TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

roankr Archive

View 1 posts and 406 comments by roankr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

roankr/r/askTRP07/08/16 08:17 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

When?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:31 PM
2

Oh I didn't know this raw files thing was there. Nice!
/r/MensRights22/06/26 09:36 AM
6

I would only argue if the biological father is complicit. As usual with most justice systems, if the biological father is proven to know then the courts would push to sentence the man harsher than the woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/26 05:10 AM
19

Criminalization is a correct concern to have. It's a question as to whether women must be jailed or have their income garnished. Personally I think paternity fraud should be sufficient grounds to annul the marriage with alimony and subsequent child support being reversed back to the father. It should not be on either men to provide, the frauded husband or the biological father.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/26 04:25 AM
28

LWMA does not support feminism in its current form. Any visible forms of feminism seen in agreement are rooted in the left-wing opinions of the group, not feminist opinions.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 08:33 PM
20

Misogyny is Misogyny even if women do it to women
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:22 PM
24

If my response is going alienate her from this even AFTER what she's noticing happening to her son then you have to really ask what the point of her coming here is about.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:04 AM
149

You should ask yourself why it takes until your son is hurt for you to notice this. A lot of media even before the modern era had ample messaging about acknowledging the needs and sensibilities of a woman yet it takes your own flesh and blood for you to see how others treat the male gender. Of course if you're not here for introspect and only here for an accolades then look around. If you're from the US maybe you'll come back here again expressing shock that the draft is still a thing or somethi…
/r/MensRights18/05/26 10:52 PM
4

It's the kindergarten cooties thing they never grew up from
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/26 10:44 PM
14

Trying to imply this was the far right's doing is an attempt at whitewashing any possible avenues of critique that can be put against the groups which backed the whole hubabba in the first place. The progressives who had supported this farce of a reporting by knee jerk reaction and lack of thinking should be held culpable regardless of whether this is or isn't some far right psyop. Doing this will be staying true to the fact that the progressives are an activist group who should be measured in t…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 10:39 AM
12

Gee it's almost like this patriarchy thing isn't a system that supports men!
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:56 PM
2

And I'm not even red pilled still saying that, Did you recently change your stance? Your flair still says redpilled man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 10:07 AM
6

I'm particularly interested to know but you don't have to answer it: did the podcast ever broach into the seeming contradiction between his Jewish faith's requirement for circumcision and his work in outlawing circumcision?
/r/MensRights06/04/26 09:40 PM
9

Fauxmoi is a gossip sub. It does little to maintain decorum and the most to stir a hornet's nest. I'd say gossiping is pretty pathetic overall but I'd be wasting time giving them more attention that what they deserve, which is none.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 06:03 PM
2

You just skipped their second paragraph that hard huh?
/r/MensRights03/04/26 04:30 PM
13

What a lame ass position to take
/r/MensRights21/03/26 01:53 PM
46

It'll take time but until misandry is a word that gains usage to point out society's mistreatment of men articles like this won't hit where it needs to.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 04:48 PM
7

Technically yes but again, this difference in wording is intentional in academia when the word rape itself could have been used.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 10:47 PM
8

OP is not using made to mean force. It is on fact what academia is being pushed to use as a replacement for the word rape when it comes to male victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 10:18 PM
0

Can you reframe your rebuttal taking into mind that the car was being compared to semen and not a child? I'm not going to respond to something that isn't taking that nuance into account simply because you want to re-position the state of the argument when the issue is that parentage is assimed by default at conception of the fetus for the man but at birth of the child for the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 07:40 PM
2

Yeah sure buddy, keep thinking people are rational actors. You're giving me a bag of laughs from this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:21 PM
1

You are STILL arguing for rational and sensible actors. It is genuinely laughable at this point that you are doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 09:40 AM
1

That's negligible input in the whole process of pregnancy. It's a kickstarter sure, but that does not immediately argue for no choice to opt out of parentage when there is infact a way to opt out but it exists only under the authority of one person.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 09:39 AM
1

Making money is 100% a product derived from USE of your body.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 09:36 AM
1

This doesn't change the fact that it falls back on the state. The fact that it falls on the state is irrelevant. Everybody pays taxes to the state all the time for the institution to subsidize costly or deficit projects all the point. It's even the JOB of the state to spend money on children's welfare regardless of parents through numerous supporting schemes and drives. They all literally happen on your taxes already. What are you trying to attempt at when you squirm complaining that it "falls b…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:38 AM
2

You are still arguing for people to being intrinsic rational or sensible actors.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:22 AM
-2

If the woman has complete control over whether the pregnancy comes to term or is terminated then she is not being FORCED, she has CHOSEN. A man on the other hand has no control over the same choice as it is not his body. That automatically means his body is being forced to enact in something against his will. That by argument from definition is infringing on the man's bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:19 AM
3

How does this work when the child is abandoned in a fire station or dropped at an orphanage?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:18 AM
1

Why do people dig up perfectly normal land in random pursuits of striking rich? People are not rational actors, much less sensible ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:12 AM
-1

You can see from their pathetic attempts at rebuttals with me about a default assumption to no parentage that they don't want that burden. Women like her don't want to actually risk the moment with that question because it makes them vulnerable. They want to offload that burden onto men wholly while demanding to save their opportunity to demand support if they want it or abort if they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:11 AM
0

Pregnancy is a consequence of it too, yes, but the pregnancy can be stopped without taking away anyone's bodily autonomy. Except the man has no authority (justifiably) to stop the pregnancy. It is not under his authority or right to insist that a pregnancy be stopped because he does not want to care for a child. This is because the woman has the sole discretion of what happens within her body. BUT, what happens within her body is of HER choice. This fact does not then lead to the reasoning for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 12:08 AM
-1

Consent to sex means there's a risk of creating a person. The risk does not matter. If it is not consent to it and there is control in someone's hand that the pregnancy can be terminated then the risk has changed from something impossible to manage to something that can be dealt with. With that possibility the question of risk is moot. If you create a person, you pay for it Except the man did not create the person at all. This logic is so bizarre you are clearly not thinking rationally and are g…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:55 PM
-2

The bodily autonomy question just doesn't apply to them - men (generally) can't get pregnant. The bodily autonomy question does apply to them when you insist that the state has the authority to coerce or extract the labor value of a man against his wishes to fund the care of a child he explicitly has no interest in caring for, especially for one that had been born outside of any usual contract. Pregnancy is not the only aspect that can bring up the question of bodily autonomy and insist it is wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:51 PM
-1

Why aren't men taking owner ship of their own bodies and the consequences that come with it when it comes to creating babies and stepping up to raise them Taking ownership of the consequences is a total re-imagination of trying to force paternal duties on to someone who in a default state would have clear presumption to say has no interest to it. Remember. Pregnancy is a consequence of it to. Arguing about consequence to what comes with it while breathing about bodily autonomy is one hundred per…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:27 PM
-4

The fact I have given my sperm to someone is entirely irrelevant unless I am explicit in my intentions that I want her to take it so she gives birth to a child I want to share parental righrs to. I can give someone a car. That still does not make me culpable to a responsibility especially when I am explicit in saying I do not want to do anything with how the person uses that car be it transportation, murder, side gigs, or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:22 PM
1

We hold people financially obligated to something under explicit contract. The only exception to this has been taxes with the state. Having labor extracted from someone without their consent is otherwise entirely bizarre and within the topic of infringing someone's bodily autonomy. It is 100% not the same as letting another person live inside your body. But bodily autonomy is not wholly about someone being in your body, it is ALSO about chosing what you get to do with your body within the bounds…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:17 PM
-2

I mused on this for a few seconds and I realized this isn't what you're really arguing for. If you instead let the default be considered no paternity assumption then the woman who is about to have sex could have the demand put that if she is to have sex with a man then she agree to paternal obligations should she conceive. You're arguing for the opposite because you lethargically can not believe you can bring that point up in a way that goes to sex without actually risking the entire moment. Try…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:12 PM
-2

Assuming that men have a default assumption to forgoing paternity immediately is conscious awareness that the woman can have about chosing over abortion or not. Arguing that this is a question about responsibility is intentionally trying to move the question from bodily autonomy to presumption of duties. If this has to be the case we could begin talking about gender roles again, without question to how extreme of a response you think it is to even try bringing in the idea of responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:09 PM
-6

Right. This still doesn't answer how the ejaculation of that sperm comes to relate with how the state can coerce or enforce an extraction of labor produce from someone while trying to argue it isn't a question of bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:01 PM
-3

Extracting the produce of one's labor against their explicit desire from it is entirely within the topic of bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 10:59 PM
–

Yeah you bet it isn't Next you'll tell me you're not delusional lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 11:52 PM
0

The only thing pink about you is your enraged face lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 08:11 PM
2

Ambattuh khan!
/r/BlackPillScience26/02/26 12:42 AM
8

Pic 8 talking about being unphased because they can't see him shutting down. Pathetic pieces of garbage.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/02/26 01:39 AM
12

Can't ever forget that women here had such a bad idea of male anatomy that they had to create some new fetishized orifice in male bodies to "make sense" of the sex acts happening in fujoshi mlm content.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 11:14 AM
56

Society is being used as a catch-all term to mean "everyone but me".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 11:12 AM
2

"Secular/Christian western feminism" What exactly are they trying to say? Handmaid tales with heavier weight on their bellies?
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/26 01:17 AM
8

Pretty spot on. It's all just a game of yapping that tries to wear down by attrition. Just like "not a true feminist". To reach for every single hop of this supposed diversity is intentional as a part of obfuscation and attrition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 12:21 AM
2

That person had so much energy to yap here but now won't respond to this good question you've asked. Very telling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 11:55 AM
8

No one agrees with you. Yeah and a lot of fascists don't agree with non-fascists as well, it's pretty disgusting people hold to fascist facets when they feel comfortable to like a person's height.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 12:07 PM
24

The Left is rounding people up based on their height and shooting them. Irrelevant, still wrong
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 01:02 AM
27

It doesn't have to be the same for it to be still wrong In fact, taking examples of unchangable attributes as reason for dehumanization IS a facet of fascism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 12:56 AM
20

Not your masculinity to control
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 11:19 PM
10

It probably is because you hadn't socialized as a woman prior to transitioning which has you blind to that belief. By not being in the circle group that perpetuates that idea in the first place your mind was in ways shielded from the belief of it. But for other transmen who initially grew up within these groups, that perception exists strong until it comes to head against their now lived experience as that group in question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 06:55 PM
6

"I started manifesting the great ones" This is beyond delusion, it's just patheticness at this point
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/25 03:29 PM
6

The credit card and banking argument is both overdone and untrue. Women used to get credits and loan, while the number of it is documented lower because most credit for women was handled through individual stores instead of larger well documented banks. Not to mention the appropriation of the 1970s act which was to secure the protection of rights to blacks being used as a cudgel on women's struggles.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/12/25 10:48 AM
7

The liberals of yesterday turned into the neocons of today Perhaps the same is true of progressives, who are now neoprogs or something
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 06:11 PM
14

When women are cared for, everyone gets better. Reagan would be proud to see his trickle-down beliefs copied over to other fields as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 04:03 PM
15

Feminism is an ideology concerned with the rights and issues of women and women only. The problem isn't that this is true, the problem is that feminists say this but then say it's about supporting and fighting for men as well when threatened on their egalitarian credentials. It's an intentional misdirection done to shield from criticism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 04:01 PM
2

The trans man's circles, not LWMA.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 08:52 AM
6

True feminism also includes men and our wants and needs without being ridiculed and belittled for it. Any movement that speaks for the inclusive support of every other individual should not be allowed coopted by a movement that began with a specific goal. Whenever you profess this idea of a "true" or "real" feminism, the real goals of the feminist movement become undone. The goal of marxism isn't to provide "true equality", it's to undo the control capitalists have in economic production through…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 11:57 PM
3

Isn't androphobia and misandry the same? What makes the two different?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 11:51 PM
20

The miners and the LGBTQ community supposedly turned allies when protesting the UK government. But what happened to their comradery after the dust settled? The feminist movement demands allies from different identity groups under the guise of intersectional feminism but their expectations for these allies are often what it was for men, to be silent and supportive of the larger feminist movement.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 10:44 AM
10

There was a transman I came across on LWMA who simply was blind to the passive misandry in their own circle. It took a bit of speaking to make them see the disconnect in their own words between the pervasive use of the word patriarchy and its supposed use within the circles they inhabit.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 10:41 AM
5

You simply can not do this in a meaningful way. Gender roles are derply entrenched, they have merely been made less visible because women now wear men's clothes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 01:01 AM
17

I'm not accusing the AI of propaganda. But I am accusing the US gov org of misleading or even intentional misdirection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 12:32 PM
15

You should present counter arguments and demands for rebuttal in subs that cater to feminist theories, not those that cater to groups clearly outside of the feminist circle like LWMA
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 10:42 AM
21

I would rather that report be held as it is to show proof of intentional word fudging by the institutions to discriminate against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 10:39 AM
71

I think I know why the AI is saying that. It's because of this surveyed research by a US bureau: https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021 This is what its brief reads The percentage of females murdered by an intimate partner was 5 times higher than for males Followed immediately by the raw numbers that clearly don't match the wors salad's intended implication Of the estimated 4,970 female victims of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter in 2021, data reporte…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 09:10 AM
3

Can you share more on how the commentor was cherry picking data as well? I'm scratching my head over what you said in your response to them. You said (AFAICT) that according to existing surveys, about 1/3 of rape victims are men. The commentor said about 79% of male rape victims have female perpetrators. It's the first source they use. If we are to assume 100% of female rape victims are males (which is closer to 90% accounting for female perpetrators), then male victims of female perpetrators fo…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 02:22 AM
2

Which sources are you using to base this claim off of?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 01:12 AM
2

When will we start realizing thay patriarchy/misogyny/rape culture harms all our society, all genders from a very young age. Until we stop shoehorning every societal failing as "patriarchy" and "misogyny" instead of more appropriate terms such as "socially enforced gender norms" that acknowledge discrimination against genders as they are instead of women as the sole focal point. A start would be to use the term misandry as it were instead of trying to use misogyny for men who experience exactly …
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 01:01 AM
7

So odd to see frictional fractions in feminism. Lesbian feminism and het feminism are hand-in-hand pushing for institutional misandry but often the blind hatred can spill over against their own in-group individuals quite humorously.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 08:56 AM
28

The argument from feminist scholars about how feminism can be for men should be viewed in parallels to how Reagen spoke of trickle down economics. Rights and societal safety mechanisms afforded to one group need not directly imply that other groups get it through some magical indirect means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 07:21 PM
1

Oddly the link doesn't load for me. It errors out. I suppose it is geo-restricted? I can't comment on the link. But, regarding everything else you've shared: my people don't really make each other pay child support This speaks more on the choices by culture than about legal process. Your statement doesn't say that the state offers legal recourse to an individual who doesn't wish to retain parental rights or obligations to a child not yet born, which is what the OP posts main point is.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 05:54 AM
6

This is such a needlessly aggressive comment. My mother made positive choices to ensure I grew up in a positively nurturing household. None of this proves that a man should be forced to stay or part with his bodily autonomy to support a child he doesn't wish to take part in. I would reason it's a negative to both the child and the mother, but you seem too ignorant to think through everything before shouting emotions without thought. Try to bring something more reasonable instead of crying hoarse…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 08:16 PM
1

Signing them away, still makes one a parent of the child- just not in the eyes of the law What is the Canadian process to waive these rights and obligations? Can the father be protected from obligation to pay child support should the mother pursue suing the father when the father waives his right, especially before birth has even occurred?
/r/MensRights05/10/25 08:03 PM
4

Correct, I believe that if it is the mother's choice to keep the child then it is her right to but the father should not be forced by the state to an obligation of the child's upkeep if he doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 06:58 PM
7

Did you stretch before that long ass reach to dying from driving a vehicle? No, it's a reasonable assumption. You should not dismiss the possibility of accidents, you're being intentionally obtuse by doing so. You're making a lot of effort to avoid taking responsibility for your actions. Wrong. What I'm saying is consent to sex is not consent to parentage. It's pretty simple. Arguing about "avoid taking responsibility for your actions" is talking points that anti-choice/pro-life people take whic…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:30 PM
3

Both parties had to agree to the terms; but, It really wasn’t a one-sided thing whatsoever. In a lot of ways, my brother got off really easy. Good for him, but unfortunately I think you're giving away the lede here by not noting how he had to actually get permission from his baby's mother. There is more to be explored, I think, such as how your brother was notified about the baby or if this was in a union which later was dissolved through divorce. So if it's the later things can get more in the …
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:19 PM
9

In what world does sex not have the chance of impregnation? This is irrelevant. Consent to sex is not consent to parentage. You want to eliminate the possibility of being a father? Don't put your penis inside her. There is a real life chance that driving a vehicle can lead to situations where you can die. You want to eliminate the possibility of being dead? Don't put yourself in a vehicle.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:03 PM
7

Women have to go through the exact same process men have to go through if they wish to terminate their parental rights. Please read on designated safe havens and baby hatches. You're clearly not reading my comments at this point. Safe haven laws only apply to infants under 3 weeks and it is to prevent people abandoning their babies in an unsafe way Except I haven't come across text in law that says men can do the same either. A woman can drop her child there but if she doesn't then the man is st…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 04:00 PM
1

Yeah, I misread this. What jurisdiction is this under? Is this in the US or some other country? Did the relinquishment require explicit consent of the mother or did your brother get to do this without the mother's consent required?
/r/MensRights05/10/25 03:56 PM
9

I don't know what to call this. Weasel wording maybe? Or perhaps just plain bait and switch hook? Yes, the court has to consider what's the best for the child. Except the legal structures that do not require consultation with the court also allow for the mother to relinquish her parental obligations without question. Designated safe haven laws as they are called in the US and baby hatches as are generally called worldwide provide for such avenues where the mother gets to do this exactly. I'm sur…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:57 PM
7

It isn't a straight forward matter, it has to go through court and it usually has to meet two requirements 1) it's in the Childs best interest and 2) there is another parent willing to adopt i.e step parent So this means the individual can not actually relinquish their parental obligations because it depends on the other parent actually finding someone to form a union with. This is not a right afforded through a system, it is an opportunity that the relinquishing parent has to hope the other mem…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:25 PM
4

How did it not relieve him of his duty? If he's paying he's still partaking in the duty towards the child. There's no two ways of seeing this. He doesn’t have to take care of the child physically, emotionally, financially or otherwise. Also: He doesn’t pay a dime towards that boy and until recently, he didn’t care about the kid. Except he is. That's what child support is intended to be, paying towards the boy. I don't think you're really keeping track of what you're talking or trying to insist a…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:20 PM
12

It is a gift, and is now the woman's to do with as she pleases. Counterpoint. Consent to sex is not consent to parentage.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:06 PM
4

My brother did it awhile back. He seriously regrets it now. He didn’t realize signing his rights away doesn’t mean he just doesn’t pay child support - he has no legal right to my nephew at all. Which is why calling is a waiver of parental rights should be considered a misnomer. It's parental representation which does not really relieve the individual of their duties which is what bodily autonomy as a question comes up for.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:04 PM
7

Mens' rights activism does not adhere nor advocate for gender norms to be the structure of society. Individuals are free to choose how they live, insofar as their rights do not infringe on others. So you may enact the duties you believe to hold as optimal, while others get to live as they do in sense of mutual harmony.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:01 PM
8

They're traditionalist.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 01:00 PM
11

Men absolutely have the right to terminate their parental rights after the child is born but this does not fall under reproductive rights as it has nothing to do with reproduction. Can you clarify this more? How do men get the right to terminate their paternal rights after the child is born? Please try to do this without adding the caveat that the man still has to pay child support to the child still, meaning the man has responsibilities without rights to represent for the child.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 11:44 AM
11

That sounds less like bodily autonomy and more like financial autonomy. Financial autonomy is gained through bodily autonomy. With laws that enforced wage or wealth appropriation, the autonomy of the individual is also being infringed upon as it is through the person's work that wealth is accrued. This distinction should be considered unreasonable. Men still have the right to decide what happens to their body, regardless if the child is born. The reason why the distinction should be considered u…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 11:12 AM
18

But refusing fatherhood/child support isn't really a reproductive right It is a right to bodily autonomy, which is what OP had even headlined their post with. Even women don't have the right to refuse child support. This depends on location but many nations have laws surrounding abandonment where unwilling mothers are legally allowed to drop their babies are certain locations without question. You may search the term designated safe haven, or baby hatch. It just seems like a legal mess to me Mar…
/r/MensRights05/10/25 10:04 AM
23

This is exactly the problem. For feminist rhetoric even LWMA is part of the manosphere. But so many are blinded by the words used in popcult that they fail to see their blindness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/25 11:11 AM
89

Men would get told to man up about it.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/25 08:22 PM
2

They were calling you by your reddit username
/r/MensRights23/08/25 04:20 AM
14

What problems did you have?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/25 02:58 PM
7

Is your issue with male genital circumcision that: it's supposedly benign and shouldn't be worried over? or there's antisemetism in your region that ties circumcision to Judaism and you are afraid of being mocked about it?
/r/MensRights10/08/25 06:40 AM
7

Wow that's excessively petty and insecure of her.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 06:31 AM
2

Even if you were directing it to the OP your post did reek of victim blaming which that person is perfectly justified in calling out. You are not insulated nor shielded from being critiqued for your poor points just because the person arguing back is someone else.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 06:25 AM
3

Went through the link you gave and AGAIN I come across some woman talking about studying the clitoris https://nitter.net/AM_Pines/status/1947150163337715820 I did a comment in this thread about the malicious use of this information that drive this detatched narrative.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 06:04 AM
17

Medical history as a wedge to insist on male privilege or male support in societal system gets shammed as a reason onto many other topics as well. I personally remember an instance where someone tried to use the 2022 study on average count of nerve endings of a clitoris as proof that we know little of female anatomy due to poor funding, except the nerve endings on a human male penis only got studied in 2024 (Pasting below the comment I gave to this woman who spoke about the female clitoris examp…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:42 PM
13

99.9% chance the OP is complaining about some kind of auto response on a fake account in this case. 😂 The OP post clearlt shows two people interacting, one quite disrespectfully with an off-handness in their response. Hardly "auto response". Diminishing this to some "fake account" misdirection is also ungrounded, simply reaching for excuses at this point.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:25 PM
13

Hanlon's razor: do not ascribe to malice what can be ignorance.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 11:30 AM
25

This message comes off needlessly ignorant. OP is being respectful of someone's time by messaging another person who tapped them that they're not intetested. It's respectful to let another individual know whether you are interested or not. Yes, you can ignore, yet that doesn't justify the idea of ignoring someone just because. OP decided to give the approacher their honest thoughts, which the other person clearly did not want to heed. OP then is justified in informing the approacher to buzz off …
/r/MensRights09/08/25 11:28 AM
8

How about a link instead of whatever this is.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 10:32 PM
28

They can't see this going both ways lol
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/25 03:53 AM
2

My guess is that the ID is confirmed with the UK government. But now I'm beginning to doubt that myself. My basis for assumption is that Reddit (or persona) will still have to confirm the ID as legit, or in this case as not being sourced from a data breach.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:23 PM
4

This likely only works if the ID is from the UK.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 06:02 PM
1

And average men get called "chopped", meaning buttfuck ugly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 03:53 PM
4

A pretty interesting heading article about Karen Decrow https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/06/the-now-president-who-became-a-mens-rights-activist/372742/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 03:48 PM
2

Want my opinion? Be bold here. Say what you mean and do not let her take it to mean anything else. It's harsh to say it to you now but I wish I had this ingrained in me before. Because you either grow together or you lean so hard either you or your relationship snaps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 03:31 PM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snark_subreddits Their indulgence happens on this platform with immense toxicity. Yet in their reception, opinion points are to find balance or worth in them. I see no worth in snark subreddits when they lead to intense cyberbullying intending to force an individual into suicidal tendencies such as Mikayla Raines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikayla_Raines
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 03:17 PM
8

If men ever intend to reclaim our role as leaders, If you're looking to help establish men as leaders "again" then you're in the wrong subreddit. r/MensRights is about the lack of social support, general apathy, and the concerning antipathy brewing in social institutions for men. It's not about men being made or supported as being leaders, any less than a woman can be of her own life and those who elect her individually to be a leader. So yes, really.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 06:22 AM
2

What happenings have you organized?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:14 PM
6

What are you doing to making it happen? Calling your elected politicians? Writing letters to representatives asking them to be involved?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:44 PM
8

What's funny about this is that the draft for WWI is the direct cause for Irish Independence. The region was volatile, yes, but the mere belief that the British were about to draft Irish citizens bolstered violent protests for independence.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:42 PM
15

Why is Europe not joining in then? Why are they so content in sitting this out, watching Ukrainians die under forced press gangs? Buying them rations does jack shit when it's human lives being forcibly taken from their casual civilian moments to fight a war they need not be willing to fight. This entire situation has left a bad taste for many third world countries, mostly those who used to be part of NAM. The initial Russian invasion shocked man, but the European, US, and largely western silence…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:30 PM
-9

Why tf are the women just standing there?! They literally can do nothing. At best they are obstructing the press gang members from dragging him to the van, but any assault or battery can lead them to personal harm as well. It's an overall shitty situation, though clearly with worse outcomes for men right now.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:24 PM
3

They had nothing to say which I found to be the case whenever I spoke from either experience or facts & research. Is it that they shut themselves down when faced with reliable second hand experiences? I've seen this happen sometimes, they just give up arguing and turn stone cold like the mere mentioning of counterpoints against their worldview inflicts some form of trauma. It might make more sense to then view of it as indoctrination as they feel whiplash in dissonance between their asserted bel…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:35 AM
7

You gave us the setup, where is the resolution? What was the class' response to your experiences? Did they verbally fight back, argue, be dismissive, or ignore you?
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:00 AM
10

It's good, in its own way. Crying as an emotional response can be healthy, which society in general often rejects men in general from having as an avenue of relief.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:36 PM
8

You really are head over heels in defending the term. There is zero reason for the term patriarchy to exist. Social norms, sociatal structures, gendered norms, there are many other phrases and terms that can be easily put in place to provide better nuance. Patriarchy as a term is rooted in its etymology to mean a societal structure comandeered by men. Evidently, even in history, this is false as our norms have been a confluence of various struggles through culturally unique institutional structu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 11:29 AM
18

50% chance they have muslim traditions that strongly adhere to that. India is not an Islamic nation. It's 20% Islamic, and even Islam has concepts of remarriage. The loss of virginity in Indian society excludes you from seriously pursuing anyone meaningful Right, but where does this come from? What do you mean as pursuing anyone meaningful? Are you making sentences up here?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 05:24 PM
17

He was the reason she could never remarry What stops her from marrying again?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:54 PM
28

They're here fighting for their lives yeesh.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 08:19 AM
1

The work on this is appreciated, I wish the OP considers this as encouragement to punctuate their post for all to read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 04:45 PM
4

Try regardless to paragraph your post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 04:55 AM
2

It may not be your implication, but the commenter to whom I pointed out the fallacies did imply it. This is what I intended to call out. That you reject my responses I honestly take it to be irrelevant insofar as they aren't being clarified on. The commenter argued about "no true leftist" and that "Marx critiqued these people". Marx is not the "final boss" of leftist theory. You didn't make a precise statement either, simply tacked on some example and tried to stick as a counter. An example that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 05:07 PM
2

The reason why I'm pointing to Appeal to Authority is that the comment was constructed as if Marxism is the be-all-end-all for leftist theory. Marxism isn't. It perhaps is the benchmark in some schools, but it is not the requirement in many of them. His principles in Das Kapital can be taken while still not adhering to multiple other facets of his philosophies of classism and capital driven division plus oppression in an era.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 04:55 PM
4

first wave of feminist violent act against men. What do you mean by a wave. Feminist violence against men has been sporadic but prevalent. Valerie Solanas who wrote a misandrist genocidal manifesto called the SCUM Manifesto is an example off the top of my mind, but a spates of vitriol against one of the founding members of UK's first domestic Violence shelters, Erin Pizzey, comes to mind as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 04:04 PM
7

These are fake leftists, Marx critiqued these people. No True Scotsman Fallacy. Also Appeal to Authority basing it off of Marx's works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/25 03:58 PM
1

You're focused on the act of pantsing more than on the intention for it. They did not point and laugh at the men when undressed. They checked for whether the men had done the Khitan then chose whether to kill.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 07:36 PM
4

OP, context is necessary for what point two was about. Stripping down men to check their genitals. They did this not as a form of humiliation. Islam in general, including Muslims of the Indian subcontinent, dictates men to circumcise their foreskin off. This is an established practice, understood as a ritualistic practice used to signify whether one is part of the wider Islamic world: Ummah. The practice is called Khitan. Along with checking whether the men they were about to shoot had been circ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 03:37 PM
2

Here's an exercise for you: Can you point to the "Hindutva apologia" in that answer?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 03:15 PM
1

Her feelings and damages are as deserving of consideration as his. Correct. Yet it doesn't override the callous response and poor ability to connect if you're running from someone with whom you share a close romantic relationship. Hence why it's amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 06:18 AM
9

No, Sindoor is apt. This was a clear religiously directed terror attack, India used cultural motifs that are part of the greater religious harmony this nation had to signify. India is not looking for revenge India at no point was intending to not consider this an attack mediated through a need for revenge. India's stated targets were what its intel considered military bases. Civilian casualties are unfortunate, but Pakistan has persistently aided above and beyond any measure these militants in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 05:28 AM
1

So you're with a supposed male anonaly that otherwise everyone should ignore when making another misandrist point. Why pipe up now? Feefees hurt?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:41 PM
1

I don't think you're being genuine describing your reaction, I am. man who thinks that's a good time to talk about SA accusations A time when people feel most vulnerable, close, safe with each other isn't the time to bring up an important issue he feels his significant other to know because of the damaging it causes to him? Right. I am amused.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 11:25 AM
1

Damn. No wonder you dames will never win in the "choose better men" competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 11:05 AM
1

You are dating a woman named "Sally" insert question Would you date Sally? This got a good chuckle out of me. I get what the question is trying to ask, or rather what it's trying to compare with, but the phrasing is contextually poor. Should have been if I continue to date when Im already dating Sally. Alternatively it should be positing that I am about to date when I then hear about the accusation. This post propositions neither question. Dare I say, it's jumping its own shark.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 07:15 AM
1

are you all nuts, when you hear bad things about a stranger you don't know yet you're supposed to keep going alone with them? You should try to stay in track. So again, why are you in bed with a stranger?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:56 AM
1

Perhaps you'll be surprised to realize they often don't get ostracized.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 03:52 AM
0

Playing daft really is the goal huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:05 PM
1

Fair, agreeing to this where a woman cannot find out about it. It nonetheless is reinforcing the victimization, specifically social isolation, as the accusation persists to haunt him and leaves him handicapped as he cannot discuss it level headed with who he hopes to be a life partner and the general vibe of the responses the women in this thread keeps throwing up. By it's nature it's a filter the victim can not use judiciously without social safety from backlash, or reinforced accusations, or d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:57 PM
4

The victimization is understood to primarily be from the false accusation. The general shock in this thread is post women reinforcing/revictimizing the man by not using that super snooping info skills to find out the details and figure out if it's true or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:44 PM
2

If you think your victimized mental state from rape by "chad" is going to handle the social ostracization after being accused of raping "chad" then you're either asocial, or sociopathic, or deluding yourself about your mental fortitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:41 PM
1

Why are you in bed with a stranger?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:37 PM
1

Because I found it amusing that there was nothing about asking him more pertinent details to gain a clearer picture before deciding if the relationship stays. It's straight out the house, heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:36 PM
1

I know you're not the one I asked the question. What I did is assert that the lack of a reply is odd, not my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:24 PM
1

Sexual assault and rape are clearly two different levels of victimization yet it's still reasonable for one to say the victim's voice needs to be heard. In that perspective, false accusations are very damning to people, especially those not in power like a normal salaryman because he often has poor support groups and any strong enough often break due to social stigma surrounding the implication, manifested again in example like the Instagram reel. Isolation, helplessness, lack of support, social…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:21 PM
1

What's odd is a lack of a reply for that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 10:05 PM
1

Does the time you take to depart from his house depend on the depth of the relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:57 AM
6

I agree, 21 is a far better age to consider than 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:39 AM
6

CMV: it's misandrist to track a man's hormonal cycle to stay out of trouble
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:35 PM
5

Your kneejerk reaction to consider an anti-misandry sub as anti-feminist speaks more than whatever you're trying to imply. At the same time is is unsurprising that a self-avowed feminist has this kneejerk reaction. Misandry is like air in the spaces you inhabit for your self-validation. You also went stalking OP from the previous post where they dunked you to try shooting quips at OP here, lmao. How socially out of touch are you?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 04:53 PM
–

No, it's a very good analogy. It's unfortunate you're hurt by it and so many were confused by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 06:14 PM
–

I don't know. I could but I find it amusing you assumed men are the food here. This misunderstanding is funny to know so I refrain from offering an explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:24 PM
–

Not about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:15 PM
–

This covers the desire for sex part but not the sexual success thing that your original post mentioned. Nonetheless thank you for the link, interesting read up in that user's article as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 12:31 PM
–

Do you have a link to their comment? I want to read upon their attempted assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:30 AM
–

You wont survive if you keep eating diseased food. But you will have prolonged suffering from the pain before death ultimately prevails.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:54 AM
–

Tangential but: That's why homosexuality used to be in the DSM. Isn't it still in the DSM? AFAIK the DSM's sexual sections to consider anything deviating from the "reproductive norm" to be part of some DSM 'malady'. I know Blanchard's influence has kept 'autogynophilia' in the spotlight for some while now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:29 AM
–

if I had to If my granma had wheels she would have called herself a bike
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:26 AM
–

What's better? No food or diseased food? Edit: surprised at those opting for diseased food, it's like people are detached from the suffering brought by disease that ultimately leads to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:24 AM
–

World isn't a fair place. You don't win prizes for good behavior. There's an eerie awkwardness in coming to terms with this fact. There are numerous people who "did good" such as "defending their homelands". Many died, their sweethearts writing Dear John letters then moving on. Similar cases can be taken for so many other things. Comes back to Just World Fallacy. People think things work out because they are deserving of it while ignoring how conducive circumstance is the defining factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:23 AM
–

but how the fuck cna they maintain these relationship when they are known criminals ? Love knows no bounds. There's a /s somewhere but I cant be arsed to find it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:20 AM
2

I do not believe this to be a conversation that aligns closely with the problem of r/MensRights. This subreddit is about coming to terms with norms and expectations that unfairly judge or disenfranchise men in society, which does include what you might have subtly experienced with the anxiety and panic attacks at your 20s. So it's of no surprise that the thread has few comments that really talk about your post's context. If in doubt of what I said about, note that the main focus of your post is …
/r/MensRights03/05/25 06:43 AM
3

Do you carry this energy about the body positive movement in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:50 PM
6

Me, personally? Someone has to start from somewhere. So no diss that they're looking for ways to socialize as quickly as possible. College is about condensing information as fast as possible since self-learning can take months compared to simple textbook excerpts that can help with solid foundation within weeks. Though I'll probably have alarm bells ringing in my head if the woman spills spaghetti far too often in any conversation. They might be wonderful to be as an acquaintance or a friend but…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:34 PM
1

She's feeling a lack of masculinity from her partner because she has tied masculine power to penis size. She is probably struggling to come to terms in spending her time with a man with whom she might feel like is "fucking like a woman". Feel bad for the guy, he's doing pretty good for himself. I don't see OP recognising this mental problem in her based off the few replies ice skimmed through.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 05:31 AM
4

This is called moving the goalpost lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:36 PM
7

I don't agree to this line of thinking but hey, I'm a guy so I have no intricate understanding of what women think of about bi-men. IMO, the sole reason why a large number of women do not like bi-men may be because of their misandry. TERFs are misandrists who extend that anger to transwomen. Women in general can be misandrists who can not see the variety of masculinity and use social contagion to shame bisexual men the same way. Homosexual men may not be in this scope because gay men are, in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:31 PM
4

Unfortunately the binary between real life and social media is not as clear cut any more. This has been the case since accelerated smartphone proliferation from the late 2010s and then every person owning one during the pandemic over 2020 and 2021. The opinions people harbor online are often shadows or mirrors that reflect deeper opinions which are hedged to those sides. So, no. People do act like this in the real world. It's increasingly becoming common to exaggerate work SAHM do to maintain a …
/r/MensRights10/03/25 07:01 PM
8

This is exactly what's happening. Men are patting each other on the back, validating each other for the completely detached opinions they have, supporting those using Reddit trinkets like awards, while women keep going "Yes yes keep it up" behind them. It's absolutely pathetic to see this. The guy works, is hungry for what likely seems to be hard labor, and is being blamed for being lazy when she is literally a SAHM. I know what SAHM lifestyle is, I rent an apartment for myself and keep it clean…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:57 PM
2

That's PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 10:09 AM
9

Her slap was not in self-defense against the tickling. The escalation from established playfighting to slapping is far too large.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 09:57 AM
3

The hygiene argument is asinine. Do you shave the head off your hair every single day as well? After all, easier to keep no hair for a faster scalp rinse than with hair. Or beards for that matter. If you can spend more than 2 minutes to scrub soap around your hair then you can spend less than two minutes to slide your foreskin back and scrub some soap on your dick.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:11 AM
2

I don't know what you said but deleting because you had a lot of downvotes is pretty childish. Especially on a debate sub. You're going to be disagreed or agreed on, there's no two ways around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 04:23 AM
4

Comments on BORU have correctly pointed out a scathing hypocrisy that most of society has with men. Male labor in providing for his family is not valued, but historically it has been argued that female labor wasn't valued in the household. These gender-flip stories have amazingly done well to unwrap the biases that western society in general has allowed itself to be seeded with. Edit: I also remember the adage that silence is compliance. There are numerous women in the AITAH post coming out of t…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 07:54 AM
1

Reddit did not let me write this as one post: Back to the transman in question, I also think there's some sense of hyperbole. They say everything, but likely did not stick their dick into the dirt. But if the idea of pushing a penis into a hole did cross their mind, I won't be surprised if they were excited by it. Men deal with persistent arousal that may be triggered by the most benign of thoughts depending on their comfortably to humor them sexually. There's the obvious saying that men, if giv…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:31 PM
1

but to suggest that it's just a normal thing for men to see a Xerox machine and have uncontrollable sexual thoughts is probably not meant to lead to a better understanding of men or to make sense of male behavior. This was not suggested as a normal thing. What I suggest is that it is understandable that a person may associate sexual desire to objects that serve no apparent purpose to elicit such a reaction. Paraphilia exist, and its existence was not something I contended with either. Even in yo…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:30 PM
2

They deleted all their comments and the post as well.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:51 PM
0

My genuine position is that you have poor reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:43 PM
1

I have already answered this question. That it is not necessary to do so. You later asked why I think so, and that a good reason why you may see it as necessary is children deserve to know their parents for medical purposes. I, in turn, answered by stating that the mother knows and her active reluctance or resufal to answer it is part of paternity fraud. Are you struggling to stay on track with the line of conversation we are having?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:30 PM
2

child deserves to know their parents for medical information There is an obvious person in this situation you have forgotten to account for. The mother knows. Her active refusal to answer in legal contexts should be considered paternity fraud, and her active refusal to answer then is also a dis-service to her own child for the exact reason you stated.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:22 PM
2

Thanks for looking out for me, it's appreciated. I didn't go into their comment history because there's often a context-to-context variation in what they may say. Plus, even if they are kids, I think it's worth the time spent. It confronts them, and to put it in a positive spin for myself, helps me sharpen my ability to point their arguments out. But again, I appreciate that you did step in to help me contextualize the reason for their inexperience as a man. Their comment history being in trans-…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:20 PM
3

A registry is not necessary. The only thing that needs to be confirmed is if the DNA matches. We do not need the DNA to match every child in the country, only the child in context of the discussion. Edit: u/janearcade why delete your post and comments?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:16 PM
3

I think that's fine honestly. If no one steps in to confront them on their biased perception then it will seed worse beliefs that can harm them while encouraging them to harm others. I guess the only downside to this is if they're deadset on those beliefs due to a religiously held ground, then it will make die on that hill. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 05:34 PM
2

Shows your insecurity, good luck on your self healing.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:17 PM
5

Funny, you argue for us to stop being misogynistic in one paragraph and then try to sympathize with women who break their friendship with you because they can't keep "feminizing us" in their heads. Have you perhaps thought that they broke up with you exactly because they began feeling uncomfortable sharing their female circle with you? That they think you are no more a "close friend" to them because of this transition? While I may not be speaking for other men in this group, I for one can be sur…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:32 PM
2

Made a second post because Reddit would not let me fit everything in one comment: are not normal thoughts and they definitely come off as unwanted especially the Xerox machine and the convertible sexual desires You are misunderstanding their words. This is an insane amount of effort to put into to be so wrong about this: A very increased libido where I would see a woman who was attractive or just had an attractive quality and that was enough to flood his mind with aggressive pornographic images …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:24 PM
2

so a trans man on testosterone will never really experience this peak teenage boy fuck rabbit thing I disagree. I don't see any logical reason why this has to be true. Even in the menstrual cycle, women do not achieve testosterone levels comparable to men. Refer to this article: https://www.brighamhealthonamission.org/2023/07/03/peak-total-and-free-testosterone-in-women-of-reproductive-age-are-higher-than-previously-reported/ Total T—increased from 15.6 ng/dL in the early luteal phase to a peak …
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:23 PM
1

No, we're talking about more than just the xerox machine. It makes no sense why the Xerox machine is such a focus from where everyone wants to argue about this. Some men find relief in sticking their dick in a tube of pringles. Sexual impulses can be strong, they make people stupid. That is a part of what they do, dulling down rational decision making to blow a load out and get the generation rolling.
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:22 PM
3

My bad, I used HRT in reference to the phrase "hormone replacement therapy" as a general term than the specific one it may be used with regards to women. What my point was though is that his peak "sex drive" should be over as its typically the first year as the clit grows due to the HRT. Teenage boys experience "peak sex drive" over a far wider duration of time. Easily far more than a year or two. I don't think it's right to force a time restriction into this. I think he might be dealing with OC…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 12:32 PM
3

It's not like Adderall bro, it's a low dose you stab in your body every week and it takes month's to even grow a little moustache, even longer if you're using gel. I have not anywhere insinuated or implied that their TRT levels are higher than men. I'm comparing their dose compared to what they in women's bodies had before beginning TRT. I think the person is lowkey a creep. I disagree. I think he is having understandable male sexual arousal patterns. He isn't being a creep, he is being aroused.…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 12:02 PM
15

Funny since they also compared themselves to meat.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/25 09:45 AM
4

Two things to say to this: Firstly: Male sexual desire varies because there are two aspects at play when dealing with arousal. The increase in androgens that seek to incite a desire for sex in one's mind and the reception of the necessary hormones and neurotransmitters in one's brain for that desire to be invoked consciously. So if you as a person may not have had the same experience as the person discussed by OP, it's likely because you've had one of the two mentioned above. Testosterone though…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 08:28 AM
2

basically there are 2 types of feminists, the chill ones and the toxic ones No True Scotsman fallacy. Also, expecting feminists to advocate for the rights of men is baseless. They are a liberation/emancipation movement for women. They may sugarcoat it to mean it's about being equal, and that being egalitarian automatically means you're a feminist, which is all fine and dandy but then some use that to hoodwink all egalitarian movements to somehow become or follow feminist movements at their core.…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 08:01 AM
3

even says it's antifeminist And? A part of the MRA's activism hinges on accusing feminist dogma at trying to pigeonhole men into gender roles that are still sexist. The women's liberation movement has done exactly that, liberate women. Their activism has not liberated men and if anything has forced them into a double-bind where they are expected to accept non-gender conforming women while still adhering to "masculine" gender norms that women demand men uphold. Antifeminism then seems the most re…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 07:51 AM
1

MGTOW still pushes harmful gender roles and sexist ideology Where are you getting this from?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:37 AM
3

Part of MGTOW indeed is about dealing with that trauma inflicted upon them from gender expectations. It's looking at finding ways where men who were pigeonholed into their gender role can find ways to heal that in them. Some would overcorrect, trying to build a vindicative fantasy that ties with that trauma. Some assumed MGTOW would be about going to the woods and going off grid. But in reality the most that MGTOW explained on is to "go ghost" meaning interaction between the man and women was ke…
/r/MensRights19/02/25 04:26 AM
10

This is not going to go as positively as you hope it to. MGTOW is exactly what this, the group used to invite men who wished to find meaning in living outside of pursuing relationships with women or on what they as men could provide. Feminist literature, and eventually layman perspective by extension through popular media, harshy painted them as misogynists for their "self centered" opinions. It didn't help in being painted as part of the manosphere either, loosely linked to PUA who are diametri…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 08:23 PM
11

But it would be funny if you did.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/25 12:20 PM
10

there are more men that have fathered kids post vasectomies than men that had failed reversal The fact that it's safest is irrelevant to who is being asked to undergo a surgical process. A man who does not want a baby now may want it later. That later may happen at some unknown time. So your argument about IVF is again null and void. If the woman is 100% she does not want a child, she can opt for a hysterectomy. If you do not feel comfortable agreeing to that, then maybe you shouldn't be peddlin…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:53 AM
8

Taking away the right for a woman to take a pill and end it in the first couple of months which you likely voted for means mean are absolutely responsible for the kids being birthed now and in the future. I have neither argued for nor supported this. Even in my own post, I have argued for and asserted that women have the right to bodily autonomy, and through that also the ultimate choice in whether they want to or not want to keep the baby. If you're going to continue sticking arguments I have n…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:49 AM
8

I honestly think a lot of men who say this do so because they themselves had things happen to themselves and they are trying to rationalize it. My counter to this is that the men who say stuff like this fantasize about it consensually and so they fail to understand what not consenting means in that scenario. They are hollering or cheering for it is because if they were, as they are when learning about the incident, in the victim's place then they would be consenting to the act. Women face this a…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:51 AM
7

The fact that women who support abortion do not later opt for it is irrelevant. Why? Because that again is their choice. That choice is not afforded to men, hence the demand for a legal right to unmarried men who wish not to be stuck with child rearing obligations if he doesn't want to. The choice to remain with a child is the woman's and so it should be with the woman that the child remains. A man does not have the right to extend his decision of remaining with a child onto a pregnant woman, as…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:27 AM
8

Vasectomies can be permanent. Their reversibility reduces with age. So the real answer to your counter is that if you do not want children, ger a hysterectomy. Otherwise, pursuant of legal realities, allowing for unmarried men to opt out of child rearing duties is obligatory of a society that recognizes paternity choice in women as well.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:24 AM
1

I'm fine with the draft staying above 18. It honestly should not touch below 21 at all. If higher, better. Instead, the draft should expand itself to include women of fit fighting age. Those between the ages of 25 to 40 are well within fitness range to maintain work necessary that alleviates pressure on the military forces. Managing mortars, flying airplanes, driving vehicles, anything before it ends up being about guns on the trenches if the government and society is so concerned about that. It…
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:37 PM
37

The government does not have to pay for the choices that a person consciously makes. If abortion is a woman's rights issue, then pregnancy fundamentally becomes a woman's choice. She chooses to remain pregnant or opt out of pregnancy, and that choice continues throughout her pregnancy until birth. That means it has been unequivocally her choice to remain pregnant. Also, even if she does have a father, those support funds will keep pouring in. If she is poor, she will be poor with or without the …
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:24 PM
–

Depends on what level of confidence and charming this person has. Also, one side to being charming is to actually not be visually unappealing. If you're ugly, it's hard to be "charming" as first glances matter. And confidence past a certain amount of failures begin appearing as insanity. Adding a high level of confidence after a sleuth of failures is borderline PUA-esque. I don't think that's a positive outlook to inculcate. Then again you haven't quantified how this level of confidence sustains…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 01:08 PM
3

I think there are caveats to this. Recently, a while ago, a woman came to this subreddit conceding that she cares about men now because she has a boy. It comes in line with all the vitriol that "boymoms" get online in pro-feminist or female-exclusive spaces because boymoms are seen dangerous to their perception. Expanding on this can help men. We should not throw our hands up on expecting women empathizing men.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:08 AM
4

The second part of my comment was a counter-point to the point the original commenter raised saying "do men dont have mothers?". They said we shouldn't argue against pro-women policies because they benefit men and women both. I'm pointing out to the dual-applicability of that same phrase for pro-men policies as well.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:28 AM
66

I do not think the draft is as big of a concern to the American male demographic as argued about in the internet. Male circumcision, which is the needless mutilation of a recently born boy's foreskin for no reason than to "lull their sexual vices" as touted by the progenitor in America, isn't fought as vehemently either. It is ironically supported by many men who are deluded from knowing what phimosis is or simply do not agree to the harm through sensitivity it imprints on them for the rest of t…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 08:13 AM
17

Why does it need explaining? Do women not have fathers or brothers or sons?
/r/MensRights09/02/25 08:08 AM
6

I think it's an interesting thought exercise to have, if you'll spare me for lack of a better term on this sensitive topic. What exactly constitutes rape? Sexual penetration by penis? Sexual penetration of the body by a penis-like object (i.e fingers/sticks)? If the phallus is monitored to gauge if an act is rape or not, can rubbing it on someone be an act of rape and thusly argue that grinding genitalia or bodies by itself without consent also be rape? Doesn't have to be answered. But a large p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 05:33 AM
9

There was no strawman, if you want to throw fallacy accusations make a dart board and spend your time there. I am protesting miscategorization of a particular term because it doesn't help us in recognizing their prevalence in media. But if you want to defend that same miscategorization then you do so at the detriment to the men's right movement that gets sullied in with this because of convenience through accusation of merely being about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 08:41 PM
18

Right, and I can spot a lie when I can see one myself. If you can't recognize the anti-gender norms rhetoric that fortifies TRP's arguments then you're just snorting down lies that you took up. Let me guess, you also confuse PUA with TRP, and add MGTOW into the mix and muddle it all up in a gravy of manosphere. Called it before, calling it again. You're incapable of engaging with the content, so how seriously can you be taken?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 05:07 PM
18

If you're incapable of engaging with the content then how seriously can you be taken? You're calling others out using your ignorance of the topic at hand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 05:00 PM
11

No, TRP is not "in line with the modern right wing ideology and rhetoric". This again comes from common talking points that feminist media regularly sprout. TRP even gets accused of being part of the "alt-right" which makes no sense. One could argue that incels by and large are infact right-wing, or alt-right, but the TRP and incel have an insignificant overlap (albeit with the pill usage) None of this is weaseling out, this is calling a spade what it is and trying to define things as to what th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 04:58 PM
13

The Red Pill does not buy into the right wing's beliefs. TRP is not a right-wing movement. The manosphere in general, is not a political movement. But it can be a vehicle that helps drive political outcome. This confusion persists due to talking points that permeate from a wide array of feminists clubbing all anti-feminist movements together into a "manosphere". Fathers' Rights Advocate groups for instance is considered part of the manosphere which I do not think the LWMA will be wise in conside…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 03:33 PM
3

So then OP should've found a lot of content in Marx that speaks about such male-oppressing-women culture wide social systems which OP conceded on. I hope this helps OP figure out why merely latching on to icons does not help justify their argument. It's appeal to authority, where Marx and Engels are supposedly the main authorities of the left wing movement. The movement has moved on from Marxism, named through pretty chains like Marxism-Maoism or Marxism-Stalinist or Marxism-Leninist or somethin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:28 PM
2

Then you'll see clearcut differences between these groups. MRA advocates are not concerned about how they act around women or how to act around women. MGTOW, PUA, and TRP do the "why women do X" tango. MRA groups like the Father's Rights groups and LWMA here instead worry about the state of affairs that men have in contemporary society. Fundamentally, they are political movements. For consideration, I think contemporary MensLib is also a "MRA" group in that it advocates for men but does so withi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:09 PM
4

Wikipedia lumps it on simplicity. Take for instance MRA and Father's Rights Group. The two are invariably linked to each other, to a point where Father's Rights Groups are in effect Mens' Rights Advocates. The Wikipedia though lists them separately for no concrete reason other than to highlight them. Also, ADL and other groups also list MRAs as being part of the manosphere. But this comes from implying the term manosphere intrinsically means misogynist and then lump together disparate popular mi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 06:45 PM
4

Feminism itself actively fails to stay coherent regarding its own ideals. One side of feminsim advocates for the idea of gender fluidity, trying to disassociate the biological and the social; another side of feminism advocates for the persistent struggle between the biological and social. TIFs actively consider trans women to be women, the other actively considers trans women to be men. TERFs are not vilified as much as trans-inclusives in LWMA might hope them to be. This is a cowing of LWMAs to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 06:17 PM
9

I still don't need to, I think. The reason why I asked you to point out on quotes from Marx regarding male-oppressing-female social systems is because whatever they might say, would have been improved upon or re-studied in different lenses. Let's go to Engels then. You say that Engels has spoken about it. Why not bring your quotes by Engel that describes patriarchy specifically? I ask specifically because I know he has broached on oppressive family systems but he speaks of it under the lens of a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 06:12 PM
3

Yeah this write-up is poorly done. It tries to answer a male thing using a female example. Doth dare I say, a feminist thing to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 06:00 PM
7

Okay, which quotations by Marx did you read which have asserted of a male-oppressing-female social system? And not talking about Engel because your post body specifically pointed out Karl Marx as an example, as per your own words, of a "far left icon". I want to restrict it to the example you brought up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:51 PM
1

Very poorly understood as such. I know for certain that groups like the ADL retroactively mention incels as a manosphere group. Yet, the earliest published mentioning from them on the topic comes from late 2020 which is when COVID had an upswing: https://web.archive.org/web/20200731020712/https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/incels-involuntary-celibates
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:45 PM
6

Let's confine this to the discussion of Marx. Engels did speak of the plight of women. Which books do you talk of that have Marx using the term "patriarchy" or conceding that such a framework of male-oppressing-women system exists?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:40 PM
19

Marxist feminism does not mean Karl Marx believed in the patriarchy. It means that a subsection of feminism used the framework that Marx provided in his literature to advocate for their cause.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:37 PM
5

Yeah, I recognize my write-up doesn't include them. Typically incels weren't considered a part of the "manosphere" and this would be right. Incels as a word used to be gender-neutral. It's the recent rise of internet precipitation in popular discourse over COVID that incels as a word got gendered to mean male involuntary celibates and subsequently femcel for female involuntary celibates. Incels even expanded the blue/red pill analogy to include the word blackpill. I wanted to consider them as a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:18 PM
2

The manosphere as a term places emphasis on it being a male-exclusive space. MRAs are not male-exclusive, as the term honey badgers would indicate. MGTOW, PUA, and TRP on the other hand cater to and are virtually dominated by male presence. MGTOW has it in the name, PUA concerns itself with men trying to get sex, and TRP is ironically about male self-improvement while accepting "the gynocentric aligning underlying inequalities" of society. MRAs, and LWMA as a subset of MRAs, are not male-exclusi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:08 PM
11

The manosphere is three things grouped into one space. MGTOW TRP PUA These three do not overlap as much as people want to believe. MGTOW is analogous to the 4B movement, mostly crowded by men who feel burnt from dealing with their poor luck within the dating pool market, also includes those who did think they found their "The One" but then were heartbroken for any reason when she left (divorce or not). MGTOW usually focuses on self-indulgence or group indulgence amongst men, sharing time amongst…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 03:08 PM
1

I wish to believe that the users here read it. But based off of that post about manosphere failing men because Trump? You best believe I'm atheistic of that!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:36 PM
1

Because it's a copout. Like a racist that says she cares for "helpless blacks" but then goes back to argue why segregation laws are beneficial to everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 08:04 PM
1

The best thing about the redpill is no one really sits down to recognize what TRPA specific is. It's like the diagram for the holy trinity where it's the manosphere being shared between TRP, PUA, and a third other thing (probably MGTOW), EXCEPT since no one fucking sits down to know what each of these are end up being used as synonyms.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 07:46 PM
2

OP you should've blurred the name at the bottom as well.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/25 07:07 PM
1

Youre trying to say reading a love story that isn’t sexual is the same thing as erotica and they serve different purposes Wrong, but thank you for letting me know you're truly incapable of reading as well. I can refer to my previous comment and show you why you're truly incapable of proper comprehension as well: This is like trying to slice a filament. Emotions in the mind can invoke physical responses. These emotions are not just about sexual ones. Such as being tensed up when anxious or spooke…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 05:13 PM
1

Perhaps, if you think intelligence is only tied to hearing a man's voice speak to you. I'm pretty sure sapiosexuals (people who say they get aroused by intelligence) don't function that way but perhaps you think they do. I've already stated in my earlier comment, it's not the medium but the content of the medium. They serve completely different purposes. To YOU. You are the person who uses romance novels to get your mind off of anxiety. You're projecting your personal experiences onto everyone e…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 05:01 PM
2

This is like trying to slice a filament. Emotions in the mind can invoke physical responses. These emotions are not just about sexual ones. Such as being tensed up when anxious or spooked, or relaxed when mentally calm. You should revisit your thinking on this, you're trying hard to differentiate pornography which is watched to written erotica which is read (and extending this to something like an audiobook that might be heard). Often, except for the visual (and audio) stimuli, their differences…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 02:21 PM
2

I think this is different to people who recognize the time and value effort put into it, in my case it's for those who go the gym or those who are at their office cubicles working. I really wouldn't like it if I'm in a cadence when a woman came out of nowhere and tried to pick up small talk with me. It completely ruins my flow, and now I have to manage this dance of being sociable but not too rude when someone is making me spend my time to manage their feelings about their approach. It's not all…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 12:08 PM
2

Why do you think I'm trolling? What part of my comments even try to imply I'm "trolling" when stating why she's acting like a noxious person looking to invade another person's space for her own narcissistic self?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 11:28 AM
3

Women who point fingers at men about being rejected simply do not recognize that the feelings go both ways. Some women get hurt, some women may go on a rampage because their feelings got hurt. The lack of the later currently is not because women are "handling" rejection well, it is because they aren't the ones getting themselves vulnerable enough TO have rejection swing their way. The "hints" they talk about are exactly that, women trying to have the say-no-say card.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 10:03 AM
5

I think your point would be easier to come across by saying that "unattractiveness" is more objective. The converse is not necessarily true, i.e "attractiveness is more objective".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:55 AM
13

I know it's not all women saying these things Your silence makes you complicit, so they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:53 AM
14

Calling someone a "creep" isn't feminist language. Neither is being mindful of another person's space in areas with clearcut purposes like a gym. Least of all. Being a pervert that is trying to impose their presence on others who are busy doing their own thing is definitely a creep. She isn't being mindful, her entire reason there is to find ways over time will be intentionally intruding onto others' personal spaces. She shouldn't be doing that, least of all in a place that has numerous heavy eq…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:48 AM
7

What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 09:03 AM
18

You don't need her to be a man to know she's acting like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 08:14 AM
2

I disagree on it not applying to romance novels. If you'll argue about the later part of your sentence that says "focus on healthy emotional connections", I can argue the same in pornography that "focuses on healthy emotional connections". If you want to argue that porn doesn't exist in such a form, one can argue that romance novels in the same vein also imbibe an individual with unhealthy expectations of romance and relationships between people. It's almost always about the content of the mediu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 08:03 AM
2

An apt flair for this case, shoot your shot man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 06:47 AM
70

Me paying $270 a month at equinox to dress in cute workout clothes and walk on the treadmill for 30 minutes so I can find a gym boyfriend... I've been going here for 7 months and nothing What a creep. She can find her "gym boyfriend" through conventional methods in our contemporary era. Dating apps, social media pages dedicated to people sharing their perspectives on having a healthy and physically fit body, and the likes. Instead she's there, being a lecherous creep. Her being "cute" are all in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 06:44 AM
13

Let's be more honest and call it with a better phrase. "Social norms", "gender norms", anything that doesn't carry a connotation that hints at it being lenient to one half of the population so that the other half can claim victimhood.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/25 12:32 PM
3

No, I'm talking about the working class/"daily wage" women. Lower middle class women often opt for avenues that get them into vocational or degree schools. Polytechnics and colleges, like other men in their income bracket bracket. Edit: Now that I think about it, daughters from "lower income" families are usually sent more to vocational schools compared to their sons as well. Definitely not what you're trying to argue over.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:46 PM
2

Hi, I am also from India. In fact I have lived in both rural and urban regions of the country in roughly equal parts of my life (due to education, work, as well as family). I think I have a pretty good picture about this as I've been involved with the process and have interacted. So my initial point still stands. I know how Indian women put food on the table as well. Most actually opt to travel from their rural regions to work on desk jobs in nearby towns and cities in low-paying technical jobs …
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:38 PM
15

The problem with people who are dying of thirst is they cannot fathom of drowning in a sea. They just think they'll learn to float and solve it. Most don't remember that when you're so far from water, the arms may need time to kick in before things can land upright. All that to say: when you're focused on wanting something, you forget to also recognize when you may not want it. A form of investment/sunk-cost fallacy.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 03:05 PM
2

Most western countries, even Eastern countries even actually, don't have women working in construction. In India (and perhaps Africa), it's sort of unique and even then the work is typically not as ubiquitously opted by women as you think. Most work to women for construction comes through the MGNREGA schemes trying to localize development, but outside of this particular space women aren't opting to work in construction. FYI Indian houses that usually get built in rural areas now get built brick …
/r/MensRights29/01/25 03:00 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 08:47 AM
5

Do you mind linking Johnson's videos here in your comment? I understand it to be extra effort but having them here for more people to view might help understand your, ahd subsequently perhaps broaden their, perspectives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 06:33 AM
1

Crazy how men say they care about a womans body count but yet they keep paying sexworkers. The guy paying for a hooker is not planning to marry her. These are two different things. If anything, guy might prefer a hooker with a higher body count on the expectation of better sex which funnily doesn't play out the same way in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 09:02 PM
18

You may be a better mother to your son by trying to better understand your father. I am honestly disappointed by women who keep talking about this when thinking of their sons when they have fathers. Men are usually hounded at by saying they should "think of your mothers, sisters and even if not then you should think of women" but the only source of empathy that women can offer to men is when it comes to them having sons. Your daughters are likely to marry men as well, which is why you ought to h…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 12:50 PM
4

You're right, it is certainly a choice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/25 11:27 AM
3

Empathy wont help them understand what we need. Empathy will only help them recognize that we do have needs. Again, two different things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 04:54 PM
3

I like to consider this as part of inculcation or habitual learning. The brain is built up of habits after all, so when you repeat an act then that act will be preferred than other acts. That act could even be a mental thought, or a vocal response like people's call for help when in pain. So if we regularly use feminist lexicon to argue then we may fall into feminist perspectives, or when put on the spot to argue for non-feminist opinions may struggle to elucidate upon these perspectives with th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 04:09 PM
0

woman says regarding men's problems "go figure it out on your own" it's extremely hypocritical Do you think, women as their own gendered class, will understand male struggle or male issues outright? We should recognize hypocrisy not from them saying we should figure it out on our own but on the hypocrisy in burning down our avenues for recourse. These are two different things. One is about them knowing how to help, the other is them ensuring help is out of reach.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 03:04 PM
-6

I don't think that's wrong. Again, I do not believe we as men shouldn't fight FOR women's right. We SHOULD nonetheless know where their rights begin to trample upon ours and disagree accordingly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 02:23 PM
-4

It's not gaslighting in the same vein Reagan wasn't gaslighting when he spoke about trickle-down economics. For the women's movement, everything centers around the oppression of women through societal norms or active male harm. So from their perspective, good society for women should obviously lead to a good society for men because why wouldn't it? If it's good for them it HAS to be good for men as well. This perspective they have clearly ignores pitfalls they make surrounding their perspective …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 08:50 AM
8

Proof through negation is a valid way to discredit an underlying hypotheses. I don't blame the scientists for approaching with a bias it is human to do so. They are worthy of blame when they back away from the data when it proves their bias wrong.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:25 AM
2

It's because there's nothing about him to hate; except when there's something about him to hate, then there's everything about him to hate.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:05 AM
7

Is it then misandrist to point out that men rape women as well? Or were you meaning to say something that isn't "we can't be not misogynistic when critiquing actions by women like abuse by women on men"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 06:46 AM
7

You're not wrong. Linguistic determinism is a field of study, insofar as I know has not been debunked or disproven. If we use feminist lingo we might struggle to convey ideas outside of their sphere of thought, or worse petpetuate it as well through "systemic feminist perspective" haha.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 06:43 AM
-1

Why do you want them to go fuck themselves? They're not wrong, feminism is ultimately a women's movement. Men can not, and should not, expect a women's movement to help solve male issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 06:40 AM
7

Random thought I just had when reading the title. Could there be parallels to how being anti-zionist is often considered to being an anti-semite? Zionism came from a desire for a nationstate for Judaism. It came to this conclusion through its search for emancipation from what are known atrocities against the Jewish people. Maybe something for someone else to dig deeper into as I have sparse knowledge to further improve on this thought.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/25 06:37 AM
1

what i mean is, feminists and those traditioan lbeliefs people has the same general belief of woman always being the victims and never doing anythign wrong. Then mean it instead of clubbing them into convenient labels. Do not call them feminists and then run here for support. but we have to admit that their general beliefs are the same No? Conservatives or traditionalists bicker on gender roles and argue about how a man or woman should be. Feminists are a women's emancipation/empowerment movemen…
/r/MensRights03/01/25 03:53 PM
1

lmao no, people with traditional beliefs are definitely not feminists. They are different camps entirely.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 03:11 PM
1

That is not self-explanatory. They might also be traditionalists, or plain old misandrists. They may be people with traditional or conservative beliefs also will think a woman is less likely to be violent or perpetuate harm. Feminists are not the only kind who believe in female victimhood.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 01:49 PM
4

learn to be volcel No one considers advising a scrawny man struggling in bulking muscle to learn pacifism.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 09:18 AM
2

Do we want to take that self reporting at face value though? Hey now, believe all women.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 09:05 AM
1

That person is right, how do you know these people are feminists in particular?
/r/MensRights03/01/25 08:57 AM
10

Correct, it is indeed whatever I said.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:51 PM
17

Funny you say that when you've never been on this sub before this comment of yours. Me-thinks you're a racist, so your line is as effective as one drawn on seashores.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:34 PM
1

You don't need to exercise it. The argument is to HAVE said right. They are two different things. An American has the right to own guns, and a German has the right to trespass onto unclosed private property. The argument is not whether the person exercises those rights, but whether they have it or not.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 08:45 AM
1

Chivalry comes from an entirely different era with entirely different clothing. Its existence is due to social momentum over gender relations instead of acknowledging these changes.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 08:26 AM
3

The fact they do not know this person is the OP's husband is immaterial. It's the fact they revel in dehumanizing men as sexual predators that should be a cause for concern. Not in fear, but in glee they paint men as violent and is perpetuated through a mix of self-centered excitement about it.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 08:17 AM
10

your example require multiple lower courts and then them pushing other courts into it Precedence from one will set the stage for ruling in other cases. You're basis for rebuttal lies solely on jurisdiction and presumption of hierarchy in court precedence which is not how the courts work. They work within the avenues provided by the state's laws, but then also use rulings from other courts higher or lower to justify their own judgement decisions. This is because while the judiciary works under th…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 08:10 AM
14

Your second point does not need to be referred for my comment on precedence. It is irrelevant as I have mentioned in my earlier comment on how the courts will gradually widen their purview once an avenue is provided.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:56 AM
15

Case rulings from lower courts CAN do the same. Jurisdiction is not the only aspect to set precedent. Legal organisations during the civil rights movement used the rulings of multiple lower courts to effect opinions on the higher courts.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:36 AM
12

This begs the question, what if the sperm accepting entity (couple or individual) wishes to opt through alternative avenues? Perhaps they are not infertile, and are gravitating to accept only from a specific person. I think this comes down further to right to revoke parenthood, a larger concern within the legislative across the globe for men. Men can not opt out of parenthood even if they are not in marriage. Women on the other hand do, and for justified reasons under bodily autonomy. But, if on…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:31 AM
10

it's still a good idea to know how frequent this is to have a better idea and not have unecessary hysteria Replying the same as what I've said to the other comment. In law, precedent can change how the judiciary views these cases. Unless the legislative arm intervenes, the judiciary will opt to widen their purview on the matter than narrow it. It needs to happen once, every other case can then be filed to hinge on that pre-existing case, solidifying its prominence in rulings and effectively cons…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:05 AM
45

Except they are right. If it happens once, the judiciary sets it as precedent upon which other cases may be based upon. Unless legislation steps in to close this avenue, the courts will often opt to widen their purview on the matter than narrow it.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:03 AM
7

You're welcome! I imagine having these conversations help us men in better relaying our experiences to others. One main hurdle I see in helping women understand how harming the self-victimizing construct they've put themselves into is the inability amongst men to respond. Consulted therapy, the kind that is popularized on Reddit for instance, often poorly manages male mental health issues because it doesn't recognize the poor range of vocabulary men have while dealing with questions that pertain…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 06:17 PM
13

still has trouble believing there are men out there who weren't privileged by being forced into a provider role There may be a reason for why she fails to recognize the systemic sexism pervasive in society as being bad for both genders. High paying work in our contemporary age is not as physically demanding as it was a century ago, so she fails to see the degrading health that can be associated with such work. People working in the trades perhaps are the only ones who face these health issues. F…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 04:26 PM
1

The production and accruing of capital necessary for paying child support comes from labor. Labor, as such is using the body (which includes the mind as well) to partake in activities that may strain it to produce such capital. If the person is not given the choice to opt out of parenthood, and subsequently to support the child's welfare, then the state is in fact forcing the individual to forgo bodily autonomy to care for the child. Also, the argument regarding child welfare is bad. The child c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 06:25 AM
8

You don't have to go far as speaking it as a hypothetical. Male rape victims, even underaged male rape victims, in the US is currently forced by court of law to pay child support. It's without doubt a violation of the boy, and subsequently grown to be a man, from a right to bodily autonomy as they are forced to pursue labor on a crime committed against them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 05:59 AM
12

"It's the child that is the priority" They are parroting words. If they knew what it meant, they might process this in context a bit more. Instead they use child payments as a whip. Some even lack empathy, where I faced one in r/MensRights trying to argue that financial abortion is about trying to be free of consequences (which is funny given that's an argument anti-abortionists and pro-lifers use).
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/24 05:00 PM
0

Yes on this planet. It'll probably behoove you to know that 'toxic masculinuty" as a phrase originated from the men's rights movement that grew alongside the sex liberation movement spearheaded by hippies. It began as seeing destructive male behaviour as being rooted in harmful expectations imprinted in them from society and advocate against it. That the phrase is co-opted by feminism shows the leviathan it has grown to become, championing itself as the be-all-end-all movement of everything "goo…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:14 AM
2

On Reddit? Seems so. Its also likely shared amongst contemporary men dealing with men's rights movemenf as well. It's the same case anywhere, media instead latches on to the fringe and violent to grab eyeballs when more moderate activists are ignored or brushed under the rug.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:05 AM
28

The more appropriate analogy might be "If you're homeless, why don't you just stay in someone's home?".
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/24 04:32 AM
1

The ideal Nazi man tall, blue eyed and provided for their family. Some menosphere humor the idea of how women's groups would respond if a large influx of working age women migrated to Europe. This came on the waves of anti-immigration sentiment amongst conservatives and right wings in Europe as they struggled to rationalise against open border invitations of refugees from the middle east. Thinking on this. I think it's currently the climate considering Ukraine's exodus of women in the ongoing wa…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:17 PM
1

The "financial" part steals from the children and overburdens the mother and her support network. Again, the mother has the option to opt out of parenthood. The man does not. You are slyly letting this aspect of the discussion out of the core feature on this. If the man does not want to partake in parenthood but the woman does, and the state is ready to force the man to pay for the child, she is willfully doing so against the man's wishes and thus against his bodily autonomy. The woman has compl…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:47 PM
1

This is a lot of text that tries to bring caveats as a reason for why financial abortion to not exist. Sit down and reason to yourself, if these exist as things for women why would they not for men? In paragraph one you talk about swiping a condom out. Do you not think that it could then be considered rape? Removing a condom during sex has been considered rape, wherein without consent a change in sexual act has been conducted which means the sexual act is not done with due consent either. In par…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 02:27 PM
1

The right for a man to opt out of being made the child's legal guardian/parent should he have been the biological father of said child. In some cases, especially in the US as I've seen but also in other countries like India, men are not offered the right to opt out of childcare obligation even when proven to be a fraud victim, i.e proven adultery often does not protect the man from opting out of childcare. Women through abortion clearly have that right, and some countries even have post-birth av…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 04:53 AM
1

High profile cases do not equate to it regularly happening. It does not mean that men are guaranteed to be the biological parent to numerous children either as, your own phrase implies, these are cases and not regular occurrences. Again, very inappropriate to say out loud and also misguided.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 04:42 AM
1

The US is not the only country in the world. This has been referenced to in the brackets that states how in the industrialized and industrializing world abortions are not restricted from women. Rape victims do not consent to sex, and in virtually all countries also agree that these victims also should not be restricted from abortions should they be impregnated through rape either. Unplanned pregnancies get covered in the above two paragraphs I mentioned. Also, historically, women have not been r…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 04:39 AM
13

Can you check in with Erin Pizzey for me instead? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey Why do you think she was treated the way she was?
/r/MensRights07/12/24 03:15 PM
17

Unfortunately they clearly do not practice what you purport they preach.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 03:11 PM
10

so anyone wanting to guarantee agreement that victims include the innocent state women and children. This is the correct reason. News articles are using this phrase to direct attention at casualties being non-combatant. The issue is women and children have also participated in the conflict in their own volition as well. This is not to undermine the reality of the conflict, but it does show how public perception currently is regarding war conflicts.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 03:09 PM
8

If a man wants a chance at fathering dozens (or, grossly, hundreds of children) he can donate his sperm and become hyper-fertile. This is both very inappropriate to say out loud and also misguided. Your sperm will not automatically be used when donated, nor will it assuredly by chosen selected by anyone else to have their own child. Also, your last para goes into what you opt to decide is how your partner can or can not participate in your child's life. This is not something the state guarantees…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 02:57 PM
5

Is the phrase specific to a law, or set of laws?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/24 04:43 AM
2

I want to disagree, but it's you who know them and not me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 04:21 PM
6

Using the term patriarchy to make it into a catch-all phrase that means gendered societal norms is a cheap-out. Either use the phrase it ought to mean, or come out to say it's what it is. Patriarchy can not both be harmful to men AND at the same time be something only men reap from. Doesn't work that way. The word used to mean that the men of the family used to come into counsel and agree on what the family would do. Modern literature uses it to be a catch-all phrase that says men made the socie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 02:48 PM
3

It could be a double-face incident. In front of people, they hold the facade of agreeing. Online, the vitriol comes out. There's a public assumption men do it, cordial offline but making "incel echochambers" online. There's not one single reason why women are incapable of the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 02:36 PM
7

You lack an understanding of what a misandrist society looks like if you think this society is a matriarchy or suffers from a severe misandry problem comparable to the patriarchy which expects men to be in positions of power. You say this then accuse me on the first sentence about reacting by buzzwords. Lol, lmao even. I used the term "gendered social structures" and other similar neutral phrases but you sought to respond with words like "matriarchy". You are not here to argue about misogyny. Yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 02:30 PM
5

You know, misandry can be a thing part of a general society that tries to conform sexes into gender roles. The idea of the patriarchy is instead feminism trying to dissuade any agency by women in supporting these societal norms and gendered social structures. If you call it as sexism by society instead of a mythical leviathan that doesn't exist then you're going to spend time talking about nothing made out of thin air built to shift blame on to others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 12:18 PM
34

A scroll through r/Mensrights lists numerous women as teachers harassing and raping school boys. What "statistics" is this person yapping about? The statistics of that kid NOT being sexually harmed under a male teacher?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 01:36 PM
2

Gotta burst people's bubbles but this is pretty much what feminism is about. It's a movement made by women, for women, about women. It's to emancipate women from societal expectations while trying to throw the burden of its consequences on anyone no women. Today, feminism tries to be more than what it is. It argues if you are against class inequality, racism, sexism, and all other forms of societal discrimination then you are a feminist. But the reality is that feminism as a movement has subsume…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/24 08:56 AM
2

Raising a child as a single parent will likely be even more horrible. Income after a certain amount will make do, but without more hands it stays significantly hard to raise a kid right.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:39 AM
7

What a bad question to ask in the context of this thread.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:38 AM
8

What?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 05:45 PM
2

If you're hinting at the small male phallus; it's idealized in "submissive" or men that are emasculated in their sexual interactions. Not amongst the pursuers or idealizdd dominants.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 12:37 PM
4

Write men and Asian women is a strong meme. Sure, Latinas are a contender but by popularity? White men supposedly salivate at Asian women.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 08:20 PM
8

Has the Democratic party in unison openly called to extend the draft from being just men to all genders within the USA?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:25 PM
2

That's great to hear. Having multiple avenues of income helps buffer economic shocks in life. Sure, working a 9-5 is better than working at a moment's notice on your own, but earn hard now to save money on rainy days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 02:12 PM
2

>Well, what's so good about Kamala? No, he did not ask if Trump was worse than Kamala. On your second point, Drumpf bad is not a good response to why Kamala is "not bad" either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 01:14 PM
5

A tangential question from the sub, more related to you in particular. What do you do these days for cashflow then? What's your main source of income?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:50 AM
3

Sulk didn't call Kamala bad. He asked if Trump is worse than Kamala.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:46 AM
11

Damn, could make a good counter point using this. Thanks! (And I feel dumb for not making it myself sooner)
/r/MensRights30/10/24 04:32 PM
3

It's accountability, risk being a part of it. No one likes risk, but to risk something you won't be held accountable for losing is the real fear. Proposing anything means being held accountable to what it entails and being seen as the person to be blamed for ever proposing.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/24 09:49 AM
6

>You are welcome to try to catch up You are responding to a woman, how do you recommend she help men catch up?
/r/MensRights25/10/24 02:58 PM
1

It's an enforcement problem in India. The state in India has a hard time trying to manage its population, its institutions are still nascent compared to its population. This will for the foreseeable future stay in limbo as India's society does not let itself depend on the state which is unlike other societies. So, when you have an impaired police force to enforce the will of the state within its jurisdiction, the best alternative is to work around by affording spaces intended to isolate groups d…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 07:56 AM
20

Incompetent HR is becoming an industry pandemic. There are scores of employed people speaking of their experiences on Reddit and on other platforms, about how their resumes don't pass through filters run by HR of their own company.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 07:49 AM
-1

Have I? Or are you inept at reading what my first comment wrote? You may feel attacked personally, and I think this attack is directed correctly because you've been misreading my initial comment and have since been responding nonconstructively.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:44 PM
2

Mind linking to the thread at there? A little amusing.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:40 PM
1

And again, I'm not. I'm merely acknowledging history as it is.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:37 PM
1

Not at all! Simply acknowledging history as it were.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:36 PM
-6

That is not their history. Feminist movements have advocated for the rights of women over the past century. Mostly policies to help uplift women from restrictions against participation in the workforce independently. The fact that they do advocate for policies against men is specifically because of what I mentioned in my previous post. They do not see where else to continue advocating for something as they've reached parity. No where else to go up, so now the best way to sustain their movement i…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 02:12 PM
-7

to advantage females Agreed. to the disadvantage of males Disagreed (partially). Feminism should be understood primarily as an advocacy movement. It advocates for a better society and culture for those who identify as a "human female", initially as a sex but now increasingly so as a gender. (See the distinction between lay feminism and TERFs). Feminism fundamentally advocates for the empowerment of women against social norms and expectations. But does so blindly without consideration for mens is…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:45 PM
45

The joint account is staying as is, because we just don't want to mess with it. The comment only matters if you care about keeping your access to the joint account. Is it possible to prepare yourself for any storm? If she feels entitled to your profits, your sister may try to "gain" this through the joint funds leaving you empty handed. I recommend reaching out to a financial lawyer, or an established CA that's well versed with inheritance and trust funds. See if any legal avenue exists which yo…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:20 PM
13

Is it not sisterly to invite your brother along for a trip? Lmao.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:15 PM
23

It is a massive reach to argue about brotherliness or sisterliness on this. Such a randomly thrown in statement intended to force a sense of obligation when there is none. Especially taken in comparison to your last line.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:14 PM
6

Idk if this is an enraged response so I'll drop this instead. Most of the oldest colleges/universities were established as centers of theological learning. They were less equipped to handle the study of techniques and technology until the Renaissance went into full swing.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 10:39 AM
2

They are called the "rules of the internet", a tongue-in-cheek set of supposed rules that the internet abides by all on its own. It's origins are from 4chan, though the previous moderator says it's made in homage to another service. Rule 34 has a "sister rule", rule 63, which asserts that every piece of content made will eventually have a gender swapped version of it. Enjoy reading if you so please: https://rulesoftheinternet.com/
/r/EverydayMisandry18/10/24 10:31 AM
8

What particular video(s) would you recommed from Dr.K as the highlight of these aspects showing up in him? It can be easier, and healthier for those involved in this dialog, to use these are points from where more can be seen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/24 01:05 PM
4

And he will get out of debt how? Debt increments itself entirely on its own. Opportunities are lost because finances deny access to vast resources, an example right in front of you. It's a silent killer because it can rob an individual of life through unfulfilled living. But you can prove me wrong. Since you said it's worth going into debt, help finance him with your savings.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 12:54 PM
48

She wants individuals who are leaning towards misandry but in the same paragraph also calls it a myth. The hate is real lmfao.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 11:03 AM
1

A $5k certification for $18/hr is a good investment over what can be anywhere between $100k-$200k degree for $50/hr. At least at first glance the investments make sense. Most trade jobs are not automotable, robots are yet to fix roofs or plumbling in homes. Meanwhile the degree does have automation risks involved. Fields in STEM in fact have the most risk and many others such as in literature have seen their job opportunities vanish over covid, a span of 2 years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/24 05:41 AM
2

Probably in error. The rest of the comment doesn't say the same in context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 10:40 AM
11

You don't need to feel humiliated as an Indian when reading this. This is appaling when considering humanity as a whole.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:56 AM
3

You should link the TV interview. Content like this from the horses' mouth do much more than from the crunch of the carrots.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/24 09:09 AM
7

Question still stands on asking what the term "male approval" means when OP uses it.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 11:23 AM
8

Why was "male approval" an issue? What do you mean by that?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 09:46 AM
9

Now I'm wondering if this is some convoluted psyop where someone from these misandrist spaces decided to drop this here and then take screenshots to show imagined cruelty and manipulation.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:17 PM
10

I honestly think this would be a good filter. If the opening had to have x characters and they started with hey with extra Ys then they're extremely obnoxious people. For those who need the rose tinted glasses removed, this is a good way to get it ripped off.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:00 PM
6

You're being seen as trying to deflect the blame from a specific set of people who are accused to harbour ill intent upon people. You may thing that feminism doesn't exist because the corporates have malformed it into something but for those who feel like they are being attacked for a certain unchangeable trait, the attackers are easily identified by the ideology they espouse while attacking so you trying to say "stupid motherfuckers" may feel like you're distancing that ideology from the blame …
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:57 PM
1

Using honestly applied math, yes, but the way feminists twist words, who knows they meant. The report specifically mentioned count, not the percentage, of women being 8 to 9 times more. So there is no ambiguity over what the organisation meant.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 06:04 PM
1

Hang- 8 to 9 times higher than 15%? 8.5 x 15 is 127%...so 127% of rough sleepers in England are women? OP I wanted to point out about the math here. It won't be 127% Lets take; x to be the total number of homeless women; y to be the total number of homeless men. In the original statement, if 15% of women are homeless then the math is [x/(x+y)] = 0.15 If they say there are 8 times as much homeless women then the math is [8x/(y+8x)] The new percentage will then bring homeless women to be about 58.…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:47 PM
5

Not to diss you in particular but this, in a way, is parallel to what "studies" and studies have shown. Men successful in the dating pool will in subtle but assured ways view women much more negatively than less successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 11:42 AM
6

Shows how confident they were with the comments, to cry about the downvotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 11:36 AM
1

Interesting. This makes me ask what the typical standards of an investigation are. If the suspicions were on the husband or not then how would the investigating officers act. I also don't think the thread not post (other than OP) is pointing to the hospital care as accusation against the OP. It's the suspicions that the wife has on the husbabd this immediately which is being called out.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 07:39 AM
1

You should also see that the wife jumped to suspect her husband as well. It should be easy to read given it's the first sentence there.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 07:08 AM
1

One can infer this from the first paragraph of the post. The first few sentences do enough.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 03:30 AM
1

I am suggesting that someone who sees what may be evidence of abuse should not jump to conclusions of WHO has done it and instead try to find out what the extent of the abuse is. That extent of abuse can be clearly done by first providing medical care. Yes, she did look into providing medical care. No, she did not do this before flying accusations around. That the wife decided to accuse her husband is a concern. Because of all the reasons she thought were plausible reason she found it very reaso…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:57 PM
5

While she does not need to say the accusation, it is enough to have thought and acted upon it to recognize the situation. Her thoughts likely were not about protecting his reputation when she made that assuption but to first gather evidence upon it. This has to make us ask why she ever did do such a thing. Why does she accuse him of such a cruel thing to their child? Do you think your reaction to seeing a random man at a park is equally acceptable or repulsive?
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:57 PM
3

He could also be trying to buffer his statements. Your colleague may be uncomfortable with the idea itself, or for comveying the idea. That the abuser is a woman may be true, but asserting it could be misconstrued by bad actors to accuse him of being misogynistic, a sexist bigot, and any other charges words which he may have no desire in being entangled with. It's not a far fetched possibility as well, a lot of op-eds and audited news content was about how the "coverage" or "accusations" or "Dep…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/24 12:21 PM
-17

I feel bad for your wife and as antithetical it may be to say this in this sub's perspective, I hope you get the chance to recover so that the two of you get to build a life that you two deserve.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 05:07 PM
2

While this doesn't answer the question exactly, it is exact in answering the route taken for it so I'll give you that. The issue though is not about how these papers are released through whatsoever research that is undertaken. Unfortunately, while understandably an expectation rooted in good meaning, people can just as easily cast doubt on external scrutiny of that research on assurances that it's simply a "lack of training/study to notice or distinguish these variables".
/r/MensRights29/11/23 10:44 AM
12

Which stats and peer reviewed research had you snapping out of it?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 08:47 AM
8

I went through OP's history. My assumption on it is the Netherlands.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:15 AM
3

I'm genuinely beginning to feel perturbed and increasingly weary as I recognise what this means fundamentally. Society actively tries to move on when someone is killed, assuming that the death means the murderer is done with the desire for killing. There has been in history more serial killers than serial rapists, yet we are more fearful of the later than the former. As for any one to argue about value and investment loss. Death brings with it the loss of experience, fine tuned intuition for the…
/r/MensRights05/11/23 05:05 PM
1

We should stop having this term defined as per their standards then. ​ If Trans-Inclusive Egalitarian are to attempt a definition of the term then it should mean that: The individual is the arbiter for their own self The criteria that the individual wishes to use There will not be any checks and balances within the issue of gender Let's put this clearly, for a Trans-Inclusive Egalitarian, gender and biological sex are not the same. Gender will be defined as the sexual role that the individual wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 04:26 PM
2

That documentary honestly is the only thing that I ever liked from Matt Walsh. He did really well to establish the intellectual environment around the issue of gender, specifically of the female gender (girl and woman). Anything else from him pales in comparison.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 10:34 AM
3

Should be obvious, no?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 08:58 AM
8

Likely because it's a place considered safe for men's issues to be discussed. Are there similar places IRL where it considered safe to discuss men's issues without things like protests that shut down the conversation happen?
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:24 AM
5

This must mean all those who hate their job are women. I can't say that to be wrong. Maybe that's right, bemoaning is such a womanly trait!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 06:17 AM
6

What is a man?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 05:36 AM
3

Isn't that close to minimum wage in the UK? At 10.42 per hour for 23 and above, that's minimum threshold of 22kGBP. For a teaching staff, being about 6k higher than the min wage feels incredibly low.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 03:16 AM
6

I'm a bit jarred by your example there. I don't see a reason why your acquaintance there should have felt uncomfortable by your complimenting. This is me assuming the shirt had no significance and you said so mildly enthusiastically on the lines of "Oh wow that's a nice shirt!". I don't think that's an issue on being neurodivergent. I think your acquaintance there was just being mean. But relating to your experience as a child. I do not think you were being bullied for being seen as a creep, eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 04:57 PM
17

Do you think that autistic women are called creeps or predators? Or that women who fail to recognise social cues are considered aggressive and disrespectful of boundaries? Not asking if they can be, but if you have this opinion that they are being labelled as such by first or second hand experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 04:37 PM
5

looks boring on men This is a non-issue lol. The dress style dominated India due to the weavers being a strong class in the region until British mechanised looms took over production strength. The clothes can and do look good on their own, the "boring" is as limited as the black formal pants that corporate India wears. The current climate surrounding clothing is now of convenience over anything. Men and women wear pants or short pants (shorts) because it's not all easy needing to keep a wrap stu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/23 03:55 AM
8

Depending on your definition, the Indian lungi, dhoti, panche, and such are all skirts. They are tied around the waist and are not fabric-pipes (pant, pantyhose).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 05:00 PM
13

So I thought comments on Reddit could have images uploaded to them but right now I don't see that option any where here. Leaves me scratching my head right now. I think that's because r/MensRights has that turned off. ​ Best you can do for this is to post a new thread to upload the image if you're up for that. You can make a new post, and then you can edit the main OP of this thread with a link to that other post. This way others can check that image out. ​ Hopefully the mods here won't mind it,…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:48 PM
15

And your poster was the one which initiated this discussion.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:32 PM
33

Yeap. Even if it is, people can think of ways to improve it. Now that isn't a guarantee, but movements do snowball from little nudges.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:24 PM
63

Hey OP, can ya share your poster over here on Reddit? Literature like this, even if it feels benign, can help promote viewpoints that otherwise get shunned.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 05:31 PM
2

I would take these statements with keen interest. A person's bare minimum generally reflects the socio-economic environment they're from along with their background experiences. ​ If they're bare minimum is manure, they likely are the flies that keep being attracted to manure. One can let them know that pretty flowers are around and they need to be butterflies to find them. But flies still stay as flies unless they work on themselves, so they'll always miss the flowers for the manure. ​ This is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 04:22 PM
17

How do you understand the cliche behind a stereotypical fat nerd with glasses as being seen as an "incel" but not someone who is autistic?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 04:10 PM
22

In this modern day gender has been gradually defined to mean how a person now wants to be perceived by the general public. To your friends, this should be good news. ​ This means that now women can simply act like men and be considered men. They can give away their seat for a pregnant lady even if they're tired from their grueling blue-collar job; they can begin to pitch in any where between 50% to 100% of arranging and paying for dates; they can begin to be the breadwinner of the family while t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/23 04:07 PM
1

Some amount of exploring does do good. No use in holding a hammer if you don't try polishing a few pearls with it.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 09:18 PM
6

You have the option to "save" a post or comment to read it for later. Why comment here for that?
/r/MensRights09/10/23 05:11 PM
15

Heyo there, glad to see you here. Before I add any more to this comment, I want to mention that I went through your profile just now and see that nearly all the comments you've written on this sub have been over the past hour. This leads me to believe that you only recently found this place. On that part, I also see that many of your comments have been dismissive or outright confrontational to the point of being contrarian to the comment you are responding to. Based on these two things, I believ…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 05:30 PM
6

If you couldn't pull it back even before then it probably was a case of phimosis. Certainly not a desirable thing, and is somewhat rare.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:23 AM
1

Makeup involves directing ones attention and care onto the face, involves communication do describe what's happening with each step, and overall helps build an environment where you close out the rest of the world. When she did your makeup, you were sharing an intimate moment with her which probably led to arousal from her part. That doesn't mean makeups in themselves are only intimate, but the novelty in it of being done by your wife helped.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:59 AM
1

Would you elaborate or point to reading material that speaks more on the Prussian revolt thing? Tried to find on search engines but the only results are about the Polish uprising or Russian revolts. It'd be interesting to read about this because that revolt would probably be the first active movement of anything close or parallel to the MGTOW idea (and which might not be steeped in religios reasoning).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 03:19 AM
3

Assume "fam" to be synonymous with "bro" or "dude".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 05:50 AM
3

To give it a different perspective, it seems to be phased as "I consent to being raped" or "I consent to being the object of rape by you" (where "you" is who you consent to)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 01:41 PM
3

Do you mind sharing what the contents of the questionnaire was, and on what your bio prof said? I'm guessing it's something along the lines of control groups or not takung into account for the person's history, but I don't think that's what your prof said.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 01:15 PM
2

The only instance of this being true that I can recall of is that one court case where it recognizes the fact that the promise of marriage prior sex had then been reneged on. Marriage is on a whole new level of "relationship" compared to even cohabitation even by Indian court standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/21 07:04 AM
14

Yeah, you need feminism because other people are oppressed. That's like saying rich people need tax breaks because the poor don't earn enough (the trickle down economics didn't work either)
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 08:26 AM
1

Wish you prosperity dear man, the feminist has receded without declaration of defeat, but wild allegations.
/r/askTRP08/08/16 06:41 PM
1

Socialist Frankfurt School German? So they failed us yet again.
/r/askTRP08/08/16 12:53 PM
1

Give link please.
/r/askTRP08/08/16 12:53 PM
1

I'm saying the same thing (sexist and not thing). But no Until empowerment is reached the struggle exists Empowerment means empowerment to equality
/r/askTRP08/08/16 12:52 PM
1

I know. These feminists are getting good in getting us to speak with them.
/r/askTRP08/08/16 12:51 PM
1

Topkek. But seriously, we're men. Fucking kill them bitches in the vid (OP, not you).
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/16 07:42 PM
0

IDK if my advice even would work, but whenever those "stronger leaner dudes" are there, just go up to them, give your fist up and be like "rad workout dude" at the end or something. It'll make you feel better, well for me it did.
/r/seduction03/07/16 07:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter