TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reLincolnX Archive

View 8 posts and 3,100 comments by reLincolnX on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,100 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I’m not calling ALL men abusive You just kinda did it in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 10:16 PM
1

It's a shame that your ability to infer all of that about a stranger on the internet doesn't work in real life when it comes to detecting abusive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 10:15 PM
0

No, it's not. There are many studies about stated preferences and revealed preferences. And there is also the Women Are Wonderful Effect. Women virtue signal a lot, like a lot. Especially here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 10:11 PM
0

meanwhile, no one is telling men to hold themselves accountable and not treat women horribly. That's patently false.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 09:41 PM
2

There is a difference between finding the majority of men attractive and only finding 20-30% of men attractive. There are levels to this shit. The thing is, women freely admit that they find the vast vast majority of men unattractive and proudly claim they saw attractive men once every 10-15 years or so. What the heck is the average man????? The majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 09:33 PM
0

When will this realization happen? We are tired of waiting. You were voluntarily flippant here. Don't try to backpedal now and just assume you find the majority of men to be dogshit. And don't worry, we know you still register them as human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 09:30 PM
5

Those requirements? Those are so difficult for the average man to have? Women find the vast majority of men unattractive. So the average man is unattractive to women by default. The average man can be as fun to be around, loyal, etc... as he can the most important requirement already disqualifies him.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:49 PM
2

Don't worry, it's gonna change soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:43 PM
-4

My point being, your comment isn't smart. It's a failed attempt to say something nuanced when you're in practice agreeing with the point OP is making.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:40 PM
3

Why do you say it's dramatic when it's actually what you believe?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:38 PM
1

That's not moderation. That's called soft separatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:26 PM
2

Women usually bend over backwards when talking about men to say it's not all men #NotAllMen is used as a diss against men and now is followed by #AlwaysAMen.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:12 PM
3

I also argue against sexism against men, and I haven’t received any of the push back you seem afraid of. Can you give us an example where you did that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:07 PM
13

That's patently false. Dude, there is a cognitive bias called Women Are Wonderful Effect. There is no such thing for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 10:05 PM
22

you see ugly men with women all the time When you find 80-90% of men ugly, obviously you're are gonna see "ugly men with women all the time."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 09:59 AM
–

The industrial revolution is an analogy for social media. Do you want me to bring the studies about the impact of social media on our society, or do you plan to be the most dishonest possible? I already know you won't bother to read them, anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 08:29 PM
–

You see, just like before the industrial revolution, we still need to eat, shit, and take a piss. That must mean the Industrial Revolution had no impact on our way of life. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 08:25 PM
–

Dude, you need to stop being re*arded like that. The social media era has completely changed the approach to socialization. If you don't see the difference between today and the world pre-2005, you shouldn't be part of these conversations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 08:15 PM
1

Lots of straight men support LGBT rights AND say they like masculine women and gay women are cool and hot and whatever, but they’re just as disinclined to actually DATE a woman with short hair/deep voice/body hair. You missed that part. That's why that doesn't make sense for you. If you claim that you like masculine women, and find them hot and cool, but don't want to actually date them, you're just virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:17 PM
2

Yes, you're. Dude, don't delude yourself. You're shitting on men in a way you think is subtle. In every one of your comments on this sub, you always shit on men while pretending to have some kind of moral high ground. Yes, you believe that men are simpletons who can't grasp basic social skills, and you use that to blame them while pretending it's about "standard" that you don't hold for women because you think they are better than men. In your fair and unbiased view, men are the reason why the r…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:13 PM
2

You're seeing what you want to see because you've already decided on what you think and are trying to work backwards. You do the same. You're not looking for a real debate, you're trying to browbeat people into agreeing with you. You also do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 02:17 AM
3

Notice how once again you are attacking women while at the same time giving men a pass. Pretty rich coming from someone who does the opposite of what you're accusing him. All you seem to do is attack women and give men a pass. You do the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 02:09 AM
2

We call it virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 01:44 AM
1

Speaking a language isn't the same as a sexual orientation. Your Polish men can learn English or whatever and multiply their dating pools exponentially.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 01:43 AM
2

Thanks for proving OP is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 12:44 AM
0

There wasn’t any consensus at all on social media. Every time a woman is begging to be left alone and explaining how it is her greatest wish, every women on the thread are agreeing with her. The reason why men don’t approach is because women told them to not do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 12:42 AM
-1

*As long as they are men when they assault women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 04:30 PM
3

« Divorced women on TikTok » are your sources. You go on TikTok to know things? Are you for real? It’s not my logic it’s what you said. I called out your stupid comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 06:23 PM
3

Yes, I heard it. However you were the one claiming men are fine staying with their unhappy wives, contrary to women who divorce if their wife are unhappy. So again, with your own dubious logic, considering the amount of divorce in lesbian couples, it seems women are unable to keep each other happy. I believe you were trying to say « men bad » but again with your own logic it doesn’t work here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 06:03 PM
3

According to your logic, women aren’t able to make each other happy since the divorce rate is so high in lesbian marriage…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:37 PM
9

u/Solondthewookiee your friend got arrested…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 05:42 AM
–

Or maybe men don’t spend their time trying to murder women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 06:55 PM
12

Hybristophilia is a well documented phenomenon. People use the example of serial killers because so many people like to pretend that dating is about moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 01:47 PM
2

You’re on PurplePill media and you engage on this sub. Your feed isn’t as whole as you think it is. This sub is pretty niche and since you engage on it you also have other contents that expose you to the « gender war ». You’re not a « fine people » if you’re here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:16 PM
3

Women on social media and Reddit in particular actually care a lot about it. Even for 29 and 45. Fauxmoi, popculturechat etc… have a thread about age gaps every week.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:02 PM
5

According to women on social media and Reddit in particular, women can be considered like adults only when they reach 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:00 PM
4

You’re slut shaming. It’s not nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 01:09 PM
–

« I’m totally biased and I believe I’m not biased. »
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 11:52 AM
6

No, I’m not insisting that at, I’m insisting that you are nonsensical with your fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:14 PM
6

Because real life isn’t divided between « normal women » according to Physical_Sherbet199 and « mentally ill women » also according to Physical_Sherbert199, when she doesn’t want to be right on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:04 PM
7

It’s a « No True Scotsman » because you’re pretending that only mentally ill women do that bad thing you don’t like. The only delusional person here is you that believe you are some expert on people and you are able to diagnosis people you never even met.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 06:52 PM
8

Stop repeating your « No True Scotsman » fallacy over and over again. You’re being stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 06:13 PM
6

Repeating it isn’t going to make it true for every woman and man
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 06:34 PM
–

Did you understand what I wrote? We are talking about self respect and dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:30 AM
–

Being fine to be shit on by people you’re trying to help is a perfect example of a lack of self respect. Some slaves also believed they were doing the right thing and it was ok for their master to whip them when they felt like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:20 AM
–

Your servility is not something most people aspire to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:16 AM
–

Contrary to tou I went to school and I know you didn’t fight for universal male sufferage, etc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:14 AM
11

It’s the same. You can expect people to help when you shit on them the next day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 12:48 AM
3

No, they didn’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 12:47 AM
4

You’re not supposed to go there to see the fish. You’re supposed to go there because you enjoy the sight. Go there to see the fish make you desperate, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 09:36 AM
3

I agree that meeting more people will help you get a relationship. However, again, it’s how it’s worded and the contradiction that amount to actually telling people who are asking for help « be glad to be single and toss a coin into that pond and make a wish ». I don’t see the good advice here but I can guess that it’s « well intentioned ».
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 09:17 AM
12

Saying to people to do something to « hopefully » get something else is as useful as telling them to pray to maybe get something they want and hope God or whatever will give them what they want. Your advice on a practical level means « hope for something and be glad to be single » and you wonder why people shit on that type of good natured advice. When people ask for help they want practical solutions, not wishful thinking with no ends in sight. So next time instead of pontificate over people la…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 01:43 AM
–

Just like a good sexual life with your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:55 PM
2

The average women in the US is obese, Chad chasing, delusional and egomaniac and she is as charming as you’re.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 03:07 AM
0

Lusting after criminals is something a lot of women actually do and it very well documented. However you’re so biased, you kinda forgot about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:03 PM
4

No
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 12:47 PM
3

It’s a debate sub precisely. Intellectual honesty means you don’t put exceptions on the same level as the rules. You have a very niche preference, when we are debating you at least try to come up with something more substantial. Again intellectual honesty.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 03:53 PM
7

OP is speaking about women in general. He is talking about the vast majority of women. You and your pal coming and saying « yes but look how special we are » to try to prove them wrong is « regarded » if you catch my drift.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 02:44 PM
7

And it’s known that the vast majority of women actually like short, submissive and easy to pick up men. It’s like the norm and it’s not dishonest at all to pretend that it’s quite common, like any random girl tend to like short, submissive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 02:29 PM
0

I didn’t say « communication » I said « owed communication ». « Emotional honesty » means absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:00 PM
2

« Owed communication », « emotional honesty ». How many empty words can you come up with just because you don’t want to admit your double standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 12:49 PM
2

You’re making a No True Scotsman Fallacy. You’re the one coping here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:15 PM
2

Incels don’t approach women in the first place. In fact the vast majority of men aren’t approaching women in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 02:02 PM
–

It’s also hard to have a functioning society when some folks love to explain how cis white men are oppressors and how they are a « problem ». But I can get why you prefer to be in denial with that kind of stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 01:16 PM
–

Bernie is popular on social media. When it’s time to vote no one shows up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 01:08 PM
4

« Living sex doll » is mostly used by women who love to pretend that men don’t see them like human beings. Before that women used « bang maid ».
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:53 PM
5

Not according to your feminist sisterhood…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 08:57 PM
5

Can you remind us what happened November 5th?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 05:09 PM
1

I would like it to be true, but I don’t think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 01:48 PM
1

It has already been reported that women on social media slut shame more than men. You’re depicting a false narrative here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 01:39 PM
1

You married a conservative man, yet you insult them in every comment you made on this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 11:01 AM
–

The data they used is other surveys not even made in the same years to explain that the gap between young men and young women isn’t that great. « Here is a survey from 2023 » « But the date from 2019 shows that the gap isn’t as big » « The APS and GSS made surveys in 2019/2020, and we can’t see that the gap isn’t that big so it means that the Pew research survey from 2023 is false » Like did you even learn statistics in college? Every data in your opinion piece proves that there is an uptrend th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:26 AM
6

You aren’t debunking anything with your link. You’re making an opinion piece and pretending that it’s the truth when people bring you legitimate surveys made by people that do that for a living. Your whole argument is full of logical fallacy and you have the pretense to call it nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:46 AM
3

It means that instead of pulling the classic man move of questioning and blaming the victim, to put resources and attention toward investigating and punishing rape. To be considered a victim there needs to be some trial or someone convicted. The fact you want people to assume the person making the claim is already the victim proves that you want people to believe women without evidence. People are called victims after the investigation and prosecution, not before for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 05:43 PM
2

Women outperform men in academia as well as in workplace productivity. Men don’t want to admit that they have to withhold jobs from women because they’re afraid to compete with them. Can you give us the sources of that claim pls?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 05:40 PM
2

Yes, single means single. Situationships don’t count as single.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 02:59 PM
4

Nearly 55% of 18-29 men are single while only 34% of 18-29 women. So apparently young women don’t seem to want to date young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:51 PM
4

Nearly 55% of 18-29 men are single. While only 34% of 18-29 women are single. So no, 20yo don’t date mostly 20yo.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:46 PM
1

Yes, we were, when we were talking about young adult women. Adult is the opposite of children, if you didn’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 04:08 PM
5

You’re moving the goalposts of your own thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 03:42 PM
4

20 something women are children now? Just take your meds.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 03:40 PM
4

I don’t know, you tell me. Nobody is hating on women in the discussion we are having. We were talking about double standards when it comes to sexual practices.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 10:44 PM
1

What kind of satisfaction do you get from being such a sycophant to online people who absolutely don’t care about you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 08:19 PM
6

Handjob and are easy too and the majority of women don’t know how to give one. The rest of your comment is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 08:17 PM
1

When men complain about lack of blowjobs they aren’t complaining because they can’t face fuck their partner. Bringing « rough blowjobs » is kind of disingenuous imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 08:14 PM
8

You’re proving the point he is making by considering that women refusing to do a blow job is fine because doing a blow job is apparently painful now but men not wanting to do give oral is not fine at all. Your « distinction » is precisely the double standard he is talking about. Men should be fine by giving oral and using toys because they have to give pleasure but women are perfectly valid when they refuse to do oral because of mental discomfort. Like please…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 03:31 PM
3

They’re usually just living it. That's why you're here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:58 PM
0

The majority of normies get divorced. The majority of normies aren't happy in their relationships. The majority of young men are single. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/marital-satisfaction-is-linked-women-s-sexual-desire In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 04:55 PM
3

Then you’re lying or unable to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:21 PM
4

There is no comment where it said that 40yo men should date a teenage girl. You didn’t even read the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:20 PM
2

Then you have no example of threads where apparently people say that 40yo men should date teenagers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:14 PM
5

25yo is a teenager now?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:09 PM
2

Can you links us these threads where people say that 40yo men should date teenagers?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 01:08 PM
1

Dude, the fact you’re on the spectrum isn’t a excuse to put word in people mouth. You don’t know what an analogy is it’s on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:34 PM
1

No, my point is to show the nonsense of your whole argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:27 PM
1

I didn’t put the desire for food on the same level as the desire for women. I said that your food and water are controlled by other and you still need them. How can you live with that reality when you don’t like being dependent on something someone else control?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:11 PM
1

Your food is controlled by other people, just like the water you’re drinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 01:07 PM
5

That proves that your point is pretty nonsensical. You don’t need money to be alive, yet you work your ass off to get some. You don’t need to be here on Reddit sharing with us your inanity, yet here you are trying to interact with people. You’re being cynical and obtuse only when it suits your flawed narrative without getting the hypocrisy of your situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:26 PM
-1

Money isn’t a need either. Beyond eating, drinking, breathing and shitting nothing is a need. Yet here you’re.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 12:21 PM
2

The Women are wonderful effect is a well documented cognitive bias. Pretending nobody even does is like saying the Halo Effect doesn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:40 PM
2

If you don’t see the difference between OLD today and back then I don’t know what to tell you. If you didn’t see a shift before 2006 and after you’re more stupid than the people you make fun off. For example, Wall Street existed before 2008 doesn’t mean that it’s the same today. If you want to debate start using your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:22 PM
2

The main difference between blue and red is that one admit that attraction and dating is completely amoral and that men and women aren’t playing the same game while the other tend to believe in the « just world fallacy » when it comes to dating and gender dynamics. Red and blue have changed from the beginning. Fifteen years ago it wasn’t the same. It wasn’t mainstream at all to admit that being a decent guy is completely irrelevant in your dating success. Now OLD is a thing and you can’t gasligh…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:14 PM
1

Considering that nearly 70% of 18-29 men are single while only 34% for women at the same age. One could deduce something from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:12 PM
5

And it is known that women don’t like that and that it considered bad. Women never give « lie to her » as dating advice so it can’t be mainstream advice. In rom coms it’s more new character in town got all the male attention because she is wonderful to begin with. Twilight is an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:25 AM
1

Now you’re either a radfem or anti-feminist. TIL something I guess. You were the one talking about being a player and a hardcore feminist in the first place. So if I have casual sex 2 times in my life that means I’m a player now? Like if I drive a Lambo 2 times I’m a rich now?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:21 AM
1

If you don’t read what I wrote there is no point to arguing with each other. I didn’t say anti-feminist. Read again. My question isn’t how to have casual sex. My question is how to be player someone who sleep with many different women with high frequency without deception or manipulation. It was coined by Red Pillers but by 2 women iirc. Before you and I heard about the red pill. Nice try tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:06 AM
12

I didn’t say they invented it. Lying to women isn’t a mainstream advice btw. Same for lookmaxxing because society doesn’t like to admit that look matter so much more than personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:02 AM
1

You don’t know what « just world fallacy » actually is apparently. And btw, there is a world outside the US. The majority of black people don’t live in the US. Just a reminder
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:30 AM
2

Life doesn’t work with a well cut plan. It’s not that simple with everyone agreeing to be casual and not catching feelings or everything running smoothly. Explain to us how someone in real life manage to sleep with 2 different women per month without some for of deception and or manipulation. Seduction is a form of manipulation by the way. In theory everything actually work pretty well. In practice it’s never the case. Feminism rely heavily on the Women Are Wonderful Effect. Again a player actua…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:27 AM
6

My point isn’t about redistribution but about your hypocrisy at making fun of people who complain about life unfairness. Not having equal pay is still redistribution of wealth. Just one that we deem unfair because reason… Yet when it comes to unfairness in dating it’s perfectly okay to make fun of people who complain about it as long as they are men. I wouldn’t make that analogy with money if you showed the same casual and cynical attitude you exhibit when it comes to the poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:11 AM
6

Money isn’t a commodity either bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:01 AM
1

A player isn’t someone who like sex. A player is precisely someone who is in practice sleeping with different women in high frequency. There is no way to be a hardcore feminist and spinning plate at the same time. For the main reason that sleeping with different women with high frequency is a lifestyle that imply some form of deception and manipulation of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:00 AM
6

Mainstream dating advice is based on the just world fallacy and the women are wonderful effect. Your mainstream dating advice is the reason why the red pill started in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 01:55 AM
5

You’re right bro. It’s just like why people complain about equal pay work. So what if your male coworker earn more than you? You guys are acting like toddlers because you aren’t billionaires. Take your food stamps and stop whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 01:52 AM
2

Society has also the expectation that hard working people get rich at the end. You’re spouting « just World fallacy » like it’s some gospel.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 01:40 AM
–

No that’s the thing. The whole « dressing for the male gaze » was coined by the same folk who were telling that women dress for themselves and not for men. The same people, simply with a different audience and with a different goal. They were singing P!nk « U and ur hand ». It was a very fun time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 08:36 PM
–

I’m not missing his point I’m saying that he can’t explain why he isn’t into fat people. Because if he actually said that he find fat people unattractive then his preference would be seen as insulting. Why? Because during the last decade some people didn’t like to be told that being overweight is unattractive. So now, next time instead of using your profiler talent to insult me in a « subtle » way you should bother following the convo you’re piggybacking in and then you would be able to not stra…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 08:33 PM
–

According of the narrative many of them want to push. Monday it’s for the male gaze, Saturdays night it’s for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 07:23 PM
1

You’re not into them because you find fat people unattractive that’s the reason. The thing is you can’t say that because it would be seen as fat phobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 06:18 PM
1

According to women themselves, they dress and do make up for themselves. Not for the male gaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 05:50 PM
1

Nobody were gonna take seriously people who complained to not be found beautiful while overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 05:45 PM
1

Fat activism was quite mainstream back in the days. And it was about shaming men who didn’t find fatties attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 04:56 PM
3

Isn’t it a bit offensive to assume that fat people don’t have an active lifestyle?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 04:54 PM
0

That’s not true at all especially in our era. Back in 2010 fat activists used to get offended when medical staff told them to lose weight. And we are not talking about trans activists who don’t like that you don’t find trans women attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 04:51 PM
–

The internet is the truth. According to women online men are worse than bear and the reason why every thing is bad in the world and women are queens. Should we believe that kind of gospel too?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 02:08 PM
–

I didn't make a rant, I called you on your nonsense. Not's my fault if you keep saying nonsense and contradicting yourself. Your point is saying that 70% of young men are playing video games in a basement and watching porn instead of socializing. And that in life you are either married or single. And that women apparently are willing to date people they find unattractive. What kind of answer do you expect from such idiocy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 01:38 PM
–

TIL that relationship is a synonym for marriage. People are either single or married. Every day we learn something crazy on this sub. First it was about people STEM lord not having relationships, sorry because apparently in your world view the only relationship that count are the romantic ones, so first it was about STEM lord not having romantic relationship then you tell us that nearly 70% of 18-29 men being single (you were claiming the opposite btw) is okay because only marriage matter anyway…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 12:41 PM
–

Nearly 70% of 18-29 men are single while it’s 40 something percent for 18-29 women… So, you are already wrong with your « everyone else have relationships ». According to recent data the majority of young men don’t initiate romantic interactions with women anymore. Instead of telling people to go outside you should start by getting out of your own wishful thinking. People don’t date people they find unattractive. So yeah per essence people are against dating unattractive folk. It’s true for wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 12:06 PM
–

You know why you find a whole bunch of people unattractive without interacting with 90% of them? Because you find them physically unattractive. That’s simple. Now you can pretend that your spend your time surrounded by STEM lords and you know them so well. But considering you have also a very strong opinions on other types of men, I’m gonna guess you’re full of shit and being disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:49 AM
–

I’m not saying any of these things. I’m talking about STEM lords. Women tend to simply not find them attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:27 AM
–

No they are making a shitty analysis based on absolutely nothing just like you’re doing. STEM lords aren’t friendless, they’re simply not desirable to women because they aren’t attractive. They have friends and hobbies, the thing is women simply don’t like them. There is also doing well at education and just enough to get by. When you do well in STEM fields in a top college you can go from poor to « rich ». Especially when college is so expensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:16 AM
–

That’s pretty much what you said, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:32 PM
–

Your husband was setting him to fail. That someone fancies a girl since whatever, he and she know each other since whatever. If the girl never bothered to show him any romantic interest while he was pinning next to her that actually means she was never attracted to him to begin with. There is nothing he could have done or said to get the girl. Wanting to help people is fine and very nice. However it’s better when you actually know what you’re talking about or understand what you’re talking about…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:27 PM
–

You didn’t try to help. You told us your husband is « highly charismatic » and he tries to tell his friend some magic formula to get girls that never fancied him since they know each other. But we are happy for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:15 PM
–

You made this comment just to brag about your husband and yourself. Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:08 PM
0

You’re Billie Eillish or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 07:12 PM
9

Why don’t you try to do that with a male profil and see how much success you have? I think it’s the only way for you to get that men and women don’t play by the same rules when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/24 07:07 PM
9

Forgot that 66% of women are in fact lesbians…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 10:43 PM
9

Nearly 70% of 18-29 men are single while it’s 34% for 18-29 women. So, young women actually don’t date young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 10:34 PM
9

In which world men ara thanked for their work? Not in this one for sure. But let me guess your mother spent her time thanking your father while he was too busy being a slavemaster and taking her for a bang maid?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 04:33 AM
26

Your second paragraph contradicts pretty much what you’re saying in your third. Your second paragraph shows that you’re yourself pretty much Team women vs Team men. « Women suffer because of men. And when men achieve something it’s because women make it happen. » You should preach for men to leave women alone. It would be more honest and it would achieve the same result you maybe want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 03:32 AM
1

65% of 18-29 men are single while it’s 34% for women in that age bracket. You have a boomer approach of the whole situation and kinda forgot about the scale and the stats of what is happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 01:45 PM
5

Your pal can’t seriously be the straightest dude you ever met. The guy was fucking his roommate on the reg. It’s like saying you don’t do drugs but every Friday you blow lines longer than Park Av.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:30 PM
–

And who is gonna pay for all that? Y’all are out of you goddamn mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/24 11:49 PM
2

Firstly, they actually don't. The same source the 5% swipe graph came from showed that the median woman had 3x the matches of the median man. This is exactly what you'd expect based on the gender ratio of current users. In terms of Tinder app success rate, a guy has a 2.8% chance of landing a match, while a girl has a 35% chance of landing a match. (source : Roast data set, 2024)The Tinder success rate for girls far outweighs those for guys, but guys can still stand out. Which study are you talk…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:27 AM
2

If you actually look at data pertaining to outcomes such as dates, forming relationships, and hooking up however you find almost complete gender parity. I want a source on that one because I fail to see how it's possible. If you take Tinder for example, women have infinitely more matches than men. Based on that the outcomes can't be the same, especially considering that there are far more men than women on these platforms. Despite all the complaints we hear here and elsewhere men also report mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 05:06 AM
3

I personally believe that women’s in their 20s tend to date men in their 30s. But women on social media love to swear that women find older men ugly or disgusting and that a 30s ma dating a 20s woman is predatory if not child abuse. But it doesn’t explique such a large gap. People love to refute the OKCupid analysis by saying that women messages men they find unattractive. So why pretty much any studies on OLD since then reached the conclusion that men shouldn’t bother with OLD because it’s a sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 04:43 AM
4

You want me to bring the shit show that we call OLD to see how many men actually "date" on this? Like, y'all are so disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 01:42 AM
3

We are playing semantics now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 01:40 AM
7

We shouldn’t declare the sex recession over based on just a single year of data—especially a single year that relied on new survey methods—and a fairly small sub-sample of 229 respondents.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:10 AM
8

34% of women in that same age gap are single. It's 70% for young men. Do you see the difference? So young men are putting off dating but young women apparently aren't. Women give you no interest but it's fine bro. Like please.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 12:06 AM
15

God, you're all unbelievable. Now, apparently having relationships only matters when we reach 30? Like please, what kind of lame argument is that. People spend a whole decade without having any interest from women but it's okay because they are under 30 anyway. GTFO.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 11:56 PM
6

They didn't say that women don't say it. You're the one putting words in their mouth while believing you're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 11:44 PM
10

Yes, you say and others say that all the time. Nearly 65% of 18-29 men are single. While only 34% for women. So, the average people don't date pretty much anyone. Not average young dudes at least. And women find the vast majority of men physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 11:43 PM
7

They weren’t swearing up and down. They said that women say that a lot. You’re the one saying they didn’t say that at all. Stop putting your nonsense in other people mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 11:37 PM
7

Yes, they do. When it suits the rhetoric. It’s called having a narrative. Rich people never say they don’t care about the poors. « No that’s ridiculous, of course they care about the poors ».
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 11:15 PM
2

Your situation isn't the norm of most marriages. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/marital-satisfaction-is-linked-women-s-sexual-desire In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable than men’s. Men’s levels of sexual desire stayed higher and more constant than women’s th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 03:04 AM
1

Because women find them unattractive. I didn’t respond because it’s a nonsensical question. You are asking me to list some standards to refute them and then pretend that it’s men’s fault that they are single. Men are single because women don’t want them. For many reasons that can be summed up by saying they find them unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 05:16 PM
1

Dude nearly 65% of 18-29 men are single while 34% of women of that age group. Every study shows that OLD is a cesspit especially for men. Women regularly admit that they find the vast majority of men unattractive. Now if you want to deny reality (so much for being a data male) and ask nonsensical question it’s fine, I’m not here to pierce your bubble after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 04:53 PM
3

Ah yes, nothing is gonna happen and everything is gonna be fine when men and women stop fucking each other and we end up with a 0,7 birth rate. Less work force to maintain the economy is gonna to be fine. No long term consequences because apparently porn exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:03 PM
10

Who says you're not evil?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 12:04 AM
8

Isn’t that the nature of life? Gender is confusing but it’s a journey we go on alone. There is no playbook of masculinity anymore so I’m not sure why men keep asking for one. So confusing that some people begged for representation in any media to have "role model". There is no playbook because you and others have explained for years how masculinity is problematic. They are giving up because they have been taught for the last 2 decades that they are the problem and they need to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 12:02 AM
14

Idk how to explain this it’s just hard to align yourself with people that genuinely don’t care and even benefit from your oppression. Why are you talking on the basis that women actually care about men? You're talking like it's only one gender that doesn't care about the other. It’s genuinely disheartening and is a huge reason why men don’t receive a lot of empathy from women. When did men get empathy from women, to begin with?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:58 PM
13

Did you even listen to yourself, ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:45 PM
17

65% of 18-29 men are single while 34% of women in that age group. The vast majority of 18-29 men didn't bother approaching a woman in the past year. Every study shows that OLD is pretty much a cesspit, especially for men. Men and Women aren't at each other throats IRL, you're right. However, something is gonna give. I'm not talking about some violent uprising like some Incel fantasy, but fail to see how it's going to end well socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:44 PM
9

Sometimes she does, sometimes she doesn't...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:28 PM
6

chad lies to keep them around and in turn, hoards women from other men And to think that you make fun of X-Pillers and their theories. we agree its a shame women aren't mindreaders. But that's the thing, you're mind readers according to you. You're able to know the personalities of the men you don't want to date and that's why you don't date them, because of their bad personalities. But when it comes to "Chad" you kinda forget about doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:14 PM
7

We are talking about accountability in their behavior in this specific situation. Not accountability in general. So again, men have no reason to hold these men accountable in that situation because these men aren't the ones gaslighting other men about women's mating choices. Women are the ones saying that they don't want to be hoarded by men, they don't want to be part of Chad Harem. Yet reality says something else. no i think if men were honest that they were pursuing and fucking other women at…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:47 PM
1

so men refuse to hold men accountable when they can scapegoat women, got it Why would men held accountable these men? They aren't the ones gaslighting their fellow brother about women mating choices. And it's unbelievable that you casually admit that women have no problem being hoarded by men and being on a rotation. And you're pontificating about misogyny in the same breath. Truly a Reddit moment. speak for your fuckin self one of us has a minor in a classical language and it ain't you "I have …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:28 PM
4

Now, some interesting data. I will peruse that, thank you. However, I wonder how it's possible since another survey showed that the vast majority of young men didn't approach any woman in the past year. Food for thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:09 PM
6

men can't get girlfriends so women fault? Learn to read sweetie. Then learn to understand the basic of logic. why is it not the fault of men who are hoarding women? According to you and your kweens, women don't want to be part of Chad Harem... You have to choose your narrative. ok show me the oldest iteration of the women are wonderful effect and i'll show you the oldest iteration of misogyny 😂 You don't know how to read akkadian or sumerian, get your head out of your ass sweetie. You're not gon…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:05 PM
8

This wall of text is the reason why you never should ask a woman how to date women and instead ask people who actually successfully date a lot of women. This comment is a mix of wishful thinking, delusion with reality, and self-righteousness made by a terminally online neuroatypical woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:58 PM
3

I wasn't talking about height. I said that apparently the vast majority of young men aren't as wonderful as you are. I don't want to be obnoxious, dude, but every piece of data about dating shows that your situation isn't the norm at all for the vast majority of young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:48 PM
6

The short and ugly men we see all the time in happy relationships with women would have suffered if they believed it was futile and gave up. 70% of 18-29 men are in fact single while 34% for women. So you don't actually see shit all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:36 PM
3

Men need to stop shaming women for being too picky and learn to be happily single if they are unable to attract women. If they want to threaten rape or violence over this then they can be shot in self defense and incarcerated. There should be no compromise. Poor people need to stop shaming rich people for being rich and learn to be happily poor if they are unable to be rich. If they want to protest and threaten a Revolution, they should be shot in self defense and incarcerated. There should be n…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:35 PM
7

Billionaires pay their fair share of taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:27 PM
2

According to data, 70% of 18-29 men aren't as funny as you it seems. And we can also wonder why dating apps where women are the ones who have to initiate aren't as successful as their counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:24 PM
15

Dude, you would have a point if nearly 70% of 18-29 men aren't single while only 34% of women in that age group are. Who is this rest of society who is having the time of their life in the dating game? You shouldn't call other people naive while you pretend that non feminist men weren't already Red Pilled back then. Every single piece of data that came up since the Red Pill became mainstream pretty much confirmed some of the Red Pill basis y'all are here arguing against. No, the Women are terrib…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:48 PM
1

They struggle because the game is brutal as he said. If you want to consider that more than 50% of 18-29 men are awful is up to you. Some people just believe there is something.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:18 PM
3

You’re right
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:13 PM
7

The friend thing is so ridiculously stupid. I personally believe that terminally online women shouldn’t be listened at all. Online men have autism and online women are neurotic. IRL some women didn’t lost their mind. Thanks God!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:38 PM
6

TikTok wasn’t a thing before 2010.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:31 PM
8

That’s what they want you to understand. « Leave us alone!! ». That’s their motto bro, on the internet at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:26 PM
5

Y’all spent your time shitting on your grandpa because he wasn’t liberal enough, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:25 PM
17

Bars and clubs are for « girls night » you know. They don’t want to be bothered there too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:46 PM
11

You get promotion because you have leverage. Not because you’re the good guy of the office. Like please.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 02:57 PM
3

So they made a place to discuss pretty much with themselves. I hope you’re not being critical of echo chambers of any groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 01:54 PM
-1

You said yourself that sex isn’t a priority. You say it’s fine to love someone and not being sexually attracted to them. So on this basis, sex isn’t a big deal for you. It’s fine to not be sexually turned on by your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:42 PM
1

No, I’m just being as nonsensical as you’re with your dumb takes. I’m not the one bragging about my sex life to a stranger on a thread about marital sex. Attaboy!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:55 PM
-1

So cheating isn’t a thing since you’re just exercising your bodily autonomy by fucking someone else. You want to sleep with your partner and you also want to sleep with someone else, no big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:51 PM
1

Being exclusive is reducing each other your bodily autonomy because you aren’t allowed to fuck someone else. So exclusivity in marriage means marriage make you lose some bodily autonomy. Penndeljn was indeed right.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:46 PM
0

Women aren’t entitled to fidelity in a marriage, find someone who doesn’t care about sex like you. 🙄 Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:28 PM
-2

Can he go fucking someone else, then? If you say no, that means you are restricting his bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:20 PM
-1

Why ask for sexual exclusivity in a relationships then? Y’all are like sex isn’t a big deal yet you won’t accept your partner fucking someone else. I mean as long as they love you and they are present to listen when you have a bad day, why care if they fuck someone else since sex is no big deal and apparently it’s fine to love your romantic partner and not being sexually attracted to them…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:11 PM
1

Your analogy would work if it was just about finding something beautiful. The thing is the more effeminate a man is, the more attracted you’re to him. That should tell you something… Thanks God, you don’t care about look. Otherwise you wouldn’t be able to date anyone once you reach 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 12:20 AM
8

Billy Ellish said pretty much the same thing…after she said that beautiful women shouldn’t date ugly men. Yeah, we all know about women’s empathy and fairness when it comes to men…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 12:17 AM
2

That doesn’t make any sense but it doesn’t have to. I hope for you that you’re gonna stay forever with him. If you happen to be single when you reach 40 you gonna be in dire need of therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:09 PM
2

I don’t care what they say. I find it funny actually. My point is the Fat acceptance movement proves that some people want to shame other people because they don’t find fatties beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 10:05 PM
1

You’re maybe bi. I’m not judging but considering you don’t like masculinity and find women more attractive than men maybe you should try « masculine women », just sayin. And according to the majority of women online, women are better sexual partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:58 PM
3

The majority of people who read what? The point is that women tend to date men older than them. The average age-gap in relationship is 2-3 years (according to you and your friend they are nonce), so no the majority of people actually don’t date people their age. I don’t have the median here but I’m pretty sure it would be interesting too. Why did I dismiss your point? Because you’re from the UK and I remember reading that 63% of 18-29 men aren’t sexually active. I’m on mobile and I don’t have ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:50 PM
7

It’s because you find women more attractive than men to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:20 PM
5

You gave example about your whole school and as I said we know it’s false. Most of your peer don’t have an active dating life to begin with. Most of your peers got more rejection than success so far in their life and probably by girls who want to date older guys to feel more mature or simply because older guys tend to have more means than younger ones. You don’t know what an appeal to authority fallacy is. You don’t date, why are you talking about something you don’t do?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:22 PM
2

Government debt and citizens debt aren’t the same thing at all. A state don’t have a life expectancy to begin with amongst other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:10 PM
3

Do you think you gonna be ugly once you’re older than 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:06 PM
1

You didn’t disprove anything since you don’t know shit about the dating life of the hundreds and thousands child you met in you went to school with. So when a 20 yo like yourself come and say that every one in their school (18 yo boys date a lot it’s known, lol) were dating people of the same age we already know that you’re lying. And since, according to you, you are single by choice, what do you know about dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:03 PM
8

Fat acceptance activists started complaining about doctors telling them that being fat isn’t healthy at all and that they should do something about it. Then they started telling people that fat women are beautiful. The whole movement is totally dishonest btw they never bothered to campaign about « fat men are handsome » we wonder why…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 07:51 PM
4

Dude you’re a 20 and « single by choice ». Stop talking like you know what you’re talking about. You don’t know shit about the dating life of your school.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 07:05 PM
2

We are on a sub that talk specifically about people’s preferences and we debate about it. That’s the whole point. So obviously there is a reason to « broadcast » that preference. It’s like complaining about people talking about sex in a brothel.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 06:42 PM
12

Fat acceptance activists beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 06:15 PM
16

Fat acceptance and Fatphobia were created to shame people that didn’t find fat women attractive. In the same way, if you don’t find trans women attractive it’s because you’re transphobic. So no, it wasn’t just about not being mean to fatty.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 06:02 PM
6

So you can sum people based on a pic. I can say you’re a complete idiot just because I don’t like what you look like? Dating apps is making a judgement call on someone based on a photo. Your take is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 10:03 PM
–

You need therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 06:31 PM
–

I’m not just talking about being hit on. A study showed that people cared more about baby girl crying than baby boy crying. You would like that too? Would you also like to see your chance of having mental issue and being suicidal skyrocketing too? Would you like spending sometimes years without anyone saying something nice to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 12:32 PM
0

The Return of the Queen!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:14 AM
2

I don’t need to presume anything, I know you’re not a man and especially you’re not an average man. So you actually don’t know what it means to be ignored as a man. Sorry to pierce your bubble about that…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:07 AM
5

Would you want to be left alone for the rest of your life? Everyone pretending that you don’t exist beyond what you can provide?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:03 AM
1

You don’t know what being ignored actually mean when it comes to men. There is a study that showed that people cared more about a baby girl crying than a baby boy crying… So no, you don’t actually know what being alone means when you’re a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:00 AM
3

The vast majority of men never had the opportunity to turn down genuine desire from people they’re shown zero mutual interest in, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 01:50 AM
1

He is your boyfriend and gets laid all the time? You’re swingers or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/23 12:24 PM
3

The study isn’t about « average people » (something you’re unable to properly and exactly define). The study is about the number of people being single. That’s it. So now, if you want to believe that you know more because you and your friends so a couple at the mall, be my guest, but have the decency to not pretend that only your reality is the right one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 10:10 PM
2

Yes, reality is in fact what you believe. Where you live you don’t see children being soldiers or dying in war. So according to your own solipsism, these dead children doesn’t exist because you and your friends didn’t saw them… To think you were being condescending…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 09:49 PM
0

Meaning 18-30. I shouldn't have expected you to argue in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 09:25 PM
1

Apparently, 63% of men under 30 are single. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 09:06 PM
2

You’re asking losers to shut up and be fine with their situation. Would you be fine, if we asked the same of people who are poor or people who care about wealth distribution?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:19 PM
2

Women call men they don’t find attractive NPC…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:23 PM
3

No need to be salty when someone call you out on your virtue signaling. You fuck misogynistic men as long as they’re hot. Keep clutching at your self-righteousness, it’ll make you feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 02:31 AM
1

So we may as well fuck the hot ones. And do not pretend you care about misogyny then.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:14 AM
8

Yet, women still fuck them while pretending that misogyny is a turn-off and they are able to sense it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 12:13 AM
0

Your boyfriend doesn't cry in front of you, isn't very open with you and you have a fulfilling relationship. Sounds like you're making TRP's point here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 02:17 AM
1

Good for you bro, you’re wonderful.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:30 PM
6

That’s the problem. Most men spend their life counting on one hand the times a woman gave them a compliment. Tell them to be monk at this point it would be pretty much the same
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 07:09 PM
15

Since women don’t pursue the vast majority of men, your « solution » is dogshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/23 01:42 PM
1

There is a difference between not hating and being actually attracted to men you find unattractive as listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 02:34 PM
12

You never heard about the Halo Effect, did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 05:18 PM
3

Would you even care about waxing your legs if you were only living at home? Would you care about your appearance if you were the only woman on this planet?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 06:21 PM
1

You never heard of many things that’s why.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 08:30 PM
1

You really believe that or you’re simply spouting wishful thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 02:56 PM
3

Yes, we know. Men are animals who would put their penis in anything. Women sexuality is more sophisticated. Just because some women used to fuck their dogs, that means all women get off to that. It’s the same for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 02:28 PM
1

Username and flair check out!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 02:26 PM
4

Your confusion and (respectful) push back is showing you have zero understanding of women. Pretty rich from someone who considers that a toaster is good enough to get a man orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 12:41 PM
0

So yes, you blame men for the need for validation of some women. Poor women are just doing what men tell them... Zero accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 01:39 AM
0

You're basically blaming men for the need for validation of some women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 01:34 AM
-1

We don't allow hitting because it can escalate to something worse than a slap and can actually be dangerous. Someone not talking to you nicely because of your attitude or for whatever mundane reasons isn't the same thing at all. And one can be as neurotic as you're and consider that crying is hurting other people because you use your tears to make them feel bad or to manipulate them. You see, we can have stupid takes like yours. And you seem to have main character syndrome too. You also need the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 09:11 AM
-2

Because raising your voice when you're angry is like crying when you're sad or having an orgasm when you are properly stimulated. If you feel intimidated when someone raises his voice when talking to you, you really need help. That means you can't handle someone not talking nicely to you. Adults don't need to be coddled.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 08:54 AM
1

The stupidity of your comment is baffling. You need therapy if you think that raising your voice while angry is acting like a toddler.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 08:41 AM
5

That’s why I said some women on social media. I prefer to believe that women in real life aren’t as out of their mind. And this 21 yo started a trend that many women on social media were happy to hop-into.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 04:35 AM
2

Women don't fuck ugly guys mate. I missed you too buddy!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 03:30 AM
9

According to some women on social media, you shouldn't ask them if they are still using some machines at the gym. It's creepy!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 03:28 AM
1

You're always dishonest Soloandthewookiee.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 03:27 AM
0

intelligent independent women. Most of them actually don't like men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 10:47 PM
4

The vast majority of people don't "enjoy" their job. Even if they're competent at it they're clearly not having the time of their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 01:56 AM
9

Wage slaving never made anyone "better".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/23 01:49 AM
1

Poor fragile masculinity, she has to be the problem. SLAY KWEEN!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/23 02:30 AM
1

No, I explained that your point is patently false when it comes to fiction made for boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 04:24 PM
2

Then try to not talk out of your ass next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 03:06 PM
0

I’m of the mindset that even the shyest guys make it known when they like a woman. Is it wishful thinking or do you have proof of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:58 PM
3

The potential is there but he can't skip the "hero's journey". And it's only after he proved his worthiness that he can get the girl. It's basically the basis of fiction and the reason why people hate "Mary/Gary Sue". In nearly every shonen, a coming-of-age story or whatever with a male MC he always has to work and overcome a set of trials to be "great" or "fulfill his destiny" or simply achieve his goals. You want to see a main character starts awesome and ends awesome? Looks at Rey Skywalker o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:54 PM
10

Idk why they get so jealous of us like no we have to put in effort for the women we want lookswise just like you do. It's because you have "rich people problems". And "rich people" have it easier than "poor people". You're complaining in your Bugatti.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:43 PM
3

Boys? They're told the male main character starts awesome, and ends awesome. That's it. This is patently false.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 02:24 PM
–

Or maybe he is not weird and she simply doesn't find him physically attractive. Maybe you actually don't know how to read. Maybe you don't know what you're talking about. Plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 04:24 PM
1

Did you actually read your link? As for the shape of the penis I fail to see how that matters when it comes to « level of sexual horniness ». The thing is men and women don’t have the same level of testosterone. Hanging around women will make you realize that they have a very fluctuating libido and not the same level of horniness as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 02:46 PM
1

Biologically it doesn’t make sense for humans to not be equally≈ as horny. It doesn't make sense when you think men and women are the same biologically. We know for a fact that our bodies are designed to have frequent sex. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/22 12:59 AM
4

You still consider it more okay for women considering you paint it in a far more flattering way than for men. It's not the other way around for you. It's the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/22 01:51 AM
5

So yeah, 50/50 for domestic labor and if you earn more you give more. You're basically confirming what OP was saying. Equality when it suits you and but your money is our money because of "love".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:19 PM
6

If you want a 50/50 dynamic like so many women complain about, why wouldn't you want 50/50 when it comes to money?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:36 PM
2

You're being so dishonest here, it's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:30 PM
2

Money is an indicator when it comes to attraction. Women aren't attracted to money they are attracted to what it suggests about the type of guy you're.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 12:57 AM
2

But no, they don’t find “big brains” sexually attractive as a general rule, and even then, that will never be as important as looks. Women don't find big brains sexually attractive either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 12:48 AM
7

They will use this as evidence that feminism makes women hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 11:43 PM
14

Your advice to date a woman is to treat her like a friend. You're asking heterosexual men to see women they want to date as other heterosexual men. Your post is a perfect example of what people mean when they said women give terrible advice when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/22 06:22 PM
3

If you had a hammer, people would love it if you hammered jewelry for them. People would hate it if you struck them with the hammer. Both actions are not cut from the same cloth just because it is the same action (striking motion) with the same tool. It's a bad analogy. Making jewelry is a craft, beating people to death isn't at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 01:07 AM
1

That doesn't mean he could have fucked left and right back in his days if he wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:43 AM
2

I didn't talk about any ideal. I said some standards you have. Now, you are telling me that dating down is about how other people feel about your relationship. So women date down in terms of looks according to other people. Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:26 AM
2

We don't know shit about Peterson's life beyond what he was willing to tell us. You're making conjecture on pure speculation here. We didn't know what he was like when he was young.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:20 AM
0

1) I didn't say that means being unattracted. I said that dating down in terms of looks means that you actually find someone less attractive than some standard you have. Now if you to pretend that "dating down" in terms of looks means actually something else go ahead. We can make up shit as much as you want. 2) Women admit it themselves that they actually find the vast majority of men physically unattractive. You even admit yourselves that when it comes to looks women date down. There are alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:18 AM
2

Peterson doesn't exercise his options because he is in a committed relationship and before he became famous we don't know if he had a lot of options beyond his childhood sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:06 AM
2

You said it yourself. If women tend to date down in terms of looks that means they don't find a lot of men attractive. So yeah, women find the vast majority of men unattractive in terms of looks that's why they date down in terms of looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 02:05 AM
1

Women date down in terms of looks because women find men physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:59 AM
2

Yeah, men who have options exercise them they don't spend their whole young adult life saying no to women throwing themselves at them. And being some high performer doesn't make testosterone disappear.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 01:43 AM
2

So yo know plenty of IQ men (2% of the population) who have options meaning women throwing themselves at them who obviously don't care about dating. Why didn't you bother to at least try to make it believable?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 12:50 AM
1

2.2% of the population and yet you know plenty of them...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 12:45 AM
2

No, I won't love him less, but I also would understand that he doesn't want to raise someone else kid or that he would have really liked to actually have a bio kid. Some people wouldn't mind raising someone else kid and some people wouldn't want to do that. I perfectly understand why some people won't and I find it perfectly reasonable. And in many cases, it seems that the people who don't want to raise someone else kid get blamed more than the spouse who cheated. I find this baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:43 PM
1

I think most people would prefer that it was their bio kid. It's irrational but it's still valid. You're not supporting it but you make it like it's not a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:23 PM
5

In your example it was Stacy that was making a move. She is beyond the early stage of flirting in that scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:19 AM
6

But if Stacy for some reason has been upping the flirting with your old ass and is making sexual innuendo towards you and constantly trying to get you alone, and making obvious openings that she wants to be asked out, yes shoot your shot. So if someone already agreed to date you, you should make a move. No shit!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 01:14 AM
5

A marriage with a dead bedroom isn’t a marriage. It’s called being roommates. You are the one who shouldn’t get married. Don’t forget to be upfront with the fact you plan to don’t fuck your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/22 10:01 AM
1

Because their neighbors never paid attention to them until they heard about him on the news.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 01:51 AM
13

A rhetoric question is by essence disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:28 AM
12

Because it’s disingenuous
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:25 AM
16

"Is someone holding a gun to your head forcing you to stay poor?". You used to do some social work, IIRC, I'm pretty sure you don't like that kind of rhetoric when we are talking about poor people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:17 AM
16

don’t want to be that guy that gets settled for? Then don’t be that guy that gets settled for. You have choice in the matter so quit acting like you don’t. "Poor people don't want to be poor? They just have to be rich!" And while you’re at it, quit acting like there aren’t normal men in normal LTR who are both stable and exciting/sexy. This is what I was saying the other day. You can be a good husband and still be spontaneous, fun, and a demon in the sack. PPD men, Quit scapegoating women and se…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:10 AM
8

I don’t get off on hating on popular people. I don’t care. It wasn’t my point at all and not at what I was talking about. It was simply an example that people can get. I wasn’t the one complaining about frat bro and their rapey vibes and toxic masculinity. Now if you want to talk about the wonderfulness of popular people do it with someone who cares. I don’t mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 12:16 PM
6

That’s why college girls liked to complain about the rapey vibes and toxic masculinity culture of fraternities between 2010 and 2020. If I wasn’t on mobile I would give you some of the articles about it from back then. Nobody is hating on anyone. Keep cleaning your towns and stop trying to be a shrink on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 12:03 PM
5

That’s why college girls liked to complain about the rapey vibes and toxic masculinity culture of fraternities between 2010 and 2020.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 10:41 AM
3

That’s why college girls liked to complain about the rapey vibes and toxic masculinity culture of fraternities between 2010 and 2020.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 10:41 AM
6

Sorry, a lot of frat bros aren’t kind people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:36 AM
17

No true Scotsman fallacy! Plenty of men are getting relationships and getting laid on a daily basis and they aren’t kind people at all, they are simply attractive and charming. Frat bros or finance bro aren’t kind people yet they never lack of willing partner. Being good looking make other people perceive you better than you actually are. Again we call it the Halo Effect. But I guess it’s easier to believe in some Just World fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 03:18 AM
22

Women are attracted to physically attractive men. The more physically attractive they are the less they care about their kindness or assholeness. Being kind is irrelevant when it comes to romantic and sexual attraction. It’s not necessary. Anyone who says otherwise are simply virtue signaling to feel good about themselves. The Halo Effect and its influence on personality is already well documented. If Christian Grey was an average/ugly dude, 50 Shades would be another episode of Criminals Mind. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 02:47 AM
1

This!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 02:38 AM
66

Because they aren’t physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 02:37 AM
6

Your comment makes absolutely no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 11:07 AM
11

You didn't understand what he was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:34 PM
6

You like reason and accountability so much that you are denying facts. OP gave a lot of sources and studies and yet you still pretend that it doesn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 12:47 PM
7

In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable than men’s. Men’s levels of sexual desire stayed higher and more constant than women’s throughout the duration of both studies. Furthermore, declines in women’s sexual desire predicted declining marital satisfaction for both members of the couple. Interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 08:59 PM
1

So you’re SO is at the same time considered ugly by your friends but he can’t sit in a room without being swarm by women. According to women men who are able to simply be swarmed by women simply for existing are an infinite minority. So either you’re a lying or you’re giving credit to the RP. Or you’re just here to brag about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:13 PM
1

So you’re SO is at the same time considered ugly by your friends but he can’t sit un in a room without being swarm by women. According to women men who are able to simply be swarmed by women simply for existing are an infinite minority. So either you’re a lying or you’re giving credit to the RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 08:11 PM
5

You didn’t understand what I said. Ugly GIRLS don’t want ugly guy. I said ugly GIRLS. Because ugly people don’t find ugly people attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 06:03 PM
2

My SO a desirable man GETS hit on BY a lot of girls and only has sex with me. He sits down in a room trying to exist and gets hit on by so many girls other people want, and turns them all down for the person HE wants. He dated no-one. Had zero sex. For 2 years. Before he met me. I dated no-one. Had zero sex. For nearly 2 years. Before I met him. Tell me you don't expect people to believe that and to be taken seriously...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 02:18 PM
1

Their shit doesn't stink too. It's known!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:52 PM
16

Those girls don't want them. People need to stop to believe that ugly people find other ugly people attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:49 PM
14

Dion, Berscheid & Walster (1972) conducted a study on the relationship between attractiveness and the halo effect. Sixty students, thirty males and thirty females from the University of Minnesota took part in the experiment. Each subject was given three different photos to examine: one of an attractive individual, one of an individual of average attractiveness, and one of an unattractive individual.[46] The participants judged the photos' subjects along 27 different personality traits (including…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:42 PM
1

Most people aren't fond of BDSM, polyamory or cuckoldry or whatever floats your boat. Telling people to just "go find a girl to get pegged on Fetlife" doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 03:10 PM
0

If schlubby kinky dudes can have a ton of sexual partners with the basic effort of being an interesting person that puts themselves out there for sexual contact, why aren't TRP guys that can't get laid copying their very useful skills? Because they actually don't get a ton of sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/22 03:04 PM
15

No one is owed attention, love or intimacy. No one is owed anything actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 01:40 PM
1

Sure mistress…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 09:55 PM
0

Cucks are so secure that they are willing to let other men fuck their wives because they feel inadequate. Pretending that cuckoldry isn’t born out of insecurity is just a lie made by people who love to be in denial. But yeah, we live in the era of wishful thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:36 PM
7

According to OP normies already know that that’s why everyone is preaching about men doing more domestic chores and how it’s important for women’s libido.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 04:03 PM
12

These sources have been used ad nauseam on this sub. Each time people gave them to you and your like minded friends, you deflect and refuse to engage them. Then you complain about people giving life experiences instead of sources. But fine. Does the average Joe know that the halo effect show that it’s far more important to be physically attractive than having a good personality? (Read the link) Does the average Joe is totally aware that his wife would duty sex him down in the road because once t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:24 PM
6

Wavering every men complain and observation under the umbrella of irony is dishonest as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 02:58 PM
22

According to OP average Joe is totally aware of: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect#:~:text=The%20women%2Dare%2Dwonderful%20effect,women%20as%20a%20general%20case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect#On_personality https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire https://www.scientificame…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:35 PM
1

If you have nothing to say stop pestering people who didn’t bother you in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:41 AM
2

Yeah, it’s hot to let other « superior men » rail your wife while you wait in the next room and waiting to have some scrapes. However it can be a problem when you have something called self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:40 AM
1

If I view it negatively that means I’m judging it. Same if I viewed it positively. And I didn’t give my opinion on it, I never hotwifing is bad, I said that we call that hotwifing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:36 AM
0

We are here to talk about sexual dynamics between men and women. Spouting platitudes like you’re doing is irrelevant
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:25 AM
2

I don’t care about what they think. I’m not the one enjoying being sexually insecure and fetishizing it. I’m not the one who enjoy to be in denial for the sake of getting off.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:24 AM
0

If you're dating a hot chick you're gonna have to watch her beat off other men. That's just how it works. You don't have to fetishize it but you do have to accept it. I agree. I will say though, there's not really a better feeling than watching your girl finesse a drink from a dude at the bar and then come up to you and start making out with you, watching the other person reaction is 💀💀 Humiliating people is always a treat I know!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 09:24 PM
-1

It’s not hotwifing. That requires actual sexual activity involved in the situation. Not simply some stranger admiring a picture. It's proto-Hotwifing if you prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:39 PM
2

Yeah, that's what I said. Dion, Berscheid & Walster (1972) conducted a study on the relationship between attractiveness and the halo effect. Sixty students, thirty males and thirty females from the University of Minnesota took part in the experiment. Each subject was given three different photos to examine: one of an attractive individual, one of an individual of average attractiveness, and one of an unattractive individual.[46] The participants judged the photos' subjects along 27 different per…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:36 PM
-3

Also this may absolutely dumbfound some people here. But their are men out there that absolutely love the fact that their are other men (and women) drooling over pictures of their partner. Yeah, we call that Hotwifing... And we already know what is the next step...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:28 PM
6

Attractive = good Unattractive = bad. We also call it the Halo Effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:22 PM
5

The man I'm crazy about, is relationship material, who I care about beyond just outward looks, want to be with forever and would be happy to have his children, want him to be happy and want to make him happy is a beta because I like him for things other than just looks apparently You like him so much that you're fucking another dude while you make him wait for sex. a lot of women could go out tomorrow and find or sleep with a man far more conventionally attractive than their SOs but they don't b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 12:35 AM
2

There is a difference I give you that. I just think you’re playing with semantics here and being neurotic about the whole thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:28 PM
2

Do you know many romantic relationships in which people don’t bother caring about sex? You’re going to tell me that in the vast majority of relationships kinda forgot about sex? We are playing semantics here
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:21 PM
2

Conveying sexual interest is not equal to being hit on. Considering that hit on is synonymous with flirting, you happen to be quite wrong. Hitting on is slang. You're making a potato/potato distinction here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:06 PM
2

You actually need to be seduced to be in a romantic relationship. Someone has to start hitting on you for things to happen. What are you unable to understand in this? Being hit on hasn't a connotation of rando, that's simply your neurotic understanding of the word. To start a relationship you need to be seduced meaning you need to convey some sexual attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:58 PM
3

Nope not at all. You don’t need to be hit on by a rando to start a relationship. I never said that you needed to be hit on by a rando to start a relationship. Are you able to read?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:50 PM
1

Normal men don't feel the need to have a plan B. According to data, normal men struggle a lot with their plan A.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:44 PM
3

You actually need to be seduced to be in a romantic relationship. Someone has to start hitting on you for things to happen. You're conflating being hit on with starting a relationship with a stranger at the bar. And by the way most casual relationship actually happens between strangers who didn't know each other before downloading the app or entering the bar/club.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:38 PM
1

You've never met a woman in a romantic relationship? Are you stupid or trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 03:32 PM
1

You're dishonest once again. Many people already said how shitty it was. Being willing to wait 7-8 years while being passed over to get a woman isn't a good strategy. But, keep your wishful thinking as much as you want. Please just stop trying to help men! They already struggle enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 11:46 PM
1

Your most commonly used strategy is actually a shitty strategy as so many people already explained in your thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 11:40 PM
0

If they had the personality of a moldy orange they wouldn’t be « bro ».
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 12:56 AM
1

So you’re bi
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 02:50 AM
7

A straight man gives blowjobs on demand as much as a straight woman eats pussies on demand...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 01:01 PM
9

That being said, it’s stupid reason to break up and screams insecurity but even stupid reasons are valid overall if you can’t get past something. You're an admirer of Jada Smith?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 11:24 AM
1

You’re so mature it’s beautiful bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 02:15 AM
1

Women know when guys lie and then they complain about being abused. Women famous spider sense, I heard about it. Looks play a part sure, but I know ugly dudes dating attractive women. They’re just genuine good dudes with vibes everyone wants to be around. Yeah, everyone knows these ugly dudes who are just supa dupa wonderful and they are dating models.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:44 PM
2

If the douche is honest that means he isn't a liar, yet he admitted himself he was one. Maybe they are behaving that way because they find the douche physically attractive and since they don't want to seem shallow they label average Joe a "nice guy" instead of saying they find him ugly... But, women are wonderful and they wouldn't do such a thing...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:23 PM
5

A lot of men here believe that the vast majority of men are struggling when it comes to dating and that women aren't blameless as a lot of people here love to pretend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:03 PM
5

All you do on this sub is stroking your inflated sense of self-worth and looking for women's validation. And it's not as hilarious as you think. At least, you admit that your narrative is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:26 PM
10

No one is talking about some grand conspiracy. According to you and your pal here, this sub is in fact pointless considering that people act without thinking and are unconscious about what they are doing when it comes to dating and hooking up. It just happens...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:24 PM
7

To debate, you need to have some questions up to debate. If you go around on a sub like this one saying that people in fact just fuck for shit and giggles you aren't debating or saying anything pertinent for that matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:14 PM
12

So why it is the point of this sub? Apparently, people just fuck each other for shit and giggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:12 PM
8

If people fucked over people just for shit and giggles, what is the point of this sub beyond stroking your ego?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:08 PM
14

Yeah, our choice says absolutely nothing about us. It's known! We are whatever we are because life is just wishful thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:05 PM
7

Ted Bundy too was an honest guy!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:03 PM
3

Maybe they appreciate the honesty? Nice guys are manipulative liars. Honesty from someone who admits to being a liar?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:52 PM
1

You’re so nonsensical. First you’re talking about e-girls 22yo influencers whatever and now you are telling us the feminists narrative that have been debunked already. Human history didn’t start during the 50s and 2022 isn’t the 50s either. As for the divorce rate, the only reason it’s decreasing is because fewer people actually marry. I never said RP was the truth. You were claiming that you spouted RP truth in another way that I don’t like. I simply told you that you didn’t say anything RP at …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 10:10 PM
2

No, you’re making a just world fallacy when you start talking about « good women date good people ». You’re a making a moral claim about something inherently amoral. Plenty of good people don’t get any attention and plenty of bad men get to be in relationships with women who aren’t 22 yo whatever you want to believe they are to make you feel good about yourself and your wonderfulness. RP teach that kindness isn’t making any women wet. That there is no such a thing as fairness when it comes to da…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 05:22 PM
5

When you spent your time spouting righteous platitudes no wonder people call you out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 04:02 PM
4

Good women date good people - you and OP are hyper fixated on 22 year old wannabe influencer e-girls who have no brain but those are the only people RP strategies work on. Just world fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 01:57 PM
1

Biology didn't say we aren't monogamous. Simply that we are more "serial" monogamous. As for kink shaming it's the same kind of argument used by people to justify what is a toxic relationship when they want to make it more glamorous than it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:59 PM
1

Who says we aren't monogamous by nature? The polyamory dude who is fine sitting in the dining room working on his insecurities while "his girlfriend" is plowed upstairs in the bedroom?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:52 PM
1

Breathing isn't a choice. It's a biological need. People who sleep around a lot tend to have a harder time pair bonding. Something some people would care about if they are LTR-minded. We can also talk about the risk of infidelity. The reminiscence of "hot girls summer" once they have settled and "matured". There is also a lot of baggage that tends to come with "high" promiscuity. And before you try, I prefer a slut to a virgin. However, I'm still able to be self-aware about what kind of woman I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:45 PM
1

No, you asked what are the consequences of sleeping around. I also asked you a rhetoric question. They are many people who smoke a lot and they are friendly and nice and whatever. Doesn't mean what they are doing has no consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:36 PM
1

What are the consequences of someone who fuck everyone who asks for it? Let me guess, you also wonder what are the consequences to smoke 5 blunts a day?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:29 PM
1

I really don’t think people sleeping around should be such a high priority to judge someone off of. Sleeping around has consequences. That's why some people care about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:23 PM
1

Oh please, she is considered one of the founding mothers of second wave feminism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simone_de_Beauvoir#Legacy Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex is considered a foundational work in the history of feminism. Beauvoir had denied being feminist multiple times but ultimately admitted that she was one after the influential Second Sex became crucial in the world of feminism.[5] The work has had a profound influence, opening the way for second-wave feminism in the United St…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:21 PM
3

Simone de Beauvoir isn't just "a single woman's opinion", especially when it comes to feminism. Your dishonesty is out of this world. Next time Marx's opinion on communism is simply a single man's opinion, who cares? Goddamn, people!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:12 PM
-1

We already know that female sexuality is perfect, unlike men's sexuality...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:01 PM
1

People should stop acting like actions and behavior have no consequences. Or that they have consequences until they don't when it suits them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 06:00 PM
2

He simply debunked your point. Just take the L.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 05:57 PM
8

People want to be ignored until they are really ignored. Become a "low value" man and you would get what you wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:17 PM
2

It wasn’t a counter. You asked me why your post was nonsensical and I explained to you why. I never said that men were better or anything, you’re straw manning here and arguing with yourself. Now once again, I don’t care about the rest of your stupidity. Since you’re looking for women’s validation be my guest and waste someone else time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 06:39 PM
2

Since you’re begging for it. If you consider that sex is a skill that means it’s something you can learn. Now if you weren’t to busy trying to get women approval and some kind of validation like the simps you’re, you would know that women have to learn that skill if they want to be good lover. What is funny with ret*rd like you is that you claim to know better yet you’re as stupid as the rest. To have good sex you need to people who strive to get it. Not just men with big dick like some porn you…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 04:52 PM
0

I should have been more clear. My bad
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:58 PM
3

I wasn’t talking about you but about these young women who are blameless and obviously are all wonderful in bed. So try to keep your solipsism for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:48 PM
9

You’re contradicting yourself in your own post. You should be devastated by your inability to have coherent thinking process.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:43 PM
7

The level of stupidity in this post is out of this world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:37 PM
9

Women really need to stop believing they are Aphrodite Reborn. Maybe the reason why so many men have a hard time with women is that you're just shitty in bed. You're passive, don't know how to arouse anyone, starfish to the moon, don't know how to move your hips, and are unable to ride a cock even with a gun on your head. Stop blaming porn and start having some self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:30 PM
1

Jut google Quantitative Analyst.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:23 AM
1

I was using your derogatory word. Quants are human being. As much as we like to troll what they are doing on WallStreetBet we all know they are doing things 95% of people are unable to understand. Evaluating the potential growth of a company is far more easy. Some retard on WSB do that and many aren’t less successful than some analyst on CNBC.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:17 AM
1

Again they are technically called: Quantitative ANALYST… Of course they would be able to do what analysts do. Do you actually know what analysts do in corporate finance? Yes quants are paid more. When it comes to corporate finance, the better STEMlord you’re the better you get paid. Beside executives obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:07 AM
1

Quants are humans. If you’re not a STEMlord you would never be able to do what Quants actually do. That’s the point. Once again Analysts have an understanding at best of what Quants do. It’s « easier » for a student to be an analyst than to be a Quant.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:55 AM
1

Without these computer programs, they wouldn't be able to cruise the Mediterranean on their Yacht. They would still be selling and buying stocks and bonds...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:46 AM
1

What are you trying to say here? That you don't need a CS background to create a website or a marketplace for lodging?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:40 AM
1

Analysts are also useful especially when it comes to M&A and making investment calls and telling how they feel about the market on CNBC... Executives are the real bosses, however.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:31 AM
3

Wall Street didn't have the dimension its have now precisely because quants weren't a thing. Derivatives (CDO and MBS) are the reason why the banking industry peaked so much. Before that banking wasn't something sexy and that lucrative. Buying and selling bonds and stocks aren't how Lehman Brothers made their money. Guess who is making these derivatives? And Quants are technically called: Quantitative Analyst...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:24 AM
0

Yeah, I'm pretty sure someone without a CS background would have been able to achieve what they did... Just like it's just happened that Warren Buffet is a businessman that learned a thing or two about investing at Columbia...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:16 AM
3

Quants are the one who makes securities and derivatives that make the whole casino run. JP Morgan or Well Fargos or Hedgies wouldn't do shit without Quants making complexes derivatives that fuck over retail investors and make the cash flowing in the "right direction". Without STEMlords there aren't Market Makers, so no Wall Street.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:08 AM
1

Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and the Paypal Mafia aren't STEMlords? Like please...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:00 AM
2

You consider that Quants aren't STEMlords? Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:59 AM
3

Yeah and we all know that women stop after selling a nude or two...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:56 PM
5

You're fallacious as hell, computers, and programs weren't at all the kind we are talking about right now. You even put it in quotes for a reason because you know it. And we were talking about gaming, not hardware.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:53 PM
10

No. The reason there are female devs is that some men created the whole thing because they had that passion. You should re-read The_Meep_Lord comment here to see how Gaming is like any male hobby, he explains the process perfectly well. If men weren't there to create and support the whole thing at its beginning no female devs would care (and would be there) about making video games for consumers who had to wait for the whole thing to not be considered a "loser hobby".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:18 PM
0

Video games have never been better tho. Just no.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:09 PM
7

1)gaming is not a 'male hobby' and hasn't been for a while. It's majority male, but it's nowhere near to exclusively male. https://www.statista.com/statistics/232383/gender-split-of-us-computer-and-video-gamers/ Without men, that industry wouldn't exist, to begin with, and without male consumers, it wouldn't either. Gaming is and always will be a "male hobby".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:04 PM
7

Just because you believe you're wonderful, that doesn't mean you actually are. Narcissists also like themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 04:11 PM
0

that the impetus and outcomes of a more equal and just world are fundamentally There is nothing more equal or fundamentally just in the modern left. It's quite baffling to talk about comforting fantasy while preaching about some nonsensical master class.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 01:32 AM
10

If you're a young dude with some semi-formed ideals of collectivism and solidarity, one of the big steps you need to take is to get comfortable with the idea that you are not the main character. Your point is stupid and highlights the problem that is talked about here. You talk about collectivism and solidarity and turn it into that self masochism bullshit that is destroying the left. Collectivism was never about straight white men having to "check their privileges". Really, that's baffling and …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 01:29 AM
1

And women wouldn't date 95% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:28 PM
1

I focused on that decades because when people start arguing with "women didn't work" it's pretty clear that their "understanding" of human history starts with the 50s. As for the reason why so many leaders are men is far more complex and it seems far beyond your understanding. Just to give you an example you probably never heard about. In many Matriarchal societies, like the Mosuo, politics, and outside labor are men's spaces while women manage propriety and rule the family. In Sparta, politics …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:27 AM
2

Brainwashing pure and simple. Neo-Feminism is a fucking cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:17 AM
2

Women always worked. Even a suffragette debunked that whole narrative back in the days. https://www.marxists.org/archive/beard/woman-force/index.htm For God's sake, human history didn't start with the 1950s. Capitalism and liberalism weren't invented in the 1950s... You don't know what you're talking about here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:01 AM
4

The amount of nonsense in your post is out of this world. The standard for CEOs developed in a patriarchal society? Are you even thinking when you talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 12:41 AM
1

Compared to most people here you are a kid yeah. Some folks here could be your parents and some are older than your parents I'm sure. When I said you were hiding something I wasn't making an argument I was stating a fact: your omission in this case. As for people fucking in High School it's true, and one could say that you are even more lying about your willingness to fuck anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:35 AM
1

Oh, you're a kid in fact. You weren't saying the whole truth as I said. Now that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:28 AM
1

You're obviously lying. You can be rich and poor at the same time, for example. Just like you can't be willing to fuck anyone and not have found anyone to fuck. So either you're lying to yourself or to me. In both cases, you're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:23 AM
1

You're lying or you aren't giving the whole truth. You can't be willing to fuck anyone and not have found anyone to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:19 AM
3

Let me get this straight you're not average, you aren't a methhead and you aren't a whore... Yet you will easily fuck someone you have no attraction for... Maybe it's a kink but I think you're bullshitting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:13 AM
3

The only time desperate average girls are willing to fuck someone they aren't attracted to is when they are prostitutes or doing coke on a daily basis. If they were fucking for free so easily, we wouldn't be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:06 AM
7

When it's your job it doesn't count
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 12:57 AM
1

The postulate of your study is a fallacy. I took the time to read some of it. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/men-who-do-housework-have-less-sex/ Each time we are talking about that subject people can't stop themselves to say or imply that men are lazy and women are doing everything. OECD data about paid work and unpaid work already debunked the idea that men are doing nothing while their wives are slaving away. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54757 Now I find the results of…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 08:36 PM
5

You might have noticed the army of hairy fat guys who's wives are utterly crazy about them. Hard to notice something that doesn't exist. And I can back it up with studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 08:05 PM
8

Nice to know you have duty sex with your partner...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 07:33 PM
1

Your whole post is simply false and has already been debunked by studies. "It's men's fault" doesn't work in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:53 PM
11

Sexual attraction doesn't work that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:45 PM
17

his point has been discussed ad nauseam yet people keep asking the same question. Because women spend their time gaslighting about it on a daily basis when it suits their rhetoric. Today you and other women are agreeing that women aren't attracted to the vast majority of men and the next day you're going to come and say Red Pillers are full of shit when they talk about women's dual mating strategies aka Alpha Fuck and Beta Bux.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:36 PM
20

The average woman isn’t way hotter than the average man. Just because they aren’t attracted to 80% of the men population that doesn’t mean women are way hotter than men. The reality is pretty simple. Men have testosterone and women not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:15 PM
45

Of course, attraction matters, you don't want to end up in a dead bedroom situation but as long as she treats you well and you have sex regurlarly, I don't see the problem with a partner being only mildly attracted to you. If she is mildly attracted to you she won't have sex regularly with you. You're just wrong here and are gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 02:32 PM
2

religious LBGTQ+ people And I thought I had seen it all...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 12:01 AM
2

And reading through online women and educated women and listening to mainstream media, men are oppressors and the reasons why we aren’t living in Eden.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:47 PM
2

My quest for pussy is spiritual, so you could say I’m not very materialistic. You like to delude yourself bro. I don't blame you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:45 AM
2

Your second example isn't a misandrist statement. You're juste using victimhood rhetoric. If you don't know what misandry is, just ask more intelligent people to explain it to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:44 AM
1

Do men have good reason to be sexist too or is it just for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:42 AM
6

Nice to admit that women always hated men and now they are freer to say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:41 AM
6

They counter it by saying how much they hate men? It's pretty funny to complain about the misogyny of male culture while female culture doesn't like men that much, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:40 AM
2

Do you love the fact some working-class women sell their wombs to upper-class women? Do you love the fact that some people consider that you have to learn how not to oppress because you're an oppressor by default? What do you like outside of money and how much money you make with all of the geniuses you deal with on a daily basis apparently? I ask you this because I'm guessing you're pretty materialistic in the philosophical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:36 AM
2

No, just someone who doesn't say yes or no to such a complex question to some random dude believing he is Freud on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:28 AM
2

Especially manly tears.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:27 AM
2

Awful, I cried every night waiting for someone on Reddit asking me how do I feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:25 AM
2

Why does it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:24 AM
1

Those blue collar folks too sobered by reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:23 AM
2

I went to Syria fighting ISIS. Now you're going to make a point or are you trying to dismiss my perspective by telling me "you have never been in a fight so I'm right about everything"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:22 AM
1

I never said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:19 AM
1

The reality where people like you make fun of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:19 AM
–

You're doing worst. You're using the death of other women to further your own agenda just to win a petty argument... And you're being totally fallacious by doing so
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:18 AM
2

That means sometimes I "won", sometimes I got beaten. What is your point here? That war is awful and useless?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:16 AM
-1

Without men there wouldn't be a society, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:14 AM
2

Yeah. I tried to give as much as I got.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:13 AM
2

I'm baffled by your larping. You make fun of whining men, yet you're weak yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:10 AM
–

I fail to understand why you're so prone about shaming whining men while at the same time you're advocating for surrendering in a life and death situation. Just because you will just wait to be killed because you're too holier to actually fight, that doesn't mean people willing to defend themselves are stupid. It's when shit hits the fan that we know what type of man you're.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 04:06 AM
1

It's not illegal to catcall women. Yet it's not socially acceptable. Do I need to explain it more or you're able to understand the nuance between the law and the practice?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:22 AM
1

And yet women with the capacity to commit some kind of violence still aren't given nearly the amount of respect that men are. Yes, they actually are. Nancy Pelosi comes to mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:21 AM
0

That's why I said socially. I wasn't talking about the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:08 AM
1

He means that in practice women don't care about men's violence because it's done by other men. It's socially acceptable to not care about violence against men. It's absolutely not to even disagree with violence against women in the broadest sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 12:03 AM
1

r/geopolitics or r/philosophy are also totally male-dominated. Just like so many others.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:28 PM
3

Do you mean like r/politics where everyone considers Third Wave Feminism as the Holy Truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:21 PM
3

You cannot talk to men about the things like what I talk to women about. It isn't a conversation, it turns into a monologue, if they're even interested in such things to begin with. 90% of subs who talk about serious shit are totally male-dominated. You're just lying here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 06:43 PM
2

and frankly on the suffering of people who have it the worst. Life isn't fair. Why care?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 06:29 PM
2

Already proposed and already debunked. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/men-who-do-housework-have-less-sex/ And since you didn't bother to read: However, the authors stress that because couples without children also showed declines, parenthood is not the only challenge for women’s sexual desire and couples’ marital satisfaction. I even bothered to bold it in my first post to make it easy for people like you. Otherwise, I can also bring you the OECD data about paid work and unpaid work …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 06:02 PM
2

Fair enough. However, I don’t think these behaviors are social constructs. Women dual mating strategy is already well documented.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 05:21 AM
2

I fail to see what you’re trying to say here. I get you’re trying to refute these studies but you’re spouting nonsense here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 05:04 AM
5

Fancy way to say, It's men's fault that women don't want to fuck their husband. Men don't know how to do anything. It's known! Unfortunately that's already been debunked. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/men-who-do-housework-have-less-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:10 AM
1

Yeah, contrary to most people here I'm self-aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 12:06 AM
1

I wasn't talking about romance, I was talking about romantic relationships. What you call romance is also known as seduction or mating dance. Romance is simply a more noble word to say the same thing. As for your understanding of romance, you are being romantic with your friends too? Because they give you gift to cheer you up and not get into your pants. Just like your parents gave you gifts to make you happy and feel special. Are your friends and parents are being romantic with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 07:12 PM
21

I'm posting that here because I want people to have a better understanding of what happens in most LTR. Most women settle and that's what happens in most LTR according to studies. In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable than men’s. Men’s levels of sexual desire stayed higher and more constant th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 07:01 PM
2

Asexual people: am I joke to you? Yes, you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:47 PM
3

Your welcome. That's for that kind of discussion I come here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:46 PM
1

Yes, it does. Sex is the main difference between romantic love and friendship. You're conflating romance and seduction. It's not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:44 PM
1

The examples aren't the same. And your post is dishonest as hell. Women cheat because of men, now. It's men's fault if they get cheated on by their wife? Just the other day: https://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/sxed8x/i_26f_am_engaged_to_an_amazing_guy_28m_that_i/hxrkikn/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3 Now since you didn't bother to read the previous link: In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the research…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:40 PM
4

Sorry, if I have been rude too. I'm a cynical asshole anyway. I really believe that you genuinely love your man. And maybe my whole point doesn't concern you particularly. As long as you get what I'm saying, I'm fine even if you disagree. I think I also get what you're saying. How to name the relationship you have that is more than friendship but not quite romantic (in the main understanding)? I think it's tenderness. Like a genuine love without lust. Not quite romantic but still loving and not …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:30 PM
2

I said that sex is what differentiates a great friendship from a romantic relationship. Romantic relationship = friendship (someone you genuinely like spending time with for so many reasons) + sex (someone you genuinely want to fuck).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:00 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire That's what happens to relationships when people aren't fucking. There is no justification for your argument beyond using 0,1% of the human population to make a point. But since your asexual's friends told you, it must be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:54 PM
2

Yet, educated women love to lecture men about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:50 PM
1

Clearly you define romance very differently than the vast majority of people. The vast majority of people aren't asexual. And the vast majority of men aren't low libidos either. Tell you what, you ask people if they would be fine to not fuck that much with their partners. And having them not genuinely desiring them. Then we would see who has the shit take here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:49 PM
1

Ha, what? That’s not an argument. Yours weren't one either. This is however enough to refute your claim that there is no such thing as romance without sexual desire. Since when 0,1% of the population are the rules? Exceptions aren't the rules especially when they are so few. You're not refuting anything you're just being dishonest. I’m interested to know how 2000 years of human art and history proves that romance without sex is impossible. What about you start to read about Eros for example. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:44 PM
2

No, I never said you need to love someone to have sex with them. I said there is no such thing as romantic love without sexual desire. As I said to someone else, asexuals are beyond a minority, using them as examples is fallacious as hell. They don't know either what romance is. I'm not saying that you have to fuck all the time. I'm saying that if you don't have genuine sexual desire and consistent sex with them that means you have a great friendship. But it seems that in fact you and your partn…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:37 PM
2

I disagree based on the last 2000 years of the human history of thinking and art.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:28 PM
5

I told you who wouldn't agree on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:18 PM
0

I never said that you can't have sex if you don't love. I said that there is no such thing as romance without sexual desire. Asexuals are beyond a minority and they don't know what romance is either. Using them as an example is fallacious as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:18 PM
1

You're right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:11 PM
5

No, I said that the only thing that differentiates romantic love from the other type of love is Eros. Sexual desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:10 PM
1

But it's not the be all end all for a successful romantic relationship. That's where we disagree. The decline of a woman's sexual desire destroys relationship satisfaction for both partners. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire I'm not doubting that you love your partner. I'm simply arguing that if you aren't fucking or lusting after him, that means you have a wonderful friendship. And that's great and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:09 PM
4

You don't care about fucking your husband, that's the point. He could be whatever type of friend you want him to be considering that romantic love isn't the basis of your relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:00 PM
1

Yeah, if both of them don't care about sex and aren't fucking, it's great for them. However, that means they have a great friendship. Not a romantic relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:57 PM
4

whether or not my man and I are having sex doesn't determine whether we love each other or not. You don't fuck your parents or friends or whatever, yet I'm pretty sure you love them. The thing is the love you feel for them is still love, but a different kind of love. Eros is the main component of romance and what differentiates romantic love from the ones cited above. If you aren't fucking that means you have a wonderful friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:51 PM
12

And it would have been a blessing for both of us. When you pretend that the main difference between a great friendship and a great romance isn't sexual intimacy (so lust or Eros). If the latter isn't there that simply means you have a great friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:47 PM
13

Flap, I already know that you're old enough to be my mom and that your husband has low libido. I won't argue with you because you tend to argue like sex is irrelevant in a relationship while it's plain right false.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:41 PM
4

Don't forget to tell that to your partner. That way they won't be surprised when you deadbedroom them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:37 PM
1

We aren't talking about random strangers but your boyfriend/husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:35 PM
6

The outrage is in mainstream media when people talk about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:34 PM
0

So you won't genuinely want to fuck your partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:30 PM
7

There is no such thing as a loving strong relationship between 2 people without genuine sexual attraction and consistent sex. And before you say it older people are different and women here love to brag about the fact that grannies are fucking like it's the last day of Rome in retirement homes. Online women really need to stop pretending that cuddling on the couch and being emotionally vulnerable with each other is the pinnacle of intimacy or enough intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:30 PM
1

Jeff Bezos was divorced because he cheated on his wife who supported him from the beginning. Now his new girlfriend doesn’t mind to eye fuck Leo DiCaprio in front of him. It’s a bad example. Once again your analogy is bad. The AK is amongst the best assault rifles in the world. Instead of being a Bugatti it’s a Lambo. It seems average because it’s cheap, but it isn’t average. Now, I’m on mobile I won’t be able to give you the study that show that in most marriage women end up duty sexing their h…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 07:41 PM
1

I was talking about probabilities. If you tend to be something that means you less likely to be the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 04:36 PM
1

If women tend to be more gentler and kinder, that means they are less likely to be bad than men. If you tend to be rich that means you’re less likely to be poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 03:27 PM
11

I'm going to save this post. It illustrates so well what Red Pillers mean by AF/BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:36 PM
3

Yet women love to gaslight men because they don't like to acknowledge the unsavory part of their behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:23 PM
4

It's not that men don't like to be compared to objects, the point you missed is that men don't like to be gaslighted.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:15 PM
3

Yeah, and politicians or lawyers mean exactly what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:09 PM
16

Your analogy is bad. Not many assault rifles were liked as much or more than the AK 47. That gun was a prize in most cases. That is why it is so famous.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 11:04 PM
1

You're contradicting yourself. You said that if a woman is wearing headphones that means you do not attempt. The thing is women wear headphones practically everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:11 PM
2

So in fact, men should never attempt to approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:05 PM
8

So practically everywhere outside of work and since you shouldn't do it in work too...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:59 PM
1

You're wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:33 PM
5

Testosterone doesn't exist. It's known!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:16 PM
3

You're arguing in bad faith. What full agency does even mean? Are you applying some 21st century liberal worldview (mostly Western liberals for that matters) to periods you actually have at best a shallow understanding at worst a cartoonish take?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:16 AM
4

I agree with that and it's a shame. That doesn't mean that women never had any agency. Even in Matriarchal society (like the Mosuo) women's behavior is what you would call traditional feminity...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:03 AM
5

They were a women's rights movement. That doesn't mean half of the human species never had free will or agency for 300 000 years until some well off American women couldn't stand anymore to not be able to play with the top 10% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:55 AM
6

And how many men had a bank account and a credit card in the 60s and 70s? The world was born with the US? Once again are you trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:49 AM
6

The right to have a bank account and have a credit card was created for the industry captains who had a lot of cash, like a lot. So 90% of men didn't have a bank account or a credit card back in the day it was created. We are talking about the "modern" banking system here. I'm pretty sure you never heard about Florentine bankers who already used to store assets of (rich) patrician women... Now, if you want, we can talk about the fact that Roman women had unilateral rights over the asset they bro…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:43 AM
7

Women weren't able to think before the 60s? Like women never had free will before the 60s? The patriarchy created women's behavior? Are you trolling?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:22 AM
10

Because women have absolutely no agency and have no behavior that isn't dictated by men. It's known!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:16 AM
0

Someone comparable to you is someone who makes your life worst? Are you even listening to yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 01:41 PM
8

Just because you can't read, that doesn't mean people don't have answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 06:57 PM
2

Again, are you Cathy Newman? You're pretending that differences in physical attractiveness have no consequences. And you have the gall to accuse me of black piller mentality? What are you unable to understand in: A person's physical appearance has a critical impact on their sexual attractiveness. ? Like really. The previous links show that women have dual mating and sexual strategies. They also show that women get bored with sex in LTR. They also show that in LTR (so long term strategy) women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 12:18 PM
2

And gold diggers don't exist either. And duty sex doesn't exist. The moronic statement here is to believe that the average Joe has the same level of sexual attraction as a highly physically attractive man because he invested his money in an ETF. "Men are willing to fuck plain Jane and they are also willing to bang some 9/10 Insta thot, that means plain Jane and Insta thot have the same sexual attractiveness. So women don't mind fucking average Joe" - decoy88. Differences create consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 12:10 PM
0

Can't be married since modern women actually don't want the vast majority of men. In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable than men’s. Men’s levels of sexual desire stayed higher and more constant than women’s throughout the duration of both studies. Furthermore, declines in women’s sexual desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:05 AM
1

Wives will talk shit about husband's who don't do the dishes. Walk talk shit about husband since the beginning of time. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/men-who-do-housework-have-less-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 01:49 AM
1

And plus the way to identify whether it’s there… is if a woman has sex. The presence of sex is the best evidence of sexual attraction. Dude, prostitutes aren't sexually attracted to their Johns. Just like sugar babies, or gold diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 07:18 PM
2

I never said it was irrelevant. You are talking like it is. I didn't decide anything, you conveyed that point that these 2 options are not the same when it comes to looks. Because a 5 isn't an 8. So either you're saying things without thinking, or you're being fallacious. Who told you that comparison was sexual attraction vs NO sexual attraction? Why didn’t you think sexual attraction vs LESS sexual attraction? I never said no sexual attraction. My point is that if a woman compromises and settle…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 07:15 PM
2

Are you Cathy Newman? What don't you understand in "A person's physical appearance has a critical impact on their sexual attractiveness."?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 06:53 PM
2

I already answered. It's hard to answer a dumb question. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_attraction Sexual attraction is attraction on the basis of sexual desire or the quality of arousing such interest.[1] Sexual attractiveness or sex appeal is an individual's ability to attract other people sexually, and is a factor in sexual selection or mate choice. The attraction can be to the physical or other qualities or traits of a person, or to such qualities in the context where they appear. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:30 PM
2

Why are you talking about that ranking if it doesn't matter apparently? What is the point of making that looks distinctions if apparently, it's so irrelevant that one is a 5 and the other an 8? I didn't decide anything, you conveyed that point that these 2 options are not the same when it comes to looks. The last time I checked a 5 is less physically attractive than an 8. If we are ranking it's for a purpose. It's about making a comparison. Not just talking for shit and giggles. You on the other…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:26 PM
2

Sexual attraction and arousal are mostly primal. You can't negotiate it and having a good portfolio doesn't make a woman sexually attracted to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:11 PM
1

I'm using your own ranking 'tard...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:09 PM
1

If she considers him a 5 in looks that means she doesn't find him that sexually attractive. And before you start pretending that women's sexual attraction has nothing to do with looks, don't bother there are already studies that explain that women care as much as men about physical attractiveness when it comes to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:06 PM
1

You can't continue any conversation because you don't know what you're talking about. And my point is backed by studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:03 PM
3

Your question here is fallacious as hell. You're talking about women's dual mating and sexual strategy and pretending that physical attraction and lust who are the baseline requirement to have sex, is an irrelevant factor in an LTR. It's simply totally false. Once again sexual attraction matters. If a woman is settling for you in that department, and choosing you for reasons that will keep her pussy dry down in the road you aren't going to have a good relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 04:53 PM
4

Also second choice for casual sex might be first choice for LTR Having a neuroses over that fact is immature shit. What is stupid is the fact you think not finding your partner sexually attractive or not wanting to fuck them is perfectly fine and won't have consequences. Your whole is disingenuous as fuck. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 04:48 PM
2

I said that in online women's heads as long as you cuddle on the couch and are emotionally vulnerable with each other you're in fact in an LTR. I agree with you that not fucking means you're roommate. But online women don't agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:43 AM
2

I said that women don't have sex with their long term partners. I never talked about celibacy or rebranding sexual relationships as celibacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:37 AM
2

I never made that claim, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:31 AM
3

Not having sex with your partner is fine? Tell that to every man you want to have a relationship with. They would like to know about the dead bedroom incoming, I'm sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:28 AM
2

Not in their head.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:47 AM
3

Online women who preach about the non-importance of sex and the non-importance of physical attractiveness in mate selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:21 AM
3

According to women, it's not celibacy as long as you cuddle on the couch and you're being emotionally vulnerable with each other. According to women, it's enough intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 02:17 AM
1

They also duty sex their husband down the road too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:28 AM
5

As long as women have sex with their long term partners They actually don't...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:25 AM
5

So you can worship such stupidity?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:22 AM
6

The level of bullshit of this post is out of this galaxy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 01:22 AM
1

Once again you're acting like 5s actually want to settle with them while they still prefer spending 5 mins with Chad than settle with some 5s average Joe.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:52 AM
0

So I say again: what can a man bring into my life beside money? Absolutely nothing since you hate men. Something you hate can't bring you anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:16 AM
1

You kinda forgot that women have the power in the relationship market. Your point here is like saying that people who struggle to find a job are all looking for being a corporate executive at BlackRock while they are high school drop out. In practice, you find out it's much more complex than ugly men not wanting to date ugly women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:11 AM
1

But short & ugly dudes still get laid and it's not the end of the fucking world. If it were the case, we wouldn't be here talking about this shit. The Red Pill and the whole pillosphere wouldn't be a thing, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 12:03 AM
1

Well, when all the romantically and sexually successful men You have to explain what you mean by being romantically and sexually successful. I think you don't have the same understanding of that as the people you're arguing with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 03:57 PM
1

I have seen some people getting successful when they didn’t earn it either.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 03:40 PM
2

Yeah it’s a type of respect however, as I already said that also means in practice nobody care about you or your issue. That means no more social movement to get you equality or anything else. Men and women don’t have the same understanding of what respect means. In men’s world respect is earned. You don’t get a sit at the table if you didn’t earn it in a way or another. You don’t get to cry about not being taken seriously by other people because in men’s world that means you didn’t earn to actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 03:02 PM
1

You don’t know what basic politeness or indifference actually means. In practice that means you don’t care about people around you unless you have to actually mind them and even most people don’t care. People walk before homeless folks all the time and give them basic politeness and indifference. That’s what we are talking about here. It’s certainly not respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 01:49 PM
8

Yeah and profound disinterest too. Still not respect. Not in the way men understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 03:28 AM
2

So you're admitting that men can get scammed by some Gold digger when in their 40s while women get to not be scammed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 02:22 AM
13

If you mean basic politeness and indifferent interaction, yes That's not respect. It's simply basic politeness and indifferent interaction. That also means if you are struggling nobody would care.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 02:13 AM
2

I said, at the end of the day, what matters to women is how you make them feel, and in this regard, both your looks and personality matters. If she finds you physically attractive it's far easier to make her feel good. It's not about not being ugly. It's about being physically attractive to her. And again, if it's no, no amount of personality is going to offset your looks unless you're willing to be with a woman who is going to duty sex you down in the road. Your study, especially in regards of …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:30 PM
0

The thing is most people don't spend their time punching old ladies in the face or disparaging service staff (well it depends on the country and the culture). However, most people like to believe that the people they find attractive have a good personality and are willing to be in denial about it. Most people do that because they like to believe they are themselves wonderful too in some way. It's like: "My handsome boyfriend is intelligent because I like intelligent people and in a way that mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:16 PM
7

It's not just "true in some cases", it's true in the vast majority of cases. I already provided proof of how the Halo Effect influences the perception of your personality. Being good looking makes other people believe you're better. I precisely bolded the relevant part. It's not just reducing your chances to get rejected on sight. Once again, I bothered to come up with a well-documented concept. It would be actually nice of you to actually read about it and not just tell wishful thinking. Attrac…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 02:18 AM
7

All one needs to know about the role of "personality" when it comes to relationships. People’s first impressions of others influence their later decision as to either approach or avoid those individuals.[44] When people first encounter someone, the information present about that individual is limited; therefore, people will use the information available to assume other characteristics about that person; for instance, observable behaviors such as eye contact, leaning forward, smiling and positive…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 12:35 AM
3

Men aren't the ones saying the past doesn't matter, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 12:25 AM
1

The beginning of Covid was hail days. Congrats and fuck you!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 10:11 AM
1

Tendies are just one call away! It's known. Just one more. Lambo or Wendy's dumpster!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 03:20 AM
5

Women only care about the integrity of the men they are fucking. Overall they simply don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 03:13 AM
1

One could say I hate money since I started option trading and found WallStreetbets 3 years ago. So you would be pretty right on this one! And no, I'm not saying I'm so smart. I don't have an inflated sense of my own intelligence like you, for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 03:05 AM
1

I never said I was against giving women more opportunities. You're the one spending your time creating a boogeyman in your head. I already told you about Sweden that tried to level the field in STEM. You should look it up. We can also look at affirmative action. There is a variance that implies concrete consequences. Not everything is a social construct. Foucault and Derrida nuked your brain. I don't care about your achievements. However, I care about your ability to have an intelligent conversa…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:57 AM
1

Once again if you actually took the time to read instead of ranting and being stupid you would have seen the part where I said: "on average men are less risk-averse than women". Now you lack reading skills, but that sentence doesn't mean that risk-friendly women don't exist. The point is, they tend to be not as numerous as risk friendly men. 7-8 out of 10 risk friendly people would be men. That's all I said. Do you believe you be able to be smart if you weren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:42 AM
–

You may be right.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:35 AM
–

Virgin men aren't virgins by choice, except when they are religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:31 AM
1

There is a difference between genders. I know you have a hard time really understanding that but women aren't simply men without penises. I know it also must be shocking but differences have concrete externalities and consequences. Shocking I know. Women aren't less intelligent than men. I don't believe that personally. However, they are more risk-averse than men and tend to be more passive overall. The mate selection illustrates that perfectly. Do I also need to tell you what an ad hominem is o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:29 AM
–

They're quick to assume I'm naive, asexual, or both, just because I'm a virgin. In most cases, they would be right though. In our modern world women who are virgins tend to not care about sex for religious reasons or whatever. It's kinda hard to grasp that you crave something you never did and simply imagine in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:13 AM
1

So simple and redundant and yet you fail to understand them and strawman them. We are talking about the variation between men and women, not every single individual. For God's sake, even bankers and insurance sellers know that women and men haven't the same Risk tolerance and account for it in their pricing. So, again, on average men tend to be more innovative than women. Men trust the extremum of the distribution. Making something innovative implies taking a risk. You're trying to make a change…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:08 AM
1

Considering throwing ad hominem is your pavlovian reflex when you're outsmarted, I'm pretty sure you're simply projecting here. We were talking about men and women and you admitted you don't know what testosterone is and what Risk tolerance is about. I never talked about biological credentials but nice strawman I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:50 AM
1

It's not some women. Once again there is a reason why men tend to be more innovative than women. Are you ever heard of testosterone or Risk tolerance? If you never heard about that there is no need to keep talking. Women weren't excluded as much as you want to believe. You're spouting Feminist history here. Even today while women are dominating the academic field you find more men in tech for example and more patents made by men. Affirmative action is more and more present and we don't see women…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:27 AM
1

If women had more testosterone yeah they would be less risk-averse too, and more prone to experiment and so innovate. But they would be men at this point. So for women to be as innovative as men as a whole you have to turn them into men. I'm not making your point at all unless you're unable to understand what I'm saying. And it's not bullshit figures. The laptop or smartphone you're using to say whatever nonsense to some stranger across the world was made by men. Just like the eating system you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:11 AM
1

90% of innovations are made by men. Men are less risk averse than women and so more likely to experiment. Except for feminism, nearly every social change was championed by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:00 AM
1

You have no room to talk while you're leftist and cancel even your own pal on a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:54 AM
1

Any meritocracy is by essence inequal. So, yeah one can fairly say that inequality is logical.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:52 AM
1

90% of innovations are made by men. Men are far less risk-averse than women and so more likely to experiment. You're so wrong it's baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:50 AM
3

A lot of socially progressive views straight up harm men and there’s a lot of blatant misandry on the left as well. There’s just not a lot of appeal to engage with the left or left wing women as a man. It works that way too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:45 AM
6

Cancel culture isn't open mindness. Believing you have some sort of holy truth isn't open mindness ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 12:32 AM
1

« Cultural nationalist brainwashing » means absolutely nothing. If you want to pretend you’re smart you would need to do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:48 PM
1

Yet here you're making a boogeyman of a perfect stranger. Once again you want to make it personal. Yes, it would take much and need taxpayers money who won't stand for paying for sexbot and whores for citizens they consider to be an annoyance. Women would never agree to that and other people would call you out for your false caring.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:22 AM
1

And most men don't simp for OF models either. Most men simps for women on a daily basis. Simps didn't need OF to simps for Becky.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:13 AM
3

Pretty shocking that you admit that the majority of men are sexually repulsive to women. Did you use to claim you aren't an RP?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:08 AM
1

We aren't talking about "us" but about what you proposed. If you think women and men like you are going to be willing to pay more taxes for guys they despise, I have a bridge to sell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 01:04 AM
2

Why don't you simply slaughter them all instead of pretending to care? It will cost you less.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:58 AM
-1

You are aware that you can't get smart women to be stay at home moms anymore with this? And eventually even the stupid women will catch up. You just almost completely erased the existence of SAHM'S with one move AND reduced the birth rate MASSIVELY. "Smart women" want to be more and more childfree and don't want to be SAHM to begin with. They also don't care about birth rate as long as they can be as hedonistic as they want and have it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:52 AM
1

The USA is scared of not having the biggest GDP in the world, despite multiple countries who aren’t being fine. These countries are fine because they profit from the USA having the biggest GDP in the world. EU and the US are the reason why the liberal order your greatly benefitting from exist in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 12:36 AM
0

We can say the same about you. You want to believe that men are evil and women are right to think so. It benefits you probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:45 PM
3

Insulting a man's ability to get laid isn't men's toxic bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:30 PM
2

No, you are a hypocrite when you go around telling that "It’s on men to unlearn that their value is derived from having people to have sex with". It's totally dishonest to say that when women and men like you love to call Incels/whatever shaming tactics men who don't perpetuate the Women Are Wonderful Effect. Women and their simps always insult the ability of a man they don't like to get laid. It's a meme for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:17 PM
1

You're a simp and a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:08 PM
1

You're strawmanning here sweaty. You don't know what subjectivity is and actually implies. You can't say in one breath that creepiness is subjective and said that it's objective and calling people incels because they don't agree with you. Please, try using your head. (Now I'm being insulting)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:07 PM
-1

I'm not insulting you or trying to make an argument. You're blaming men because some of them don't see you as a potentially great friend and try to date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 07:05 PM
3

Next time you and the women you simps for call incels or whatever shaming tactics related to sex/relationships because they don't perpetuate the women are wonderful effect, remember how much of a hypocrite you're.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:59 PM
-3

Maybe they don't want to be less than a boyfriend because you aren't as wonderful and great friendship material as you believe you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:57 PM
2

You don't know what subjectivity actually means, do you? And you actually don't know most people. You and the people you like aren't most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 06:52 PM
7

A free run with a psycho.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/22 01:49 AM
3

No. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/si7nvv/comment/hv7amo4/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:32 AM
4

Looks are just so damn irrelevant for most people because everyone is butt ugly at 6am on a Monday. I'm reading just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:29 AM
3

It's not the point I was making. You're strawmanning here. We are talking about the importance of physical attraction and sexual desire in an LTR. If you are unable to follow a simple discussion, just tell me. The majority of marriages actually fail. It's not some people's marriages. The only reason the divorce rate is declining is that fewer and fewer people actually marry while single parenting is skyrocketing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:26 AM
3

declines in women’s sexual desire predicted declining marital satisfaction for both members of the couple. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire So perfectly healthy that they aren't happy... Like are you even trying or are you already so far up?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:14 AM
2

Just go on social media and you will get some too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:03 AM
3

You don't get it. Many women aren't sexually attracted to their husbands. Many women actually duty sex their husbands. If you ask them they would tell you how wonderful their husband is but they still don't want to fuck them. That's how relationship satisfaction is destroyed while these women are too busy believing that physical attraction and sexual desire are irrelevant, just like you claimed earlier. So many women believe that not fucking is fine as long as they get to cuddle on the couch wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:00 AM
1

Except people already admit it. No, they don't. They are too busy virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:50 PM
8

When you were fallacious as hell about the importance of having good looks (aka physical attractiveness). If your partner doesn't find you physically attractive they aren't going to want to fuck you. That's simple as that. Yet you go around claiming that looks are irrelevant because 6am.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:47 PM
1

It's hard to discuss with people who talk like women do nothing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:36 PM
1

So you weren't able to be friends with other men because you were obsessed with getting laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:35 PM
2

PPD women and their simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:31 PM
6

You never hear about anything when you have your head up your arse. Real relationships never happen without physical attractiveness. When Women kinda forgot about being physically attracted to their husband they start to duty sex them. That destroys the relationship satisfaction for both partners. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire Now, you can also look up the Halo Effect and see how physical attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:30 PM
2

You weren't able to get friends before stopping obsessing about getting laid? You weren't able to be a good son before you stopped caring about fucking?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:22 PM
4

Yet OP is only talking about men and probably believes that women do nothing wrong when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:20 PM
7

You're the one saying they have a pretty good spider sense and are able to spot these guys. Then you backpedal. How about you start using your head, then I would blame whoever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:19 PM
6

Looks are just so damn irrelevant for most people because everyone is butt ugly at 6am on a Monday. You're so fallacious it's baffling. How many times does that wishful thinking have to be countered for people to stop preaching that kind of nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:17 PM
6

Sure... Nothing to do with the Halo Effect or lying to oneself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:15 PM
11

Women and their famous spider sense. It's a wonder why they complain about being abused.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:13 PM
13

Because women don't care about men who read books either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:10 PM
6

In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable than men’s. Men’s levels of sexual desire stayed higher and more constant than women’s throughout the duration of both studies. Furthermore, declines in women’s sexual desire predicted declining marital satisfaction for both members of the couple. Interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 03:39 PM
7

In two longitudinal studies (one spanning one year and one spanning four years), the researchers found that, on average, women’s levels of sexual desire were not only lower than men’s at the beginning of their marriages, but much more variable than men’s. Men’s levels of sexual desire stayed higher and more constant than women’s throughout the duration of both studies. Furthermore, declines in women’s sexual desire predicted declining marital satisfaction for both members of the couple. Interest…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 03:37 PM
4

Or maybe I used to be a bartender… Maybe I was a bartender in a student town with an internationally famous (to my dismay) street where people drink alcohol like it’s water and are proud of it… Maybe I was a bartender in a bar where people come to dance things like Kizomba or Salsa on lascivious music… What is telling is your delusion about how is the scene for average Joe…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:51 AM
3

And I’m saying what I’ve been saying. An average looking male gets women IRL at the bar via being social and seductively charming. TV Shows aren't real...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:18 AM
2

They’re not mutually exclusive. Everyone knows really attractive people get more runway Everyone has a hard time admitting that in fact, as long as she finds you physically attractive your personality is less and less relevant. And you know this because of some psychic power? Are we all just the same 14-year-old boys we were in school with deeper voices and more eye wrinkles? Is that why you put a term as innocuous as “maturing” in incredulous quotation marks? I know this because aging isn't the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 12:56 AM
6

The thing is men actually treat girlfriend material better than a booty call. With women, it's the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:50 PM
8

This level of dishonesty in your post is baffling. Plenty of men who treat women like shit or mostly don't care about their feelings don't struggle to date because they are physically attractive enough to pull it off. It's not at all about "maturing". People need to stop with this meme. It's about being disillusioned about the whole thing and trying to get happy in another way because your first way didn't work. The boys realize that women didn't want him before and now it's about being enough i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:45 PM
2

Misogynist men aren't in fact bad, they are simply not a doormat. That's why they get led so effectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:36 PM
3

If they aren't bad at all, why did they want to not date them as they got older?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:33 PM
2

The question is why are you making them wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 11:00 PM
3

Even if I disagree with you most of the time, I'm sorry for you and your kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 02:01 AM
-1

What is your point, Sigmund Freud?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 08:13 PM
-1

Because I'm able to appreciate imperfect beings for what they are and don't need to believe or pretend they are God's gift.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 08:06 PM
0

Bro, your whole post is a contradiction. Being powerless against someone actually means that someone has power over you and you don't. You can't be powerless and at the same time not be powerless. Now, I understand that you love sustaining the Women Are Wonderful Effect and it's great, however, it doesn't justify to strawman the whole argument. Men don't believe that women owe them validation. Just like the poor don't believe that rich people owe them validation. They simply see who gets fucked …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 07:53 PM
-1

You are incapable of relating to half of the species Just like women. The funniest part is the men who can actually respect women as human begins get mad pussy lol. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:37 PM
1

The thing is you have a hedonistic mindset while at the same time talking about meaningfulness. Something meaningful is per essence something that can be moved by fickleness. If you're fickle you can't have the depth that is necessary to pretend to have something meaningful. As I said you need to make an analogy with the mindset of a player. He fucks around and is looking for fun that's why he can swipe so easily from one partner to another. The next best thing is always coming anyway so why bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 06:29 PM
2

Don't misunderstand me, I agree with you about not giving up a big opportunity for the sake of a GF, especially when it's only 5 dates. The thing is, you have a hedonistic mindset. What you call meaningful life is in practice entertainment. I'm not saying you're unable to have a meaningful life, I'm saying that just like some player who fucks around and has plenty of fun, you're here for the fun. You even share the same mindset. Plenty of fish in the sea, plenty of pleasure. Why bother with a "r…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 04:30 AM
2

You talk about meaning while having a hedonist mindset. You're not interested in meaningless sex yet if some big opportunities (we are mostly talking about money) come along you would be "Oh no...Anyway" about your relationship. I think you don't care about meaningful whatever. You want someone there to have something going on in your dating life. I'm not judging I just find it quite pointless to pretend to bother when in practice you actually don't. You want entertainment, you don't want meanin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 03:13 AM
3

Nuance? That's how you call it. Nice!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 02:27 AM
2

I wouldn't bother to be in a "relationship" with this woman if I knew I would move as long as something more entertaining comes along. Once again, why not simply just have sex with them and cuddle on a couch every 2 months and be done with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:56 AM
7

It can't be your fault, my dear. You're a woman, when it comes to interacting with men you never ever do anything wrong. It's known! Now, I'm happy for you that your spidy sense is better and that you can't be deceived anymore. You get to brag about it like every woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:50 AM
4

Like you think people start becoming wonderful once they leave high school?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:33 AM
1

Who's "me"? Not, you specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:29 AM
2

You don't know what platitudes are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:23 AM
1

Because part of dating is compatibility. If you have passions taking you on a different path, you aren't compatible anymore. Why bother being in a relationship and not just some kind of Sexfriend deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:22 AM
–

Considering that some frats have a "rapey reputation" and still have a lot of women going there for parties... Again a spider sense means you're able to see beyond lies. It means you're able to see when someone tries to deceive you. It's an intuition...just like the famous "female intuition" you're so proud of when it comes to dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:20 AM
3

Many men know you're virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:03 AM
0

Oh please!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:02 AM
–

Having a spider-sense means you're able to see what isn't totally obvious. Frat bro, finance bro, ghetto guys are really far from being the less sexist guys around. Yet they never get a shortage of willing women. Most of them don't even bother maintaining the Women-Are-Wonderful Effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 01:01 AM
2

Can you simp even more?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:56 AM
9

Good liars who can seduce the ones who desire to be deceived. Are you admitting that your spider sense surprisingly stops working in front of "socially dominant men" (nice way to say it by the way)? Who would have thunk right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:45 AM
–

Women say all the time they are able to spot Incels/Red Pillers/Whatever from a mile. What about using your spider sense all of you are so proud about?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 11:52 PM
1

You absolutely did. You interpreted his description of women’s behavior as defining “bad women”, meaning women outside that description are not bad. No, I didn't. I said he was talking about bad women. I never said that your definition of bad women isn't true. Simply that yours and his are both legit. Meaning that the women he was talking about are bad and the ones you're describing are bad too. Just because I never meet some children's murder doesn't mean women like that don't exist. Simply bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 03:09 PM
1

You believe it’s that guy’s opinion that a woman who does none of the things he described but murders children for fun isn’t bad? I never said that or implied that. I said that what you call a bad woman isn't more legit than what he calls a bad woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:54 PM
1

You said that you were able to "describe some bad women who don’t do any of the things he said" meaning your description is going to be different from his. I'm simply saying that your description of bad women (whatever it is), isn't more legit than his. Once again if you're unable to follow a discussion, find something else to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:49 PM
1

Your description of bad women isn't more legit than is. That's what I'm getting at here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:44 PM
0

Do you believe you're the only one able to describe bad women and only your criteria are valid?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:40 PM
0

When you read something you also try to get the subtext and follow what is the discussion about. In the post, you answered with your shaming tactics he was talking about bad women. You would have gotten his point if you weren't too busy trying to shame him instead of understanding what is the point he was making. So when he asks you about women who operate as he described in his first post, you said "Non-existent". If you're unable to follow a whole conversation and only answer people in a vacuu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:37 PM
1

I already did.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:31 PM
1

Because I have reading abilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:30 PM
3

And the women that operative like this every day are…? He means bad women here. And you answered that they are non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:28 PM
1

If you say bad women are non-existent, he isn't making a strawman at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:22 PM
8

Yeah after all, most straight women are used to actually date other straight women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 06:59 PM
22

Do you actually believe that following women's advice gets one laid? Like seriously...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 01:31 PM
7

It’s not absurd to want to live. It's absurd to want to live for the sake of living. Once again why do you think people wanted to be killed instead of suffering? They still want to liven, they just don't want to live like that. There is nothing logical in what you're saying. It's actually pretty dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 01:33 PM
2

People survived and actually worked to be able to live and not die before reaching adulthood. Everything else is extra? Who cares about sanitation and medicine? Who cares about education that makes it possible to share knowledge about how to have drinking water and farming food? Who cares about geometry to build shelters? Farming isn't a job? Sewage workers aren't working? Are you trolling or are you actually that dumb? You don't know what the "modern world" is. You're using a concept that you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 01:31 PM
13

Technology isn't simply the laptop/smartphone you're using. Farming, Sanitation, Politics, Writing, Philosophy. All of these are in fact technologies. Without them, you wouldn't be here showing so much of your ignorance about Homo Sapien History. The reason why people were able to walk the earth is that they reached these technologies. If we didn't Natural Selection would have wiped us all already. Now, I understand that you want to settle some grudge against men but the next time you're taking …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 03:44 AM
11

It's not that women need men. This level of delusion is astonishing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 03:28 AM
17

Being alive is plenty reason to live… Living for the sake of living is totally absurd. You never wondered why in so many countries there is a debate about euthanasia?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 03:26 AM
2

Because you're average yourself maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 05:10 PM
2

You're saying the 80/20 is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 05:02 PM
4

"Struggling" in this case is necessarily related to striking out with multiple opportunities or the dude isn't actually trying in any real sense. Not struggling is about getting women's attention and getting positive attention from women. If you don't get any or that much, you're actually struggling. Trying with "thousands, billions" of women and wishing for luck isn't a viable or legit option at all. You have repeatedly made the logical error that because (a) there exists a category of men for …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 02:51 AM
5

Yes, which is why it's important that there are billions of women in the world. If "a" woman doesn't find you suitably attractive, another woman might. It was never my point or what we were talking about. But whatever. Honestly, your comments are just full of logical fallacies and extreme black and white thinking. It's difficult to even engage. Dude, you don't even understand what I'm writing and you start making strawmen and moving the goalpost. We were talking about looks and personality and n…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 02:31 AM
12

There are plenty of men who struggle because their personality is not sufficiently appealing to make up for other shortcomings. Personality doesn't make up for other shortcomings. Miracles don't exist. If a women find you physically unattractive or meh, your personality isn't going to make up for that unless you don't mind being duty sexed down in the road. The Halo Effect already showed that in fact, it's looks that influence perceived personality and not so much the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 02:26 AM
19

No, it simply shows that a repulsive personality isn't the reason so many men struggle. And we are talking about dating, in this context misogyny isn't simply another repulsive trait for quite obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 01:07 AM
2

This, right here!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:49 AM
3

Because you believe that these men aren't getting duty sexed by their wives who swear they love them so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:43 AM
13

Men are losing their shit because they are gaslighted by women. Nobody likes having their intelligence insulted. Your "kind" HB 4 is also attracted to the hot asshole. The only difference is that she just has to wait and be sexually available for him. "Hot bitches" don't fuck simps. Men aren't the ones pretending that the reason they are attracted to some chick is that they have a wonderful personality not all because they have solid physical assets. Considering that sexual desire is amoral is i…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:39 AM
2

Women fuck and lust after depraved players all the time. That's how they become depraved players, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:27 AM
9

Being misogynistic is a character trait. If sexist men get laid easily according to you that means they actually know how to sell themselves to women in a way that makes them able to get laid. So again if sexist men are able to get laid that means women don't care about character and more about game or what they call personality because they need to virtue signal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:17 AM
3

Do you really believe that the other women (the good one in your Just World, I assume) aren't dating for looks and status first and foremost?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:05 AM
18

"Define good" =/= personality. You're conflating the whole thing by indeed using the wrong definition since you're not talking about the same thing. Personality isn't an adjective. The thing is women conflate game (how you sell yourself) with personality while men conflate personality with character (what kind of human you actually are). It's not about context.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 12:03 AM
3

No, but when it comes to dating one would consider it the most important for quite obvious reasons...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:58 PM
11

And in the end the shitty guy who got laid and the shitty guy who can't both die alone so they're both getting what they deserve so... You're having a revenge fantasy here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:40 PM
15

Who said they don’t get laid? Who said life, dating and sex were fair and guaranteed? Women who pretend that personality is the reason why so many men struggle to get women's attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:38 PM
8

On a relationship stance most sound minded and self respecting woman will not put up with that. True Scottman Fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:37 PM
44

I guess I’m challenging your view by asking who said exactly that “sexist men don’t get laid”? I’ve never heard that. Women who pretend that personality is the reason why so many men struggle to get women's attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:36 PM
8

Just no.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 11:32 PM
1

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:39 PM
3

PPD is and hentai sub now?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 01:50 AM
6

Most people are incompetent. What's new? You're most people and not as competent as you think you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 01:30 AM
–

Your line of thinking is the exact same reason why people don’t mind the fact that women get less harsh punishment than men for the same crime. It’s also why educated people consider « guilty until proved otherwise » when it comes to sexual crimes is a perfectly legit take. What I find baffling with your line of thinking is that you’re fine about inequality of treatment as long as it’s only men who are disadvantaged by it. Yet, I’m pretty sure you’re also and advocate for equality between men an…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 05:01 PM
15

You get it wrong OP. Technical Analysis IS astrology for men. It's known!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 03:38 AM
–

Women duty sex beta bux. Why one would complain about being duty sexed?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 10:57 PM
1

No, I already agreed that women and men sexuality isn’t the same. What I’m arguing is the difference you’re trying to make. Women sexuality is different but it’s not more complex or whatever than men. And the difference is more akin to potato/potato.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 05:11 PM
1

That they require it or not doesn’t change the fact it’s induced by physical attractiveness. So the core element and the relevant part is the same for both gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 04:55 PM
–

Pickier in a man ability to be beta buxxed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 04:50 PM
–

Crush to me = observing someone over time and falling in like with not only how they look but how they move in the world. Maybe she watched him play basketball Sat morn at the park and found that sexy and impressive. Crush =! One quick static glance/photo of someone It's basically the same for men except in fact. Men don't start having a boner just with one quick static glance, either. Of course, they are more likely going to feel something if they are watching some sexy photo made by a woman th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 04:39 PM
–

Usually this happens when she’s already developed a crush on a man. If she developed a crush on a man that means he does make her feel something and make her tingle... You're contradictory with your take here. If she is aroused that means women can simply be aroused by a perfect stranger they never talked to. Just like...men so.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 03:22 PM
–

It simply grants that man access to be in her space to dial up the behaviorisms to make the pussy jump. Hope that helps. It doesn't grant him anything if the woman doesn't give IOI's. And as you said she doesn't get the drive to do that because he makes her feel nothing even when she finds him cute in her head.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 03:12 PM
–

Men aren't the ones claiming they have a spider-sense that makes them able to sense bad people, though...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 03:09 PM
–

She’ll think he’s cute. It’s an opening. How does she think he is cute when she doesn't see him at first glance and doesn't feel anything for him? How does a man know that some random woman thinks he is cute while that woman simply stays there not necessarily engaging him because apparently, she feels nothing when she sees him? I agree that women's sexuality is reactive, however, sometimes you (and others) give credit to some men who complain about needing to be a dancing monkey to be more than …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 03:07 PM
0

No they aren’t. They didn’t bring any argument while I was actually debating with the comment I responded at first.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 09:47 AM
4

Yes, it actually does. Dion, Berscheid & Walster (1972) conducted a study on the relationship between attractiveness and the halo effect. Sixty students, thirty males and thirty females from the University of Minnesota took part in the experiment. Each subject was given three different photos to examine: one of an attractive individual, one of an individual of average attractiveness, and one of an unattractive individual.[46] The participants judged the photos' subjects along 27 different person…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 11:40 PM
4

You never heard about the Halo Effect, did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 11:27 PM
8

Most women need more than raw physical attraction to actually consider someone a good dating prospect, so someone whose “top 20%” in looks may fall short in other dating criteria and someone in the “bottom 80%” is a better match. The Halo Effect actually proves that your statement isn't as true as you want to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 11:26 PM
1

You’re so sweet. You’re aren’t debating and you’re defending someone who didn’t come here to debate either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 08:22 PM
2

I said that cause capitalism needs to promote a materialistic take about what happiness is. To keep the system running you need people to believe that buying the next new supa things is going to make their lives better. More consumers, more profit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 05:47 PM
3

Biology rarely send memo
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 03:40 PM
1

The majority of people are like that. And you're not immune to it to either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 01:36 PM
7

If I said “I don’t date short/white/conservative/foreign/fill in the blank men because they’re terrible people” doubt you’d think that’s OK. Women consider physically unattractive men as terrible people. That's the Halo Effect reversal, one could say. That's how they justify why they aren't attracted to them. They blame it on personality while in fact, they simply didn't find him physically attractive enough to ever consider him in the first place. People are perfectly fine with that lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 01:28 PM
3

The Halo Effect isn't simply about hot people but people that you find attractive. The point is that people don't perceive the same way people they are attracted to. It's a cognitive bias. So, when you see someone you find physically attractive, you become more complacent with them and tend to give them attributes they don't necessarily have...like a great personality. So, Normal women don't mainly choose based on personality. They see a man they find attractive and then the Halo Effect gives th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 01:25 PM
5

Did you ever hear about the Halo Effect?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 01:08 PM
1

Aren't you a bit too old for coming here and arguing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 08:10 PM
1

Different schools of philosophy talk about it, so do religions. Unless you are trying to say they concept itself is somehow meaningless. You're right however they don't talk about it for the same reason. There is a reason why communists don't like the Church (and not just for political reasons). My point is that the worship of materialistic success is a consequence of liberalism and has nothing to do with conservatism. We could ad hominem back and forth all day bro but that doesn't constitute an…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 08:06 PM
1

I wouldn't dare to assume, it's rude.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 08:02 PM
1

Close the deal, bro!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 08:00 PM
1

You should leave. Please?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:57 PM
0

IIRC, you said you look goods in tight clothing and you lowkey brag about your hotness. You're virtuous enough for me. I'm a simple man you see.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:57 PM
1

In theories, QE is an unconventional tool. Yet the Fed and the ECB aren't agreeing with that anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:54 PM
1

Your grandmother wasn't forced to be married. 2-3 generations ago, it was boomers time aka the most privileged generation of human history. But you're right, women tend to never respect men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:52 PM
1

Because theories are mostly a political tool while mathematics is the reality. Theories are important but the only certainty is....uncertainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:50 PM
-1

If you just want to show me how retard*d you're don't waste your time, I believe you!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:47 PM
1

What is crazy is people trying to insult people's intelligence. I don't mind that you like butt scrunched leggings, don't virtue signal that's all...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:46 PM
1

When I talk about Economics I'm not talking about theories. I'm talking about Macro, Micro, Stats, financial mathematics, etc... I'm talking about programs you take because you want to be working in finance or some MFI.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:44 PM
2

And in every Economics program, you do more mathematics than you write essays. Nice try...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:37 PM
2

No, it's simply they choose something more useful to make money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:31 PM
3

If she didn't respect him why did she bother to have a family with him in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:27 PM
-1

Oh please, you never read any leftist thinker. Start with Marx and then compare it to conservative folks. Or maybe try to learn more about Materialism in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:25 PM
3

He already did that in high school, just like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:21 PM
4

Why are you unable to actually read?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:20 PM
4

No, it's the same women. It's just that she changes her tune to always look good!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 07:10 PM
0

I never considered you or progressives as bad people. Just because I disagree with you and don't share your view doesn't mean you're a PoS. Unfortunately, we can say the same about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 06:56 PM
1

Many people lost their money because people wanted to believe some woman is a wonder because she is a woman but that's nothing compared to what you have experienced. But, yeah I kinda forget sometimes that in your world people who aren't you are obviously evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 06:48 PM
1

Different preferences made by corporates who used to sell you larger clothes before they decided to sell you this?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 06:41 PM
1

Some RP ideas fit neatly into traditional values. Like the way they worship materialistic success. Materialism is a leftist school of thinking. Bro, you shouldn't try to use big words like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 06:39 PM
2

How do progressives infantilize women? By pretending they're always victims of men and that they can do nothing wrong. Recently Elizabeth Holmes was convicted. Before that people believed she was amazing because she was a woman in tech. These people are progressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 06:37 PM
1

Hmm, easier maybe, but I would never post my personal shit. Many women are less scrupulous than you about that. Do you honestly believe this? Like, do you believe that older couples who meet and just want to feel intimacy again will soon lack desire just because they might not be as hot as part partners? Don't m own if I believe people work like this, but then again I'm a low N count very emotionally sexual person compared to what people expect. It's different for older people. They come from di…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 05:49 PM
1

Women trading down when it comes to looks are going to duty sex their partner down in the road. A decline in women's sexual desire means a decline in relationship satisfaction for both partners. You're right about the stranger yet you and so many people would precisely advise against hitting on strangers. Meaning that the people you should hit on are in fact people you can get some pieces of information about them beforehand. I would also add that with social media it's becoming easier to make a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 05:22 PM
1

regardless of any ridiculous TERPer hamstering about "the best she could hook up with." Even, if I agree with your post, considering your competition in a highly competitive set-up as dating kinda makes sense and should be done. Women don't trade down, they always trade up. If you aren't "in that group", chances are she isn't going to be more than polite to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 05:08 PM
1

According to smart educated women, Aunties and grandmothers used to be forced to pair up with men they found unattractive. And then as women's rights became a thing, aunties and grannies ended up duty sexing their husbands too, they also found them physically unattractive. They also probably believed they were smarter than their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 03:54 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201909/are-there-not-enough-men-worth-marrying And you can't find in the media women who complain about men not making enough money.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:00 PM
1

Men also like to be respected, and desired by their partner. If a woman feels the need to dumb down her intelligence that means she considers herself smarter. So she ends up not respecting him and not desiring him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:42 PM
1

And as I said intelligent women who do this don’t respect their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:16 PM
2

In my experience it’s often been really in it’s head. In my experience, intelligent women tend to kinda forget that men need to also feel useful for their partner while feeling like a man. Men are human doings. If they think you mostly need them to cuddle on a couch, they actually don't feel like men or useful for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:01 AM
1

Unfortunately for you, I'm not American and I wasn't there either. But, whatever makes you feel better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:39 AM
8

Most guys deem women “intelligent” as long as they have opinions and views similar to them. Just like you who deem men 'intelligent" as long as they have opinions and views similar to them. People rarely consider intelligent people they don't agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:34 AM
7

You make it sound like it's men who are insecure while you kinda forget that women don't respect men they feel they kinda dominate. If a woman believes she is smarter than you she won't respect you at worst or your masculinity at best (well, I would at worst too but according to smart women, masculinity isn't a thing). It's not about self-emasculation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:31 AM
6

Women don't respect men they feel they dominate. If a woman believes she is smarter than you, she won't respect your masculinity. Now we live in an era in which some people consider that masculinity doesn't exist so...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:26 AM
-1

It is quite hypocrite of you to have that kind of discourse. You're a liberal and you consider that you possess the Holy Truth too as most liberal in this progressive era.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:22 AM
1

How would a woman’s income not be considered shared income? He is saying that some women themselves tend to not consider their income a shared income. And women don't see a woman career the same as women see a man career.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 10:44 PM
4

It’s hard to be intellectually honest while you’re too busy virtue signaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 10:11 PM
2

Your ability to insult people intelligence is really amazing. Such a talent
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 10:09 PM
4

Maybe because straight men tend to have liking for beautiful asses and straight women tend to like muscular men. Make the former hard and make the latter wet. But yeah we already know that rhetoric about women just wanting to show their asses for themselves. Men don’t do it because they don’t want to be called creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:31 PM
16

Wanting to show off your beautiful ass has nothing to do with sexual attention? Sorry I kinda forgot that in some women world asses aren’t sexual. Women aren’t doing that because they don’t want men to get any ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:08 PM
3

I don’t view the way I dress as sexualizing myself any more than men who wear tight t-shirts or skimpy muscle tank tops drawing attention to their chests. When you work hard for your body, you like to show it off. Liking to show off means you want to draw attention to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:55 PM
14

Leggings that seems to draw attention to butts are also really comfortable and were mandatory in a dance class I took (because they're easy to move in). Oh please come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:48 PM
28

If a woman was complaining about how she feels settled for despite her man treating her well we would tell her the same thing. Do you consider that duty sexing your husband is treating him well? Do you believe that not being that physically attracted to your partner is going to have no consequences on the relationship? https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/marital-satisfaction-is-linked-women-s-sexual-desire https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 06:32 PM
0

Women don't respect unsuccessful men especially in dating. Women love and need preselection.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 02:27 PM
1

Women might rate most men as below average (although that's another issue that has to do with automated messaging for rating 3 or higher and women having more diverse tastes as men), but when it comes to sending out messages or replying looks don't matter much to them. If women rate most men as below average that means looks actually matter to them. women don't like me because I have a shitty personality Stop using things you're unable to define precisely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 02:17 PM
4

Why do we need abortion then?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:00 AM
10

Now nothing is harmonious and nobody is happy at all. Men and women can't stand each other as time goes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:55 PM
3

Yeah indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:54 PM
7

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:53 PM
8

And now they just hate men and don't want them too. Such an improvment!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:52 PM
6

Because, whenever someone said that you and others are denying it to da moon.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:44 PM
8

Sweety, you're saying that women virtue signal because they are forced to by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:43 PM
3

Bro, average men aren’t pandas who kinda prefer playing video games instead of having some pussies. At this rate you and women are going to tell us that video games cancel the existence of puberty and testosterone. Average men are less interested because they already know they aren’t going to succeed. People here consider that sliding into DM’s is an approach because women don’t want to be approached by average men. Boomers methods aren’t a thing anymore. The landscape isn’t the same. In bars, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 01:27 AM
2

That is false. You’re working with some bad data there mate. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/parenting/university-students-arent-having-sex-parents-dont-know-whether/ And male students are less sexually active than their female counterparts, *with just over a third (34 percent) saying they’ve had sex during their time at university**, compared to nearly half (47 percent) of women, and more than one in ten (11 percent) say they are celibate because they want to be.* We aren't talking sexlessne…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:56 AM
2

Not to feel superior. But for pure entertainment. There’s a difference. Don’t assume intent. One doesn't exclude the other. People getting entertained by people they despise do it for selfish reasons. No one want te be selfish, of course. Most people want to consider themselves wonderful. It’s meant to be debates about sexual and dating strategy! Debate between the sex-havers. You're from the UK, 66% of 18-29 men aren't getting any sexual activity. Incels may have the wrong pictures but you're o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:38 AM
1

Sure, you're! Congratulation for calling you out then! You're so brave.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:16 AM
1

Calling everyone a loser while complaining about passive aggressive behavior. Cognitive dissonance 101!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:11 AM
2

As I said you come to the zoo to feel good about your wonderfulness. I'm not blaming you, I just find it funny how people need to shit on people they despise while pretending that they are above the people they are shitting on. I like to defend the real average men. I don't care about incels or whatever. I just don't like that people feel the need to shit on them while being uber complacent with the other side. I hate virtue signaling and I have a gift to spot when people want to feel the most w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:01 AM
21

It's funny because every cognitive bias analysis proves you're wrong actually. Even in art (movies and literature) it's well known that ugly people tend to be bad guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:46 PM
2

Critical thinking? That's how you want to call it. Fine with me bro, fine with me. Since I happen to have a good memory, I will congratulate you any time you show us how you shit on men...I mean on desperate loser men with the other folks who do the same as you here. It's important to appreciate your critical thinking for what it is...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:37 PM
5

Sorry bro, you throw other males under the bus on a debate sub about men imperatives vs women imperatives, because you’re a such a wonderful guy. Do you feel better?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:17 PM
0

Women don’t protect these boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:56 PM
1

I said I was going to link them when you’re done being stupid. You’re not doing a good job right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:40 PM
1

Open your mouth, just wait it’s coming!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:37 PM
1

I will when you stop being disingenuous first!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:34 PM
10

Desperate, and as a result, are typically more willing to throw other people (even their male friends) under the bus for anything that looks like a chance with the opposite sex. Bro, you and others are throwing other males under the bus on a daily basis just to look like a good boy in front of women. How many times "Not thirsty guys" are condoning and sustaining the Women Are Wonderful Effect on a daily basis here? How many "Sex having men" call other dudes incels because they can't understand t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:33 PM
1

Now, you want facts after being stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:33 PM
2

They wouldn't shoot innocent black men if white women didn't feel unsafe because a black man walk in their direction...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:29 PM
2

Not just fake accusations to send them to prison. Or calling the cops because you don't feel safe around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:24 PM
18

The consequences of fucking up as a woman are way worse than as a man. It will always baffle me how people can say that while men are since the dawn of time be the disposable gender and the gender that has to work to even be considered. Are you getting OP any sort of validation by sustaining the Women Are Wonderful Effect as you do? Men are the disfranchised gender that nobody cares about. The gender that is now considered to be inherently evil (or need to be "corrected" when they want to be les…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:03 PM
5

This would be less of an issue if men just stuck to women their own age, or a few years older. You kinda forget that women are also looking for older men and don't care about men their age. Men cheat on their wives or don't help them out in any way, thus setting a poor example or ruining/ending their families. Women aren't sexually attracted to their husbands, to begin with. And cheating isn't the first cause of divorce, it's financial struggles actually. Men aren't the gender that cares about t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 02:45 PM
8

It's because of Kpop. The vast majority of Asian men aren't Korean-looking pop stars...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 03:27 AM
1

You were talking about sex and dating and you’re moving your own goalposts here. Where did I said women don’t have to pay bills and rent? Are you dating your bills? Are 40yo people dating and fucking their rent? If you can’t handle your wine poppy stop drinking. You seem out of your freaking mind. More than usual I mean
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 02:47 PM
2

Next level
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 02:33 PM
1

I already answered. Yeah, he has to work to even be considered (since he hit puberty) while she has to work to get the best. They aren't playing the same game at all contrary to what your apex fallacy makes you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 02:26 PM
1

Considering that modern women (especially the smart and educated ones) consider that 40yo white men are evil oppressors that oppress humanity since the dawn of humanity. Yeah, a 40yo woman has probably an advantage over a 40yo man. He has to learn not to oppress for a starter.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 02:18 PM
1

We are talking about SMV and RMV. Not every righteous platitude you like to say that makes you believe you're smart and nuanced. Women have indeed an intrinsic advantage and in our era, they also benefit from the women are wonderful effect. Meaning modern society judges women better than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 02:12 PM
1

That doesn't negate the fact that men have indeed a disadvantage that women don't have.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 01:51 PM
11

And men are the boogeyman of women. As you and your kweens explain to us every day...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 08:03 PM
6

What a good source. It's simply the Halo Effect. You shouldn't look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 06:30 PM
2

Because you're a liberal on social media and I'm pointing out that what you said about Red Pillers can also be said about you...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 07:42 PM
1

Does it prove that liberals on social media just like Red Pillers are considered crazy by adult humans?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 07:35 PM
1

Walk out your door and ask five adult humans what they think of [insert lastest Twitter liberal flavor] or any of this stuff and they will look at you like you are a crazy person and with good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 07:31 PM
1

Literally nobody outside of kids on Reddit thinks this way. Just like liberals on social media?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 07:24 PM
1

You welcome
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 01:29 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/parenting/university-students-arent-having-sex-parents-dont-know-whether/ (you need to use something to bypass paywalls for this one)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 01:16 AM
1

You're the one making speculations to invalidate it. "Maybe some aliens destroyed their house and so your survey is not valid"...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 01:08 AM
1

Why don't you simply admit that you don't know how that thing actually works instead of being your most dishonest self?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 01:03 AM
2

Data show that in the UK 66% of 18-29 men are sexually inactive, in the US, it's about 51% of 18-29 men who are single. These trends are rising. Another study showed that college women care in fact as much as men about physical acctractiveness So, yeah, the average men actually struggle with women. Until they reach...30 and get settled for. Plenty of dates for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 12:54 AM
2

Yeah, that's what I said. "Just reach thirty bro"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 12:48 AM
2

And not getting any women's attention until you reach 30, doesn't mean the average dude is having the time of his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 12:46 AM
1

Yet fuck boys don't struggle to get willing women. The average men struggle with women. The data already show it. You're in denial here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/21 12:43 AM
11

TIL "women are in fact as shallow as men" is a misogynistic statement. Really you're a wonder...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:43 AM
10

it's obvious that people think women are wonderful because they have more positive interactions with women. In egalitarian societies, men are thought of more positively than in less egalitarian societies. It doesn't really show what you think it does. Women are nicer to other people, that's why WAW is in effect. No, that wikipedia article didn't say any of that. You're pulling that out of your ass. WAW is a cognitive bias, just like the Halo Effect. It's nothing to do with the fact that women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:27 AM
15

Men would start to empathize when you'll start not doing what you're doing. It's akin to gaslighting. You're using feminist rhetoric (meaning "it's men's fault") to explain why women love to pretend that they aren't as shallow as men when in fact they actually are. Really, it's baffling all the mental gymnastics you are willing to do rather than admitting an unfavorable truth about your gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 11:54 PM
9

Yeah, we know everything is fine and the dating market has never been so wonderful according to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 08:45 PM
10

Don't worry dear, you're going to get a reward for being the most righteous person around.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 08:38 PM
26

No, we say that women virtue signal because we have first-hand experience about interacting with women in a romantic/sexual fashion. Contrary to you. As a matter of fact, you watch what they do and don't trust what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 07:53 PM
109

For the umpteenth time, it's all come down to 2 things: - Women virtue-signal a lot. Like a lot. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect You add to that we live in a progressive era that hammers every day that everything women say has to be believed and you end up with men being surprised when they found out that women are in fact as shallow as men and that physical attractiveness is 80-90% of your success in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 05:17 PM
5

If you want people to contribute, you should start by being less dishonest lel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 02:29 AM
4

Yeah, and being complacent with some women shitty behavior is just a part of your personality
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 02:25 AM
3

When you start talking about experience because you're unable to admit that indeed 1 in 3 female daters is toxic. The dude was agreeing with you but not the way you liked it and you start to be condescending.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 02:22 AM
2

Don't talk about experience while you're condoning toxic behaviors because you want to defend other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 02:17 AM
3

We are talking about the quality of the males population… Try to stay on topic if you want to discuss
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 04:06 PM
5

You're right. However, you can have arising civilizations when they aren't any men left to actually do it. If the decline of males keeps going the next civilization is going to leave earth to simply die in space.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 02:17 AM
10

They don't want relationships with the vast majority of men, to begin with. A decline of males means fewer men to bother them and not having to tolerate men they find unattractive anymore. A win for modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 02:12 AM
6

You're right. One can't do much about that. I simply think that men shouldn't be enjoying that precisely. But yeah, since the ship is already sinking, one can simply "enjoy the decline", might as well try to be optimistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:56 AM
7

When you implied that the reason the vast majority of young men (18-29) aren't getting any women's attention is that they spent too much time on Reddit not swallowing the "Women-Are-Wonderful Effect" Pill anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:34 AM
31

Dude, the fact that women don't care about the decline of men is one thing. They have been told that men are bad. However, as a man, you shouldn't be enjoying this decline. Men are still the reason why civilization is standing and running. A decline in the quality of human males means the system isn't improving at best and can't be sustained at worst. Trading civilization in exchange for some potential pussies isn't a good deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:30 AM
5

Not sit on Reddit and look up graphs to identify a way to blame women for women not wanting to fuck them. Yeah, they should listen to people telling them they aren't good enough. Because women do nothing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:07 AM
23

Based on every scenario I've seen, ever, it's ALMOST never about the money or looks themselves. Look doesn't matter we already know... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect#On_personality "Participants were then asked to predict the overall happiness the photos' subjects would feel for the rest of their lives, including marital happiness (least likely to get divorced), parental happiness (most likely to be a good parent), social and professional happiness (most likely to experience life fulf…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/21 01:06 AM
5

What the fuck is wrong with you guys that your major gripe is complaining about where it is you personally chose to ask women out to? I mean jeez. If you hate doing it then just stop If your father or grandfather didn't bother to ask that woman out, you wouldn't be here being fallacious about men doing the first step. "If you hate childrearing just stop having children", "if you don't like having an abortion, just stop fucking".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/21 11:50 PM
2

Yet you were able to find on your own the justification that many women use to explain why they traded their partner for someone better.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:33 PM
-1

Don’t talk about you like that. You’re wonderful and a Queen. You’re empowered and you should be able to find the meaning of that word
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:24 PM
-1

Google it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:22 PM
4

Cheating is the main reason for divorce actually. Sorry to break your bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:18 PM
-1

Mildly shitty but also people grow and change and there’s nothing wrong with that inherently. I bet you use that kind of rhetoric to justify why you're going to be hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:15 PM
5

Your comment is a wonder. PPD women in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:11 PM
9

Why do you call him a BF when you have options open and don't give a fuck about him? Why not simply call him sex buddy?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:08 PM
2

I can agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:31 AM
17

Women fall for: " being interested but not too interested and dominant but caring and being into her but patient" "He has real abundance mentality" Whether you LARP it or not women will fall for it. As long as she finds you physically attractive. Women love to pretend they have a spider-sense...until they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 12:20 AM
7

Yet he gets plenty of girls even tho he’s average attractive wise cause he’s just a nice dude that people genuinely like Yeah, plenty of girls because he is nice...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 11:05 PM
19

How to blame men for LARPing the behaviors that women actually reward in practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 11:04 PM
-3

Yeah you should just do that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 10:54 AM
4

Yet you're still here...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 09:31 AM
2

You can be euphoric even when you have no pride and no self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 10:57 PM
3

You nailed it!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 10:47 PM
5

« We all have different tastes » would have been an even greater point if it was let say 25-30% of young men who didn’t get any female attention. The thing is we are reaching 50-60% and the trend keeps rising. It would come a time when we are going to reach 70-75% and I really wonder if people are going to push the denial to da moon. At the end of the day, you’re right. One shouldn’t let studies rule one’s life. However pretending that everything is fine and dandy isn’t helping anyone. Being in …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:04 AM
4

You're repeating yourself. I already agreed that it's expected that women enjoy their options on dating apps. That still doesn't make them less picky in real life. If you want to say "why are you complaining that we find 80% of you ugly? We are kweens it's normal!!!" Just say so and I would agree if that's what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:41 AM
6

You and I aren't talking about women enjoying their options. We were talking about women finding 80% of men "below average". Men on this sub aren't arguing about women enjoying their options either. You're moving the goalpost.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:31 AM
3

Yes, it should be expected that they are going to be even pickier than they already are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:23 AM
4

You're fallacious as hell, but since you want to be disingenuous I won't stop you labelling it a conspiracy. It's not relationships that the vast majority of young men aren't getting. It's also women's attention in the first place. On OLD most men don't even get an answer. Hard to get anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:40 AM
4

As I said earlier 51% of 18-29 US men are single, 66% of 18-29 UK men are sexually inactive. The trends are rising. So the vast majority of young men aren't in relationships. So it wouldn't be far-fetched to consider the minority that actually gets women's attention tends to be Chads or Chad-lite.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:07 AM
2

When they aren't Chad they are settled for. Women settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:02 AM
3

It focused on dating, not just online. Average men aren't meeting anyone on these apps, that's why there are stuides that tell them to not bother with it unless they are very attractive. Women virtue signal more than advising when it comes to dating. The Women Are Wonderful Effect is to blame for that I think. Relationships being inherently transactional is a Red Pill tenant. You're maybe more Red Pilled than you think you believe. You're right nevertheless. If a man wants to be desired he is to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:54 AM
5

Researches suppose it's a delay in adulthood. They don't prove that this is the reason. As I said they making a hypothesis about the reasons for sexual inactivity amongst young people. They are making conjecture. Just like TRP. You show stats about people graduating later I gave you studies that tell men to not bother with OLD. You give me stats about men living with their parents, I give you speed dating experiments. The researchers aren't finding why men are sexless either. They are making con…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:32 AM
5

A delay in adulthood is an interesting explanation. You can go with that, I simply believe that that isn't the single or the main explanation. All the articles you linked are just like us trying to give reasons. You and them hypothesis that it's a delay in adulthood, TRP believes it's simply that women find the vast majority of men unattractive. Your researchers are making hypothesis about the explanation just like Red Pillers. You chose one over the other that's all. Once again, the 80/20 is ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:02 AM
3

Divorce is declining because fewer and fewer people actually marry. You aren't making a point here, sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:15 AM
11

Your studies say it's MAYBE one of the factors. Other studies showed that women consider physical attractiveness as important as men do. The fact that the (vast) majority of young men aren't getting sex is enough proof that women consider the vast majority of men unattractive. TRP never said that top men are "stealing" all of the women. TRP says that women consider 80% of men unattractive (pretty hard to deny that when the data are precisely showing that the vast majority of young men never get …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:13 AM
14

51% of 18-29 men in the US are single. 66% of 18-29 men in the UK are sexually inactive. 40% of Aussies boys are sexless. These trends are rising. I'm pretty sure everything is fine for them and they don't mind at all...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 11:59 PM
1

18-29 men aren't sexually active for the vast majority of them. You're pulling your stat out of your ass here. And Beta Buxxing exists too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 11:50 PM
10

no one has a problem with it. Women and top men don't have a problem with it. FTFY.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 11:43 PM
1

You heavily implied that by wondering why men put it at the top of their list.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:25 AM
1

I didn’t say you said it’s not important, I said « not THAT important ». When in fact it’s that important from a man perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:23 AM
1

No, men aren’t behaving that way. Women consider that they have the higher moral ground and see men’s view on relationships as lesser. The other forms of intimacy you’re talking about can be found in great friendships. Men can share they biggest fear to their real homies. They can have emotional intimacy with friends or family. When women pretend that sex isn’t that important in a romantic relationship, men can’t agree with that because while it’s true in some romance novel or some women wishful…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:15 AM
2

Your conclusion is that men shouldn’t mind being reduced to horny dogs and complain when women (the one with the higher form of sexuality and relationships) consider that all that matters to them is getting their cock wet. Men value sexual intimacy more than the other forms because men know that sex is mostly what separate friendships from romance. « If you aren’t fucking that means you’re roommates ». When it comes to relationships, men are prosaic and women are lyrical.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 02:54 AM
2

They say yes to the question of your thread. They don't agree with the condescending conclusion you're coming to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 02:41 AM
1

And yet there are users in this thread genuinely offended at the suggestion that men have a higher libido. Perhaps they think testosterone isn’t real and men and women are exactly the same. They are offended because women love to trivialize men's views on relationships and consider they have higher moral ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 02:35 AM
2

Sure you aren't... If it makes you feel better about yourself, that's great I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 04:06 PM
1

But you're a man and you spend your Reddit time getting women's approval while arguing with people you despise...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:50 PM
2

Average looking women fuck average looking women all the time, it's painfully normal. The data are disagreeing with you but okay...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 03:49 PM
2

You don't know at all how that business actually works.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 07:02 PM
1

Does he apologize for being an oppressor and try to be an ally?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 04:49 PM
1

And what if they're doing all the emotional support/housework/child-rearing/while also providing mind-blowing sex? That's absolutely not the norm, and it's pretty much doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 12:58 AM
2

Can I get to be VP, please?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 11:44 PM
2

Yet they still supported Obama and the Dems and are now supporting Biden/Harris. Well, they did when they weren't voting for Senior Trump. The future political landscape is going to be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 11:39 PM
2

The majority of white men are voting GOP and the trend isn't going to change at all. I won't be surprised when immigrant men are going to join them in spades in the next decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 11:31 PM
-2

Like democrats are definitely not tolerant of white men...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 11:29 PM
2

Women athletes get beaten by teenage boys. They have a hard time competing against 16-17 yo boys. What do you think that would happen against grown men who train as much as them? I don’t care about your child free badge of honor. I was pointing out that if you had you would have been confronted firsthand to some basic biology you have a hard time to grasp.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 03:55 AM
1

I thought that women considered it a "badge of honor" to hate men and to be a feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 12:17 AM
1

Sports should be based on what one is capable of, regardless of gender. You're wishfully thinking here. If sport was based on what one is capable of, women would have no place in it. Since you never are going to have a son, you would never be confonted to the difference between men and women when it comes to biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 12:10 AM
2

I believe women who settle for betabux want sometimes to enjoy being fucked by a Lover (Alpha fuck). They want to get some with a man they are sexually attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 09:23 PM
3

That's not what they say when they ask for half your money when they divorce you...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:56 PM
3

Clearly not as much as Bezos...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:47 PM
3

Yet Bezos's girlfriend eye-fucked him like crazy, while Bezos was right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:46 PM
3

Jeff Bezos's girlfriend was eye-fucking Leo DiCaprio while Bezos was just there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:05 PM
3

Getting that male suicide rate down? Imagine using male suicide rate while you don't give a fuck about it simply to be spitful and not lose an argument... You are a wonder!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 01:24 AM
4

That's why you're giving such advice...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 02:31 AM
6

Your rambling and shaming tactics would be true if the vast majority of men weren't able to get any friends and have any hobbies. The fact is the vast majority of men have friends and many hobbies and the vast majority of men never get any women attraction. And for some of them, they have a lot of women acquaintances. Now, since you have actually never been a man in your life, you shouldn't talk about courting and being condescending about it while you actually never courted anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 12:37 AM
6

sliding into DMs (Instagram, Snapchat Like seriously bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 12:16 AM
6

Women don't care about 80% of men. You shouldn't have bothered to say more.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 12:15 AM
7

Real easy to strike up conversation and writers and artists network like crazy. He didn't say it was difficult to strike up a conversation, he said it was not possible to actually court women in these places because women don't want to be courted in these places. You want to have a lot of Facebook friends? Sure one should do as you say. You actually want a relationship? You better be to be physically attractive to her. to stand out. So you strawmanned him and you didn't give any solution beyond …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/21 12:14 AM
6

Keep being in denial. It's not men who are complaining that modern women don't earn enough money...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 12:27 AM
3

And she would have never respected him for that. Like most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 12:24 AM
2

I didn’t take anything personally. I called you a weirdo because you are calling men pathetic on a daily basis. I’m used to discuss with man hating women. But you can keep being a therapist on Reddit. You wouldn’t be the first one with a fantasy job.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 04:46 PM
4

Never said it was. You asked what lies were told about women and I gave you a cognitive bias that society has when it comes to women. As I said, women virtue signal and believe they have the moral high ground. They try to explain to men how wonderful they are and how they can't be blamed for anything when it comes to male/female interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 03:42 PM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect Women virtue signal a lot. Like a lot. Many men actually believe what women say when it comes to dating. Most men don't know that women consider the vast majority of them unattractive. Most men actually believe that women are less shallow than men because women spend their time pretending they have the moral high ground and that their attraction process is rocket science. Women spend their time pretending that looks don't matter that much …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 03:10 PM
1

« I didn’t insult you I’m just misandrist ». Ok sweetie
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 02:14 PM
0

You call men pathetic all the time and you dare complaining about ad hominem…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 02:03 PM
1

Keep your man hating raving weirdo
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 08:53 PM
2

Men aren't the ones posting booty pics all over the internet or having a side hustle with OF. You're living in your own head.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:57 PM
1

No, but keep lying to yourself. You're the only one looking stupid pretending that women don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:55 PM
0

And you double down with your nonsense. You're saying absolutely nothing while you actually believe you're making a point. Fake it until you make it means you are pretending to be something you aren't. Being confident has absolutely nothing to do with discipline or weakness. You don't even know the meaning of the word you're using.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:55 PM
17

You’re the hungry customer. To avoid being the hungry customer (aka to be confident) show up less than starving and with a cool patience. So learn to cook. Don’t show up hungry by learning to build your own confidence Your analogy is so bad. You don't learn to be confident out of thin air. People really should stop believing that confidence can appear while you have absolutely no result. You're expecting people to act like millionaires while they have a pretty hard time getting a raise in their …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:27 PM
1

Women say it to other women and keep it within their gender. They don't drag men into it. No, they don't. They call that feminism. No need to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:14 PM
1

The majority of women do that already. Social medias beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:13 PM
3

Yeah, you pretty much care about racism, homophobia and xenophobia. You're very preachy about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 06:11 PM
2

I never said you never ever fuck, I said that he doesn't mind being in a sexless marriage. If he doesn't care about sex, obviously he doesn't mind not fucking. I'm still brighter than you...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:34 PM
2

You bragged about his low libido so many times. Like it was God's gift. How perfect it is for you that he doesn't want to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 03:14 PM
6

Both of them...at the same time of course!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 01:25 AM
4

I agree with you that a man should be able to wait 2-3 dates. And I also agree that a couple of dates builds the sexual tension. However, we are not talking about waiting 2-3 dates but 2-3 months so that the woman can make up her mind about you. It's not at all the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:53 AM
8

That's why men should still keep fucking other women while waiting for the other to make up her mind. That way the man isn't begging her for sex and she has all the time she needs to make up her mind with a man who isn't desperate for it. So that makes him even more attractive to her. Of course, the dude never tells her. Win-win for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:21 AM
8

Your husband is low libido, so obviously he wasn't there for the sex. The dude doesn't mind having a sexless marriage...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:12 AM
2

The first type of woman should train the other. Help them develop that spider-sense they love bragging so much about and protect the other poor women who spend their time in abusive relationships. Mentoring and all...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 07:33 PM
8

You never listen to women then. They brag all the time about their spider sense that makes them able to avoid incels and Red Pillers...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 07:19 PM
4

No, it proves simply that women get blind when they are attracted to someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 07:18 PM
18

It's because of virtue signaling. Women virtue signal a lot. Like a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 07:11 PM
1

I fail to see how you can say they are inferior while the first movie isn't that deep when you take it purely on its own. It's like reading the first Harry Potter book and not bothering to at least read the fifth and sixth ones. But I digress. If you weren't hooked by the first one, don't bother watching the rest. It's not for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 03:07 AM
1

This has also been done, usually as a segue to future entries in a franchise. If the chosen one was able to resolve everything in a single movie basically no franchise would ever take off. There are 3 movies in this franchise. At the end of The Matrix (so the first movie), you don't even know the true purpose of Neo. I don't think that you ever watched Reloaded or Revolution, in fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 02:56 AM
1

nobody would care about half the cast being wiped out if everyone weren’t badasses… People actually cared because in most movies the good guys actually win at the end. That's why so many people were shocked when Ned Stark was beheaded. Thanks God, you aren't explaining anything considering your inability to actually understand what you're watching. Keep liking Rey and Captain Marvel, they are so strong and brave after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 02:05 AM
1

Avengers are the only superhero movies? Like The Avengers is the epitome of superhero movies? I thought that Thanos wiping out half of the universe and the Avengers failing to stop him was the plot of Infinity War. But it seems it was in fact about how everyone is a badass...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 01:49 AM
1

Neo happens to be a different take of the chosen one since his purpose isn't to save humanity or the good guys but simply to make the hell they are living more bearable. At the end of the whole thing, humanity is still being farmed by an I.A.. The problem is people who conveniently forget about this whenever the lead happens to be a woman. Because when the lead happens to be a woman most of the time there isn't any hero journey at all. Rey literally defeated the main antagonist during their firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 01:39 AM
0

Isn’t “every character is a badass” the plot of most superhero, war, crime, heist or otherwise ensemble movies? No, it's not actually. OP deigns to accept arguably the best female action hero in movie history. Bra-vo. He liked Sarah Connor and The Bride too IIRC... And Alien isn't an action movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 01:19 AM
1

No, to have a good movie you better cram in as many good things in it as you want. Every character being a badass never made a good movie actually or a good story. I fail to see how a movie full of Captain Marvel-like would be great. Yet she is a strong independent woman... As for OP he pretty much liked Ripley it seems. So you're again being dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 01:03 AM
1

Because you know so many movies where the main character lives in a virtual simulation that was created to better farm humanity bioelectricity after humans were stomped by an I.A.? Main Character whose sole purpose is to balance an equation and make that virtual simulation actually working? As I said you're using a movie you didn't even bother to understand and you use it to make an analogy that doesn't even work. The Matrix is about so many (philosophical) things and Neo's hero journey isn't th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 12:46 AM
1

No, you're cherry-picking what he said and you're being dishonest. His point is that they are fundamental gender differences. So when you want to write multiple female characters, you can't have all of them have strong personalities and motivation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 12:25 AM
2

The Matrix isn't about Neo's personal journey. The dude is the seventh iteration of something greater. You didn't get The Matrix like so many people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 12:12 AM
0

That's not at all what he said or implied. He said that men and women being different warrant different paths to achieve the same outcomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/21 12:08 AM
3

No, I'm not saying you should give anyone some chance. Nobody is begging for your pity. You're not as wonderful as you think you're. And if you think only "manosphere" man are disagreeing with your brand of feminism, I have a lot of bridges to sell you. As a matter of fact, most women don't identify with your brand of feminism. I wonder how you call them but I already know I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:45 AM
3

More than the reverse since some of them don't consider they are bringing some gospel from heaven to 50% of the population...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:37 AM
3

And what are misogynistic thoughts? Do you either consider that you can be wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:33 AM
3

No, I consider that you call misogynist men who disagree with you because you actually believe that you're better. You're a narcist that actually genuinely believes that they are God...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:21 AM
1

No, that's actually not how it works especially when it comes to people. If I like black people being slaves that don't mean I actually like them. Sometimes, it's like you are unable to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:16 AM
1

No, you're simply contradicting yourself on a daily basis. You hate men and masculinity and at the same time you pretend to like them as long as they are like you want them to be. You actually don't like men, you like yourself and you like men that reflect what you consider is your awesomeness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 02:01 AM
1

No, you actually don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 01:55 AM
6

Considering that the vast majority of men never get any female attention you basically confirmed that in fact women are attracted to 20% of men. Basically, TRP is right. Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 01:29 AM
3

Do you still preach about taking women's words for the truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 02:31 AM
5

The mom will get a slap on the wrist and nobody would care about the man being fucked in this situation. The man is the one expected to suck it up in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 02:24 AM
3

Just like poor people and minorities, I guess...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 02:08 AM
1

I can maybe understand the "not being nicer" part, but it's not like people have the same sex with a rando as with someone they trust in a relationship, right? If she likes to be fucked in a certain way, she won't stop liking that because she knows you better.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 03:53 PM
2

I often wonder how these guys are so easily comfortable being intimate with a woman they don't know well, like what if she makes unkind comments after you get naked, or asks you for a type of sex that kills your boner? Waiting wouldn't make her any nicer to you or make a difference how she likes to be fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 03:45 PM
17

The reason is that most heterosexual women don't know sex as much as they want to believe. Most of them never bothered to learn about anything since they don't have the burden of performance they just believe once they have consented to have sex, the fun is over and they don't need to do anything beyond lying there and letting the man proves his worth. The vast majority of heterosexual women wouldn't know how to ride a cock never less how to suck one for example even with a gun at their head. Mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 02:51 AM
9

I never said women were at fault I said they were as bad as men, they just get a free pass about it. Men don't have any problem either during gay sex or masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 02:41 AM
1

But the male libido is not some all consuming, undeniable force - there have always been men who opted out Yes, and we call them monks at best and incel at worst. MGTOW when one wants to be neutral. You make valid points, however. I can agree to some of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 02:27 AM
1

They are tools to bypass paywalls. I found them as usefull as adblockers. You should look at it. When young hot-blooded men aren't looking for sex it's because they have given up on it. You're making the mistake of believing that men and women are the same and have the same libido. Young men don't choose to not care about pussies without reasons...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 02:16 AM
1

Regardless, the majority of men are not struggling The majority of young men are. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/parenting/university-students-arent-having-sex-parents-dont-know-whether/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 02:08 AM
1

I'm not talking about sexlessness but more about sexual inactivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 02:03 AM
1

They would simply tell me the same thing as you. You guys have a common policy so to speak. If you’re dismissive they are going to be too. The fact is you removed my thread while you didn’t bother to actually read it. Quite baffling for a debate sub. But you guys make the rules and the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:59 AM
0

You're being dismissive and a little bit disrespectful but since you're a mod, I guess you get a pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:52 AM
0

In real life, average guys easily get average girls and real life dating is less looks-based and more based on your conversation skills / actions / behaviour / you ability to make jokes. In real life chubby anime neckbeards who are funny and nerdy could easily get the same girls would only date GigaChads on Tinder. That's false and we have data that show it. Young men are struggling more than ever. As for your whole comment, it's a hell of a strawman I won't bother to respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:48 AM
0

I didn't say only looks matter, I said that personality and human decency are irrelevant and I bothered to quote a whole wall of text about a well-documented cognitive bias to explain why. It seems nobody actually bothered to read it. I even bolded the relevant part that explains my point to make it easier. If as I quoted looks affect women's view of men's non-physical features, that means these non-physical features are actually irrelevant in the decision process since they are affected...by lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:45 AM
1

Every girl’s threshold is different - we’re not as looks based as men Yes and no. To quote you. I mean too many young men are struggling for that to be true. We aren't talking about 10-20% of young men, it's far far more than that. and it’s no exaggeration to say he is punching well above his weight If he is punching well above his weight I think these women aren't that attracted to him and he is "buying" their attention. But you know him better than me so.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:36 AM
0

A shame really. I'm just asking someone who claimed the opposite of what I said here last week hadn't had their thread removed. Are we only able to say things that are in tune with the Women-Are-Wonderful effect to not be considered as an incel?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:29 AM
0

I would agree more with that if the looks threshold weren't the decision maker still. Don't get me wrong I'm not saying you have to look like a movie star, just that she had to find you physically attractive first. And then you can cruise on the Halo Effect. But I get your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:19 AM
0

I said "mysterious" as an example. The point is that in practice women are going to turn it into something "positive" because they find you physically attractive. They are going to bother painting you in a better light.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:16 AM
0

Thank you bro for getting my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:07 AM
1

That's not how it works but whatever...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:04 AM
3

They are relevant to what I initially said, which was that sexual and romantic attraction are different which is still very true because it is true of aces and others as well. Exceptions don't make the rule especially when the exception are at best 1% of the population. For example, most women don't want romantic relationships with other women, but women are notoriously known to be attracted enough to other women sexually that they will experiment, partake in threesomes with women etc. There are…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 01:03 AM
2

Charm, wit, and a good sense humor You forgot to read the whole wall of text I quoted about the Halo Effect... It would be nice if you do so...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:54 AM
3

No, the hottest guy you ever met will appear, he is at best average when it comes to his character or personality, and then you're going to find him wonderful and create him qualities he doesn't possess and then believe that you give him the time of the day because your spider-sense told how wonderful as a human being he was.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:51 AM
2

You have a lot more leeway when you're physically attractive. The boring handsome guy isn't actually boring he becomes simply mysterious and aloof or whatever. Women will create qualities you actually don't possess because they find you physically attractive. Hence the Halo Effect. TRP considers that you have to build Game to compensate when you're lacking in the physical attractiveness department.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:48 AM
2

I brought the Halo Effect into the mix and a study about it. When you consider the Halo Effect you can clearly understand that my point is absolute only if you consider that everyone is unique and not that shallow...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:44 AM
3

Ok. So how do you explain how it's different from friendship? Why is that? My point is that it's in practice on a daily basis absolutely no different from friendship. You would not feel hurt if your friend sleeps with someone. Why do you care if he is sleeping with someone else since you don't care about sex at all? So how do you explain that? And what about elderly couples who no longer have sex? Or disabled people who cannot? Elderly people used to like sex before they got old and their bodies…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:41 AM
4

What you call nuance mostly boils down to righteous platitude. I said that personality and human decency are irrelevant when it comes to women's attraction. Because it's true unless you believe that the ever increasing sexual inactivity amongst men is because they have "bad personality". Being a wonderful dude would never be a decision maker if she doesn't find you sexually attractive. At best she is going to "beta bux" you. But yeah, we can keep the wishful thinking tell young men that it's bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:33 AM
–

Ya'll can't even make women orgasm Don't worry women don't know at all how to fuck either. They just get a free pass because men are lenient when it comes to your sexual abilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:06 AM
2

If you're having a relationship with a woman you aren't fucking or never wanted to fuck you that means you have a great friendship and a reliable roommate once both of you move together. So many women really need to understand that what they feel in their tummies isn't akin to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 12:04 AM
3

I mean that it doesn't make any goddamn sense and is so far-fetched that either there is something you don't tell us or you're devoid of any logic. And that's fine either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 11:58 PM
–

Lack of sexual attraction alongside the existence of romantic attraction is much, much, much more common in women. It has been proved that a decline in women's sexual desire decreases relationship satisfaction. So you're basically spouting some wishfull thinking that absolutely doesn't work in reality. If a woman doesn't want to fuck you that means she isn't that into you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 11:56 PM
1

I love him as my best friend, and I desire him sexually, but I have no romantic feelings for him as far as I can tell (based on what I've been told it is like). Goddamn, woman! Sometimes I really wonder if women aren't trolling by default...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 11:51 PM
6

You have a point
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 02:22 PM
6

It was very powerful men who were able to have multiple women. Like top 5% of men could pull that off and most of them were head of state...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 01:48 PM
3

Women don’t find most men attractive because women aren’t attracted to the vast majority of men to begin with. Every man in the world can do the same thing as you and women would still find the vast majority of them unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 01:26 PM
1

Because these 10% won’t give you any opportunities most of the time and you’re going to miss each other a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 01:21 PM
5

Ah yes, you all have a spider-sense until in fact, you don't. But you're all still able to tell. And you're only able to be tricked by chessmasters. Since women complain so much about abusive relationships there is a lot of chessmasters running around I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 02:12 AM
2

One of the most frustrating things I find here is the level of anger directed towards woman who are not "your" match. I met many men who were not my match, I didn't resent them for not being right for me. Men are angered because 90% of women find them unattractive. When the vast vast majority of a gender never give you any romantic/sexual interest (especially when you still happen to be friend with them) at the end of the day it could be hard to suck it up and be fine with it especially when soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 02:08 AM
9

Yeah we all heard about women spider sense. It's a wonder how they are able to still be abused by men with such abilities...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 02:01 AM
1

And these normal people live shitty life and for average men, they live shitty romantic and sexual life. Marriage is considered a patriarchal concept by feminism. Nothing to do with the manosphere. Instead of telling people to go outside, you should use your brain. You're full of wishful thinking and feels good rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:03 PM
1

Bro you're talking about traditionalism and fatherhood in an era where the divorce rate is skyrocketing where women are every day less and less attracted to men where men have to either tryhard to get the pity of average women who aren't actually attracted to them or opt out and be called an Incel. You're talking about "normal people" while women aren't attracted to men and so 66% of 18-29 men are sexually inactive. You're talking about men wanting to be patriarchs in a society that reminds us a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 01:56 PM
6

Because fewer people are actually marrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 10:37 PM
5

It’s on me sweetie
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 10:32 PM
9

I was pointing out that you're totally disingenuous. "Me and some random person on Reddit are agreeing, so we are right teehee!".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 10:18 PM
4

Based shaming tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 10:10 PM
8

You probably never dated a woman in your life. So you have less experience at dating women than the men who are disagreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:55 PM
3

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/#:~:text=Among%20men%2C%20those%20younger%20than,of%20men%2065%20and%20older. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/parenting/university-students-arent-having-sex-parents-dont-know-whether/ And male students are less sexually active than their female counterparts, with just a over a third (34 per cent) saying they’ve had sex during their time at university,
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 09:17 PM
3

It is not true that women don’t want to associate with most men. Not by a long shot. He meant it in a romantic/sexual sense. And he is right about it. if you want to date successfully it’s on you and no one else else to make that happen. "If you don't want to be poor, just buy some money or just become rich, it's on you. Why are people complaining about inequality?" When it comes to dating women are more capitalist than Goldman Sachs CEO...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:12 PM
3

Everything about the OkCupid blog posts proves that looks don't matter much to women. Women might rate most men as below average (although that's another issue that has to do with automated messaging for rating 3 or higher and women having more diverse tastes as men), but when it comes to sending out messages or replying looks don't matter much to them. Looks actually matter as much for women. If it weren't the case, OLD wouldn't be a shit show for men. And you are basically pretending that the …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:32 PM
4

54% of 18-29 men are single. 66% of 18-29 men are sexually inactive. You're basically wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:20 PM
-1

Elaborate shit like trying to be a better person, cleaning yourself and doing your half of the housework. Being a "better person" means absolutely nothing. You are talking about something you're unable to define and you're smug to actually see that. We should also call the authority since you're apparently able to know the housework habits of total strangers... As for cleaning oneself, it's a fucking meme. Next time you want to say r*tarded shit, have the decency to not be condescending about it…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:41 PM
1

And I’m a billionaire too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 03:31 AM
1

The only thing pathetic here is the fact you believe you’re witty.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 03:29 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/ If I weren’t on my phone I would give you another one about 66% of 18-29 men being sexually inactive (not sexless). I will go outside when you will stop to be in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 02:37 AM
3

You literally just need to go outside (which I understand is difficult for the basement dwellers) and you will see plenty of average/regular in relationships. a quick trip outside and that is immediately disproven. Data beg to differ too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 02:25 AM
1

Because normal men who have normal dating lives 18-29 men haven't a dating life. That's why we are here in the first place and that TRP actually exists...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 11:07 PM
1

Your rant here is absolutely ridiculous considering that 2-3 days ago you told me that your ideal man is asexual and that’s what you were looking for because according to you since men likes sex, that means they can’t love women. Asexual people are estimated to be 1% of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 06:17 AM
0

Considering how much women love to virtue signal, they are top tier liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 07:01 PM
15

Plenty of no-fat girls are completely invisible to you. No, it's you who actually find 80% of a whole gender below average. Yeah, you call housewives gold-diggers and parasites and then leave them when they're in their 40s and 50s for a hot, young bimbo. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/dating-and-mating/201909/why-marital-satisfaction-is-closely-linked-women-s-sexual-desire https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/women-get-bored-sex-long-term-relationships/582736/ Well, they're…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:56 PM
0

It's okay to be less masculine. Just don't pretend to be something you obviously aren't especially when not being that actually turns you on. Yeah, I heard of switches. And I also heard about cuck claiming they are still masculine. We heard everything in the realm of God. To be a man comes with some expectations. Just like being an adult instead of a child. If you like to forsake your masculinity to get off, all power to you but don't go around claiming you're a man in a metaphysic sense. As for…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 01:06 AM
0

a man being submissive is unhealthy, that submissive men have extra baggage and “fucked up hormones”, and essentially shaming them for being less masculine. They precisely get off by being emasculated and not masculine. I know it's a pretty hard pill to swallow in an era where so many people believe you can be anything you want as long as you feel it. The thing is submissive men precisely get off because they lose power and get emasculated by it. Now saying you can be masculine while you're bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 12:20 AM
1

You literally obstinately ascribing your own solipstic meaning to the concept of romantic love. The only one being solipsistic here is you who actually believe that less than 1% of people's feelings actually matter as much if not more than 99% of how people actually understand things and describe them. You're the one who said that love must involve carnal desire, or are you saying that your 50 year old wife will still invoke the same lust in you? Will you feel lust for your wife when you're both…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 12:51 AM
1

i already told you there's a huge personal difference for us between feeling romantic love and familial love And I already told you that meanings don't change because of your feelings. but i'd rather die alone than marry a man whose so called "love" for me is based on how fuckable i am to him and therefore his "love" has an expiration date, rather than him actually loving me for who i am, funny that that's "true love" to you With such an inability to understand nuances and complexity, you might …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 12:06 AM
1

You're using words you don't understand and using concepts you aren't actually able to distinguish nevermind explaining them precisely. I'm not here to convince you. You can be as delusional as you and make up things as long as you feel it. And for the record asexual people represent about 1% of the human population... Just sayin'
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 11:48 PM
1

Asexual people can romantically love each other, for the record. No, that's the thing they can't. Because you can be romantically in love with someone while you aren't attracted to them. The woman here that got an asexual husband has said so herself that her husband isn't attracted to her. Friends can love each other, their love has nothing to do with eros or psyche, however. So, call it as you want, doesn't change the fact you are simply conflating things here. Just like people conflate love an…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 11:36 PM
1

Yeah and as someone said they wouldn't be attracted to you. The only difference between you and their best friend forever is that you both live together and share practicalities. But if you want to keep the delusion, it's up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 11:25 PM
1

It's not about opinion. Meanings don't change depending on your feelings. There is no such thing as love without carnal intimacy. If you don't have the letter that simply means you have a great friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 11:23 PM
2

You're conflating love and friendship here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 11:14 PM
1

They exist, they are asexual or they are monks. In both cases, they wouldn't bother fucking you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 11:08 PM
-2

People bitching about things that aren't a big problem has existed since the dawn of time, saying there is a problem because people complained about it on reddit makes absolutely no sense. You're right, however, it doesn't change the fact that sexual inactivity among young men is a rising trend. Article is locked You can use an addon on Chrome/Firefox to bypass paywalls. You will find it as useful as adblock back in the day. "Woman value physical attractive just as much as men" ok and? Men are c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 10:08 PM
-5

37% of young men have no interest because they already have given up on dating. I know since you're a woman and don't know at all what it is to be a man but when young men don't go looking for pussies while they are still having testo having a party in their body, that means they have in fact given up about it. If everything were so fine we wouldn't be here in the first place and TRP wouldn't be a thing, to begin with. And according to this: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/parenting/universit…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 09:00 PM
-9

Most men actually aren't dating. That's precisely why TRP is a thing, to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 08:37 PM
3

Because they already know that 95% of the time it wouldn't go well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 08:30 PM
1

I'd say the most effective is working through social circles. Make friends and meet their friends, but don't meet people to slither through groups and find someone. That's snek energy. Wait until it happens and maybe you would get something, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 08:27 PM
2

Bro, I personally believe that simps should be slaughtered and in a very spectacular way to make dissuade any man. It doesn’t change the fact that women will always have the upper hand because they are the sexual selector and consider the vast majority of men unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 05:26 PM
1

Women are swimming in options because you men make it that why. Instead of bitching all the time, why don’t you rally all the men to stop being so thirsty, simp-ish, and weak? You said in your second sentence that men are 15-20x more testo than women. Then you ask men to act like they don't have 15-20x more testo than women...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 02:59 PM
0

Since when do we have to believe anything people say because they are the good guys according to liberals? Do you believe anything R Kelly says because he is black?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 02:45 AM
1

The point here is that women don't care about how nice you're as long as you're attractive. Being nice is at the best icing on the cake, but it's pretty much irrelevant overall. You can be a women hitter and have a lot more women's attention than an average Joe who is considered a "Nice Guys" by women who never give him the time of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 01:40 AM
1

Now you know about Rhianna and Chris Brown.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 01:15 AM
0

It's also apparently hurt you more than being an abusive man who doesn't mind at all slapping women around... But as we know women actually don't mind that. Nice of you to admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 01:14 AM
1

And obviously, the ones who don't mind shitty men as long as they are attractive are a very tiny tiny subset of damaged women? Amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 12:50 AM
4

Thank God, I know better.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 12:47 AM
10

But apparently, according to women, women have spider-sense to know that "Nice Guys" aren't actually nice and they just know it. That's why women and theirs kweens spot Red Pillers, Nice Guys, Incel, and whatever from a mile and can't be deceived.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 12:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter