TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pearl_harbour1941 Archive

View 7 posts and 2,050 comments by pearl_harbour1941 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,050 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I have come to the conclusion that feminsm is just one part of: Female-female sexual competition This video explains it, but it is nearly 2 hours long. Basically, where men compete with other men for sexual access to women - and men do it by being good at something - women compete with other women by sabotaging other women. Women will give other women bad social advice, in order to lessen women's chances of mating. Feminism is part of that bad social advice. It's aimed at women. Men are just col…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:44 AM
6

"Classical Feminism" was terrorism. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:38 AM
3

I agree. The education system (curriculum) has been intentionally changed to obviously favor girls. Female teachers are known cross-culturally to favor girls in grading and marking, as well as discipline. This sets up all boys to have formative experiences that show they are "less than", "disfavored", "wrong", or even "sub-human". It cannot fail to have a long-term effect.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 03:22 AM
14

Women who have had strong positive male role models growing up (i.e. a good father figure present from birth to late teenagehood) do not become man-hating. It is the ones that do NOT have male role models - ironically from single mother households - that end up being man-haters. There's very well proven child developmental psychology that supports this idea. Pre-verbal pre-toddlers learn trust in men using the give/take game. That's where it starts. Likewise, boys who are mistreated by women (an…
/r/MensRights21/03/26 10:19 PM
53

I think Bill Burr nailed this (before he went woke). "If they are right, they argue the point, and they stay on point until you're down on your knees, begging." "But here's the thing. If they're wrong, they go rogue. They start thinking about things you are sensitive about, and they start concocting this evil statement, this hail mary attempt to make you so fucking mad.... you just call them a cunt."
/r/MensRights21/03/26 02:32 PM
0

I have. There are several ways of doing it. I tried a Tibetan Buddhist way. There are two meditations and you choose ONE of them and practise as you are literally falling asleep. The first is imagining a white dot on your forehead. This improves clarity of dreams. The second is imagining a red dot on your forehead. This improves volume of dreams. They both worked for me. But I know people that they don't work for. Be warned, you still don't get to choose what you dream of! Your general mental st…
/r/MensRights21/03/26 02:28 PM
6

Theroux was edgy back in the 1980s. He's not now, he's painfully woke and mainstream.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 12:12 PM
17

https://www.girlsaskguys.com/social-relationships/a32803-the-real-gender-gap-the-tax-gap This contains some great graphs. You'll see that over their lifetime, women never break even on their taxes, at any age. (graph 3)
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:58 PM
13

But at the end of the day not to say that woman wouldn’t be able to do this and men would be affected most of the time because (They commit 97% of rape idk it’s in the 90’s or 80’s idk it’s high) This stat is mostly due to legal definitions that define rape as something only a man can do to a woman. When you include "unwanted sex", 43% of young men have had "unwanted sex", and 95% of the perpetrators were women.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 02:29 AM
2

Yeah, I'm sorry I was forward about asking which State. Totally get the privacy thing, it's far too easy for people to get reaaally weird on here. I agree with you. Not sure how to balance rights and responsibilities, but it does seem somewhat one sided right now.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:46 PM
2

I don't believe that the child's rights should supersede either parent, except in the case of being born. It should be born, first. In my state I can do whatever I want with my body. Can you? Which State is that?
/r/MensRights15/03/26 04:00 PM
19

You may find that if you look carefully at your State legislation on the issue, a father's parental rights are dependent on the mother's word alone. If she puts him on the birth certificate, he has a limited time to object, he must do so at his own expense, and the courts can overrule the facts, if they declare it's in the best interests of the child. The child's rights supersede his own (which means he doesn't have any rights to begin with). Bodily autonomy - FGM is illegal, MGM is widely pract…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:27 PM
0

I agree with your bullet points. I would suggest that they are actually all centrist, not rightist. I am almost dead center and those points are equal to each sex, based on merit, rights-and-responsibilities, and practicality. Rightist would probably be unequal but in favor of men.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 01:14 PM
47

Men have no bodily autonomy in the way that women do. Men have no reproductive rights, but 100% reproductive responsibility. Men have no automatic parental rights, where women do (men can be denied parental rights on the word of a woman, or they can be forced to take on parental responsibility without being the father). Men are subject to the draft in most countries, where women are not. "We just want equal rights". Now, where have I heard that before....
/r/MensRights15/03/26 01:09 PM
22

I stopped watching TV nearly 20 years ago, for the reason that I was out of range. I have never really looked back. All I watch now is old episodes of Top Gear and podcasts by men. I love the banter between the guys, no women to mess up the dynamic.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 01:21 PM
0

Neoteny: the genetic trait of looking younger (or ageing more slowly in comparison to others) i.e. youthful looks. Neoteny bring with it both pros and cons. Youth are protected by society (i.e. men and older women), and therefore youthful women are protected more than youthful men, simply due to looking younger. Cons are that due to the younger looks, women tend not to be taken as having as much life experience as men of the same age. Women express neoteny up to about the age of 40, after which …
/r/MensRights08/03/26 12:57 AM
16

When you say "historically" exactly which time period are you referring to? My great grandmother was a lecturer in Archeology at Bristol University UK in the 1920s. My grandmother was a lecturer in Ancient Greek at Cambridge University in the 1960s through to the 1980s. So it must be beyond the last 100 years. If we go back any further, it was only the very rich who could afford to educate themselves, all other people - men, women, boys, girls - could barely read or write. So I'm wondering what …
/r/MensRights06/03/26 01:29 PM
4

I did read bell hooks. She writes that mothers teach Patriarchy to daughters. ("Understanding Patriarchy" 2004) That was all I needed to know. It's just women teaching other women to behave badly.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 04:45 PM
18

How do they know that those "male" warriors didn't identify as women?? So bigoted. lol
/r/MensRights03/03/26 03:10 PM
2

She doesn't address your first point very much. I would suggest that in times of resource scarcity, nothing much is needed to be done by resource-rich women, as they can afford to support multiple offspring healthily, where poorer families will have higher rates of infant mortality due to diet and disease. She does specify that these underhanded strategies only are used in resource-abundant societies, although she doesn't elucidate that it might be due to the fact that almost every "class" of wo…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 10:29 PM
10

Next 15 minutes: Women give other women worse dating advice (i.e. hindering reproductive success) when compared to what they would actually do themselves this tends to show up as the general feminist mantra of "don't need no man, family is not important, sleep with as many people as you can, career is everything".
/r/MensRights02/03/26 06:30 PM
14

It's a nearly two hour interview, so here's a brief overview of the first 15 minutes: Women compete with other women for reproductive success. This competition primarily engages looks (as a proxy for reproductive health) therefore women dressing up, wearing makeup and wearing revealing clothes is fundamentally an aggressive move against other women and has little to nothing to do with attracting men The goal is to have more babies than her competition, and continue this over successive generatio…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:43 PM
8

That's why he qualified it with "by definition". Some bozo in an office somewhere with a hatred for men simply "defined" what rape was and excluded men in that definition. Rape should simply be "unwanted sex", and if you take that specific definition, nearly half of all young men have been raped, 95% of those by women. You can see how that would undermine the idea that "women are wonderful"...
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:17 PM
355

It comes from Mary Koss's 1983 Campus Rape Survey, in which she engaged in "definition creep" throughout the academic paper (if it can really be called academic). Here's how she did it: she claimed, in order consent to sex is the defining factor determining if it is rape or not a woman cannot consent if she is blackout drunk (ignoring men, and ignoring that women rape men) therefore drinking is the major factor in rape in setting a limit of how much alcohol prohibits informed consent, she said a…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 04:00 PM
7

Yeah, I also missed the part where she was required to register as a sex offender and pedophile...
/r/MensRights26/02/26 01:35 PM
23

"Society changes" "Women most affected"
/r/MensRights18/02/26 03:40 PM
34

Please stop reading, clicking and reposting The Guardian. Don't give them your attention. They will close and the world will be a better place for it.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:53 PM
11

This sort of thing? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68880671 (mentions a girl, the picture is of all men) https://www.dawn.com/news/187173/21-women-eight-children-die-in-stampede-karachi-congregation-ends-in-tragedy "21 women, 8 children, and 50 others" [i.e. men?] https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/delhi-meerut-expressway-accident-2-women-killed-in-truck-car-collision-near-ghazipur-toll-plaza-children-injured-videonbsp/4140108/ "2 women and 3 others"
/r/MensRights14/02/26 10:50 PM
12

The double standard is allowing rich guys to do it, but not poor guys.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 03:48 AM
18

Actually, men are more like to be incarcerated for crimes. The entire legal system employs up to 60% leniency towards women over every stage of the 8 stage process, leading to an imbalance of 95:5 which is exactly the same ratio of the prison inmate population. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235215000665
/r/MensRights11/02/26 08:06 PM
50

My (ex)wife weighed 200lbs+ and could easily hold me down. There's no shaking that hippo off of me. But you know, I probably wanted it....[/s]
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:58 PM
23

Who does she get attacked by though statistically? A criminal.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 05:16 PM
44

*Woman grows up feminist* *gets attacked* *wants men to come save her* ____ She's on her own now. She wanted equality, got it, and didn't like it.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 01:52 PM
1

I have read about toxic masculinity, and in my opinion the term makes perfect sense and is not at all misandric. I am looking for evidence that the concept of toxic masculinity is sometimes used in a misandric way That wasn't your original claim. Your original claim was: Hi! I have often heard complaints that the concept of "toxic masculinity" gets abused to shame and condemn men and maleness in general. But I have never seen any really good examples of this. I would like a better understanding …
/r/MensRights09/02/26 03:22 PM
1

If you'll excuse me for saying, it appears as if you have already made up your mind that there are zero examples of the phrase "toxic masculinity" being used to denigrate all men, and you're simply discounting everything presented to you, for one reason or another. You dismiss the articles because "Nothing in them strikes me as misandric". But that wasn't your original claim, so this sounds a little like shifting the goalposts. If an actor is dismissing the argument that "not all men are bad", h…
/r/MensRights09/02/26 03:02 PM
30

So the current state of affairs seems to be: Women have 100% of the decisions, and 0% of the responsibility Men have 0% of the decisions, and 100% of the responsibility Women decide whether they tell the man if they are on birth control or not (she doesn't have to tell the truth, btw), she gets to decide if she gets pregnant, she gets to decide if she keeps the baby or not, she gets to decide if she puts the child up for adoption or if she keeps it. Men get to pay, by force. She doesn't even nee…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 06:31 PM
1

Orgasms, apparently?
/r/MensRights07/02/26 08:16 PM
2

The following thought of mine is purely speculative, and I have no evidence whatsoever to back it up, but I am considering: Women's brains are wired to sense and avoid danger, for evolutionary purposes (mainly to keep children safe). In addition, it is my speculation that they can't turn this skill off, such that if there is no danger, their brain continues to look for danger in less and less likely areas. No women in the 1940s were worried about "the Male Gaze" - that happened in a time of peac…
/r/MensRights07/02/26 01:43 PM
3

https://portfolioofhope.com/2024/11/29/violence-against-girls-and-women-the-threat-of-toxic-masculinity/ This article doesn't say "the threat of men and boys" it says "the threat of Toxic Masculinity". But it actually just means "men and boys". https://www.vice.com/en/article/all-masculinity-is-toxic/ "All masculinity is toxic" https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/benedict-cumberbatch-toxic-masculinity-behaviour-men-b1964096.html [Actor Benedict Cumberbatch]: Dismissing the argument that “…
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:22 PM
1

So, are you looking for a psychological or biological cause for what people describe as "toxic masculinity"? If so, I don't think you'll find one.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 12:11 PM
71

It's projection. Women have a harder time dealing with negative emotions, and are much more likely than men to hate parts of themselves. Women then enforce this with other women. But to be open about hating oneself is to be open about the root cause of the problem (oneself!) and therefore only oneself is to blame, which looks an awful lot like accountability. We all know how allergic to accountability most women are. So they project their own self hatred onto men.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 11:22 AM
2

I would disagree with your assessment. To give an analogy, if someone said "[X] is a negative trait of Black people" you would rightly point out that this is a racist statement if people from other races do it too. Likewise, if someone says "only men can be [X]" this statement itself is sexist if we can show that any woman at all can be [X]. But if you disagree, perhaps you can help me understand in greater detail what it was you were looking for?
/r/MensRights06/02/26 11:17 AM
5

This is quite literally what all men do, all the time.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 02:03 AM
7

It's not like masculinity in the term toxic masculinity can refer to... often stereotypical behaviours such as aggressiveness, standoffishness, misogyny etc.? So here's the problem: When Twitter found online misogyny, they also found that 2/3rds of it was women writing nasty things about other women. So it turns out that misogyny IS gendered, but exactly opposite to how we are always told. Aggression is not gendered, nor is general violence. Extreme violence seems to be slightly gendered, and du…
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:38 PM
10

https://chatelaine.com/living/toxic-masculinity-essay/ "The rules of manhood are holding [men] back" Researchers have found that men who most strongly exhibit conventional masculine traits, or who are most anxious about their masculinity, are more likely to behave in ways that hurt themselves and others: more likely to have unprotected sex, to binge drink, to sexually harass women, to bully other men through homophobic slurs. Note: unprotected sex, binge drinking, sexual harassment and bullying …
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:25 PM
10

It can only be "toxic masculinity" if it is an attribute that a) only men have, b) men are engaged in to reach a goal, and c) is detrimental to them and other people. I have a hard time finding such attributes.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:10 PM
3

I've given you some examples already - play structure in preschoolers, free choice of career (skewing women towards social professions and men towards object professions), fairness, mood regulation... but there are many more, and they are well studied. Women tend towards indirect communication, men tend towards direct communication. And it's not that either side can't learn to communicate differently, but the tendency is biological.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 07:23 PM
2

https://anthropologyreview.org/anthropology-glossary-of-terms/exploring-the-evolution-of-feminist-anthropology/ Leading to: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/medialse/2026/01/16/was-shakespeare-a-black-woman-why-authorship-and-representation-matter/ William Shakespeare was a black woman...
/r/MensRights01/02/26 07:14 PM
1

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to accuse you of something you didn't say. Here's what you did say: Of course relationships and the desire to be loved is natural, but traditional gender roles, especially for men aren't instinctual or biological and they were just socially taught to us So it does appear that you were saying biology played no role. I don't agree with that assertion. It is true that there is overlap in psychological traits across men and women. I'm not disputing that. But there are also b…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 07:12 PM
-1

I agree that both social and biological components play a role. But to suggest that the biological plays no role at all is a little bit one sided. We know, for example, that Testosterone is not responsible for raw aggression - Aromatase receptors in the brain are (and the number of receptors is not gendered). Any hormone breakdown product can trigger an aromatase receptor (including estrogen and progesterone breakdown products) which leads us to a non-gendered outcome for raw aggression. This ca…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 05:15 PM
3

traditional gender roles, especially for men aren't instinctual or biological and they were just socially taught to us I disagree. Gender roles are quite well studied, and have two main components: social and biological. If we minimize the effect of one component, we can see whether the other component is active, and that's exactly what we find. In the Scandinavian countries, we see the most gender equality of all nations, with the least social impediments for either men or women following whate…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:43 PM
1

I'm a strong advocate for men's emancipation and men's rights. However, I think men's overall desire for women is normal and natural, just like women's desire for men to provide is normal and natural. Where it becomes a problem is when people try to weaponize that against us. In my opinion there's a narrow line to be walked down which allows men to appreciate and follow their natural desires for having women in their lives, while protecting ourselves against being used as pawns in someone else's…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:31 PM
13

I agree with your methods. It's interesting that the general field of psychology has known for some time (decades?) that men solve their internal problems through action, and therefore action-based therapy is by far a better option that sitting/emoting therapy. So why aren't we catering to that? (Rhetorical)
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:42 PM
34

I had a friend who divorced, but he and his wife went through marriage counseling first. The therapist claimed she was neutral, but my friend very quickly found out she was biased towards his wife, simply because: woman. He called the counselor out on it, and discontinued sessions. I'm not sure that you're likely to get an unbiased therapist - the entire field is set up in a female-centric way, and is staffed by people who agree with that female-centric worldview. The best therapy I have had was…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:47 PM
68

I would still advise extreme caution. Supposedly, whatever you say to a therapist is confidential, but if you actually look at the fine print, that confidentiality doesn't run very far. If she thinks you are a threat (non-specific, with no clear target victim, just a general "threat") she can tell authorities (anyone, basically) everything that you have told her, and her professional opinion about it.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:18 PM
218

Run. She sound like she isn't able to be objective (I wouldn't actually trust any female therapist to understand men's point of view anyway), even though therapists are required to be. Walk away. If you're traumatized by it, you can possibly ask for your money back, possibly report her to the governing body too, but I wouldn't hold your breath for any action to occur. Therapy is female oriented and female dominated. You won't get far. Cut your loss. Find someone else.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:11 PM
3

What gender equality do we need to work towards? Think carefully. An unpalatable fact is that by giving women the vote - disregarding the obvious right without the commensurate responsibility of having to lay their lives down for their country - women as a voting bloc will always vote further and further left, inevitably and always leading to fascism (via communism first). Do we need equal rights? Or do we need checks-and-balances against the slide into totalitarian regimes... (which would requi…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:03 PM
28

Almost anything with Denzel Washington in - Equalizer 1, 2, 3.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 12:41 AM
24

This is one reason why I refuse to use ChatGPT or any other A.I. and if someone else does I will reject their responses out of hand.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:32 PM
18

There is a recognized phenomenon called "The (Gender) Empathy Gap". Women have a 5x higher in-group bias than men. In plain terms, this means (all other factors being equal) a woman will side with another woman 5x more often simply because she's a woman, than men will side with men OR women. This is the underpinnings of women's bias against men, but men also have a bias towards women. This is more pronounced in young men, but leads to men (generally) having no one to support or side with them.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:18 PM
13

My personal viewpoint is that men are just as emotionally intelligent as women (possibly more so, depending on how you define it). But men go about being emotionally intelligent from a man's point of view, whereas women go about being emotionally intelligent from a woman's point of view. For example, a man is more likely to shrug off an insult than a woman is. This is a man being more emotionally intelligent than a woman.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 05:50 PM
1

I am not sure I see the equivalence between making a religion illegal and killing someone so that they will never have the chance to experience anything at all, nor fight for a better life for everyone. Surely, the finality of killing a being is worse than making worship illegal?
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:28 PM
1

It is a problem that the fetus is reliant on her, but it isn't part of her body, as it has distinct dna different from hers.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 12:24 PM
3

Drake. In case you're in the dark, Drake supposedly put hot sauce in his condoms, and apparently one woman who slept with him ended up in the ER because she put the contents of the condom inside her in a bid to get pregnant despite him having taken the necessary precautions. It's called spermjacking.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:31 AM
5

I think you're forgetting a couple of problems. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ This 13yo BOY was forced to pay child support. He is a rape victim (it's called statutory rape because as a 13yo he was unable to consent). So, BOYS have no reproductive rights, nor do men. There is a lesser talked about subject - "made to penetrate" - which is the female version of rape. Numbers are hard to come by but up to 43% of young men have ha…
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:28 AM
1

Why doesn't the fetus or baby have bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:22 AM
1

That's the entire way every mammal that gestates does it. I think you may need a biology lesson. If a woman doesn't want to have a fetus/baby rely on her body, she can keep her legs closed. It's pretty simple.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 04:14 AM
7

"If she fucked up, she fucked up". Why aren't you holding women accountable for their own choices?
/r/MensRights22/01/26 10:33 PM
1

She consented when she opened her legs.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 10:32 PM
3

I suppose that's where we differ. I believe that suffering (even if due to fostering) can end, whereas killing is reasonably final, leaving no room for improvement of life circumstances
/r/MensRights22/01/26 10:26 PM
4

Not if it ends with the killing of a baby.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 07:42 PM
0

Okay, let's unpack it. If a pregnant woman dies, great effort is spent trying to save the baby before it too dies. There is no legal precedent that I know of that allows a woman to legally stop a doctor from performing an emergency c-section to save the baby if she dies before it is born naturally. Basically, the baby is not an organ of the mother, therefore her rights stop where her organs stop - the umbilical cord.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 03:39 PM
13

Actually men have no rights before the act, that is the whole point. Fairly downvoted.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 02:02 PM
17

Apply this to the woman.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 02:01 PM
17

Why doesn't that apply to the woman?
/r/MensRights22/01/26 02:00 PM
36

"most likely" She has no obligation to spend any of that money on the baby.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 02:00 PM
1

However that argument fails when she decides to donate parts of her body while she is still alive. She would not be allowed to donate her healthy heart if she was entirely healthy. No doctor would perform that operation.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 01:59 PM
4

Basically, women hate men because men are genuinely happier. Misery loves company, and men keep noping out of that female misery. Men hate shitty people. So I guess women should probably stop being shitty people, if they want men to like them?
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:39 PM
7

I was a stay at home dad for 7 years. I did the cooking, cleaning, laundry, tidying, school runs, child care, garden work and renovations. It's dead easy. You just get on with it. My (ex) wife was a tornado and would leave mess literally everywhere she stepped. By the end of the weekend the house was a trash heap (I'm not even kidding, I took photos for evidence at the time we were breaking up). I could clean and tidy the entire house, but she didn't even know where to start. It took me a day to…
/r/MensRights20/01/26 03:09 PM
3

I find it interesting that when interviewing convicted rapists (ones that had admitted to raping), they all seemed to have a sixth sense for the most vulnerable woman in any group. So by telling young women how vulnerable they are to men raping them, ironically we are making women more likely to be raped. That seems to fit with your analysis.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:06 PM
18

On top of it is that from a world history perspective, interactions between men and women are clearly and unequivocally men oppressing women and not women oppressing men. And across the world, from Latin America to the Middle East to Africa and South Asia, it is objectively men oppressing women way more than women oppressing men. This is not true. The very first feminist, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote that women held a special place in society, one not afforded to men, in 1792 (On The Vindication Of…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 04:08 PM
55

I don't think it is. Psychopaths can be very good at reading emotions but use that trait negatively and have zero empathy. I am not sure the two things are necessarily correlated.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 01:55 PM
10

The only answer is stop watching their drivel.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 04:40 PM
1

The physiological effects of birth control on women is fascinating!
/r/MensRights01/01/26 04:31 PM
1

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2022/demo/families/2022-cps-childsupport.html Table1 (excel) shows that women are worse at paying all their child support and worse at paying any child support. Men in the US are sent to jail if they don't pay child support, and then they still have to pay the same amount in jail (which they obviously can't do because they are in jail) and that leads to years more sentencing. It's not quite as simple as "If a man becomes a father without a choice, he’s well wit…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 04:23 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights24/12/25 03:27 PM
4

Apply your logic to the wage gap. Dude u can’t honestly be on here comparing women's wages to men's wages 🫥 while I do agree with you, that the problem with being paid less as a woman without your consent is horrible and should be illegal everywhere,... Don't make excuses. Don't try to play the "who's got it worse" game. Just ban MGM, period. Men would like the right to bodily autonomy, which women actually have.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 03:09 PM
6

Yeah, most women have never thought about this subject, they've simply swallowed their tiktoks and regurgitated the emoting points.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:43 PM
14

men may have a higher criminal population I find this interesting and somewhat depressing. Women are known to get leniency (up to 67%) in every stage of the legal process - from cautions, arrests, arraignments, charges, plea bargains, non-custodial sentencing, custodial sentencing and time served. That's 8 distinct process steps. If you multiply 60%^8 you get approximately 5%, which exactly mirrors the male/female inmate population in the US. 95% : 5% Could it be that women are every bit as crim…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 09:21 PM
51

I don't think the Yass Queen phenomenon is as real as you claim. It's the same thing as you wrote: Traditionally (at least in my experience), women were often portrayed as being competitive with each other, sometimes speaking behind one another’s backs rather than openly supporting each other. In public, women egg each other on, and in private they take each other down.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 06:56 PM
9

You'll lose $300. Venmo me.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 06:33 PM
57

Yes you're correct. Bodily integrity/autonomy - FGM is illegal in 160 countries and widely condemned, MGM is legal in all countries, advertised and widely practised. Reproductive rights - a man cannot stop a woman from using his sperm to impregnate herself. He has no legal rights to stop her, and no legal rights to refuse paternity against his will, even if he was raped, statutorily raped, or he is/was a boy. He is legally obligated to pay for the resulting child for 18 years. Parental rights - …
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:34 AM
8

I'm under no illusions.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:25 AM
3

Who is "society" in your grand statement of It should be the responsibility of society to address and decrease undue danger. Are women society? They make up 51% of the population and the electorate. Or, are you going to suggest that women avoid their responsibilities yet again and outsource that responsibility... to men?
/r/MensRights23/12/25 12:28 AM
34

Are you suggesting that women don't have reproductive rights because "many states have enacted a total ban [on abortion]" but men do have reproductive rights? If that's what you're saying, you're likely to get some pushback on that idea.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 11:02 PM
93

I tried with a good female friend. It started with her saying "Ugh, I wish women had more rights!" I asked her what rights women didn't have that men did, and she went a bit silent, so I pushed her a bit further, and said "you know, men don't have at least 3 human rights that women do....?" We haven't talked about that since, and it's been a year and a half.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:22 PM
6

"Oi, mate! Do you have a loicence for that speech?"
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:20 PM
46

Heaven forbid a woman learn to take accountability for her own safety and avoid dangerous situations.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 04:47 PM
148

"I don't feel safe reading this" "BAN THE INTERNET" We desperately need an education system that teaches young people that their emotions are not necessarily the truth, and also teaches them how to manage their emotions. I don't currently see that anywhere.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 04:08 PM
2

Thank you. We need your voice and your support.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 10:13 PM
32

That (in)famous study was the 1983 Campus Rape Survey by Mary Koss. In it, she gradually changes the definition of "being drunk", starting at passed out from alcohol abuse, to unable to resist, to "any amount of alcohol". But also, she only included women as being unable to consent if any alcohol had been consumed. Men, apparently, were still able to consent when passed out. Mary Koss has done the entire world the most immeasurable disservice, and should have had her academic credentials and ten…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:16 PM
6

Women compete with other women for resources and status from men. ALL beauty standards for women are driven by other women, not men. But those beauty standards are in pursuit of a man (for his resources and status). The statement "Women's beauty standards are imposed by men" is not actually true, it's better to write it: "Women's beauty standards are imposed by [women's competition for] men." They just leave out the bit in brackets.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 05:20 AM
28

The UK has a similar rate of medical students and what is more worrying is that in their annual poll of final year med students, the majority of female med grads said they did not want to work "full time". So we have a situation where we're intentionally making future healthcare overstretched due to a lack of doctors. We know it's going to happen and we're still lauding "women's empowerment in Med!".
/r/MensRights15/12/25 09:37 AM
9

I think it's important to delve into the psychology of women, just to get a clearer perspective. Women are more group-oriented than men. Women form more groups over solitary activities than men, and this leads to the basis of identity politics - the in-group and the out-group. This explains why in a feminist's mind you're either a feminist (in-group), or you're evil (out-group). Feminism itself can be described as a lower-status woman's intra-group sexual competition. What I mean by that is this…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 02:01 AM
14

It was a leaked dossier from the Green Party in the UK. It isn't a manifesto, yet. As far as I can tell it was what the Green Party wrote up, then had their legal team scrutinize for obviously illegal things. That's where it got leaked.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 01:45 AM
5

I was looking for a known case of a US Marine on deployment overseas, who was ordered to pay child support to a woman who he had never met. Due to there being a statute of limitations (i.e. a short time period) in which a named father can contest his paternity, and due to him being overseas, he was not able to contest the paternity and ended up paying 18 years of child support. He never even met the woman. I can't find the link right now, but it's out there somewhere.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 01:27 AM
16

Unfortunately - as others have pointed out - some women do actually lie intentionally about who the father of their baby is, precisely to cash in on someone else's better salary. https://www.schlissellawfirm.com/prostitution-charges-against-sixteen-year-old-dismissed-2/
/r/MensRights14/12/25 08:31 PM
2

"Straight to jail"
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:38 PM
1

From the article: Leaders are considering broadening the party's definition of misogyny to the point that 'any disagreement' could lead to men facing sanction. The proposals are set out in a leaked 53-page dossier on legal and reputational risk prepared by its own lawyers. So it can't actually be confirmed until we see the leaked dossier.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:37 PM
1

This IS the new world order...
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:33 PM
3

We may have forgotten when that astrophysicist landed a space module on a distant asteroid, but feminists attacked him for wearing a Hawaiian shirt that had women on it.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:31 PM
30

I don't think this phenomenon is limited to that category of goods. Look at men's clothing. A year ago I wanted to buy a nice suit but the only colors I could find were light gray, dark gray and navy blue. That was it. I'm not looking for pleated tassels in gold lame (I don't even know what that is), I just want a non-npc color. Nothing fancy. But nope.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 08:28 PM
85

Since the Green Party is also unashamedly pro-trans, perhaps even more so than it is pro-woman, the answer is simple: All men identify as trans, therefore disagreeing with a trans person is now a crime. Checkmate women.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 07:05 PM
6

I would be interested to see the same charts of numbers of degrees and higher degrees but on a per capita basis. This would give a true representation of the value of such a degree. If twice as many degrees are awarded per capita, it means those degrees are worth half as much in the workplace. In addition, since tuition fees have risen exponentially, the per-dollar-per-capita degree value would have to be less than 1/10th of what it was in the 1960s.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 03:33 PM
4

"Define a woman" Canada: "errrrrr......."
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:27 PM
21

"We seek to hire a renowned expert in implementation science whose scholarship promotes systemic uptake of evidence-informed research to..." ...evidence-informed... Flat Earthers are evidence-informed. They just ignore that evidence.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:56 PM
3

Me neither. I got turned off by two things: the movies became crap, and the noise was quite literally deafening. I'm not sure when cinemas were exempted from the general noise regulations of 78dB but I swear it's well over 100dB in there.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 02:12 PM
1

Why anyone ever used wikipedia in the first place is beyond me. Why they continue to use it now is absolutely absurd. Stop using it.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:44 AM
18

In fact, men don't even need to stop working. All men would.have to do is to stop paying taxes and women would quickly see the downside of no men. Men's taxes subsidize all women. Without those taxes, women would starve.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 02:32 AM
68

Wow. In fact, any single mom earning between $16,000 and $29,000 is as well off, or better off than a man earning between $30,000 and $66,000. Crazy stuff. If she were to lose her benefits by living with a man that earns more than $66,000 then in reality she needs him to make up the difference of the benefits that she would lose, which is between $25,000 and $39,000 - so he MUST earn over $100,000. Now it all makes sense why so many deadbeat single moms demand a guy who makes 6-figures. It's jus…
/r/MensRights25/11/25 07:50 PM
34

In addition, one of the main reasons men don't join teaching is the widespread feminist chant that all men are pedophiles. Male teachers have lost their entire careers due to a scorned ex-wife making a single false allegation. Why would you enter a profession with those kinds of odds stacked against you?
/r/MensRights25/11/25 02:02 PM
49

The article suggests that the current rate of 15% male teachers entering the profession swiftly get promoted to superintendent (60% male), forgetting that to be a super you have to have had 30+ years of experience, making them all much older than the new teachers. The article does mention that 30+ years ago, the rate was 30% male teachers entering the profession. The article also fails to mention the extra hours of overtime required over decades in order to qualify first as assistant principal, …
/r/MensRights25/11/25 01:55 PM
35

Men who identify as feminist are employing a zeta-level sexual selection strategy in the hopes of getting laid. Agree with, and pander to women's insane demands, in the hopes that their solidarity with the sisterhood will win them enough "gift points" for them to get their pp wet. Low level roosters do this too - give gifts to low level hens in order to get laid.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 09:36 PM
26

Ironically, there are a few high profile feminists such as Sinead O'Connor who have converted to Islam, after 30+ years fighting for women's rights.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 09:33 PM
142

Feminists in the 1900s: "Men shouldn't have male only spaces" Feminists in the 2000s: "Men should have male only spaces" If ever there was a good time to stop listening to them, now is it.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 07:23 PM
6

The difference being that after marriage, a man still has obligations but a woman doesn't.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:22 PM
1

The ones I have been to were just men and were trying to keep it that way, but it seems clear that women just can't stand men having anything for themselves so the women are campaigning hard to be allowed to join (as you might have seen from the website). The men I met were just regular guys with regular life stories, no self-described MRAs or anything. You'll have to figure out who is like that as you go.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:13 PM
1

Women prey on those who are weaker than themselves. Historically, women kill children and the elderly more often than men do. 100% of abortion is done by women. 100% of neonaticide (the killing of a child under 24hrs old) is done by women (there has never been a recorded case of a man committing neonaticide). 90% of infanticide (the killing of a child under 1 year) is done by women 70% of the murder of children under 5yo is done by women (source) The spousal murder rates used to be quite similar…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 04:15 PM
3

https://usmenssheds.org/find-a-shed/ Florida: Palm Beach Gardens, FL. 33418 You could start there?
/r/MensRights17/11/25 02:01 PM
0

You asked for evidence and a 5yo explanation. You got that. Where is the problem?
/r/MensRights15/11/25 01:12 AM
3

Women perform a significantly higher proportion of unpaid domestic and care work From memory, the numbers are about: 5 hours child care per day for a man, 6 hours for a woman. It's not all that different.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:51 AM
3

There is also evidence that aggression generally, is not gendered, nor is it dependent on testosterone. Female mice given excess estrogen will exhibit male territorial aggression displays at a similar rate to males given excess testosterone.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:11 PM
1

On the flip side, women see doctors much more than men, and for more minor issues. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/8/e003320 On some of your other points: Your reference paper tries to blend "hegemonic masculinity" as a theory, with pain management. "Hegemonic masculinity" is not a theory, it is a postulation, one backed by only Gender Studies faculties. I would advise caution. It cherrypicks quotations from small sample papers to try to drum up support for its thesis. For example, 4.1.1 “All …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 03:14 PM
69

A lot of words to say: White men have been demonized through the education system. It's a poor article as it doesn't delve into the fact that "right wing" is used entirely as a slur and has no actual basis in reality. I have been accused of being a "far right misogynist bigot", but I did my political compass test and I'm almost dead-center. Young men are being accused of the same, but according to the latest research they are all still liberal, just not as wildly extreme-left-wing as young women…
/r/MensRights10/11/25 12:51 PM
13

I agree with you that finding the root cause of a problem is important, and jumping to a predetermined conclusion (be that starting from the middle or The Patriarchy) is not wise. Occam's Razor must apply when ascribing reasons to measurable inequalities. "The Patriarchy" - an abstract collective noun with a non-concrete definition - is not as good as "biology" if we are looking at men being bigger, stronger, faster and more resistant to damage than women are (generally). Just for example. Moreo…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:31 PM
7

I appreciate you responding. I did warn you not to ascribe various measurable inequalities to "misogyny", which you have done. Bodily autonomy - FGM is banned by the UN, illegal in 160+ countries and widely condemned. MGM is legal in all countries, allowed by the UN, and advertisable on billboards. impregnation - https://www.livescience.com/health/fertility-pregnancy-birth/the-choice-of-sperm-is-entirely-up-to-the-egg-so-why-does-the-myth-of-racing-sperm-persist - this may interest you. Bonus (c…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:18 PM
33

Be careful of the tendency of feminism to frame all inequalities as relating to "misogyny". There is an equal and opposite word "misandry" which is the hatred of men. It seems that feminists are given free reign to hate men, and you will see the effects of this across all sorts of areas of life once you start looking: Men have 3 human rights fewer than women The right to bodily autonomy (circumcision is legal and widespread) The right to reproductive autonomy (men cannot stop a woman from using …
/r/MensRights01/11/25 04:15 AM
10

As a victim of my wife's physical abuse against me (I never retaliated), I found two things: 1) all research shows that women are just as physically violent as men, but this is not palatable to society 2) the courts are not only unaware of this but also absolutely unequipped to deal with violent women. As a victim, the only support network the courts offered was a men's anger management course.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 07:38 PM
35

Stereotype: the man is always the abuser. This shows up everywhere. Domestic violence shelters, legislation, media reporting. It's always the man who is framed. The woman could have berated him or attacked him mulitple times over days, weeks, months and years, but if he lays one finger on her he is the abuser.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 03:43 PM
23

Men are the only ones who step in to stop assault. Fewer men means more opportunity for criminals to assault women with no one to stop them.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 12:32 PM
8

I totally get that, but it is still disingenuous to include murders of post-natal women, because the pregnancy didn't cause the murder.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 03:55 PM
19

I always thought it was disingenuous to include "...or 1 year after birth" as a proxy for "pregnant". That literally skews the data far in a different direction for two reasons: first, it's a longer timeframe than 9 months of pregnancy, and second you now have a tiny air raid siren that destroys all your reasoning skills.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 11:16 AM
1

Go post "I'm a supporter of men's rights, I want to have a civil talk" on any feminist subreddit. That should show you the difference between men's rights and feminism.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:41 PM
1

So go live in a Muslim country and change their misogynist laws. Or.... if you remain in your own country, then change the unjust laws that disfavor whatever group is disfavored (you'll find that's men, always, in your Scandinavian country).
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:29 PM
1

This is absolutely not true at all. As early as the 1500s, women could own land, but with that ownership came responsibility. The landowner was 100% responsible for the crimes committed by people they were lord over, and 100% responsible for the taxes owed on their land (and by people working their land). Women, it seems, are less inclined to take up that heavy burden of responsibility than men are.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:28 PM
1

You may have forgotten that men weren't allowed to vote either, until just a short time before women (historically speaking). It sounds like you've accepted the female-centric re-telling of history without ever questioning the reality.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:25 PM
1

This sounds a lot like tone policing. Feminists: "If you want to talk about men's issues, go make your own space." Men: "Okay, done." Feminists: "Hey, let us in, excluding us is sexist!" Men: "Fine." Also feminists: "You shouldn't talk like that in here. If you want to talk like that, go make your own space." Where is the space that men can just vent, eh? Or is venting exclusively a female privilege...
/r/MensRights20/10/25 12:03 PM
1

You say you care about women's rights. Which rights do women NOT have, that men do? Once you've drawn a blank, then ask yourself why men have 3 distinct human rights fewer than women. That should show you where your focus should be.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 11:58 AM
6

Holy fuck. Can you even imagine what would have transpired if the roles were reversed?? This sickens me.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 03:02 PM
5

"Who hurt you?"
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:07 PM
2

I can agree that women tend to use objects for their violence, and men tend to use their fists, otherwise the raw rates of domestic violence are equal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography This is a link to 343 scholarly research papers that show that women are equally as violent as men in their domestic relationships. In fact, 70% of one-way violence (i.e. the partner who was…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 01:34 AM
4

You're right, It is systemic. When I was assaulted, I looked for a helpline, but all the helplines catered to women only. There were no shelters I could go to. When the court heard of the abuse against me they sent me to an Anger Management course. There is no support for men, none. Domestic violence is not gendered - women commit the same amount of physical abuse as men (even though you never hear about this), and yet there are zero supports for men being abused by women. I appreciate your enga…
/r/MensRights16/10/25 06:58 PM
5

You are correct, losing a job or loved ones does make us feel sad. But just that isn't enough to make men take their own lives. It's situations such as my ex-wife assaulting me, then taking a hammer to her own leg and framing me for abuse I never committed, then being backed by the state to strip me of my own children on the basis that "men are the abusers", and me not seeing them for 17 years. There are no solutions to that. That's when it becomes too much to bear.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 06:20 PM
23

Firstly: stop treating men as if they are damaged women who just need to open up, be vulnerable and emote more. We're not women. Men need a purpose in life, and solutions for when things go wrong. Emoting and being vulnerable doesn't help in the slightest. Men take their own lives when they have insurmountable problems and no solutions. There are society-wide structural problems that men can't fix, from the government being blatantly and openly sexist against men, to the general undercurrent of …
/r/MensRights16/10/25 12:37 PM
16

Yes, it even has a name - intra-sexual reproductive competitiveness. It's been shown that female hairdressers intentionally give pretty women bad haircuts.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 02:18 AM
124

The psychology of it is somewhat convoluted, but I'll try to explain it: Women (generally) score higher on Trait Neuroticism - the inability to ward off negative emotions. Once a negative emotion is felt, women are less able than men to put that negative emotion aside and replace it with a positive one. Many women have a negative self-image of their own body, or at least some part of it. Women are more likely to employ emotional reasoning - if something feels true, it must be true. Women have a …
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:07 PM
1

Yes yes, but it doesn't feeeeel like it, and as we know, feelings are more important than facts... [/s]
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:52 PM
1

No, they are not. In the mid-1980s the curricula of many countries changed from a single exam system to coursework. It was well known that girls do worse in single exam situations and much better in coursework situations. Marks were (and still are) awarded for non-academic factors such as sitting still, neat handwriting, non-disruptive behavior and cooperation, all of which girls do better at than boys. Despite there being virtually no difference in the mean academic IQ scores between girls and …
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:41 PM
14

Reasons men go to the restrooms: to pee to poop Reasons women go to the restrooms: to pee to accompany their friend to pee to gossip to pee to fix makeup to pee to fix their clothing to pee to text someone to pee to check sanitary products to poop There's the reason for your gap.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:18 AM
7

They are better with language. This is actually a myth. It arises from girls' early puberty (compared to boys') when their brains develop earlier. Girls outperform in language tasks between 11 and 15, but by 17 the boys have caught up again. Men are more concise with their language, women are less concise and use more emotion-based language. But otherwise there is little difference in language ability.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:32 AM
2

2/3rds of female internet harassment is by women. So there's that.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 12:38 PM
7

I am a strong advocate of people carrying out their proposals on themselves first, to gauge effectiveness. Anyone suggesting reducing the world's population needs to start with themselves.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 01:53 PM
2

I am still trying to put together a list of qualities that determine if someone can be predicted as left wing, but it seems to be largely these two things: You get upset seeing suffering You don't have any resources, and want more (possibly at other people's expense) This sometimes (in my view, erroneously) gets translated as "you have a heart" and "you believe in equality". I have found that left-wingers only have a heart on paper, and only in situations where it doesn't disadvantage them perso…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 03:12 PM
12

This bugs me. Before the 1600s, everyone worked in the fields. As early as the 1600s, women AND GIRLS (as young as 6) worked down the mines. https://nation.cymru/culture/women-in-welsh-coal-mining/ Feminists love to try to make it out that women were stopped from working and forced to stay home, but it's absolute bull.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 02:11 PM
1

Self-Made Man, by Norah Vincent
/r/MensRights01/09/25 11:26 AM
1

The rest of men are absolutely invisible to women.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 12:47 AM
1

Women's health research is incredibly underfunded I'm not sure that's entirely true. Women's cancers attract 10x the amount of funding compared to men's cancers, despite a much higher mortality with men's cancers.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 08:19 PM
1

I'm not entirely sure I agree with you regarding the childless man/woman privilege? There have been bachelor taxes at various times throughout history, but no commensurate spinster tax. So we have quite literally legislated against bachelors, but not spinsters and crones. I also slightly disagree about safety issues, given that 90% of violent attacks are against men. Nursing... eh, it's been shown that where gender equality is high, more women choose to become nurses.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 08:18 PM
14

What privilege do males benfit from?
/r/MensRights25/08/25 03:26 AM
3

I was just talking to a friend today, about this particular post and subject. I've noticed an uptick in "conspiracy theorists are lunatics" type of post on the psychology sub. The last time I noticed an uptick in certain "controversial" content was in late 2018-2019 about vaccine deniers. Well wouldn't you know it but less than 2 years later we had mandatory vaccines. I do wonder if this is a prelude to "mandatory conspiracy theory criminalization". I do hope not, but my spidey senses are tingli…
/r/MensRights10/08/25 11:22 PM
1

So just to give you some light reading on domestic violence: https://odem.gr/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Martin-Fiebert-2014-DV-study-abstracts.pdf 343 scholarly investigations showing that women are as violent as men in their close personal relationships AND that of unidirectional (one-way) domestic violence, women are perpetrators in 70% of cases: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020 Back to your links, which I appreciate you posting. This one: https://www.science…
/r/MensRights10/08/25 02:52 AM
0

You'll have to support your opinion with science that is gender-neutral. There is plenty of science that does not control for gender, and is sexist as a result. Here's a good example: You may be aware of domestic violence laws, and how "most of the perpetrators are men"? Yeah, well that literally is false.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 09:58 PM
0

My personal opinion is that therapy has arisen out of the need of bored housewives needing to talk to someone. It didn't arise out of the need of men who had gone through all of their own solutions and were now seeking other's solutions. That's why it is next-to-useless for most men. It's got the wrong fundamentals.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 07:45 PM
1

I get that there are people like that.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 12:58 PM
3

Right, you say that. But when I went, I told both therapists specifically that I was looking for solutions, told them what the problem was, what I wanted to get out of the sessions and why. No solutions from either, over the entire course of therapy.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 12:57 PM
136

I find the same thing. "Therapy" is specifically geared towards talking. That's it, as if just talking about something is magically going to fix it, which it doesn't. I need solutions, not talking.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 11:26 PM
1

It is not a woman's job to make u feel loved i don't have empathy for people who say "this is how we are". It does appear more like you have no empathy for men. That's certainly how it reads.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:23 PM
1

Perfect demonstration of the empathy gap.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 12:27 PM
2

I am genuinely interested in trying to put myself in the shoes of others so I can understand their point of view. I don't have to agree with them, but if I understand where they are coming from, maybe I can find some common ground. Help me understand this from the point of view of the woman. What frame of reference do I need to adopt to understand where she's coming from?
/r/MensRights06/08/25 12:38 PM
27

I think the point is that she is more than capable of squishing a bug, but she asks you to do it. Generally, the application of violence has been institutionalized (police and military), and those institutions are thoroughly co-ed. I'm not sure that's actually as true as we might like it to be. The vast majority of patrol cops in most countries are men, and the female cops do not get physically involved as much, they generally "wait for backup" - i.e. men. Same in the military, it's predominantl…
/r/MensRights05/08/25 02:59 PM
151

The spider thing is quite interesting: It's women demanding that men do violence on their behalf, to assuage a feeling they had. It's the same mentality as wives expecting their husband to go investigate the noise from downstairs at nighttime. Women expect men to do their violence for them, as a default. I think it might go even deeper than that: [Woman]: "I've spotted a problem that needs fixing, and YOU need to fix it!" Anyone else notice this?
/r/MensRights05/08/25 01:48 PM
15

Wtf?
/r/MensRights05/08/25 12:16 PM
1

I don't really think it's as simple as I described, but it's a much better analogy than the original one.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 12:14 PM
20

I mean, this is class action of all class actions. Any lawyer wanting to make a name for themselves should be in on this. Can you even imagine a lawyer representing all men in the world? "Your Honor, all men seek damages from both the app makers, and the women users of the app." It would shut down any other stupidly sexist app, forevermore. I can't wait.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:44 PM
9

Not sure if you'd noticed the rampant anti-male stance the Democrats have taken? Also, I'm not sure that this A.I. post is really genuine. Your post history is astounding. 20 A.I. posts a day?
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:32 PM
13

Plenty of women use "Are you gay?" if they think a man should be attracted to them, but he rebuffs them. So, yes.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 08:13 PM
2

Let's see him cry uncontrollably first. If he wins after that, then maybe he has a point. I suspect he won't do either though.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 01:05 PM
13

Watch as the toxic hive of female nursery workers rallies around to make false accusations against the men, to protect "their" territory. It's going to be worse than the cabals of female nurses ganging up on male nurses (that happens, ask any male nurse).
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:26 PM
1

Occam's Razor is a useful tool whereby among competing hypotheses, the one that makes the fewest assumptions is the correct one. "Patriarchy" cannot be defined, outside of "society's attitudes". It's a mythical construct that has no basis in reality and is used in one-dimensional thinking as the boogeyman that all problems can be blamed for. Conveniently, it is both "all men" and "not men". It's a fallacy, and when really asked to pin down what it is and where it is, I have never found anyone wh…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:19 PM
0

Define "abuser". I was accused of child abuse by my ex. The court-ordered psychologist found she was simply lying to get an advantage in the custody battle. Or are you just trying to score points on a hypothetical?
/r/MensRights01/08/25 04:15 AM
1

Kids are objectively worse off in single parent households, and that's WITH the extra money the father (usually) provides.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 04:05 AM
1

Ironically, moms are worse at paying any child support, or the right amount of child support, than dads are. Turns out there are more deadbeat moms than there are deadbeat dads. So that's a net win for kids.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 03:51 AM
84

How about simply having women hold other women accountable, as they used to do?
/r/MensRights01/08/25 03:38 AM
2

Which ones? The ones about the Roman Empire, in which women had rights to own property, so they divorced their husbands, kept the property and kicked their husbands out? That one? Or the ones about the Dark Ages, when no books were written? Or the ones from the era of, let's say, Nefertiti, when women were adored? Or how about Ancient Greek books, who did the same? Or the more modern era, let's say 1972, where the first feminist wrote about how good women had it? Those ones?? Sheesh.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:35 AM
8

Mostly to keep your electricity running, keep your water flowing, sewers clear, and garbage removed.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:31 AM
1

While I hear what you are saying, I struggle to understand how men had more freedom than women.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 12:07 AM
3

OP just posted another cracker. Way to get banned from the entire of reddit...
/r/MensRights31/07/25 08:26 PM
11

I don't think that you're entirely correct. We seem to have forgotten that along with men apparently having the upper hand legally and financially, they were concurrently burdened with legal and financial duties - a man who owned land was 100% responsible for the people that lived on that land, and a man was 100% responsible for his wife's crimes and debt. He had to pay, if she screwed up. She didn't. I'm not sure why we forgot that part, but it's critical to understanding our current dilemma: f…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 08:05 PM
79

People forget that society is not (and was never) distributed as a Patriarchy where men sat on top of the hierarchical pyramid and women sat below. If the pyramid analogy were to hold, a few men with high status are at the top of the pyramid, all women are in the middle, and all other men are below women. This explains every society that has ever existed.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 02:21 PM
1

Sure, and when we DO open up, the women who have chided us for not opening up - the same women that we open up to, nope out of our lives within days. So we're caught between a rock and a hard place.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:32 PM
3

You are right. I realize what a hugely privileged life I lead, I am well aware of that and I am grateful on a daily basis to be able to live such a life. But it's still absolutely true that it is our amazingly abundant and resource rich world that allows us the space to dedicate time towards understanding and dealing with emotions. If you had to spend every minute of your waking day hunting food and collecting fresh(ish?) water to drink, you wouldn't have the luxury of ruminating on your lot.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 08:48 PM
3

It is a privilege to have the space in your life to suffer from emotions. It's a modern day luxury. It's also wildly middle-class. Tough guys tend to be lower class, and that might be your problem with them. They're not actually wrong with their assertions of how to measure if someone "has a spine", and I'll tell you why: Men emotionally pressure test other men (banter) to see where their cracks are. We need to know this if we are to trust that man with our life. My opinion is that this comes fr…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 06:55 PM
1

Female genital mutilation is illegal in 160+ countries, widely condemned by the UN, and punishable with imprisonment. Male genital mutilation is legal everywhere and advertised publicly.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 12:17 PM
1

Men do not have bodily autonomy, women do. Men do not have any reproductive rights, women have 100%. [And there is a corollary that men have 100% reproductive responsibility where women have 0%] Men do not have automatic parental rights, they rest on the word of someone else, usually the mother.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:58 AM
12

I like a good conspiracy, have you got a link to a docu?
/r/MensRights29/07/25 05:44 PM
28

You'll have to explain to me why young women (especially) use false accusations of rape to get themselves out of mildly embarrassing situations. Hardly life threatening, but her lover faces an entire life of being registered as a sex offender and the potential for 20 years in prison. You might not call that insidious, but I do. There is nothing more evil about women than men. You'll have to explain away the evil women that did evil things, with no men around.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 05:43 PM
18

I sense that your comprehension level is not as high as you might like it to be. The bombing of Pearl Harbour happened in 1946. My user name was specifically chosen for a time 5 years before the bombing, when Pearl Harbour was a lovely place. But you didn't spot that.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 05:33 PM
16

Kinda weird how quickly this is happening. WW2 officially ended in 2016, 70 years after the surrender, because 70 years was how long Germany had to pay reparations for, and was banned from having a military. Less than 10 years later and we're talking about Germany forcibly conscripting men, for war.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 05:30 PM
75

Oh they know how cruel their words are. And they intentionally use them, within earshot, at a volume that you were supposed to hear. You were the butt of their joke, and they made sure you knew it. Your only strategy is to learn what signs these women are displaying so you can spot them early, and avoid them for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:29 PM
348

People tend to forget just how rude, demeaning and obnoxious some women can be. I'm sorry that you had to endure that. It's the female equivalent of jocks "joking" that they would definitely rape a young woman sitting on a bus near them. It's only funny to them, not to anyone else. To everyone else it's highly offensive. This is the face of women objectifying men. I have no suggestions on how to stop it, I'm sorry.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:16 PM
5

I have heard exactly the same thing: nursing is very cliquey, and men are NOT welcome.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 12:27 AM
4

https://kings-printer.alberta.ca/1266.cfm?page=F04P5.cfm&leg_type=Acts&isbncln=9780779854820 Here in Alberta, Canada, there are very specific sections of the Family Law Act that define a father, legally. Rules of parentage 7(1) For all purposes of the law of Alberta, a person is the child of his or her parents. (4) A person who donates human reproductive material or an embryo for use in assisted reproduction without the intention of using the material or embryo for his or her own reproductive us…
/r/MensRights29/07/25 12:05 AM
6

I appreciate your response, thank you. I usually listen to what feminists have to say, and then assume that they are talking about their own stuff and projecting it onto men. The whole "using biology to avoid accountability" harks back to the 1980s trend of (literally) getting away with murder because it was her time of the month. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1981/11/11/A-British-woman-who-said-pre-menstrual-tension-drove-her/4609374302800/
/r/MensRights28/07/25 11:26 PM
2

Who are you taught by? 100% of pre-K care is done by women 100% of Kindergarten care is done by women 90% of primary teachers are women 60% of secondary teachers are women ALL of society's teaching with the formative years is done by women. You'll have to explain how women teach Patriarchy. We don't have a patriarchal society. The Patriarchy (which is actually a conspiracy distinct from a patriarchal society) is nowhere to be found.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 08:45 PM
18

Canada: https://inspire-sdg.ca/services/clinical-and-support-services/male-survivor-of-sexual-assault/
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:59 PM
3

I don't think we do want to return to traditionalism. Custody used to be awarded to men, until the Tender Years Doctrine. All we're asking for is equal parenting, by default. Paternity fraud is a big thing, but even within traditional marriages. Mandatory paternity testing would end that. We're not actually concerned with rigid expectations of masculinity, so much as rigid assumptions about masculinity by feminists. On the whole, men are generally okay with paying for dates, but there needs to b…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:53 PM
3

This is called The Bandwagon. It's a logical fallacy whereby the user assumes that because everyone in a group believes something, it must be true. And I'm not going to argue with you - all you have to do is show me how and where The Patriarchy was set up, and who it's controlled by. That will be enough evidence to convince me. Btw, please don't rely on "it's always been that way" (non-falsfiable), or "it's just society's attitudes" (that's just "society" and the status quo, not magical proof of…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 06:12 PM
10

The very first feminist, Mary Wollstonecraft wrote in 1792, that women held a special place in society, one not afforded to men, and that women had power over men. So that means that any Patriarchy that exists must have been set up since then. Any believer in Patriarchy will no doubt be able to point to exactly which men set it up, when, and how, presumably some time in the early 1800s, when we have extraordinarily good records about. Curiously, I've never come across a feminist that can do that…
/r/MensRights26/07/25 03:08 PM
80

Most of what women say about men is projection. It's just women scapegoating their own failings by projecting them onto men. The most sexist of the two groups of <women> and <men> is women. This has scientific backing. But all we hear about is how sexist men are. The most aggressive of the two groups of <women> and <men> is actually women but both men and women don't like that answer, so we all jump through hoops to make it look like men are more aggressive (and I will absolutely agree that the …
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:32 PM
168

It IS difficult to have a conversation around such loaded and charged topics. But I hear your point. I can't imagine anyone would be okay with the boy victims of (female) teacher-student rape standing up in court and getting applause for saying to the woman "You'll finally get raped in prison and not the way you like it", or a similar statement.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 06:28 PM
48

Synopsis: In primate species, researchers concluded: sex gives females a lot of bargaining power - if a male wanted to mate he had to act right - females use this power as leverage Women using sex as a control mechanism. (Never trust headlines)
/r/MensRights23/07/25 05:06 PM
3

"Emotional labor" is another one that gets me going. You don't get paid for remembering birthdays and putting up a chart of chores on the fridge. Just. No.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 03:33 PM
7

Yes, I am aware. Both are designed to "keep the wife in a lifestyle to which she has become accustomed". Why do we need to do that?
/r/MensRights23/07/25 03:06 PM
10

Alimony has not been necessary for many decades. It arises out of the biological drive for women to marry across-and-up socio-economically. i.e. it is desirable in a woman's mind to choose the best provider so that her children will have the best advantage in life. Alimony and child support are the legal encoding of this female biological imperative. The law is de facto sexist, although very few people will be able to admit this. Child support is the modern word for Alimony, although alimony lim…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 02:44 PM
2

Ah, the classic Reddit assumption. Nice. I've never used the word femboy, nor alpha male. But you keep making assumptions and see how far that gets you.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 02:11 PM
0

Wait, you're in favor of shaming people?
/r/MensRights22/07/25 01:20 PM
0

Totally agree. Tradcons do deviate from the norm and we shouldn't shame them.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 12:52 PM
8

They are called Men's Sheds. https://mensshedsacrosstheworld.ca/ (there are many other websites).
/r/MensRights21/07/25 05:12 PM
11

I believe that women have 3 more human rights than men, worldwide. I believe that women have always been protected by men (and thus the claims of "historical oppression" are wrong). I believe that boys and men are suffering greatly but there's no one to come to their aid. Yes, men and women should have the same rights. Yes, men and women are different and have general tendencies that differ and it's okay to say that and allow for it. I believe that men and women are complimentary and that societ…
/r/MensRights20/07/25 06:46 PM
20

The devil, as they say, is in the detail. The study is riddled with errors of definition, errors of attribution, and more. For example: Studies have consistently found that the majority of domestically violent women also have experienced violence from their male partners. What they do NOT say is whether those women started the violence. And as we know, 70% of one-way domestic violence is started by women. So we know that women start more physical violence. To then conclude: The victimization the…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 04:12 AM
6

The very easy solution to most of these problems is this: Women's conveniences are paid for solely using women's tax revenue; men's conveniences are paid for solely using men's tax revenue. Done.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 08:01 PM
1

Correction: parents kill their children, at a rate of around 50:33 which isn't all that different, AND it doesn't account for women using other people (often step parents/lovers) to kill on their behalf.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 06:40 PM
1

A.I. is not a source of good information. Here's the immediate marks that it is biased: "Males" - "Women". Only feminists that hate men use different nouns such as "males/women". A.I. is feminist and cannot possibly give you an unbiased opinion.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 06:22 PM
1

That largely depends on what you classify as murder. If you include abortion as murder, women vastly outstrip men, by several orders of magnitude.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 06:20 PM
1

I agree with you. I also think that female violence is rising, concurrently with male violence declining. I don't believe that women were "kept in check", except possibly only in the literal decade of the 1950s. Outside of that narrow time period, there is plenty of evidence that women were violent towards men, particularly the men they were in relationships with.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 08:47 PM
1

Yes, you're right, this is called the Proximity argument. It's usually used by women arguing that even though women are overrepresented in child murders and child abuse, this is because women spend more time with children, and therefore men have lower opportunity to do so. However, proximity fails when it comes to child murders and child abuse. I would suggest that it fails when it comes to newborns too, and since there has never been a case of a man killing a newborn, this seems to hold true. I…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 08:45 PM
1

I agree, but all the studies done on relationship aggression show that women are equally as physically violent, if not more violent. I would suggest that outside of close personal relationships, or perhaps where the woman does not know if she faces a stronger competitor, she will resort to indirect aggression which usually carries a lower risk for her.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 08:41 PM
3

Not sure you're being positive...
/r/MensRights14/07/25 07:40 PM
3

I think it's instilled in a lot of men that if they need help they're weak. I would say that it's actually that we learn pretty early on that women don't care about us. Our moms, our sisters, aunts, female friends at school, and heaven forbid we break down in front of our girlfriend. My mom was blatant with it from when I was 12. "Mom, why does my 9yo sister get more pocket money than me?" - "Because girls need more". Sure. Disguise your sexism by dressing it up as consumerism, why don't you mom…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 06:29 PM
14

Why do you think mental health resources for men are still so scarce or ignored in society? Primarily because men are naturally wired to give women what they want. Generally speaking, women want men to be their rock, emotionally. And most men want to be their woman's rock too. This sets up both women and men to allow women to be emotional (safely) and men to not feel safe opening up. Most of us have had an experience where we were encouraged to really open up to a woman, and it massively backfir…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 12:10 PM
20

I don't really agree with your numbered points. Women objectify men, and women objectify themselves (as is evident by the success of the smut novel 50 Shades). Women's aim at high status men is much more to do with securing resources for themselves and their potential offspring, which is solely biologically based. Women have a 5x higher in-group bias (i.e. favorably towards other women/girls) than men do. Women also have higher innate preferences towards the care of children. These two traits to…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 03:09 AM
4

https://forrettindafeminismi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/martin_s_fiebert_assoult_bibliography.pdf This is the updated Fiebert - 343 studies now.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 12:48 PM
6

I think you've touched upon a point. When the pendulum does swing, we will remember the women like Jess Philips who out-and-out made men's lives more difficult by explicit choice, and our dislike of her will extend to any woman who didn't openly oppose her. All that is required for evil to flourish is for good women to do nothing. Which makes those good women, evil-acceptors by default.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 12:46 PM
3

Great point. Here's the best research on Queens being more violent: http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Queens_Dube_Harish.pdf I am beginning to wonder if women are directly as violent with people who are less likely to fight back, and only indirectly as violent with men (who are more likely to overpower or fight back). Women make up 100% of newborn murderers (babies killed in the first 24hrs of life). There has never been a recorded incident of a man killing a newborn. Women make up 90%…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 12:18 PM
3

Why do you think that human aggression has a weak positive correlation with estradiol? Because - as I've pointed out - ALL hormones are broken down in the body, and those breakdown products are what trigger aromatase receptors, resulting in aggression. It's very rare for typically feminine women to become criminals. It's extremely common. We just don't prosecute women for it though. Women are vastly overrepresented in lying, false accusations, shoplifting, reputation destruction, violence-by-pro…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 08:08 PM
3

It's misinformation to say women are as violent as men. Men commit 95 percent of homicide worldwide and 86 percent of homicide in the US. I don't agree with either statement. There is no good evidence to show that Testosterone is directly causative of aggression. I have provided evidence (and there is plenty more) to show that testosterone is indirectly causative of aggression, but that evidence also shows that estrogen is indirectly causative of aggression. It's because it's not the hormones th…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 03:10 PM
130

The biology behind raw aggression is very clear: https://neurosciencenews.com/estrogen-aggression-amygdala-neuroscience-1729/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4349580/ Summarized: Any hormone breakdown product can trigger aromatase receptors in the brain. The number of aromatase receptors is not correlated with sex. That means we can give women excess estrogen and a percentage (thought to be around 9%) will become uncontrollably violent. This makes sense of why raw aggression is not sex-…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 03:11 PM
7

I take the view that - in general - ordinary men and women aren't all that different from each other. I would expect that there are roughly equal numbers of men and women facing homelessness. However, women tend to line up a potential "savior" before they end a relationship, whereas men tend not to. Largely speaking men are still burdened with the task of providing a roof over a family's head. A man definitely cannot rely on any woman coming to his aid in times of crisis. Then there are local ge…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 12:44 PM
17

Female teachers mark boys down, just for being boys https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/02/16/female-teachers-give-male_n_1281236.html (secondary paper which is now hard to find the original) http://empathygap.uk/?p=437 (contains other studies confirming the same) When coupled with an education system that was purposefully designed to favor girls over boys, this leads to disastrous outcomes for boys.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 08:03 PM
4

Where's men's "safe space", eh? I can't discuss all sorts of things with my gf, nor my wife when I was married. A bunch of my friends are not in a position where they understand my point of view, and even my brother called me a "far-right-misogynist-bigot" for suggesting that maybe women had enough human rights and perhaps men needed the same ones, finally. Society doesn't have a place where men can openly vent. And to suggest that we don't need to vent occasionally is to be somewhat blind to hu…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:02 PM
27

"Should women be equally represented in all professions at all levels at all times, everywhere?" Then you tell them to equalize bricklayers, roofers, electricians, loggers etc. first.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 02:54 PM
1

A 2014 study from cosmetics firm Dove found that over five million negative tweets were posted about beauty and body image. Four out of five were sent by women. lol
/r/MensRights01/07/25 07:18 PM
1

I have noticed that too. I see men's talking shit to each other as a way of seeing where your mate's cracks are. We need to know where his weak spots are so that when we go hunting (figuratively) he doesn't put the whole group in danger. "Your mom's a whore" *chuckles* "Yeah, like you'd know a whore when you see one, you can't even get action from your own hand." This shows us that he's emotionally solid. Whereas: "Your mom's a whore" *gets angry* "Fuck you Brendan, I hate you" We know that we c…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 03:20 PM
0

You and I can live in what we deem to be luxury, because our standard of living is "just above the poverty level" and half a billion dollars is pretty much the same in our minds as a billion dollars. Any amount will improve our lives. But for a billionaire the stakes are different. They compete with each other for status - ever noticed how Bezos has the world's largest yacht? He spends less than 2 days a year on the yacht, so he doesn't have it for any good reason other than a status symbol. His…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 03:03 PM
1

Good point, but this is Reddit. If I don't grovel somehow, I risk either getting myself banned, or the entire sub taken down. This sub is already labeled as far right misogynist hate speech, simply for stating facts. I don't need to make it worse. I'm interested in how men and women differ in their "talking shit" to one another. Tell me more.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:52 PM
3

Good point.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:54 PM
1

Why is it not legitimate for them to complain? They just lost half a billion dollars! And why is your suffering not self-created? I'm genuinely wondering how you come to these two conclusions.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:48 PM
2

From the point of view of a "woman-with-communistic-tendencies" (I prefer to write it this way instead of generalizing all women) you could see that equal outcomes are more important than equal input. Therefore a waitress should earn the same as an engineer. There's all sorts of post hoc rationalization that goes on - "the waitress does just as much housework and emotional labor as the engineer!" - but that's to cover up for the basic premise that women really want all other women to be at the s…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:22 PM
-1

It's because we can't comprehend how rich(er) people suffer, not that there is no suffering.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 01:17 PM
7

I don't actually agree that Women's Empowerment means supporting Capitalism. It think it is actually supporting communism. Women seem to prefer a communistic structure, one in which equal outcomes are more important than equal input, responsibility is shared (or "abdicatable" to someone else) and yet we are all ruled by a distant all powerful government (substitute father) that has the power to forcefully intercede in local and family matters. This is not a description of Capitalism that I have …
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:27 PM
5

Funny how fast the men in a Men's Rights sub abdicate their principles because it's a hypothetical rich man suffering.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:03 PM
56

I seem to remember there was a group that posted pictures of women using public transport seats for their shopping bags? I'm sure it got taken down. But it goes to show that (some) women do take up much more space than their reasonable share, just like (some) men do.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 11:18 PM
2

I can manage my anger quite well. I use it to point out to myself that something else is wrong and needs fixing.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 10:02 PM
16

I agree. We've seen it happen in Universities too, and it's affected the quality and tone of academic research.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:07 PM
1

But privileges are never equal, that's what makes them privileges, and that's why the legal system and the people enjoying the privileges do not have any problem with the unequal set up.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:00 PM
84

I will put my bottom dollar on the fact that we find that it's mostly other women saying nasty things about women, online. We've already proved this - Twitter (as it was then) found that [insert ridiculous percentage like 103%] of women were harassed online. They failed to mention that 63% of that harassment was OTHER WOMEN. I'll bet the same thing here.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:48 PM
3

I'll tell you how many men do that: zero. https://momlovesbest.com/child-abandonment-statistics-and-facts No men drop babies off at drop off centers, but apparently 7,000 women in the US do, every year.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:24 PM
3

Have you ever heard of a man dropping off his baby at a drop off center?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:13 PM
2

I am not aware of a father's right to do this. Can you point to a law or reference on this?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:02 PM
5

Wow that's a big difference!
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:01 PM
7

Have you heard of "drop off" centers? They are places like police stations or fire departments where women can literally abandon their baby without any repercussions.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:57 PM
6

It could be that people here just want equal rights? You know, like feminism keeps promising them??
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:51 PM
7

What a great paper! Thank you for taking the time to write it, it is absolutely on the money - the logical contradiction(s) between rights and responsibilities between biowomen and biomen (as you term them) is something that is well worth talking about. Most people, including the justice system take the viewpoint that it's fine to have different rights, because....women. But I'll add a confounding element to this, that you rightfully avoided because it wasn't in the scope of your paper: We don't…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:50 PM
1

No, my feelings aren't the issue. They point out an issue. It's not semantics to say that. I get angry when life doesn't go my way. The anger is an indicator that life is not going my way. Anger is not the problem. Life not going my way is the problem. It's a very important distinction to be able to make, otherwise we get into a circlejerk of always attending to the feelings and never the actual problem.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 12:11 PM
4

I don't agree. My feelings are not the root cause of my issues, they are indicators.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 09:03 PM
4

These milestones undeniably helped shape a more just society. Did they though? Those movements have ejected 2,000 years of Roman Law ("Innocent Until Proven Guilty") and ushered in quite the opposite - guilty unless he proves himself innocent (which will not be believed anyway).
/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:16 PM
10

The Suffragettes are widely considered to have been terrorists.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:11 PM
9

The last time I had (10) counseling sessions I was left in exactly the same place as I started, because I went there looking for solutions, not just a place to vent and become teary-eyed. What solutions can you offer me to help with [X] issue? I went with a specific purpose in mind: to learn techniques to help me with conflict resolution. I stated this at the outset. By the end of session 10, NO solutions had been offered. None. It was all performative sympathy - "Oh, that must have been so hard…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:40 PM
13

The world has grown tired of the girlboss kick-ass-ing her way around and beating up men. This won't work.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 07:13 PM
2

Look, the formatting is dreadful. It's too long - two full computer screens of text - and the truncated points read like a Jaguar commercial: Chase power. Prioritize independence. Suppress maternal instincts. cf. Jaguar: Create Exuberant, Live Vivid. Delete Ordinary. If you repost your original, I'll read it properly and give you some feedback on the content, does that sound fair?
/r/MensRights27/06/25 05:08 PM
8

At this stage, ChatGPT is obvious to spot and annoying to read. The content might be good, but it gets rewritten annoyingly. Write it yourself, take the time to actually put a part of you into your writing. Moreover this particular post doesn't really open up a conversation, it just presents a feed of stuff and then closes with a conclusion. It's a bit like the Manifesto crap that we've seen lately. Enough, thank you.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 04:52 PM
32

Steinem openly states in her autobiography that she was trained by the CIA. What she doesn't say is the work that she did for them - this would likely be classified as a State Secret and will never be released. So it leaves it open to conjecture. Steinem was part of a number of Jewish women who eventually headed the major feminist/women's organizations, if that has anything to do with it. It seems most likely that the larger picture was "divide-and-conquer" - a strategy to continue the destructi…
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:54 PM
9

Edit: just the first chapter. Sorry, not the full book.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:42 PM
12

You can read online here: https://z-library.sk/book/2710612/2a270a/the-privileged-sex.html
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:23 PM
20

She almost got it. I remember when part of heterosexual male culture involved showing up with a woman to signal something — status, success, desirability. Women were once signifiers of value She missed the nugget: women aren't of any value any more.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 06:58 PM
-1

No, you're not reading what's there. If you want to do socially unacceptable things in your bedroom, go for it, you're not harming anyone. But if you want to engage other people in your socially unacceptable practices YOU NEED THEIR CONSENT. Consent. It's an amazing thing. Learn it.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 03:20 PM
2

I agree with you that there is a double standard widely practiced across society.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 01:26 PM
1

Your question does two things: Sidestep the issue of consent Prove my original point of Gamma Bias In the 1920s, women did face serious criticism for wearing pants in public. But in the subsequent 100 years it has become mainstream. Also, there is a difference between something being legal and something being socially widely accepted. It is legal for men to wear dresses, but it is not socially widely accepted. Likewise, it is legal for a woman to go topless in many countries and all but 5 US Sta…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 12:55 PM
2

You've posted a number of similar manifesto-style A.I.-written posts. They seem to follow a pattern: Circumcision grief Androgyny Goth attire/music Moreover, your post rate - 40 posts across different subs in around 48 hours suggests that you are either manic, or a bot, but I suspect you are not a bot. I urge you to get help. The word "manifesto" is unfortunately linked to people who subsequently carried out atrocities. It may be worth stopping using the word in this Men's Rights sub, for your s…
/r/MensRights22/06/25 12:28 PM
0

You need consent to explore your fetish in the presence of other people.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:52 AM
4

What makes it a fetish is if you get a kick out of it. Note, I haven't even said a sexual kick, just a kick. It is entirely possible to have a fetish for non-sexual things, in a non-sexual manner - "she had a fetish for curly hair". It's an irrational reverence or attraction to something. In Izzard's case, he had a fetish for wearing women's clothes in public - something which at the time was frowned upon socially. Clearly he got a kick out of doing something socially unacceptable. I did make a …
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:15 PM
11

As with much of the modern narrative, Gamma Bias is at play here. Gamma Bias is the simultaneous exaltation of women, and degradation of men: Women do something good? Celebrated, you go girl! Strong and powerful. Men do something good? Ignored or downplayed. Women do something bad? She's a victim (usually of men) Men do something bad? Oppressor/perpetrator In the sphere of the trans debate, we seem to have forgotten that the first people to be called trans were transvestites. i.e. men that dress…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:46 PM
3

We're not, and we don't want to. Have you looked at the idea that the issue of abortion is actually about protecting other human lives? I've noticed that it's never the woman's body that is aborted. it's only ever a distinctly different human being's body that is aborted.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 02:15 PM
14

I'm beginning to come to the conclusion that all women are "pick me's". Women compete with other women on a fertility scale. Some women are blessed with fertility - natural figure, blessed with good looks, etc. so they have a natural fertility advantage. But other women know this, and will actively try to sabotage pretty girls - its been discovered that (female) hairdressers will give pretty women worse haircuts (but tell them they look good). Average women will make best friends with a woman of…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 11:10 PM
1

I think I get where you are coming from. In Buddhism, it is taught that all sentient beings have the capacity for enlightenment, even though most sentient beings are not enlightened and some do horrific things. There is an underlying essence of all beings that could potentially become enlightened. That is where Buddhism places the value of beings. In their potential. Although I am Buddhist, I was coming at it from the other angle - not a being's potential, but actual. i.e what they contribute.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 10:01 PM
1

Again, why? Why should we value someone just for having been born? I'm genuinely open to hear your reasoning.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 08:30 PM
0

I'm sure you can see why I'm asking this, and it's not to be obtuse, or to troll. Women are valued because they create babies and help babies survive through the first few years. Men are valued because they provide. No one is valued who doesn't contribute in some way. Just being human isn't enough for people to assign value to them.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:06 PM
1

Sure, but what value does anyone have, merely by being human?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 04:04 PM
1

Your comment doesn't seem to relate to the subject at hand. Would you care to explain what you mean?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 04:03 PM
2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19085605/ 62% of the undergrads studied had rape fantasies. So, yes, the majority of these women did. But a fantasy is not reality.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:46 PM
2

I'm not sure I can entirely agree with you. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Net-caloric-resource-flows-from-parents-grandparents-and-husbands-among-Tsimane_fig2_26871611 This graph shows that in forager societies, fathers provide 3x the amount of net calories to children than mothers, and more importantly, husbands provided most of the calories to wives that the wives then passed on to their children. Essentially, mothers did very little providing, it was mostly fathers.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 01:29 PM
1

The trouble with that suggestion is that it's easy to come up with extreme examples of how it is wrong. What value does a genocidal despot have, just by being born?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 12:39 PM
1

I appreciate your attention to detail, thank you. Human rights: Women have bodily autonomy, men and boys do not (FGM (female circumcision) is illegal in 160+ countries, whereas MGM (male circumcision) is still legal and widely practised across those same countries. Women have 100% reproductive rights, men have 0% reproductive rights Men have 100% reproductive responsibility, women have 0% reproductive responsibility Women have automatic parental rights, men have no automatic parental rights - me…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 04:09 PM
1

Lol You appear to have instantly confused the two different words, despite me defining them as clearly as I could so that you couldn't confuse them. Patriarchy (no indefinite article) means "The Patriarchy". Otherwise you would have written "A patriarchy". But you didn't. Please be clear, because your description confused Patriarchy with a patriarchy. A patriarchy might require women to take a man's last name upon marriage. Patriarchy does not. And I disagree with your notion that this alone is …
/r/MensRights18/06/25 01:35 PM
1

"The Patriarchy" (capitalized, ideology) - i.e. the great boogeyman of feminist thinking - does not exist. "a patriarchy" (lower case, collective noun) - a society which is run by men - does exist. _____ If you consider that men and women are equal, then if a man can keep it in his pants, you must conclude that a woman can keep it in her pants. The fetus is not her body, therefore "her body, her choice" does not apply. By comparison, a man can abandon a woman and her baby, but likewise a woman c…
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:35 PM
1

It might be wise to be very careful of denouncing one type of feminism as "not feminism". It is intrinsically a No True Scotsman fallacy.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:20 PM
2

Document everything. Write it down in a book that she will never find. Write all of the previous episodes, when they happened, where, who was there to witness it, what the effects on your children and you were. Then, go to a doctor to have a formal record of it, and maybe ask the doctor if post-pregnancy hormones could play a role in it (it's an easy way to give her violence a reasonable cause, and that way it also legitimizes that IS violent, without it making it look like you are causing it). …
/r/MensRights16/06/25 02:01 PM
3

I need to point out: Puberty. At 11 years old, more than 50% of girls have entered puberty, which sees increased grey matter in the brain, enhancing cognitive function. Almost no boys have entered puberty at that age. It's not comparing apples with apples. In fact, there is no way to compare apples with apples. Comparing girls' and boys' brains at similar developmental stages in puberty is near impossible, because boys would have to be graded at 13 years old to girls at 11 years old. Obviously, …
/r/MensRights16/06/25 01:26 PM
13

Technically, this sub has this in its description: However, any issue that pertains to men's relationship to society is also a topic suitable for this subreddit. Men's rights are influenced by the way men are perceived by others. Abortion is an issue for men as well as women, or are you thinking that only female babies are aborted? Or that men had absolutely nothing to do with the conception? It isn't her body that she is aborting, so her body, her choice doesn't hold. Moreover, "Patriarchy" isn…
/r/MensRights16/06/25 01:10 PM
19

The "male gaze" is actually the human gaze, much like almost every other issue that feminists rail about. Women check out men, and women check out other women too. Women objectify men and women objectify themselves.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 01:03 PM
3

For me it was a little bit the other way around. Mostly it was because she wanted the photos to remember the events, and she took the initiative of getting the camera out. Then she had low self esteem about her looks, and every time I said "get in the photo" she would refuse for any given reason - no makeup, dress made her look fat, clothes weren't ironed, hair wasn't done, etc. Luckily there are pics of both of us, and they capture exactly what it was like, warts and all. I prefer to show my ki…
/r/MensRights15/06/25 04:02 PM
2

This is the usual argument for pro-choice people - the inconvenience the woman caused herself and the potential danger associated with that inconvenience (that she caused herself), outweighs the life of another human being. It's not all that concrete of an argument if you look at it dispassionately.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:40 PM
2

How?
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:28 PM
1

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578887/
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:27 PM
1

You're welcome to explain why.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:26 PM
1

No, it's factual. The error most people make is taking an average preference across a wide selection of one group, and assuming that all of that group must have a higher preference than all of the other group. But as to the social conditioning idea, that's easily given an answer using biology: When a woman gives birth and breastfeeds, both acts cause the automatic release of oxytocin into her body. This is known as the "cuddling" hormone. It promotes physical and emotional closeness, and helps t…
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:26 PM
1

It's a good question. I'm not sure I'd use the word childish, but it does seem as if Dark Triad traits (narcissism, machiavellianism, pschyopathy) are easily mistaken for positive qualities such as confidence, leadership, and resilience. As for longevity of relationships, I would wager that there are many factors that go into it, not least being the current societal ease that a relationship can be ended, and the one-sided rewards that comes with it. I would suggest that a one-sided rudimentary r…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 02:36 PM
2

The empirical data is a little confused on the topic, largely due to methodological problems and unstudied confounders. But essentially the idea is: During the 3 days surrounding ovulation, a woman's hormonal balance tilts her mate selection preference towards someone with more masculine attributes. During pregnancy and post-pregnancy, her hormonal balance tilts her mate selection preference towards someone with less masculine attributes. It's a complicated subject with various researchers on bo…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:01 PM
5

Male, old, redfaced. But basically yes.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 02:01 PM
6

Overall I think it is safe Nope. Not at all. Having lived in Australia and suffered false allegations at the hands of a BPD woman who had no problems lying to people, this is extremely dangerous. The police are primed to arrest men on no evidence. The courts are primed to convict men on the word of a woman only (no evidence required). Australia is weird in that they have a societal undercurrent of "Life's harsh, suck it up" that they have no way to see or challenge.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:23 PM
11

Can confirm this too! Was in Victoria, ex made false allegations against me (she had assaulted ME and I had called the cops on her). I was arrested and charged. When I asked for an intervention order against her, I was screamed at by the Magistrate: "DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DOESN'T HAPPEN TO MEN!! ITS THE LAW!!!" Yeah, well thanks for that. I'll remember to tell my 60kg body next time it gets thrown down a steep concrete driveway by a 120kg gorilla.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:16 PM
12

My personal opinion, not supported by any reliable sources today (I could probably find them but it would take me forever and only serve to clutter up my reply). I don't think society is ready for honest communication, true emotional expression and sincerity. And I don't think most relationships are ready for that either. Here's my reasoning: If we're really honest, we have to admit that - in general - men want a long term partner who provides peace at home. Not a replacement mother, but someone…
/r/MensRights09/06/25 02:35 PM
12

Wow those are some good resources! Thanks for posting!
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:58 PM
0

Low value. Not related to men's rights. Posted elsewhere. Title not descriptive.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 01:36 PM
7

Lol it was the therapists all along. God damn, why didn't I see that?? 😂 Aside from the obvious fact that therapists have been behind 50 years of women's increasing unhappiness and men being taken to the cleaners in divorce courts.... I have noticed that women (not feminists specifically) abuse the vulnerable (babies, children, disabled and elderly) at higher rates than men do. I haven't worked out why this is yet.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 01:17 PM
1

I guess since feminists forced the legal definition of rape to exclude men, it's not entirely surprising that the stats show that no men were legally raped. Weird how that works, huh? 40% of young men have had "unwanted sex" at the hands of a female perpetrator. It's not called rape, it's called "unwanted sex". https://time.com/37337/nearly-half-of-young-men-say-theyve-had-unwanted-sex/ That's more than the (doctored) lifetime prevalence of rape among women. Domestic violence is perpetrated just…
/r/MensRights03/06/25 05:38 AM
3

There are apps with body type as a requirement. I seem to remember Plenty Of Fish had one? Almost all women put "average", because they rated themselves "average-for-me". What men often don't realize is that women's weight fluctuates fairly often, usually to do with fluid retention at particular times in their cycle. The women rated themselves according to their own internal system, rather than an objective one that men might use. Plenty of those fish were way over "average", but they saw themse…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:31 PM
38

Correct. But Tinder does. They need to keep making money off men.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:02 PM
10

Lol. Tomorrow's headline: "Tinder accused of world's largest human trafficking scandal"
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:16 PM
24

For sure, so if they aren't getting money out of women, how can they do that?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:04 PM
241

Tinder knows that the dating scene is broken. Both men and women are done with online dating. They know that there are 2x as many men on the app as women, and this is a way to attract more women and get money out of those women (because they sure as heck aren't going to let this premium feature be free). Tinder's business is making money. They will roll this out, because every woman will pay for it. It will make their profits rise, short term. But 85% of men (those under 6 ft) will just stop usi…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:42 PM
16

You're welcome to your opinions, but I suggest you back them up with reliable data if you want to be taken seriously
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:47 PM
18

You're welcome to your opinions, but I suggest you back them up with reliable data if you want to be taken seriously
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:35 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1kxcdin/comment/mup41vz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button Your posts are too long They read like a manifesto The seem to embody only your own values of a feminine male I get the impression that you're 1.5 steps away from shooting up a school. Please stop.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:34 PM
4

The article uses a wikipedia definition of misogyny. I'm out. At least use a reliable dictionary definition, or some kind of agreed-upon authoritative source, rather than wiki! Holy heck. Because here's the problem: by using wikipedia (which itself has gendered bias in its definitions) she de facto starts with a gendered bias between the two words misogyny and misandry ("despite being both widespread and detrimental phenomena, misandry does not have the same level of institutional and systemic s…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:27 PM
23

Raileyx: Feminism fights for equality by putting out fires on the female side of things, primarily. It's kind of in the name. Not sure why you would expect otherwise. Also Raileyx: I'm not equating feminism with women, the incel loser dipshits on this sub are. Which is it? Moving on. For example, one assumption is that equal relationships are more healthy and fulfilling for both partners. I think this is true Based on what evidence? https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellec…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 01:04 PM
12

It is arguable that feminism was never about equality, right back to 1792.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:49 PM
1

I could give Bindell the benefit of the doubt if the main body of her writing was roughly equally directed at men and women. But it's not. It's entirely directed - predictably as a lesbian feminist - at how women are oppressed and men are the oppressors. That in itself is ironic as it is a joke. But a joke that Bindell doesn't see as a joke. What was your opinion when Roosh V suggested making rape legal?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 12:27 PM
16

Puts on Ron Burgundy suit: "That escalated QUICKLY. I mean, that really got out of hand!"
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:39 PM
23

Norah did more for changing opinions about men and women than any feminist I can mention. "Self-Made Man" is the name of her documentary and it is well worth watching. Yes, she checked herself into a clinic after the 18 month experiment, because trying to be two people and two different sexes, constantly switching, didn't do her mental health any good. Please do not jump to the conclusion that she opted for assisted life-ending care (I can't say the real word) because of her experiences 15 years…
/r/MensRights01/06/25 04:26 PM
1

I agree with you. Except also, I don't agree that it will happen. It absolutely does not matter what population size you have, the hierarchy remains the same.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:54 PM
2

It certainly is a paradox. Physically, the young, elderly and women are more vulnerable than young and middle aged men. I'm not sure this is reasonably contestable. However in the modern theater of war, no one is surviving the devastation of weapons. It makes no difference if your bruises heal in 5 days as opposed to 7 if the weapon used against you left no discernable trace of your body, or cooked your skin off, and was remotely piloted and detonated by someone in a hut on the other side of the…
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:40 PM
12

I sought custody because I loved being a father. I still do, even though my kids are 25 and 23. She sought custody because she hated the idea of me continuing to be a part of their lives. We are not the same.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:16 PM
21

I get what you are trying to say, and on a surface level analysis it could look like that. But I think the problem is more complex that you have written. women's 5x higher in-group bias - I agree "Women Are Wonderful" effect - I agree Innate protective traits - mothers tend to shield from all danger, fathers allow experimentation with danger until a threshold It's this third aspect that is worth considering. It tilts the male onlooker into a state of "let's see how far this goes" but you could b…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 07:00 PM
91

For the US (there's no reason to suppose this is vastly different in other Western countries), here's the stats on the gender divide according to occupation (pdf). Waiters/waitresses, servers, coffee shop attendants - all over 2/3rds women. Retail sales cashiers - over 2/3rds women. Office/admin - over 2/3rds women. This reflects in part women's tendency to gravitate towards inside, non-manual labor, social roles. Using the same chart, you can work out where to look for jobs that are staffed mor…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 04:08 PM
13

I dislike the last one just as much. Not only do I notice "280 dead, 80 women and children among them" (so.... who were the other 200???) or "10 firefighters/soldiers/[insert profession] wounded" omitting that they were all men, but in the case of "innocent women" I want to ask them: "Were they actually innocent? Or had they just not been charged and found guilty yet." It would change to: "This attack killed 80 women who hadn't yet been found guilty"
/r/MensRights28/05/25 04:23 PM
25

I dislike the word "microaggression" and think it should be phased out. English has a plethora of phrases that work, that apparently Harvard Professors are completely unaware of. slur passive aggressive remark snide remark unintentional sleight underhanded comment unconscious dig verbal hostility negative framework There are many. Not all are aggressive. The use of a term that defacto sets up a scenario where the person being blamed is regarded as aggressive, is not helpful. But it's done to fit…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:34 PM
5

Your posts are too long They read like a manifesto The seem to embody only your own values of a feminine male I get the impression that you're 1.5 steps away from shooting up a school.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:35 PM
22

Bill Burr said something that seems relevant to this [paraphrased]: If women are right, they argue the point If women are wrong, they make it about something else Use this. The moment they talk about how "women have it worse" you know you've won. Walk away.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:21 PM
16

most women are not perverted like men I beg to disagree. Most women are more perverted than men. Show me a light BDSM book that men bought 100m copies of. most women are not racist You will need to provide a source to back this up. women who are often more intelligent than men This is demonstrably false. Men have a higher average IQ, and men have a higher variance. Don't be cheap, women get really disinterested if the man is cheap. This is the only quasi-truth, but it's not all that true either.…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:44 AM
5

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20775070 It's quite possible the the reason that you don't hear much about antisemitism in other cultures or demographics is because you will face severe consequences. There's no consequences to calling white men antisemitic, you'll face no backlash. But criticize women specifically for their antisemitism? Misogyny. Criticize Islamic culture for antisemitism (and it does seem hard-baked into their culture): Jihad. I would question your sources carefully. It sounds li…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:17 AM
9

Oh, I'm sorry, I actually read that incorrectly. I thought you wrote "Dating Experience with women who have a child".
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:23 AM
22

DO NOT. Order of her priorities: Herself Her own children Her mom The dog The house Her work Her ex ... ... You
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:21 AM
17

Broadly speaking.... (wish I didn't have to write a disclaimer on this): Women receive online 63% of online hate. (there used to be a reliable stat link for this, but it has unironically disappeared) Women are 67% of the abusers in this online hate. This link says 50% Women have a 5x higher solidarity with other women, than men with men Put together, this means that women will temporarily stop their abuse against each other if a man strays into their territory and calls them out on their abuse. …
/r/MensRights28/05/25 02:16 AM
4

case in point, the OP of this thread is against reproductive rights for women, which is a misogynistic position to take, Firstly, you're being disingenuous - here's his post - and here's what he wrote: I’m for the 3 exceptions (rape, incest, medical issues). Outside of those 3 exceptions, the vast majority of abortions happen to fetuses with a heartbeat - which is one defining characteristic of living beings. We could quite easily suggest that women in the US are responsible for approximately 1m…
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:36 AM
3

I don't agree with you. It's a logical fallacy, I'll grant you that. It's in the same vein as wives expecting their husbands to take out the trash, because [insert stat about men being stronger/more inclined to do dirty jobs]. But it's just a logical fallacy. You don't necessarily hate all women if you don't want to change diapers and you use a non-related factoid to justify your aversion. I think modern society has lost sight of the meaning of "misogyny" and started to call anything that even l…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:58 PM
2

Not the same one who appointed more females to his lead positions than any other president in US history? Man that's so Patriarchy. Appointing women to positions of power. smh
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:51 PM
6

The same fat slob who made US history by appointing the first female Chief Of Staff?? That one? Yeah, totally misogynistic.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:50 PM
11

I guess it all depends on which definition of misogyny you use. If you use it in the strictest sense - the hatred of women - then what you described isn't necessarily misogynistic. I can expect my wife to do most of the caring work if that's what she wants to do and it's balanced with her expecting me doing most of the handyman work. Beating people up is straight up violence and is not intrinsically misogynistic. It's just plain violence. If you only beat up women, and solely for the reason that…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:48 PM
24

They aren't calling you a misogynist because they are thinking rationally about it. They are calling you a misogynist to shut you down and ban you. That way they can ignore everything you say, even if it is true and should be listened to.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 07:39 PM
4

They will also ruin that man if he doesn't reciprocate her attention, or worse still, chooses one of her rivals.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:54 PM
12

Judging from some of your past posts and comments, you still idolize women but have woken up to the idea that women can be nasty sometimes. But it's still mostly men's fault for men having problems. I encourage you to get more life experience. When you get unfairly slandered, financially stripped, cut out of your own children's lives and find your social and professional life destroyed - by a woman who you love(d) and who loved you, you'll start to understand not only how life truly is for men, …
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:14 PM
2

I've been in Calgary for 12 years and just moved to Edmonton. Companies ghost you, across the board.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 02:46 PM
2

Alberta is seeing a jobs freeze currently, due to a) massive influx of Vancouverites and Montrealians, and b) the tariffs.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 01:48 PM
33

Largely speaking it comes from this sort of thing (safe to click). The author notes that it would cause widespread outrage if "men" was substituted for "blacks" or "women". But let's go down that path anyway: If men have to earn their freedom (which actually isn't even possible right now, since we can be drafted, have no bodily autonomy, no reproductive rights, no automatic parental rights, and consequently no financial freedom and there is no way we can earn our freedom from any of these burden…
/r/MensRights26/05/25 09:36 PM
22

It's a double problem because not only do you have lower quality doctors, but it has been shown that female med students do not plan on working "full time" doctors hours once they graduate. This requires ever more lower quality candidates, worsening healthcare for everyone.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 10:31 PM
1

Different country.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 11:03 PM
3

Thank you. I'm now thinking out loud, but I will suggest that there is a link between agreeableness and Utopianism. "Life would be perfect if only people could just get along with each other (agree)". I'm not sure which way around it is though. What this unfortunately leads to is that with Utopianism, any amount of death and destruction is permissible if it furthers the cause towards the collective Utopia. "Anyone who disagrees is a Nazi. Kill all Nazis." It's certainly ironic that agreeableness…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:20 PM
5

There is a psychological trait called Agreeableness. Most average people are reasonably agreeable - they'll go along to get along. Women seem to exhibit higher levels of Agreeableness, but it's not a huge difference until you get to the extremes. One thing that Agreeable people like is.... to agree with other people! It's a tribe forming trait and is very necessary for tribal cohesion and social stability. It's counterpart ("disagreeable") is also necessary for change and/or protection of the tr…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:43 PM
5

It really is that simple. Just don't be a dick. If it's that easy for men (remember those "don't be that guy" campaigns??) then it's just as easy for women. But in all seriousness, I do hear what you are saying. I think you're right - both men and women are taught from an early age to be dicks to men, while simultaneously being taught to be gentlemen towards women. It's possible that there's an extra factor in women's case - their innate preference to side with other women. What are your thought…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 02:11 PM
6

Yep. Don't be a dick, as a woman.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:57 PM
4

Firstly, punctuation - capitals at the beginning of a sentence, periods at the end. Commas to separate thoughts within a sentence. Secondly, the original post reads like a crypto scam message. Thirdly, it comes across as a gender confused Zoomer goth with very little life experience (which is unrelated to why it might be deleted).
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:32 PM
4

I have no idea why it was removed - you'll have to ask mods. But here's a possible reason: Look at the rules of the sub - Rule 2 Posts must provide value to the sub If you have a point to make or a story to tell, make a self-post. It isn't the content so much as the format that is the problem. You wrote: This isn’t a debate. Ok. So what value does it bring?
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:19 PM
20

I have come across (mostly Left-leaning) people who use moral slurs as a way to try to win arguments. It's a logical fallacy - "I'm more moral than you, therefore my opinion is more valid" - is what it's designed to achieve. It's not confined to gay men at all. I've been banned (temporarily here, and permanently on other platforms) for providing peer-reviewed research that showed that women also engage in bad behavior at rates similar to men. "OMG found the Nazi!" "Misogynist!" "Incel" It's play…
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:03 PM
12

"Patriarchy" as a construct.... simply does not exist.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:34 PM
14

If debates alone were enough, women wouldn’t have been excluded from voting, owning property, or attending university for centuries. I might turn this back on you and say "That's a pretty selective reading of history". The debates revealed (as I have already written) that women didn't want the vote. And that men already voted in women's favor. Who's to say that throughout history it wasn't actually women that refused to accept greater burdens upon them? Land ownership came with the inextricable …
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:53 PM
19

There was a peaceful path - debates had been held on the subject of women being given the vote, and the majority of women didn't want the vote. Moreover, budding leaders like Churchill were against giving women the vote on account of the fact that a) men voted in their own wife's and daughters' best interests anyway, and b) women as a bloc vote ever further left, leading always society in one direction only.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:23 PM
24

I mean, if the British Government says they are, and everyone agrees that bombing people and businesses and killing people for your cause is terrorism, then.... Or are you running down the path of "it isn't terrorism because I agree with the cause" argument? Careful, that would make you a terrorist sympathizer.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:08 PM
27

https://media.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php/suffrage-100-militancy-help-hinder-fight-franchise/ The Suffragettes were terrorists.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 05:58 PM
2

Since at least the 1960s, broad sections of the female workforce have outearned their identical male counterparts. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/2026661/thomas-sowell-takes-down-the-gender-wage-gap/ It has remained true ever since. Women out earn men if they do not have children and before they marry. But yeah, I can see how you could have missed than in the.... 60 (?) years it has been true....
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:57 PM
2

Those ovens don't cook themselves...
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:54 PM
2

I agree with you. Of course a guy would be more attracted to a 9/10 CEO over a 5/10 cashier I used to believe this, but as I age I have started to think that maybe it's wrong. There is a trope that men only care about looks, but that is very far from the actual truth. Men care about all sorts of other things alongside looks, and one only needs to search Reddit for a question like "what made you realize she was wife material", and none of the answers involve looks. OP is looking for a partner, no…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:50 PM
8

I don't have a PhD in women. The comment was rhetorical towards OP who has been brought up to think that gender equality goes both ways, when it absolutely doesn't. He's trying to make the case that his two Masters' Degrees mean that he matches with a woman who also has at least one Masters' Degree AND that that woman would necessarily believe in splitting things 50:50. Life doesn't work like this. I'm trying to point out that his two Masters' Degrees have not prepared him for life.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:07 AM
11

I have to assume the neither of your Masters' Degrees were in "women". You need to wise up and learn about real life women. They don't work the way you've been led to believe. Yes, you are supposed to pay for everything. Even if she earns more. Equality is a lie, it always was. The sooner you realize this, the better your outcome will be. Find an admin assistant at the Uni, or research institute. Don't go for a MSc or PhD.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:52 AM
17

"Successful" women are looking for Assistant Professors, not other Master's grads. All women look up the pay scale for a partner. Stop looking at the women on your direct level and start looking elsewhere.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:27 AM
35

I am looking for a partner, an equal, an adult, Well, good luck with that. Women (while not being a monolith) generally take the opinion that "what's mine is mine and what's his is ours". Women only want equality when it comes out in their favor. That's what feminism is. That's what feminists mean when they say "equality" - they mean the woman has a better deal. It's not impossible to find a woman who shares your values, but I will wager you won't find her on a dating app, and you won't find her…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 01:07 AM
3

Having been married, and seen the sheer vast quantity of toilet paper and tissue paper my wife used on a daily basis, a strong case can be made for women's carbon footprint (in the form of chopping down trees to make the paper) is way higher than men's. Toilet paper usage was notably absent from the calculation. I wonder why.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 11:36 PM
2

Tip #1. Be tall Tip #2. Be rich Tip #3. Be handsome (but seriously, good vid)
/r/MensRights21/05/25 03:27 PM
36

Two things can be true simultaneously. 2% of all suspected perpetrators of police reported rape actually end up going to jail. That's true. 8% of all police-reported rape accusations are false to a standard that can be successfully prosecuted for perjury in a court of law. ... Feminists like to use the logical fallacy of assuming that all allegations of rape are true, therefore 98% of perpetrators walk free. I seem to remember the YT feminist Lacie Green used this argument until she grew up. The…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 01:16 PM
21

Exact same experience. I was happy to distance myself from her, but she went all out to cut me out of my children's lives and that nearly broke me. Stay strong. It took 15 years of not even seeing my kids or hearing them on the phone. No contact all that time, but my daughter plucked up the courage to question her mom's side of things, reached out, and we have been back in contact for 2 years now. She even came to see me, and it has been amazing, as it always was. Stay strong.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 12:59 PM
1

Here are the questions: 1. What types of men do you recognize today? 2. What do you see as the main role of men today? 3. How have women changed over recent years? 4. How would you describe your ‘ideal woman’? 5. How have men changed over recent years? 6. Is there anything else you'd like to share about men, masculinity, or your own experiences? We welcome any additional thoughts, reflections, or questions you think could help us better understand today’s reality. That's it. It's quite broad, an…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 01:15 AM
1

Women leave their husbands at higher rates if the husband loses his job, so I guess that balances out the sickness thing? Some people believe that women cheat at higher rates than men.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 11:46 AM
3

Not satire https://cdn8.openculture.com/2017/04/17213812/protest-against-coffee.jpg
/r/MensRights18/05/25 11:47 PM
2

I like that theory.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 02:10 PM
1

Because in Australia men obviously have way too many rights and women need to fight to make it equal. I'm assuming there was supposed to be [/s] after that remark?
/r/MensRights18/05/25 01:57 PM
1

Going against "For better or for worse, in sickness and in health, til death do us part" is nullifying her marriage vows. Not sure how that can be interpreted wrongly?
/r/MensRights18/05/25 01:56 PM
10

Since you're on a journey down a rabbit hole of injustice, have a quick look around the internet to see if you can find any public space that is men-only or male-only, aside from public restrooms. I'll wait. Women have noticed when men have their own spaces (exclusive clubs, for example) and systematically campaigned to have them either shut down, or forced to let women join. Whatever country you are from, look at how many women-only domestic violence shelters there are (2000+ in the US), and ho…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 01:28 PM
3

I like your thoughts. I agree that marriage would have benefited middle aged women in a time when they weren't in the workplace. I seem to remember that at various points in history, from Roman times forward, women protested bachelors and agitated for a bachelor tax to be instigated?
/r/MensRights17/05/25 11:48 PM
2

marriage favored men more then women I guess that's what I am questioning. Does it (or did it) favor men more than women?
/r/MensRights17/05/25 11:32 PM
4

Continuing on from my thoughts, if we were to do a thought experiment, we could potentially find the answers to whether or not women rejected marriage: Do women still get paid some of the man's salary after deciding to nullify her marriage vows? If so, why? Aren't the vows null and void? Do women still have to uphold any spoken or unspoken agreement for that money? (i.e. to tend to him if he is sick, clean his house, cook, etc.) If not, why not? Basically, why is does the marriage contract conti…
/r/MensRights17/05/25 11:31 PM
8

This question is too broad and non-specific to have any meaning. There are so many false allegations in certain areas that the question should never have been asked.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 02:27 PM
1

Miners were paid Fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 12:09 PM
3

Kilts, caps/hats with buttons or feathers (thing Austria), woolen scarves, swashbuckling capes....there is a ton of creative menswear. What you need is: balls, a good iron, and more balls (you gotta wear this stuff in public, or what's the point) I like a colored suit with a pin. Smart with some finesse. But trying to find a colored suit in Canada was next to impossible. I had to get suits imported.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 07:20 PM
2

You seem to be rather short on actual facts. Farmers farm the land, but more often than not they are not the actual landowners. This holds true today and it holds true back into the past for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. I notice you were completely silent on women coal miners...
/r/MensRights16/05/25 07:05 PM
3

Yeah, that does happen. I got perma-banned from a number of subs just for commenting in this one. You have to remember that Reddit moderators are chronically far-left leaning and anything that doesn't glorify women is automatically "far-right hate speech".
/r/MensRights16/05/25 07:02 PM
1

I'm sorry to hear that. I have no idea why that might be, I didn't find your comment to be in any way offensive, it hasn't been downvoted, and I see no other reason why you might be banned. Maybe you could appeal the ban? We need voices here.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:08 PM
3

You wrote: A main theme of Austen novels is how limited women's financial options were Austin was writing about the upper class, so I fixed your sentence for you. Your sentence does not apply to anyone outside the upper class. Upper class women did not work, lower class women absolutely did. Your sentence does not apply to them. You made a sexist generalization that wasn't appropriate.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:04 PM
2

I have heard different numbers, I would be interested to read the research that you base your opinions on. Infanticide and filicide are defined differently according to different researchers, for example. Around 90–95% of men who are murdered are killed by other men, usually in the context of criminal activity, gang violence, or conflict — not because of their gender I will submit that you are wrong. For example, you may remember when Michelle Obama exhorted the American public to "Bring Back Ou…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 03:56 PM
2

https://news-archive.exeter.ac.uk/featurednews/title_645183_en.html Tudor and Stuart women spent more time making money than caring for their families, new research shows Women and children have worked on farms as farmers since the dawn of the Agrarian age. Also, this: https://spartacus-educational.com/CoalIndustry.htm quote: In the 17th century most coal was taken from small and shallow "bell pits". Pits were often on common land and run by small groups of families. These families worked in tea…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 03:17 PM
3

A main theme of Austen novels is how limited [upper class] women's financial options were... FIFY
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:29 PM
0

Women had no way of making their own money in those days Apart from the maids, servants, bakers, cooks, nannies, secretaries, assistants, nurses, animal carers, farmers.... Yeah, women had NO way of making their own money [/s]
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:27 PM
3

Are you suggesting is that women are basically prostitutes who only allow men to copulate with them in exchange for resources? That's pretty misogynistic, isn't it??
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:23 PM
7

Women were allowed to own property, please read your history books carefully. It was more usual that if she was married, her husband owned the property - because owning property came with inalienable responsibilities to maintain that property along with all people, serfs and chattels on it/in it. Women, it turns out, don't really want extra responsibilities. Men were responsible for all the debt accrued by their female relatives too, His wife was not responsible for her own debt. Let that sink i…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:22 PM
4

I love reminding folks how upper class Victorian women were put on a pedestal In her book "On the Vindication of the Rights of Women" [1792] the very first feminist Mary Wollstonecraft wrote that women were afforded a special place in society. It shuts modern day feminists up pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:04 PM
3

'It is a truth universally acknowledged that [women think] a single man, in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife...' FIFY.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:01 PM
7

Prenups have been shown to be basically worthless, from a legal standpoint. They need to be updated every year, and both the husband and the wife need independent legal advice before signing. Without these two legal impositions, they can be easily discounted.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:10 PM
2

I agree. I would add that there was (or is) a hidden hierarchy that women have always adhered to, which was the matriarchal structure of the family. Great Grandma ruled the roost, and every woman knew her place within that family structure.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:09 PM
6

I think I would go further than you and say that for all men marriage is potential slavery. Here's the thing: the only thing a woman has to do in a marriage is have sex once for it to be "consummated" - i.e. made legally binding. Without that, a marriage can be annulled. So, she has sex once, and then..... .....she doesn't have to do absolutely anything at all ever again. The contract is now one-sidedly enforceable. The man is required by force of law (i.e. guns and prison as a final punishment)…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:04 PM
12

Thanks buddy! Love that you're staying positive, that's a win.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:35 PM
1

Alternatively, play stupid games, win stupid prizes. If a governor does something illegal, is given the chance to change their illegality, and refuses, who is to blame for their misfortune?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:03 PM
13

A female waitress and a female CEO are worth the same if they look the same. I had never thought of it like this, but you are absolutely correct! Love it. I would add that actually the waitress is likely to be worth more simply on the chances that she isn't a hard-ass girl-boss like the CEO is.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:20 PM
101

Men generally do not receive any love at all, from anyone, past the age of perhaps 14. When was the last time you received flowers? When was the last time someone touched you platonically, but lovingly? When was the last time someone told you "good job on keeping your shit together for so long"? Men are mostly starved for love. Also, most men find it a bit weird if their guy friends start giving them flowers or touching them lovingly but platonically. That's just how it is for us. So we seek the…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:55 PM
1

I think it's easy for women to be compassionate/empathetic towards people, children and animals that are more vulnerable than them. But that's where their compassion/empathy ends. It's a vulnerability-index-linked trait. If we're brutally honest, it's not actually empathy at all. It's sympathetic caring. In her mind, men are unworthy of compassion, empathy or sympathetic caring because they do not rank on her internal vulnerability index. Men are either not vulnerable, or should not be vulnerabl…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 07:53 PM
5

Shallow dive into female psychology 101: Women support other women 4.5x more often than men support other men. I was falsely accused of domestic violence by my wife when I was divorcing her. Her statement to the police clearly showed she was lying, and I was not charged. She has never recounted, to this day. When I moved away and told the story to my sister of all people, my sister said "well, you must have done something for her to do that!?" No, I didn't. She was mentally ill (confirmed later)…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 06:27 PM
1

There is historical research showing that female Heads of State waged more wars than male Heads of State. "Queens" by Dube and Harish 2015
/r/MensRights11/01/25 10:53 AM
2

dipshit< You already know that insults simply show you have run out of coherent arguments. What you just posted shows very clearly that oppression is the metric by which feminism splits communities, at the same time as oppression being the metric by which Marxism splits.....communities. Own goal, I think.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:12 AM
1

Lol who hurt you
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:29 AM
4

The answer is that women were not oppressed for centuries. Women have always been given special treatment by men. Not all women, and not all men, not all of the time. But in general, women have been given special treatment.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 10:59 PM
0

farse. *farce
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:04 PM
0

Wow, clearly I hit a nerve. Does Marxism divde society into two groups? Yes. Are those two groups oppressor an oppressed? Yes. Did de Beauvoir divide society into two groups, oppressor and oppressed? Yes. Is there any other ideology that divides society into oppressor and oppressed? No. So we have found the culprit. That YOU know better than this, and can throw slurs around because YOUR personal view of Marxism includes socio-economic status (as, ironically, feminism does too) doesn't make me ri…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 02:56 PM
0

https://study.com/academy/lesson/marxism-definition-basic-tenets.html#:~:text=The%20basic%20principles%20of%20Marxist,to%20an%20age%20of%20communism. On Marx's account, society is increasingly characterized by two socio-economic classes who are in an unequal struggle for power. The bourgeoisie is the social class defined by owning the means of production (factories, machines, capital, etc.). The proletariat is the class defined by the need to sell their labor for wages. The conditions of society…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:46 AM
10

Because you can fact check Simone de Beauvoir, her pedophilic tendencies, her sexual abuse of her students, and her book "The Second Sex". It's not that hard. That SHE got Marx wrong is not MY problem.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:21 AM
30

Largely speaking, it comes from beloved Feminist icon Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986), who was a pedophile, sexual deviant and lost her job and teaching licence because she sexually abused her students. She was lovers with the French Philosopher and Marxist, Jean-Paul Sartre. Marxism divides the world of interpersonal relationships up into: Oppressors Oppressed In Marx's original view, it was factory owners that oppressed factory workers. This may well have been true for all the factories Marx vi…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:47 AM
2

It may happen that way, but I suspect that if a large proportion of men find themselves without work, two things will happen: 1) a war requiring subscription will happen, and 2) women will get very tired of being the breadwinners, very quickly. They will demand some kind of change.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 05:04 AM
32

women actually no longer need us except for reproduction In Sydney, Australia, train drivers went on strike, and it's not the first time they've done it. Train drivers are 95% male. Every time they strike, basically the entire city shuts down. There are not enough women to fill the gaps. Multiply this by every male dominated industry and you've got absolute bedlam. Women absolutely need men, but in places where they don't have to look at those men for fear of the women getting the ick.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:14 PM
10

She was only diagnosed during the divorce.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 04:42 PM
5

I have a feeling that the far eastern Asian countries totally normalize domestic violence against men, but I have no other evidence than seeing women from those countries behave intolerably towards their men. Throwing their sandal at their husband is the usual go-to.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 03:14 PM
1

I agree. And it may even go further than society in general subconsciously cared more about bad things that happen to women. I would suggest that society cares more about small achievements any random woman does, over and above men dying. "Oh, yeah, so sad about the suicide rate, but look! Lucy knitted a vagina hat for her cat! Isn't she strong and brave"
/r/MensRights02/01/25 02:49 PM
88

Of all the red pills I took during my divorce, that was the most bitter one to swallow.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:10 AM
294

I had the same experience with my sister. I had gone through the mother-of-all-divorces, to a woman who had Borderline Personality Disorder, and took a hammer to her leg multiple times to falsely accuse me of domestic violence. It was hell on earth, and it's a wonder that I even survived it. After moving countries, and reconnecting with my family, my sister (of all people, and of whom I had been particularly protective) said to me "Well, you must have done something to deserve that??" No. She wa…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:01 AM
5

Dear lord, that webpage loads ridiculously in my browser. I would love to see a wealth transfer statistic! Come on guys, someone out there must have a link to something?
/r/MensRights02/01/25 05:57 AM
5

Did he consent? That's all there is to it. No consent, no responsibility. I'm being intentionally hard-line about this so that you can see that I'm using the classically feminist point of view. If she didn't consent, it was rape. The same goes for every man. Moreover, feminists allow for a woman to withdraw consent post hoc, allowing for what was a consensual encounter to become de facto rape. Why does this reasoning not apply to men?
/r/MensRights31/12/24 07:25 PM
6

No, it's an equal rights thing. At the very least, the scales need to be tipped back towards men. Men have no reproductive rights, no paternity rights, but 100% financial responsibility - even for kids that aren't biologically his. In anyone else's world, zero rights but 100% responsibility is called "slavery". But since we're debating men's financial contribution, why shouldn't we discuss how much contribution, if any, a man should make? Why should sperm donors be financially responsible for a …
/r/MensRights31/12/24 07:01 PM
1

https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/03/coerced-sex having unwanted sex did not appear to affect the victims’ self-esteem. “It may be the case that sexual coercion by women doesn’t affect males’ self-perceptions in the same way that it does when women are coerced Anecdotally, I have a friend who was "raped" in his 20s. He had a one-night stand with a girl, they slept in the same bed afterwards, and he woke up in the morning to find her on top of him, him inside her, her going for it like…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:09 PM
6

It's a flawed article. He does make some good points, but also misses some great ones entirely, and even comes to the wrong conclusion once. He started with the c.1900 paper proposing that humans are gynocentric - which they are - but fails to elucidate where this comes from: A lot of early sociology comes from farm-yard observations by landowners. Yes, it's that stupid. One of the main drivers of the idea of gynocentrism is beehives. The common idea is that the female worker bees do all the wor…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:47 PM
1

I agree. I found some of the points a bit stretched, and an alternative hypothesis to explain the myriad of "female-first" cultural mores wasn't given. He could have pointed out that Briffault's Law extends to men as well: if a man does not believe he will gain something from a woman, no association will take place. That something is usually sex. Men will not be friends with women they wouldn't consider having sex with (however unlikely that eventuality may be). He could have pointed out that th…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:26 PM
3

I had problems reading it, so I clicked on "print" and then read it all via the print box.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:12 PM
4

As one-sided as this article is, and avoiding going into the reasons for this kind of junk "academia" (there was a great post on it within the last week in this sub), the problem is easily rectified (on paper, at least): Men get free choice as to how much they support any given child. Consent to support can be withdrawn at any time. Feminists like the word "consent" and the idea that without enthusiastic, ongoing consent, it's rape, right?
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:52 PM
3

I think it can be done discreetly without making a fuss (the birth DNA test). The umbilical cord is "recycled" and not needed by either parent, but it contains blood from the mother and the baby. If it was just mandated that umbilical cord testing was performed at every birth, a nurse in the background could prepare a sample in a jar and send it off. No one needs to know the outcome unless it doesn't match.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:48 PM
10

I appreciate you writing this out here. This is the default experience of men. Almost no woman I have come across, understands this at all on any level, until they have a son who means the world to them. Then it becomes personal. But before that time it's as if it is an abstract concept devoid of any reality to women. I noticed that your first thought was for your son, not for your husband. Just an observation. You didn't step up to the plate and tell those teens off for being sexist idiots to y…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:39 PM
52

Men don't fight against their struggles because literally no one listens.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 06:51 PM
17

I was hoping someone would point this out. Cosmo magazine publishes "Best Olympic Packages" showing male athletes' genitals in speedos. How is that not sexual objectification...
/r/MensRights30/12/24 04:15 PM
23

Thank you for writing this. I would add that underlying the foreskin theft is the right to bodily autonomy, which men do not have.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 04:00 PM
3

Yeah, it was the Soylent comment that gave it away.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 07:14 AM
12

lol fake post.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 06:17 AM
2

"why did they never show us any of this?" Murray Straus did research on that: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment (downloadable pdf in link) His main points were: Conceal collected evidence by simply not publishing it Avoid collecting evidence of female perpetration Selective citation of research (cherry-picking) State conclusions opposite to what the data indicate…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:30 PM
3

I'm sure! "Patriarchy" has now become such a nebulous, uncategorizable thing that feminists point to any bad behavior by a woman as "ingrained Patriarchal behaviors", as if women are completely innocent darlings that can only do wrong things if they learned it from a man. No. It's just shitty human behavior. Women aren't exempt from being shitty humans.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:12 PM
1

I seemed to read it this way: Half of the students said they ended up having intercourse, 10 percent reported an attempt to have intercourse I agree that the wording is a bit misleading, as it first reports that 4 out of 10 students reported sexual coercion of some type, but doesn't then specify that of those 4 out of 10 the percentages are broken down further into half and 10%. So in reality we're talking about half of the 4 out of 10 ended up having unwanted intercourse, plus a further 10% of …
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:04 PM
3

The wars themselves were fought by men and men only. But it was the female head of State that started it.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 04:54 PM
4

This is the research https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2014/03/coerced-sex#:\~:text=A%20total%20of%2043%20percent,of%20Men%20and%20Masculinity%C2%AE.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 04:13 PM
3

You're right, the narrative is quite weird. There's historical research called "Queens" by Dube and Harish (2015) that showed that between 1400 and 1900 in Europe, female heads of State and Queens were more likely to wage war, and those wars were longer and bloodier than wars waged by male heads of State. They even corrected for the Queen having a male consort (in case it was him who made her do it).
/r/MensRights29/12/24 04:06 PM
14

Firstly, anyone uttering this phrase is not going to listen to you. You're a man, or if you're a woman, you're a man-sympathizer. But here's the nuts of it: mothers are 100% the perpetrators of killing babies within 24hrs of birth mothers are 70%+ the perpetrators of killing children under 1 year, and 60% the perpetrator of killing children under 5 years 60% of child abuse is perpetrated by mothers, and 70% of that is against boys women are equally as violent in close personal relationships as m…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 02:01 AM
3

I can answer the second part. Emotional labor is a null term. Men do far more emotional labor by putting their emotions aside 24/7, so that their wives and girlfriends don't have to deal with them. Many men report having opened up emotionally to their partner, only for that partner to instantly lose respect for them and start making relationship exit strategies. Women do not want men to be emotional, men find this out the hard way and learn to do 24/7 emotional labor for women. For childcare: ge…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 01:33 AM
63

Yes, women still have a harder life than most men. In European and North American countries, this is not true. Women have a life vastly superior to men in almost every way.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 10:43 PM
15

I agree that there are privileges in society, underneath rights. My opinion is that women have many many more privileges than men do. On the topic of sex trafficking (I know you didn't mention it specifically), more boys are recruited into armies and trafficked for labor, than girls are trafficked for sex. But we never hear about that. When Michelle Obama was telling the world to "Bring Back Our Girls" - the 300 girls kidnapped by Boko Haram in Nigeria, no one mentioned that 10,000 boys had been…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:19 PM
29

I was raised with all the same slogans as you. "Women need more rights!" etc. but I have since learned that women have 3 distinct human rights more than men: Bodily autonomy - female circumcision is banned in 160+ countries in the world, but male circumcision is legal, widespread, and advertised. Both are genital mutilation for religious reasons. Both should be banned. Reproductive rights - a woman gets to choose when to get pregnant, and whom to. Men are not afforded this right. A woman can (an…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:55 PM
77

Sadly, welcome to the world of truth. You won't hear about it from women, and you won't hear about it in the news. Feminism is big money. They keep their well funded quasi-government jobs by scaring women and getting funding for scaring women. The wage gap was debunked in 1979 by Prof. Thomas Sowell (he is on Firing Line in 1981 in this vid), and it's been debunked every couple of years since, including by feminists in 2014. Women are as physically violent as men in their close personal relation…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:34 PM
7

when it comes to actual physical violence, men blow women out of the water Not within the sphere of close personal relationships. Women are more violent. There are significant disparities between the types of violence men and women choose to use: men use fists much more, women use objects and violence-by-proxy. This is simply for physical violence. For psychological/emotional/relationship violence, women are in a league of their own. Further: 85% of the victims of men's violence are strangers to…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 05:38 PM
43

What a fantastic article! So many truths packed into such a short space. I fully agree with pretty much everything he wrote, and it's the first time I have seen it laid out so clearly. The only thing I take issue with is this: The data suggest that women have a slightly higher average IQ than men The data that suggest this was modeled on 11-yo boys and girls. At this age, girls already have a larger percentage who have entered puberty than boys, which has increased their brain capacity. It was d…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 05:04 PM
35

This is essentially what a majority of men have concluded. There is no advantage at all in having a romantic relationship with a woman, and there are many disadvantages. Don't expect it to change - women will always support other women, first and foremost. It's only when the majority of women see that there is a material advantage to themselves for looking after men and men's issues that men will be given some leniency. But it won't be altruistic, it will be self-serving on the part of women gen…
/r/MensRights25/12/24 06:48 PM
2

Great write up! Anecdote: my grandfather was apparently unhappy in his marriage. But, being born in the early 1910s, "one simply does not divorce!". At the age of 65, he retired and promptly died. My father maintains that this was the honorable gentleman's way out of marriage.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 02:26 AM
63

When I had the first meeting with this therapist she assured me that whatever I told her would remain confidential. This is a huge mistake/lie. Therapists are required by law to report whatever you have said to them, to the police or other authorities, if they believe it is incriminating. There is no confidentiality with therapists, only with lawyers. Having said that, what she did was way beyond that. She needs to be removed from the profession forever.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:23 PM
1

Sinead O'Connor
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:44 AM
14

If it were as easy as accepting 20c difference! The real figures show that young single women out-earn young single men by about the same 20c. For no other reason than they are women. There's a reverse wage gap, and it's been noted and measured constantly since the late 1970s. All the b/s about "77c to a man's $1" is made up tripe.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:21 PM
67

This is sometimes called a "Motte & Bailey" defense. When defending one argument gets too hard, they retreat to an easier-to-defend argument, according to need. And then when that gets hard to defend, they switch again.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:19 PM
46

I heard there was an angel of death, a nurse that killed 400+ babies. I'm pretty sure that every hospital must have several of them, recruiting unsuspecting nurses to do more killing. Watch out!
/r/MensRights22/12/24 04:49 PM
3

Personally, I think many people will be drawn to Islam for that very reason - both men and women. In fact, we have seen some prominent "women's rights" feminists join Islam in recent years.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 04:46 PM
3

There are tests at law to gauge if an agreement is valid. Because of the changing nature of a marriage (particularly the assets over time), it was ruled that both the husband and the wife needed independent legal advice, as well as needing to update the pre-nup every year, to reflect any change in asset status. Without those two steps, any pre-nup is now considered automatically invalid.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 04:44 PM
21

Yes, but pre-nups have been shown in court to be absolutely worthless.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 04:03 AM
1

Nor have I said anyone should. But at least you and I agree with each other that it's biology, unlike the previous commenter. It can be hard, though. As an example to the contrary, if we were to say "women shouldn't obey their biology" when it comes to mood swings across their monthly cycle, I'm sure there would be a lot of pushback.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:46 PM
3

Yes, there's a lot to unpack surrounding the notion of gender being a social construct. I'm not the person to do that, and reddit is NOT the place either.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 06:47 PM
-11

No, it's absolutely biology. Biology leads to culture. Culture cannot change biology.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 06:45 PM
8

I have come to a similar conclusion.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 05:38 PM
8

No, I was pointing out that your biology dictates that you save women first. You can't undo that, it's hard-wired into you. That you hate everyone still doesn't undo your biological instincts.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 05:19 PM
4

Test for you: A young woman and a young man are in front of you as you all walk down the street. They turn to cross the road between crossing points and you can see a truck will mow them down. Which one do you instinctively try to save? If they are equally hurt, which one do you attend to first?
/r/MensRights21/12/24 05:13 PM
100

Is killing a woman somehow a worse offense than killing a men? According to all women, yes. According to young men, yes. That's 3/4 of the population. You have to remember the in-group bias women have, and the out-group bias that men have. This leads to Gamma Bias. It has always been there, throughout history. No matter that 100% of neonaticide is done by women. No matter that 90%+ of infanticide is done by women, and that 70%+ is mothers killing boys. No matter that Bring Back Our Girls (the 29…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 04:54 PM
7

I'm not OP.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 05:22 AM
9

Right here: I’m sure there was equally bad/ cruel men in that hospital as well. There is no evidence for your assertion. None. You generalized the entire of male nurses into a category that they do not deserve. Check your privilege.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 08:26 PM
17

just because you had a few bad experiences doesn’t mean you should generalise. I’m sure there was equally bad/ cruel men in that hospital as well. You're sure are you? You just told people reading this thread not to generalize, and in the same sentence, you generalize. Based on what? "All men are bad"??? "Not all men, but always a man"??? Check your privilege. Women are held to lower standards than men, everywhere. This particularly holds true in nursing, because (being highly female dominated) …
/r/MensRights19/12/24 05:56 PM
24

One would think that of all places to find caring people, it would be in a place specifically designed to care for people and which employs....caring people? I can admit that the "proximity" argument (or a version thereof) could apply here. Between 85% and 95% of nurses are female, so if there's a bad apple, it's gonna be a woman 8.5 to 9.5 times out of 10. That's simply more women = more abuse opportunity. But I suspect that it is a problem that runs much deeper. I haven't come across a single …
/r/MensRights19/12/24 05:43 PM
15

You'll notice in the abstract of the paper [1992]: men, who killed nonintimate acquaintances, strangers, or victims of undetermined relationship in 80% of cases, women killed their spouse, an intimate acquaintance, or a family member in 60% of cases. So, 60% of the victims of women-killing-people are family members. But only 20% of victims of men-killing-people are family members. This makes sense of why when domestic violence shelters were set up in a widespread fashion, it didn't change the mu…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 08:45 PM
20

Unfortunately there's a bitter truth pill in your experience. There's no magical "straight male privilege card". Life as a man is hard, and you're finding out first hand just how that is. Men are guilty upon the rumor of a woman he doesn't even know and has never met. So the advice is the same for any man: brush it off, be stoic, watch people very carefully, and only keep friends who absolutely have your back. Protect yourself at all times.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 01:32 AM
12

The Author: Anna Motz is consultant clinical and forensic psychologist and psychotherapist in a women's prison, providing specialist consultation, assessment, and treatment for high-risk women. She also works independently as a psychotherapist, specializing in self-harm, violence and childhood trauma. So she's 100% biased towards a) women only, and b) women with childhood trauma. It's no surprise that the article only mentions a single woman client who is absolved of her sins "because childhood …
/r/MensRights15/12/24 04:04 PM
19

The point of the post is not about women-as-a-monolith-wanting-only-Aryans. Nor is the song really about women wanting Aryans. You're clever enough to know this. Both are about women having unrealistic dating standards. The reason both the song and the post get traction is that - as a "joke" it's largely true. Women, men and science all agree that women prefer to date/marry across and up from their socio-economic status. This is not even contestable, it holds true across cultures and time. The s…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:38 PM
13

Ohhh, this is the type of joke that's "funny because it's true".
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:20 PM
1

I'll hazard a guess that "shopping" would be included if it made women look more like victims. I haven't seen stats that disentangle "grocery shopping" from "general shopping". Women can and do spend far longer just browsing, than men do. Is it right to class this as a "household chore"?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 11:49 PM
8

Dear Lord. "Feminist Town Planning". Next, in Edinburgh: "Council introduces bleeding culverts, so that women menstruating non-men can free-bleed into them if they are walking around town." "Edinburgh replaces £££ with pads and tampons as new currency" "Edinburgh makes entire city inclusive space for women only. Men banned" *civilization collapses
/r/MensRights13/12/24 11:26 PM
1

Not on hand. But I seem to remember that there is a lot of obfuscation with the numbers. Some organizations like to just compare inside housework, in which, not surprisingly, women are shown to do much more of, consistently. When comparing all housework (dad's do 99% of gutter cleaning, lawn care, driveway fixing, and car maintenance) it evens out a lot but is still not equal. (it seems that DIY home-improvement projects such as building a deck, shed, or other improvement that takes whole weeken…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 11:17 PM
1

No, actually I can't find my original source about hours spent with kids, but it was much broader and not confined to a single demographic.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 10:41 PM
1

Thank you for that. Section 6.3 Perpetrator's sex: Table 6–3 shows that a biological parent was the perpetrator, the majority of children were maltreated by their mothers (75%), but a sizable percentage were maltreated by their fathers (43%). Ratio: 75/43 (1.75 to 1) I forgot in my original comment to put the hours spent with kids. Here it is: Paper: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4131769/ Graph: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 06:28 PM
5

About 15% less per day, comparing full time workers only.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:29 AM
3

I have only just heard of the term "redshirting", and I don't have any opinion on it yet. As I write I can recall that some of our brightest minds from history were late learners (Einstein), and on the opposite spectrum, "hot-housing" (very popular in the late 1970s) led to early development and subsequent burnout of mental faculties. Add to that the known (but not much talked about) societal pattern of girls liking older boys (and women generally choosing older men) and there is perhaps somethi…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 11:52 PM
13

I realize that you had a LOT to get through in a short time, so well done for a very well thought out interview, and allowing her to speak without interruption! Great interview. At 11.10 you ask Mary to finish her thoughts about holding boys back ("redshirting"), and she touches upon the idea of changing the curriculum for boys. It's a shame that the topic wasn't covered in greater depth - sitting still for 45 minutes is relatively easy for girls, but very difficult for boys simply due to anatom…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 06:06 PM
2

Mothers don't spoil boys, on the whole. So there's that.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 04:34 AM
1

Feminists, past and present, claim that some of those restrictions have been excessive, and I think you and would agree with that I agree that feminists claim restrictions on women have been excessive. I don't necessarily agree with the statement at all. Would you care to give an example?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 04:33 AM
1

No, rights cannot be denied. They can be infringed upon. You have the right to breathe. That cannot be denied. But it can be infringed upon.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 04:31 AM
1

“I have a mask that I can put on, and I can be gregarious,” said Reimer. “[But] I feel like people don’t want to hear about my life.” Surely, this recent post and my comment to it encapsulates this perfectly? But Reimer had a different upbringing. He was raised by a single mother Nailed it. “Without dialogue and without being able to address the harm — in a way that isn’t harmful itself — we won’t change how men act, out of resentment toward women, disrespect towards women, each other, or societ…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 03:52 PM
2

Of course you do. Most people do. But if you think carefully about what this means, it requires a Daddy Government willing to take by force from those who don't want to give, and give to those who they like the most. By entering into the mindframe of "I want more privileges", we inadvertently bolster the Parent/Child relationship that government needs so badly in order to stay in power. You and I are the children in this analogy, with our empty begging bowl like in Oliver Twist. "Please, sir? Ca…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 03:16 PM
16

Rights are inalienable. Privileges can be granted and taken away. ALL the talk about women's rights since the very beginning has been about privileges. Women want special treatment (but weirdly have been given special treatment throughout history, so I'm not exactly sure what further special treatment they need). Early retirement? Privilege. More human workplace? Privilege. Child custody/support/alimony? Privilege. Lower prison time? Privilege. Let's be VERY clear here. Women just want more priv…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 03:01 PM
3

That didn't define "women's rights". What differentiates a right from a privilege? Voting is a privilege, given to us by a government, to reduce the potential for civil unrest. It can be taken away. So here's the thing: A right can't be taken away by someone else. What rights do women still not have? What privileges are women worthy of receiving? Then ask yourself that about men.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:58 PM
2

But it’s not just my lived experience. FIFY. You're not a man, it's not your lived experience to know what it is like to be a man. Just so you're aware, men get a LOT of pushback for doing this sort of thing to women. I believe women call it "mansplaining". Don't be surprised if you receive pushback too.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 05:24 AM
12

Define "women's rights".
/r/MensRights10/12/24 05:18 AM
3

With the greatest of respect, you do appear to be telling men that their lived experience is wrong, based on your own second-hand experience of a few men you have dated. Has it occurred to you that this is the very avenue that women rightly get annoyed about if men do it to them?
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:38 AM
72

u/TheBananaKing said it best in his fantastic comment here: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/yy2rcv/comment/iwsae0r/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 Shared because the original thread has been deleted: Men who encourage other men not to open up to women, why? You think you're ready. You're not ready. You're ready for a few manly tears, like Grey Worm admitting he was afraid to lose Missandei. You're not ready for ugly-crying, lying in the foetal position and rocking, go…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 10:00 PM
2

Right. It is entirely possible due to skewed treatment of men and women in these situations that two standards are used to determine if someone can consent or not. I genuinely don't know if this is the case, however: Koss used the standard of "any alcohol a woman has drunk makes her unable to consent" which led to normal loving consensual long term relationship sex being defined as "the woman was raped". Conversely, since the man is often treated as a default predator/perpetrator who can consent…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 04:11 PM
287

Sperms donation will stop naturally because of the court rulings that despite anonymity, a woman can successfully appeal that and find out the donor, and despite careful legal paperwork that was designed to shield the man from child support, women have now successfully challenged that. Donate sperm? Child support for 18 years. No parental rights though.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:47 PM
4

Also women: "You're beautiful at any size"
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:34 PM
2

As a dish, I do seem to attract a ton of dogs...
/r/MensRights07/12/24 08:30 PM
7

There is research from the 1970s showing that a subset of gay men are not "classically" gay, but very sensitive boys who had controlling, possessive or smothering mothers. It isn't PC to point this out, but it happens. I have also heard of the younger generation, of whom it is said 20% are "gender-non-conforming", that a subset of the boys who identify as "non-binary" do so because of the huge programming that "men are violent abusers" and those boys genuinely want to be seen as safe and trustwo…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:06 PM
25

I'm straight but I have quite a lot of gay friends. None of them are overly feminine and there's no way you could tell outwardly that they are gay. I think women have a strange fetish for gay men, almost as if you will perform both traditional masculinity (i.e. protect her when she's vulnerable) and femininity (she can gossip with you about gf stuff). All the while there's no way it will get complicated by either one of you wanting to have sex with each other. So she falls in love with you, just…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 02:45 PM
1

I really appreciate the links, very interesting. I don't see how they comment on women's in-group bias, or how culture affects that, did I miss something? But feminism goes against compliance Only if it suits the primary objective which is more stuff for women. Many cultures throughout history have had women go against the grain, but this doesn't prove that biology didn't come first. It just means that where there's a will, there's a way, and that we can override our biological impulses if the n…
/r/MensRights04/12/24 12:51 PM
6

That's very kind of you to say, thank you. I don't always get it right, so I'm open to correction.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:46 PM
3

it's due to the indoctrination I can't entirely agree upon this. My opinion is that you have to have the foundation of a belief system before you can really take on the minutiae of it. Women wouldn't take on feminism at all, if they weren't already primed for it biologically. There would be equal pushback from women if it were simply indoctrination. Here's a good example: You might think that "gold-digging" is a relatively recent phenomenon, an extension to the "woman-takes-all" approach of femi…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:45 PM
3

I agree that cultures vary. But I don't have any evidence either way, so I didn't post it. Do you have evidence that different cultures have different levels of ingroup bias? If biology really came first in this situation, feminism wouldn't exist. I'm not sure how you come to this conclusion, can you explain it?
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:37 PM
2

On the whole, I view most of male and female trends as almost identical, but some are expressed in different ways between men and women (or boys and girls). For example as you mentioned there isn't all that much difference between how much girls and guys care about their appearance, except that girls place a lot of emphasis on what could be called "fertility markers", whereas boys place a lot of emphasis on "resource providing markers". This can explain why girls become interested in make up and…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:36 PM
13

There could be some sociocultural pressure. If there were, we would find that across different cultures, women's bias towards other women would vary in a measurable way. What I tend towards believing is that sociocultural pressures are based in biology. Biology comes first, culture comes second.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:23 PM
3

I agree that feminism is an ideology. It is women fighting for special things for women. In a different thread, I've outlined how there are 13 feminisms and 4 waves of feminism. The only thing they all have in common is that they are by women for women. The only thing that can explain this sufficiently is women's innate internal ingroup bias, which means that all women are by default feminists. Whether they choose to label themselves as such depends on personal circumstance.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:18 PM
47

90% of men practice casual misogyny. No, they don't.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:09 PM
9

They literally only fighting for her rights Which rights do women NOT have, that men do? I'll wait....
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:05 PM
6

...if you're an antifeminist and see all women as being feminists, then the logical consequence of that is that you're against women as a gender. That's exactly how feminists describe people who don't subscribe to their ideology: if you attack feminist talking points, you are accused of hating all women. The logical inference is that either all women are feminists, or that feminism is simply for all women only.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 04:04 PM
3

You might not agree with this, but it remains true. You may have adopted a dictionary definition of feminism, and made an evaluation based on that, but the trouble is a) there are at least 13 different feminisms, and 4 epochs (waves) of feminism, so as fast as you can say "feminism is...." I can come up with a different version of feminism that does not believe in what you just said. This leaves us the only option to view what all feminist waves and types do that is the same: fight for women's a…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:50 PM
21

You can imagine that we are as wary of you as the women in 2X or other female subs are about men. We've had our fair share of women pretending they care, and then screenshotting troll comments and posting them elsewhere to have us doxxed and banned. Whenever I hear disrespect of women, I go berserk and leave my moral ground. It is likely that this is a biological thing. Women generally have a 5x stronger favorable bias towards other women, than men do towards men, or women towards men. Biology c…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:44 PM
1

I seem to remember she solidly debunked the 1 in 5 myth, and showed it was around 1 in 52,000.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:11 PM
42

Here's the science: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ Women like women 4.5x more than men like men. Women tend to be ambivalent about men, as a default. Men tend to like women, as a default. So the whole of society favors women, as a default, always have, always will, because it's biological. Feminism is simply this effect, encoded into words and actions. That's why you never see feminists fighting for men's issues. That's why you don't see feminists fighting to equal the numbers of bric…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:07 PM
10

Meaning the only legal parent would be the mother. This is the current standard. I'm sure you didn't actually know that. The mother is the only automatic legal parent. The legal rights of the father are decided unilaterally on the word of the mother. She gets to say, and the named person has a fixed period of time to go to court to challenge her word if he doesn't agree, likewise for a person not named who wants to be named. Men are NOT automatic legal parents. Someone else has to name them a le…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 02:52 PM
12

Already answered. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1gzs0md/as_a_feminist_i_might_be_over_looking_the_mens/
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:35 AM
3

Question asked: Why don't women use their emotional intelligence and innate or learned relationship management skills to keep the relationship together?? Your answer: you don't understand the terms that are being used. Google emotional intelligence Question asked: If emotional intelligence is the ability to read and respond to emotions, why do women initiate the vast majority of divorces? Your answer: family court system. You haven't given any satisfactory response, other than women's gold-diggi…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:25 AM
1

I'm well aware of the family court system. But it's a serious question. Why are women so quick to end relationships if they are so emotionally intelligent?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:06 AM
2

I'm just using what you wrote. If emotional intelligence is the ability to read and respond to emotions, why do women initiate the vast majority of divorces? Surely they are the ones taught and incentivized to make relationships work.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:33 AM
2

If women are biologically wired and socially trained to be better at emotional intelligence, which, as you say should make them better at relationship management, why are 80% of divorces initiated by women? Why don't women use their emotional intelligence and innate or learned relationship management skills to keep the relationship together?? Something within what you have written doesn't add up.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:53 AM
20

If all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail. If all you have is gynocentrism, everything starts to look like men are the problem. Gynocentrism will never go away, it is hardwired into all women and all young men.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 10:29 AM
3

Great response, thank you. I totally agree about having a plan. Funnily enough I got fired from a different work just two days ago, but I saw it coming many months ago, as they unfairly fired a coworker first. So I drew up a plan, worked that plan to the letter, and I am genuinely looking forward to how they explain certain actions they took in the lead up to firing me. I haven't been anxious this time around.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 02:52 PM
3

Action-based, or goal-based solutions are what I needed and none of the therapists I have seen have had any to offer me. It was all talk therapy. I don't want to talk about my emotions, I need solutions. Things I can do about my situation. Even when I do talk about my emotions, I actually want solutions to the problems causing the emotions. I don't self-regulate my emotions simply by talking about them, I self-regulate by doing something about them. For example, a long time back, I was complaini…
/r/MensRights28/11/24 10:20 AM
5

I would suggest that 60% of female inmates have perpetrated domestic violence. DV rarely happens in a vacuum. But when it does, it's 70% women perpetrating it...
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:50 PM
2

Lots of good answers, so I won't recap all of them. Here's something for you to consider as you do your research: Try posting the same, or a similar question in /ask feminists or /2x. In order for it be considered similar, you'll have to tell those forums what they are allowed to discuss and what they aren't allowed to discuss, just as you have done here. You'll notice that in this sub you didn't get too much negative feedback on that. You'll have to figure out why. I wonder if you'll get negati…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 02:50 PM
10

Apparently not.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 10:42 AM
3

The UK government ran campaigns some years ago, trying to persuade more women into STEM careers. Their strategy was to point out how few women were in STEM (the inference being that the field was wide open for women to join). Unfortunately, polls afterwards indicated that young women looked at the lack of women in those fields, and decided that it would be lonely, challenging and "a sausage fest" if they joined, precisely because of the lack of women. The end result was that fewer women joined S…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 10:37 AM
1

“equal pay for work of equal value,” Even this can be used against men. For the vast majority of everyday jobs - warehouse worker, office worker, etc. - people get paid equally for equal time spent at work, not equal value of work, precisely because equal value can be hard to quantify if you're talking about Jenny in Accounts vs. Andrew in Sales Admin.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:35 AM
5

Hmmm....why do I get the feeling that this is a religious thing, not a gender thing? It will also look at issues affecting victims of so called honour-based attacks and violence against gay, bisexual and trans men. The UK has never had a history of "honour-based attacks". Only other countries have had this. I'm sure I couldn't give any specifics....
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:55 AM
1

You can't handle the fact that women perform better than men in higher education. https://pjmedia.com/helen-smith/2012/11/26/female-teachers-give-boys-lower-marks-n130705 (Female teachers mark boys down, just for being boys) for reference: 100% of preschool teachers, 90% of primary teachers and 60% of secondary teachers are female. https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/girls-outperforming-boys-at-gcse-because-they-do-better-at-coursework/31465425.html (Girls do better at cours…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:41 AM
1

...from Sweden...?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 10:21 AM
28

Reddit is a left leaning site. There aren't all that many voices in the center, and very few on the right. This skews the site's overall politics towards the left. One of the mantras of the left is "women most affected". We should expect the majority of redditors to take this viewpoint. The situation gets worse when you start looking at the ban-hammer politics of mods and admins. I would guess that not a single mod or admin across the entire of Reddit has center-right politics. This will further…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:58 AM
2

There IS a 2:1 hiring bias in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) towards women. This seems to exemplify that fact.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:35 AM
6

I agree with this. In his outstanding work "An Annotated Bibliography", Martin Fiebert shows that historically, murder rates between spouses were roughly similar - for example in Chicago in the 1970s, 57% of spousal murders were carried out by the husband, and 43% by the wife (the researchers did not look at proxy murders (i.e. the wife engaged someone else to murder on her behalf), so the actual numbers could have been equal. With the introduction of (female-only) domestic violence shelters in …
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:31 AM
318

In preparation for her next diatribe about the wage gap, read Prof. Thomas Sowell on the wage gap, who debunked it in 1981, and it has been debunked regularly every few years since then, even by feminists. Single, never-married childless women in the age ranges 20-29, 30-39 and 40-49 out earn single never-married childless men of the same ages, at 117c, 112c and 109c to a man's 100c, respectively. Interestingly, a woman earning 112c to a man's 100c makes International Men's Day the day that wome…
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:28 AM
1

When your definition of "Sexual Abuse" includes "attempted-not-completed" acts, which is defined as "an action a woman thought may occur but actually didn't"... ...you know that the stats are plain falsifying data. It didn't occur. But she was scared that it might. But it didn't. 1 in 3 women were scared once in the lives? Believable.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 02:36 AM
3

Actually I use bell hooks against feminists precisely because they worship her so much for being a black feminist. In her book "About Patriarchy", she explicitly writes that Patriarchy is taught by mothers to daughters. I love pointing out that even according to their own High Priestess of Feminism, it has nothing to do with men at all, it's just women passing on shitty attitudes to each other. Tends to shut them up pretty fast.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 11:56 AM
25

Wow, thanks for the suggestion. I just looked up Generation of Vipers and the outtakes are breathtaking! He was an Esther Vilar, but 30 years prior. Sample: "Mom . . . is a middle-aged puffin with an eye like a hawk that has just seen a rabbit twitch far below. She is about twenty-five pounds overweight, with no sprint, but sharp heels and a hard backhand which she does not regard as a foul but a womanly defense. In a thousand of her there is not sex appeal enough to budge a hermit ten paces off…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:38 PM
33

Huh, that's weird. How did you come to that conclusion? Was it that women have 3 humans rights more than men? Was it that women get special privileges across the entire of society, from the time they are born as girls, all the way through school, uni, hiring for first jobs, promotions (glass elevator effect), etc., or was it the legal system where women get up to 60% leniency for identical crimes, simply because....as you put it...they have no dick. That kind of "no privilege"?
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:04 AM
117

Having lived in Cardiff once upon a time, the gender ratio is something like 9:1 men to women, because women get automatic priority for housing. They are an "at risk" group, apparently.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 12:55 AM
5

Yes, I have tried. He still lives with his mom, that's the biggest issue. Plus, while my daughter remembers what it was like when I was still there ("OMG it was so much FUN!" is what she said when the memories came flooding back), he was younger and won't have such strong memories. I know he'll come back to me, but it will be when he's ready.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:53 PM
3

I reconnected with my daughter for the first time last summer and it was wonderful! We instantly connected on the very deep level that we were always able to. She's 25 now. I still haven't spoken to my son or seen him since he was 6. He is nearly 23 now.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:45 PM
1

You're welcome, I find it interesting as well. If "performative [insert emotion]" is a thing, could that then explain why many women hold to the belief of "emotional labor"? I don't know many men that really subscribe to this idea, it seems it's mostly put forward by women. I can absolutely believe that if someone performs sympathy for whatever social construct is dominant, they might feel that they are laboring to provide emotions that otherwise would not have been there. And if that is the cas…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:03 PM
13

It's sad that these hit-pieces still get written and see the light of day. Basically, it's saying that "parental alienation" - where one parent (the mother usually) withholds the children from the other (the father, usually) claiming that the non-custodial parent is abusive and the children are scared of them - isn't a thing. Having been in Australia (which shares a similar culture to NZ where the article was written) and having been a stay-at-home dad with a fantastic relationship with my two c…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:55 PM
12

We will have to disagree regarding all brain differences being explained by socialization. This simply isn't true, it's a mix of both biology and social factors. There is a lot of research on the topic, but here's a nice one: https://www.livescience.com/6225-testosterone-women-nicer.html Women's social output can be modified by giving them biological determinants (i.e. testosterone). An unexpected side effect is that it made them nicer, debunking T as the aggression hormone. Likewise, raw aggres…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:20 PM
7

If you look hard enough you can find evidence for ANYTHING. Then this also applies to you. Here's the thing that feminists won't tell you - men voted in the interests of their wives and daughters. This is well documented from at least the mid to late 1800s, when the debate about women's voting rights was being held. One of the main arguments against giving women the vote was that men already voted in women's interests. It's hard to argue that "men held all the power" when that power was directed…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:17 PM
5

My apologies if I mis-read your comments. It very much did appear that you supported the Duluth Model, and were minimizing the abuse that women perpetrate; abuse that professional research has confirmed for nearly half a century. How did I come to that conclusion if you don't believe that?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:12 PM
16

My mum was abusive - doest that mean all women are? I'm sorry that your mum was abusive. We do need to look at the different types of abuse that occur between men and women, and we find that - largely due to innate biological differences - although women physically abuse men at similar rates to men physically abusing women (the feeble excuse given is that women know they aren't going to hurt men...) the levels of emotional and psychological abuse and manipulation are much higher in women than me…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:10 PM
10

All this prejudice against men didn't really start in any significant way until the beginning of this century I do not agree with this statement. In Roman times, bachelors were subject to a bachelor tax, to force them into marrying. Nearing the end of the Roman Empire, women were given rights to divorce with impunity, which they did in vast numbers, taking the men's resources and forcing the men out of the cities, leaving the cities open to Barbarian attack, hence the Empire fell. In 1674, the w…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:02 PM
6

I already acknowledge that women are and can be abusers. I was married to one for 10 years. Don't try playing semantics to diminish the work that you need to do on yourself. Change happens at the individual level, and judging from your comments in this thread, you still hold to some part of the tenets of the Duluth Model. Let it go. A percentage of humans can be trash, and there is very little difference that genitals make to them being trash.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:43 PM
9

The Duluth Model is horribly misunderstood and misrepresented. I don't think it is, I think it is fairly represented: even the wiki page does not contradict the idea that the Duluth Model treats only men as perpetrators, and only women as victims. And yet for more than a decade before the Duluth Model came into existence, and for all decades following, reliable research has proven that women are abusers just as often as men, and more in lesbian relationships where there is no man to stir things …
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:32 PM
16

I hold a special contempt for the UN. UN: Boko Haram kidnaps 300 girls: "OMG LITURILLY THA WURST" Also UN: Boko Haram kills 10,000 boys: *crickets*
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:20 PM
2

You might be on to something: I feel like they are thought to be fixers and when being confronted with a situation that is unfixable, they tend to just ignore it. I agree with this, but I would add that this doesn't negate the sympathy or compassion they have, just that men's default mode is "fixing problems" and if they can' t fix a problem, they are stumped. Doesn't mean that they don't still want to fix the problem. Having said that, in my personal situation, I have come across a couple of pe…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:04 PM
6

I think he's saying that there is a hardwiring that sets up a default pattern. How strong that pattern is in any given woman is entirely individual, and how much she can override that pattern with her own social conditioning is also individual. But the general pattern exists.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 02:57 PM
32

It's weird then, because men's lived experiences are telling you differently. Are you womansplaining?
/r/MensRights17/11/24 02:51 PM
76

Stop clicking. If we click, we consume, they win. Stop clicking.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 05:41 PM
8

Feminists have been very vocal about women breaking the chains of "Gender Roles" Vocal, yes. Active in breaking the chains of men doing all the dirty, dangerous and antisocial jobs? No. Like you said: Maybe because its a gender norm that women directly benefit from? Exactly.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:57 PM
23

(notice how it's always people getting angry over trans women and never trans men in men's sports) Are there any trans-men in men's sports? That could be a more coherent reason as to why no one is talking about it. people just want an excuse to be hateful of people who are different. Or.... and hear me out here.... it could be that people take issue with people-who-were-born-with-biologically-male-bodies cracking the skulls of women?
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:21 PM
4

The Oppression Olympics?
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:18 PM
7

I'm happy to hear constructive criticism of the things you do not agree with. The last few paragraphs could be interpreted differently by different people, but that could simply be due to my style of writing. I'm open to suggestions on how to make it less confrontational.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:47 PM
1

Thank you for your comment and genuine questions. They are good questions. I wrote this list in 2019, and I hope the the last 5 years has helped me mellow out a bit with age. I still have some strong opinions and I can be a bit sharp with some of my replies, so if that happens please know that it isn't me having a go at you, it's just me being old me. Paternal rights - good question. I'm not sure. I think the point of the post was to get people to think about what rights men do not have so that …
/r/MensRights15/11/24 03:46 PM
19

BROADLY SPEAKING.... (I wish I didn't have to put disclaimers like this) There are noticeable, studied differences between male and female brains. This can account for some proportion of what is happening. Men tend to be more spacially oriented, have higher risk tolerance (and make more Type 2 errors), be more competitive (but also be more generous within that competition), have an out-group bias (women and children first), have lower trait neuroticism (the tendency to get caught up in negative …
/r/MensRights15/11/24 02:28 PM
11

Perhaps that's why they are so upset: men said the women's quiet part out loud, and before they did.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:51 PM
1

The first thing that stood out for me was that the four researchers are all female. Women are known to exhibit a strong favorable bias towards other females. The second thing was that they totally ignored the category of "made to penetrate", cutting out many female perpetrators of sexual abuse. And the third thing was that the Sexual Aggressiveness scale they used (from Krahle) gave three main categories of aggression, two of which were physical domination and one of which was verbal threats. Th…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:47 PM
13

Seems there's a degree in Astronomical Idiocy
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:32 AM
6

The researcher should research Nikki Catsouras. Enough reason to extend the ban on driving until you're 26 to all women. Please DO NOT google, unless you are very very very comfortable with gore.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:07 PM
0

I am too. I am glad he won, even though I live in Canada and we're gonna get fucked. Heck, actually we've been fucked by the Trudeaus for decades now.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:16 PM
0

Right, except the reason people voted for the Republican candidate(s) was more to do with the high cost of living under the Democrats, not to do with them actually agreeing with conservatism.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:26 PM
1

From a logical viewpoint, your idea of "showing women actually can be horrible and in fact generally are" is a good one. The.....only.....trouble with that is 100% of women and 50% of men are NOT going to discuss that logically, and instead get very angry. "WOMEN. ARE. WONDERFUL. And don't you forget it!" If you even suggest that any given woman could be horrible, you'll have the entire sisterhood against you downvoting you, deplatforming you and canceling you within an hour or two. The white kn…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:00 PM
4

Your comment is everything except helpful.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:47 PM
4

Holy fuck that's evil. I'm so sorry for you dude.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:46 PM
3

It wouldn't surprise me at all. I had something stolen from me this year. I found the item on the local Craigslist and was going to get it back. I decided to report it to the police as that was the only way I could protect myself if things went wrong. If you have insurance, your insurance goes up for years afterwards, which makes it not worth getting your stuff back. So why report? Just take the L and don't suffer the insurance hike.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:42 PM
6

I was in your exact situation. I had been a stay at home dad to my two kids and had a VERY good relationship with them. I saw the end coming more than 2 years before it happened, and warned her that things would end in 2 years if we didn't get our shit together. 2 years on, and bingo, I filed for divorce. She went ballistic, faked and injury (took a hammer to her own leg, photographed the bruising and went to the police). I was arrested for assault and potentially faced jail time. Luckily for me…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:35 PM
6

RAINN uses NCVS definitions that exclude men-who-were-raped-by-women. There is no category for a woman forcing a man to have sex with her. Rape only includes penetration. It's a sleight of hand where you can "game" research into making it look like men are the only perpetrators and women are the only victims. Beyond that, the numbers for "rape" are bolstered by adding the "sexual assault" category, which includes non-completed, not-threatened events (i.e. things that didn't happen), but that the…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:21 PM
9

It's interesting that they seem to gloss over Figure 1. in which it shows that in "gender unequal" countries, more people experience the highest level of happiness and satisfaction than in "gender equal" countries. This would directly refute the idea that gender equality is a determinant of high levels of happiness for the general population, or women specifically. Instead we get: "Women experience higher levels of happiness than men. Women most affected."
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:00 PM
31

This is standard media practice - either call men by their job titles, or don't specify them at all. "10 killed". You gotta stop clicking on it. It's literal clickbait. Stop consuming this trash. It will have to go out of business if people stop consuming it, or change its ways.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:28 PM
5

You don't have to, this is Reddit after all. But it is all true.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:43 PM
10

ick
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:39 PM
1

Here's an interesting stat: Up to the mid 1980s in the US, spousal murder rates were nearly identical - wives killed their husbands almost as much as husbands killed their wives. When domestic violence shelters (for women only) were implemented across the country, the number of wives killing husbands dramatically decreased, but the number of husbands killing wives did not. The only sensible theory put forward for this is unexpected result is: giving the murderer a place to go to cool off. Surely…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 03:36 PM
37

I've been sexually molested AND I've been falsely accused. Which was worse? Being falsely accused, 1000x. This is not an exaggeration. I was 11 when I was molested, multiple times over a summer vacation. It was awkward, embarrassing, and plain weird. I generally froze up because I had no idea what was happening or why. However, when I was falsely accused by my wife, I lost my kids for 15 years, had doors slammed in my face by friends, nearly got a criminal record, spent an extraordinary amount o…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:04 AM
3

Unfairly downvoted. Reddit is weird.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:56 AM
1

Woop woop. Back end of beyond. Deep in the forest. Outback. A long way from civilization basically. lol
/r/MensRights11/11/24 07:12 PM
4

It used to be quite common for feminists to cite the 2% conviction rate and assume that "98% of rapists walk free". I pointed out that it could be seen completely the other way around, and that if only 2% of allegations end in a conviction that must mean that 98% of allegations were false. They didn't like that, for some reason.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:53 PM
8

Yeah, the DiCanio (1993) figure of 2-10% is a number that prosecutors found were false to a standard that could be successfully prosecuted at law for perjury. That means she lied, and she got caught lying, and there is sufficient evidence of her lying that would convince a jury. That's a HIGH standard to reach. Obviously there is a wide margin on the rate, largely dependent on jurisdictional area, it seems. But that means there is an additional percentage where she lied, she got caught lying and…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:29 PM
3

Then I'm guessing you haven't heard that women have been just as violent as men in domestic relationships, since probably the beginning of time, but definitely since the 1960s when research on this began (with Erin Pizzey). This meta-study found 343 scholarly papers showing that women are just as violent as men https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography But we never hear about it be…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 03:51 PM
2

Men are hardwired to protect women, and it has been shown that when a woman is injured in battle, it actually takes 3 other (male) soldiers out of service in aid of her. So I agree. But if we are looking at efficiency of battle triage, it's also more efficient to let the wounded die without attending to them at all, so that all others keep fighting the battle, as it doesn't take any other soldiers away from their roles. And if we're looking at equality (which is sort of what this post is about) …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:22 PM
3

It was more of a tongue-in-cheek comment that I couldn't resist. I too have my biases and I've been called out on some of them on reddit and other places. But yeah, I totally agree about the one-sidedness of the media coverage.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 10:14 PM
55

I wondered, do women ever stay and think No. They do not.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:46 PM
14

I don't think you can call it research. Presenting a lived critique of contemporary Korea, these feminists ask how young women are led to imagine their current, single life as a temporary state, as consumer capitalism and the patriarchal state together place these young non-married women in an economically vulnerable position. They see this as achieved by endorsing ‘feminine’ desires and a presentist lifestyle, as well as excluding non-married women from opportunities in the job market and state…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:15 PM
2

Done. Let me just fake a US birth certificate....
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:54 PM
8

No.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:44 PM
3

I might amend your statement very slightly. Men do learn that women think and feel differently from them, and generally Western society is pretty clear about it. We all know how they are. This rings true. But I am not so sure the reverse is true. They all know how we are. I can't say that for sure, because we have seen many examples over the last 10 years of broad advertising campaigns literally demonizing men based on a woman's idea of what men are probably like in her mind. I'm coming to the o…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:36 PM
8

These people live in a state of hatred of themselves. But that's too painful to admit, so they project out their hatred onto safer targets. #allmen are an easy target. If you swap the sexes in her rant, it actually makes just as much sense, perhaps even more.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:28 PM
10

Girls in real life are really nice, feminine and don’t have attitude unlike here on this app. That's not my experience at all. What I find is that writing our thoughts out directly onto a screen circumvents our social contract to be nice, or even appear civil. Whatever you are feeling comes straight out. This means that what you are reading on these female-heavy subreddits is women's unfiltered minds. This IS reality. Women pretend to be nice to other people's faces, because that's the social co…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:14 PM
1

I appreciate your well thought out observations, thank you. I don't advocate for circumcision at all. I was attempting to provide some justification for the barbaric Stone Age practice - from a Stone Age point of view. This is a sensitive topic to people on both sides of the debate. My point is that without modern medical interventions, people will invariably come up with ways to try to mitigate risks and solve problems, even if those ways seem abhorrent to us now. And my further point was that …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:09 PM
5

Actually both of them are very reasoned individuals and they listened to what I was saying. Not much more than that though.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:40 PM
1

There IS a study done across at least 4 different countries simultaneously, but for the life of me I can't remember how to find it. It was large, too. Many thousands of students in each country, and the results in each country were almost identical. I'm sorry I can't find it right now. It's a good question about a solution. I don't know, to be frank. We do know from reputable psychological research that women (generally) have a 5x stronger in-group bias than men. Put simply: women prefer other w…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:38 PM
1

Pleonasm. A word I have never come across. Thank you!
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:56 AM
1

Girls seem to stop mentally maturing at about 14.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:53 AM
3

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/female-teachers-blamed-for-schoolboy-slackers-poor-results-study/VU6LLHYYNAFY5FIW43IO2OV3IA/ I can't find the actual research by Prof. Smithers, but there seem to be a great many articles in reputable papers about it that it must at least exist.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:50 AM
2

Interesting pick of scholarly literature. Those two papers appear to contradict each other. Ignoring the blatant bias inherent with most rape research - that women are biologically and legally incapable of rape and therefore are taboo from being researched as rapists - the first link extols Brownmiller (who is on record as saying that all men seek to keep all women in a perpetual state of fear, something that has absolutely NO evidence to back it up), and the second link decries Brownmiller for …
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:42 AM
2

I would suggest that there is a reporting bias in the under 18 female category. It's as if government programs, school intervention programs, and feminist ideology in the media and wider society have made it clear to younger women that they should report any minor perceived infraction as sexual assault. Men are generally either oblivious to sexual assault on them by women, or don't care as much. Case in point: I have a friend who had a one-night stand, and the next morning woke up to find her on…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:43 AM
3

Kind of you to say. I wrote it in 2019 just before I got perma-banned from Quora. It's not complete though, so feel free to add whatever comes to mind. Someone else mentioned military service which is a good addition.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:16 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1f7e1tn/female_teachers_discriminate_against_boys_when/ https://www.bbc.com/news/education-31751672 https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2022/10/17/teachers-are-hard-wired-to-give-girls-better-grades-study-says/
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:01 AM
4

The US publishes reports on who pays child support and who receives it. It turns out that women that owe child support are worse at paying any child support when they owe it, worse at paying all their child support, and worse at paying on time. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-269.pdf (pp. 16 & 17 first column)
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:47 AM
1

Did I just read women reducing Margot Robbie to an object? Surely not.... [/s]
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:30 AM
4

Good questions. These are the reasons: female teachers mark boys down just for being boys, but male teachers are more even-handed. Boys grades suffer under female teachers. This is now studied across many nations, so it is not an isolated occurrence. Likewise since the 1980s the school curriculum in most OECD countries was openly changed to favor girls and girls' style of learning (sitting still, grades dependent on classroom etiquette, coursework, neatness of handwriting, etc.). This disadvanta…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:24 AM
1

Let's look at relationships where sexual violence occurs, in order of most prevalence: Lesbian relationships Heterosexual relationships Gay relationships Lesbians top the chart. Strange how there aren't any men in those relationships, yet the sexual violence is there in greater amounts.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:20 AM
1

I disagree slightly with the statement "the common motive for rape is sex not power". In interviews with convicted rapists, sex was almost never the main motivation. I'll see if I can find the research again.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:16 AM
62

I had this conversation with two women recently, at different times. They were both "OMG, women's rights!" so I pointed out that men actually have fewer rights than women, such as bodily autonomy. They had literally never thought about it once in their lives. ... On the topic though, I will suggest that a ban on circumcision will face significant opposition. We have some precedence as well. I believe that Iceland debated a bill to ban circumcision, on the grounds of gender equality, but was veto…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:05 AM
3

Sure thing. It's no biggie. I realize that there are split opinions on this one.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:54 PM
7

I agree. There is no reason that women can't serve in the military. Even if the feminists want to save them from the front line, there are literally tens of thousands of jobs for them behind the lines.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:47 PM
2

Sure. I get that many religious groups might not approve. But when you look closely at the reasons that those religions chose for adopting circumcision, their arguments generally fail. All Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) grew up in the same hot, dry, dusty area of the world. Medically, if you get as little as one grain of sand under the foreskin in an environment that has no clean running water to wash it out, it can get embedded and infected, and eventually the entire peni…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:45 PM
2

Well, since she's reading this, I wish you both the best of luck. I was married for 10 years, and my wife was controlling and possessive. I went along with it like you, for at least 5 years of the marriage, maybe a little more. She forbid me to have friends, we moved to the boonies too, she estranged me from my family, controlled the money, and told me what work I could and could not do. I would caution you both to seek counseling for previous trauma that seems to have already led to a co-depend…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:39 PM
3

Are you here to [X] or are you here to [Y]. Classic binary equivocation trap. You're either for pegging, or you're a misogynist bigot. Yeah, that kind of thinking is what got Trump elected, and I'm guessing you didn't like that?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:23 PM
1

my neck beard doesn't peg me as non feminist. I'm guessing there is definitely some pegging going on....
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:10 PM
46

Bodily autonomy - circumcision is illegal until the age of 18, when a man can choose for himself. Paternal rights 1 - it is illegal to use a man’s sperm without his explicit written consent. Paternal rights 2 - a man is not responsible for a child that he did not consent to. Paternal rights 3 - women cannot claim child support from men and boys they raped Paternal rights 4 - 50:50 shared custody is the default that can be amended according to the couple’s agreement. Paternal rights 5 - Equality …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:04 PM
3

There are many youtube channels that do speak out about men's rights, rationally, logically and with forethought. Here's the thing: anyone who primarily uses their emoting brain will try canceling you....because emotions. The only way this is going to change is one person at a time, until it becomes fashionable to be a men's rights advocate, particularly if it benefits women. I've literally been perma-banned from sites for posting non-emotional, well reasoned, scientifically backed arguments (wi…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:38 PM
11

Women's body and fashion insecurities largely come from other women, not men. It's just easy for women to blame men, because then they don't risk angering the entire of womankind.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:34 PM
1

Put briefly, your analogy of restaurant reviews is great: How likely are you to eat (rape) here again? Not at all likely (you don't forbid yourself from doing it) Not very likely (so you would, we just need the right circumstances for you) Neutral (okay, you're gonna do it, we just don't know when) Somewhat likely (great, you're just waiting to do it) Very likely (we knew it!) Everyone is a rapist, they just are in denial.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:45 PM
2

Reasonably easy. The authors use Koss (1987) as a standard for self-reported (college campus) rape. Koss starts that paper by saying there were basically no reports of rape on college campuses, but that....since most sexual assault (notice the change from "rape" to "sexual assault") happens when one or other of the parties have had alcohol (I'll come to that bit in a minute), and as alcohol CAN impair the ability to consent, therefore ANY alcohol consumed MUST remove the ability (of the woman on…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:38 PM
2

Kudos to you for being on the edge. Talking of internal biases, I have met a number of women who have chosen traditionally male industries, one of whom was 70 when I met her. She never felt like doing the traditionally female roles, and chose to become a welder. She complained to me that it was a boys' club and the men were so misogynistic towards her that she gave it up shortly thereafter. When I asked her what they had said to her that was so vile, she replied about "sexist slurs and insults".…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 06:05 PM
1

That's not men's lived experience though. I guess no one thought to listen to men when they were saying this?
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:01 PM
1

Please note that I'm not having a go at you. It's been shown that women (as a group) never break even on "paying taxes vs. receiving tax spending". Only men as a group are net-tax-positive over their lifetime, which means that all women's tax breaks/funding/free stuff comes from men as a group. It's not entirely surprising - it's just the Patriarchy providing for women, and still by force. But now there's a third party called the government that conveniently buys women's vote in exchange for pro…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 04:00 PM
0

I'm guessing you don't understand how inflation works, like other Dems here. Trump kept Fed money printing stable, but Biden cranked it up, resulting in massive price hikes (inflation). Here's how it works, put simply: I have a tree that produces 100 apples each year. I have $100 each year. Each apple is worth $1.00 I print $100 more. Now there is $200. But still only 100 apples. I need $2.00 to buy an apple. This is inflation. If you print money, you devalue the dollar's spending power and you …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:43 PM
1

I'm guessing most Democrats also don't understand how inflation works, including the other replies to your comment. Biden printed trillions of dollars which devalued the ordinary person's spending power, resulting in huge price rises. That was Biden. Trump didn't do that. In fact under Trump, Fed money printing went down slightly.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:37 PM
3

That's fantastic, well done. I will _suggest_ that you do (or did) actually inadvertently rely on men. If you have ever been in receipt of any tax credits at all, female-only funding/programs/equity/Title IX, free legal advice, free women's only counselling, women's helplines, free tampons, or any other government-paid-for women's help, you will absolutely have had that paid for by men.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:30 PM
2

I mean....the way the Democrats have twisted the word "Healthcare", it sort of does maintain the population level...
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:15 PM
4

So....as a woman....you're in sales (which is classified in the same bracket as service industries). You just proved his point. And his point was not that he was mad at women for not taking up physically demanding roles while simultaneously berating women for not having the physical strength to do those roles. His point was that women fight for "equal rights" in employment, but then choose non-physically demanding roles, just like they have done for the entire of history. If we've had 100+ years…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:14 PM
7

I have only ever seen one chart on that subject, which shows that both men and women are a drain on taxes until their 30s, at which point only men (as a group) become "net-tax-positive" - i.e. pay more taxes than they have consumed. Women (as a group) never pay as much in taxes than they receive (as a group), and over their lifetimes are always "net-tax-negative". Men pay for women. We always have, but now it's done by stealth, force and without consent.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:05 PM
1

It's worth remembering that Esther Vilar wrote this book as a bit tongue-in-cheek. She found it humorous, and it should probably be read in that manner. Having said that, she did hit the nail on the head, as this IS how a lot of women think, but don't want to admit. That's why Vilar got so much negative feedback - from women! She let the cat out of the bag.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 05:48 PM
10

If you look even closer at the definitions, sexual assault includes "things that never happened but the woman was fearful may happen".
/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:59 PM
1

Even more than preferential treatment, the entire education system was changed in the 1980s specifically to cater to girls' unique learning strengths and give them a material advantage against boys.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:27 PM
52

Let's unpack the entire premise of ANY law restricting men. WHO is going to enforce this law? Other men. Who is going to abide by this law? Good men who abide by laws. Who is going to ignore this law? Men who don't care about the consequences of being caught (i.e. dangerous criminals). You just made the world more dangerous for women. Congratulations. Look, this is absolutely basic tribal identity politics and nothing more. The appeal is to get (scared) women's votes. It was never about fairness…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 03:12 PM
0

I had a friend who exhibited the opposite way round. She had a medium body count - I never actually asked a number but I assumed between 5-10 based on her previous relationships. She LOVED finding virgin men, and was open about it. I guess it was linked to her jealousy issues - a virgin man had never been anyone else's, therefore hers exclusively, or something. But it seems it goes both ways, we just don't hear about it often.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 09:53 PM
1

Yes, as a matter of fact. 70% of all one-way domestic violence is women acting alone. The man never engages. 43% of lesbian relationships experience domestic violence, where 41% of heterosexual relationships experience domestic violence, and 37% of gay relationships experience domestic violence. The actual biological mechanism for aggression is well known: [No. of Aromatase receptors in the brain] x [overall hormone levels] It is entirely independent of sex and gender. This explains why around 9…
/r/MensRights03/10/24 02:48 AM
1

"If I wear a short skirt, am I a slut, or simply liking the way I look?" This is a female standard, not a male one. Women judge other women's clothing 100% of the time. Men just shrug and say "Whatever you wear, it's coming off". "If you put your dick inside of me, the probability of pregnancy is likely, per Kolmogorov's axiom number 1. Therefore, its also your responsibility." But the outcome of the pregnancy cannot be determined by the man, only the woman, therefore the responsibility is 100% …
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:26 PM
3

Biology. Women are wired to side with other women for their safety. Men are wired to save women (over men), for procreation. This creates a two-pronged bias where women are prioritized over men by both sexes. ANYTHING that goes against this biological prioritization of women "feels" wrong. No one is very clear about why it feels wrong, because it's a part of our reptilian brain and mostly out of reach of the ordinary person's self-awareness.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:13 PM
5

"we've done some fucked up things in the past such as having more rights than women" Until the mid-1800s the vast majority of men could not vote. ALL men had the responsibility to die for "their country" without voting, and if they did, all their worldly possessions (including wife and children) would become the property of the King. Which means ALL men were not free men, just like all women were not free women. We have to stop accepting this false narrative that men had more rights than women. …
/r/MensRights20/09/24 02:08 PM
5

You may find on closer inspection that the arguments put forward: "prejudice plus power" or "men have never been oppressed" are simply fill-ins or placeholders for what's actually going on (which is why they don't make any sense at all): Gamma Bias. Woman does a good thing: boss girl Woman does a bad thing: bad man made her do it/ignored Man does a good thing: ignored/woman made him do it Man does a bad thing: he's bad, of course
/r/MensRights17/09/24 02:34 PM
2

Yep. Prenups have been shown to be basically worthless. They need to be updated every year, both spouses need separate legal advice, and even if they are watertight, courts can overrule them.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 06:45 PM
1

You could look into Gloria Steinem being CIA funded? You could look into the Jewish nationality of the most prominent US feminists through the 1980s? You could look at the banking industry owners nationality and their sworn war on gentiles?
/r/MensRights10/09/24 06:00 PM
3

The "data set" you are using is the same as the one you accuse me of using: a single survival show. You've already made the argument that survival training was the sole cause of the men winning a survival show. It's at this point that I start to wonder if you're not really arguing in good faith, since you're denying your own comments. I guess I'm done responding now. Thanks for replying. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 05:27 PM
7

I wasn't saying that you're falling for a fallacy, I'm saying you're employing a logical fallacy. That (deliberate?) misinterpretation of something I wrote could also be construed as a logical fallacy. Then you go on to use the idea of a "faulty data set", something that you yourself are doing. You're intelligent, you can do better than this.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:31 PM
8

I'm not entirely sure which logical fallacy you are using, I'd have to look it up. Two things can be true simultaneously and not impede each other, and furthermore I suspect there is a hidden condition of agreement contained in your comment: I can agree that survival experience could influence decision-making in survival conditions. Whether it actually did is a separate question, potentially hidden in your comment. If I agree to your statement as a general principle, you may "Gotcha!" me by assu…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 02:06 PM
14

IIRC one of the reasons that the island survival challenge was won by the men was that the men immediately self-selected tasks that each one either enjoyed doing, or was good at, whereas the women spent 5 hours at a time trying to come to a 100% collective decision on whose knickers to wash first, and ended up accomplishing nothing. That has nothing at all to do with survival training, and everything to do with innate biological tendencies towards individualism/collectivism.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 01:50 PM
6

No. The "Proximity" argument has already been debunked. You're using an argument from proximity - i.e. that you're likely to see more mothers be abusive to children simply because mothers spend more time around children. In 2-parent households, mothers spend 6 hours a day with the kids, and fathers spend 5 hours a day with the kids (averaged). We should see a 6/5 split in abuse rates within 2-parent households. We don't. We see a 68% mothers/32% fathers split (i.e. 2/1 or mothers being 3x more a…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 11:40 PM
61

Never expect a sane article out of The Guardian. I won't even click on links. They still employ Julie Bindell - that woman who suggested putting men in concentration camps, or reducing their numbers to 10% of the current population of men. Literal genocide. Stop feeding the ghouls by clicking on them.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 11:15 PM
2

Neither of the OPs sources mention single parent households, except for this: (2nd source): "Between 1986 and 1993, as the number of single-mother households increased dramatically, fatal child abuse increased 46% and serious child abuse increased four fold." Moms are objectively more violent. Proximity fails, as we do NOT see this stat reflected in single-father households. If it were just a case of "the person spending more time with the children is more likely to abuse them" then we would see…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 06:38 PM
1

Studies exist showing that across many cultures, women marry a man 4-5 years older than her, on average. Even in highschool, girls will prefer to date a year or two above their own. It appears to be a biological directive, as both men and women seem happy with the arrangement. It's when the biological reality is violated that people tend to have an issue.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 06:25 PM
2

The child does need clothes and some food. But there are several solutions. If the mother does not work, then grant custody of the children to the father who can afford to clothe and feed them. If the mother DOES work, she doesn't need child support, she needs to adjust her living standards.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:53 PM
1

"States generally only push collections to avoid paying welfare." I thought that States got equal funding from the Federal government for all child support dollars collected? They are financially incentivized to increase child support.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 05:49 PM
2

I noticed in the second link interview, Gerwig mentions she had "just given birth to an infant". I thought to myself that this was a strange phrase, and that if the infant had been a girl she would have specified "girl". Nailed it. She has 2 sons. Can't even call them sons, or boys. Nope, they are "infants". Stopped watching after that.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 08:23 AM
17

You should read this: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/yy2rcv/comment/iwsae0r/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 All men WILL suffer if they open up to a woman. Don't do it.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 04:54 PM
12

The trouble with you taking issue with the post you kindly quoted is that you say it's misogynistic and not true, yet it absolutely aligns with real world experience. There was a post here a few months back.about why men don't show their feelings to women, and the overwhelming majority of men agreed that REALLY showing your feelings to a woman was the fastest way to have her exit your life forever, whatever kind of relationship you had with her: wife, gf, friend, coworker, therapist...
/r/MensRights24/10/23 02:01 PM
1

Is your assertion backed by any evidence of its own?
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:21 AM
1

Strawman. "highly doubt" means you've assumed. The point was that women are NOT so attracted to a man's fertility as a man is to a woman's fertility, so his age is inversely relevant. It depends on whether you find resources attractive. Many women do. If you don't, you're probably a rare case. My point was that young girls want to marry a father figure - someone who is physically bigger and stronger, provides resources for little in return, and is emotionally unflappable (i.e. is stable in the f…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:49 PM
13

Both sides are presented here: https://www.circinfo.org/Circumcision\_and\_sand.html
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:19 PM
1

This is utter garbage. Yes, the Icelandic women took "a day off". No, it was not pure chaos, and no, the country didn't lose millions of dollars, and no, pre-made food didn't sell out immediately or everywhere. No, the men didn't beg the women to stop. The only changes were that sausages sold out because there was no warning, so the men needed to cook something for their kids - which they did! It's not like the men were clueless regarding how to cook anything, it was just short notice. Men took …
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:07 PM
2

Huh. I wrote the bones of list in December 2018 on Quora before I got perma-banned and my answers deleted. Nice to see it has been resurrected!
/r/MensRights01/10/23 05:44 PM
170

"Most women don't like uncircumcised men" Only in the US. If you're talking with women online, ask them if "most men don't like uncircumcised women" and see what their response is. The two things are both genital mutilation. The US circumcision (outside of the Jewish population) is entirely driven by the archaic and prudish religious settlers who proposed it as a way of stopping young men from masturbating. That's all there is to it. All the Middle-Eastern religions practised circumcision as a r…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 05:03 PM
1

The only ones worth comparison are manslaughter and murder. Are they worth comparing [with rape]? Rape now includes post-facto regret. i.e. she was all up for it on the night, but in the morning realized that she's going to get negative feedback from family and friends, so she retracts her consent post-facto. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775371/ I do not agree with you that our current cluster of rape cases are in any way comparable to manslaughter or murder.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:47 PM
1

Legally male rape is classed under sodomy. We are aware that legal definitions of having sex with underaged boys are crafted so that women who force actual intercourse on these boys are legally exempt from being classified as rapists. But that's exactly what they are - rapists. A child can't consent to sex with an adult, so it's rape. Excusing women from this is a disservice to boys that get raped by female teachers, and also other women because it infantilizes women generally by denying them "a…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:39 PM
1

The fact that 60% of young men are sexless could well show that young women simply do not see those young men. As for sugar babies, it really depends on what your definition is. If it means that the man is any amount older than her, then that's exactly what you just proved. Women of all ages prefer a (generally) older man. If, on the other hand, it means that women prefer men with more resources, that's also a given. It only breaks down if you narrow your definition to a point where....it breaks…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:34 PM
11

Firstly, well done for writing such good English! Second, feminism will exist anywhere that resources are over-abundant. If a woman does not have to produce, provide or maintain anything in order to secure her resource/income stream, she will not do so. Before resource-abundance, women had to keep relationships together (or become poor and hungry). They had to earn their right to be provided for. Now, the government simply takes men's money by force and gives it to women for free. Until that dyn…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:08 PM
1

Yep. Always the man's fault for some rando whore's lack of accountability. If there were ever a next time (which I hope for your sake there isn't), instead of answering the question "how old are you?" with an age, try answering it with "I'm too rich for your friend". Might as well have some fun if you're getting the blame.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:04 PM
1

I think the point was that women don't see those other men. There is a direct counterpart - men don't see women over the age of 45. I don't know if you've noticed that yourself, but there are articles written by middle-aged women who complain of being "invisible". For example: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/invisible-women-50s-male-gaze_n_63a38c4fe4b033ea8cc577aa (She tries to frame it as "men-are-the-problem", which is ironically how you yourself take the comment you were responding to, but the…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:59 PM
2

You should be nervous! https://people.com/heather-pressdee-nurse-accused-killing-patients-insulin-7505352
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:41 PM
3

If we switch around your stats for a moment: 70% of one-way violence is women being violent and the men just taking it from her.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:39 PM
13

Basically, the 1 in 3 myth is derived from extraordinary loose questions which include events that never happened but the woman had a feeling could happen. And such events that never happened include a man looking at her. "Have you ever felt fearful that a man could look at you?" Not surprising that 1 in 3 women said yes. It's a bullshit statistic.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:59 PM
4

At what point in history?? In the hunter-gatherer times, women were just as likely to hunt with the men, or stay with the tribe and gather, new evidence suggests. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/early-women-were-hunters-not-just-gatherers-study-suggests-180982459/ In medieval times, everyone tilled the land and harvested. Children included. This went on until the widespread education system - which was stopped during harvest season so the children could harvest. Hence summer holidays..…
/r/MensRights01/10/23 01:28 AM
9

Firstly there would be HUGE kickback from feminists. Secondly, women would actually become happier, overall. It's a difficult thing to gauge, but I believe that some restrictions on women's behavior is a good thing. Roosh V did a thought experiment a few years back that ended up getting him canceled, but it went something like this: "Imagine that rape was legalized. Women would NOT go out without a chaperone that they trusted to protect them, and the incidence of violence and rape against women …
/r/MensRights01/10/23 12:54 AM
2

When your gf is putting on weight people will suggest going to the gym together.... Yep! But if the guy is putting on weight, DUMP HIS ASS. If she smells, shower together, but if he smells, DUMP HIS ASS. etc....
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:58 PM
28

I think it's actually a multi-faceted, society-wide problem. In an era of unprecedented resource abundance, girls and women do not need to adhere to the old division of labor. "The Government" (meaning men's tax money) provides a complete safety net for all women, meaning that women are entirely free to behave how they want, with no restrictions. Our "education" system teaches girls that they can be anything they want, and gives unrestricted leeway to girls in terms of behavior (ironically at th…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:55 PM
7

Her line? "You don't like hugs, do you? Ha ha, I'll bring you round!" His line: "You don't like rape, do you? Ha ha, I'll bring you round!" Just so the douchebags saying "it's not that bad" can see the double standard.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 05:33 PM
6

This is so true, because she will file a whole bunch of "experiences" under the Doesn't Count heading. Impromptu gang-bang on a hen night? Doesn't count. Sex on a bus with a stranger? Doesn't count. Unplanned friendzone sex with her beta orbiter? Doesn't count.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:05 PM
5

You're aware that the word "creepy" is almost unilaterally used by women to describe ordinary men doing ordinary things but the woman is not attracted to him. Billionaire saying "hey babe, show me your tits" - not creepy. Poor man saying "hey babe, show me your tits" - creepy. That's literally it. Why should men do anything at all about this??
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:37 PM
12

wasn't safe to show them without being shamed or ridiculed for it. Yep! Watch how fast her pussy dries up when you show your real emotions. It clangs shut with a noise that usually ends the relationship. So many guys have written about this already.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 05:17 PM
3

Women rate men's attractiveness based on a) physical looks (square jaw, broad shoulders, tall, etc.) which also varies according to what stage of her cycle she is at, and then by indicators of wealth and status (i.e. expensive watch, jewellery, car, etc.). Any man that isn't "high status" is deemed not attractive and is thus labeled a creep. And considering most men do not match up to that unreal portrayal of wealth, most women categorize most men as "creepy".
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:33 PM
2

Whole foods is a gold mine for the most oppressed rich women society has.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 04:25 PM
1

Women had to consent to and cooperate with patriarchy But prominent and esteemed feminist bell hooks has already told you that women perpetuate Patriarchy, that Patriarchy is spread through the female lineage, utterly destroying your idea that men had some nefarious plan to enslave women that just needed women's consent to work. Why is it laughable that women can't be the architects of Patriarchy? A)... Strawman. B)... Women instinctively know that their role in life is to civilise men, so perha…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 06:35 PM
1

So, your problem was that "men" in general don't learn about women's history of oppression. You suggest to read a book. I come back with books that point out that women were NOT specifically oppressed by men, quite the opposite actually, and one of the books quite rightly elaborates that women are the architects of their own beloved Patriarchy. And that doesn't invalidate your arguments? You're now engaging in the mind-fuck that I wrote about. Women are not oppressed and were never a singled out…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 06:10 PM
4

We say non-birthingkind.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:49 PM
26

care-based morality This is the first time I have heard the phrase, can you elaborate as it sounds interesting!
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:26 PM
2

Quickest way to become a millionaire is to start as a billionaire and marry a woman.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:21 PM
1

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-95cd411fe2dc49cf0d99bc30cc34bd70.webp https://topmediadvertising.co.uk/female-shopping-statistics/
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:52 PM
1

I love stirred casserole. But to respond seriously: I see A LOT of "all men are" comments elsewhere, so it strikes me that probably a certain proportion of both men and women engage in "black-and-white" thinking. It's an all-or-nothing approach, leading to absolute statements. I used to do it myself, but I went through a phase of allowing myself to admit that there was usually a large grey area in the middle. I think it is unreasonable to feel disheartened that (some) men do the same as (some) w…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:49 PM
8

She then states that the demographic shifts to 70% male and 90% white demographic when there is traffic on the road. So.... technically you're pointing out that non-caucasian people do not like cycling with traffic on the roads, which is a bit racist TBH. It's like you're saying that they have such bad spacial awareness (as "minority" groups) that they can't navigate around obstacles. A bit racist, really.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:44 PM
13

The point is, the demographic of people cycling should be representative of the demographic of a city. Okay, so Leeds in the UK should have lots of Muslims cycling? Or how about a government program to get the 450,000 Polish people in the UK cycling in proportion to the rest of the demographics. Do you realize what you're saying here?
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:39 PM
4

Why did she called cycling a sport? It's some native language thing? It's a transport Tran-sport. You called it. Hence the lycra, and having a sharp saddle shoved up your butt while you're doing it.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:36 PM
12

What the ScienceDirect study states is: When examining categories of incident (discussed more fully under Section 3.4), we also investigated women׳s reporting of problematic (generally too close) passes – one of the more common and more frightening types of near miss. We found that differences in rates per trip stage or per hour were not statistically significant, while differences per mile were, with women reporting 50% more passing incidents than men, per mile cycled So....nothing happened....…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:34 PM
5

https://www.livescience.com/6225-testosterone-women-nicer.html
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:50 PM
42

So, men are the only gender group that pays more taxes than they receive. And women control or spend 80% of the world's privately held money (to corporations) Why not make it 100% of the money, and you just made a 25% profit. In global terms that's a lot of money and you get to make financial slaves of BOTH men AND women. Then you sit back and control everyone because they owe you. Why wouldn't you print a headline bemoaning the fact that this nefarious plan is going to take way too long for you…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:32 PM
10

Is it testosterone though? Or is that your assumption. Women get angry if they have too much estrogen or progesterone, and they get nicer on testosterone. Anger and rage are NOT fuelled by testosterone. Also, men do not see women as possessions. You ought to try having a relationship with a woman just once. Men instinctually protect women because it is biologically built into us to a) protect, b) sacrifice our lives and c) do those two things for women and children - both of whom are needed for …
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:23 PM
3

An improper understanding of power structures makes it look like the people with power are all men. But they are just the puppets. The president of the US is a puppet. Always. How can they hold any real power if their term is limited to 4 or 8 years? Likewise all those men in public positions. It's the people behind them that wield the power. But you never see who they are. Which ironically means you're engaging in sexism if you suggest - without evidence - they are also men.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:17 PM
8

Yet I can't think of a single woman who got lynched just for being a woman. But Muh Feelingz! It feels like I get lynched every time Teh Hwite Male Gaze TM lands on my delicate oppressed features!
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:08 PM
18

Any comment that suggests that "toxic masculinity" is to blame should be downvoted to hell. How about Tribalism? It is far easier to spot and you yourself engage in it, whether or not you acknowledge that. Tribalism explains all sorts of "toxic" problems where racism and sexism cannot be neatly applied. Russians killing Finnish? Tribalism (they are the same race) Congalese killing each other? Tribalism (they are the same race) Bloods and Crips? Tribalism. And I will suggest that even the suppose…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 03:04 PM
10

The trouble with the idea that the world used to be run by men and men alone Is it is absolute bollocks. Men, women AND children used to sow crops, work the mines, harvest, mend, and much more. Women have had the ability to take men's wealth since Roman times, and shame men for being bachelors, protest about men spending time in coffee houses (and not at home, 1674), and much more. Feminist Mary Wollstonecraft acknowledged the power that women held over men - in 1792. Stop with the obviously fal…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 12:50 AM
3

Thanks for the dictionary definition of feminism. Here's another dictionary definition of feminism: Feminism: belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests So, ONLY women's rights and interests. I am not responsible for what other people say, because feminism is not a club, association or anything like that. You're doing exactly what I wrote that feminists do. Here's my…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 02:01 PM
5

As a "survivor" (I hate the word) of female domestic violence, I had to find out why it had happened to me - as the general assumption was that unhinged men were violent to women only. It turns out that domestic violence (or Intimate Partner Violence as it is now called) has been around since the dawn of time, and reliably studied since the 1970s. The early studies reported equal rates of men > women and women > men IPV - and in some cases almost equal murder rates of wives and husbands. There a…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 01:53 AM
3

But the single criterion for calling oneself a feminist is this: You identify as one. That's it. So we have a rotating set of definitions, set by anyone and everyone who simply self-identifies as "a feminist", and used almost exclusively to avoid responsibility for what other feminists do or don't do, all the while claiming that their particular feminism is the one-true-feminism. That's literally how the No True Scotsman fallacy works. You can argue against that until you're blue in the face, bu…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 01:07 AM
7

but what a truly feminist means... This is called the No True Scotsman fallacy. You say that feminism means [X]. I point out that feminism does the opposite of [X]. You then say "that's not true feminism". I have had multiple conversations with feminists, and ALL of them describe their own style of feminism as the one "true feminism". And when I pointed out that their particular brand of feminism a) contradicted other people's, and b) didn't do what they said it did, they resorted to the same fa…
/r/MensRights20/06/23 12:29 AM
1

Right, most mothers would pay for their own child, but also expect their higher-earning partner to pay more for general expenses - bills, rent, food etc. You didn't mention those. If you were earning less than your partner and had a kid, would you expect your partner to pay more for general expenses? Or would you still go 50:50?
/r/MensRights19/06/23 03:44 PM
2

So what would be your feelings if you earned less than your partner, and YOU had a child from a previous relationship? Would you still feel like you needed to pay 50:50 plus all your own stuff, or would you quietly enjoy him paying for more? After all, you'd be looking after your kid and have less time for earning money...
/r/MensRights19/06/23 03:32 PM
1

"How do you feel about the wage gap?" "I feel fine." "BIGOT! SEXIST A-HOLE" *banned The sub is not about discussion, it's about conforming to the hivemind. Why do I need to waste my time with that.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:42 PM
205

Most of us do not waste our time checking on 2X. There is no possibility for debate, rational discussion, or even a nuanced comment thread. Anything that remotely strays towards a centrist political outlook is immediately downvoted to hell and the redditor banned.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 03:31 PM
4

It is always nice to have more people here, your support is appreciated, and welcome. I find that my opinions about trans people tend to fall into a much larger category. You're not alone. We all have a psychological make-up that lends itself in one particular direction or another. As a Buddhist I have come to accept that 100% of humans have psychological patterns that keep repeating themselves, keeping us locked into a certain way of viewing life. These psychological patterns do not necessarily…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 02:48 PM
97

Something to do with organizing office parties, or birthday cards or some shit. Literally who cares. These women get PAID to do this stuff as part of their salary. Perhaps they didn't read their contract that says "...and any other tasks as may be required..." Or maybe women actually LIKE organizing parties? My gf absolutely gets OFF organizing shit and being "involved". It's like a drug to her, she actually gets a visible erection when asked to do stuff like this. Okay. Maybe not a visible one,…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 02:18 PM
2

I'm sorry you are going through this. I went through it 15 years ago and - having been the stay-at-home-dad to my two children - got forcibly removed from their lives. I haven't seen them once in 15 years. They are now adults in their 20s. Hang in there. I did. You can. It IS heart wrenching, it IS a travesty of justice. It IS wrong. You know that you are a vital part of your children's lives, and I know that too. I firmly believe that you have a spiritual heart connection with your daughter, ke…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 02:02 PM
10

Good comment. I also noticed the quasi-Christian religious nature of feminism, including all the different "churches" (strains) that have splintered off due to a microscopic difference in belief.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 01:47 PM
1

I guess it could be similar to straight men fetishizing gay women? (I used the same wording intentionally, no offense meant)
/r/MensRights15/06/23 04:10 PM
7

Colttaine did a video on Youtube called "Dogs, A.I. and Air Conditioning". It's 38 mins long, but well worth the watch. In the video he explains how A.I. facial recognition programs were trained to recognize dogs faces first, and if you ran a white-noise picture through that algorithm to try to find a face, and ran the results through again and again, eventually dogs faces would start to appear from the white noise. This is a false positive result - seeing something that isn't there. He then lik…
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:28 PM
7

I have 10 or more gay friends. NONE of them call each other "girl". You wouldn't even know that they were gay if you walked past them on the street. They are regular guys. Quit with the stereotypes of people you have never met.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:19 PM
2

Most of men's rights activists also happen to be heavily leaning towards the right I don't think there is a shred of evidence for this. We don't have a political right in most Western countries. It's either far-Left or near-center. Right-wing would be certain religions, or neo-Nazis, of which there are vanishingly few. Most men's rights activists are NOT in any of those categories. The media have labeled Men's Rights Activists as politically far right, but that's not true. My family think I'm a …
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:15 PM
1

Yeah, why is that? Why do straight women fetishize gay men?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:08 PM
2

obviously when i go out to the gay clubs you get the hanger on straight women who think you want to be their bff and follow you around starry eyed like you’re a sparkly mythic creature when you’re just trying to have a boogie with your people I've never quite understood this. Why do you think women love having a gay guy around that they can fawn over?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 02:05 PM
2

It's shocking. Can you even imagine the reverse: three "Right Honorable Gentlemen" considered whether there was evidence that women could be raped, and although they found some anecdotal evidence, they did not discover sufficient to convince them that this women could indeed be raped.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 06:35 PM
9

In tomorrow's news: "Office For Men" set up. Staffed by women.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:59 PM
18

Old school feminism - in fact, any feminism - has never been about equal rights and opportunities. ALL feminisms have been about female superiority with no accompanying responsibility. The Suffragettes were terrorists. 1970s feminism was funded by the CIA (Gloria Steinem) and focussed on destroying the nuclear family and criminalizing men (thus making society in general easier to control). 1980s and 1990s feminism (intersectionality) was a divide-and-conquer strategy to pit different races again…
/r/MensRights14/06/23 02:56 PM
6

Right. But the prison population is 95% male. So if that were equalized to 50:50, would the numbers be skewed towards women again?
/r/MensRights12/06/23 07:54 PM
2

Good point. I'm trying to think of a movie with a strong feminine role. Last one was probably "Shooter" with Mark Wahlberg.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 05:46 PM
1

It's good isn't it!
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:35 PM
25

1000 people surveyed is usually enough to get a clear representation of the population at large. It's a statistical sampling thing. But it can be easy to game. We also have no link to the actual online study, so what they report has no verification other than their own. I have no evidence that they are lying, but I also have no evidence that they aren't. Given that the survey finds outlandish results such as 1 in 3 men will slap their partner if she gets out of line - a result not in accordance …
/r/MensRights11/06/23 08:33 PM
37

Okay, fair point. Here's a test for you: A survey said that 85% of women said they would eventually start a family. Also, the survey found that 33% of women were shrieking harpies that stabbed their partner regularly. You trust the first half, why not trust the second?
/r/MensRights11/06/23 08:26 PM
137

I find it highly surprising. Survey write up (in German) here https://www.plan.de/fileadmin/website/04._Aktuelles/Umfragen_und_Berichte/Spannungsfeld_Maennlichkeit/Plan-Umfrage_Maennlichkeit-A4-2023-NEU-online.pdf Most of the questions have pretty standard answers. Men feel like they have to succeed because no one else is going to help them. Men feel like life is a competition. Men like to spend time working out. Nothing unusual. And then all of a sudden (section 7, p.20), an uncharacteristic se…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:21 PM
6

Do you have a link to the study?
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:58 PM
62

Given men AND women's propensity to support only women, I reckon it has always been this way - quite to the contrary of what feminists would like you to believe. I suspect that women have always had an advantage. Yes, I am aware that women didn't vote before the 1910s, but we conveniently forget that men didn't vote before the 1830s. It was only land owners (which included women if they were the principal holder). Likewise, everyone worked all the time throughout history until maybe the first ha…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 06:10 PM
3

A book like "Understanding Patriarchy" by bell hooks, in which she says that Patriarchy is taught by mothers to their daughters? Or a book like "On the Vindication of the Rights of Women" by Mary Wollstonecraft, who admits (in the late 1700s) that women held a special place in society, and had power over men? That kind of book?
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:34 PM
2

Perhaps you missed the logical contradiction that I was referring to: "Male dominated careers have prestige." "Teaching was male dominated." "Teaching is now female dominated." "Teaching is not highly regarded." (i.e. no prestige since the men left) Does that make it clearer? Basically the author is saying that the predominance of men in a field is what makes it prestigious, and then complains that women make it less prestigious. That's on women, not on men. Hence the mind-fuck. I'm ignorant abo…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:27 PM
2

...studies have shown that these careers tend to enjoy less prestige as well. Although teaching was once a career for men... The tortuous mind-fuck is obvious here. Apparently, historically male dominated careers have more prestige. Teaching was one of those. Now women dominate teaching. But it has no prestige. Like, how do someone even reconcile that inside their heads?
/r/MensRights10/06/23 04:45 PM
1

Quick reminder that it was only ever women who put their own children up for sale during the Great Depression. It was also only women who killed up to 30% of their children in Aboriginal Australian societies - as a method of "birth control". On the subject of the female pedophile, we're not even looking for them. (Youtube vid on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WdTAJ9\_IY0)
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:49 PM
1

I heard this exact thing from nurses. It's a girls club, and all the middle management are female because they gang together to take down any male nurses. What tends to happen is that the male nurses specialize and get further degrees, taking on anti-social shifts and work, and they get paid more. But none become practice managers. I have never see a male practice manager.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:43 PM
4

*White Even the UK government admits it: https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/6364/documents/70802/default/
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:41 PM
1

Most Nobel Prize winners are also Jewish. But no one seems to mention that.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:34 PM
2

I hear those slate mining degrees are sexist anyway.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:33 PM
3

"Sex work is empowering!" "Except when men do it!" "It's illegal for men to enjoy women's empowering sex work!" (I'm looking at you, Canada) Yeah, the double standards are immense.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:31 PM
3

women on average do more unpaid work This is not true. It's derived from women self-describing their own input into their lives, and then comparing it to men doing the same jobs. It automatically excludes outdoor housework and commuting, both of which men do far more of. Is it work to do the dishes? No. It's a requirement of life. But women say it's work (housework) to make it look like they are downtrodden. On top of that, men are generally much more efficient at housework, spending less time b…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:29 PM
1

I'm reasonably sure that the IQ distribution does NOT have the same average IQ. The tests were "gamed" by testing 12-13 year olds. At that age, almost all girls have hit puberty and their brain mass has increased significantly. But boys at that age have mostly not hit puberty, the average time-lag being 2 years later. Their brain mass has NOT significantly increased. There are very few studies measuring the real IQ differences across time, but those that do have found that boys lag behind girls …
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:22 PM
1

Regarding the link of the man-who-calls-himself-a-woman-now. There could be a myriad of covariables that might be responsible for the papers not getting accepted at such a rate, and NONE of these are mentioned. Did he relax and think that now he calls himself a woman, people will fawn over him? Did his writing style change? Did his subject matter change? Was there a change in publication acceptance rates generally? Nope, it was sexism. lol
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:18 PM
64

Nora did more for men's rights than any other feminist. It's a shame there isn't someone else to take up her mantle to "prove" Patriarchy, and inadvertently disprove it.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:33 PM
1

Here's the problem: THEY are arguing emotionally. YOU are arguing rationally. YOU will lose, because emotions > logic. Here's the solution: Deconstruct every argument using Gamma Bias. Point out their inherent bias, then refuse to listen to them until they correct it.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:31 PM
1

Domestic violence is NOT gendered. Here are 343 professional studies that prove this. In fact, they prove that women are more violent than men (explaining the curious fact that lesbian relationships have higher rates of domestic violence than either heterosexual or gay men). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography Murray Straus showed why publications often omit to publish the re…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:28 PM
4

I would wager that the older generations have more constricted views on what they consider to be domestic violence. Basically it will be simply "Did she hit me/throw an object at me?". That's an artifact of their upbringing. In the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s that was pretty much what domestic violence was. Anyone older than 50 is likely to believe that DV is just physical. Contrast that with the (ironically feminist) expansion of the meaning of domestic violence in the 1980s onwards - it now include…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:19 PM
1

Having had a quick look at your website - specifically your definition of Domestic Violence - I would suggest including a few more categories. Psychological - includes gaslighting, manipulation, put-downs, belittling, threats of social harm (i.e. "I'll tell your parents that secret you told me, if you don't [X]"), and setting up of false dichotomies or lose/lose situations Financial - she has almost complete control of your money and tells YOU what you can spend your own money on General - class…
/r/MensRights10/06/23 02:12 PM
14

Actually, Prof. Thomas Sowell showed in around 1980 that single-childless-never-married women outearned single-childless-never-married men by a significant margin. That has remained the case in 40 years. These women still outearn their male counterparts by anywhere between 9% and 25% (depending on age, mostly).
/r/MensRights10/06/23 01:46 PM
3

I agree. It is becoming more common for people to publicly disclose a laundry list of mental illnesses as a badge of honor, while simultaneously using them as a shield against any criticism, as well as covertly using them to destroy anyone who disagrees with them. It's weaponized victimhood.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:11 PM
9

It also shows the absolute lack of any accountability for herself. "I am damaged, and it is YOUR fault", is basically the set up.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:46 PM
14

The Moon Jelly Fish commenter (probably a real-life description of her body) claims she has Complex PTSD, BPD, a self-harm addiction, Autism and unresolved childhood trauma. (And that's just from the comments in that thread!) Not gonna win any prizes interacting with that unholy mess.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:33 PM
1

Endocrine disruptors are well known to cause boys to want to be girls. JFYI
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:08 PM
2

My first guess was Florida, East coast somewhere. Sun is behind the camera and to the right of the viewer, beaches, high rise building, pier. To me that says Florida. But no idea where.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 02:05 PM
36

She wants 100% authority over the kids but 0% responsibility for them. Fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:40 PM
3

Funny you should mention that specific situation, because I am experiencing it right now. I got fired for a workplace injury. They are not allowed to do that, yet it happened. And yes, they are being sued. But you're talking about a different thing. Here's the difference: A company doesn't make a woman pregnant, that's her choice. But the company IS responsible for making the workplace safe so you don't get injured.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:36 PM
2

Is it insane? Two people apply to be a cardiac surgeon. One has a disability, the other doesn't. Which one do you pick as your surgeon? Two people apply to be profect manager on a time-critical project. One is pregnant and will be on maternity leave during the most crucial part of the project. You still have to pay her but she won't be there to do any work, meaning you have to employ a second person to cover her, doubling your cost and jeopardizing the project. Who do you choose? It's these sort…
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:28 PM
2

It's making an assumption based on identity.. No, it's looking solely at future productivity.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 01:21 PM
-1

It does sound irrational until you look at your suggestion in the light of day: You suggest that women are treated as irresponsible children. Try motivating an irresponsible child to act like an adult, see how that goes for you. And I'm the irrational one?
/r/MensRights05/06/23 10:57 PM
1

I think we do agree, but I can see the OP's point. While he didn't mention it, there was a mid 1900s study done on exclusively female offices/factories that showed that the women regulated their own productivity as a group, often going against the (male) manager, according to the group mind, and often reducing their overall productivity if that suited any particular purpose or whim. Men don't do that. So, if you were a business owner, who would you choose to employ, if all other factors were ide…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 05:40 PM
14

OP appears to be a feminist. The only other comment they have made in Men's Rights is about how gender quotas protect individuals from having to compete with men. Strange language. I guess women are individuals and not women any more? In this post, there are no stats or links provided, and the narrative is basically "women don't falsely accuse rape" (it's unthinkable) The actual stats of rape allegations show that the false allegation rate runs at around 400% higher than any other crime (general…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 04:45 PM
1

Sure. I made it an obviously stupid example. But it holds true for any other job requirement. If you have two (otherwise identical) female candidates, are you going to choose the one with better skills and more productivity? Or the one that is woke? Productivity IS a factor in hiring for a position where productivity is a requirement. And if men ARE more productive, it stands to reason that men will be hired more, without it being discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 04:30 PM
1

The raw rates are actually almost identical. Women historically use poison and other people to kill their spouses (i.e. murder by proxy).
/r/MensRights05/06/23 03:28 PM
1

I don't actually think this is true. Women are as violent physically as men are, but the way in which that violence is perpetrated, and the harm that it causes is different. Then there is a legal blind spot that basically forgives nearly all women for violence, making the convictions almost exclusively male.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 03:26 PM
1

The trouble is: we HAVE to discriminate. It is human nature to discriminate, in order to work out what things in the world are dangerous and what things are not. We require discrimination to survive. What we now all agree on is that discrimination on grounds that are unrelated to the task at hand is not valid discrimination. So yes, you are right: choosing someone to do a task based on the color of their skin is wrong. But choosing someone based on their physical characteristics could be useful.…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:41 PM
5

There's a newer poll done by Ipsos that shows that in the 18-25 age range nearly 2/3rds of young women are feminist. What that actually indicates is that 2/3rds of young women are sexist to a point of absurdity. "Feminist" is not a badge of honour.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:00 PM
0

Women are pushed by their instincts, just as men are, but they're no more controlled by them than men are- So...excusing murder on the grounds of PMT never happened? Try arguing rationally with your girlfriend when she's mad. Tell her those cravings for chocolate ice cream are not there and that she looks fat in that dress. Of the two sexes, women are more controlled by their biology than men are.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 01:57 PM
1

The 30% figure was derived from a Fawcett Society poll. For those that don't know, the Fawcett Society is an opely feminist society that focusses exclusively on female issues in the UK, to the detriment of men. It is in their interests to show support for their cause. But we don't know what the question asked actually was. I suspect that if a male-focussed society (and there isn't one) were to ask similar questions to determine if someone was feminist, the answers could be very different. Anothe…
/r/MensRights05/06/23 01:53 PM
1

My Grandma actually knew Greer, and in true grandma style she said "She wasn't a real woman, she never had the curse"
/r/MensRights01/06/23 08:31 PM
1

Bot post.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 10:58 PM
1

Surely the idea that all women want a financially stable partner is an outdated Patriarchal construct. It's a relic of old white males out-earning women. Why aren't feminists trying to destroy this part of Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 07:44 PM
3

If you swap out "The Patriarchy" for any other boogeyman, the cultish self-delusion becomes obvious immediately: Why do men commit suicide more often? Because of the toaster in the sky. Why do boys cry less as they get older? Because of the toaster in the sky. Why do men do more dangerous jobs? Because of the toaster in the sky. Why are men afraid to show their emotions? Because of the toaster in the sky. ... Yeah. Ignore. Move on.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:48 PM
4

Actually they are. This has been studied well, and cross-culturally (meaning that the phenomenon is independent of social factors within any given society). Women marry an average of 4-5 years older and higher in salary or status.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:26 PM
2

I've literally had this kind of scenario this week. I have a restraining order against my landlord, so he sends his girlfriend in to mess with me instead. I called the cops and left the property. Later, the cops rang me to say they weren't arresting anyone, and that the girlfriend had made the allegation that I was "crouched in a dark corner spying on her". I told the cop she was recording the whole thing on her phone, and asked him if she had shown him the video. He said no. I laughed and said,…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:22 PM
1

All women have a uterus. But there are exceptions.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:09 PM
3

im here to abolish any confusion Oh good. Explain to me what feminism is: Feminism is…..[insert shifting definition]. Feminism is…..equality Feminism is…..equality for all Feminism is…..equality of the sexes Feminism is…..women’s equality Feminism is…..women’s rights Feminism is…..equal opportunities Feminism is…..equal opportunities for women Feminism is…..equal outcomes Feminism is…..the radical notion that women are human beings Feminism is…..smashing the Patriarchy Feminism is…..not what she…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:06 PM
2

Feeling safe is a basic human right. No. It absolutely isn't. There is NO basic human right to feel any particular way at society's expense. You can swap this out for any emotion and come to the same conclusion. The values of Western societies give you the chance to pursue happiness. You have no right to be given happiness, security, freedom from strife, worry, death or any other negativity. And given that our feelings are not anyone else's responsibility, it is up to every single woman to creat…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:57 PM
3

You and I will have to disagree about that. I believe it is absolutely 100% biological. We see it in hens and cocks. Beta males will bribe the hens to have sex with them. That's the biological basis for hypergamy - sex for resources. More resources = more sex. No resources = no sex. It's literally that simple.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:42 PM
2

I have read the thread and your comments to other people and I am aware of what you mean. But I am specifically responding to your assertion that feminism in general is not a hate movement. I strongly disagree witht that and I believe that the evidence over 100 years or more supports me.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:18 PM
2

Feminism in general IS a hate movement and always has been. The Suffragettes were literal terrorists, bombing businesses and killing people.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:14 PM
2

But which OG? 1900s terrorist feminists? (Suffragettes) 1970s man-hating feminists? 1980s man-hating feminists? 1990s intersectional man-hating feminists? Or the current man-hating feminists? Not sure there were ever normal feminists...
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:12 PM
2

I disagree with you regarding whether feminists are a hive mind or not. I believe they are. We see this in their absolute dedication to the sisterhood, and their unilateral exhortation that their own style of feminism is the one true feminism. They all share those two things in common. That's a hive mind.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:08 PM
5

I don't think a neutral moderator can be elected, for the simple reason that no one will agree on what is neutral. A leftist (most of reddit) will think that neutrality is far to the left of center. We don't even have a far right, they are banned and literally criminalized. For example, who do you know who is legitimately proposing to remove voting rights from women - as a way of rebalancing the political landscape (not as a misogynistic punishment)? That would be right leaning, and not even far…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:05 PM
7

I dated a raging feminist, complete with one side of her head shaved. She claimed the same thing as most feminists: equal pay etc. but literally got turned on by the thought of a man who earned way more than her. She couldn't see that her biology was diametrically opposed to her beliefs. With such a fundamental dichotomy inside her, she literally wasn't being true to herself and that's what was intolerable. At least conservative women are true to their own biology.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:00 PM
10

To be exact, are any of those discrimination against women? No. More likely supply and demand - too many people for jobs that suck at tax payers money without providing the commensurate value. ?? Pick a country and stick with it, don't move the goalposts.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:56 PM
1

De Beauvoir was correct in two ways: you are not born a woman because a woman is an adult female. You are born a baby girl with the potential to mature into a woman. This does not make gender a social construct, but a biological certainty. The second way is there are societal expectations that a woman must fulfill in order to be considered "a woman" by the rest of society. These were largely so implicit that they didn't need spelling out, and in not spelling them out explicitly, de Beauvoir robs…
/r/MensRights27/05/23 04:01 PM
1

I have. But not physically changing my body or dressing up in female clothes. Just get my driver's license changed so that when challenged I can legit say "oh, I'm a woman", and claim that whoever has a problem is a bigot. But I haven't done it.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 03:03 PM
3

And likewise, if 10 men only were actual rapists but women colletively made 100,000 reports, then the conviction rate would be 0.01%.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 02:50 PM
1

You forgot the poignant part: almost all men are in the bottom echelon, underneath the women. That would mean that the vast, overhwelmong majority of men live in a gynocracy.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 12:28 PM
2

It looks like a system run by men, but that's not actually the reality. The people most likely to become millionaires from nothing (or billionaires starting from a millionaire) are hyperfocused workaholic megalomaniac autists with a mean streak. That means that they spend 16 to 20 hours a day, 7 days a week on a single focus - making money. Most of us can't do that. The people that can are more likely to be male. But that doesn't mean the system is run by men, it's run by psychologically unbalan…
/r/MensRights24/05/23 05:42 PM
2

I think there is a lot of confusion currently where "capitalism" is demonized, but in fact everyone really means "predatory consumerism". The two things are not the same.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 05:32 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 05:30 PM
3

Gonna be called "Starkers and Cooch"
/r/MensRights11/05/23 12:13 AM
69

If only that were true: https://www.independent.ie/world-news/women-happiest-when-their-partner-is-upset/26829394.html Women Happiest When Their Partner Is Upset
/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:36 PM
2

I feel for you, man. A quick browse of the subject reveals that North Dakota doesn't give a damn about the guy paying. https://www.swlattorneys.com/child-support-questions-north-dakota/ 2. Are the child support recipient’s wages taken into consideration when calculating my child support? Probably not. When calculating child support in North Dakota the obligor’s income is the only income that is typically considered. and 3. Can we use the obligor’s (the person paying) spouse’s income when calcula…
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:20 PM
45

Women (as a group) also commit more crimes while in space. What to choose...
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:56 PM
25

Strange how no feminists are shouting "shoulda kept it in your pants, girl!"
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:29 PM
3

You're actually right, there is an element of white-knighting, but mostly it's just politicians doing what angry women want, in order to get the female vote and stay in power, not out of some altruistic desire to save women.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:27 AM
10

Perhaps you don't understand that men do not stand a chance of coming out of a marriage "intact". If they want marriage and kids, men have a 60% chance of ending up with no access to their own kids, and their bank account drained. It isn't worth it. Women caused this situation, not men.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:25 PM
5

The trouble with this type of thought process is this: If you only change the words, you don't change the underlying assumptions. In actual fact you buy into them and lend them weight. There's an easy way to prove this. If you enter into a discussion with someone who uses the words "traditional gender roles" and you simply change the words to "natural sexes qualities", you'll only end up debating which words to use, not the underlying principles. That means that you don't object to the underlyin…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:26 PM
3

I see. I had no idea that my comment was reported, I don't get notifications for that. There is no prejudice against women in my comment. It simply says that women (as a group) are tax-negative over their lives, and any benefit that women receive from taxpayer dollars must necessarily be funded by men. That's not bigotry, as it is not prejudicial in any way, it's just a fact. I suspect that the reporting redditor is the same person that got downvoted literally hundreds of times in this entire po…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:19 PM
2

As a mod, of course you're correct. But you'd also have to apply that logic to the comment I was responding to, which categorized women as a monolith. Therefore the correct response was to continue treating women as a monolith, which I did. No bigotry anywhere to be seen.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:16 PM
2

Women don't need the government or divorce money or men to support them Actually, yes they do. https://avoiceformen.com/featured/research-finds-that-as-a-group-only-men-pay-tax/ Any tax benefit a woman receives - i.e. including any service anything that was funded using tax dollars - was paid for by men.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 01:02 PM
5

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wage-gap_b_2073804 (Wage gap myth exposed - by Feminists!) https://time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-myth-feminism/ (Wage gap debunked by more feminists) https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jel.20160995 (Wage gap debunked) https://www.academia.edu/3578319/The_Gender_Wage_Gap_in_the_1990s (Wage gap debunked in the 1990s) https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/race-and-culture-a-world-view_thomas-sowell/270651/?resultid=891d8659-5df8-48ce-b47b-73a0e7defc2c#edition=2402029…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:59 PM
1

I think what is meant is this: Men are more interested in sex than women are. Women are seen as the gatekeepers to sex, because biologically speaking there is a higher cost to her from having sex (just as you firmly believe). This makes women choosy about which partner she sleeps with. Conversely, women are more interested in relationships than men, making men the gatekeepers to a relationship. It is men who "grant" women a relationship simply by continuing to stick around.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:50 PM
2

Men have full comprehensive bodily autonomy of every part of themselves You probably forgot that circumcision exists, is legal, publicly advertised and widely practised. But female circumcision is illegal, condemned and prosecuted. You also may not be aware that it is legal in the US for women to "sperm-jack" a man. Basically he uses a condom to avoid getting her pregnant, ties it up after and throws it in the trash. She can take that condom, put the sperm up her, get pregnant and successfully c…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 12:37 PM
7

Great math! And don't forget that the high earners are usually 50+ and most being 60+, but women are looking for younger, further narrowing the pool.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 03:58 AM
1

I did read that the current Republican party is further left politically than the Democrat party of 1900. In addition, it seems like the far-left and the far-right actually meet up at the opposite side of the circle. In your opinion, why do we need to abolish the gender roles you mentioned? What is gained from forced opposition to biology?
/r/MensRights06/05/23 03:52 AM
2

I thought lack of health insurance topped the list. Domestic violence doesn't cause maternal deaths.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:18 AM
2

85% of women end up having at least one baby, in the US. So that's still most women. Maybe you could give specific examples of what you consider women's setbacks or problems are in the area of childbirth in the US?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:11 AM
2

I'm saying that in Somalia, the very real consequences for women giving birth are death, disablement and poverty. In the UK, mothers have free healthcare, are paid by the government to have babies and have copious resources at their disposal, as well as no social stigmss or setbacks. This is opposite to your idea. You see it, you acknowledge it, yet you go back to believing something that you just acknowledged isn't true.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:05 AM
3

You may need to provide some kind of evidence for your assertion.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:54 AM
3

Wow. It's almost as if you just can't accept a new way of looking at things, even when you just understood it and agreed with it. Amazing to watch. In a resource rich society like the UK that has one of the world's strongest social and financial support systems for women getting pregnant, and this makes women have fewer babies, you chose to believe the opposite - that there are "very real social, mental, physical and financial consequences disincentivizing them from doing so". Utterly amazing.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:49 AM
1

If she chooses a man who later doesn't measure up to her hopes, that's on her. Her man, her choice. Literally no one forced her, she actively chose him and also chose to marry him and also chose to have babies with him. I thought feminists were aware of choice and consent?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:42 AM
12

Women are ... having less children because they know what will happen to their bodies and life trajectory/quality of life if they do The reason for this is NOT: If society didn't allow a woman's role, personal development, autonomy, time, career, and finance to be compromised and deteriorate as consequence for becoming pregnant The reason that women have fewer babies overall is to do with the abundance of resources. In countries (and historical time periods) where resources are (or were) scarce,…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 06:04 PM
14

The comment was Many will become single mothers dependent on transfer money. We men will pay either way. This is not victim blaming. Victim blaming would be saying that men got themselves into a situation where they have to pay unwillingly, it's their own fault. Or...single mothers deserve their lot in life.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 05:58 PM
7

These industries specifically target men and have a greater negative impact on them because men’s brains are more sensitive to their rewards. This is not true. If you look at video game engagement it's pretty even between men and women, but the type of game differs widely. Men are interested in shooting and driving games, women are interested in matching color or pattern games (Candy Crush, dressing up games).
/r/MensRights04/05/23 05:55 PM
4

Yeah, so funny to watch feminists say that "traditional gender roles need to be destroyed", but try taking a baby away from their mom and see how quickly feminists jump on you!
/r/MensRights02/05/23 11:01 PM
7

Pre-nups have been shown to be not worth the paper they are written on. The reason is that marriage is a contract between THREE parties: Bride, Groom and Government. Government overrules Bride and Groom, by the fact that they make the rules.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 02:56 PM
20

I remember seeing a short Jordan Peterson clip that explained his idea that (in his view) the female brain was set up primarily for a mother-infant dyad relationship - a codependent relationship only between her and her baby. Primarily. (I hate that I have to put disclaimers like this for any trolls looking to jump on threads like this). It means that men don't figure in her brain's biochemistry, outside of being necessary to provide resources to support her mother-infant dyad. Always, a man wil…
/r/MensRights02/05/23 02:31 PM
15

In 2019 I wrote a list: Bodily autonomy - circumcision is illegal until the age of 18, when a man can choose for himself. Paternal rights 1 - it is illegal to use a man’s sperm without his explicit written consent. Paternal rights 2 - a man is not responsible for a child that he did not consent to. Paternal rights 3 - women cannot claim child support from men and boys they raped (sadly this happened) Paternal rights 4 - 50:50 shared custody is the default that can be amended according to the cou…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 06:48 PM
1

It's quite possible. There are commenters who suggest that women can't love men unconditionally, they only love men for their utility to her. Once his utility wanes, she "falls out of love" with him.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 03:08 PM
9

You should pay for your mistakes. What about guys who were sperm-jacked? He was raped? What about paternity fraud? Does she have to pay for those intentionally criminal actions? Why does he have to?
/r/MensRights30/04/23 12:38 PM
1

The punchline to this advice is this: Man says: "Honey, we don't need to argue about this. If you admit you're wrong, I'll admit you're right." Woman: "Okay. I admit I'm wrong." Man: "That's right."
/r/MensRights29/04/23 09:36 PM
1

Massive amounts of physical exercise.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 07:28 PM
50

I have come to realize that anything a feminist accuses men of, she's doing that same thing herself.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 05:38 PM
0

Islam is not rational at all. It is a Stone Age war-mongering pedophile's arbitrary set of rules for conquering the world. There is speculation that Mohammed was fed all of his "divine" revelations by the Catholic church who wanted to set up and maintain a rabble to undermine Jewish rule in the area. But it will still be seen as the more rational choice once peak insanity is reached by the West.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:02 PM
6

Not too long ago, Islam appeared to be bat-shit crazy. There are Muslim leaders who genuinely believe that the Earth is still and the Sun revolves around it, that satellites (and satellite TV etc.) do not exist because Mohammed said no man can exist in space. But Western civilization is giving Islam a good run for its money in the bat-shit crazy sweepstakes. At some stage, Islam will be seen as the more rational one. I never thought I would ever say that.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 01:38 AM
1

It is crap. Studies show that women are much more likely than men to believe authority figures and follow their advice (even if the advice is bad advice). So we're in a real spot of bother here. Authority positions are usually made up of idiot megalomaniacs who just want control and power (Peter Principle coupled with Power Corrupts). Women are actually easier to control than men, simply by biology. Tell them what to do, and they are more likely to do it than men. By allowing women to vote, we s…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:35 PM
2

What this boils down to is a simple divide and conquer strategy. If love is missing from the equation of sex and sexuality - and I have yet to read any feminist writing that includes love - it must necessarily be applicable only to those who do not experience love. By applying an ideology devoid of love to a population that thrives on love is to dehumanize them/us. And the only reason to do that would be to stoke the fires of dissatisfaction in an attempt to make it about us and them. Divide. Bu…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:10 PM
5

Women ... should be held responsible for child abuse. Women ... should be held responsible ... ​ Fixed it for you. But seriously, totally agree.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 01:17 PM
4

That's just half of it! I'm job hunting right now, and after telling my gf about a company I want to work for - but not finding the right person to contact - she spent half an hour stalking the company members and came up with all sorts of hidden information; direct telephone numbers, emails, social pages, all sorts, and none of it from the actual company's website. I understand that all women do this to their potential dates too. Stalking is a serious problem that you don't know about until it'…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:18 AM
3

I can suggest that if you take the time to understand men's viewpoint, you may get softer answers to questions you pose/post. But if you come in here like most other feminists - with a concrete set of beliefs intent on ruffling feathers - you're not likely to get a warm welcome. We have a number of women who write on here consistently and with forethought, and there is no obstacle to them doing so. We aren't monsters, but common decency and courtesy go a long way to helping you find a way of com…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:12 AM
4

That depends which demographic and which geographical area you are studying, across what time period. Mercy, J. A., & Saltzman, L. E. (1989). Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1975-85. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 595-599. (Examined FBI figures regarding spousal homicides. During the 10 year period from 1975 to 1985 found higher murder rates of wives than husbands <43.4% vs 56.6%>. Black husbands were at the greatest risk of victimization. Spousal homicide among blacks…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:02 AM
17

Fiebert et. al showed 343 scholarly articles that concluded women were as violent if not more violent than men in their intimate partner relationships. Straus showed why this information was stifled.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:08 AM
1

1 hour old account, only posted in Men's Rights. Suggest this might not be a genuine question. Will ignore.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 02:05 AM
2

Welcome. I will suggest that you spend some time researching men's issues or reading various posts here to get some understanding of the inequalities we face. I notice from your post history that you believe in the wage gap, emotional labor, and a bunch of other feminist talkig points. You may experience significant pushback here if you bring those things up. Mostly because they are easy to debunk and they have no basis in reality, but feminists keep claiming they are real (despite feminists the…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 01:18 AM
35

It's okay. There are no dumb questions. Rape is sexual intercourse against someone's will or without their consent. Sexual assault covers a wide variety of actions that might include touching body parts inappropriately, etc. but doesn't include rape.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 09:48 PM
18

Yep would love a link!
/r/MensRights27/04/23 08:16 PM
204

"1 in 4 women on college campuses has been raped"? If true, that would make college campuses the most dangerous places in the world for women. That number was obtained by sending a survey to the mailing list of a sexual assault support organization. The number is found by: joining two distinct categories of offence together: rape; sexual assault. expanding the definition of rape to include any consensual sex if the woman had had any alcohol prior to that sex expanding the definition of sexual as…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:28 PM
1

I don’t know the reasons most couples divorce. The most common reason is "irreconcilable differences" which doesn't offer much explanation. Anecdotally, it's usually the wife that is planning several years ahead in the marriage, and can already see her own writing on the wall. Having kids irreparably changes her brain so that the kids are more important than her husband. This is how nature needs it to be, so I'm not commenting on whether or not it is a good or bad thing. But that means a woman w…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:35 PM
11

The article is a Law firm advertising for well-paid female clients to represent. Of course they are going to make it sound like women have a raw deal and that their law firm understands and can take care of them.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:51 AM
5

There are lots of doctors that have killed. There are lots of soldiers that never fought. There are exceptions to every rule.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:29 AM
34

It's straight Gamma Bias. Anything a woman does is good, anything a man does is bad. Thus anything bad a woman does must be because a man made her do it. And anything good a man does must be because a woman made him do it.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:34 AM
10

Feminism started as a movement for equal rights and opportunities for women That's demonstrably incorrect. The Suffragettes were terrorists, burning buildings, setting off a bomb, and killing people. They had nothing to do with equal rights.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 02:33 AM
12

Well, he's young. So I'll forgive him for being a feminist. Hopefully he grows up and stops referring to feminism as some kind of good thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:49 AM
51

The company that produced that T-shirt had a whole line of them with different slogans. Imagine: "Girls smell of fish" "Girls are stupid, ostracize them" "Girls tell lies, poke them in the eyes!" ​ Although... if they had had this one: "The stupid factory, where boys are made" and then an arrow pointing down at her coochie, it could have been funny.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:44 AM
5

That argument might have held true a few years back when people still could determine what was masculine and what was feminine. I'm not so sure in today's world.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:30 AM
84

Just so you know, if enough of a controversy is stirred up regarding T-shirts they will eventually be banned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys\_are\_stupid,\_throw\_rocks\_at\_them!\_controversy
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:28 AM
4

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-psychiatrist/article/domestic-violence-is-most-commonly-reciprocal/C5432B0C6F8F61B49A4E2B60B931FA07 In non-reciprocal domestic violence (i.e. one partner hit, the other one never engaged at all), 70% of the perpetrators were women. Also: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746 Researcher Says Women's Initiation of Domestic Violence Predicts Risk to Women It's pretty simple. Most domestic violence is two-way. But if you start s…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:18 AM
3

Didn't Lawrence Summers get fired, or quit due to "sexism" for pointing this out? It's literally science, but because some women didn't like it, his career was toast. Another gem is that since the 1980s, the entire education system in most countries changed from single exams to coursework. This was done intentionally and openly to favor girls.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:15 AM
4

I don't suggest you go full retard in your presentation, but just for your own personal information, were you aware that the "common knowledge" of girls being as clever as, if not cleverer than boys is based on a flawed IQ test from the turn of the 1900s. Anyway, here's the generally accepted differences: https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/sexdifferences.aspx Note that they use the Wechsler (c.1955) and the Stanford-Binet (c.1916) tests. There is a trouble with both of these tests: IQ tests: openl…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:53 AM
5

Just in case one of the ladies in the class claims that "yeah, but women are hurt more by domestic violence!" [Maxfield, M. G. (1989). Circumstances in supplementary homicide reports: Variety and validity. Criminology, 27, 671-695. (Examines FBI homicide data from 1976 through 1985. Reports that 9,822 wives & common law wives <57%> were killed compared to 7,433 husbands and common law husbands <43%>). Mercy, J. A., & Saltzman, L. E. (1989). Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1975…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:26 AM
4

Some more for you, just for ammo in case your teacher is female: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/female-teachers-accused-of-giving-boys-lower-marks-6943928.html Female teachers mark boys down just for being boys.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:18 AM
3

Enjoy!
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:15 AM
4

If she's correct.... Why do Lesbian relationships break up more than gay couples? [source: https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2016/13/lesbian-couples-likelier-to-break-up-than-male-couples] There are no men here to be the reason for break ups. Why do Lesbian relationships have more domestic violence in them? [Scholarly source here: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01506/full - extract "Even though there are a few studies on Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence (SSIPV), they highl…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 12:13 AM
3

The Dead Sea?
/r/MensRights26/04/23 05:50 PM
109

Yep. Another film I won't watch.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 05:41 PM
7

Not much lower. But if she took a dump in his shoes, assuming the shoes were on the floor, that would be lower.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 05:41 PM
3

I don't think you're in the wrong. I don't think you're an asshole. But you are young, and likely naive to the minefield that the working world has become. I've said stupid things at work. One time I'm with a half-caste black guy in our work truck. I like him, but didn't know he was once the toughest guy in the hood and you sure as heck didn't mess with him. He's got blue eyes, but coffee coloured skin. I have blue eyes and pale skin. I say: "Great! Coffee and Cream!" It's actually a back-handed…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:24 PM
2

What can you safely assume? That I'm u/ERiC_693? Nope. That I judged you for having a vagina? Nope. You're reaching. It isn't working. Try being a human.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 08:01 PM
6

Welp, you're making things up. I had no idea you had a vagina and I don't care. I'm not the same person you replied to originally.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:52 PM
3

Welp, can't argue with a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:40 PM
2

You're aware that anyone can edit wiki? AP is owned by the feminist Rothschild family. You're seriously going to make an appeal to neutrality argument??
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:38 PM
5

Dyslexia? Fat thumbs on a smartphone hitting the wrong keys? Nice judging.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:32 PM
3

FIGG Engineering (who actually built and oversaw the construction) is owned and headed by Linda Figg, feminist. So, there's that?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:31 PM
1

Literally no one 4 points to the left of center believes fact-checkers any more. Snopes (who Politifact call "their friends") are just two hard-Leftists that used to live in their mom's basement. The structural engineers responsible for the actual building and checking of the bridge (as verified by the OSHA ruling) were FIGG Engineers, headed by Linda Figg who is part of the feminist organization 100 Women Strong.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:27 PM
8

Or worse: he's talking to a slim woman he likes, then she disappears and is replaced by a fat woman who he is disgusted by. Yep, I can imagine the double standard.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:22 PM
3

Sorry, someone probably should have linked to it. Yeah, brand new bridge built by feminist contractors hailing an "all woman team" for a University in Florida. It was a non-redundant style with (redundant) ornamentation. Basically, non-redundant means it doesn't have back-up supports if one of them fails, which means that when one thing fails, the whole thing fails. Most bridges work on some kind of redundancy where if one truss or cross beam fails, it can be replaced, and the bridge doesn't col…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:10 PM
8

I love to find biological reasons for the difference of general personality traits between men and women, but this one has me stumped. I'm genuinely not sure what causes women (as a group) to avoid responsibility like the plague. It shows up everywhere. Heck, I adopted a stray cat, got him vet-checked, passport, chipped, the whole works (because girlfriend wanted a cat). Girlfriend takes him for cuddles and petting, but as soon as he has anything negative (he was in a fight, or he got fleas agai…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:05 PM
9

How many bridges collapse a year, how many planes go down, that were completely built and run by men? This particular one fell down before completion. Very few (and I can't think of a single one off the top of my head) fall down before completion that were designed and built by men. The bridges and planes that go down usually do so after an extended lifespan, way beyond their design life.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:56 PM
0

That is weird, seeing as how straight women are generally attracted to men in the first place. It may have something to do with women's innately greater propensity towards disgust in general?
/r/MensRights25/04/23 04:37 PM
35

It's also weird that straight women are most disgusted (i.e. are least likely to date) bisexual men. They'll actually date gay men before bisexual. Yeah, so it's a giant shit-test.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 03:49 PM
1

I am pleased to hear that you are learning to like yourself. Keep doing that. Take small steps. Be kind to yourself. I know first hand that the world around you will change for the better the more you keep liking who you are.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 05:35 PM
1

Reading your post history reveals that you have tried transitioning to be a man, but it didn't work for you. You're 18, and you're experimenting with drugs. Firstly, I'm sorry you haven't found a remedy for your discomfort. Secondly, you are learning that men tend to tell you like it is and fix the problem, where women tend to "be nice". So here it is, according to what you yourself have written: You hate your body/situation. You hate other women (for name calling). You hate men. I don't think t…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:39 PM
2

“Women, commonly called Ladies, are not to be contradicted in company…” "Educate women like men," says Rousseau, "and the more they resemble our sex the less power will they have over us." This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish them to have power over men; but over themselves. She tacitly admits that women have power over men (just as Rousseau stated) but wishes that women would actually have self-control.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 07:45 PM
2

Good point. Mary Wollstonecraft acknowledged that women already had power over men in her 1792 book "On the Vindication of the Rights of Women".
/r/MensRights23/04/23 07:39 PM
24

Yeah, the Beeb. Not exactly impartial writing. They make the argument that Blasey Ford was not lying because "most of the false accusations were teenage girls trying to cover up shameful behaviour". They suggest that Blasey Ford wasn't trying to cover up, and she wasn't a teen. But they neglect to mention that there was a massive Democrat-Republican war going on. Even the wiki article about her states: On October 5, Ford's attorneys said she had no regrets about coming forward, and did not want …
/r/MensRights23/04/23 06:52 PM
12

"Science progresses one funeral at a time" - Max Planck
/r/MensRights23/04/23 05:44 PM
3

I guess that my point was that feminism was always a sexist ideology, and also a violent one. It was never about equality or fairness.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 05:36 PM
1

The origins of feminism were actually a terrorist organization (Suffragettes) who burned down buildings, bombed shops, and killed people. The later 1970s version of feminism ("burn-your-bra-Gloria-Steinem) was funded by the CIA. So there's that.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:50 PM
34

The best thing you can do generally is to call out your female friends and family when they engage in destructive behaviours. Gossiping, name-calling, relationship destruction, property destruction, violence-by-proxy (i.e. they get someone else to do their dirty work), actual violence (slapping, hitting, pinching, throwing objects), using the silent treatment, you know how girls fight. Call them out on it.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 12:53 AM
4

Yep. You can imagine the amount of hate a man would get for saying the same in reverse: "Women should be nice to women more!" Cue cancel culture.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:49 PM
20

The no.1 way of stopping violence against women is to stop women being violent towards others. For reference, the risk factors for experiencing domestic violence are: Witnessed parents being violent Cohabitation before marriage Drinking/doing drugs Partner drinking/doing drugs Starting violent behavior against partner. Which would you focus on first? Oh yes, wearing high heels. Smh.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 01:05 PM
187

Hey, she's an adult, she has a mom she was already on the phone to, so it's NOT your responsibility to save her. I get that us men have an inbuilt desire to help the damsel in distress, but you did the right thing. One time I was at work in my work van, and I saw a young lady with a flat tire by the side of the road. She was doing the helpless thing, so I pulled over and asked if she needed help. She looked me up and down and then said, "no". Apparently I wasn't a billionaire pirate in a suit, a…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:34 PM
3

I think I spotted your error. You needed your lawyer and her lawyer next to you in bed getting signed consent for each thrust of each new position. Probably, if the woman wanted kids, your lawyers would need to reach up into her lady parts and have the fetus sign its consent to be born, or that's like reverse rape or something. Especially if that baby was a boy. smh. Rookie.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:11 PM
2

Why do you ask guys and girls different questions? Surely this would invalidate any conclusion you want to make, since you are not comparing apples with apples?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/23 06:09 AM
6

I totally agree with you except for one small point: women actually enjoy male suffering. There is research that shows this.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:55 PM
9

Downvotes because if you were actually educated about the subject, you would have read Prof. Thomas Sowell's books on racism in the US and you would know that the Black community in general had higher literacy rates, higher marriage rates, lower divorce rates and higher employment rates than the white community, back in the 1930s. Save us the quasi virtue signalling, it doesn't work.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 03:13 PM
17

So, by that logic we should all treat the clearly bitchy women who talk with snide tones and judgy looks, as equally deserving of our respect? Hard pass.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 06:23 PM
1

My ex also presented the court with a psychologist report of her sanity and my insanity without the psychologist ever contacting me. The courts take a dim view of this. Instead of mounting a defense, for the court to take your side I would suggest asking them to order a court-appointed psychologist ofr an official report. We did one of those and they are as impartial as you would expect and the courts take them seriously. It came out massively in my favor.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 06:15 PM
3

As other comments have pointed out, when feminists, or even normal women start campaigning for men to have even some of the rights that women have regarding their reproduction, men may take them more seriously. A boy gets raped by an adult woman teacher, she gets pregnant and the rape victim is forced to pay child support. Which moms of boys are protesting this?
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:51 PM
2

I agree. After all, we're only ordinary men.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:41 PM
1

And the result of these surveys is that women self report being survivors of sexual assault at a much higher rate then men. This much I can totally believe. There is a fundamental difference between men (as a group) and women (as a group) towards sexual encounters and whether a perceived sexual encounter is wanted or unwanted. Women tend to rate 95% of their sexual encounters as "unwanted", but the reasons for that are more complex than "it was sexual assault". It has been shown that women rate …
/r/MensRights06/04/23 05:27 PM
1

I am aware of those studies, and have read a number of them. Starting in 1983 with Mary Koss, we see a "definition creep" whereby she intentionally changed the definition of sexual assault and rape to exclude men entirely, and make normal consensual loving sexual relationships "rape" if the woman had consumed any alcohol. The participants of that campus rape survey even stated they didn't feel as if they had been assaulted or raped, but Koss included them as having been raped. Since then, defini…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 04:51 PM
14

Sexual assault is almost equal between the sexes, but you are forgiven for thinking it disproportionately affects women, because the media either purposefully fails to report men being sexually assaulted by women or downplays it with headlines such as "teacher had affair with student", instead of "female pedophile raped child".
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:58 PM
6

A woman's job is to deny accountability...
/r/MensRights30/03/23 02:08 PM
4

Oh, but didn't you read? She's a gEnDeR sChOlAr!
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:05 PM
1

A better standard of behaviour from simps? I'm going to put it out there that this is only something that will happen when enough men get together to have men-only spaces where the older men can teach the younger men the bro code.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:38 AM
1

I think that it may be situation dependent. Remember, simps are usually after lower quality women, because they aren't seen by average and above-average women as attractive. Betas suffer a similar fate, and there isn't all that much difference between them. It's a turf war, really, between C- and D-class men. My first instinct was to black pill the D-class man, which is somewhat similar to what you are suggesting (powerlessness). Do you have a specific situation in mind?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:26 AM
1

That's a very good question, and one that I have no immediate answer for. Give me a short while to think about this. In the meantime, what are your thoughts on it?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 04:16 AM
2

Did you ask for your computer, phone and scholarship back?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:41 AM
6

I hear what you are saying, but in order to confirm your opinion, we'd have to separate out which parts of our psychological processes are biologically driven and which parts are not. For example, the psychological aspect of male disposability could actually be biologically driven.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 07:06 PM
18

I think it could be.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 05:11 PM
23

Me neither, but most men would.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:18 PM
52

It's weird though. What women don't realize is that along with most men being able to physically overpower most women comes the protective instinct. Most men will protect a random woman on the street - someone they have never met before - for no other reason that she is female.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:05 PM
6

You're right. Once you realize this, it is really difficult to re-integrate this knowledge into your everyday life and just cope with reality. How do you go to work/go to a store/have a relationship when you now know that the people you are dealing with are basically children, emotionally? I hate that I even have to type these words as it makes me look like a desperately misogynistic asshole, but that's the entire point. I can't even call them out on it. Somehow that's hateful? How do you cope w…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:51 PM
4

Downvoted, for these reasons: 1) you have a go at "hateful incels", but don't define who you are talking about, making any discussion about "them" fruitless. 2) You have a go at Andrew Tate. I'm not a fan of him, I've never watched any content by him at all. But he exists because there is a vacuum in young men's lives - men are craving strong any role models. You seem to have missed that point. 3) You invoke scientism as the solution: "Scientific studies with large sample sizes and hard empirica…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:40 PM
7

It's normal for a guy your age to be feminist. I was feminist at 15. This may change as you age and see how many extra rights and privileges that women already have over men. I was biologically ready for sex at 13, and had the opportunity at 17 with my girlfriend at the time, but I said no, because I felt that I wasn't ready. I was 19 when I had sex for the first time. I am lucky that I had the opportunity to choose when I felt ready, and I would want that to be the case for all other boys and y…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:30 PM
30

You shouldn't be aggressive to me. You shouldn't be violent to me. You shouldn't be an asshole to me. FIFY. Women generally want a guy who can stand up to her, protect her from harm, and "do the heavy lifting" both physically and emotionally. That de facto requires him to be able to be an asshole to other people who may be a threat to her. But not be an asshole to her. It's encompassed in romantic fiction - the taming of the beast/vampire/psychopath by a woman, so that he is docile towards her, …
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:23 PM
12

What's so sad is that you're absolutely right. With a wave of the hand, a feminist might dismiss the double suffering of men as men's own fault. Catch-22. Kafka-trapped. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:01 PM
96

I'm still blown away by this comment on a post at /askmen https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/yy2rcv/comment/iwsae0r/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 "Men who encourage other men not to open up to women, why?" You think you're ready. You're not ready. You're ready for a few manly tears, like Grey Worm admitting he was afraid to lose Missandei. You're not ready for ugly-crying, lying in the foetal position and rocking, going to pieces, being unable to function. You're not r…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:03 AM
5

Guarantee that your wife doesn't know when the gutters need cleaning, or when the car has a minor squeak that means something's wrong. Why doesn't she just know this shit!
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:00 AM
1

Reading my comment back it does appear as if I am saying "attach yourself to the loonies", but I didn't mean that. I meant to distance oneself from the loonies and appear reasonable by comparison.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 12:33 PM
7

In my mind, feminism is an ideology because it has within it the idea that a utopia will magically be created if "Patriarchy is smashed", or "equal rights for women" occurs, or some such thing. It has an element of magical thinking that has no basis in real life. I do not see that magical thinking in Men's Rights advocacy.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:50 AM
5

Well the reason I asked is that generally ideologies are seen as having some kind of utopian thinking within their belief structure. Men's rights - and advocacy in that regard - does not require that.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:54 AM
23

I'm another one who is a contrarian. I disagree. My reasoning is simple: The Overton Window (the range of "allowable" socially acceptable thoughts) can be shifted simply by the loudest person in the room. Feminists are shouting their heads off, and us men are quietly, meekly saying "er, that doesn't sound rational". Who gets more air time? Feminists. And that pushes the acceptable range ever-further towards the radical left. You REALLY want men's rights? Organise a group of hard-line extremists …
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:28 AM
10

I would be interested to hear how you define an ideology as distinct from, let's say, a grounded set of beliefs about how the world is.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:17 AM
12

As you dive further and further into the abyss, you'll come across absolute proof that feminists have simply made up the entire of their schtick and are gaslighting men. For example, one of the most common things I come across with feminists is the idea that "women have been oppressed (by men) forever". Yet within feminists' own writings you find such gems as Mary Wollstonecraft, who in her 1792 book "On The Rights Of Women" openly said that women are not to be contradicted in society, and tacit…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:38 PM
39

Meanwhile, women's (IP) violence against men seems to be at record highs, and NO ONE is talking about it...
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:53 PM
1

Like others have pointed out, nature has a "honeymoon" period of around 7 years, after which time the happy hormones wear off. Talking to older couples, you find that there ARE secrets to a long marriage, and some of them include not trying to correct your partner's mistakes. One man in his 80s was asked the secret to his happy marriage, only to tell the reporter that it wasn't all happy, they had had difficult patches, one of which was 10 years long that they hated each other. Can you even imag…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 06:47 PM
1

I agree with you that our societal religious value systems have been eroded. But that doesn't mean there are no value systems at all, or that people generally don't need or want them. You may be aware that Islam is the fastest growing religion. One reason for that is that it provides a value system for those who need one but didn't have one. We see feminists converting to Islam (Sinaed OConnor) after realizing that their promiscuous lack-of-value system didn't work for them. Likewise we see the …
/r/MensRights18/03/23 05:13 PM
2

I figured lol. Just having a joke. But yeah, the original feminists were actually terrorists.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:40 PM
1

Nice! I had never come across that before you suggested it. Now I am wiser.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:20 PM
2

So you go around burning buildings, throwing bricks through store windows and killing people? Nice!
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:01 PM
7

I agree that it is all to do with the wording of the survey questions. Do you believe in equality? Yes? You're a feminist. No? You're a far-right misogynist incel.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 02:57 PM
17

Feminism is tribal. Everyone looks to find their tribe, but feminism has an advantage over other tribal belief systems in that its members automatically side with each other on the basis of their body type. "Hurt women" is feminism's tribal basis. So you'll find women who feel hurt agreeing with it, as they have found their tribe. As an aside it is a reason why men will NEVER have a movement for them that resembles feminism, as men are required to not be hurt.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 05:36 AM
16

Maybe ask her what actual human rights she thinks men have that women don't, and watch her flounder. She'll say something like the wage gap, or period poverty, neither of which are human rights. Then you come back with the actual human rights that women have that men don't, and watch her head explode. Be proud to be male. It's a noble profession.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:27 AM
3

I get what you're saying, but we have had robust governing systems in place since the time of Jesus, making your challenge sort of a silly one. What is interesting is that we see the Pareto principle in place in the natural world, particularly in other primates, and we are now seeing it in humans, since the breakdown of the old social strictures.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:15 AM
16

I agree. Although nature tends towards a pareto distribution where a tiny proportion of men get lots of women, and many men get no women, society is better served when the split is generally 1:1 Hordes of young, frustrated men without partners tends to lead to rioting.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:52 PM
11

There is a biological reason for women having low body counts that seems to be instinctively known by both men and women. Biologically, mostly due to women having a "receptacle" that contains fluids for hours or even days, there is a higher likelihood of a woman contracting an STI from a man, and a lower likelihood of a man contracting an STI from a woman. This alone skews the disease burden on to women, making it in humanity's best interests for women to guard their sexuality and keep their num…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:23 PM
5

There is a society-wide general lack of understanding about what emotions men feel, when they feel them and how. There is then a complete lack of knowledge about the way in which men a) deal with their emotions, and b) share them when they run out of their own options. Further to that, as this AskMen subreddit thread shows, when men do actually finally open up to women, those women run off pretty quickly. Other men aren't usually equipped to deal with that level of opening up either. So yeah, we…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:33 PM
2

, I'm not saying that raising a baby isn't the most difficult job in the world but it's not easy. Physically demanding jobs are hard for a couple hours but raising a newborn with a stay at home parent is a hard 24/7 I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and suggest that your double negative in the first sentence wasn't what you intended. However, the second sentence is plain wrong. Feeding/caring for a baby is disrupting for parents for the first few months, but the parents have a lot to do wi…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:12 PM
222

This is female dating strategy 101. You're obviously a catch, and the trashing of you by your dates - to other women - is a way to "get back at you" for not choosing them. They want to hurt you, by chasing off all other women from your life. It's about the worst thing women can do, and it seems like it's automatic. There is NOTHING rational about this, and although you dodged a massive bullet, it still scarred you. No one is policing those women. However, in your favor, you seem to have an insti…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:13 PM
2

More information needed. I "got in trouble" in Australia after my ex took a hammer to her own leg, photographed the bruising, then went to the police and said it was me. Without any evidence to the contrary (and the police there believe the "victim" - only if she is a woman), I was advised that even though my Barrister had seen her fake all sorts of other things that were now on court record, I would not be believed by the court and it was much easier, quicker and cheaper to agree to a peace bon…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:33 PM
1

That's not exactly true. Having recently been awarded Permanent Residency in Canada, I can tell you that ALL police records show up and can be a problem later. I don't have a criminal record, but I was arrested during my divorce after she falsely accused me of domestic violence. That was 15 years ago in Australia. I entered a peace bond which expired 14 years ago. Previously, governments would look at, say, the last 10 years and ask if you had any criminal convictions in that time. Now, they ask…
/r/MensRights15/03/23 04:29 PM
5

I am in the unique position of having been a SAHD and also having worked in the oil industry standing over the wellheads snapping pipe and rod together. 12 hrs of grift, 10 days out of 14, ongoing, but often more in order to catch up on the backload. Your wrists, elbows, forearms, shoulders and back hurt like a mutha. One wrong move and you've lost a finger. Fall off the rig, you're not coming home without an ambulance. Raising a 0-1yo? Dead easy. Feed, change. Repeat. You really need some life …
/r/MensRights15/03/23 12:53 PM
5

The deleted user is a troll. Keeps baiting and then deleting their comments to avoid downvotes (in their own words).
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:34 PM
3

So you admit that men wear dresses. That's a start. You also admit that men wear face coloring (which is what makeup is, sweetie). Women definitely contribute to the patriarchy but men created it Black feminist writer bell hooks disagrees with you. "Patriarchal thinking shapes the values of our culture. We are socialized into this system, females as well as males. Most of us learned patriarchal attitudes in our family of origin, and they were usually taught to us by our mothers." Mothers perpetr…
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:10 PM
5

Because, according to -deleted guy- testosterone is socially constructed lol
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:05 PM
0

Weirdly, men use makeup in war games (such as NFL or action shooting games). Guess you forgot that. Men wear dresses. This is mostly cultural. The Scottish have worn a quasi-dress for 1000 years? The entire Muslim population wears a quasi-dress. Indonesians wear quasi-dresses. They are useful in agrarian societies with no toilet facilities, where you can just pop a squat anywhere. But we don't live in such a society, meaning there is no biological need for a dress. Guess you hadn't noticed that …
/r/MensRights13/03/23 02:59 PM
2

To stop this fruitless conversation in its tracks, what we have found is that in the countries where the greatest efforts have been made to reduce the social stigmas and inequalities surrounding masculinity/femininity, masculine/feminine traits actually maximize. This would indicate that there are inherent biological underpinnings of masculine and feminine behaviours (and thus masculinity and femininity). They aren't social constructs, they are biological in origin - with a disclaimer that socia…
/r/MensRights13/03/23 02:47 PM
1

Wrong sub.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 02:15 AM
5

So you're saying you don't remember your father being present? How did that make you feel?
/r/MensRights12/03/23 03:35 PM
12

Lol. "Men in the ghettos just need to share their emotions more" to stop crime.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:33 PM
1

OP is self-described BPD, which may explain the absolute lack of empathy, and the selfish outlook on the situation (how do I get the hugs back, how do I get him to love me again, me me me). My ex is BPD, and it was always about her being the victim, despite her actually creating her own situations herself. I will go further by analogy with my ex. Her mother and her sister were also totally screwed up people, and the triad would constantly be battling with each other to manipulate people and cont…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:28 PM
27

"There are better DV services for women because they fought harder for them." "There are better salaries for men because they fought harder for them."
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:58 AM
15

Another factor is that women tend to have more difficulty with negative emotions. In the link, there is a graph showing that in Europe, women score an average of 2.95 on the scale of "neuroticism", compared to men's 2.45 The ratio is interesting! 2.95 : 2.45 = 1.20 64% : 49% = 1.30 The actual difference is [1.30:1.20] = 1.08 : 1.00 Women are 8% more likely to be told to cheer up, accounting for their increased level of negativity. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 08:23 PM
38

Don't click on the article. You'll see this disclaimer at the bottom: Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting Yeah. Not allowed to disagree with this one.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 04:55 PM
7

Ha! Perhaps they just mean "equality between women"? Certainly looks that way.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 05:08 AM
40

How can anyone "strive to achieve gender-equal representation in all corners of our business" in the same tweet as proudly proclaiming "75% of our leadership team are people identifying as women" and "74% of our staff are people identifying as women"? Oh wait, it's the City of Calgary. Yep, that explains it. The same city whose new mayor just imposed an $87bn tax on its residents to make the city carbon-neutral by 2050. The same city that is the white-collar hub of the Canadian oil industry. Yea…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 10:01 PM
14

You can have an opinion as long as it's the right opinion.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 06:58 PM
1

Hehe. You're right, I didn't explain myself at all. It IS horribly expensive in most countries. There IS indoctrination - most universities require mandatory "sensitivity" or diversity training. Often this training is one-sided and in some cases is blatantly sexist (men get "anti-rape training, but women don't). Some universities have banned words (Cardiff Metropolitan, I'm looking at you) Other universities give unearned advantages to women (Oxford Uni I'm looking at you - 15 mins extra on exam…
/r/MensRights07/03/23 02:01 PM
2

Thank you. I rarely receive compliments about my writing, and some of my writing is truly off the wall, so it's nice to hear that this one was good. Thank you again!
/r/MensRights07/03/23 03:03 AM
2

Exactly. There are other reasons for keeping to 1 man, 1 woman all the way across society, not least being that if you have 60% of young men alone and sexless, they tend to riot.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:40 AM
1

You're very kind to say that. Did this one miss the mark?
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:16 AM
1

Haha! I DO do that,
/r/MensRights07/03/23 01:12 AM
10

Or does it? That's kind of what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 12:38 AM
3

Just made a comment on a newer post, but it is equally relevant here: Basically, anything a feminist is saying about men is actually the truth about women. It's all projection and gaslighting. Next time you hear a feminist talk, turn her complaint around and see if she is (or women generally are) doing the same thing. I'll be right 95% of the time.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:59 PM
26

Basically, anything a feminist is saying about men is actually the truth about women. It's all projection and gaslighting. Next time you hear a feminist talk, turn her complaint around and see if she is (or women generally are) doing the same thing. I'll be right 95% of the time.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:54 PM
10

Crazy. And that's the overt, publicly accepted mutilation sanctioned by the government. If you were to look at the expanded definition of "domestic violence" within the context of relations, the government is actually the abuser of all men - forcing them to do stuff against their will, financially crippling them, etc. and finally gaslighting them by saying that it's not happening and that they need to "man up".
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:33 PM
6

You're right, I'm not actually a proponent of the "infinite growth" model. We have a finite space, we need a finite population. I only provide the arguments that more growth is possible to point out the fallacy of the Malthusians (who have been arguing for 300 years that the population is too big, and have been proven wrong for all that time). My dad is a Malthusian and strongly believes that we already have too many people on the planet, and we need to cull numbers. I asked if he would be willi…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 07:55 PM
1

You sound well versed in science. Having seen that the temperature increases on other planets and moons is up to 90% of the temperature increase on Earth, we must conclude that at least 90% of the warming on Earth is extra-terrestrial in origin. Not man-made. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] I accept that. So we're now down to the last 10% of temperature rise. Is it man-made? Hard to say. The Earth is not a closed system (as the Greenhouse idea might have you believe). It is an open system. The Earth off…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 07:09 PM
1

I probably didn't write clearly enough, so for that I apologize. I agree with you that I believe that most women will want natural conception. But we know that there are drugs that, if given to pre-pubescent children, will interrupt their natural puberty and leave them infertile, even if all other signs of puberty seem normal. It is not beyond the realms of dystopian thinking that entire generations of children will be "accidentally" given something that leaves them infertile as adults.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:52 PM
3

I tend to be a skeptic where opinions are broadly "it will only be used for [insert small demographic]" Not so long ago (within my lifetime anyway) the world was horrified at the thought of tracking devices that could tell your every move to within a foot. At that time it was being suggested for only the most violent offenders out on parole, and didn't include heartrate, pace cadence, etc. Now we have wristwatches and phones that do all of that and more, and everyone has them. It didn't stop at …
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:39 PM
0

Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:32 PM
2

My personal opinion is DON'T get a degree. Several reasons: 1) it's horribly expensive 2) it doesn't make you stand out 3) it won't teach you anything useful, with a few minor exceptions 4) it will indoctrinate you Seriously, if you want to change the world, live the change, be an example, show others how to do it. Tell a woman "no", see how that goes for you. The experience will be worth more than 3 years of study, right there.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:31 PM
18

I agree with you that there is an apex fallacy, and that 80% of men are deemed unattractive by women. But I suspect that has always been the case. It's nothing new. As for: Because there certainly is a lot to be worried about across the board: a growing population combined with finite essential resources like fresh water, the threat of viral pandemics, climate change, the energy crisis, AI and other dangerous technological advances, hyperinflation and the threat of an extended economic depressio…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:16 PM
18

Wow she hit the wall hard. Finally some news to counter the hateful "To violence against women, Australia says NO".
/r/MensRights06/03/23 05:12 AM
23

I recently worked for a mining company in a rough country town where the local crime solving was knee-capping the perp, rather than informing the police. The company used a woke app to track sign in times, and it had a space for pronouns. I knew the HR lady well enough to joke with her, and I told her my pronouns were Sir and Your Lordship. She lost it laughing. Glad someone in HR still gets it.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 11:23 PM
10

Yes, it would imply that most ballons are blue. It's a quirk of the way the sentence is constructed: All balloons are blue. (Positive, absolute) Not all balloons are blue (denying absolute) literally only need 1 balloon to be not blue out of trillions to confirm this statement, hence tacitly confirming a large majority It is different from saying some balloons are blue, which is not absolute, and implies usually less than a majority of balloons.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 11:18 PM
17

There are some semantics at work which could explain the difference. killallmen is an active statement encouraging a call-to-arms from a population famous for doing very little, which in fact makes it an ironic statement because they never will do that and they know it too well notallmen is a retaliatory statement trying unsuccessfully to rebut a falsehood Here's the thing about the second statement: it is also a falsehood. It's usually used in the case of "all men are.... [rapists/aggressive/wi…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:09 PM
7

I think there are screen readers you can get, might be fairly easy to do. There's a free one called Jaws, I think?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 05:10 PM
10

"Humans have bodies" "Humans have heads" "Humans have arms" "Humans have two dimorphic sexes" "Men are characterized by penises, testes, and generally a 60% hip to shoulder ratio" "Women are characterized by uteruses, ovaries, milk-producing mammary glands, and generally a 66% hip to waist ratio" need I go on?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:47 PM
13

Is sexism though? Is it sexist to tell the truth? Do we need to wrap women up in a cuddly blanket and tell them how wonderful they are all the time? No. They are adults. Mollycoddling them is treating women as children - exactly how Esther Vilar says women like to be treated! She's telling the truth, which makes it not sexist.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:06 PM
4

To answer this question: "Do you think the gap in education...is due to gender?" The education system in most western countries was changed in the 1980s, from a system of many years of study followed by a single exam (which boys tend to excel at) to a system of continuous grading ("coursework"). Part of the overall grade of this continuous grading is given for neat handwriting and class etiquette (not interrupting, sitting still for long periods, etc.) all of which girls excel at. Literally, the…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:04 PM
11

It can't be sexist if a woman wrote it, about women.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:58 PM
46

Holy fuck, I just started reading it on your advice! Wow! Text-only version here https://archive.org/stream/Djinn_201906/THE%20POLYGAMOUS%20SEX%20ESTHER%20VILAR%20OCR%20PDF%20%20for%20translators_djvu.txt Unlike women, says Esther Vilar, men can love several partners at one time. And the reason behind it is the opportunistic attitude of women. A woman will pretend to be a child in need of protection by the man. She virtually puts herself up for 'adoption'. In this way she forces him into polygam…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:48 PM
11

No idea why I got downvoted already. My comment history should persuade redditors that I don't put women on a pedestal, or give any free passes. The book is hilarious because it's so fucking true! You'll either have to laugh or cry. I chose to laugh. It's brutal on women, truly brutal. Absolutely the opposite of what we are so used to hearing from feminists. "Oh, so strong and brave!" [Esther Vilar: "To guarantee material security and allow a woman to seem helpless and incapable of earning a liv…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 03:44 PM
7

I have seen OP respond once or twice. She claims she has slept with 21 men, but that her sister told her husband it was 100 or more after the sister's fiance made a move on OP (Sister was mad with OP, not her fiance). OP claims she actively refused the attempted kiss. Something still doesn't add up. I have seen my own grandmother flirt mercilessly with my aunt's husband (i.e. her own daughter's husband!). Sisters will flirt with each other's partners, sometimes for fun, sometimes as a shit-test,…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:52 PM
32

Those are direct quotes from the book, they are not mine! Hehe
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:46 PM
7

Droopy tits energy
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:32 PM
2

That backdrop behind the newscaster at 0:15 looks like they paint with a tampon.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:32 PM
7

I snorted my coffee! Best comment.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter