TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pilotIet Archive

View 0 posts and 577 comments by pilotIet on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Of course. If you're ugly, it's rape. If you're not ugly, it's just a courtship game to see the strength and potential of that man. Never pay attention to what they say, but to what they do.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:33 PM
12

I am a man and being that is the best. I have never felt bad about being a man and I love being a man. The problem with being a man is what is expected of you, what you want to do with your life and what you want in general. It would be more complicated to have a mind with constant emotional short circuits governed by frequent hormonal processes and constant dissatisfaction.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 04:32 PM
3

It’s based on 50s style relationships between men and women and therefore not that relevant to most people today. You’d be better off reading one of the authors more recent books. It continues to have permanence because regardless of old relationships and dynamics, that instinct of manipulation and exploitation of man remains through what is materially available. Today, women can change husbands just like they change tissues, and the truth is that marriage has become obsolete but with very simil…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:51 PM
33

There is a correlation.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 01:46 PM
3

Little by little, but I think we will not reach that state since developed countries will end up being colonized.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:33 PM
36

The curious thing is that people think more about Jews than about Muslims, who are a larger minority in many countries and it is a religion with enormously larger numbers of followers than Judaism.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:31 PM
7

Women have always been like this. Now, they have the freedom to do what they want, and the security of not being questioned, because they have not only rights, but also privileges. If it were up to women, most of us would be enslaved while a minority of men inseminate everyone.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:27 PM
6

It is a fairly old book with few editions. So it is best to search through different bookstores and regular sellers on different platforms. Here in Spain, the cheapest book can cost $70, and it is old, second-hand and in dubious condition.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 12:25 PM
49

Permanent minors.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 10:35 AM
3

Indeed, they only want "equality" on those comfy jobs with artificial quotas. If a woman works hard to get those jobs, she deserved it more than anyone else, but hey, let's create quotas so they access jobs they are not good enough.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 06:01 PM
2

That's how it is.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 05:59 PM
13

Women are solipsists.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:42 AM
18

Because only the man they admire (millionaire Chad) is the privileged man: that is, the one who would not choose them, among all the women and they have many more possibilities.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 02:41 AM
1

No matter the time, always reject a woman's opinion, because they will never have anything to tell us about ourselves.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:52 AM
1

No, it means that's how society works, by biology, conditioning and both. The gulf countries are successful and prosperous, another thing is their respect for individual freedom, it is irrelevant to this debate.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:38 PM
0

We're talking about 1st world countries here. Countries in Europe and North America have less men. You have not specified. And no, there are no succesful countries that practice polygamy. That's bullshit. Name one if you're so sure of yourself. Gulf countries are quite successful. And no, what you say isn't reality. It's anti-male propaganda. No? What world do you live in? Isn't man disposable in himself on the sexual, emotional, professional, military and social levels? Big cope.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 06:09 PM
0

There are successful and unsuccessful countries with both monogamous and polygamous practices. Economic factors like resource management, infrastructure, and education play a larger role in prosperity. As of 2024, there are 4,103,612,213, or 4,104 million, or 4.10 billion, males in the world, representing 50.28% of the world population. The population of females in the world is estimated at 4,058,360,359, or 4,058 million, or 4.06 billion, representing 49.72% of the world population. The world h…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:43 PM
6

No, men are just braincucked by a society dominated by women's dominion. Everything is misogyny, including breathing nowadays. WOMEN DETECTED, OPINION REJECTED. Repeat this until death because it is the only thing men need to understand from women. And who said I represent the men here? I represent myself and people may agree or disagree with me.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:30 PM
1

The basic concept of communism literally is total equality, and the idea is to have everything managed in a way where everyone is awarded equally for their work. This is a pretty idealistic view of communism. The reality is that communism is built on the assumption that people will work selflessly for the common good. But, historically, this hasn’t played out well. It sounds great in theory, but in practice, it turns out that centralizing control in the hands of a few creates immense power imbal…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:27 PM
1

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 05:20 PM
3

Human sexual relationships -all the things regarding how people meet each other and end up fucking or having relationships- are based on a pure market of sexual selection, which usually is ruled by a woman in a dual mating strategy, where women are willing to attract the most handsome and richest -or the one who provides best-. Since a woman desires the best genetics for her offspring and at the same the man who can bring up the most resources, women nowadays just need to focus on the best genet…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 04:49 PM
47

Women just need to exist. Tutorial mode.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:32 PM
2

Good bot.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:31 PM
6

It's impossible. One is, it is not a process of being in order to be something else. Either one is, or one is not.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:30 PM
3

Meeting the physical-emotional need.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:28 PM
21

Truly, women do not need to think of themselves as part of a sexual market because they are the sexual selectors. Solipsism. reasonably attractive. Most men are not attractive to most women. Wake up.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:28 PM
13

You need to understand that the sexual market is different for men and women, both in how it works and in their strategies. What a man can expect and achieve is different from what a woman can expect and achieve. In this sexual market of supply and demand, a woman essentially offers herself to the highest bidder and can usually get attention from thousands of men. This oversupply, especially driven by social media, has inflated the value of women because accessing them is extremely hard and labo…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 02:08 PM
1

Likewise. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:56 PM
1

No, I am not creating any reality of my own. All the values I have mentioned are studied, analyzed and have a statistical and easily studied, unlike the abstraction that one determines the totality of reality on the basis of one's own thinking.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:54 PM
1

The reality of men and women are not even comparable. The fact that your life has changed is irrelevant to the fundamental nature of reality. Just because you’ve constructed a narrative that works for you doesn’t make it universally applicable or valid. Your personal experience doesn’t equate to a universal truth, especially if you to advice men, who live a different reality from yours. Claiming that truth doesn’t have to be hard if you don’t want it to be is a convenient excuse to ignore the ha…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:53 PM
1

Again: self-indulgent fantasy. The world doesn’t adjust to personal whims or idealistic dreams. It operates on hard facts, market dynamics, and societal forces that don’t care about your feelings or preferences, unless you, are most valuable element on the markets, so you live in another reality that most men do not. This notion that you can mold reality to fit your desires is nothing more than escapism. The real world is unforgiving and operates independently of our personal narratives. You’re …
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:40 PM
1

Do you live with their mother?
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:36 PM
30

Attractive: flirting. Ugly: harassment. Water is wet.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:27 PM
1

Your response is pure fantasy, wrapped up in self-help nonsense. You talk about living in a reality of your own design like you can just wish away the actual world and all its hard truths. That’s not wisdom; that’s delusion. Reality doesn’t bend to your whims or your so-called "co-creation." The world is what it is, and pretending otherwise doesn’t change a damn thing. You can play these mental gymnastics all you want, but it doesn’t alter the fact that human beings operate in a social framework…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:23 PM
1

I perfectly understand that you, as a Romanian, have linguistic limitations, but, repeating over and over again the same thing without refuting the arguments just makes you a clown with clear mental deficiencies.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:19 PM
1

Your response is a textbook case of someone burying their head in the sand, clinging to a fantasy world where everything is wrapped in a pretty little bow. Reality doesn’t give a damn about how you think things *should* be. The real world isn’t some playground for your idealistic whims; it’s brutal, it’s unfair, and it doesn’t care about your feelings. You want to "make yourself a hero" in a world of make-believe? Good luck with that. While you’re off chasing your utopian dreams, the rest of us …
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:18 PM
1

First off, the claim that "the problem with communism and Marxism isn't the concept of it" is laughably naive. The problem is exactly the concept. Marxism, at its core, is about the violent overthrow of the existing social order. It’s not about "equality and meritocracy": it’s about class warfare, the abolition of private property, and the centralization of power in the hands of the state. The idea that you can somehow separate the ideology from the authoritarianism it inevitably breeds is delus…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:16 PM
1

No, the market is about supply and demand, and it is demand that determines value, regardless of whether they are highly rationalized or irrationally made decisions.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:08 PM
1

No, it is precisely the human being and the rest of the elements that are pushed under extreme conditioning based on their initial material conditions, from their physical appearance to their intelligence going through their problem-solving ability. As I told another user, human beings have socially imposed rights and duties in the search for social harmony.The rest is morality. A morality that is easily dismantled in the face of general trends and what people generally choose. The value is dete…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:07 PM
1

On the contrary, it is the market that imposes its will regardless of how you feel. Practical use does not determine anything, but supply and demand does; Therefore, the greater the supply, the lower the price, and the greater the demand, the higher the price, Added to this dichotomy is the difficulty of access to these demanded elements, that is, a shortage of supply.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 01:02 PM
1

You wanna talk objective reality? Nothing on this planet has any objective value, everything is meaningless space dust! Value is objective when the elements under supply and demand are quantified. A bottle of cold water in the desert while you are dehydrating has a high value; In a world where those needs are met, water is not so expensive. And this is objectively determined by the market, supply and demand. Just excuses to rationalize being a cowardly conformist. Nothing to be done. The most th…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:59 PM
1

Through repetition, simple examples, and with a development over time.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:47 PM
1

It's not that I think it, it is what it is. Human beings are social beings, even if they want to live alone in a kind of parallel reality and deceive themselves about their worth. The human being is social because he survives in society, he feeds himself through society, he works through society, he reproduces through society and his life revolves around society. No, human life is much more complex than Walmart, because unlike Walmart, human beings have characteristics that are difficult or impo…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:46 PM
2

Yes. Because it is supply and demand that determines the market value, whether it is a loaf of bread, your salary, your sexual success or even whether you are using a mobile phone right now. This is how reality works.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:37 PM
1

Women put threshold because they are natural selectors. And they tend to generalize the men at the top as the reality of all men when those men are a statistically negligible minority.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:36 PM
1

Yes, it is, as has been expressed. It is one more value among many easily measurable values. From sex, to work, to relationships... Is not answered. Is not answered. If I can do it, I am not the totality of reality, it is the whole of reality is what determines things, not what I do. A thought is not a pattern, The ideal is not the common, and the common has little value because it is easily found.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:32 PM
1

No, that universe does not exist. I have a value based on what can be demanded of me. Whether it is in the sexual, work, economic, or video game realm, and even if people deny it in the competitive hierarchy in which we made. Again, you, as a woman, are trapped in a solipsism where you seek to universalize the totality of reality based on your thinking, while no matter how much you think otherwise, the sun always will rise from the east.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:28 PM
1

You confuse self-esteem with objective market value. The sexual instinct and the desire for company and forming families is a value that many people feel, and very few achieve. The value of a man objectively on the sexual level is how many women are interested in him, In the case of women, if they can get the best value. This is a market for many, just like in the job market where being objectively attractive brings more benefits than being intelligent and productive a priori. There is no "self-…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:25 PM
1

Yes, it is because: Most men will not reproduce. There have been more women who have reproduced than men (most have been concubines or wives in polygynous marriages). In the current state of things, now that marriage and the morality that prevailed decades ago have died, man no longer has anywhere near the emotional and sexual opportunities of yesteryear. like yourself who can’t bring themselves to value another person further than what you can get from them. Men can do it, I can do it. Most wom…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:20 PM
1

And it is clear that you have not understood anything, because the platitudes and the value that one gives oneself are irrelevant to material reality. You, as a woman, want to impose your thoughts on reality, while what a man stands out for is precisely to subject thought to reality. For that very reason, man as a whole has built the world that surrounds you, and woman has only been an efficient parasite.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:05 PM
1

Just as a man cannot sense a woman's menstruation, a woman can never sense male disposability. The men you value are a statistical minority, despicable for your actions to be relevant to a general trend.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:01 PM
0

I am neither a conformist nor a tradcon. Reality is what it is regardless of your wishes, and that's the problem with copers like you, You live in a parallel reality while you want to deny the reality that is, in itself. You alone do nothing, nor can you change anything. Nor can many things that affect men be changed because in essence it would be taking away women's freedom of choice.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 12:00 PM
0

Your particular experience does not determine the totality of reality. What you believe or stop believing is irrelevant. Why would you want to continue believing that? Maybe it has momentum for you, or you are hanging around too many people that believe men are disposable? Because it is a reality. At the work level, at the social level and even at the interpersonal level, man is considered nothing more than an entity that provides, from whom everything is expected. If we say that the belief that…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:55 AM
-1

Fuck you too, sweetheart. Use value is a Marxist concept. And it is false. The market determines the value of the offer through a demand. Most men are wageslaves whose highest value is that they are as cheap as possible to be exploited. This is not something desirable, but it is what it is, and it happens with everything, from work to interpersonal relationships to sex. Cars are not more valuable than diamonds because diamonds have a higher trade-in value than most cars on the market because the…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:37 AM
1

The fact that you are a woman is precisely what makes you not even remotely understand the struggle of men.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:33 AM
5

Misandry, unlike misogyny, exists in the same way that hatred of men occurs precisely because of their sexual, economic, and social uselessness. Thus, it is no coincidence that most misandrists are women. Let's be clear; the women on Reddit are many of them morbidly obese men-hating women because Chad probably fucked her and left her after the pump and dump, because they are lesbians with serious mental problems, or some kind of abusive father-boyfriend who has left them. So remember: women dete…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 11:06 AM
2

Market value is determined by social demanders, not the value that one wants to give oneself subjectively.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:58 AM
2

Males are disposable, regardless of what we believe or what we want things to be. as a mother of two sons myself It's as if I as a man were to talk about menstruation and say "menstruation is neither painful nor uncomfortable because I have never had a period," it's pure solipsism. A man's value is built, while a woman's value is already there from birth. Denying this under platitudes and self-help phrases does not change the fact that most men are just pack mules who are easily disposable and r…
/r/MensRights12/08/24 10:56 AM
14

The classic "Are we dating the same Chad?" promoted and defended by social media corporations versus "How to overcome suicide to the expectation of being a failure as a man?" banned communities. What a world be living in.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:29 PM
16

It started as a redpill concept, though. That's why I recognize the redpillers on this concept before the blackpillers.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:23 PM
72

Alpha fucks, beta bucks. Classic redpill.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 12:13 PM
8

No one blames women for this, but rather how the State privileges women over men. Only on the subject of love and interpersonal relationships could someone criticize the attitude of women and yet, whoever does this is because they do not know feminine nature and how, It is assumed that she is a mental minor.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 12:09 AM
7

I prefer Urology. Good afternoon.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:17 PM
6

Are you arguing that women DID evolve to see men only as tools for resource provision? Yes, resource and/or sexual provision: dual mating strategy and Briffault's law.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 07:02 PM
52

No empathy for your face, she said.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 06:21 PM
1

Chad only.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:28 PM
2

No one deserves anything, but as sexual selectors, they can afford to demand $100 for a piece of mint gum. Another thing is that they find buyers.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 04:27 PM
3

Nobody is perfect. But for a reason, they are the ones who come to our countries and not the opposite to cause problems and screw everything up, and all thanks to leftists, who always want to import their failed model. The truth does not help. It is what it is.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 06:44 PM
1

Cross our fingers.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:01 PM
3

White immigrants are not causing this disorder wherever they go, like other races are doing, like Moroccans and blacks in Spain. It is not a problem of racism that the majority of people who cause problems are of certain ethnicities.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 04:01 PM
0

Understandable, hero.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:05 PM
15

At least we're not quarantined, like the Redpill subreddit. These feminist cucks will never learn.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:05 PM
10

Lovely copypasting.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:04 PM
1

I am from Europe, and I tell you that yes, the whites are indeed partly responsible for its replacement, but not complete, and I'm talking about my country, Spain. Illegal and irregular immigration is increasingly overwhelming, large companies prefer to have blacks at the price of slavery to lower their production costs while they live in warehouses with 10 more black men in a 10 squared meters flat. And not only are they screwing up the labor market, but they represent a huge burden in taxes be…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:54 AM
13

Only losers complain. That is the mentality that they seek to impose and furthermore, they want to make other men believe.How can it be that man's stoicism for women is possibly the best attitude for her? Why should your house slave complain?
/r/MensRights01/08/24 10:06 AM
0

If apocalypse every comes, men will die and women would be kept safe because of their reproductive value. My theory is that women would be enslaved and used as commodities, because when there is no law, all possible restrictions die. Returning, perhaps, to a more primitive state where female empowerment is not protected by the artificiality of a State.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:24 AM
6

No civil war. (((THEY))) have been very clever giving a lot of copes to incels so they do not rise in a revolt, being, them, in fact, less violent than real misogynists who have plenty of women to fuck. What we can already know at least in Europe is that Islam is expanding demographically while Europeans prefer to have more dogs than children to rise our nations. They prefer to lower more and more wages, everything is more and more expensives and it is sooner or later to be absolutely fucked up.…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 12:06 AM
1

Verily FDS can be very original.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:24 PM
2

That's it.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 05:23 PM
1

Unlucky.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:42 PM
2

Ticket prices would increase and it is not feasible.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:42 PM
1

Nah, I am looking for Chad. 👀
/r/MensRights31/07/24 02:33 PM
3

Just be Chad theory.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 02:01 PM
33

Leave those places, d'uh! You're just feeding that cuck part inside you watching how women talk about 80% of men as useless scrotums
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:48 PM
9

5€ that this shit will not go further.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:39 PM
6

The surplus is 70 million men. Imagine the competition that must be.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:00 PM
34

They would lose money, which is not efficient, so this kind of stupidity won't go any further.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:59 PM
-10

Nobody cares except some Muslims, maybe.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:57 PM
-11

So? And if they screw me, then I'll change airlines. Easy.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:56 PM
-29

I don't see it as bad. Maybe it's the best thing that could happen to me on a flight, not because I dislike a woman, but because it's simply more comfortable to be seated next to another man.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:06 PM
13

Interwiener.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:23 PM
20

Everyone prefers belief to the exercise of judgement. —Lucius Annaeus Seneca
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:22 PM
3

Morality is about what's right and wrong in terms of benefiting people and societies, like promoting fairness and kindness. Ethics, on the other hand, often relate to how systems and institutions maintain control and may not always align with what's morally good. So, when we say religions have moral codes, we're talking about their attempts to define right and wrong, which can influence behavior and culture. It’s not about their survival or control, but rather their attempt to guide what’s consi…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 06:53 PM
5

I said to you that there are no women who stand up for men's rights. The cases are rare, extremely minority or moderately visible cases are pickmes and women who seek to capitalise on men's rights for their interests. To speak of women defending men's rights is to speak somewhat significantly, because that portion is statistically small, almost so small as to be statistically negligible.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 06:50 PM
2

Historically, women have always been focused on their own issues, jumping on men's rights only when it suits them . This isn't about some mythical group of caring women; it's about recognizing that their support often comes with strings attached. The idea that a significant portion genuinely cares about men's rights without self-interest is a nice fairy tale, but reality paints a different picture. Therefore, there are no high-profile, bombastic cases of women defending men, being intellectually…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:56 PM
3

Everything. Morality is about principles of right and wrong behavior, and religions have been laying those down for ages. They've shaped our laws, influenced cultures, and dictated our ethical standards. When you talk about what's fair, just, or good, you're diving into moral territory. Religions have been the moral compass for countless societies, telling people how to act and what values to uphold. Ignoring that is like ignoring the sky is blue. And look, whether you think the moral codes reli…
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:49 PM
3

Claiming religion has nothing to do with morality is just ignoring reality. For centuries, religions have been the go-to for moral rules and guidance. They've shaped laws, influenced cultures, and told people what’s right and wrong. Contradictions? All you may want and wish in religions,, but to say they’re not about morality is like saying water isn’t wet. Whether you believe in them or not, religions have been handing out moral codes forever.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 04:22 PM
4

How much? Women don't genuinely care about men's rights. Historically, they've focused on their own issues and only support men's rights when it benefits them (pickmes). The idea that women support men's rights equally is naive and ignores the fact that most feminist movements have been predominantly self-serving.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 03:40 PM
8

Of course they do. They have their own morality.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 03:39 PM
5

Vague and useless, as always.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 03:13 PM
3

Since when women care about men's rights?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:54 PM
9

So, let's remove oppression and let men also be able to reject fatherhood whenever they want. From a moral point, this is ultimately a question of religions and alternate morality; In the case of true equality, let us make women equally responsible for their actions. Easy.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:53 PM
82

Because your lust and your desire to break your loneliness is highly capitalized, just like that of many men, desperate or not. It never happened to me, but if happened, I do not care. Once you are out of the closet as a gay man, nor is there anything else on my part that could scandalize my family or close circle.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 12:41 AM
7

We must begin to assume the following points. Most women don't wet their panties for most men. As OP says, women show less interest on average than men, that only makes you a slave to dosed sex (I. e. Esther Vilar's books). Under conditions of freedom, this will continue until the most advanced countries become extinct or are replaced by other civilizations. Surely someone has thought about injecting all kinds of things into women or enslaving them, but, really, it's over, gentleman, It's time t…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 10:39 AM
5

Women does not need you, but she does need a mass of male tax-paying slaves who support the State as a provider; Equality is simply an empty term created for something that always escapes analysis: women have more power and freedom than men. Sexually, we already know that if it were up to the majority of women, the majority of men would be castrated and put to work as eunuchs while they share the best possible man in polygamous relationships. It's nothing new, it's pure hypergamy. It is absurd t…
/r/MensRights26/07/24 10:15 AM
8

Therapy is a meme. Some people need medications to correct brain neurochemistry. The rest is assuming how things in this life are broken, do not work, are circumstantial, and "normality" is simply the life that is expected of you, or that you can expect, but cannot access. Is it a social problem and/or is it a brain problem.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 10:06 AM
41

Women exploit men. Easy. That's it. It's not that deep.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:51 AM
10

Lmfao idk If you do not know, why do you answer?
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:46 AM
7

Now post it on r/feminism
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:19 AM
7

Their business.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 12:41 PM
1

My friend, even though you have tried to give me good arguments, I consider that there are flaws that seem contradictory to the points that I have already expressed previously and I will try to give you an antithesis of why the same mistakes continue to be made. Men are as rare as women, without influence. influence that allows women to behave this way, is because we enable them to do so We are undoubtedly social beings, however, what we want to affirm is that society is what permeates instinct …
/r/MensRights23/07/24 12:31 PM
2

Okay, but hypergamy doesn’t work if the m/f population is equal. This does not make sense, my brother, and I would like you to elaborate on this so that I can understand you better. Men and women are not biologically equal and biology permeates behavior. The interests of both sexes are diametrically opposed and equality on a biological level is impossible. With respect to social equality, it is not possible precisely because of the biology of both sexes and also because of the elementary fact th…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 03:34 PM
7

Because it is not a question of perceptions, It is not a question of behaviorism either, but for the first time in history, women not only enjoy full sexual freedoms, but they can also maintain their autonomy and, on top of that, they are supported by a state of well-being through heavy impositive tax-paying. Leaving aside this phenomenon of scarcity, the woman will therefore only be left to choose the best sexual material, hypergamy worsening massively. The great religions have or had their mos…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:16 AM
3

The solution that civilization arrived at to socialize sex was chastity, especially that of women, and severe punishment for extramarital relations (fornication and adultery). In societies where sexual choice is absolutely free and without consequences, the majority of men will not be picked up and it is impossible for there to be a balance, even if we talk about attractive men and selective women. Water is wet, is not it? Briffault's law. Only in scarcity, the woman is afraid of losing her asso…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:04 AM
3

The best award is that you are there, my brother. I love you, thanks for existing.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:18 PM
7

No, it is simply a deeper reflection than this shitty comment to which you have neither given feedback nor antithesis.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 02:25 PM
24

The term feminism has also been prostituted. Where once it was a rather bold ideological debate from structuralism, postmodernism and other philosophers, a woman who today calls herself feminist It only wants to tell itself that it seeks a kind of duality between being able to function in society without any consequences for what it lacks and for what it supposedly should be called accountability. Now, let's reflect together on this dichotomy in which the sexes fight. On the one hand, the main a…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 01:46 PM
11

Thats a long hot shower.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:23 AM
80

How much is "many women"? Two comments?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:49 AM
0

I see.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 11:07 AM
-3

It is logical that there is a certain misandry on Reddit, but one thing must also be recognized. The number of larpers on Reddit is masterful.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:29 AM
5

I have never had misandry problems with other men. Of course, there is always the competition between friends and the good vibes of fighting "friendly". But if you mean socializing with women, well, that's another topic.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:25 AM
36

Yes, indeed how terrifying it must be that there are people who want to end the inequity generated by feminism. Not even Islamic jihadism was so terrifying.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 01:36 AM
7

Cry about It.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 10:35 AM
2

No, thanks.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 10:30 AM
45

"Oh, no, inkwell, if you don't help me it's because you're a misogynist virgin who resents us and wants other men to hit us." How great is the manipulation!
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:03 PM
182

Indeed. It's pure natural selection. Women must be saved so that a statistical minority of men reproduce with them while men must defend themselves to prove their masculinity. The wise man already said it: feminism has precisely achieved that man rises in his own liberation
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:01 PM
-1

Ask yourself if there are more men or women in politics and why happens so.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 12:54 AM
17

In France, private paternity tests are illegal, even if ordered from foreign labs. This means you can't buy a kit online or use an at-home test. It's a big no-no with a potential fine and jail time. And that's unfair and just a way of justifying cuckoldry (the burden is always on men). As you said, paternity tests are legal if ordered by a judge as part of a legal proceeding. HOWEVER, these paternity tests will be dependent on the decision of a judge, and will not be able to represent a burden o…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 04:39 PM
20

In countries like France, both the test and the use of the paternity test as an element of legal and evidentiary burden are illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 03:26 PM
25

It is not an authentic source of reference, but a form of ideologized subjectivism: Some may present men's rights as a loose organization of concern groups dealing with problems such as low funding for testicular cancer or other valid problems that uniquely concern men. Unfortunately, this is not the case. These aren't dealing with "men's issues", but instead with a non-existent problem they call "men's rights". Their primary concern is not supporting one another through uniquely difficult chall…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:58 AM
12

Basically.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 02:39 PM
3

What is the difference between the hasty generalization fallacy and anecdotal evidence fallacy? (scribbr.com)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 05:24 PM
2

Depend which subreddidt I was in, but I was never censored because of saying "blackpill" or talking about it.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 05:13 PM
4

And I understand that Reddit is a platform for expressing your experiences and sharing your opinions, however, we cannot take it as evidence or advice because it does not objectively represent the functioning of the market, even less taking into account how two things are confirmed A man is ugly therefore he has difficulties or no female validation. An ugly man, by magic or infused science, will be more successful because a woman X is bisexual. They have no relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:46 PM
8

First you said you've seen bisexual women dating and then you're redirecting me to another subreddit so I can prove your argument isn't anecdotal evidence by referring to more anecdotal evidence. Don't you see a contradiction in this?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:37 PM
12

Anecdotal evidence is not evidence at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 02:16 PM
6

Straight facts, my brother. Even if people want to downplay the blackpill and say it is misogynist, it is how reality is. Then, people can do with this information whatever they can feel, like starting to target women, but that's irrelevant itself to the reality.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 01:58 PM
11

Let the bl*ckpill guide you. No need to censor it, honestly. I understand that most people cannot accept the hard fact that looks are everything in sociosexual relationships and that the halo effect "builds" the perception of the personality of other people. And I feel bad for men, not only because many of them do not understand this reality, but because many believe delude in what they can expect. What is not attraction, is tolerable economical sex-exchange. And what is not both of them, is inc…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 01:56 PM
4

The first thing I consider is that civil associations must be created that gain the strength and representation of many national members and that later, these measures be included in the political debate. It is not something instantaneous, but rather a matter of decades. In Spain, those who lead the MRM more than organizations, are YouTubers for example who converge on certain platforms and even political parties. I see no other way than constant and determined persuasion: a call to other men to…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 11:12 AM
13

Quotas should disappear if we want to aspire to an equitable society. It is a long process, and will take a lot of time. In the case of relationships, there is nothing that can be done except a radical change in society that will hardly come. The man is under suspicion of being a potential misogynistic rapist and the fear of the man has been so exacerbated that today, the law is capitalized for personal benefit. In Spain, many legal frauds involve a woman who has reported being mistreated: the m…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:54 AM
6

Basically this.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:48 AM
21

Feminism is a mix between what is being pushed through the media through social networks as well as experiences that we can all have personally. In my case, the quotas to access a job. By law, in Spain, there are quotas, and although each private company can do what it wants, competition in selection tests has always been focused on: "it doesn't matter how you do it, if there is a woman opting for the job, Even if your objective test results are better, she will enter before you." It is discrimi…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:46 AM
24

Men's privileges they say.
/r/MensRights11/07/24 07:09 PM
1

Well, you keep mixing up, the textual semantics of what Islam is, with what people in Islamic societies actually do. It's not that I'm confusing it, it's just that you want to start from a fairly primitive base. As I have understood from your interventions, Islam is diverse and therefore, so is the use of hijab; which is doctrinally false. And it is obvious, and more than obvious, that social hypocrisy regarding religious matters is a constant, but this is somewhat irrelevant to those of us who …
/r/MensRights11/07/24 03:52 AM
4

It is one thing that one can debate whether it is useful or not, but that is the reason for the matter.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:10 PM
1

Islamic cultures where covering the head is not as strongly associated with that faith tradition. Who is it? One thing is that the family does not care in the least what the woman does and another thing is what happens in the countries of origin of these people. There are none in Islam except sectarian minorities who deny that the veil is mandatory. Most Westerners don't know much about Islam, and hijab to many of them, is not much more than a slight social curiosity, or even in some cases an ex…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:07 PM
2

How Islam is associated with socialism except Muslims living in first world countries voting for socialists so they gain benefits from the state while they create their ghettos and impose their ideologies in their neighborhoods?
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:26 PM
8

Indeed, reading Islamic sources can help us determine why the Arab culture at that time decided to impose the veil on women. ˹O Prophet!˺ Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their chastity. That is purer for them. Surely Allah is All-Aware of what they do. And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornmentsexcept what normally appears. Let them draw their veils over their chests, and not reveal their ˹hidden˺ adornments e…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:25 PM
3

Lowkey, many Muslim women like this because it's ironically in practice just another way of weaponizing female sexuality against men. This doesn't make much sense, especially since most Muslim women in the West do not wear the veil, because this does not bring them benefits, it is more difficult for them to socialize, find a job or even "feel beautiful"; and in fact r/hijabis is a clear example of this. The use of the hijab as a sexual fetish is a constant that reaches very high peaks with Mia K…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 04:18 PM
3

It is, however, nonzero. That is the question. Because statistically the number of genetic incidences and the number of abortions worldwide are hardly correlated based on a calculation of probabilities. It's ultimately a tool that can be used for good, and for placing a limit on suffering when used correctly. It has historical precedent, it can be performed safely and effectively, and it has good outcomes for the woman who has the abortion. The problem with playing with the murder of a life in g…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 02:26 PM
4

Well, I hate to say it, but I don't want someone who doesn't want to be a parent forced into it because the kid will suffer. It is the same parallel that the Nazis used to kill disabled people, considering themn"lives that do not deserve to be lived." Life is autonomous to the decisions of the pregnant woman, despite the fact that what is ontologically a murder is justified under the body's own autonomy. Also, abortion is used in cases where the kid's gonna be a potato Of the hundreds of thousan…
/r/MensRights10/07/24 12:24 PM
17

One prevents you from having children, the other murders. Ontologically, abortion can only be called murder.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 01:56 AM
3

Courtly love and chivalry are strongly related. Both emerged in the high Middle Ages within aristocratic circles. The troubadours, who sang of courtly love, were often knights themselves. Courtly love wasn't just about emotions; it was a social performance. Chivalry's ideals of courtesy, bravery, and service to a lady were a way for knights to express their devotion according to courtly love's code. The woman in courtly love was often married or otherwise unobtainable. The knight's acts of chiva…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:58 PM
4

We talk about chivalry as courtly love and how it has evolved socially, not the fact on how knights were supposed to behave, because that is another matter.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:35 PM
6

No, It has always been women who have educated men in a certain feeling of what is expected of them. "Chivalry" is nothing more than a form of courtly love, typical of aristocracies and medieval social elites that over time has received a certain folklore. For practical purposes, a true patriarchy would have taken away all of women's freedom of decision and action.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 11:49 AM
1

Very vague. Maybe you can benefit from the Reddit search engine with different prompts.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:10 AM
56

The only thing you can do is prepare legally. Whether she reports you or not, you must learn the lesson that today any casual sexual relationship is potentially dangerous by its very nature, even more so if a woman considers that she can take revenge on you for any disagreement. Take care, my friend.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:10 AM
82

Chivalry Is one of the strategies imposed by the matriarchy for centuries to use men without having to give them anything in return except the hope, and only that, that they can obtain her favor. Man is socially and biologically programmed to feel happy serving a woman and as a slave he submits to these types of acts. Remember, she won't do the same for you.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:06 AM
2

People living in denial, indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:46 PM
0

Good Ramadan, do not starve enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:45 PM
1

Not your business, They use ad verecundiam arguments, they are pure fallacies. One could say "yes, I'm in academia, my opinion is worth more" and even then it would be absurd, apart from being a fallacy. Either you debate with facts and data, or you don't debate. But people find it hard to debate with what they know instead of what they expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:55 AM
2

Not your business.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:16 PM
5

No, the bad name surrounding it is basically because people love to live in a perpetual cope and gasligthing others. That's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 09:15 PM
2

Evolutionary psychology isn't perfect, but calling it "least sound" is just wrong. You think physics stopped after a few dropped apples? And stats? They're there, crunching data to see if these ideas about evolved traits hold up. And statistically, there is strong argumentation regarding it, and not so much its opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 09:14 PM
1

Yes, plus blocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 08:36 PM
3

Intelectually dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 07:19 PM
3

"Main motivation"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 07:17 PM
5

Everything I do not like is pseudoscience theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 06:53 PM
3

Continue researching.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 06:48 PM
3

Yes, it is a fact that men rape and raped and it may happen due to different reasons. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 06:28 PM
6

No, it is not speculation, it is backed with observation, statistical evidence, and it is falsifiable, in comparison to the rest of "it is my opinion, it is my experience" platitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 06:18 PM
4

Nope. It has more foundation, described observable phenomenom and statistical research than any field on this regard. Else is simply denying evolution as a fact and the driving force of species.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 06:02 PM
3

Everything I do not like is rubbish theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 05:43 PM
3

There's no single statistic that tells everyone will be in a relationship. No single odds. Some "normie" majorities will be able to fuck and having a girlfriend, even marrying in the long term, but that's basicly excluding 50% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 05:42 PM
-3

No, a trip to any public space is what proves almost analytical redpill -because the rest of the redpill beyond analysis are just copers- and blackpill. Yeah, everyone has a girlfriend now. Do not make a fool of yourselves. That's false.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 05:40 PM
5

Science in this sense draws on evolutionary psychology and in sociosexual relations, statistics is the most comprehensive way to study large social phenomena. Anyone can perceive general dynamics, but men are made to be gaslighted with exceptions or platitudes, rather than raw data. Statistics are a reflection of what is going on in society, not what one wants it to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 05:37 PM
0

Yes, we can agree that there are Stoic currents that are more or less beneficial depending on the purpose, but in the end, the centrality of their philosophical approaches are quite useful for men in these times in which he lives cloistered within himself and where changes are neither easy nor always satisfactory. Regarding pills, I consider it to be one of the most basic issues to understand how things work. The sociosexual character has always been of great concern for man because essentially …
/r/MensRights07/07/24 03:30 PM
1

MGTOWs live their philosophy and teach others the reason for their decision. Pills have a certain degree of analysis, either at a sociological level, as does the redpill, or from a more reductionist biology perspective, as does the blackpill. Getting rid of pills is counterproductive for man, because they contain great truths that are undeniable, from the essentials of lookism to the capacity for economical exploitation that a woman can have over a man she does not perceive as attractive. Stoici…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:59 PM
1

Blocked. Read a dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 03:42 AM
1

I have not talked about fear or anxiety. It is you, troll, who wants to impose his subjectivity on the rest. Blocked. I'm not going to waste my time with you. Intellectually dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 03:34 AM
1

Also called "agreed upon", in this case, by its own etymology.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 03:16 AM
2

You subjectively use the term as it suits you and not what the etymology of "need" is. Not only will your definition be found in common language, but it also closes "the need" in everything that, if you lack it, kills you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 03:13 AM
2

No, I have used the term in its consensual version. And the world and your perception do not revolve around what you think or what it seems to you. Simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:47 AM
3

No, it makes absolute sense, however I recommend that you read more books.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:35 AM
5

No, it is irrelevant to be good or bad. It is all matters of looks. That's what all matter in the sexual market. No, no sane person claims that they are owed sex, that's simply you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:34 AM
3

Yeah, imagine living in a perpetual solipsism that what other people say is only based in what your brain can conclude.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:29 AM
5

Sex is a need by its etimological definition, because all people have sexual instinct and this sexual instinct generally go for the opposite thing as a majority and normal thing. People need many thing, they may need a new car, they may need to eat healthier and do more exercise...; yet, by your logic, people should steal to get their needs or in the case of men, you are advocating for the same logic of, if nothing matters, why men do not go rape women so they get what they want? That's the reta…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:26 AM
3

Yeah, they'll figure out, however, not with what naturally repels many men. Easy as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:17 AM
5

So, what is your problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:16 AM
3

Yes, indeed. If you do not like men, engaging in sex with men would be like drinking contaminated water. No, there is nothing rational in the sexual market. Looks come first and the halo around looks is what built that unknown and abstract term known as "personality".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:15 AM
2

No, it should not be. Not everyone is attracted to their own sex. I hate no woman, and I do not want to fuck them. The difference is that you, fools and incompetent people, do not know the difference between debating men's issues with "muh, men complaining to much, why they don't die and let sexhavers live in peace", because since always, you had and have bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:43 AM
5

Incel to tranny/gay pipeline. That's what these gaslighters piece of shit are suggesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:26 AM
1

Yes, it is also interesting to drink from a contaminated source and catch any gastric disease. Fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:25 AM
1

No, homosexuality is not a way of exiting inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:21 AM
5

Do you have any problem with men going to prostitutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:17 AM
1

Irrelevant. If A suggest B does not mean that X is W; needing something and not getting it are two different things. Not every man acceding the sexual market was always a factor of capabilities. not a matter of men saying: "well, I am not reproducing in my life". In the past, it was money to marry, now, it is the pure freedom of women to decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:52 PM
-2

Don't worry. Men will figure out a way to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:16 PM
1

Natural instinct, just an instinct that has been limited by the use of protection, but that's the main concept behind having sex: reproducing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 06:20 PM
0

You're fixated on this black-and-white idea that a need only counts if you’ll croak without it. That's beyond simplistic. Sure, sex won’t kill you if you don’t get it, but it screws up your mental and emotional health big time. Depression, anxiety—ever heard of them? Just because it doesn’t whack you outright doesn’t mean it’s not essential for a healthy life. You mention exercise being a need for long-term health. Guess what? Sex does the same: cuts stress, improves sleep, boosts mood. Denying …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:45 PM
2

Basic biology. Nowadays, societies have found ways to have sex without the need that act ends in a woman pregnant, but, at the end of the day, having sex is just the natural mechanism for reproduction, and so is sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:03 PM
2

We need to procreate. Another thing is that men are being gaslit on thinking so, so they cope with they idea that will not perform their natural instinct of reproducing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 05:01 PM
7

You said it. Most women consider it bullshit, but women consider also that most men are disposable or "conditionally useful". Men are discriminated just by their looks and their status. So men are seen either as the greatest evil -basicly, because most men aren't useful to women-. That's the point behind this kind of joke-serious memes and social media nonsense. Most men love women, but most men will try to access the women they can have access too. A handsome guys will have his IG full of follo…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:59 PM
1

I understand it, however you are just trying to push a reductionist definition that literally no one used and did not try to use. "Need" as a concept has been defined, and no one else brought this "biological need" debate. And you’ve yet to demonstrate how sex is “essential” as opposed to merely being “desirable”… So even by your own hamfisted definition of the word, sex still wouldn’t count as a need versus a want. You’re trying to argue that sex is just a “want” and not a “need”? That’s like s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:47 PM
-2

There will be always shit like this; worrying about this shit instead of the real issues men face is just wasting time. In fact, we should support women going to the wild with bears so natural selection do its business.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:30 PM
0

No, you defined "need" wrongly and are using subjectivism to make a point. Either we accept that words have an agreed definition, or every conversation that wants to get a bit deep would end in nonsense. Sex isn't just a "highly desirable activity"; it's a biological imperative in heterosexual people, a fundamental part of human existence. It's how life continues, genius. Ever heard of reproduction? It's kinda important. And let's not forget the mountain of evidence showing that sex impacts ment…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:29 PM
0

Need: require (something) because it is essential or very important rather than just desirable: I mean, you can make a point, but enganging in linguistic subjectivism is fruitless. People may need sex, as it as a natural need, and they can cope masturbating on the lack of it. Men are obligated to accept this because it is assumed that women have freedom of choice, which, paradoxically, makes many men sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 04:16 PM
81

It's time to bury this bear vs men shit, like seriously.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:32 PM
15

Whenever I read about problems, there has to be a woman in the middle. Cheer up, brother. This life only goes uphill and many times the tests are hard that they crush us, but one comes out stronger and with more experience, not necessarily happier.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:41 AM
2

I see, I see. Thank you for the feedback.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:38 AM
1

No, I don't pretend anything. I say that the "wage gap" and access to wealth accumulation is proportional to jobs and labor-educational activity around the civilized world. Many women study useless things and yet total differentiation is computed while, at least, in my country, Spain, engineering careers They are almost exclusively male and their derivations are from technical vocational training. Maybe in the United States it is different - I would ask you for the global count of women and men …
/r/MensRights05/07/24 09:58 PM
18

I don't understand this kind of humor.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 01:56 PM
1

We would have to see the general calculation. However, I believe that the number of women engineers is much lower than that of men while in STEM, It will depend on specialty and specific career.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 11:48 AM
5

No, most women studying degrees are basically useless ones like arts, literature and so o. Men commit suicide because they cannot justify the reason for their existence.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 06:23 PM
19

Very few people hate people just because of their sex. Everything is called misogyny today.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 06:10 PM
3

It's possible. However, there would still be a lack of obese single mothers for everyone. 🤣
/r/MensRights04/07/24 12:52 PM
6

I don't think that dropping out is generally voluntary. The man who has had no experiences was never able to enter the market, and I think that is the majority of new generation men.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 12:42 PM
7

The most curious thing is that the concept of "many men" is a concept that is only understood in contrast to the desires and interests of a group of women in the sexual market. Masculinity among men are certain physical-moral values, and for women, the inherent usefulness of this man on a sexual level. It is not surprising that the tall, attractive man, with a certain social dominance, is considered more masculine than the short, ugly man who is not attractive to most people. If feminism sought …
/r/MensRights04/07/24 11:54 AM
17

Because they can. Feminists would have no effective power if there were not men stupid enough to submit to their most basic instincts and believe that through betaization they will access to the sexual market, and are only used as cannon fodder.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 11:13 AM
-1

Women hitting on men? If we call a statistical minority of men "men", it sure happens. The rest is pure feminist gaslighting fantasy.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 03:03 AM
38

A truly parasitic attitude.
/r/MensRights04/07/24 03:00 AM
3

No, that's like saying that most women are not attractted to hot guys, and men only choose women who are attracted to hot guys, which makes no sense and basicly stupid, because attraction is naturally brainwired and intersubjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 02:17 AM
7

While I do agree that, ''women's intuition'' is a BS concept and isn't magic. What ''women's intuition'' is, is just the immediate rejection of explicitly misogynistic or hostile guys who otherwise have no redeeming qualities or attractive traits. I partially with this statement. The concept of a man being "mysoginist/hostile" and a woman accepting or rejecting this is basically based on the halo effect regarding how we percieve people through just appearances. Which is also a bias, but we are n…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 02:12 AM
1

Most men are considered as subhuman by the majority of woman. So, usually, when men become the subject of criticism by women, feminist groups and others groups in particular, men are critized in two different planes of utility: In the first group we have those attractive, "high-value men" if you want to call them like that that would only use the majority of men to pump and dump their sperm and leave when bored or when he finds a woman this is more appealing than the first. And We find the "evil…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 01:48 AM
1

Both are intertwined; there is no morality or code, or religion in the majority of people when they want to know each other. Some people may couple because they have amazing sex and having good chemistry, others are work mates, others meet through a videogame...; the concept is related in how hook-up culture. The man with possibilities are going to fuck everything they can and more, and when they want a stable relationship would choose the younger or the one with less bodycount to form families …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 01:38 AM
1

However, the fundamental difference is that one has religious overtones, and the second cultural. In Western countries, if you wish, you can impose the sanction of circumcision but in the case of these countries, no, because that is what inherent religiosity has. Female circumcision continues to be practiced the same as male circumcision due to Islam. And no, I am not justifying anything, I am only commenting on the nuances between FGM and circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:07 PM
2

Lube is also a thing, anyways. If the woman is dry as floor in a summer noon, then, she's not aroused generally.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:40 PM
1

This does not negate the fundamental fact that sex and/or relationships have a market, different market, in fact, if it is based on online -like most peopel are doing nowadays- or through events and other activities. So I do not really understand your claim that there is no sexual market.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:37 PM
-3

I do not think so. FGM was compared to circumcision, and it is wrong objectively.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:35 PM
1

It is. Demand and offer and proportionally inversed. There is no equilibrium and there is no socialized sex or opportunity to access relationships. Personality, you may say.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:05 PM
2

Basically skyscraper's high. Else is cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:04 PM
0

I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 07:12 PM
-9

And one thing is the circumcision of the woman and another is the removal of the clitoris. Something that people don't understand at first.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:20 PM
-13

No, people do not understand how FGM works and how it diferentiates from the circumcision of women's clitoris. In some countries, women are circuncized and in other countries, the clitors is removed completely or almost completely. And I brought this up because generally, men and women are circumcized in those countries, the same way men are. And it is a religious thing. So the arguments exposed are basically wrong. Men and women are circumcized equally. Despite the efforts of ONGs against femal…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 06:04 PM
1

Yes, however in comparison to Islam, judaism is a very very very small population.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:47 PM
10

I believe it decreases the ability to give a woman an orgasm with penetration alone. It is absolutely irrelevant. The anatomy of the vagina and the ability to orgasm through penetration is only proportional to the width and operating length of a penis and not so much to the lack of skin. A dildo can give orgasms and has no skin itself.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:11 PM
-25

What many people don't understand is that FGM and circumcision are not the same in women. A woman can be circumcised and her clitoris will not be removed or cut directly.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:09 PM
-2

All or most Muslims are circumcised. It is an obligation for their religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:08 PM
1

Intrasexual competition. In the same way that men compete with each other for sexual access, women compete with each other to attract the highest possible value man. Diametrically opposed interests.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 12:54 PM
5

We can play many linguistic-semantic games and reach the elementary conclusion that only predatory animals and that these types of parallels never occur with the seduction or acceptance of being vulnerable.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 09:47 PM
3

Do you realize that the word "predatory" is being used incorrectly as a parallel to the animal act? There is no predatory behavior under manipulation and seduction; Therefore, only the man without possibilities is predatory.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 06:07 PM
6

All men are predatory, therefore. Which makes no sense by that definition. If women trust you, you cannot be predatory.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 05:46 PM
4

I refer you to what I answered to u/ChromeBadge
/r/MensRights02/07/24 04:25 PM
–

Attractiveness is not an indication of security, in fact, that is not what we are discussing. Ugly men cannot be predators, only rapists; while the attractive man does not need to use force at all.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:50 PM
5

I refer you to what I answered to u/ChromeBadge
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:41 PM
12

You have not refuted any point.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:37 PM
61

Did Ted Bundy force women to be with him? Ted Bundy being objectively attractive and charismatic is precisely what allowed women to trust him and end up murdered. The difference is consent. The ugly man who makes all kinds of approaches is called a predator, while the handsome man cannot be a predator because women agree to be with him, and then, it turns out that this man is a deranged psychopath. Therefore, "personality detectors" curiously fail as the man's attractiveness increases. Even afte…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:31 PM
9

Water. However, it is important to make these comments because in the end feminism speaks of "men" in an ambiguous way. It uses tiny examples of successful men to extrapolate men while also extrapolating men (an undesirable majority) to accuse them of the greatest evils.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 02:06 PM
2

I understand, if so, then it is a good recommendation.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 12:49 PM
171

Only ugly men are predators. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 12:26 PM
2

No, I do not agree that radical feminism dominates or is dominating feminism; but feminism is being used as a political weapon, an economic incentive and something that is socially evident: the polarization of interests and a sexual war, which regardless of how it is created, is as old as humanity: inter and intrasexual competitions. No, it is not reversible either in the short or medium term, not only because of how intricate all the laws promoted to discriminate against men are (in my country,…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 11:24 AM
2

In the same way as the Querer theory and other postmodern relativisms for a few decades now, feminism follows the same pattern of sectarianism while there is a prevailing feminist current that dominates the political and economic sphere while each of its individuals disassociates of the bases and foundations of feminism and its most basic theory. And there are only two options: either feminist women are ignorant and defend misandry because they believe that misandry is what will bring equality t…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:29 AM
6

This whole situation is being globalized throughout first world countries in general and developing countries in particular. There is nothing that can be done except litigate hard so that the offspring have the best childhood and adolescence possible. Men, for legal and societal purposes, are inferior to women, objectively.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:23 AM
3

My advice, kindly, is not to recommend things you haven't had experience with. First read the book, enlighten us with the wisdom you have acquired, and then present it to the world. This is the fairest thing, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:20 AM
1

Hmm.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 12:17 PM
13

Obesity.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:57 PM
30

That woman has more options than the average man, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:56 PM
14

Debating. Reddit. Choose one.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:55 PM
8

All is hope is lost. The war of the sexes undoubtedly leads us to organize to fight for our rights; There is no hope for reconciliation because it is a battle for domination, not for equality and even less equity. The problem will be when other civilizations replace a decadent Western society with a harsher morality that does not respect the freedom of women.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:17 PM
69

The boy is cute. And they say AI will end the world.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:12 PM
39

There is never enough tea for people like that.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:42 AM
10

Seriously? Impossible. /s
/r/MensRights28/06/24 10:15 AM
8

No great personality for one's face/height/unfixable defect. And in the same way that someone marries you for money, they will divorce you in the same way. For this reason, the majority of divorces are initiated by women and exceed more than 50% in most developed countries.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 07:59 PM
18

False. There are fat, old, and terribly ugly women who are married and have a stable life. The opposite is very difficult if we start from initial conditions in which the man is either fat, or ugly, or old, with the peculiarity of using his money to live in a betabuxx relationship. You, like most women, think that men, as such, only represent a statistical minority of whom you feel attracted or who are useful to you, while the rest are non-existent, or are not considered "men" as such. Because t…
/r/MensRights24/06/24 06:07 PM
4

Some do, some do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 09:43 AM
6

Absolute bullshit. It is better for every man to be alone and pay prostitutes than being an absolute cuckold.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 12:10 AM
21

Of course. The problem is not hearing this truth. The problem is when you want to constantly deny that water is wet, with platitudes and gaslighting towards many men who seek guidance and help, when the truth is that what is not looks will only be a relationship of economic exploitation that will most likely end. Personality, for practical purposes, is an extension of lookism. Many people can be better people, they can be educated, they can be cultured, but that's the problem: Most men are not a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:56 PM
3

Yes, reality is something that takes away many opportunities. But remember: It's better to be single than to find a bad woman who wants to steal the fruit of your work and effort and take advantage of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:41 PM
5

Blackpill and redpill consider hypergamy as analytical element in the sexual market. However, the redpill focuses on sociocultural variables while the blackpill takes lookism as its fundamental analytical value; and then, if possible, you can add money and status as complementary values (dual mating strategy).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:44 AM
9

75 % of Tinder users are male
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:40 AM
1

have read the paper and there is no way for you to honestly and intelligently say you know the methodology; it's not open access research. No, you did not. Yes, it does say it. You can see white men ranked above white women clearly. And also black men ranked above black women. No, The distribution of matches by sex is not shown. In fact, it is not even the object of the study, hence its irrelevance to the debate. Sounds like you're upset that someone might like Asian women (according to every st…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 11:32 AM
1

Lol, you have no way of knowing that. Read the paper. Like I said buddy you can deny it until you're blue in the face but that's exactly what the chart says. It's also backed up by recent research showing that white men are considered more attractive than white women: No, it doesn't say it. The illustration It does not answer the question of the sex distribution of the matches. Marriages between White men and Asian women are over twice as frequent as those between White women and Asian men. Rece…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 03:22 AM
1

Doesn't matter if they haven't been peer reviewed. They're not corroborated in the study I showed you. The methodology is correct, the sampling is correct and broad and does not contradict the trend of the sexual market, in this case, Tinder. And the conclusions are objective and concise: the number of matches received by both sexes, and how it is demonstrated, under overwhelming evidence and by parallelism, the majority of studies on the matter: the majority of women only apply to a minority of…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 03:11 AM
1

Doesn't matter if they haven't been peer reviewed. They're not corroborated in the study I showed you. The statistical sampling is there and the methodology is correct. There is no study or statistics that contradicts these facts. Tinder statistics are raw data and do not allow discussion. Deny it until you're blue in the face, buddy. White men get more matches than white women: No matter how much you want to reformulte about an illustration, it is not going to show what you want to show: which …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 03:04 AM
1

You're scientifically illiterate. These are not sources. Arxiv.org is a repository for papers that haven't been published, because they weren't reviewed. Anyone can post anything they want on arxiv.org. The sources are statistical and corroborable in any other means of statistical data collection. There is no study that contradicts the two elementary points established: The matches are monopolized by a minority of men. Most men receive few matches. The majority of women receive matches that exce…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 02:39 AM
1

1607.01952 (arxiv.org) · Female profiles gain matches rapidly, often exceeding 200 matches within the first hour. Male profiles, however, build up matches much more slowly . · The data shows that most men receive very few matches, while a small number of men receive the majority of matches . · Women are three times more likely to send a message after matching compared to men. Specifically, 21% of female matches result in a message, whereas only 7% of male matches do . · Men are more likely to li…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 02:02 AM
1

Not what I said. Sure. Our entire view of the world is based primarily on the past. Otherwise, every new generation would start out at square one caveperson type situations. This includes influences from as far away as recorded history can be found to the 1950s to the year before last. Definitely no red herring. We're dealing with the here and now, not living in some history book. Dragging in ancient times or even the 1950s is just a cop-out to avoid addressing current issues head-on. If we clin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 01:41 AM
1

No. Most men get no matches. Only a few recieve all the femenine matches, including Asians.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 01:30 AM
1

It's certainly an significant element of courtship on dating apps. How could it not be, considering the nature of the process? But for this to be any sort of evidence that women objectify at the same rate as men, there would be as much selection of maternal basement dwellers as of financially successful men. Or those barely literate enough to fill in a profile. Or the chronically unemployed. That's not the case. Saying women don't objectify because they avoid losers is absurd: having standards d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 12:47 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 12:29 PM
1

So the bottom line is that normality in perspective is what you have determined
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:07 AM
1

But that's exactly what happened - a change in the balance of power. Simply not liking the change or believing the results are not yours or anyone else's best interest doesn't mean women weren't liberated from the oppression of not being able to choose. And really, if it isn't reality, why are you so unhappy about it? It did happen. What has happened is that women have gained freedom of choice and economic independence. Under these conditions, the woman will choose what naturally has always seem…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:03 AM
1

Liking and being able are precisely the entire dichotomy shown here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:36 AM
2

My hypothesis is that hypergamy would not have spread as massively as it is today and men would compete locally for available women. It certainly wouldn't be as frenetic and crazy as it is today.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:32 AM
1

Could you specify what is relevant to all this? The preferences are racist: The white man is the most attractive for all women and the man who has options chooses the Asian woman. If you continue investigating the statistics in dating apps, you will understand that a statistical minority of men monopolizes matches, and other symbols of acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:30 AM
1

So, it is a woman's problem to choose men with whom they do not want to have children. It is an autonomous and free decision as a general rule in the Western world. Most men are neither married nor have children. If the latest data shows us that approximately 66 million people are married in the United States, to name a country of reference, half, the men, there would be no more than 33 million, which would have to exclude small percentages of gay men, men married to infertile or transsexual wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:28 AM
1

Your response is a weak attempt to sidestep historical facts with irrelevant modern comparisons, again. European immigrants didn't just shape America "because they were the ones who cans during the Industrial Revolution": they built the nation’s infrastructure, established its legal and political systems, and drove its economic growth. Today's immigration patterns don't negate that foundational history. As for your rambling about Nazis and hate groups, it's an incoherent deflection, again. It do…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:39 PM
1

Correct, with the elementary difference that it is the man who offers and it is the woman who demands. Most men do not have the ability to choose, only opportunity when they receive female acceptance, which as the sexual market is, is not very promising.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:03 PM
1

No, not a cope at all. You confuse the fact that there are men who have entered into marriage or partner relationships with men's inability to decide generally, but rather to be chosen. Sexual selection is primarly female's or Chad's.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:07 PM
1

Your attempt to deflect with irrelevant anecdotes about the West doesn’t change the fact that European immigrants overwhelmingly shaped America’s early economic and military power. Minorities were indeed present, but they were marginalized and were generally irrelevant. Bringing up Nazis and skinheads in this context is a desperate attempt to smear without substance. Stick to the facts: European immigrants were the driving force behind America’s foundational development, and your attempts to rew…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:05 PM
1

More revisionist history. Again, sure, Europe was in conflict, but that doesn't change the fact that European immigrants dominated U.S. immigration for centuries, shaping its power. Claiming "Chinese and brown people" were here from the start is a laughable distortion: minorities were a tiny fraction compared to the waves of Europeans. Your attempt to muddy the waters with irrelevant nonsense about propaganda and Nazis is pathetic. Stick to the real history: European immigrants were the backbone…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:58 PM
1

Chooses the person who can, not who wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:53 PM
2

r/FemaleDatingStrategy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:51 PM
1

Sure, people left conflict and famine, but the U.S. still mainly attracted European immigrants for centuries, which shaped its early economic and military might. As for the South, yes, it was built on slavery, but that doesn’t negate the fact that European immigrants laid the foundation for the nation's overall power. And please, avoid attempting to derail the conversation. Stick to the facts and quit resorting to cheap shots, or ad hominem fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:47 PM
2

In fact, I believe that most men are not considered as such by most women. The term "subhuman" or "useless scrotum" are the most enriching terms to understand this phenomenon: FDS is the narrative of the internal dynamics and forces of the majority of women who do not dare to acknowledge the obvious, or do so timidly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:42 PM
1

The bulk of U.S. immigration history has been dominated by European immigrants, and it's only in more recent decades that non-European immigration has surged. Claiming it's been diverse all along is revisionist nonsense. The U.S. built its initial economic and military power primarily on the backs of white immigrants.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:40 PM
1

Your fairy-tale notion that women’s sexual pickiness is some kind of liberation from historical oppression is naive and ignores reality. Women’s so-called independence has turned dating into a brutal market where men are discarded like trash if they don't meet elevated standards more men cannot comply fueled by economic power plays, not genuine connection, because, now that most men cannot offer money to mate and create a family, most men are ending single, without options. This idealized fantas…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:37 PM
1

White immigrants mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:13 PM
1

No. That won't happen. The tactic of countries with a dangerous birth rate is to encourage immigration in Europe, for example, and other countries are encouraging births through considerable aid, as is the desperate case of South Korea. Large companies and corporations are the last ones that want to reduce their net profit in the face of a population decline. And that is the reason why women are another part of the labor market. Yes, I have studied history enough to know that the end of history …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:05 PM
1

No, it's the other way around. Female worshippung is already seen in the simps phenomenon. Putting a phenomenon or a set of groups in the spotlight is for a reason: and it is the debate, knowledge and dissemination of ideas that they can consider beneficial for the majority of men. Therefore, you, who may or may not have a partner, You navigate this community and others with a discourse, with a mentality and surely, counteracting what you do not consider correct. if they’re going their own way t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:59 PM
1

Not even close: https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20180818_FBC544.png Doesn't respond to anything. You can find much more severe statistics if you investigate the success rate in these applications, what is the ratio of men and women and what is the choice of the majority of women in these statistics: follows a Pareto distribution. Lol, Latin America is not patriarchical and they have very low birthrates. Southern Europe has the lowest birthrates in Europe. So?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:50 PM
1

I say that the wall is a cope because that does not prevent the majority of women from being able to marry and have children. The problem lies, as always, in the hypergamy that subjects women to a dual mating strategy, where the woman will end up divorcing over time or being unfaithful. Or not even getting married to continue fucking out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:47 PM
1

Man cannot meet the requirements of attractiveness no matter how hard they try. They cannot be taller, they cannot have a different facial structure, they cannot change their skin color, they cannot increase the size of their genitals. and they cannot change so many things that show objective elements of sexual attractiveness. And this is the basic thing that must always be repeated to make it understood that the majority of men in a free sexual market are disposable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:45 PM
1

Each person has the right to say whatever you want. What are you doing here? Controlling dissent in other people's discourse? Do not be a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:43 PM
1

There is no revenge. Nor desire for It. There has been talk about how the dynamics have worked for centuries and how society corrected the tendency of the majority of men to be social under religious platitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:41 PM
1

Defining love today has as many connotations as defining what a woman is. Evidently many women were forced to marry, And many miserable ones. Others simply understood marriage as either the natural course of things or the monetary-sexual exchange. Of course. The use of studies and calculations of probailities based on statistics They are the efficient way to know social trends, Believe it or not, it is a more efficient tool than anecdotal evidence. And yes, It is not something that I defend, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:40 PM
1

We live in a time of enough stability to think that we have reached the end of history. Social collapse does not necessarily have to be universal, it can also be local. Given the low birth rate in many developed countries, we will have to see what measures to take. And each region has its challenges: Europe has a fairly growing Muslim population while we see, for example, in Spain, my country, that there are more dogs than children.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:31 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:25 PM
1

Most men could not and cannot marry a woman today. Hence, monogamy is the most widespread in the Islamic world.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 12:22 PM
1

What evidence are you looking for? That attractive men fuck more than ugly men and that attractive women have access to handsome men while average women are only pumped and dumped by the man they like but will never commit?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:08 AM
1

Millennial and Gen Z women are statistically less promiscuous than Gen Z and Boomer women when they were younger. Could you indicate how many men access the sexual market as opposed to the number of women and calculate the average for both sexes? Surely the statistics you have are explicit in this calculation. Thots simply have a stronger online presence No.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:06 AM
-2

As you can understand, anecdotal evidence It is an argumentative fallacy. Lookism precedes personality and generally the personality we associate with other people is constructed from the halo effect of physical appearance, and not a genuine introspection of the personality of people as a concomitant value that initiates the attraction between both people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:56 AM
1

Decades, even.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:54 AM
1

I am not. 😅.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:52 AM
–

According to Statista, there were approximately 61.44 million married couples in the United States in 2022. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/183663/number-of-married-couples-in-the-us/). That's ~18% of US population. It is impossible that the majority of men have been married, even more so if we restrict the pool to the new generations and not to the boomers, who are from another generation and of course, other values. The crude divorce rate in the United States with data from 2020-2021 indi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:48 AM
–

When you don't refute any argument, no matter how much you think you've said something, you haven't said anything. To this day, I am still attracted to men. If one day I become bisexual, or start having feelings for my girl friends, I'll let you know. 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:30 AM
2

No skills, just looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:28 AM
-6

If we talk about women's sexual freedom, indeed, women's freedom is detrimental to most men. Of course, I am not saying that I support this, but that it is the point by which a once dominant religious point is understood: monogamy and chastity. Marriage and chastity were very efficient tools given by religions to distribute sexual access to the majority of men while religious morality restricted the woman's actions to decide what she wanted to do. And many times, money took precedence over a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:27 AM
3

What unrealistic expectations have men? Only men with options can choose, and most don't have options; men who have options either represent a statistical sexual minority or a monetary claim of exploration in the medium-long term in a money-sex transaction: a kind of marriage prostitution. And the second paragraph is partially wrong, because you omit the market trend: Most men aspire to many women and few end up accepting them. Most women can receive the potential attention of most men, but only…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:21 AM
1

That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:15 AM
–

Most men do not marry, most men do not reproduce, most marriages end in failure and most divorces are requested by women. Check your facts. The blackpill is relevant, because physical appearance is the first and most important factor in the sexual market, and so it is the MGTOW for most men who understand that their ultimate claim is only a monetary exchange that in a relatively long time will transform into an economic-bureaucratic hell in a divorce; making men subjects manipulated and exploite…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:12 AM
4

Intrasexual competition between men is brutal. Of course, women see your inability to enter the sexual market as something suspicious, as a defect that you hide or that they cannot find. And the man competes to see who is most sexually suitable for the majority of women. And of course, A woman's virginity is highly valued, because, not only is it a scarce commodity today, but it objectively represents the greatest reproductive success and long-term permanence.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:08 AM
–

No, they are not expectations. At most, the expectations are those that the common user places on successful people and especially, the especially attractive ones. who live an orgiastic union of money, status and lookism. The applications result in something paradoxical: in most dating apps there are men; Networks like Instagram or Snapchat are the true epicenters of courtship where people, like a market, are bought and sold to the highest bidder, or to any bidder, in the case of the majority of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:06 AM
–

Precisely because most of the time most men have been inoculated with platitudes, lies, cops, and endless vanilla statements and clichés so as not to discourage them, from friends, their own mothers, and even Reddit. When you talk about "men who are hyperfocused on sex" You say it as if women did not have their sexual instinct and were devoid of desire and instinct. Can we agree that men are more intense because of all the testosterone that moves them? Definitely, but that does not even respond …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:01 AM
–

I completely understand that you believe that personality is the important factor, however, the trend in the sexual market determines what is moving. And the truth is that physical appearance is what determines everything else. Personality is an extension of looks. And although this assertion turns out to be exaggerated when carefully examined, The truth is that the halo effect accompanying physical appearance is what gives results to the personality, not the real one, but the one you create in …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:54 AM
-2

The MGTOW philosophy is nourished precisely by what they flee from: women. And those communities, like any other, have men from many places: Some are divorced men, others were falsely accused, others are disenchanted young people and others are simply incels, -in the etymological and literal sense of the word- who confuse their frustration with the legitimate desire to live apart from economic-sexual relationships and games. Men need women sexually more than women need men In that aspect. Going …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:48 AM
–

No, man lives deceived in platitudes of "improve your personality". The man needs to know that the majority of men are useless to the majority of women in the sexual market. But, this is not a reality that wants to expand. It would be devastating, a blackpill difficult to swallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:28 AM
6

*Women think most men are not good. Most men cannot be good. Therefore only few men will reproduce: very low birth rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:18 AM
1

It's a matter of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:17 AM
3

In this society, if there are a portion of men giving up, there are a portion of women as well. No it's not true. It is more than evident that a statistical minority of men rotate the majority of women in the sexual market. Any woman who wants to have options will have them. The problem is that many times, the average woman does not have enough value for the value she seeks in the sexual market and either becomes content or flatly rejects her options, which is inversely proportional to what happ…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:15 AM
1

Who's creating revenge fantasies? The MGTOW community spreads its philosophy and lifestyle to other men. Or should they keep silent and keep other men ignorant?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:11 AM
1

Absolutely. Isn't it hard to be a woman today? Where are the good men?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:09 AM
2

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:04 AM
13

What is insane about stating the obvious? It is difficult for OP to understand that in conditions of freedom and economic independence, the majority group of men will not gain access to the sexual market because neither money nor physical appearance will be complaints in the majority of men. Doesn't a heterosexual woman have the right to be happy with the man who most attracts her and gives her security? Of course yes, and this is something that many men fail to understand because they do not un…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:01 AM
1

This is the fatalistic reaction of the cuck about to be eugenized. Other men decide to rape and murder en masse. In the end, there are those who accept their own destiny that their sexual chances are slim, and others do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:52 AM
1

A pussy they won't even smell.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:31 AM
4

Maybe yes, maybe not. Man is disposable, replaceable and this is the way we are going. Being attractive is being apparent, the rest is pure halo effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:20 AM
1

Simps ignore the futility of their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:04 AM
–

They are allowed to do as they wish and if anyone speaks negatively about it they are called a misogynist. Of course they are free. What else is going to be done? Enslave them and tie them to a radiator for life with a burqa? Most men are not attractive to most women. That's the strategy: increasingly extreme hypergamy; and not only that, but also, the sexualization that many feminists denounce is the first economic demand of women whose value is no more than their own objectification. The redpi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:03 AM
25

You are enlightened.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 12:37 AM
12

No has entendido nada, chico (o chica, no sé, quizás chique). El matriarcado se impone a través de otros hombres bajo manipulación directa de los grupos de presión. No solo la mujer vive con más beneficios que el hombre, sino que además, se defiende esta desigualdad ante la ley. And secondly, in most societies, women have never needed to impose themselves as a dominant figure to control the destinies of other people. They simply manipulate, as I have said, other men for their purposes.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 08:55 PM
16

Easy: law; the biggest matriarch in occident at West, and concretly at Spain, my country: DIFERENCIAS DE DERECHOS ENTRE MUJERES Y HOMBRES EN ESPAÑA (law.blog)
/r/MensRights19/06/24 08:07 PM
1

Fantasyland thinking. You say that women's independence will magically increase everyone's sexual satisfaction and make men more realistic? That’s a fairy tale. As women gain economic power and autonomy, they’re becoming pickier about their partners. This means more men are left in the dust, unable to find someone. This isn't some new enlightened age where everyone finds balance. It’s a jungle out there, and women are picking the top-tier men, leaving the rest high and dry. The numbers don’t lie…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:07 PM
16

Patriarchy is over in the West. Welcome to the gynocentric matriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:49 PM
1

Men are taught and encouraged to objectify women, allowing for far fewer qualifications in a partner, while women are still greatly affected by society's admonitions around sex purely for its own sake. Honestly, I think you live in a parallel reality or you only call "men" that small statistical percentage that has high sexual attractiveness you were attracted with in the past. Men are neither taught nor encouraged to do anything. The majority of men do not choose, the majority of men do not hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 12:05 PM
26

Even the manosphere has this set of white knights and cucks that not only would they want to kill themselves, but they call every man to be everything that a woman expects of you. I have seen this in many "traditionalist redpillers" as an oxymoron, but it is quite present. And for all the men who can see or comment and say: "no, I want to die to defend abstract ideas" Go on Telegram and follow the men who were either shot, imprisoned, raped, mutilated and even betrayed for wanting to leave the b…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 07:01 PM
15

This kid deserves all the love from the world, but just because he nearly died to protect someone doesn't mean he is more of a man than other adults. Being a man doesn't mean you have to be disposable This is what is defined within the characteristics of the masculine and specifically, what you, as a man, are expected to do, from centuries of programming in early childhood. You fuck well, you inseminate, you work, you provide and you die, or your value is negligible, because you want your value …
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:54 PM
1

This is when a woman talks freely about what she would do with most men who are of no use to her.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 03:09 PM
2

It never began for Xcels.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 03:08 PM
5

This subreddit never ceases to amaze me. All I have left to read is: "My girlfriend wants to give up her rights as a woman. Should he be the male she is looking for?". Go get your girlfriend a pregnancy test. Staying still doesn't fix anything.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:44 AM
5

This is simply the core of the female mind set. We require more men to use as tools, so that we can achieve what WE want. Brutal Esthervilarpill. It's like when women say they need "more tools," they must be talking about adding to their collection of men who can fix things around the house, reach the top shelf, and open pickle jars, and of course, who are expected to offer the best sex of their lives. Because obviously, what else could we possibly be good for but being slaves?
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:41 AM
2

We always knew. But they called us professional woman-hating misogynistic incels. 😎
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:35 AM
10

You keep saying that men are the root cause of all these issues, and then act surprised when the pushback against this ridiculous narrative gets louder. Misandry is a common theme among feminists nowadays, but brushing it off as just a reaction to men's actions is a cop-out. Humans, regardless of gender, are flawed and capable of both good and bad. If you think the solution is to "recognize the scrutiny is often well-founded," you’re justifying the same harmful stereotypes you claim to oppose; m…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:50 AM
4

Sure.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:44 AM
10

Claiming feminism isn't a "hate movement against men" while acknowledging that men are overly scrutinized today? Sounds like a contradiction wrapped in a nice little bow of denial; feminism didn't arise out of some pure, noble crusade against injustice; it came from a bunch of grievances, some legit, some totally blown out of proportion. And now, it’s evolved into a blame game where men are the punching bags for every societal ill. Why do you think feminism needs to vilify men to make a point? M…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:26 AM
11

Blaming men for everything under the sun is the oldest, laziest trick in the book. Yeah, men are more likely to be perpetrators in certain crimes, but you conveniently forget that men are also more likely to be victims of violent crimes too. Ever heard of selective statistics? And sure, let’s pretend women had nothing to do with the societal stereotypes. Women are just helpless bystanders, right? Society's messed up because humans are flawed, period. Pointing fingers at men alone is like blaming…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:22 AM
6

And if I read you as MLK I would also fight against you. What is that of africanamericans instead of saying "black? Huh? Most racist thing I've read today.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:17 AM
20

Feminism is a supremacist moverment. "Rights for me, woman, at your expense".
/r/MensRights17/06/24 08:56 PM
41

If we are preprogrammed to take drugs, what can we do anyways? Bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 08:55 PM
4

Water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 11:35 AM
2

A contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:29 PM
4

Absolutely, Sometimes I don't understand these types of posts and why they are not deleted directly. Absolutely offtopic. It looks like a vent about why a man of possibilities decided to choose a younger woman. Welcome to hypergamy 101.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:41 AM
3

What does this have even to do with this subreddit? If you want to vent, there are more suitable subreddits like r/askmen.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:39 AM
15

Empowerment is inversely proportional to equality. And since we know that equality is impossible and equity is the aspiration, what can we say about feminism if not a supremacist movement?
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:11 AM
1

Hi there; I see that you have a quite evident inability to show your own arguments to muddy the debate and say absolutely nothing. I recommend that you use the articles as a reference and quote, but don't copy and paste them without saying anything and expect people to understand what your arguments are in the abstract, especially since you are not creating debate, thank you. I can't read the first article completely (requieres me register) with respect to the second, it explains absolutely noth…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 09:31 AM
1

I deeply respect debating with you, so please, I ask you to continue to maintain a dialectic that allows us to continue debating, but if ideas are not confronted, it is quite complicated, even more so when you want to delegitimize the arguments because of the thought that I may have, which I can justify and I fervently wish to defend my position. Oh, so now I’m “big brained” and “logic pilled”? Thanks for the compliments, But let’s cut through your confusion. My supposed “bias” is just me being …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 08:07 PM
1

If you think tossing aside data and facts makes you some kind of social wizard, you're missing the plot entirely, and that's the full debate since the beggining. We aren't talking about solving world hunger; it's about understanding people. You claim I'm blinded by data? Nah, I'm just not blinded by bias. Personal interaction isn't some magical realm where logic takes a backseat. Ever heard of emotional intelligence? It's about reading cues, not horoscopes. When you sit down on a date, yeah, it’…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 06:44 PM
1

Give me a break; your method of judging people is foolproof because you think your judgments are spot on? That's rich. "I don't have time to get to know anyone, so I'll just judge a book by its cover." Brilliant strategy, How often do you think that leads you astray? But hey, when it does, you can just shrug and say, "Oh well, my bad.", because your justification of anecdotal evidence and the halo effect, both as bias and argumentative fallacy have no weight: seek to subject reality to your crit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 04:45 PM
1

Your argument is still leaning heavily on appearances and snap judgments. Claiming it's "common sense" to assume someone's potential for harm based on how they look is exactly what perpetuates the halo effect, a bias you initially rejected confusing it with beauty or reality to then justify your bias. Just because someone portrays themselves a certain way doesn't mean you've accurately assessed their entire character or capabilities. People present themselves differently for all sorts of reasons…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 03:27 PM
1

Survival instincts are one thing, but using that as an excuse for stereotyping based on appearances is another. And it is still the bias that you initially rejected. Your "snap judgments" are exactly what the halo effect is about. it's not just about looks, but also about assuming someone's intentions and character from superficial cues. Putting up a tough photo or being vague online doesn't justify your assumptions about someone's entire life or potential for harm. There are plenty of folks who…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 02:20 PM
2

Dude, claiming you're not affected by the halo effect because you don't equate looks with goodness or badness doesn't cut it. What you're describing judging someone's potential danger solely by their eyes and expressions is textbook halo effect. You're still making snap judgments based on limited information, which is exactly what the halo effect is about. It's not about being PC or calling people ugly or pretty; it's about recognizing that your perception of someone's danger level is likely bia…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 01:50 PM
0

Blaming economic failures and women’s rights issues on polygamy is a joke. Plenty of monogamous countries are economic disasters and treat women like second-class citizens too. How many men in these "polygamous" countries can actually afford multiple wives or actullay have them anyway? The real issues are corrupt governments, lack of education, and poor economic policies, not marriage structures. And claiming monogamy birthed democracy and human rights is laughable. Europe has a long history of …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:55 PM
1

Thanks for the article. It was an interesting and refreshing read, however, I still don't understand your argument on why monogamy means more freedom for women than non-monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:27 PM
1

solely based on their appearance, facial expression Halo effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 11:29 AM
1

Could you please elaborate this argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 11:26 AM
1

Alright, let's get this straight. First off, anecdotes aren't worth much when it comes to understanding complex issues. They're like tiny puzzle pieces that don't fit the whole picture. You can't rely on personal stories to make informed decisions or draw accurate conclusions about broader trends. Secondly, outliers are outliers—they're exceptions, not the rule. Bringing up outliers doesn't change the fact that the majority follows predictable patterns. It's not about ignoring outliers; it's abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 01:53 AM
1

Sure, I get that you're fired up about outliers. But reducing complex issues to anecdotes doesn't give us the full picture. It's like saying one cherry blossom represents all of spring. We need broader data to understand trends and make informed decisions, not just single stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 01:27 AM
1

Oh, so now we're pivoting to "a single person represents a single point of data"? Are you seriously reducing complex issues to an anecdote because it suits your narrow view? Let's break this down in simple terms for you since you seem to be missing the entire point. You're fixating on one person's anecdotal experience as if it's gospel, completely disregarding broader patterns that emerge from rigorous data analysis. Data isn't just numbers; it's a reflection of reality, a reality that includes …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:04 AM
1

You're missing the point completely. It's not about ignoring reality or just focusing on numbers. it's about actually understanding what the data means and its relationship with the observable phenomenon. When studies contradict each other, it's because there's more going on beneath the surface that needs to be looked at. Reality isn't just what you see in front of you; it's also in the data we analyze. If you can't grasp that, then you're the one ignoring the complexity and settling for oversim…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 11:46 PM
1

It is best to contrast the available information with the statistics and information that may contradict the first studies one encounters in research. There are many factors, such as analyzing the methodology, sampling...; In cases where the available information does not conclusively corroborate a paradigm, the ideal is to remain skeptical and fully declare the inability to determine a contested phenomenon or that it is a phenomenon that is variably dual, binomial or multifactorial, If the reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 10:05 PM
1

What you have said is a very interesting idea, however, I do not agree with it. My experiences have confirmed precisely what the statistics illustrate. And other times, I have been surprised at how my experiences did not conform to what is usual in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 08:43 PM
1

On many levels and phenomena, I find that statistics and the calculation of probabilities allow me to understand many social, interpersonal and other multifactorial phenomena.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 06:57 PM
1

If you have enough information, you can predict many behaviors and trends, yes. Although not necessarily reading my mind in its totality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 04:20 PM
–

Well, looks like someone can't handle a little truth. If the shoe fits, wear it. No need to get defensive just because reality hit a nerve. Embrace the cringe, buddy, it might just be your reality check.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 02:15 PM
1

Good.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 01:36 PM
–

Congratulations on not being a complete failure in those relationships. It's refreshing to know that someone as average as you, supposedly, has managed to find partners who care about your pleasure. Perhaps you're not as ordinary as you claim to be if women have consistently prioritized your satisfaction. Keep riding that wave of luck and enjoy the benefits of being a regular guy with above-average experiences in the dating world.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 01:18 PM
–

In truth, it is not mutual. Generally it is the man who is expected to prove his worth in giving pleasure, not in a woman's cooperation in expressing what she feels, and what she needs. Because the woman is also afraid of the man's reaction, and truly, the dickpill can definitively sink many men, regardless of the previous awareness that they may have had, generally, the average man, even more so with the handicap of a small penis, will be as active as an average woman in the sexual market. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:43 PM
–

It remains irrelevant. The size of the penis does not subtract, just add, even more so the more sexual experience a woman has. The thickness and length alone represent a superior stimulation tool than, for example, a man with a smaller penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:17 PM
–

Yes, it makes sense, however a man does not need so much flourish and effort to satisfy his most primary and basic sexual instinct, Therefore, sex and its dynamics are ultimately monopolized on how you, as a man, can satisfy a woman, and not the other way around. Therefore, there is a naive debate about why the size of the penis is relevant, and not, for example, the width or length of the vaginal canal or the size of the clitoris or its externality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:06 PM
–

Penis size matter. It is a fact and the gaslight that revolves around this is because perhaps, the "dickpill" is one of the hardest pills that a man, whether average or below average, must face, and by pure statistics, the more sexually active a woman is, the greater her tendency to prefer penises that are slightly above average, if not larger. The size of the penis, no matter how many surgical methods or blood irrigation methods, cannot be changed. Either the couple sits down to find solutions …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 11:00 AM
1

I have the feeling - I have no statistical evidence to prove my point - that most heterosexual men, unless they have been sexually or romantically successful at an early age, are prone to these kinds of actions in an attempt to curry favour with a woman. And isn't that what is instigated by platitudes and copy-paste advice? Men are advised in the abstract from an early age to improve their personalities, to be good people, and with this, they are told that some woman will notice the goodness of …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 10:31 AM
20

The law forbids you to do anything, and then the law does not compensate you for the harm done to you. It's a bloody joke. But if you want to understand why this is happening. Just read carefully how FDS is the epitome of this social dynamic: a woman will abuse you, steal from you, humiliate you, use you as an object of genuine exploitation and sadistic gratification. Then, the law does not protect you, and everything will remain "women's stuff". The dichotomy of wanting to be women with suppose…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:21 AM
1

Predictions are the backbone of rational decision-making. Trusting gut feelings in interpersonal interactions is a fool's game. Data-driven foresight allows for calculated responses, giving you an edge in understanding and influencing outcomes, even more so when it comes to relationships and how things are so screwed up that you have to be extremely careful about the trends that emerge.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 10:12 AM
1

So let me rephrase the question. Why would it not be appropriate to use certain statistics if, for example, it can elucidate the trend based on a phenomenon?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:06 PM
0

I quote: THERE ARE TIMES WHEN THEY ARE NOT.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 10:43 PM
1

If you have read what I have said in this debate, carefull, you will understand that I am not talking about cases like yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 09:49 PM
1

Nor have I said that you have stated that statistics should be rejected, but rather I am asking you your criteria for accepting or rejecting statistics, since this is ambiguous and confusing. Statistics study trends, and within these trends, we should see what these statistics study. It is obvious that people are more than statistics, but this does not invalidate the fact that statistics can result in good indicators depending on certain phenomena (smoking is harmful, Obesity can cause a plethor…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 09:26 PM
0

Yes, indeed, in the averages we find quite interesting trends about the social group as a whole, and what stands out above and lacks below will have reasons that do not conform to this norm. And then, of course, we would have to give an analysis of the why of things and what the paradigms are, which make, for example, some men have sexual abundance and others, completely lack it, logically in conditions where we can discard sex as prostitutes from these dynamics. Then, of course, it would be qui…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 09:18 PM
1

No, I simply consider that the most important elements in sexual attraction are genetic, and not acquired, except extreme and specific cases: a negligible statistical minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:12 PM
1

And the difference is that if you start from unfavorable factors, it will be of no use. By lifting weight and gaining muscle you are not going to have more sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:54 AM
1

If a person of normal weight and healthy is not already successful, the facelift will not help them at all. It's a cope. Personal improvement must be differentiated from improvement to be attractive in the sexual market. Lifting will not help you that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:45 AM
1

Have a great day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:26 AM
4

THERE ARE TIMES WHEN THEY ARE NOT. Unless the cut is 50%, what is the moment when a trend is not a significant phenomenon? What is your criterion for accepting or rejecting statistics and probability calculations?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:10 AM
1

They focus solely on the biggest percentages of people and treat any other experience as an unimportant anomaly, almost like anything less than 50% is utterly negligible. The thing is that one cannot speak of exceptions when there are obvious trends. The problem with exceptions, and anecdotal evidence, is that they have no general application nor do they serve us absolutely except to create a mirage. If a phenomenon is 50% answered affirmatively (for example, the divorce rate in the United State…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:08 AM
1

The halo effect is basically the confusion that people have when associating appearances (physical or other) to what things really are. A basic example would be the example of Disney movies where the good guy is beautiful and the bad guy is horribly ugly. That isn't to say that one should avoid dating someone that is financially well off or physically attractive. But it shouldn't be the main driving factor. If it is, the relationship is built on a poor foundation. And it is money and attractiven…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 10:44 AM
1

IMO, the redpill sidebar is about as redpill as it gets but few people have read it. I would consider it to be part of the redpill “bible” along with other written content like The Rational Male. This does not make any sense since by this rule of three, we could talk about ideological deviations in each subject who decided to give their opinion within the redpill community, just like any other ideology. For example, the style of The rationale male and the.pdf that you have attached They differ i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 10:40 AM
1

I doubt it, horribly, if you didn't already have the same options before lifting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 10:31 AM
8

I don't doubt your ability in the past to date, and perhaps the technological problem is one of the main causes of this, but it is quite difficult to determine if you are objective when determining yourself as "average looking" or "beyond average"; And I don't say this because I'm asking you for a face reveal, but because of the fact that it is difficult to study individual cases with respect to the tendency.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:13 AM
5

it’s true. Hit the gym, watch your weight, dress nice, clean car, good social media presence, etc. This is a platitude; Saying Chad is built is the cruelest thing you can say to the average straight man, because, It is a bit of improvement, which is always good, but the improvement in all this is not proportional to your success or ability to improve in the sexual market, unless you start from an extremely radical change in which your first version eclipsed your potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:07 AM
7

This is a problem of analysis, since neither sentiment nor individual perception determines the value on the sexual market. Women, at a basic level, have infinite value in the sexual market, due to their demand and low or no offer, while the man is categorized according to how successful he is based, effectively, on his sexual attractiveness. The number of young, single, sexless, and loveless men is huge, and in that game, it is only the woman who determines how, who and when.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:04 AM
21

As I understand from reading various authors, from redpillers to blackpillers, the "betabuxx" is the man who stays to pick up the leftovers of that man's orgiastic behavior of those "alpha" men or "Chads" that over time they have discarded many women or rather, they have only been with them for casual sex, but not for something more serious and solid. Thus, other concepts such as "The wall", "biological clock" and "reach a certain age" in which the woman converges, supposedly with mental-emotion…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:58 AM
1

Maybe yes, maybe I haven't made myself understood as much as I wanted to. The fact is that I have sought with my questions to reach the foundation or sets of foundations when we want to talk about the redpill, beyond "Reddit users say X, the redpill subreddit users say Y". Since, OP, she is convinced that the statement that women don't have hobbies is hardcore belief among redpillers. And reading these quotes, more than understanding this, I understand, on the part of the redpill, that it is sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:44 AM
5

Regarding the instruction: "never approach equal woman". What is the criterion by which a man and a woman are equal? And based on what? What one can easily observe is that, despite a debatable supposed equality before the law, a man and woman are socially different and the comparison between a millionaire man and a millionaire woman do not have the same degree of comparison except for what objectively unites them: the accumulation of capital, but not what both are: a selector and a sexual select…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:38 AM
2

Hi, thanks for your post. However, I would like to debate with you one point you have made: Afterall, wealth is a very superficial reason to be in a relationship with someone. What is the difference between a relationship that is supposedly built under solid values and the halo effect by which what we believe we know about that person begins to develop? I define the halo effect as the confusion that exists between what is initially apparent and what can later give rise. If it is not because of p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:29 AM
7

I see, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:21 AM
-1

These are many quotes, and I identify that much of the development of these quotes, in large part, have their origin in the development that Esther Vilar made in her works. And although this may result in an approximation that redpillers seek to theorize, I do not find maxims that are categorically established, beyond the analysis, correct or not, from the analysis of these redpillers. Is it perhaps the maxim of these quotes and specifically, of this work, that women are intellectually deficient…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:20 AM
1

Thanks for the references; along with another user who also posted hers. Now, how can we determine that the statement that women don't have hobbies is a hardcore redpill belief and what are the hardcore redpill ideas, if such a compilation exists?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:06 AM
2

As you can understand, if you take the debate to insults, then we will hardly be able to debate, because the arguments will be mixed with personal attacks before I can respond to you with my arguments. "Dating" is a concept to be defined based on who has the power of sexual selection and what is it that women will want to exploit according to monetary-sexual criteria, where primacy lies in lookism. If it's not sexual attraction, it's monetary exploitation. This is something that many men do not …
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:02 AM
6

Thanks for the references.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:54 AM
-4

Could you please redirect me to those comments? And of course, could you tell me, as neutrally as possible, about the hardcore - and I guess more established - beliefs among redpillers or redpill in general? Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:45 AM
3

What is the probability that a woman in a pool of million of women can marry a millionaire? And what is the likelihood that a millionaire will explicitly decide to marry that small number of women who can access this millionaire?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:43 AM
-2

Who are these redpillers that say that women have no hobbies? And what are the hardcore redpill beliefs?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:32 AM
3

Who says that women have no hobbies?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:28 AM
1

If we are going to disrespect each other, I think this debate has nothing left to continue. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 11:43 PM
1

It's not as simple as "most men are not attractive to most women". It's a question of why. Pure and simple biology. Attractiveness is sexual utility plus material utility. Most men can only aspire to be ATM machines in exchange for measured sex, and perhaps, one or two children.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:44 PM
3

Curiously, more and more men are single and they cannot access the sexual market, regardless of the idolatry that many men may engage in. Actually, the marriage institution also continues to decline and in the end, is what you say, living together which rises to quasi-matrimonial status nowadays.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:41 PM
2

At the end of the day, each person decides how to live their life, but the truth is that it is not promising to be a provider in the Western world. Maybe this is a good bet in other countries, but in the West, It is neither a good bet nor does it have good odds of success in the long run. And that is the problem, although many would like to, few access this dynamic. Yes, it is simple, because we assume the freedom of women. Nothing a man can do.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 08:50 PM
3

Logically, he who opts for a marriage will initially have what he wants under assumptions that the man has assumed as ideal factors. The problem, however, is not understanding the conglomerate behind marriage and these monetary exchanges. However, in modern times, not everyone gets married, nor can everyone get married, even more so in the Western world, where there are fewer and fewer marriages and everything revolves around getting together. What today we would call "having what everyone else …
/r/MensRights11/06/24 03:23 PM
2

So you're going to pay a prostitute to go on dates? Obviously OP is referring to having a relationship with a woman not based on financial remuneration from the beginning to carry out such an activity. The genuine attraction, that is the question. If a woman is not attracted to you, you are just going to become an ATM, and that is easily discovered if one investigates very well the partner one has. Then, we wonder why half to 90% of marriages end in divorce in Western countries while the vast ma…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:46 PM
6

If you have read OP's concerns carefully; He does not seek sex as a way to alleviate his grief, but instead seeks to be genuinely valued by a woman, which contradicts the concept of economic remuneration to engage in sex. If because of your physical appearance, which is generally the reason why many men do not achieve this experience, you are constantly rejected, or too much is asked of you to be able to access this experience, The only alternative to this are two: Accept that no woman is going …
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:25 PM
3

Great works, indeed. However reading The Rational male was severe testicular pain: The format is horrible. 🤣
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:29 PM
16

It is an alternative only if: Understand that other cultures also have problems, sometimes quite severe ones (Japanese society). Don't go back to your country with that woman. The passport should only serve as a path to forming a life in another place and another society, never as a ladder that allows a woman to exploit you for what you have, Economically speaking.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:02 AM
7

why should I improve myself? It's all about objectives. If there are no objectives. Why improve? And perhaps, that is a great peace of mind. If I don't have need, where is the suffering for desire? Disappears. but why should I self improve when so many other guys out there seem to have no issues with women? I have heard of and even seen losers and abusive assholes still have attractive women. why cant that shit happen to me? I am a strong defender of scientific blackpill. It all revolves around …
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:57 AM
51

There is a Slavic saying that says: "you have to lack food to feel what hunger is". It is truly a "water is wet" proverb, and it is, objectively, but, In abundance, people do not know what it would be like to lack what you take for granted, and even more so in primary instincts.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:48 AM
27

Everytime I seek support and guidance and open up about my struggles with dating and how I feel lonely, people always fucking say "no one owes you anything" and tell me to not view women as sex objects. Indeed; a man who has difficulty having sex or a partner or experiences is a man socially and sexually understood as unfit. Some will tell you personality, others will tell you status, and the most knowledgeable will tell you that it is a mixture of looks-status or pure and simple lookism. Nobody…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:45 AM
3

I agree with you that the conclusions of the pills always revolve around, in their conclusions, seeing what is the shopping list that women want to make with men and what do you do to have some chances. But in a way, that is biology and natural tendencies, and logically, man feels inclined, mostly heterosexual, to want to reproduce and create that construct called lasting family. Going your own way nowadays is natural, but it is circumstantial today, since we are walking towards the abyss, towar…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:14 AM
0

as thinking women should remain virgins until married which is a fundamental departure from seeking and drawing attention to uncomfortable truths. The female body count is proportional to the stability of the couple in the long run, and specifically, in religious-civil institutions such as marriage. Thus, we can say that this is a "fundamental" pill within the sexual market in contrast to the feminist argument of "a free and sexually empowered woman will love more, and will know what she wants."…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:09 AM
2

I think you are left with the concept of what the pillas represent, but not the background that the pills have. If you stick with the Matrix movie and the metaphor, then, logically, being told certain truths is not something striking either; However, the fact that it seeks to destroy a system of erroneous thinking about how things work leads you to rethink what to do, what you are doing and what you could do. In the case of redpill, we see that there is feminine behavior and how gynocentrism has…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 01:04 AM
5

Very good observation and I appreciate you making it. I see in the redpill only what Esther Vilar called the manipulation of man in the redpill: You must be what is expected of you, because naturally, you must follow, as if you were a train on rails, excellence to receive supreme feminine attention. However, I differentiate an analytical redpill, which coincides with the blackpill (both seek to explain the reason for female behavior in the sexual market) and the prescriptive redpill, which is, h…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 12:57 AM
7

The video is really stupid, but I don't understand how you concluded that this has to do with a sexual-racial competition in which distrust is proportionally related to the liar's phallus and fetishism for the BBC, since in this case, based on the video, we can only conclude that it is a competition between BBCs, that is, one of poorer quality and another better. The white husband is only left as a cuckold, in this case, but he is irrelevant to that racial competition. But this is putting too mu…
/r/MensRights11/06/24 12:48 AM
-2

The question is that this sub is basicly people complaining 24/7 about "modern relationships" and bitching about some kind of feminist conspiracy theory on women attractions, wihle, it is just that most men are not attractive for most women. As easy as it sounds.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 11:55 PM
-6

To be honest.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:48 PM
1

the remarks seem always predominantly aimed at men, never at women Women don't need to improve. This is a fact, rather than an inflammatory statement. Most women only need to stay healthy to be fully functional subjects in society. The rest of the actions, such as fitness, and makeup routines It only obeys the competition of women for access to the best man they can access, but not a sinequanon reason why they need to improve, because, a woman, will always receive positive feedback, whether from…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:54 PM
5

Hi, mate! Could you please elaborate on "the law of conscience"? Thank you. 😊 This is the core of your rights' issues. You inherently know you're not equal in value to a woman, to a society, to a child, nor will you ever be, to yourself or them. Honestly, I think that a deep and historical analysis of how we as species have evolved and how societies and civilizations have organized themselves to deal with the main problems is requiered. On the one hand, we have access to sex for the majority of …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:38 PM
21

I bet the best way to protect your assests is going your own way.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 01:44 PM
1

That's fucking life, the world is not a garden with rainbows and unicorns. There are bad places, and good places. And women, due to their sexual value, can be raped and abused due to the lack of moral and legal incentives. It's the nature. Before, for centuries, this was known, and it was understood as a risk to avoid. Today, people want to change the world based on good intentions. Absurd.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:31 AM
2

Hi, brother. How are you today? I believe, at the risk of receiving ridicule from the majority of the community, that talking about mental problems is more common and I think it is talked about quite a bit. The problem, perhaps, is the approach, because, obviously, what approach can a man give when the maxims by which we are programmed biologically or socially do not depend on you and much less to the acquisition by money? But in your case, my question is: was your life so empty that you had to …
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:24 AM
16

What are two people doing alone in the woods and why should they both have interaction? If the woods are socially assumed to be dangerous places. Why would you go to these places? I completely understand the claim that women should be able to go wherever they want and not have to be afraid of being harassed, or in danger of being raped, but..., me, as an average man, I also wouldn't feel safe going through a forest, away from everything, and where there may be people with very bad intentions the…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 12:26 AM
1

It is what it is: a fact. Solutions, measures, and alternatives are things that human beings go around with.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:49 AM
4

Hypergamy continues to function and despite the independence of women, their hypergamous instincts have not ceased to exist. In conditions where the woman is independent, instinct also applies.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:48 AM
18

If the woman prefers them dominant, be dominant. If the woman prefers you to be stoic, be stoic. If the woman wants X and Y, I know X and Y. That you follow or seek to follow a woman's wish list will only make you a slave to other people's desires. If a woman wants a dominant man, who dominates? The man who is supposed to be dominant or the woman who specifically looks for a dominating man? Therein lies the contradiction: it is the woman who dominates the dominant and takes advantage of him.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 11:45 AM
3

Which is curious, because all the fruit of sex revolves around the woman, since in an environment of freedom, it is the man who must show his worth so that the woman remains before that "sexgiver".
/r/MensRights04/06/24 12:17 AM
1

Funny, not gonna lie. So funny cucks and women want to execute you equally. 🤣
/r/MensRights01/06/24 10:25 PM
39

Then we wonder why some men go crazy and end up killing everyone and themselves. This is mental illness. Hardener that scares me to horror
/r/MensRights01/06/24 06:00 PM
1

I don't understand two things about your answer. That the phenomenon is more complicated. The fact that women do not dominate the sexual market in the Islamic world. Women are sexual selectors under normal conditions in Islam. Not only do they have the ability to choose, but they can also impose a fairly high economic tax on sex (mahr) highly elevated. In countries like Saudi Arabia, The mahr can be equivalent to the price of a middle-class apartment. Supposedly, Islam in some way seeks to balan…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 12:49 PM
60

We should aspire for more realistic goals like fewer men being cannon fodder. Absolutely, my friend.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:12 PM
1

Women are sexual selectors. Men of "low" and "high" value both undergo either acceptance or rejection. Any characteristic that this "high value man", "Chad", or whatever you want to call him has been It is simply a wishlist that a woman will passively benefit from.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 10:24 AM
6

Is it normal to masturbate? No doubt. Is it normal to masturbate while consuming porn while married? It is morally questionable. You should talk to your wife about what you need and start looking for solutions or steps to take.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 03:57 PM
14

In the sexual market, women, as sexual selectors, are in charge. That's the way things are, it's no more complicated. This is reproductive nature.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 12:35 PM
2

The lack of action is imposed by the sexual market, not a fact by which sexual success is generally decided And I respond to what I think requires clarification, gentleman; not only for OP, but for the readers who read here. Greetings.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 09:20 PM
1

A woman's virginity or low bodycount is directly proportional to the stability a woman will have in a relationship. It is an objective fact.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:03 AM
2

No, blackpill is practically a direct link to the scientific study of why X men don't fuck, no matter how much "personality" they have. Analytical redpill does this too, but most redpill theorists are neither on YouTube nor focus on the overarching issue of what looks is most important above all.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:02 AM
4

I don't agree with your analysis that blackpill does not act. The blackpill does not offer paths to "improvement" because many times, these improvements are extremely limited, even more so in purely physical aspects (height, facial structure, penis size, frame...). Redpill often does not focus on lookism, which is essential for everything, and often focuses on copes that are of no use to many men and do not earn any benefit; the redpill, outside its analytical spectrum, is a cope milked very wel…
/r/MensRights28/05/24 10:59 AM
1

I meant what I meant.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 01:25 AM
16

Brutal.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 01:14 PM
9

Simply change "woman" to man, and you would have the reality of the sexual market.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 01:12 PM
11

Statistically every woman is volcel.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 01:12 PM
4

Hypergamy is the phenomenon by which women dominate the sexual market and seek in it a duality of looks-money. based on the best phenotypes and a provider (dual mating strategy). And from here, there are different lines of analysis. The redpill assumes that your main task as a rational man (Rollo Tomassi) is to become a scarce value in this sexual market, either through looksmaxxing and moneymaxxing (which generally also leads to a statusmaxx) Blackpill assumes that regardless of what you do, yo…
/r/MensRights27/05/24 01:10 PM
6

We value women because we are too uncomfortable to be vulnerable with other men and women are the only ones we feel we can let our true feelings out to. A big mistake, honestly. Any sign of weakness is better understood by a friend than by a partner. In a friend, it is a sign of mutual knowledge, in a couple, a weakness that can turn against you.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 02:10 AM
17

Allow me to open a debate, but honestly, I don't know if now, at this very moment, man is more disposable than before or the same as before. In the last century alone, millions of men died in wars; In populations where the world wars were not so severe, the demographic ratio remained stable, but, in former countries of the Soviet Union or in Eastern Europe, let us remember that there are more women than men; and that is because millions of men died in those bloody battles, unlike women, who if t…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 12:27 PM
1

They always did. In the past, sex was exchanged for goods. Now, it is the same, with the difference that women no longer have to exchange anything, except for women in extreme need. Or they are prostitutes.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 12:02 PM
47

You have to understand that for feminism, only tall, handsome, attractive, successful men with purchasing power (whom they secretly desire) are truly men. The average man in all aspects does not exist, he is invisible: a kind of ghost or spectrum that lives to support the foundations of a society for which he has never cared. Who is going to cry that a man sleeps on the street? Who is going to cry over the death of a man who wanted a roof over his head? It seems that no one; because only a woman…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:35 AM
7

It is the metaphor of a man who lives enslaved under the domination of a woman, burned by great sexual feelings that demonize him and destroy his life, because in the end, this woman is like an illness, a fever, that takes his life.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 09:47 PM
9

F.E.V.E.R. - Orden Ogan
/r/MensRights20/05/24 09:27 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:58 AM
1

You must differentiate between animal jealousy, and slut-shaming. Biologically, it is jealousy, and slut-shaming is a more complex concept based on dichotomies between marriage-sterility or fornication-chastity. In hunter-gatherer societies, promiscuity was often encouraged as it ensured genetic diversity and increased chances of survival for offspring. However, with the advent of agriculture and civilization came notions of property and ownership – including women being seen as possessions rath…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 04:06 PM
8

Slut shaming is a despicable practice, but it's rooted in hate for the male sexuality, that I knew. Slut-shaming only finds its origin in a generally religious morality based on chastity in which it is considered that the greater the number of sexual partners a woman has, the less this will be the stability of women to create solid and lasting bonds with another man. This could be a useless myth if it were not for the fact that numerous studies show that marital stability, for example, is propor…
/r/MensRights18/05/24 12:37 PM
2

Honestly, without giving great incentives to families, little can be done. Because, we start from the basis that people are free to decide. Work, facilities to have children in the form of subsidies and of course, that the State also helps with daycares, schools, cafeterias while parents work. But of course, that would be a very heavy burden on the State. Or society changes radically in its morals and behavior as well as economic incentives for the working class, or the only short-term solution …
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:29 PM
7

Sometimes democracy doesn't work. Especially when there are large parties that monopolize the electorate. Partitocracy is brutal.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:24 PM
26

Only women have "hyster" (check the Greek origin).
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:21 AM
15

Only one woman uses a child as a kidnapping device which at the same time is the object of economic exploitation to the state and the father. Honestly, at this point, we could become extinct or become a multiracial people.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:20 AM
0

Ask their partners.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 10:33 PM
2

I do not invalidate your own experience, I, for example, am gay, but like you, I have seen many heterosexual friends and couples. I honestly don't know if I'm more attractive than you or less, what I do know is that I'm average, and depending on the day, below average. 😜 It's not that I believe that a man's destiny should be a cuck or an ATM, but it is, ultimately, what an average heterosexual man can aspire to in the sexual market. What attractive claim does an ordinary man have for an ordinary…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 07:55 PM
1

I believe that everything I have said has been relevant. If not, it is quite possible that our positions are irreconcilable and there is no need to waste more time in this conversation-debate. Have a great day.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:39 PM
4

Men and women face the same problem, which is paradoxically opposite in both sexes. Women face a dual strategy of relationships, both sexual and affective as well as economic. Women are lost between what they really want and what suits them best: they burn with desire for an extremely attractive man while they can only settle for an average man to help with the domestic economy, since those attractive, tall and rich men are a statistical minority and have better options than the average woman. A…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 04:05 PM
1

Well, the important thing is that they are jokes Yes, we can be talking about online communities, because it is true that many people go to social networks, such as Reddit, but also X, Facebook, among others, but they do not necessarily make incel participate in these and even less in those private echochambers. One thing is the incel as a passive subject of information and another very relevant thing is their participation in these communities. That is the distinction I want to make. Gossiping …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:57 PM
2

And why do you hate your life? Most incels are not on echochambers-forums. Although incels of many nationalities can be traced, Those who access these virtual communities are mostly people who live in the first world, and a statistical majority of them, in these virtual communities, are white. Women do not target men, but rather talk about them in their spaces, generally private, and then use other men in the public sphere to defend themselves against their own words. And as I told you, I have d…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:33 PM
0

As a gay, I already tell you no. There are legitimately ugly men, horrible to look at, who did not receive, receive and will receive male affection. Neither as passive, nor as active, and much less for stable relationships. If Tinder and other social networks seem difficult to you as a heterosexual to find a partner, many more are the networks for ugly gay men, even for casual sex, as is the case with Grindr. And this is a scientific blackpill, however, the gay man, as is my case, is considered …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:30 PM
22

It's all looks. It's the halo effect. Only a man perceived as extremely masculine, that is, tall, strong, with a handsome face (and therefore with a high probability of having many women behind him) It is what determines the contrast between an incel and an extremely attractive man (Chad). Lookism, lookism, lookism, lookism.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:26 PM
6

I have also read this on that forum. But the truth is that the community is divided in considering whether a man who goes to prostitutes is an incel or not. It is generally considered that they are still incels because in the end, the definition they give of inceldom is that state in which a man cannot access genuine, consensual and non-paid sexual relationships. Seeing how social networks effectively impose a model of happiness and life that they will never be able to have, or very difficult to…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:17 PM
10

Honestly, there is a difference between those incels who really are incels because of their looks, which I think are the majority of so-called incels, And then there are people with serious self-esteem problems and that they are terribly lost. The experience of the incel, the ugly man, and the term "loser" in its most American sense, is quite far from the life that a woman can have, which is generally different. It's all lookism.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:13 PM
5

More than out of context, I reflect based on what you have said. Because truly saying that an incel is a man who is not attractive to a woman is a "water-is-wet" answer.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:10 PM
2

Yes, he is the most prominent echochamber among incels. Honestly, reading this forum is a curious degree. Not only are there authentic urban, religious and even political tribes within this forum, but there are also authentic "fratricidal wars" where they are accused of being "fakecels". And it's curious, because apparently only the heterosexual man can be an "incel" according to them and, They fight each other to determine who is the biggest incel among them.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:09 PM
9

It all depends on how attractive you are, yes.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 02:53 PM
6

Generally, a lack of female affection is just the surface of all an incel's problems. The lack of feminine affection also represents the shadow of something much deeper: the lack of social capabilities that are reaffirmed by, effectively, a lack of looks. They are all looks in this society. Indeed, this spiral of revenge and uprisings could even be understood in school shootings. Some will say they were "mentally ill", others will say they were simply sadists, and others will simply say that it …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 02:52 PM
20

Truly the life of an incel is terrifying. Many have lost hope in life, live on public subsidies and abandon themselves to a parasitic life with their relatives. If being a man is already terribly difficult, being an incel is a terrible state of life. Not only are incels denied sexual affection, but they are also isolated, among themselves and outside of themselves, except in echochambers. Mocking will never end because it is also part of intersexual and intrasexual competition. The incel no long…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 02:47 PM
9

Cheating is breaking the contract that both have made. Not separating from that person while enjoying the benefits of another person as a person makes you simply despicable. The rest is pure cynicism.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:06 PM
1

🤣
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:00 PM
32

They know what they want. It's called dual mating strategy: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_238-1 They want a cuck that provides while getting fucked and impregnated by a hot man. Ideally, the hot man would provide, and the circle would be closed, but the truth is that the hot man tends towards polygyny, or he just doesn't want to commit.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:38 PM
11

I do not agree with exonerating women for their behavior based on a feminist influence; but precisely the feminine nature of not accepting responsibility and sneaky behavior It is what brings many women together in feminism, that is, in taking advantage of the State to apart from being free from many responsibilities, use man for this purpose.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:04 PM
45

Which makes you conclude that a woman is not looking for someone in her partner to consider her equal, but rather an object of economic-sexual exploitation. Looks, then money, then status.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 03:01 PM
1

Genetics or nothing.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 06:49 PM
1

I open debate: Is friendship between heterosexual men and women possible without one ending up having mixed feelings for the other?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 05:51 PM
2

Whoever deny that women marry conditionally is just a fool.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:56 PM
0

What scientific data are you putting on the table?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 04:55 PM
4

No. Wokism goes aside. The fact of committing morally questionable acts for social acceptance based on physical-sexual characteristics It is the society without morals in which we live, and also, part of unbridled human nature.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:20 PM
10

There is no brainrot, if you ask me honestly. Women know very well what they do and know that they have advantages that allow them to carry out their depravities and injustices. From a position of social power, why did they care about what is fair if their actions have no consequences? In the end, it's like Rollo Tomassi said: "a woman is never yours, it's just your turn."
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:03 PM
12

They won't change either. If we base most social interactions on an exchange, The only possible case would be, precisely, to enslave women, which is morally questionable.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:10 PM
6

Honestly, why should the man care about the woman? It is obvious that man needs woman for reproduction, but, what is PurplePillDebate but the justification of gynocentrism?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:08 PM
13

Lookism is everything, from what we can see. Lookism justifies the worst of depravities because lookism is justified, it is the highest value you want to have. Some deny it to gaslight you, and others accept it in their mental illness.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:07 PM
6

English is not my native language and since you are under the influence of alcohol and pills, it has been difficult for me to read the text, since it was not written with words that were easily readable for me. Don't worry, reading several times, in the end, I understood you.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:38 AM
20

I have had serious difficulties reading your post, but I understand your frustration. We have reached a point of stupidity that only one can feel frustration for what we men go through. Keep living, keep enjoying the small pleasures of life, keep raising your voice for all those men who don't have any.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:01 AM
3

"Arguments" in favor of bears being better than men. Literally, it's not a meme. There are people who really believe it, instigated by feminists and women in general on social networks.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 11:40 PM
182

Honestly, "men vs bears" shitposting should have died the first day that shit started circulating. Let women go to the woods and enjoy the company of a bear. Natural selection will do its thing.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:09 PM
1

Bearyboy.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:37 AM
21

It's a mix between people who have spouted shit and the mods have quickly banned them and a kind of push on the part of feminism to both silence men's problems while secretly proselytizing and to other men that complaining is not masculine at all, and that it makes them "weak men" (therefore, appealing to the desire of many heterosexual men: access to a vagina). If you ask why this subreddit has a bad reputation among NPC echochambers, you will always find a woman.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:32 PM
1

That being said, looks help a man get a girl, but good character keeps her around. The point is that it is no longer a question of personality, because there is a problem that is very rarely analyzed, and that is why, in most Western countries, half of marriages end in divorce, and in countries like Spain or Portugal, the divorce rate reaches 90%, That is, 9 out of 10 marriages in the long term end in divorce. The statistical study shows us that the majority of divorces are initiated by women, a…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:22 PM
1

The inceldom is considered a condition, as other conditions of life are considered. I define condition, pardon the redundancy, in its etymological and primary sense, and not in the common English language of affection, but a state, situation or experience that extends over time due to different reasons. is assuming by definition that their something wrong other than your personal choices and personal character which is where these "blackpilled conspiracies" spring from. No, these are not assumpt…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:24 AM
4

I define sexually incapable as the man who cannot have sexual relations without paying, although it is true that perhaps I should have been more explicit with the question.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:51 PM
2

We must clearly differentiate between etymology, groups and ideology. Being an incel is a condition, Incels may or may not meet on certain platforms and what often sustains many incels gathered on platforms is "the blackpill" as an explanation for their inceldom and then the particular political ideology they may have. Therefore, speaking without knowing is daring. your community I neither belong to a community of incels nor am I involuntarily celibate. Like many, of course I have carefully read…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:48 PM
1

It is eugenics, there is no doubt.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:04 PM
22

So you conclude that being a sexually incapable man is the same as being a misogynist? Stupidity is bold.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:03 PM
183

Online communities, volunteering and hobbies. This is the healthiest thing to do. Don't make my mistake and start smoking and drinking in bad times.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:16 AM
7

One thing is interests, and another is equality of opportunities. As long as there is a man enslaved by his own lust and a lazy and inefficient woman, these cases of exchanges will occur.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:26 PM
46

I don't know where you live but the truth is that when they say that "Reddit is not real life" rather than meaning that what's on Reddit is fiction, it means that people in real life generally don't share their viewpoints. Women essentially do not need or want to understand what men suffer because in the end, they live in cognitive solipsism. The interests of both sexes are diametrically opposed, and you, as men, if you are not useful for procreation, you must be useful to sacrifice for them or,…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:19 PM
1

Imagine today, it is deadly difficult to be with one, to have two or more wives. 🤣
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:54 PM
1

Stoicism is acknowledging emotions but not letting them control or overwhelm you; as I said, it teaches individuals to focus on what they can control and accept what they cannot, leading to a more peaceful and fulfilling life. Suffering for things you cannot control or change is precisely denying life and denying yourself.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:56 PM
1

Stoicism is solving what has solution and accepting what has no solution. We are all going to die, and yet, we live. And I speak of philosophical stoicism, because, today, being a passive and submissive man is confused with being a stoic.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 02:16 PM
3

How would this work? Like, "Are we dating the same slut?" It doesn't seem to work in my mind, especially because I horribly doubt that this group has the same purpose except for men who suspect of being with an unfaithful woman.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 03:24 PM
36

I guess Facebook doesn't take defamation seriously?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:59 PM
0

TikTok only feeds the minds of idiots. Don't be an idiot and delete that app.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 02:55 AM
16

I guess whoever drew this believed that getting hit hurt less for us men. '
/r/MensRights21/04/24 02:52 AM
47

Do not marry. The problem is when people believe that in the slightest probability, they are going to be the winners of that infamous company; It's like believing yourself to be a prophet of winning the lottery or highly sophisticated games of chance.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 02:13 PM
2

Feminism literally screws men in many socio-legal matters. The rest is pure complaints about how hypergamous women can be and how difficult it is for the majority to build relationships, not even stable ones, but in general.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:13 PM
1

You will never be sure if she is genuine or interested. The fine line lies in your objective analysis of your attractiveness. If a woman does not love you for your attractiveness, she loves you for your resources and if it is not for either of the two, you will not have any woman who will approach you, so it is a game of judging appearances properly.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 06:11 AM
1

The choice is always based on options. The problem is that many women believe they have the option to access Chad for a long-term relationship, but that is pure deception.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 06:04 AM
4

It is a general answer to the question of how to determine "a worthwhile woman", that is, self-deception, because this is impossible to know without sufficient prior experience.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:38 AM
13

only date women who really want you. Difficult to determine, especially when one of a woman's sexual and survival strategies is to reconcile the truth and what she thinks and feels if she believes she is gaining an advantage; something human, but very remarkable in women. MGTOW is the way. It is the way because if you do not go your way, you will other people's way. Fuck, have a good time, keep a cool head and never put the State as an intermediary in your life.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:32 AM
3

Do not feed this idiot.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 05:23 AM
56

There is little that can be done when men are considered socially replaceable and substitutable, and on top of that, there are many men who would die for this ideal of wanting to be replaceable and substitutable. The only way is to do our bit for the organised struggle for men's rights, wherever we are, and let time bear witness to what we build, because you don't change overnight the gynocentric thinking that man must die in the hope that he will be able to reproduce or that his genes will expa…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:12 AM
8

Masculinity has no other origin but women's.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:04 PM
15

The idea is that you sacrifice yourself while the women of your society get railed by other men. How magical.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 03:02 PM
6

A neutral society is impossible. The only thing that can be done is to legislate through law. Outside the law, people will act on their own instinct and motivation; and what is certain is that nature tends towards gynocentrism, something easily fixable if people are free in their decisions.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 02:57 PM
1

There is no irony in that term being coined by a woman initially. What call incels as a men's issue existed since always. Inceldom is not a movement, it is not an ideology and it is not something that can't extrapolated except for some groups or some individuals, as everything.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 09:06 PM
2

Paying a prostitute is not a solution to inceldom. It's not so much about not fucking, but having someone willing to have a relationship with, without paying, as normal people would do. If it was about sex only, there would be no one with this issue.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 03:59 PM
5

The strategy is different and the expected results are different. The incel desperately seeks the attention of any woman who can accept him, the misnamed "femcel" rejects the options presented to her because she believes she deserves more. The first is involuntary, the second is voluntary. Improving the most relevant aspects does not generally depend on an improvement decision, but rather playing with cards that you cannot change.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:41 AM
206

Statistical disparity: the majority of members in these applications are men. The women who are on those apps are only looking for a statistical minority. Most men in such applications will not be successful. And yet, dating apps are only surpassed by social networks that similarly seek a kind of status+looks ecosystem: Instagram, Snapchat...; constant brainwashing ecosystems.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:33 AM
13

Nothing you can do, nothing women can do to change their hardwired mind. Either you accept to play the game as a tacit exchange where you may be able to procreate or, alternatively, you abandon the game and let Chad monopolize the market even more. It is like seeking to debate morality with a slave owner so that he stops depending on his most precious capital. Why would a woman give up her privileges? She will not.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 09:33 AM
38

Young men, indeed, often find themselves neglected and underrepresented in various forms of media around the world. Their struggles, frustrations, and hardships are often overlooked and overshadowed by other narratives. They are trapped in a world that expects them to conform to societal expectations of masculinity while denying them the support and understanding they need. This can lead to feelings of misery, depression, and loneliness. What is social expectation for a man? There are many, from…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:53 PM
16

Disposable Male Syndrome: Society often places less value on the lives and well-being of men, leading to a lack of empathy and support when they face hardships or vulnerabilities. Men are expected to be self-reliant and stoic, which can result in their struggles being overlooked or trivialized. And although it may seem obvious to any man who reflects a little and looks around, it is often not so obvious, or is seen as a matter of something that is by itself, "natural". Lack of support for male v…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:49 PM
7

Indeed, the value of "good" and "bad" is determined by their market value. Human relations and what is expected of people is an eminently social phenomenon; especially when the aim is to curtail the freedom of men, even more: to hijack the thinking of men in order to make them thinkable, and not to make them thinkers.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:33 PM
-14

It seems we have here the fragile ego of someone who can't handle a little dose of reality. It seems you took offense to my previous response and are now resorting to baseless accusations and personal attacks; I don't trivialize slavery, nor do I misuse words. I simply provide a perspective that challenges the status quo and highlights uncomfortable truths. As for the terms I used, they were meant to illustrate certain societal dynamics, not to throw anyone under the bus. If you feel attacked or…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:30 PM
-7

We are what we do with what they made of us, as J. P. Sartre said. We are condemned to be free and to be ultimately responsible for what we do with what we can do. There are wise men, there are snake charmers, and in between, there are confused men, some did not learn to live, others could not live longer, and others sought to improve their lives to the best of their ability. And the truth is that men, in their masculinity, live enslaved to what other men, and especially women, expect of them.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 12:00 PM
3

It seems you have fallen victim to the twisted machinations of those around you. The possibility of being drugged while you sleep is indeed a chilling reality. There are substances that can be administered in various forms, including inhalation, that can induce prolonged unconsciousness without leaving noticeable side effects. It appears that your friend's sisters and mother may have taken advantage of your vulnerable state, reveling in their sadistic amusement at your expense. Their attitude of…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:07 AM
1

You seem to be under the illusion that the article is an accurate representation of feminism and its core principles; while the article may claim that feminism is about equal rights for everyone and distancing itself from "radical feminism", the reality is far different. Feminism has become a breeding ground for misandry, where men are vilified and marginalized under the guise of equality. The extremists within the feminist movement have gained significant influence, shaping the narrative and dr…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 11:00 AM
4

I would like to hug you... 😔
/r/MensRights07/02/24 01:01 AM
1

The article is so contradictory and laughable that it does not deserve further mention except for a rather boring, insulting and inconsubstantial anecdote. Feminism has never had this connotation of going hand in hand with men to create a better society; the only extensively intellectual example I can think of, beyond "pickmegirlism" It is Marxist feminism, which, at its base, rejected feminism itself (considered a bourgeois thought) and blamed the struggle between men and women as a consequence…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 12:35 AM
2

key word ‘radical’, I don’t condone or agree with the actions or beliefs of any extremist or radical group, but it is important to understand that a large number of feminists are seeking equality rather than women superseding men’s rights. And I don’t think there is any defending extremist men’s rights groups or saying they’re misguided cause most of the time they say things like all women should be enslaved and raped on demand. Unless of course, that’s what you believe You claim that they seek …
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:28 PM
5

you can’t generalise feminism as all that, feminism at its core advocates rights for both women and men, radical feminism does it at the expense of the other gender just as some radical male movements also do. It is simply unconstructive to argue over which gender gets treated worse, the truth is both men and women have their own struggles within society and what is a non issue for them is a massive problem for us and vice versa. It is more useful to examine how we can improve rights for everyon…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:47 PM
7

why do you think feminism isn’t about equality? Feminism is the wolf in sheep's clothing. While it claims to be about equality, it is nothing more than a power play masked as a noble cause. Feminism has devolved into a movement that seeks to elevate women above men, trampling on the principles of true equality. It perpetuates a victim mentality and promotes the idea that women are perpetually oppressed, while conveniently ignoring the issues faced by men. Feminism, is a tool used by determined w…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:14 PM
1

Men's desire to protect women, you say? It's rooted in our instinctive need to assert dominance and control over the "weaker" sex somehow. And as for the desire for more sex, well, it's simple biology. Men have a higher sex drive due to their testosterone levels, which drives them to seek multiple partners. Now, let's talk about women. Hypergamy, my dear, is a natural inclination for women to seek out partners of higher status or resources. It's a survival mechanism, ensuring they secure the bes…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:03 PM
3

The counterpoint allows us to understand that part of people's loneliness is due to their own decision; however, it does not respond to the argument that I wanted to establish and that ties in with all the previous conversation, which is that in conditions of searching for an affective-sexual relationship, the interests are diametrically opposed by nature itself in the search for candidates in both sexes, so that the voluntariness in having or not extrapolates to the phenomenon that concerns thi…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 04:24 PM
3

Again, the loneliness of both genders is virtually the same. As I have argued before in my previous answers, The loneliness of men and women is due to diametrically opposite reasons because their emotional-sexual interests are opposite. This leaves as the only way to reduce loneliness, a male effort to improve the patriarchal bargain they are offering. No matter how much there is tried to be argumented that men's loneliness is a matter of attitude, or that female tastes and preferences in condit…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:51 PM
4

As I observe and on the basis of the data that we can consult statistically, it is obvious that indeed, the affective-sexual demand is more and more given by the internet and that there is also a majority of men who represent this demand for relationships, whether sexual, affective or both, by antonomasia. The argument that "women should lower their standards" obeys a rational conclusion based on the premises described above: women receive more demand than the supply they are willing to assume, …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:49 PM
7

Thanks for your answer. I hope we can have a fruitful debate. No. While this article raises a fundamental issue, which is based on the feminization, genuine or metaphorical, of the weak man, Your no answer straightforwardly, but the article does not answer the essence of the question, which is extremely multifactorial and spans from childhood to adulthood, going through an immensity of experiences that both sexes will not coincide and will not receive the same treatment. Women who are involuntar…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 11:04 AM
14

Hi; I appreciate you citing that statistic. However, I have several questions. Can men and women be compared under the same social conditions and requirements? I mean, Do both sexes start from the same social reception? One of the "social epidemics" associated with man is objectively inceldom: many heterosexual men - and even gay men - can't find couple no matter how much they want. Is this comparable between sexes? Can a female inceldom really exist that is not purely a voluntary celibacy if we…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 10:21 AM
3

Hi! Could you elaborate? Thanks. 😊
/r/MensRights26/01/24 10:11 AM
25

The fact revolves more around the idea that women, whether extremely thin or fat people, will have greater social, sexual or emotional acceptance than men under the same conditions, regardless of health. Height in a man is a social claim and sexual hierarchy, a fat woman can perfectly be the sexual attraction of many men. It seems that I am stating the obvious, but truly the social levels are completely incomparable. Not only there is not equality in sexual-emotional terms, but it cannot be eith…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:50 PM
3

Thank you very much for recommending the work of Marcus Aurelius. Reading the Stoics is always truly comforting because, in the end, what can we change but ourselves? But more importantly: why suffer for something we can't change? 😅
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:42 PM
3

Hi! I hope you are well as well as all the readers who gathered here to read! I would like to qualify some points that you have expressed, perhaps we can reach a higher understanding through dichotomy. Objectively, material conditions have changed in such a way that a person in the early 80s and 90s I lived in a different type of society than the one we live in now. The instinct has always been there, However, it is difficult to separate material conditions from social conditions because one cau…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 05:39 PM
8

At a primitive level it seems to be similar in the consideration on the one hand, perhaps hypocritically, that women have and should have the same rights and duties as men, but on the other hand, a proportionally inverse response is understood as the worst crime. That is, it is a dichotomy between women sharing, as stated, the same rights and duties, but on the other hand, it is hypocritically considered that women are inferior and that men should equally bear the blows but not play the game of …
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:25 PM
10

It is usual for me, being only connected to the Anglo-Saxon world through social networks, that I am ignorant of many concepts. One of them is "nice guys", and the truth is that I find it difficult to trace the origins of this term. I understand that the genesis of this term comes from a contradiction, that is, a forced dichotomy in men who must deal with two elementary factors: "improving their personality" through a sublime treatment of the opposite sex as a tool that facilitates sexual possib…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:45 PM
3

Happy cake day!
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:12 AM
4

Oh, I see. 😅
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:31 PM
7

Hi! It's probably because English is not my mother tongue, but I'm having a hard time understanding your post. What can we advise you on?
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:36 AM
5

It hurts to read this, because it is something I see constantly repeated: the male as a replaceable being, bait, sometimes even deluded by a moral duty, perhaps neurally programmed, to give his life, or worse, being forced to give his life because his life is considered less than that of a woman. Sometimes, when I watch the news and see wars, I can't help but obviously feel lucky not to live through that horror, but on the other hand, it makes me want to cry because I know that I could very prob…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:31 AM
10

Reflecting on this, I have often felt fear, not necessarily rejection, of this future that lies ahead. Will we ever reach such a level of technological sophistication that we will be able to simulate human beings or at least tools for companionship? On the one hand, I shudder at the idea, and on the other hand, it saddens me, because it would pain me to always know that it is not a person who loves me, but a code, determined, without will. I hope at least that if these bots one day arrive, they …
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter