TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

prybarn Archive

View 1 posts and 182 comments by prybarn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It doesn't matter what happens "before". Consent can be revoked at any time. So if she's "crying...clearly not enjoying herself" then there is no longer consent and it is now rape.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:34 AM
1

Unless you're into BDSM.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:39 AM
12

Bravo
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:24 PM
1

Right to vote. (without signing up for draft) Right to bodily integrity. (circumcision) Right to choose parenthood. (financial abortion)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 02:41 PM
184

Her body, her choice. Her choice, her responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:15 PM
3

Are you sure this applies? He is talking about a tech school, not a high school.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 02:39 AM
1

Did you see this about the twitch streamer? https://clips.twitch.tv/BoredRelatedEmuFrankerZ
/r/MensRights02/04/17 09:55 PM
10

No in between right?
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:21 PM
11

Getting yelled at is part of the job. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:17 PM
0

Both are illegal. But you are greatly understating.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:51 PM
8

whoosh
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:45 PM
1

She didn't just point out that conservative men did that. She also said we should vote for women...? Why is she making it about sex? There are plenty of conservative women that would have done the same thing. And yes, the post should have shown you that I don't hate women, if you weren't so sexist and biased yourself as to not interpret someone wanting equality and not focusing on sex as misogyny.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 08:12 AM
6

77% of the people on the Innocence Project website are men exonerated of sex crimes. In fact, there are only 4 women exonerated of sex crimes on the site, and 3 of those are from the same case. And people think it's weird that men's rights cares so much about false accusations.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:35 AM
1

Men's hips and legs are literally shaped differently. They go out, while women's go in.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 04:20 PM
1

yup
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:02 AM
1

just reverse the sexes and see if it still makes sense.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:45 AM
1

No, not at all. Try going in some threads and disagreeing. You will get downvoted, if anything.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:45 AM
5

No. The only people who get banned here are people that spam links to certain red pill sites and people who just go totally nuclear and threaten others.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:31 AM
1

We will be generally voting for female candidates? Were males not also the majority of people who voted in favor of this legislation? What is it you hope to accomplish by pointing the blame at men? Should I feel guilty for something that someone with similar genitals did? Does it somehow dismiss the issue? Does this mean any issue that affects women is not valid if there are other women propagating it, or internalized misogyny? Why are you so eager to tell us to vote for women, not just at all b…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:10 AM
1

What the fuck are you talking about? You guys are having a field day with these strawmen.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:54 AM
2

Yes I believe you're right, and it does happen more. Look at the girl who ran onto a baseball field and grabbed a bunch of male college players' asses. How many victims of sexual assault were there from that? Zero. Now imagine a guy runs out on a volleyball court and grabs a bunch of female college players' asses. How many victims of sexual assault result from that? Several. (Also note, this has never actually happened, for the reasons that you already described.) So you can't say that there are…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:01 PM
3

Every single high profile college rape story has turned out to be a lie.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 05:42 AM
6

There is no evidence that he dragged her, and in reality they were not nearly as close to the dumpster as journalists have lead to believe. But I know, you're not saying that's what happened.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 05:15 AM
2

Just in case, I want to clear something up, especially since the documentary is called The Red Pill. This is a little confusing but hang with me. Sometimes, or least, a long time ago, MRAs used the term "the red pill", but they it had nothing to do with pick up artists or the subreddit named the red pill. It was just a general reference to taking the red pill and waking up to an uncomfortable reality. To MRAs that means realizing that men in the Western world have a lot of issues, they aren't re…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 03:28 AM
4

For those that don't know, here are the problems with calling Elam pro-rape: When he says he would vote innocent in a rape trial, it's not because he is pro-rape, it's because he's against subverting the justice system. He believes that all the special exceptions we make when it comes to rape, such as rape shield laws, make it so a fair trial cannot be had, and so he could never vote guilty, as he has to presume innocence. And when he says that some women go around wearing "rape me" signs, he cl…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:25 PM
1

convicted ???
/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:18 AM
1

That is why it's extra crazy that feminists and so many women pretend that men are poison M&Ms and all this other shit. They act so scared to walk down the street, and see all men as potential rapists, child molesters, and responsible for all domestic violence, and yet...none of them are scared to get in an angry, threatening man's face because they are sure they won't get hit, presumably because no man has ever attacked them before.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 10:05 AM
1

I really like your analysis.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:14 AM
10

Or a minor.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:17 PM
1

Supposedly, the FBI definition of rape would include this scenario.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 06:56 PM
1

But that's only on college campuses right? And they can only expel them or something, not send them to prison or anything.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:32 PM
1

Feminists have made plenty of "all men are pigs" type statements that are equally unfair. Why does the tone of feminism seem so anti-male or at least anti men's rights? Shouldn't they leave men alone and only address other women (instead of teaching them not to rape, manspread, mansplain, educate them that their life is easy mode, etc.)? Since the tone of feminism makes no sense, and is anti male, or at least anti men's rights, then isn't feminism an issue that needs to be addressed by men's rig…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:49 AM
1

Since feminism did not free men from their prescribed roles, we remain in them. You ever even hear of a "woman card?" A real man...has a huge list of responsibilities and qualities that make him a real man. A real woman...???
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:40 AM
1

Even if what you said was true, what is the point of bringing it up? "You guys have men to blame, not women, so...leave feminism alone?" Feminists are the ones doing what you're doing. Looking for any excuse to dismiss male issues.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 11:39 AM
1

it's not women who beat up effeminate gay men for violating gender norms There are a lot of women who will make a man's life hell for violating gender norms. If you're a guy, and you go into a job surrounded by women, but refuse to be "chivalrous" and demand equality, they will treat you like a goddamn child molester, and maybe they won't be doing any beating but they'll try to turn men against you with their highest hopes being that those men beat you, or cast you out, or feel the need to prote…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 11:22 PM
1

I don't have time to read all these responses, and I do see that some are pointing out that women are majority of voters, and also that only a very small number of men at the top experience the privilege you speak of, but just in case, I'm going to tie it all together for you. You basically go with "men have themselves (meaning other men) to blame for their problems", but women have themselves to blame (meaning other women) for the fact that the majority of offices are held by men, and in realit…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 11:13 PM
1

I think most of the people complaining about mad max were red pillers, not mras. But you have to admit, it's kind of offensive that they spent most of the movie trying to get to this promised land, and then you find out that it's a place inhabited by only women, who distrust men, and and in fact lure them in to slay them. Gamergate was bullshit. The majority of people getting into that were probably not MRAs but there probably were some. The problem with gamergate is that it had nothing to do wi…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:03 AM
5

Why do we have to point out false accusations? Why do we have to attack rape hysteria? How does this tie in with attacking feminists? Who do you think is pushing for these affirmative consent standards? Who do you think is pushing for kangaroo courts in colleges? But addressing these things makes us "woman haters"? If I had held men's rights activism to everything that has been done in it's name Such as?
/r/MensRights25/05/16 03:05 AM
6

Thank you for sharing that.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:19 AM
2

So it's not ok to force people into concentration camps but it is ok to force people into death and maiming.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:38 PM
4

This is interesting too: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/31/new-jersey-judge-orders-newspaper-to-take-down-article/
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:39 PM
3

Wishing you well.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:15 PM
4

You could also be robbed if you pass out drunk. Somehow I don't think there would be such an uproar for warning people about that.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:56 AM
2

Looks like Madonna. Google Image Search says Madonna and Kazaky.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 07:32 PM
8

No, don't you get it? Rape and sexual assault victims are always women...
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:11 PM
4

That's a good point. I'll be on the look out for that. There will probably be a lot less claiming that the standards are sexist against women
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:46 AM
1

This is what she said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdqFhYFxhk4&feature=youtu.be
/r/MensRights21/02/16 09:34 PM
3

I don't know, but she is just as big a problem as anyone else regarding this stuff. http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6590572/lady-gaga-andrew-cuomo-enough-is-enough-legislation She also accuses a producer that she worked with of raping her, but when pressed for details she just says he manipulated her by complimenting her...all of that is on Howard Stern.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:30 PM
5

Lady Gaga also did this :http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6590572/lady-gaga-andrew-cuomo-enough-is-enough-legislation That's kangaroo court creating, affirmative consent standards. It's ridiculous. They say in that letter "rape is a crime and should be treated like one" as they advocate for doing the exact opposite, by not letting criminal courts handle it. She is going around, heavily implying that she was raped, but when pressed for details she instead says she was "manipulated". She the…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:17 PM
1

what business is it of yours whether it "counts" as assault anyway? She says that's what it was, so that's what it was. Encountered this the other day.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:25 PM
3

I didn’t know who they were, what gender they were. I’m pushing back, punching back, just trying to get out of there It's fucked up that he feels the need to say this.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:07 PM
1

This is why I like to ask what happens when a 17 year old man takes advantage of a drunk woman. In reality, it's not illegal to have sex with a drunk woman even though many people believe that it is, but I've caught more than one person being completely hypocritical when answering this question. If they say she didn't do anything wrong, then they are saying that it's ok for an adult man to have sex with underage girls as long as he gets drunk first. If they say she did do something wrong, then t…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:31 PM
1

You mixed it up some there. Yes, I understand that is the opinion of a lot of unreasonable people. I'm just saying, despite what feminists would have you believe, it is not illegal to have sex with a drunk woman.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:35 PM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:18 PM
1

She's drunk so she's not able to give consent This is not actually the law, but a lot of people believe that it is.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 01:22 PM
9

Just 12% of men felt that women had fewer opportunities to advance in their organizations...Yet when you look at the actual data, women’s odds of advancement are 15% lower than men’s. When you look a the "actual data", it has nothing to do with women having fewer opportunities. It has to do with women "feeling" like they have less opportunities, and being "less eager". These fuckheads dare to call men "stupid" and "blind"?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 02:40 AM
1

Unless you're talking about California or New York where the government kind of does require it. In California they will withhold financial aid, and I imagine New York is the same way.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:26 AM
1

Now that some colleges are forced to uphold affirmative consent standards, they are not handling the crime of rape. They are handling cases that don't meet the legal definition of rape, only the feminist definition: cases that don't meet the affirmative consent standard or involve intoxication. I'm not sure where I'm going with this. I guess I'm just pointing out that they could claim that. "You're not equipped to handle rape cases!" "We're not handling rape cases."
/r/MensRights15/01/16 01:40 AM
3

The fuck. fuck balls wtf
/r/MensRights12/01/16 06:52 PM
6

Sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 06:22 PM
1

The woman is the one who made the decision to bring a child into the world. No one else.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:41 PM
1

I think someone screwed up their math somewhere. It should be that a man's sentence is 60ish percent higher than a woman's. Meaning you take 60% of the woman's sentence and add it to the sentence to make the man's. But according to the numbers in this graphic, the difference between the man's sentence and the woman's sentence, is 60ish% of the man's sentence. If you look up any articles on the sentencing disparity between men and women they say it's 60% higher than women's, but this graphic says…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:37 PM
1

I always thought that men received sentences that were 60% longer than women's sentences for the same crime. But you're saying that the sentences of women are 60% less than those of men? It seems like if the latter was the case, then it would have been easier to just say that men get sentences that over twice as long.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 09:29 PM
1

Wait. Is that even true? I don't think there is any law that says a drunk woman can't consent.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:29 AM
5

Her body, her choice. Her choice, her responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 01:06 PM
8

“A girl starts going out with a fella. She decides she wants to go out one night. That seems to be fine with him. But he then turns up at the door with a bunch of flowers. He’s ‘forgotten’. She cancels her night out, stays in. She’s already being controlled.” ... “If you say to a woman ‘does he sexually assault you?’ she might say no, but if you ask ‘do you have sex with him when you don’t want to’ and it’ll be ‘all the time’,” says Monckton-Smith. ... Domestic violence offenders who engage in c…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 12:41 PM
1

http://www.cafebabel.co.uk/society/article/spain-gender-violence-what-about-abused-men.html http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/spanish-gender-stalinism-part-i/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjgBfklmYj8
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:32 AM
3

The selective the service. The whole point of which is the draft.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:07 AM
2

Maybe they should ask Spain how their special courts are going.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:40 PM
1

It's up to the jury.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:08 AM
2

Maybe red is a man.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:27 PM
1

There is an upside to this. A lot of women like James Deen. They won't want to believe he is a rapist. This may open their eyes to how out of control rape hysteria has become. It might even turn their attention to affirmative consent standards and kangaroo courts in colleges.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:15 AM
1

women feel endangered when walking home at night Those kinds of attacks are pretty rare. Most sexual assault happens in a more familiar setting with someone the victim knows. Men have much more reason to feel endangered when walking home at night, statistically.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 04:55 PM
1

You don't have to be a gentleman to be an MRA.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:26 AM
3

So how does this work exactly? Is it like California, where it means that colleges will expel/punish students, or will there be actual legal consequences? It would be pretty weird to say it's a crime for one group of people, but not for another. That just goes to show how full of shit these people are. When signing this into law, they talked about how "it is a crime and should be treated like one" but that's not how crimes are treated. They aren't enforced by kangaroo courts and only against cer…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:46 PM
1

http://www.torontosun.com/2015/04/23/as-kids-in-the-hall-reunite-dave-foley-says-nothing-has-changed lol, just being a smartass. This is article is more informative: http://www.straight.com/arts/589141/dave-foley-comes-back-canada
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:35 AM
5

This article is hilarious to me. She admits that women's choices make the difference - women simply don't apply to jobs. But her answer is to cater to them in every way, nitpicking the language and format applications use, and practice discriminatory hiring processes.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:58 AM
1

It seems this is the standard they are teaching children, but the standard is not actually part of rape law. Kind of like how they teach that drunk women cannot consent, even though the law does not say that.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:56 PM
1

Is this actually a law? I've heard that it's legally required to teach "yes means yes" to high school kids, but that's different from it actually being the legal standard to determine rape, right? Also, CA has more or less forced colleges to accept that standard, but that's still not really a law, just the standard they use to kick men out of college.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:48 PM
5

people in comments mostly don't believe him. And that's what causes downvotes. In the first thread, he didn't bring up his wife cheating or anything too outlandish. It was just about a vasectomy, and every one of his comments was downvoted to oblivion even then.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:36 PM
4

Additionally, 80% of victims of intimate partner violence are female. That seems unlikely considering the number of male spousal violence victims in Saskatchewan is about the same as the number of female: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-224-x/2010000/ct001-eng.htm
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:45 PM
3

We see it in the movies, in music videos, in sports, just perpetual violence against woman It's really mind-blowing that someone could say this with a straight face. There is almost no violence against women in the media when compared to violence against men, and it when it does happen it's portrayed as the worst possible thing in the world (next to rape of a woman).
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:41 PM
5

Sulkowicz’s actions concerned Nungesser’s conduct and not his status as a male But when a girl claims rape, they don't say "well this about her being a victim, not her status as female" and then go on to apply Title IX. Moral of the story: men are not allowed to utter the phrase "Title IX", but if anything happens to a woman it's sexism and should involve Title IX.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:40 AM
2

It's not clear. "men...affected by domestic and family violence" does not necessarily mean victims of violence. They could fall under the category of "people who are concerned about someone they know" for one thing. Either way, they are clearly denying the existence of female abusers.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 12:24 PM
7

They don't admit men need a DV helpline. The mensline is for abusers, not victims of abuse. It's in the second picture.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 11:06 AM
1

Almost 8 millions views. How many does it have to get before you won't say "do you know how easy it is to get..."?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:09 PM
14

If a woman decided that the man she was with was only interested in her looks, and that she didn't want that, there is no way they would be that harsh on her.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:06 PM
1

You're right. I'm sorry. I'm sure this video will do nothing to propagate the false statistics and make people believe there is an epidemic, especially young, naive people who think it is a good idea to create affirmative consent standards and kick men out of college with no evidence. I'm sure there won't be any people like that out of the millions that have watched it in the past few days.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:58 PM
1

It is the featured video. You go to Youtube and that is the first thing you will see. That everyone is seeing.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:06 AM
2

She's so talented and it breaks my heart when she does things like this. She also claimed there is an epidemic of music producers raping female artists, especially young/underage ones. She claims it happened to her and she wrote a song about it. But when you actually piece together the stuff she's admitted, it doesn't sound like rape. She was 19, but she likes to bring up underage girls when she talks about it, because that would clearly be rape. She claims she was "manipulated". Manipulation is…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:00 AM
4

This is so great.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:40 AM
5

You can have to same job title and pay and guess who's going to be doing any heavy lifting that needs to be done? Nobody talks about that gap.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:49 PM
1

Ultimately the woman made the decision to bring a child into this world, so she is responsible for it - not the man who had no say in the final decision.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:31 PM
1

I guess I'm saying that even you could actually get someone to listen long enough to why a man might not have chosen to end up in the situation he ends up in, and show why it was not in his control, they will just fit him into a box and find a reason to justify his position, saying that's all he is capable of, for instance, or that he "deserves" it for some reason. Either way, their position will not be chalked up to any kind of discrimination of "oppression".
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:30 PM
2

I was going to bring this up and there might be a lot of the "just world" mentality mixed in there too.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:35 PM
17

They're talking about forceful rape but trying to make it sound like they are talking about drunken sex. They're being dubious.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:26 AM
3

This is exactly what's happening. Typically, we picture dates as between two people who may kind of like each other, but aren't experts on each other. So what she's saying is, she wants a man to invest money in her, even though he may not even know that he likes her that much, yet, but she doesn't have to invest the same money. She's ignoring the fact that he may not even like her that much, and may want to find some things out about her before he determines if he likes her. She doesn't want som…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:01 AM
2

Why do men and women have different shoe sizes?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:33 PM
1

The implication is that women choose less effective methods because they don't actually want to die.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:56 PM
2

Laws that say that are actually pretty rare.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 07:23 PM
1

Actually, when I read that comment, it's not even saying that the female scientist is crying because she's female, it's saying that she's crying because the person criticizing her is someone she loves.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 12:09 AM
1

Sorry, the description of the image mentioned that the one with no skewness is the bell curve, but the image did not mention that. http://www.assetinsights.net/Glossary/G_Bell_Curve.html
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:20 AM
1

If you did change the last two brackets and they did happen to continue that pattern, it would be skewed, not a bell curve. http://www.assetinsights.net/Concepts/Curve_Symmetrical_and_Skewed.JPG
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:18 AM
8

Consent can be withdrawn at any time. A contract wouldn't change that.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:53 PM
2

A lot of hospitals have sections called "Women's Imaging". Where do men who need a mammogram go?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 04:09 PM
1

Household income in the US is not really a bell curve. That's why I question it.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:57 AM
1

agree that silence equals consent But you can't do that. That doesn't change a law that says that silence is not consent. "Yes means yes". Silence doesn't mean "yes". The absence of a "no" doesn't mean "yes". So why would the absence of a safeword mean "yes"? That's the whole point because apparently "no means no" wasn't enough. Here let me make some quotes, too. These come from the very first result when you Google "affirmative consent". The current societal script on sex assumes that passivity…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:52 AM
3

To me it just seems like sometimes companies that know they are in the spotlight choose women as CEOs for the right image.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 04:13 AM
1

Medians are used in place of means for skewed data, and also when outliers are a problem.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 04:11 AM
1

Are salaries even on a bell curve? Is CEO income a bell curve? US household income is not.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 04:10 AM
2

There are times when the median is preferable, such as when the data is skewed. When we look at household income in the US, we use the median, not the mean, because the data is not "normally" distributed (but also not uniformly distributed). It is not a bell curve.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:56 AM
1

Ok, then explain to me how the two can work together.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:05 AM
0

http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2013/11/12/the-15-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america/ http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/NontraJobs_2010.htm
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:28 AM
1

It doesn't work, and they've never actually thought about it enough to even say how it's supposed to work and realize that it's impossible. The proof is that many of them are into BDSM, which obviously cannot ever work with "affirmative action" and yet most them don't realize that.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:10 PM
3

Was it Christina Hoff Sommers?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:58 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKkAL1AEam8
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:50 AM
6

potentially out of place ... possibly odd
/r/MensRights16/05/15 06:06 PM
3

the intention of making the man sound creepy. Well that's definitely the intention. guy who seemed totally normal and okay Implying that he was not actually normal and okay, and why? Because he may have made advances? And who knows, maybe he was telling the truth when he said he just wanted to talk and didn't change his mind and want to make advances until he got drunk. If so many claim that women can't be held responsible for decisions they make when drunk, then why is it this guy's fault if he…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:58 PM
5

saw him follow her out of the bar and up the elevator Is that what they saw? Or did they see a man get into an elevator in order to get to his room? That's just one of the possibilities. And what purpose did the phone call serve exactly? What would they have done if no one answered?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:55 PM
1

Don't believe me? rolls eyes I guess now you get to tell a bunch of imaginary people "I told you so!"
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:28 PM
4

So this needs to be on the r/news right?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:24 PM
2

Chris Hardwick is so goddamn annoying. I would always try to listen to his podcast for the interesting guests but couldn't make it through because of him. Now I have a good reason to not even try.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:25 PM
1

Does no one understand that "teach men not to rape" started as satire?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:23 PM
1

Part of the problem. Everyone has to say what goes without saying because hysteria. Do we have to go around saying "first things first, I don't think it's ok to have sex with someone who was hit in the head and knocked unconscious"?
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:16 PM
2

But it's just testimony. I assume their testimony would contradict mine.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 11:00 PM
5

She did say she was "ok" with what was happening when he asked her. That's a fuckload closer to "affirmative" consent than most rational people ever get.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:45 PM
5

You're being kind of nuts here. So if I claim someone mugs me, the only evidence I need is that I called the police and the person I'm accusing saw me running away from them?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:41 PM
1

Do you think she liked what she saw?????
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:46 PM
5

He's not an MRA, but Joe Rogan was accused of being one and his response was basically "is that bad? Should men not have rights?"
/r/MensRights03/05/15 02:26 AM
1

This is real, real bad.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 12:01 AM
16

National Organization for Women NAFALT!!!111111111 Just the biggest feminist organizations!
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:49 AM
1

http://www.news.com.au/national/women-more-promiscious-at-sex-than-men-more-unfaithful/story-e6frfkp9-1111118269034
/r/MensRights25/04/15 03:16 PM
6

When people are not allowed to express any opinion other than complete outrage without a disclaimer that they are not a rapist/pedophile/wife-beater, it's HYSTERIA. Fuck disclaimers. Fuck these hysterical loons.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:21 AM
1

Because typically people care more about catching and incarcerating drug dealers than drug users...unless that drug is sex...because then the dealer is usually a woman.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 11:12 AM
3

I hate Wil Wheaton so much. Goddammit Felicia Day, quit working with the fucking worst people imaginable. First Wil, now Anna Akana. GODDAMMIT GEEK AND SUNDRY IS LOST! At least Felicia tried to be diplomatic about Gamergate, even though she missed the point entirely. GODDAMMIT
/r/MensRights18/04/15 10:11 PM
3

I have no problem with this being seen as reactionary to feminism. Feminism has left no other choice, as they want to coopt everyone else's causes and even the word "egalitarian", while obviously not addressing men's issues at all. Keeping this in mind may help future "waves" of men's rights to not be as ridiculous as later waves of feminism, or to not exist at all.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:28 PM
3

If what you want was done, THAT would be deteriorating to feminist standards. There is not a whole lot of meaningful discussions going on at the feminism subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:24 PM
3

They could also be referring to having sex with minors.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:38 PM
5

And of course it's possible that the only reason they think he's a rapist is because someone else said he was, and the someone else was lying. Not that you are saying the opposite.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:29 PM
17

So why didn't you take a second to educate us about educating women to not rape?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:57 AM
18

What's that mattress girl up to?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:25 PM
2

Your comparison is shit. All women are afforded the power that we speak of and fear, by society. Not all men are afforded the power that you speak of, by nature. you should be waiting to have sex with a partner until you trust them not to do this. Victim blaming.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:11 PM
10

Don't drink at all, don't smoke, you must exercise and eat vegetables and fruit.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:41 PM
1

PROjection!
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:00 AM
33

YOU THOUGHT WRONG MOTHERFUCKER This is what always happens. Making fake videos and making fake accusations are a GOOD thing, because they draw attention to the real (real fake) issues! /Shit
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:43 AM
1

I think that's why they used the word "motto" instead of chant. This article does not have the words "sacrifice my body" in it. I think they were saying that was the overall theme for boys though. I found this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrZS8Aekqfw There is a full version of the girls' chant but only what appears to be a small excerpt from the boys' chant.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:03 AM
1

The description makes clear that boys were not included as potential victims, they were included as presumptive criminals. You don't care enough about boys to train girls, or boys, not to abuse boys. Just in case they think there is any level of assumption you are making by only looking at the article: In parallel to girls program, boys work through 6-week IMpower classes to reject the “violence as power” paradigm. Boys learn to develop awareness, courage and dozens of skills to intervene in ass…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 08:30 AM
10

girls have their own shout: "I'm dangerous" Yeah, I'm sure teaching boys that their lives have no value compared to girls, while teaching girls to chant "I'm dangerous" will turn out just fine.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:27 PM
14

And on 2x they're deleting comments for QUOTING THE ARTICLE to show this.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:25 PM
0

Maybe it's the same reason a woman who works in tech will often end up with a cushy, well-paying "project manager" job that requires her to understand nothing aside from nagging people.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:56 AM
1

Probably just a hateful comment towards sexist nurses.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:54 AM
3

Either way, only like 1/3 of people in their 20's and 30's are married these days.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:11 PM
1

I thought you might be interested in this: http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150319/university-village/50-shades-of-grey-rape-trial-starts-thursday-with-uic-students-testimony
/r/MensRights19/03/15 11:04 PM
1

It really does sound like something Nazis would do.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 10:56 AM
1

Wanna have some fun? Ask a feminist how these laws are supposed to work with BDSM or couples waking each other up with sex. Chances are pretty good the person you're talking to will be into something like that. Then watch them squirm to find some reason why the rules don't apply to their particular situation.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:20 AM
1

They plan their "scenes" in advance and stick to them. Even if they were to do this it would never be detailed enough would it? One hand in the wrong place, just a little too much pressure or there and maybe it would be seen as inconsistent with the plan.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:29 PM
1

For one thing, the U.S. Supreme Court has created a doctrine of privacy that, at least in some areas of sexual behavior, now insulates consenting couples from criminal prosecution. While the doctrine ofLawrence v. Texas (mentioned earlier in this paper) has not been applied in the BDSM context, the principle of privacy is a powerful one that works in our favor. Oh I get it. I was going to say I want to know more about this, but now I see what they're saying. I thought maybe they were talking abo…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 04:29 AM
1

I am familiar with safewords. And yes, I already realize that according to affirmative consent laws, agreeing upon a safeword and relying on it is not technically consent. That "safe word" with a written consent is a "get out of jail" card. As long as there is no serious injury. It's not a perfect defense, by any means, but it is a whole lot better than nothing. Ok, so I think you are basically admitting to everything I said, but you are not explicitly making any distinction between areas with a…
/r/MensRights01/03/15 04:17 AM
1

Ok but basically it's still the act that is illegal. I don't think it would just suddenly become legal because you know someone better. So basically, aren't you saying that couples are breaking the law all the time but we just have to trust that they won't get charged with rape? I don't really understand how written consent could fix anything. I mean, there is no way they will stick to some specific plan or whatever, and no one is going to agree on definitions and which act counts as escalation …
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:27 AM
1

In advance and in writing, and that still won't give you blanket immunity. Do you think it should be this way?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 09:21 AM
1

You are probably right. "Third-wave" mensrights will be a fucking nightmare. That's why I don't mind so much when people accuse us of being a reaction to feminism.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 08:56 AM
1

I find it more interesting to ask basically but the same question but with the result being a living child. "My body, my choice", but what you are suggesting is that we can reach a point with technology that the "my body" part is no longer accurate, because the procedure is so non-invasive, which I guess we could compare to drug tests and paternity tests, etc. What if the technology were so advanced that we could remove the fetus "non-invasively", and then incubate or raise it without the use of…
/r/MensRights21/02/15 01:15 PM
1

There should be a game show called White Knights or Feminists. Seems like either one could be responsible for this kind of bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 02:55 AM
2

For those of you in the UK, you can look at Spain (as far as gender issues go).
/r/MensRights20/02/15 02:51 AM
1

When keeping it feelz goes wrong.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:27 PM
3

So the pink gang comes from all the police corruption and stuff right? Ok, so imagine a "black gang" in NYC, a gang of black men armed with clubs going all vigilante and shit. I doubt the Western media would have been so excited to embrace them.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:25 PM
1

Yeah or being able to go to a store, and not see one employee working outside lifting heavy things in extreme heat while the other stands inside in the same place all day at the cash register as they both "earn" the same pay.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:53 AM
4

But...but...rape!
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:41 AM
4

Guess someone finally took a look around.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 10:44 PM
3

Wait so he went to the police but no drug screen?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 10:43 PM
15

I think men still go to ladies' night.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:27 PM
1

Who said anything about censorship?
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:59 PM
1

The sentencing disparity IS important. Does that mean that all these "WBB" posts do anything to address it? It's questionable.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:18 PM
1

I just realized after reading this that in time they could start trying to use the word "enthusiastic" in the law regarding consent, and then they would just constantly shift the goal posts, redefining how enthusiastic is enthusiastic enough for the law, which is basically never if a woman desires to lock up a man.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:30 PM
3

Thanks.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:49 PM
3

Initiation doesn't matter. I can't have sex with an underage girl and then say "she started it!", even if I was drunk. Good luck getting everyone to agree on what the definition of "initiate" is.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:49 PM
3

Hey, competent. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:04 PM
2

At least we know women are a lot better. Oh wait, no we don't, because they didn't ask any women. Just like the last survey like this, which also had shitty questions and didn't reveal it's full methodology.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:40 AM
1

She had, or tried to have sex with someone at that birthday party.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:22 AM
1

You could say the same thing about most sex crimes.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 03:54 AM
0

It's just a bet.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:40 AM
0

i bet just as many men cheat. They don't, but that might be because it's not as easy for them.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter