TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

purrit Archive

View 9 posts and 327 comments by purrit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

meth?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:35 PM
1

Right! I was the hostile one! Soooooo sOoOoOrRyYyYy!!! Also, you're a rapist. What? the fuck should I be accountable for my claims, you look it up!!! dumb question. lazy, arrogant fuckstick. all swell arguments from a reasonable debater. I hope you're joking or trolling, but I know there are lots of aggressively defensive shits like you in the world.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 07:32 PM
7

If depression is anger without enthusiasm, MGTOW is Red Pill without hope/confidence. Yes!
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 11:00 PM
2

Wtf? For one thing, my name isn't Jesus. For another, I think lots (most?) news media is controlled by tptb. Like I said, I'm not familiar with MM; I just wanted to know how you came to your conclusion about it. I suppose I could have phrased it that way, instead of asking for a source.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 12:58 AM
2

Not doubting you, but I'm not familiar with MM. Source for it being a WH press release factory?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:50 PM
7

MIT biologist Nancy Hopkins said, "I felt I was going to be sick. My heart was pounding and my breath was shallow. I was extremely upset." Wow, scientist from highly respected school can't hear a possible reason for something without succumbing to the fucking vapors. Shit.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:53 AM
6

mother's little helper Longer than 30yrs, and maybe before women were working "as much" as men.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 05:39 AM
1

Living in a Utopian gay city, I've heard about and seen this sort of thing many times and it has confused me. Can you explain it? It's funny that there are many women who want a man who has lots of the stereotypical gay traits: super-groomed, really interested in gossip, really interested in celebrities, OCD about cleaning, fascinated by furnishings, eager to go out dancing to the same handful of corporate hits, etc.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 12:10 AM
2

Kids (these days), they just don't understand.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 08:18 PM
3

Don't forget why this is much more of a crisis for women. They have a smaller dating pool, and from that smaller pool they only want ~10% of the guys.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 06:28 PM
3

A little Off-Topic, but seeing this got me to thinking - Feminist/Gender Studies are far more pervasive and persuasive in academia than African-American/etc. Studies, aren't they? Why?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:51 PM
2

I used to be a server and women generally tipped me less than men did. Women also asked for more stuff and wanted more attention. They also asked for ridiculous things: salsa at a French restaurant, requesting me to sing happy birthday to their child, etc. Those two didn't tip me at all. And, no, I didn't work at Chuck E. Cheese or anywhere else that singing happy birthday or anything else is expecting. Maybe it was because I hardly ever flirted with my tables. Sometimes old/unattractive women w…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:47 PM
1

Made me think of this party of the first part
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:20 AM
2

I haven't read its comments in this thread, but I second this motion.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:57 AM
1

Dunno who they are/were.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:05 PM
3

I can't think of any group of people who haven't had a significant percentage of those who stoop to dirty tactics. I've given up on humanity.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:05 PM
1

The IRONY Well, since this is Australia, you must be making a play on their use of the NEIN IRON, right?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:11 AM
21

Male here, I live in a big city too. I've been sexually harassed/molested by both women and gay men. The thing I've noticed is that they go about it differently.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:09 PM
2

Straight Outta Compton!!!
/r/MensRights18/08/12 12:43 AM
14

not sure if deliberately misinterpreting or dumb. don't get it.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:46 PM
9

More like: Somebody who vaguely looks like your ancestor. While the people seeking revenge ally themselves with the descendents of the 'thieves'. Simply put, the well-to-do were fucking over men and women for a long time.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:26 PM
6

This is at fucking Cambridge, not some school held in lesser esteem. Wow.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 11:10 PM
1

Don't all groups get put down on Reddit? Conservatives, Liberals, Christians, rich, virgins . . . Okay, maybe not 20-somethings or Atheists. But the one time it really matters is when it's women!
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:28 PM
1

[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CFwQtwIwAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DCgfqVdZUZ40&ei=Ml0QUL3YKKrfiALZjYHABg&usg=AFQjCNHAIO7EDqsQwAQsF8espR9VjWUURQ&sig2=3GIK-HHkR8XQIe90Gk5wJg]
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:56 PM
2

Are men allowed in the SF WB? I've passed it many times, but never had a desire to enter.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:43 PM
2

lol, yeah, that's what I'm saying happens here. Well, not that extreme.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:50 PM
2

If only this were the case where I live. Taxis here slow down and hover, hoping you'll decide to use them.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 10:22 PM
2

He isn't alive now, but Asimov had the highest IQ around when he was alive. Wrote 450+ books, spanning all the major categories of the Dewey Decimal System. I have no idea if he knew how to cook though, lol.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:39 AM
10

There is a perpetual downvote brigade here.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 08:10 PM
2

I could be wrong, but pretty sure it goes - An American House and An English Salary
/r/MensRights22/06/12 02:34 AM
1

Or "payed" by having a child that you could cherish.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:34 AM
2

Same. I have to wonder at all this recent increase in plugging Rs is done by shills. I'm sure at least some of it is . . . I'd say all, but people are zealous about their side of the two-party system. Edit: if they aren't shills, they should realize that what they're doing is going to turn off some people and hurt the movement.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:55 AM
6

And even more worthy are the incessant Republicans who try to convince the community that voting R will make a difference. Or that giving even more to the wealthy, corporations and military is worthwhile. I don't vote R or D anymore.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:49 AM
1

I generally like you . . . and I'm a lefty . . . but no longer a Dem (actually, am still registered as a Dem; I should fix that) . . . and though you are correct, I am flustered by your ~smearing~ of lefties. also, I am drunk, thus the shit puncutaction, sorry.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:27 AM
1

what makes you have that assumption?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:23 AM
8

yeah, no shit. I was reading a fark thread a few months ago; it was about "what would you do if you were transported to 2,000 years ago?" %90 of the female response was: whore, babymaker or burned for being a witch. -those who do not study the past are condemned to repeat it-. good job, feminism.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:39 PM
2

I also thought she was retiring. Not that familiar with her, but she seems like one of a very few sane Republicans (there aren't many sane Dems either).
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:34 PM
0

I've had a lot of girlfriends and when looking back on them, there is only one who I think I could have been happy marrying. She was pleasant. Sometimes quiet and sometimes effusive . . . but it was definitely a good match that she didn't talk constantly (I like/need quiet sometimes). American (and white) girl, but she was quite rich. Maybe her family's money helped her be more content? I'm not defending American girls, but I've also had girlfriends who were: Canadian, Indian, Mexican, etc. Yet …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:47 PM
10

Thinking a random woman is attractive; thinking a random woman isn't attractive.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:41 PM
1

You/somebody could also link the image on their yelp page. I can't as I have no yelp account. Or don't - there's a good chance this blatant misandry will turn off a lot of people who just walk by the windwo.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:35 AM
3

substantially affect the quality of life
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:04 AM
10

that's good. hope there isn't any backlash.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:07 AM
1

http://www.yelp.com/biz/masonic-grand-lodge-of-california-san-francisco afaict, this is it. maybe it isn't. all i know is that i was walking with a girl around there and she complained about a male-only libary. i can't find any others, but i also can't find anything saying that this library is male-only.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:41 AM
2

http://www.change.org/petitions/sf-mayor-lee-toss-ross-suspend-sheriff-mirkarimi-now supposedly, his wife told neighbor (who is part of NOW) about some abuse. wife publicly said that this is a fabrication. most assume her public statement to be a lie - so she doesn't get in trouble with her husband. the NOW creature has interest in the sheriff's election opponent. . . . . hmm, should we ban the proper spelling of 'sheriff' since it contains the word 'she'? 'scheriff', 'shariff' . . fuck it - 'co…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:33 AM
6

i was in the military, as were most of my older male relatives. great-uncle died while flying a plane during the invasion of italy. fuck you.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:40 AM
5

what was the name of the woman who bitched about -no women in special forces- right after the news of bin laden's death? serious question.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:38 AM
1

also, you think obama is amazing. i voted for van buren.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:36 AM
2

. . . I always heard the lyrics as "Bitch want Red Lobster? I'm thinkin' Burger Kang", but quick google says otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 09:36 PM
1

There is a men-only library where I live . . however, it is only for upper-class males. There's also a men-only (? maybe it isn't anymore) gym, also for upper-class men. There are a lot of female-only things though.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 08:24 PM
2

it's sad that you're downvoted w/o explanation. yay, more proof of zealous idiots in every group.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:47 AM
1

yes. i just came back here to say you gave me a little doubt in my view on his intent, but then i read more of that wiki: Vonnegut himself has connected the story to recent attempts to make people equal using the language of political correctness. According to this argument, the respectful treatment of all marginalized groups may be a slippery slope, as “Harrison Bergeron” suggests. If we begin with the equal treatment of male athletes and their weaker female counterparts, for example, we may en…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:51 AM
2

that doesn't take away from my point. vonnegut was liberal but this doesn't prove that he was for whatever you think he was for. it's like saying every republican is for war.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:29 AM
4

no, it isn't. for one thing, left-wing doesn't mean retardedly affirmative action. it's like saying orwell was a left-wing guy - 1984 was a parody of what left-wing ppl want.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:13 AM
2

i don't want to muddy-up this topic with discussion on animals, but sorry: it seems to me that humans only follow their base desires for the most part, too. animals might be less base than you think. first example that i thought of is the two dogs in the aftermath of last year's earthquake in japan. one was badly injured and the other wouldn't abandon the injured dog. they were different breeds, so it wasn't even a family thing. it has been shown by science that dogs object to unfair treatment t…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:18 PM
2

Um, how do animals wallow in narcissism and hedonism?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:00 PM
1

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron]
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:13 PM
2

"alludes" not "elludes" haven't checked if anybody already pointed this out. sorry if somebody did. "the word is elude and it means to escape, either physically or mentally". "allude" means "to refer to". pardon if you already know this and it was a typo.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:02 AM
5

http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2010/06/07/overanalyzing-the-shame-and-guilt-issue/overanalyzing-the-shame-and-guilt-issue-2/
/r/MensRights31/01/12 01:16 AM
4

have you had girlfriends? if so and you're lucky enough to have avoided naggers, good for you. i've had 30-40 girlfriends and i can count on one hand the number of them who didn't nag or stopped nagging when i called them on it. if i include girlfriends of friends i might have to use both hands.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 08:02 PM
2

because he complains? Complainers Prisons . . . hm . . . rubs hands together
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:52 AM
7

toward females too. like protesting Hooters and similar stuff.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:39 AM
1

Oops, just remembered that there (at least used to be) a 1 day wait period before being able to post.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:06 PM
18

pretty sure the housework in these complaints doesn't include things like mowing the lawn, fixing the car, etc.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 07:39 PM
2

Yes, and they're generally arty, non-conservative looking. My dad was angry about it though, but he was the only male to get upset.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 03:56 PM
4

I live in super-accepting San Francisco and have heard plenty of racist cattiness when I was with an Indian girlfriend. Same thing when I lived in the Mid-West. Always from white women.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:21 AM
5

eh, still not a reason to get up in arms over it. at all.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 03:28 AM
15

probably just a troll. would have been more specifics (even if vague) if real.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 09:17 PM
1

it isn't also, whoa, this thread got weird.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 05:22 AM
3

this comment: "The rise of the internet and digital media has certainly been a boost for onanists the world over. I do wonder if the concurrent rise of a more independent female cohort has something to do with it too. Perhaps the young men of Japan can't cope psychologically with more self confident women ?" LOL, you moron. the men are coping just fine. it's the women who are complaining. Also, the article mentioned the nuke crisis . . a while ago somebody commented that it was all/almost all me…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 10:07 PM
6

'34 bad economy then, too.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 11:05 PM
0

uh, i'm currently drunk and barely understand whay you mean. but "backhanded" doesn't sound good. anyway, glad you're still here.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:16 AM
0

you know what that means - feminism is good for men, too!
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:16 PM
1

"clueless" is a lot like "loser" - it doesn't really mean anything, except to shame men.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:06 PM
1

do you have the same log-in on Fark?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:01 PM
9

what surprises me most about this - Kmart still exists.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:03 PM
1

true. it could be seen that way though.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:11 PM
2

please don't dismiss a historical tactic because you don't like the context. i'm not xtian either, and i saw this coming.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:00 PM
1

missed the very obvious parts of the article in which he is talking about the west and the usa?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:49 AM
2

since i was circumcised, i read stuff about the protest against circumcision for a while, agreed with it . . . then ignored it b/c i'd rather not think about it too much. i'm certain that i wouldn't advocate male genital mutilation. but i also know most people have a very low opinion of this controversy, so i feel focusing on issues that have a lower chance of of being derided. so, to answer your question, for this subscriber - i just pass over this issue on this sub.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:04 AM
2

hahaha “family annihilator” — a subcategory of intimate partner murder-suicide.Family annihilators are murderers who kill not only their wives/girlfriends and children, but often other family members as well,before killing themselves.7 of course!
/r/MensRights10/10/11 07:07 PM
2

if i were open to getting married, this is not something i would worry about (even if it makes me unwise). i just don't care about number of partners. maybe it has something to do with how i know i get bored with having sex with the same person over a long period of time.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 09:08 PM
1

a network that thinks its purpose is to tell me why it's justified that no Christian prayer was allowed at the memorial for a plane crash even though several other religious prayers were wow (not christian either) edit: i was kind of hoping canadian female mra was you. better that there's more than one, rhough.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 09:59 PM
2

I blame Tony Romo and Jerry Jones.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 07:40 PM
9

time for me to man-up and get married
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:34 AM
18

also - women always have it worse!
/r/MensRights04/10/11 10:02 PM
1

stop having sex with women who don't like sex. stop having sex with women who aren't good at fucking.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 10:00 PM
1

so vote republican! they do so much more for you! in case you haven't noticed, Ds have become more and more republican, while Rs have become more and more . . . well, for the rich. PS - i didn't vote for obama, nor did i vote for mccain. i threw my vote at some independent. . . . and though i was happy obama won, since then i have decided to only vote for independents. not just because of m/f issues.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 02:46 AM
-1

why is this downvoted?
/r/MensRights27/09/11 03:13 AM
2

i thought this post was funny, so upvoted as for your original post . . . how about looking at it like this: whiteknighting for the uber-rich is like WK-ing for women. they're both extremely privileged (. . and they both bitch about needing more all.the.time.) edit - and you could look at as both of them wrecking the economy.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 02:57 AM
3

So recording someone against their will or knowledge is illegal is that true? so somebody could be in court facing rape charges and say, "i have an a/v recording showing that it was not rape" . . . but that evidence would be inadmissable?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:58 PM
0

yes, there are some women in the comments saying what a stupid list this is, but all those who are in agreement . . . more proof of lots of cunts complaining about the littlest things. thanks for the reminder of why i avoid romance.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:52 PM
1

yeah, well i'd vote for mccarthy, lol
/r/MensRights25/09/11 08:27 AM
5

the big scary republican monster is scary. and kind of buggy (so are the other big parties). sorry, just putting this here to show that not all anti-feminists are republican.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:32 AM
6

not really worth reading, as it is just more hyperventilating, but if you feel like raging at an idiot . . .
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:33 PM
3

i was debating this with myself last night - there are different disadvantages for both black men and black women.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:18 AM
7

right, I did that first. problem - ppl i'm arguing with won't feel that stuff is proof enough. oh, well. this looks like a lost cause.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:18 PM
6

sincere thanks, but nothing from her opposition?
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:05 PM
1

searched, but couldn't find. so now i'm trawling through all of my comments. annoyed that afaict, i can't start at the oldest comments.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 06:14 AM
1

yeah, makes me want to search for the thread.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 05:57 AM
2

SCUM manifesto. and countless others but - notamonolith,notamonolith,notamonolith
/r/MensRights17/09/11 11:46 PM
10

I think it was right after i found reddit and r/MR and a thread about homelessness came up. somebody claimed that there are just as many (if not more!) homeless women, but they are hidden away by the patriachy of the homeless society. lol
/r/MensRights17/09/11 11:31 PM
1

has anybody ever gone to that sub and asked what they think of all the main issues of the MRM? i just went there for the first time b/c of your link and got curious.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 11:24 PM
14

as offensive as that comes across, i am convinced of it.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 07:47 PM
3

hopefully it's time to ban the completely useless BarelyHumanTroll.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 11:53 PM
1

nfl guy is guilty of rape. or knowing a rapist. or maybe not even knowing the guy all that well, but still. so smear his name! before the other guy is even convicted. if you were young, had more money than most people and had people come to your home . . . and one of those people may have committed a crime, would you want your name in the news for having something to do with the crime? and have people saying shitty things about you? even if that crime were something less reviled, like stealing a…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:11 PM
1

if a man is more picky about sex partners, there is something wrong with him. also, when an undesirable woman just won't give up, then gets angry and vengeful at the man she desires, men are expected to . . . i dunno, give in? it has happened to me many times. lots of guys act a certain way around horny, unattractive women. i used to treat all women the same, but it got me sexually harassed.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 07:32 PM
3

off topic, but you and gww are the two people with whom i agree the most. so thanks for being there and being square.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 10:22 AM
2

(some time, but not much desire to go all into it) this could be a good thing, but the prevalent attitudes in which it will be implemented will almost certainly make it a bad thing.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:51 AM
-4

besides my not having the time or desire to address other stuff (possible positive and negative things about this) . . . this is the same place that likes the idea of a man tax? huh.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:47 AM
4

"VAWA for example has ridiculous "primary agressor" policies where the man is arrested automatically in certain states. Feminists did this because the first introduced "mandatory arrest" policies which led to an increase in female arrest rates by 446% compared with mens 37%. Feminists hated that so they invented the extremely discriminatory "primary agressor" (aka arrest the man no matter what)." do you have a link to evidence of this? headache right now and cursory look at your pdf hasn't shown…
/r/MensRights07/09/11 11:48 PM
1

is there text of what he said in his criticism? i haven't read the article or anything else about this case, but am i correct in assuming a professor was fired for saying something . . . in a place (college) where you are supposed to criticize ideas. edit (w/o using the edit button), now i've read the article, and yes, that is what it is about. fuck alksdjf qpoweiy bhugiq8-90437 jsfsjf92834
/r/MensRights07/09/11 11:28 PM
15

porn?
/r/MensRights03/09/11 12:26 AM
56

looks like Temseh and the sorority girls are part of rape culture
/r/MensRights30/08/11 12:40 AM
17

cool, i'm going to shut down the local Curves because they are witches covens.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 05:22 AM
-1

should set up a project to funnel faminist funds to NASA in order to have the moon or mars an entire world for women. oh, but wait, then the women would bitch about not having the good life on earth but if the men are shipped off to the moon/mars, women will bitch about men getting all the glory hmm, take all the money in the world and bribe god to kick all the men outt heaven.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 07:46 PM
0

cool, when do we get spaces free from: cattiness, false-rape accusations, screeching voices, boring conversations about food/shelter/clothing? oh, BOARDROOMS, amirite?
/r/MensRights17/08/11 07:20 PM
1

. . avoid the noid?
/r/MensRights17/08/11 06:42 AM
2

but, ah, maybe naive (not retarded) to sign up thinking you'll do some good, only to be shocked at some atrocities?
/r/MensRights14/08/11 11:27 PM
-4

in case the 2 downvotes so far aren't from a wet blanket . . . care to explain the reason for the downvote?
/r/MensRights13/08/11 10:08 PM
6

You're trying to compare I love Lucy to the Holocaust! lol, thanks for the first laugh of my day!
/r/MensRights11/08/11 09:30 PM
1

yeah
/r/MensRights11/08/11 07:49 PM
5

ever consider that you're That Person here? p.s. tbf sometimes you say useful things
/r/MensRights11/08/11 06:33 PM
2

Q: Do you want to keep women barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen? no, i wouldn't be happy with a woman like that. Q: Do you want to make women subservient to men? nah, I can't stand being bossed around. i only boss others around if they are shitty to me and wouldn't be happy in a relationship in either situation. Q: Do you pine for the olden days, when a man could beat his wife with impunity? well, those days got nothin' on these days when a woman can beat on her husband with impunity! Q: Do yo…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:09 AM
1

all good points, and when i saw the headline i also thought of the few women who i've known/seen playing chess . . . i still can't think of anything in which women are better than men. (this from a guy who doesn't want women to be inferior, but was raised with the typical women can do everything better than men! . . while we tie your hands behind your back. i'm sick of the BS.)
/r/MensRights11/08/11 02:59 AM
4

text book invasion of her private-see!
/r/MensRights11/08/11 02:17 AM
6

so you're saying she has an invisible abdomen? or he has x-ray vision? we need to clear that up, or i'm going to bring up some more nonsense.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 01:04 AM
2

how old is your son?
/r/MensRights10/08/11 11:26 PM
5

or religion
/r/MensRights09/08/11 11:32 PM
6

yeah, that too.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 06:36 AM
18

lol I love people who speak with great authority about history while making it clear that they know little about it. hint: Puritans haven't been around for "a few millenia"
/r/MensRights07/08/11 06:30 AM
4

I'm mostly liberal . . . and I think most libertarians are naive.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 06:09 AM
2

does "opposed" equal "opressed"?
/r/MensRights07/08/11 06:06 AM
2

and i love the bat-guano. keep it coming.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 08:30 PM
6

I'm going to go with "more than half". but this is a guesstimate.
/r/MensRights04/08/11 06:20 PM
1

bashful means "shy"
/r/MensRights04/08/11 09:10 AM
0

yeah, makes me impatient for The Joker or whoever to show up.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:16 PM
0

Wonder if it is safer to fire men than women.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:25 PM
5

I wonder how many of the mothers who kill their kids do it because the children were there to cement the marriage? "Guess I don't need my child anymore!"
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:24 PM
2

so it's like being in church/temple/etc? yet another instance of women being sacrosanct.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:46 AM
1

huh, pretty sure i saw them on that tour.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 09:15 PM
6

proving once again - sarcasm doesn't often work on the internet.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:56 PM
0

and anarchist at the same time.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:45 PM
7

they will date guys who make less than they do. at least they date me, but they won't marry a guy who makes less than they do.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 05:27 AM
3

"might"? I mean, I'm man enough to take this advert, yeah! I coat my balls in brass when I watch TV; molten brass. (I haven't actually seen the advert.)
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:26 PM
3

but then, an hour later, i have this thought - people notice and take more interest in things if there is drama/conflict.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:07 PM
1

YES!
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:46 PM
15

not entirely on-topic, but i realized after a while that all my -feminist- girlfriends did absolutely nothing for women or women's rights. they were feminists only in that they were angry at men and, of course, me. most ppl, after hearing/reading anything i say about men's rights end up shunning me. i don't mind losing them.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:16 PM
1

I'm . . . 47?! I expected to be lower.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:04 PM
4

needs to be said twice! (serious and joking)
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:54 PM
6

now, 12rjc12, you know that's not the issue here. you know that if she wasn't offended, we should all coax her into seeing the light.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:28 PM
2

big ups w/ the vote button seriously, i'm proud of you
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:50 PM
2

did a guy write this? I haven't read it, but I'm not a fan of women telling me what kind of women I should be attracted to, nor do I appreciate men doing the same.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:14 AM
1

but you can w/ misandry, correct?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:36 AM
3

yup
/r/MensRights17/07/11 11:16 PM
1

ever notice that men are more likely to joke and laugh at shitty situations? it's almost like women feel that they are sacrosanct
/r/MensRights17/07/11 11:15 PM
7

no, because patriachy
/r/MensRights17/07/11 11:00 PM
1

playing like girls = bickering endlessly playing like men = getting shit done fuck you Plaschke and your lack of neck.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 10:53 PM
5

what have they "been through as women"? why the fuck do young women feel that they have been oppressed long before they were born . . . i mean, other than that it justifies they're shitty actions and attitudes.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 10:47 PM
5

I wonder if all these complaints will be dismissed with the usual MRM is a bunch of _______________, who should be ignored.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 09:34 PM
1

huh, you've opted not to respond/threadshit to girlwriteswhat's points. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights16/07/11 10:22 PM
1

eh, I tell people that I vote outside of the main parties when things aren't close. and when voting in a red state/blue state boondoggle (like I'll vote for the best Dem in a primary . . .) and I try to convince people who don't vote to vote; usually this is a waste of breath/typing.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:50 AM
4

1 - I was exaggerating. I would vote for a female politician if the opponent was shitty enough. 2 - remember the rabid supporters for hillary in 08? something is needed to counteract that.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:43 AM
-4

and this is why I will not vote for a female politicians. especially when I consider that there are many women who will vote for a female just because of her vagina.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:35 AM
1

tips hat
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:09 PM
4

upvoted, thanks. i wasn't aware of that. but i'm going to pretend it means: hydrogen trotskyism. or hammering Thor.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 07:21 PM
3

oh, goody, it's moderated. good chance that MRM points won't get through. you go, Big Sister!
/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:52 PM
6

so . . . she's openly admitting that feminism is a female-superiority movement?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 08:43 AM
1

no! sounds way too wishy-washy. you're new suggestion is good.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:22 AM
2

yup
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:21 AM
1

no, you're married to an adult child
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:03 AM
1

would say "know thine enemy" but then, most of the stuff is the same shit over and over again.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 09:05 PM
16

ever notice how nothing is as bad for men as it is for women?
/r/MensRights14/07/11 08:23 AM
2

exactly how I feel.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:28 AM
-1

anybody make the excuse that the husbands wanted to become lady-boys, anyway?
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:27 AM
1

yeah, when ever i encounter these kinds of arguments, it seems to me that feminism is exactly like arguing with a gf/wife who is never wrong, forever re-offended, manipulative and immune to logic. not that i've ever had a gf, i'm too repulsive. but i have been married and do owe and owe and owe CS and alimony.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:20 AM
1

oh, sorry tht I was unclear. I meant that spellcheck shows me that I misspell far too many words. Even easy words, like "definite". My mention of this was merely my way of saying, "I'm not perfect, either".
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:18 PM
-1

then . . . (some) women should stay away from men. they could form their own country. it would be best for everybody; i'd love to have a lot less shrill harpies around. but then the women in their new woman-only country would have to stay away from puberty and thus getting menstrual cramps? other options: stay away from jobs in which they claim to be discriminated against. stay away from all creepy potential rapists. etc.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:49 PM
1

Yeah, I know. Bad habits, ugh, yo P.S. I'm sometimes surprised by spellcheck; there are too many words that I have been misspelling since . . .
/r/MensRights13/07/11 07:16 PM
1

is this directed at me? if so: what did i misspell? where is the bad grammar?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:57 PM
1

this is what i came here to say. while sitting on the toilet just now i had a Eureka! moment when i thought of correcting the bad grammar of posters in this sub. it would help teach allies how to express themselves more clearly. of course, that would essentially require my to start using my shift key and be a less lazy typer. (yes, i'm exagerating a little about it being a Eureka! moment, but i really do think it would be a decent idea.)
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:11 PM
1

i agree with both you and Factory. he's being harsh to you, partly b/c he is rightfully scared of what women are allowed t get away with. and people can't make fun of things like this happening to women, b/c women are sacrosanct. i find myself raging about women . . . sometimes going on and on about shit like this story to women i know IRL. women who are understanding that this is nonsense . . . b/c there are other women who just don't care and who will interrupt with diatribes about the evils o…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 05:24 PM
4

this is good news - for one thing, i'm sure the misandrist harpies would like to and are aching to descend, but possibly the fact that the are WOMEN commenting makes them check themselves! a good sign pointing to MRM making a difference, i hope.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:57 PM
3

2nd
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:55 PM
1

oh, finally had the time to read more of the article and realize my mistake. sorry, seems very likely that this has nothing to do with me. still reading this (as confusedly and incompletely as i did) was a shocking reminder that i have no idea if i am a father or not.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:42 PM
1

ok, thanks to the two of you for filling in for my laziness and lack of time. but what i read was that the beginnings of this case were in "the midwest" once again, i cannot require you to do the research for me.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:34 PM
1

ok, thanks
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:31 PM
2

um, sorry to keep talking about myself. but does anybody know in what city this guy lives? because i just realized that it was about 14 or 15 years ago that i had that encounter. and the girl was blonde with blue eyes. and it was in the mid-west. yes, i'm being serious and honest. read the beginning of the column. don't feel like googling to try to find out where he lives, but if nobody wants to tell me i'll get around to it later.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:36 PM
1

met a girl a long time ago and she seduced me. i could call it rape, but i enjoyed it (and she was hot, a local model) - i was in a place in which i didn't want to rush into sex with anybody. later, like 9 or so months later, i saw another guy (who i knew was with her), pushing a baby carriage down the street. i certainly wasn't ready to have kids at that time, but it's disturbing to think that i might be a father. i don't consciously think about it often, but when i do it feels very strange.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:01 PM
3

not for false rape accusers who didn't file an official complaint, right? i know one who merely spread lies to people she knew.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 07:54 PM
4

upvote; yes, don't allow them to steal the language.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:08 PM
2

yikes.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:51 AM
2

really, i should stop making references
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:43 AM
6

it's a song. i think by steely dan. "are you crazy, are you high, or just an ordinary guy". sorry, thought everybody had heard it
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:42 AM
3

no, you're high or maybe just an ordinary guy.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:27 AM
2

it was a joke u wouldnt have a boner if u were a girl
/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:08 AM
0

then you wouldn't have had a boner, now would you?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:52 AM
1

apparently she didn't say that. i thought she did. guess other feminists did say that, though.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:24 AM
2

link? really want to read about a book burning feminazi, so i hope you're not exaggerating. if you are, that's okay.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 01:17 AM
5

i don't worry about what you have to say b/c the one woman you had sex with is less attractive than the 25 that i have. nyah-nyah! p.s. are you against slut-shaming?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 12:02 AM
2

why does he get short-changed on the number of virgins? b/c he didn't kill any heathens, just himself?
/r/MensRights10/07/11 09:44 PM
1

ok, thanks !
/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:19 PM
1

Father Time also key to youth disappearing: studying instead of partying sorry, had to.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:10 PM
4

wife/gf yelling at husband/bf in public = misogyny husband/bf yelling at wife/gf in public = really dangerous misogyny so i don't care a lot about the public perception of misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 10:07 AM
1

i respect that and was going to leave it at that and not reply but gotta add that it is frustrating - so many ppl do as you do. with the result of shitloads of disaffected who don't vote having their gov't run by jackoffs who do vote. e- i didn't downvote you, btw.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 08:09 AM
3

shows you a map here there be crazy women. and here. and here. and here. over here there are some crazy cunts. and here. and here.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 03:01 AM
1

to what address? i lived w/ somebody who owned the selfish gene and read more than half of it. but i'd like to send an email in support.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:53 AM
2

no, she claimed that a guy almost raped her. got blown out of proportion to -he may as well have raped her-. taking attention away from the whole conference and turning it, like everything else into WHAT ABOUT THE WOMENS?!?!?!
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:51 AM
1

good point. i see this as a likely scenario. yes, some xtians are crazy, but not as batshit as feminazis. and, yes, it is reasonable to call them feminazis when they act like this. i hope dawkins stands up to the pressure.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 02:49 AM
1

ok. i've got a lot of friends w/ similar views. but you're not licking their hands by voting against a political machine if you vote for somebody who isn't going to win. what are you going to do instead? nothing? they're fine with that. violent revolution? difficult and about the same thing as casting your "useless vote" against them - as a single militant in an armed rebellion, the quantity of the difference you make isn't likely to be that much higher. kill yourself? they're fine with that, to…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:32 AM
5

but let's focus on getting more women to be chairmen of the boards, wooo! that's not preferential treatment, but trying to get more men to be teachers would be. anyway, if you succeed in getting more men to be teachers, we'll just accuse them of pedophilia!
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:02 AM
6

yes - it's a problem. i'm mostly liberal; haven't voted for an R ever for a major office. and i encounter the same shit (not in school though, that wasa while ago). most liberals are total hypocrites about MR - "there are a lot of obvious laws and mores which totally discriminate against men" "NUH-UH!!!!"
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:58 PM
1

i like you and agree with things you say on here . . . i'm just sometimes shocked (. . . SHOCKED!) when i fervently agree with on some things are also in favor of things/people i'm fervently against. this includes men who are !!you need to coddle the womynz, boys are bad and evil!!!! and whatnot. sorry, just had to share. i didn't vote for obama in the general, btw. figured he'd win. plus i live in a blue state. so i did what i do in those instances - voted independent.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:26 PM
2

please consider voting anyway. vote for somebody outside of the the two main parties. vote for somebody outside of the 3 or 4 main parties (if you count libertarians and tea partiers as "main") that's what i do - gives some support to a better party system. and it tells the main parties "look, support is growing for people we weren't taking seriously" and voting doesn't take that much time.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:20 PM
3

you may as well. lots of people will be engaging in bestiality, necrophilia and all sorts of things they wouldn't normally do - because her being elected is one of the signs of the end of the world.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:14 PM
16

ugh, does the person that suggests this realize that african-americans did this for white people before desegregation. further proof of the pushing of men into 2nd class citizenship.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:44 AM
3

yes, all of this ^
/r/MensRights08/07/11 06:41 AM
1

maybe she wants to replace blind worship of the gods in religion with the blind worship of women? either that or she hasn't thought things through.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 05:43 AM
3

nah, thinking that way is like retreating. like if a man were to say the same thing b/c he didn't want to be associated w/ elevator guy and his heinous crimes. all of his heinous crimes, of which there are too many to count.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:58 AM
0

soon "to corner a woman" will mean everything and anything including occupying her thoughts for a moment.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:55 AM
2

i can't bring myself to fully agree, but i'm starting to see the point in the idea - "women are begging to be treated like children/put under sharia law" i sure as shit don't want to be anywhere near these buffoons.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:53 AM
2

wow: Sexual advances are threatening and intimidating to the less powerful person in any situation of vastly unequal power. In the context of this incident: Rebecca, a woman who is, just by virtue of being a woman, a severe minority in the freethought community in which she was participating, in the enclosed space of an elevator, in the middle of the night, with the isolation of any potential allies being far away and/or asleep, was in a position of vastly unequal power. somebody else: That is w…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:51 AM
0

and for someone who's anti bullshit (at the comment that any woman could get away with these crimes), you jump to a lot of conclusions about me, wouldn't you say?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:53 AM
1

good points in there however, i don't have a&e. if i did, that's not exactly a good source, is it? i'd have to watch it for at least several hours, wouldnt i? and not all women get away with those things, true. but those who do -empower- those who might want to try. why don't you spend 5 minutes googling. you don't need to post what you find if you don't want to.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:52 AM
2

durr, but it's perfectly legitimate to focus on the accused man's past.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:33 AM
3

you're right, there is no reason to talk yes, i did read the original comment. and your original response - the one in which you began the insults. the one in which you claimed you could give us all a list of men who got out of jail free. you still haven't done that.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 12:04 AM
4

huh, insults. when i asked for the examples you said you could provide. i don't watch A&E, because i'm not a fucking idiot like you. and what problem am i a part of, shit for brains? the one that offends you by calling attention to women being dealt with softly in law? asshole fuckface shitass?
/r/MensRights07/07/11 11:38 PM
7

can you do that, then? other than OJ, i can't think of any men who got away with murder recently. i can think of numerous women who got away with murder.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:59 PM
3

dork-shaming alert!
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:45 PM
2

i put some effort into coming up with stuff for this list. only thought of vonnegut's non-fiction in which he describes his parents - mom was crazy verbally/emotionally abusive to his dad. this was in the 30s or sometime around then (going by the fact that kurt was a soldier in WW2). it was one of the things to tip me off that it wasn't always men abusing women before feminism. it's in one of his collections of essays, speeches, etc.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 09:27 PM
6

haha, good point. i forgot about that junk. remember how rabidly defensive female fans got about it - "how dare you make fun of twilight, on an anonymous forum?!?!?!?" seems to me very similar to "how dare you even think misandry exists, everybody knows women have it sooo bad!!!" and it seems like the twilight fantasies are very dear to some women, which is strange. btw, i like your name, l_l . . . mine sucks.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 08:58 PM
8

and ugly women hate sexy women. and fat women try to convince men that fat women are better lovers/partners . . . as well as shaming the men for having "too high a standard" women of one group do their best to make the other group of women seem unappealing. it's really pathetic.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 07:51 PM
1

true
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:15 PM
1

and he was a really masculine guy, but in a very different sense than hemingway. his devotion to writing books in all the major categories of the dewey decimal system.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:55 AM
6

also - if women have the right to not be "slut shamed", men should have the right to NOT be shamed for even thinking about MRA stuff.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 10:44 PM
1

i've considered wearing a ring to deter (and i guess sometimes attract) women. before that goofy rom-com came out. but you're idea makes more sense
/r/MensRights06/07/11 09:44 PM
6

rape is bad though. and sex is good. sarcasm
/r/MensRights06/07/11 09:30 PM
3

the movie is terrible the end of the book was rather abrupt, i thought. also, funny that you mention it - he was betrayed by a woman and that's the way they finally got to him. the dog in that story made me incredibly sad . . . which reminds me, i should get a man's best friend.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 09:10 PM
3

yeah, everybody says he's a bad writer. kind of true. he definitely didn't write flowery prose, but he did write very clearly, which i appreciate. another thing against him is the supposedly 2D characters. and the only characters he wrote more depth into are basically -isaac- himself. i disagree.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 08:12 PM
2

i read that when i was a kid and loved it. barely remember it now though - strangely do remember where i was sitting as i read it though, huh. not entirely on-topic, but i think isaac asimov and kurt vonnegut (both younger than EH) were also titans.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 07:01 PM
4

I hope you're serious, because that's fucking insane.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:53 PM
-1

because WOMEN, that's why. shut up!
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:35 PM
2

i'm a creep and a troll and i feel terrible about it
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:20 PM
0

i can only recall having two female bosses. one of them wanted to fuck me. got angry when i didn't. job went to shit. that's okay, though. i was oppressing her!
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:13 PM
1

. . . i just told a male friend about the inane skepchick almost raped story. whenever i tell friends about crazy misandry, i get apathy. even from friends who see through other kinds of bullshit. even friends who aren't allowed to see their children. it's totally wtf?! so, yeah. just reinforcing my appreciation for you and this subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:11 PM
1

just random-ish wondering why you and women like you would put so much effort into bashing something that could give you a -leg up- then i realize that it means you/ppl like you are putting sense above selfish ego. which makes me have hope for people. and then i realize how rare it is. which makes me less happy. also, was drunk. like so drunk i woke up and am still drunkish. ow.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:46 PM
2

and no, i'm not just covering for MRAs
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:54 AM
6

like i said in my response to rantgrrl . . . i don't think that's a good thing one of the things that makes MRAs superior to the BS of feminism, is actual equality. and i'm not cool with some guy getting off the hook. whethet it's because he a male or rich or whatever.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:53 AM
1

(i haven't read anything other than /r MRAs about this story) and i am fond, overall, of your posts, . . . but sometimes wonder if F mras are just in it for anti-feminist rewards. you've just show that you're not full of shit, so thank you i'm drunk and sorta new to reddit, so have no idea how what i posted will be taken, but all of it is serious. smiles
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:50 AM
4

true but we've already started convicting people of maybe-they-thought-it-crime. sorry, i'm drunk and angry.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:23 AM
1

but . . . aren't you a scary man?!
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:32 AM
7

yes. it was sarcasm born of frustration.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:18 AM
0

ok
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:33 PM
2

disagree - IME, unattractive women often object the most and the loudest when a man they don't want hits on them. it's like they want everyone to hear LOOK AT ME, GUYS DO LIKE ME AND I AM BETTER THAN THEM BECAUSE I'M REJECTING THIS ONE had no idea whether she was attractive or not til i read these comments.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:29 PM
0

it gets even better - (some) women fly into a rage if they want you to introduce yourself to them by talking . . . and you don't do it. doesn't occur to them that they could take initiative. but of course sometimes they want a guy to try so that they can shoot him down.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:24 PM
-8

women aren't scary though - even though they can and do stuff like this. except when women want to be scary - men should figure out how scary every woman he encounters wants to be, and act accordingly.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:19 PM
4

lol, you'd still take this position when women bitch about men these days, right?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 06:01 PM
4

nah, the two i'm thinking of are both very attractive, have boyfriends all teh time (and have uni degrees). it seems like there are more and more women who see the misandry in feminism.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 01:33 AM
6

lately i've noticed a lot of women who don't like feminism. i think they were a lot more rare just a few years ago.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 12:31 AM
8

i think this is the best comment i have ever seen on this board. i'm considering creating an alt just to upvote it again (not really).
/r/MensRights05/07/11 12:16 AM
3

fyi - communist countries are supposed to be "2nd world countries" at least that's what they were when i was in elementary school.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:43 PM
6

um, he said "one of the luckiest men" and the general idea is - it is rare to find a woman who doesn't hate men. it's even rarer to find a woman who fights for men's rights. and probably rare to find a well-written women who does all of the above. (i also hate that one of the most fulfilling things in the world is to have romance . . . but what can you do? would be awesome if science came up with something to counteract that need, but it hasn't happened)
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:14 PM
3

another vote of thanks from me. seriously, thank you for working tirelessly against this nonsense.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:07 PM
1

so vote for micheelle bachman? seriously - i'm disappointed in obama for at least a few reasons, but the only real alternatives are much worse. e: also, it's "affected" not "effected" sorry, but that drives me nuts.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 10:46 PM
3

i know it's common for women to expect to be paid for . . . but i've had lots of women pay for the majority of dates and stuff. all of them were either rich or had rich parents though. plus i'm picky about personalities (still, this didn't prevent me from encountering other crazy misandry stuff)
/r/MensRights03/07/11 10:53 PM
5

please answer rantgrrl's question.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 08:03 PM
2

yup exept, PATRIACHY, you asshole!
/r/MensRights03/07/11 12:21 PM
13

yay! fuck innocent until proven guilty! the feminists say so to gain power, the republicans (and now the dems, too) to gain power. let's all merrily skip, while cowering in fear, down the road back to the dark ages. also, anarchism is good if she's in charge and gets her way, der. i'd rather live in a society of dogs. they have a better sense of morals than humans.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 12:09 PM
10

do (some) women being sexy drive men crazy? does that bother the women who can't drive men crazy with their sex appeal? naaaaahhhh!
/r/MensRights03/07/11 10:27 AM
11

and when they do respond it is with that sort of sentiment very very rarely is it: that poor guy
/r/MensRights03/07/11 04:19 AM
2

my opinion is that it's about sex-power. (male) rapists are people who are very frustrated w/ the power women have over their desires, so they take away the resistance to the fulfillment of those desires by raping women. then there are all the women with rape fantasies. my opinion on this is that these women want men to have unbridled desire for them. but there's also the whole pain fetishing. i've been asked to pull sex partners hair. this doesn't do anything for me . . . but i try to oblige (a…
/r/MensRights03/07/11 01:32 AM
7

you must've forgotten - women!don't!rape!
/r/MensRights03/07/11 12:10 AM
2

true, and i prefer the pornstars who seem to have the most going on behind their eyes.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:25 AM
1

banal?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 04:01 AM
3

do they though? do they, really?! because almost every time i've seen men and women using together (not that i do that sort of thing, ever), the men consume more of the substances. sorry, i'm bored. even though i'm aware that this isn't funny, i have to click -save-
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:07 AM
-2

i'd rather the mother feel shame. instead of playing the -find somebody else to blame- game
/r/MensRights27/06/11 08:07 AM
2

sorry to hear that sucks when people bite the hand that feeds. or the hand that shelters.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:27 AM
2

nevertheless, it's still really nice that she's doing this for those three, even in the face of opposition from her family.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 05:01 AM
1

also, i know that census workers counting of homeless people was a lot of guesstimating. i'd imagine the same process takes place here, but i could be wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:55 AM
1

maybe . . . but probably not ; ) is that where you live?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:53 AM
2

i didn't vote at all on either post, but sometimes a pointless negative reply deserves a negative, nearly useless riposte. also, thank you for sticking up for the issues with the people in your life. especially when many people consider even thinking about them to be a vile idea.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:34 AM
-2

i don't understand why this was downvoted, so i upvoted it for you.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:29 AM
10

good point oddly, the only time i've been homeless was a few months after i got out of the service. it only lasted four or five days, thankfully.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 04:00 AM
4

lol! you, at least, got me to laugh. and got me to realize that even in this west coast city that i call home (where there are way more homeless people than anywhere else i've been), i'd estimate that the %85 of the homeless are men. and all of the homeless women are unattractive.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 03:58 AM
1

haven't read all the replies yet, so i'm not sure if this has already been stated . . but have you ever heard the guideline: *attractive *intelligent *sane pick two. the idea being that it is so rare to find somebody who is all three that they may as well not exist. this has fit my experience. i'm really picky about personality/intellect and appearance, so i've mostly dated crazy girls. the trick is to find an insanity that you can live with. as for a direct answer to your question - i dunno, ma…
/r/seduction27/06/11 03:46 AM
3

minor correction - both men and women shame men for asking for help.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 03:32 AM
1

no worries
/r/MensRights27/06/11 03:14 AM
10

could you explain this "forced by males" thing? because i read that and my first thought is that women tend to avoid being seen in situations that aren't considered respectable. even minor things like being single on valentines days. e: i really am curious for an explanation.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:57 AM
2

i've never heard that. citation? just for the lulz i have heard people imply that women who are homeless are more deserving of help . . . for some untenable reason.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:53 AM
2

i agree with you for the most part but are you aware that sf passed the No Sit/Lie law? i'm not sure how effective it is though. also, the west coast has a lot of trust-fund homeless. kids playing at being homeless. they have laptops, cell-phones, pets (even cats!) and credit cards. san francisco pays for their pet care, which i think is absurd.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:45 AM
12

seems like women are also pitied more and more often - ppl will take them in but wouldn't do the same for a man. also, aren't there women-only homeless shelters? another thing is that this is similar to the men are both more intelligent and less intelligent at the extremes. so, this isn't irrelevant. feminists often complain about men having so much power and money, while ignoring the fact that there are a lot of men without either.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 02:37 AM
2

how many times will this have to happen before the issues are taken seriously?
/r/MensRights25/06/11 07:11 PM
3

i'm aware that it happens all the time . . . but i have no idea how people like her are taken seriously.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 04:04 AM
1

thankfully, i'm not that bad. but i do catch myself being more nice to cute girls and it bothers me.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 11:13 PM
5

how far away are we from holding people like the son-in-law accountable for driving the women in their life to these sort of acts? adding to my own comment: the MRM's existence is probably one of few things in the way of that happening.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 11:08 PM
2

yes. i don't mind all that much that women can go out and play with the desire of various men. it does piss me off that they feel like they can be angry at the reaction that they get though. for instance, i read things online (like this reddit) and i know i'm going to get pissed, but i don't go out and burp in the face of old people or something - while expecting them to pinch my cheek, smile and give me a piece of hard candy.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 06:44 AM
1

anecdotal - a long-time friend of mine is female and stupid. she almost admits that she's stupid: "i'm a feeler, not a thinker." was hanging out with her and her daughter and (another female) friend of hers. the daughter was going to india with her grandmother; her first trip outside the US. the two adult women both graduated from college; i dropped out. in public school, i was put in mensa type classes. i am a lazy fucker. but also the kind of fucker who has problems with being shit on, as i wa…
/r/MensRights23/06/11 06:40 AM
1

uh, sorry. first self-written thing. small second paragraph shouldn't have looked like that. also, thank you, MensRights subreddit, for giving me a place to blow steam about this.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 05:44 AM
1

uh, sorry. first self-written thing. small second paragraph shouldn't have looked like that.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 05:43 AM
12

start with: doesn't believe women are always victims of jerk men. work from there.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:19 AM
15

this made me actually cry. sorry, man. (guess a picture is worth countless words)
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:56 AM
3

not sure exactly how old i was; somewhere between 4 and 7 i guess. but the judge asked me who i wanted for a parent. i picked my dad and that's who i got. kind of an odd case though - mom divorced dad and disappeared, then tried to get me back after she re-married and had another kid. i didn't know her; she just felt entitled to having me.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 09:33 PM
-4

i have no idea how common this is, but i often have high-school girls rubbing up against me and stuff. kind of uncomfortable since i'm in my 30s. most likely they are just testing their sexuality, still isn't fun to have my libido toyed with. also, i get sexually harassed by unattractive women and gay men. i'd like to criminalize unattractive women and gay men
/r/MensRights30/05/11 06:13 PM
1

x-post to two-x that would be a good band name. sorry, had to.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:53 PM
1

thanks for bringing this to my attention. i was excited when i saw CA, but i don't live in that district.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:50 PM
1

yay, politics!
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:08 PM
8

could there be a similar reason for giving engagement/marriage training to women? "he' terrified of you!"
/r/MensRights17/05/11 08:20 PM
5

"that require men to never break up with a woman unless she is 100% in agreement." yikes, don't give them ideas!
/r/MensRights17/05/11 08:11 PM
10

not going to happen, but i look forward to the Find a Way to Blame a Man Game for this crime.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:49 PM
10

“If they want to practice FREE-ER speech, they can choose to go to a different school where such rules are not in place,” she wrote. UGH!
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:57 PM
1

haha
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:54 PM
1

my comment wasn't an attack on you. i was voicing my boredom.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:33 PM
1

the way women tend to be vague/send mixed messages about things = "pay attention to me, think and talk about meeeee". it bores me. doing it with sex is the basest way to do it.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:31 PM
3

just to make it clear (to me, anyway), it isn't entirely the OP's fault that he treated women 'like glass'. but yeah, a good point
/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:12 AM
0

the -children- of your post . . . such tedious shit. just another way to get attention by being vague.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:47 AM
1

it wasn't supposed to make sense, that was the point.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 06:02 AM
1

"(That's a book on the subject. Maybe there are summaries and stuff available somewhere?) Patriarchy doesn't mean men. It means the entire system of society as it has been organized for centuries and which we are just beginning to overcome. How long can we say that woman have genuinely been viewed as equals of men? Obviously wasn't the case in the 1950s, but where we can we draw the line and say "okay, women became equals NOW"? This means that women not only were viewed as non-equals by men very…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 09:49 AM
1

yes! and we should also censor what the damn liebrals say! or is it just good when it's because women, that's why! shut up!
/r/MensRights10/05/11 09:43 AM
2

is there any way 90%+ of your posts can be automatically upvoted by me? -smiley face-
/r/MensRights07/05/11 06:13 PM
5

men going their own way
/r/MensRights07/05/11 06:00 PM
2

cool, thanks.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 04:17 AM
3

won't someone think of the . . kangaroos?!
/r/MensRights04/05/11 12:42 AM
6

does anybody have a link to that document? thanks.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 11:02 PM
3

that's what i figured
/r/MensRights03/05/11 05:25 PM
1

is there anything like that for the reverse?
/r/MensRights03/05/11 04:32 PM
2

is there anything like that for the reverse? oops, dbl post, but to clarify - anything remotely similar, but applied to women for men?
/r/MensRights03/05/11 04:32 PM
6

i'm sure that's part of it but it's due to the status quo of: emotionally imbalanced women does thing which negatively affects others - blame men. man, due to emotional imbalance, does thing which negatively affects others - blame men.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 06:21 AM
1

did this sort of thing start (or become more prevelent) with the OJ trial?
/r/MensRights14/04/11 03:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter