TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rg57 Archive

View 35 posts and 5,221 comments by rg57 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
253

Discriminationrg57/r/MensRights02/05/15 05:23 AM
90

Discriminationrg57/r/MensRights07/02/16 08:53 PM
79

Anti-MRMrg57/r/MensRights23/01/16 07:05 PM
48

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:09 AM
27

Feminismrg57/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:00 AM
19

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:33 PM
18

Fathers/Custodyrg57/r/MensRights30/06/16 12:56 AM
16

rg57/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:21 AM
15

Action Op.rg57/r/MensRights21/01/15 03:41 PM
14

Fathers/Custodyrg57/r/MensRights05/10/15 10:47 PM
14

Discriminationrg57/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:03 AM
12

Legal Rightsrg57/r/MensRights25/07/15 05:54 AM
12

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:10 AM
12

Legal Rightsrg57/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:21 PM
12

Intactivismrg57/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:39 PM
11

Edu./Occu.rg57/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:37 PM
9

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:24 AM
9

Feminismrg57/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:04 AM
8

Intactivismrg57/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:54 AM
7

Edu./Occu.rg57/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:02 PM
7

Fathers/Custodyrg57/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:43 PM
7

Reverse Gendersrg57/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:54 PM
7

Fathers/Custodyrg57/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:21 AM
6

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:49 AM
6

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights10/04/16 05:06 AM
5

Newsrg57/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:05 AM
5

rg57/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:45 PM
5

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights23/03/17 07:07 PM
5

Edu./Occu.rg57/r/MensRights06/02/17 08:32 PM
4

Feminismrg57/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:10 AM
4

Generalrg57/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:01 AM
2

Blogs/Videorg57/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:37 PM
0

rg57/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:59 AM
0

rg57/r/MensRights23/10/14 08:14 PM
0

Social Issuesrg57/r/MensRights21/06/15 01:53 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,221 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Tinfoil hat conspiracies are not important, whether they are about women being raped, or pedophile rings.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:37 PM
1

This is going to get a whole lot worse for women Of course! Who are they importing to replace the lost children that were never conceived? Muslims! Because Islam is so feminist.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:35 PM
1

I am so glad I'm gay, when I read things like this. Gay men actually like men.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:27 PM
1

Because it was never about the sexual assault. It was always about the being male.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:02 PM
2

I used to have respect for her, up until the 2016 campaign when she came out of the closet as the sexist pig you describe.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:00 PM
1

Does it still regard it as "better than equal" when women live longer?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:57 PM
1

That is because women are not the demonized sex in our culture. When people see a woman, they see an actual human being, and spend a few moments actually considering the situation before passing judgment. When people see a man, they have been conditioned to see a monster. That is the problem that must be resolved.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:56 PM
1

Quantity is not evidence. I'll wait for the conviction.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:55 PM
1

This is a case of bad manners, and regardless of the sexes involved, it should be treated as such. It's astounding that this can generate so much discussion. It's almost like it's distracting from the real issues of the day or something....
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:53 PM
1

Of course it's time to recognize male victims of abuse but: There's nothing particularly Hollywood about this. Corey is a no-talent lunatic. We also need to recognize the male victims of a system rigged to disrupt their lives when they seek out, enjoy, and brag about sex.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 05:50 PM
1

Funny thing.... the names and dates are safely irrelevant. Corey is a nut, nothing more. Real victims don't come with conspiracy theories. They come with facts. The first time.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 08:08 AM
1

I spent the next nine years telling people the story at parties for laughs For laughs. Nobody should be facing the law, or damage to their career, based on something so plainly harmless that it was fodder for nine years of party laughs.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 08:04 AM
2

I agree. Finally someone is pushing back. But is it too little, too late? I think the problem is bigger than just the accusations. In some cases, the law itself (harassment) is inhuman and must be repealed. We all know that the same actions carried out by someone attractive are not considered harassment, but are harassing when carried out by someone unattractive. And we know attractiveness of men changes with the bank account, and other factors. It is not natural to expect humans, who are after …
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:56 AM
2

Why stop with liberals and conservatives? There isn't anyone doing it right.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:44 AM
1

Maybe your cock is some wilting plant, but mine can survive being touched. We act as though a cock is some fragile watercolor painting in a waterfall. It's just not. And frankly, there's no better way to wake up than someone taking care of your wood.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:41 AM
3

This is just nonsense. Sorry, but real sexual interaction involves "unwanted" touching. That's HOW you determine whether it is wanted or not, including if you are the one being touched. Being touched can indeed change a person's mind about being touched. We have to get beyond this feminist idea that there needs to be a form, signed in triplicate, outlining all actions to be conducted. It's inhuman. And Takei should have defended Milo and Spacey, but Takei is a coward.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:35 AM
1

Except it was never about equality.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:31 AM
3

I feel that a prominent individual will be accused of some misconduct and they fight back and keep their careers on track, and that will be the end of taking such allegations seriously It should have been Louis CK. What a fool. I blame Bill Clinton. He lied, and he got caught in his lie. That became the template. All accused men are lying.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:28 AM
3

Can you imagine if a male prostitute had shot a woman, because she couldn't deep throat him?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:25 AM
3

Don't even think it won't happen.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:24 AM
3

Before attaching individuals' faces to "sexual assault" there ought to be a conviction for sexual assault. It should be easy, with so many accusers, right? Just one conviction. It's not much to ask. As for "harassment", I think that law ought to be stricken from the books. It's a direct attack on non-feminist (that is to say, human) sexuality, and it's a proxy attack on men.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:21 AM
3

Great job!
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:19 AM
0

Just like Anita Sarkeesian, amirite?
/r/MensRights26/10/17 09:32 AM
-5

Untreated mental illness isn't a good look.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 09:31 AM
2

This is because words are not violence, and words are not harm. Men generally understand that. Women have been taught by feminists and tradcons that words are harmful violence against their honor. They've also been taught that men are degenerates, and if they bring up anything remotely sexual in anything but the most controlled circumstances, they aren't worthy of respect. Men must deny being men, with attractions, in order to exist in public.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:41 AM
7

It's not that we've turned a blind eye to sexual harassment... it's that we've turned normal sexual overtures, generally the responsibility of men, into crimes. We're no longer interested in protecting people from harm, but enforcing a purity of behavior. It's extremely illiberal in intent, and unequal in implementation.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:36 AM
1

My response to that is that "someone" was representing the airport, and therefore it is not "someone", but rather the airport itself that made the remark. when someone is being paid, whether it's a cake baker or an NFL player, they are representing their employer or customer, not themselves. Even if you don't live there, we all eventually have to fly through O'Hare. Why should a person have to take insults from that place? And to some extent, we have to play the game that we're in. It's all fine…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:17 AM
4

Absolutely. She's representing the airport. Surely this is not their position. Make the complaint in writing. And make a new post with their reply when you receive it.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:13 AM
0

I assume that all these people violating their NDAs will be refunding any money paid to them. They made an agreement to settle their claims. Now they violated that agreement, and their legal cases are dead as he surely would not have admitted guilt in a settlement, but accusers accepting the settlement without conviction is a pretty big sign that there's no evidence to convict.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:09 AM
8

So.. who is assuming all these boys are straight? And who is assuming all these boys are ... boys? Why do gay men and transwomen have to suffer the loss of a foreskin (particularly troublesome for bottom surgery in transwomen) just to benefit a bunch of straight women? I guess this must be like if a parent is Jewish or Muslim they can cut a boy for THEIR (not his) religious beliefs... If circumcision worked, the USA would be a beacon of sexual health, as compared to Europe. It's not. It's intere…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:58 AM
1

her two-year graduate degree I initially misinterpreted her degree, assuming it was a typical degree. But physical therapy is one of those nonsense fields, where you can go straight from highschool into becoming a "doctor". Prior to this, the highest degree was "master" (which you could also just jump into right from high school). A PT having ONLY a MPT is may not be qualified to practice. There is a transitional-DPT degree they ought to be working on to bring their skills up to date. This field…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:50 AM
3

law should follow biology It's people who said that who wanted to make gay sex illegal Law should follow exactly one thing: provable harm.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:50 PM
1

I'm curious, how old do you think he was? Did you read the article at all? Or do you just have the opinion you're told to have?
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:42 PM
1

No. Rape is rape. At the very least, we should ask what the victim thought of this at the time, and the judge seems to think she had the ability to deny consent and did not do so. (Also the translation Google gave me says the "man" is twelve... "The North Savo District Court left a man of the age of twelve without judging the sexual offense")
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:40 PM
1

Well, if this is really where The Mary Sue wants to go, let's go back to 2016 then. Vice said that NeoGAF (which like Gawker before it, has just cratered) was one of the sites that sent the most traffic to the Clinton campaign. And NeoGAF's owner is in the midst of a sexual harassment scandal. Funny how Clinton keeps getting tied to these people.... Weinstein, Malka, even her own HUSBAND.... If you want to find a misogynist, it seems all you have to do is find Hillary, and look to the person sta…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:48 AM
7

How about we just ban unnecessary genital cutting? Even for phimosis, you never have to remove the foreskin, and only rarely have to cut into it in any significant way.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:44 AM
1

What reason would r/relationships give for not liking your post? (By the way, my following response would be same regardless of the sexes involved... further I think our laws are outrageously draconian when it comes to government involvement in the sex lives of couples, when there is no harm.) Was she also drunk? I've been in similar situations with my (male) partner before, and it's not something that concerned me. Aside from the fact that, both being drunk, not a lot was ever going to happen i…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:26 AM
1

I think they're innocent until proven guilty (but they made the bed, and they're lying in it). Actually, even the jerk Harvey is innocent until proven guilty. Women lie far too often about rape, and we know the trend to falsely accuse men, in a pile-on, to "support" the other defendants. By the way, kids and former kids lie too, and Singer is also innocent, until proven guilty. I mean, good god, if even one of these men were guilty, and had been assaulting and raping so many people, ONE of them …
/r/MensRights23/10/17 05:53 AM
-8

Not sure if there's an implied "/s" there, but I'll take it as written, seriously. In my view, if there's no harm, we should tell people to just leave it be. There is no harm from a grope. And in this case of a pop star on stage, it certainly elevates his sexiness, which is absolutely a required characteristic for his career. Why do you think the fans are mostly female? They want to have his babies.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 05:45 AM
1

I try to treat all criminal accusations the same. Did the person report it to the police? Did it go to trial? Was there a conviction? These are our tools for determining the truth. Until they've been used, I dismiss these claims. Further, given the politics of the article's author, and the time period, I think the "forced himself on me" claim about his same-age gay friend, has about zero credibility. Rather, it reads more like "gay panic" situation, common at the time.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:00 AM
1

circumcision season I guess the good news is that it stops... It's open season year round in North America.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:45 AM
0

The proper response to something "unwanted" is to reject it, and to stop it, and to remove yourself from the situation if necessary, and to get on with life. Humans are sexual beings, and I strongly reject the idea that someone making a sexual move is something we need to blow up into the proportions that we're seeing today. It's not the end of the world. It's nothing. Further, it's increasingly trivial to get crimes (like demanding sex for advancement) on tape and take down someone who is using…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:34 AM
1

No. Rather the #metoo tag should be used to call out false accusations. Just going by what makes it to the mainstream media, the majority of accusations are false. And in particular, regarding the Harvey claims, most women (and men) decided that they would prefer to take the job with Harvey, instead of some other job, and embrace the "abuse". So they have to own that. Coming out against Harvey now is an attempt at covering their ass, ironically.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:28 AM
1

You can reverse this for tradcons and get the same hypocrisy. I wonder why you focused only on the liberals?
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:25 AM
3

While the exposure of hypocrisy is delightful.... The OTHER exposure of hypocrisy is NOT. No person should be fired based on accusations. And we here should certainly not celebrate such things (but this subreddit increasingly does).
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:44 PM
1

Well, they are in a position better than anyone else to know that their accusations are BS...
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:36 PM
-15

Why would a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory about Weinstein cause me to believe a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory spouted by Feldman? It's amazing how feminist this subreddit becomes, when it's convenient for the narrative.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 01:05 PM
2

Thanks for your interest.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 08:46 AM
2

It's times like these when I wished I trusted the government, because this sort of person should be forced to endure exactly what they did to someone else. But the government must not have the power to cook people to death.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 08:44 AM
6

That is illegal.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 08:41 AM
1

That makes sense. There is probably a statute of limitations. Unfortunately, that means your claim is boring and not useful at all.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:48 AM
1

I hate the fact that citizen tax dollars go to funding this garbage. It would be one thing if CBC were private... you don't have to watch or pay (in theory... of course they would still get paid as local TV even if you never subscribed). But we all pay.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:46 AM
1

The amazingly bad sequel to WALL-E.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:43 AM
1

I hear that latenight guy Corden is a pig. I wonder if he'll join the sounder?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:39 AM
1

So it's not enough that they live longer and draw on the pensions more... the start age has to be lowered TOO?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:38 AM
2

I'm in the middle. I think the ad feels very out-of-date. We've had pink clothes, long hair, and humping each other for decades now. But such an ad may open the door to asking the real questions.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:34 AM
0

These appear to be two different forums...
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:27 AM
2

how do you cope? Honestly, with all that is wrong with society right now, this is about 20% of what I care about. I mean, we could all be nuked tomorrow. I cope by realizing that most people are morons, and they are not swayed in the least by evidence. But one thing is sure... they will age and die. We have an ability to reach the next generation, simply by existing. how can I support men's rights as a female? Be you, and don't take shit.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:25 AM
3

This is not a women-versus-men thing. It's a feminists-versus-reality thing... and even more than that it's a postmodernism-versus-enlightenment thing. I think the #metoo idea shows EXACTLY what is wrong with the other side... they think that feelings and the mob govern what is true. Previously, we had responded with the "Laci Green raped me" campaign, and maybe that had some effect since she's now redpilled. Certainly turnabout is fair play. Hollywood feminists are quite likely to have raped me…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:13 AM
12

Social Justice American Circumcision I am so conflicted right now, as I suspect many attendees will also be. Social Justice means that men and boys have "privilege", and cannot be victims on the basis of sex, and that any time spent on us is time not spent on "real" victims (i.e. women and girls). But hopefully some eyes will be opened. That must already be the case, if it made it into the program.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:59 AM
1

There are no souls. Just people. It's the not-so-wild blue yonder, not the Religious Cinematic Universe.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:51 AM
3

It would be nice to have the gate agent's version of events, perhaps with video... Much as I oppose the Women's March and those responsible for it, she was owed an explanation for the failure to put her in the desired seat, and she should NOT have been punished for stating her desire to write a complaint. This will almost certainly blow up in American's face. (And in 20 years, if I choose to ever fly again, someone will probably quote-mine me on this and call me a terrorist. It's the world we li…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:48 AM
1

How long before the rise of the workplace sexbots? I mean, if your robot can manage the office AND give you the BJ of your life, who would ever hire a human for that job? I just love the idea, because it will blow their minds for so many reasons: men getting the sex they want women not being hired because the job simply won't exist Best part: nobody to blame. What happens between a man and his Lexmark is nobody's business.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:15 PM
3

(By the way, feminist gay men are also trouble)
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:12 PM
1

This isn't how the left works. They will deplatform every last man, woman, and child, running the enterprise straight into the ground, and even then they will not admit their error. Regardless, centralized platforms are inherently defective. The solution will be decentralized.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:10 PM
6

While I'm glad to see men having strong relationships with men, it's sad that many straight men cannot have this relationship with the person they love, because feminism has so poisoned things. It's certainly better if you believe the person you love is also your best friend.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:07 PM
9

This is wonderful! They're openly demonizing all men, no matter how feminist. In spite of actually being true -- those most opposed to any form of sex transgression are invariably those who perpetrate it the most -- it shows that feminism is eating itself, as all inquisitions must.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:59 PM
22

The logical answer to this is to allow boys into their organization.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:06 PM
4

I have no problem with this, PROVIDED that the Girl Scouts do the same by allowing boys in. Really they need to merge. (By the way, when is BSA going to allow openly atheist boys in?) The entire range of experiences and badges should be available to all kids. I reject the "sky is falling" response to this. Most boys are still going to choose boy things to do, and most girls are still going to choose girl things to do. But they all should have the full range of choices.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:03 PM
3

Although I think the use of "feminism" as a label is sexist, I do appreciate your willingness to go where you expect to find opposing views. That's a very valuable trait these days, and a hard one to maintain, and I respect you for it. It's not just issues of sex, but also race, religion, and any number of other things ... people can't just take sides any more, but must demolish their opponents. So, glad to see another person in favor of a more rational approach.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:00 PM
1

At the very least, ALL court proceedings should be broadcast on YouTube in HD. I am told there are some amateur Heroes who would gladly transcribe the video manually, if the automatic subtitles are inaccurate.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:50 PM
1

SInce this does keep coming up over and over again, a side issue: Do men really use the term "nappy" or "napkin" to refer to their kids' diapers?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:30 PM
1

How many times is this going to get posted?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:26 PM
-5

and none of the top comments mention men or MRAs at all That's because this isn't an MRA issue. It's a feminist-men's-auxiliary issue. This is in two ways: MRAs demand evidence against false accusations, but suddenly this disappears when the accuser is male. For consistency, MRAs must demand evidence in this case also. Feminists attack sex like it is nuclear. Everything has to be codified, signed, copied in triplicate... it's not the natural way human beings behave. MRAs stand for a human sexual…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:23 PM
0

"Sexually molested" is weasel words. He was groped, in public. There was no sex, and there was no harm (assuming any of this is even true at all). It's sad to see men support this obvious white knighting.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:15 PM
1

Seems like a ridiculous over-reaction to a literally harmless groping. A simple shove would have sent the right message.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:09 PM
-1

Stories are stories, and Hollywood is full of stories. It's what they get paid for. Unless he names names, and goes to trial, this is white knighting.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:07 PM
-1

Yes, she should be doing time, not community service. But, he has PTSD, loss of relationship, and contemplating suicide? He's allowed this temporary event to define his life. Men should not be aping feminist women when it comes to blowing things like this out of proportion, to wallow and revel in victimhood.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 06:04 PM
9

Funny you should mention those bigots. Check out their Global Gender Gap Report 2016 (why are you working with 2014?) On each country score card, look at the score column (white text on dark background). Look at how they compare the sexes in each country in the world. On any positive measure, they calculate a ratio between 0 and 1. 1 is meant to be perfect equality. When women do worse, the score gets closer to zero. But what about when men do worse? It's a gender gap report right? Each sex shou…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:40 PM
14

Boys learn their place in society when they look down one day and realize a part of them was cut away before they could even speak. If they can cut pieces off you, just because they want to, you have no rights.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:15 PM
19

They don't even want equal outcome. They want increasing numbers of women and darker-skinned people. Forever. Once they get started on something they actually want women and darker-skinned people to be in, it never stops at equal outcome.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:12 PM
2

victims Sorry, but you don't have victims until you have a crime, and that gets determined in a court of law. What we have at this point are accusers. The news, as is typical in these cases, is very fake. Look at the Ghomeshi case in Canada. The man, and his women, enjoyed very rough sex. But later the women in his life teamed up to destroy him. Fortunately, he kept his old emails for a very long time, and was able to prove them all to be liars. Yet the media, EVEN NOW, treats these false accuse…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 05:04 PM
5

I agree and disagree. Rather than consent, the most important fact should be harm. And he plainly did harm her (slightly), so that's where I start. If there is no harm, I don't think ANY case should go to court. THEN I move to the consent question, as a defence, And she plainly did not consent to that either. And there's no claim that this was the result of an accident. He did it on purpose. I agree with the sentence, but not the post-sentence punishment (which ought to be unconstitutional) Even…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 04:58 PM
3

A lot of "the left left me" leftists have been spitting on the far left for some time. Unfortunately, there's not enough spit (nor other bodily fluids) in the world to put out that dumpster fire. The best we can do is try to form some sort of fire break, until it burns itself out.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:05 PM
9

Yet. It's a virtue signalling organization. Give them time.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:02 PM
11

By the way, she already had her own plaque at the Eagle and apparently wasn't even that impressed with Crick and Watson's discovery, so while her work was helpful, it's not as if she understood its significance.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 05:59 PM
3

They are simply a product of their statistics so nothing is lost by grouping them. If this is actually what he thinks (and it seems to be) then he has utterly failed to understand intersectionality and individuality. Even if we are all completely deterministic (and we are), you nevertheless can't get down to the individual level without applying at least tens of categories (about 33 independent categories if each one divides the world in half). And EVEN THEN that assumes that the person you've i…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:55 AM
0

The problem here is that this was not supposed to be a discussion or a debate. It was an interview. (which you can hear at 1:40 -- "and now for the interviewee") But Sargon insisted on not being interviewed. Now, I fully expect the SJW side to be represented by a cunt, but I hate it when my side is too. (To be clear, I like Sargon, but come on...) Both people were cancer, and someone should have stepped in to moderate the thing.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:43 AM
0

It disgusts me how mere accusations, rather than convictions, or at the very least charges, are all it takes to cost a man his job, from the company that bears his own name. And these accusations don't even have to be of anything harmful. They only have to be purity violations, or even just discussion about purity violations. I suppose it's a lesson... keep your company privately-owned whenever possible. It may not be what's best for the company, but it's likely what's best for you. And society.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:28 AM
2

Segregation is a bad idea, regardless of the outcome. The reason we don't segregate is because when you do that, it makes it trivial to treat one sex better than the other. Further, it creates an expectation that good work can only happen in segregated environments. The real world is not segregated, nor should education be. If students have different learning styles, then we should address that problem by providing teachers who can adapt to those styles. But they aren't learning with their genit…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:39 AM
2

Even the judge realizes what a joke the charges are: You engaged in a full-blown sexual relationship... As a birthday treat she ... perform oral sex on him. Instead of focusing on her, this subreddit should be supporting HIM against this disruptive intrusion into his private sex life, which is probably going to screw him up.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:34 AM
7

Often the soup of sexism is so thick we forget we're swimming in it. It says a lot that it's just another day on Earth when a woman threatens to falsely accuse a man of a sex crime.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:30 AM
6

People who can't respond to your arguments always look for ways to make the argument about you, personally. They think that will be easier. Sadly, given what public discourse has become, they're often right.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:26 AM
3

The alternative is apparently Voat. But really, I think the whole platform-hosted "front page to the internet" idea is over. What we need is a browser add-on that allows you to join a comment discussion on any web URL, in a way that is entirely uncensorable and decentralized.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:24 AM
1

Never underestimate the law's ability to be an ass. It has accused young people of criminally victimizing themselves by being adult enough to be culpable for publishing photos of their not-adult-enough naked bodies.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:40 PM
1

it's still statutory rape Those are the legal words we use, but we all know that's nonsense in most cases, and in particular in the case outlined in the image, where the "victim" is taking advantage of that very law, in order to get the sex he wants.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:37 PM
-4

They have a president that was raped He certainly was not. People who seek to distort things can call it whatever you like, but there's no claim that he was raped.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:38 AM
10

If the feminists defeat the French, what hope do the rest of us have? The French wouldn't even let email be called email... it had to be courriel or some nonsense. THIS bureaucracy is going to fall to feminism?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:33 AM
5

It's not discrimination at all. Rather, it's is bringing women in line with men, on this subject. It's equality. I'd prefer if the change went in the other direction, by requiring coverage of male contraceptives as well.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:22 AM
2

Not much change at all. But I am encouraged that the message is at least getting out there. Undoing the damage feminism has done (demonizing men, and demonizing sex itself) is going to take a generation or more.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:57 AM
6

Do you watch the news? Or perhaps you have some neighbors? There's your answer.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:42 AM
8

But it's one of the only contraceptives that also reduces STD transmission, and for that purpose it's also useful for gay men. (We're often told that the government has to require coverage of female contraception, because it's not just about contraception).
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:39 AM
12

Something along these lines... the right to the same level of contraceptive coverage as women, in insurance plans the right to divorce a pregnant wife, regardless of who is the genetic father the right to refuse to be the legal father of a genetic child that he never wanted or knew about the right to make decisions about vasectomy and reversal without his wife's permission the right to be presumed an equal parent during and after divorce the right to egg donors and surrogates, on a par that wome…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:34 AM
30

I just thought all penises were two-tone, until I saw what a normal penis looked like, in porn.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:25 AM
2

You're telling us this subreddit is being brigaded by a single user?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:23 AM
2

So, although nobody knows why Paddock did it, here comes renowned psychologist Dr. word-writer-for-free Charlie Hoehn to blame toxic "unhealthy" masculinity. And where did the good Charlie Hoehn receive his education? The Mask You Live In
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:18 PM
2

Or he should have....
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:07 PM
6

Wow. Bolding! So it must be true! Except it's not. If we're going to be precise, she's may be an ephebophile (as is anyone interested in the "teen" or "twink" categories on PornHub). There is a study of straight men that has tested this. They showed men images of adult women who still looked like mid-teens. Men were physically attracted to these women, knowing their true age. But men who were told that these women were indeed the illegal age they appeared to be claimed not to be attracted to the…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:04 PM
8

And the rest of the world will continue to ignore women's sport, because if you want to see the fastest, and the strongest, that's not where you go. (But that's changing with trans.... fun to watch the meltdown)
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:42 PM
1

That's nice. Maybe they can play the anthem long enough so their players can take a knee for all victims of discrimination, not just black ones.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:41 PM
5

It's clearly NOT rape or sexual assault. But it is a violation of some sort. I wonder how many feminists are pushing this, on the false assumption that it is men who are doing it? Mostly it seems to be women who want kids, and want someone to pay to raise them, but can't find anyone willing.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:39 PM
6

What we're seeing here is an example of someone being indirectly discriminated against because of their sex "indirectly"? What was indirect about it? It doesn't get more direct than that.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:36 PM
1

You are right that the good deeds of men go ignored. But your headline omits the many good deeds of women who saved men that night.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:33 PM
2

Parents should not helicopter, as children deserve a private life, for their own health. But your second point is true... their children should have been taught what to do when threatened (and that is the real crime here... extortion or uttering threats... not rape or sexual assault). They should have had no fear of telling their parents immediately, even if they had complied with the demands.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:31 PM
2

It's a way of transforming the alleged victims' purity (which isn't so pure) into rape. "Rape", even of adults, shouldn't even be a crime. That is, we already have laws on the books to deal with assault, including sexual assault and aggravated sexual assault. We don't need this "rape" thing because when you look at the history of the term, and how it's even used today, it's more about defiling someone's possession. Feminists who don't like women to be objects should agree with me on this. But of…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:15 PM
2

Well done! I bet it could be put to music....
/r/MensRights06/10/17 05:10 PM
1

A male coworker of mine had breast cancer in both breasts. I had a non-cancerous mass in one breast. These are things that don't get talked about much, but they're common enough. But all the ribbons are pink.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:08 PM
1

Not the best timing after Las Vegas, where that seems to be the only motive of the shooter....
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:05 PM
1

keeps deleting Do I want to see this? What am I going to be seeing?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:03 PM
4

No, individuals and groups do not want an egalitarian society. That's why we have politics. Our politicians are supposed to gather together and hammer something out which will satisfy us all, and the best way to do that is to make it egalitarian. Where politics fails is when one side (e.g. feminism) becomes dominant. Then they just run all over you.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:02 PM
0

Obviously the affair made him bad at math! This is a person who doesn't want to take responsibility for their own problems, nor admit that alcoholism is in part a genetic problem as well.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:56 PM
1

This is ridiculous. Most people, including most trans people, believe there are two sexes, and that they are one of those sexes. I'm pretty sure it's a common law principle that if you're the one with the odd condition, we don't make everyone else conform to you... you just deal with it, and we help you do that within reason. Banning words that help us organize society and describe our bodies is not reasonable.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:50 PM
2

I thought "unperson" meant totally erased Give them time.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:42 AM
11

The solution then is to expand her article to include her other work, such as her Filmography. Deletion of someone who is clearly notable is not a reasonable response. Except in Wikipedia-land, where the rules don't matter, and feminists run everything.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:41 AM
12

Apparently despite directing 8 films, and being all over international TV for The Red Pill, she's not "notable".
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:39 AM
12

If nothing else, she can add it to any sequel she produces.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:38 AM
2

Oversight often IS malice. When you specifically refuse to take measures to include half the population, so that you can claim "oopsie, didn't know", that's malice. Also gaslighting.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:32 AM
1

There has to be a cost to these apologies, that is greater than any cost causing the apology in the first place. I don't believe anyone really cared about these flavors. But people should care about this grovelling and shaming.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:30 AM
3

Wouldn't it be nice if infanticide was considered a WORSE (not better) crime than murder?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:26 AM
9

If prayers did anything, shouldn't they have come BEFORE the surgery? And fuck the parents. They should be sterilized and imprisoned.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:24 AM
1

Prayers for all those affected This is why people who pray should go to prison, or a mental hospital. They claim to have the ability to instruct the all-powerful creator of the universe. They fail to prevent the largest mass shooting in modern (likely all) US peacetime history, through their negligence in prayer. They then seek to influence their god after the fact. Their god doesn't undo the event, doesn't re-attach the amputated limbs, doesn't re-animate the dead. These people are either compl…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:21 AM
-2

We should not pretend that men don't have a problem with lethal violence. Yes, women are violent too. But pretending that men don't have a particular tendency to kill, whether in terrorism, mass murder, or even domestic violence, goes against all the evidence that we like to blame feminists for ignoring. MRAs should be better than feminists, and that means dealing with the facts, rather than inventing our own.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:17 AM
2

If it's JUST that, then it is ridiculous. But you can be so "kind" that you stunt someone's growth as person (typically regarding someone in their 20s) and make them dependent you can make people resent kindness by being ridiculously kind at first, and then using that as a club against the other person for not being as ridiculously kind in return. It's a way of creating your own verbal punching bag, and stripping away someone's self-respect.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:12 AM
10

I don't think this is representative. I've heard stories (from men who were shot) of women saving men's lives there as well. Let's not do this.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:06 AM
4

The original article: http://www.wcvb.com/article/mom-accused-of-shaving-9-year-old-boy-s-head-as-act-of-retaliation/10400938
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:05 AM
9

Anyone who thinks a drag queen (a guy in a dress and a wig, making no secret that it's a dress and a wig) is "sexualized" has more problems than this kid will ever have. Step away from the feminism.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 11:01 AM
2

People call men "predators" so I think the term "equating" is reasonable here.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:38 PM
1

This isn't about how women view men, but about how feminists view men.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:37 PM
1

This is absurd. Men are quite commonly victims of forced prostitution (among other slaveries). Anywhere you find females forced into prostitution, you will find males as well, because sex and sexuality are not regional, but biological. Ask her why elephants don't run the world, since they're big and strong.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:32 PM
1

Yes. You need to capture on video behavior that will lose her parental rights (as if one should have a "right" to parent anyone). But getting this video is probably illegal.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:29 PM
2

Come feeds of criticism Wat?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:27 PM
3

Nobody cares what happens to babies, particularly if they are male, particularly if the offender is female. Cut 'em, kill 'em, nobody cares.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:26 PM
1

Robertson started "chatting and sexting" a student via Snapchat shortly after spring break, then invited him over to her apartment. The student then asked if he could bring a friend he was with, and Robertson agreed. Yes, that justifies a decade in prison /s Nothing in the article indicates the "victims" wanted her imprisoned, or were in any way harmed.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:22 PM
3

Hah! Unless they find a way to graft a wallet onto that thing, no woman is going to use it. Many older gay men will be quite happy though.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:18 PM
7

Our society with its focus on two-income nuclear families has really destroyed both family and community. This problem is bigger than divorce... it's societal and generational.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:22 AM
1

Perhaps soon they'll let them out of their bags, and imprison any of their men who rape them for being visible. (Well, it's Saudi Arabia, so I guess it'd be more of a beheading offence...)
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:19 AM
3

if the kid wants it, there's no harm That may be others' position, but mine is simple... if there's no harm there's no harm. Harm needs no proxy. And where there is harm, the news is quite eager to tell us about it. But mostly they want to titillate the public about sex. There is no process that turns a harmless event into a life-changing disaster. The largest surveys (of whole populations, not self-selected, nor chosen from the legal system) simply show long-term harm to be a myth. Rather, what…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 01:13 AM
3

I agree with all your points. I would add: younger MRAs and feminists more gay, bi, and trans MRAs more Philip Davies some people who should be MRAs but aren't (Thunderf00t) some people who are feminists but shouldn't be (Bill Maher) MRAs from every continent, and every ocean men's centers -- these are places making a difference
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:49 PM
1

You are right. The whole thing is ridiculous. He was specifically targeted for this, too. No harm came to anybody, and indeed what happened was exactly what the "victim" wanted to happen. Of course, we're not allowed to know her name, even though she may be part of the reason Trump is president. The Comey announcement was one thing, but I remember the Weiner connection had a big impact as well. Nobody should ever go to prison for speech (which includes text and video) no matter the content of th…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:32 PM
-2

Even though he was not a minor it was illegal because he was in her care Unless they can show that he received better marks than he earned, this isn't worth considering. Nobody should be dragged through the legal system for this nonsense.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:28 PM
-2

Actually, it's a new term for completely enjoyable and harmless sex. “I love you so much,” Eng reportedly told Sayar in a Facebook message at some point during the trauma. “I always loved you, since last year,” The punitive damages are, of course, double jeopardy, because she's been convicted criminally for the same thing. The news article doesn't describe any harm that's worth a half million dollar compensatory payout. Was the orgasm so good that he can no longer walk?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:41 PM
19

Circumcision is considered compulsory [for other people] by most Shi’a Muslims Let's be clear. We're talking about Muslims who cut other people. No child has a religion. Rather, one has been forced on them by their parents, in clear violation of their independent religious rights. There's a reason religion tends to spread down through generations, and therefore clumps in regions, rather than spreading among adults, and being more widespread and diffuse. And that is most adults aren't stupid enou…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:20 AM
10

2:00 yeah that anasthetic is really working well. Wanna bet that it's only there to make it easier for people to cut boys? ("Well, I gave him the anasthetic, so....") What kind of person do you have to be to do this? I thought we all learned from the Milgram experiment that we should listen to that little voice inside our head (or the screams outside it) and NOT do things like this to people. I watched a little further, and I am not watching more. F--- these people.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 11:00 AM
1

You have linked to a 24-video playlist. Was that intentional?
/r/MensRights23/09/17 10:57 AM
1

Milo not always the best manager. But this should have been in the realm of things he could pull off. But if guests don't even know they're invited, or have refused to attend, that's a problem.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 10:55 AM
14

Sorry, but f--- this guy. A dead body cannot respond to his accusations. That's very convenient. I don't buy it when a woman says it. And I don't buy it now.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 10:52 AM
7

I'm pleased that nobody will get banned for saying that in THIS subreddit. Even Jews themselves are increasingly opposed to MGM, yet if you say anything about this sexual abuse and torture committed by fundamentalist Jews, heads explode and you get banned. It turns out atheists are mostly about being anti-Christian and anti-Scientologist. If you say anything on the same level, in the same way, against Jews or Muslims or Buddhists or Hindus, you're out. By the way, Muslims also cut boys (khitan).…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:47 PM
5

The relevant portion: A SENIOR female NSW Labor MP has been branded a “pompous crud” after she grabbed a male political staffer and shoved him out of a lift. Opposition transport spokesman Jodi McKay was trying to get into a packed lift before Question Time in the NSW parliament when she noticed­ Luke Sikora, who works in the Speakers’ office, was among those inside. Eyewitnesses say Strathfield MP Ms McKay grabbed Mr Sikora­ by the shoulder or arm and ejected him from the lift while fellow Labo…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:42 PM
1

Does infanticide count as abuse? Why, or why not?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 05:00 AM
3

For the UK 20 years seems about right. For OK, 20 years seems awfully light. (I didn't intend to rhyme, but there it is... maybe it can be a protest chant)
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:44 AM
2

For some reason, you've chosen to link to an image, rather than an actual story. If there are charges, it's appropriate to say what the charges are. But it's also important to get information about what actually happened, and in most cases that make the news, it was plainly consensual, not rape. Here is the first link I found about the story: http://www.wilx.com/content/news/Former-high-school-soccer-coach-charged-with-sexual-assault-444570323.html The worst that he says about it is that it made…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:40 AM
3

This isn't unusual. Make the doll a little smaller, and I think you'll find most people will say dolls can be raped, including most people in these comments. On the other hand, can videogames be raped? I know the feminists and other SJWs have been attacking them pretty viciously, for their portrayal of female characters, some of whom can be "raped" (as can some male characters). And do these games turn people into rapists? (Hint: no).
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:17 AM
2

they think punishments should be for men only If you look at the laws, and you look at how they want them interpreted and enforced, you'll discovere that it's not even about the application of punishment. Being male IS the crime.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:28 PM
0

I wonder if I'll read 4 posts about it in the same morning... this is my second so far.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:25 PM
10

And in neither category is anyone actually interested in what happened to the supposed victim. The real victims of rape often get ignored when the accused is female, and real victims of the hysteria-pushing professions (law and therapy) often get ignored when the accused is male. That is the best indication that the whole category is a scam.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:22 PM
1

So... how likely is it that he's being Ghomeshi'd?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:45 AM
3

Of course. He's a man. There's always something creepy about men, particularly as they age. It's what the word "creepy" means -- "not young or female".
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:42 AM
2

Would be interesting to see a show of hands of anyone in the audience who has seen it. (If nothing else, it would generate interest in that group.)
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:39 AM
4

It's a fun commercial. The only thing I'd object to is the outrage if the sexes were switched. We need to get over the misandrist idea that men aren't allowed to openly appreciate scantily-clad women, or indeed to share images of them. This goes right to the core of what it means to be human.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 08:38 AM
3

That's because it documents something real... the hatred of men... and the risks you face for defending men. In a sense, knowing the content of the film may make you wary of taking the risk of talking about it. Because you're aware of the cost. Nevertheless, we should know that these people are out there. The ground is fertile to do something useful now. What DeVos did on Title IX is part of that.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 02:09 AM
2

The name is "Statement Festival" Apparently the statement is that we suck. Unless we claim to be trans. See you there.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:17 AM
1

Is not the stuff of which Prison Population is made Well, that's because she didn't go... so I see an easy way to fix that...
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:14 AM
1

The bigotry on the left is starting to actually scare me. It's not only the injustice, but the "drunk with power" way it's run, and the clear desire to expand. All races except "white" can band together to defend their interests. When white people do it, it's racism. And women can band together to defend their interests. When men do it, it's sexism. Gay and trans people can band together to celebrate their sexuality and identity. When straight people do it (and it's not called "Mardi Gras") then…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 03:09 AM
8

I came here to say this too. I'm pissed that someone did this to me for no good reason and escaped punishment, and that it continues to happen to other babies. It's sexual abuse. It's theft. It's imposing someone else's religion on a baby.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:35 AM
1

they give hope to those worried about the future of capitalism and free speech in America The wave of demonetization, limitation, takedowns, and outright banning suggests otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:31 AM
1

Except he calls himself a classical liberal. And he did do that video "Why I Left the Left". He's a liberal, but not "left". I'm not sure he's adequately covered by a category.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:28 AM
2

Now, Trump is my guy. I don't see the connection. I get why Hillary was terrible. But so is he (DeVos aside).
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:25 AM
3

As I noted on a less-popular repost of this: I took the red pill when it was an elevator with a non-existant man inside. I could have no idea then that it was just the tip of the iceberg on this and so many other issues. I am still left. But I strongly reject the people running the show Edit: I am treated as though I am on the right, but all the political tests I take insist I am almost socialist, and fairly libertarian (although I sample political stances from everywhere to build my own).
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:18 AM
1

I took the red pill when it was an elevator with a non-existant man inside. I could have no idea then that it was just the tip of the iceberg on this and so many other issues. I am still left. But I strongly reject the people running the show.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:14 AM
6

Be genderfluid, and go to the media. But you have to commit to it. They can't force you to act or behave any particular way, but you have to keep the identity for the duration of the issue.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 01:12 AM
1

I went to view the actual tweet, and it's there. That account seems to do a hell of a lot of retweeting... how is it humanly possible? Must be a basement dweller.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:42 AM
2

If we've learned anything this year, it's that the news lies. Usually they lie by omission, but Vice is quite happy to just publish blatant lies. Lots of people are being lied about. Now, you can lie about a few people a lot of the time. But lying is getting to be a habit with the mainstream, and you simply cannot lie about most people most of the time. The people who have been lied about will find each other, and put things right.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:33 AM
8

Oh, feminists. Seeking to win with nagging what they cannot win with ballots It worked in Canada. The Canadian cabinet is appointed by the Prime Minister, typically from elected MPs (although occasionally they appoint Senators or other unelected people). The elected MPs are mostly male. But to get into Justin's cabinet, you were something like three times more likely to get in, if you were an airhead like Chrystia Freeland (you can watch her on Bill Maher, if you doubt she's a moron), because XX…
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:33 PM
1

If that's what drives this, we should be driving it the other way. If we do not play the same sport (or a better one) than the one we're currently losing at, we will not advance.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:09 PM
2

I believe this falls into the category of "microaggression". It wouldn't be a problem, except that it's part of a pervasive cultural misandry.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 11:08 PM
4

*Debate Fortunately, the debate seems to be held by Intact America, so it's not for the cut.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 09:19 AM
6

If I knew who did me, I wouldn't be waiting for a prosecution.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:19 PM
4

This would be a case where I would call her a "rapist" and what she did was "rape". Because, facts.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:18 PM
2

Surely a child ought to be kept in the same school where he has forged friendships, some of the first and perhaps most important of his life.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 09:15 PM
7

Of course not. And the real question is "Does brain damage mean you must spend your life celibate or even completely unaroused?" And the followup question is "Why should it matter if you got your brain damage as an adult, as a child, or before birth?" This situation is caused by the irrational way we police sex. We should be taking a harm-based approach. If there is no harm, butt out.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 08:18 PM
4

Conservatives respect individual liberty. Cutting the skin off someone ELSE'S genitals, removing unique and irreplaceable tissue, because of YOUR beliefs (or desires) is a tremendous abuse of individual liberty. I recommend this comprehensive video. Also, I would note that even though male genital cutting IS just as bad as female, that is NOT the burden that must be met to ban it. Rather, it only has to be bad ENOUGH, regardless of female cutting.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 10:44 PM
1

"Men are too ill, and are taking too much time from their wives, who should be out brunching and shopping with their girlfriends instead of spousing."
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:17 AM
1

edge of seventeen Which one? There was a pretty good gay film, and then someone came along and stole the name for their unrelated movie last year.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:14 AM
1

hereticaly ?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:13 AM
3

I'm sure some context could help us understand his positions regarding these issues. It seems unlikely to me that he woke up one day and decided to screw the disabled, for example.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:10 AM
1

Dude. It's a movie, not an instruction manual.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:27 AM
1

I praise our future overlord.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:26 AM
1

Yeah, but how big is its dick? I bet a whale has a bigger one. Let's get to some facts people care about.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:25 AM
2

In some cultures, you can dig people up and execute them all over again, just to be sure.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:23 AM
3

Feminists have a special place in hell for folks like our mothers. Fortunately hell is about as real as rape culture and the wage gap.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:21 AM
7

There was a time when I boycotted movies because of the actors in them. All I ended up doing was missing some good films. In this case, you're probably not missing much. But even so, it's just not worth it.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 03:20 AM
13

What did they think would happen when they stripped reproductive rights from men, and expanded those for women?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:44 PM
-1

Actually what should be criminal is making decisions based on single anecdotes rather than valid data.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:42 PM
21

Well, at least something good will have come out of the Trump administration. Let it not be the last good thing.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:41 PM
22

Most of which wasn't even made into cosmetics for them!
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:40 PM
2

It's something to do. If it works, great. If it doesn't work, I did my best. I think the current generations are lost, but there are always fresh eyes for hypocrisy, who can see the emperor has no clothes.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:38 PM
2

I'm sort of a socialist. Or a Martian. I don't know any more. Not conservative though. Except on some things.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 07:55 AM
3

Men's rights is not a sexist movement. Therefore MRAs (of any sex) appreciate the support of whoever supports MRM.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:10 PM
1

Justin must be so proud.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:06 PM
2

The vast majority aren't terrorists either. However, almost all terrorists are Muslim. (Not my claim... just go to Wikipedia)
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:03 PM
1

*whoa
/r/MensRights05/09/17 06:59 PM
11

Consider what this means when Google aligns with them, and controls your access to history. I was considering tossing my book library, but the more I think about it, I may be one of the small percentage of people who kept things on paper, that can't be edited out of existence by Google. Google has become quite aggressive recently, getting people fired from media outlets for just speaking against them. We should all be concerned, and not just from an MRA perspective...
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:12 PM
5

evidently he didn't appreciate it I'm glad to see you're taking an interest in what the alleged victims think. Small steps forward. There's a difference between not appreciating something digital, and having someone prosecuted for sending it to you. Even if he's gay and found it uninspiring, I doubt that would be his reaction except for the fact that students are taught that the thing to do is report, to save some other kid from being raped and murdered. A woman flashed her goodies at me when I …
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:07 PM
4

Single men and gay men will be beneficiaries, as will many women who can't or won't give birth. Indeed, many babies will benefit, as the birth process isn't entirely safe for humans. Humanity as a whole will, of course, suffer. We don't need more people.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 10:54 PM
1

Did you just assume their gender? :O
/r/MensRights04/09/17 10:14 PM
5

One of their Tetris pieces has 5 blocks, and the others only have 4! Of course it's the penis shaped one, in blue! Patriarchy! Patriarchy! But wait... what's this? It's supporting another one by itself, and helping the orange one support still another! Oh my. I think we've all learned something here today.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:33 AM
6

It's not just women.... our society has devalued people so much that nobody is good enough for anybody. The legal landmines on top of that are just the icing on that cake.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:28 AM
-1

So it's open to the public. Your privacy does not extend into limiting who is in the next stall, any more than you can limit who is dining at the next table. (That is, assuming we enforced de-segregation)
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:24 AM
2

*public
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:23 AM
1

You might have to take piss in a restaurant restroom that's also accessible to women and disabled patrons I agree this shouldn't be an issue. But for some reason women feel that they're unable to crap next to a man taking a leak. Because princess or something.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:22 AM
9

When you criminalize male behavior, it's no surprise that prison is for men.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 02:04 AM
-4

Indeed they do tend to be more honest when the accused are women, because people are trained to see women as human, whereas men are seen as anything ranging from beasts to machines.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 02:02 AM
-10

one of her daughters had recorded the alleged victim asking her not to tell the police about the affair. He allegedly said he had developed feelings for Ms Padilla. This is clearly NOT a rape. This is a jealous daughter, who took out her anger on a young man, and nobody cares.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 02:01 AM
5

Or maybe she's just the right icon.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:57 AM
9

SPLC is also being sued by Muslim reformer Maajid Nawaz, for defaming him as an extremist. I wonder if their almost certain Gawker-ing has anything to do with funnelling their money out of the country.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 10:15 PM
3

As a married gay guy who has a father, and many other men in his family who are fathers, I totally reject the idea that Father's Day is somehow incompatible with same-sex marriage. It would have been nice if they'd included a few seconds of a two-dad family... but I can see why they might want to avoid the subject in the middle of a vote...
/r/MensRights02/09/17 10:08 PM
1

Interesting perspective. I think it likely that our student and the instructor are using each other to make progress promoting their viewpoints. The instructor wants to be sure she will always be able to win. The student (I think) wants the same result for themselves, but also wants that badge that demonstrates to those who are impressed by such things that they did in fact take the course, and perhaps even got the degree. In the long game, MRAs take over gender studies...
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:21 AM
2

I'm just glad the discussion happened at all.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:17 AM
3

I brought up the sentencing gap and they were quick to dismiss it with men's higher crime rate, criminal history, etc I don't stop there. They've just lost the argument! Men only have a higher crime rate because we've defined crime as the things men do. Look at the things women do... even when they are hideous and violent crimes like infanticide, they're treated on the scale of a non-violent theft or something. But men are expected to be the sexual aggressor. And yet saying hello is harassment. …
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:15 AM
2

I have a TV. Girls turn to violence and savagery a lot.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:13 PM
3

Oh dear god. This really needs a stronger warning....
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:22 PM
7

Truly, this is a beautiful story. Someone should make a short film about it, or based on it.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:19 PM
2

What part of it's all fine and well to cuss out feminists on social media but does this address? Or is that the joke?
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:20 PM
1

The YouCaring page is not as it is described in the link. Unless there is some media coverage of this, I must file this under fake news. Not saying it didn't happen... but we have to do better with evidence.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:15 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Otis+Redding+respect
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:08 PM
4

It's not an aggressive response at all, and these are literally the same things, so the comparison is appropriate.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:03 PM
3

You could organize a protest at the circumciser's office, and shame the mother for abusing a baby. You could find out which device they are likely to use there, find a photo of it in use, blow it up large enough for a sign, and put her giant smiling face right next to it -- including this image in a comic bubble quote.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 05:01 PM
1

I don't believe there are any genders. It's a nonsense term. But there are certainly more than two sexes. Ultimately, it's about what utility you want to get out of the words. I have certain expectations from someone described as "man" or "woman" and lots of people don't fall into either group. Even from a strictly biological perspective, there are males who can reproduce with females... and then there's a bunch of other people who can't or won't. It is mere stubbornness to try to force people w…
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:07 PM
12

Why do we allow these cosplay barbarians to harm babies? The whole lot should be in prison.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:04 PM
-1

That second picture could be a photo of anybody...
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:24 PM
3

Any decent human being would have done the same Then it should be easy for you to find the corresponding version with a woman carrying a man and his child. Take all the time you need.... for PhotoShop.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:20 PM
1

What are the odds he'll be charged with sexual assault, and how many days will it take?
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:18 PM
2

This is, at best, a temporary measure, as the enemy will follow your retreat to these more-vulnerable hideouts. Instead of using a defence that even one of the most powerful companies in the world couldn't muster, you need to change strategies. Focus on decentralization. Things like ZeroNet or lbry.io are the way forward. I'm unfamiliar with BitChute, but maybe it is in this category.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:13 PM
1

The real solution here is to work on a Facebook killer. There is zero reason Facebook should be a centralized platform where Mark gets to decide who can use it, and what news is "real". It should be a service that we serve to each other, uncensorable.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:08 PM
2

Of course they are. The left likes to consume itself.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:03 PM
3

OK so, first off you're basically right in your definitions. Sex differs from gender, although there is of course usually a correlation between them, and both are biologically determined in nature. Their causative factors are connected, but are not wholly the same and therefore in most cases they correlate, but because there are a minority of causative factors that are not common between the two we also see a minority of cases where sex and gender develop differently. That's not an issue, we see…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:28 PM
1

Uh oh... Someone's about to be fired...
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:10 PM
1

Did you see him run when that tard rushed the stage? If there was a real battle between him and a movie projection of the CNN logo, my money is on the image. (I say this as someone who hates CNN). If he doesn't run away in terror, he'll try to stare down the projector and go blind.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:07 PM
2

Hah! Trump doesn't care about us, and even Hillary's parental leave proposal was better for men than Trump's. Trump only cares about one thing... Trump. And I see nothing that we can do (and should do) for Trump, in exchange for some meaningless proclamation from some fool whose words mean nothing the second they leave his mouth.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:05 PM
2

I disagree. You know if you're a boy or a girl. Even though I was attracted to other boys, I knew for sure that I was also a boy, not a girl. If anyone should have had a doubt, it should have been me, but I had no doubt. If some kid that looks like a boy tells you they're a girl, I think we need to believe them.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 11:01 PM
1

Not just the law, the Constitution itself (section 15(2)). The Constitution has MANY exceptions in it where the government can duck out of liberty and equality "guarantees". Somehow this is regarded as a good thing that should be spread around the world. I find it detestable.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:55 PM
1

I did serve someone a few days ago who had a full beard, but told me they were female. Perfectly nice person, but I'm just using them to illustrate that this strategy is well within the parameters of what's already happening.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:44 PM
1

I was going to make a North Korea radiation therapy joke here, definitely in bad taste, but the Ministry of Manners would probably have me drawn and quartered. So I leave the work to your own minds...
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:41 PM
1

bullshit feminist They didn't. ;)
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:38 PM
4

Wait... CNN is "both sides"-ing this? Have they gone full Nazi?
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:36 PM
3

So, her mistake wasn't sexism, but suffering the negative results of sexist policy. I'll take it.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:35 PM
6

Hair salon.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:33 PM
1

Now, which future do we want to build... the one where everyone goes to prison, or the one where everyone gets applause? I'm for the applause scenario.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 10:31 PM
3

And soon, sex robots. I think that will probably appeal to the tinkerers among us.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:57 PM
2

Have you seen the news?
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:53 PM
16

Nobody should to prison at all for "wanting" or even "failing". But she did it, in terms of destroying reputations, and getting people arrested and jailed. And geez... these poor guys are not only accused of rape, but of actually... ewww.... the stomach heaves....
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:35 PM
1

Abundant or not, dick is ALWAYS of high value, to anyone who loves dick. This is why I don't think women are really straight.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:44 PM
2

Your use of the element/member symbol has thrilled me.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:28 PM
1

Yes. I blame the same people I always blame. tradcons feminists globalists The Evil Triad.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 10:22 PM
4

Anything goes really! This is Reddit. We know this cannot be true.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 10:21 PM
2

Engage caffeine. It will all make sense. Mostly.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 10:18 PM
10

Camille has some nutty ideas, some that I admire her for, and some that I can't agree with. But I am so glad that she exists at all. She's one of the few people who will say things that could get her deplatformed or worse.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 10:17 PM
1

What difference does it make if the party they answer to is currently in government? They still have their slant. And their party will be back in power one day. They're going to want to have portrayed them approvingly, don't you think?
/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:20 AM
3

Sexual violence IS a hoax. We have a word for violence already. It's "violence". Emotional violence is not violence. Structural violence is not violence. Sexual violence is not violence. When they say "sexual violence" they mean "sex". I used to think they meant violent sex, or violence forcing sex, but no ... feminists really mean just sex, and in particular they mean sex that involves a penis.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:34 AM
1

just as harmful This tells us more about the absence of harm when the offender is male. Not surprising, as the harm is largely mythical (don't blame me... I didn't write the book) and like vaccines, is used as an easy excuse for pretty much anything bad that happened ever afterward.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:28 AM
10

No good deed goes unpunished, in this world.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:34 AM
1

This commercial is not disgusting in the least. Rather, the likely reaction to a sex-flipped version of it is what is disgusting. Women need to get over themselves.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:31 AM
2

When she heard that sex offenders in this European country undergo castration -- be it surgical or chemical -- she could hardly believe it. This also happens in the USA. California is also one of a handful of states that mandate castration — either chemical or surgical — for repeat offenders before being released Now, keep in mind what this means... they are acknowledging that the person cannot change.. they are imprisoned for being who they must be... so they instead force a change onto the per…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:26 AM
1

Unfortunately, in Canada, you have to have very particular medical conditions in order to get the relief you seek. I really don't know why we think we have ownership over your life, but we do. Sorry (genuinely). I don't have a good answer for you. If I did, I think if I said it here, your family may seek to sue me. There must be change on this issue, so I am asking you to ensure that your MP and MLA know how you feel about your right to end your life in a dignified way, in your circumstance.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:13 AM
3

It's not weird. Morally, it's evil. Logically, it's irrational. Scientifically, it's faith-based (not referring to religion here).
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:07 AM
1

So... the people who built Voyager... they wanted to launch mom to the edge of the solar system? TIL moms are bad.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:05 AM
1

It's not going to go well for humans, if aliens ever arrive and see what we've been up to. The dogs, however, are going to do very well. They are goodboys. They do eat one of us from time to time, but I think it's probably earned.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:01 AM
5

As I've been saying, the entire idea of consent for sex is a legally amorphous concept, and ought not to be used in deciding cases. People outside the relationship or not present for the sex are simply not able to determine whether there was consent. I can tell you, if a cat can consent to sex with another cat, then certainly a Down's Syndrome human can consent to sex with his wife. What these people are saying is that Down's Syndrome people don't deserve this part of life. They're lower than ca…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:23 PM
3

Yet, they have the identifiers of a class that ought to be protected. identifiable group (online maps) subject to disadvantage (housing, job restrictions, assuming anyone would hire them anyway) can't change their status (only the government can) without political power (not only that, some are permanently disenfranchised)
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:17 PM
2

This is the entire point of registry program. They aren't going to change it just because it's actually working, as they see it, any more than the Nazis would have ended the concentration camps because Jews and many other people were being killed quite effectively. When you punish people beyond their sentence, but you don't call it punishment, what you're really doing is an end run around the law, to harm a vulnerable group. That's all it is.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:12 PM
5

You need to support, either with your time or your money, or even as a user, the decentralized services that are going to be the end of Big Censorship (Facebook, Google, DNS, Reddit, even Minds). By supporting projects like Tor, IPFS, ZeroNet, FreeNet, Lbry, MaidSafe, Storj, and so forth, you can be part of reinventing the internet. These things really haven't found their "killer app" yet, but being a home for conservative, libertarian, and classical liberal views (basically anything that you co…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:05 PM
4

It's just silliness. Even in adulthood it doesn't work this way. "Can I touch your hand?" before shaking hands. "Can I touch your arm?" before drawing blood. (Oops, aggravated physical assault!) Consent is never about asking and receiving permission. It's about the absence of objection. That's why sometimes you just kiss someone, or they just kiss you, and the world is a better place for it. You shouldn't need to fill a form in triplicate. The litigation of our intimate lives is a disaster.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:32 PM
1

What will you do with these Cokes? Do you have an orifice into which to pour them? Or do you consume the entire container too? Or do you just revel in being owed Cokes that you will never consume -- an ever growing Coke debt that will never be paid?
/r/MensRights20/08/17 12:14 AM
1

In such cases, it's a matter of journalists simply following their own herd. Nobody does their own research, thinking, or writing any more. However that is not to say there isn't a valid reason for avoiding the term "rape" in these cases. In most of the cases (not all) that make their way to this sub (often three or four times each for each stage of the legal proceedings... one post is never enough) there is plainly no rape involved. Rather, the law is called rape, in order to get the public beh…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 12:01 AM
2

Assuming the snapshot is true (it's usually wise to doubt all snapshots) Desmortius is simply advertising what an ignorant (or lying) person they are. This subreddit and the MHRM generally have both been welcoming to gay men, because gay men are men. Trans people (men and women both) due to their nature also often run afoul of the same things that hit boys and men. There are people in MHRM who don't like gay men. But nevertheless we can work together on this cause.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 06:33 AM
17

I'm assuming they are some brand of feminist over there. They have failed, of course. This is exactly opposite to what actually happens. (They probably regard this as a success). Using stereotypical patriarchal cisnormative colors and shapes. No niqabs or burkas. So bigoted.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 05:31 PM
1

I'm starting to think you're a little jealous.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 04:01 AM
-1

Oh give me a break. This is just hysteria.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 03:59 AM
1

The decent thing to do is to describe the relationship as the people involved see it. (And since this is just a screenshot, conveniently we don't get to know). As a gay man, I certainly wouldn't want my arrest (for sex with my husband) referred to as "committing the unnatural act of sodomy upon each other", which it would have been just a few years ago. There's no reason for bad law to dictate reporting.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 03:57 AM
2

Eye for an eye doesn't work well. Norway seems to have a good handle on reforming convicts.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:27 PM
2

That information is not in the article, nor is it in the article it uses as its source. I checked three other sources on Google, and none of them made that claim either.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:25 PM
1

His death was due to malaria, not this vicious assault.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:20 PM
0

If they're calling it a romp, you can be certain that's exactly what it was. Rather than recasting this teen's fun as something horrible, you ought to be calling for men to be treated equally with women, for similar romps.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:17 PM
2

Apparently "AM" means "Assembly Member" of the National Assembly for Wales. Wales has unicameral legislature.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:27 PM
7

Most people are stupid. Don't worry too much about it. By the way, most people are also unaware that the "white nationalist" rally was organized by a black guy. I guess that's inconvenient news.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:24 PM
3

Your mistake is in caring what other people think. The people who can be influenced by what you say are the people who are interested in what you say, not where you say it, or who you are. The rest are bystanders.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 09:37 PM
1

the law grants these students the capacity to consent That's funny, because I thought that came from their brain. That's where I get my capacity to consent from, not the government.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:43 PM
1

Prop 8. The judge declared a CONSTITUTION unconstitutional. It should be noted that state judges are not subordinate to federal judges, except when it comes to interpreting federal law. Only state judges can interpret state law. It's worth noting that in the US, the federal government is a project of the states, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:38 PM
1

No person should face prison or registration for anything of themselves they may text to anyone else.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:25 PM
-1

I'm sorry, was somebody cannibalized?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:23 PM
6

We have to wait for names? We never have to wait for men suspected of any form of sex crime. Why do we have to wait for these people who killed a man?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:13 PM
3

No charges have been laid in the young man's death, and officials are not identifying any of the people involved We need to know who these litterbugs and murderers are. This is very clearly a second degree (or higher) murder. They conspired together to commit a violent crime, as a result of which their victim died. Why are we not going to court to prove this to a judge?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:08 PM
8

If you have to apply for a permit, it's not really a protest, is it? What sort of protest is government authorized? It's hard to believe the country that used to be the United States of America has this kind of thing going on.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:55 PM
1

It's almost as if a job networking service should be a distributed protocol, not a platform that can be placed into the hands of SJWs...
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:36 AM
7

Feminism is about equality Read your history. It was never about equality. To the extent any equality was achieved, it was a byproduct, not a goal.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:29 PM
2

Unfortunately, this is not a legitimate organization.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:52 PM
1

I saw this in r/science, and thought it may be of interest here.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:03 PM
1

Let's not pretend that feminists don't also promote the idea of "virginity". It is an absolute bullshit concept, no matter which puritans are using it. It belongs in the dustbin of history, along with "hell".
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:38 PM
1

He deserves not just a beer... he deserves the whole brewery.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:52 PM
3

Someone at Google has been watching a lot of Dave Rubin, and taking notes (show-off!) I think it's great document, and applicable to government just as well as to Google. I really hope Dave his this person on his show.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:47 PM
8

We can assure you that Evan did not intend to cause any offence How surprising that the news imagines that it can "assure you" of what is plainly a lie. What they really mean is that Evan was so confident that their bigotry would be acceptable that they said it anyway.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:16 PM
0

More likely it's just the echo chamber of this subreddit. If you go over to r/atheism, you can read all about priests raping everybody. People seem to be very selective when it comes to which accused, which accusers, they care about. If you don't like a group, this is the issue people turn to, to attack it.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:34 PM
1

if one group is being harmed or denied an opportunity, the moral ideal of equality does not require that the other groups be harmed as well. It requires that no group be harmed. That's a ridiculous argument. Is draft registration harm? Well, are vaccines harm? They hurt. They can make you bleed. They are definitely harmful, if only just a little. But what are the FOR? They make the body healthier, more able to defend itself. Just like draft registration makes your community more able to defend i…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:29 PM
2

Great. We've moved from the Conceptual Penis to the Conceptual Testicle.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:21 PM
3

This is wrong, at least in the first two sections. Currently cultural mores, and the distance of history, have allowed the First and Second waves to appear far more sensible and equality-minded than they actually were. The First Wave shamed men (and only men) to go and die in senseless WWI. The Second Wave invented "political lesbianism" which set back gay rights at least two decades in the USA by convincing everyone that being gay was a choice. For most men, it certainly is not. I support the l…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:17 PM
3

The only way to stop this is to end the hysteria around sexuality. As long as we treat sex as something deadly, that some people should be beaten, maimed, and killed for, this is going to continue to happen. To some extent, the boy is lucky... it could have been worse.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:11 PM
1

Dead women don't lie about rape. These facts are true, but I don't think we should base any sort of action on them. Not sure the vandal agrees with me.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:09 PM
2

This is yet another nail in the coffin of free speech, and honestly that coffin is pretty solidly shut already. Please support anyone who moves away from YouTube to ANY of the competing platforms. But understand that other platforms will suffer exactly the same problem, and you will get the same results, no matter how committed they claim to be. And if they don't, Google will just buy them, and that will be that. The real, long-term solution is protocols and systems. Decentralization and the use…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:57 PM
3

All you have to do is add the missing "WO" they seem to have forgotten. It is women who are most aroused by violence against women .. whether they are other women, or themselves. Maybe this person simply wants to reduce the competition, so they can have all the rape-fantasist women to themselves?
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:36 PM
18

He's already being punished. They "saved" him from his girlfriend, spread his sex life all over the media, and now he'll probably be going to therapy.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:31 PM
-100

He consented, so no. The law may say otherwise, but common sense says that with consent, there is no rape. he was a willing participant and was not coerced. And clearly she's 44. There's no faking that as a teenager. No person, of either sex, should be going to prison for consensual sex. Period.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:27 PM
0

The way forward is by being their worst fear, and showing that it is nothing to be afraid of. This is why I answer questions like the "bathroom bill" controversy by saying we should just desegregate the bathrooms. Their worst fear is that someone will pee in the same room that their darling daughter Darlene is pooping in. And that other person won't be a woman. Oh noes! Be their worst fear. When all they have on their side is hysteria, you must do it. Milo (when he isn't issuing apologies) is an…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:07 PM
0

I'm not likely to believe Milo's book has 686 paragraphs, much less 686 pages...
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:00 PM
2

I guess anyone should take advantage of whatever legal avenues are available to them.... but I do not regard either situation as rape, and I recommend changing the rape laws to make it clear that drunk sex is not rape. Either people are responsible for what happens when they are intoxicated, or they aren't. We seem to have decided in every other area that they ARE. So the same should apply here.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:58 PM
6

This problem is much bigger than men's rights, and has been escalating for years. So a lot of people already know that it's bull. Just like "rape", the words "Nazi" and "alt-right" have been distorted beyond all useful meaning (or in the case of "alt-right" never really meant anything of importance) Become familiar with GamerGate, to understand how the establishment and SJW media have blatantly lied about whole segments of the population, because they can. The best you can do is let people know …
/r/MensRights31/07/17 11:05 PM
1

No. It's more like if we objected that none of the three leading cast of Hidden Figures were men.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:26 PM
1

It appears there is also a PART 2
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:19 PM
2

The thing is, antifeminism, like antitheism, isn't a "thing". It's just a bunch of people who have rejected the claims, and further seek to oppose them. The reasons behind it are many, and nothing is essential other than being against the other claims. MHRM has good reason to be antifeminist but, going the other direction, I wager most antifeminists are not MRAs.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:17 PM
4

I disagree on healthcare. Remember half the population would also be gone.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:18 PM
6

Maybe 007 is a lady, but she won't be doing her own stunts... Just ask The Guardian Craig, too, got his fair share of cuts, bruises and black eyes, and at one point sliced off the top of a finger
/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:19 PM
11

Even if she had been raped, she still wouldn't be a "survivor" of that any more than she'd be a survivor of bank fraud or a survivor of copyright infringement or a survivor of Starbucks. A person survives disasters, attempted murder, armed robbery. These are things where you are likely to die. Given the ever-expanding definition of rape, it is important to stamp out this idea that it is something a person "survives". Feminists insist on very specific language. That process should be interrupted.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:01 PM
3

Not being "raped" means that you don't get to cash in later.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:52 PM
-4

Language policing is something the other side does. Let's not duplicate that here.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 03:50 PM
-3

You forgot the "/s"
/r/MensRights29/07/17 09:35 PM
3

No, no, you feminism-addled fool, she definitely is not. There is no "regret rape". Two people had consensual sex, TEN times, and enjoyed it. That's it. NOBODY should ever go to prison for that, particularly when their accuser agreed to wear a stupid blindfold the whole time. Would we even be having this conversation if the "fraudster" was a black man pretending to be white? What if the "victim" was naturally blind and there was no blindfold?
/r/MensRights29/07/17 09:34 PM
7

u/spez is also a dick. I try to gender-balance sex-based insults.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:09 PM
7

Fathers, please raise your daughters not to be cows and harpies and banshees. Teach them the values of family, compassion, relationships, reciprocity, and fairness. Joy is a thing that exists. Also, don't assume your daughter is straight, or into men at all, or will ever want a relationship with any human being.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:05 PM
1

Firefox (yes, I know) says: "The owner of www.ceddit.com has configured their website improperly". I'm too lazy to fight with it.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 07:01 PM
3

Nobody should be facing criminal charges, probation, fines, or imprisonment for consensual sex. And indeed, if we buy the feminist way of thinking (which I don't, but let's just see where this goes) this man was raped by fraud.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:59 PM
2

I hope this person is correct when they claim that MRAs have somehow dominated the dad's side of this issue. I don't see it anywhere, but it would sure be good to see some people demanding compassion and justice for divorced fathers.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:30 PM
1

They should have asked whose genitals had been cut against their will.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:40 PM
1

That's a very strange way to make that chart... it makes it seem like all the races earn degrees in equal number. Is this meant to show us that some races are more divergent in male and female degrees than others? It isn't even normalized by who applied, or what the population looks like. And why put the associate's and bachelor's degrees so far apart? This is crappydesign.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:37 PM
4

This is a stupid slogan ("the future is female"), but it is not a eugenics program. It's additionally stupid because many trans people (apparently their target audience) are FTM. The future is decidedly NOT female for them. And while Planned Parenthood has a dark past (as do both political parties, by the way) we need to focus on what it does today. While abortion is only a portion of what they do, it's a necessary thing, including for men.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:22 PM
1

There are no claims that any rape (other than by expanded definition) occurred here. In fact, the article is devoid of nearly any information about the accusation at all.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 04:15 PM
-3

In no case should anyone be going to prison for a photo.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:27 PM
2

If you go to the site, it gets even worse: Renounce the monster male and his mission of violent oppression As a gay man, I am deeply shamed that this is what my "community" is choosing to put out there. I'm gay. I love men. This is bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:22 PM
4

Equality is one thing. But let's not aim to make everyone equally miserable, OK? Nobody should be fired for this. It's just ridiculous and cruel.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:40 PM
6

Of course it's a men's rights issue. It's about how men deal with adversity and are generally ignored, versus how women deal with adversity and all of daytime TV talks about it. Assuming it's "daytime talk" time for you, turn on the TV right now. What are they talking about?
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:38 PM
4

That guy is awesome! I hope he won the internet that day.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:37 PM
1

By not referring to her as a woman it gives the readers the impression that a child is being unfairly punished Only if those readers believe children should be treated somehow differently. I don't. If you don't want your kid to spend the rest of her life in a cell with Bertha, then you teach your kid right from wrong.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:34 PM
2

She's not going to prison, silly. She's going to women's prison.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:33 PM
5

Didn't read the article, but that seems to be all that the lawmaker has said, or it's all that people are complaining about, yet it is absolutely true. It's also true for husbands that refuse sex with their wives, and in same-sex relationships. People who refuse sex (they are claiming this is a sexual orientation) should not be in marriages or relationships with normal people.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:31 PM
2

I smile and laugh Don't do this... making a scene may be uncomfortable, or may not even work to change minds, but you'll feel better about being true to yourself, and I think that probably must be paramount.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:07 PM
3

This is fine, so long as men are also allowed into "women's" toilets. All rest rooms should simply be labeled by the facilities they contain, not who is permitted to use them. Segregation is bad. Further, the fact that women want "unisex" bathrooms prove that the risk of rape (probability and potential outcome) is considered preferable to the risk of peeing yourself. This should be taken into account when it comes to sentencing anyone for "rape" these days.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:03 PM
2

it's safe to assume people will universally support a circumcision if it's done as a dick-saving medical procedure. Name such a case that would come up in the context of a child. There are always exceptional cases, but I'm not aware of anything for which male circumcision is a reasonable response.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:04 PM
25

Many thanks to this woman.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:01 PM
2

it reduces chances of HPV, HIV, UTI's and other health issues in males The difference is minimal, and is reduced to zero when proper hygiene and safer sex practices are used. Why does your wife think your baby is going to be having sex? He can make this decision for himself when the times comes, if he really wants to. Bottom line, it's his choice. Tell her that even if you're OK with it, and even if your other son is OK with it, it's not really ANY of your choice. It's your new son's choice, and…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:12 AM
4

What does Breitbart have to do with anything? That's an image of the Daily Wire, and their comment is entirely consistent with what you quoted from USA Today.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:03 PM
1

What is the purpose of the bill? Unless someone can demostrate some harm (which they can't) then the bill is not only unnecessary, but unjust. By adopting the feminist idea that sex (and everything else) is about power, such laws undermine genuine human relationships between all people.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:54 PM
1

It's too bad he took the easy way out by justifying double-standards, when the fact is that when people enjoy sex together, it's a good thing no matter who they are. Nobody dares say the emperor has no clothes any more. But that guy is not wearing a stitch.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:52 PM
2

this is not a mens issue Of course it is. It's about a boy's freedom to dress up in a non-conforming costume. And it's about a good dad.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:47 PM
1

The way the media and society are going, I believe everything, and nothing, any more. The unreliability of everything you read, see, and hear is going to become a major issue, given the ease with which statements and events can be entirely fabricated by AI now... I am really not looking forward to the next presidential election...
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:44 PM
1

I think a standard prison cell, in a men's prison (i.e. real prison) is fine for her. I wouldn't want to be her cellmate though... I still have my parts and I'd like to keep them.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:38 PM
1

This may be a minority opinion here, but I always want the original link. Having accurate sourcing is important. That said, originals tend to disappear. One day, we'll have the permanent internet.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 06:37 PM
1

It's worth reminding people of Dave Rubin's word (or at least there's where I first heard it) "bigoteer", about a person who accuses someone of bigotry, when there is no evidence that the target of their accusation has any negative feelings about the group, or has any desire to cause them discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:46 PM
1

Was anyone likely to forget that feminists are authoritarian sexists?
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:44 PM
15

if there is a broken lawnmower on a bench, and you come back later, you'll find those men now know everything about each other And the mower works now. Men are cool that way.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:43 PM
11

That is what the image is saying, basically.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:25 PM
15

It's basically the Twinkie defence and it shouldn't be allowed. But if it's going to be allowed, then it should also be available for men, because men get PPD too.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:22 PM
0

So what surgery are the women offered? At the very least, some of them can do with some liposuction, maybe some breast implants.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:16 PM
1

You are WORTH fighting for. All men are. Don't say this unless you mean it. I am likely to include more men than you will, but even I don't include all men. I'm quite done with the Kim Jongs of the world, for example.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:13 PM
2

You experienced the world as it should be, and should use this experience to motivate you to end laws against this sexual "harassment". Women should not have a trump card, so to speak, to play against men.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:10 PM
28

The larger gay subreddits are infested with the same SJW and authoritarian nonsense that most of the gay organizations are infested with. Just keep in mind that things are changing. There have never been more openly gay conservatives, libertarians, and true liberals, than there are today.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 05:05 PM
1

Nothing in that article describes rape.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:27 PM
1

We don't men anymore. So, fake. Gay?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:21 PM
3

Nobody should be going to prison at all, for what is clearly consensual behavior. "Depraved", "debauched"... what is this, the Victorian age?
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:18 PM
2

Ironically, "fat acceptance" cannot be about caring about someone, because being obese, or even just overweight, is seriously bad for you.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 06:16 PM
22

Just the feminists. And the feminist men.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:39 PM
1

Of course, whatever she said is filtered through a media outlet...
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:19 PM
3

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, as is generally the case in the comments section. However, when you combine the "survivor industry" with the ever-expanding definitions of rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment, I think the evidence is all around.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:12 PM
-1

And I'm sure it would help my ego to be referred to as Your Majesty, but words matter.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 08:11 PM
16

And that video is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY1o1GZgf8Q
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:25 PM
-1

It's like they solved your mouse infestation by crashing an airplane into your neighborhood.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 04:23 PM
2

I thought I was a feminist. It wasn't something that I gave a great deal of thought to. It's just the narrative that you're fed: women and girls are in trouble, so we have to stop MRAs and help women. But when ElevatorGate and Atheism+ happened, that's when my eyes were opened to what was going on, and I came here to check out what MRAs were saying. Over time, based on the behavior of MRAs vs feminists, and based on the arguments of MRAs vs feminists, I became anti-feminist. It is clear which si…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:50 PM
1

Help him out! I don't think we can do that, by the rules...
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:56 PM
1

You used my love This is about a bad breakup, nothing more. Nobody should be going to prison over this.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:59 PM
1

The US imprisons people for insane amounts of time, because they don't value human life. Canadian sentences tend to be more in line with the rest of the civilized world.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:57 PM
1

Of course they see it. They think it's right. That's why there needs to be a house-cleaning right at the top.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:56 PM
2

On the one hand.. good. Now, if we can just get murdering moms to do at LEAST the same time, in the same prisons...
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:55 PM
2

Thank you. So excluding biological differences, you'd want things to be near the zero line. I also wonder how much of the difference is due to telling girls, and only girls, as we now do, that they can be anything, should aim high.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:41 PM
1

It's odd that "very unsatisfied" and "satisfied" (and neutral) are excluded. Edit: on page 71 (see full report comment above/below) you can see that the four allowed responses were "very satisfied", "satisfied", "moderately satisfied", and "not satisfied". It seems designed to divide up the (moderately) satisfied group, so it looks like two smaller groups.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:40 PM
6

Not to mention certain notorious female camp guards and serial killers Yeah, but they were just acting white male, so it's still patriarchy. What is being done to “white males” now, it should go without saying, is not on a par with what was done to those people This is wilful blindness. It is EXACTLY what was done to those people, and if things continue, were going to see extremely unpleasant results from it. If you're a white male, you should be doing whatever you can to dismantle the prison sy…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:22 PM
5

straight men don't face challenges related to their sexual orientation What, you mean like this? When straight men have to fight to be allowed to hold a job or live in a flat without having to hide their sexual orientation Like this? (in case you missed it, this man was innocent of all charges) unless you express your affection for women in disgusting ways Like this? (oh how awkward...) Regardless, there is no price of admission to pride. Straight people are exactly as entitled to it, for themse…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:49 PM
4

If it was up to me, straight men would be welcome in the "gay" pride parade, marching as themselves, for themselves. Gay people have achieved so much over the last few decades that we've reached a point, in many places, where there is no discernible difference between life as a gay man and life as a straight man, or where it's actually worse to be straight, not because of any orientation discrimination, but because of misandry and androphobia, which is less likely to manifest in same-sex context…
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:41 PM
3

I assume that on rare occasions, it actually works. Why do people play the lottery?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:49 AM
3

Indeed that is a law. When a victim dies because of a crime, that is murder, even if the death was never intended or attempted. I don't happen to agree with that law, but it's there, and shouldn't be ignored just because the victim is unpopular.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:37 AM
2

Well, he was clearly a Nazi, so it was OK to punch him to death /s
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:36 AM
3

This has already been posted here, when it happened. I think it was in the Superbowl, wasn't it?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:34 AM
-5

Kids, like women, know that unjust laws can be used in their favor. They aren't stupid. By the way, it's a riot, isn't it, that people in this sub don't think the bar should be blamed for producing and showing child pornography, but yet they want a woman blamed for having sex with a teen she thought was of legal age. Hypocrisy, thy name is ... everyone.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:50 PM
9

Walk out. There's no justification for this cutesy old-timey sexism. If you're good at making a scene, make a scene. It won't even matter to anyone else what she said if you say "WHAT DID YOU SAY TO ME?!" (provided you don't go full Zarna Joshi... never go full Zarna)
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:44 PM
7

She should never have reproduced. That's evident. Honestly, there should be a license. Unlicensed reproduction should result in sterilization. We're racing to 8 billion. We don't need more. We need MUCH less. This species is on its way out if we don't solve this.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:41 PM
2

Gay men too. I'm not even attracted to women, but nobody really wants to deal with a land whale. And ham planet sounds far more interesting than it really is.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:38 PM
20

That's not really a men's issue. We support transmen (and transwomen for that matter). Most trans people do not say that sex doesn't exist, or isn't biological, which is entirely WHY they feel the need to take medication and have surgery. The mind is a production of the brain. The brain is a production of the genes in their environment. There is no part of trans phenomenon that is not biological. Rather, just like people whose mismatch is visible in their genitals alone, there are people whose b…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:36 PM
5

Give these guys some privacy and pornhub, and you'll have a success....
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:33 PM
1

Good. Now, what about the builder?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:03 AM
1

If any of my male teachers had actually been attractive, I would have loved to have had sex with them. Unfortunately, even in gym and shop, they were mostly fat, saggy, lumpy things, nor were their personalities particularly inspiring.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:41 PM
1

Thank you for pointing this out. Of course, as we know, having sources and data is bigotry.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 07:31 PM
1

This is bizarre, on both sides. There is no claim of rape here (except something unrelated from years past, as an excuse for bad driving now). I have never bought the absurd "position of authority" proxy for rape. Either there was rape, or there wasn't. And they made no claim that there was rape. And why is someone being convicted of "aggravated assault with a deadly weapon" for what is a car accident? People sometimes run red lights. Sometimes it's intentional, and sometimes it's not. Did they …
/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:53 PM
6

I think so. I mean, this is just one film, not seen by a lot of people in cinemas or on TV, so that limits its effect. But I am certain that even MRAs who saw it were changed, and it certainly opened the eyes of non-MRAs, for whom most of these concepts and people would be new. I think this film opens the door for more. But unlike the Matrix films, the new ones will be even better. This subject is so deep and diverse that it could easily support a whole shelf of DVDs. It is that drumbeat that wi…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:42 PM
0

How many men do you hear about having done this? Very few. How many men are teachers? Very few. Priests, on the other hand...
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:53 PM
3

I cannot begin to explain the terror Because there is none. Good grief, this is nuts. before they are at a level of maturity In most of the world, 16 is mature enough to understand and have sex.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:51 PM
13

Nobody should be sentenced for any image, of anything or anyone. Period. Just as there are no words we should not read, there are no images we should not see. Unfortunately in both cases, government steps in to tell people what portions of reality they're able to handle, and which will send them to prison, for everyone else's safety. Because governments are so good at that.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:42 PM
6

I agree. They always trot out the "cut everything off and sew it shut" version, but then they ban even the slightest nick on the labia. And with boys, they conveniently ignore African and Muslim practices, and even the bleed-outs and deaths that happen in Western hospitals, and pretend that every cut male has something that looks and works "normally". This slipperiness is nothing more than sexism, and must be denounced when it is encountered.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:41 PM
0

On the other hand, you seem to prefer catastrophizing the situation.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:24 PM
1

It's almost as if people know that involving the criminal law to police drunken behavior is a stupid idea, until a man is the drunk, because of society's fear and loathing of men.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:23 PM
1

Regardless of who did it, her punishment for drunken groping seems reasonable to me. I'd have banned her from air travel for a year, but I guess eight months of house arrest works too. Nobody should be on a registry in any case, and jail for this just seems ludicrous. We need a system-wide reform of our sex laws, making them more proportional to the actual harm caused. In this case, someone had an unpleasant flight next to a grabby drunken idiot. Still better than a screaming kid, I bet.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:02 PM
133

Losing a slave is always such a tragedy to the family.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:23 PM
9

These men should have said they were being misgendered, and gone directly to CNN. They could have a big laugh about it back in Egypt...
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:05 PM
5

Except it's not. While there is misandry, there is also androphobia. This is the key reason people use for keeping trans people out of bathrooms... the idea that some little girl might be in a bathroom with someone who is "really" a secret man! Nobody cares about the opposite case, because it's not scary. Women, even secret women, are wonderful.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 12:06 AM
2

No person should come to Court and remain anonymous to the public, whose interest is in holding the Court to account.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 04:17 PM
0

While the sentencing disparity is indeed ridiculous, this is probably not the subreddit to come to if you want to kill defendants. When you have facts and reason on your side, you don't need (or want) to resort to these measures. No person (and it is mostly men, who end up in court) should face vigilantes and prison for consensual sex.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:39 PM
4

Don't need to splain it. It failed right in the name. "Women's Equality". It's like saying "W=". There's no other side of the equation, therefore no equality is possible. But at least they're honest about feminism. Calling it "The Equality Party" would actually be worse because: They aren't about equality.. they're for equity (equal outcomes). They really don't care about men, except to the degree caring about men helps women.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:29 PM
1

"What has been seen cannot be unseen" is true in more ways than one. Vice is lying. While they may block certain services, you cannot block the overall concept of archiving, and holding media to account.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:47 PM
2

This is vulva/labia surgery, not vagina surgery.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:38 AM
2

The results were even more striking regarding the hiring of aboriginal people. When applications were blind, much fewer would have been hired. But when their identity was made clear, potential hirings went up 20% or so. It couldn't be more clear that people are hiring based on race and sex, in a racist and sexist attempt to achieve some arbitrary level of diversity.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:27 PM
3

Lie detectors don't prove anything, which is why the results are not admissible. They are simply a pressure tactic to gain confessions or other information.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:24 PM
3

Assuming you're in the US, your friend's uncle has a 6th Amendment right to legal representation.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:22 PM
2

If something costs $100, and you only have $96, you'll discover that $4 matters.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:17 PM
11

This study was about beings who have human brains, not whale brains. I imagine that's why they didn't include whales.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:15 PM
5

We are attracted to masculinity Well, "we" are, but many gay guys are attracted to femininity.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:11 PM
-4

The 17-year-old "wanted to continue the relationship". Of course, we're given almost nothing to go on, but it seems like she was going to dump him. It's a bad relationship, not a crime.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 01:03 PM
10

Being nearly 2/3 the skin area of the penis, foreskin provides a gliding action during sex, so that there's less friction and tearing for both partners. When not having sex, it also protects the glans, which otherwise becomes keratinized and rough. Compare your lips versus your arm. And it's also simply for pleasure. Some have compared the difference in sensitivity to the palm of your hand versus the back of your hand. And it looks cool.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:33 PM
8

Well I don't have a penis so maybe I'm not allowed to speak That's silly. Everyone has the right to speak on any subject. Indeed, while having personal experience with a subject can give you insight and a visceral interest in the subject, and can provide an example or counterexample, it tells you nothing about the situation at large. To suggest otherwise is the essence of prejudice, assuming that all humans of a sort are the same, experience the same, react the same.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:24 PM
2

Oh my. It looks like you've got some competition, bot. Who will win? Grace or raw power?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:20 PM
3

Oh my. It looks like you've got some competition, bot. Who will win? Grace or raw power?
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:20 PM
5

Hate is absurd. It's a strong emotion, and is easily diverted from legitimate use. Often those who wield it will see it turned against themselves. If you just want to watch the world burn, hate is great. Otherwise, it should be avoided. My hands are neither around your wallet, nor your neck. ✌️
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:05 PM
2

Wait a minute. She led two men to a garage for sex... and they went? This is why we need charity prostitution. Men are so desperate...
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:30 PM
1

*"lesbian"
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:27 PM
2

I am not sure what more could be said here than has already been said. It's ethically wrong. It's a violation of religious rights. It's harmful. It has no benefit. And it's an opportunity for sexism where we over-protect girls and under-protect boys.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:23 PM
5

Any bets on when Linda Sarsour will invite Ann, Myra, and Kay to speak about prison conditions at a UK women's march?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:43 AM
1

I would be terrified as well if I saw some stranger walking with my kid Why? The majority of bad things that happen to kids are done to them by their own family, or other people they know. Many kids are safer with a random stranger than other people in their life.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:51 PM
-5

Things are rape when they are rape. Signs of things not being rape are when the "victim" seeks out the rape, repeatedly over three years. I notice you prefer to link to an image of a tweet of an article, instead of the actual article.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:48 PM
3

If you support the hysteria, then you have to accept that this outcome is something you helped create.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:52 PM
16

Worse than rape, actually...
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:49 PM
-2

Rather, it is the reverse that should irk you. Nobody should be going to prison for consensual sex. Of course, in this case, the defendant plainly did not want to put herself or the young man through a trial, so nobody will ever really know what happened, but its reasonable to assume that if there was any force or coercion or harm, the public would be told.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:42 PM
1

Only Siths deal in absolutes You aren't helping your "not a sith" case with this edit.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:14 AM
2

Gay guys do it all the time. Shower too. There's a difference between behaving in a reasonable manner, and being emotionally dead.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:12 AM
5

I think you're right. Karen is absolutely great, and essential. But Warren has the advantage of time. At mid-century, we can re-evaluate :)
/r/MensRights27/06/17 03:01 AM
2

It's undoubtedly worse than rape. There are many kinds of rape: rape because we say it is, but both parties enjoyed it, no harm rape because the man lied, but both parties enjoyed it, no harm rape because she was drunk, but both parties enjoyed it, no harm rape because she thinks maybe she didn't consent after all because she's not a slut, but both parties enjoyed it, no harm rape because they were coerced into it by the other one, but there was no harm rape because they were threatened with vio…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:52 AM
1

Which part of the video was ironic?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:40 AM
21

Because foreskins are a profitable business, cutting them off, turning them into creams, even restoring them. Even just the discussion generates a little bit of economic activity.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:37 AM
1

tennis placera Wat?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:34 AM
1

We need to police our movement See how well this has turned out for our opponents... now they're policing EVERYTHING.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:45 PM
18

Feminism is rooted in misandry. In any ideal world, there is no feminism.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:42 PM
3

It's important to draw a clear line, so the public sees it. But I wouldn't "cast off" any men. They arrived at their position due to the crap world we're living in. They've found a way to make the most of it, which is understandable. And some won't want the better world MRAs want. But they'll nevertheless have better lives because of it.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:40 PM
27

I think the quickest path forward is to be your country's Philip Davies, and if someone already is, then be your country's second. We need to get people elected, who will stand up. Once elected, you'll have four years, and if they need your vote to hold their government together, they won't even kick you out. We need men's centers, legislative change, changes in judiciary, and social change. But I think the main thing right now is getting the message heard. The success of The Red Pill shows ther…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:33 PM
1

Never heard of "truscum" before. What are the origins of this slur? I'm glad you spent some time considering men's and boys' issues. Hopefully you will continue to be MRA. I don't think you'll be a different person just because you'll have a more female body, although maybe you'll have different experiences, or have different friends, which may give you a wider perspective than most of us can have. I do think you should examine feminism carefully, because I can find no way to reconcile feminism …
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:23 PM
-3

his cellphone had evidence that he and the teacher were in a romantic relationship It is inappropriate to substitute your own opinion of this relationship when the people actually IN it saw it as romantic, not rapey. An indictment charges Jarvis with sodomizing Sodomy is not against the law. The charge would be "statutory rape". This is only included to titillate the reader with the imaginings of what kinds of sex they had together. That's kind of unusual, because the media tends to want to avoi…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:11 PM
2

Wow! You enacted that labor!
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:00 PM
2

Just the feminist women. They called it "lying".
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:58 PM
1

While that's true, I guarantee you'll find many people (maybe even yourself) cheering exactly such deaths, for various groups of undesirables in the USA.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:57 PM
1

Depends what you consider brain death.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:55 PM
1

I would never patronize an establishment that promoted the idea that there ever was an Ark. The Titanic sailed far longer than the Ark ever did, because existence is once of the required properties of a ship. But even if you buy the fairytale, the Ark never had to encounter anything, because it was in the Middle East, and everything was under water. But if it had hit an iceberg, there wouldn't have been time for the band to play. Land-based life would have simply ceased, and that God jerk would …
/r/MensRights25/06/17 09:50 PM
2

It's the bicycle SEATS that are the real problem for men... turns out what you can't see -- arteries and nerves -- are even more fragile.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:39 PM
1

I wonder how many will continue with the skirts, for equality, perhaps for self-identity for some, but also because even shorts are not as cool...
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:38 PM
1

So this would not appear to be a case of no-platforming (as if one could no-platform Dear Anita) but ensuring that speakers are actually on topic.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:36 PM
0

Urination is more important than feeding babies. Everyone has to do it and there is no substitute. But we don't let people do it on the municipal bus. Also, women will tell you that breastfeeding is a sexual act. And as men have nipples as well, we can confirm that they are sexual organs. They can wait to do that in private.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:27 PM
9

We're supposed to believe in evidence around here. The police are (say it with me) "to protect and serve". And in particular they were to protect and serve HIM. Instead, they shot him dead. That's a pretty big f--- up, and you can excuse it however you want, but there is no excuse. Keep in mind, this man was killed because he had a wide-set nose. Also, you forgot this part: Before Castile completed the sentence, Yanez interrupted and calmly replied, “OK,” and placed his right hand on the holster…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:13 PM
9

We keep hearing about how black lives matter (and they do), but the fact of it is that the vast majority of people murdered by police and other corrections officers are men. The "justice" system is designed in such a way that the bulk of its force is applied to men, often with deadly result. Women are barely included as an afterthought. We need changes throughout the system the laws themselves how we police how we police the police the courts and prisons the economy
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:05 PM
3

This is so sad :( The Obamas should answer for why they ignored the boys.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 12:04 AM
2

And the reason why women go through the menopause and continue to thrive, living longer lives than men? It's not because they're ugly and unattractive: it's because we need them. TIL we don't need young women, except to the extent they pop out babies, and then become old. I'm so glad I got rid of the scientific bullshit, and now have just the truth.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 12:01 AM
16

It's due to chivalry. Such a man would be a scoundrel, and if she enjoyed it (which she legally cannot, to protect her honor) she would be a whore. It's worth noting that this case came to light by a jealous third party.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:42 PM
3

If you aren't getting banned, you aren't saying anything worth saying.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:38 PM
1

I get the skirt thing. I'm not liking the dress look. By the way, temperatures into the "30s" could mean anything from 30°C (86°F) to 39°C (102°F).
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:34 PM
3

why don't they have to shave it? Because you'd be insulting their supposed femininity. Ironically this is only an insult if they exclude trans women or lesbians... I'll never understand why some trans people glom onto feminism, when it clearly doesn't want them. There was a time feminism didn't want lesbians either, until they decided lesbianism was a political choice.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 11:14 PM
2

Now she says she is going to report me to the police and all her girl friends are backing her up with that You need to get your friends to back YOU up, and go to the police first.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 09:24 PM
11

The way birth certificates are being used today, I don't even know what the point is. They clearly aren't about genetic heritage, because the genetic parents (certainly the father) don't need to be the birth certificate. They clearly aren't about de facto parentage at the time, because the parents can be changed. They clearly aren't about the sex of the child, because the sex can be changed. They clearly aren't even about the name of the child, because the name can be changed. So... what's left?…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:49 PM
5

As one of the very best faggots, having witnessed various "LGBT" people falsify claims of hateful harassment, I personally apologize on behalf of the lunatics I used to fund, which apparently led to this outcome. If someone is saying words, the punishment, if any, should be words.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:44 PM
0

You lost me at "Lauren Southern tells the truth". Just not believable.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:37 PM
0

Men look good in skirts. More should do this.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:36 PM
1

If the ingredients are different, then they should say what the (different) ingredients are, rather than imposing "for women" and "for men".
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:34 PM
-1

That's surely against the law.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:33 PM
2

If you can't find this yourself, you've spent less than 5 minutes trying.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:29 PM
24

I know this is very patriarchal of me, but I do love it when people use the degree symbol successfully.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:23 PM
73

They both can. But the courts will ignore Josie's consent so they can imprison Jake. Because it's 2017.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:22 PM
1

Once the parasite has invaded the brain, transforming it from man to mangina, no, it is no longer a man. It's possible with therapy to recover from this illness, but it's rare.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:21 PM
3

It still includes the word "rape" to describe consensual sex.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:19 PM
39

Rather, it's what misandry looks like. As boys, males are forced to end their relationships, and send partners to prison. As men, males are sent away to prison for orders of magnitude longer time, simply for being male.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:18 PM
-27

Well apparently not this one Where's your evidence of that? she should be thrilled to be raped by him When "rape" means "mutually enjoyable consensual sex", yes. I refer you to Eve Ensler, or Milo Yiannopolous 2016.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:16 PM
-36

He WAS lucky, up until he was forced to end his relationship. Frankly, I cannot imagine how horrible that would be.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:15 PM
-26

Nobody was assaulted here. Of course, we're not told what actually happened, because that might reveal something true, but it's likely that the relationship was discovered by a third party, and the boy was threatened into providing his evidence.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:13 PM
17

Or, rather, people will see that punishing men extra harshly simply for being men makes no more sense in these cases than it does in murder cases.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:09 PM
-19

sodomized This silliness just ramps up the hysteria. You make it sound like this is another Abner Louima case. It's not. And sodomy itself is no longer against the law, so that charge will be dropped. He got a blowjob. Oh the horror.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:08 PM
11

I agree, almost completely. The stereotype you begin with is a pedophilia stereotype, and as you note, it does not conform to reality for men, or for gay men. It also doesn't conform even for pedophiles (article available on SciHub, but here's the link I got from Wikipedia), which is a critical point. All men, straight and gay, are being tarred with defamation that isn't even true for the group it's supposed to be about. And that tells us how to end this. We must pull it out by the root. We shou…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:27 AM
2

In all the West, he seems to be the only politician that gets it.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:58 PM
3

Each day that passes makes me more disgusted in the Liberal government. Just another day in Canada.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:55 PM
1

F*cked is our natural state. We'll deal with it.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:32 PM
1

I think a child's rights to behave in whatever male or female mode they wish should override whatever the parent(s) want. But unless a child is being harmed in a way we can measure ON THAT CHILD, I think it's a terrible thing to break up a family, and should always be avoided. It should be enough for the child to know that someone has their back, on this issue, even if their parents do not. But their parents are their parents. To be clear, the role of parents is not to "own" the kid, but to prov…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:20 PM
3

Were you? I sure wasn't. I think if someone thinks they're the other sex, that's a big biological deal, and it's nothing you nor I have any experience with.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:17 PM
1

Indeed, if she kills her kid(s), we in North America (probably Australia too) have a separate crime just for her, so she doesn't do a lot of hard prison time. Gotta give her a do-over, amirite?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:15 PM
6

You can be assured they will find someone to make an example of, and score many SJW points on the global stage. It will probably be a Twitter user, rather than Jordan or Gad. (I wish I was kidding).
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:11 PM
13

"Gay" is not a gender identity. You're thinking of "Trans". Ontario's version of this law is already being used to push Jordan Peterson out of his teaching position, because of his stated intention not to submit to all requests for certain pronouns. The Senate admitted that the law is based on provincial law (at least the human rights components) and therefore any human rights violations (are these not crimes?) would be pursuant to those changes.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:07 PM
8

No they did not. Rather, they criminalized acting AS IF you don't believe it. You can have any opinion you want, and you can even state that opinion. But if you put that into action, by referring to someone as "xir" when they were supposed to be called "thon", then you're gonna have a bad time. So, pretty much all the time, if you're an instructor of any sort. As for full retard, we've been full retard AT LEAST since 2003, probably earlier. Much like the USA. It's the new normal.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 05:04 PM
1

I am as well. I often say sorry as a reflex. It's nothing to admit when you're wrong. But if I'm being accused of something, or asked to say sorry, it's not ever going to happen. All we have to do is see what happens to people who apologize under those circumstances. It's merely the first step in ending your career, relationship, whatever. Nobody should participate in their own assassination.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 04:56 AM
2

You could found a men's organization like this in your area. Men are always in need of food, shelter, counselling, and representation.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 04:52 AM
2

How, exactly?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 04:46 AM
5

No person should be cutting or pricking a minor's genitals, for non-medical reasons. As an adult, if that's what they want, or if they want to cut the whole thing down, let them do it (either sex).
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:29 AM
3

I will have you know that in atheism, we eat kids on Wednesday.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:23 AM
8

There are some good people who think they are feminist. Once they reveal themselves to be human, they are often ejected. So, when that happens, direct them over here.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:01 PM
9

Well, OFFER recess. I hated recess. Let the ones who prefer recess go do recess. Those of us who preferred something else should get to do that.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:57 PM
2

In seriousness, I've already heard of a fourth wave. I think it's reasonable to refer to feminist categories as feminists themselves refer to them. But I see no fundamental difference between the first, second, third, and fourth waves, except in the cancer stage they represent (which corresponds exactly). While it is true that they got some good changes, and had some good ideas, they were fundamentally rooted in bigotry, and have done nothing to purge their ideas of bigotry. https://en.wikipedia…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:44 PM
12

Because feminism is like nausea, vertigo, terrorism, and zombies. All together.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:36 PM
6

https://www.propublica.org/article/boys-in-custody-and-the-women-who-abuse-them both female guards and the boys they molest share some responsibility --Reggie Wilkinson, the former director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:32 PM
1

He may have raped some of the women Which ones? I think he was mostly innocent How does the inclusion of 49 innocent cases make even 1 guilty case less serious?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:22 PM
10

WIth 50 accusers, and no defence, they still couldn't convict him. This prosecution was a farce from day one. Let the man go. I recommend he do a college tour.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:21 PM
1

I liked what I read. Maybe divide into smaller pieces.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:45 AM
1

male transgender So, transgender girl. That's the terminology, and it's one thing to disagree, but let's not make the language even more confusing, mmkay?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 05:39 PM
3

That's not masculinity. It's male feminism. He saved his pregnant wife and two daughters. #HeForShe ♀♀♀! Most London men just let it burn! /s
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:51 AM
3

With AI, we're all going to have a lot of time to do a lot of things, mostly because we won't actually be the ones doing it.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:46 AM
1

"Interfered with" is a crime in some jurisdictions. It's never clear what exactly was interfered with, of course.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:42 AM
0

The stats show that in neither case is the population any more messed up than the general adult population. Your particular experience is unusual.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:41 AM
0

Your headline is (no surprise) fake news. Nothing in the referenced article says how this came to light, or who accused her. Oh, and by the way, for a subreddit that often claims to be for due process, when it's a male accused of rape, where is that love of due process now? With charges like this, her identity is trashed, and she hasn't been convicted of anything.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:39 AM
2

There's like no body fat on him at all! I mean, congratulations on the achievement, but that cannot be healthy...
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:33 AM
4

Indeed it does. 15(2). It's the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which makes up the first portion of the Constitution.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:21 AM
2

Apparently this clip is from this video, as noted in the description https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJyVhQq9K60 It appears any video or audio deficiencies were in the original.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:46 PM
1

... and yet here you are, replying ... I think you are culturally appropriating the intellectually challenged. CAN I GET SOME MUSCLE OVER HERE? WE HAVE A RAPIST OF THE INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED! ;)
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:26 AM
2

I'm just not that good at lying. :(
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:23 AM
2

Mon crayon est large.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:01 AM
1

I just want to thank Milo and all the rest who helped get this movie funded. It is really making a difference, even when it isn't seen directly.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:57 AM
1

Any time you read "clapped back" written in earnest, you know you're dealing with an idiot, and it's best just to leave the page. The brain is gone.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:48 AM
1

So many deleted posts today... is this the new normal?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:46 AM
4

Thank you for asking, and acknowledging the answers.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:44 AM
1

Why was it deleted? This is good topic to discuss. For myself, I feel betrayed. I am certainly scarred. I don't have the patience to restore fully, but I did loosen the skin and that alone has been an improvement. But it shows me just how much I've lost... It would be one thing if my generation had been the last, but to see this continue to go on, while society flips out over a mere nick on a girl, makes me pretty angry.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:40 AM
4

Not that anyone cares, but here's the thing. Homophobia is the word for prejudice against gay people. It's the attitude in someone's mind. And while we tend to use the same word for actual discrimination against gay people, the correct word for THAT is heterosexism. Homophobia produces heterosexism, like misandry or misogyny produces sexism. Does anyone care? No. We call it all homophobia. But they did not just pull this word out of their ass. It's been around for at least three, maybe four deca…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:22 AM
-60

Although the legal situation says otherwise, it IS OK to touch people this way without permission, certainly in public. Good grief, this is how people actually interact. The idea that this is some sort of harassment or assault, in itself, is pure feminist bulls--t, rooted in misandry and the hatred of human sexuality. The law needs to be brought in line with reality. We tolerated this view when it was women, because we were still emerging from a time when women were viewed as "less than". Now th…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:57 AM
1

It's unclear what the situation is. If you would be living in a separate unit, with separate entrance and appliances, I'm quite sure it's illegal to refuse to rent to you. But if the unit is accessed from within her home, or shares appliances or other facilities with her home, then she may be able to refuse you rent. Those rules seem fair to me. Nobody should be required to actually live with someone that makes them uncomfortable. Nevertheless, if she can't rent to the whole market, maybe she ou…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:11 PM
1

As if feminism isn't reactionary ("of, pertaining to, marked by, or favoring reaction") They reacted to perceived deficiencies in the system of the day (and now react to phantoms). MRAs react to the sexism and erosion of due process represented by feminism today. MRAs are simply trying to hold Western cultures to their own stated ideals of freedom, equality, rationality and empiricism. Gay people fought for their rights, largely represented as the right to marry. For a long time it was thought t…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:56 PM
2

Wow! I'm gay, but she is HOT... And of course, as per usual, there is zero claim of harm.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:54 PM
4

Good grief... seeing the photo, are we certain the drugs weren't for himself?
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:42 PM
8

It seems this is NOT hearsay, as Constand would be available for cross examination regarding Jackson's claim.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:36 PM
11

She's the same sexist who wrote that women claiming to be mothers should be able to bring their kids into the country with less scrutiny than men claiming to be fathers. If she's making a change, good for her. It's a little LATE, at the end of her career...
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:26 PM
1

Thanks for posting this. I saw it at: http://cnews.canoe.com/CNEWS/Canada/2017/06/10/22730350.html
/r/MensRights12/06/17 06:15 AM
6

It's always darkest before the dawn. But the Canadian Centre for Men and Families is making a difference. And it's not the only one. Milo's Privilege Grant is sure to have an impact as well. We have to play the long game. Get into school. Get the degree. Get into academia. And start restoring it to normal. This means learning all of their BS better than they do. And defeating it. Be the Philip Davies of your University faculty. But even more importantly than that, be the SECOND Philip Davies. On…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:52 AM
6

that it is not feminism that is the problem, but the radical members of feminism As Karen would tell you, at Seneca Falls, the Declaration of Sentiments wasn't about changes in policy. Rather, it was was about listing out the terrible things "He" had done to "her", and ignoring any problems he might be facing, or any obligations he might have toward her. Further, the male signatories were segregated to the bottom, and were described as "in favor of this new movement" rather than as part of the m…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:46 AM
1

That seems unlikely. And so does that.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:35 AM
5

Yes. But I will still say "Don't be that woman" regarding potentially lethal baby dumping, as long as feminists say "Don't be that man" regarding rape, to make the point.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:34 AM
1

I think we can forgive the use of "so" when it should be "and". This isn't a philosophy course.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:30 AM
15

Both are incorrect Wrong. Nothing about being male embraces murder. It's not a choice (for most people) to be male. You're born. You're male. You're part of a group that is more likely to murder. But as a group, you're still more likely NOT to murder, than to murder. It's not a defining characteristic. In Islam, murder is baked in. The Quran is the holiest source of information in Islam, and it is filled with murder. (There is no New Testament course correction... indeed the murder-y bits writte…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 05:28 AM
0

Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and says nothing, one way or the other, about one's "soul". In any event, being attracted to 15-year-olds is not pedophilia.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 09:16 PM
-2

what she’s done to me which is, notably, unclear and unstated, so the reader is meant to fill it in with whatever horrible idea comes to mind Rather, the boy was caught by his mom, was embarrassed about his sexual urges, and threw his lover under the bus to protect his honor. It's not an unusual story.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 09:15 PM
3

Being a wise political movement (unlike, for example, the so-called "LGBT community") feminists are in control of BOTH Labour and the Conservatives. That's why Davies had to speak for an hour about how the recent bill on violence against woman and honor killing completely ignores what happens to men.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 10:19 PM
2

But WEP is still more popular than the Pirate Party, which is a shame, particularly as the Conservatives seem set to abolish private communications altogether. And let's remember, the Conservatives ARE feminist. Who do you think Davies was speaking to, when he was criticizing the bill on honor killing? Feminism is rampant all over the UK.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 10:17 PM
2

They have stealth-edited their article already. No mention of the wrong information they put out, of course. Just: Many have gloated online as people mistakenly thought he lost his seat Gee, I wonder how that happened... maybe they read it somewhere. Can't imagine where...
/r/MensRights09/06/17 10:12 PM
2

Yes, he will continue to be in government party.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:57 PM
1

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article. Can't imagine why not...
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:49 PM
2

Even his Wikipedia page was updated to read What, the wiki that now bears a closer resemblance to HuffPo than an encyclopedia, was WRONG? How very unusual.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:45 PM
1

Well, that's great news! Still, it's never bad to gain an opportunity, even a false one, to thank a great man for the work he has already done. Now, to know he will be able to continue it is even better.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:42 PM
7

I've certainly seen this in my own parents' relationship. If he does anything that isn't for her, then he's the worst husband that ever was. X's husband never does this. Y's husband always does that. Did I mention he has dementia and is unable to walk? I think he should divorce her, but even if he agreed with me, I don't think he's in a position to be able to do it.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 09:27 PM
1

If you're being beaten with a stick, in a case of mistaken identity, the easiest thing to do is just take the stick away. In this case, that means ending the stigma against pedophiles. Anything less than that, and it opens you up to defamation such as: you're lying, you like them, you're one, etc. Why waste time? Take the stick away. I'd like to live in a world where men weren't afraid to be teachers.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 05:01 AM
7

It's occurred to me that it would be a wonderful feature if all the shadowbanned people got to see each other's comments. It's like they would be having the real discussions, in the real sub, while everyone else is in the matrix-sub.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 04:54 AM
-3

And it IS a snub, regardless of the sexes involved. Grow up and just hug the person, like normal human.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 04:52 AM
-2

She's a terrible person, but I have a hard time thinking someone should be punished by the law for saying "kill yourself". Are we going to shut down the internet? I do think there should be a requirement to alert authorities of some sort, if you know someone is obsessed with thoughts of suicide. That would be something to prosecute her for.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:23 AM
0

I think Benetton's statement was kind of stupid. Their boys look girly to begin with, and then they strongly suggest you can't buy these clothes for girls. I think it's just as bad as what Alamo did, reserving some showings at some venues for women only. Why can't people just buy what they want?
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:14 AM
29

All objectification is OK, regardless of sex. Good grief, we're a visual, sexual species.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:10 AM
1

Well, I thank him for what he did for us... seemingly uniquely among the MPs and Lords, Reps, and Sens of English speaking countries.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 02:06 AM
2

You didn't say, so I'm assuming you're in high school. Unfortunately, the most informative and emotional activities won't be allowed in your classroom because it invades privacy. Therefore don't get yourself in trouble by asking which students' genitals had been cut, even though the result would be a striking display of the harms we allow to come to boys, while protecting only the girls. Also don't ask which students have been drugged in order to "behave" better in school, but it's probably most…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:30 PM
7

Some laws do. It's like affirmative action on steroids. In Ontario, for example, a judge decided that it's racist, sexist, and bigoted (and illegal) to leave your estate to white people because they are white, or to men because they are men, or to straight people because they are straight. BUT it's a GOOD thing to leave your estate to black, female, and gay people for the same kinds of reasons. Because, in the past, bad things happened to someone else. The root cause of this is in Canada's const…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:25 PM
3

I have problems with people being dicks about it. I have problems with people being cunts about it.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:17 PM
4

The first paragraph in the first comment is about they think you are a feminist. feminists are known to have chosen a new tactic The female part is in the second paragraph. The second comment didn't appear to be attacking you at all, on any basis.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:14 PM
3

Because when a characteristic has been used to discriminate against people, the default should be that we disallow it as a reason for segregation unless there is some need so serious that it requires us to segregate. Gyms are not that serious. There should be no women-only, or men-only gyms. Besides, by having women and men in all the same gyms, it becomes abundantly clear what the differences between the sexes are, even when all the most capable women are trans.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:33 PM
9

It will be interesting to see whether lesbians are forced to start paying for their sex partner's kids that they never wanted.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:20 PM
1

No. They've told us why. And it's very simply that we aren't Muslim. Anything else is a mere aggravating factor, but they'd still attack us. They have been very clear, writing it down. It's no surprise that the same media that lies about us also lies about them, to serve the SJW narrative.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:09 PM
1

Don't be that girl!
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:28 AM
1

Sorry this is the world you're entering. It will be a tough slog, but I'm certain you'll be better at it than my generation, who was caught by surprise.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:26 AM
1

You can say it a lot, but it's still not true. You do not get to substitute your imaginings for his own opinion. He married her. They had kids together. And even when it came to separation, he chose not to fully divorce. He could have easily thrown her under the bus at any point, and he could have posed as the heroic victim that everyone insists he ought to be, but he didn't. This is someone of strong character, who loved.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:20 AM
1

It is a love story, although it has come to an end. In seriousness, it would make a good stage musical, but I doubt anybody has the guts.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:15 AM
4

These two statements are in conflict: lots of the single mothers ive been dating...they're raising thier sons to be girls Take away the barbies and buy the boy some lego. Don't sent him up to be ridiculed in school. If your claim is true, then the kid likely to face ridicule is the "toxic male" No kid is going to just be a girl or boy just because you want them to be. Give them the toys they are drawn to. If you try to force it, all you'll end up doing is creating bad childhood memories. You are…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:03 AM
3

Fuck that bitch. Gay MEN launched her career.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:58 PM
5

Thank you for doing the smart thing.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:08 AM
10

I don't care who I get lumped in with, so long as they are clear I won't tolerate them talking shit against men.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:04 AM
24

The worst people are people.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:02 AM
7

Don't worry. It's not gay people, but the "LGBT community" and its mouthpieces that are the real problem. My sense is that gay and trans people make up the same proportion of MRAs as we do the whole society. Hopefully some of us will make it into whatever documentary is next, so it will be clearer that gay MRAs exist. (Although Karen does represent!)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:58 AM
1

Baby dumping is pretty barbaric...
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:10 AM
4

So far, to the extent the models have been wrong, it has been because the rate of heating has far exceeded the outside predictions. If you care at all about your kids, or the species, you'll be doing something about this, now. There are worse things than extinction.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 07:01 AM
2

My handshake was not innocent What kind of moron talks like this?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:59 AM
1

Everyone lies. I just try to read a variety of sources, in the vain hopes that if something is untrue, someone else will notice. It's not a good plan, but it's what I've got.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:52 AM
1

To be clear, she IS a comic, and it was funny (just a little). She should not have done it, because it inevitably causes a legal sh-tstorm when you put "death" and "current president" together. But her career should not have been torpedoed either (and f-cking Milo Yiannopoulos of all people should not have piled on because he knows very well what that is like). I'm glad to see Jim Carrey (an old white guy) and others have come to her defence in some way.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:49 AM
1

Ironically enough, social constructs are a direct result of physics.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:41 AM
2

Yes, but as a mathematician, you probably wouldn't use "+" to denote that operation in the context of integers or reals, because you'd be easily misunderstood. You would probably use something like "⊕" (which may still be misunderstood as a binary bitwise XOR, but might at least cause the reader to ask the question)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:33 AM
1

Let me guess: The double slit experiment is transmisogynist. Did I get it right? (I couldn't make it past the first page without laughing, so I had to stop...)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:28 AM
1

averted an estimated 21,000-33,000 new HIV infection, according to mathematical modelling studies Cool. So they can live to enjoy their 2x risk to get penile cancer from HPV, which they will be exposed to because apparently they aren't using condoms. Victory!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:26 AM
3

Kenya had circumcised around 790,000 adolescent boys and adult men by the end of 2013 What a disaster. Who tells them that they still have to use condoms? That must be a good time to have a laugh. We cut off your foreskin for nothing! And you let us! Haha! /s
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:23 AM
2

I also recommend viewing the playlists of the ICMI in Sterling Heights in 2014, and in London in 2016. I do not endorse every individual speaker, but there is probably no more complete set of videos on men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:19 AM
2

You know that a female-only showing today is going to lead to a black-only showing next year, and a white-only showing (with accompanying week-long riot) the year after that. Is that the future you want?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:11 AM
5

They started this shit in Seneca Falls, by demanding that the men sign underneath the women, and only "in favor of" the movement of others, a document that defames all men for the actions of some.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:09 AM
1

“If they were trying to do a gay-only Brokeback Mountain [showing], I would feel the same way,” the professor, who is gay, told the Austin American-Statesman. Yeah! Represent!
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:01 AM
1

Wow. With a lawyer like this, it would be easier if Kathy would just empty her accounts into Times Square. She could pretend it's like New Year's since she won't be part of that any more.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:59 AM
2

I clicked on my region, and got "404 - page not found"
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:54 AM
2

That is something I hadn't thought of. Thank you.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:51 AM
1

As appealing as ballet can be, I have to say that rather than encouraging boys, we should be discouraging everyone. It's not good for the feet.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:49 AM
1

While his performance was poor, failing to recognize that a newbie taking the same dose as an experienced user will result in an overdose, his overall strategy was sound, and is indeed working. This man is a hero. He was almost an hero. Thin line.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:44 AM
0

Wait until they start talking about compassion. That's neither sympathy nor empathy. I'm pretty sure it doesn't involving filling in the hole... lots of yelling when I did that. Well, for a while. (This line is called humor, if I need to say it... it's 2017 and someone has probably already reported a body, somewhere on the reddit)
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:38 AM
3

Read into his actions Or just read the story instead of inventing "facts" in your mind.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:36 AM
2

It doesn't matter if you're a Trump supporter. The entire world is a Trump supporter (or alternatively, a Nazi) based on who they disagree with on some minute issue, no matter the mountain of issues on which they may agree. You'll know you've arrived when you get punched.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 05:31 AM
15

All sex is rape. This is why husbands must get their wives permission for vasectomy... to ensure that wives are being seeded, rather than raped. There is a reason the male condom and vasectomy were explicitly not covered under ACA, despite the effectiveness of the latter, and protection against STDs of the former (including for gay MEN).
/r/MensRights03/06/17 10:22 PM
5

Nevertheless, there's a long way to go in the UK. There's still the claim that there are "medical reasons" for total circumcision, which is not true. They still allow parents to impose their will to cut upon a child, and it can be done even if one parent disagrees, if a judge allows it. The medical harms of cutting certainly HAVE been proven, notably the loss of the cut off piece! But there's the loss of function, the loss of feeling (both of which are intentional) and then as we recently learne…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:38 AM
1

I'm glad the photo they used depicts the nastiness of the procedure, without the gore. I wasn't expecting that from BBC.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:33 AM
2

I want to hear Puddles (of YouTube and America's Got Talent) sing this. In any case, I see nothing creepy in it, except if you accept that "creepy" means "male" (which it does today). I've never heard the song before, nor do I know any history that might be around it. We don't know the circumstances from the lyrics... we're only witness to his feelings. But it seems likely that this man loved Sylvia, but she was cheating on him, with the full encouragement of her mother, who never liked him anyw…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:14 AM
3

Can you imagine Plainly the man is a cuckold, and is trying to demonstrate his subservience. Nevertheless, the other half of that equation... if there was, in the mid-1990s, the exact same encounter but with teen girls and teen women instead of teen boys and teen men, and everyone had the same good time, and everyone again left unharmed, then no, nobody should be in court for that either. The feminist demonization of sex is the undoing of men, and we have to stop it at the source, rather than ni…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:08 AM
-1

The only low here is the continued attack on people (a MAN and a woman) for entirely consensual sex with teen males from decades ago.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 03:04 AM
2

HeatSt complains about new crimes to punish men, but soon they'll be demanding these laws punish women as well. Don't be fooled. They're just as much in favor of using law to criminalize manners as those they claim to oppose.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 05:06 PM
1

The concept of "rape" has been greatly overblown in our society, by feminists and their followers here. There's regret rape, eye rape, I forget rape, and we had a great time but I'm 17 rape. If there was no harm, then the news and legal systems ought spend no time on it, whether it was a woman or a man. In this case, there is no claim of any harm or coercion. It doesn't even say who supplied the beer they should not have had (but which did not harm them).
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:48 PM
1

McClaren admitted she asked the boys not to reveal the photo You know you're reading a biased source when they write lines like that. "Admitted"?
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:35 PM
2

It's OK. You'll do better next time. There's always a next time.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:21 PM
10

He always has a choice of what to wear. I of course support his choices with love and respect. There's only one imbecile, and it's the author of that article. Men's rights is not about hating women, even lesbians, even obese lesbians with blue hair. It's about men's issues. One issue facing some men is dress codes. Women have the freedom to dress in just about anything. Men cannot. This is a welcome change.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 04:18 PM
8

No it wasn't. It was considered and was explicitly rejected. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/missing-murdered-indigenous-women-inquiry-to-break-legal-ground/article33922270/ will not expand its mandate to include the murders and disappearances of indigenous men, but it will explore ways that the violence against male victims underpins the female tragedy And here's some rationalization for excluding men (if they're straight): http://www.cbc.ca/2017/why-gender-is-such-a-critical-part…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:10 PM
2

I would expect nothing less. People who don't have the ethical upper hand cannot win on ideas, and must therefore destroy their opponent. This is of no concern.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:55 PM
-2

There was no rape, and therefore there was no child rape. Your disapproval of their relationship doesn't change what happened. And the termination of their marriage doesn't re-define what happened years ago.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:53 PM
1

Or we could demand that all accusers provide evidence, before we come down on the accused like a ton of bricks.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:51 PM
-4

The problem is the title. They had sex. Nobody was raped.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:50 PM
-7

How is separating two people who love each other any kind of justice?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:50 PM
-8

I bet you're just waiting for Macron to do the same, right? This was no rape. But it is an example of how marriage is no longer a stable institution.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:48 PM
13

Not only is it child abuse, it's child sex abuse.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:40 PM
9

While I generally agree, I think you lost track with the ending portion in bold... The torture and mutilation of children, such as by genital cutting, is even beneath pedophiles. (When was the last time you heard of a schoolteacher telling her student that she's going to circumcise him?) These people have a sexual desire, but they also love children. Yet there are other people who get a sexual thrill from cutting and harming men and boys. Sadist isn't the right term either. I'm not sure what to …
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:37 PM
10

One can never be too sure, on reddit. What can be said today cannot be said tomorrow. It's a lesson I've learned of late.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:16 PM
6

It seems that Davies is being targeted personally, rather than as a Tory, although other Tories have also experienced this. That suggests this has to do with his apparently unique efforts to bring equality of sexes to the UK parliament.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:14 PM
5

And of course The Independent can't even be bothered to treat these same things the same in their own headline... "circumcision" vs "genital mutilation"
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:11 PM
7

It's not that the roles are good or bad, but the attempt to cram everyone into a particular role based on who they appear to be. Everyone should be permitted to live in a way that feels most like themselves. And if someone feels like they're a housewife or a breadwinner, or whatever the case may be, they should be able to do that. Our society has recently made things tough, with the expectation that everyone will go out to earn a living, and with sexist laws that fall largely on men (even when w…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:01 PM
1

Looks like Bill Gates.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:57 PM
-14

Bottom line is that he had sex with a minor, and also recorded it. If you think the law is stupid (which it absolutely is) then work to repeal it.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:55 PM
2

How do these stats compare against motherless homes? I suspect this is being made into a sexed issue, when it's really about quantity... single-parent vs two-parent.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:19 PM
1

All people involved in court proceedings should be named, whether accused, accuser, or witness. How else is the public to follow the case through the news, and to ensure that the case is just? Particularly in historical terms, how are we to track the outcome of a case over time? The courts represent us, as a society. We bear responsibility for what courts do. We must know the names.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:14 PM
10

You need to pursue this, criminally and civilly. If you are comfortable, go to the news with it (after seeing a lawyer). As the victim, you are not required to provide your ID, including SSN. and was told he didn't see it happen What does that have to do with anything? Police rarely actually see the crime happen. Make sure you take this up with his superior. You have evidence of the crime. The accused was right there. And you described the motive. In contrast, her explanation is laughable.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:03 PM
4

Dr Ivan Head I've an 'ead? Never can be too sure these days... What's in it?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:00 PM
1

Capitalism ends in mass unemployment. I'm not sure that's a useful plan, for men.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:52 PM
3

Because most men are too busy trying to prove to women how much they care about women, to care about their own, even more significant, issues. It's just how most men are wired, evolutionarily.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 05:50 PM
10

That judge should be in prison, with the people he sent there. If you can't do the time, don't do the crime. And false imprisonment ought to be a crime from which judges are not exempt.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:42 PM
15

Most feminists I know This is the problem with anecdotes. Now ask yourself what happens when we ask to spend money on male victims. Consider what happened when men and boys were murder victims. Whether it was Boko Haram, or the Missing and Murdered Indigenous inquiry in Canada, feminists worked hard to ensure that men and boys were not part of the discussion, even though they got the worst of it.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:38 PM
5

That's simply not true. You can listen to what they say, and you can read their works. Except for a handful, feminists in academia are about the advancement of rights for women and girls, regardless of equality, or expense, to anyone else.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:35 PM
3

It's a good question. Indeed, why would anyone get 115 years, longer than a human lifespan, for ANY crime? If these crimes were committed as part of the same event, then the sentences should similarly be concurrent. I think 10 years is sufficient. When we waste resources on warehousing people for no good reason, then we also aren't rehabilitating them, and we aren't returning them to society. It's a lose-lose.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:30 PM
25

this sort of thing requires a more feminine touch That is illegal.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:45 PM
4

Bisexuals and transpeople are particularly good eyes through which to observe the world.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:48 PM
1

That picture is so beautiful... An Oscar would have been better, but this is really so poetic.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:28 PM
9

As we now know, this isn't about trans people, but is about destroying male-only space, while preserving female-only space. It's plainly illegal. I happen to think male-only, and female-only restrooms (without a third category) are also illegal. But that situation is superior to what you have now, which ostracizes half the population and elevates the other half. I would remove all references to sexes, and simply describe what is in each room... toilets in one, urinals and toilets in another. Peo…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:24 PM
6

...at Digital Hollywood's Spring 2017 DigiFest Co-sponsored by WIF, which seems important. Very briefly scanning their page, it appears to be a typical feminist organization. I suspect some heads are exploding. Couple this with Laci Green teasing us about maybe taking the red pill... is there a change underway? Are men ... actually being heard?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:16 PM
8

A world in which a person can go to prison for merely receiving, viewing, or possessing content puts everyone at risk. While this is a case of severe inequality, the real solution is to pull the rug out from under the whole house of cards, and legalize all content. People should go to prison for the harmful things they do, not for content.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:12 PM
2

Thanks. It would be good if this was part of the image.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:44 PM
1

If you were sentenced to prison for consensual sex, would you consider it lenient? Amazing that she was charged for this, when it seems obvious she should have been charged with supply illegal drugs, something that has harmful potential.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:54 AM
-6

Except it's not even a serious offence, and ought to be covered under free speech. We've permitted tradcons and feminists to gang up and distort our justice system, to make simple visual communications into not mere civil offences, but actual crimes. This should never have even been considered by a court.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:51 AM
5

This was no "vile crime". Rather, it is a case where people can identify with the female, as human, and thus that is reflected in the probation. This is yet another example where, in contrast, men are seen as the dangerous, alien "other", and are subject to harsher sentences.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:48 AM
3

He wasn't just shamed for his sexuality. He was accused (correctly) of being a child pornographer, and threatened with prosecution, and a life on the registry. If you've been part of the hysteria on this subject (as several people in this sub are), you are responsible for this boy's death.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 04:39 AM
3

So here we have a legal professional, who apparently thinks it's OK to get herself sloshed to give herself permission to slut it up, outside the station. This barrister's clients deserve to know what kind of lush they're hiring. Someone should pierce the anonymity of this person. No person should ever be permitted to be anonymous in court.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:29 AM
1

So... now that this is known to the authorities, they'll make equal time for equal crime, right? (Indeed, they should get MORE time, due to trying to circumvent the sentencing process).
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:25 AM
11

Deaf people live full lives, and don't see themselves as having a disability. Indeed, they have a unique culture. We could deafen all the female babies (for only the very best fairy tale reasons, protected by the constitution) and, as adults, they would make the same argument... they weren't traumatized. But I think any person, whether hearing or deaf, would recognize how wrong this would be.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:23 AM
9

Welp, better cut the whole thing off then. -- almost any feminist /s
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:18 AM
1

I thought pre-emptive banning wasn't allowed on reddit any more...
/r/MensRights24/05/17 12:15 AM
2

Be sure to note the IMDb rating, the ranking on Google Play and elsewhere, and the awards it has won.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:13 AM
1

It WAS a romp. Just read the facts. Nobody, regardless of sex, should be going to prison for something like this. By the way, she is the victim (if any) in this case, and yet the accused remain anonymous. This is exactly the kind of thing that MRAs fight against, not for. The sexes of the accused and victim shouldn't matter. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4527344/Teacher-convicted-sex-acts-students-aged-13-18.html By the way, it's telling that this Canadian story is more covered in the …
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:09 AM
1

I'm pleased to see that the girls who watched it ranked it very highly. Hopefully it will act as a sort of vaccine against feminist cancer they'll be exposed to in their education, social life, politics, and employment.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:04 AM
8

Gay men do not have it worse, regarding men's issues as such... BUT, there are separate issues relating to being gay that make things worse, for which there doesn't appear to be a straight counterpart. For example, in the USA, there is not much protection against discriminatory employment or housing practices, and a lot of people clearly want to discriminate (we know because they say so). And in some places in the world, being gay can get you dead (by the state), which doesn't seem to happen to …
/r/MensRights23/05/17 02:59 AM
1762

Not to mention assault... If you ignore the nudity, this is a case about girls assaulting a boy.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:05 PM
6

If it was Milo talking about his own experiences at a similar age, they'd end his career... and they did (so far).
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:02 AM
1

Ack. I deleted my original comment. I had initially thought Big Red was identified by her real name in the film, but upon reviewing the on-screen label for her, and the credits, I see that's not the case (even though her real name is well known, and easily available on the internet anyway). It's possible Cassie or Red may have spoken her name during the film... I could swear she was identified somehow ... but I haven't the time to re-watch it right now.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:51 AM
3

Are there any hard numbers on this? I don't know what it takes to make a profit off a documentary that has faced this sort of opposition... I'd like to have some sense of how many people have paid to see it (surely hundreds, but thousands? tens of thousands?) and what the revenue has been off that.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:43 AM
3

Every movement has a "bad side" from various perspectives. The thing is to focus on core issues, and get it done. I think you'll find MRAs to be far more open to discussion, and having more diverse opinions, than feminists. People are going to disagree on a lot (say, economics, or government). But most of us want to see things get better for boys and men (and girls and women and others) to a point of equality. Equality of opportunity mostly. Anyway, if you disagree with something, speak up. You'…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:28 AM
1

Now that is how memes (image macros, whatever) are done.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:21 AM
3

Well done! Best of luck.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:18 AM
6

Yes, I'm sure a tree will make them feel so much better. What's worse... the sexism, or the total do-nothing-ness of this gesture?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 12:12 AM
-11

Wow. You have no concern at all for your own son, and would be willing to f--- up his entire life, murdering someone he likes or loves, just to virtue signal.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:16 AM
-1

a boy would feel lucky Do you have any evidence whatsoever, that suggests he didn't feel lucky, until authorities ended it? The absence of such an obviously damaging claim in the reporting about this strongly suggests he did feel lucky (as if the repeat visits aren't enough evidence). You would know as well as anyone that the media loves to report just how badly the victims were treated.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:14 AM
-6

Just like those male immigrants who "raped" that 14-year-old girl, this is NOT a rape. Of course, it wasn't the "victim" who reported it, either. His mom found out, and the situation was out of his control at that point.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:08 AM
1

Note that rape culture is not theoretical... it DOES exist, mostly in the Islamic world, and in our own prisons.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:00 AM
4

From the night before, she actively planned a sexual encounter Huh. Almost as if 14-year-olds can consent, or something. the victim willingly shared the pictures What's ironic about the two teens charged is that they're going to wish they were charged with "rape". Being charged with child porn can result in incredibly long prison sentences, much longer than what "rape" would get.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 03:53 AM
36

They don't even care about women's issues, honestly. All they care about is the infrastructure they've built around their narrative, and the power it gives them.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:39 PM
0

Who uses Netflix anyway? I'd be happy to see it go under.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:34 PM
1

The problem with what you did is in showing her your disabilities. Women have been demanding equality, and indeed have been crowing "anything you can do, I can do better" for decades. We just had a woman run for president, on the basis that women are better presidents. Either they want equality, or they can shut up. You don't need to justify who picks up the table.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:33 PM
20

Leah is nothing more than a child abuser and a sexist. That kid should be rescued and placed into a loving home, where he can wear what feels right for him, and play how he wants to play. Yes, he should be made to try new things. But once he's tried and rejected them, leave it alone.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:35 PM
6

Looks like a hustler.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:32 PM
4

As far as women go, this is the real rape culture. It's a rapanoia (paranoia of rape) culture. (Actual rape culture is men's prison).
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:58 PM
4

Haha! Because I'm sexist toward both sexes (according to them) then I'm feminist! I love it!
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:55 PM
9

WHO don't know what they are talking about WHO certainly knows what they're talking about. They just don't care. He's all for freedom of religion No. He's for imposing a parent's religion onto a child who doesn't have it. That's about as far from freedom of religion as it gets.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:36 PM
13

More penis, more cancer.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 05:35 PM
9

I guess that's why he teamed up with Prime Minister Hair to tackle the barriers to women in the workforce, right? And why his parental leave program in the campaign didn't include fathers (unlike Hillary's) right?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:07 AM
9

That's merely when I started taking notice. We're still accumulating a critical mass. In contrast, feminism is entrenched in governments, universities, movies, and television. They cannot do better. We can.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 03:01 AM
4

It's almost as if that law is completely ridiculous, and has no place in a free and just society.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:58 AM
3

Because I have no choice; I believe in equality, and liberty, and the truth.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:42 AM
6

Men's rights is not trying to be like feminism. Rather, it working to help men in real life, and it is working to change the laws to treat men equally to women. Notably, men's rights differs from feminism: respect for due process, evidence, facts, and science doesn't make an entire sex the enemy respects sex and sexiness as a good thing, and a liberty humans have isn't incompatible with other groups (gay people, trans people) trying to figure out why feminist don't accept them I honestly don't t…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:38 AM
4

Article is from 2010, by the way. Now, a feminist would look at this, and if it was reversed, she would cite it as proof that testosterone is poison. Therefore, they should have to accept by their own (invalid) logic that testosterone may in fact be the cure.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:47 AM
5

intelligence is not just IQ Nevertheless, that is the measure that we have.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:44 AM
1

Well, if you assume he's referring to feminists...
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:42 AM
5

It's all she has, really.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:41 AM
7

someone had to win. Too bad that no matter which of them won, the USA would lose.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:40 AM
5

If they liked the "what a crazy bitch" part, then you should feel great! If they liked the "you are trash" part, then it's probably best to block them and move on with life. Unless you know they think otherwise, or have a particularly dark sense of humor...
/r/MensRights04/05/17 12:28 AM
2

It's a bit shouty, and myopic, but I like it.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 04:34 PM
3

I thought I knew a lot about these issues, but I learned more. Even being familiar with the issues, there's also the social and experiential aspect of seeing it with people, on the big screen.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:19 PM
1

While I like the joke as wordplay, unfortunately it assumes I'm the kind of person who would let a guy cut my kid's dick.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 10:16 PM
5

Foreskin Man currently exists in seven issues, involving many different opponents. http://www.mgmbill.org/foreskin-man.html It's hardly anyone else's fault if the Jews revere a book that includes Genesis 17:10-14, which has brought misery to Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike. Just as I demand Muslims should re-edit the Quran if they expect me to stop calling Islam a violent religion, I also demand Jews and Christians should re-edit Genesis if they expect me to stop calling these religions sexu…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:59 PM
7

It's more than that... it's doing that while the penis is bleeding because you cut it (which absolutely IS a fetish for certain people... you can find places online where people get off on the act of circumcising boys ... and wouldn't you be surprised to learn that some of them actually do it) and it's also doing that while you have an STD infection that you can transmit to the victim.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:34 PM
8

An act is an act. It doesn't matter what fairy tale you dress it up in. In this case, the act is is sucking a baby boy's penis, and optionally transmitting a sexually transmitted disease (read that again in case it's unclear... sexually transmitted disease) to the baby. In 2017, we don't clean things with our mouths, which we know to be loaded with bacteria and other nasties. I will believe your claim ONLY if you can prove to me that these mohels never once use toothpaste, floss, or mouthwash, b…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:20 PM
7

I was banned from r/atheism for saying the same thing. Funny... atheists will let you criticize Christians all day long. But they get antsy if you criticize Muslims. And NEVER let you criticize Jews, even when they give baby boys STDs, even when those boys later die.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:17 PM
1

statutory rape So if I got a law passed called "statutory theft" where if I loan you my shovel so you can plant your garden this spring, it's actually theft by you, you'd be OK with that? (Don't think this is unlikely to happen either... lots of people want to end sharing, because it "steals" from corporations who makes stuff, and they're very interested in protecting my right to solely own and use the stuff I buy)
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:07 PM
2

Gonna need you to prove that. Because this case, by itself, disproves your claim.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:05 PM
0

There is no evidence that anywhere an actual rape occurs, that "we" don't call it rape. Rather, when there is clearly NOT a rape, many people refuse to call it rape, just because of the sexes or difference in ages of the parties.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:03 PM
-5

yes I should be locked away for years if I did this Unless you would be doing it in some substantially different way than she did, no you shouldn't. Prison is for people who harm others. There has been no claim, and no evidence, of harm.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:02 PM
1

In fairness, the charge of "sexual interference" is pretty bizarre. Rather, by any objective viewing, it is the justice system who interfered with this young man's sexuality.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:01 PM
1

claim that girls and women are oppressed. We'll never hear the end of it after As opposed to what? This is what happens already.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 05:45 PM
1

I'm 23 hours later.... Happy belated birthday, Cassie!
/r/MensRights02/05/17 05:43 PM
2

If this law gets passed, it should be a top priority to become sexually involved with, and then report, every Labour member. Of course, there can be no official coordination of this. But if it happened spontaneously, it would be a beautiful thing...
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:17 PM
4

Genital cutting should only be permitted, for either sex, after the person has actually had sex, and has a sense of what they will be losing. I'm in favor of a minimum of 18 years of age, because there can be strong parental and community influence, tainting this permanent decision.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:13 PM
2

Sexual violence is, itself, a feminist concept. We shouldn't be duplicating it here. Violence is violence. You don't get to define someone a victim who does not see themselves that way.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:10 PM
2

I think it's some guy in a turtleneck, winking, or wearing a monocle and missing the other eye.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:05 PM
5

Just in Ontario (Canada): http://www.canadian-universities.net/Universities/Programs/Gender_and_Womens_Studies-Ontario.html And just in Australia: http://awgsa.org.au/study/ Not only do they have courses... they have entire degree programs.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 05:57 PM
-8

Can we not leave this guy alone? He wanted what happened, he enjoyed what happened, he was not harmed by what happened, and then he bragged about it to his friends. Now it's all in the news and the courts. It's not as if people don't know who he is... he was telling (and showing) everyone. This case should never have gone to trial, regardless of the genders involved.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:58 PM
4

What you are doing is called "lazy Uh, no. They used the internet to get more information, and they got it. What YOU were doing is called "lazy" (or "hoarding". We could almost call it "Suey Parking") because you had the information, and you talked about it, but you failed to link anyone to it. It's not THAT big a deal, but you DID do it. THEN you called out someone else. That's why I downvoted you, regardless of the factual content of your comment.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:44 PM
2

Leave crazy in the past. You deserve better. If you think the law should be involved, then you're going to need to gather evidence (and this SHOULD be true regardless of genders). Violating the law yourself makes this a problem. So don't.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:37 PM
1

That's actually kinda delightful. Can you imagine what MIGHT have won in this spot? And can you imagine the outrage this outcome will produce in all the right places?
/r/MensRights28/04/17 10:04 PM
2

Silly, it's only bad when men do it.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:19 PM
5

recorded so the young man could brag to friends Everyone brags about being raped, right?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 11:16 PM
2

the law is based on when people generally mature It really isn't. That's why it's so different around the world.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:30 PM
0

This is absurdity. Sex is not heroin or hepatitis. And sex is a highly positive component of most people's lives. To the extent that a male's right to refuse fatherhood of a genetic child isn't respected, of course we can fix that law at the same time as we fix the laws on sex.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:29 PM
2

The article is, as always, short on detail. But it's safe to assume that, no, there is no victim (unless you count the law itself as the offence -- then they are both repeat vitims). When there is actual harm of any sort, or even if there's not evidence of harm but also no evidence there ISN'T harm, they like to play that up, because it justifies what they've done to these people.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:25 PM
3

It's almost as if these people have a solid sexual relationship, and society has no business meddling with it.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:24 PM
3

Alternatively, androphobic women (backed by white knights and cultural authoritarians) have written sex laws specifically to target normal and natural male (dare I say human) behavior, rather than addressing their own inability to enjoy harmless sexual advances, and consensual sex itself.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:16 PM
2

That's good news! However, I have seen things disappear from archive.org before, based on viewpoint (but not on men's issues, yet). So I view it as only a matter of time. Consider lbry.io as well. They took over all those videos from Berkeley, when the court declared that they were all illegal because they didn't have subtitles for deaf people. I haven't used lbry.io, but as a decentralized service, I think the risk of videos being deleted for content is less with them.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:07 PM
3

You are good at this. Soon it will be 1 in every 2.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:02 AM
3

As a gay man, I don't see that the red pill ideology (not to be confused with The Red Pill film) has any relevance to me. From my limited understanding, it is about recognizing the position men are in, but instead of attempting to change it, to simply accept the inequalities and prejudices, and to find ways to get what the individual man wants, from women. I refuse to blame the men who choose that route (in the current environment). But it's a hindrance to MHRM.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:42 AM
2

It just seems like armchair psychology, accusing "4th wave" feminists of hating men because of a bad relationship with their fathers. I could be convinced that it's more likely that a feminist had a bad relationship with their father, but to say that they are caused by bad fathers ... I'm going to need a LOT more evidence. In a way, it seems to be the flip side of Stefan Molyneux's argument that women are responsible for all the bad men, because it's primarily women who raise boys.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:34 AM
2

On the other hand, if you want to win a fight, you may have to use the same kind of weapons as your opponent, with greater skill... I don't have the answer.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:20 AM
8

My understanding is that when women perform better than men, the score is "1" for perfection, the maximum. Except when it comes to life expectancy. When men die earlier, then the score is larger than 1 -- better than perfection. There is no maximum score. If they treated us all like poultry, killing almost all the baby boys, but keeping a few for breeding, the equality score would be off the charts. I want to say I learned this from a noelplum99 video, but I'm forgetting if that's the case. He d…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:41 AM
2

saying things like "cuck", " stupid bitch", and being a sexist asshole hurts our movement Well, individuals get to express themselves how they will. There's a difference between people who are put forth as representatives or experts, and average folk. And there's a lot of gray area between MHRM and other men's movements, who have different focus and priorities. And even for movement "leaders", these may be OK, in context, as in Elam's response to a Jezebel transgression. What we see from feminis…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:33 PM
2

Read the original. https://reason.com/blog/2017/04/19/dad-and-daughter-hauled-off-plane-becaus/print
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:51 PM
7

To be clear, as the quote points out, the reason this is sad is the hysteria (sometimes duplicated here) about sex offenders. As men get more involved in their kids' upbringing, it will bring them into collision with these hysterical ideas about men as creepy and dangerous. https://reason.com/blog/2017/04/19/dad-and-daughter-hauled-off-plane-becaus/print
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:45 PM
19

Unfortunately, this article perpetuates two myths... that teens cannot consent (the existence of the law saying to ignore their consent proves otherwise) and that it's men who rape men, when in fact it's often women who rape men. Omitting this group makes their invisibility all the more intense, in an article that should have been about them.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:40 PM
5

This will hopefully be a delightful smackdown of the so-called Women's Equality Party. You'll note that while equality amongst the sexes cannot be a women-only thing, that doesn't stop this group of bigots calling it "Women's Equality".
/r/MensRights23/04/17 08:28 PM
1

prostitution is illegal at any age. Only the buying. The selling is not illegal. Gotta keep the cops in business.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 04:27 AM
2

A boy under 16 cannot. Of course he can. That's why a law was invented to ignore it. Consent isn't that complicated at all. (It's just difficult to prove.) We were all under 16 at some point, and some of us had sex with adults. Listen to what people are telling you about their own experiences. Milo and Takei have things to say about it. Even Dawkins. IMO, it is important for the MRM not to copy the mistakes of feminism, supporting the creation of victimless crimes, where men (and boys) are the m…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 04:25 AM
7

Every time someone is investigated, charged, and convicted for consensual sex, it makes something like THIS more likely, because it feeds the paranoia.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 04:16 AM
0

Didn't have time to waste on someone else's opinion of the ad, so I watched it directly. I don't see the problem. Not sure what it had to do with cars though.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 04:08 AM
0

girls have to be penetrated If you are familiar with male anatomy, then you must know that males also enjoy being penetrated. No person, male or female, has to be penetrated, in any way, to have sex.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:50 AM
2

I don't see a lot of damage done either, despite the dogged attempts by some posters in this subreddit to convince us. I am not ever going to be OK with sending any person to prison for harmless and consensual and enjoyable sex with any other person. That is unjust -- wrong. It must be opposed. And if you dig into the stories, while there are absolutely a handful of cases that are legitimately called rape, the vast majority are nothing of the sort. Most often, it's a third party making the accus…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:43 AM
9

Obviously for Electoral Equity, a random selection of 7.4% of ballots cast by women should be discarded. Alternatively, no woman should be able to cast a ballot until a corresponding man has cast his ballot. One Sex, One Vote! Electoral Equity Now! (do I need to say this isn't serious?)
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:11 PM
8

You already knew it went wrong, in the title. There's nothing invisible about the hatred of men. What's invisible is the effort to stop it, as evidenced by the frequent shut-downs of The Red Pill and similar venues where men can speak on their own behalf.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:06 PM
2

Good points. I think your comment deserves an answer directly from the top. Not to diminish what I just wrote, it's in our interest that the conference, even as it is, be whatever success it can be. It will reach more people on YouTube than can fit into a conference room.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:26 PM
2

I often assume that everyone (including everyone on reddit) is feminist. I don't see much evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:00 AM
3

But she's no good at chess, and I just can't fake being that bad a player...
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:52 AM
2

involved Keeling assaulting the boy at least 100 times He thought she was rather cool he rather enjoyed it Give me a break. He LOVED it. the boy disclosed the alleged abuse to his mother in 2012, after reading of the Jimmy Savile scandal As if what she did is in any way similar to what he did. Note that it doesn't say HOW he told his mother... it could easily have been "well I had sex with Carolyn, and I liked it, and I turned out just fine!" It was only later that he came to understand Regret i…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:49 AM
2

So, she's kind of like a Muslim who posts videos encouraging people to join Islamic State or Al Qaeda, as a way of joking about people who oppose Islam because it produced Islamic State and Al Qaeda. Mmmkay.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:40 AM
1

Quote-mine away... The thing about non-feminists is that, outside of hierarchical dogmas like religion and feminism, we recognize people generally like to have their own individual opinions, and they can share them, without endangering the validity of the rest of their opinions. Feminists see everything like feminism... hierarchical, rules-based, arbitrary, hypocritical....
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:31 AM
1

It's unfortunate that reddit doesn't have a built-in system where it provides the original link, and an automatically archived link, for ALL links. Having both puts the choice in the reader's hands.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:24 AM
3

Unfortunately, the term "trafficking" like the term "rape" has become so bloated by feminists as to be meaningless. There's no reason to duplicate their errors here. There were no further details released about the case and it is unclear why the charges are only now being brought against Mr. Grazioplene In THIS sub, we actually care about the facts, which are notably absent in this case.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:48 AM
3

Please just tell me we're not being afflicted with another acronym. GSM, QUILTBAG, GLBT, LGBTQIAA2SQ I've been unable to locate a valid source that shows this to be anything other than fanciful misuse of stats This was initially from the Bush (41) administration. "Report of the Secretary's Task Force on Youth Suicide." January 1989. But it's just common sense that suicide is aggravated by stress, and being a hated minority (as we were in the 20th century) even within your own family, certainly c…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:03 AM
6

It's astonishing that an intact penis is something that would need a moral or aesthetic defence. It shows how our society is at once both so irrational and so unnatural. An intact penis is a thing of beauty and wonder. As a sexual species, this shouldn't be surprising.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:49 PM
1

All I need to know about Stefan, he showed at the first ICMI in Sterling Heights. He was there to speak on MGM, and spent most of his time ranting about women. I'm so glad they found someone who can actually speak on this topic at the second ICMI. Stefan is a waste of air.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:02 PM
4

He also takes down Mr. Southern...
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:00 PM
8

It's a publicity stunt It's a real bill. There is no provision in the procedures for publicity stunt bills.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 10:55 PM
2

I didn't "come out" as such, but I'm pretty clearly an MRA, in terms of the positions I take and what I talk about. Honestly, we need a better term... I'm already stuck with an acronym I hate (LGBT) and I really, really don't want another (MRA). Zero bad experiences.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:47 PM
4

Both are OK. Humans are sexual beings, and sex and the desire for sex are good things. Men should not back down when feminists complain. Rather, men should double down. (And get the law changed as well...)
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:35 PM
-2

I have a hard time caring when two of my sworn enemies choose to fight each other. It's a time for a beer!
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:33 PM
2

BUT you absolutely SHOULD get involved in your local Democratic or Liberal party. Those of us who aren't insane could use the help. There's only one way to fix this, and that is by taking over,
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:31 PM
2

What do you think has changed? The left. I used to be one. I haven't changed. But I'm not one now. And I'm glad not to be associated with those kind of people.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 08:11 PM
5

Here's my stab at at it... Men's Rights Movement is about demonstrable, measurable, real equality of opportunity among the sexes -- no sex-based barriers or prejudices. It's a movement based on rational thought applied to empirical facts about the sexes, and the expectation of the same from our legal system. And it is about replacing oppressive systems, like those supported by feminism, with systems that defend and encourage freedom.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 08:03 PM
2

Isn't there some frat, anywhere in the country, who is willing to do the necessary thing here?
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:09 PM
5

Don't want people to see your underwear? Don't wear clothes that have a direct line of sight to your underwear. Not only should it be legal to film up skirts, but any shame that might result ought to be placed on the skirt-wearer for making it an issue. Quick: don't think of elephants....
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:06 PM
1

Old. This is something that belongs in a Wiki, not reposted.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:33 PM
2

How do we tell the difference between language evolving, and stupid people reproducing? Or IS there a difference? (Serious question, actually)
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:31 PM
2

Women don't want dick. That's all you needed to know. As a dick-loving man, I'm convinced that most women are asexual, or lesbian.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:29 PM
1

lesbians were not even sent Correct. TIL that although lesbians have claimed the black (antisocial and "work shy" sort of catch-all category) triangle as the lesbian counterpart to the pink (gay, pedophile, zoophile) triangle, there is no record of even a single lesbian being imprisoned on the basis of being lesbian, in the camps.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:35 PM
2

So if we hit them, it's OK?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:25 PM
3

If I have to pay, they do too Go ahead and make her miserable. But the kid never asked to be born. They are as much a victim of this as you are. Don't dump your misery on the kid. You have a chance to influence this person's life, and protect them from what happened to you, or prevent them from doing it to someone else (depending on what sex they are).
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:21 PM
3

That's not true. He created a job for an abortionist. He created a job for an adoption agency. It might have been due to a condom break. It might have been due to mis-timing "that time of the month". I see nothing that he ever intended to become a father.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:18 PM
7

But you should take partial financial responsibility Of course not. Nobody should be forced into parenthood. Now, it's not clear form the post whether the kid is already born or not, and whether he agreed to parent the kid at any time, or not. But I suspect he never agreed to be a parent, in which case, he shouldn't have to pay a single cent.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:16 PM
2

Men have no reproductive rights. This must be brought up every time the discussion of "reproduction rights" is mentioned.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:15 PM
2

Milo loses everything making a joke He did not make a joke. He very clearly (and correctly) noted something I'll be banned for saying, so I won't. But there's no way you can watch that clip and come away believing it was a joke, or throwaway line. He believed it completely. Certainly the other people in the show knew he was serious. Since his capitulation, I don't think he can be taken seriously ever again, unless he goes through, line by line, which things he said were true, and which were not,…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:08 PM
1

Suffer the little children....
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:53 PM
2

Rape charges filed reported to local news in 3... 2... 1...
/r/MensRights12/04/17 05:52 PM
13

I would recommend something I often oppose, which is the publicization of female public school teachers having sex with students. While it's not a men's rights topic, it IS certainly something the larger culture needs to know more about. Once there is an equal suspicion on men and women, it will free all adults to resume their normal roles as educators and mentors and friends. The hysteria around adults and kids has to be broken down, so we can restore a healthy connection across the generations…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 10:37 PM
1

She would potentially not only have to have a referendum on whether to stay in the UK which people already voted for staying in. She would then also need to have a referendum on the EU itself and whether Scotland wanted to join so she could prove the population was behind her There's no reason not to do this simultaneously. Q1. Should Scotland remain in the UK? Q2. If Scotland leaves the UK, should Scotland join the EU? The first question was already asked, in an environment where the UK had pro…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:15 PM
3

"She had no notion of wrongfulness on what she was doing" This is ridiculous. Like any impaired adult, she is still responsible for her actions. If she had outright strangled him, would anyone be arguing the Twinkie/antidepressant defence?
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:12 PM
2

It's my view that there should be a statute of limitations of 5 years for any crime, simply to encourage people not to dwell on the past, and perfection-seeking. In cases like sex crimes, where you may want a statute of limitations for other reasons (fading memories, etc.) these shouldn't even be crimes in the first place. If the demonstration of harm is so shaky that time alone can affect the case, it doesn't belong in the criminal system at all.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:08 PM
1

1. Should anyone be jailed for failure to pay child support? No. People should not be imprisoned for failure to pay. There are other methods of satisfying debts. 2. How much money does a child deserve? Enough to be healthy and educated. No child asked to be born. Children are the direct result of intentional action on behalf of at least one adult, the mother, possibly with a second person. 3. Why do we have child support? Ideally, this should be for a parent (of any sex) who reneges on their res…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 09:02 PM
4

Judging from the legal landscape, I'd say the joking ended a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:56 PM
3

Clearly the difference that needs to be made in your area is awareness. Simply bringing the subject up as a valid topic for debate, whether you ultimately win or lose, is progress. There are many topics you could talk about, but I think the ones that are likely to work best tug at the heart. boys and men who are mangled or die due to cosmetic or ritual cutting men who never intended to be fathers (or who are not genetic fathers at all because she screwed around) who are nevertheless used as bank…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:47 PM
2

Nothing in the article says that this was a rape. There is no claim of force, no claim of coercion, not even any claim of harm whatsoever. Instead, we have words from a third party.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:06 PM
1

If you can cut a person for your own fairytale, or just because you "like how it looks", you can do anything to them. Cutting must be stopped.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 11:03 PM
12

I am sure she wasn't thinking this would be the outcome Doesn't matter. It's a reasonably likely outcome. We know about bullying. nor could someone who is eleven be tried as a legal adult It does happen. But really, there shouldn't even be "juvenile" crimes. You do the crime, you should do the time. If we wouldn't subject an 11-year-old to the same sentence in the same place, that tells us about the ineffectiveness or inappropriateness of what we're doing, not the 11-year-old. A person is dead h…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 09:12 PM
8

The Islamic world really is the patriarchy that feminists so often accuse the West of being. It's bad for men, and it's bad for women. However, the solution to that isn't feminism, another system of sexism and prejudice. Rather, a system of egalitarianism is required. And atheism. Humanism is too closely tied to feminism for me to recommend it. You're doing it right. Therefore, please be safe.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 09:10 PM
1

Ironically, you are in a hostile working environment, due to racism and sexism, but your complaints will be dismissed.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:26 PM
1

Wikipedia Come on, you know better than that...
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:17 PM
1

But we are the opposite to feminism, along the authoritarian-libertarian divide. This is how you see feminism teaming up with tradcons and Islam. MHRM's natural allies include journalists and sexual minorities and the poor, and a lot more. They just haven't all been permitted (by feminists) to see that yet.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:16 PM
3

Responsibility can be taught as well. We demand far too little of kids these days. If you don't want kids going to prison for murder... maybe tell them that prison is a real possibility for them.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:37 AM
4

This idea that they're too young to understand is ridiculous. We should be punishing all people according to the same laws and sentencing. If someone bullies a boy to a foreseeable death, which is what they did here, then they ought to be behind bars. Instead we'll protect them, and nobody will know who they are.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:35 AM
8

Graham was jailed for 18 months The accusations she made are of a category that gets people (read: men) tortured and killed, in the current climate in the UK. As such, this should be considered for sentencing purposes as close to attempted murder.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:43 AM
3

This is ridiculous. Comic book fans DO want more strong female characters. But they don't want the feminist SJW political crap that usually surrounds such characters in the real world. Story matters. Leave the politics for the politicians.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:29 PM
3

Perhaps one of these will meet your standard (all written by different writers... or at least that's what they claim) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/05/father-reported-paedophilia-checking-hotel-daughter/ http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/widower-holiday-daughter-13-horrified-10162059 http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/travelodge-accuse-man-being-paedophile-after-booking-room-his-13-year-old-daughter-1615546 http://nypost.com/2017/04/05/hotel-calls-police-after-mistaking-father-for-pedophile/
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:24 PM
1

The page is missing the page-width line: But they do link to this informative guide
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:17 PM
1

Clearly I need to step up my game...
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:13 PM
5

biological or adoptive
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:11 PM
2

When you make it a crime to just be a kind of person, that will blow back on you in ways like this. The laws need significant reform. Even if this man was a pedophile (which he may well be, for all we know), the simple fact is that he committed no crime, and never even intended to commit a crime. The result is now a traumatized family, in particular the teen. The staff should be charged with filing a false report, and should be banned from working in the hotel industry again, and the police shou…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:07 PM
1

Continue.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:59 PM
3

This is a sale on men's clothing, not a "no women allowed" sale. Women buy men's clothing both for the men in their lives, and for themselves. Even if this was a "no women allowed" sale, the fact that discrimination is not unique to one vendor or sex hardly makes it legal.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:57 PM
5

This is surely illegal. But how do they know what sex you are online?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:54 PM
1

This is the whole reason I discovered I was not a feminist. Elevatorgate and FreeThoughtBlogs and WomenInSkepticism and even SkepticInk divided the online and conference atheist worlds into feminists and shitlords. So I've sided with the shitlords ever since. Many people seem to use the "logic": Atheist, therefore rational and reasonable and skeptical. It's not true. Some atheists even go out of their way to OPPOSE skepticism. (I've also discovered that many other undesirables also have legitima…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:47 PM
31

The documentary, which purports to depict a feminist’s change of heart about the men’s rights movement Meghan Potkins is essentially calling Cassie Jaye a liar here.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:39 PM
19

I agree. I suspect they're starting to consider what acting like raving lunatics is doing to their movement, particularly as exposed by The Red Pill, and are toning it down as a means to take away a talking point. But that's hard to do when the evidence is already in the film, and the repeated attempts to ban it.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:37 PM
4

It was doing rather well on Google Play, in Canada, the last time I checked...
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:35 PM
18

I'm so glad so many people turned out to see the film. Ironically, the struggle just to get the film screened will re-emphasize the film's content, and make it stick in viewers' minds more surely. Feminism's gonna feminist. So MRAs are going to win.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 09:33 PM
1

Good luck. Men need such a clinic, not just for general health, but also for mental health, and also pretty much anything covered by underwear. But it's just not seen as necessary for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:24 AM
2

Bring back our gays. It's actually an issue for straight men as well, because you can always face the accusation (much like rape or child molestation, in the West). Ask Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:04 AM
2

The female voices in this movement are the best (not because they are female, though that does help open the door to some audiences, but because they really are great) and this movement is merit-based equal-opportunity. It is so much better than feminism!
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:03 AM
7

Really, there's enough for 20 books of 250 pages each (and we should be writing them...). The two international men's conferences are a great place to start.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:58 AM
5

It's amazing that people think that in the last couple hundred years, we've suddenly discovered something about human sexuality, from a social standpoint rather than biological, which is somehow new. If we didn't have 58 genders in Ancient Rome or Greece, we almost certainly don't need them now.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:56 AM
3

It's like the recent Reason Rally, a pale shadow of it's peak attendance. Instead of advocating for secularism, the right not to believe, and the end of special rights for religion, it became all about women and LGBT and people of color. People don't want this crap (not when it means changing the subject of every event ever), and they vote with their feet.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:50 AM
2

People who get shit done looked at their slogans, and interpreted them as just nice folks who want nice things to happen, nothing to be wary of. This is how they slipped into power. If people weren't busy actually getting shit done, they might have noticed what was really happening.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:47 AM
1

Inquire at the ACLU. If there has been a violation of your rights, they may want to take the case. They are unafraid of offending their SJW donors.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:45 AM
1

Likely, but not necessarily.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 01:09 AM
3

Well, I actually do want equality (of opportunity, generally) across the board. But to enable that, you first must have freedom.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:42 PM
8

I recommend considering decentralized storage like LBRY.io or ZeroNet. In particular LBRY.io responded to the deletion of thousands of Berkeley lectures (because they didn't have subtitles) by hosting them in their network. I would avoid Minds, because their terms are way too long, and include this gem: Minds may terminate your access to all or any part of Minds at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice, effective immediately This is exactly the problem people are trying to fix.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:29 PM
3

It's not "women" who are furious, but feminists. And because they are mentally ill, this is their natural state. Was someone expecting something else? 30 pages of PDF is a lot to read. Anyone got a summary?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:17 PM
2

Your link appears to be about the "penis seat". All they're doing is reinforcing the idea that men are so worthless, you can even turn them into a chair, and you'll get praise for doing so.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:15 PM
2

Where did this idea come from? Feminism. Forcing someone to have sex is illegal. But we all are in a position of power and weakness with respect to everyone else. There should be no doubt today, it is the student who wields all the power.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:11 PM
2

There's nothing predatory about either. That's just nonsense.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:58 PM
2

I call them human drones.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:56 PM
2

My understanding is that reddit now takes a dim view of banning people from one reddit, on the basis of posting in another reddit.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:56 PM
1

The real question is why it's possible to ban anyone at all. Seek out people who are working on the uncensorable web, and help them get it done. At best, reddit is a series of echo chambers. But even within the echo chambers, it's becoming so you have to have the right echo. When the technology enables censorship, should we be surprised when mods censor?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:10 PM
-53

It's not rape if it's consensual. I'm pretty sure, at any point during the summer of 2016, he could have stopped f---ing her.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:51 PM
1

the boy’s explicit description of one sexual encounter: “One thing led to another" It sure did. Now you think she's easy money, pre-emptively turning the tables on a potential claim for child support. Shame.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:48 PM
3

Regardless why she smiled, it's a good move. It's harder for an impartial observer to hate a smiling person, and it simultaneously will infuriate her opponents. Everyone should do it.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:45 PM
0

YouTube is dead. The next video platform will be a protocol, and we will serve it to each other. Something similar to LBRY.io is the way forward.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:06 PM
14

So, according to the Mayor, in order to protect the religious rights of adults, not only is there no harm in sucking off a baby (clearly too young to be said to have any religion at all), but you can EVEN do it just after you've cut skin off the penis, and there's no harm. On what basis, then, are we imprisoning people in NYC who suck off 15-year-olds, who aren't being cut, and who clearly seek out the BJ?
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:00 PM
8

No act is pedophilia. Pedophilia, broadly, is the attraction to minors. There's no act. Touching an infant's genitals (you omit "with your mouth, sucking" for some reason..) is a sexual act, regardless of what else it might be. It's the means for the mohel to demonstrate his power over everyone in his society... he can do this to his friends' kids and the parents will praise him for it. He can do this to YOU before you can object.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:55 PM
4

It's not anti-Semitic... Judaism is built around cutting baby dick. But it is anti-pedophile. That should provide some perspective.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:46 PM
4

The studies who have looked into people who hurt kids show that the majority of people who hurt kids (including sexually) are not pedophiles. Pedophiles are better than these people.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:44 PM
12

Who cares if it's libel? Cutting baby dick should be illegal in any case, but it should be doubly-illegal when it's done outside a hospital setting, or involves sucking a bloody baby dick. But it's not libel, because it actually happened, and there's proof.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:41 PM
1

Thank you! Any minority should make use of this technique.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:46 AM
1

If it's the "end-of-class review", what was the point in kicking you out, except to shame you for disagreeing? You paid for the course (or someone did) and you are entitled to the course. Surely someone has video... it's 2017, right?
/r/MensRights30/03/17 02:41 AM
12

You made your son's life a misery. I am making no promises about your sentence Why not? This is easy. She should be going to prison for whatever the maximum sentence is for cruelty, abuse, and torture. And it should be real prison, not "women's" prison.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:57 PM
1

I've occasionally noticed by refreshing the page for other reasons, you can see how the vote has changed in the meantime. True, it doesn't tell you who simply revoked their upvote, but downvotes seem more likely. There's probably a more direct way, but that's how I've "seen" them.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:44 PM
-2

the love of God What God... the one who made this the sign of His covenant with His people? (Gen 17:9-14)
/r/MensRights28/03/17 11:42 PM
9

A County Court judge, who cannot be named Well that's a new one. Now, not only do we have secret accusers and secret evidence, but secret judges! This is fine. The judge said the woman had taken the boy's adolescence away from him That's quite a feat. I would like to try this time-travel device myself... it would be good to skip the Trump administration. Professor Ogloff found the woman had not been acting in a predatory way or been driven by a deviant sexual desire, but instead had allowed her …
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:20 PM
4

Gary "And what is Aleppo" Johnson is looking pretty good right about now, isn't he.... He was the only candidate to speak positively of men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:13 PM
14

I'm left, but not Marxist. I'm more like what is being called "classical liberal" except I think people have to bake that damned cake if someone orders it, and I think universal basic income is coming whether anyone likes it or not.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:11 PM
1

Anybody in the room could have him arrested for sexual harassment, right now. The problem isn't trans people. The problem is the law.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:57 AM
3

protect him from the situation WHAT situation? Someone else's body? It's so absurd. This is why we need to eliminate segregated facilities altogether. Men and boys are not fragile little flowers who will curl up and die just because someone with boobies saw their dick. When they get older, half of THEM will have boobies, and besides, all the gay guys in the team or class have already seen their dick anyway. It should be no different for a trans person to see it.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:55 AM
1

VIdeo posted in 2014.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:50 AM
3

Well, that depends. If it's a parade, then you need permission. If it's a protest, then asking for permission is irrelevant. Who asks permission for a protest?!
/r/MensRights26/03/17 01:10 AM
2

every time makes me a bit more sour and suspicious towards women That's not what this subreddit is about, or should be about. While feminism IS cancer, non-feminists are good people, regardless of their sex.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:03 PM
-6

People exist to contradict every claim you've made. Consent must be proven, or disproven, in court. Legislation can't do it. You'd think in THIS sub, due process would be important.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:01 PM
2

Yes, libraries are that hotbed of misogyny I've been hearing so much about....
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:38 PM
0

If you think about it, they're all victims of an out-of-control legal system. These were people who enjoyed each other, and now that's gone, and everyone local knows it. The "victim" will now be subtly shamed into re-framing what happened as victimization. He will have to rationalize what he knows to be true about them, and what others are saying about them. It's going to be painful. But it'll keep the therapists employed. Later, if a woman accuses him of raping her, because she regrets having s…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:36 PM
2

Not just virtue signalling, but illegal. You cannot hire based on sex.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:05 PM
1

I suspect they also fund gynecologists, but don't even know what an andrologist might be. (No, a urologist is not the answer).
/r/MensRights24/03/17 06:01 PM
0

Show us the harm, then we'll send her to prison.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:10 PM
1

That's what this media said it was...
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:09 PM
2

It's probably more conspicuous now that nobody is playing it. When I played in the summer (before they banned any phone worth having) I was in parks at all hours of the day and night. That game is great for losing weight! Nobody bothered me at all. Some folks came over to say hi and ask which team I was on (pretty sure it wasn't a gay reference).
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:04 PM
2

I would require that among the people raising a child, at least one must be stay-at-home, or time-share so that there is always one parent at home at any hour, any day of the week.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 07:22 PM
2

Well that's disappointing... Just be sure that this isn't "bash a violent bitch month" redux. Context matters.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 07:20 PM
1

Why deleted? This seemed to be important. In any case, Title IX is not the end of the law. If even one man is denied access to similar training in a way that doesn't ostracise him, it is a violation of the US constitution.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 07:16 PM
18

deception was “insulting” to the Denison community and “especially offensive to the African-American community So... NOT offensive to men?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 07:12 PM
21

It should be. It should also be legal for the husband to divorce his pregnant wife (regardless of who is the sire) if she doesn't abort. And it should be legal for any father to sign a document to prevent any parental responsibility, prior to the birth.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:24 PM
1

If you're in Canada, you can be a woman TODAY, and secure that job. It requires no change in your behavior, appearance, or anything. You just have to tell a doctor you're a woman, and get them to sign off on it. Ask Mr. Lauren Southern.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:20 PM
-59

As neither the student, nor the husband seem to be upset by her behavior (it's just the mom, trying to control her son) there's really no reason for anyone else to be involved. This is something for them to process on their own.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:18 PM
1

They mean How do you know? They could be just repeating the feminist reasoning on this topic.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:44 AM
7

That research is contradicted by non-American research. Notably, other countries do not perceive a financial incentive to continue circumcision, unlike US doctors. But you can debunk it with common sense. Billions of men have not had this procedure, and lived life just fine.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:40 AM
2

Another comment, and the discussion following that comment, strongly suggest that this film is not what you think it is.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:33 AM
1

So it IS possible! When do we get this on this side of the pond?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:31 AM
2

same clothes to all This makes it sound literally like the same clothes. Actually, allow boys and girls to wear kilts, shorts or trousers So there is still a diversity of choices for everyone. It just won't be enforced by sex. Good.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:27 AM
1

I suspect this is a re-run. Perhaps there ought to be a wiki for these sort of things.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:25 AM
2

Something terrible happened. I just don't know what.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:23 AM
1

Perhaps a short version, with links to longer analysis for those who want it.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:20 AM
3

I think Bullfrog777's idea of sharing it with friends and family can be effective. It certainly shocked (in a productive way) the people I've shown it to.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:17 AM
15

If Canada's rape trials result in acquittal more often than trials for other crimes, this DOES prove men's point that the system is stacked in favor of accusers, because many of these (Ghomeshi for example) shouldn't even be going to trial in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 02:14 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:49 PM
1

First, this is the internet, and you have correctly used and spelled the word "pique". My day is done. Second, what do inspirational women have to do with computers? (Yes, yes I know Grace Hopper and Ada Lovelace and all that, but even if Turing and von Neumann and everyone were women, WHAT does it have to do with computing?) Now, you've chosen an anti-feminist, and an ex-feminist... so I think many in your class are going to instantly turn off (unless there's some quiz later). Consider adding C…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:45 PM
1

The same way "genders don't play sports" but "Women's" NCAA basketball is on ESPN.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:05 PM
6

Unfortunately, if we do not have the defendant's name, it makes it difficult to stop, or at least protest, a miscarriage of justice in a timely manner. By the same token, we ALSO need all accuser's names.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 06:01 PM
2

What's more likely? She loved him and that's why she was spied kissing him, and doesn't want him to be harmed, or that after developing this relationship, he decided he'd just kidnap her instead? It could still turn very ugly for him. We'll probably kill him, if not before trial, then after.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:54 PM
2

I remain consistent. These are two people who found something to love in each other, and society lost its shit, so they're in hiding to protect themselves. I wish them the best, but due to the hysteria, he's going to prison and she's going to therapy to tell her that what she felt was a lie.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 05:51 PM
1

on CNBC Nope. Try again.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:24 PM
8

If an adult wants to get cosmetic surgery on their penis, that's not a problem. Well, it's a LITTLE problem, because particularly in the USA, people are so uneducated about the frenulum and the foreskin, they don't understand what is lost during the procedure, and how it affects the sensation, and the dynamics of sexual intercourse.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:20 PM
5

Thank you for the video link. Here is another one that you may find informative or effective. It's a 2016 video, showing the results of a 2012 review of circumcision. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8izzCSRhKXs It's possible that during the video, the speaker or slides might say where the source material is from, or provide enough information for a Google search.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:15 PM
16

Couldn't possibly be guilt. Couldn't possibly be a mental illness.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:06 PM
4

What about the cases of accused killing themselves to avoid court, or to avoid the public condemnation of being accused? Nobody cares about that.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 07:05 PM
148

They didn't consider boys raped on campus "real" rape victims. I didn't see this in the article. And, in any case, that doesn't tell us WHY they didn't consider them rape victims. (Despite the photo, most of them had nothing to do with the Sandusky case. Unless I missed it, we're not told the age or sex of this majority.) Due to the feminist-inspired hysteria around this issue, it's likely that the reason at least much of whatever happened wasn't viewed as rape is because it ... wasn't rape, or …
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:59 PM
6

Credit where credit is due that they had Cassie on after that shit show feminist No credit is due. Truth, and blatant lies, are not covering two equal sides of a debate. And having them on separately virtually guarantees that people who saw one will not have seen the other. This interview is to give the FORM of fairness, while being as unfair as possible.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:35 AM
4

they give airtime to a completely misinformed delusional nutjob Well, it's CBC, after all. That's kinda what they do.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:34 AM
0

Further, if the First Amendment means what it says, then the government cannot intervene into the religious expression of these Jews to mutilate and infect the baby boys in their possession. I'm all for amending the First Amendment to eliminate the "free exercise" clause.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:27 AM
8

Only action on the "controversial" cutting then, not on the other boys who are cut against their will, and may still bleed to death even when it's done in a hospital?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:25 AM
4

It's so ridiculous.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:21 AM
2

Then they should all be shamed, publicly, repeatedly, relentlessly. These are people who are either elected, or who seek to influence elected people, to make it easier to physically harm boys for no particular reason, resulting in brain damage and death.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:17 AM
4

Take this opportunity to do the RIGHT thing, and ban all male genital cutting on children, except where this is medically necessary as the last resort, and delay will make the problem significantly worse. (Further, write this law in such a way as to be gender-neutral, replacing any existing law on "FGM") There should be zero, or near zero, circumcisions in New York.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:14 AM
1

If the ex-husband had accepted the boy as his own, and was acting in the role of father, then I think he's made his bed and he has to lie in it. There is a boy to think of here, and he's more important than the man. The article didn't seem clear on what the relationship, if any, was, but the man admitted to "efforts to raise the child".
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:09 AM
1

It’s not your responsibility to raise a kid that was formed in an affair outside of your marriage just because you’re married to the woman Well, that actually IS a key reason why marriage exists now. Historians and lawmakers and marriage experts went to the US Supreme Court and this was their central argument against same-sex marriage.... Gay people didn't need to be made responsible for each other's children, because we don't have accidents. (Turns out that's not true... gay kids are having a l…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 01:06 AM
1

don't see often I'm seeing it twice today... (I'll let myself out)
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:55 AM
3

Legally "[The judge,] Lady Scott said there had been consent from the victim"
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:52 AM
3

Also, the girl engaged in sex willingly. How odd. Usually, we're told that's impossible. I guess the mountain of evidence supporting this fact was taller than the pile of bullshit the usual suspects try to cover it with.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:43 AM
2

Trump is already screwing men, with his Trudeau announcement.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:37 AM
1

Why do these people insist that every piece of music has to reflect the actual desires and intentions of the singer and/or listener? It's like these people have never watched a movie, read a book, or heard a story. Oh the horror... there's an actual genre called... Horror!
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:36 PM
1

In reality, all "rape" is sexual assault. But if we're going to use the word "rape" (a property crime) for some sexual assaults, then it is certainly clear that men can be raped.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 10:30 PM
1

Strange article, seeming to suggest that relationships in the military are a bad thing. Read your military history... Alexander the Great, for instance.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:08 PM
2

You're right, but I think at least some of these were not self-made videos. It's a minor point that doesn't really affect the whole ridiculousness of the faux-outrage, but it's there nonetheless.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:06 PM
5

This is, again, based in misandry. I doubt any of them would mind if women were assumed to be the audience for these videos. But the idea that men might get some pleasure from watching a woman... well that just can NOT be allowed. There is -- literally -- no harm that comes from being in a video, and from someone else, probably somewhere else, watching that video. But there can be some good, for the viewer.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:05 PM
1

Didn't know that.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:03 PM
1

This is why the concept of "consent" as a legal standard needs to be eliminated. Even when it works, it fails. Two college kids got drunk and had bad sex. They were none the worse for it the next day. Life SHOULD just go on.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:45 PM
2

These procedures are done for the same reasons, with the same results. It needs to end. No group should be left unprotected, just because of their sex.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:38 PM
-1

This is such a waste of resources. Leave these people alone, and... oh I don't know... catch a murderer, maybe? Stop a terrorist? Find my bicycle?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:36 PM
3

If you can get extra credit for laziness, it just goes to demonstrate that the regular credit is also worthless as well.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:32 PM
2

The actual working link appears to be this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2408953/Texas-father-beat-Jesus-Flores-death-raping-5-year-old-daughter-NOT-face-murder-charges.html The man at the very least is guilty of manslaughter. Yes, you have a right to defend your kids. But I have a very difficult time believing this level of violence was required. It's very easy to believe that this was about expressing anger, and that's not a valid reason to kill someone.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:47 PM
1

I have no problem with her new relationship, but you don't abandon your kids. That's just vile, and ought to be a crime. Lock her up.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:39 PM
5

Sometimes, it's the downvotes that prove you're correct. It amazes me that feminist tactics and thinking are suddenly OK, on this single subject.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:32 PM
0

They aren't victims, except of the jealous girl who turned them in.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:30 PM
3

This is like being blown up by your own bomb. (Milo, you know about this, right dear?) This is bad, no matter who it happens to. We need to reform the way we handle these issues by listening to the science, and by listening to the many "victims" (like Milo) who regard their experience so positively that they never reported their older partners, and protect them from a hysterical public even now.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:18 PM
4

they are trying demonize all normal male sexual behavior. And they are doing it. They start around the edges, and then they close the trap tighter and tighter and tighter until all of a sudden, regret has become rape and you're banned from campus just for looking like someone else and obtaining a photo of a hot marine can probably get you landed in prison. We need to return to a standard that we're not going to even consider putting someone in prison unless there's demonstrable harm. That is wha…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:05 PM
8

She attacks The Red Pill by saying that all it is about is men's "natural right" to demand sex whenever, wherever, and however. She says all the other issues in the film (which she presents as if they were her idea, not from the film) are related to this natural right to unlimited sex. She also says the red pill in The Matrix is about staying in the matrix. She's as dumb as a rock. She says that we have to be more aware of the "pathetic" but growing movement among Conservatives and WIld Rose (al…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:08 PM
4

If you had civics class, you know that the grand jury's purpose is to examine the evidence from only one side, with an eye to starting a prosecution. What should outrage you is that you are participating in the labelling of people guilty, even though they haven't even been given a fair trial. Indeed, many are dead. That's convenient.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:04 PM
3

As with claims of rape, these are mere allegations until proven in a court of law. Grand juries cannot determine guilt, as there is no cross-examination of accusers, nor is there any exculpatory evidence admitted. It's almost as if there are two sides to a story, or something... nah, that can't possibly be how the law works....
/r/MensRights14/03/17 07:00 PM
10

It isn't going to change committed feminists. But it WILL change those people who actually believe the feminist spin, and aren't aware what a load of crap it is, or what men are having to deal with. This sort of thing would have been an eye-opener for me about five years ago when I still assumed I was a feminist because I believed in "equal rights for women". You don't fight your opponent to change their mind. You won't. You fight your opponent to change other people's minds.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:36 PM
1

This is plainly judicial misconduct. The judge's sexism, presumably in violation of the law, is made clear in their own words.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:34 PM
7

When men express emotions in ways that are most natural, they get defamed for it.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:30 PM
2

I love how they blurred the baby's face, as if anyone is going to recognize a baby... she faces life in prison if convicted This is absurd. As we here know well, she could have killed that kid and left him in a dumpster, and received a light sentence. There has been no claim of harm, from this act. Officials are in the process of locating the tot’s father, and he is currently in the custody of the Department of Health and Human Services. How do you lose someone who is in custody? son was taken o…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 07:27 PM
3

SNL certainly seems to think so, according to that skit they did last week.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:41 PM
1

I have no problem with a fake-abortion kind of protest at a Catholic church. If you ban safe and legal abortion, then unsafe illegal abortions will happen instead. I support rights of all sexes, not just men. As for the Catholic Church, I loathe that institution. It has SO MUCH to answer for, from the spread AIDS in Africa, to the torture of gay kids, to the sexual abuse of boys, we don't even have to go back to the Inquisition(s) and Crusades, but they are there. If Mary had been able to have a…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:21 AM
3

Fortunately, they haven't been able to shut down The Red Pill on everyone's phone and tablet, and that has Karen in it. It must be killing feminists that people are actually willing to PAY to hear these things, and now they can't stop it.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:14 AM
3

Honestly, the guy doesn't dad very well. He didn't take charge. He didn't show affection. He should simply have excused himself, calmly and caringly escorted the young'uns out the door, secured the door against re-entry, and that would have been that. 30 seconds? 40? It's OK to dad.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:09 AM
1

What does "pull someone" mean? I assume it's not a handjob...
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:04 AM
2

On behalf of men everywhere, we thank you, Mrs. South Korea's ex-President.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:01 AM
3

Her friends tracked down the real Graham Wow. It's bad when your friends have to hunt down a stranger to warn him about you.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:02 PM
1

So, basically it's "I need feminism because men masturbate." And people wonder why we laugh at (not with) them. Rather than advocate for their own issues, they just can't help themselves from going straight to man-hating.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:58 PM
5

By the way, article is from 2011.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:55 PM
2

The video included in the Guardian article "does not exist" (thanks once again, YouTube). What was it?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:55 PM
2

Thank you. You have an open mind, which is all anyone can ask for.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:52 PM
2

I treat this the same as if a female had made the claim. And I'm simply not buying it. If you make yourself that drunk, you are responsible for what comes next, whether it's a car crash, or sex.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:24 PM
6

The bonus part is that she can claim to have been raped. Who can say she wasn't?
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:22 PM
2

It's not just the literature. It's their actions. It's their everyday speech in the street, on Twitter and Facebook. It's the things they produce (e.g. the "male tears" mug). And further, it's the intentionally distorted reality they project by the devaluing of men and boys, and the diminishing of male experiences. The feminists have been telling us for years about a "culture of hate". No wonder they're so good at it.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:48 PM
2

You'd think mugs of "male tears" would be enough. Can you imagine ... "Jewish tears", or "black tears". The country would have a meltdown (rightly so).
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:45 PM
2

The evidence is overwhelming that feminism is a hateful ideology. However, there is no legal definition of a hate group, as far as I know... only hate speech (in some places) and hate crimes (in more places). When people refer to "officially designed as a hate group", they're usually talking about the feminist group SPLC, and they aren't likely to be designating feminism an ideology of hate anytime soon.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:42 PM
1

Sometimes people prefer video. The most important video on YouTube, in my opinion, is this, from ICMI 2016; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8izzCSRhKXs
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:38 PM
4

How can a bigot like this get elected? It shouldn't be possible. There should be a riot outside her home, for a week straight. Say what you want about feminists, but they get sh-t done, and the rest of us pay the price. It's time to flip that script.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:35 PM
5

I'd buy that man a beer. Feminists don't get comedy. Or joy. Or rebellion.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:31 PM
2

I ask them how. And I ask for proof. And I provide counterexamples. I ask them that if killing babies by bleeding-out and herpes is something feminists are against, if my body is my choice, then why do they put that "F" in front of GM? If they are against honor killing, which in the UK has about 25% male victims, some of whom are killed for being gay, why do feminists in parliament laugh about male honor killing, while attempting to introduce a bill to protect only female victims, explicitly exc…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 05:01 AM
5

They've been oppressively feminist for quite some time... in my view it's nearing a decade.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:58 AM
1

Try to get at least one of these people to watch the film. If you think the content of the film is important, this is kinda your job now.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:56 AM
1

sanity isn't my strong suit Anyone who can stay sane in the current environment is, ironically, not sane.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:54 AM
1

An experience isn't a fact. Feeling unsafe isn't a fact Well of course it is. What you mean is that it's not data. society IS NOT MEANT TO MAKE YOU FEEL SAFE Actually, yeah, it is. Society is what happens when people cannot live alone, perhaps due to overlapping territory, and make a decision to live together. You need rules. And safety is ABSOLUTELY one of those rules. It's why we give a damn about domestic violence against men, and about cop killings of men.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:51 AM
2

That's unusual. Most MTF I've actually seen anywhere OTHER than TV are quite supportive of men, because they've lived both lives, and are aware of the bullshit. Circumcision alone means that their new vagina won't be made from shaft skin, but from riskier, and mentally less appealing, intestine. Not to mention the TERFs...
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:48 AM
3

You should feel sorry for them both. There's no reason this needed to happen to them.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:26 PM
2

They are both victims of a feminist hysteria. This should never have gone to trial in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:25 PM
2

because he "liked it" he offered consent True. First, liking it is merely a normal, pleasant, biological response. It's not a sign of decision or intent. Consent is (by definition) the absence of objection. It's not something a person "gives". and thus should be punished This is ridiculous. Why should he be punished for momentarily enjoying something that was not even his idea, and that he wasn't even actively participating in? Those of us who have actually been 14 know that expecting him to sto…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:32 PM
2

I'm as surprised as you to learn that I agree with you this time.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:24 PM
9

This is such crap. Women should be serving the SAME time in the SAME prisons as men. If they get raped or shanked, well nobody cares when men are raped and shanked. Can't do the time, don't do the crime. Maybe then we'd get some meaningful prison reform, if women actually had to go to real prison.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:22 PM
10

I screamed like a little bitch There, there. It's gonna be OK. No, really! I'm so encouraged that so many people are seeing this film. It's a game-changer.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:17 PM
1

Funny thing... most educators in history have been male. So if you taught a male something you really could educate not just a whole community, but an entire region. If you taught a woman, it would go nowhere, and she probably wouldn't even use it. Apparently the only thing feminists dislike about this situation is which sex does what.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:15 PM
21

As a gay guy, I have to tell you, anyone who says that male chests and nipples and abs aren't JUST as sexual as women's breasts, is completely lying to you. If men can be topless, then so should women be.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:11 PM
-1

Indeed, one would hope that rapists would spend a long time in prison. But this wasn't rape.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:34 AM
2

That there may have been a sexual attraction between them is nothing to the point - this legislation is designed to protect young people from their urges And that's what this is really about -- taboo-enforcement
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:33 AM
1

We're already there. Surely you've noticed.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:54 AM
2

In his meeting with Trudeau, Trump proved himself to be as cucked (never used that word before) as Obama. Indeed, they named a new organization after it... the "Canada-United States Council" CUC.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:47 AM
5

I absolutely love that The Red Pill is taking down feminism across the continent, in people's homes, and on their phones, as we speak. And there isn't ANYTHING they can do about it this time. No screaming. No fire alarms. No blood-smearing. Change is coming.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:45 AM
2

Really? Which parties? There's someone I can vote FOR ?! Oh... OK nevermind
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:41 AM
3

Still not available on amazon.ca... :(
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:26 AM
5

Unshackling men from their cheating wives' offspring helps everyone. Paying for male condoms, to prevent unwanted pregnancy and disease, helps everyone. It works both ways, dear. People might care less, if there was a corresponding amount spent on International Men's Day, on men. But there's isn't. Because "equality" is a word Liberals don't comprehend.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:18 AM
6

Well, that would make things better for people. That's not what Liberals are about.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:16 AM
1

Did we really expect anything different from Prime Minister Hair?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:15 AM
2

He's not wrong. I try to look at as many as I can. They're fun to play with! Oh. Did Berkeley think I was supposed to be straight? You know, rumor has it that us gay people are pretty good at the whole "making graceless existence bearable" thing, almost any way you look at it. Poor Melania. I can't imagine her home life is very good. And she is routinely attacked, for no good reason, by liberals.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:39 AM
5

I love the still image they chose...
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:28 AM
0

It's C$4.99 in Canada...
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:27 AM
20

I checked the Play Store on my Android: "New Movie Releases" - not shown at all "New To Rent" - not shown at all But "Most Popular Movies" - 16th (and 1st in Documentary category) This contrast can't be an accident. I scrolled and scrolled and scrolled and scrolled and eventually came to the next Documentary, the feminist film Embrace. I thank Cassie, and I thank Milo, for making this film happen.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:19 AM
4

Interesting things: The Wound (original language title Inxeba) Xhosa men are expected to be cut, and are expected to do it without expressing fear or pain The cutting procedure that is part of "ulwaluko" may be familiar to you from the name of this website documenting the tragic results: http://www.ulwaluko.co.za/Photos.html (NSFW) Boys are considered gay, until they get cut. Then they are straight men Gay male love story, uncut men Has attracted a boycott, and isn't even released yet CNN can't …
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:44 PM
7

Except of course that Islam is a choice. You can literally wake up one say, and say "f--- this, I'm out" and that's that. Being male is not a choice, unless you want to spend a lot of money.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 10:21 PM
1

Victimless sex crime is a feminist idea. Therefore any reporting where no details are provided can be used to promote the idea that pretty much anything is rape.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:05 PM
1

Also, you'll find that when a priest is on trial for something that happened decades ago, it gets more coverage than even a women accused of something from last year. There's a sex-criminal stack, much like there is a progressive stack. On atheist sites, you can be guaranteed none of these public-school-teacher stories will be seen, because it goes against their narrative of religion-bad, secular-good. (A narrative I agree with, but I also like facts).
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:04 PM
1

As usual, there are no facts provided to explain what happened in this case, or how it was brought to authorities. So I don't buy a word of it.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:02 PM
0

We need to show distribution platforms like Netflix and Hulu that the film has potential to be lucrative for them This is a joke, right? All they have to do is find maybe 5-10 GB of space somewhere to store it. That's the SOLE cost. I'll point out that the pirates can find this space for free, in exchange for nothing. So.. yeah.. not that expensive. Netflix and Hulu are never going to put this on their platform, because they disagree with the viewpoint.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:53 PM
1

Burger King is called Hungry Jack's in Australia?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:49 PM
3

Can anyone name an issue facing men, which was not covered in the film? In some cities feminists have prevented it from being shown to the public. Why should this film be banned? Does the fight for equality of the sexes have to be segregated into men's issues and women's issues, or can it move forward on issues facing all humans? If together, how do terms like "feminism" and "patriarchy" work to bring people together?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:45 PM
2

After they removed discussion boards, because people weren't saying the nice things IMDb wanted them to say, IMDb became dead to me. As with Facebook and Reddit, we need to be working on decentralized, uncensorable alternatives to these platforms. Put them out of business.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:36 PM
1

It is designed to spread hate. Note how it compares an optional ideology (which is nevertheless associated with terrorism and oppressive governments globally) with genetically-determined race and sex. It cannot be assumed that white people or men have something in common just because they were born with white skin and dicks. However, we CAN make that assumption about Muslims, because they either chose to join, or failed to choose to leave, this hateful ideology.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:54 AM
2

Of course not. Porn is just audio or video or stories or other content, of humans doing what humans do with themselves or each other. Obvious it objectifies the subject, but so does EVERY audio or video or story of a human. And so does EVERY job. Perhaps the worst is the engineer who works for a corporation, only to discover that nothing he invented is his, and nobody will ever even know his name, during his lifetime. Now THAT is objectification. Most people who watch porn do it because they hav…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:47 AM
8

The signals are already equally male and female. Why are feminists insisting that women have to wear dresses? That's not feminist. Next, they'll demand that the female signal be represented only by a pair of eyes, since the niqab is a "right".
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:34 PM
2

FGM (which is illegal around here, in case you were wondering) is a pretty different beast to make circumcision It really isn't.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:47 PM
2

u/WigglingCaboose gave an excellent answer below. Here is another one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8izzCSRhKXs
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:45 PM
8

I'm tired of seeing comments that say "this has nothing to do with men's issues" under articles about feminist wrongdoing and hypocrisy Not only does it have nothing to do with men's issues -- it also has nothing to do with feminism. It's not as if it's difficult to attack feminism based on feminist terms, feminist theory, and feminist practice. There's no need to resort to anecdotal one-offs.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:07 PM
7

men had some problems and long ago before feminists in their current form appeared This is division of labor. Women did the work at home, and took on the rather significant risk of death associated with childbirth, and men did the work outside to pay for it. What feminism did is it gave women more freedom, but it never gave them the responsibilities.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:05 PM
20

I agree with you general claim, if not the details. Any ideology that has as its goal "smash the [men]" has got to be opposed.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:02 PM
7

The white feather. They even shamed men who had fought, and were back for reasons like medical leave.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:26 AM
2

There are three aspects to an answer to this question. Right from the start, feminism was an attack on men. People other than me can do a better job of relaying this history to you. Pre-feminism, there were sex roles. Men were responsible for earning the income to provide for his wife and their children. Women were responsible for running the home and raising the children. This is not inherently a bad thing, for the majority of people, who fit into these roles easily and naturally. Each role had…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:20 AM
8

I will no doubt be much prouder to see Karen on the TV, than Justin. Screw the popcorn... I'll be having a beer. :)
/r/MensRights06/03/17 02:07 AM
1

I'm gonna go ahead and guess that, outside of maybe hair salons and strip clubs, nobody is going to notice.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:01 PM
1

following Following? Or because of?
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:57 PM
4

I know it's cool to do that in some cultures, but in my world it's now considered shameful. I became the outcast, the pervert. Please note there that the guy is TELLING us that the problem is not the sex... it's US... If you care at all about young men and boys, you'll listen to what they actually say.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:52 PM
3

If she had to threaten him, that made it wrong and illegal.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:50 PM
1

I don't think I've been banned from anywhere (except feminist subreddits) for commenting or posting here. The only place that ever banned me, for other reasons, was the so-called "lightly moderated" r/ainbow sub. I don't moderate my views for anyone, least of all other gay people.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:47 PM
3

While the spectacle would be wonderful, there is nothing I see in Jordan or Milo that suggests they want to run a university administration, or have that capability. Both have other things they want to be doing.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:44 PM
2

Milo's own words, when he was not under duress of losing his career, speak for themselves. He may be a hypocrite now, hey may be a coward now... but he certainly advocated for sex between men and boys like he used to be. And he certainly covered for other boys and other men. Milo is a highly moral person, and would not have allowed harm to come to people. This tells us something about the nature of what he saw. (By the way, it wasn't just Joe Rogan, it was also Drunken Peasants) (And by the way …
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:35 PM
2

Wait until feminst women discover that they're ALSO on the bottom of the stack. The future is trans. If you aren't cutting something completely off/out, you're not the future (in an SJW world).
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:49 PM
4

The reason I'm here is Elevatorgate and AtheismPlus. The reason I stayed here is because I was just astounded at the number of real disadvantages and prejudices men face, and the ferocity with which feminists fight to keep it that way, all while playing innocent.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:44 PM
2

Unlike in science, the law has a presumed default. People are presumed innocent, until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:43 AM
3

If being drunk means you're responsible for the car crash you caused when you fell asleep while driving, then it also means you're responsible for the sex you had, during which you fell asleep.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:41 AM
1

it was a jury. To be clear, what you mean is that while THIS case was decided by judge, ANOTHER case was decided by jury and would not be directly affected by training judges (but might be indirectly affected). CBC says "Judge Gregory Lenehan found Bassam Al-Rawi, 40, not guilty Wednesday following a two-day trial in February in Halifax provincial court" TheStar.com says: "Judge Gregory Lenehan ruled the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the woman did not consent to sexual act…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 05:36 AM
1

The comments are not depressing in this case, but rather in cases where it's a man. Men are thrown under the bus, including by mensrights.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:35 AM
2

the police did not arrest her sooner because she was not thought to be an 'immediate danger' to the community Even the police know this is nonsense. They could only charge her with "unlawful sexual intercourse" because there was consent, and there was no harm. Of course, NOW there is harm, since these football players are having their sex lives turned into a court case. Of course, nobody in mensrights will care about their rights.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter