TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rm-rd Archive

View 24 posts and 171 comments by rm-rd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
559

Feminismrm-rd/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:50 AM
380

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights05/09/22 08:06 PM
292

Feminismrm-rd/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:02 PM
240

Humourrm-rd/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:01 AM
195

Progressrm-rd/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:18 AM
137

Feminismrm-rd/r/MensRights28/04/24 09:17 AM
105

Legal Rightsrm-rd/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:04 PM
101

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights13/12/21 06:23 AM
90

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights06/11/24 10:07 AM
85

Feminismrm-rd/r/MensRights01/04/24 06:26 AM
72

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:16 AM
65

Progressrm-rd/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:35 PM
45

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:37 AM
45

Healthrm-rd/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:52 AM
41

Discriminationrm-rd/r/MensRights22/10/24 02:10 PM
41

Discriminationrm-rd/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:37 AM
26

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:13 AM
17

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:38 AM
12

Feminismrm-rd/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:11 PM
9

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights14/01/22 08:23 PM
4

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:14 AM
2

Marriage/Childrenrm-rd/r/MensRights10/06/22 07:25 AM
1

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:46 PM
1

Social Issuesrm-rd/r/MensRights18/02/22 12:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Waiting for the childless redditors to explain that the child is under 35 so some part of their brain (which the redditor definitely knows next to nothing about) is still developing ... If you do have kids, you know that a 4 year old has a 50/50 chance of acting like a human being, and by about 6 they're almost always in control of themselves. Yes, a kid can get sad or angry, but there's a difference between having emotions and smashing stuff then blaming it on those emotions. I guess some bad p…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:54 PM
1

The "wage gap" is explained by couples with children who have shared finances. Married men work longer hours and commute more, married women spend more time cooking, and married women tend to spend their husbands' money. Is this really unfair to women? Cooking for yourself is a privilege, because food tastes better if you cook it yourself. Even Asmondgold (a famously lazy Youtube streamer) raves about how good his shitty steaks are. NEET-wives who whine about how hard cooking is (as opposed to g…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 04:58 AM
3

Yeah, I could speculate, but it would be interesting to see what different generations (on average) actually think it means.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:53 AM
3

I think you're getting at the cause. Most people are in favour of equality, but a lot of people think that the current mainstream feminist movement is not about equality.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:52 AM
21

A lot of straight people will always whinge about the opposite sex to some extent - every bad date, bad relationship, rejection, crazy ex, etc.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:46 PM
1

Older men see the upside of getting their NEET-wives to contribute to the family finances.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:36 PM
2

I sense a euphemism treadmill. People used to excuse women's behaviour as "hysteria", but it got a bad name because if women are prone to being crazy then they need to be treated like they're crazy when they're acting crazy. Post partum depression / psychosis will have the same fate. Either women are prone to being crazy, or they're not.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:54 PM
1

A grown adult is allowed to have their own account. If an unemployed roommate offers to let you eat some of the food they make and do some vacuuming instead of paying rent, you don't have to say "yes", and you certainly don't need to share your bank account with them, even if they had a child a few years ago.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 09:09 PM
5

People disciple big dogs (even good ones like Labradors) more strictly than small dogs (even monsters like dachshunds), because it's a lot more noticeable, and an out of control large dog is a big problem. Boys are just bigger and more exuberant than girls, on average. This could be a reason to keep them in line a little more zealously, but not to discriminate in other areas.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 09:26 PM
1

They only tested men. Further research should be done.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 09:06 AM
1

Found in this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hUvyLgZOFM&t=658s (note, there's only about 20 seconds on DEI and ESG, the rest is just about tech jobs in general).
/r/MensRights11/10/24 02:40 AM
8

Women take something like 40% more sick days than men, and while it's partly explained by things like "new baby" it's mostly not. Typically women say they're sick if they're not feeling 100%, and men say they're sick if they're actually seriously sick. I think this is the main source of the "man flu" - every time women hear a man saying he's sick, he's making a big deal of how bad his symptoms are, but that's because because if he didn't have bad symptoms he wouldn't say he's sick.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 09:47 PM
1

Academic subjects can be objectively or subjectively graded (or somewhere in between). STEM tends to more likely to objectively graded because there's right answers and wrong answers. Yes, there's scope for bias (even on an objectively graded test, there can be part marks for working, or partly right answers, or a very messy number that could be 1 or 7) but there's a limit to the bias. Poetry is more subjectively graded. Jews used to be very heavily discriminated against, and often did STEM (esp…
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:08 PM
5

Think of an ethnic group where the parents are relatively supportive of education, and teachers are comfortable discriminating against the group. What subjects do they tend to flock to, to avoid discrimination? Are those also the subjects where people complain boys are going into?
/r/MensRights26/09/24 09:49 PM
6

Also, if you ignore all the women who are taking a cut of a man's salary (e.g. shared finances in marriage) there isn't a wage gap. If you want to end the wage gap, encourage financial independence for women - no more shared bank accounts, alimony, child support, etc - you'll quickly see women pick up a lot more hours. Obviously it would need to be phased in so people can adjust, but people respond to incentives and having free money makes people have less of an incentive to work.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 09:28 PM
6

TERFS are usually the feminists who hate men so much they can't stand anyone with a Y chromosome, even if it means that they'll then be chucked out of most feminists groups.
/r/MensRights08/09/24 12:36 AM
3

While you can argue that subs have the right to censor (the argument is "freedom of association" - cultists like to create their own hate-filled bubbles) if a sub is heavy handed on banning people it should be excluded from the front page.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 10:04 AM
1

They're probably hinting to their boyfriend that he's getting fat from sitting around playing video games So instead of learning to communicate like a normal person, they make autistic screeching noises and help they are a useful hint?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 11:09 PM
-5

DV against women is a more serious problem, but only because men are way more capable of doing damage. However, in Australia, people have decided to listen to feminists on how to solve the root cause of DV, which is dumb because almost everyone knows they're nuts. You can't say that to reduce violence against women, we need to look at alcohol abuse, poverty, and of course violence against men (all of which are extremely obvious causes of bad behaviour in men - anyone knows that if a dog is bitin…
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:42 PM
26

A stoner at uni doing uni work, partying, and keeping afloat with a part-time job would be considered a total loser if they couldn't manage basic cooking and cleaning. But somehow it's the world's hardest job when a mother does it? And look, I get it, a toddler can be a pain. But the narrative isn't "toddler's are hard work", of course they are. But if cooking is the hard part, you're either a bigger loser than a massive manchild college student, or you're whining about having a hobby (cooking e…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 02:37 PM
1

You're ultra polite, and you find that you're more polite than most of the guys you date? Maybe it's because you're ultra polite. Every straight person who has any relationship drama will notice that it's always someone of the opposite gender at fault (unless they blame themselves, which few people do).
/r/MensRights01/06/24 07:49 AM
29

Yeah, spending a lot of time doing stuff inefficiently isn't hard work, it's just a performance or a dumb hobby. So is cooking for more than 30 minutes. If you go to a restaurant and the cook takes 30 minutes, you wouldn't think they're working hard, even if there's 4 different meals ordered at your table, and several other tables.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:18 AM
46

A side note, I don't know why reddit hates this woman. Yeah, she sounds pretty miserable, but she just had a hardcore solo Alaskan expedition turn into a horrible struggle for survival. You don't mess with bears, and anyone who compares a bear unfavourably to a person is probably part of a hate group.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:04 AM
4

40% of female DOCTORS leave the workforce within 6 years of earning their medical license. it doesn't take a lot of fancy math or social statistics to figure out why that is a VERY bad thing when the majority of medical school students are female. Not correct. https://www.aamc.org/news/why-women-leave-medicine According to the research, within six years of completing training, 22.6% of women physicians were not working full-time compared to 3.6% of male physicians. The gap between men and women …
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:55 PM
3

Or to encourage support of the troops. It shows a lot about where people's priorities are - there's a lot less support to keep Ukrainian men alive. Meanwhile Russia is running "Be a real man" for its ads (with male soldiers in lots of taticool gear). https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russia-real-men-military-ad-war-ukraine-recruitment-rcna80792 Military propaganda is never entirely clean.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 10:29 PM
10

Note, Australia is not America. If the prosecutor charges you with murder AND manslaughter, the jury can dismiss some charges and find you guilty of others.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:05 PM
3

This is called the "withdrawal method" and about 1 in 5 couples who use it get pregnant in a year - https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/withdrawal-method/about/pac-20395283 Women can also keep track of their cycles and not have sex when they're ovulating. This is called the "rhythm method" and 24 in 100 couples who use it get pregnant - https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/rhythm-method/about/pac-20390918 So as I said before, men can pull out, and women can watch their cycles, and…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 08:25 PM
0

"Bad girls" also have their fans. Just go through the average guy's internet history (nudge nudge, wink wink) Partly it's because "bad" also means "fun" (we're not talking about accountants who minimise their taxes to an anti-social degree, we're talking about fun rule breakers). Partly it's because there are actual rules against being attractive. Women shouldn't dress like strippers, but bad girls might. Straight men are also not meant to dress too attractively, but bad guys might. (So might ga…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:51 AM
6

Since you're clearly not well educated on sex (assuming you're not being downright disingenuous) let's look at Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejaculation At start of orgasm, pulses of semen begin to flow from the urethra, reach a peak of discharge and then diminish in flow. The typical orgasm consists of 10 to 15 contractions, although the man may not be consciously aware of so many. After the first contraction, ejaculation continues to completion involuntarily. During this stage ejacu…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 07:27 AM
28

So men also have a preference but not a say?
/r/MensRights01/04/24 09:01 PM
3

On the hindsight I have quite a few female friends too who says all they know are mans who just want to f*ck and mostly rotten. Women don't do a lot of work in starting relationships. They end up with guys who do a lot of work in starting relationships. Some of those guys will be horndogs. It's like if a man said "I put zero work into meeting women, and the only women who sleep with me are prostitutes, why are women all like that?".
/r/MensRights24/03/24 12:02 AM
3

If someone says cooking and cleaning is hard ... A dysfunctional meth-addict who can only cook for a single table in an hour would be sacked from any restaurant. Cooking is hard, but it's not super hard unless you're useless. Yes, you can spend hours cooking a meal for fun, there's drunk rednecks who can spend a whole day cooking a few pieces of meat on a fire, but that's a hobby not a job. Cleaning is pretty similar. Professional cleaners don't take a whole day to do a bit of light cleaning in …
/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:14 PM
0

An incel is a man who can't get laid. Involuntarily celibate. Women don't want to have sex with this man. Most self-described incels are total idiots who think that women wouldn't have sex with them if they asked. You agree with them. They're total idiots 99% of the time who simply lack "game". They'd rather whine about how they can't get laid than approach a bunch of women (maybe dozens, maybe hundreds, it's a numbers game and some aren't the smoothest operators or the best looking, but practic…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 10:15 AM
11

Incels don't have sex, because women don't want them. Who are incels? You seem to be conflating "people I imagine I wouldn't have sex with because I saw a comment on reddit that I disagree with" and "people who women don't have sex it". Basically if someone calls you an incel it's not because you're a dorky virgin, but because you have vile opinions, you're repulsive, you lack respect and women avoid you due to all that. That's an incel. You're an incel. Does that mean you're repulsive, you lack…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 10:06 AM
49

Feminists implying they only respect guys who get their dick wet is actual rape culture. That's the implication, right? You don't need to listen to a guy, because he probably doesn't have a wet dick. If only real men get laid, then men who don't get laid need to get laid. But thirsty guys trying to get laid at all costs (even maybe doing risky shit like having drunk sex with drunk women) is what most feminists talk about when they say "rape culture".
/r/MensRights29/02/24 08:57 PM
23

The taxpayer funded abc news site can't find the "Domestic Violence" tag again, when it's a female offender. Strange.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 03:00 PM
2

IIRC it's true to an extent. I forget the exact numbers, but male speaker is judged within about 1 minute. A female speaker is judged within about 15 seconds by women, or 2 minutes by men. Women do not really respect other women, while men give them the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:26 AM
24

Maybe the average woman has the "pick-up" skills of the average reddit moderator? If so then they really could benefit from a little help with the basics.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 03:15 PM
0

"Therapy works for women because it's designed for them. Therapy doesn't work for men because it's not." That's dumb feminist / social justice talk. "Designed for" is a weak argument, because it's all based on statistical / experimental evidence of what works. Psychology professors couldn't design a paper bag, let alone design therapy that actually works, it's all luck in whether or not the statistics show that an intervention is effective. The same is true of most social systems. Intentions don…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:40 AM
10

Or compare cars, or office desks. If it's not a nest, women are not noticeably better at cleaning then men.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:59 PM
4

Apparently the first time she'd had a large amount of marijuana, and apparently it's not always safe? https://www.yahoo.com/news/woman-fatally-stabbed-man-108-040540550.html The state-appointed forensic psychologist, Kris Mohandie, wrote in a 37-page report that Spejcher appeared “possessed” in police body-worn camera footage from the night she killed O’Melia. The state’s expert also wrote that stabbing “her own beloved dog, without any evidence of animal cruelty tendencies, is highly inconsiste…
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:55 AM
-2

Women have a lower pain tolerance (on average) and are more likely to go to the doctor for a non-issue. I am not a doctor, but it works something like this: If a woman presents in ER saying they have a mild pain in their tummy, they're probably just wasting a doctor's valuable time. Sure, there can be some screening, but it's probably just hypochondria. If a man presents in ER and says they have a mild tummy pain, the doctor is going to think maybe it's actually severe pain, and that the guy onl…
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:55 AM
50

Science has generally been fairly progressive. There's a handful of examples of women who were famously treated genuinely unfairly (Chien-Shiung Wu is a legitimate example but it wasn't just about her gender). It's more about the education system. The reason behind our education system is not (despite what dumb Ted talks and Youtubers say) "to make people ready to work in factories". People adopted the Prussian system (which is actually progressive in a lot of ways) because the Prussians were wi…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:47 AM
15

Feminism also (in some ways) hurts women. Women have genuine issues, but feminists will harass and defame actual sane experts trying to help with those issue because the real issues aren't focusing on "the real problem" (patriarchy). A good article on domestic violence (one of the major causes is alcohol abuse, but any attempt to get suspect wife beaters to stop hitting the sauce so hard is nixed because that's not a feminist solution) - https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australian…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:41 PM
5

As long as a bystander is happy to watch the man throw an adrenaline fueled punch back (probably without any real idea of whether or not it will do any real damage - most people don't have much experience) then that's their choice. You don't just intervene to stop a fight, you intervene to stop it escalating.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:26 PM
1

Yes, it seems likely that men are (on average) more naturally violent (or at least capable of violence). I suppose you could argue that it's partly just size, Labradors are more dangerous dogs than corgis even though corgis are often vicious little shits, since Labs simply have the size to do some damage. But the best reply to this in an online argument would be that since the vast majority of violent crime is targeting other men, it's clearly not due to misogyny (at least in a significant way) …
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:19 PM
8

IIRC the research shows that men are more empathic to circumstance, while women are more empathic to displays of feeling. In other words, men tend care about solutions (and prioritise based on the situation) while women tend to care about feelings.
/r/MensRights25/11/23 06:45 AM
6

Male feminists will point out that they could beat the woman in a fight, if forced to.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 06:23 AM
6

I suspect a certain segment of academia hates him because his Jungian approach is a direct competitor to their approach. I'm not fan of Jungian approaches. You just point to random analogies, and say "look this is following an underlying pattern, and patterns repeat, so the same applies to other stuff because there's some quasi-mystical force making the pattern repeat especially if the pattern occurs in a great or popular work of art". (Maybe I'm being unfair?) It's actually a very similar to th…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:33 PM
3

I'd say the best and fairest overview is The Identity Trap by Yascha Mounk. Overview - https://theconversation.com/how-a-new-identity-focused-ideology-has-trapped-the-left-and-undermined-social-justice-217085 There's 7 interrelated theories / stances (not all of which are upheld at all times by what Mounk calls the "Identity Synthesis" crowd), and there are reasons both good and bad why they are popular: Scepticism about objective truth: a postmodern wariness about “grand narratives” that extend…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 09:50 AM
1

Billie Eilish Pirate Baird O'Connell (that's her real name) is 21, and was homeschooled by her actor parents. She's a good singer (I don't like her style but she's certainly talented) and was successful at a young age (with her big brother writing her songs and producing for her); but I don't think she really has the life experience to know what she's talking about.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:46 PM
9

Modern feminism claims that it's about fighting the patriarchy, including (presumably) any bit of the patriarchy that negatively effects men more than women. However, it's also obsessed with supposed power imbalances, and so they won't want to do anything that's aimed at helping men because that will contribute (in their minds) to the power imbalance. When feminists have the choice of fighting against gender roles, and fighting against men, they often pick the later.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 07:56 AM
16

Let's assume it is often the same people. What's your take. Is it OK to make "incel" and insult (from a feminist perspective), or are you just here to troll?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 01:26 AM
11

Did they include money transfers from men to women? If not, are they say that if a women gets money from men (married, alimony, child support) isn't really earned?
/r/MensRights17/11/23 08:22 PM
1

You can listen for free on Spotify Premium, if you have it. I've only got through the first section so far, but it includes a tour of the original philosophies behind the movement, the background of the original exponents of those philosophies, and occasionally how those academics are now a little annoyed by how their work has been taken the wrong way.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 08:44 PM
3

Suppressed emotions always find ways to manifest themselves, and can end up perpetuating cycles of violence. People who say this are always thin-skinned hypocrites who can dish it out but can't take it.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:25 PM
2

A man can (almost certainly) defend themselves against a woman. Opponents of men's rights are quite keen to point that out. They're less keen on saying what this looks like, though, because if you don't want to give men a chance to get out of a fight, you need to accept a certain number of women getting injured (sometimes severely). There's always a few armchair martial artists who can explain that they can use their jujitsu qi-powers to safely immobilise an opponent, but those techniques are on…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:49 PM
5

It's a joke, it doesn't mean "the man wants a wife", it's "every single woman and their families wants him to marry".
/r/MensRights28/10/23 09:13 PM
14

"Abandons" - isn't that how you describe a dog or cat that is left without an owner? Or a small child? It's bizarre that feminists aren't incensed at the expectation that the patriarch is responsible for their adult women-folk, unless they're raging hypocrites.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:47 AM
16

If a man is stick with a woman hitting him, he'll eventually hit back. So even if you think men shouldn't be protected, and women should, surely you can see why it's important that men can get out?
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:22 AM
12

What I am against is a man punching a woman with a closed fist in retaliation to being punched. So you think men should be told to slap women if they're defending themselves?
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:21 AM
23

So can you explain why domestic violence shelters are necessary for women? Why don't they just leave? I guess you think they're useless idiots if they've got nowhere to go? Now, where do you suggest men go if they're in a violent relationship?
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:41 AM
19

A large fraction of women who end up in hospital in domestic violence threw the first punches, and eventually the guy "cracked" and hit back. Now maybe you're a gentleman who would never strike someone in anger. Maybe someone (man or woman) could slap you silly and you'd just take it like the gentleman you are. But not everyone is as infinitely patient as you, and perhaps we need to protect violent women from the consequences of their actions. If a man and woman are in a violent relationship (wh…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:38 AM
5

Psychologists act like they do stuff that's "evidence based". But the evidence is often that it works for a mentally ill patient who is seeking therapy. Other medical practitioners don't take a treatment that works on a small number of sick people (with good evidence for that context) and start "treating" the entire population with it. OK there's a small handful of things like vaccines and fluoride, but in general most of what medical practitioners do will make you sick if you don't need it.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 01:51 PM
1

It's basically saying "lies are OK, if they're for a good cause". Or "some lies are terrible, others are not a big deal". Maybe that can be the case, but there's plenty of reasons why even a well-intentioned lie or seemingly benign lie can cause problems. What if misogyny is not the cause of "murders, rapes", etc? If society is serious about reducing violence against women, then knowing the actual causes might help. In some ways, traditional gender norms might even be designed to protect women i…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 12:57 AM
3

Feminism is reductionist. It can't deal with men having some things worse, and women having some things better. The theory is a simplistic "privileged oppressor group / oppressed victim group" dynamic that works well for slave societies but not well for all the complexity of men and women naturally being a bit different, and society doing a sometimes poor job of making everything work for everyone.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:04 AM
1

Pick "A, B, C, D".
/r/MensRights17/09/23 10:05 AM
1

I could explain why essays are actually good if I wanted (I won't because I dislike them too), my point is that your opinion and my opinion on their place in education is probably just a result of bias. If you want fancy words, there's content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity (all of which kind are about if the thing tests what it's meant to test). But education usually only reaches "face validity" ("IMO it's good for reasons"). And we aren't even hitting consequential validi…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:58 AM
1

Sure, and a truly open question doesn't test anything in particular, other than the ability to waffle and find citations that kind of back a point up.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:38 AM
1

If the teacher knows the right answer, it's trivial. If the teacher doesn't know the right answer, how can they mark it?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 09:23 AM
7

Read older research, and there's always been stuff that was better for girls, in some ways. Girls have always been graded higher for the same work, for example, or praised for effort rather than called dullards if they couldn't solve a problem. However, there were advantages for men and boys. Universities were literally medieval church institutions where only an unmarried man could attend (and they'd try to direct them into the Doctor of Theology to become priests). OK, but what about school? Mu…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 08:42 AM
1

If you had an adult NEET child who cooked and cleaned for you then you'd probably feel like you'd fail to raise them properly even if they did a good job.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:45 PM
3

A very diverse agency, look at their team: https://www.wgea.gov.au/about/our-team All women, except a white guy with a beard (the Information Systems Executive Manager) and an Asian guy (the Data and Analytics Executive Manager). I hope they don't pay the tech managers more :/
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:50 AM
3

A Pew Research poll found that 7% of black women said feminism had helped them personally a lot. But 7% of black women said it harmed them a lot. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/07/07/a-century-after-women-gained-the-right-to-vote-majority-of-americans-see-work-to-do-on-gender-equality/psdt_06-20_19th_amendment-20/ Interestingly Hispanic women actually often think feminism does some good, I think maybe it's something to do with it actually being a bit of a macho culture (obviously…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:48 AM
4

If it's on reddit, tell them that using "incel" as an insult is saying men need to sleep with lots of women to be "real men", so they're reinforcing toxic masculinity and rape culture. And if they meant "misogynist" instead, they should learn to spell it - you don't use ethnic slurs in place of "someone of low socioeconomic status" unless you're a racist, and you don't promote rape culture if you're not a terrible person (even if you think it's funny).
/r/MensRights12/09/23 10:29 AM
3

Fun fact - most people think feminism helps women. But most women don't think feminism has actually helped them personally though. Those who do are the groups that have a very positive view of feminism (so maybe they don't have any real reason to think it actually helped them, they just think it's a good thing), or are Hispanic (maybe it does actually help Hispanic women?). https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/07/07/a-century-after-women-gained-the-right-to-vote-majority-of-americans-s…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:45 PM
1

Are you ignorant or disingenuous? Something like 80% of divorces are initiated by women, mostly with “financial stress" being a large risk factor. So it's not a stretch to claim that a guy losing income is likely to end up getting divorced (whether or not the woman has a decent job).
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:21 PM
1

maybe it’s not a smart idea to marry someone who will make so much less money than you So you're saying women shouldn't marry lower men, and men shouldn't marry loser women? Would you say that out loud in public (not just the first half)?
/r/MensRights04/08/23 11:19 AM
1

Married men have big bills to pay and will work longer hours to do so, or there's a good chance they won't stay married.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:10 PM
13

Most of the really misogynistic guys I know do fine getting laid. Getting a date is mostly about playing the numbers game, and taking risks with women. If treat women as NPCs in a game and just keep rolling the dice, picking slightly sleazy dialogue lines, you'll probably do OK, as long as you have some attractive features (looks, humour, confidence). Misogynists don't have a problem with that.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 08:45 AM
1

Completely irrellevant. How many women do you know who sleep with men, and don't want children (yet)? I'm guessing quite a few. How many women do you know who want children, but don't want to sleep with men? Sure, there's lesbians, but most of them have plenty of male friends, are happy to have a sperm donor if they want kids. The turkey baster has not replaced men, and the vast majority of women don't want it to, just a small number of femcels like to rant about how men are obsolete (until they…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:08 PM
18

There was a study. Probably worth checking if it was actually men leaving more often, or if sick women were more likely to leave (maybe they just had data on relationship data and serious illness and if women get sick, they are more likely to have a short fuse, and in general women are more likely to initiate a break-up).
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:42 PM
2

Ever since a very toxic and abusive relationship of hers ended about eight years ago, she has hated men ... She hasn’t had a boyfriend since the bad one I think you were right about her needing therapy. Not a shrink, but someone needs to draw a Venn diagram for her of "stuff you can control" and "stuff that will make your life better", and suggest she do stuff in the overlapping bits.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:51 AM
2

Russia conscripted basically every man in occupied territory they could grab and sent them to die on the front with substandard equipment and training. https://www.reuters.com/world/conscripts-sent-fight-by-pro-russia-donbas-get-little-training-old-rifles-poor-2022-04-04/ Even pro-Russian Donbas leaders were complaining that "50 year old music teachers" (IIRC) were being sent to the front, and that they were given very poor equipment.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 10:37 AM
1

It's not an issue I really care about, but it's a clear example of double standards. The media will go to town over a woman getting told off for breaking the dress code. Is it sexist to blow up at Obama for wearing a tan suit, when women wearing a slight color variation would be a complete non-story? It's not like he was wearing a tank top (which is the bar for a female politician getting flack).
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:45 PM
2

That may be the case, but it's SOCIETY'S fault, women are never actually at fault patriarchy just made them fragile /s Obviously not all women, in fact a little light teasing is good as it helps dodge bullets, but yeah it can be the case.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 10:43 PM
2

It's heavily influenced by the type of academics and writers who think that ideas are more important than actions (since they're all talk but never do anything) so there's a tendency to think that disagreeing with feminists is the worst thing a person can do.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 11:03 PM
4

Or you could suggest that it's because men are too secure in their masculinity to make it worth conning them by making the pink version cheaper. Too many men would just tough it out and buy the pink version, because they're not that insecure.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 03:37 PM
3

It's social movements in general. Also political movements and influencers. Religious leaders and atheist groups. If you want to put yourself in the limelight and tell other people how to live their lives, there's a chance you're a bit up yourself.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:42 PM
8

On average, men commit a lot more violent crimes than women. In a way, it's surprising how little domestic violence there is, compared to the amount of violence targeting men, since proximity and financial disputes are a major indicator of who is going to be targeted in a violent crime. Men are already socialised not to hit women (for the obvious reason that they're almost always bigger and stronger) and it's already very successful.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 06:31 AM
34

Black people aren't physically stronger, there's a lot of regional variation in body type (IIRC some region in Kenya has the best marathon runners, and there's some places in Europe where people have hips are good for some power lifting). There's a ton of variation in any continent, and different body shapes do better at different sports. As you say, there's swings and roundabouts. Saying any group is overall disadvantaged is highly contextual. Generational disadvantage doesn't make a lot of sen…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 07:42 AM
12

Jackman could have been natty in x-men 2. He wasn't unnaturally big, just really shredded, and he was peaking for a couple of days of shirtless shots (and with professional lighting and make-up that could make a reddit mod look shredded). He probably had a coach and dietician and was highly motivated. And it was just a couple of days (dehydrate and have a lot of salt, then pump the muscles up on the shoot and just hope your heart doesn't give).
/r/MensRights13/05/23 10:26 AM
9

Stability. (As in the opposite of neuroticism - stoicism can be defined as the reduction of all emotion, while stability is the reduction of negative emotions).
/r/MensRights30/04/23 12:38 AM
1

No, the study found that a marriage is more likely to end if the wife is sick, not that the man would leave the wife. One mechanism could be that women don't like to give up control over housework. For example, it's quite a privilege to cook stuff you want to eat every day, even if it means you need to make a few extra serves. Maybe women would rather end a marriage than give up that privilege (if they no longer have the time to make extra serves?).
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:52 PM
1

WitchesVsPatriarchy is an insight-free group therapy session. They're mostly harmless, compared to 4chan occult alt-right groups, but about as sane.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 08:13 AM
5

Whingy children and women tend to get sympathy. Whingy adult men just get treated with disgust.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 07:48 AM
3

Stupid people assume that the world is a stupid "red team vs blue team" fight. "Smart" people like themselves will agree with them on any issue. "Stupid" people disagree on every issue. They think they're scoring points by pointing out how both themselves, and people they completely disagree with are hypocrites. I suspect that most of the time, when someone attacks their opponents supposed hypocrisy in a hypocritical way, they're the kind of stupid that doesn't understand that not everyone eithe…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 12:08 AM
24

Bias is not such a big problem in STEM, as objectively correct answers exist. Maybe that's why boys tend to end up there?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 09:49 AM
0

I’ve been reading stories I think it's a TicTok trend, like eating Tide Pods - it's a meme that isn't actually all that common. I bet some of them are also staged.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 02:05 PM
38

Say that on most of reddit, and someone will start talking about the difficult of "inventory management" and "logistics" and "nutritional requirements" as if it's hard to not just eat pop-tarts.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:00 AM
1

Aren't female rulers typically more warlike?
/r/MensRights17/01/23 05:54 AM
1

In Australia? Stomp and scream that it's unacceptable, then tell them to do an anger management course and 100 hours community service. No-one died, so the judge thinks they will be the one to turn this poor victim of society around.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 09:29 PM
1

Call them "reductionist". Sure, men have some (though now a lot fewer) privileges. None are legal. Some industries are more male friendly. Teachers discriminate against men in bullshit subjects (where it's easy to discriminate) so it forces men into real subjects like STEM. I guess we don't need to have periods? Men don't try to date men (unless they're gay), which is both good and bad. Women also have privileges. Saying that one group is more privileged, overall, is just reductionist.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 07:39 AM
1

For the same reason people tolerate small dogs like corgis being assholes, but expect large dogs like labradors (who statistically cause an awful lot damage, due to their size) to behave well.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 10:35 PM
10

Men shouldn't hit women unless it's a dire situation. However, some men are always going to be idiots, especially if they're under stress (e.g. having a big argument then getting hit). Not everyone will take a hit and not hit back. Walk up to 100 men in the street and slap them, and you'll get a few black eyes (even if they weren't in a bad mood to start with - and fights usually don't happen when people are in a good mood). So there needs to be 5 things: Men need to be taught not to hit women. …
/r/MensRights04/01/23 04:41 AM
4

Mainstream feminism is mostly driven by academia. Academics (especially ones with nothing better to do) like to imagine that the words people say are really super important, because if ideas aren't that important then they'd just be swindlers (or worse, the only reason some courses at university are useful is because they encourage teenagers to figure out how to lay out a coherent argument like they should have learnt in middle school). So feminism tends to have this magical thinking that saying…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 01:02 PM
63

It certainly has issues. It's not just hypocritical because it's "body shaming". It's hypocritical because it's reinforcing whatever "toxic masculinity" is. Associating a man's worth with his ability to destroy vaginas is not very feminist. On the other hand, Tate is under arrest for being a pimp, there's what look like credible allegations of sexual assault, and he's long been considered by a lot of people on this sub to be a con artist. I'd also say that Greta isn't primarily a feminist, so I …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 05:37 AM
6

We aren't like fascists, so we get annoyed when people are arrested for just announcing their opinions (in a way that's not inciting violence). People with dumb ideas shouldn't be arrested for them.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 08:26 PM
1

https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/56/23/1375.full.pdf Twenty-one randomised controlled trials (n=2551) with 25 comparisons were included in the network. There were no differences in treatment effectiveness among the three main interventions (exercise vs antidepressants: standardised mean differences, SMD, −0.12; 95%CI −0.33 to 0.10, combination versus exercise: SMD, 0.00; 95%CI −0.33 to 0.33, combination vs antidepressants: SMD, −0.12; 95%CI −0.40 to 0.16), although all treatments were more …
/r/MensRights07/12/22 12:00 PM
1

News story happens in a country where most people in the Anglosphere don't speak the language. Reporters and redditors make shit up to fit their own agenda based on a vague translation of a headline.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:17 AM
1

The media coverage destroyed the chance of a fair trial so it ended up a mistrial. Journos didn't care about justice, but these trial combine both outrage and sex (so it sells) and they can pretend it's in the public interest.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:59 AM
1

But I thought biology doesn't change behaviour?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 07:56 AM
7

The feminist party line used to be "male victims of violence are usually victims of male perpetrators", which is true, but only if you include non-domestic violence. (And if that's what you're looking at, men are by far the most common victims). It was highly disingenuous (and homophobic), but not an outright lie. Now it's just a lie.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 08:36 AM
7

Have a look on any "relationship advice" subreddit. People act like dumping a woman is like abandoning a child. Or a dog. Unless a woman does something that's worth calling the cops over, even reddit (which is famously pro-men relative to most of society) will make excuses and say to give it another chance. If a woman is a little unhappy and the man doesn't fix it, they'll say to dump him. And this is reddit.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 09:14 PM
2

It's "structurally" sexist and misogynistic. Which translated into plain English means "I think your opinion is not good for women". Similarly, if you think Affirmative Action is bad for minorities, then AA is "structurally racist". If you think AA is good for minorities, then opposing AA is racist. Basically anyone who disagrees with you is sexist and racist which sounds like a mental illness or conspiracy theorist thinking to me but that's how a certain segment of academia works.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 09:12 AM
8

Even reddit acts like a man breaking up with a woman is akin to abandoning a dog (or child) - something you only do in the most extreme circumstances. Could that be a factor?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:42 PM
-2

Accept that there's swings and roundabouts. There's issues men face, and issues women face, and issues both face. Are men afraid to be pegged? Maybe some, I guess it's some kind of homophobic thing. Men better not like anything remotely gay, then there's a risk that a bunch wouldn't bother putting up with women, right?
/r/MensRights12/11/22 07:50 AM
1

If we didn't live in a patriarchy, they'd make pills women could take to avoid getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:49 PM
1

The internet has a lot of crazies. Mens Rights tends to split between the heterodox left (leftists who are annoyed with feminism's extreme dominance), libertarians, and hardcore conservatives.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:15 AM
1

It's because Russia knows there will be negative public opinion if they send back too many conscript women in body bags.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:08 AM
1

The vast majority of Russian support the war when it's a "special military operation", they do not support full mobilisation. Polls show a lot of support for Putin and the war, but IIRC 30% support for a draft. It's a country of chickenhawks who want to see their country kicking ass, but don't want to actually enlist themselves.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:34 AM
1

IIRC people with a range of mental illnesses find it stressful to act "normal". If you look at the people who claim that they are doing "emotional labour" to act like a normal person in a relationship, is there a chance a lot of them have some kind of mental illness?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:59 PM
2

Just ask them if Brock Turner was responsible for his actions since he was practically a child. Or Kyle Rittenhouse.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 03:33 AM
3

If you expect someone to deliver your food for $2, you can't expect them to mess around looking for your apartment if it's hard to find.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 06:35 AM
2

Women would shoot other women a lot more readily than men. A better argument is that there's way more public outcry when only men are getting shot. In some cases (the war on terror) I'd say it's a good thing ... why the fuck were we in Iraq to catch a Saudi who was hiding in Pakistan? But if the military should exist, it might have to go into harms way, and it shouldn't be hampered too much by the fear that a female solider might be harmed.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 09:09 AM
48

Very few men get married having lived at home their whole life these days. No man who has lived alone will think "gee, it's such a burden to occasionally pick up some shit, wash some dishes, run around with a vaccuum for 10 minutes, hit the shops twice a week if I'm too lazy to plan properly, and cook dinner at night". Lazy stoners get kicked out of share houses when they offer to do this instead of paying rent.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 09:05 AM
17

It's just worth remembering that the people who oppose men's rights are either dumber or more disingenuous than climate change deniers.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:42 PM
1

The counter-argument is that misandry is not structural - not "power + oppression". Even if misandry exists, it's not part of a self-reinforcing "structure", so it's not so important. Maybe structure it in 3 arguments: It's reductionist to only consider the misandry / misandry structure. Class based structures exist, and in part rely on misandry (negative stereotypes about men, used to oppress the unruly lower class men). Race based structures exist, and in part rely on misandry (negative stereo…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:20 AM
22

Yes but the husband clearly accused her Or the cops inferred the motive and pressed charges.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 09:19 PM
2

Yeah, more women can have sex, but women are less likely to have a good time in a hook-up, and there's more risks. It takes zero skill or effort to get a guy off. It takes a fair bit of skill / compatibility for a woman to have a good time. Women in bed are like pizza - there might be a difference, but even a sub-par pizza is still pizza if you're hungry. Men are more like sushi - if you pick them up at a gas station then you're playing a dangerous game for very little reward. When it comes to r…
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:16 AM
1

If they don't survey men, it's both excluding male victims, and hard to put the figures in context. Now I'm not saying men can't be victims. But if a survey includes "has your SO, past or present, ever physically pushed you" then maybe you'd expect a little less hysteria if it was a large number of men and women.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:38 AM
5

Anger is an emotion small children, heavily autistic people, and just really stupid with little empathy can easily identify.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 09:28 PM
8

If women are so much better in relationships, why do bi men and bi women both usually end up dating men?
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:36 AM
-5

Men have porn. Women have vibrators and "romance" books. Different strokes. It takes zero skill to get a guy off, so it's not like power tools are needed.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 08:33 AM
1

Letting your partner deal with the fallout of untreated mental illness is a choice.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:09 AM
40

Lower class women are usually worse off, because the system can't get blood from a stone. But that's not where the reforms usually end up being.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:16 AM
3

If women don't want sex, just tell them that no sex means no fidelity. If they're bored with you, or just bored with sex in general, then it's an open marriage. And that you'll probably be needing to spend money on that (since you'll either be dating other women, or paying for sex, neither of which is free for guys). Sure, it's a nuclear option (since women can generally have sex more easily with random guys), but that's how it is. Or a less nuclear option would to say "if you don't want it ever…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:01 PM
6

So she didn't actually say anything? Maybe she was waiting for the machine. Or eyeballing what your workout is. Or is new and was wondering how the machine worked. Or she was going to use the prone hamstring machine opposite, and didn't want someone being forced to stare at her glutes (why do they put those machines there ...). Or she was checking you out. Probably just annoyed that her machine was taken though. I mean, it's a bit rude to glare at someone who is on "your" machine, but whatever.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 12:41 AM
1

The idea is not new, it's part of the assumptions behind Larry Summers' speech (he didn't reference it but it was old hat) - https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2005/2/18/full-transcript-president-summers-remarks-at/ Of course, it's only one chromosome pair, anyone who thinks that one single chromosome pair controls all of intelligence is either trolling (like the authors) or an idiot or both.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 10:41 AM
8

More women are hospitalised in domestic violence because men are larger and stronger. So failed domestic violence policies (designed with the assumption that it's all because of patriarchy) are primarily going to hurt women. Here's some things that the current domestic violence policymakers ignore (because of feminist ideology): Drug and alcohol effects. Apparently you can reduce domestic violence without worrying about substance abuse, because it's not a "root cause". Bilateral violence. All th…
/r/MensRights23/07/22 11:02 PM
5

Men have it better than women in some ways. Women have it better than men in some ways. It's stupid and reductionist to try to point to one gender that generally has it worse. It's partly nature, and partly due to society. Wanna bet if I'd get banned for saying this here or on a feminist sub?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:52 AM
5

Conspiracy groups always get overrun by extremists of some kind, and due to polarisation these days it's almost always either the far left or far right. Antiwork is a conspiracy sub. They think that they don't need to work, if only the nasty capitalists would stop hogging all the tendies and distribute them to lazy people.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 04:49 AM
2

Origin - https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/10/24/privilege/ In 1997 a message posted by Mike Jebbett to the Usenet discussion newsgroup bc.general contained a statement that partially matched the adage. In the following excerpt “women” were viewed as “living on the high side”, i.e., living in a privileged manner. Women like her are suffering from a condition I call “Advanced Pedestalism”. Which basically means that they [women] have been living on the high side for so long, equality looks like …
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:36 PM
12

I hope your Aikido sensei has warned you that a "peaceful" technique is only peaceful when used on the mat against an opponent who knows how to react. A "peaceful" restraint can cause serious injuries if you use the wrong one at the wrong time against a resisting opponent. Yes, a man can probably win a fight against a woman. But if a gentle push doesn't work, and a firm shove doesn't work, what's the next step in escalation? Remember, not everyone here is a trained bouncer or police officer, and…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:39 AM
2

Feminism is the belief in equal rights, and the belief that women are the main victims of inequality. The first is fine, the second is stupid, outdated, and reductionist.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 10:26 PM
3

Affirmative action makes very little sense when privilege isn't intergenerational. Gender issues is not like race, where intergenerational poverty is a big thing. Boys and girls have the same number of mothers and fathers to pass on any privilege. (I'd also argue that it's not always a great idea when it comes to race, because it results in guilty white people rolling out programs that they wouldn't think effective for other white people, often to the detriment of the intended beneficiaries).
/r/MensRights12/06/22 10:21 PM
1

Ask whether they mean "men" or "patriarchy". Then point out that if they genuinely want to do something about patriarchy, maybe 100 years after feminism started it might be worth looking at a few of the things that mostly hurt men.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:51 PM
-3

This lasted for a month and really broke me mentally. 5 years and i still can't get over it. If you're just a bit salty, no big deal, but if you're seriously wounded by a few words then it sounds like maybe you do have issues. (Yes, maybe it's a bit of a betrayal, but 5 years ... )
/r/MensRights10/06/22 05:11 PM
6

The escalation towards violence wasn’t understood OTOH is it greatly exaggerated? The staring-at-boobs guy in 99.99999% of times might just be a minor annoyance.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 04:33 PM
3

I think she's just a bit uncreative, and she's rehashing shit by dumb tradcon men. Dumb tradcon men are about half right, but they do not credit enough agency to women. She seems to just be reading bullet points that summarises the dumb tradcon man (redpill) philosphy.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 04:32 PM
-23

I think MRAs are sometimes a bit oversensitive on this kind of thing. There's probably like 3 guys in the UK who will walk up to women on the Underground and just stare at their breasts point blank for several minutes. And they'll upset a lot of people. Should there be a law against this? There's assholes and crazy people, and women's rights advocates (as well as feminists) want to put a stop to their shenanigans. The problem is, a lot of the laws (or proposed laws) are kind of broad if you take…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 04:10 PM
6

There's an easy way to beat a good lawyer in court - tell the truth, tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and don't be guilty.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 04:05 PM
1

The head of the Tasmanian Greens apologised for supporting Depp, which upset Clementine Ford for some reason. https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/hurt-and-confusion-tassie-greens-leader-cassy-oconnor-apologises-for-pro-johnny-depp-posts/news-story/5216a02b1015b2abb6a5f904a240f922
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:17 AM
2

Why? The later Pirates movies kind of lost it, with Depp and even Geoffrey Rush just mumbling lines while listening to earpieces. They don't want to do it except for the money, and the scripts are no longer any good. Pirates 1 (and maybe 2 and 3) were good because they were well written. Maybe not Noble Prize good, but they were very funny. The characters had really clear goals, and were trying to outsmart each other to achieve them. And has anyone played the old Curse of Monkey Island games? Th…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:38 PM
1

A lot of "crazy" people are crazy because they don't have a good enough reason to change. This can be as simple as trying not to be crazy, but in serious cases it will often involve professional help. As I understand it, an awful lot of modern therapy is tricks to get the patient to admit they're a fuckwit (or whatever fancy diagnoses they use, but let's pretend "fuckwit" is kind of a disorder), and that while being a fuckwit has both pros and cons the consequences are now getting to the point w…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 09:41 PM
2

Think of any man you really respect. Do you respect him for offering stuff to women? Of course not. I suspect it's more biologically seated - men are often driven to take responsibility for women by some natural trait (for obvious evolutionary reasons), but an advanced society doesn't really take it too seriously as something that needs to be enforced (and it takes very little to enforce).
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:44 PM
1

It's kind of like Covid. You can die with it, or of it, or be OK and the high prevalence makes it quite a high risk even if it's not the worst thing to get.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 05:44 PM
1

Correlated with good business. The question is causality.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:13 AM
-2

It ... depends. Quotas were shown to cause problems. Women on boards were shown to be a good sign, but only if it was not forced. It could be a common cause (good companies would promote based on talent, not just find jobs for golf buddies) or it could be that successful companies could afford to find good female candidates. A good company may also (I'm making this up) be likely to have plants in the reception (maybe because they take pride in their business, or maybe because they just have the …
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:51 AM
7

I've worked with a few shrinks. Most of them are fairly reasonable people. A lot of modern psychology is all about not having too much of a victim mentality and doing what you can to solve your own problems (but you wouldn't know this from the way a lot of laypeople talk about mental health).
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:04 AM
1

Note that privacy laws cover individuals, not "accounts". https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/36-2/bill/C-6/royal-assent/page-44#8 (3) For the purpose of clause 4.3 of Schedule 1, and despite the note that accompanies that clause, an organization may disclose personal information without the knowledge or consent of the individual only if the disclosure is (a) made to, in the Province of Quebec, an advocate or notary or, in any other province, a barrister or solicitor who is representing the or…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:54 PM
1

Copy and paste (no archive in Australia, it's censored): (My compliance was malicious for the ex husband) I'm working in the billing queue in a call centre for one of big three telcos, and a client calls in regarding a billing concern. This lady calls in, is puzzled by why she got charged a one time fee $49 for a wireless access point(it's gen 1 equipment for wireless set top box's for Optik TV). She's even more puzzled, why would she have that charge when she doesn't have TV services from us. A…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 10:53 PM
3

Insanity is doing this same thing twice and expecting different results. The last 10 year plan also had "gender equality" as the first principle - https://plan4womenssafety.dss.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/4AP-At-a-Glance.pdf It was a failure - https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/08_2019/2017-18-annual-progress-report-third-action-plan.pdf
/r/MensRights14/01/22 08:36 PM
1

You could point out that if a guy slept with a lot of women he didn't know, plenty of women would think less of him.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 09:06 PM
9

If you're depressed, and you respond by acting like a shithead, that's your fault. Also, people don't have souls. You are your brain chemistry. If your brain chemistry makes you a bad person, you're a bad person.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 08:27 PM
6

Last time I checked, depression does not always manifest by being an entitled asshole. But entitled assholes can be much more annoying when they're having a bad day.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 07:23 PM
10

If you pay for something in a social relationship, people are primed to see this as you paying for their time. Most women would consider their company as being worth WAY more than the cost of a meal or a few drinks. See Feynman's story for a guy who is crap with women, but still manages to do better just by not paying for a sandwich in the most awkward way imaginable. If you invite a woman on a date (especially a first date) to somewhere that one of you will have to foot the bill, you have faile…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:13 PM
1

Just post a link to campus mental health services "in case anyone is feeling overwhelmed".
/r/MensRights17/12/21 08:29 PM
1

There can always be subjectivity. Unless the maths is 100% correct, there's part marks, and part marks can be subjective.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 08:05 AM
3

seemed to be Seemed to be. Or maybe the author was being misleading, and it was simply that STEM was less biased. Did you check the numbers in the original study? For instance, there was more pro-boy grading behaviour by teachers in algebra rather than in history or ancient Greek. Note that this doesn't quite say if there's more pro-boy or pro-girl teachers in STEM. Is this a case of an author being misleading, and people repeating what they implied (but didn't say) thinking it's a fact?
/r/MensRights13/12/21 07:46 PM
19

Quote: Many teachers favoured boys, and many teachers favoured girls, with these behaviours varying by subjects. For instance, there was more pro-boy grading behaviour by teachers in algebra rather than in history or ancient Greek. Paper here: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26021/w26021.pdf Our sample includes 101 pro-boy teachers, 259 pro-girl teachers, and 58 neutral teachers. Hmmm. The result they really jump on is that female students are more prone to change courses to av…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 06:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter