~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homebody? Workaholic? Even then, AWALT. | Rant/Venting | rabidoctopi | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 03:54 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | A Starters Guide for New TRP Followers with Social Problems and Bland Existences.it must be hard to live with that rod up your ass. Project much? He has chosen hobbies and activities that he likes and that expand his social circle. Reality is, novelty is highly effective for expanding social circles, which is what this post is about. How is your comment helping anyone? | /r/TheRedPill | 02/04/18 10:39 PM |
| 1 | How do I not hate myself for being female?Wait, but it is controversial bile. Here's why: the difference in the standard deviation of the male and female IQ curves is not so enormous, certainly not 10:1 at 145. For high-achieving positions like surgeon or physics professor, anything over 130 is sufficient for great achievement within the field. The different in the ratio here is maybe 1.5-2 males : 1 female. So the pools of capable candidates are not equal, but they aren't substantially different. | /r/RedPillWomen | 23/02/18 06:25 AM |
| 3 | The Talk is Socially Retarded, Don't Do It.In my experience the type of high value men we are seeking here are honorable and not inclined to cheat. So do you consider it cheating or not? High value man or not, honor is not involved if exclusivity is merely compiled from nonverbal cues, because nonverbal cues do not a promise make. Of course this doesn't mean every man WOULD use this carte blanche, but the problem is more in the failure to establish clear expectations. Does following someone else's leadership mean that you should abnegate… | /r/RedPillWomen | 23/02/18 05:17 AM |
| 4 | The Talk is Socially Retarded, Don't Do It.Not having a talk about commitment would seem to mean that a guy could NEVER cheat, because the commitment wouldn't be specified. | /r/RedPillWomen | 23/02/18 04:28 AM |
| 0 | The Only Real Reason for School ShootingsCall me some person under the banner of the "fempire," but I think it is a reasonable to avoid (ie ostracize, when done en masse) somebody who glorifies weapons (Florida guy) and/or says really creepy things--like that he dreams to "flay [men who women interact with or flirt with in public] alive, to strip the skins off their flesh and make them scream in agony as punishment for living a better life than me." (Elliot Rodger's manifesto, recording a conversation with a friend). Boys and girls ali… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/02/18 05:02 AM |
| 1 | Let’s Talk Female RatingsAs the curve is for all women, and, as you say, it would be naive to extrapolate from average female behavior to the behavior of the girls that you're interested in, then you can't dismiss only the messaging behavior curve in the graph but actually the rating curve as well. That takes you all the way back to square one. Further, you've shifted the goalposts from "the bottom 80% of men get nothing, zero, zilch, nada. No interest from women at all. The top 10% get all the attention" to what I pres… | /r/TheRedPill | 10/08/17 03:52 PM |
| 2 | Let’s Talk Female RatingsYou said that the scale isn't laid out according to how women see the world. This is still confusing me because my estimate of them receiving interest was based on what I've seen out on the street. Such guys frequently have women flirting with them. Care to clarify? Looking at the graphs, I don't know that it makes sense to ignore the blue line. Women messaging men should theoretically be correlated to interest and therefore their actual attraction that they act on (what they do rather than what… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/08/17 09:12 PM |
| 1 | Let’s Talk Female RatingsWait, wait, wait. So you're saying on a scale like this ( http://imgur.com/mMyag9s ) most men are 2-4? But most women on their scale are 4-6? I acknowledge that my impression of male attractiveness may not be representative, but to me it seems like all the guys on that scale 6-9 would have plenty of women interested in them, given what I've seen irl. Are 6-9 really the top 10% and 1-5 as the bottom 90%? When 6-9 would be, what, top 37% on the women's curve? | /r/TheRedPill | 08/08/17 08:43 PM |
| 1 | Let’s Talk Female RatingsJust curious, what do you think the distribution for men is then? | /r/TheRedPill | 08/08/17 08:17 PM |
| 1 | "I'd hate to have to settle for a mediocre man"To be fair, if as you say men date "up, sideways, and down," their partners, women (I presume we're assuming heterosexuality), must be dating down, sideways AND up. | /r/TheRedPill | 01/08/17 12:55 AM |
| 5 | Looks like I just took the red pillRight. Easily refuted: 1) Society acts like it owes women everything and kisses the ground they walk on while it puts men through the meat grinder. 2) Men don't owe women anything, but in a just world women would owe men everything because it's only thanks to men that they have any rights at all and any standard of living. The world is built and dependent on men and is maintained despite women rather than because of them. Oh, and they suck every individual man they can dry of all his resources. … | /r/TheRedPill | 28/07/17 04:52 AM |
| 3 | The Fall of LeoYou don't need to conclude that Katy is a horrible terrible person... You can lead with it as a starting assumption because AWALT. Leo (and all men) is only to blame in that he doesn't realize that is woman's nature. Even Mother Theresa is guaranteed to have just been putting on a facade. | /r/TheRedPill | 27/07/17 08:25 PM |
| 1 | If we're going to talk about how important parents/fathers are, we need to have a basic understanding of what's going onHow am I validating your point further? I admit my mother did not aspire to achieve the highest status position in her chosen field, but by making herself indispensable she did make her own position that was awfully similar in power and compensation to the higher status position for PhDs. She worked long hours. Had she chosen to get the PhD and the lead investigator position, the difference would have been largely immaterial. I think I would have been worse off had my father made her devote less… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 01:06 PM |
| 0 | If we're going to talk about how important parents/fathers are, we need to have a basic understanding of what's going onRight. Of course the only benefit of a two parent household over a household with a single father is to show children that women's place is in the home as domestic help. I know there are a number of people that love to bash women here, but quite frankly it should be obvious that EACH parent does quite a lot to instill values in their children (not just relating to women's role) and help them grow into functional adults. Just compare the outcomes of fostered kids to the kids of single moms. My mo… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 06:50 AM |
| 1 | Homebody? Workaholic? Even then, AWALT.No, I'm not Indian. Irrelevant anyway. More than 4. Since she's guaranteed to have hamstered some away. What's the multiplier? 3 or 4? Point is, there are no good girls. She cheated on her bf with that boob thing, and had string free sex for years. She told me once that she was still sleeping with Chad because she was growing comfortable as a sexual being with him. That she had ended a relationship in high school because she was ashamed of her body and having sex, and Chad made her feel like she… | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 08:57 PM |
| 1 | The Post-Third-Date Awkwardness of Not BangingYour action plan is appropriate. A relationship shouldn't be guesswork; you should be able to talk things over. U/JvSOUL is right that banging isn't necessarily slutty, but there are the other people here that believe an n higher than 0 makes you worthless as wife material. As I assume that's your goal, it's appropriate for you to look after your long term interests but be respectful and cognizant of his desires. The people here advocate men put themselves first. Why should you not do the same? | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Homebody? Workaholic? Even then, AWALT.Nah, man, the best thing I can say about this girl is that she knows her stuff. She's not talking about science to posture. It's her shit man, she's obsessed with it and good at it. Politics is a hobby for her, but that's not to impress people, either. She has more insightful things to say about it than most guys I know. And she doesn't hijack conversations for it, she's selected a group that shares her interests and enjoys such conversations. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Homebody? Workaholic? Even then, AWALT.Yeah, that's two people in college. By her own admission she fucked two others in high school. So by rp rules that means she's fucked more than 4 people at 22. I know there are bigger sluts out there. But this is to show that even the good girls are like that. They won't stay with you even if you employ dread. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 05:17 PM |
| 1 | Homebody? Workaholic? Even then, AWALT.She had sex with a guy who by her own admission treated her horribly, by hamstering herself to the irrational belief that maybe he would treat her better/be willing to be her boyfriend now that they were sleeping together. It didn't change anything, he still insisted she would never be girlfriend material, but she continued sleeping with him for a year and a half anyway. She hamstered away her feelings for the guy, and then continued to pursue meaningless sex with him. In the second year she wou… | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 03:56 PM |
| 0 | Homebody? Workaholic? Even then, AWALT.Maybe I was unclear? She went from being a plate for this alpha musician for a couple years to an LTR with the other guy, the scientist. This other guy is not a Chad. The AWALT in this situation is that she tolerated/escalated to sex with a guy that treated her like shit, and then after two years decided that she owed the guy who plated her no loyalty. Took no time (just two months after calling it off!) to find a boyfriend. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/17 05:22 AM |
| 2 | Zero sugar will change your body and lifeIdeally, most to all the sugar you consume should be consumed with fiber, because fiber is extremely beneficial in large amounts and sugar is healthiest in small amount or when it's absorbed slowly so your blood sugar doesn't spike. To be clear, fructose is still healthy... so long as it's in moderation. Conversion to triglycerides is helpful so long as you're not absorbing excess fructose and therefore producing excess triglycerides and excess glycogen. That said, there's far too much fructose … | /r/TheRedPill | 16/06/17 05:22 AM |
| 1 | Zero sugar will change your body and lifeNo, sorry for the ambiguity. I'm talking about the fructose/glucose ratio, and specifically the comparison between the apple and the poptart. It may very well be that the fructose/glucose ratio is a little more than 2 for poptarts, too. I just don't have data on the number of grams of each. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/06/17 04:51 AM |
| 2 | Zero sugar will change your body and lifeFrankly, by saying that there isn't that much fructose in an apple, that passage is horribly misleading. Stonefruit, for example, not only have smaller amount of fructose, but the fructose:glucose ratio is lower as well. The only condition it can possibly be true for is in relation to crazily sweetened processed foods like a poptart. And we don't even know if the ratio is actually different. It might not be. In which case the beef is really with total sugar versus fiber anyway. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/06/17 04:02 AM |
| 1 | Zero sugar will change your body and lifeI've never read that book, although it does allude to my point about fiber, but an apple has more than two times as much fructose as glucose. https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2122?n1=%7BQv%3D1%7D&fgcd=&man=&lfacet=&count=&max=50&sort=default&qlookup=apple&offset=&format=Full&new=&measureby=&Qv=1&ds=Standard+Reference&qt=&qp=&qa=&qn=&q=&ing= Compare to broccoli: https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2871?n1=%7BQv%3D1%7D&fgcd=&man=&lfacet=&count=&max=50&sort=default&qlookup=broccoli&offse… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/06/17 03:44 AM |
| 3 | Zero sugar will change your body and lifeI appreciate that you're trying to inform people, dude, but I got to set the record straight on a few things for the sake of science. Regular white table sugar is sucrose, which is fructose and glucose fused together. It tastes sweeter than glucose but less sweet than fructose. The big problem with high fructose corn syrup is that it's really sweet, but fructose fails to trigger the feeling of satiety, or fullness by itself. So you eat more of it than you should because your body doesn't tell yo… | /r/TheRedPill | 16/06/17 12:36 AM |
| 1 | Trying to understand my girlfriendThen thank you for the concern, but I am happily "doing" most of the time. And thanks for the critique of my writing--I'll work on that. | /r/TheRedPill | 07/06/17 01:25 AM |
| 0 | Trying to understand my girlfriendWow, that's impressive. The one thing I asked for (a clarification of what you meant by "if a woman says it, she says it because it benefits her to do so"), you managed not to give in your whole large post. As for everything else? I specifically said my goal was not to get into an argument about everything in the list; it was to demonstrate that there are corresponding traditional and giving stereotypes exist for women as they do for men. It seems like you're saying they (traditional giving ster… | /r/TheRedPill | 07/06/17 01:17 AM |
| 1 | Trying to understand my girlfriendLol thanks for the platitude. Have a good one. | /r/TheRedPill | 07/06/17 12:44 AM |
| 1 | Trying to understand my girlfriendIf we don't logically evaluate our own interpretations of what's around us, how can we be rationally secure in the veracity of our beliefs? It becomes a matter of faith in dogma otherwise. If you have an actual bone to pick with the logic, be my guest. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/06/17 08:43 PM |
| 1 | Trying to understand my girlfriendThat's a very unhelpful "correction." When you said, "if a woman says it, she says it because it benefits her to do so," what DID you mean if not that your interpretation was dependent on the assumption that the speaker was seeking personal benefit since she is a woman? And yes, your post was obviously not a proof (not that I said it was), but men giving and women taking was the subject of the discussion, wasn't it? And yes, you can list a lot of things that men do to give. That's not sufficient… | /r/TheRedPill | 06/06/17 07:58 PM |
| 1 | Trying to understand my girlfriendYou have assumed that my standard of intellectual honesty is to react the same way if a man or woman said it. And that is simply not the case. Let me explain: The assertion in contest was that men are self-sacrificial whereas women are seeking personal benefit. When presented with a statement that if true would contradict that assertion, your interpretation of the statement was dependent on the assumption that the speaker was seeking personal benefit since she is a woman. (Correct me if I misund… | /r/TheRedPill | 06/06/17 06:50 PM |
| 2 | Trying to understand my girlfriendQuick verification of intellectual honesty: she says she grew during a relationship to keep it together, and with that information alone you've interpreted that as her partner helping her grow, ie she's still receiving rather than giving. What about if a man said the same sentence? | /r/TheRedPill | 06/06/17 06:05 PM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Anecdote vs. statistics, dude. Anyway, enjoy your easy and simple life then. You've sure shown little old me. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/17 04:39 AM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Sure, of course there are going to be girls that would say that they would like to be a stay at home mom. My very same physics buddy has a dream of being a stay at home dad. Big deal. If you can't see the difference between that and statistics belying the capability of people, then small wonder you've failed to learn from the surprises and twists that life is sure to have thrown at you. Life is far too complex for you to have it all figured out. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/17 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Yup, and you repeat all of the unfounded assertions again. You're essentially taking a few assumptions and claiming that they explain one observed fact. Never mind there are other explanations that require fewer assumptions to explain declining happiness. For example, since we're talking averages, being expected to do work fulltime out of the home while still burdened with the lion's share of cooking and cleaning. And you can google it for yourself to find that women are far more likely to do th… | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/17 02:56 AM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Unfortunately, I believe you're right that there's nothing more you can say. Same assertion that women artificially enjoy high achievement, with flimsy substantiation. Wish you would actually substantiate it. And although I don't agree with your explanation, I should point out that women being brainwashed to pursue careers against their own happiness is logically incompatible with your earlier claim that people can't be taught to deny their natural proclivities. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/06/17 12:39 AM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Didn't we already address that the difference in capability is not that great (really, I encourage you to look at the ratio at IQs of 130 and above)? Isn't that how we got into the whole socialization conversation, because that was your alternative explanation for why women make up just 5% of physics professors? And while I agree that the lede of the article is prejudicial and unhelpful, what evidence do you have that this school is demonizing men and putting men down? That the top 16 ended up b… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/06/17 10:51 PM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.What you just quoted and dismissed was literally a paraphrase of what you said yourself: "Women aren't socialized to enjoy physics. One because men are actually better at it. Two women don't actually enjoy it as much naturally." Furthermore, it's clearly not true that people will pursue their natural inclination regardless of what they are taught. Examples: suicide bombers and celibate priests. We can agree that they have natural drives to live and have sex, yes? I'm sure you can think of thing… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/06/17 09:49 PM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Where we started and what I was trying to address by the example of physics was that you can't explain widely different outcomes on the basis of differences in intelligence between men and women. You have now acknowledged that by pinning the difference in outcome for physicists on socialization (seemingly based on the assumption of a difference in intelligence) rather than an actual difference in intelligence. So then maybe we'd have to go back to your culturally Marxist commentary. Are we reall… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/06/17 09:11 PM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.I agree with you: women who produce the top caliber of academic work (I'll define that as the best 5% of work) are outliers. So are the men who produce the top caliber of work, by the very nature of the work being better than the rest, at least by two standard deviations. Similarly, I agree with you that most women are of average intellect and men have more variance, but I will point out that most men are also of average intellect. Because the peak of the normal curve for men is still centered a… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/06/17 07:50 PM |
| 1 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.So correct me if I'm wrong, you're talking about the school rather than the article about the school. And the top 2% being women is because of cultural Marxism cutting down the boys to raise them up rather than because of the relative achievements of those particular women. Not that I'm disagreeing that school doesn't heap some extra challenges on young boys eager to be active, but the women I know (and statistics) would lead me to believe that this should happen at least every couple of years w… | /r/TheRedPill | 02/06/17 04:13 PM |
| 5 | Media praises Arlington High and its graduating class because the Top 2% were all women. Imagine if the genders were reversed and the Top 2% were all men.Are you seriously saying that men rightfully earn academic distinction but women don't? | /r/TheRedPill | 02/06/17 06:22 AM |
| 1 | I Am the Girl Sleeping With Your Boyfriend: Confessions of a SidechickGotcha, so it's not that women shouldn't hang out with other women, it's just that their interactions are terrible. Though I would argue that showing off and influencing each other is something men do as well, even to a similar degree (though not about how much money their girl makes). But we wouldn't say that it means male friendships are cancerous. This forum knows full well that it's beneficial to have male friendships. My problem is mostly that I've seen a number of people treat women having… | /r/TheRedPill | 31/03/17 05:01 PM |
| 4 | I Am the Girl Sleeping With Your Boyfriend: Confessions of a SidechickI genuinely don't understand. Women shouldn't hang out with other women, because that's toxic, but women also shouldn't hang out with any men because AWALT. So... should women just be social hermits dependent on their man? | /r/TheRedPill | 31/03/17 02:43 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter