TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

radrler Archive

View 4 posts and 352 comments by radrler on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

radrler/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:51 PM
19

radrler/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:31 PM
2

radrler/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:46 AM
0

radrler/r/MensRights29/06/13 10:51 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Have you had a chance to use it?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:53 AM
5

Also this: Women have the privilege of being given preferential treatment in a crisis This is just plain false, if you are at all familiar with actual crisis management. True, many people expect women to receive preferential treatment in a crisis, but it is by no means a done deal. Also, op is a teenage troll.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:20 PM
18

Those alarms have been going strong for four hours now. It seems we may have a Dr Phil on our hands.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:16 PM
0

Yes, it could mean that. Or it could mean men get luxurious new prisons with arcade rooms, while women are shipped off to dank and wet barracks somewhere. As far as this news story goes, it really could be either one. You can't just take neutral facts like this and spin them until men are somehow the victim, that's textbook feminist tactics.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:54 PM
0

Are female prisons so overcrowded, closing one means freeing all the inmates? Were there even any inmates in said prison? Do we know what happened to them? Did they go free? Were they shot and piled into trenches? Are all subsequent female arrests just going to result in the perp walking free? We don't know that and there's no reason given in the article to assume as much. It seems like a logistics issue more than a gender one.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:40 PM
-9

A female prison is closing. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Oh wait, nobody gives a fuck. Try harder.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:29 PM
12

Read the comic. It gives off a very anti-rape-victim vibe. IMHO, at least.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:22 PM
8

Again, slowly: rape victims are not the enemy. The enemy is those who would absolve women of all responsibility for their personal safety and place it squarely on the nearest man. This means, more often than not, other men. This is not what we should be up in arms about.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:18 PM
1

"grabbed her phone" /thread
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:02 PM
30

I am against scrutinizing rape victims to find how they contributed to the event. It's cruel and unnecessary. Teaching rape prevention (aka common fucking sense) definitely gets worse cred than it deserves.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:00 PM
5

My non-working father literally oppresses my working mother and I couldn't get laid to save my life. I'm a bad MRA :(. In all seriousness, I really should leave such things to less embittered people.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:56 AM
9

But if you did, you'd holler, right? Sorry...
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:53 AM
2

Pfhaha, let's not act like he wouldn't go out of his way to say cunt as much possible whenever his mother was around. FYP
/r/MensRights27/08/13 12:30 PM
4

And if that doesn't happen, "escorting" her out like a bouncer on your way out would also work. So, how's prison?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:30 AM
5

Oh, I know all about that. Women often feel entitled to use the men's room, no qualms about it. Point is, not all of them do and I don't think "punishing" the asshole ones is worth alienating the rest. We're not fighting a goddamn war here...
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:26 AM
0

And that's why I never use urinals. Not because of women, but because I hate to have my junk out in public view. If having to use bathroom stalls seems oppressive to you, you may want to rethink your priorities.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:03 AM
6

Um... you guys are being obnoxious. I accidentally entered the women's room once or twice and would hate to have all this passive-aggressive bullshit dumped on me...
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:02 AM
9

That's not the issue, though. The issue is, males want to see themselves as big and strong and women want to see themselves as voluptuous and attractive. To claim otherwise is willing ignorance. Player character characteristics reflect that. Feminists, as always, deny reality and claim victimhood.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 10:10 PM
29

Also, anybody who argues from the male=agent;female=victim viewpoint is completely full of shit.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 07:41 PM
10

Agree with Feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:50 PM
9

From my experience, you probably made a top-level comment. What is a top-level comment? GASP, you don't know? Banned! Boom! Haha, go free expression and exchange of ideas! But seriously, us muggles are only allowed to reply to comments on r/Feminism, not to the OP. They're doing a swell job of clearing that up, mostly because it makes it easier to ban dissent.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:35 PM
2

Yes, that is OP's logic and no, it's not rational. Feminists try to ground everything back to rape - which has somehow become this ultimate PR weapon of theirs - but that doesn't mean we should be doing the same. Rape is only rape when it's fucking rape. It's not rape if you revoke your consent post-factum.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:20 AM
1

My mother tried to indoctrinate me into chivalry (and, mostly, succeeded...), so coming to terms with the concept of MRM and questioning Feminism's axioms has not at all been easy. I absolutely agree that we should challenge gender roles, but that means all gender roles at once. It is criminal exploitation to "liberate" only one part of society.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:44 PM
5

Because they're not equivalent. You are not an adult if someone else is responsible for your well-being. This is particularly glaring in Russian speaking countries: women are fully emancipated and still men are viewed as "head of the household" - by women. Words like "feminine" are thrown around as insults - by women. Men are expected to be stronger and more decisive, and are held to task when they don't live up. The view of women as property or children is one of the trade-offs they make for a …
/r/MensRights16/07/13 03:32 PM
2

Like I said, it's not something to strive for. I just want to emphasize, that women in more, ahem, traditional societies aren't these poor victims of their husbands, in need of saving. They have an arrangement where every partner gets their own perks.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:53 PM
1

This is regarding Afghanistan: GWW has a very good talk where she explains the actual Patriarchy. Basically, Afghan women aren't only oppressed, they are also provided for and protected. Obviously, it is not something to aspire to, but the important distinction is men don't oppress their wives and mothers and daughters, they're slaving away at work and going into harm's way for their families. If you focus solely on the women (as feminists are want to do), you don't get the whole picture. Wester…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 01:32 PM
4

...Women chose to stay home? Um, no. Never said that. They got to stay home, yes. Also, clearly you aren't living in the modern day, where most women work. ...and still want a man who makes more than they do. Women are the ones trying to balance out your "sexist, sexist history." Stay-at-home dads are becoming more popular because women WANT to work, not stay at home. Good. I feel like you harbor some deep-rooted hate for women because you think we have these choices. Ever try living in a woman'…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 01:31 PM
2

Ah. Well, I suppose that makes sense.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:54 AM
2

Versus normal history classes where we learn all about what men have done, 99% of the time. Guess why? Because women got to sit at home and raise the kids just like they do now. Because a man spends his whole life trying to please and impress women, while women get to sit back and fucking CHOOSE. That has nothing to do with the sexist, sexist way history happened.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:29 AM
8

TRP don't care about men's rights. TRP think we are all losers who should grow some balls. TRP places sex above all other values and are simple pragmatic in how they pursue it. Fuck TRP.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:25 AM
3

Sex is the currency they put out FYP
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:23 AM
5

GWW has a very good talk where she explains the actual Patriarchy. Basically, Afghan women aren't only oppressed, they are also provided for and protected. Obviously, it is not something to aspire to, but the important distinction is men don't oppress their wives and mothers and daughters, they're slaving away at work and going into harm's way for their families. If you focus solely on the women (as feminists are want to do), you don't get the whole picture. Western women (supposedly) trade bein…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:59 AM
-6

Seriously, mensrights is about as far from TRP as you can get...
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:21 AM
6

Will Smith? Is that you? Oh, Mr Putin, then? What's that? Random loser on the internet? Newsflash: you are betа as fuck.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:12 PM
1

They don't actually see it that way. To them, it's all about equality. They just have a very poor grasp of reality. Regardless, please stop comparing their ramblings to people getting gassed and turned into lampshades.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 08:03 PM
0

Without invoking the No True Scottsman fallacy, this is nowhere near the goal of mainstream feminism. Feminists do seek to make men responsible for every single female want and need, but they don't seek to exterminate men at all. Not anyone with real influence.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:50 AM
0

"Feminazi" is a disgusting slur that makes you look like an angry teen. While feminism is a highly unpleasant movement, they are lightyears away from nazism. Neither are feminists all powerful, as Texas demonstrates. Stop paniking,
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:54 AM
6

Patriarchy hurts men, too. Actually, it's mostly men. Like, a crushing majority. Women sometimes get hurt, so technically, saying it hurts women and men, too is grammatically correct.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:50 AM
2

Feminism is all about playing the victim. Men defined by their contribution (to women, no less) - perfectly normal and these pussies better not complain. Women defined by their ability to control men? Sexism!
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:47 AM
1

...except it only applies to, you know, men.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:44 AM
2

My pleasure.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:42 AM
12

Doesn't claim his body. Perfect consistency.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:42 AM
-5

The worst thing is that a whole lot of conservative women actually encourage young men and boys to act masculine and not talk about their emotions. All women do that, period. Feminists demand men throw themselves under the bus for strong, independent women without batting an eyelid.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:41 AM
-5

See? Patriarchy hurts men , too.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:39 AM
16

Yes, this is exactly the kind of argument I was expecting. It really would be nice to see how much of that money went to groceries.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:47 AM
3

Let's just say they won't pull any fire alarms over it.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:14 PM
2

I'm sorry, but there is no rape culture. The only place where rape is accepted and encouraged, is in prison. Do you mean that rape culture? I'm guessing no...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:28 PM
1

Enjoy: http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/ Our chart shows how men have rated women, on a scale from 0 to 5. The curve is symmetric and surprisingly charitable: a woman is as likely to be considered extremely ugly as extremely beautiful, and the majority of women have been rated about “medium.” The chart looks normalized, even though it’s just the unfiltered opinions of our male users. As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as worse-lo…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:35 AM
1

It's still bad.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:18 AM
-2

A woman's body is a precious treasure everyone craves. A man's body is a weapon to hurt women. Obviously, we need to protect the former. /s
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:49 AM
1

No, many people in the MR recognize that men and women are different. It is unfair exploitation of men under the banner of "equality" that we oppose. Also, feminists don't actually want a uniform, shaved head society. They just want men to keep their head down while women do whatever they please.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:20 AM
35

Because it sounds like (and likely is) bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:24 PM
1

Nice idea and useful data, but horrible, horrible infographic.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:22 PM
1

I'm not sure whether to tell you to fuck off back to /r/TRP, or /r/Feminism.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:10 PM
2

Step one: Post "men only" wanted ad. Step two: bask in the warm, shrieking glow of the Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:27 PM
1

While there is some truth to your post, I find attractiveness plays a role mostly at the extreme ends of the bell curve. That is, extremely attractive women will have an easy time finding a partner and extremely, ahem, homely ones will have a hard time. For the average looking, it's mostly about personality.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:21 PM
1

Oh god... flip the genders. Same response?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:05 PM
3

... You should feel obligated to prevent any sort of sexual activity FYP
/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:06 AM
2

Oh screw you, Brad...
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:32 AM
1

Because it's men doing one and women doing the other. See? Easy. :)
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:31 AM
1

All I meant, was that painting it as "women hurting themselves" is wrong. Certain women are making all women look bad. It's not a "women objectify themselves" situation. Of course, it's definitely not a "men objectify women" situation, either...
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:39 PM
-8

How is this different from "violence against men is mostly by other men"? It's wrong regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:57 PM
1

Good point. Go pick another one.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 11:28 AM
11

But are they rational baboons?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 11:21 AM
-1

Dictionaries are not passive aggressive.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:08 AM
2

From what I've seen of feminists, they'd see right through to the end result and go utterly apeshit. Probably dress it up as misogyny and an attempt to control women by refusing them sex. They certainly are capable of it.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:50 PM
1

Oh, haha. Nice having you :) I don't think it counts as feminist representation, though. If they banned you, that is.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 07:06 PM
1

And you still think they want to "communicate"?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:05 PM
6

I think that solution just found a problem :)
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:22 PM
3

I would not. I am giving an example of an opinion that can (and ought to) be ruled out without engaging in lengthy discussion. If you seriously contemplate banning one sex from the Democratic process, your ideology has made you a menace to society. protip: /r/feminism is averse to this notion, but not nearly as much as they should be.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:42 PM
6

Feminists are free to come here and communicate. We are shadowbanned on sight, often with nary a word of explanation. They can keep their police-state forum and discuss their lies among each other.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:16 PM
-6

Your excuse clashes with your stated intent to drive business away from the establishment. I bet you're lying.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:10 PM
12

Um, I'm not an extremist, but maybe - and this is all theoretical - we should chain every women to the kitchen sink. Now don't go apeshit on me, I'm just raising a discussion point...
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:54 AM
1

Better idea: fuck r/Feminism.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:30 AM
1

Surely, op will deliver.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:57 PM
4

We got rid of Hitler but he came back stronger as a she in great number through new bigotry. Well, that reasonable comment escalated quickly...
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:14 PM
43

This is hilarious. "because society thinks men are all sex-crazed, you are not a man for turning down sex." Signed, Feminism.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 06:28 AM
3

Your post is basically one long "she only lied because she doesn't want to be punished, you guys!" Yes, this much is obvious. That's the irritating part.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:10 PM
10

Um... I was tutoring a little boy (in Israel) and he would sometimes act up in public. Nobody cared. People would sometimes give us warm looks, but that's about it. I think the guy just lives in a shitty town (country?). It may have helped that I am caucasian and the boy was black...
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:16 PM
3

My bad, thank you for the correction.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:59 AM
1

feminism was originally about equality, but from an age when women were considered chattel. Bullshit. Feminists never wanted to work in coal mines, nor serve in the army, nor pay alimony. They were more than happy to shame men into military service, by the way. They want what they always wanted: to accumulate as much privilege, as a free society can possibly bestow upon an individual. When they tell you they want equality, it's simply not true. Sorry. I wouldn't generalize all feminists as man h…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:10 AM
0

We aren't against women's rights, never were. You will not see prominent MRAs advocating a ban in abortion or some such nonsense. We will not "stop and work together with feminists", because that movement was never about equality and frankly, I don't trust them to change. We are doing what we believe is right and if other groups want to help, they are free to do so.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:44 AM
5

To me feminism means gender equality, which seems to be the general consensus with MRAs. And Scientology is all about being kind to each other. We oppose what feminism is, not what it claims to be.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 08:08 AM
7

Rape culture has very little to do with what feminists claim it is. The term has been corrupted beyond usability.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 07:50 AM
7

Fun fact: TVTropes no longer has a Rape as Drama page. They used to, but they don't. This is because Murder, Cold Blooded Torture and Fate Worse Than Death are all artistic depictions, but RAPE IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, GODDAMNIT! Fucking annoying, if you ask me. It just plays into the victim Olympics.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:56 AM
12

You don't understand... if men want to change something, they need to make their own movement. Except feminism is for everyone. Unless men want to change something, in which case, we need to make our own movement. But feminism is for everyone.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:24 AM
-1

NSFW, asshole.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 10:40 AM
1

Benevolent?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:02 AM
20

That's just more male body shaming. Nothing to see here, no women have been offended.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:29 AM
3

Now now, that's feminist talk ;)
/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:24 AM
2

I'm sorry, it really is different: a girl's orgasm will not get you pregnant. This is closer, though not similar, to a guy trying to pull out and the woman wrapping her legs around him and yelling "be my baby's daddy!".
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:52 PM
2

Fuck, that is some satanic imagery right there...
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:18 PM
2

Godwin's, man. Don't compare feminists to nazis, they are not nazis. She is a silly girl with narrow horizons, don't take it so hard.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 03:51 PM
2

Nope, I'm pretty sure ejaculating into someone against their will is rape territory. Imagine if a couple engages in oral sex and one of them bites the other in the dick. Okay, I'm not sure what to call that, either...
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:02 AM
1

I work as a barista. We have a mixed male-female staff. Whenever heavy lifting is required, a random man is ordered to perform it. No volunteers, no nothing. They straight up walk up to you and tell you to do it. When I brought it up with a junior manager, she asked, incredulous: "would you prefer if a girl did it?" Now, I am not a small man. I don't mind helping out, something I'm actually quite liked for at my place of employment. However, it is incredibly demeaning to be treated like a slave …
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:55 AM
0

You should be protesting poor English skills, not feminism. All she meant was "don't blame the victim", it seems.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:47 AM
2

Maybe sleeping in a shelter counts as "rough"?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:45 AM
1

This is a scientific study. It is neither good, nor bad.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:08 PM
16

I guess it should be illegal for poor men to have sex.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:08 PM
3

I just think we should be fair. Right now, being a man means you are enslaved to a life of pandering to women, where as a woman can basically do whatever she wants. Despite this, women constantly feel like they're victimized and therefore don't mind breaking a few rules "to compensate". It amounts to men being an almost literal second class.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:46 AM
5

I will probably get banned for saying this ... Hardly. This isn't r/feminism, we don't pretend the world outside this sub doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:00 PM
0

I'm a barista :(
/r/MensRights19/06/13 01:41 PM
45

*Groped.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 01:15 PM
0

It would be more understandable if the wife didn't want kids at all...
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:11 AM
-1

The first is proof women are privileged. The second is the reason why. I don't see a contradiction. Of course, I never called for women to be shoehorned into combat units...
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:51 AM
7

I literally can't imagine that. It'll probably end up like college graduate numbers: women get better grades=equality.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:16 AM
1

This sounds like satire...
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:45 AM
5

I was nodding along and then came this: TL;DR: Betas make excuses and blame others, but wolves don't lose sleep over the opinion of sheep. Oh pipe down, Rex...
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:32 PM
1

Yes, it is a theory (an assertion, actually), but Feminists don't call it that. To them, it's closer to such concepts as "capitalism" or "gravity".
/r/MensRights18/06/13 01:19 PM
2

Feminists just call it "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:45 PM
5

Sidebar this person!
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:24 AM
2

Wealthy white women are going to claim all the plunder and give all the minorities who offered up their political goodies a few blue ties in exchange. FTFY
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:36 AM
16

Fathers, and men in general, had it coming. Yes, tell me more about this patriarchy you live in...
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:16 AM
10

You're insane.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:04 AM
1

I actually noticed I'm more likely to notice any kind of sexism since becoming involved with the MRM. To be fair, my experience so far has been thus: sexist people are sexist. That is, if somebody treats men like robotic servitors, they also think women are completely helpless and would probably die if left to their own devices. This is an exaggeration, of course, but the trend is consistently there.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:16 PM
3

Wow, that's pretty lame :/
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:12 AM
3

I'm sorry, but what did she say? I'm having trouble tracking the source of all this outrage...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:33 AM
1

It goes back to the core idea that men derive their value solely from their accomplishments. Much like women are looked down upon if they fail to reproduce. Wait a second...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 09:16 AM
6

Yep. I tried speaking to my elderly mother about the MRM, but she was just baffled: how can you demand equal treatment, when women are the ones giving birth? Not much you can say to that...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 09:05 AM
-5

I don't mean "abolish the holiday", I mean let's get over the whole panic over people congratulating the wrong parent on facebook...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:16 AM
3

You don't understand! Enforcing equality on men is cool, because of oppression, but enforcing equality on women is obscene and vulgar, because they're oppressed! (this is what feminists actually believe)
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:55 AM
-9

Shut the fuck up with your precious Father's Day already! Oh my god, you're like those Hardest Job in the World mothers, sheesh...
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:47 AM
-1

Okay, stop. Just stop. Enough facebook already.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:57 AM
13

True, but I highly doubt Batman would care either way...
/r/MensRights16/06/13 07:32 PM
2

Rampart censorship of dissenting opinion wherever possible and, on a related note, inability to distinguish disagreement from persecution.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:38 PM
3

Back to /TRP with you! Back!
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:59 PM
5

This is horrendously stupid. I would argue women, as sexual arbiters, have zero to no incentive to be funny, but tying it to gold-digging is just sexist as fuck.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 10:44 AM
1

All publicity is good publicity...
/r/MensRights13/06/13 07:15 AM
1

Again, why limit this to haircuts? It's mostly men buying drinks, why not raise alcohol prices for men? Frankly, I'm disturbed at how averse this thread is to what I'm saying. The MRM should be all about equality.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:43 AM
-2

Because women pay more Huh? So can they now market a "female" parking radar for cars, too? Because hell, all the women I know have trouble parking. Seriously. And can we also call the powertools section Ace for Men? Because it's mostly men using them, anyway. Discrimination is exactly about beating down fringe elements to force the stereotype. And yes, this is discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:43 AM
1

"Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place – that only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization." Aaaaand he's out...
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:26 AM
1

Have you heard of Zigmund Freud?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:25 AM
1

That woman had some really poor karate teachers...
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:17 AM
1

You know, despite this being blatant self-promotion, I'd like to take it as an opportunity. Why do barbers charge women more? That's not very fair. How about having a "basic" haircut, available to everyone?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:14 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:42 AM
5

You seem upset.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:27 AM
2

Unchecked. FTFY
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:18 AM
1

You're right, the article has been amended to alleviate just such concerns.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 10:53 PM
2

She already consented. Consent can be revoked at any time. You should know that. You always consent and make sure you set up a safe word when you get into S&M. That's rule number one of S&M. She wasn't testing to see if a guy consented she was testing to see if her trusted partner could fulfill her needs. Where does it say that? Yes, you have to do these things, I just don't see where she did them. She had no plans of crying rape she just likes rape fantasy. Why can't you see that? Or are you so…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:08 PM
1

Dude, I'm not saying she's a bad person. I'm saying you have to choose: either partners MUST ensure COMPLETE AND AUDIBLE consent every step of the way to avoid a rape charge, or you get to TEST people by pretending to resist with no advance warning.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:42 PM
3

Read it again. This isn't scripted, it's how "best boys" are determined. Just read it again. > No matter who I’ve done it with, my immediate reaction has always been “ow fuck, ouch, please stop.” And I wriggle and I try to pull away, and I panic. The test of a boy that I really want to sink my teeth into is that he’ll keep on going anyway. > The best boys will push me face down into the bed, put their full weight on top of me, wrap their arms around my chest and my throat, and whisper in my ear …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:03 PM
1

How do the numbers stack up, if we define "mature" as "making their own fucking money"?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:53 AM
5

Not at all how I see it. It seems more like a shit test: here I am, removing my consent. Are you man enough to rape me?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:50 AM
3

No matter who I’ve done it with, my immediate reaction has always been “ow fuck, ouch, please stop.” And I wriggle and I try to pull away, and I panic. The test of a boy that I really want to sink my teeth into is that he’ll keep on going anyway. The best boys will push me face down into the bed, put their full weight on top of me, wrap their arms around my chest and my throat, and whisper in my ear that I have to take it. That I should calm down. That I should shut the fuck up. That I’m such a …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:49 AM
8

Remember kids: men are afraid women will laugh at them, women are afraid men will kill them. KILL KILL KILL. Boo!
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:40 PM
2

I understand that and I'm saying it's a very bad idea to call them "white". You're contributing to the demonization of white people, who aren't any more at fault for being white, than blacks are for being black.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:39 AM
-11

First of all, calm down. Second, I don't think it's fair to include society's reaction to a crime in determining the severity of the crime itself. By that logic, robbing a bank is no crime at all, since all that money is insured. If I understand correctly, this logical fallacy is called "appeal to consequence."
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:10 AM
2

"White" opinions is a. nonsensical, since there are a lot of different whites with different opinions, and b. racist, just like "black" opinions. "Inclusive" isn't just PC, it's also more accurate. I'm not trying to be holier than the Pope here, dismissing white people as "bland" or "bigoted" or whatever is a very popular thing to do.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:02 AM
2

No, I meant you using terms like "white" opinions...
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:52 AM
1

Feminist here. I fight against "feminists" with sexist, hateful, noninclusive, white, and violent viewpoints and opinions. Um... You need to work on your diversity skills. Hard.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:45 AM
8

It's also important that feminists know that they can come here and challenge our ideas without censorship (unlike their own forums/SR). It reveals who are being the bullies in the gender discourse. This. A million times this. I'm trying to give them the benefit of the doubt, really, but it's extremely hard when they start badmouthing MRAs and then ban any MRAs who show up to tell their side of the story.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:43 AM
-36

I'm sorry, a false rape accusation is not as bad as rape. Yes, it can lead to life-shattering consequences, but it's not the same as grabbing someone and physically violating them. Assuming we're talking about actual "rape"' where the perpetrator is aware of the fact of rape taking place...
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:34 AM
4

Regardless, it wasn't oppressing anybody.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:33 AM
3

I imagine similar "horrifying" opinions were held about slaves who murdered abusive masters. The baby was nobody's master.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:11 AM
2

Funny story, English is my third language, which I learned mostly from the video games of my youth. Never been to an English-speaking country, either. Regardless, poor self-expression skills are a red flag for me that something is wrong, especially where there is no explanation provided by the author.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 01:48 PM
4

Horrible grammar. Was this written by a teenager?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:12 AM
-9

She is not a feminist hero. Feminists aren't monsters, they just fail to, ironically enough, check their priviliege.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:39 AM
12

Women are better at everything, evil men don't appreciate them.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:36 AM
9

Do we get a source for this insanely high number?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 04:35 AM
1

I see. I didn't consider the fact Jews are a "sensitive" minority over in America...
/r/MensRights08/06/13 04:29 PM
-2

Um... why does it matter that they're Jews? Religious fundamentalists I can understand, but Jews? I'm Jewish, I think it's insane.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:01 PM
18

That's how Patriarchy works: lulls you into a false sense of security and then BAM - you're raped by an email emoticon.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:01 AM
1

It's largely about intent. What's the point in asking "when was it good to be a guy.", unless you're trying to get MRA to talk about 'dem fifties and putting womyn in their place? Or you could just be bored, I suppose.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:38 AM
3

Could you provide a screenshot?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:14 PM
8

Feel free to provide the missing context.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:33 PM
1

Uh... what site? Is this another crazy blogger? What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:31 PM
1

Once again, this is not r/Feminism. Their official policy is acceptance of MRA visitors, but in practice, our posts are deleted and we're shadowbanned, unless we preface every post with a "feminism is awesome, but" disclaimer. Just because people come here with existing opinions, doesn't mean they're not wanted. Trolling and calls to violence are problematic, where as vigorous debate and even vote brigading are not.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:57 AM
0

What do you mean "outside people"? We're not r/Feminism, I should hope. Anybody's welcome to come in, take part and yes, vote on submissions. As long as there's no mod deleting "undesirable" content, I don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:21 AM
1

Honestly: if you need to change or control the behaviour of your partner to be with them, PERHAPS YOU SHOULD NOT BE WITH THAT PERSON. This is 100% how most women feel. It's deeply ingrained in Western culture that it is up to the woman to "make" a real man out of her ape.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:05 AM
1

I agree with you, he has a subsequent post that is considerably less incidiary. I have played my men's rights leanings pretty close to the chest till now but this censorship is outragous, I linked this in facebook as my first men's rights post. So did I. It would seem we're not the only ones complaining.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:52 AM
1

I don't walk around in a skirt, nor do I want to. However, I've caught myself in the past ridiculing men who did. It's wrong. I just wanted to point that out.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:32 PM
1

I don't walk around in a skirt, nor do I want to. However, I've caught myself in the past ridiculing men who did. It's wrong. I just wanted to point that out.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:32 PM
6

Now this is something I don't mind sharing :)
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:03 AM
1

No, I meant the good reason part. What's the good reason? Is it the same reason women don't wear pants?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 09:34 AM
1

If a man did, it'd be taken quite badly and for good reason. Could you elaborate?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 08:53 AM
1

TITLE, genius, TITLE. You can ride around on your high horse all you want, I ain't "outing" my views with "FACEBOOK BANS TRUTH ZOMG", thank you very much. Frankly, this whole thread gives me a distinct impression of "you're either with us, or against us", that's so popular with feminists. You want supporters? Spend two fucking seconds thinking what they think and feel, before dismissing the entire world as conformist sheep unworthy of your attention.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:30 PM
6

Don't get me wrong, I'm not ashamed to be associated with MRM or AVfM. However, because this is such a sensitive and unorthodox issue, anything I say needs to be unassailable, bulletproof. Otherwise, both myself and the MRM get labeled out of the way and out of public consciousness. If the headline was "Facebook censors political infographic", I'd share it gladly.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:56 PM
1

Yeah well, here in the real world, people instantly dismiss you if they get so much as a whiff of crazy. Lots of crazy in that title. You stay right, Mr Quixote.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:17 PM
7

Like timdusuyo said, it's not about appeasement, it's about being taken seriously. If I start foaming at the mouth, screaming words like TRUTH and GEORGE ORWELL everywhere, the only cause I'm helping is that of Feminist censorship.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:54 PM
21

Extremely disconcerting. Unfortunately, I am rather disinclined to share this on my wall, since the title is so off-putting. I'm not asking PE to make himself more to feminists' liking, I just don't want to look like a lunatic to my social circle. BANNING THE TRUTH just screams lunacy, even if it happens to be an accurate description.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:08 AM
2

I have no intention of arguing, our viewpoints seem rather different, perhaps too much so. I was merely pointing out the internal inconsistency: either the "friend-zone" doesn't exist, or it does. Whose fault it is, is an entirely different question.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:42 PM
5

I often see mention of the 'friendzone' on the internet, not often in r/mensrights, but in other places. It doesn't really exist. If you know a girl, and you're friends, and you'd like to have a relationship with her, then simply say so. If she says she's not interested, that's it, and if she is, then great. It really isn't very complicated at all. If you find yourself in this 'friendzone', you're simply not being assertive enough. So... the friend-zone doesn't exist, because if you end up there…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 11:12 AM
1

Probably a troll, but whatever.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 09:35 AM
3

Indeed. In my experience, women who friend-zone someone would never, ever date them, so it doesn't really matter what you do. "Let's be friends" basically means "sorry, I can do better."
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:38 AM
0

Bullshit. A mother and a child were killed, others were injured. Don't be grasping at straws, now.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 04:31 AM
1

I tried posting in r/Feminism, but they shadowbanned me. SO FUCKING BRAVE YOUR HEAD WILL EXPLODE.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:23 PM
0

Google. Use it.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:15 PM
19

You need someone to hover around you in the ready position because (emotionally speaking) you are a very brittle (though sexy) vase on top of a very high display? That's more a job for the professionals (psychiatrist, not escort). We're still talking about men, right?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:06 PM
7

We have all the power! Give us more power! Feminism.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 04:03 AM
1

You bloody excuse for a half-wit dumbass, I'm trying to make sense of what the guy's saying!
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:22 PM
-2

I think the point being made, is that a circumcised woman can no longer masturbate, while a man can. Or something along these lines...
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:13 AM
1

is absolutely nothing that says you can't attend a Catholic church. Just don't take Communion. xD Why, will he burst into flame? :O
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:26 AM
1

Skeptic community: question everything (you don't like).
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:25 AM
1

Men are usually excited to find someone with such refreshing news. Women are mostly baffled, though that varies.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:40 AM
1

Um. For a moral minded man, opting not to marry means opting never to have sex or children
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:20 PM
2

Satire is traditionally the weapon of the powerless against the powerful ... When satire is aimed at the powerless, it is not only cruel – it is vulgar. Not this shit again...
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:44 PM
3

They just see it as free publicity. You can't win with these people.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:13 PM
3

...because it's their sacred duty to keep the oppressed women out of harm's way.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:08 PM
-1

To be fair, some forms of FGM are medically necessary procedures, but I get your point.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 04:44 PM
1

And of course this just highlights rape culture and misogyny, Would YOU want to be judged solely on your sexual value, as opposed to your social status, financial liquidity, personal assertiveness AND sexual value?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:03 PM
1

Ending of Ace Ventura 2. Only the threat of rape in Tenacious D. Harold and Kumar, the Escape from Guantanamo Bay (although that could be satire)
/r/MensRights27/05/13 01:53 PM
1

Βeta?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:28 AM
1

That's because women expect men to do everything for them.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:13 AM
7

It's mostly other men, so it's ok. /s
/r/MensRights26/05/13 08:27 PM
0

She's there to manage the poor thing, obviously.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 07:02 PM
3

I like how literally every single person talking about this thinks it's witty and original to finish by addressing the reader.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 06:18 AM
1

ex-husbands paying child support late every month This really is the best part. TORTURE.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 12:17 PM
1

Oh god, this is like a goldmine of stupidity. Sexism, anti-intellectualism, logical fallacies, lame jokes... something for everyone.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:41 AM
1

lol, complex ethical dilemma, i better jump in with all four./s
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:08 AM
0

Patriarchy forced this woman to degrade herself.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 01:08 PM
5

Actually, a lot of people in Israel go through MGM in their adulthood. Part of the conversion ritual to Judaism. It's... complicated.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:31 AM
2

That discussion group sounds eerily similar to r/feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:44 PM
1

God, the language is obnoxious...
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:40 AM
2

"As a mother"...
/r/MensRights19/05/13 02:13 PM
3

Samsung's been on my blacklist ever since they declared war on baristas. I'll have you know, I'm a barista and I also happen to be a comedy writer. I get that they're trying to generate buzz, but sometimes, the price is just too high.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:02 PM
2

Playing something of a devil's advocate here (in a very similar position myself, btw): It's not just raw physical force that plays into the equation. Men are brought up to confront physical hardship head-on and generally be physically active. This is the expectation and the "traditional role" men play. Women, even big and strong ones, are taught to live pretty much outside the "physical" domain of life. That is, they aren't "supposed" to lift things, to deal with mechanical issues, to get their …
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:19 AM
1

It's not malice. She might be a wonderful, intelligent person. It's just part of society's brainwashing, there's no getting around it. A real man pays for dinner and that's that...
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:38 PM
40

Really, anyone with no car or money for a date, might as well be invisible.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:12 AM
1

Problem is, "rape" has come to define such an insanely broad range of activities, it's no longer obvious to the perpetrator. If all they had to deal with were drooling fiends in back alleys, they wouldn't have a case...
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:14 AM
1

To be fair, this is exactly how they see us...
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:50 AM
1

Does "feminism" count?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:06 AM
1

*leaflet example.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:02 PM
1

The women who like being dominated... are they content with their partners, or do they try to cajole them into being more masculine and dominating? I'm not saying women are oppressing the male population (that's debatable), but to say it is men who are "controlling" is utterly preposterous.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:28 AM
1

This really made me feel for the only girl in our electrical engineering class... oh wait, no, not really. She's got it made.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:24 AM
4

In my experience, women pretty openly strive towards total and complete domination in a relationship, attempting to shape their partner to their whims. But sure, men are controlling and stuff.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:11 AM
1

This is not "another movement". We're not coopting anyone. This is a man, who was discriminated against for acting inappropriately. Now, if you or I don't have the resources to deal with it, that's fine. However, "focusing on the main issues" has a distinct "dismantle the patriarchy first" ring to it.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:54 PM
5

Hello? Gay men are men, too? This isn't "spin" this is Men's Rights. Would feminists stay silent if a woman was deemed "too manly"?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:39 PM
2

"Just a tip". Disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:24 AM
7

Who's surprised?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:34 AM
3

Aaaah, objectification!
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:01 AM
19

"Big men feel pain, too." Warren Farrel :)
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:25 AM
7

Are you being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:22 PM
2

Native Russian speaker here. Never heard it. Also, Russian culture is incredibly sexist.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:34 PM
1

This looks like a very obvious troll. Too much hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:56 PM
1

I can vouch for that.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:11 PM
1

Are we at "then they fight you" already? Wow, good progress.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:10 PM
1

Male disposability is a very specific assertion: that women's safety is inherently worth more than men's in modern society. To me, this is obvious, as well as the fact it goes directly contrary to patriarchy theory. Every group is going to have its own slang, I just happen to think Western feminism is full of shit, which is reflected in its vocabulary being detached from reality.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:25 AM
1

A man is an unfeeling guardian/provider. Anyone else need not apply. Unless of course they're sexy. Basically, the same deal average women get with cooking and sexual favors.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:44 AM
1

That the same organization that beats women for showing forearm?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:36 AM
2

And you expect him to develop flirting skills how exactly?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:23 AM
2

"Somebody?" Really?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:45 PM
2

reproductive FYP
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:11 AM
-4

Oh god, just shut the fuck up. You're no better than the PUAs.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:30 AM
3

Using David Wong's own words, they're throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. They also hate Russians with an evil passion, except for when they want to seem reasonable on the subject. They also hate the Japanese. Basically, everyone except women is a horrible piece of shit deserving to be ridiculed. Hilariously, they keep pointing out how half of their readers are female. Very important demographic, you see. P.S. I have nothing against targeting men or women for comedic purposes, it…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:36 PM
1

I don't think there's any room here for a battle. Rather, an excellent opportunity to educate the teacher about gender equality. Seeing as how she takes part in hundreds of students' upbringing, OP can make a significant long term difference.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 07:02 PM
1

I mean if there is a double standard regarding sexist jokes. I guess it is overtly pessimistic. Probably closer to ignorance, than actual bigotry.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:00 AM
1

Simple. If there is a double standard, it's bigotry.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:14 PM
1

Ah. I guess I did miss your point.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:14 PM
1

I think the sentiment being conveyed is a wrong one. That is, it's nothing to be proud of and nothing you should be saying in the first place. "Sand nipper" also carries certain connotations, but they're really, really bad.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:53 PM
0

"Pussy" is a heavily gendered term. It insults a male by comparing them to a female. As far as slurs go, I rank it even worse than "cunt", because it simultaneously insults all women and implies a certain standard of maleness for all men to adhere to.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:39 PM
2

We should force a single standard for both sexes. If it's light humor - in good health. If it's thinly-veiled bigotry, we should expose it and confront it head on.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:31 AM
-1

Congratulations on the whole "mens' rights" hat. Now... what exactly is a "pussy" male and how does that term fit in with the "mens' rights" narrative?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:21 AM
6

Maybe in the 19th century.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:38 AM
13

This just in: patriarchal conspiracy causes women to die of old age, while keeping the young and attractive ones alive. More at 11.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:53 PM
22

I think it's safe to say that if women were (somehow) the stronger sex, female on male rape would be rampant.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:50 AM
48

Alyssa Rosenberg thinks "No means yes" It's worse than that. She doesn't care if it's a yes or a no, they understand each other perfectly. There is no misunderstanding, no consent issues. This is what actual back-alley rape looks like.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:41 AM
59

If the genders were switched, by the end of the episode, Bruce Willis would put a bullet in Louie's head. I know it's banal, but holy shit, this is pure insanity.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:33 AM
5

if (applicant.gender==male) return unfit;
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:02 AM
2

Ahahahaha "we're not gonna say "oh sir, please put your hands behind your back, so I can arrest you"". Are you kidding? It's a man! He doesn't speak human.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 12:38 PM
3

I'm Jewish and I agree. (non-religious, though)
/r/MensRights07/04/13 12:26 PM
52

I love it. "Man cheats - woman gets angry and hits him. Woman cheats - man gets angry and the woman hits him." Yay equality!
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:45 PM
5

45 minutes?! I hope you realize you're going to have some major selection bias going on.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:52 AM
2

It's attacking the masterminds marching against gay marriage, not men in general. Agreed, there's no reason it should be a man, but it might as well have been a woman. The point is irrelevant to the speaker's gender.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 12:54 PM
3

I'm not confused, I'm pissed off! If I went and told someone I am unwilling to date them, because they don't have enough sexual market value, I'd be a psycopath. Yet women have no problem at all telling me to my face I don't earn enough. Like, smart, independent women. You're a man, work more hours. In these and similar words. Is this what I'm supposed to be fighting for?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:06 AM
-7

Most? You seem to be describing a negative stereotype.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:23 PM
2

Hey, lurkers have brains of their own. Hopefully, the guy's nonexistant "debunking" of said myths will garner MRM further support.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:14 PM
2

Aaah! Righteous fury! I'm melting, meeeeeeltiiiiiing...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:08 PM
-2

No no no, you don't get it! If I'm disadvantaged, we need to work towards complete equality! Life is only unfair when it's somebody else's problem.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:15 AM
7

”I’m really grateful that my husband and I have fallen into traditional gender roles without conflict,” Ireland told New York Magazine. “I’m not bitter that I’m the one home and he goes to work.” If anyone needs me, I'm getting a palm tattooed on my face.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:29 AM
2

I'm sure the actual "protecting" involved is being allowed in a woman's vicinity.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:39 PM
1

These are all extremely common opinions and widely known talking points. It's not reasonable to expect people (especially women, who are completely unfamiliar with the issue) to just take MRM at face value and re-examine their worldview on a dime. It's much easier to just dismiss MRAs as another sect of crazies. Basically, the friend hasn't warranted punishment, rather education.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:51 AM
1

Hey, admitting men have feelings and wanting to protect them isn't so bad.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:35 AM
2

Please shut the fuck up with the beta males already... You're giving us all a bad name.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:04 AM
8

It's funny, last time I read the article was before stumbling across MRM. Kiiiind of takes the fun out...
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:08 PM
21

Yeah, they're not big on talking in r/feminism.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:45 AM
-7

Enough with 4/chan already...
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:22 PM
14

It's more like XX and XY, anyway...
/r/MensRights06/01/13 07:41 AM
1

And then, of course, be surprised if nothing changes. QED. Don't you mean... [drums] IED?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:33 PM
37

Sure showed them neckbeard losers, didn't you? What a stud.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:37 AM
2

I was not aware of this and I can't imagine it going smoothly.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:37 AM
47

That is true, but imagine a similar hubby-consent form for abortion or cosmetic surgery. Just... imagine it.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:02 PM
6

I would think the irrational fear of bright colors being pushed on boys is a bigger issue...
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:59 PM
3

That's very good.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:21 PM
10

You belong in a museum :)
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:54 AM
1

Um, no. You're just making the conversation about something else, instead of addressing the allegation. That's dishonest.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:53 AM
9

Enemy of my enemy and all that... except somebody here is confused about who the enemy is. It's OP. OP is the enemy.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:14 AM
1

As someone who has had bigots bombard them with the "proper" definition of "anti-Semite", I don't care too much for or about the dictionary definition of misogyny. It implies bias against women and that should be enough of an allegation in its own right.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:10 AM
7

PUAs break down women's natural selection filters, effectively preventing them from choosing the "fittest" candidate. Regardless of the movement's morality, of course they take away some female power.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:23 AM
2

Hey, that's the only kind of wealthy man that will date such a harpy, presumably.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:51 PM
3

Considering what they do to baby girls in China, the author really should be ashamed of herself.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:50 PM
2

I fail to see anything. That is one shitty poster.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:23 AM
2

If you don't trust me, why not let me hold a loaded gun to your head? DON'T YOU TRUST ME?! It's not about trust, it's about women having all the power in the relationship.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:40 PM
14

So... An allowance, then? Nope, that's abuse, too. All of your money, all the time, or it's abuse. Don't want to make money in the first place? To the divorce court!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:39 AM
2

Ripping into guys for liking/wearing a certain color/TV show is what Misandry is all about. While MLP isn't my personal cup of overtly sugary tea, I doubt you'll find a more accepting audience outside of dedicated subs.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:12 AM
2

I can just see feminists embracing the poor guy as one of their own. Any minute now...
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:09 AM
7

Not helping!
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:18 AM
2

You are free to express your mentally disturbed opinions. On the other hand, everyone else is perfectly free to provide their opinion on the matter, as well. So, I'd advise you to "get over yourself" yourself.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:07 AM
17

What? Feminist projection? No!...
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:18 AM
1

A great deal of sexism comes from other men: there is this constant pressure to conform to largely neanderthal standards of masculinity, which simply isn't a problem for women.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:40 AM
1

Guys, with all due respect, there's much more to Soviet art than work, vodka and bears. I can understand the comparison to propaganda, but let's not confuse the two...
/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:38 AM
6

I'm trying to imagine the duties she had to perform in the military, that would lead her to such a conclusion.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:35 PM
1

To be completely fair, the trope, as far as I understand, originates from men being seen as the "default" for any given character and "femaleness" being some kind of personality trait all by itself. Of course, it still contributes to the very real perception of men's expendability IRL.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:17 AM
1

How would they be prosecuted without their badge number?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:00 AM
9

How about "disregard your upbringing?" "Pretend you're an alien?" Anything that isn't firmly rooted in prejudice against white, heterosexual males? BTW, not American.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 09:48 PM
17

You gotta make people uncomfortable... unless they're black people. Or women. Or gay. Really, you can't just go around, making people uncomfortable!
/r/MensRights28/11/12 09:46 PM
5

Threats of violence are literally the first (and often only) argument against the MRM. This isn't indicative of its propriety (since groups like WBC also provoke violence), but speaks volumes of the usual critic's bigotry. edit: MTM -> MRM. Freudian slip to ATM?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:00 AM
2

Here's what the sidebar says: No memes or rage comics. No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites. Spam/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Use self-posts for related topics, justifying their relation. Facebook posts must be done w/ screenshot & blanked names. Absolutely no doxxing will be tolerated. Advocating for violence/illegal acts may be removed. Links to other subreddits must be >24h old or have more than 30k subscribers. Young accounts are given no tolerance. Absolutely …
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:12 PM
1

Naw, I'm not really a beast. Just Israeli. Reddit feels like tourism.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:53 PM
1

Don't look at me! I'm ugly! I'm ugly!
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:16 PM
8

And once again, women are comparing themselves (or rather, their victimized idea of self) to the three dudes on the planet hogging all the sex.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:07 PM
9

Everyone has a first. Cries
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:06 PM
1

Hey, as long as I'm not the only one.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:06 PM
2

Um... English is my second language. What do you mean? Should I irrigate my nasal passages?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:38 PM
4

Sorry, I guess I'm more biased than I thought. I live in [current place of residence].
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:01 PM
1

Whoa. Talk about vocal. Sorry you're being stoned...
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:47 PM
0

Well, MR doesn't seem to give a fuck (we're actually a relatively egalitarian country), but Reddit on the whole...
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:31 PM
5

Women are the largest consumers of government welfare in America, from cradle to grave. Men are the largest portion of the taxbase, that pays for that social welfare. Well, let's put it this way: I got the impression the author cared more about economics than gender inequality.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:46 PM
3

You're right, I'm sorry. This is just a correlation I noticed.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:40 PM
1

Please remember the UN has members (so many members...) where women are honest-to-god oppressed. This isn't about entitled Western women securing their deathgrip on every aspect of society.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:47 PM
1

I have. Bloody teenagers.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:18 PM
-1

"In society"? How about some examples? And no, "dominant" doesn't quite cover it.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:08 PM
0

Some of the points are actually valid... I'm surprised it's so much feminist and so little straw.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:30 AM
7

To be fair, there's like a billion dislikes, and that's on Youtube.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:40 PM
1

Hey, I'm not attacking anyone. I just didn't like this aura of piety forming around her.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:13 PM
0

Does she want to help, though? Or is she just looking out for herself?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 12:10 PM
2

Sadly, it seems she has a vested interest in men's rights - clientelle.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 08:43 AM
6

Prisoners don't usually build their cells, either. If you want to talk about women's privilege, SA is not the first place to start.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:35 PM
8

Um... Selection bias? Didn't we just talk about women getting away with shit that would get men shot?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:37 PM
0

The point is, there's inequality.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:42 AM
1

Um. Yes. Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:41 AM
26

My god, the world really is going mad. Freeing up space on the subway? Nah, that's for savages. Let's just sue people for touching.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:27 PM
12

Well, that's surprisingly balanced and fair.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:04 AM
0

It's called black humor. Post a female version and see what happens, then judge. (I like my women like my coffee - black and tied in a sack. or something funny. whatever)
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:33 AM
15

Don't forget to pay for your date!
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:42 AM
2

Like... all of them?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:40 AM
1

Obviously, they're "capable" of it, using video game logic. I was basing off the OP's linked study
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:21 AM
2

Pictures of text. Yay progress!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:43 PM
1

Yes, legally obligate women to pay for stuff. Men, too, let's get the economy rolling!
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:47 PM
4

To be fair (and I am by NO means downplaying the study's significance, it's bloody shocking), male physical abuse was found to be more damaging. That is, for women, being attacked by their partner is a terrifying and potentially life-threatening experience, where as for men - a mostly emotionally frustrating one. Once again, this does not make it okay to treat men like slaves, but it does help explain why male and female abuse are treated (and kind of are) different.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:45 AM
1

I'm sorry, what does this have to do with condoms? Are circumcised men unable to use a condom?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:43 AM
0

I'm fairly sure they disagreed about facts. Claiming facts instead of opinions is not a good debate tactic. She will have a billion bogus "facts" of her own.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:20 PM
3

Why stop there? Charge white people less, so blacks will go elsewhere and not deter other white people from coming. Makes perfect sense!
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:53 PM
2

How is this a con? Sounds like a tax on stupidity.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:47 PM
5

Only Sith deal in absolutes? I hope you see the irony.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:03 PM
3

He means the male body has ways of shutting that whole thing down.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:21 AM
2

I think you mean "facts [citation needed]".
/r/MensRights19/09/12 01:11 PM
1

Well, they cut off the hood, so it's all shivering and exposed.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:57 AM
3

Does she know?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 07:55 AM
-7

Misunderstood boss: Assembles a female-only meeting Fires all attending
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:52 AM
0

How is this passive aggressive?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:50 AM
0

You forgot one: he is the President of the United States of America.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:16 AM
15

Or, you know, lawyer up. Whichever.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter