TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

pnw_diver Archive

View 16 posts and 1,954 comments by pnw_diver on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
78

Social Issuespnw_diver/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:22 PM
65

Feminismpnw_diver/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:41 AM
41

Feminismpnw_diver/r/MensRights01/12/15 01:02 AM
37

Social Issuespnw_diver/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:24 PM
37

Feminismpnw_diver/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:53 PM
32

pnw_diver/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:17 AM
25

Videopnw_diver/r/MGTOW08/10/15 05:06 AM
23

Feminismpnw_diver/r/MensRights10/01/16 08:39 PM
20

Edu./Occu.pnw_diver/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:19 PM
16

Social Issuespnw_diver/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:39 AM
14

Generalpnw_diver/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:26 AM
13

Generalpnw_diver/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:38 PM
12

Feminismpnw_diver/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:03 AM
12

Feminismpnw_diver/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:12 PM
10

Anti-MRMpnw_diver/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:24 AM
1

Generalpnw_diver/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:29 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,954 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This graphic has nothing to do with Mens' Rights and is not even funny as a joke.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:20 PM
3

Why would anyone read Jezebel? It's a hate site.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:28 AM
74

Well its clear men are second class on campus.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:33 PM
3

My thought on Laci Green is that I would like her strapped int the belly of a Saturn V rocket and launched into the heart of the sun.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:45 PM
9

Feminists dont see any difference between "men" and "rapists".
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:43 PM
5

Ew. Theyre trying to program us.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 08:43 PM
3

She should be asked.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:24 AM
7

All female?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:14 AM
2

I prefer brunettes, but to each their own.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:53 AM
3

You summed up the feminist understanding of men in one fell swoop.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:56 AM
2

Charlotte can kiss my ass. Shes a misandrist creep.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 03:54 AM
3

/r/feminism is a bunch of idiots
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:27 PM
3

Why would I read Jezebel? It's a hate site.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:18 AM
1

It does chafe a bit, seeing yet another piece written by some woman comfortably sitting on her comfortable ass, sipping tea and nibbling at a pastry, authoring yet another screed as to how oppressed she is.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:13 AM
7

There seems to be an entire industry of very comfortable women who make their money professional complaining about everything.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:36 PM
4

She isn't really even running on that. I'd say she is running on name recognition and big money.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:35 PM
-6

What did that annoying little girl do this time.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 07:19 PM
3

Find a woman who is willing to sleep with a man with less money than her as well. So sick of the feminists and their narcissistic, hypocritical, hate-filled bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:18 PM
7

Misandry on parade.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:17 PM
2

She should be arrested and prosecuted for false reporting.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:17 PM
11

Yep. Saw it. Never say anything sensible or reasonable in front of a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:16 PM
13

Watch that male suicide rate keep growing in the UK. "Male tears" cups for everyone!
/r/MensRights14/01/16 05:15 PM
16

What is it about women and a man's height?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 06:22 PM
2

Not a man is safe from feminist smear campaigns.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:15 PM
1

Mens' Rights ... why?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:54 PM
26

NOW borders on being a religious cult.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:40 PM
3

Much of feminism is entirely rooted in misandry and feminists are antagonists to men. Look at the state of the man-woman relationship today and tell me feminism hasnt made it terrible.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:59 AM
1

NOW is an extremist organization, and should be regarded as on par with Aryan Nations or the Klan.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 08:44 PM
0

NOW is an extremist organization and should not be seen as mainstream in any way.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 08:41 PM
1

Let them read Gloria Steinem. That will keep them busy so I don't have to encounter them or talk to them.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:49 PM
10

No, of course she was not punished. Accountability is not part of the feminist brand.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:48 PM
3

Let's give feminists their way: never touch them under any circumstances.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:47 PM
13

Same reasoning applies to dildos.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:46 PM
10

I generalize based on race? Wow, I didn't know that. Thanks for cluing me in, troll. Did you have anything other than a pointless insult to offer? Btw "cheddar" not "chedder".
/r/MensRights09/01/16 04:29 PM
4

Ok. Fuck Twitter. Man-hate site. Got it. If they dont need me. They can do with a few fewer.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:12 AM
1

I dont know why any man would date a western woman anyway.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:08 AM
25

This kind of hate-filled shit has come to define modern feminism.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:03 AM
1

This spammer or troll does this repeatedly. Its a disgrace to us. We need an administrative response. This is not a porn forum. I just opened that link, stupidly, in a polite restaurant.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:01 AM
8

What vile, bigoted, sexist garbage. So Hillary Clinton hates men. Got it.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:16 PM
3

This is Mens' Rights ... why?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 02:03 AM
2

This is offensive and I am flagging it. Go away, troll.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 10:49 PM
8

Do feminists have any answer as to there are fewer women in STEM besides "blame men!"?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:08 PM
2

There are lots of women in the world.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:30 PM
8

Give the feminists what they want: never engage in a non-professional way with any western woman.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:33 PM
1

In a modern environment in which men and women encounter each other through work more than in any other context, what do you expect? I maintain that the demonizing of this guy is just another culture aar victory for man-hating angry harpy feminists.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:31 PM
8

Roosh et al are much more associated with the "pickup artists". There is friction between them and us.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:25 AM
1

got it. feminists hate men asking women out. noted.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 01:13 AM
2

Well, if 2016 is the year we ban single-gender leaderships then presumably she would agree that all-woman leaderships are just as objectionable as all-man leaderships.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:37 PM
3

Does she want to ban all-woman leaderships?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 11:30 PM
6

Prudes 1, humanity 0.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:16 PM
24

How evil! A date!
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:37 PM
11

Start with #KillAllWhiteMen then.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 08:01 PM
1

Are they going to add "sneezing in public while male" to the definition of "rape"?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 01:00 AM
2

Feminists are absolutely totalitarian in their mindset, and yes, at base, they are incompatible with a functioning liberal democracy. I was surprised but not shocked when I first saw that photo of that idiot burning a book. What was she thinking?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:58 AM
8

The belief that any man who understands that there are false allegations made is probably a rapist is about as extreme and silly a viewpoint as could be. Little girls like this one are something of a disgrace; is this the victory that feminists sought, that spoiled little girls can prattle like that, and expect to be taken seriously? I really appreciate the linked blog - it is high time this page saw more contributions from men of color, and certainly the phrase "false accusation" cannot be unde…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:09 AM
3

Let's see how the court case plays out. My hope is that there will be a fair and thorough trial, with a conclusive outcome.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:07 AM
7

She's definitely not winning any popularity contests ... we don't typically start out our comedy set with a screaming match with the crowd and an attempted assault on the previous comic.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 09:55 PM
5

I see, so the writers injected one line of pandering mangina-ness. Or manginicity. Or whatever the word would be. For my part, the great Sherlock Holmes would be far too sharp of a mind to ever be a mangina.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:12 AM
2

That woman is a creep. EDIT: other comments indicate there might have been some sort of self-promoting satire. Can someone who actually knows put up the authoritative information? If this isn't some sort of crappy joke this idiot's name needs to be written on the wall.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:08 AM
1

I got triggered when you wrote "triggered"! You need to put a warning on that.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:22 PM
1

I don't envy the UK its women ...
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:20 PM
8

Why do you waste your precious time trying to talk to those dolts.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:00 PM
4

Thanks for the warning. I'll miss it.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 09:59 PM
1

You can even scroll past whatever dipstick is calling you names.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:55 PM
4

Ah, yes, the thoughtcrime of presenting rebuttal based in fact.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:49 PM
2

Katie McVay is now at the top of my list of women not to fuck in "2k16". (What a fucking airhead!)
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:13 PM
2

The news reader sounded like a 20-something airhead.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:12 PM
3

I wouldn't have expected those things in the article you linked. That article, incidental, was quite interesting. I had no idea that these trends we see in the US were so global. The truth is, the world is overpopulated with humans. We don't need so many -
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:10 PM
5

Is this how British women duke it out? And I agree with Hopkins, if Twitter troubles you, get off the damn thing. "Cyber bullying? Hahahah close your eyes."
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:39 AM
1

Culture war wedge issues! It's a fair point you make.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:25 AM
2

You make sense. Another thing the MRM should do is loudly denounce actual convicted rapists and sex assaulters. By that I don't mean the feminist idea of that, which is a rapist and sex assaulter is any man who looks at her the wrong way at the bus stop while she is in a bad mood. I mean, we should denounce actual real violent criminals who have bad problems they never dealt with, and are demonstrated in court to be just that. There should be no shelter for them until they have served their time…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:24 AM
1

More weight!
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:09 AM
4

She isn't thinking. She's ranting self-righteously.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:55 AM
1

For my part, I will withhold my personal judgement on Cosby until the outcome of his prosecution is clear. On the one hand, I abhor media trials of men, and without a doubt, some of the allegations generally made against him have got to be dubious. However, there have been a lot of allegations by a lot of women, and that also puts him a very dubious place. It is better that someone accusing him of a sex crime has actually pressed charges. Now, we can see if they stick. I encourage people opposed…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:53 AM
1

My experience - which included definitely a number of years "in science" - absolutely proved to me that women are not taken less seriously than men in science. In fact, increasingly, as is the case all across academia, there is a stigma associated with being a man.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:14 AM
97

I had an argument with a friend of mine last night. Therefore, I was assaulted!
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:09 AM
1

The gender war is a terrible thing, to me, and it makes me completely sick. There are always conflicts between the sexes because men and women are somewhat different but feminism has just turned the whole conflict into open war of hate and mistrust.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 02:06 AM
1

Putting someone in prison for years for saying something offensive is 100 percent outrageous and does not correspond to a functioning open society. That is tyrannical. No wonder feminists love it.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:55 AM
304

I particularly like how, when Woman A says she has sex and regretted it, it wasn't rape, Feminist B tells Woman A that Woman A apparently doesn't know what she is talking about, on the basis of a vague tweet. In other words, Feminist B had absolutely no idea whatsoever of any details of the sex encounter being alleged by Woman A and still automatically declares rape to have occurred. Where I come from, that is a sign that someone is truly stupid.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:53 AM
6

Much of human behavior is motivated or impacted by innate sex differences, I believe. As far as societal issues that men face I don't believe there is any excuse for misandry and I don't believe for a moment anyone is biologically hardwired to hate and resent men. And misandry is the biggest of all the issues we face, and misandry is a very recent trend, historically.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:00 AM
1

Really, imagine that.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:41 PM
2

Not another mangina ....
/r/MensRights28/12/15 09:29 PM
4

Sneerng, contemptuous, and hateful.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 09:28 PM
2

Sexism is OK if it benefits women specifically, remember.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 09:12 PM
1

Better. Replace "males" with "men" (we are men) and replace "humans" with "people" are my remaining suggestions. Nice graphic. Good point. And staple that motherfucker all over every telephone pole in America, and anytime a feminist tells you that feminists don't hate men demand that she tattoo that graphic on both ass cheeks. Keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:26 AM
1

I found it non-amazing that he left out the F-word.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 07:24 AM
5

Breaking up with her will be a good thing. You don't need someone like that in your life, someone who takes her political ideology more seriously than her relationships with people. Get away from her as fast as possible as there is a real possibility she'll start making false accusations against you if she is nutty enough.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 08:00 PM
1

Excellent.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:59 PM
6

Famously, the gender studies departments don't get the brightest or the best.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 07:59 PM
2

Well-put. Gynocentrism is on parade!
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:44 AM
3

The average Muslim here is pretty broke ... I do appreciate that you delineate between elites with power and their first victims, their subjects in their own countries that they own and rule.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:39 AM
2

The Gleaming Scimitar of American Feminism Her Regal Highhood Queen Hillary Clinton I personally saw to it, while Secretary of State, that Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and certain other dubious countries received an enormous boost in military aid from the US one of her four years, a total of 165 billion dollars in arms sales - arms which the Saudis are now using in barbaric war crimes in Yemen. I'd really, really, really like Feminism, Inc. to explain to me how it is they can sit with Hillary Clinton wh…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:36 AM
1

I am sure feminists on Reddit would love that ...
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:32 AM
4

I think we can def agree that Saudi Arabia stinks!
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:31 AM
11

If I was a Washington Post reporter, I should be ashamed of myself as a consequence of that piece of shit article.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:26 AM
1

There are certainly countries where women are subjugated. For example, here in the US we have an incredibly close and chummy relationship with the Wahhabist monarchy of Saudi Arabia. For its part, Saudi Arabia is the progenitor of hardline Sharia - which is the most absolutely atrocious vision of Islam and which is, yes, very bad for women (for anyone, I think) and I wouldn't mind parachuting Gloria Steinem into Riyadh with a Mr. Microphone and a 2 liter bottle of water just to get at those bast…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:22 AM
6

Which "Islamic countries"? They aren't all the same, you know. Are you trying to equate Turkey or Lebanon with Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan? Are you trying to equate Iran with Somalia? For a long time, in Uganda, Joseph Kony and the Lord's Christian Army held effective power. The goal of the LCA and Kony was to set up a regime with law dictated literally from the Ten Commandments, and an Old Testament vision of culture and life. Sound a bit like hard-line Sharia to you? It's not the religion that…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:14 AM
4

I have to admit, by the time she invoked men as "the unpaid home bodyguard" (2:05) and then went on to conclude that women are cast as human beings, whereas men are cast as "human doings" (2:14), she had pretty much upended the feminist apple cart. For that matter, "feminism is not synonymous with justice" (about :30) probably made Jessica Valenti spontaneously erupt into leprosy a thousand miles away. (Edit: Finished watching .... Good Lord she is a fireball! Thanks for sharing!)
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:54 AM
5

I have a funny feeling that the target audience of most comic book movies - adolescent boys - aren't going to be flocking to Wonder Woman's bosom anytime soon.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:48 AM
11

Staple it to every telephone poll in America. Thanks. (BTW, second paragraph lacks a needed comma: "Further, projection ..." May be best resolved by omitting "Further" and simply starting with a declarative tone "Projection ..." Also "social phenomena" not "social phenomenon" as the latter is singular but you invoke the plural with your choice of words. Not trying to be a douchebag grammar NAZI here, I just know that when I make something for public display I want all the little errors I normall…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:42 AM
2

I hope that vile woman gets what she has coming to her: the rest of her life spent being ignored in ignominious obscurity.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 01:40 AM
10

Try GQ from Spain or some other country where it is not actually considered evil to be a man. American GQ and other American "mens' magazines" are ass-kissing mangina publications. Plus the fashion advice and ads in American GQ suck shit. The clothes they pitch are bland and make a man look dull. Spanish GQ is far superior. The Spanish and other European versions of the magazine offer a lot more on fashion, appearance, etc.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 07:51 PM
2

It's clear that "late stage capitalism" is run by morons. Why waste time on them? Mods: Please sticky this post for a bit ... the abusive and dismissive way in which OP was banned is a sign that we should all be aware of how pointless and hostile "Late Stage Capitalism" is.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 07:47 PM
1

Who's worse? The True Believer? Or the Manipulative Demagogue?
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:13 PM
4

Welcome to the board, thanks for your sincere and reasonable introduction, and I hope your new relationship goes well!
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:09 PM
2

Exactly. When the feminist programming becomes both so over-the-top, and results in a total farce of canned characters, and implausible plot and action as well, attempting to watch the film is no longer just a painful exercise in taking in bad art, it becomes a truly negative and frustrating experience. I am not paying 20 dollars, putting up with the crowd and the lines, and giving up 2 hours of my life so that some limousine liberal feminist Hollywood producer somewhere can feel like she is fin…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 07:57 PM
7

Thanks very much for sharing this. I don't necessarily agree with everything Molyneux said however it was engaging. And quite frankly, I am also nauseated by the ever-present "ACI" character he describes. I am very sick and tired of the cloying, horribly unbelievable cliche 100 lb teenage girl shown beating 200 pound bruisers in combat, solving all technical problems at hand while the dumb idiot boy looks on staring at her boobs and acting horny, effortlessly operating all vehicles of any descri…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 05:28 PM
8

Whereas if we spend money left and right we are no good spendthrifts who are bankrupting our women. I fucking hate this politically correct man-hating bullshit! Someone ask "Vera" her opinion on the fact that suicide is the number one cause of death for British men under 40.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 04:18 PM
2

I think it is important that we see information like this, and that category violence be understood and respected.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 04:17 PM
23

Thanks very much for writing to "Vice". They need to understand that misandry is not acceptable and that they are really obnoxious quite often. Its a well-named outlet in this sense; and I do mean "outlet" in a fairly particular and gross anatomical way. This reply written to you from Sun Liquor, NW Capitol Hill, fellow sea-towner.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 03:04 AM
6

Mustafa is on par with a Klansman.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 02:51 AM
5

Paglia I can respect. She is no fan of men per se; but she isn't stupid, she doesn't lie, and she doesn't wallow in groupthink or intellectual weakness.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 12:55 AM
2

From the article: When Reggie Yates investigated these men ... found advocates for decriminalising rape on private land ... This is completely dishonest or simply proof that Rupert Myers did absolutely no journalistic research whatsoever. On one hand, Roosh is not a MRA, he is Red Pill PUA. On the other hand, what Roosh wrote was an essay, containing this sarcastic idea, more broadly part of a claim that feminism has stripped women of accountability for the own actions. This kind of misinformati…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 12:27 AM
5

The suggestion that lifting weights more often will simply make the problem of women in combat roles go away is pretty silly. If anything, unit cohesion where women are present will go to shit, for all the obvious reasons. It was a totally stupid fucking idea to try to integrate the combat arms.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:57 AM
1

During the entire time they were married, was there a single police complaint about any alleged violence?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:55 AM
7

Throw the guy in the slammer for a long, long time.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:53 AM
12

Did the UN send any men to the US to assess how well men are here?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:01 PM
3

She should be forced to register as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:22 AM
2

Noted - I am aware that birth control pills can cause hormonal "fun" for women who take them, and I was hoping Norplant was a way that sex can take place without having to worry. I'd happily to birth control for men, or at least try it out, if it was invented, and didn't produce any weird side effects.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:21 AM
1

At this point, any politician who has the sheer brilliance to actually address men as a relevant and legitimate voter category will be a) hated by feminists, publicly reviled and b) accepted by men.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:40 PM
2

Skittles are filled with unhealthy ingredients and are bad for your health. Eat healthy snacks instead.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:37 PM
2

I have very little respect for Gloria Steinem, in particular when she engages in snooty-sounding thinly-veiled hate speech against men.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:37 PM
3

But never She for He! It's a one-way conversation with feminists.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:36 PM
1

Or just snooty-sounding shaming rhetoric and thinly veiled hate speech like Steinem was indulging in.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:30 PM
2

For my own understanding, what happens when a woman takes Norplant?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:29 PM
14

"Alright students, repeat after me, '1 in 5 ...'" The shaming will begin in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
/r/MensRights15/12/15 07:28 PM
17

Plea bargain and no sex offender registration?! If this had been a man taking a picture of a woman he would have gone to jail and spent the rest of his life registering as a sex offender. The Accountability Gap.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:05 PM
7

Its a great idea, if it was no more impacting than Norplant, Id likely buy it and support its use. I have had to rely on women to use birth control and I dont like that.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:35 PM
6

They have to charge her with something to hold her for long. And the truth is that it can be justified to shoot someone. This is a gender-blind fact. Without knowing more of what the police investigation determined its jard to criticize.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:34 PM
2

I have no problem with different fashions between men and women in fact I often like being able to tell men and women apart through our outward expression.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:19 PM
1

Given that a very large number of men won't be voting Republican it is probably not a very good idea to try to attach the Mens' Movement to a political party or right-wing ideology. Many of us hard leftists who reject political correctness just as fast as we reject corporate power.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:05 AM
55

Feminists have always relied on deeply insulting armchair psychoanalysis with respect to men in order to try to shame us or make us out to be inferior, or even just to sound like they know anything at all. Psychology 101 - all people - both sexes - tend to transfer their parents' personality onto authority figures. For Steinem to make it out that only men, apparently do this, and to furthermore attempt to construe transference as a response to any "power" Hillary Clinton has is deeply dishonest …
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:02 AM
1

The only news allowed in /r/news is politically correct news.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:58 AM
9

Feminists don't want chivalry for women, and we men should oblige. There is no shortage of babies or women in the world, the planet is arguably overpopulated by humans, so the biological imperative for protecting women doesn't make sense anymore.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:56 AM
2

NPR is a home to babbling fembots.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:21 PM
5

I thought you were joking. This woman was sent to county jail for 5 years for multiple ongoing relationships with statutory rape and she is claiming she is a victim because she didn't consent to a video of her having an orgy with minors that was used against her in court!! I'd like to remind you that, even in places where the age of consent is 16, anyone - especially teachers - in a position of power or authority over a minor, is not just guilty of statutory rape but is extra-guilty by abusing a…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:06 PM
4

Whoever she is, she needs to give up her feeble attempts at writing, she comes across as an untalented 9th grade essayist.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:21 PM
1

This action is unconstitutional without a doubt.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:13 PM
3

Why would you seek out contact with a nutbag like her?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:12 PM
1

Presumably there was physical evidence of some sort involved in the trial?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 08:06 PM
2

Priceless.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:18 AM
2

Fair enough
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:46 PM
7

More to the point, we can look forward to more wars and wealth inequality with Hillary.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:26 PM
10

If American women want to get in shape, anything to help them out ... ! :) (I have no problem with women having spaces to themselves; I have a big problem with feminists trying to outlaw mens' spaces.)
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:39 AM
10

I downvoted your comment. Romantic chivalry has gotten men fucked sideways. Quit giving them anything for free. They don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:35 AM
7

I read your venting with a lovely Italian accent in mind. Buona sera.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:34 AM
3

Straughan is an impressive young person.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 03:25 AM
18

Generally physical force must be justified and proportionate. This is a gender-agnostic reality.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:53 PM
1

Not at all a ramble, share your insights.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:14 PM
9

But feminism is an equality movment! /s
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:12 PM
121

More to the point - do the 16 year old kids in Sweden, in particular the boys, get to have any heritage themselves, as young men? Or are they just to be shamed-from-birth non-girls in Swedish society?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:47 PM
4

I was amazed - it didn't take 24 hours before all of a sudden there was this mass media fixation on the fact that one of the terrorists was a woman. And you could see it between the lines - fem-bot reporters and editorialists desperately looking for a way to twist the story of the terrorist attack into yet another feminist anti-man victimization story.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:45 PM
2

Jailed for 8 years for this? Completely extreme, over the top.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:41 PM
2

Are we truly at the point where a terrorist attack against the US is cause for ... feminist navel-gazing? If there was a nuclear war, the next morning, would the survivors be subject to Gloria Steinem, in her bunker beneath Harvard University, telling us that the war was an act of men against women, and that [insert stream of feminist psycho-babble].
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:33 PM
15

It would appear the Social Justice Warrior Times is being confronted with the little fact that the feminist dialectic and victim narrative doesn't include little realities like women as terrorist leaders. (Syed should not have let Tashfeen lure him into actually doing a terrorist attack.)
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:29 PM
30

Isn't it disgusting that all of a sudden we have to respond to feminism trying to make the female terrorist out to be some sort of innocent coerced victim of the evil men.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:23 AM
1

He and his parents should hire a lawyer and file a Federal court Title IX lawsuit against the school district if this woman is permitted to continue teaching at the school.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:15 PM
3

You're not alone. Boys in the school system are targets of feminist hate all over America and this very much includes some teachers. By standing up to her, and then by exempting yourself from that class, you have done the right thing and you should be proud of yourself for standing up to a bully.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:51 PM
5

You need to work with your parents to formally complain to the school's principal that this is going on. And you need to work with your parents to insure that you don't have to attend that class, ever, and that you receive no grade in it either.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:50 PM
1

And given that this is a daily thing, what you describe ... ?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:34 PM
2

Exactly. Burn motherfucker, burn.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:34 PM
3

Normally I would think well of a "country's sexiest man" competition, view it lightly and with humor and bit of humility (I won't win any such competition). However, with the amount hate and vitriol that feminists have now injected into our culture and the war between the two sexes, I agree - this is sexist trash and the result of a double standard that favors women.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:43 PM
3

I think many of us would agree that Planned Parenthood is an important institution and it should be treated with respect, and funded. Those of us who for religious or other reasons oppose abortion can probably imagine that no woman seeking an abortion at PP is particularly thrilled about it, it's a last resort for her. And PP provides services to men as well.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:40 PM
1

I think the solution is simple: give the feminists what they want. Allow laws to pass that, in effect, criminalize male heterosexuality. And let society sleep in the bed it has made.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:36 PM
0

It ain't a mirage. We are targets of hate.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:04 PM
6

I don't know if you noticed, but that billboard in the picture was from Edmonton.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:03 PM
0

It's fucking hilarious: this morning, Huffington Trash has multiple articles on this woman up, attempting to pin her actions on either her father ("became hardline after moving to Saudi Arabia") or her husband ("contacted al-Qaid'a affiliate"). The one thing we are not - repeat not allowed to think is that, yes, women are just fucking capable of reprehensible violence as a man. Female terrorist? Feminists say: "victim of men!!" I've lost all respect for the Huffington Trash this week, any I had …
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:02 PM
0

Thank you, I guess, for taking your precious valuable time, and expending it trying to find one undigested grain of truth in a pile of feces. And no, I disagree with you. Masculinity is not defined by women. Masculinity is defined by nature. And a rare and precious thing we were, so created. Never give a woman or a feminist credit for defining masculinity, or the egregious privilege of presuming to do so. They know we men like humans on Earth try to imagine what bacterial life on Mars might have…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:01 AM
2

And you know? Anarchism is about an understanding that structures of control inevitably become corrupt and must be met with force from those who are vulnerable, those who are abused or exploited too easily. And modern feminism is now a state-within-a-state and very much a control structure. Nascent totalitarianism is incompatible with a functioning liberal democracy. I love women, I respect equality, and I reject modern feminism.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:56 AM
1

Forgive me, I missed Cockburn's death. Quite a damn shame, he was one hell of a man.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:52 AM
8

Counterpunch has been for a very, very long time a forceful voice of reason and fact. Cockburn does not bullshit nor does he allow his publication to bullshit. "Mainstream liberals" in media despise Counterpunch for this reason, as it tends to not subscribe to illusions. As a very long-term hardcore leftist, I am increasingly disgusted by the way wishy-washy mainstream "liberalism" has been co-opted by politically correct, doted-upon, superficially-educated, fact-averse social justice warrior we…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:13 AM
31

"You frightened of strong men, arent you?"
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:02 AM
6

Women at this point feel free to be hateful and creepy towards men.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:01 AM
11

Hmm. So we view boys as automatically hate-filled little bigots and rapists unless they are specifically programmed otherwise. Don't take the piece of shit poster down. Write what I was just wrote on it: "So, we view little boys as hate-filled and likely to become rapists by default?"
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:00 AM
1

Actually it contributes plenty including the idea that those who are not well-suited to the combat arms to begin with should not be forced into that world, because the results will be even worse.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:54 PM
3

Right, when you see the J.W. heading up the stairs out front, you close the curtains real real fast and sit quietly while they knock on the door, waiting for them to go away. Five minutes later you breath easy again, and, timidly, peak out the curtain to make sure they're gone, before opening the curtains again and going back to your day.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:52 PM
25

Police have to respond to the button.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:49 PM
3

It was utterly bizarre that this weird author managed to miss the absolute irony there.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:48 PM
2

Bizarre ... accusing the Men's Rights Movement of "permanent victimhood" after 50 years of feminism and a victim culture now thoroughly pervasive within feminism so large that it spans continents.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:48 PM
7

The British Brainwash Corporation is a dependably vacuous propaganda organization.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:45 PM
11

Feminists call for the banning of all forms of literature, drama, music, and entertainment not formally approved by a committee of feminists. (Seriously, what are feminists going to do next? Organize public book burnings?)
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:43 PM
11

Has there been a police complaint yet? If not, then "James Deen" needs to sue "Stoya" for defamation, demanding a huge sum of money.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:56 PM
59

This is what gender relations in the Western World have become ... if a man and woman make eye contact, one of them can be expected to push a panic alarm that summons police officers to respond to a public safety threat.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:55 PM
25

Yep! Push the button every single time a woman makes eye contact with you.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:53 PM
3

Wow, a first post ever from this brand new account, and it seems almost perfectly designed to make people here look bad! go fuck yourself TROLL
/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:49 PM
1

And in principal, that should be a good thing - the trouble is, it will be part of the shaming process for boys that feminists are building into schools, as opposed to any form of positive vision for the man-woman relationship that could be encouraged through education. What a shame -
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:39 AM
4

The canned applause lines and yes - that smirk - I remember it from the second debate - make me want to vomit up my 1.5 tall cans of Rainier I have consumed while waiting for my lovely pasta sauce to simmer for another hour. Hillary: Bad for dinner discussion. Edit: Hillary is never, ever, ever invited over to my house for dinner, and I wouldn't share a beer and a shot with her, either.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:51 AM
4

It is a shock to the system indeed to take the blinders off and realize how much women become bullies the moment they are given the power to become bullies.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:14 AM
5

By the way, given her pre-fab, canned, dismissive answer to the question, and the almost ... pre-planned ... applause ... it may well be that the question was asked by a plant in order for her to inoculate herself.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:02 AM
8

Trying to pretend that this vile woman has any ethics or moral compass whatsoever is and agonizing and depressing waste of time. She's likely to be elected in a farce of an election. Stop your children from joining the military and make it clear to your friends that whatever she does, she won't be doing it with your vote.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:00 AM
5

It wouldn't get past Fox, Rush, and Breitbart. CNN, New York Times, etc. would blacklist any attempt to produce debate on the issue. That's what I believe. And Democrat base voters don't watch Fox, don't listen to Rush, and don't visit Breitbart.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:59 AM
17

The Accountability Gap once again.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:38 AM
8

If you think for a minute that feminist-dominated mass media is going to broadcast any evidence of Hillary Clinton's total lack of integrity you are very much mistaken.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:19 AM
1

If they are to be drafted put them everywhere but the combat arms. Conscripts are famous for not being the most effective of forces and if you take the average American Becky Cornbread who has been raised in a mass consumer fantasyland and with the expectation that men will dote on her every word and that she is born privileged she will be a terrible fighter indeed.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:52 AM
181

If you ever see a feminist talk about men as if she knows anything, laugh in her face and walk off, wasting no more time. (I really fucking hate how feminists get offended the moment a man indicates he can understand women but try to tell we men all about ourselves and how we should be as if they are fucking experts or something ... that such arrogance is somehow tolerated makes me want to shout at the top of my lungs.)
/r/MensRights04/12/15 12:50 AM
11

Gee I thought online stalking and harassment was bad and grounds for TED talks and UN speeches and jailing men in Canada and stuff.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:38 PM
1

Feminists are OK with more men dying so that they can claim t win the gender wars.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:08 PM
2

Hey! Its Ladies' Night at the university now! Such a thing of attempted in the US would result in the father of all Title IX lawsuots, thankfully.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 08:05 PM
2

I read this differently than others: you were given factual information, along with instructions as to how to file a Title IX complaint specific to our Puget Sound region. Instead of getting angry at the (obnoxious, yes) OCR, file the Title IX complaint as instructed. And I would include only information you personally believe to 100% supportable as fact, unequivocal fact. If you have information that is unsound in the complaint it will certainly be used against you.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:23 AM
6

Laci Green is a conceited little college girl who thinks she has a basis to lecture the general public now that she has read a couple books in school or something.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 05:59 AM
1

So let me get this straight - her daddy is in the DEA, she has enough volume in drug sales that she can pull 39,000 dollars out of her ass to make bail, and we're supposed to focus on her damn smile? If the offender here had been a man, it would have been quite different. You see, men and women are held to entirely different standards of accountability in our culture - and quite frankly, the standard of accountability for women amounts to almost zero quite often.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 05:58 AM
7

He should sue for defamation. Wouldn't that be a precious thing? "Porn actor sues for defamation, wins."
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:20 AM
8

But its relevant all of a sudden because ... WOMEN!
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:20 AM
4

The moment I saw "Hillary Clinton" I just sort of thought negative things and tuned whatever it was out.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:19 AM
1

The whole fuckin' thing was: "Prison ... yes, men ... fuck that, WOMEN!" Otherwise vacant piece. Offensively so.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:18 AM
19

Unless they have approached the police and filed complaints he should sue them both for multi-million dollars worth of defamation.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:08 AM
2

That's a hangin' crime 'round here!!
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:05 AM
1

By whom?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:05 AM
7

Has he actually been charged with anything yet?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:07 AM
4

Misandry, anyone?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 01:46 AM
4

If the assaulter had been a man, he would have been given "the treatment" by the officers, and probably abused or beaten prior to his incarceration the same evening. I find it peculiar that the woman wasn't even incarcerated, its as if the fact that she was beating someone she knew and could find later in the evening - cops are supposed to arrest one or both of the people involved in the domestic violence so it doesn't get lethal later - wasn't a sustained public safety threat.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:54 AM
20

According to some feminists, men owe wimen solving their problems that we create for them, while, yes, they owe us nothing.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 11:41 PM
5

I couldnt agree more about The Simpsons, or most mainstream TV at this point - its filled with hateful, sexist cliches of men, and not worth watching.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:50 PM
1

Ask yourself what youre fighting for. If your wife holds you in contempt, and the judge holds you in contempt, and your own attorney holds you in contempt, then dont you just want to get away from them?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:09 PM
0

Sorry, couldnt get past the trigger warning at the top.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:53 PM
18

Fine, lets also axe everything with male gender stereotypes. No more entertainment for anyone.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:49 PM
0

I have not been censored on Reddit. The Mens' Movement has not been censored on Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 08:41 PM
8

Let's all start naming and shaming the hundred varieties of misandrist out there.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 08:38 PM
2

Cast aside on the streets or arrested as default-presumed offenders. The city has all but criminalized being male and heterosexual.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:31 AM
1

I think of that scene at least once a week :)
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:31 AM
2

The CFR is imperialist plain and simple.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:30 AM
20

Feminism is not an equality movement. Feminism is a supremacy movement. It's the Accountability Gap - this particular gap is extraordinarily beneficial to women, who can either play the victim card, or accept infantilization, and be held less accountable or not be held accountable at all.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:57 PM
8

You'd think if she was violently raped she would want to work with the police. I have a feeling this woman was drunk and obnoxious and entitled, and when it started to become clear that playing the game of regret=rape might have the consequences of being proven a liar by a police investigation, she decided that the party was over and time to head back to school post haste.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:46 PM
3

Unless women are planning on spending their teens and twenties and thirties - in general, all women - working very hard at their jobs and careers, and sacrificing relationships, kids, and spare time - under-investment in men will produce general societal decline. And the sense I get is that women in general aren't planning on spending all their youth on hard work like men do.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:24 PM
7

This is one of the most obnoxious things about feminists authoring pieces on what is, really, the deliberate destruction of boys and men in this society - the thinly-veiled triumphalism and smug sense of superiority. And its not earned, either, professional victimhood and self-fulfilling prophecies are hardly an achievement.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:22 PM
7

The US will, in decades to come, learn the cost of under-investing in boys and men, and treating them as second class citizens. The physical reality of civilization was created by us.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:02 PM
1

Do us all a favor, and yourself as well, and soend a couple hours asking what you can do for yourself that will make you stronger. We are men. That means a lot of things, including that we grasp that OKC and the Southwest are rough, and we are up to it.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 06:01 AM
0

Freedom of religion means people can be pagan if thry want. I like a pluralistic society, myself.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:02 AM
19

The Norwegian Association for Women’s Rights (NKF) considers female conscription as a misunderstanding of the concept of gender equality and the intentions of the Law on Equality. Gender equality implies first and foremost that women and men should have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms. Women should be valued and allocated power and resources on equal terms with men. But women and men do not have to be alike or do the same things to be equal. Oh, suddenly a dirty job emerges, and m…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:59 AM
368

The gap that feminists never discuss, the Accountability Gap, rears its ugly head once again.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:56 AM
2

A revenge dished up nice and cold :)
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:32 PM
2

Here in Seattle, doing anything other than genuflecting in front of the sacred cow of feminism and pedestalized women gets you immediate hate and contempt from men and women alike. It's just culturally disallowed to think of things in any way outside of the feminist victim ideology.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:57 PM
3

You can bet that, whatever it looks like, there are lot more male teachers than are found currently, and probably a focus on boys well-being and education that doesn't currently exist. This is an important topic, too, because the American education system is now profoundly anti-boy.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:51 PM
1

A general strike would be good for the whole nation, for multiple reasons.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 05:47 PM
13

It's just astounding - she was basically relieved of accountability on the grounds that she is female. The judge should be hung.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 05:44 PM
10

Wow, the British Brainwash Corporation was actually forced to retract wording that placed women as a higher value than the un-mentionable men. I am truly surprised.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 05:42 PM
3

This should be a lesson to us all - never invest yourself completely in a woman.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 05:39 PM
38

This woman should be fired immediately and barred from ever working with children again. She's a demented ideological social justice warrior and has anti-boy, anti-man agenda. Employing her as school teacher is like employing a KKK member as a police officer in a community of color.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:45 PM
53

Feminism: equality = subjugation of boys and men, and gender-based advancement of girls and women.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:43 PM
6

I think he completely misses the point of how the Islamic State came to exist - a century of Western imperialism inflicted upon a poor, and backwards region of the world, and Western support for despicable autocratic regimes there. It's not a male thing to create that outcome, Hillary Clinton is about as imperialist as it can get for example, she'll happily keep up the status quo in the Middle East that creates entities like Islamic State.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:42 PM
1

Yep more feminist hate.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:32 PM
2

At this point why don't feminists just come clean and admit the truth: they don't want boys educated. They want boys and men subjugated.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:02 PM
8

I noticed that the article was written as if men aren't ever victims, only women. The majority of victims of swatting are men.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:08 PM
10

Because under-privileged boys don't need a future or anything crazy like that.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:07 PM
24

By all means let the female students go on "sex strike", men will be safe from false accusations.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:05 PM
0

Which school?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:14 AM
5

Ew! MEENNNN!!! With penises. Ick Ick Ick
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:08 AM
2

Hey welcome to modern feminism he gets lots of stroking that way.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:49 AM
3

Vote against the ten cent whoring, preening prick they elected recently. Speaking as a leftist, that is, if Canadians can get that pandering peacock out of there you'll be better off.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:49 AM
7

Can we get this put in policy. "If it's a man that hits your car, ladies, then drive away at once!" Yay. Sorry, I mean Yay!
/r/MensRights26/11/15 05:46 AM
1

Thanks very much! I always enjoy Sargon, and I agree, Stephanie Guthrie has problem glasses, and very much appears to be a C---.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:30 PM
2

And he has to go in front of an immigration judge before he can actually be set free. As far as I am concerned, 16 years in prison on a wrongful conviction is sufficient to summarily grant the man US citizenship if he is willing to accept it.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:19 PM
3

That kind of ridiculous bullshit is the result of our politically correct culture. I didn't realize women at the U of O would be so oppressed by the horrible misogyny of a man's soccer team, and if they want a womans' football team, do they expect men to set it up for them? Or is the absence of the football team the patriarchy in action? Or could it be that they have no such interest?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:15 PM
9

Obviously this woman should not be caring for children, given her behavior. Next question: does this get-out-of-jail-free card also apply to men with children? Or only women? (Britain appears to have succumbed completely to the worst aspects of misandric feminism and political correctness.)
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:04 PM
2

You can't help her if she puts you in jail. You have to protect yourself, and the kid, and then you can help her out.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:01 PM
1

And in truth, women can definitely react emotionally, and unsurprisingly, men tend to be emergency responders more than women.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:01 PM
1

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 07:00 PM
1

I had no idea, thanks.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:55 PM
1

Hillary Clinton is the female GWB. She's even running on his foreign policy. But yes, you make a fine point.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:55 PM
4

Actually, does Title IX as far as Federal funding is concerned also apply to public K-12 school systems? If so, the boys' parents should file a Title IX lawsuit against the school district.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:54 PM
7

The woman should be fired at once. She has ideological stuff going on that clearly makes her unfit to take care of children.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:52 PM
7

And its good change, too! He's fuckering off!
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:00 AM
-4

"Blame Canada! Blame Canada!'
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:46 AM
2

Yeah. That's fucked.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:36 AM
1

Fine. Let them ask for female receptionists. And let them let them hire a lady with nice legs and who understands that being a receptionist includes the critical responsibility of knee-high stockings and skirts. Cool. Balance re-achieved. (Women tend to make good domestic managers, and this very much translates into job descriptions where general operational management of an office or workspace as far as facilities and the social expectations of dealing with strangers walking in are concerned. T…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:28 AM
2

Reality is not particularly romantic. You can help her from a distance, where you are safe. This is Survival 101. Best of luck, bye.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:26 AM
2

So, again: you've been jailed and you're still hanging out. Don't be a dipshit. Get out. Take care of the kid.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:24 AM
2

Women crave mens' protection.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:22 AM
6

Good. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:21 AM
0

Everything I indicated has been widely reported in public news. In the last case, her statement that she intends to use the AUMF was in the 2nd Democratic debate quite recently broadcast by CBS News. I'd suggest youtube for records. I'd go dig up links for you but the last 15 years of Hillary Clinton's public life is a bit too a) public and documented for the last 15 years and b) much work for tonight. Inform yourself.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 01:30 AM
2

Law enforcement here is hugely biased against men in any conflict involving women. This sounds like a terrible situation. Sorry it is happening. Now, I don't think you should be delighted to have to have a "safety plan". I think you should get a divorce, and fight for custody of your kids. You are in a relationship with an unstable, violent woman, who has already caused you to be jailed. Think about that. She caused you to be jailed. This is not a viable relationship at this point, and you are b…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 01:26 AM
22

"Jess Phillips" is walking, talking proof that remarkable women apparently don't ever make it to the top, as she is at the top. I wonder how her male constituents feel, being represented by someone who so viscerally hates men?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:25 AM
8

Thank God that poor man was released - and let this be a lesson to everyone as to what false allegations can do. Now, on to the next matter: how did the prosecutor convince him/her self of this man's guilt, given his fundamental innocence? How did the prosecutor manage to "prove" the "guilt" of someone who was fundamentally innocent? You either prove something true, or false, through evidence and reason, and if that thing is false, you cannot prove it true, supposedly.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:21 AM
6

Mel was definitely an asshole, and 450 million dollars was absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:20 AM
2

I think that gender studies probably doesn't bring in the brightest bulbs.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 10:43 PM
3

Cue: cheers and jeers from feminists, who get to smugly get back at those nasty men once again. (The Canadian law transcends simple sex discrimination, and becomes pure misandry. Basically single men are condemned to death or becoming jihadis, in the Canadian policy.)
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:20 PM
2

Hillary Clinton is running for office on George W. Bush's foreign policy. Her "plan for ISIS" is ridiculous in multiple ways: It's centerpiece is a no-fly zone. Last I heard, ISIS doesn't have an Air Force. However, the Syrian government does. And so does Russia, which is flying sorties in support of the Syrian Army. So in other words, the centerpiece of Hillary Clinton's "plan to take on ISIS" is an escalation intended to force the recognized government of Syria out of power. This has always be…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:02 PM
3

Yes they can and do grasp that, and their attempts to ruin men's lives with accusations of "rapist" are very deliberate and willful, and also fact-free if that is convenient.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:30 PM
3

Or places where men and boys can be together in the community, and the male heritage maintained. That is important to me; I am the product of a single mother, and as a young man, I faced a lot of difficulties because of the lack of that heritage being passed on to me. I know personally how important these spaces are because I never had them, though it was not the fault of feminism. However, the assault on any mans' space in society by feminism is a bad thing, and must be stopped.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:22 PM
1

Remember the gap that feminists don't like to talk about: the Accountability Gap. Men are held accountable for our actions; and then we are blamed for women's problems, and they are not held accountable for their actions at all.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:21 PM
3

Certainly, the prevailing view is that many young men who become jihadis do so because they are dispossed minorities where they live, with few prospects, and no message from their communities that provides with direction or meaning, and in comes salafism and jihadism to fill that void. Plus, in war torn areas, yes, men are faced with joining up to fight or being killed themselves. And so yes, what you say is correct, shutting man refugees from Syria out selectively will only help add manpower to…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:19 PM
37

This is somehow seen as “pro-woman” and not as a way of turning a grown woman into a child ... Feminists have, indeed, turned grown women into children.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:13 PM
3

Should Hillary ever actually deign to hold a press conference (her regal highness is the only candidate to avoid those in general) a reporter needs to ask Hillary if "Jackie" deserved to be believed. Further: if she thinks that men deserve to have our civil rights stripped of us - no Bill of Rights - she should make that part of her official campaign platform and not hide behind vague sound bites.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:57 PM
3

Does that idiocy include mens' spaces? I disagree with you - women should absolutely have spaces to themselves. That is fine. And so should men. The issue is that, at this point, feminists have created a total stigma on mens' spaces.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:56 PM
2

If it means I can have a mens'-only gym, then I am perfectly OK with women-only gyms, as that way I can have a mens' space to work out.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:54 PM
6

Feminism sure seems to aggregate some stupid women. The one unifying factor among all those "womens' officers" is that they are, well, idiots. As in "marginally low IQ". But, perhaps totalitarian and supremacist movements have always relied on dumb people to be loyal ideological foot soldiers.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:49 PM
53

On account that sending men back to Hell to die horrible deaths is OK whereas because women. Pretty effed up
/r/MensRights23/11/15 07:00 AM
5

Anonymity is useful. But what if you have to stand up for what's right, with your name on it? I did that tonight, and lost face in the minds of people who I recognize in hindsight, really didn't rate the importance I placed them at previously.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:37 AM
15

You may well be correct. I'll summarily place American universities higher up on the pyramid of "please get these people out of power".
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:19 AM
23

There seems to be a culture where expression is being limited based on one group's viewpoint. We call that "nascent totalitarianism" where I come from. The fact that a university administration is sitting idly by while this goes on is just stunning for me. I can't have respect. There are grown adults running these places. Supposedly they have minds.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:18 AM
1

And that's cool. The official charter organization however is pretty seriously right wing with certain religious affiliations. That's fine; we just need more than one scouting organization for boys.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:15 AM
1

Nagging is definitely a tool. See: "feminism".
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:14 AM
2

Of course. Its also a minor edit from Wikipedia - so review the link, which has more information, Id suggest. But anything to pnw_diver is fine. And get more information from other sources ...
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:17 AM
25

Do it immediately. Hesitation would only raise questions later. Principles matter more than a subjective evaluation in a single class. Speak to the Department Chair and present that figure with a polite, supportable, and brief statement in writing expressing your objection and intention to escalate both to the Chair and possibly the Title IX Coordinator on campus if the behavior doesn't change. If you get met with "Why haven't you approached the professor yourself?" that is when you point out th…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:29 AM
2

By all means. I think that there could be any amount of work done to aggregate completely a record of female participation in terrorism (not just Muslim terrorism, either!) and it would be valuable to have that information centrally located. The world needs to understand that women are violent, too. Humanity is violent. You can have any opinions you choose on that matter, but trying to pin violence in its entirety on one half of the human race is the kind of lunacy you would expect from some sor…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:26 AM
15

Male disposability, again.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:40 AM
1

There have certainly been more than six. Note that the list below appears to have not been updated since 2013, so it is certainly incomplete to the extent that the female ISIS suicide bomber is not part of the list. And of course, the Suffragettes used arson/bombings, just not of the suicide variety. Damn that toxic masculinity, making men prone to hyper-violence. In Lebanon on April 9, 1985, Sana'a Mehaidli, a member of the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP), detonated an explosive-laden ve…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:31 AM
7

Why does anyone pay attention to David Futrelle?
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:28 AM
42

I can't think of a clearer example of "creating a hostile environment". You should speak with the Department Chair, and give that person something in writing, and contact as well the University Title IX Coordinator. That level of abuse and hostility towards men is 100% entirely unacceptable. If International Mens' Day should be a reflection on male rape, then International Womens' Day should be a reflection on female suicide bombers (see my latest post).
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:27 AM
213

The administration of this university is obviously a disgrace. This sort of abusive behavior should never be tolerated. And the women perpetrating this abuse, and their enablers the feminist media commentators, should be deeply ashamed of themselves, as well. Being self-righteous does not make you actually right, nor does it necessarily mean that you aren't stupid, either. What has happened to that man is that a dumb, angry, vacuous mob called "feminists" has been allowed to violate his right to…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:17 AM
90

Wow, British universities are a joke, clearly. They tolerate that sort of inane behavior? And they will allow one of their students to be harassed and ostracized for disagreeing on a subject with an angry mob? I feel sorry for the British, and in particular, British men. I'd suggest that this poor guy be offered a scholarship to an American university, but they're almost as bad here.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:14 AM
2

No, it was just "internalized misogyny". Or the Patriarchy made her do it. Remember: the Islamic State is viciously male-dominated, so the woman who became a suicide bomber in Paris was obviously just an exploited victim of men.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:10 AM
1

Yes. There have been plenty of female suicide bombers.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:09 AM
8

So now let's go ahead and loosen up standards in the military combat arms, as well.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 12:08 AM
2

One of the Paris suicide bombers was a woman. Just point that out.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:40 PM
8

And in so doing, CNN will diminish their journalistic credibility in the eyes of anyone better informed than the absolute general public.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:40 PM
5

It just seems like it would be so easy, if this particular group wants to go camping, to simply do so, and if the local Girl Scouts aren't into it, so be it. You don't need to have a Christian-conservative boys & men organization to go camping. Further, given that whoever the parents of these girls are, they are presumably not Christian-conservative men (else they'd respect the Boy Scouts) and so it seems bizarre that they would try to force themselves into the Boy Scouts. For my part, if I was …
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:34 PM
10

Get an attorney. The moment police are in contact with you the issue is no longer "friendly". Whatever actually happened, she is playing for keeps. Get a lawyer, its your only defense.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:57 PM
5

Whoever she is, she is an idiot and a braying ass, with a lot of time on her hands (presumably a liberal arts student on the Daddy Bill?)
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:44 PM
4

He is a smart guy!
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:37 PM
11

This has pissed me off. Personally, I don't even like the Boy Scouts (I was one) because I see them as eerily close to the Mormon Church and really just a conservative programming vector. With that said, they are still a space for men and boys to maintain our male heritage. The Girl Scouts have the word "Scouts" in their name and therefore, are presumably 100% entirely capable of going camping. Do they need boys to go camping? No. They can do it themselves. This attempt to get girls into the Boy…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:36 PM
1

These sites basically make money by having 100 guys sign up for every 10 females and then compete for attention pathetically. Here in Seattle, anecdotally its true, I've heard it said that some women are claiming to get up to 50 emailed notes a week through those sites. Men, conversely, wait weeks with no notes to them. The gender imbalance in Seattle is already famous, and those sites simply amplify it. Besides, with western women - at least the freezing post-feminist narcissists and shrews her…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:22 PM
16

It was farcical, the social justice warrior bullshit that someone got their 10 year old daughter to repeat in front of a reporter. The goal is not to go camping. The girls can go camping already. The goal is to destroy any space or context in society that allows men and boys to connect and retain any sort of male heritage.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:17 PM
57

Can't the Girl Scouts arrange a camping trip? Why does every space reserved for boys and men have to be taken over by feminism and turned into a mechanism for demonstrating female supremacy? Can there be no space in society where men and boys are together? It's as if the goal of feminism is to insure that men and boys are fractured as a group, that females are prioritized in every quarter of society, at every moment in our lives. It's as if the feminist agenda is to very deliberately destroy eve…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 06:59 PM
1

I think I misspoke - his work has no credibility. It is taken as having credibility because it reinforces a narrative whose narrators can be happily fact free, if it is convenient.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:34 PM
1

I certainly have never participated in "online dating".
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:34 PM
17

Dating web sites make their money by milking men for access to a tiny, tiny handful of women. Take up a social hobby, you'll be better off.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:00 AM
3

I don't know what OP means by "socialism" per se but: a) "feminism" has nothing to do with a socialized economy. b) the rights and social justice issues that are a source of combat between "feminism" and men have nothing to do with socialism or economic justice or fairness. c) it disturbs me, the degree to which only so-called "conservatives" apparently value men sufficiently to recognize us whereas self-proclaimed "progressives" seem to hate us. Further: socialism - in particular Democratic Soc…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:49 AM
2

It's pretty much a trip, the way we are regarded. Well written, and thanks.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:44 AM
2

Extra credit for a valid calculation of the percentage of the American gross domestic product that corresponds to male sexuality, real, or potential. (In short, its hard to get past the situation you describe, given that so much of reality is underpinned by mens sexuality.)
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:28 AM
1

Most people of any race fit negative stereotypes, ultimately ... why not try to do better ourselves?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:25 AM
1

that time is is already here
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:24 AM
1

Mexican people are a lovely and amazing people. The hatred that you endure from a nation next door to you - and we should be your absolute best friends - is unacceptable and, frankly bizarre. It sounds like this woman was a terrible human being. I am sorry you had that experience. What I can relate to you is that the Mexican people whom I have had the privilege to know, have never been anything to me other than warm-hearted, strong, intelligent, spirited, and inspiring. I like to visit Mexico wh…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:25 AM
1

OP: I'd love to read what you write, however, without paragraphs and essay structure it is really hard. Consider a formatting edit?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 03:09 AM
1

How debunked can a single study become? At this point the David Lisak study is starting to have as much credibility as "Chariots of the Gods". Perhaps the gender studies department buildings on all the campuses are really just highly visible targeted landing facilities for visiting extra-terrestrials.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:45 AM
1

By all means do - and do note that in this case I deleted one of my posts which was simply rude, and downvoted the other, which is the post that this discussion is on. I prefer to greet questions and questioners with open arms, absolutely.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:23 AM
10

Actually, what your son did was completely legitimate. In ball sports, when someone gets knocked down, you keep playing until the referee or arbiter calls a stop. Sporting matches are competitive and the goals of them include winning. Your son made a good goal! You should praise him for that. (Honestly, getting knocked over by a soccer ball is not likely to result in severe injury. You wouldn't assume so, and therefore you wouldn't assume taking the goal available at that point was on par with a…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:17 AM
1

Fairly edifying, thanks.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:08 AM
2

We should petition all of them to simply relocate to the Guardian, which would therefore provide one-stop-shopping for their fanbase, and a single quarantine zone for all of us.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:27 AM
6

It's pretty amazing what lengths she needed to go to in order to justify that.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:26 AM
2

I was referring to a report announced in the New York Times - even the feminist Times - within the last 8 weeks demonstrating that broken households and in particular the lack of a father figure is especially damning to boys' well-being and the success of their upbringing.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:25 AM
19

Isn't that just the deepest irony? She's the actual perpetrator of a false allegation that cost millions of dollars in lawsuits, wrecked lives, and hijacked the national debate on sexual assault, and nobody can even know her damn name! Whereas her victims are all quite well known.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:24 AM
8

I am sorry, I was late reading your comment; out raping and all. Needed to wash up afterwards, put some tincture on the claw marks my last victim left. But yes, congratulations, you ought to pen a memoire recounting for all of us how you managed to hold off it for so long! Just admirable, really.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:19 AM
10

Millions upon millions of dollars in lawsuits, careers and lives ruined, a national debate hijacked by misinformation, and "Jackie" still faces no form of accountability whatsoever. When will false allegations face consequences? When?!
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:18 AM
5

Why does Lisak have any remaining credibility whatsoever at this point?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:06 AM
11

One in three mothers should therefore have no contact with children, ever. In particular, boys, who need their fathers greatly.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:33 PM
1

He knew what he was in for. Her pretentious, hateful shit was just way too much for me. I don't think "Baroness Bakewell" (my God does Britain still host such appalling references to royalty and monarchy?!) is much of a human being. More: I am not much of jingoist, but when I saw "Baroness Bakewell" I realized on the spot how happy I am to be an American. If she was put on CNN here in the US and started in with her routine every last person with a job and no pedigree in this country would sneer …
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:28 PM
1

I think that one gap that we men need to close is the divorce gap with women. Currently women are initiating divorces much more often than men. We should equalize or even reverse this trend. Men need women in order to be fulfilled even less than women need men in order to be fulfilled; so if we're going to have a culture of hate and conflict underpinning the relationship between men and women, we men really ought to be, well, manning up, and kicking them out of our lives when the relationship is…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:26 PM
2

It would be great if all of them could just write for the Guardian, then we could all just avoid the Guardian and therefore not be confronted with their sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:20 PM
1

I think there was a probably a time when people could see that the breakdown of justice - economic justice, social justice - as well the line dividing the evil done with power (such as foreign wars, imperialism) - was first and foremost found along class lines. The two parties, whenever it comes to issues of oligarchical power and the agendas and unquestioned rule of great private wealth, are functionally one party, with the same class being represented. Famously, Bill Clinton is a good friend o…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:19 PM
2

Thanks for getting back to me, and I assure you that your English is better than my attempt at any non-English language you speak. Why is there a need for a mens' day? Well, men conceived of and built a large chunk of what we consider to be civilization, and, today, we are in general treated as if we lack value. Our rights are selectively reduced based on our gender, and our valuation in western society has been selectively reduced based on our gender. Further, there is a womans' day ... if the …
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:16 PM
1

In this case I couldn't agree more - I just had a very harsh reaction based on the experience of abuse coming from virtually anyone "outside" of the group, the moment they present themselves. Being a target for abuse has consequences not the least of which is a hugely defensive posture.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:13 PM
1

Men cannot rely on any "society" to aid us. To "society" we are a source of labor, economic consumption, and bodies to be used in warfare. We have to decide, each of us, how we want our lives to be, and which people we will have in our lives, and who we eject, and each of us needs to make his daily reality more bearable.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:12 PM
63

She certainly seemed fluffy, I guess all it takes to get published in the Telegraph these days is to claim to be a "feminist" and then to proceed with narcissistic navel-gazing and claims of victimhood. I mean, Christ, she even managed to get a nude image of herself inserted into an article on women in science, somehow.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 06:11 PM
2

Obama? Try Hillary Clinton ... shes basically the return of George W Bush.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:51 PM
65

Yes, welcome to being a man in America - you are automatically assumed to be the vilest possible human being, until you can somehow prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:36 PM
7

You will deal with this from feminism every single time you attempt to deviate from their ideological line - they will attempt to silence you, or to shame you then change the topic back to the words they want said and heard. In particular be ready for the shame and stigma that you automatically get for disagreeing with them in anyway, I have learned to avoid talking to anyone I know about these issues, I just let them exist in their culture bubble.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:04 PM
7

Dear God I got through about 30 seconds of "Baroness Bakewell" explaining sarcastically that her "heart bleeds" for us (she just dripped hatred) and that there are "isss-ssewws" while waving her hand in a condescending professorial way. Thank God On High I am not represented by "Baroness Bakewell". Thanks for the horror movie clip today, and I will write my American congressman shortly asking him to up the number of refugee visas available to men trying to flee the United Kingdom.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:02 PM
2

I read the question and saw a hostile tone, which, in reflection, may not have been there. Mens' Day has been so abused in media and on the internet that I frankly admit to having a knee jerk defensive response. In this case it may not have been warranted at all. In the other 99 out of 100 cases it was warranted. But I downvoted myself in this case as I jumped the gun.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:58 PM
1

I read the question and saw a hostile tone, which, in reflection, may not have been there. Mens' Day has been so abused in media and on the internet that I frankly admit to having a knee jerk defensive response. In this case it may not have been warranted at all. In the other 99 out of 100 cases it was warranted. But I downvoted myself in this case as I jumped the gun.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:57 PM
7

I am a leftist myself, and a recovering feminist. I don't like the way feminism - which has become a supremacist movement - has dug its claws into leftist politics. Unfortunately I can't support imperialist wars, oligarchy, over-arching corrupt power, extreme wealth inequality, etc., so I just resign myself to being a pariah in the leftist world for not genuflecting in front of the sacred cow of feminism.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:54 PM
7

Welcome to the post-feminist world - men are constantly attacked, degraded, put down, overlooked, and trod upon in mass media. It's not going to change soon, either. Just get used to the abuse. Oh, and feel free to not get married to a Western woman, as well. If they are going to thrive on the backs of us being put down, let them invest in sex toys and romance novels for their spare time.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:52 PM
9

Why so many women? Only women are entitled to public speech without demonization or apology, at this point.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:44 PM
3

BBC - the Brainwash Broadcasting Corporation.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:41 PM
1

Let me help out - you don't need to participate in "Linked In". You can get a job without it. I haven't checked LI in at least a year, so I don't have to worry about the gender war bullshit you bring up. I agree it sucks (I thought the workplace and the professional environment were inappropriate places for our personal political views?) but it is easy to avoid - reward "Linked In" for their activism by Linking Out.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:39 PM
7

BBC - the Brainwash Broadcasting Corporation.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:39 PM
3

Got a link? (I am not surprised if the people who made this "film" cannot answer simple questions about it.)
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:10 AM
4

Someone please find out which McDonalds now employs her. I will personally pay to have an order serviced by her flown out to my location on a different continent, in order to have the pleasure of throwing it in the garbage without touching it. In other words if I was starving I wouldn't eat food that vile woman made.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:02 AM
8

I agree, it is pleasing to know that the pointless asshole we all know as "Bahar" (whatever the fuck her real name is) has been buggered off to nowhere-land. I look forward to having her serve me a baggy of "McNuggets" assuming "Mickey D's" is stupid enough to hire her.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:00 AM
1

Good! She resigned! Hopefully next "Bahar Mustafa" (whatever the fuck her real name is) will have to go get a real job somewhere. I hope to thank her for making a nice capuccino, assuming she is qualified to do even that.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:58 AM
-5

Can you please fuck off?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:57 AM
1

BBC: Brainwash Boadcasting Corporation
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:32 AM
16

This woman is twisted and should not be in contact with children, in particular boys, whom she seems to hate.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:30 AM
12

Thank goodness that obnoxious ass was finally pushed out!
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:51 AM
44

The people who made that film are incredibly dishonest ...
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:50 AM
4

Nice article, thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:38 AM
1

Why would any man in his right mind participate in "Two X Chromosomes" or the others. Those are feminist circle jills.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:30 AM
1

Excellent!
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:29 AM
3

Noted. Avoid American doctors of a younger generation.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:28 AM
28

This is completely illegal, and the people putting up these fliers should be sued, and named, and shamed.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:07 AM
3

A woman-only political appointment ... no, that's not official discrimination, or anything.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:54 PM
4

It's another feminist hate sub, without a doubt.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:02 PM
26

Whoever thinks freedom of expression requires any qualifiers at all is a dolt.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 12:13 AM
12

SJW-dominated web sites and media operations do NOT want to discuss mens' issues or anything counter to the "man = bad, woman = good" narrative feminists rely on to have such power.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:46 PM
34

I saw the debate last night, and I just started laughing out loud when she invoked 9/11 and terrorists after being accused of taking payoffs from Wall Street in the form of speaking fees, foundation donations, and campaign contributions. I mean, Hillary has always been bad, a liar, dissembler, and has made some really cheap statements (Bosnian sniper fire!) but this one was just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:46 PM
102

So Reddit wants to hide political views and make a front page based on recipes, cat pictures, and goofy memes?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:42 PM
4

"This whole enterprise is shot through with a breadwinner-male definition of marriage that is well past its sell-by date." Riiiighhht. Women don't look for men who make more money than they do, no, not at all. This article was rubbish, yet another woman believing herself entitled to tell men how to think, how to live, how to be.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:36 AM
6

Feminism offers its adherents in the West the same things that fascism, or supremacism offer: A sense of moral superiority over others, along with the agreed-upon right to demonize those deemed "other". A sense of egregious victimhood. A belief that triumph is nigh at hand. Likewise, there are women who just genuinely have problems with men, and feminism gives them something to hide those issues behind.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:33 AM
35

Because God only knows men of color don't have it worse than virtually any other segment of society.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:37 PM
1

Your philosophy professor is a horse's ass, and you can tell him/her/it that he/she/it is part of the problem, bot part of the solution.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:26 PM
1

Did the PC crazies make that "leh-leh-lehl-leh-leh" shriek before charging in a horde against Free Speech in their jihad? (Thanks for the video).
/r/MensRights13/11/15 05:54 AM
4

The plight of black men in this society is terrible. They are trapped in an endless cycle of poverty and violence.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:14 AM
2

I guess men in Honduras who are murdered don't really matter, or are of secondary importance to the women killed.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:13 AM
1

Feminists declare as misogyny anything that any one of them at any moment finds disagreeable for whatever reason, articulated, or not. Its a shame word that they have abused and overused to the point where it has no real meaning anymore.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 08:00 PM
9

Good news! Title IX is a great weapon to use against the SJWs.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:00 PM
8

Feminism has pretty much killed off free intellectualism and free thinking on Reddit. I don't bother with most of the subreddits intended for intellectuals or those who follow politics, simply because they're all just feminist ideology echo chambers and fairly vacuous for that reason.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:05 PM
3

I saw what I needed to see, which was an angry, silly, entitled, privileged little girl acting like daddy really was supposed to give her the pony she wanted, and getting huffy when she didn't get it.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:41 PM
1

Get out the popcorn for the angry black lady at the laundromat!
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:38 PM
4

She sucked pretty bad, and got what she had coming, and I glad indeed that a fellow eeeeeeevviiiiiiilll white man (two, really) finally stood up for himself on Huffington Trash and simply told her to either act like a grown up or stuff it. We need a lot more of this in Western society. "Just because I was born white and male doesn't mean I gave up my right to an opinion or the ability to have an intellectual conversation."
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:37 PM
1

Yep. Athletic criminals are, by definition, misogynists.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:31 PM
7

OH GOD I nearly barfed. Heavy metal features "sexual violence against women" and has "a problem with women". Why yes, that misogynist Slayer. I always thought "Reign in Blood" was a campy, if fun, wallow in cliches surrounding Satanism. I never understood that the album was actually about stripping women of the right to vote, or trafficked prostitutes. Is someone trying to build a media career as the Anita Sarkeesian of heavy metal music?
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:29 PM
1

There is a point where you simply conclude that American women can sleep with their crappy cat eye glasses and we are better off without them.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:14 AM
1

Rich and comfortable.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:13 AM
0

the idea that men cannot hold a perspective That is the foundation of modern feminism
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:12 AM
3

Dammit Affleck youre wrecking my optimism.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:13 AM
3

This is an intriguing idea, and Id like to see some intriguing answers. For now Inwill withhold mine. UV
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:10 AM
63

So the existence of a physical fitness test that shows that a police officer can deal with physical confrontations, chases, etc. Is "sexist". Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:10 AM
20

Wow, a celebrity woman who actually acts as if she has a shred of dignity and perspective both
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:07 AM
1

Shorter: feminists dont hate men, and when they do, it is perfectly justified.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:09 AM
3

Wow. Just ... wow.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:50 AM
9

Another celebrity rapehoax. How is it that feminists are getting away with this? 19 Harvard Law professors write an open letter denouncing the outright defamation apparently in this film? Why is it that feminists are relying on misinformation - rapehoaxes and bogus studies - to whip up hysteria?
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:49 AM
2

The point being, by making not hating men the same as 'anti-feminist" they seem to admit that feminism is anti-man.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:17 PM
2

I think that reproductive freedom is a given in a free society.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:14 PM
4

As a man, I support reproductive freedom, and I support Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:13 PM
3

Thanks for this!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:12 PM
39

It is pretty bad, holding a panel on mens rights, and not inviting anyone from the movement, unless you accept the fact that the purpose of the panel is to make MRAs look bad.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:08 PM
37

This may be the first time in history a female SJW academic has in any way been held accountable for completely egregious behavior. Im aghast.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:46 PM
6

I noticed this as well ... according to whatever creep it is who made this comic, not hating men is "anti-feminist".
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:14 PM
30

Are the female staff stopped from being obnoxious?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:11 PM
1

Internalized misandry. Domination on the grounds of gender is bad however it is set up.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:16 PM
1

Its pretty much a gross thing for an officeholder to do!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:06 PM
1

Whoever wrote this article is an imbecile or in the very least failed How To Do Journalism Research 101.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 02:09 AM
3

If you have managed to miss the man-hating that feminists spout, you haven't bee paying much attention to them.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:55 AM
3

Feminism is a hate movement, a supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:53 AM
2

I am open to that, but what makes you think so?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:32 AM
2

Borrowed from MGTOW, without asking.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:29 AM
1

I did not claim she was solely responsible, and I don't care. She had her hands on all those disasters. Lots of people died because of power she had and exercised. And she should be held accountable. That accountability should start with her never holding any position of power again in her life. She's shown she can't be trusted with power.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:58 AM
1

She should be publicly denounced if not held liable for all the damage she has done.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:57 AM
21

Spoiled princess spending Daddy's Money at Yale goes over the line, news at 11.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:56 AM
4

Thanks for politicizing the goofy-yet-fun entertainment of James Bond, Mr. Craig. We all really needed yet another intrusion of feminism into a lighthearted mens' space.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:53 AM
4

I feel sorry for whichever South American forest this village gets built in, but if could conceivably house every feminist on Earth after becoming a big city it would be a godsend to us all.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:51 AM
1

The upside is that the women are being treated exactly as a man would be treated had he done the same thing, at least on paper. That indicates that the police are trying to be genuinely gender-blind and treat all equally under the law in this case.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:50 AM
22

But ya see, that doesn't fit the narrative, that she got paid lots more than some male actors. All that should be said, from a feminists' viewpoint, is what fits the victim narrative, and that is the fact that Johansson is paid less than Robert Downey, even though Downey is the highest paid actor on Earth and by definition all other actors make less than he does.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:15 PM
6

This is the very definition of privilege - being in the position of simply telling half the human race that our views are irrelevant or of secondary importance next to womens' views. McCaskill can shut the hell up.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:33 PM
3

Senator McCaskill is an insult to her office and should shut the hell up.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:26 PM
18

Imagine if a male Senator had gone on television and told women to "shut the hell up"? That men don't "value their opinion on everything"? My reponse: Claire McCaskill should shut the hell up. I value her views on nothing.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:26 PM
17

A lady told me she wanted a ring ;) I told her to go to a pawn shop. Dinner still went well. They can deal with reality. To this day, she keeps on with me.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:59 AM
6

I call bullshit on "vice".
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:11 AM
5

A feminist uncovered, through her academic research, yet further how horribly oppressed she is? O My! Whocouldanode?!
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:05 AM
1

Good for you!
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:04 AM
3

Publicly identified as in the New York Times publishes her name.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:03 AM
2

Why would anyone spend their time at "/r/feminism"? It's a miserable circle jill of vacuity.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:59 AM
1

Notice that boys are ALWAYS the problem. You noticed that too? The whole debate was "are we raising sexist sons?" In other words, boys are presented as nothing more than just a fucking problem for women and girls just for existing. It's pure hate that gets tolerated because it wears the label "feminism". And I am sick of it. And yes, some of the comments were just absurd - women claiming that boys and men are awful monsters and that it should be just OK to throw us away. Feminists are far too in…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:33 AM
31

The author of that idiotic piece of shit apparently doesn't believe a man should exist outside of a relationship with her and a servile, guilt-tripped relationship at that.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:28 AM
2

Hard and honest. Thats the way we roll -
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:07 AM
2

Ive never seen her officially named in mass media and I couldnt otherwise agree more with you. uv
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:59 PM
6

This kind of unadulterated, chemically pure bullshit serves only to pit men and women against each other and to obscure facts.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:57 PM
11

Separate plaintiff, separate suit.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:19 PM
5

She is a victim of her own gullable and ideological self. Her editor, Jann Wenner, who had to resign, is one of the real victims here.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:54 PM
54

Furthermore, the UVa administrator whose career was ruined and who received death threats as a result of the RS article has filed a 7.5 million dollar law suit. Note that the only accountability so far over at RS is that the (male) editor had to resign. However: "Jackie" has yet to be publicly identified, let alone face any accountability whatsoever for the lies she told and the 32.5 million dollar consequences. She has presumably completed her degree and moved on in life, Scot free. Sabrina Erd…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:35 PM
13

Lemme guess Lorena is now a tenured professor of gender studies at Harvard with tenure granted for her previous "cutting edge" work in feminism?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:51 PM
2

What this article is really glossong over is that males are often functionally slave labor in some South Pacific regions. Hint - those EZ Peel shrimp frm Indonesia were harvested by men living and working functionally as slaves. You wont really get that from official media like the Times though.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:49 PM
26

I hope that, someday, "Jackie" is finally publicly named (notice she faces no accountability whatsoever despite international anger over her lies and 40 million in lawsuits) and one can only hope that Sabrina Erdely is finally fired - notice that only her male editor was fired, whereas she is still somehow employed at Rolling Stone (despite her article resulting in 32.5 million dollars in lawsuits against RS).
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:14 PM
10

Cant be as bad as dating a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:05 PM
5

Emily Cook is a menace, attempting to free a child molester on the basis of gender.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:48 PM
7

Excellent piece, thanks.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:46 PM
2

All I did was state her record ... that isnt fair?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:33 PM
1

Thanks! That is what I sought.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:33 PM
9

I couldnt agree more ... American women now take the fact that boys are falling behind in school as a good thing.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:32 PM
4

Feminism in its modern reality is a supremacist movement rooted in an outmoded victim narrative along with a deep and fundamental hatred of men and boys, and a belief that men and boys should be second class citizens. Asking "what does feminism get wrong about mens' issues" is like asking "what does white supremacism get wrong about race issues".
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:30 PM
11

Notice when you read these pieces that the two man-hating feminists, when asked to debate what to do about boys, respond in essence that boys are an obstacle to girls in need of removal. Notice furthermore that, in a debate on boys, 3 out of 4 panelists are women. Imagine if we had a panel on girls with 3/4 authors being men. The shrieks of "sexism", "misogyny", and "privilege" would bring down the sky.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:57 PM
18

And it's ironic that she says that, because Hillary Clinton has never met a war she didn't like. Every strategic disaster since 2003 that the US has been involved with, has had her hands on it: Iraq War and Occupation Libya bombing and toppling of Ghaddafi Honduras coup (Hillary State Department embraced a regime most Latin nations consider illegitimate) The attempt to depose Asad in Syria The embracing of a military regime in Egypt that mass executes political dissidents The coup in Ukraine Exp…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:13 AM
15

People who weren't alive before the internet are sometimes unaware of pre-internet history. Shorter: millenials sometimes think the world began with them, and don't like to hear otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:05 AM
18

They believe they are even entitled to assault people who disagree with them - such victimhood.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:52 AM
6

Shorter: "Men bad, women good." There.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:38 PM
7

Take up a hobby entirely different from your work, away from anyone you know. Something you find interesting, and throw yourself into it. Others will share your interest.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:31 PM
12

Avoid the trap of counting on coworkers to be friends. This is normally a superficial friendship. The reality is that there aren't a lot of relationships of a meaningful sort that are available to modern men. We're expected to exist to serve our employers and our wives and children, but never ourselves or each other.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:20 PM
11

Marriage is a financial trap for men, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:17 PM
3

Yeah, and he probably did it himself, voluntarily, to please her.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:14 PM
8

Plus, if we are single at middle age or later, we are regarded as absolute bottom status males. So the epidemic of over-50 divorces is probably a contributor.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:14 PM
10

It's probably best that men and women just in general avoid each other at this point.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:13 PM
1

I wonder how Manuela Fredericksen's husband (she claims to be a "mom and gender activist") feels about her deep hatred and contempt for men.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:49 PM
2

Excellent, a far better suggestion.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:43 PM
2

I meant, what she actually intends to produce, subjectively, and in detail, and what more money contributes to the film.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:41 PM
25

Men are increasingly shut out of society, in particular when we reach an adult age.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:39 PM
6

Ridiculous - is Ms. Johansson, now in her 30's, not worth enough hundreds of millions of dollars? Furthermore: Robert Downey is one of the richest actors in Hollywood, worth over a half-billion dollars after a long and lucrative career. Presumably Ms. Johansson is worth a lot more financially than any number of male actors - how does her wealth compare to, say, Viggo Mortensen's? Christian Bale's? Matt Damon's? Why is she suddenly compared to one of the richest actors to have ever emerged from H…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:56 PM
10

Oh God ... she said "like" as a verbalized pause how many times? A British ... Valley Girl!!!! BWAHAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:25 AM
1

Call the food market, complain about the asshole loud and long to a manager, and explain that this completely intolerable and unprofessional behavior, and express that you really wish you had another food market to go to. And if your girlfriend gives you any serious shit over it, ask her if she'd like to find a new boyfriend. But don't just be butthurt and whine on the rights forum. Get his ass fired. Real men get losers like that fired when they cause problems.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:12 AM
2

I am so so so glad that I am not a British man.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:09 AM
0

You're a douchebag.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:08 AM
1

I am interested to see what Ms. Jay intends to accomplish with this funding.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:08 AM
1

More telling headline: "Women work fewer hours and focus on work-life balance more than men in all industries, ever level: new report"
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:05 AM
3

Definition of privilege = "able to base much of the media on our movement on repeatedly debunked 'studies' without any challenge from journalists".
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:04 AM
1

The words "feminists" and "hate" are synonyms.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:59 AM
0

We are really, really tired of assholes like you subscribing so that you can put shit like this up to try to make us look bad. It's a cheap ploy. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:56 AM
1

Do they make a can of DEET that works on douchebags in addition to insects? OP: we have gotten very tired here of creeps like you who show up, and post shit like this to make us look bad. Fuck off. It's a cheap ploy.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:55 AM
1

The opposite sex is completely judgemental with us, and does not apply the same standard complaints of "sexism", "misogyny", or "objectification" to their own judgements of us, which are automatically "OK" in their minds.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:33 PM
2

I couldn't agree more! I am 100% all-in for equality (not identicality) and I am 100% opposed to the supremacist movement that modern feminism has become. I also am all-in on not buying products and services from businesses that genuflect in front of "movements" like "HeForShe", which deliberately position men as a source of problems for women, and try to pedestalize women while reducing men.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:32 PM
1

This is an important discussion to have, thanks to OP for bringing it up.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:31 PM
1

This is a most under-discussed issue we face, the impact of beauty and sex appeal standards on men. To answer the original question, I do find the built-like-a-Navy-SEAL beauty standard for men to be unattainable at least in my case. I do not, however, unlike feminists, decry "injustice" or "unfairness", simply because most men aren't ever going to be built like champion athletes. I certainly have been judged, and rated, and socially statused, based on my own 5'10" 170 lb (average to short, and …
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:26 PM
8

Well, then, Vodafone can count me out.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:12 PM
51

She laughed at the idea of discussing mens' issues, that's all that needs to be known about this person. The fact that she is trying to make obnoxious tweets out to be anything real or particularly special (male politicians get these, too, only it apparently doesn't matter) is irrelevant. When faced with the suggestion that mens' issues be discussed - at all - she laughed. That is all that matters.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:09 PM
3

Hillary's pathetic attempt to smear Senator Sanders as "sexist" is both dishonest and vile. I'd say it causes me to lose respect for her; sadly, I cannot, as I long ago lost any and all respect for her I ever had.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:15 AM
6

Sadly, Fiorina is at least partially correct, though "left wing" includes things that have nothing to do with the Oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:15 PM
8

So feminism will now presume to dictate to us how it is we can physically sleep together?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:26 PM
1

While I don't agree that with the author of the article that we don't need Mens' Rights - we men and boys do very much need a movement, as feminism is now a supremacist movement that is damaging us - I do agree that, ideally, getting rid of genderism and looking for realistic equality (equality that is not conflated with identicality) is the best outcome.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 10:00 PM
52

Why don't the hateful women inventing these "horrible crimes" of men just come and admit it - they aren't bothered by someone leaning on a pole. They aren't bothered by a sitting position. They just hate men. And part of that hatred, is them hating seeing men at all in public. I don't envy the men of the UK their women. who seem to be these hateful, privileged creeps.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 09:51 PM
1

If these allegations against "women in tech" groups are at all true - and the people making these allegations are not exactly lacking in credibility - then these groups should be named and shamed.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:29 PM
3

/r/feminism is mindless.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:59 PM
1

These are helpful things you suggest. Can you identify an example of what you consider "extremism"? Likewise, I want to emphatically state that the MRM I support embraces men of all races and orientations, and that the issues faced by black men are atrocious issues, are mens' rights issues, and do belong here.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:20 PM
12

The wage gap is somewhat a myth.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:15 PM
7

Prepare to be hated! You might speak to a lawyer first about how to combat totally hostile discrimination on campus and what your rights are.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 06:34 PM
50

That is probably illegal employment discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 06:33 PM
6

I didnt see the idiot author suggest that women read any books that come from the direction of the mens movement. Typical.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 05:23 PM
1

Yes, Bernie Sanders, the farthest left lying politician in American politics, fan of gay marriage since the 70s, feminist, and recovering hippy, is sexist Thank you Hillary for being the Democrats' Trump.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 04:43 AM
11

There is something very bad eating at the boys and men of Britain.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:55 AM
30

Thanks. I think, based on this article, that health care spending is probably in general more devoted to women than men. If we are to have a health care system that is about cost reduction mainly, not helping everyone have the best life possible, then we men should have parity with women, not be cast aside yet again.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:45 AM
4

Like many here, I don't support banning people for having different ideas than I do. That's part of what makes us different than feminists - we tolerate diversity of opinion.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:08 PM
1

Use your imagination.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:41 PM
1

I've had great relationships with Latinas. More broadly, virtually anywhere not in the English speaking world treats men better.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:32 PM
3

Why is this it worthy of the most-read editorial page in the Western World, one woman's fluffy, inevitable commentary about sexual competition? I can see Huffington Trash publishing vacuous dreck like this but are vague (and banal) "womens' issues" now so critical that "my thoughts on experiencing sexual competition" should appear on the same editorial page as commentary from heads of state and internationally renowned leaders?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:15 PM
1

It's good to know this fellow won't just be sent back to the Islamic State/US-Russia war zone because some regret sex case came back against him.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:39 AM
1

Halloween again.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:33 AM
1

Boundaries do get fuzzy. (I am a straight man ... I ended up making out with a lesbian in the street about 5 weeks ago. Kinda weird but it just happened.)
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:32 AM
1

Bill was the antichrist.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:12 AM
3

Fortunately, I will comfortably tune out the "online harassment" panel as I learned all I needed to learn when I heard that Anita Sarkeesian appeared in front of the UN and complained about some nasty "tweets". That someone would take the privilege of an opportunity to address the UN, and would use that opportunity to complain about rude tweets, makes my blood boil. We could address the UN on the tidal wave of refugees all these wars are creating. We could address the UN on the advancements that…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:24 AM
2

Nonetheless, I'll look to your handle as a reminder of the right way to be.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:43 AM
11

You forget some items: Has never opposed any American war. Has had her fingerprints on the most recent disasters, including the Iraq War, Libya, Ukraine, and Syria. Is a wholly owned lawn jockey of investment banks and the financial system. Claims she is "proud she voted for the PATRIOT Act". Appointed neo-conservative, Dick Cheney adviser Victoria Nuland to Assistant Secretary of State, paving the path to the coup in Ukraine. Says she wants an enforced no-fly zone in Syria, meaning, WWIII. Lies…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:41 AM
17

A lot of feminists have been overtly hateful towards gay men in general.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:30 AM
12

There is a sense of entitlement - the princess syndrome - that a lot of women have - throw in some drunks, and the sorority girl inside comes clawing her way right out.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:29 AM
12

I do that, absolutely, and it is a fair thing to suggest or demand, because it's very true that gay places are being invaded (I've lived in the gay district in question, one of the biggest in the country, for 20 years, and I've watch it get corporatized and straight-ized, they have every reason to complain) and my presence is part of that, though I am a man (and I have very good social skills in these places). It's just that, often the women don't want to be made invisible in the straight places…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:25 AM
2

To I_TRY_TO_BE_POSITIVE - so do I, thanks for the reminder.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:21 AM
7

I mean to say that I trust Hillary Clinton with banks and the military like I trust a rabid chimp with a hand grenade. Maybe I should stick with what you said, it was more moderate.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:20 AM
5

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:19 AM
13

Exactly what you said. Further - there are those of us who are leftists. Not "liberals", but leftists. We aren't pissing our pants over 2nd Amendment rights, either, we are leftists in the sense that we are anti-imperialist, and believe that the oligarchy and corporate power have gone too far in America. And Hillary Clinton is an insult to us. It's ridiculous to say "I'll vote for Sanders, or for Clinton". They are diametrically opposed figures on real issues. You are either a leftist, and that …
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:45 PM
33

I understand completely; I am a straight man, and I live in a gay district, and every now and then I go to a gay bar, simply because I want to have a beer and relax, or I am with a male friend, and we don't want to deal with the straight bar environment, and all that comes with it, in particular the baggage and tension that show up the moment women enter a room. When I am in these places, I keep to myself, and recognize that I am in a place for gay men, whom I relate to easily, and whose general…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:20 PM
36

Calling Sanders sexist is simply outrageous and unacceptable. This is the cheapest form of dishonest, go-negative politics, and its Hillary Fucking Clinton doing it. I'll never vote for her. I'll never support her. She's just too cheap. No class at all, no integrity, no principles, she is utterly dishonorable The Benghazi hearing allowed her to play the victim card, which is the only trump card she has. She has now decided to try to desperately play the victim card with Sanders.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:11 PM
5

So let's appease feminists by encouraging childhood obesity?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:34 PM
21

The goal, it would seem, is to start programming boys, at a young age, with pre-emptive shame, insuring that they grow up unbalanced ie not "toxic".
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:32 PM
27

This assault was simply disgusting, as is the fact that the woman who did - purely because of her gender - is getting not just probation-only, but the entire incident stripped from her record. Can anyone think of a purer example of "privilege" than be exempt from the consequences of committing an unwarranted, aggravated criminal assault, then lying about it to the police, expecting that, as a woman, your claim will simply be accepted without challenge? Is there a purer example of "privilege"?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 07:02 PM
2

Feminism is about how deep fried foie gras is part of a patriarchal conspiracy to force women into subjugation.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 06:46 PM
6

And so it begins ... the sisterhood is going to try to tear her down, smear her, destroy her anyway they can, for the crime of breaking ranks with them.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 06:45 PM
2

This was absolutely excellent, thank you very much for sharing it.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:56 PM
2

Complaining that Doom is "too violent" is like complaining that deep fried foie gras is too fattening. The whole point of the deep fried foie gras is the fat. One either eats it, or one does not, but one does not complain about the foie gras as if it is some sort of conspiracy to make you fat with clogged arteries.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:16 PM
2

I, too, have decided that Fallout 4 will take precedent over any concern about society and feminism. It wasn't a hard decision to make, frankly, and I am pleased to say that Yennifer of Vengerberg also assisted in defusing the misery of Western womanhood for a bit.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:15 PM
5

Stop trying to blame men for your own personal insecurities. Exactly. What's more, stop trying to make a political movement out of your own personal insecurities. The world does not owe you total comfort and confidence in yourself. One of the things I love about being a man, is that we don't respect ourselves or each other if we see our own weaknesses, or flaws, or outright failures, and demand that everyone in the world changes such that these failures are actually just fine. We instead either …
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:13 PM
3

Remember: men are disposable therefore our deaths are omittable, and less tragic.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:56 PM
3

The answer to all this is clear: Western men must simply stop pursuing Western women for sex. There are billions of women on Earth, and plenty of modes of transport and travel. If Western women are so convinced that everything under the sun is violent rape, and that men are the root of all evil and ill on Earth, then it's best that there simply be an international culture-wide divorce.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:55 PM
3

Adorable :)
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:52 PM
4

I want Emma Stone and Lena Durham to quit blaming men for all the world's ills, demeaning us, and pedestalizing women. Also, when women call me "babe", "honey", etc. which does happen, should I get outraged and start shrieking about "sexism"? What's the problem with terms of endearment between the sexes? What's the problem with men and women actually getting along in affectionate way? What's wrong with identify heterosexuality as part of the relationship between men and women, even overtly? Most…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 04:39 PM
15

I loathe Harvard, and I still think it is terrible that men arent allowed to have any spaces to ourselves.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:12 AM
10

How about 70 million to help Western boys succeed in the feminist, anti-boy education system?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:55 PM
4

Ask Mr. Colbert if he has noticed that the 389 men in Congress are not at all representative of men in general. Are the women in the Congress representative of women in general? There are numerous women in Congress, so women have no right to complain, correct?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:54 PM
8

Its called "the boy scouts". There is also a "girl scouts" organization. Who is telling girls that they should be able to join the boy scouts? That is the same as saying there should be no such thing as a boy scouts.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:51 PM
3

Huffington Trash is a man-hate site.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:08 PM
7

But the UK doesn't need to have a parliamentary debate on mens' issues or anything, even though British men are killing themselves in droves.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:06 PM
4

It's really not a problem. Women are happily brainwashed. Nod and smile, and say nothing when the topic comes up. Any western woman who is claiming to be oppressed or something is pretty clueless on the topic, and its not going to be positive or even useful to speak with her on these matters. People who have a sexual relationship with each other don't have to agree with each other on everything, and for that matter, don't have to know each others' views on every subject. (If she is a loud harpy …
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:59 PM
7

Perhaps if she hadn't met a reasonable statement with sheer contempt, simply because it wasn't boilerplate being stated, people would be less outraged.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:56 PM
4

O Me O My I am showing my twat to the entire downtown and my great- great- gramma is denouncing you for noticing!
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:07 AM
1

That 40 point lead is one poll. CBS at that same site has her up by 3 points, Bloomberg, by 7.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:39 AM
3

Because Hillary Clinton is running on the important issues, after all, not just vacuous gender warfare riffs.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:35 AM
3

The idiot that wrote this article was probably not even born when Rush Limbaugh (incidentally, I loathe Rush) said "feminazi". And yes, they're FUCKING FEMINAZIS.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:34 AM
6

This is hysterical: the term "feminazi" did not emerge in the "dark web". The term was coined in the 1990's by Rush Limbaugh, in radio broadcasts. This term was "mainstream" probably before whatever Princess Pixiedust McFeminist wrote this P.O.S. article was ever born.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:32 AM
1

It's time to do away with The Guardian altogether.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:30 AM
1

My understanding is that the typical modal child abuser (in the non-sexual sense) is a female caregiver.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:28 AM
2

The most frequent child abuser is Mom.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:28 PM
1

My God. I thought it had to be a joke. Wow. By the way, I always thought that the word "a" as in "a feminist bullshitted today" was sexist as well. Brutally so.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:23 AM
1

I also believe that Hillary Clinton being elected increases the risk of a truly catastrophic war.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:23 PM
2

I am in particular nauseated by Hillary - she is the most crass, lying, capitalist, imperialist, warmongering monster on the stage right now, and feminists run out and embrace her after Gloria Steinem and the 1960s told us feminism was all about peace and justice. Theyre vacuous, and insulting to the intelligence, and menacing as she is because if she takes power we can look at worsened wealth inequality, injustice writ large, and more and more war.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 02:22 AM
1

Hillary Clinton supports capitalist exploitation, wealth inequality, anti-Democratic and authoritarian structures in society, pervasive government surveillance and policing, evil, imperialist foreign wars that destroy impoverished nations and people, and she is furthermore a pathological liar. Maybe that's feminism now.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:08 AM
6

I am all for the making of any film that forces ideologues and those with the upper hand in society to face the failures and flaws of their own understanding, and to understand the truths and strengths in the thinking of those whom they despise.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:06 AM
6

Feminism very much has a totalitarian bent, and relies on censorship and silencing dissenting ideas. Furthermore, the elite of modern feminism (see: Hillary Clinton) never met a war they didn't like, in particular, wars serving capitalist interests that destroy impoverished nations and kill impoverished people in order to advance the agendas of elites. One always has to be a bit careful with Assange; but I think that people need to wake up and see what modern feminism is about: supremacism, hate…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 12:00 AM
5

Excellent news! Feminist censorship can go fuck itself.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:55 PM
2

It would interesting to see how many felons in general - men and women - had poor sex lives prior to committing crimes? It would also be interesting to see how many non-violent, non-criminal mentally ill people have poor sex lives? I suspect that mental illness anti-correlates with healthy sexual functioning. Probably healthy eating as well. How many mass shooters had poor diets before committing crimes?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:05 PM
4

Perhaps different mass shootings had different reasons for happening?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:29 PM
2

The rain itself is part of the crypto-patriarchal bro conspiracy to force onto womyn the injustice - the shackle - of carrying umbrellas.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:17 PM
2

Hip-hop star: point taken.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:14 PM
20

Not just "logical argument bros" but the now-evil "bros" itself, hurled at us all at once by this Mighty Womyn Culture Warrioress for Equalite. See? Brotherhood, or any notion of it, is now the new target of feminist hate. The idea that men could relate to each other, and have a culture together, is too much for them to tolerate, so they have to hate men standing together, insult us, shame us, try to smear us in front of each other and the public. See? We have an example of a boy throwing a ball…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:29 AM
18

You are an idiot. I cited the authors on their own survey flaws and nothing else. I then handed you one of several professional and technical debunkings of that survey publicly available. The damage is too great with you, I can't help, best of luck and good bye. Time is too precious.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:27 AM
13

Well, certainly my comments on the survey bias mirror those made by the study authors themselves who were the first to point out this huge problem and then went on to warn that their work should not be used to make any "broader conclusions" (for an example of "broader conclusions" see "1 in 5 college women is sexually assaulted or raped"). Did you just magically tune into this conversation? It's been going on a while. What I just wasted my time telling you is not my own invention and has graced …
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:19 AM
20

Plug in your brain. Also, read thoroughly. 1-in-5 or 1-in-4 is reported based on: A horribly biased survey in which more than 80 percent of those surveyed did not bother to respond, The use of the controversial and extreme "affirmative consent" standard, The lumping of name-calling along with violent penetrative rape into a generic and scary-sounding "sexual assault" category which accounted for all grievances, big or slight, and this survey ended up reporting, therefore, a rate of "sexual assau…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:02 AM
90

Let's see you run around telling everyone that, in essence, you view all men as raping pigs. Now you expect one of us to want to get to know you. If I run around telling everyone that I think all women are prostitutes, do I expect one to want to get to know me?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:09 AM
5

What, pitting men and women against each other is going to make the workplace better? Is that what someone thought?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:55 AM
1

How hard you want to try to find that one? What's it worth?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:54 AM
74

Of course Hillary is smearing Sanders as a "sexist". Cheap and banal, and frankly dishonest, as it is, the victim/gender card is the biggest lever Hillary Clinton ever had. I vote against imperialist wars, corporate exploitation, profound wealth inequality, and social and economic injustice, and Hillary Clinton can take a flying fuck off a tall rock. Sanders has his imperfections absolutely but he is lightyears better than her, she sucks.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:14 AM
2

Is "dating culture" anti-man? Let's put this way: I no longer really engage with American women on that level, it's become such a miserable exercise in struggling to get through the toxic anti-man cultural wall feminism has erected between men and women. It's just too much fucking work. There is no real way for a normal, happy interaction between a man and a woman to take place. At least where I live that's the case, uber- politically correct Mangina Seattle.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:10 AM
21

It is good to see that people continue to debunk the AAU study, but this debunking was insufficiently thorough. The plain fact of the matter is that, for the AAU study's conclusions to be factual - that the number of assaults reported to universities amounts to 1 in 4 or 5 women in the entire university system, the average university would have to be violating Federal law (the Clery Act) by under-reporting to the Federal government assaults reported to the average university by a factor of 100 t…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 01:05 AM
2

Didn't realize global warming was part of the patriarchy. I learn something new every day.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:58 AM
18

How creepy. It seems the "manhood crisis" is the fact that men exist as something other than subordinates of women.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 05:56 AM
24

Expecting consistency from feminists is like expecting your pet Schnauzer to drive the American space program. They rely on the victim card, the women are wonderful effect, and society's apparent willingness to accept a profound double standard from them that applies to virtually every context, in order to be seen as valid.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 05:46 AM
6

Such an outcome is impossible to imagine in the Western world. The status quo cultural dialogue is derogatory to men. Questioning that status quo invokes the wrath of the media feminists, who immediately play the victim card and express outrage and attempt to silence whatever questioning takes place.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 11:57 PM
3

This article is 13 years old.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 09:44 PM
11

False allegations are a tyranny, and there needs to be a consequence for making a false allegation.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:19 PM
12

Why, golly, every country on Earth doesn't exactly match the US in terms of employment opportunities, life span, childcare options, economic and food security, liberal democracy, and education.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:12 PM
5

Free housing. Just for being female. How biased can society become?
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:00 PM
4

Title correction: " Gloria Steinem is laughable'.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 04:16 AM
2

I didn't see any femsplaining in this "writing" from Jezebel, though Jezebel is certainly known to do that sort of thing. This particular "piece" looked like just more feminist navel-gazing - and I found this strange - without actually lashing out at and insulting or demeaning men and boys. The author probably took her anti-depressants on time this week.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 01:02 AM
3

Why is my tax money being spent to attack men and promote radical feminism?
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:20 PM
2

I would rather be hung than listen to that woman prattle.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:11 PM
1

I have no "fear" and there is more to battlefields than stationary marksmanship. Be serious.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 07:10 PM
0

Why did you waste your precious time trying to reason with the asshats of /r/feminism? If you're that bored buy a Nintendo, or make You Tube videos of yourself farting out "Ode to Joy", or do anything but address those monkeys. It's actually counterproductive to try to talk to them, it only encourages them.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 11:21 PM
2

I agree with the notion of equality requiring them to be conscripts; I also oppose conscription in general, and to be blunt I wouldn't want to be a in rifle company with women.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 11:16 PM
2

What a little asshole she must be!
/r/MensRights22/10/15 11:09 PM
1

Its terrible that the uncomfortable lecture got shut down because feminists cant handle being uncomfortable. And I also agree that censorship is all about one group controlling what anyone is allowed to hear and consider.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:01 PM
8

I would rather be skinned alive and thrown into a salt pit to dessicate to death in horrid pain than be exposed to that revolting girl's ... EW just EW
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:48 AM
9

God she is the epitome of the spoiled, conceited little daughter who talks down to everyone - and says things that are vapid. EW.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:47 AM
12

Let me help with the title: "Laci Green Doesn't Understand Anything". There, all fixed.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:27 AM
3

Such a "diversity discussion", never mentions men once. The email, however, is useful ... it informs you right as you step on campus exactly which buildings and which get-togethers you should avoid like the plague.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:24 AM
18

Feminism has produced a generation of angry, entitled, intellectual cowards who instinctively believe that their own self-righteousness trumps any requirement that they be able to take in any view different than their own.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:19 AM
7

You are wasting your time talking to feminists. You might as well talk to a potted plant. Well, a potted plant that emits toxic gas instead of oxygen as part of its metabolism.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:10 PM
12

We all have this experience. Tipping the sacred cows of feminism puts you right in the crosshairs of every sanctimonious, entitled, indulged Social Justice Warrior near you.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:18 PM
2

Vancouver is a lovely city. I hope she finds Yaletown and the nice Izakaya place there for a later supper after her presentation.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:40 AM
7

Get it on video and have her cited for assault.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 12:08 AM
3

Ridiculous - they lumped us in with racists. How fucking ignorant
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:03 PM
12

This is sex discrimination in hiring under Federal law and the university should be sued.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:05 PM
8

As soon as you printed the term "male-friendly" in relation to Huffington Trash I knew something couldnt be right ... and yes the good feminists of H.T. certainly do place housepets at a greater level of respect than men. Thats why so many of them will be late middle aged spinsters relying on lap dogs for companionship.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:01 PM
6

This is the bogus Association of American Universities study again. Its been debunked repeatedly.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 09:31 PM
17

According to that article, little girls will be organized by the teachers to police little boys. I cant think of a more utterly sexist regime, it places the girls as superior to boys. The administrators and teachers who thought this monstrosity up should be fired. They are crazed radicals with an agenda and they should certainly be kept away from littlw boys.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:36 PM
3

Do keep in mind that feminism has been working on its agenda for 100 years now. Keep in mind further that feminism controls the school system and therefore has vast leverage.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:16 PM
12

I couldnt agree more with the rebellion. These classes are degrading and insulting to men, and will accomplish nothing except appeasing feminists by letting them see they can further shame and stigmatize men. Because, you know, a rapist is going to be convinced to be otherwise by a "consent class". Its just a brilliant approach to dealing with violent sex offenders, making men eat shit in a degrading class "taught" by anti-man social justice warriors with an agenda.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:01 PM
15

Feminists rely on stifling, silencing, and shaming, in order to avoid being confronted by other ideas. I am not particularly a fan of Milo, and this does not change the fact that modern feminists are intellectual cowards.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:25 PM
1

Wishful thinking on my part. Thank God its not a son.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 06:24 PM
5

The good news is Jessica Valenti, hating men as she does, is very unlikely to reproduce or raise children.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 08:25 PM
1

And yes this post cannot be upvoted enough.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:21 AM
10

Let me help with the posting title: "Male Students: Protest and Boycott Consent Classes" If questioned by media why, ask the reporter if s/he enjoys the idea of being legally presumed a rapist unless s/he can prove otherwise given the basic reality of human sex drive.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:18 AM
78

Yep. Just assume she's psychotic and empowered over you. End of story. Dear College Men: Avoid American women like you avoid Bubonic Plague.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:16 AM
2

Asking a challenging question of feminists is liking asking an infected zombie to stop eating meat. In other words, pointless.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:15 AM
1

Probably you should have started making rude and insulting comments on her Facebook page (the person who put it up) and then, when the complaints show up, just claim you did it out of love.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 10:55 PM
3

I laughed at some of those comments, like: "There are fewer women heads of big corporations than male heads of big corporations named John". What a fallacy of reason that was - comparing the population of CEOs of international corporations - and there are very few of those regardless of gender - to the most common name found across about 1/2 of the English speaking population on Earth.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:30 PM
68

We look at systems like that that go awry and realise 85 per cent of that population [of engineers] is male. “There’s evolutionary biology that suggests there are [certain male] behaviours and that when you have more equal representation of women in work groups, you mitigate those behaviours and get better outcomes – better outcomes for the climate, better outcomes for the work group.” This woman should be fired at once. Her commentary borders on the same sort of bullshit that eugenicists have i…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:36 AM
83

What fucking vile sexist bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:30 AM
1

So attack people walking out of a church, hurling bottles and feces at them, assaulting them, assaulting police?
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:44 PM
2

Avoid any non-work or unnecessary contact of any sort with female co-workers. Contact with female co-workers is a mine field with guaranteed casualties. Keep contact focused on work, sufficient only for work, and if at all possible always in full view of people who can serve as witnesses. Women know full well that if they so much as say the word "discrimination" at work somebody, almost always a man, is going to get fired or reprimanded. Its best just to stay away from them.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:53 AM
2

With respect to men, modern feminism has become a hate movement.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:40 AM
1

It's irrelevant what Hillary Clinton does or does not say, ultimately, because nothing that woman says in public can be believed.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:53 PM
0

That activity borders on terrorism. Just a little bit more arson and the line would have been crossed. But we all know that feminism is about peace, and equality, and rainbows and unicorns and pixie dust. Some of the women shouting "asesino!" at the riot cops put into the position of firing live shotgun ammunition into a violent, rioting crowd trying to protect non-violent people engaged in a commonplace activity is pretty amazing, too. When you drive a badly outnumbered, cornered group of cops …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 11:50 PM
16

Did you actually watch the POS? Like when asked "How would you be different than 4 more years of Obama?" the men all had policy answers and she said "I am a woman". How fucking vacuous
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:33 AM
3

Chronic bitching about everything.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:58 PM
22

Let me help out with the title: "Famous YouTube Feminist Has No Clue" There. All fixed.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:56 PM
9

All that, yes, the same coterie of whining feministas who want to censor the internet and control dialogue and communication as suits them, plus ... again ... neither the author, nor any of the dubious sources ... grasp at all that men get abused too. It's just too much for their pea brains to imagine.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:53 PM
2

Appreciated
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:51 PM
5

The Mother Jones article is absolutely ludicrous - the Association of American Universities report would require all 7500 schools in the association to be under-reporting their Clery Act requirements by more than 90% - year, after year, after year, going back to the start of the requirement. The AAU report, if it is to actually be believed, would require thousands of reported assaults - at every school in the system - every year. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports several thousand reported…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:31 PM
10

Hard work and conviction, paying off, keep it up!
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:24 PM
1

They'll get angry that it isn't covered by Obamacare plans.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:22 PM
3

Anyone who publicly writes on controversial matters online, taking a stand with a wide visibility, gets abused by random strangers. Apparently Huffington Post failed to notice that this rule applies to men as well as women, and to virtually any controversial topic, and that further, still, women can be horribly abusive of public writers online. Some of the worst invective I've ever had hurled at me has been hurled at me on web sites like Reddit, by feminists who believe they are entitled to bull…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 10:25 PM
3

Seeing how many jobs she's actual held in her brief life (was she ever actually so poor as to have to work for a living at any time?) I can tell how valuable her input should be.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:44 PM
11

Hillary Clinton is a dishonest, manipulative crook. I would never care about the gender of a presidential candidate - you don't choose a head of state on the basis of gender, that's idiotic. But using gender as a cover behind which to back a lying crook? That's where I start to get pissed off.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:43 PM
21

I am so saddened to learn that the millions and millions she was paid to be in a movie, "work" in which she was personally housed in the finest residence by the studio, fed the finest food by the studio, and attended to by an army of aides and hangers-on, was insufficient in her view.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:36 PM
-6

Pretty confident it is :)
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:16 AM
2

Why do you think the boys cried?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:12 AM
1

Why yes, what the US is doing in Syria (completely illegal warfare attacking a recognized government with huge casualties) is the same as fucking Anita Sarkeesian being told that her juvenile perspective is just that via Twitter. Fucking shoot me already is this really what humanity has amounted to?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:28 AM
39

Go! Go Bill of Rights Go!
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:26 AM
-3

Would you quit referring to yourself as a male? We are MEN. men. Motherfucking MEN.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:26 AM
10

Did a lawyer write that?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:25 AM
5

Determine first which sources of Federal funding are present for your school. In your letter in a footnote identify these clearly. In the body of the letter indicate with no lack of assertiveness that the environment that you are experiencing is hostile to you as a young man, and young men in general, and that the result of what is has happened is a deep understanding on your part that men and boys are second class in the eyes of school administration, and that you and other young men like you d…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:21 AM
1

Know your IX :) :) :)
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:17 AM
1

The words "sexist" and "misogyny" can both be equally defined to mean "Anything that any woman ever hears that for any momentary, inarticulate reason causes some sort of discomfort, as a result of anything whatsoever, without challenge, or accountability, or anything at all."
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:16 AM
4

Emma Watson is yet another piece of shit Hollywood celebrity - and they are Legion - who can take a flying fuck off a tall rock. HadItUpToHere.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:15 AM
17

I dont see why this isnt a Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 11:34 PM
3

Figured it had to be a joke :)
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:51 PM
4

Remember - in modern America, the word "man" can be used a slur, much like the word "nigger".
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:37 PM
5

"Red Zone" - makes it out to be some season of terror. Hysteria much?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 04:26 AM
15

This is cute: if two women have a grudge against a man, for whatever reason, it becomes trivial to automatically fake evidence, and have the authorities alerted. What's wrong with calling the police if you have been assaulted?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 03:59 AM
3

The one thing anyone can see, is that feminism definitely does not concern itself with good sex.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 03:55 AM
5

Every man you meet is a rapist who hasn't been accused yet. Exactly. The goal is to criminalize normal behavior, and to stigmatize men.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 03:51 AM
2

I just can't believe that people who have so much opportunity and comfort in the world, and so much that they could be doing, would act like this ...
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/15 01:00 AM
7

We'll just have to laugh at them.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:47 AM
15

This is a good article to read, and it makes well the point that, under the affirmative consent standard, male heterosexuality itself is effectively criminalized unless there is a woman to vouch for it on a case by case basis. And yes, under affirmative consent, a man who has sex with a woman is presumed a rapist under the law unless he can prove himself otherwise. Affirmative consent also establishes no penalties for demonstrably false allegations, effectively eliminating accountability for wom…
/r/MensRights12/10/15 12:07 AM
2

I shudder to think of how warped this film will doubtless be. I am expecting 100% a hit job and that's it.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:43 PM
5

It is just amazing, how problems primarily facing men, such as suicide and homelessness, suddenly become womens' issues the moment politically correct media operations report on them. OP has articulated his point well, it's as if men and boys just cease to exist as relevant the moment the world is seen through the media lens.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:42 PM
2

Couldn't agree more. At least, unlike Hillary, he actually has principles, and a consistent record of being on the right side of affairs.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 02:13 AM
2

I'd certainly keep a supply of it around. American women and American heterosexuality are often more trauma than anything else, more liability.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:21 AM
1

Here in the US if Sanders was a woman I'd vote for him/her anyway. I think it is asinine to focus on the gender of someone who will be in charge of the most powerful and most frequently used military in the world, and who will be presiding over a nation defined by great and skyrocketing wealth inequality and ever-growing corruption.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:19 AM
1

So, because political corruption happens, we should therefore turn a blind eye to a particularly corrupt and loathsome politician?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:18 AM
3

Sanders will assuredly genuflect in front of the sacred cow of feminism. And he will probably believe all of the good and all of the bad together.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:18 AM
3

Is there something wrong about boys having any place to themselves in our society?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:17 AM
4

Feminism has become a hate movement. It's entirely taken over by the hate mob.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:16 AM
2

We'd all be better off if we men had a pill that would let us surgically turn off our sex drives with no side effects, whenever we wanted.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:14 AM
7

I wonder if anyone has noticed that the cold, ongoing calculation and negotiation entailed in so-called "affirmative consent" looks on the face of things more like rape than any normal sexual encounter. The entire ongoing negotiation with legally binding commitment each step of the way implies not even just a total lack of trust between the two people involved, but even a context of outright hostility. It is as if sex is presumed automatically to be hostile and unwanted in this situation, and mu…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:13 AM
1

Sir Tim was horribly abused, burned at the stake by vacuous Social Justice Warriors, and its duly noted that the Association of British Science Writers endorses and protects hack journalism if that is what it takes to bow before the sacred cow of feminism.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:59 AM
2

How fucking weenie can it get?
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:17 PM
21

On the balance, I really wouldn't mind voting for a woman candidate. The truth is that there haven't been too many. With that said, regardless of our ideological affiliations, or outlook, I think we can all agree gender is the least important aspect of a candidate for the US head of state. Without a doubt, the election of this figure, whoever grasps the brass ring, is a death knell to many people in the world, inevitably a sign of increased poverty for those who work in the US, and otherwise an …
/r/MensRights10/10/15 04:44 AM
2

God, what a whiner she turns in to when she isn't given her way! Julie Bindel is a sad joke.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:13 PM
3

Woman problems are easy. Ignore them for 2 weeks. They disappear.
/r/MGTOW09/10/15 06:42 AM
1

Well. We've arrived.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:53 AM
3

Shit can't they get a computer at least with more than one hard drive. Save it to d:/ for christ's sake. Don't expect anything mounted from a feminist (too sexual) but jeez only one drive.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:46 AM
2

That moment when suddenly you tune out females.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:45 AM
2

The UN is a very important organization with a sadly unfulfilled mandate to achieve a better way of national entities relating to each other such that those who work, those who are vulnerable to the games elites play, and peoples with great differences, can have a more peaceful way of life. Let's get this politically correct tribute to pierced-nose tumblrinas outta there. If we are to fixate on women as if men don't exist, there are women in places all over this world who deserve a voice, and do…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:42 AM
2

The photo next to the link appears to be the correct photo in this case. I am pleased that wherever this tawdry, sad little tale took place, that the regional authorities applied justice in the correct way. Good for them. And I hope that the little princess is held accountable, completely, and learns a lesson, just as a little prince would if he had raped someone. Let's hear it for accountability! Hip! Hip! Hurrah!
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:45 AM
5

Asking why a radical feminist does anything is like asking why a resident of an insane asylum ... does anything. Unless you are prepared to suspend reason and accountability and enter a Cthulu realm of dark insanity you will never have a hope of understanding any of it, and if you do all that, you will rue the day you did.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:43 AM
9

Perhaps if feminists were intellectually strong enough to stand on their own two feet and not rely on censorship, silencing, and thought-policing political correctness, it would be easier for them to get whatever points they still have across.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:39 AM
8

If you don't like it, you're not required to subscribe to it ...
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 07:36 AM
4

Well, damn. There is a labor issue if I have ever seen one.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 07:27 AM
2

You know he's gay himself, right? I don't like being in the position of defending him, because I am not too well impressed by him, but he's not on the same level of obnoxious as Julie Bindel, who is only acknowledged in public because she claims to be a feminist, and is otherwise just one of these people with a long, strange trip.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 07:24 AM
5

Plus you have GCHQ vacuum cleanering all of your communications and no press freedoms to speak of, and no real freedom from your government. Not even Posse Comitatus, which is our law that prevents military personnel from being deployed on domestic soil in any "order keeping" role. I think your smaller murder rate is the result of a number of things, to your credit, a smaller and fundamentally more connected population, along with a tax and spending structure that fundamentally prioritizes the n…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 07:22 AM
7

I've been exposed! Eeeek! (Forgive the sarcasm but when my denouncers actually hit puberty I'll take them more seriously.)
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:43 AM
1

I attest!
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:34 AM
2

Would someone please get rid of that silly photo of that obnoxious woman!! When I see it I want to smash my laptop.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 03:50 AM
1

I suppose Romper Room can't really let anyone in who might upset small children.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:54 AM
3

I am actually serious ... what was the official reason for banning Yiannopoulos? I am not a particularly big fan of his, it just smacks of political correctness, cancelling him, and caving in to the whines of people who want him silenced, period, regardless of any other factor. He certainly is not somehow an "equivalent" in fuzzy way of Bindel, who is brainless wallower in hate speech. Yiannopoulos to my knowledge hasn't suggest that women should face horrible treatment, or just been worthlessly…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:38 AM
1

Free Speech for All, or No Free Speech for Anyone.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:18 AM
128

I firmly object to arresting anyone for political speech. With that said, let's all note that Mustafa is one of these little pierced-nose princesses getting ahead on the misandrist feminist ticket, and deserves no real respect, and that furthermore the law in this case is attempting to be gender blind, which can be respected. I just upvoted this article. Simply because I can't stand Bahar Mustafa.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:17 AM
3

I can understand banning Bindel, who wallows in hate speech, but was Yiannopoulous simply banned to "be fair" or something? (Incidentally, I would give up my last five dollars as a fee to avoid any chance I would ever be at such a "debate". Any discussion or town hall forum with a feminism sign on it is to be avoided like a plague zone, unless you want ideologically rigid zombies all around you engaged in a mutual circle jill based on hating men.)
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:13 AM
17

What would anyone like this woman know about being in the 'tech' world. She has never had to face anything like a real job. I am so sick and tired of filthy rich celebrities and oligarchs making reference to the lives of working people as if they have any fucking clue whatsoever. In the case of this particular asshole it's not even a gender issue, per se ... this is a class issue. This particular imbecile is so entitled owing to her great wealth that she feels comfortable presuming to speak of t…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:12 AM
1

Yep. One way or another it will simply mean lower wages and hiring headaches.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:30 AM
3

As soon as I saw the words "Sheryl" and "Sandberg" together in print I felt traumatized and had to click away. Put a trigger warning on that shit!
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:28 AM
1

Murder and manslaughter are OK if a woman claims he was abusive, remember? Being female exonerates you of all accountability.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:26 AM
2

What a lovely idea :) Feminists: go rebuild Syria! Show us how to do it!
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:36 PM
1

I certainly can't fault any man in Syria who decides its high time for an extended vacation in Western Europe. Or Eastern Europe. Or pretty much Anywhere Else.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:34 PM
1

Being drafted to fight for an unpopular dictator is probably not a vision of a future any of us crave.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:33 PM
3

What, it's not "feministic" enough for them?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:31 PM
1

The Times is reporting on the hard truth: it is men fleeing the Middle East, or returning after bearing arms there, that European governments are worried about, and it is men fleeing Syria that leave Syria in a damaged position from which to rebuild and recover once the Syrian nightmare is finally over or at least the Islamic State is driven out. Suddenly, it is becoming clear to some that Syria is going to need more than women to become whole again. And that may be a problem because any man who…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:43 PM
4

Let's make sure, each of us today, who is a man, to lecture a woman or women somewhere, on the decline of womanhood.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:37 PM
5

Given that this is a recent trend (the test scores, etc.) one has to wonder what recent changes occurred that suddenly resulted in boys scoring so low. It is either the teachers, the way they teacher, or the curriculum, or some combination. There really isn't any other explanation in the school.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:58 PM
20

So being physically fit, that's bad. Got it. Thank goodness that we have feminists to teach us what's right and what's best.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:42 AM
4

Stunning! Allow police to investigate criminal acts! What a radical thought!
/r/MensRights06/10/15 12:28 AM
1

I couldnt agree more. The victimization narrative has just gone too far, and has become silly. Throw "sweat-shaming" right in their with "sexist air conditioning" and "misogynist sitting positions".
/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:00 PM
13

Hillary Clinton is certainly vile - incredibly manipulative, dishonest, and cynically self-serving. Famously she also very upstairs-downstairs and loves her class privileges. I'd rather be shot than vote for her. If she had a shred of integrity she'd resign from public life at once. All that said, it will take a lot to convince me of these sorts of allegations against her. They've been going around a long time, along with the "secretly-a-lesbian-involved-with-Huma-Abedin" story, and there doesn'…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:25 AM
21

Couldn't agree more with the premise. People demonstrated to be making false sexual violence allegations should be publicly tarred, and feathered, incarcerated, and rendered civilly liable for damages.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:22 AM
7

Objectification, anyone?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:21 AM
2

They're suing in part claim discrimination on the grounds that they're Canadian ... what, is "Canadian" now a protected category?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:19 AM
2

Exactly. Who's privileged?
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:28 PM
3

Bring on the force-feeding of Ritalin, I am ready.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:26 PM
1

]reaches for bottle of red pills[
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:24 PM
2

The hypocrisy is only nauseating if you expect integrity in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:23 PM
3

The hypocrisy is only nauseating if you haven't already observed that, in reality, feminists have no integrity whatsoever. They're basically a mob mentality in action.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:22 PM
3

See: Ralph Nader, and "gonadal politics". Panem et corcensai.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:17 PM
18

O Dear. Mainstream corporate mass media attempting to understand part of the internet. What a joke.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:14 PM
21

No group is subject to more fascination and derision than teenage girls. Actually, men and boys are subject to far more derision than any group of Western females.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:36 AM
3

I have less than zero respect for Anita Sarkeesian. That is the same saying I hold her in contempt. Yes, I do. (If you had the opportunity, whether you had earned it, or not, to address the UN, would you whine about angry tweets or web site postings you didn't like? How fucking childish can this twat get?!)
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:19 AM
3

Is there any reason to read Vice? It's anti-man as hell. Don't we get enough of this shit just walking down the street these days?
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:18 AM
5

All marriage amounts to is a legal contract that entitles the woman to the man's money when the relationship ends. It's time to end this hooey institution.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:16 AM
29

Can there be any doubt that the education system - the people in it, and the processes that comprises its functioning - are 100% anti-man? Suspending a boy for a (consensual!) staring contest on a school yard? For crying out loud.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:13 AM
16

Its about time to ban Anita Sarkeesian, who has made a mini-career out of not liking video games. This dubious "achievement" does not entitle one to speak in front of the United Nations, IMHO.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:12 AM
10

So the feminists called aggressive, armed, rough men, to solve their "problem", which amounted to two people in view who disagreed with them. Two people whom they hurled verbal abuse at as well. I am not exactly a fan of Breitbart; that said, the "feminists" once again distinguish themselves as being particularly intolerant of diversity of opinion, and in particular, capable of piss-poor behavior when they perceive their sacred cow being tipped.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:10 AM
3

Nobody you are addressing here believes that Western women are, by any measure, "oppressed". However, the victim ideology or narrative is important to the careers of media feminists and academics, and to an industry that now exists to provide navel-gazing to comfortable women (Feminism, Inc.), and so you will have to endure the noise forever.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:06 AM
1

Right. Drunken-ness absolves women of accountability, but drunken-ness only reinforces mens' accountability. What a fucking cop out.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:46 PM
30

I am very tired of the feminists' sanctimonious belief that they are entitled to bully, abuse, insult, mistreat, and silence anyone who doesn't repeat what they want said. Feminism, as a movement, shows poor behavior and poor character.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:35 PM
4

He should file a Title IX lawsuit against the university and take them for every last penny he can get.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:37 PM
2

I couldnt agree more that "toxic masculinity" is a garbage idea. Do you think all the mass shooters have this same source of motivation?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:19 PM
2

Excellent! Equal accountability. This is a positive sign.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:15 PM
19

"/r/Feminism" is a joke. Its an utter echo chamber hostile to any outside input. I dont know why anyone not seeking that echo chamber would ever waste time trying to interact with those people. They are effectively mindless because of their inability to interact with anyone outside their bunker. Its really kind of sad, ultimately.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:03 PM
36

I think that the issue of mass shootings and mental health is a very serious issue, and should not be taken lightly. There is something gone very wrong indeed and that something needs to be identified and fixed. I dont rhink any gender war ideologue has the answers. This issue should be studied by psychiatrists and paychologists with no agenda other than figuring out what has gone so very wrong that we have this problem with this frequency.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 05:54 PM
2

Why would I want to try to talk to a feminist? Ill get a better conversation out of my pet gerbil Wilma.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:10 PM
27

"Marriageable" defined as "most advantageous to women". Way to objectify us. Marriage is just a contract that entitles a woman to a man's money when the relationship ends, anyway.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:07 PM
5

The best news for men, for all the clear reasons.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:59 PM
10

Quit talking here. Now.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:04 AM
5

Thanks for the share. I mean, what a trip. Someone actually realized that there was a problem and coughed up some pocket change as a small gesture. Anyone have the "He For She" UN budget happy? My guess is that it is a decent fraction of the annual US war budget.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:04 AM
-9

Dont worry, she just put it up as a joke.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 12:29 AM
1

The news article states that witnesses saw him do this.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:27 PM
8

The shooter was quoted during the shooting as making people state their religious affiliation. This sounds to me like he was a religious nut.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:03 PM
0

Were the 11 men therefore killed by fear, not bullets? Since "a woman was shot in the chest".
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:01 PM
7

Mens' Rights here is on Reddit, the 10th most visited web site in America, with over 120,000 forum members. If someone wants to pretend a random nut who may have posted here (as 1 in 120,000) is typical of us then I bet we can find proof that Faecbook is an incubator for virtually every crime known.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:58 PM
3

Witch hunt.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 07:17 PM
5

It is difficult to take Donald Trump too seriously.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:24 PM
5

Dr Elesser says training on sexual harassment awareness should also look at what is not sexual harassment, and that firms can break down the 'sex partition' by bringing both sexes together. She suggests scrapping women-only networking events, getting psychologists to help lawyers draft employee guidelines and introducing long lunch tables in workplace canteens, as well as being more open about office romances. If this isnt a help cry, I dont know what it is. It sounds like someone over in the gy…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:13 PM
5

The rape hysteria has become ridiculous. This poor kid should never have been accused ...
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:58 PM
2

I, too, was only 75 percent certain this was a joke.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:55 PM
4

Objectification?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:54 PM
2

I saw this piece earlier today on Huffington Trash, and got through the first sentences before tuning it out as yet more boilerplate garbage.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:51 PM
26

Remember #KillAllWhiteMen was "just a joke" too.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 02:52 AM
2

As it stands now, Debbie Wasserman-Schulz, who is the head of the DNC, is being (rightfully) accused of trying to reduce as much as possible the number of debates the Democrats hold, and to time them such that as few people as possible will see them, purely because Hillary is famously already a dishonest dud in open debate, and in particular she will look terrible next to Bernie Sanders, who is the real meal deal as far as leftists and liberals (the party's base) are concerned. She has to hide f…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:28 PM
2

It's really really easy. If a friend of yours makes an anti-man comment, ignore it the first time. If she persists, tell her you find the comments hostile. If she erupts, or gets alienated, or persists despite your discomfort with her anti-man issues, then reduce or eliminate contact. She's not your friend if she hates men more than she likes you. I have definitely followed my own advice in this matter, and I have not suffered one bit for it. I don't need friends whose anger at my gender makes i…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:41 PM
4

Absolutely no surprise warranted - feminism tends towards totalitarianism: A belief in the supreme moral correctness of their own views. A belief that all other views are illegitimate. A belief that subscribers of all other views should be subject to censoring or silencing. A belief that subscribers of all other views are moral degenerates, or less-than-human, and legitimate targets for any form of attack.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:05 AM
7

I was pleased that the two were at least minimally civil with each other. I thought both were fairly weak at making points. I appreciate that she didn't degenerate into the typical feminist temper tantrum upon being presented with ideas different than hers, and I appreciate that he did not resort to a raised voice, or dumb statements, or anything at all that embarrassed me as a man. What I saw overall: Britain's domestic life has been sundered by feminism. Men are now organizing just to protect …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:03 AM
1

Try posting "Is the wage gap sexist, or what?" along with bullshit claims of believing in it, and watch how fast "agenda posts" are permitted, after all.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:44 AM
1

Definitely government service in the purest (or least pure!) sense of the word :)
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:43 AM
1

So, what you're saying then, is that it is probably legitimately true, that 75% of the fatalities are adult men (and that presumably half the children are boys)? If so, wouldn't be conclude, then, that "Men and boys are the primary victims of war" in the sense that most civilian fatalities seem to fall into that category, at least in Syria? And, furthermore, if civilian, non-combatant men are killed in great numbers, isn't that a sign of war crimes taking place? Or it is only a war crime to kill…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:40 AM
2

Hell, I'll support a tax raise for this!
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:29 AM
1

It's very easy logic to comprehend: if accused is a woman, defend! else attack!
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:29 AM
1

A prison sentence is appropriate. Or at least a large fine for Pete's sake!
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:27 AM
5

Christ, if you're gonna get screwed by the government, best it be by a subsidized prostitute and not by a rich guy reaching for your wallet :) And it certainly beats bombing another Middle Eastern country.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:24 AM
7

It was a creepy sexual assault on the street. Police wouldn't have been able to do anything really about it. She had nothing to lose. And it was wrongful but it didn't rate hitting her by far. In the future yell really loud at her to take her hand off your crotch. That should be all that is needed, and that is proportionate.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:23 AM
10

Notice that the greatest interest is in UK/Britain/Australia, where man-hating harpy feminist political correctness has most taken hold. I assume the women of the Commonwealth nations are looking forward to the about-to-skyrocket divorce rates in their various nations.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 12:20 AM
7

Way to bring us together, Michelle ... by pitting men and women against each other even more. I generally have a reasonable opinion of Michelle Obama - however this kind of toxic shit takes away from that positive opinion very quickly. We don't need a First Feminist in the White House.
/r/MGTOW30/09/15 12:17 AM
1

If there is no public money being expended, then there is no scandal.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:14 AM
3

What I find interesting is the singular fact that among civilians - non-combatants - three out of every four fatalities is an adult man (remember, half of the kids killed are boys, probably). That seems peculiar to me, as a figure. Either these numbers of people killed include combatants (whom are principally men, because nature made us the natural combatants) or there is some other factor or factors at work that are making it so that fleeing or displaced refugees, or people unable to flee, are …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:12 AM
5

Hillary's poll numbers have in general been plummeting for months, even with women. People are beginning to realize that she never stood for anything other than her personal aspirations, and then after that, corruption and crooked, self-serving influence and favor peddling. The latest NBC news poll has her now leading Sanders, nationwide, by only 7 percent. Hopefully the current trends will keep up or even increase in effect, and by the time the primary elections start, she'll be relying on Glor…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:04 AM
9

Divorce her.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:00 AM
1

Michelle Malkin and her web site have all the credibility of a counterfeit 50 cent piece, and probably less value. NEXT.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:59 PM
44

There are definitely two standards.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:35 PM
5

Hopefully they will meet every two months for a tea-and-crumpets circle jerk, then go away and do nothing.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:13 PM
0

Never ask for sympathy as a man. Take what you need. It is the only way you will be respected.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:05 PM
16

This little thread OP shows us captures feminism in a nutshell: "Censor all ideas and expression I dissaprove of and the creators of those ideas are immoral and not human beings." Nascent totalitarianism, completely incompatible with a functioning democracy.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 04:27 PM
1

And it would be the court dismissing the case.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:00 AM
1

I don't know about that. I see your point. Given that gay men are the largest risk for HIV/AIDS, I would support funds targeted to help that specific group. I think aside from that, though, money should be gender blind.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:00 AM
3

Yes, there certainly is.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:58 AM
3

Ah, Jezebel: where over-educated, spoiled young ladies who have never had to soil their gloves or booties, no not once, sit comfortably in offices sipping coffee, eating pastries, and bitching about fucking oppressed they all are, and how the eeeviiiiilllll men are the root of it.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:58 AM
2

Wow. Gomez’s ex-husband filed for divorce immediately after her sentencing, and she received nearly $1 million in assets as part of their settlement. This is a convicted child-molester released from prison, who was divorced by her husband when she convicted of molestation, and who received a million dollars - making her one of the wealthier ex-convicts walking the streets today - and is now simply trying to soak her ex-husband for more money. What a piece of work!
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:45 AM
2

You might consider talking to your parents. If that isn't a good idea, you can confidentially call your local crisis hotline (Google will tell you the number) and talk to someone there. That is anonymous. Most likely they will be able to refer you to a male counselor or therapist. If you are under the age of 18, there may be complications - but if you can't consult your parents there is help just a call away.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:43 AM
199

If he has been convicted or held otherwise on the basis of false statements that the prosecutor or law enforcement agency had reason to believe were false - and the CBS news article indicates this is likely - then the responsible LEO or prosecutor should join the lying girls in replacing Tyler Kost in his prison cell, for a very, very long time.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:41 AM
2

Having listened to a portion of the interview, I was struck singularly by how dispassionate the tone was. For my part, long past my college years, I nonetheless fervently believe that the persecution of men taking place on the campus is part of a larger trend towards the ongoing degrading of mens' status in society. The campus is just a microcosm. Try reading the New York Times in the morning. Almost every day, it seems there are multiple editorial and news pieces fixated on some supposed "pligh…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:42 PM
5

Because, you know, the education system isn't fixated enough on women and girls, yet, and there aren't already more women than men getting educations in America.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:19 PM
1

Like, how about, if she is hitting you?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:17 PM
25

If the court dismisses this case, then we can safely conclude that the American university is the most anti-man institution in society.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:17 PM
2

Blame shame-tripping feminists.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:33 AM
3

How ridiculously sexist. The policy should be sued into a oblivion. My tax dollars can go to help men and women be free of disease. Apparently Obama and his administration view men as disposable.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:33 AM
29

Meanwhile, don't ask why there is such an imbalance in the ration of females to males in colleges, or ask what should be done about it. Inequality only matters when it damages women, you know.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:29 AM
2

For 2.5 billion years, people were "safe". Now bring in feminism, anything having to do with men is suddenly "unsafe".
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:07 AM
3

I laughed. Then I cried.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:36 PM
5

There isnt one.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:17 PM
3

Anything a boy naturally does, banned.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:11 PM
0

Whats the problem? Crooks wont resist or flee arrest by a female cop ... that would be sexist!
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:35 PM
2

I awat the day when passing gas in proximity to a woman results in a rape conviction.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:31 PM
2

Not her.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:42 AM
3

Take care of yourself. Message noted.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:40 AM
7

Cute - VICE picked an absolute loony and made him the face of a group of men few have ever heard of. What a dick move. And the sneering tone of that article ... classy.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:35 AM
5

She's not the most anti-labor in history! The US has a long history of political power treating laborers as a commodity to be used and abused by the wealthy. But the Clintons absolutely do have a fairly despicable history with respect to workers. As a leftist, I have numerous reasons to loathe the Clintons, and I would never vote for one, but all it really takes to know why no one outside of wealthy elites should ever vote for Hillary is to recognize just how deplorably dishonest she is. The man…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:31 AM
3

I'd respond that a woman can't take away my manhood. She has no real access to that, even if the feminist power/revenge fantasy is about doing such a thing. However, feminist attacks on men unfairly demean us, and are about creating an environment in which it is possible to reduce our rights and standing in society while affording special status and privilege to women. That isn't taking away my manhood, that's attacking equality and creating an unjust environment.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:28 AM
5

Not exactly a figurehead for economic justice, is she?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:02 AM
7

There is not a single time I am again confronted with the "if women were in charge, there would be no wars!" nonsense that Hillary Clinton's abject (and corrupt!) militarism doesn't come to mind. She has never opposed a single American war. Or for that matter, economic sanctions that kill through the conditions of poverty and distress. She apparently just loves driving up the infant and maternal mortality rate in foreign countries she supports sanctions on because that's what sanctions do. And s…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:58 AM
8

She also endorses greater arms sales to Saudi Arabia and related countries, which was part of her legacy as State Secretary. US made cluster bombs are killing civilians and refugees in Yemen, courtesy of Hillary Clinton moving mountains to get more military sales to the Saudis.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:07 AM
3

I am pleased to see that at least a minority of the mass media operations out there have the courage to stand up to Rape, Inc. and put these "surveys" to the torch as should be done.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:24 PM
47

Absolutely nothing Hillary Clinton says in public can be believed. The woman is a career consummate liar who has been running for president for over 15 years now, and never cared about anything other than her personal ambitions. Every position and act she has ever taken or done in public has been exclusively about manipulating public opinion in her moment-to-moment favor while paying back the fat cats and special interests bankrolling her. Placing that aside, if she is a feminist, she is a farce…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:18 PM
2

Ignore tiqr. He is a feminist troll who haunts this sub.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:12 PM
2

So you presume a crime (drugging) in the absence of any evidence, and ignore the simpler conclusion (someone had too much to drink and got wild, and now regrets it). That's some reasoning capacity you've developed there, bud. You ought to be proud. How about "Don't get blackout drunk with strange men who are drinking also." I know that implies accountability, and self-responsibility, but even a feminist is capable of that ultimately.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:12 PM
2

You are correct. Feminists try to create a culture of pervasive victimhood and shame-tripping, and then exploit people's natural sympathy to get power and privilege for themselves without any accountability.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:10 PM
3

Exactly. They want a magic wand given to women only that gives them total power over men without any accountability whatsoever. In other words, subjugation.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:01 PM
24

The idiot author starts out by complaining that women shouldnt be incarcerated because the prison system is designed for men and therefore negatively impacts women. Someone needs to tell the idiot that prison is punishment. As for the conclusion that women shouldnt be incarcerated for anything, that is the same as saying that the worse punishment is only for men, which is hateful, sexist, and vile. And which is also typical. Imagine what would happen if a male lawmaker stood up in public and sai…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:10 PM
2

Once again "equality activists" are revealed as lacking any sense of humor.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:07 PM
6

It is a waste of time to try to talk to feminists. You might as well talk to religious fundamentalist and explain to them that the Earth is older than 6,000 years.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:48 PM
4

Feminism is trying to define consensual sex while drunk as "rape" if the female participant for whatever reason wishes it so the morning after. And while being drunk removes a woman's responsibility for sex, the same condition of intoxication does not remove a man's responsibilities for sex. In essence, feminists think that drunk women are in the position of being unaccountable, defenseless children, and the expectation is that men step in to the role of responsibility and accountability for any…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:42 PM
3

Randi Harper is a piece of work.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:26 PM
10

Fuck you, Google. Apparently they no longer want male users.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:10 AM
41

Good to know that "anti-harassment" means "only women, never men" and also people like the monstrous creep "Randi" who conducts online harassment campaigns. Fuck you, Google.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:08 AM
4

So you think one of these media feminists is "genuine"? Sorry, diverge from you. They're exploiting everyone.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:02 AM
1

Bookmarked, thank you.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:54 AM
3

Shit. Send them all to the Isle of Lesbos UV because DAMN.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:53 AM
16

Feminists' ultimate nightmare: men really are better at the maths than women. No lying possible.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:40 AM
10

I would dearly love to see feminists campaigning for equality in terms of accountability for women, the same standards faced by men.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:37 AM
2

It's better than the alternative, which is being stuck with her!
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:25 AM
2

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:24 AM
51

Why, of course its not bullshit. It's just that all 7,500 or so universities in America in general under-report felony violent-force-penetration rape by more than 90%, in direct and gross violation of long-standing Federal law. It's certainly easier to believe that than to believe that "Lady Gaga" might be cashing in on public hysteria with a music video, just like Hillary Clinton with her slick ads.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:21 AM
4

Because 100 million dollar programs paid for by men should not in any way directly benefit us.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:20 AM
10

Yay! Accountability.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:19 AM
2

Not in Seattle!
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:39 AM
7

I am pleased that the Post allowed the actual rational truth about this latest warped "survey" - which is being broadcast far and wide with credulity - to be printed. Some day, the people who push these "surveys" will understand that spreading untruth and falsehood is damaging no matter what. The public does not benefit from lies, whether the lies are produced by self-proclaimed "anti-rape activists", or by self-proclaimed climate change "skeptics". The public benefits from having ideology and a…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 01:06 AM
2

Men who have taken the trouble and time to develop a sense of our issues and upset, and rights, and who wish to connect with each other over it, generally are passed homophobia.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 01:00 AM
8

The way that feminists act as if female life is more valuable than male life is definitely alienating to me.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:53 AM
3

They get their last final slice of you, a pound of flesh paid monthly, but after that they get no more ... :) Think of it as escaping from the monster's lair horribly wounded, and bleeding, but still likely to survive.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:52 AM
3

I obey a rule I think is very old probably, and I do not go casually into the lairs of my adversaries. This video was entertaining, and frankly that "film festival" looked like a pit of hell to me, I would never have set foot in it.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:50 AM
6

She came across a spoiled princess to me, in appearance as well as substance, and I found her revolting.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:40 AM
5

Thank God for the modern blessing of no-fault divorce. If you fuck up and get married, you can get out.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:38 AM
2

Lovely video! I particularly like that he made points, very biting points, while keeping a slight smile and tongue in his cheek. That's a sense of humor that feminists don't have. And yes, echoing other comments, the screaming child in a womans' body at around 13 minutes really does sum up (in a dramatic way) the princess syndrome that seems to govern women. For all the complaints about male privilege, you'll find no human being more privileged than a woman.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:37 AM
2

It really is time for the key figures in administrations that pursue these kangaroo courts and persecutions to start getting fired. At the point in time when faculty or administrative staff believe credibly that six-figure paychecks will be summarily cut off, and a job search required, as a result of summarily persecuting men as if we are simply dogs, then the tide will turn on this insanity. That's how to fix this problem: make hypocrisy hurt. Make intellectual weakness and failures of integrit…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:12 AM
8

And YOU are an outlier. That's fine. Admissions tests are critical in determining who has access to the limited resource of higher education, and why. What the idiot article author wants (get rid of admissions tests!) will dumb down universities even further. We already have a problem with universities requiring less and less of students. The idiot article author would be better to simply demand that only women be allowed in universities, because she doesn't give a shit about anything except mor…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:01 AM
33

This is the typical experience when a man confronts a feminist with simple reason and a questioning mind. They reach for hate, shame, and anger, their biggest tools, and start attacking you in an emotionally enraged state. I have experienced it many times myself. Placing aside the mental weakness that this shows in feminists generally, it is an obnoxious, creepy experience to have, and convinces me ever more whenever I have the experience, or see it second-hand, that there is simply no point in …
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:53 PM
5

I wish society would strap Ellen Pao down in a capsule atop a Saturn V rocket and launch her into the heart of the Sun.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:48 PM
83

"Since I perform poorly on tests, they should be abolished." Whoever argues this clearly doesnt belong in a famous university.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:10 PM
3

Polis is a disgrace to the office he holds.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:06 PM
6

I think Ill work for a world better for men.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:05 PM
4

I didnt read it, as I was watching porn while playing a video game.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 11:18 PM
17

Plain and simple, its a fight to advance our legal rightsand disposition. And note that "womens' groups" are among our biggest enemies, along with lawyers who make money on the current process.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:12 PM
3

Trouble is men face the extortion gap, not women. That makes us the victims, not them. Doesnt fit the barrative, wont work.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 09:31 PM
9

Brownmiller is right. For my part, the latest generation of feminists come across as vacuous, spoiled daughters demanding ponies and throwing a tantrum if they dont get one. Some day we will look at the generation that decried "sexist air conditioning" and shake our heads on wonder.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:33 PM
8

So where are feminists, precisely, on the issue of blackmail that men face?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 07:35 PM
1

Someone was talking about a mens' issue? Funny, thought the entire society was fixated on females for the last 40 years.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 07:34 PM
1

Why did it have to be American University? Why cant we have the best universities embrace the udea of mental fortitude?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 07:30 PM
2

Survey finds 100% of rape culture surveys to be terminally biased and flawed, created by ideologues with no interest in fact or reason, and really sad in that they motivate such passion in people ... without actually really being accurate.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:58 AM
2

Adorable :)
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:56 AM
4

I agree on the multiple reposting. We don't need 5 versions of the same article on one page. I don't tend to agree as much about the "human interest" stuff because that is the sort of thing we share with each other that remind us that this is more than a dry legal civil rights recitation, that in fact there is some outrageous bullshit out there that we are dealing with. So if we can agree to not put up 5 of the same link in the same 2 day period I'd like that. On a different note, I really don't…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 03:42 AM
3

I suppose they could point to the skyrocketed American divorce rate as one of their greatest achievements, at least by their own standards.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:54 AM
1

And here I thought that women were always the primary victims of war ... it looks like this one is cashing in on it just fine!
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:24 AM
3

My opinions are as follows: Who was she to tell you that you have to do anything? That's annoying. Blow it off. Most important of all: if I was back in school today, I would have a GoPro body camera mounted on me through any interaction with any female on campus. If it can protect the police, and it can protect people from police, it can protect men on campus from the hostile, vindictive, anti-man culture that seems pervasive now. No joke. Get some peace of mind. Get a body camera. Wear it every…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:17 AM
7

What, you aren't enjoying your shaming? Go figure -
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:14 AM
2

"... the while man ..." Good Christ, at least take the trouble to spell check your drivel. Or better just delete it.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:13 AM
1

I maintain that the Washington Post has degraded itself, not by publishing this study's conclusions, but by doing so with utter credulity. The "affirmative consent" standard doesn't exist as a standard yet. "Affirmative consent" goes completely beyond the standards of rape and sexual assault, and the authors of the study dishonestly use terms like "rape" or "sexual assault" as determined by their own standards, not by legal standards. Lumping forcible penetration in with unwanted compliments is …
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:39 AM
1

They group comments about physical appearance with forcible rape in this "study". That is one of the most (at best!) dubious things I've ever heard. It's like claiming a murder epidemic exists because a few murders happen and then lots of name-calling too, which is grouped in with murder. Why does media credulously report this shit?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:24 AM
10

It is totally vacuous, lumping achievements from 100 years ago with the petty, vindictive gender culture war of today. The right to vote is not the same as the right to complain that the air conditioning is sexist, that the way a man is sitting is misogyny. Western women today are the most colossally indulged and doted upon humans in the history of the species. Western women today are the most colossally indulged humans in the history of the species, categorically. The princesses of today need t…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:15 AM
10

Are men stereotyped? I'd say we are subject to all manner of stereotypes, in particular from women, and in extra- extra- particular, from feminists. If men and women are both stereotyped, then is Penny Wong's complaint still valid? Possibly. She comes across as shrill and silly, as do most of the well-off, indulged, western public women figures of today who complain about everything while living caviar lives. But lets suppose her complaint is valid nonetheless. If she is being stereotyped, doesn…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:52 PM
2

Be careful asking these questions in Sweden, my understanding is that asking these questions is the one and only one reason the Swedes will impose the death penalty.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:47 PM
0

File under: "It is possible to do a 'study' that is designed to answer its question the way you want it answered before taking the study." Media then does its job, and credulously reports your results, with outrage.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:45 PM
7

Because women are never creepy.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:09 PM
14

Dont worry, she cant prosecuted, she is female.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:08 PM
1

Polanski had to flee the country into exile where he will stay for the rest of his life, plus pay huge sums to his victim, who ages ago called for his punishment to finally stop.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:07 PM
2

Polanski had to flee the country for the rest of his life, pay reparations to his victim, who herself has long ago called foe his punishment to stop.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:06 PM
38

Women are not held to the same standard of accountability as men. I wont hold my breath until it happens, but Id just love to see feminists fighting fornwomen to be held as liable as men.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:53 AM
17

Australia sounds like a pretty fucked up place.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:51 AM
2

I have seen this myself. I live in a gay districr,
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:54 AM
5

Actually, liberalism has been co-opted by feminists and Social Justice Warriors. Liberalism is the social milieu behind The Enlightenment and the striving towards modernity. It has however been taken over by various parties whose ideology is coddled by liberal humanitarian and egalitarian tendencies.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 07:18 PM
0

I hope she didn't molest the boy!
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:49 PM
2

I hope she didn't molest the boy!
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:48 PM
4

Feminists would prefer that men be required to sit in the back of the plane.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:48 PM
5

Australia appears to be one of the most man-hating countries on Earth.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:46 PM
1

The reason is that women are automatically presumed to be these innocent and wonderful creatures. There is no "The KKK is Wonderful" effect.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:41 PM
7

Good point. "How do you write women so well?" “I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.” - Jack Nicholson - "As Good As It Gets".
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:40 PM
1

Couldn't put it all better than you, thanks.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:34 PM
2

I am saying that white American women are the most privileged category of people alive on the planet today.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:31 PM
9

Ah, yes, a conspiracy! The eeeeeeviiiiiiillll male-dominated Marines set up a fake "study" just to "prove" that women in units were a liability, all because of Patriarchy and Privilege!
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:06 PM
23

What, the Marines dont want worse casualties in war, poorer morale, and less effectiveness overall, just to appease Social Justice Warriors, almost none of whom have ever been in the military, or ever would consider it? And isnt war and militarism part of the evil male patriarchy and its destruction of the naturally peaceful and feminine Earth? And arent women the primary victims of warfare? So the feminists want to participate in the egregious killing of women across the world?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 06:01 PM
12

Straight women tend to quietly hate gay men, and regard them from a standpoint of alienation. I have seen this happening.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:48 PM
5

That's a valid point, maybe the only one that can be made against my own.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:32 PM
0

I mean, yes, he is a neckbeard. Truly. However, it's still funny!
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:25 PM
1

I am never, ever, ever eating fish or shrimp from Indonesia, again.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:21 PM
6

Burchill is a monster.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:36 PM
7

Exactly. I am a proponent of speech as well. Unfortunately, feminists often exploit the public's tolerance of speech by degenerating into anti-man hate speech and this must be combated.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:34 PM
5

Thanks for this information. I will be sending each of contact a courteous, civil, and completely blunt explanation that Julie Bindel is a hateful monster and by associating with her, the University and Trust both tend to endorse her views, to validate them in society. She is a disgrace and anyone who associates with her is a disgrace as well.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:33 PM
24

Is this woman actually suing in part because she wasn't given a promotion while on maternity leave?!!! I am all for paternity and maternity leave, and job security. But I don't expect a fucking promotion for being gone for months!!! A promotion ... for not being there, and not working? God, the gall of it ...
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:23 PM
2

The most important quote from that article, is the last words of it: stupidity is actually gender-neutral Couldn't be truer.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:20 PM
3

Is this in the Telegraph UK?!! It's just amazing that a British newspaper would print anything other than hate-filled feminist screeds ... I feel like I've stepped into a bizarro universe reading this. The word "misogynist" actually debunked an insult, as name-calling? Wow! I never thought I would live to see the day such an idea would be printed in the Uber Politically Correct British media.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:04 PM
18

Anyone who thinks men get to be "whole people" at all times has obviously never been a man and probably never known one either. By writing such a thing, the insipid asshole feminist in question objectified men completely.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:55 PM
17

I would never go to Reddit for relationship input, anyway. But I think you have nailed "/r/relationships" on the head.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:53 PM
30

Paternity testing should be a legal requirement or at least social expectation. It should be a perfunctory part of the birth of any kid. Nobody should have to have any fear of it.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:52 PM
1

Exactly. Affirmative consent means guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 08:11 PM
2

Fitting that one of the most pepetually dishonest figures in American politics would rely on misinformation yet again.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 07:56 PM
-24

Publicly paid for internet services probay shouldnt be used for porn
/r/MensRights18/09/15 07:50 PM
5

Yeah its totally fucked up but guess what? Its not our fucking fault. Just like shes needs a condom to not get pregnant, we need proof to keep her from retroactively creating rape and destroying us. They wanted it, not us. Something in writing sounds good.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 04:56 AM
9

Shes a human turd. Time to go for accountability.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 04:54 AM
1

Yep!
/r/MensRights18/09/15 04:34 AM
2

In the meantime, we men, we can just go fuck ourselves.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:52 AM
-2

Lets get a betting pool going on "serves no time in prison".
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:51 AM
7

Its time for us to expect something in writing before sex at this point.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 01:27 AM
39

Mabus came across as duplicitous and something like a deer in the headlights when the Marine Corps study came up. And what can he do? He is nakedly overruling the best study done by professional battlefield military leaders to enforce a civilian political agenda intended to appease feminists, virtually none of whom have ever been in the military. Mabus is a disgrace. People will ultimately die who didnt need to because of his decision.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 11:00 PM
15

Of course she cited that debunked study. Hillary is profoundly dishonest. She seems unable to publicly state anything true. The fact she cited the study is proof that it is bunk. She said it publicly; ergo, it is false or untrue.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:35 PM
1

Given that no western country has had a bigger hand in creating the refugee crises in Iraq, Syria, and Libya than the US, we should absolutely be welcoming refugees. Its a basic accountability thing. You break it, you buy it. Also, categorically not a Mens Rights issue.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:26 PM
5

I saw this yesterday. Its completely outragious. A man who commited the same crime against a woman would face prison for a very long time.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:17 PM
4

Try not to get arrested on Suspicion of Not Being Politically Correct.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:29 PM
8

Utterly vacuous. Consider for example the feminist icon Hillary Clinton, who has been in power and seeks the highest office in the land. Her policy positions would perpetuate the Israel-Palestine conflict or worsen it, and that has been the biggest incubator for terrorism of all time. Likewise, she wants the Assad regime toppled which would tend to make Syria into another Libya. Already a war she supported (the Iraq War) has turned Syria into the biggest terrorist epicenter in human history, and…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:48 PM
8

Also, the rape kits that have not been processed are a huge problem, and they are not dealing with that. Its just amazing, that you never hear the words "rape kit" coming from the mouths of the "rape culture" types. You would think that, in the age of DNA testing, college feminists would run to the rape kit as proof of sex at least. But that proof implies accountability to the accuser, so I guess its to be avoided.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:27 PM
2

Shes got a great schtick, right? Imagine never having to do a job, just pull her bs routine.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:53 AM
4

Stopping engagement with Western white women in general is a fantastic idea for men at this point ...
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:32 AM
3

"Australian Accused of Being Male". That's now the universal headline there. Thank God I don't live Down Under.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:25 AM
2

I am so fucking sick of "Charlotte Proudman" I could puke. Whoever or whatever she is I hope it is proud.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:24 AM
28

All I saw was "Men are evil pigs fuck you blah blah men are evil fuck you blah blah". Great way to address a talented 18 year old boy who worked hard in his teen years in an anti-man K-12 system and got into college despite feminism. This "training" introduces him to his new status as "hated raping pig" on his first day on campus. Whoever put the "training" together can go fuck herself.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:19 AM
5

Forgive the words if they could be taken wrong. They made a good point, in a positive way.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:17 AM
53

I personally think that every single sexist act against men on campus should result in a Title IX complaint. Every. Single. Sexist. Act. If a feminist farts in an elevator sue the university. It's time for us to quit being nice guys.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:15 AM
1

Saw "Proudman" and the Officially Designated Middle Aged Douchebag, and couldn't continue. Fuck that shit! I am so tired of feminist denigration of men I could puke.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 06:13 AM
97

It's pretty derogatory towards men! That kind of "training" (cultural programming) probably won't stop a single rape from ever happening (we all know how much actual real rapists care about "training" as they are willing to commit illegal violent acts already) but goes a long way to creating a poisonous anti-man atmosphere on campus. I'd ask the Title IX official on campus if there is grounds for a Title IX lawsuit against the university given that the "training" creates an anti-man atmosphere h…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:17 AM
8

I respectfully disagree that the US should not take a more pro-family, and populist approach and provide benefits and leave when children are born: Children are the resource for the future, and we need to better invest in them. If we want sound families, providing economic and home-care guarantees when children are first born is a great step forward. Doing this, so long as there is no gender discrimination and men get the same benefits and leave as women - the same options - in no way has implic…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:13 AM
13

Adorable :)
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:06 AM
5

White men have been rhetorically condemned by feminists and in particular feminists in the academy for decades; the result is that, across the board, men have a reduced civil status relative to women. What we are seeing right now is a push on campus to fundamentally strip us of due process rights, and I personally believe that this stripping of civil rights is practice for a bigger, grown-up stripping of rights in society in general, still to come. The goal of feminism is now to subjugate men wh…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:57 AM
3

One of the most dishonest figures in politics claims that there is a right to be automatically believed. The implications of this "right" incidentally are that people accused on campus of vile crimes are guilty until proven innocent. Standard operating procedure for Clintons: lie, to pander to people, in a way which is particularly insidious - and actually work against the liberal causes in so doing, all to advance their own political careers. EDIT: I write these things as a leftist who has long…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:22 AM
1

The omission is so obvious it had to have been deliberate. And that is sad, that she would deliberately not apologize to her victims, which are the people she falsely accused of a vile crime in an internationally read magazine.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:05 AM
9

Suspended sentence??!! If a man had done this to a woman in the US hed be concemned in the media prior to even being arrested and sentenced to decades in prison!
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:46 PM
19

Did she call the frat guys she screwed over to apologize? Did she ever apologize to all the people she damaged? Or is this just another narcissistic yuppie princess worried about her career?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:38 PM
1

Can we tag this NSFW please?
/r/MGTOW15/09/15 09:24 PM
1

Read the study results, the article that started this all. Youd think that would a precursor to posting comments
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:10 PM
10

Unbelievable. The author's position is basically "fuck men, paternity tests make women less powerful." Thanks for sharing this.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:32 PM
18

I assume she also wsnts to police sex positions as well, eliminating any that imply male power. Oh and dont forget the way you aee sitting is misogynist and evil.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:11 PM
19

I believe this is why Hillary Clinton is suddenly taking this position: Huffington Trash article Hillary Clinton's once-overwhelming support among women has dropped significantly since the summer, a new survey finds. In a Washington Post/ABC poll released Monday, 42 percent of Democratic-leaning female voters said they support the candidate. It's still a double-digit lead over her rivals, but a 29-percent drop since July. Considering that her gender is the sole rationale for her candidacy in a s…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:42 AM
30

Let's ban dildos, too. They make a mockery of my body, and allow women to separate sexual gratification from the reality of knowing and relating to men. Finally, dildos emphasize the ultimate stereotype of a man as a dumb and permanently rigid sex object. Really, if we are banning sex robots, let's ban dildos too.
/r/MGTOW15/09/15 04:29 AM
8

Hillary Clinton doesn't actually have any sort of moral belief system. Her handlers seem to have calculated that she can appear to be a "voice for women". This is a way to try to distract, perhaps, from the disaster she's been so far. She will never president so long as 70 percent of the population believes she is fundamentally dishonest, btw. And if she keeps up with this, she will have to address the concept of "innocent until proven guilty".
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:24 AM
3

The campus feminism and its backers in the government are so comfortable stripping men, categorically, of our civil rights, that I can only conclude that feminism, the way it is headed, is fundamentally incompatible with a functioning democracy. It requires one half of the population to be second-class citizens completely civically and legally helpless, and always second to, the other half.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:18 AM
4

If UC does this, UC can look forward to men who are harried and insulted by campus feminism filing lawsuit, after lawsuit, after lawsuit.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:11 AM
3

That's not just a war on college men, what this asshole Representative says he believes, its war on all men. What he is saying is that he believes men are second class citizens in America who don't deserve the same rights that women get. The man is a disgrace to the office he holds, and I do hope the men of his district learn of his abhorrent beliefs about them, and vote his ass out of office forever.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:09 AM
8

I don't happen to agree with you. She is regularly published in mainstream media like the Guardian UK. If feminists thought she was crazy, she wouldn't be published. She is also hardly alone in her sheer, unadulterated hatred of men.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:07 AM
18

I'd say number one tool of feminists is shame. They use shaming tactics against anyone who doesn't bow down to them.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:56 AM
25

It's ironic, that the pathologically dishonest and lying Hillary Clinton would claim that anyone has a "right to be believed". She's walking, talking, lying proof that nobody should just be believed, automatically.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:56 AM
358

Exactly. And while we are at it, let's go ahead and let every other ideological or religious group with sexual taboos and sexual moralizing ban what they don't like: No gay sex, in order to appease the religious. No oral sex, in order to appease prudes. No interracial sex, in order to appease the racists. No protected sex, in order to appease conservative Catholics. And then, appease the feminists, meaning most heterosexual contact and activity at all will be banned. Feminists are trying to cont…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:51 AM
28

Actually, the University is not blaming MRA. The men’s right movement at University of Toronto is to blame for recent threats targeting women on campus, feminists charged Monday. Feminists are trying to blame MRAs, and offer no evidence. Unfortunately modern Western society doesn't require anyone calling herself a feminist to actually back up anything she says with facts, so the smear will go far and wide.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:46 AM
1

Except for the fact that the Marines just showed that females mixed into combat arms units perform quite worse relative to all-male units. Do you not want the country's military to function well at grave times? Is the emotional value of seeing women in a rifle platoon that important to you?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:43 AM
5

Modern feminism is definitely totalitarian in character and I am not at all surprised to see one of the man-haters burning a taboo book above a caption that reads #maletears. Whats appalling is that mainstream society and media dont ackknowledge when this happens.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:40 PM
1

When you have 50 000 battlefield soldiers you kind of have to be systematic. You cant really evaluate everyone on a case by case basis constantly. And the way you discover someone cant make it in the combat tour involves enduring a higher risk of injuries or fatalities. How did you determine that so-and-so wasnt right? Well someone got killed Unfortunately you cant take some risks so that everyone can be accomodated in their personal aspirations. Men and women are equal not identical.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:30 PM
17

Does she also have a problem with any sexual position but female-superior? It seems that if we are now at the point of policing contact between sex partners we'd have to try to take on the patriarchy in bed, too. Perhaps feminists will now enlighten us to which ways people can touch each other are OK, and which are not?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:00 PM
15

Nothing Hillary Clinton says in public can be believed. Shes just pandering.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:56 PM
3

You have a typo. "know to have" should be "known to have". Thanks for doing this stuff, I agree completely with you.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:00 AM
5

What an asshole comment. Fuck them!
/r/MensRights14/09/15 01:58 AM
1

Except for the fact that being able to pass a physical fitness test and complete basic training doesn't at all guarantee that a person is going to be functional on a battlefield, and a serious professional study conducted by the Marine Corps shows that women in particular are a liability in battlefield combat roles. This isn't a "gender discrimination" issue. This is an issue of life and death.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:16 AM
5

Much of modern feminism is rooted in pure hatred of men, as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:13 AM
1

Rqce and gender are not equivalent differences in this context, so dont group them.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:02 PM
2

This is totally fucking ridiculous. I mean, SHIT. What are they gonna complain about next? That nature itself is sexist because evolution produced sexual dimorphism? That Earth is sexist for tolerating the existence of mammalian reproduction? For Christ's sake this complaint amounts to a diatribe against the existence of sexual dimorphism in the human species. The display of the hand was critical because it shows that we have thumbs in opposition to fingers providing the capacity to grasp and us…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 07:03 PM
1

Yep! Shame and ostracizing, that is the feminist way. Ignorant and sanctimonious shaming.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 06:16 PM
2

I live in Seattle. They're all feminazis by default. Even if they didn't actually do it on purpose, they're all programmed. And none of them ever had anything but more rights and deference than men, nothing but privilege for them, which is a bitter irony. The big complaint here they quietly have? The men never talk to the women in the "singles" context. They get angry and upset about it too. They don't seem understand that they should blame Gloria Steinem, not us.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 06:11 PM
1

Loved "Brainwash", agree it was an important watch. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 06:04 PM
1

The military-industrial complex can be seen as having a huge and costly economic component that corresponds to exactly what you are describing, a constant push to get more usage out of lighter and smaller objects. The plain truth is that, however, body armor, food, water, batteries, weapons (many of which require more than one person to move and use), lots of ammunition (my guess is that running out of ammunition is the worst nightmare), explosive munitions, and medical and communications gear s…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:56 PM
2

Thanks for clarifying, I think I understand your point better now.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:51 PM
1

Say "incoming mortar" to a feminist and look at the expression on her face.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:05 PM
1

Actually men who can't qualify get tossed from combat arms. And being short really doesn't help.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:01 PM
3

No shit dude. Military women apparently already have an unplanned pregnancy rate in the stratosphere relative to the national mean, and then throw in combat and the age-average 19 year old Marine Corps rifle platoon and oh-shit look how many more men will get killed, young, so that feminists can perceive themselves as having won the gender wars.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 04:56 PM
8

Well they certainly seem to have the ears of: The presidential administration High level military management An entire national political party Substantial numbers of Senators and Representatives Numerous TV talking heads, major newspaper pundits, and celebrities. I'll go with the more likely hypothesis, which is that mainstream feminism is demanding that studies like this, done by career military professionals, be overlooked, in order to give feminists the symbolic or emotional victory of watch…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:30 AM
4

Tell that to some kid 5 years from now who dies of a survivable injury because his female comrade couldn't move him effectively to safety, and in the delay involved, got injured or killed herself.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:20 AM
3

I'll take a look at the front page, thanks. If feminists are trying to turn it into another anti-man smear campaign, I'll just have to puke.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:10 AM
30

Is it just me, or is all this gender war feminist bullshit driving a wedge between normal men and women. The last time I thought of asking a woman out, or engaging with her I held off. I held off for one thing, because in the context of traumatized heterosexuality we have today, you really can't know what kind of response to expect, even though the odds are it will be negative or even deranged. Women are as head fucked as men and its walking through a minefield potentially, trying to engage them…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:07 AM
21

Does this mean that anytime one person kisses the other person without first asking and receiving explicit and probably video recorded consent that its assault? And that its OK to consider it assault when young teenagers hit puberty and do it? This is the very portrait of insanity. By the notions those nuts are following, I have, myself, been sexually assaulted numerous times throughout my life, even quite recently, but going back even to childhood. Even in elementary school I was sexually assau…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:02 AM
1

Where is the misandrist propaganda blitz? All I see is an article saying that a University is taking measures, along with a police agency, after some sort of violent threat was made. This is reasonable. Nutjobs make threats, and sometimes, even carry them out.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:59 AM
17

I'd like to understand the reasoning behind disregarding a study that shows that it is profoundly bad military judgement to do what Secretary Mabus has decided to do anyway. Basically he is asking people to take on added risk of getting killed or injured in order to make room for women, simply because of their gender.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:40 AM
14

Which cut are you referring to making? Are you merely talking about the exit physical at boot camp, and then completing of basic infantry training? Or are you talking about the ability to function 100% on par with men through a full combat tour, categorically? The Marine Corps study was, without a doubt, quite serious and rigorous. The Marines may not be known for their kind and respectful ways, and they may not be known for being rocket scientists, but they have over two centuries of experience…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:33 AM
4

There are times and places in the world where maybe men don't belong. I accept this absolutely and without further need to debate it. And maybe there are times and places in the world where maybe women don't belong. Why is this controversial? And do the "gender theorists" not understand that combat selects for very specific traits, all of which are primarily biologically associated with men, and that in fact, not all men are even well suited? You know, maybe the feminists should note that not al…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:23 AM
8

Makes no difference, dating, or professional.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 09:57 PM
2

Yes, thanks very much.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:06 PM
1

National Enquirer presented as real source for bullshit allegatiins?! How many times can I click the downvote button!! BS like this is why subs have moderators.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:57 PM
3

This woman is deranged and is creating a very hostile environment. Take it to HR and mean business.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:52 PM
20

Its amazing how political correctness and SJWs have turned universities, which were bastions of idea freedom, into a model of totalitarian thought policing.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:49 PM
18

Bullshit! This is just another version of the obligatory feminist demand that female unhappiness is somehow special or worse than any other group's unhappiness. Its just another way of demanding that women be placed on a pedestal and given special deference. Being an unattractive man is awful, and women in particular are cruel to unattractive men.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:45 PM
7

What if everyone is sexist?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:18 AM
3

I can completely respect your position and be OK with it. I also personally think that given sexuality mixing women into combat toles is very risky for all the obvious reasons, and I also dont think women are psychologically suited for combat, the ultimate full contact sport that turns men into permanently traumatized basket cases. Further I find it disturbing that feminists, who in the one hand preach that war is an evil of men and masculinity and that women are the real victims, suddenly dont …
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:11 AM
6

Does anyone have the debate between McElroy and Valenti avaialble to post here? That might be good viewing for this guy.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:36 AM
11

As was I - and feminists exploit that. One of the truths that comes with the Pill is confronting the fact that, often, your desire to be kind is not altruistic, but instead is a weakness, and based in the need for approval. And that weakness will fester. When the need for approval of women gets to the point where you subjugate yourself in a culture of unreality and exaggeration, and youll even say the sky is red though you know otherwise, just because it seems expected, then you know its gone to…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:33 AM
46

I welcome you back to the world of the living! I was raised a feminist, a total shame-tripped mangina, and it was only as an adult when I noticed that women were abusive and contemptuous of men, and exploitative of our kindness, and that much of feminist expression seems to amount to the manipulative shame trip mixed with anger at men, that I started swallowing the Pill. I consider myself a "survivor of feminism" :) and I welcome you to the fold. PS - read what you wrote - youre totally shame tr…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:13 AM
2

They should call it the "Office of Violating Mens's Civil Rights" or OVMCR. The Congressman's comment shows that he fails, fundamentally, to understand the meaning of the Title IX rules - that we agree that access to education is a legally-regarded civil right, and that a university that acts in a way to bar access to education on the grounds of, say, gender, is violating someone's civil rights. Even if that someone is a man. Men are the civil rights equals of women in this society, whether or n…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:13 PM
5

I can think of one problem with her: she's a ridiculously over-indulged, self-important little girl with a trim figure and symmetric facial features that made her obscenely rich before she was old enough to learn any life lessons. It must feel good to buy your way into the UN.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:07 PM
2

And she is a menace to socialism as well.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:24 PM
20

That is a very big deal. Not only does the individual soldier get injured more frequently - but the risks to others, to missions, and cost of dealing with the injuries, all things being equal, go up by a factor of 6.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:17 PM
0

Good people can disagree on this matter. I personally don't think the core combat arms roles are a place where women should serve.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:15 PM
5

In a lot of situations it really is just best at this point to avoid contact.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:10 PM
8

Oh why bother with evidence or process at all, just shoot men that women identify a complaint with.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:40 PM
6

Earlier this year she used the left-wing website Left Foot Forward to explain that she was a campaigner for feminism, not equality, because: “Men live and work in a brutal society, which is maintained through stratified social order based on ritual humiliation, gentleman’s clubs, fights, rites of passage, sexism, and banter. “When women enter the male realm whether law, politics, or a construction site, they find themselves in a repugnant world in which their only means of survival is by undergo…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:33 PM
2

Ya know what? Fuck western women. They suck.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 07:52 AM
1

Shorter you: they aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer and listen to asshole man-haters on account of that makes an emotional reaction. Suit yourself however. I am done with man-haters, that means, I am done with much of Western society.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:42 AM
2

Whatever happened to caring for our children? Regardless of whether or not one is, unfortunately in politically correct eyes, a male child?
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:40 AM
5

Let them earn it. (Translation: Go to a non-English speaking country if you actually would like to meet a woman. Just don't waste your time in the US, UK, or Australia at this point.)
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:37 AM
3

Any publicly used parking facility in America that tries women-only parking spots is going to get the living shit sued out of it.
/r/MGTOW10/09/15 12:14 AM
1

For my part, the Mens' Movement is ultimately a defensive reaction against feminist misandry and the damage that feminists gleefully do to men in society.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:02 AM
10

Because women are held to the same standard of accountability as men in society, and all,
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:20 PM
1

Hysterical. Appalling! Typical!
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:18 PM
0

That would actually be the anti-science, fact- and - reason free conservative movement. Today's conservatives would have supported the persecution of Galileo.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:15 PM
3

Shame is the number one go-to tool of feminists.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:14 PM
1

With feminists, there is nothing anyone can do in any context that wont be a source of hatred, anger, and vacuous outrage, so its almost as if it would be better just to acknowledge this as their universal default, and only pay attention if and when any of them deviates from it.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:11 PM
1

I found this writing reasonable, if understated in denouncing how vacuous first world feminism has become. While in some places women are functionally property an entire generation of blue haired princesses, doted upon their entire lives, has decided to base a hate movement on how men sit on the bus sometimes.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:48 PM
30

Screw your own son over in favor of your daughter to make a political statement: this how society values boys and men in the age of feminism.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:00 PM
2

I believe your reply captures our zeitgeist completely. I name you Thread Victor!
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:55 AM
5

I wonder if Chic CEO has anything to say about this?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:28 AM
2

This is excellent and positive news. Men will need to re-engage with childcare and in particular the K-12 education system if we are to start to undo the damage feminism has done to us. Each cheering dad in this case is blow back at the education system's social programming.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:10 AM
10

Trust a feminist to be a) wrong, b) sexist, c) offensive, and d) proud of it.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:09 AM
2

Sexist air conditioning, sexist bathroom signs, misogynistic sitting positions, and now New Scientist (which is probably bought almost exclusively by men) is placed in the sexist mens section. Whats next? The sky is sexist, because it is blue, not pink? Or the fact that the sky is perceived to have color at all is clearly sexist?
/r/MensRights08/09/15 10:47 PM
3

Thats absolutely discrimination and is probably illegal. Start a mens only club.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 10:40 PM
1

I think there is truth to be found in all three of the areas. I think that I will take the Manosphere over feminism any day, night, dawn, dusk, or afternoon siesta of the week.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:41 PM
6

If Sarkeesian dislikes video games, then she should not play them. Doesn't that make sense?
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:39 PM
1

I agree in principal, but unlike most people, I don't think women should be in the core combat arms roles. The US has never fought a war with a military with the added complication of Marine rifle companies filled with 19 year old boys mixed in with young women, and I think that it will ultimately be a mistake if and when the US has a true battlefield war to fight, one where there are lots and lots of American casualties. Selective Service is not going to be used for elective counter-insurgencie…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:28 PM
1

We shouldn't downplay the reality that a tiny minority of adults target young children, who are vulnerable. But this just looks like "eww ... a man!" raising its ugly head again.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 06:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter