TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

randomnightly Archive

View 1 posts and 101 comments by randomnightly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

randomnightly/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 09:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If you want to cheat, you will find the opportunity anyway. Even if you only go to work, shopping and the church. I doubt that cheaters would choose a public place like a club for it where they likely meet someone they or their partner knows.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:07 PM
2

Why can't people have friends if opposite gender when they are married? Most people are not attracted to their friends, also friends can be of different ages, you can have your former retired teacher as a friend for instance. Or some young coworker that takes you as a parent. They might not even be straight. Even if they are of the same age, it doesn't mean that they are attracted, also adults can control themselves. It seems to me like everyone who talk about not having friends of opposite gend…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:03 PM
3

So called nice guys are often very fast with things and that seems clingy. They think they like you before you even know each other. It takes more time for women to start liking guys. This is why someone who is an "asshole" seems more safe, because you don't have to think about hurting or disappointing them when you're just getting getting started. But it doesn't have to be an asshole - it can also be a guy who is hard to get, mysterious, picky about women, someone who needs time and wants to ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 09:06 AM
2

Yeah, if you agree with everything all the time, you either don't care or don't know about the world. This is the same in the same sex friendships also, just boring or ignorant
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 08:57 AM
3

No, women aren't interested in boring guys. Being "nice" and boring often overlaps, because the reason why most people are nice is that they fit in and their opinion is very similar to the average. So they never even get into situations where they get upset. I don't think they are faking it, they are just really bland, agree with everything, talk like they think girls want, etc. People who have actually experienced hardship or have lots of unique opinions, but are still nice, are a rarity. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 08:53 AM
1

Men "do" romance because it is an exception - they usually don't start conversations and friendships with women without any romantic interest. For instance if there is a mixed group of people where no one is looking for a partner, the women are the ones starting the conversations and keeping them up. Men are much more passive. There are exceptions but if you are an introverted person in that kind of group, almost everyone that approaches you is a woman. This is the actual reason why people notic…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 08:02 AM
1

I haven't really seen femcels here, more like women in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 07:53 AM
1

Women do look a lot better than men, it is a fact. Use an app that swaps faces of men and women, woman with a man's face looks like an ugly woman and a guy getting a woman's face looks as a pretty gay boy. People tell ugly women they look like men, but never the other way around. I'm not saying men look ugly, but that women are far prettier. Which is logical because they evolved for this as they were always chosen for their looks. Men are a lot more shallow when it comes to looks, because the ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 07:47 AM
2

I very much disagree that men choose more based on personality. It is the exact opposite. All the men who are deeply in love with someone and haven't asked her out, are talking about attractive women, not ugly ones with a great personality. Usually not even average, but far prettier. I think women are choosing their type over their hated (not neutral) type almost any time, maybe more rarely when it is preferred vs neutral. Men probably choose their liked type over hated either, but facial beauty…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 07:53 AM
2

Idk what is 3/10, but I would say that your preferred type wins almost always, unless the person is very unfortunately ugly or obese. Especially when you compare that to the type which annoys you. Like you would go for a slightly below average skater in than example than a hot gym fratbro if you hate the type. I think men are more likely to pick women that just look good, regardless of their type. Like you can be an outdoorsy guy and pick a typical bimbo that hates everything about the nature, j…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 07:22 AM
1

There is one thing very wrong with claims like that and it is that both genders inherit those genes, so if a father is a psychopath, so will his daughters be . Now, if men don't want psychopathic women, then those psychopath genes should disappear. The same when anyone claims using men is female nature, if that strategy is successful, then her son's will be using others too if they inherited the genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 07:14 AM
11

I don't think the natural selection says anything about fat women not producing healthy offspring, if you don't mean morbidly obese. Storing fat has its purpose and if you were fat before the industrial age, people were more likely to think you were healthy, you weren't starving and you were strong. Most fertility goddesses were somewhat fat. If by fat you mean someone extremely huge who doesn't have a woman's shape any more, then yes, it is a modern development. But being slightly overweight wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 01:30 PM
8

I know only a few women who have slept with more than 10 people, having 4-5 partners is common even in the 30s. I know more virgins than those who have had 20+ partners. It isn't about being ugly, but going with random guys is unsafe and lots of women have to be friends before getting naked because it is uncomfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 06:28 AM
4

It always amazes me how some people think an average woman has had more partners than an average man. Do they think these women are sleeping with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 06:18 AM
1

It is possible you know women who are your friends girlfriends. I knew a lot of single women in my 20s though, but very few of them were sleeping around, usually they were focusing on the other things like studying or volunteering abroad, some were shy and it was hard to find anyone. Tbf I knew more 25year old virgins than those who were sleeping around. Serial monogamists yes, but rarely anyone who slept with random people. Though there was definitely a bias, neither me nor my friends were popu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/23 06:14 AM
3

I don't think it is only about that. Usually, introverted people become more brave as they get older and take initiative socially, many don't even know that they can or should approach others, not only romance vise. Many girls don't know it is socially acceptable to approach men. And contrary to what is often told by people here, lots and lots of girls don't get any attention in their 20s if they are not that attractive or don't go to parties and clubs in the first place. In my country it is ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/23 03:11 AM
1

I do know lots of conspiracy theorists and they aren't my close friend or anything, still taking about this. But no kill all men type of feminists or incels who hate women. There definitely are some but I suspect they are young and frustrated, 17 and not getting laid, though it is very common to be a virgin around that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 04:44 AM
0

This sub was dominated by men who thought women were shallow and only wanted Chads, so I was reading in that context and assumed most people answering this are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 11:46 PM
0

Sorry, I misread your previous comment, thought you were being sarcastic, claiming that this best friend thing applies only if people are attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 09:57 PM
-1

I've noticed that many of those best friend couples don't really pay so much attention to appearance and often look average or even below it. They just don't care about finding the partner with the best bone structure but someone they get along with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 09:25 PM
7

They are convinced that men and women are different species that have nothing to offer each other, except sex and that is the only reason why men talk to women and vice versa. Usually they don't have any friends among the opposite gender and base their opinions on gendered drama that you see online, which is very far from real life. I have never seen anyone who talks like an incel or like some extreme twitter feminist in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 09:19 PM
2

There's a lot of people who see folks from the opposite gender and feel like they're in love because they have an intense physical attraction toward another person based on that person's appearance and how they carry themselves. This is true, young people can't make the difference between love and physical attraction, because they have never felt that way before. Sexual education is usually not about relationships, but only sex and sometimes consent, which isn't bad, but recognizing why do you l…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 02:41 AM
1

What is female nature in your mind then? I think everyone falls in love based on physical attraction when they are young. It is important to learn and maybe to talk to lots of people from the opposite gender, so you feel more casual around them and and won't fall in love so easily because you know better how to recognize the qualities you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 01:06 AM
1

Marrying up or hypergamy only has to do with money and status that's it. Only because someone says it means that, that term could have been invented by someone who considers only the looks as I said before. It just randomly happened that the person who came up with that, considered the socioeconomic status. Most people who don't browse reddit or pua sites obsessively have the experience that dating up means dating someone who is more attractive or popular, because most people earn about the same…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 12:40 AM
1

This is exactly what I don't agree with. If those women marry up status wise, those men marry up looks and health wise (healthier because the women are younger and fit). Just because that term was first used by someone who only considered socioeconomic status, doesn't mean that only that counts. That term could have been invented by some feminist who only considered looks. However, I think those trends apply in some way and mostly in extremes (like billionaires and golddiggers) but most people w…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 05:35 PM
2

I don't agree that marrying up is only about socioeconomic status at all. That term was probably made up by people who didn't even notice that that those rich men choose women who are a lot more attractive than them. It is just taking the preferences of one gender and ignoring the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:13 AM
2

It isn't really relevant that looks fade, the same can happen with money and you will still have more attractive children. Men who are unattractive but rich choose pretty women because they have something they don't. However, those cases are extreme anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 06:07 AM
1

I meant a specific look, like k -pop boys or feminine looking gays. Not many women over 25 are interested in them in my experience, sure, they can be fans but wouldn't actually date. Exception are women who look very young, cute and fragile themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 05:47 AM
2

Yeah this is why it is hard or nearly impossible to become beautiful. But in most cases humans are attractive enough if they work out and have style. Personality counts more, but not just being nice, it is deeper than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 05:41 AM
2

My point was that marrying someone who is prettier is also marrying up, even more so than socioeconomic status because appearance more about your genes and you can't really change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 05:36 AM
3

I still think getting rich is more achievable than becoming beautiful if you are neither. Plastic surgery works for women who have otherwise a great facial structure, just one flaw and they have to be rich to afford this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:47 AM
5

But why is there a word for marrying someone who has a higher status but not a similar word for marrying someone who looks more attractive? In both cases they marry up in some way, but because people equate marrying up only with status, they get the wrong idea as if only women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:42 AM
1

If you mean on dating sites, then yes, attractive men have less reason to use it and attractive women sometimes use it but only for attention. Men often have uglier photos than women, random snapshots vs posed photo with full make up. Also, 80% of men might as well be below average looking when people compare them to the society's ideal of beauty which is often feminine. For instance, if I had to rate random people's faces, women would get a lot higher rating than men because they are facially p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:34 AM
3

I think personality matters much more than people here admit. Lizzie is one of the rare types that has a great personality, she seems quite confident, is kind and caring, knows how to talk to people. There was also a guy who had no arms or legs and gave motivational speeches and had a girlfriend. There are rare cases like that where their personality compensates their looks or disability. But most people wouldn't be able to the so positive and hyper even if they look just a little ugly or are fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 04:09 AM
1

I don't think men and women are on the same attractiveness level visually anyway. You can see it whenever you scroll any news feed or social media site and unless there are men that you know, you'll more likely notice female faces because they are more attractive (unless they are some old fat politician faces that somehow look ugly anyway). On the other hand, a facially average man can be very attractive if he works out because he doesn't need to have a pretty face and some women don't even like…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:52 AM
2

What do you mean by vetting? I don't think it is a rational decision to like someone, that you think ahah, he has good looks and is polite, therefore I like him. You need to develop feelings and of course it takes time and lots of people can't have sex with someone they have no feelings for. But you don't know if that will happen in time or not, you can't rationalize this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:43 AM
0

Maybe be not top 95%, but top 70% of women look as attractive as top 30% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:35 AM
7

Why do you call it hypergamy when women want rich men but not when men want prettier and younger women than they are? Riches are much more achievable than looks, so actually men are looking for genetically better women than they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:34 AM
7

Are those "below average women" below your friends looks? Even if your friends are average looking men, they can still be less attractive than those below average women, because women are in general prettier face wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 03:31 AM
2

Exactly! It gives a vibe like "bitch, suck my dick" :D
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 02:51 AM
1

Yeah, it is strange. Some men that I have befriended online have sent me their dating profile pictures to ask for advice but then refuse to do anything because they are too lazy to change it. For instance they have only 1 photo that is a random selfie where they look grumpy or the quality is bad and they refuse to take any more pictures. Almost everyone has a normal looking age and if I was in their area or their age (usually way too young for me), I would be interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 02:48 AM
1

Can you describe a situation with women in more detail? Was it a party where you instantly wanted to talk to a woman but she ignored you and after you gave up, only then she came to talk to you? I think this situation is just luck, she probably didn't notice you at first or found someone else more interesting. If that was the case. Also, if you are interested in someone from the first moment and they are just neutral, everything they do might seem like a sign for you, but you are just a random p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 02:12 AM
3

Most people have potential if they had different personality or changed something in their appearance. I see very rarely anyone who has no hope. I am not going to be the one who changes them though, because I don't want to be anyone's mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 02:05 AM
2

I think many are not interested in serious relationships then, just talk to more girls and don't spend too much analyzing a single one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 01:40 AM
1

Then I would have asked her if she didn’t think that would lead to the friend zone ? Why not acting accordingly to the situation? For instance, if you already get along with someone and you flirt accidentally and get a positive response, don't stop it because "that's not your strategy". The same, if you want to have a platonic conversation, be actually interested in what you're talking about and making a new friend, instead of faking and "friendzone". If the woman is completely boring for you, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 01:31 AM
2

How old are those girls though?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 01:20 AM
2

Do you mean she finds someone else the same night? Then she probably isn't interested. But some people start liking people while they are away, for instance spend time together and then go home and have time to process this all. I am like this, I need time to fantasize about the person to like him. It is nothing to do with morals or playing hard to get. But if the girl actively talks to others and not you, though you made an effort, it could be that she isn't interested. Though sometimes it is l…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 01:19 AM
1

I've never been attracted to anyone who has only flirted with me and talked about nothing else, usually it is through casual talk that goes deeper.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 01:12 AM
2

Just stop thinking they are playing hard to get. Instead, consider it like making friends - not everyone connects with everyone else instantly, laughs out loud and makes great friends the same evening. It isn't because they are playing hard to get, it is just their personality. They need time to like someone, sometimes being away and starting like them only from distance. Other thing is that some people focus on those that ignore them or have any kind of conflicts with, because they are raised t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 01:00 AM
2

Depends on how you define ignoring, it is much more comfortable seeing the other person from distance and getting used to them when you are shy. Or you just need time to like someone. Some people feel or are socially ignored because they are more quiet and in that case everyone is "ignoring" them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:56 AM
4

I think women are just naturally not interested in sex instantly and need time to know the person. Maybe the reason is that men are physically stronger and it has always been dangerous for a woman to go alone with a guy she doesn't know and women have evolved to take things slowly. Maybe what you consider "playing hard to get" simply means that they don't feel like doing anything physical yet, just like some people need more time to make friends. It isn't an act. I'm really much more introverted…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:51 AM
1

I think any kind of relationship is a compromise, if one person is 100% first, it feels like having relationship with a blow up doll or something. I don't understand how is that even interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/22 12:40 AM
4

Betray how in that situation? And do you seriously think that there aren't women who have blind trust towards everyone? Even if take those who are mentally disabled? I doubt that a person with Down syndrome for instance constantly thinks how to screw someone over. Any person putting themselves or someone else first 100% isn't healthy. Not having sex on the first date has more to do with the personality and shyness than trust, most people feel it is unnatural to have sex with someone that they ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 07:15 AM
3

Why do you need to pay for woman and organize something fancy on the first date? This paying stuff is very surprising for me because here is Europe it isn't common. People usually date as students or young adults and everyone has the same amount of money. The only situations I've heard of where men pay are something like a student is dating someone who is working and wouldn't have the money to go out herself and they have a long term relationship; women who are older and expect old fashioned dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 07:06 AM
10

It isn't about waiting but not feeling ready yet. If I can barely talk to a person when I first meet because I'm introverted, how could I get naked? It seems so forced and not natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 06:52 AM
8

Even if I find someone attractive, I feel that any physical contact is uncomfortable on the first date, including kissing and holding hands. It is very rare I'm comfortable even talking to people that I meet the first time, no matter the gender. It isn't really a moral issue for me like most people think. I've always wondered when people are introverted and anxious about first 5+ times they meet someone, how can they have sex or kiss straight away?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 06:50 AM
1

There is nothing new about stupid people needing to fuck anything that moves and highly intelligent people being very picky or even aromantic and asexual. Mentally disabled people can masturbate in front of others and try having sex with anyone they see. But actually being highly intelligent is an advantage that way, you don't need other people that much and can focus on what you want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 05:02 AM
1

I think there is a difference between finding someone attractive personally and rating their looks based on how pretty they look compared to the others. For instance, I can rate feminine looking gay men or 10 year old girls highly, without being the least attracted to them. If I'm looking through that lens, I think that almost all women are prettier than almost all men because their faces are more harmonious and fluid. Testosterone can make male faces more attractive for me personally, but if I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 07:22 PM
1

I'm not arguing with that, on the contrary, some people can look attractive, while being not healthy, only because of their body type.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 07:05 PM
1

It isn't a turnoff, on the contrary. It makes me care about the person more and find common ground because I have also been depressed and am quite emotional, even though I look rational for most people because I'm autistic and have often stone face. I do not understand people who find crying annoying, as if it is something that is done for them, and not that the other person feels sad. Of course this goes for crying that is genuine and not whining, manipulation or like a child cry if he doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 07:14 PM
1

Yeah, I felt the same way when I was younger, liked more feminine looking guys and boys. Now I find them pretty but like a gay friend that I'm not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:58 PM
1

at the same time, statistically "average" face is what people consider the most attractive. Imperfections cancel each other out, the resulting face is harmonious and proportional. In physical attractiveness studies, averageness describes the physical beauty that results from averaging the facial features of people of the same gender and approximately the same age.[1][2][3][4] The majority of averageness studies have focused on photographic overlay studies of human faces, in which images are morp…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:34 PM
1

I think it really depends on your body type. Some women gain fat in their ass, boobs and upper legs and look relatively skinny or even athletic when they are overweight. And there are women who look stubby, even if their BMI classifies them as underweight. For instance, they have broad shoulders, bigger arms and stumpy legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:25 PM
3

I've heard the opposite, that women have fat mostly outside their stomach (and it is unlikely for a woman to have a big belly anyway unless she is obese), but men have it around their internal organs where it is very unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:47 AM
0

Probably because it is healthy for women to have a higher fat percentage than men, even if they are both skinny or have normal weight. Usually the fat around the stomach is the unhealthiest and it is more common in men. Maybe people have evolved to avoid being in attracted to those who have big stomachs (pregnant or unhealthy).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:44 AM
1

It is common enough knowledge that women could not have the same access to education as men did. Read this for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_education First females were let into the universities a lot later than first males. For instance: University of Cambridge - 1209 Girton College (women's college, part of UoC) - 1869 you can find a lot of similar examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:38 AM
1

Extinction of humans is neither positive or negative for one individual. I think it is weird to assign moral value to hypothetical humans :D Besides, I wasn't really talking about stopping all procreation but having less babies. Each person would have much more resources, opportunities, better jobs, less work, more time for hobbies and socializing, more fulfilling life. Imagine if you could have a big apartment and a country house with lots of land as soon as you turn 18. In a society where robo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 06:17 AM
1

women were not allowed to be educated or work in the past. It is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 05:57 AM
1

If rainbow pill means what I'm assuming it does of course you don't. It doesn't actually mean what you think, I chose it so long time ago that didn't associate it with LGBT. It meant a multitude of opinions for me. Most people, yes. Most people want kids, so that's their primary reason of wanting a partner. Outside of that I think people want partners just because they think they're supposed to want to or because as other people have kids and start families they start feeling left out. Are you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 04:56 AM
1

You don't cease to exist. Whether humanity continues, is not a good or a bad thing. We as humans assign value to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:54 AM
1

just wanting to live a simple life without having to raise another human being would be enough for many I guess. You can do that single without a husband. Do you think people have partners only to have kids? I have never understood where the desire of wanting children comes from. Thought it was all social pressure, to act like everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 12:36 AM
1

If we can all agree having children helps the country out why shouldn't we give people money for continuing to have children? I doubt that everyone agrees with that. It would be so good if there were less people (decreasing the population in non violent ways), more stuff and land for everyone, not to mention the wild nature, and all the jobs were either meaningful or really productive. It would also be great when everyone were taught to be self reliant and a relationship was introduced only as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 12:33 AM
1

I totally agree and not only because of some men vs women issue. In the perfect world there would be a lot less people which means everyone can have more resources. Everyone would have a job that they more or less enjoy or that requires human contact, while the machines would do everything else. Even right now productivity per person increases and that means we would have to create meaningless jobs just to keep people employed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 12:23 AM
1

explain
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 12:16 AM
6

On the other hand twitch and OF creators are hated because they make money on their own terms, instead of working for an agency. It is like people are annoyed that sex workers are also producers and get all the money. When it comes to simps, I think they are basically like whales in the game industry, people who have an addiction and play away most of their money if not all. In both cases there should be upper limits that one user could spend. Buying digital goods feels sometimes like gambling, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 09:09 AM
1

I don't because these things are usually very tasteless the way rich people and golddiggers do it. Shopping - buying tacky clothes with lots of gold or logos, or safe choices approved by other rich people, no minimalism or individual style; luxury - nothing inventive or creative, buying the same stuff like everyone, just more expensive; travel - usually trips organized by a travel agency or something very stereotypical. Rich people aesthetics is not very attractive, it is following the trends wh…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/12/20 07:01 AM
1

I don't know how young they asked from. Many people under 18 are not interested in either sex because they are not interested in sex or relationships in general. Many are not even interested in early 20s and identify as asexuals but are actually late bloomers. Many younger people think they are bisexuals, but they sometimes mean it more romantic or friendship way than sexual. They might not have actual instinctive understanding what sex actually is because they lack the experience or are still i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/20 07:56 PM
1

again, it has nothing to do with what I said
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 09:53 PM
1

What are you talking about? Your answer has nothing to do with my topic. Absolutely everyone commenting here has that "everyone has to know what I think disease" because otherwise they wouldn't say anything. Including you.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/20 09:52 PM
1

Why do you call being attracted to a standard? Standards are artificial lists that people have made for themselves. If a woman isn't attracted to someone, it isn't because she has high standards, it is out of her control. The same with men, if a man isn't attracted to a certain woman, it isn't because of standards. Calling attractiveness a standard sounds like men are attracted to absolutely anyone and then consciously decide to leave some out, because she has a stupid hairstyle or lives with he…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 02:22 AM
1

It is more of a naive or autistic person issue, not so much men vs women. Those young people who go home with the opposite sex often don't even recognize their sex or it isn't relevant. It took for a long time, almost 30 years for me to recognize that sometimes men see me as female because in my small town I was that weird kid and nerd and nobody noticed my gender. However, it happens also with males as I've heard. Sweet and naive guys who develop sexually later, go along with bitchy girls who s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 02:11 AM
2

It would decrease random one night stands and rape, but not actual relationships. It is positive because everyone has a chance to be sexually fulfilled and some people want to be alone anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 01:59 AM
1

Both alpha and beta men are part of the social hierarchy, that means they are the types who are interested in following that, achieving status, belonging in a certain place in hierarchy. Alphas are highschool cool kids, who are not just better than others and often they are not better outside of what their schoolmates appreciate, but their identity depends on their social status, they care about being more popular, better at socializing and having more friends than their classmates. Betas are th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 01:36 AM
1

invite you to women only events where they sometimes can have +1 friend regardless of gender, increase your chance getting in the nightclub, be your +1 on events where you need and so on; introduce you to her female friends, males tend to have less female friends; help you to understand women if she does herself, and even if she is not very girly or socially skilled among women, she can still help you to understand female physiology (periods, losing virginity, what women like in bed - talking to…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 01:26 AM
1

I wasn't arguing with you, just telling that in case of sex there really can't be a rental contract. Which makes it even more pointless to marry for sex. I don't even understand where this idea comes from. People marry to have similar life partner, for money, if they share similar background, class, want to make babies or whatever, but rarely for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 04:23 PM
1

Marriage isn't a sex contract. People just happen to have sex when they are married but don't have to. Also, sex is rare in that case that no contract can force you for that over a period of time , they have to consent each time again. It is not like a car or house but more like a workpower. Nobody can really force you to come to work even if you have a contract. That would make you a slave
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 05:07 AM
1

This problem is a little bit from the 19th century. If you don't live in an extremely conservative society, nobody is seriously pressured to marry. Of course there are old people who whine that back in my days we married and had children before we finished university but they also complain about how difficult smartphones are and how the fashion has changed. If you are under 30 and live in a democratic country where religion is not a daily part of life then people around your age rarely care for …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 02:03 AM
1

"Then again I see single people in their 50s and they seem pretty troubled . My father had a friend who was a hardcore bachelor but when he reached his 50s he suddenly did everything he could to find a relationship (eventually he did) , my mother has some single ladies friends in their 50s and they seem pretty damn lonely . It seems to me that at that age if you don't have a partner or kids it would feel like you have nothing to live for . The only reason why I'll probably try to find a relation…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 01:55 AM
1

I agree that women are "more attractive" because they spend more time on appearance. Also, styles of women are very different from each other, styles of men are very similar and therefore it is hard to stand out if you are not alternative or make your own clothes. There isn't much available for men. But if you look at different subcultures, men look as attractive as women because they are allowed to dress similar way and can use similar makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 01:38 AM
1

this data reminded me of Wikipedia article I recently read. Look at those blue and pink graphs there, the left are masculine traits and the right more feminine. When asked about attractiveness as beauty, most people think of classical beauty and rate very feminine men attractive. However, when sending a message, they prefer more down to earth looks and masculine men. Actually, this Tinder data shows just that women don't prefer attractive men and that's all. The reason why women don't rate many …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 01:31 AM
3

and there is a difference between rating people as attractive or actually being attracted to them. Especially when they are two completely unconnected questions. This graph just shows that women don't prefer "beautiful" men. They can rate their gay friend as 9 but would never date him. Straight women might rate all their female friends more beautiful than their husbands or partners but not ever want to have sex with women. Because the universal notion of beauty is often what is considered "femin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 01:17 AM
1

80s Germany was basically the post-punk birthplace. Of course everyone fucked and talked about the politics. I'm talking more about 90s ultra-capitalist society where men didn't have to take care of their appearance and women had, extremely so. These couples look like they don't even fit together, it looks like a rich (although tasteless) woman has hired someone to carry the rocks. Men were wearing random free T-shirts with company logos, didn't wash themselves too often, were rude (and not some…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 10:43 PM
1

t is truly an amazing time to be a male in his upper 40s. I have to thank all the young, feminized males for turning our society into a candy store of man-starved young ladies. really? I grew up in 90s and 00s Eastern Europe and would say that women were so starved of stylish men that they fucked any tourist or exchange student just because they didn't wear tracksuit and shaved head while complaining about women all the time. There is nothing more boring than corporate average man who dresses an…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 01:08 AM
1

While I agree that it was hateful, at the times it was really hard to detect when you didn't like the traditional lifestyle either and just heard about it for the first time. There were lots of great ideas that became violent in the 60s, like anti-racism, anti-consumerism, anti-war movement, etc. Most of he liberation was good but of course you had some fringe groups and activists got sucked in those. Although I think the nuclear heterosexual suburban family ideal is also hate based but in more …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 12:41 AM
1

"They are the vapid, entitled, attention seeking sluts who contribute little to nothing to society." and these vapid, entitled, attention seeking sluts are taking your jobs? How come? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUTnNKhF-EU
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 12:31 AM
1

1) Who is playing the "oppressed" card? Most people (women, non-whites, gays, transsexuals, or just nerdy, unattractive, awkward people) never seek help or tell anyone when they are discriminated against and while there are some who take an advantage, these people would use the law for their advancement in any legal system. 2) Feminists are much more responsible and hardworking than traditional women. Feminists earn their own money, don't demand special treatment in social situations, like payin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 12:26 AM
0

II understand that average woman is physically weaker than a man, but mentally, it depends on a person. Some people are emotional, others are not. Some people who their emotions, others don't. If you actually work with girls (not just hang out with a group of girls who are anyway pre-chosen by you or your friends), you'll see they have very different personalities. I've seen much more emotionally strong women than men. Many women are also emotional with men because they want to appear weak but a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 07:04 PM
2

I wonder how many of those radical feminists actually just wanted non-traditional lifestyle, to live with friends or in communities, rather than with husbands, have sex and be a housewife. I think I would have joined them for that reason, although I definitely don't support leaving boy children behind. However, political lesbianism could be an interesting idea for a bisexual. There is less jealously and more understanding (even physical) in homosexual relationships and having an intercourse is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 03:14 AM
-1

women’s more fragile physical and mental disposition what do you mean by this?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 03:08 AM
2

yeah, mgtow just wants women to be their way, not that they naturally have no interest in marriage, sex, relationships and so on. I've always wanted to live alone or with friends since childhood and am aromantic asexual, so I found mgtow interesting at first although I'm female. But I don't agree that all the hermits, off the grid or alternative people want to belong to the society. Many are just naturally antisocial or want to socialize only when they feel like. Actually, many urban people are …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 03:06 AM
1

TwoXChromosomes in not feminist. 99% of it is stereotypical girly stuff about sex, relationships, boyfriends, shopping, products, female body parts, make up, romantic comedies, romance books, U.S centric politics. I read it sometimes but have to scroll through 1000s of links to find something interesting that is not completely negative. I don't accuse them posting relevant activism links and news but there are other channels for this. I just would like to read something interesting that other gi…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 11:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter