TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reddexx Archive

View 2 posts and 100 comments by reddexx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah man, how many years have you been married? Give. it. time. "Women marry men hoping they will change, and men marry women hoping they won’t. And each is inevitably disappointed."
/r/TheRedPill23/05/19 07:16 PM
2

This should be the top comment. Make it so!
/r/PussyPassDenied12/03/19 01:12 PM
11

The worst kind of person, selling to the worst kind of person.
/r/PussyPass19/02/19 06:50 PM
3

I'm sharing that on facebook, haha
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 04:32 PM
3

Still gotten laid more than all the Incels combined.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/19 06:35 AM
16

For every type of guy like this I meet they always have unrealistic standards and want only the top tier women. Red Pill truth, brother. They want to smash 10s but don't realize to smash 10s you have to start with a whole lot of 3-4s.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 07:24 PM
7

Can you walk? Can you speak? If Stephen Hawking (and other 'short' guys in wheelchairs and who can't even talk) can smash pussy then you have no excuse but your excuses. Stop making them. Improve yourself and see results. That is the Red Pill of truth, brother.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 07:22 PM
0

I personally know a non-white, wheel-chair bound guy with a muscle-wasting disease. He is not "handsome". But he is a PUA guru. He dresses sharp and uses his humor. He tries hard and gets dates. If fuckin' Steven Hawking can get laid (2 wives, 3 children) who can't even speak- then Incels have no fucking excuse- but their Black Pill excuse.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 07:20 PM
2

There is no "Black pill". It is an excuse only. The Red pill is the Truth, period. There is no alternative truth. Incels are trying (and failing miserably) to create an alternate truth to salve their wounded feelings from not trying and changing enough and failing with women. Failing sucks. Trying and failing repeatedly really sucks. I know whereof I speak. But you do not get an excuse to quit. Ever. I personally know a non-white, wheel-chair bound guy with a muscle-wasting disease. He is not "h…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 07:16 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/9mo799/3_logic_based_rules_for_being_good_in_bed/e7maw51
/r/seduction12/10/18 04:24 AM
2

Very simple game. You just take turns asking each other what you want e.g. "Would you kiss my neck?" And your partner complies and then asks you back. It's very sexy when whispered, builds a lot of intimacy, and women love it because they are so unused to having their wants considered in bed. It creates a space for her to get what she wants without feeling shame. Try it!
/r/seduction12/10/18 04:24 AM
10

Women will lie to protect a man's feelings....
/r/seduction09/10/18 10:10 PM
3

Think of it this way: Introduce one new thing she's into every time you have sex. So you start with vanilla, then maybe next time you introduce some hair pulling. Next time the hair pulling and some fuzzy handcuffs. Then you maybe switch it up and play the "Would you..." game. Just introduce a little variety each time.
/r/seduction09/10/18 10:09 PM
5

More like, Guys will overlook the emotional for the physical; girls the physical for the emotional. Most guys would still fuck a hot girl they hate. Most girls will fuck an physically unattractive guy that makes them feel amazing.
/r/seduction09/10/18 10:07 PM
7

Hot girlfriend once told me, "Guys fall in love with what they see, girls with what they hear." Think on it.
/r/seduction09/10/18 10:06 PM
2

Or request Arizona's death penalty immediately.
/r/PussyPass17/06/18 03:53 PM
0

Non sequitur.
/r/seduction16/05/18 12:48 AM
2

This. It's time to push for sex or end the friendship. She's getting all the fun of prolonged flirting and companionship without ever risking the sex. Don't get strung along. Flirt and keep moving the relationship towards sex. If she refuses dump her and move on. The alternative is pain.
/r/seduction15/05/18 01:56 AM
0

but there's a lot more out there than simply mad dogging until she says no. Straw man. This is decidedly not OPs method.
/r/seduction15/05/18 01:42 AM
70

Yes, but IOIs are for chumps. I went to a social group recently, and upon spotting a very attractive young woman in our group asked if I could see her unique watch. She was frosty but held out her wrist and showed it to me. Later, I asked to try her drink. It was fruity. Later we had sex at my place. She gave no IOIs (indicators of interest) until we were alone. If you look for IOIs you will always be in the wrong frame of mind and be reactive rather than proactive. Instead, rely on compliance n…
/r/seduction14/05/18 02:00 AM
20

She might be trying to make another man jealous. Any other guys nearby she's looking at?
/r/askTRP21/01/18 09:47 PM
3

Fact: 65% of 1000 surveyed persons prefer pet fish to dogs. Margin of error +/- 2.5% Opinion: More people prefer pet fish over dogs. Note the difference. The former is empirically true, the latter is an unsourced statement of personal opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/17 11:41 PM
13

The problem is it takes time to discern crazy. And sometimes she ready to go. In fact, I'd say the crazier she is the more ready.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/17 10:37 PM
5

That's a bogus request. /u/Prometheus44 is simply stating their opinion, not an empirical fact. Research studies aren't a requirement to back personal opinions. If we followed your line of questioning, no one would be able to post anything online without linking to a relevant academic journal. Chill, this is reddit not a dissertation defense.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/17 10:36 PM
7

I'd still rather take the rap on a minor privacy violation than a false rape charge.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/17 10:32 PM
-3

"Believe what you want."
/r/seduction01/09/17 04:09 PM
2

Everyone thinks they can do better. Until the clock runs down.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/17 03:50 PM
1

Magic Bullets is the most comprehensive and well-rounded book on Game I've yet read.
/r/seduction01/01/17 05:29 PM
24

Turned it off at "International dating coach for women, author - human dynamics coach"
/r/seduction05/10/16 11:03 PM
-2

You need to fuck more women.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 06:06 PM
1

You can take women off the pedestal without turning that into hate. Bringing someone down from a pedestal does not mean you have to then bury them. TRP doesn't prevent men from meeting women, but the toxic attitude a man foster does. In my experience, men go much further in success with women when they cultivate a positive but realistic attitude toward women and relationships. The guys with negativity and toxic attitudes toward women do very poorly I find.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 03:48 AM
2

I would say "shapes" the worldview.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 03:43 AM
2

Wow, your ex was seriously out of touch. Was she born with a silver-spoon in her mouth?
/r/TheRedPill19/09/16 12:27 AM
-2

Regardless of whether this is true or not, I stand by not all women are terrible and its still our job to look for the good ones. They do exist.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 08:38 PM
-1

Thank you for making this counter-balancing comment and I concur completely. I think TRP goes much too far in hating on all women because too many commentators are frustrated virgins who find it easier to hate than relate. There really are wonderful women out there, but a toxic attitude festered by TRP prevents many men from meeting them.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:20 PM
3

Women are also deeply negative, reserved, fearful, anxious. This may be true of many, or even most, women but not all of them. You could also describe most men this way too, and equally incapable of happiness. However, in dating our job is to separate the bad from good and seek out the few women who, like ourselves, have put in the self-improvement and self-actualization to be confident, self-directed, having self-esteem and generally happy. All I'm saying is most women are no better or worse th…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:08 PM
1

Ah, that's a much better explanation. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 02:34 PM
1

Yes, but I believe it to be wrong. That's like saying "never drive over the speed limit." Sure it's safe, general advice that can't go wrong, but where's the fun in that? Where's being a fully-alive man who's lived a rich and full life of pushing his boundaries? Sometimes you absolutely need to stick your dick in crazy to learn what wild, insane, loathsome sex can be. Just like sometimes you've got to punch it to 120 mph at night with the lights off. Is it risky behavior? Absolutely. But only th…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 12:44 PM
7

Great story and thanks for sharing. They eventually ditched the dude and his group – so I guess no loss there, they were just "out dancing" with each other I disagree, because if you didn't re-engage you lost your opportunity to meet these women to a man who lead. You thought you were leading but dancing near women and making isn't really leading. Approaching and opening is leading. Or pairing off with them and touching her while dancing is leading. Taking her from the dance floor to the bar is …
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 08:20 AM
-2

I'd agree with all of this. I've done some women who wanted to be dominated all the time (like fetishistic) but I bailed out before finding out how far down the crazy went. Stick your dick in crazy, but don't keep it there.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 07:45 AM
1

I think there can be several Alphas in a big club because any particular woman may only come into contact with one or two. The other Alpha guys can be at other ends of the bar. Separate spheres of influence if you will. What matters is you're the Alpha of the guys she meets that night.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 07:37 AM
3

My definition is simple: An Alpha is the Leader. The leader is the one who everyone else in the group looks to for direction. The one they follow whether they realize it or not. Or even like it or not. He's not necessarily loud or flashy or rich. He might be quiet, edgy or even violent. But when someone makes a joke everyone subtly and unconciously looks to him to see if its funny. Very often he's the one telling the jokes to which everyone laughs. He leads the group when it's time to get out of…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 07:28 AM
20

Feminism has taught a generation of women that they can "have everything" which means a family, a successful career and being happy too. So women go into the world expecting to marry, raise a family and also have the same career advancements that the men around them do. But the hard facts of biology mean women must always make a choice between child-bearing and career advancement. If she wants to be successful like a man she has to put off kids, possibly forever. If she has kids, her male co-wor…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 07:17 AM
15

Cue: crying, spite and anger.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 07:01 AM
33

From experience, not all women want to be dominated all the time. Most women want to be dominated some of the time. Some women never want to be dominated. But all women want to be lead. At first dominating and leading might seem very similar and some women can't tell the difference or the man won't lead so they'll take dominance. But women will respond quite well to a man leading; its a very masculine trait.As a man it's your job to lead: the first interaction, dating, sex, the relationship, eve…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/16 06:57 AM
1

Dating is like chess in that white always moves first. Men are the white players, women are the black. Don't complain she hasn't made the first move.
/r/seduction01/09/16 12:51 AM
1

"No matter how hot she is, some man is tired of her shit."
/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 05:10 PM
2

Enjoy your hand.
/r/seduction10/08/16 05:34 PM
1

Good comments about cockblocking being often from protectiveness not jealousy. In my experience this is usually right if the women are all decently attractive and have good self esteem. However, in many groups of girls there will be the unattractive one, or the girl who's miserable or has low-self-esteem and she'll cockblock her friends out of jealousy. You and OP are both right in this case. And girls who actually have a modicum of self respect aren't going to fall for this anyway. Why wouldn't…
/r/seduction10/08/16 04:22 PM
1

Like a refresher course for me. Quality post. The ignorance and whinging in these comments from frustrated neckbeards about who seduction works for/on makes me shake my head. Great post but only a few can appreciate. They will be the ones who rise to greatness and many lays. The rest it's like casting pearls of wisdom to swine.
/r/seduction10/08/16 04:15 PM
1

The ignorance of this comment literally made me laugh out loud. It works because women are women and certain things work universally. It works (as I've proven to myself repeatedly) on women, period. If you think a woman has to be dumb, young or drunk to be seduced like this you don't know shit about women, sorry to say. I've pulled in very similar ways on dumb/smart young/old sober/drunk literally dozens of women and yes, met my dream wife this way from a same night pull.
/r/seduction10/08/16 04:12 PM
2

This post is a joke, for those that aren't getting it.
/r/seduction05/08/16 02:30 PM
1

If she doesn't get charged then that is a pussypass. You know any man would.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/16 06:14 PM
4

Do women like sex? Yes.
/r/seduction15/07/16 01:54 PM
1

Sure, meditation can be helpful. So can eating fruit every day. But they're all tangential to actually getting laid a lot. You just don't actually need them to get laid frequently. My dispute isn't with meditating, a fine practice, but with OP's blogspam post which offers indirect warm-fuzzy activities* over the cold hard truth that you really need to open often. You don't even need to like yourself, have money, nice clothes, a job or even a place to live to get laid. Again, they're helpful but …
/r/seduction05/07/16 04:25 PM
13

What a load of spam. Meditate? Bullshit, you don't need to meditate to get laid. These are just some general feel-good tips and there's nothing wrong with them, but the fact that tip #1 isn't "Approach until you bleed" and tip #2 isn't "Adopt an abundance mentality" tells me OP hasn't an ounce of game. OP's claim of 20 girls in two months is as fabricated as his coaching business.
/r/seduction03/07/16 04:40 PM
1

Needs to man up and do his duty to look after the child, clearly.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/16 03:37 PM
1

Some jobs aren't worth keeping...
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/16 12:57 AM
3

I think we all want to know what "kind" of sexual favors?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/16 04:29 PM
1

tl;dr As soon as the company marries she gets fat, starts buying way too much shit on credit, burns through all her cash and stops performing. Yep, sounds right.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/16 10:40 PM
94

I would say the system is working just fine.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 03:18 PM
6

Well yeah, that's kinda the joke. Most guys are going to take it to mean she has terrible taste in other men. But I meant it to mean she's obviously dating you so....
/r/seduction08/04/16 03:33 PM
4

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. If she's seeing you then you've obviously got qualities she likes. What seems better on paper (job, looks, money) to a guy may not be the things she really wants in a man.
/r/seduction08/04/16 02:30 PM
45

And just remember, women have terrible taste in men
/r/seduction08/04/16 12:46 PM
2

You know sometimes I think TRP men forget the value in a good old-fashioned take it outside approach. Some men will never learn in any other way and act with impunity until they do.
/r/askTRP03/01/16 05:21 PM
-1

Redditor for 39 minutes. Not trolling at all /s
/r/askTRP03/01/16 04:21 PM
1

Tupac?
/r/askTRP03/01/16 04:17 PM
1

Only thing I would add is include a false-time constraint, such as "I gotta get back to work in a couple minutes."
/r/seduction02/01/16 05:52 PM
2

Are you hosting? Make it a rule that all men must show up with at least one woman. No girl, no entry.
/r/askTRP14/11/15 05:53 PM
2

There's no pussypass denied here, just an interesting debate which the woman loses badly.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/15 09:14 PM
5

The confident man doesn't concern himself with so-called failure. I've learned from many role models such as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Tony Robbins and Scott Adams that they don't even think in terms of risking failure. There is only success-or learning, which better prepare you for success next. So it's success or learning, win/win. Now, what's to risk?
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 04:24 PM
12

You have to be unafraid to risk their disapproval to win their approval. That's the essence of a man.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 08:37 PM
2

Have you ever seen "The Great Happiness Space"? The male hosts almost never have sex with these women. Sex is bad for business, which is all about selling the emotional buildup and momentum towards sex and a relationship for money. They're the ultimate clit tease.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 08:34 PM
1

I agree. At first you enjoy steak, later you enjoy the cooking the steak. The skilled deduction becomes more enjoyable than the actual sex.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 08:24 PM
3

I see it as like trying to give advice on how to navigate an unknown forest. When you're new don't just rush in because you'll run headlong into a tree. Take your time to discover a path. Later you can refine the most efficient path.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/15 08:21 PM
0

It's not about the act but the punishment. And 401 people disagree with you.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/15 02:48 PM
6

She goes to their houses and it's arranged through some agency. Holy shit, I missed that she's going to their houses. I thought it was all at a massage parlor. Maybe it's just me but going out to men's houses is even worse than having them come to a parlor. Either way, she's going to be continuing this extra line of work without him knowing. She knows the money's too good and there's no way he can look for her at her place of work.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/15 10:01 PM
17

Yeh, I noticed that at the beginning of their relationship she absolutely refuses to get into monogamy with him but he persists. She knows she's going to cheat on him and break his twee heart.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/15 09:56 PM
14

But she can change....right, guys?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/15 09:53 PM
2

No, you're wrong. Inform yourself by reading the other comments and you'll see she received among the heaviest possible sentences under RCW for child rape, for a woman or a man.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/15 03:16 PM
1

In reply to your first question, see here: https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/3o3s34/high_school_teacher_convicted_of_raping_a/cvu9vzh As far as a PPD, women generally receive very light sentences for child rape but men get the maximum conviction (hence, a pussy pass). In this case, a woman received among the heaviest sentence she could receive of five years and so her pass for a light sentence was denied. Makes perfect sense.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 03:44 PM
1

See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/3o3s34/high_school_teacher_convicted_of_raping_a/cvu9vzh
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/15 03:39 PM
1

She plead guilty to three counts of Rape of a Child in the Third Degree and one count of tampering with a witness (the boy). Generally the jury decides guilt and the judge delivers the sentence. Pissing off the jury would have nothing to do with her eventual sentencing, but I get your meaning. In this case she plead guilty so there would have been no jury. The article states she could have received up to 76 months.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/15 11:45 PM
2

In Washington class C is lowest level of felony, below A and B. Per the RCW, the penalty is "For a class C felony, by confinement in a state correctional institution for five years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of ten thousand dollars, or by both such confinement and fine. Since she got five years I'd say she got the maximum sentence. IANAL
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/15 11:33 PM
4

Depends on your definition. No he wasn't forced, although she did manipulate him later for fear of being caught. So by common definition it was statutory rape not forcible. Legally, it was "really rape" though as the law doesn't have a charge called statutory rape. She was charged with four counts of child rape. The article doesn't specify but it's probably Rape of a Child in the Third Degree, a class C felony. Legally, she's a child rapist.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/15 11:20 PM
5

I dunno, I thought the entire tone of the video was leering and sensationalist, such as starting the interview with her former drama employer as "She always liked to act...."
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/15 03:58 PM
2

Same thought. There's always someone there with a camera to criticize without actually helping in any way.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/15 04:59 PM
8

I'm not disagreeing. Just pointing out that not every guy is a prize. Our job as men is to become one.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 10:28 PM
24

And there's the catch. Not every guy is alpha and a prize. Most guys are schmos who barely hold interest to women. If you're an alpha then yes this is true.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 08:33 PM
7

When you're a perpetual victim you're never in the wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/15 04:52 PM
1

I smell a troll...
/r/askTRP17/07/15 09:16 PM
3

Oh, OP is not going to be banging her under any scenario because he's already violated the first of the 9 Immutable Laws of Pickup, haha. I'm not advocating investing heavily in her at all, quite the opposite. Even if you dump your energy into the next chick who happens to be neutral, you are already one step ahead. Nope, because you're still dumping energy into a chick, just a different one. You do have to put in the effort to pursue each woman- but not get invested in any one particular woman.…
/r/askTRP11/07/15 02:46 AM
4

The soft next is usually the easy option. Of course it is. Which is why it fails. A woman wants to be pursued. It takes a lot of effort to push through to someone that is already throwing up resistance like this. Not only in txt but also in person. No it doesn't. How hard is it to send a strong text back? Versus crumpling and folding? A woman wants to be pursued. She's essentially told OP that she's not that into him and that she still prefers her ex over him. Unless OP can improve on his frame …
/r/askTRP11/07/15 02:32 AM
12

Listen to /u/red-zen. His reply is perfect. From hard-won experience, if you don't reply to her with strength, or answer "no worries" or say anything else that buys into her excuse you will not be getting laid. Period. She will not coming running back, as so many here seem to think, because you will have given her exactly what she wants: relief from feeling attracted to you. Let me translate her text: "I feel it would be a bad idea to have sex with you because I still feel bad about my ex and I'…
/r/askTRP10/07/15 08:19 PM
22

♂ Fuck, most of the advice in here is shit. Your advice is the first decent advice that deals with her strength test effectively, holds a frame without crumpling, and might even lead to a bang. Everyone else's advice ("soft next"-wtf?) completely caves to her fee-fees. [edit:added male symbol for /u/red-zen]
/r/askTRP10/07/15 08:01 PM
4

Your point about reasonable self-defense is a well made, but you were watching some other video. She clearly tried to punch him several times, did so once and got struck in return.
/r/PussyPass08/07/15 12:06 PM
1

oooh, burn.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/15 08:00 AM
1

The only way you can like diet soda is when your tastebuds have been ruined by drinking vast quantities of regular. Quit all soda for a month and then try diet....retch!
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/15 07:59 AM
2

That's the weird thing though, overweight unattractive women are still often picky. It's entitlement, basically.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/06/15 07:56 AM
5

I think the lesson is clear: don't stick your dick in crazy. Because crazy always get the PP.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/06/15 03:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter