherford County Assistant District Attorney Hugh Ammerman. Did he actually say "happy ending"?
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:02 PM
1

Von Webb may want to read Oedipus Rex.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:57 AM
1

My guess is that both blind fathers and mothers suffer the same judgments, but I don't know if that is equally done.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:55 AM
9

During his tenure as a director and teacher for various arts institutions and public schools, he has taught over 2,000 children from grades pre-K through 12. Christopher was the Head Accessibility Consultant for Broadway productions such as: Finean’s Rainbow (’09), The Miracle Worker (‘10), and Catch Me If You Can (’11). It appears Roberts is a performing arts teacher.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:44 PM
3

The sensitivity of the writer to Roberts' disability is missing.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:32 PM
5

That's a good question. I wondered too although I guess he can use his hands certainly, or maybe it is about performing arts?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:01 PM
1

My opinion is that television and major news media have been catching up with feminism, expanding their ideology to exclude stories that would promote maleness except in the defense of women - a rekindled sort of chivalry that serves feminists but will not allow for males ever to be seen as succeeding or diminishing because of their gender.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 01:03 PM
12

I know. I fear that this kind of journalistic standard is increasing.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 12:55 PM
1

Bravo!
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:34 AM
2

Thank you so much. I have just collected all of these links for my own resources on this subject.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:18 AM
2

Thank you. I will.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 03:32 AM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:43 AM
1

If the justice system cannot be changed at the voting booth, and it probably can't immediately given the huge numbers of male ex-cons yet to have their voting rights reinstated, I would imagine that as one solution that our founders would have done, but of course they would not declare it until all preparations were in order.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 12:43 AM
1

The 7% is a very conservative estimate based on prisoner, paroles, prior convictions (felony) - but if we include misdemeanors, the number is more like 35-40% of American men. To the point of women, I do not blame them and certainly do not think more imprisonment for either gender is the answer. However, I do think that feminists have done very little in their activism to reduce the incarcerating (I might call it "enslaving") of American men.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:32 PM
2

insaneHoshi, please read Wargame4life's tirade again. Notice the ad hominen attack here: "you become a hysterical "stare rape" style bat shit feminist," attacking the person not the argument. AD HOMINEM means "against the person." I cannot get any plainer than that.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:21 PM
5

So colorful.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:15 PM
2

Thanks for considering my calculation. I understand that we could squeeze the number to 0.7% by talking about only those men in prison, but the paroles and the prior convicts have many unique problems once out in society - mainly much difficulty finding decent employment.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:14 PM
7

Again, you have been so engaging and made such important contributions to this debate.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:09 PM
7

Your remarks are so engaging and enlightening that I feel already much better informed.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:57 PM
7

You lose me at "reclassifying" since you reclassify me with "hysterical 'stare rape' style bat shit feminist" (a much crazier connotative argument and incredibly without any rationality), that is if we are to call what you do a reclassification instead of an ad hominem attack.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:43 PM
7

It's 7% if you include all prisoners and paroles and prior convicts who are male.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:29 PM
1

Yeah, I think generational differences have much to do with the student non-interest. Stereotypes based on age can often be generational, both ways.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:24 PM
1

Just signed it.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:25 PM
-4

Just signed.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:08 PM
2

IMPORTANT TO NOTE THE FOLLOWING: Please note that the "scholarly" journal that the original article was published in is new and is funded by and endorsed by the Avielle Foundation (in memory of girl of Sandy Hook killings). The journal (Violence and Gender) was launched in 2013. Most of the articles in the first four publishings are about violence and males (e.g. ISIS, male mass killers, rapists, etc.). Even though this particular article was published in Dec. 2014, it still cites the 1 in 5 col…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:00 PM
-1

Ask your girlfriend to serve first.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:41 PM
9

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The "scholarly" journal that the original article was published in is new and is funded by and endorsed by the Avielle Foundation (in memory of girl of Sandy Hook killings). The journal (Violence and Gender) was launched in 2013. Most of the articles in the first four publishings are about violence and males (e.g. ISIS, male mass killers, rapists, etc.). Even though this particular article was published in Dec. 2014, it still cites the 1 in 5 college rape statistic. Furthe…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:27 AM
40

Notice that the young man is treated as responsible . . . for . . . everything.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:18 PM
4

Done. Here's the comment: I am very concerned about your choice to grant $300 million to a gender-specific cause, no matter the good intentions. Equality is not bought by division, favoritism, and sexism. I urge you to abandon this approach for a more reasonable method, or at least one that is gender-neutral.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 11:29 AM
11

Flip the dichotomy twice and here's the result: Mrs. Right shrieks, sulks, makes you feel guilty, spends your money, and expects you to be responsible for her well-being. Mrs. Wrong is supportive, tells you you are handsome, wants sex when you want it, and shares equal financial responsibility for all things.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 11:55 AM
2

A tend to agree with you that U.S. education stinks overall, with a few exceptional teachers here and there. In that sense, I think that the crisis in STEM is a ploy for raising funds for females in education.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 09:21 PM
0

Lack of a Reality Principle. Read Freud on this point. Many American feminists (females and males) choose fantasies of trauma related to sexuality (not talking here about assault). See Freud again on trauma. So if you check in with feminists like Claire McCaskill, you will will hear that the facts, stats, and details do not natter.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:01 AM
2

First, why did her boyfriend believe her? Okay, he was drunk. What does that say about false accusations? Second, why did her boyfriend act the way he did? Again, drunkenness may be the culprit. But isn't this behavior the special "white knight" knee-jerk reaction (although not the social justice warrior pursuit in court)?
/r/MensRights01/01/15 11:53 PM
1

Stupid, but we don't know what she meant by "incompetent." She could have meant that they just didn't want to help her (assuming that she is pretty difficult given her manipulation).
/r/MensRights01/01/15 11:46 PM
1

I prefer the second option but would be surprised to hear an answer other than equality.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 11:37 PM
2

After you are done making ad hominem attacks, I will talk with you. Otherwise, you only rely on adolescent adjectives like "stupid" and "sexist" to avoid dealing with the argument or the observation that Coleridge made.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:32 AM
2

You hit on something that I also came to deal with. My aptitude has been strong in math and science, testing high in those areas. But in college I studied English and became a teacher. That was a push more than an instinct. I had to push myself in the humanities, which felt so touchy-feely most of the time. I always felt like the odd guy in a room of humanities students (mainly women). I recall a women's lit course in which all the students were female except for myself. I was completely ignored…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:54 PM
1

I have to admit you may be right that there may be some other causes, but why can't the main reason be something biological rather than sociological? I would argue the same thing for why women are not naturally inclined to physical violence the way men are, based on data from wars and prisons.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:19 PM
1

I think I fixed that link. I will check.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:16 PM
1

The concern you have with sexism is odd. It sounds like the concern that "social constructivists" have all the time. You don't mind citing your own sex-division statistics when it is workable for you, but you do not allow it for others. What you may be upset about is not sex division but the degree to which I have shown that division. I work on the principle that a generalization can be made about data that offers at least two-thirds majority support. No generalization exist at 100% of course. Y…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:16 PM
1

If I accept your premise, then I must also say that other parts of human experience in nature are sexist too, such as human biology. I am willing to accept this premise and agree with you and say that reproductive development in humans is sexist. But calling something sexist does not erase the fact that sex divisions exist.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:10 PM
2

I was pretty interested in what you were saying but then it got pretty sexist. "There's another, even greater, problem facing feminist chivalry, a problem that feminism seems incapable of dealing with: It is the hypermodern, agnostic, technological, digital society. In a word, this society is unnatural to women." ^ That's not accurtate See this link on gender differences in attitudes and uses for technology/computers
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:45 PM
1

"Women, on the other hand, are left holding lackluster service jobs on the whole in Western countries" ^ That's not accurate From the National Women's Law Center: "Over a third of the jobs created during the recovery from the Great Recession pay low wages, and women make up the large majority of the low-wage workforce. In addition to low wages, women in these jobs also face the following challenges: workplace discrimination; lack of access to paid sick days, paid leave and fair work schedules; d…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:40 PM
0

Not sure if "extroitive" is exclusive of female behavior, but Coleridge's maxim makes sense. Females need to relate to others for moral principle. Not males. According to Coleridge.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:35 PM
3

Don't know the stats, and you provide none. Providing some with examples would help. We could start with the NFL black players and then go to Cosby, but aren't these examples too celeb? What about the ordinary black or hispanic bloke? And why not the Asian guy?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:30 PM
1

Yes and no. It depends on what is being defined as rude. There are two problems here. First, the space on a bus or train, if not ergonomically engineered for all adult body types, forces some body types to sit in a way to accommodate balance. Look at most seats on transit and you will see straight backs. Without an angled back, men naturally use their legs to balance. That is what is being considered as rude. Second, the question of women as rude for bagdraping is not even an issue. And there is…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 11:42 AM
1

In the 1990s, I started a men's group in California. That group still exists, but it was even then an odd thing to explain to women. So I quit telling women altogether.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 11:30 AM
3

Due process is not enough. Evidence standards must be raised too. Since many courts rely on testimony and identification to convict, due process only secures rights to provide counter testimony, but due process does not rid itself of faulty methods of reasoning. I don't trust testimony as much as I do logic.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 12:35 PM
8

Thanks for this comment. The bagdraping at this point becomes a veil or wall of protection.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:23 PM
3

Thank you for pointing that out. Yes, I am aware of the tongue-in-cheek MIT piece. Unfortunately, almost all other media coverages were not aware, with few exceptions.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 10:47 PM
5

Yes, but don't let up and don't become like the extremist feminists.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 03:00 AM
1

Talk to the National Coalition of Men in San Diego.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:14 AM
1

From "ANSWER WIKI" It's probably not rape. But: Section 376 says that sex is rape if it is without the woman's consent. Section 90 says that consent obtained via "misconception of fact" is not really consent. Based on these 2, some high courts and lower courts have held that sex based on a false promise of marriage is rape. However, there are 2 supreme court cases which hold that a promise of future marriage is not really a "misconception of fact", and the man is allowed to change his mind later…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:59 AM
1

Why aren't the feminine designs equally fascist? They dominate space, curve into grids, invade squares, etc. In this TED Talk, feminine invasion and curviness equals generosity. But I don't want your generosity because it's a trap.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:41 PM
1

Nice. And I get the point. But the master-slave dichotomy doesn't work for me. I think that there is excitement in attacking men not because they are one side of this dichotomy or another, but because they are often masters of their own fates, i.e. masters and slaves of themselves at the same time. That's the energy source, the most creative tank of fuel on the planet.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:04 PM
2

I guess NASA is stupid based on Darwin Awards criterion - after all the exploding rockets.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:29 AM
6

I like Camille Paglia on risk-taking: We'd still be in grass huts if we depended on women for civilization.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:28 AM
4

Well said about the risks men take for women. A list of the most dangerous jobs circulated on reddit recently - showed majority male workers doing near-death work.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:27 AM
5

And what causes that spring to have energy? Men as a target, which raises a more fundamental question: Why such hostility/intensity towards men? Or better, what do men have or represent that energises this spring? Answer that and we'll have the name of an important power source.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:26 AM
1

How do we evaluate data like these statistics if, and read closely, ..."Data are from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), which collects information on nonfatal crimes, reported and not reported to the police, against persons from a nationally representative sample of U.S. households"?
/r/MensRights14/12/14 12:17 AM
17

As an older student who has returned to school, I am shocked by the way colleges have become feminist fiefdoms. Nothing like it when I was at the tail end of the cultural revolution in the late seventies.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 10:29 PM
1

Charlie Rose makes sure his not the next victim while the witches laugh ghoulingly.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 07:47 PM
1

Men do matter. That's why we are here talking. But I know what you mean.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:25 AM
1

Exactly. It is a black/white thinking at its worst.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:25 AM
2

Worthy of Medea.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:16 PM
2

Goddess worship
/r/PussyPass05/09/14 07:47 PM
1

I agree although I have heard the Voice for College Men use this reference before.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:56 PM
8

Inspiring.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:42 PM
2

The problem is the simplicity of assumptions people make rather than actually thinking. They want to divide humans into right and wrong and issues into black and white. Women are good, men are bad . . . . Contemporary version of Manichaeism. Shaping women into ladies/princesses whom men serve and protect all started with courtly love and chivalry. Shaping men into white knights/male lesbians continues with "rape culture" claims and feminist hatred.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:54 PM
2

Good question. Based on what I see/hear in my field, I know no scholar who adds/edits information on Wikipedia. For reference materials, most scholars in humanities (who are actually doing scholarship) prefer more reliable and timely encyclopedias done by scholars in the field. Many of these get published in university houses and may be found on shelves in university libraries, but they may also be accessed digitally. To stay up to date, these materials are rigorously pushed through new editions…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:43 PM
1

err on the side of what is used in academia Really? Let me provide at least one clear example. I will take this example from literature, a field that has lots of scholarly work, especially on the figure I have chosen. I will avoid very contemporary subjects since they may or may not be linked to very current debates. Look at the English entry for "John Donne." First, other than the fact that the entry does a disservice to the literary study of Donne, for which he is primarily known, the entry al…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:26 PM
1

whether it is good or bad is determined by the medical community Again, here you are again in the world of bias, but one that has an endoxa within the mainstream of American culture but not the scholarship of American academic studies. There are currently at least one thousand scholarly articles that can be accessed that deal OBJECTIVELY (or at least at best, NON-JUDGMENTALLY) with "circumcision" and "human rights." Most of these articles provide evidence-based studies on the medical, social, po…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:09 PM
1

think of wikipedia like a machine that can make orange juice or apple juice This statement goes to the heart of my earlier comment that Wikipedia cannot be trusted as academic. But I will say that the statement reflects a consensus process -- yet only for those who are allowed to be selectors who are by the way looking for a predetermined outcome, either "orange juice or apple juice," not a new juice. That is, the end is already known. There is no epistemic work here even if it claims to be cons…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:58 PM
2

Wikipedia has an academic bias I wish that were true. As a university professor myself, I often find student work using Wikipedia to be sub-par at best. Even when students follow links on Wikipedia, the links take one to sites that are often far below academic sources. Typically these sources are secondary/tertiary at best, and many times more journalistic and advocacy-oriented than scholarly and theoretical. Furthermore, even when a single Wikipedia entry rises to an acceptable "academic" level…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:49 PM
2

Result of postmodern migration based on globalizing ideologies, according to cultural anthropologist Appadurai.
/r/PussyPass29/08/14 02:27 PM
0

Simply penis envy. Unrequited, stab away.
/r/PussyPass29/08/14 02:07 PM
7

I think most people (liberals and conservatives) interpret domestic violence as a crime done by men on women. Of course, there may be exceptions. But they are few and far between.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 12:22 AM
3

Fitting tribute with touches patriotic.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 01:44 PM
1

You're right, except that these standards are primarily applied to males when talking about cultural customs and social mores related to facial hair and beer drinking. As I have already shown in another comment, there are lots of scholarly studies related to masculinity formation and ritual around beer. I am simply asking for readers to expand their perspective to include more variables than a yes/no binary, i.e. black or white fallacy.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:12 AM
0

this is a parody of some of the 'grasping at straw' claims of which many feminists are guilty You may call it that, but if you prefer to dismiss cultural criticism, your view seems too narrow for me since the case remains that various sociological and anthropological analyses demonstrate that social masculine identities (including class/race distinctions) are embedded in various cultural, political, and economic rituals. One of these most important rituals for males that has been studied is beer…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:27 PM
0

Of course he was fired for being a man. Erasing gender difference is exactly what feminists want you to do. Erasure of gender nuances from cultural as well as commercial exchanges only endangers "men's rights." Believe me, manhood was not the only reason this professor caught the attention from a brewing company, but also the underlying sexual/gender identity attacked by the university. Can't emphasize enough that we cannot ignore masculinity as psychological and cultural in men's rights. A clos…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:29 PM
0

First of all, you made the point for me. And whether you will agree or not, ancient theologians from Christianity's beginnings have taught the control of male sexuality. I could develop that much more fully, but won't right here. Second, there's clearly wrongful termination. He will probably win in court, or I hope he will. But the termination is primarily centered on culturally masculine behavior and symbolism.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:28 AM
1

This is the third post to which I have had to spell out an issue surrounding men's rights. Perhaps I am too nuanced with my posts, or perhaps I see cultural tyranny used on men whereas others only look at legal biases. Still it is hard to believe that one does not get this issue as male-oriented. Beards. Mustaches. Beer. If you don't believe this article strikes a chord with men and men's rights, fine. But please recall the days that companies fired men for facial hair (some still do). EDIT: In …
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:23 AM
0

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:12 AM
3

feminism gets stuck when it comes to universally advocating for human rights, especially for men. This problem is specifically due to feminism's rejection of Enlightenment thinking (i.e. universals, humanism, science, etc.) as Patriarchal when in fact Enlightenment thinking opened up society for women's rights.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:56 PM
-1

This subreddit seems beyond your understanding. This is a zone to demonstrate pussy pass examples, no matter what you think of criminal justice sentencing overall. Let me try one more time. Female assaults = probation Male assaults = prison Capiche?
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 11:50 PM
-5

Not poor way, just a realistic way. The inequality is already there in the legal system -- sentencing men with heavier penalties versus sentencing women more lightly. My brothers who work in criminal justice see this inequality all of the time. Such reform, as you might desire it for penalties to men, seems so remote in our American Gulag that I wonder why you would continue to support punishments doled out differently because of gender.
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 06:36 PM
5

So right. Look, just reverse the gender. What happens? Male teacher takes placard from pro-life group and group of males march away. And then the male prof pushes/kicks girls away. Again, you're right. No one has to agree with pro-life position to agree that the incident is infringement of speech and body.
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 04:19 PM
5

If they'd been guys doing the harassing, they'd probably have been arrested - maybe that's the pussy pass here. Bingo.
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 04:16 PM
3

Come on, man. There are men serving 2 - 3 years for assault for touching another's phone.
/r/PussyPass19/08/14 04:15 PM
1

yeah I see your point
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:47 PM
1

Humor me. Sex club rape? Vampire in mirrors? Who play these games and then send one to prison?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:32 PM
0

So you hold to a state solution for sex.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:29 PM
0

Look, evidently some are missing the humor and the irony. Humor: Vampire sees reflection and is frightened, paralyzed. Irony: Don't go to Sex Club since you may get raped.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:27 PM
1

The Harvard piece gets at the nuances very well, and while I realize that I am not going to be one thing or its opposite, the nature of political power seems to be driven by binary, conflicting relationships. And to be honest, so it is in academe although it should not be that way.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:40 PM
2

Hi. Just gave you some gold for an incredible comment. Very helpful.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:44 PM
1

I'd strongly advise you not to build your identity around allegiance to one particular worldview I appreciate that advice. It has been difficult in higher ed humanities to detach oneself from identities like feminism, for it is as if feminism were already (and will continue to be) the prevailing system. For when I hint in the slightest that feminism may have problems, there is a circling of wagons. Strange how that frontier metaphor works here.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:37 PM
2

Thanks for asking. My studies and a overwhelming need to find sanity. I had followed the 1990s men's movement in the mainstream, with Bly and Keen and some others. But that seemed to fall out. Then raising a son shifted my attention both away and to the MRM, especially as he had to deal with certain feminist overplays in a public high school. Fortunately, we survived that. And most recently with his enrollment into college, my concern with his well-being has grown. So has mine, as I am in a PhD …
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:12 PM
1

I don't want to see the left be hijacked by the postmodernist left, though it's sadly happening more and more. That's my doctoral program to a tee. Crazy, ahistorical, illogical stuff happening -- attempting to liberate itself from the bonds of civilization, legal standards, and natural/historical cause-and-effect.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:43 PM
1

Seriously, moving to LA and experiencing this feminism was like getting fucked in the face by a gorilla with penile elephantiasis. Not Good. What's going on in LA?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:41 PM
1

"Feels over reals." In the humanities, we had this push for sometime into "touchy-feely" classrooms. At first, it was meant to facilitate greater accessibility for students, but now it has become a barrier to males in classrooms who may sound less than "feely."
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:39 PM
1

that men's issues are conflated with a particular brand of libertarian economic ideas, and some racism that can be downright troglodyte at times That is correct for me too. I am concerned with the association with stupid run to racism as place of security. My principles don't allow that but I can't stand sexism from feminism anymore, worse because it undermines not only democracy and openness, but also legal rights such as due process.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:35 PM
1

The clarity you bring between Identity Leftists and Liberal Leftists seems to fit my very problem because I most concern with making sure that gender does not trump fairness, equality and justice.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:31 PM
2

feminism can be characterized as nothing but "patriarchy in lipstick" given its reliance on chivalry (male disposability). Makes so much sense. At my research institution, feminists went after a male colleague because he would meet grad students for drinks at a downtown bar. Even though these meetings were non-mandatory and thus casual, female colleagues forced his department chair to ask him to stop meeting students at the bar since it was considered a "male domain" and unfair to female grad st…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:27 PM
1

Thank you. I have been considering libertarianism -- which seems to come into play as an independent politically in the U.S.'s two-party system.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:21 PM
1

which results inexorably in the demonization of one particular group That's exactly what I see happening to men/boys in education from K12 to Grad School. Some here call it gynocentric. That makes sense although it doesn't sound at all like my mother.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:19 PM
1

The differences between both parties are minor Yeah, I've come to realize that. Differences seem more about a manner, a style, of governing.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:13 PM
1

I wonder about that and tend to agree with you as they let feminists determine health care coverage, higher ed administration, and social policy domestic and foreign. At the least males must be subconsciously seething, ready to throw lots of dems out. Too bad, since I expected much more from democrats at this point.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:40 AM
1

Yes, I understand the anti-ideology direction although it too can become a label, just as MRA has. I have a sense that as men debate with their intimate partners and convince them of how misandry works, the movement to something much more equal can begin to take place. But in the university -- hell, that's a whole other monster.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:37 AM
3

200 years ago, that empathy manifested itself in keeping women safe from harm by having them stay home to raise the family rather than die on battlefields or toil in mines. Even today in less developed areas of the world (the majority of the world), economic conditions are still shaped by this empathy.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:16 AM
5

A different study, this one conducted by AARP, found that divorce among couples married for a long time is up -- at a time when divorce in general is down. The bigger surprise: Wives are now more likely to initiate the split than husbands. In two out of every three marriages longer than 20 years, it's the woman who leaves the man. This information seems like old news to me.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:51 AM
17

“We have spies out there looking for dodgers of the cultural practice. There are ladies who bring us a list, spies are deployed, once confirmed we pounce on them!” The women are complicit.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:46 AM
1

What feminists really hate is the patriarchy—the web of institutions that systemically oppress women. What patriarchy?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:43 AM
1

I like the egalitarian movement because it provides much more analysis and cause for balancing power, but does it have to be gender-oriented?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:31 AM
2

I really like your definition.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:29 AM
1

I started out at 16 years old doing hot roofs. What a different and liberating world than academe. But a job that can break your back over the years.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:29 AM
1

So what do you do with labels which others stick to you in academe and which influence your advancement or success? It is such a PC gossip mill in the university.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:27 AM
1

I see this ration even more lopsided for men in STEM.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:23 AM
1

I have no idea what you could possibly mean since men are far behind women in education What I mean is that educational equality was always important to me for the past twenty-five years. And as you point out, that's why I am increasingly concerned by the growing inequalities in education for males.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:22 AM
2

I am realizing that the gains have already been made, but many feminists are not satisfied that women have not taken advantage of these gains.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:18 AM
1

Reminds me of Dickinson's advice to see things slant.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:15 AM
1

That is what I need to believe -- that getting equal rights for all is part of this movement.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 11:17 PM
3

I appreciate your welcome, especially considering that I am through and through a liberal about so many things. But here I am absolutely flummoxed about how to deal with American feminism in the university classroom, humanities department, and campus overall without destroying my achievements and position. But as you say, to be where I am could make a greater difference.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:53 PM
1

The misandry is high on progressive-leaning media, and that's why I am wondering what went wrong.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:50 PM
2

Thank god. I've been feeling pretty alone on this one, except here and AVFM and NCFM (sites like that).
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:49 PM
2

equality for all That's exactly what I fought for when I started acting politically almost 35 years ago during the early eighties. But now? Now it's about driving manhood out of every corner.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:47 PM
1

At the end of the day, that's what I want. To make that clear to academics is always a tricky process.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:45 PM
3

Thanks for turning me to Harvey Silvergate. So much common sense here.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:43 PM
1

Have been reading Patai. And realize the dangers of dissent and especially questioning feminist, anti-hetero thinking.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:39 PM
3

That's a really fascinating observation. My thoughts have gone that way before, but I could not fully accept it since I knew I was supporting "liberal" labeled causes. Yes, I recall the marginalizing way gay men were treated through the fifties, sixties, and seventies, and finally into the eighties and AIDS.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:50 PM
1

What kind of madness is this? Absolute madness. Catch-22 comes to mind. If you remain silent, you're guilty. If you speak up, you're being defensive and therefore guilty.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:42 PM
1

Amazing rant.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:13 PM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:42 PM
1

in both the classic sense and an ideal modern sense of "liberal" I like that definition. That notion of liberal is constantly under attack by the postmodernists and post-humanists at my institution. These renegades actually want to move beyond liberalism altogether, which they claim is the problem (whether scientific empiricism or Cartesian skepticism).
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:41 PM
3

Rhetorical theory is my field although my focus has been how political and social movements develop, coalesce, and perform in the twentieth century. I would love to hear about your book idea.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:37 PM
8

Love the Carlin anecdote. And very much appreciate the advice and wishes. Yeah, a liberal twenty or so years ago is not the "liberal" of today.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:23 PM
3

Good advice. I like your point of being "intellectually honest," which is really what I am striving to be while feeling the political pressures of pro-feminist directions in the humanities department where I teach. Uttering a word in opposition is almost academic death here.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:21 PM
20

I finished my master's degree in twenty years ago, came back to finish PhD. Jesus, what a difference a generation can make. Higher ed is awash in really extreme PC ideas that make no sense. And now this dictum from the federal government?!
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:42 PM
2

Maybe that means that I am balancing somehow. But if I am conservative on this issue, especially the crap that has overtaken higher ed, so be it.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:40 PM
9

Labels are hangups, that's for sure. There are so many on university campuses. I like your advice of seeking truth no matter what.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:38 PM
2

untold thousands of women who spent their lives staying at home while helping a husband advance his career Seriously? NOW claims women are doing that still? NOW supports the traditional model of marriage? When there are almost as many women as men in the workforce? When women outnumber men (60% to 40%) enrolled in colleges and universities? The NOW script is very old.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:42 PM
1

Moms actually have sons?!?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:15 PM
2

This is concerning to our service as well because the citizen who observed this was close by and the citizen could have been asked for direction from this man, however the unknown man chose to ask the young children instead Simply reverse the gender. Will "citizen" report the unknown woman?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:09 PM
1

Thank you for explaining this comparison. But what about the £6,500 per month for trastuzumab.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 10:06 PM
1

How do you account for the discrepancy between the BBC reporting of lower costs and the estimates in these studies?
/r/MensRights15/08/14 09:20 PM
2

As for the blacks, that's not quite accurate, the issue was religious voters, there was simply an overlap. I agree that religious voters weighed heavily in 8's passage. However, Prop 8 would not have passed with the yes from 49% white and 49% Asian voters. It needed the yes from 70% black and 53% Latino voters. but the big picture matters. Right. That was the Obama effect -- doubling the turnout in African-American communities.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:53 PM
1

You have a point, but the devil is in the details. First, the cost for Abiraterone was about £2,900 per month per patient, whereas Kadcyla was going to cost almost £6,500 per month per patient. Second, the funding for breast cancer versus prostate cancer in the UK is almost 3 to 1.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:34 PM
3

There's nothing wrong that picture. What if the man were her grandfather?
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:38 AM
1

Yeah, I guess I did. But only on this issue.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:34 AM
1

As women increase in power or access to power, and as women feel more secure, they say and do things that are not only contrary to nature, but also injurious to males.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:00 AM
1

confidentiality disputes. The law applies to “circumstances where the parties agree or understand that the image shall remain private.” This might be obvious if the victim never consented to being recorded at all. In other cases, the defendant and victim may disagree about their expectations for the recording, which would make conviction difficult or impossible. He said/She said disputes can be easily resolved here by both parties recording their consent to begin with and agreeing to keep it pri…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:55 AM
3

we banned gay marriage True, the state has some conservative leanings. That ban strangely came about partly due to the overwhelming black vote for Obama. But the ban was eventually overturned. failed to legalize marijuana. Sure. But most NCal growers and users did not want to legalize to avoid cutting into profits and raising prices.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:51 AM
2

Just think about how 2,000 years ago the Greeks were a much more open society. We must remember that love between a man and a boy where not as taboo as today. Ancient Greeks also constructed a very powerful kind of masculinity centered on science, mathematics, logic, and athletics.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:40 AM
3

Interesting story given our dwindling privacy rights overall.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:35 AM
1

Couple of thoughts. Less funding to provide abiraterone may mean more funding to other cancer medicines that are perhaps more in tune with female-oriented health system. Same problem with reproductive drugs and services in the Affordable Care Act - fully funded for females, not for males.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 01:34 AM
1

I agree that looking for evolutionary purpose is reasonable. In fact, this PMS theory is intriguing since it assumes that sexual/survival drives underpin social development. I just want the same consideration for male biology, which is more often than not either denied or demonized.
/r/PussyPass13/08/14 05:14 PM
3

"misconstrued," "misguided" No. You're Miss Construed. You're Miss Guided.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:50 PM
2

Give up? Right when the tide is changing.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:47 PM
1

Sexual violence here . . . (let's be honest) . . .is masculinity. criticizing the partner sexually In other words, Expressing Criticism is to Act Masculine discounting the partner's feelings regarding sex In other words, Denying Feelings is to Deny the Feminine withholding sex and affection In other words, Withholding Affection is to Deny the Feminine always demanding sex In other words, Wanting Sex More Than Twice Per Week is to Be Masculine
/r/MensRights13/08/14 02:04 PM
1

Sheer number, which I'm sure still does not represent all cases, is quite stunning. Unfortunately, the degree to which male teachers get raked and baked on this issue is far worse.
/r/PussyPass13/08/14 12:05 PM
3

Not only does she have pussy (it). She has lesbian pussy (next best thing to virginity). Double pussy pass.
/r/PussyPass13/08/14 11:52 AM
1

The male nurse caretaker is a perfect analogy to the female fire fighter, except for one thing -- the way we view (and major media handle) the sexism. Both professions are about caring, but in different ways. Media seem to assume that these two professions are primarily gender specific and that they carry values associated with each accordingly. That is, nurses are bedside caretakers whereas fire fighters are dare devils running into fires. The effect is that nurses don't typically die doing the…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:07 AM
1

I will post something in the future that is related to this post, but for now I will only mention that during the 20 years I taught in California I experienced secondhand and firsthand false accusations against male teachers. One might say, "The animals have taken over the zoo." But then you might be accused of abuse for that.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:08 AM
0

ditto
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:57 AM
0

pussy whipped males
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:56 AM
-1

ditto
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:56 AM
6

Devolved humanoids less appealing than chimps.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:51 AM
1

Occupational hazards have always affected men more than women. If we had stories of hundreds of females dying while fire-fighting or while doing any high-risk occupation, our society (and feminists in particular) would be far less tolerable, putting front-and-center in the news the destructive nature of that work to women. And it would not be beyond some extremists, in fact, to call for ending fire-fighting altogether, as absurd as that sounds (much like the absurdities happening in changing sta…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:44 AM
11

Assumes that two factors exist which must change for men: (1) Men are in control - DON'T BE ANY MORE; JUST LEAVE WOMEN ALONE; DO NOT COME TO THEIR RESCUE; AND BE SURE TO TRUST NOT IN WOMEN. (2) Women hate male control - DON'T LET THEM HATE YOU; INSTEAD, LEAVE WOMEN ALONE; DO NOT BE THEIR SAVIOR/TARGET; AND BE VERY SURE TO TRUST IN MEN.
/r/PussyPass11/08/14 07:59 PM
7

Growing up in the sixties, I recall an uncle saying to me, "Remember. Women control 90% of discretionary spending and 100% of the pussy. Be wise." As crude as that was, it is disturbing to see that this study shows that not only was my uncle pretty much right, but that the economic situation has also switched in favor of women earning more on average than men equal education and status.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 07:49 PM
1

Illuminati. Light. Fire.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:58 PM
1

Sorry, man. Supreme story about failures of our system.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:40 PM
1

Yeah, right. Please.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:13 PM
1

end of innocence she was approached by a more senior male scientist who listened to the student describe her poster and made her feel truly accomplished, like a real scientist. But then things got weird. There were some flirtatious remarks; he asked her out for coffee or dinner
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:49 PM
1

Irony here is that hard scientists are just as engaged in social construction as social scientists. Put another way, I want to study like men, go into combat like men, fight fires like men, live like men - but I want to change everything to my favor and lower all risks.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:46 PM
3

This is what some moms would like police to do now that they have kicked dad out or sent him to prison.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:02 PM
1

Read the entire article. Who said Barnett discussed such and such. The school, the woman in question, other students, the Title IX investigators? Interesting that Barnett had sworn testimonies. Those are probably going to very hard to wish away. Until Barnett takes the school to court, hearsay is a powerful tool.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:39 PM
3

rule of law Universities are employers, not courts. For that reason, Barnett must go to court and sue.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:34 PM
2

fine, call it prejudice, call it harassment if you want I would call it passionate and zealous, a search for some justice.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:32 PM
9

Let's be honest. Sports broadcasters feed on tales of aggression. What's new here (and not at all chivalrous) is that instead of a male turning his cheek, he slaps back after female slapped first. Whole lot of fear shakin' down the sports empire.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:21 PM
7

Perfect Grimm's tale: Professor discovers and writes about manipulation and deception in Office of Discrimination and Harassment, then is fired.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:27 PM
4

Man may be a victim when another man attacks him or even when a dog attacks him. But never when a woman attacks him.
/r/PussyPass09/08/14 10:57 AM
1

Ah, the milk of human kindness.
/r/PussyPass09/08/14 10:53 AM
12

Silly, but makes a point comically that men can be overlooked in certain situations.
/r/PussyPass09/08/14 10:49 AM
1

Did you make this up?
/r/PussyPass09/08/14 10:47 AM
1

No pp?! What?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:45 AM
6

One abused man said: They just laughed and hung up the phone. Male: I am a victim of domestic violence. Feminist: Males cannot victims. Male: Then what am I? Feminist: You are a sexist, a harasser, and a liar.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:40 AM
7

Mama bears roaming the parks.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:27 AM
1

April's fool is a man.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:24 AM
1

Extreme libertarian thinking.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:17 AM
1

Two dozen young professional women around the country read books by exclusively female authors—Judy Blume’s Just as Long as We’re Together, Rachel Kushner’s The Flamethrowers, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah Judy Blume, who kept her first husband's name even though he had "suffocated" her -- IRONY? Kushner's The Flamethrowers, which pays tribute to Flaubert's Madame Bovary -- IRONICALLY thought to be a feminist icon. Ngozi Adichie, who says that if you say you are a feminist, then you are …
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:03 AM
2

bitch about the glass ceiling For men, there doesn't seem to be a glass bottom.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:34 AM
1

Can't argue with that example. But I don't really see the analogy with gaming devotion. The author's use of "addicted" has a different meaning, I believe, than the one for drug addiction. Here I think the author intended overly enthusiastic devotion to an activity. Maybe we will have to disagree about the interpretation. But I am amazed at how totally honest this author is about producing something that the consumer might use over and over again. Truth be known: Most people aren't that easy to m…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:32 AM
1

Actually, my point is not to say that the narrowing earnings gap is ironic. God knows, the gap is still bad. Instead, I was saying that this chart overlooks a bigger problem in terms of work earnings -- that wages/salaries overall (for men especially) have barely risen.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:14 AM
1

Such as?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:06 AM
2

She's creeping me out.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:05 AM
2

Making money selling the right product is not evil.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 02:25 AM
3

I think everything you say supports a different way in which feminism has likely benefited men (and women), on average. Still don't see the social and economic benefits overall to men if being divorced, fighting child custody battles, and paying alimony have been the consequences most men have faced. Most divorces are filed unilaterally by female spouses. Most child custody judgments favor the mother. And almost all alimony is paid by men. I would dispute your suggestion that 'high feminist days…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:58 AM
7

Two working partners in a marriage affords a better quality of life than when just the husband provides the income. False assumption #1: Pair bonds held. Not true. The trend over the past fifty years has been a downward spin for marriage, from 70% to 50% of all Americans over age 15 years old. On top of that, single mothers are breadwinners in 40% of all households today. Otherwise, second-wave feminists have always been vocally for divorce and independence. False assumption #2: Household income…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:47 PM
1

From the Mississauga News on June 17, 2014: The 42-year-old woman who was driving the 2002 Chevrolet Impala was uninjured and treated for shock. Peel Regional Police are investigating to determine if charges will be laid.
/r/PussyPass07/08/14 07:19 PM
39

Let us reverse the situation. Andrew Mears brutally assaults Ashley Haughwout. I'm not positive, since we live in America, but I'm betting the penalty is stiffer.
/r/PussyPass07/08/14 07:06 PM
1

Would you disagree that societal norms have changed in the last 220 years, about one year after the Constitution was ratified, for men and women? Of course not. In fact, that has been my argument all along. Societal norms change. So do societal structures. Since the American Revolution (a movement ostensibly about overturning the most iconic patriarchal system--allegiance to a king), whatever was left of patriarchy went into swift decline, replaced by sibling-democratic-capitalist changes. These…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:00 PM
1

Has there been any increase in sciences, engineering, etc, since 1790 that could increase filing of patents? If so then shouldn't that be accounted for women as well, as more opportunities became available for them? It is true that most patents today involve computer engineering and electronics. But women have actually dropped in employment in these areas over the past decade, as can be see in the Disparities in STEM Employment. The good news, however, is that over the past decade patents have a…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:01 AM
2

Let me deal with one thing at a time, and for this post I will deal with your claim of wage gap logic: You're using the same logic that is trotted about to justify a wage gap. I have one answer: Go read Warren Farrell's Why Men Earn More.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:48 AM
1

pp = this submission is definitely
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:31 PM
5

Just call the Post-Freud-Kinsey-Masters&Johnson Era our own Puritanism 2.0. The "crackdown" has begun in the name of saving sex workers and trafficked humans. Please do. But I wonder why these stings never start in the hallowed chambers of the U.S. Congress, where (it is rumored) lots of buying and selling of everything, including sex, goes on.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:29 PM
33

At least I did not say "double penetration."
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:18 PM
2

Example?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:35 PM
-1

BS, yes. If you mean that women want parity with men without the same responsibilities, requirements, and penalties.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:33 PM
5

Where's the global men's conference?
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:31 PM
2

Thanks for the clarification. I absolutely interpreted your point in a crazy different way. Sorry.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:29 PM
92

The standard Double Standard because men's rights have yet to penetrate mainstream culture.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:25 PM
42

Whoa, whoa, whoa! What kind of BS is this? I would argue that for a long time women were not in the position to file patents as much as men were. Let's get history correct about patents first. The Patent Act of 1790 had been enacted in the U.S. to allow both males and females to protect their inventions. And in 1809, Mary Kies was the first female to receive a patent. It was for a silk-straw woven hat.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:23 PM
2

I have followed these "STEM" numbers for awhile. Interesting how far females have fallen in the IT field. Of course, with efforts by feminist groups, Jesse Jackson, and others attacking Silicon Valley, this abysmal stat will get turned around in no time.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:40 PM
3

aut liberi aut libra
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:38 PM
2

I don't know, but my guess is there you will find more parity.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:36 PM
5

If you apply gender social construction theory, she may in fact be one.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:06 PM
7

What do your points have to with being smarter? Do you mean that going to war indicates less intelligence and that being fewer in number does too. I'm just not sure what you meant. If that is what you meant, then it falls apart quickly when an opponent points at IQ tests, science achievements, tech achievements, etc. etc. Depends on what we are comparing. That's why I prefer to see males and females as individuals and diverse and given similar opportunities, rather than focusing on one over the …
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:05 PM
17

And in fact Pres. Obama was going to tap him, Lawrence Summers, for FED chief. But, and I am only speculating here (but doing so with keen reasons to believe I am right), perhaps Michelle and other feminists said no, and told their Feminist in Chief to go with Janet Yellen, first female FED in charge.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 05:00 PM
87

Meanwhile, men hold 94.5% of commercial patents, and women are "smarter" than men according to Michelle. I can hear the cry: "OMG, but you're holding women back by embarrassing them with such statistics." Or: "That's because of the patriarchy." Or: "I don't believe in statistics!" Or: "What are commercial patents?"
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:56 PM
2

As a white male, I have dealt with this kind of logic in academe for years. In fact, while in grad school, a very bright feminist professor evaluated down my seminar presentation as inappropriate because it was, as she phrased it, "so well organized and logical" and thus "white male thinking." Because her critique was done in front of other grad students during our seminar, it was a surprise when she repeated one more time "white male thinking" in grading down my sources, mainly philosophers fro…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:44 PM
0

You have a point although the gf is now in the best position. She believes she has won.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:33 PM
7

Reminds one of Orwell's Animal Farm - "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:28 PM
1

Ad hominem attacks are okay for feminists; just don't use them on feminists.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:26 PM
0

Very nice list! I would add Peg Tyre, a self-proclaimed feminist, who discovered this very thesis (the learning gap) because she was raising boys. Book is titled The Trouble with Boys.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:21 PM
1

you literally write, "the patriarchy doesn't exist". You do go on to modify that statement somewhat I guess when posting (as opposed to writing a publishable paper) messiness results. That said, I still stand by my position in terms of the verb "doesn't" as in the present tense in developed western societies. Patriarchy, as it is typically used in academe, is a loaded, monolithic term that provides very little service in analysis of complex reality. Deleuze as you say may be used by feminists; h…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:54 PM
2

Okay. And I agree that in some ways, not all, state psych prisons are worse.
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 02:51 PM
3

Don't forget that the unsuccessful assassin was also African-American.
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 02:46 PM
1

Now wait. How would a male assassin have been treated after stabbing (attempted murder) King? Just asking. My guess, and I may be wrong, is that "he" would have gotten double the time.
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 02:45 PM
2

Of course, I agree that this concept is used by many scholars in the field of gender studies, humanities, and social sciences -- where you will find most of these studies. I mention the fields because these are not typically empirical studies but rather critical studies. That is, most of these studies rely on philosophical/political assumptions within the field of social sciences and humanities, not those in biology or physics. In terms of the social sciences, then, to deny patriarchy does not e…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:00 PM
3

Thank you for asking. I teach at an R1 school. My field is rhetorical theory. I focus on social movements and cultural theory. I understand that my view is not in line with more conventional lines of thought (but episteme needs constant questioning). My scholarship is most certainly in line with the Continental philosophy of the French and Germans over the past fifty years. And actually, the line of thought I am pursuing is one that has firm ground among key contemporary philosophers and cultura…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:19 AM
2

I teach at a university, but I am not one of those enamored of the feminist-dominated ideology and culture. That said, I have had to engage it regularly and question its objectives. Feminist thinkers (a phrase that seems oxymoronic) have a grip on academe; and if it were not for some of the sports programs and the math/sciences/engineering, the university would be lost. You are right that "the patriarchy doesn't exist." If it did exist in any real form at all, it fell apart quickly with modernit…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:54 AM
0

I have a problem with intent generally speaking. How do we define that? Even if one forgets to turn on a blinker when making a turn on the road and does not intend any harm in the process, he/she may still be responsible if there is a collision because no blinker was used. True, intent may matter in the child's death, in determining whether the parent committed homicide versus manslaughter. But my point is that forgetfulness is the worst in terms of unkind and subconscious intents, for it leaves…
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 01:08 AM
1

Exactly. I agree that abortion is not killing a baby. Indeed, I have fought for a woman's right to choose all my life. So nothing is wrong with me, except that I was not clear enough for you. So give me a chance here to be clearer, and hopefully I will be. What I was saying was that Mormons cannot have it both ways, morally speaking. They cannot both be against abortion as murder and be for a mother who abandons her child to terrible heat death. Mormons and fundies often argue that abortion is m…
/r/PussyPass05/08/14 10:36 PM
1

I agree that the girl acted so miserably that it suggests other issues. So if you want to blame her behavior on mental-emotional-family issues, I would understand. But excusing her in any way and shifting focus onto a 14-year-old male is an affront to both logic and decency. What did he have to do with the infant being left in the dirt? The boy maintains he is not the father, that he never had sex with her. A paternity test will help clear his name, but why are the police going down this path? I…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:11 PM
1

The Wizard of Oz Effect, I guess. Makes sense. Still, I wonder if shortness is compensated in other ways or other fields.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:22 PM
1

Some very successful actors who are male and short: Ben Stiller = 5'8" Tom Cruise = 5'7" Robin Williams = 5'7" Robert Downey Jr. = 5'7" Jack Black = 5'6" Elijah Wood = 5'6" Woody Allen = 5'5" Dustin Hoffman = 5'5' Emilio Estevez = 5'4" Richard Dreyfuss = 5'4" Dudley Moore = 5'2" Danny Devito = 5'0"
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:57 PM
3

compile the statistics on who left the kids Here's link to a study that looks at all heatstroke deaths of children forgotten in vehicles from 1998 to 2013, but it does not include criminal charges, etc.: Demographics of Persons Responsible for Heatstroke Deaths of Children Forgotten in Vehicles
/r/PussyPass05/08/14 04:28 PM
1

This isn't exactly unique to women. The point is that it is reasonable to believe that a father or male relative would be treated with more suspicion and most likely would have been arrested or at least charged.
/r/PussyPass05/08/14 04:23 PM
-1

With the fundraising efforts, it doesn't seem like the family actually asked for money. It's a community effort to raise it. More than likely to cover funeral costs. If it is a community effort, then why the family's photo? If the photo is being used without the family's permission, seems the family would have said so by now. And if for funeral costs, then it is for the family to use personally, right? Frankly, I have heard of no families fundraising for funeral costs. Most importantly, the enti…
/r/PussyPass05/08/14 01:25 PM
3

Great link. Read it. Story suggests that "intent" may be the key, and so I noticed these details: 15-25 child deaths left in cars per year in U.S. Typically incidents happen in spring, summer, and early fall Child safety requirements in 1990s put infant passengers in backseat No specific age, gender, race, class for forgetting a child in a car Brain science shows that operating a car often goes into autopilot, not the best brain place to be for child-caring - this phenomenon can happen to even t…
/r/PussyPass05/08/14 11:59 AM
4

I agree that pregnancy can be a roller-coaster, but before we turn this into a pity party it is important to remember that the boy is innocent of this whole thing (until proven otherwise). Concerning the abandonment, the unnamed girl evidently abandoned the girl and even acted as if it were not hers, see quote from earlier story below: Kopp’s daughter Cathleen Neal said the teen mother came outside after the baby was found and acted as if she had no idea where the baby could have come from. Evid…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:28 AM
7

It would be helpful to identify all the nonprofits and charities assisting females versus males. I can't imagine that the list of organizations for males is even half as long as that of groups for females.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:21 AM
13

Actually, you have not seen the entire story which has been a series of reports for the past week or so. In fact, it was the mother who abandoned the infant. See the July 28 story.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:13 AM
13

even falsely accusing him of being a paedophile Incidents of mothers falsely accusing a father of paedophilia are trending up just as incidents of women falsely accusing a man of rape have been.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:37 AM
1

Realistic.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:30 AM
12

No matter the level of remorse.
/r/PussyPass04/08/14 06:25 PM
3

Girl, you can't pick on someone that much bigger than yourself without some martial arts training.
/r/PussyPass04/08/14 02:15 PM
2

Nice discussion on rape myth.
/r/PussyPass04/08/14 02:10 PM
10

Looks like she will be tried after psychiatric treatment.
/r/PussyPass04/08/14 02:06 PM
42

Never heard "stop" or "cops" when the bitch was smacking the dude and hurdling the counter.
/r/PussyPass04/08/14 02:04 PM
2

Interesting. I was just reading Troublesome Inheritance by Nicholas Wade, and he discusses this very protective instinct as a development in males in our evolutionary history. Evolutionary sociobiologists argue that it seems likely that human emergence out of the woods (literally during a global drought) and the consequential pair-bonding that developed between males and females have much to do with this instinct. In fact, males and females were much the same size and body type before this momen…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:23 AM
2

Okay, I agree with you but with some qualifications - how "patriarchy" as a word is used, whether there is actually a patriarchy existing today, and whether men have free or false choices compared to most females. First, clearly "patriarchy" is used as a code word against men by feminists (and based on Farrell's argument by powerful men), so we are dealing with the power of language to win a political or social argument. The feminist "victim theory" is part of that attempt. If you believe that t…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:09 AM
1

Excellent. It is the contradictory nature of the female to hold such contradictory expectations of males. Protect me from enemies, but don't go to war. Be a real father, but don't poke your nose into my reproductive and custody issues. Be a good student in school, but don't question the oppression of boyhood and political correctness.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:23 AM
1

Chivalry today -- a perverse kind of knightly performance without the armor and without the aggression (except in sports), yet always achieved to maintain an illusion of honor no matter what women do.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 04:12 AM
1

That definition makes sense to me. Does our society at large expect anything regarding the maturity of boys that is true to their maleness? I agree that the schools have reconstructed gender expectations so that boys must act as girls to succeed.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:42 AM
1

Admittedly, I don't think I can say that adult females are as highly adaptive as young females. And I have to admit that the terms of social development today are no longer being defined by males as much as by females. Erik Erikson pointed out the problems that teen girls face for developing socially so early. But in the book Real Boys, the author demonstrates how difficult it is for a boy to mature into an adult male.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:32 AM
1

We currently define maturity in a very feminine way. I'm wondering what kind of maturity that is.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:02 AM
1

I think you're right. But I'm not sure this sociological-educational invention is any less benign than the concept of "childhood" or "parenthood," except as you say when it comes to holding boys back. On that point, I am in total agreement, but what do we do now? Return to earlier definitions or make new ones? If we accept the premise that adolescence exists for boys, is there any thing to gain from that? Probably not, although strangely enough males take longer to develop physically, psychologi…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 03:01 AM
1

Almost performs as well as Melissa McCarthy
/r/PussyPass03/08/14 04:52 PM
1

The point of paternity leave is to include males in the process of "parental leave." That's the male rights aspect. But I like your questions about the entire concept because when someone is single (or not but very independent) he/she is normally puzzled by society's parental privileges (leave, tax breaks, etc.). I have always seen the parental privileges as trade-offs for parental responsibilities that society in general does not want to have to take total responsibility for. You can disagree w…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 04:33 PM
1

Thank you for contacting me with your decision and your rationale. I have no problem resubmitting with new title less provocative, and I may at some point. However, for now I want to address your clear concerns with the hope of convincing you that my title is not any more editorialized than most others, and that your reasons for your claim have problems being supported (based totally upon the Economist reporting). Your first reason is to deny that men will be retried with a "lower standard of pr…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:33 PM
11

This job is actually several steps above getting your ass blown off in a war (98% men) or losing an arm at a manufacturing plant (98% men). Let's be honest: Men are viewed and treated as disposable. And unless we do something about that problem, sexism will continue where is really matters -- in times of war, in times of sacrifice, etc.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:13 PM
2

Mama bears always get pp
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 03:48 PM
0

document is worth citing to debunk the statistic, but of course, you are wasting your time presenting actual facts to radical feminists, and should probably only consider debunking the statistic for those who have an open mind. You're right with three modifications: Coax only the females with open minds to consider claims to the opposite Convince all males to be rational and deny stupid claims But totally excoriate and attack any male advancing such feminist claims
/r/MensRights02/08/14 03:41 PM
43

self-effacing female enablers of angry white men She identifies these misogynists and pedophiles by RACE too: angry white men. Let's see how this works logically. While the groups called misogynists and pedophiles have angry white men in them, the group called angry white men are all misogynists and pedophiles. So let me get this right, if you are are FOR men's rights and AGAINST feminist's agendas, then you are an angry white male who is automatically a misogynist pedophile?!? Such extreme ster…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:55 PM
2

You're right that I don't want the female killer to be free, but it just seems that the case has more to it than is reported. Of course, your questions about husband and friends add insight. But why couldn't the investigators lean on those people? I mean they wired up an informant. Based on what I am reading so far, I would like to know if this same prosecutor would give in so easily with a male assailant. My guess is "no" since a jury is in fact more easily convinced of a man killing in cold bl…
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 02:22 PM
1

Good question. I am not sure how WA state deals with murder over all compared with FL.
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 02:18 PM
1

It could be that in a magical social vacuum only 30% of women would do computer science as a major, but for reals it's only 20% or so. Not sure whether you pulled that number out of the sky or not, but if there is any society that has offered women (even pushed them into) such opportunities, it is this one. My god, there are some 200+ organizations recruiting women into STEM right now. How many organizations are recruiting men? As far as I know, zero.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:50 PM
0

science fields typically offer fewer social opportunities for women to capitalize on their SMV Now we are getting to where biology meets society -- that is, here's the nexus between sexuality (biology) and social behavior (society) at its most obvious. To be blunt, if your sexuality is about having and relating to children and finding family security, why would you fight that and pursue geekiness, detachment for others, and the utter lack of romance. I argue, again, that it is biology that is pu…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:42 PM
1

Abortion is legal in all states by federal law. Finding help getting one may be harder in Alabama than California.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:34 PM
0

I would not be able to stand getting reminded of that rape all the time Abortion (even adoption) as well as day after pills are available (for free under Obamacare). What is going on here is feminism's attempt to have complete reign over reproduction and its effects while still having men "pay for it."
/r/MensRights02/08/14 12:32 PM
7

Plea bargain? She had to confess. The more I look at this case, it is clearly a pussy pass. The investigators had evidence, testimony, multiple defendants -- the one thing different, however, was they had a female killer.
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 12:27 PM
7

In another article about this cold case, it was an informant in prison who broke it. He evidently knew about the body parts being moved by the murderer's second husband who buried them under concrete. The informant was wired and got more evidence from another "body mover," who also talked about the killer. This information evidently led to recovering the victim's body parts, which allowed forensics to determine cause of death. I am not a criminal lawyer, but if this kind of evidence and testimon…
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 12:13 PM
1

Marysville is a suburb of Seattle.
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 12:07 PM
2

I understand that the plea bargain can get a guilty verdict for reduced sentencing, but it seems to me that a man would be treated differently in this very same situation -- which is the point of this post to begin with. So maybe I need to find other examples; here's one to start. *Appeals Court rejects man's right to plead guilty until family of victim weighs in
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 12:06 PM
12

I am still not fully convinced. I mean, look at the circumstantial evidence used in the trial concerning the murder of Chandra Levy. The defendant in that case (a male) was sentenced to, I think, fifty or sixty years in prison.
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 05:58 AM
21

She would be guilty of murder in the first degree if either of these fit in Washington state: (a) With a premeditated intent to cause the death of another person, he or she causes the death of such person or of a third person; or (b) Under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to human life, he or she engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to any person, and thereby causes the death of a person. Premeditation was denied and plea deal struck, but certainly she showed a…
/r/PussyPass02/08/14 04:29 AM
2

AMEN!
/r/MensRights02/08/14 01:19 AM
4

Nice. Reminds me of finding a few male studies books on shelves marked "Gender" in a bookstore - although the rest of the shelves are packed with books on women's studies.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:09 PM
27

This young man is worthy of MLK's call of nonviolent conduct. The King himself was almost killed in 1958 when an irate and delusional 20-year-old African-American female in Harlem stabbed him. Of course, of course, of course, she was deemed so mental that she did not have to stand trial for attempted murder.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 09:35 PM
2

Paraphrasing Shakespeare from Troilus and Cressida, her foot speaks, but the spikes will do more harm than good -- I mean of course that wearing high-heeled spikes like these shoes deforms the feet.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:51 PM
3

Enforceable for kicking men out of colleges, tainting their educational history, etc. etc. . . . but in a court of law, I just don't see this law standing up. On the other hand, I am open to being proven me wrong about applying this law in criminal court.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:25 PM
8

the difference between this and an alleged intoxication rape . . . . . . is almost nothing except there is no one to blame but herself.
/r/PussyPass01/08/14 05:28 PM
10

I agree in principle that it becomes a "she said, he said" thing. However, the problem is that I am 99.9% certain that men will automatically be treated with suspicion if this bill passes and schools attempt to enforce it.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:07 PM
5

Actually, as strange as that sounds, that may be the best advice although it is so unrealistic with coed dorms, frat parties, etc.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:50 AM
2

If you are a social constructivist, which I am not, you are going to see sexism here since any gender disparity can be balanced with social reconstruction. If you are a social biologist, which I am, you are going to see sex differences here since any social-economic behavior is rooted in biology. We are not blank slates.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:43 AM
2

Something is stinky still about holding the guy unless they have really good evidence and testimony from others.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:37 AM
1

She says what other women think: "You know, I have slept with a lot of guys in the industry, but none of them helped me get my record deals. Which is annoying." Using men as disposable reflects on how many women view themselves.
/r/PussyPass31/07/14 03:53 PM
2

I thought about that too - why the police surveillance. Questions that police had about the case or stepping up for a buddy? I don't know why, but I do know that mateship builds strong bonds in Australia.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:15 PM
17

Seems so. And then some - since he has now still to prove the charges were bogus in court.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:24 PM
5

Smart Boy = records entire event (always do that, guys), uses video evidence (always do that, guys), and remarks that if genders were reversed he would be behind bars (always remember that, guys).
/r/PussyPass31/07/14 01:48 PM
16

Incredible - while the the accused is denied due process and representation, the accuser is given representation (confidential advisor). Look, let's blame this perversion of legal procedure not only on feminists, but also on those political men who aid and abet feminists.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:24 PM
1

My guess is the argument goes something like this in the minds of criminal justice "social constructivists": She's the mother and owner of reproductive/child-custody rights; therefore, she cannot be harmed with time away from the child even for lying or exaggerating about claims against the father, since the child is already and always hers to protect/use.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:12 AM
2

The problem with these programs -- targeting only females or people of color -- is that they break our solemn social contract that we not prejudice or favor citizens by the color of their skin and their gender. Maybe that is why the program Brother's Keeper is funded by philanthropists rather than the federal government. However, the twelve offices for women within the federal government are funded specifically for one gender although the Supreme Court has ruled in the past against any gender-sp…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:57 AM
1

Openly bigoted and in violation of Title IX.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:35 AM
6

Until due process is required, taking universities to court will be the only solution.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:45 PM
18

When the feminist author is quoted, she gets one thing right: Feminists are always offended by strong male stereotypes, even calling an "uber awesome dad was a parody." Incredible!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:38 PM
2

Yeah, you're totally right about the article being about creating the category of the gender-specific victim or female prisoner with TBI (setting the groundwork for a pussypass in criminal justice). In that sense, I can imagine that the reference to 50% of male prisoners with TBI was a perverse token attempt at gender fairness. Doesn't work as fairness, however, as you so clearly state.
/r/PussyPass30/07/14 04:21 PM
1

I should have emphasized the point that the disparity between the sheer numbers of men and women prisoners could have been made more strongly in the article by looking fairly at all TBI cases among all prisoners - that is, stating that only 4% of prisoners with TBI are female. The article attempts instead to make the issue about gender equality rather than the underlying condition for many individuals in prison being TBI.
/r/PussyPass30/07/14 03:05 PM
3

Warren Farrell's Myth of Male Power even more exactly shows how men are economically, politically, socially, and sexually disposable in our culture.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:53 PM
4

You have a point. But the pp is strongly implied here nonetheless by how media present numbers of female prisoners versus male prisoners. For instance, the journalist could have discussed both genders as areas of study and concern throughout. Instead the journalist chose to focus on females even though males represent more TBI cases not just in percentage 50%male/40%female, but also in real numbers by completely and totally ignoring the fact that 105,000 males versus 4,500 females have TBI (numb…
/r/PussyPass30/07/14 01:43 PM
2

Keep on this issue and see the National Coalition for Men Carolina Chapter for more -- never forget the false accusations against the Duke U lacrosse players.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:32 AM
3

As a college teacher, very helpful as data to support what I have come to find is hysterical madness.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:30 AM
1

Notice the immediate denial that a man can never hit a woman.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 04:15 AM
3

Dawkins is provocative, a strategy that works because he is being logical (as well as personally revealing). Of course, he could have said, "Let's consider the degree to which any act can be measured, just as we do when we convict a defendant of first-, second-, third- . . . ." But not so provocative this way.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:30 AM
5

I think the pusspass is that the university has not fired her since the assault happened on campus.
/r/PussyPass29/07/14 08:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter