TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rodvanmechelen Archive

View 497 posts and 510 comments by rodvanmechelen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1463

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/11/18 01:30 PM
1165

Opinionrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:19 PM
510

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:20 PM
388

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:16 PM
369

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:32 PM
366

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:44 PM
266

Activism/Supportrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:34 PM
263

Marriage/Childrenrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/04/19 02:02 PM
232

Analysisrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/10/14 01:27 PM
231

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:24 PM
224

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/12/15 07:50 PM
217

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:58 PM
192

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:57 AM
158

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/07/17 08:00 PM
155

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:56 AM
153

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:49 PM
150

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:36 PM
149

Generalrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:18 AM
146

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:00 PM
137

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:48 PM
118

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:17 PM
118

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/01/16 04:06 PM
115

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:28 PM
113

rodvanmechelen/r/MGTOW08/06/16 12:33 PM
104

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:19 PM
101

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:08 PM
94

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:36 AM
91

Outragerodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:33 AM
88

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:07 AM
86

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:08 AM
86

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/11/13 09:37 PM
84

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:50 PM
82

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:22 PM
79

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:26 PM
74

False Accusationsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:04 AM
73

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/06/13 09:31 PM
73

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/09/14 12:16 PM
73

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:03 PM
72

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/11/17 12:54 PM
67

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:46 AM
67

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/07/18 02:49 PM
67

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:00 PM
67

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:55 PM
65

Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:04 AM
65

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:35 PM
63

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:32 PM
61

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:00 PM
59

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:27 AM
59

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/12/14 01:49 PM
56

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:04 PM
55

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:30 AM
54

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:09 AM
54

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:03 AM
53

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:08 AM
50

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:04 PM
50

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:17 AM
50

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:29 AM
50

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:37 PM
49

Edu./Occu.rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:00 PM
45

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:54 AM
45

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:12 AM
44

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:48 AM
43

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/05/12 07:04 AM
43

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:37 AM
42

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:27 PM
42

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/01/14 08:10 AM
42

Activism/Supportrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:53 PM
42

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:31 AM
40

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:27 AM
40

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:30 AM
40

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:18 PM
39

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/02/19 01:25 PM
38

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/05/13 12:38 PM
38

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:51 PM
38

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:07 PM
37

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:37 AM
36

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:40 PM
35

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:12 PM
35

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/12 02:19 AM
34

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:45 PM
34

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:06 PM
34

Marriage/Childrenrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/12/17 08:49 PM
33

Fathers/Custodyrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/03/17 01:18 PM
33

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/11/15 01:21 PM
33

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:11 AM
32

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:47 AM
32

Progressrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:03 AM
32

Activism/Supportrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:03 PM
32

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/09/13 12:14 AM
31

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:35 AM
31

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:36 PM
31

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:47 AM
30

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:52 AM
30

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:20 AM
30

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/06/16 01:50 PM
30

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:24 PM
29

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/07/12 10:24 AM
29

Opinionrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:57 AM
29

Ragebaitrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:53 PM
28

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:06 PM
28

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:02 AM
28

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/05/13 09:05 AM
27

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/04/18 01:13 PM
27

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:41 PM
27

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:37 AM
26

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:49 AM
26

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:01 AM
26

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:53 AM
26

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:38 AM
26

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:51 AM
26

Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:38 PM
26

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:17 PM
26

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:40 AM
25

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:13 AM
25

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:01 PM
25

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/08/12 03:55 AM
25

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:14 AM
25

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:59 AM
24

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:10 AM
23

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:51 PM
23

Edu./Occu.rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:38 PM
23

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:47 PM
23

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:36 PM
23

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/06/16 05:41 PM
23

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:32 AM
23

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:09 PM
22

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:18 AM
22

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:59 PM
22

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:20 PM
21

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/16 02:43 AM
21

Satirerodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/03/15 02:32 AM
21

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/02/13 04:58 PM
21

Humourrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:35 PM
21

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:48 PM
21

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/02/17 09:03 PM
20

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/09/19 12:08 PM
20

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:51 PM
20

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:32 PM
20

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:13 AM
20

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:23 AM
20

Ragebaitrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:55 PM
20

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:29 PM
19

Outragerodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:40 AM
19

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/12/16 08:38 PM
19

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:17 AM
19

re: Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:29 AM
19

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:39 AM
19

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:00 PM
18

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:47 AM
18

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:06 PM
18

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/05/13 01:27 AM
18

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/07/18 11:48 AM
18

Progressrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:45 AM
18

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:52 PM
18

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/08/12 12:56 PM
18

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:21 AM
18

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:04 PM
17

Edu./Occu.rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/11/17 11:06 AM
17

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:22 AM
17

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:08 PM
17

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/07/12 06:00 PM
17

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/05/17 01:00 PM
17

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:46 PM
17

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:50 PM
16

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:00 PM
16

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:28 PM
16

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:32 PM
16

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:16 AM
16

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:22 PM
16

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:21 AM
16

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/06/16 09:28 PM
16

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:36 PM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:36 PM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/06/13 09:23 PM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:37 PM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:38 AM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:43 AM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:48 AM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:52 AM
15

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/02/14 10:53 PM
14

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:33 PM
14

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:10 PM
14

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:13 PM
14

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/10/13 01:02 PM
14

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:23 PM
14

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/05/16 11:43 PM
13

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/09/17 10:11 PM
13

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/11/12 08:41 PM
13

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:33 AM
13

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:38 AM
13

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:30 AM
13

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/06/18 01:42 PM
13

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:21 AM
13

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:52 AM
13

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/06/13 07:38 PM
12

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:57 AM
12

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/08/12 03:11 AM
12

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:23 PM
12

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/12/17 08:15 PM
12

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:29 PM
12

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:34 PM
12

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:20 PM
12

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/06/13 11:41 PM
12

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:20 AM
12

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:57 AM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:51 AM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:45 AM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:05 AM
11

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/12/17 09:17 PM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/09/12 09:51 AM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:54 AM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/02/14 09:03 PM
11

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:20 AM
10

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:46 AM
10

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:39 AM
10

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:55 AM
10

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/04/16 12:10 AM
10

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/12/15 01:49 AM
10

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:17 AM
10

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:21 PM
10

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/09/17 02:52 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:04 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/09/12 12:37 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:28 PM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MGTOW28/05/17 03:33 PM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:02 PM
9

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:41 PM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/03/13 10:09 PM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/02/14 01:51 PM
9

Opinionrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:36 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:43 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:42 AM
9

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:44 PM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/08/12 05:12 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:15 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:37 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:41 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:21 AM
9

Men's Rights Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:14 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:11 AM
9

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:56 AM
9

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:17 PM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:24 PM
8

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:45 PM
8

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:34 PM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:35 AM
8

Anti-MRMrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:55 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:03 AM
8

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:43 PM
8

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:26 AM
8

Anti-MRMrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:25 PM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:28 PM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:35 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:07 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:56 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:01 AM
8

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/10/14 04:50 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:11 AM
8

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:44 PM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:52 PM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/12/12 07:19 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:06 AM
8

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:52 AM
8

Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:19 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:15 PM
7

Anti-MRMrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:42 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:24 AM
7

re: Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:21 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/08/12 12:49 AM
7

False Accusationsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:00 AM
7

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:39 AM
7

False Accusationsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:04 PM
7

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/11/16 09:14 PM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:50 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:46 AM
7

Anti-MRMrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:11 PM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/01/14 02:29 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:24 PM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:03 PM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:01 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:00 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:32 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:15 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:10 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:29 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/05/13 02:33 AM
7

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/12/12 12:11 AM
6

Generalrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:53 AM
6

Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:01 PM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:26 AM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/01/14 07:55 PM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:46 AM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/04/14 08:57 AM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:57 AM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:23 PM
6

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/02/19 12:47 PM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:20 AM
6

Progressrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:15 PM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/07/12 04:55 AM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:36 AM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:56 PM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:45 AM
6

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/12/15 01:27 PM
6

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/06/12 08:59 AM
6

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/03/16 10:01 PM
5

Men's Rights Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:44 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MGTOW11/06/16 09:29 PM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:54 PM
5

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:08 PM
5

Men's Rights Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:05 AM
5

Men's Rights Newsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:52 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:56 PM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:15 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:33 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:48 AM
5

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/01/18 05:00 PM
5

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:52 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:55 PM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:23 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/11/14 02:02 AM
5

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:54 PM
5

[Satire]rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:44 AM
5

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:00 AM
5

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/05/16 03:09 PM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:14 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:42 AM
5

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:39 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:09 PM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:11 AM
5

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:35 PM
5

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:14 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:37 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:17 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:05 AM
4

Generalrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:37 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:06 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:57 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:14 AM
4

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:50 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:48 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:46 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:28 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:25 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:27 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:23 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:17 PM
4

Generalrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/09/17 07:54 PM
4

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:11 PM
4

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:36 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/10/13 01:41 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/01/14 11:25 PM
4

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:38 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:22 PM
4

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:30 PM
4

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:45 PM
4

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/02/17 12:58 PM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:42 AM
4

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:11 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:53 PM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:36 AM
3

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:30 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/04/13 01:35 AM
3

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:54 PM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:24 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:06 PM
3

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:43 PM
3

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:14 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:15 PM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:17 AM
3

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/01/18 01:34 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:01 AM
3

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:36 PM
3

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/01/17 09:10 PM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:16 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/12/12 12:21 AM
3

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:12 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:43 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:30 PM
2

Unconfirmedrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:42 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:26 AM
2

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/02/19 01:54 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:50 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:46 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:22 AM
2

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/02/17 08:44 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:50 PM
2

Social Issuesrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/01/18 02:17 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/10/13 01:35 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:19 AM
2

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:23 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:47 AM
2

Opinionrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:32 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:28 PM
2

Opinionrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/02/15 07:59 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:26 AM
2

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:38 PM
2

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:04 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:14 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:17 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:23 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:01 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights15/12/12 12:59 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:50 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:52 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:10 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:28 AM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:06 PM
2

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:16 AM
1

Analysisrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:39 AM
1

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:55 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:35 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:59 AM
1

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:32 PM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:20 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:23 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:41 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:33 AM
1

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:35 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:17 PM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:01 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:46 PM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:23 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:44 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:13 PM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:18 PM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/08/12 01:01 PM
1

Anti-MRMrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:23 PM
1

Legal Rightsrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:53 PM
1

Opinionrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:58 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights03/03/14 05:43 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:38 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:35 PM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:21 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:15 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:15 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:14 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:14 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:13 AM
1

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:11 AM
1

Blogs/Videorodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:30 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:40 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:33 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:12 AM
0

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights24/01/17 01:27 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/06/13 10:40 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:33 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:53 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:54 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/10/12 11:05 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:06 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:05 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:48 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/06/18 01:04 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:18 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:03 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:59 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:42 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:51 AM
0

False Accusationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/01/16 12:32 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights23/12/12 08:46 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:39 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:39 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:23 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:25 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:12 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:08 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/03/14 11:55 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:12 AM
0

Marriage/Childrenrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:45 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:36 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:46 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:19 AM
0

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/07/16 08:00 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 06:32 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:48 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:12 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights07/08/13 01:46 AM
0

Feminismrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:12 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:42 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:28 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:19 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:42 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:28 AM
0

Discriminationrodvanmechelen/r/MensRights08/08/16 11:56 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:49 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:09 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:30 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:43 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:36 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:22 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:43 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:42 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:51 AM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:42 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:41 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:40 PM
0

rodvanmechelen/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I knew the guy who built the MenWeb site. For the life of me, I could not recall his name until I went to the next post about SAVE Services: Bert Hoff! I wouldn't call him an MRA. He was active in the Seattle Men's Evolvement Network, which was a mythopoetic organization headed up by James Smethurst. Most of the guys who were active in Seattle MEN were uncomfortable with our efforts at The Backlash! (thanks for the nod) as most of them were neoliberal progressives while those of us at backlash.c…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:16 AM
0

MGTOW rejects male disposability.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:08 AM
3

“Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all the unifying agents. Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a god, but never without a belief in a devil.” ― Eric Hoffer, The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements My understanding of feminism truly began when, in 1980, I read Hoffer's The True Believer. It became clear that the "radical feminist" members of the Second Wave, those who espoused hatred of men, would ascend to dominate the movement. We talk abou…
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:58 PM
2

Cathy Young. About 20 years ago I came to the conclusion that the MRM would flounder and fail until women en masse began to demand equal and fair treatment for me. But the problem is, this will never happen without a reset. Multiple trends are converging on 2032, which appears to be the inflection point.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 12:37 PM
8

For decades, I have made the argument that there can be no end to IPV until we address both male and female perpetration. What I have learned, is that there is a hard core that does not actually want an end to IPV because the purpose of their cause is to destroy men to destroy marriage to destroy the west. So while I agree with this, we should expect a core cadre of feminists to viciously attack it.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:00 PM
5

Good for him. This is a situation with which I can relate. At the May 2012 tribal council meeting of the Cowlitz Indian Tribe, the head of our DV program--which provides typical "referral" support for male victims--presented us with a misandristic DV poster, one that typically portrays men as predators and women as prey. I said it was sexist, and I made a motion to reject it unless she also produced one that portrayed men as victims and women as abusers. While the men squirmed and tried to disap…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 11:51 AM
5

I just tell them, "stop violence against unborn women," and then watch them sputter.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:14 PM
1

What would it cost to send all the feminists with her?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:20 PM
2

In the early, 90s, the reason I called my 'zine The Backlash! was that we reflected the backlash against the feminist hate movement. Later, when I was forced out of print and online by The Seattle Times, whose editors did not like us accusing them of what is now called fake news, my focus expanded. But the vast majority of MRM books have been in response to the feminist hate movement. Susan Faludi's obnoxious tomb, Backlash, was our inspiration for the name. In it, she claimed there was an undec…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:44 PM
5

Women can thank Classical Liberalism for recognition of their rights, not feminism, which is a hate movement that originated with Second Wave Feminism. (I know Cathy and Christina claim the feminist label retains viable utility, but they are libertarian and classical liberal respectively and I wish they would just come out and say so and discard the feminist label.) Men, too, can thank classical liberalism for recognition of our rights, which are now and have been under assault by feminists and …
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:34 PM
1

On the right, Men and Marriage, by George Gilder, which is an updated version of Sexual Suicide (or the Naked Nomad, I don't recall which), is one of the earliest. On the left, Roy Shenk's The Other Side of the Coin also dates to the 80s. Everything of Warren's is great, although we disagree on the role of government, and I agree with Evildl17 that Myth of Male Power is a must read. If you go to my site and click on the Backlash Articles in the left hand column, I have 269 articles there, most a…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:22 PM
7

The so-called equity feminists, like Christina Hoff Sommers and Cathy Young (both of whom I admire), are classical liberals and libertarians. The dictionary definition of feminism was created by libertarian women in the late 1980s as an effort to co-opt feminists into the libertarian movement. It failed, as all they accomplished was to provide cover for the hate mongering second wave feminists.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:38 PM
1

I don't watch or read anything involving Paul.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:01 PM
2

Water vapor comprises 95+% of the greenhouse gasses by volume and 75% of the greenhouse effect, but you don't see anybody suggesting we should combat water vapor emissions. Our climate is driven by the sun, which is currently plummeting into a grand solar minimum that is going to cause a mini ice age. People who prepare for global warming will be sorely disappointed when they can't buy food because of the frosts and floods and droughts that destroy crops.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 11:54 AM
1

headingtoshore is exactly right. When I saw the question, I had the same thought.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 11:43 AM
10

Good. The more women and girls hate on men and boys for looking at them, the more men and boys will ignore women and girls, and the more women and girls will end up living with cats. Men and boys are supposed to look at women and girls. Feminism is poisoning our culture. The worse they get, the sooner everybody will reject it.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:52 PM
3

I like Jordan and I've got and read his book, but I'm also a little envious of his success and irritated that he is given credit for being the first to say the same things that George Gilder, Warren Farrell, many other men, more than a few women and I have been saying for decades. Where most of those of us who came before him saw our careers destroyed and our lives threatened, he has enjoyed fame and fortune due in part to the work and sacrifices of those who came before him, and not once have I…
/r/MensRights28/03/19 01:38 PM
-3

Just another excuse for attention seeking. Climate is not caused by humans. Global warming ended in 1998. The Grand Solar Minimum began in 2015, and for the next 30 years, at least, global cooling will wreak havoc with agriculture. The food shortages will cause food prices to rise, leading to malnutrition, starvation and food riots.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 07:28 PM
2

Before there were men's rights activists and MGTOW, there were advocates. Like Roy Shenk, Rich Doyle, George Gilder and Warren Farrell. I was an advocate, too. Still am. And MGTOW, in the ghosting sense. Advocates inform, educate and call out. In the sense my Indian ancestors would understand it, we are Raven Spirit people. We speak truths that others will not say, point out what others will not see. As a Raven Spirit person, I am not limited to men's issues, but say many things that need to be …
/r/MensRights23/02/19 09:54 PM
5

Financial abortion has long been an MRM issue. There is no rational response to it. Feminists use the same arguments against financial abortion that pro-life uses against baby abortion. Hypocrisy never stops cultural Marxists.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:12 PM
3

And don't forget to collect your all important male privilege bonds!
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:41 PM
6

In my experience, Aaron Clarey is right that only about 2% of women in the west, or at least in the US, are marriage material. He also says that most men are not marriage material, but I forget his approximate percentage, only that it's much higher than for women. I do know women I would consider NAWALT, most of them are married young and stay that way, and I respect them. There are single women I know who I consider NAWALT, but as others here have noted they have the opportunity in a fit of ang…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:26 PM
2

To gain insight, I recommend you read Eric Hoffer's book on mass movements, The True Believer. That said, from the beginning many second wave feminists were informed by Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, and many of his tactics were employed with such success that by the early 70s, male politicians were falling over themselves to be seen supporting feminists. Patricia Schroeder commented on this when she retired. Early men's rights advocates were seen as the enemy but ineffectual. But by the lat…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:02 PM
2

About 20 years ago, I wrote some editorials expressing the opinion that the MRM would ultimately fail and it would require a backlash from women. At that time, I had only some vague ideas about what is now called MGTOW, but having read Atlas Shrugged I had some definite ideas about men going on strike to precipitate a female backlash against feminism. Four or five years ago, I heard about MGTOW and embraced it as men's Atlas Shrugged strike against feminism. But then I learned, first from Martin…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:15 PM
4

I'll say the same thing I've said for the past 30+ years: just as girls mature faster than boys, chimpanzees mature faster than humans; and just as chimps are not smarter than humans, women are not smarter than men. In fact, the slower maturation of boys could be used to argue just the opposite.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 10:48 PM
3

I say we flip the narrative around on them, claim that toxic masculinity is a disorder, and those of us with Toxic Masculinity Disorder are disabled and need to go on disability so we can spend our time in therapeutic activities, like fishing, hiking, camping, etc.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 05:52 PM
1

MGTOW: the only rational response to feminism.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 05:38 PM
1

First, my tribe's one-year-old reservation is tiny. Second, tribes in the US are subject to the plenary power of Congress, which is to say, subject to all federal laws. President Reagan found it most useful to think of tribes as "being like states." So, on our reservation--and only on our reservation--my tribe is exempt from state law, but not from federal law. That said, most of our offices and facilities are on "fee patent" land, which is to say it's not reservation land, and those facilities …
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:40 PM
1

Paragraph 42: "We note that the reasonable victim standard we adopt today classifies conduct as unlawful sexual harassment even when harassers do not realize that their conduct creates a hostile working environment. Well-intentioned compliments by co-workers or supervisors can form the basis of a sexual harassment cause of action if a reasonable victim of the same sex as the plaintiff would consider the comments sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter a condition of employment and create an ab…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:35 PM
1

https://medium.com/@jimpreston_36730/sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace-8b1b7625604d and http://www.backlash.com/book/sexharman.html
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:57 PM
8

For years I've been saying that MRAs shouldn't get upset over the fact more women than men were going to college, because more women than men were going into debt to earn useless degrees. Now, here we are.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:28 PM
4

Ellison vs. Brady. At some point, this is going to catch on and upset the apple cart. Ellison vs. Brady established the "Reasonable Woman Standard" in sexual harassment. It also established a uniquely male "Reasonable Man Standard." Some day, there will be a sex harass case litigated on this basis. From the male perspective, what constitutes female "conduct of a sexual nature"? The answer is, everything that triggers the male libido to view "women as "sexual objects": short skits, halter tops, l…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:07 PM
1

Yesterday my tribe's health board chair sponsored a workshop put on by Paul Spindel, who in passing mentioned that he does workshops on sexual harassment prevention. During a break I approached him to note the legal aspect of this that everybody ignores: the pervasive harassment of men by women as defined by the case of Ellison v. Brady. He kept arguing with me over a point of fact: the precedent set by the case was the establishment of specifically female and male reasonable person standards: t…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:38 PM
1

MGTOW.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:13 PM
1

Here's my response: http://www.backlash.com/images/NYTBigotry.jpg
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:42 PM
1

Google Zapped 1982. In the original, Scott Baio can't control girls, but he has telekinesis and flashes a lot of boobs. But the two versions show the difference in male and female fantasies: the guys want to see the gals naked, and the gals want to control the guys.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 01:32 PM
1

foot_kisser pointed out that we have gynocentrism to contend with. That's a huge problem: no matter what we do, the perception is that MRAs are attacking women and that makes us bad people. In 1991 the MRA group called Gang of Six joined me to talk about the inevitable backlash against feminism. This is a cyclic thing. Martin Armstrong's blog is all about cycles. A big one concerns the collapse of socialism, and feminism is a part of that. It's not going to be pretty. It includes the grand solar…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:14 AM
1

Feminists learned a long time ago that they lose public debates, so they come up with excuses like this.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 01:06 PM
1

I've made several arguments along the same lines but from the libertarian/classical liberal capitalist perspective. I do see feminism and other aspects of cultural Marxism as a divide and conquer strategy by the plutocracy.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 01:44 AM
1

Paywall.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:46 AM
1

Heroes, both of them!
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:44 AM
1

The Mini Ice Age, MGTOW, Milo and Paul Joseph Watson are going to play a prominent role in the backlash.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:34 AM
8

Proponents of equal rights, like the author, echo First Wave Feminism. Second Wave Feminism has always been toxic, it has always intended to destroy western civilization by destroying men to destroy marriage, and it has always been psychopathic and narcissistic. MGTOW is the only rational response left to men.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 02:20 PM
5

When I complained about it, the response defended the "women are victims, men are villains" meme. They intended it to support those stereotypes.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:01 PM
4

When A woman speaks about her experience of being assaulted, that's the time for respect. When feminists whinge about men victimizing women, that's the time for disrespect. Modern feminists--the second wave, there is no third or fourth--are hatemongers spreading misandry. They blame and shame to silence and control, and they have nothing to say that is worth hearing.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:57 PM
1

I just emailed Tom to let him know I posted this here. I hope he will come up with an "official" Men Are Good poster with appropriate contact and domain name info that everybody can print out. Wouldn't it be cool if millions of us printed out and posted something like that? (FYI, I don't know Tom, I have no affiliation with him. I just admire his work and think his "Men Are Good" theme is a great response to misandry.) Here's the link to his YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/1menareg…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:58 AM
1

Had to, what? Were you the one who sent me the Stargate photo? I like it!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:45 AM
1

It spits in the eye of feminist orthodoxy while being as innocuous as saying puppies and kittens are good. Feminists constantly harangue us with the subliminal message that men are bad. Only the most fanatical and irrational would dare to accuse us of misogyny for saying "men are good." And if any employer dared to retaliate, what a discrimination case it would be. Not that I'm a lawyer, but while I've gotten a lot of perplexed looks, to my knowledge nobody has complained.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:44 AM
4

http://www.backlash.com/images/HnW_poster.jpg
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:36 AM
2

I am MGTOW and I do support all men going their own way. But we can do a Men Are Good campaign, too, and still be MGTOW.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 03:20 AM
36

A few months ago my employer put up a poster that stereotyped men as violent perpetrators and women as their victims. When my concerns were brushed off, I responded by borrowing Tom Golden's great YouTube channel art and posting this image in my cubicle. About a week later I replaced it with the version linked below. This would be a simple thing to do, and unlike the posters from AVfM, it's g-rated and suitable for the workplace. What about starting a Men Are Good campaign? Here's the poster art…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:38 PM
1

As I'm getting close to retirement (very possibly this year), I will be very inclined to do things like this in the years to come. One sign I would be inclined to carry: #FeminismIsCancer #MGTOW is the Cure.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:13 PM
2

MGTOW is not a movement. It's a consciousness. While there are always men caught up in the red pill rage, most get over it. Fundamentally, MGTOW is not about avoiding women, but about withdrawing our support for an anti-male system. We withdraw the sanction of the victim.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:02 PM
1

I added it to my watch later list and I'll listen to it tomorrow, but...MGTOW is a consciousness, not a movement. It's going Galt against the system. The power of feminism has nothing to do with them and everything to do with us. We give them power. MGTOW takes it away one man at a time, by revoking the sanction of the victim.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:59 PM
9

Feminism is Cancer. MGTOW is the cure.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 05:36 PM
1

It promotes misandry and opposes freedom because the people at these marches support big government that displaces men in families, and all rights and privileges for women and all responsibilities and obligations for men.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:50 PM
1

Me neither, but I scored 78-30-50.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:03 PM
0

MGTOW is the rational response.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 05:53 PM
2

Oh, I dunno, most days I identify as "feminism is cancer," but this afternoon I identify as a grouch.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:53 PM
1

Yet another reason to go MGTOW. When Aaron Clarey teases "VirginTow," he's correctly identifying a demographic within the MGTOW community that is using MGTOW as an excuse. But in a recent video, he spoke at length on the subject and why an ever growing number of men are saying enough is enough, and bowing out of a system that penalizes men simply because we're men. There are many women in the office in which I work. Probably more women than men. Lots of women are in supervisory and management po…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:54 PM
8

Women already have sex robots. They're called vibrators. Are men obsolete, yet? Virtual slaves, maybe, but obsolete? Not!
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:12 PM
3

In the 80s and 90s and 00s, tradcons threw MRAs under the bus. By 99, I came to the conclusion nothing would change regarding feminism and misandry until and unless women demanded it. Although it had no name at the time, I went MGTOW. Fast forward, thanks to guys like Milo and Paul Joseph Watson and Uncle Bern and Cappie Cap and TFM and Sandman (yes, there are others, but I can't list them all), tradcons are beginning to come around, but not by much, and I'm still inclined to think that we have …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:18 PM
-1

Warren Farrell, Richard Doyle, and thousands of men and women have complained about this, but it's not enough to stop the feminists and their Cultural Marxist agenda to destroy the west.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:56 PM
9

I think it was Camille Paglia who said that (in the west), it's not "rape culture," but "rape fantasy culture."
/r/MensRights11/12/17 09:00 PM
3

In the United States, under Ellison v. Brady, the answer to your question is yes.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:49 PM
11

Since 1988 I've been at this, and I welcome the growing number of men who are joining the backlash against the feminist hatemongers.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 09:02 PM
2

In 1995, the Seattle Times excoriated us for saying things like this. It does my heart good to see a mainstream news outlet provide a more or less objective report.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:00 PM
6

I met Prof. Kimmel several years ago on the Bertice Berry Show. As an American Indian MRA, I was there to speak on behalf of white men, while Kimmel was there to speak on behalf of white men making amends to women and blacks for millions of years of oppression. (That could be a slight exaggeration.) A few years ago on a CNN blog, he said it was a well known talk show. (The show was cancelled after less than 2 years.) He said some other things. I called him out on it. He contacted me by email and…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:58 PM
3

The feminist condemnation of men as violent is racist. Yes, that's right, racist. Stereotyping men as violent relies primarily on crime statistics of black men, and as the crime rate for black men is counted in a handful per 10 thousand, it's a false stereotype, and that makes it racist. When I published this in 1992, Eleanor Smeal of the Feminist Majority confessed, on a CNN show, that she hadn't realized that and that feminists needed to stop stereotyping men as violent for this reason. That d…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:02 PM
0

It will never happen until and unless women want it to happen. What will it take for women to want it to happen? MGTOW.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:15 AM
2

I agree. While there will be a demand for humans in some jobs, these will be afforded primarily by the wealthy, while the rest of us will come to rely on robots. Personally, I'm looking forward to having robots in my life.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:47 AM
1

You're absolutely right. 26 years ago Clarence Thomas got raked over the coals by Anita Hill, which was the same time that, after making comments like she wanted me in her office on my knees and making several overtures and inappropriate comments, my Microsoft manager, Nell Miller, flew into a jealous rage and accused me of hostile environment sexual harassment for paying one of my female coworkers a compliment. My takeaways are similar to yours: never compliment a female coworker, never look at…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:57 AM
1

They do this because they can get away with it, and they can get away with it because of Student Loans, which are guaranteed by the federal government. End the federal guarantees, and universities will have to become sensitive to their (paying) customers. That would, of course, also starve useless programs, like women's studies.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:30 AM
1

The landmark case of Ellison v. Brady established that women and men experience different things as conduct of a sexual nature that creates a hostile environment, and therefore a different standard must apply depending on the gender of the victim. In what kind of conduct do women commonly engage that they do not consider sexual, but men do? How could that conduct create a hostile environment for men, even though women would not see it that way?
/r/MensRights03/11/17 11:10 AM
3

The laws are skewed against men. This is intentional. Second Wave Feminists made it very clear that their goal was to destroy western civilization by destroying marriage, and to destroy marriage they had to destroy men. It's in their books, if you can hold your bile long enough to read them. In the sixties and seventies, we didn't believe they could do it, but by the eighties they were succeeding. Now the laws are on the cusp of making masculinity illegal, because it's "toxic." This will not cha…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:21 PM
5

Feminists have been making an issue of this for more than 20 years, and you can find early rumblings about this in Shulamith Firestone's first book, The Dialectic of Sex. From the beginning, the goal of Second Wave Feminism (which has carried over to the 3rd and 4th "wave" ripples0, has been to destroy civilization. They think that a matriarchal utopia will magically appear out of the rubble of the destruction of patriarchal civilization. But feminists just don't get it, patriarchy is built upon…
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:10 PM
2

It's been that way at least since 1994, when Microsoft Word showed misandry as a misspelled word. ... and it still does.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:06 PM
3

When enough men ignore women, this nonsense will end.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:00 PM
9

Good video, although I had to swallow my bile to listen to that vile, disgusting person. In the 90s I attended 2 of her lectures at the University of Washington and she plays a good game but in my observations and opinion she is one of the most dishonest people. Christina Hoff Sommers exposed multiple lies in Wolf's first book, The Beauty Myth, Wolf responded that she was very angry, and the book continues to sell. In this conversation, she plays fast and loose regarding the wage gap to dodge th…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:56 PM
1

Marty isn't a journalist, he's an economist and an old time programmer (and the guy who, back in the 80s, tried to privatize social security), the creator of the Socrates machine learning forecasting application, and the subject of the Forecaster documentary that is currently banned in the United States.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:53 PM
3

For blue pill egalitarians who are still clinging to the delusion that real social, political and legal gender equality for men can be attained through political and legal action, nothing. For red pill men, it's obvious: the only way to end pervasive misandry and legal discrimination against men, is for men to become scarce. This can happen in different ways, and one of them is for men to stop giving women attention, including sexual attention, and sex robots will contribute to that.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:50 PM
2

TFM has a video I haven't gotten to yet with a thumb showing what looks like two women. The caption reads, "One is an expensive sex object that will never love you...the other is a sex robot."
/r/MensRights18/10/17 07:46 PM
3

Everybody here is, of course, aware of this. Armstrong puts an economic spin on it, but while he has profound insights into many things, I think he's either ignoring or missing the analytical views of others like Catherine Austin Fitts, who sees an decline in population coming soon to an apocalypse near you.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:31 PM
2

This article could serve as an introduction to an Amazon link for George Gilder's 1986 book, Men and Marriage. His chapter on the topic of this article is only one of many, and yes, it's still available after 31 years. Even though Gilder is a tradcon, he wrote 3 red pill books: Sexual Suicide, Naked Nomad, and Men and Marriage (which was actually an update of Sexual Suicide). For a blue pill man, Gilder's book truly provides a red pill experience. Or at least it did for me back when it was new.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:46 PM
2

Having been very active in the MRM during the 90s and then MGTOW in all but name going on 20 years, I appreciate the difference between MGTOW and MRAs, but while an attack on the MRM is not necessarily an attack on MGTOW, an attack on MGTOW, unless it comes from the MRM, is an attack on the MRM.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:25 PM
2

MGTOW, it seems to me, should count as "non-binary."
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:31 AM
5

In the US, under the precedent set by Ellison v. Brady, a female coworker wearing a short skirt or tight top or showing cleavage can be guilty of hostile environment sexual harassment. This is something that feminists--and employers--are desperate to keep men from knowing. There are 3 criteria for determining hostile environment sexual harassment: was the conduct of a sexual nature is number one. And in the view of most men, a woman wearing a short skirt or a tight top of showing cleavage is eng…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:22 AM
4

It's 8 Seconds, according to SCOTUS. I don't recall the details, but several years ago the Supreme Court of the US heard a case and decreed that looking turned into staring or leering that was actionable as sexual harassment if the staring lasted longer than 8 seconds. Given how egregiously men in the west are penalized for expressing interest in women, I don't look.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 01:16 AM
1

To understand modern feminism, you need to start with the feminist writers of the 1960s and work your way to the present. The fundamental goal of modern feminism (which is Second Wave Feminism despite claims about there being third and fourth waves) is the Marxist destruction of western civilization. Equal rights for women is a facade. So while there are women who believe the equal rights message and who do embrace reason and evidence, the movement is Marxist and as such must reject science to a…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 04:10 PM
1

Everything she describes in this video can be summed up in one word: Libertarian. And from the seventies and eighties a lot of the feminist rhetoric was very libertarian. But while the libertarian feminists were leading empowered lives, the Marxist feminists, who had been there from the very beginning of the Second Wave, were taking over the movement. Their goal was to destroy western civilization (use the "master's tools" to destroy the "master's house") by destroying the nuclear family, which …
/r/MensRights01/09/17 12:01 AM
9

A true to female nature version would have all the girls breaking up into cliques and back-biting one another while demanding to be the center of attention, instead of breaking up into bands and fighting for dominance. But the point of the story was to pan anarchy, because like most people the author didn't understand anarchy, which is "self-rule." True anarchists are among the most productive and often most brilliant people in the world.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:36 PM
1

After factoring in years in the paid labor force and consumption of tax funded services, men pay 70% of taxes.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:40 PM
1

Most of the histories I've seen ignore everything between 1960 and 2000. Roosh, for example, did a podcast in which he effectively dismissed everything prior to about 2002. I don't trust anything from Elam, but I'll read A Brief History of The Men’s Rights Movement and do a review of it.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 08:06 PM
2

Second wave feminism (and the third and fourth waves are not waves in the same sense that distinguished the first and second waves, but are simply generational variants of the second wave), was always essentially Marxist in nature and the stated goals of many of the second wave feminists was to destroy the west by destroying marriage by destroying men for the purpose of establishing a socialist state. In other words, socialism has always been the goal of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:01 PM
24

When I went to work at Microsoft in 1988, I felt like I had finally found a workplace I could call home. They cared little about credentials but a lot about intelligence, creativity and productivity. As one of the Account Managers there told me, "At Microsoft, you can work as hard as you want to." A few months before I got fired, I learned a very painful truth: it was an ideological echo chamber where feminist dogma (cultural Marxism) was on the ascent and any man who dared to contradict their a…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:23 AM
1

I agree that NCFM isn't extreme, their silly habit of labeling just about any guy they agree with as an NCFM representative. Mel Feit's National Center for Men doesn't get much attention, but they used to be a very good example of what the MRM was really about, and why feminists hate us.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:35 PM
2

I wonder if they're getting hit with a DOS attack. The page won't load.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:15 PM
2

There has been infighting and back biting within the FRM and MRM since 1966. If it's okay for MRAs and MGTOW to criticize one another, why wouldn't it be okay for Cathy to do the same? Now, Cathy, along with Christina, claims to be an "equity" feminist, and I've criticized them both for that. As I see it, feminism has become a hate movement and the term lost all utility decades ago. So Cathy and I disagree on that, and some other things, but I respect her and like her...even if the one time we m…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:59 PM
12

In the case of Ellison v. Brady, they argued that women experience sexual harassment differently than men, and the case set the precedent to create a uniquely female "reasonable woman standard," and a uniquely male "reasonable man standard," in sexual harassment cases. Unfortunately, men are not availing themselves of the protections they offers. While women may not see a tight sweater on a full figured woman as "conduct of a sexual nature," most heterosexual men in the west do. A female coworke…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 07:48 PM
1

Eric Hoffer's book on mass movements, The True Believe, explains this. Great book, short, easy read.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:22 PM
2

Kenedy sounds a lot like Michael Kimmel.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:49 PM
11

"Potty parity" is one of those perennial issues that feminists recycle. The first time I heard of it was in 1994. We made fun of it back then. But like the wage gap myth, it never dies.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:38 PM
9

As a culture, men in the west have failed the collective shit testing. Men who stand up to the shit testing get attacked and sometimes destroyed by the beta male white knight proxies of the globalist elites.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:59 PM
7

Go on strike. In 1999 or 2000 I realized (and wrote) that the only time the MRM gained any real traction was when women spoke on our behalf. Society does not treat the specifically male complaints of men seriously. And in our gynocentric age, with hypergamy run amok, the only thing we can do is step back and let it fail. Ironically, there is evidence for this in Reay Tannahil's outstanding book (written many years ago), Sex In History. Paraphrasing, she noted that when a society prospers, gynoce…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 07:53 PM
2

I want a T-shirt that reads, "Feminists Are Funny: Cast Aspersions At Them"
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:32 PM
4

Several years ago I noted that when the economy crashes, so will socialist programs like feminism. Then I despaired when I discovered Martin Armstrong's solution, which would save the government. But then my spirits lifted when Armstrong (and then many other even more authoritative sources) revealed that we are starting a new dangerous cold period, if not a new mini ice age, that will wreak havoc on the socialist programs. So take heart. Nature will help to correct socialist perversions, such as…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:30 PM
3

I am American Indian and I might start taking the SJWs who complain about cultural appropriate serious when they include the consumption of corn, tomatoes and potatoes, all of which originated in Central and South America, in their list of things to stop appropriating.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:33 PM
3

Roosh has a good website but, like so many others he keeps taking credit for the work of others. In a video several months ago, he claimed that PUAs were responsible for creating the manosphere that allowed Trump to be elected. He claimed that PUAs were first with antiestablishment websites and were first on usenet (the precursor to the newsgroups). He utterly ignored that Robert Sheaffer and I started our MRA/Anti-feminist websites nearly 10 years before there were any PUA websites. Now, in thi…
/r/MGTOW28/05/17 03:33 PM
1

Roosh has a good website but, like so many others he keeps taking credit for the work of others. In a video several months ago, he claimed that PUAs were responsible for creating the manosphere that allowed Trump to be elected. He claimed that PUAs were first with antiestablishment websites and were first on usenet (the precursor to the newsgroups). He utterly ignored that MRAs were on usenet as far back as 1988 and that Robert Sheaffer and I started our MRA/Anti-feminist websites in 1995, nearl…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 03:32 PM
1

Climate change happens with or without humans. If we increased atmospheric CO2 by 2000%, life would thrive. Global warming stopped in 1998 and we are currently in a cooling phase that will either end in 15 years, or continue for another thousand years.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 08:03 PM
3

Second Wave feminism and its third and fourth ripple derivatives are sexism.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:59 PM
1

I used to support AVfM and Tieman. Paul Elam was even a member of my Backlash Yahoo group years before he started AVfM, and to support him I began contributing articles, but then Tieman and a host of other progressives on AVfM attacked me, at which point Elam stopped talking to me. And as a former leader of the MRM, I can say that the problem with the MRM is that it's trying to mitigate hypergamy in a gynocentric civilization with legislation that will make men the legal equals of women. It will…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:43 PM
2

The common mistake is that there is such a thing as Third Wave Feminism. There is not. All of the Third Wave memes began in the seventies and eighties...with Second Wave Feminism. The First Wave was woman suffrage. Those who, like Christina Hoff Sommers and Cathy Young, identify as "Equity Feminists" are a continuation of First Wave Feminism. The feminism of the sixties to the present is Second Wave Feminism, it's entirely a hate movement, and the sole distinction between the Second Wave and the…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:28 PM
1

Yes, it is. It might interest you to know that the first suicide ever documented on the internet (back when it was just usenet and email), was Allen Wells. Allen was my friend, we both worked at Microsoft, and he was facing being extradited from Washington state back to New Hampshire by his ex-wife to put him in jail there for refusing to to comply with the court's decision to increase the already exorbitant child support.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:08 PM
-2

What would happen to feminism and women's rights if there were widespread crop failures due to flooding and erratic cold snaps around the globe, and this continued for a minimum of 15 years? Hint: this is already happening. While the genocidal global warming alarmists have forced most of the west to prepare for a catastrophe that will never come, we have entered a global cooling phase in conjunction with a grand solar minimum that will likely usher in a mini ice age, if not another little ice ag…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:04 PM
1

No. The "radical feminists" were (and are) the second wave. The "feminists" of the sixties and today are echoes of the first wave. There is no third and fourth wave. These are all just ripples of the second wave. The MRM is a reaction to the second wave, and MGTOW is not a movement but a consciousness.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:11 PM
3

The spin that most of the videos on this topic miss...I'll cover it in my next...is that YT is screwing the advertisers, too. How? They're sending ads to the wrong users. How many of you have seen the "race is on" ad for girls to run the UN and the US, etc? I'm exactly the wrong demographic for that ad, yet I've seen it dozens of times. One of the channels I subscribe to belongs to a guy who used to advertise on YT but doesn't anymore because his ads were not being targeted to his target audienc…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:04 PM
7

I posted this here because they're coming after MRAs, MGTOW and Antifeminists, too. They're demonetizing my anti-misandry videos at the rate of two a day, now. Not that I rely on YouTube revenue. My total AdSense revenue comes to about $50 per year. So for me it's not a big deal, but I will be very surprised if they demonetize the feminist hatemongers, so you can see where this is heading.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:43 AM
987

There's an old MRM joke that goes like this: When astronomers announced the end of the world, the headlines read, "Asteroid to strike the Earth, women and children hardest hit."
/r/MensRights20/03/17 07:50 PM
5

TradCons have long held that marriage civilizes men, but in Civilization And Its Discontents, Sigmund Freud argues that marriage civilizes women. I tend to think that it civilizes both, but that in the west the law now so penalizes men that any man who gets married is inviting disaster and we're better off going Galt (MGTOW). So who, really, is being harmed by the decline of marriage?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:59 PM
1

A quick and easy response to stuff like that is to simply reply, "What a sexist thing to say," and then refuse to say anything more on the subject.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:57 PM
1

First Wave Feminism and Second Wave Feminism (and the subsequent 3rd and 4th ripples that are part of the 2nd Wave), are two separate and distinct mass movements. So it would be accurate to say that Second Wave Feminists are anti-First Wave Feminism, but their war on men is fought under the banner of feminism and so we should take them at their word and be anti-feminist ourselves, as we oppose their brand of feminism.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:59 PM
1

Rumor has it that Gretchen Mordmanner, co-executive of the Women's Elite V-jay-jay Cooperative, is the global leader.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:54 PM
1

Read The True Believer, by Eric Hoffer. Eventually, every mass movement turns bad. In my most recent video I talk about how my 1994 Seattle Times interview. During that interview, the reporter told me that the MRM is reactionary, and I said yes, of course. There is a key difference between the MRM and the "going-Galt" MGTOW: the MRM is a movement, and even in 1994 we were seeing early signs that it will eventually turn into a hate movement, and in the January 1995 issue of my magazine we ran an …
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:07 PM
1

I hope you're a STEM major.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:01 PM
1

It cost me 2 or 3 jobs, 3 times I was less than 2 weeks away from being homeless, I lived on the brink of poverty for many years, and as others have noted, the social backlash of being labeled a rape apologist and a misogynist, among other things.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:33 AM
1

Good on you, brother, I can relate.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:22 AM
2

Milo has been one of the most successful proponents of men's rights and in opposing the feminist hate mongers, so commentary about attacks on him very much fit this sub. What do I know? I've been involved in opposing feminists and defending men's rights since 1989 (on usenet), and 1993 (I published The Backlash! 'zine), and 1995 to date (with my backlash website), and about 2013 to date (with my thebacklash YouTube channel), so I know a thing or two about it. And how long have you been involved …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:15 AM
5

During the 1990s I was very active in the Men's Rights Movement, at which time I was the equivalent of a cross between AVfM and ROK, and in my MGTOW Consciousness video ( https://youtu.be/MW4Z3fCyRiY ) I very emphatically stated that the MRM is a movement. And even during the time I was, for a few years, the main figurehead, nationally, of the MRM (no, I'm not putting myself on the same level with Warren, but he has always been more like the intellectual father, while others have been the activi…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 12:47 AM
1

Warren Farrell argued, in Why Men Earn More, that between work and home, men work more hours than women.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 08:50 PM
1

One of the guys who wrote for The Backlash! was a scholar of some fame who wrote an article in which he posited that the reason most serial killers are men, is because most of the women who would be serial killers lack the necessary intellectual capacity and usually get caught early in their..."careers."
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:09 PM
1

Uh, the Men's Rights Movement started in the 1980s and arose out of the Father's Rights Movement, which began with Richard Doyle in 1968.
/r/MGTOW31/01/17 08:52 PM
1

As a former leader of the MRM who, long before there was the MGTOW name for it, went Galt, the parallel between the MRM and Feminism is that the MRM is a reaction to Feminism and the main thrust of the MRM has always been either to counter feminism (the anti-feminists) or to catch up with feminism (the MHRM). Anti-feminism is basically anti-identity politics, anti-leftism, anti-progressivism and pro-individual rights, and from fathers rights to mens rights to PUAs to tradcons to MGTOW, we can al…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:15 PM
1

If I remember right, Warren Farrell, in his Why Men Earn More, said the real gap that might be attributable to sexism was 3 cents. Where you do find actual sexism in pay is not among the rank and file, but among the political and entertainment elites, and in the highest echelons. Granted that candidates for CEOs will scrape for the highest salaries they can get, the fact is that few CEOs are objectively worth a fraction of the salaries they command. It takes generations to build a pipeline of CE…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:05 PM
1

In the early 1990s, Warren Farrell pointed out that feminism was an upper-middle class white women's movement that ignored minority women and their issues. This was followed by a lot of virtue signaling from the feminist community during which they rushed to push minority women into the spotlight. And after a couple of years they resumed focusing on the laments of upper-middle class white women. This happens every ten years or so.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 02:06 PM
1

Feminists are funny, cast aspersions at them. For 20 years I tried the "not all feminists are like that" approach, and found out that all of the dominant feminists are like that. I think Christina and Cathy are great, but we absolutely disagree on the the utility of the word, feminism. It has been utterly tainted beyond all redemption. Feminism is a hate movement that advances the cause of cultural Marxism, and there is no such thing as a 'good feminist.' Only good people who are overly optimist…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:19 PM
2

As an old time MRA, in the 90s I was one of the few rightists among a sea of leftists. Unlike Bern Chapin and some of my other fellow right-leaning YouTubers, I don't attack left-leaning MRAs but accept them as allies. One who is missing from your list, below, is Warren Farrell, who is one of my heroes despite being an avowed liberal.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:07 PM
17

Reminds me of the old MRA joke: the headline reads, Asteroid to strike Earth, women and children hardest hit.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:51 PM
5

Something I find very ironic about the modern MRM, Anti-feminists and MGTOW, is how they exist in a historical vacuum. It's all brand new today. Nothing came before them. Except, there is a historical context. In this video, Stefan covers a subject I very specifically covered in an article that I wrote 24 years ago, posted on my website almost 20 years ago, and turned into a video on my thebacklash channel more than a year ago. So of course I agree with him. But then to compound the irony, he ev…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:52 AM
2

As an old-time MRA and a MGTOW, I admire Milo and while I view MGTOW as the real backlash, I see Milo as the chief catalyst on behalf of MRAs, MGTOW and freedom. He is one of my heroes.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:08 PM
0

While my sympathies are with the Libertarians and, in my youth I was very active in the Libertarian Party, it took me some 10 years to see the wisdom in Ron Paul's move to the GOP. If Hillary is elected, it will accelerate the crash and burn and invite a not-peaceful revolution, while Trump would likely delay the crash and burn and usher in a peaceful revolution.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:03 PM
1

Warren Farrell's Why Men Earn More, and The Myth of Male Power are excellent resources.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:59 PM
1

You should also go to Sandman's channel on YouTube and listen to a few dozen of his videos, after which you will fully understand why you should NOT get engaged.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:11 PM
1

Post Structuralism, then. Frankfurt School.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:14 PM
1

Women are far more likely than men to go to the ER for minor injuries resulting from Intimate Partner Violence (IPV), and they are far more likely than men to go to the police. The statistics from those sources are considered "self-reporting." When studies are conducted in which researchers randomly sample a population with interviews and polls, they consistently find that women engage in at least as much IPV as men. Feminists always respond to this by pointing out that women sustain most of the…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:11 PM
1

That's why you need to follow Turd Flinging Monkey's advice, and come out of the closet and admit to the world that you identify as a Lesbian Muslim.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:55 PM
1

The key fact missing in this stats is that these are reported. In every study of non-self reporting victims; i.e., not police statistics, the perpetration rate is about the same.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:51 PM
4

Imagine a club full of college women. 10% are women's studies majors learning "rape culture." Go ahead. Hit on them. Imagine a dating website full of single mothers. 10% are serial false accusers. Go ahead. Date them.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:26 PM
1

The headline is incorrect. It should read Women earned majority of WORTHLESS doctoral degrees in 2015 for 7th straight year and outnumber men in grad school 135 to 100
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:59 PM
1

I am American Indian. I support Trump. As biracial I have experienced both anti-American Indian racism and anti-White racism. Years ago I concluded that "white privilege" is the expectation of fair treatment, and that all that would be necessary to mitigate this would be to extend fair treatment to all, whereas those who screech about white male privilege want to penalize white men. Initially, I thought the BLM protests were legitimate, but then I heard BLM protesters and representatives hating …
/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:38 PM
1

Affirmative Action. As an American Indian I could have (and still could) benefit from Affirmative Action, but I have never tried because it is sexist and racist and was evil from the very beginning. Eliminate everything that relies on Affirmative Action and you take a major step toward resolving multiple MRA issues.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:12 PM
1

Mel deserves global recognition for his tireless efforts. I first met him on Night Talk with Jane Whitney in Boston, and he was among the most knowledgeable and articulate I've met before or since.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:38 PM
1

I strongly recommend reading Eric Hoffer's book, The True Believer. Once a mass movements starts, it takes on a life of its own as the true believers run wild. Betty Friedan set the tone right at a time when Marxists were looking for anything they could use to tear down the west. Among MGTOW leaders like Stardusk, there is strong resistance against acknowledging the role that Marxism and Post-Structuralism has played in the attack on men, but I was a youth when this was happening and I saw how i…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 05:41 PM
1

Kintoun is right. Check out Claire Renzetti's book, Violent Betrayal.
/r/MGTOW25/07/16 05:10 PM
2

For me, it's all about the legal climate. When I began bringing this up in 1999 that men were saying no to marriage, feminists and the media came down on me like a ton of bricks. But the fact is that the laws and courts are now so biased against men that we are forced to behave defensively, even when we meet women who, because of personality or upbringing or both are probably all right. Short of transhumanism, we're not going to change human nature. But I do know several women I consider to be g…
/r/MGTOW25/07/16 04:58 PM
5

When I registered for the draft at age 18, I could not register to vote as the voting age at that time was 21.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:43 PM
4

The title "Dead Broke Dads" looked very familiar so I had to go and check, and found that while it's not plagiarism, Stuart Miller and Armin Brott wrote something under the same title 20 years ago. Good title.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 08:01 PM

Between 95 and 96% of the people killed by police are men. As an American Indian man (yes, really, I served for 10 years on the Cowlitz Indian tribal council), I am more concerned that Men's Lives Matter and the race-baiting of the BLM promoters is very offensive. I do talk about race on my website and YouTube channel but I would not dwell on it here except as it pertains to men, and I believe that BLM may have inadvertently highlighted the criminalization of masculinity, which could make it rel…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:44 PM
1

Deansdale is right. I vividly remember the early days of NOW and Ms. and have read hundreds of feminist books and articles from the period, and 2nd wave feminism was dominated by separatists and misandry and (yes, really) man-hating lesbians who viewed feminism as a way to generate more sexual opportunities for themselves by destroying heterosexual marriage.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 09:12 PM
1

Tom Sequitur on Twitter and YouTube is spearheading an effort to create an open source MRA/MGTOW-friendly alternative.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 09:01 PM
1

No. For a long time biology has seen men as essentially female hybrids. Only feminists claim and feel that men are defective women. Several years ago I made the argument, which others including Stefan Molyneux have picked up on, that because more complex organisms take longer to mature, and men take longer to mature than women, that we could make the argument that men are more advanced than women. Certainly, some vloggers like Turd Flinging Monkey do make that argument, and provide evidence to s…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 07:07 PM
2

Never have a meeting like that in private. If the story is true, he's lucky she didn't accuse him of rape. When she first told him she was pregnant, he should have gotten all the documents he did get, and in addition he should have produced a no contact order (these can be downloaded from government websites), mailed them all to her by registered return receipt mail, and then he should have had nothing more to do with her.
/r/MGTOW11/06/16 09:18 PM
2

Martin Fiebert
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:50 PM
3

More wars. On both my website and YouTube channel I have an article/video titled Memsahib Power that highlights the role women play in ostracizing "others," which is a key component of war.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:54 PM
2

As an old time MRA, about 15 years ago I came to the conclusion that it was time to "go Galt." In 2011 or 2012 when I discovered the MRA here and on YouTube, I thought maybe it had a chance. But, I quickly came to the conclusion that MRA today were facing the same roadblocks we did back in the 80s and 90s, which was about the time I discovered that an entire community had "gone Galt": MGTOW. To me, this seems reasonable. MRAs and PUAs are all in the bargaining phase with feminism, trying to come…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:40 PM
1

Thanks everybody, especially for the advice about how to bypass the splash screen. It works.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:24 PM
2

The one in three nonsense began with the Mary Koss/Ms. Magazine Rape Campus Survey back in the late 1980s, and they used incredibly broad definitions and, worse, told women who said that they had NOT been raped or assaulted that, yes, they had too be raped or assaulted. So, contrary to what feminists claim, their inflated statistics are predicated upon NOT believing women.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:36 PM
2

I think a wiki type site could be valuable. My own site is 21 years old and during that time I've seen several come and go. http://www.backlash.com/book/
/r/MensRights02/03/16 09:27 PM
2

For decades, feminists have blamed men for this, but if "pink products" cost less than "blue products," I'd buy the pink products. Since women control more than 70% of the consumer dollars, markets target women with higher prices. All that is needed to counter this, is for women to buy "blue products" that are identical to "pink products" except that they are targeted at men instead of women. These include things like razors, boots and unscented toiletries.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 01:28 PM
2

I remember when 40,000 members was hailed as a milestone, and the current membership is at...118k, so it's looking pretty good to me.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 02:42 AM
15

And when I responded to that with, "Feminists are funny, cast aspersions at them," they condemned me for a misogynist.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:00 PM
4

Second wave feminism began as a Marxist movement that adopted Post-Modernism as a weapon to take power. From the outset, they had widespread support among men despite that they portrayed men as "the enemy." But as Mary Koss, Patricia Ireland, Catharine MacKinnon, Robin Morgan and, most prominently, Susan Brownmiller worked to create the "rape culture" narrative, it began to produce legislation that went beyond simply negatively stereotyping men to violating men's 14th Amendment rights. This moti…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:43 PM
1

Broadly speaking I agree that he's more of a tradcon. While 20 years ago I was known as an MRA, several of my articles and essays at that time were proto-MGTOW and today I consider myself MGTOW. (As should be evident from my videos, I'm not one of Aaron's neck-bearded "virginTows.") But unlike my buddy Bern, as a Classical Liberal with friends and allies on both the left and the right, I'm happy to embrace and share any civilized ally against the feminist bigots regardless of their political or …
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:37 AM
1

It would indeed be ironic if that's true about Microsoft. I'm American Indian (member, Cowlitz Indian Tribe), and I was fired from Microsoft by a White woman who was jealous because I complimented another one of her subordinates (who was just a friend and there was absolutely nothing sexual about it...of which there is no dispute because what I said was via email so it was all documented) while I ignored her several inappropriate advances. So while I would not doubt that you're right about Micro…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:00 AM
1

http://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:04 PM
1

You're exactly right. Her sordid history of misrepresenting rape and hyping a false narrative about rape culture gives her zero credibility on the subject.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:01 PM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:41 AM
1

It's not unintentional. In a recent live video chat session Julie explained very emphatically that she intended the video to be ironic because the feminist hate mongers' rape culture hysteria is nuts.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:40 AM
1

She's mocking feminists.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:39 AM
1

We concur.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:38 AM
2

I don't have time to read the article right now but I agree with the headline because I participated in developing that strategy. While the leftists with whom I worked embraced it as a means to catch up with feminists (and those men were my good friends), as a libertarian I always viewed it as a tactic to neutralize feminist extremism. Warren Farrell, who is one of my heroes, is one of those leftists who wants more government interference, while I see the solution as less government interference…
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:55 PM
3

It's only complicated if your focus is on adding more laws and more government programs, which is a progressive view. The only reason this is not a left-right issue is because there are progressives on the right, too, called neocons. The classical liberal/libertarian answer, on the other hand, is simple: less government, fewer laws, equal rights under the law for everybody.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:23 AM
1

Ted Pong, whose articles opposing circumcision I published in The Backlash! several years ago, pointed out that there is an even more medically compelling reason for performing preventative mastectomies on baby girls, as the rate of breast cancer is much, much higher than all of the diseases combined that are prevented by male infant circumcision. Of course, only a sadistic thug would be in favor of removing baby girls breasts, so what does that say about our modern medical establishment and the…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:16 AM
1

I'm 62 and it was not until several months ago that I finally confronted my father about the consequences of having me circumcised when I was a baby. One of the health problems that circumcision can cause is urethral strictures. In most cases, and especially if caught early enough, these can be corrected with surgery. But mine were not diagnosed until I was in my fifties. From the age of 6 I have had kidney infections, bladder infections and, starting about 25 years ago, chronic prostatitis, and…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:13 AM
1

That's right, attack the messenger and not the message.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:58 AM
1

With our huge government and all the "human" rights written into law, the 100 richest families own more than...what is it?...the bottom 3 billion? Oh, here it is in Forbes: "The 85 Richest People In The World Have As Much Wealth As The 3.5 Billion Poorest." Most of that wealth comes from government sanctioned expropriation of resources and crony capitalism; i.e., fascism. Seems to me that we're past due to try a system based on property rights in which the property rights of every individual are…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:38 AM
1

Turning MRA into MHRA is a "men are victims too" ploy. Something like 15 years before Paul & co. I was knee deep in strategy discussions that included "men are victims too" ploys. Warren Farrell--whom I admire and hold in very high regard--has indulged in that. But then, he's a progressive neo-liberal. Being a classical liberal I'm not partial to the me-too ploys. The elegance of the natural rights argument is that it applies to everybody. No class distinctions. Equal protection under the law, a…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:26 AM
1

Feminists stereotype all men--but particularly White men--as violent, but the crime statistics prove they are lying.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:52 AM
1

Wednesday the 21st, all critical comments had been removed; now they're back, and all the positive comments have been removed.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 01:40 PM
1

Certain individuals who are very unpopular here keep emphasizing a fact that is also very unpopular here: while neocons (right-wing progressives) have not been friendly to the MRM, and the religious right has often sounded like feminist sympathizers, classical liberals (aka conservatives) and libertarians routinely challenge the feminist antimale dogma while the neolibs (left-wing progressives) lead the effort to demonize men and masculinity. People who claim that men's rights is not a political…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:41 AM
2

It began with the Ms. Foundation's Rape Campus Survey conducted by Mary Koss.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 10:48 PM
1

As much as the progressives here hate people like Bern Chapin, it is demonstrably true that progressives on both the left and the right consistently promote anti-male policies and legislation while libertarians consistently promote policies and legislation that treat everybody fairly regardless of their sex. For generations, the primary feminist slogan has been, "the personal is political," and yet in this forum we have people who claim that politics has no place in discussions about men's right…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:49 AM
1

Coached? Probably. I thought you were going to say that she's really an MRA who is saying all that stupid stuff to make feminists look like imbeciles. Guess not.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 11:45 AM
1

Feminists label any expression of male interest in women as "harassment," and that's sexist. They attribute the peacock strutting (which has as it's sole function to get female attention) as establishing power when, as Warren Farrell clearly demonstrated, it's actually an expression of male powerlessness. Remember: feminism is not a "women's movement," but a political movement that uses women to advance a progressive agenda and we can neither defend nor advance men's rights until and unless we r…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:17 AM
1

I did not tag the post as Analysis and I gave you an excellent source to which you respond by accusing me of playing the victim. A typical progressive tactic is to engage in epithets whenever confronted with facts and references. Read the book, don't wait for the movie.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:20 AM
1

Pepper's at it again. In the past she and others have claimed that it's women who are choosing not to marry when all along the statistics show that there are far more divorced women than divorced men, and far more single, never married men than single, never married women. While the number of women who are shunning marriage may be on the rise, for the past 40 years men have led by a wide margin, and the most widely shared reasons can be boiled down to a single word: feminism. I believe in equal …
/r/MensRights18/10/14 07:38 AM
1

Your analysis is correct but could benefit from expanding to include how innovations affect demand. Jay Forrester wrote the original computer model for the Club of Rome that was the basis for Donella Meadows' book, The Limits to Growth, and is used to this day with increasingly complex add-ons, to justify panic about over population, etc. What they ignored then and now is the impact of innovations. For a class project I rewrote Forrester's model with the addition of two wild cards: technological…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 06:08 AM
1

Feminists are almost never called upon to support their assertions, and yet anti-feminists and MRAs are always called upon to support theirs. Feminists write books that are nothing but lengthy diatribes full of unsupported assertions and the mainstream embraces them without question. Meanwhile, some bloke writes a short comment and is peppered with demands for sources and evidence that would require a thick volume of footnotes. So here's your book of analysis, footnotes and sources: Why Men Earn…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:22 AM
2

You could be thinking of Thomas Sowell. While I often agree with Sowell the problem I've always had with him is that he tends to be glib and his scholarship is often mediocre. He would start with a factual statement and then derive conclusions that were unrelated to the aforementioned fact. The few articles on the wage gap written in the 80s were, as I recall, based on traditionalism rather than statistical analysis. George Gilder, however, may have analyzed it based on general principles. In 19…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:17 AM
1

Warren Farrell's book, Why Men Earn More.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 04:59 AM
1

Maybe, but China's economy is beginning to crumble as their real estate bubble bursts.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:21 AM
3

Claire M. Rezetti publicized the fact in her 1992 book, Violent Betrayal, but feminists throw a fit every time it's brought up and so the mainstream press and government agencies ignored and continues to ignore it.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:37 AM
1

You might frame it within the context of waves. Friedan & Co. were second wave feminists, then came the third wave, I don't know if the current crop is referred to as fourth wave, but the MRM has gone through a similar evolution. The first wave MRAs were a reaction to the feminist second wave, the second wave was the equalitarian (some would say "egalitarian") pro-feminist/male-positive MRAs, and the third wave is now where the second wave was perhaps 15 years ago. The first wave includes people…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:20 AM
0

Freedom and liberty are fundamental to the existence of humans qua human. Arguments that we should take that away from women because human nature will lead them to make choices you don't like is the slipperiest of slopes that is shared by many religions, especially progressivism and including feminism, and if adopted would ultimately lead to totalitarianism and tyranny. There is no excuse for it and no basis upon which it can be justified.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:37 PM
1

Libertarians believe in the non-aggression principle, and you seem to be saying that if we do not aggress against people, that's "oligarchy lite"? Well, whatever, but where women and men are concerned, throughout history power has shifted back and forth between the sexes. In her book, Sex In History, Reay Tannahil describes some of them. The difference between those periods in the past when women were ascendant and today, is that today the shift in power is promulgated by the government at the b…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:49 AM
0

Woman suffrage has nothing to do with the feminist extremism, today. Feminism is a hate movement. Responding to it with another hate movement will solve nothing and only perpetuate the cycle of sexism.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:30 AM
1

I'm a man, an American Indian, and autistic. The first house I lived in was a two room plank and pole shack. Through hard work my parents were able to move us into the working class end of an upper class neighborhood and the children and most of the teachers at the elementary and junior high schools I attended went out of their way to assure me I was the scum of the Earth and had no right to exist, let alone sully their lily white neighborhood. My race, my sex and my brain physiology do not defi…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:27 AM
1

Amusing but I would have liked a real recap. Wolf is from San Francisco. I spent a couple weeks in San Francisco 7 years ago and I was astonished by how rude and mean-spirited the people there, are. A native of Seattle I haven't traveled much and Seattle is notorious as "nice but aloof," so my reaction to San Francisco might be atypical, but during my week stay in NYC I found the people there to be quite amiable, the people of LA to be very approachable, the folks up in Vancouver, BC, to be even…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:45 AM
1

The fact is that the only political party that is 100% consistent with equal rights and responsibilities for everybody is the Libertarian Party. In the mainstream parties, the only ones who align with the LP on most issues, including gender, are the so-called "Ron Paul Republicans" and "Ron Paul Democrats," who are members of the Liberty Movement. You want to advance men's issues, support any of the above. Anything else is will only advance the progressive agenda on both the left (progressive-li…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:43 PM
1

I did not hear Josh (author of the video) say anything I DISagreed with. But, many subscribers to this subreddit have asserted that the MRM is and must be apolitical. Josh has correctly noted that feminism is a political ideology. (While the most common dictionary definition of feminism can be said to be libertarian, in practice it is Progressive Socialist, which is to say Marxist.)
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:10 AM
1

I didn't realize it was veiled.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:14 AM
1

At birth socialism is like a little puppy all warm and fuzzy but then socialism grows into a bloodthirsty beast that demands submission. Yours is at the little puppy phase, while the school system is closer to the bloodthirsty beast phase. Given a few generations, yours will become what theirs is, while theirs will become a totalitarian thug if it is left to run its course.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 09:11 AM
3

I tried to defend it and engaged in several online debates, but then several AVFM supporters began attacking me in comments on the site and accusing me of not caring for men (as if losing several jobs, living in near poverty for several years, and spending tens of thousands of dollars I could ill afford, and bypassing several opportunities for a relationship and family all to fight against feminist misandry somehow didn't count), and Paul apparently began stringing me along, telling me he wanted…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:41 AM
3

And too many feminists ignore their own misogyny...and misandry.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:36 AM
1

I dunno, it seems to me that there are a lot more anti-feminists than MRAs, these days.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:01 AM
2

While the MRM has always been reactionary, in the early years it was dominated by conservatives (fathers' rights) and libertarians (men's rights). But during the past 15 years progressives (socialists on the left, neocons on the right) have risen in prominence within the MRM. This is not surprising given that the Mythopoetic Men's Movement (often confused with but very different from the MRM) was always dominated by progressives, and that the men who were involved in the Mythopoetic Men's Moveme…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:15 PM
1

Eivind makes a very interesting point in his first sentence: "Elliot Rodger's manifesto is absolutely amazing. It reads like an expertly crafted and professionally edited novel. In fact, it is so well written that it almost makes me suspect the whole thing is a hoax." Intrigued, I went and scanned through Rodgers' manifesto. Eivind is right, it is too good. This smells like a false flag event.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:38 PM
1

I'm not familiar with The Sideshow. Yes, Ms, Feminist Majority and NOW had websites at that time but the commenter I was responding to specifically remarked on Jezebel, which is a blog. The Backlash has been online since 1995 and while I did not have and still do not have comments capabilities, I was posting my own comments on much as many bloggers do, today. The point I was making with my headline (and I know for a fact that many posters here express opinions in their headlines that are diametr…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:33 AM
0

The first 8 seconds: "I want to address what I consider to be an extremely pretentious and insulting phrase: 'Check Your Privilege!'"
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:04 AM
1

Me. Back then "MRA" meant Men's Rights Advocate, and my website was the center of the MRM on the web, in those days.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:59 AM
1

Quite right, I stated it in the headline.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:57 AM
1

There was no Jezebel blog back then and there were no feminist bloggers, but there was my website and I was doing back then what is called blogging, now.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:57 AM
1

There are many posts in this forum where the headline expresses the view of the poster, not of the article itself. I am merely following that practice. My point in posting this was that feminist, being pragmatic thugs, are embracing Monica now that it serves them to do so, but that they treated her like trash at the time, while the MRM generally treated her with sympathy, though I would not call it outright support.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:54 AM
6

Sounds like you didn't bother to watch as she said pretty much the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:20 PM
2

That was exactly her point.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:19 PM
2

Actually I think Julie is from one of the northern states, Minnesota, perhaps.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:18 PM
-4

While the feminist organizations rallied round their president, it was the MRAs who gave a sympathetic nod to Monica. The feminist establishment ignores this and wants everybody else to do the same.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:16 PM
1

Women in 1950s America were not treated like dirt. Did they have equal rights? No. But neither did men. Libertarianism is what feminism only claims to be. If you want to understand feminism, read The True Believer, by Eric Hoffer.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 11:48 PM
1

In the U.S., yes.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:04 PM
3

Some factions within the MRM--particularly among the fathers rights organizations--were opposed to women's rights. The vast majority of the men's movement, however, never was nor now is in opposition to women's rights. The men's rights movement is a backlash, but it is a backlash against feminists, not women. By dictionary definition, most MRAs are feminists. The problem is that very few feminists are, by dictionary definition, truly feminist. The definition of feminism is very libertarian. But …
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:24 PM
1

Bern's style appeals to a certain demographic. That I don't share his style takes nothing away from him. If I were to offer anything in the way of constructive criticism, it would be that he could expand his focus to criticize all progressives: not just the socialists on the left, but also the neocons on the right. Aaron is another guy whose style differs from my own. Like Bern, Aaron has a following, and it doesn't matter whether their following numbers a thousand or a million, every pebble cas…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 08:05 AM
1

Yes, that's me, a has been. :) Better, wouldn't you say, to be a has been than a never was? As for working to become wealthy, yes, but it's been not much more than three years since I began to work on that, not 20. Twenty years ago I began publishing The Backlash! the purpose of which was never to "strike it rich" but first to "expose and oppose negative male stereotypes" of the kind created and spread by the progressives. Then, while continuing to publish The Backlash! (and working at "day jobs…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 07:22 AM
1

What? You mean I had credibility? Nobody ever tells me these things. Very sad!
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:22 AM
3

Sadly Congress, all fifty state legislatures and innumerable universities, colleges, most major metropolitan newspapers and the mainstream of both major political parties lack your common sense.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:10 AM
2

I'll take Naomi Wolf's pro-liberty conversion seriously when she repudiates her best-selling book, The Beauty Myth, as a book of lies. Wolf demonstrated that with the backlash against feminist bigotry gaining traction that feminists are starting to hide behind support for gender-neutrality. But didn't Wolf say, "I don't think there is any one such thing as feminism"? Yes, and that comment falls into the category that, in 1995, I called "the feminist fog," which reveals that feminism in the breec…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:07 AM
0

Is there a term for someone who advocates equal gender rights? Yes, of course: libertarian. Moreover, libertarians also advocate the right of every individual to choose their own gender role.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:38 AM
-1

Dictionaries today claim egalitarian and equalitarian mean the same thing, but at one time they meant almost exactly the opposite that could be summed up thus: egalitarian = equal outcomes; equalitarian = equal opportunities. Neither of them really embrace equality in the eyes of the law. There is only one political philosophy that truly does that: libertarianism.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:32 AM
1

Prove that most voters are women? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_gender_gap And if female voters outnumber male voters, then, as feminists point out when they're not whining about being victims that women decide who gets elected. Hence, the huge majority of people in congress and other elected offices are men because that's whom women vote into office.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 07:36 PM
3

More men are elected to congress because most voters are women.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 05:48 AM
2

Yes, you're absolutely right. George Gilder hinted that something like this would eventually happen in Naked Nomads or Men and Marriage, and we were beginning to see enough evidence of it in the late 90s that several Seattle area MRAs wrote about it. But then, I also argued that when it happens in the workplace it's sexual harassment of men because it eventually fits all 3 legal criteria of harassment: conduct of a sexual nature, (can be) unwanted (because) it is pervasive and has the purpose or…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:08 AM
1

There are a lot of great comments here, but I just went and checked the article itself and there are no comments there so none of this is being shared with the civilians, who would benefit from reading what you have to say, so I hope some of you will go there and post some comments.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:52 PM
1

At the time the folks at AVFM were throwing tantrums over Cathy's previous article on gender issues, she told me she was finishing an article about the bogus rape culture for Reason. I have never known her to be other than fair and reasonable on the issues.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:04 AM
2

Contrary to what Ashtone wrote, all things libertarian are the most male-positive...and, ironically, the most female-positive. Why? Because libertarianism is inherently gender-neutral and eqalitarian in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:38 AM
1

Everybody has the right to have and express their opinions. Feminists, of course, disagree, but we're not feminists.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:39 AM
4

Cathy has been taking on the feminists and writing male-positive articles for almost as long as I have, which is a lot longer than almost anybody at AVFM and definitely years longer than any of the women who signed the Honey Badger Brigade article. Cathy's article was mildly critical, and suddenly she's public enemy number one. Everybody--and especially anybody who gets involved in a movement, like the MRM--should read Eric Hoffer's first book, The True Believer. You would understand why feminis…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:37 AM
3

My suggested course of action, first submit a complaint with your State Human Rights Commission. File a concurrent complaint with the EEOC. The basis of your complaint might be that you were treated differently than a similarly situated female coworker would have been. As for your job search, good luck! When I went through this in 1991 it was devastating, but today the environment is orders of magnitude worse. I feel for you.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:50 AM
4

A few years after Christina Hoff Sommers' splendid book, Who Stole Feminism? came out, Cathy Young's Ceasefire! was published. Sommers' book was well received, but Ceasefire languished for some reason. It's an excellent book (I had the privilege of receiving an advance copy from Cathy), and I strongly encourage everybody to read it.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:42 AM
1

If he had said the athlete would need the pecs of Daniel Craig, the only response might have been a lot of female columnists gushing about Craig's physique.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 04:35 AM
2

This analysis ignores that a whole slew of men have also been right about the various issues mentioned, and were also ignored. Those who "buck the system" or "speak truth to power" are often ignored and shoved to the side. What's sexist, here, is that the author is ignoring the many men who have done this and is focusing solely on the women.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:48 PM
1

I took the survey and found it interesting. But if the author is relying on the MR Subreddit to understand the issues, I can suggest better sources, starting as always with Warren Farrell: Myth of Male Power. Next, Cathy Young: Ceasefire! And a long time ago I laid out the issues in my first book, on a page that I am converting to a global archive page, but still lists the issues here: http://www.backlash.com/book/
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:46 PM
2

Several years ago my brother entered a teaching program. Like me, however, he tends to have a solemn visage. For this reason, and this reason alone, he was kicked out of the program. He was told he could not teach because his face was not suitable. To me this smacks of bigotry and intolerance, and helps to explain why more men do not become grade school teachers: they can't get past the sexist feminist gatekeepers who demand that men in general, and grade school teachers in particular, become mo…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:49 PM
2

Venker and Schlafly have been on the same page as many of us for many years. Where else I think they agree, is that when men finally do stage a feminist-style backlash against women, it will be orders of magnitude worse than what happened to men, and for at least a couple of reasons. For one, women's progress had to rely on the opposite sex, whereas men's progress, when it begins, will not. Second, males are far better adapted to wage war than women, and when men as a population finally do engag…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:45 PM
1

Two of my best friends, both of who were involved in founding The Backlash!, my anti-feminist website, died of oropharyngeal cancer.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:33 PM
1

When the housing market craters (again) and all these women are underwater on their loans, will the government bail out home buyers, and if so, will they only bail out women?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 01:35 PM
1

You're right. The point was never really to take daughters to work, since most jobs are boring and dull. It was to set aside a special day for boys to be indoctrinated about the evils of being male and how men are inferior to women. But as with everything feminists do that is based on their hatred of men, it backfired on them.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 02:02 AM
1

Ain't that the truth!
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:03 PM
14

I have tremendous respect and admiration for Sommers but I really wish she would give up her Trojan Horse efforts to smuggle libertarian ideals into the feminist camp. Feminism is libertarian in theory, but authoritarian in action and totalitarian in outcome. We should just accept that reality and reject feminism.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 11:42 AM
1

On that Bern and I disagree. Rush, it seems to me, started the effort to categorize all liberals as leftists and all rightists as conservatives. It was a lie, but as many talking heads on the left as on the right joined him to promote it as the truth. As you probably already knew (and I only recently learned), "crunchy cons" like me are really "classical liberals," while libertarians are the most extreme liberals. Meanwhile, as David Stockman brilliantly outlines in The Great Deformation, Reagan…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:25 AM
2

Yes, I agree, but when Bern uses the H I'm pretty sure he's being ironic.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:30 PM
1

Oh, okay, I had never noticed the inbox before. When I clicked on the link from your comment in my last post and I did what you suggested, I was surprised to see it acting like email, and that I had an inbox and a sent box. Sorry about that. Busy autistic guy with a day job, tribal reports and a few websites that I am, I only use the forum feature and never realized there was more to Reddit than that. Thanks, Rod
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:49 AM
1

Okay. I don't recall you telling me this before. Not that you didn't. Between my day job with the state, my tribal reports and my three sites, my autistic brain tends to get overwhelmed and I forget things that aren't part of my routine. Thanks, Rod
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:38 AM
4

I don't remember who originated this insight, but the equivalent of slut shaming for men, is creep shaming.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:35 PM
1

Feminists are stupid, cast aspersions at them. And when they complain that you're being violent or something, ask them how they feel about the "boys are stupid, throw rocks at them" slogan, and when they sputter out excuses, accuse them of sexism.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:21 PM
0

I missed my chance to meet Dr. Sommers when she came to Seattle years ago to promote Who Stole Feminism, but I'm a great admirer and I've always promoted her books on my site. Where I part company with her is over the strategy she shares with the women at the IWF: their belief that by calling libertarians and classical liberalis "equity feminists" or, in this case, "freedom feminists," that they can sneak it past the feminists and hoodwink them all into abandoning their evil progressive big gove…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:34 AM
2

Obviously I disagree with his fundamental thesis, but as Bern Chapin, Stardusk and Karen Straughan all agree, most of the old timers in the MRM were either libertarian or libertarian-leaning, and libertarianism is all about freedom: freedom of choice, freedom of association, freedom of expression, and so on. All things the left--and feminists--claim to support, while they act to take away every one of those freedoms. As with all of the articles on the Return of Kings website, Goldstein's perspec…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 08:15 PM
1

My parents have all but disowned me and a faction of feminazis in our very large extended family are trying to drive me out. Autistic kind of guy that I am, I care, but not that much. And every time it starts to get me down, I just remind myself of that. In fact, I have a sign with that slogan hanging on my cubicle wall at work to remind me: "I Care, But Not That Much!"
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:47 PM
1

I Googled her and if you're not an old fart like me, who finds tattoos vulgar, she's pretty. Being socially conservative (and politically libertarian), however, I do find tattoos very unattractive, and on a woman they are generally a sign that she is a lefty, which for me is a deal killer right up there with cigarette smoking, shooting heroin, voting for Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, and carrying a pocket poodle. But maybe she's a fine young libertarian who would make a splendid consort for a man…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:41 PM
2

There's a reason Tom Leykis was so popular in King County (Seattle & environs), there's a reason why several MRA groups have come and gone in the Seattle area, and there's a reason why many of us have left: Seattle feminists. For more than 30 years Seattle NOW, WAC and other feminist groups there told us men are rapists, men are harassers, and men are bad. The regional AAUW told us men oppress women in education. And the feminist separatists told us men don't belong in civilized society. Women i…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:20 PM
3

Ah, yes. In my chapter on cloning in the section under the heading, We Create Civilization Together, I commented on this: http://www.backlash.com/book/clones.html In that chapter I also noted that Naomi Wolf agreed with Freud on this particular, and at one of her lectures she called women, "buckets of lust." According to my notes, Wolf was speaking about her fourth book, which according to her bibliography was Misconceptions. I only read Wolf's first two books--Beauty Myth and Fire With Fire--so…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 11:06 PM
1

Fired from one job for writing a book about feminist issues from the male-positive perspective, fired from another for publishing a MRM 'zine, received so many death threats I stopped paying any attention to them, a girlfriend broke up with me over my MRA views (no great loss), more recently in 2012 I was threatened with loss of membership rights for making a motion to include women in a DV prevention campaign, 7 months ago those same people stood up in front of our members and slandered me with…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:55 AM
3

To say selling sex should be legal but buying sex should be illegal is like saying that cooking meth should be legal but buying meth should be illegal.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:17 AM
4

Here is the link to Warren's press release announcing his candidacy: http://www.backlash.com/content/gender/2003/rodvanmechelen082303b.html During the past year the ranks of the MensRights subreddit has grown from about 40k to now almost 71k, and I have wondered how many truly support the MRM and how many are really progressive moles intent on sabotaging the MRM as a political movement. Feminism is and always has been a political movement, and during the past 50 years it has been a progressive p…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:30 AM
4

Most of those degrees are useless.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 12:11 PM
1

Men's Issues are Political Issues and Liberty is the answer.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 11:53 AM
3

The Backlash! http://www.backlash.com/ In the first half of the 1990s we did it through a widely read 'zine, in the latter half of the 90s we were one of the first, if not the first MRM site on the web, and in a bad month text queries dropped to less than 600,000 (back then there were so few sites that we had "first mover advantage"), during the 2000s I did very little, took a little time off from the MRM, and now I'm following a plan of cross-pollination, mixing politics, money and investing, a…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 03:23 AM
1

Right again!
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:53 AM
1

Blue is exactly right.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:52 AM
1

It's been several years since I studied those cases and I had to go check to be sure, but both of them predated Ellison v. Brady, which further elucidated on what the courts consider to be hostile environment sexual harassment, and also set the precedent for establishing a uniquely female "reasonable woman standard" as opposed to a uniquely male "reasonable man standard" in hostile environment sexual harassment cases. One of the things Kaminer and FIRE remarked is that the new...uh...directive c…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:52 AM
1

I don't know much about the law, but I do know a few things about how hostile environment sexual harassment is used to beat men down. And the people who concluded that "any verbal sexual advance that is rejected as being unwelcome is sexual harassment," included Wendy Kaminer, who is an attorney. Now me, I'm no lawyer, but I wrote the second book on hostile environment sexual harassment. I wrote it not as a lawyer, but as a reasonably intelligent person who read the legal precedents and the law,…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:41 AM
1

Several trends are converging to make chronological age irrelevant. Every man here needs to pay attention. In a few weeks I turn 60, and yet most of my male peers who are in their 40s are more aged than I am. What I am doing to slow and prevent aging is done on the cheap. When I can afford to go full tilt, the difference will become even more noticeable. But first take note: by the year 2020 the shortage of women of childbearing age that is already being felt in Asia and India will begin to spre…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 06:59 AM
3

You're right! This should make it very clear that gender issues are inherently political. As feminists have said all along, "the personal is political." MRAs need to stop pretending it ain't. Now, I'm a classical liberal and a "Ron Paul Republican." I know and work with "Ron Paul Democrats," and "Ron Paul Libertarians." This isn't about party affiliation. It's about standing up to the global elites and their proxies, who have already destroyed "America" by turning us into the US Empire. Honestly…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:38 AM
4

Maybe one of you already thought of this, but after I got to work this morning I got to thinking, since the anti-male bigotry taught in most Women's and Gender studies makes any reasonable person uncomfortable, does that make women's and gender studies sexual harassment? Of course they will say no...the same as feminists claimed that requiring police to arrest the aggressor in DV calls would not lead to women being arrested. But then feminists had to rush to modify the DV laws to target only men…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 12:23 AM
3

Fred Pearce warned about this imbalance in his 2010 book, The Coming Population Crash. It will really hit hard by 2020, and the source of the imbalance is not just China, but also India. As western civilization suffers from the burgeoning greater depression and China and Indian become more prosperous, Chinese and Eastern Indian men will expand their search for mates to the rest of the world. This will lead to a relative increase in the perceived social value of women, further exacerbating the fe…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:21 AM
5

Most slut shaming is done by women, and feminists are blaming and shaming men for it as part of their war on men.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:38 AM
2

Now that I've learned how easy it is to use my new scanner I'll be scanning all the cover art of the old Backlash! 'zine and posting it. This one was my idea, but most of the covers were conceived by Frank Cranbourne, another good man the MRM lost, and all but one were sketched by Paul, a fellow whose last name I don't recall just now.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:55 AM
3

White supremacists and other racists dismiss the high violence rate among African Americans as "black-on-black" violence. To anybody with a lick of sense that's obviously a racist way to look at it. And to anybody with a lick of sense, it's sexist to dismiss violence against men because most of it is male-on-male, let alone that often the male-on-male violence is agency violence committed on behalf of women. Not to mention that she dismisses the extremely well established fact of parity in domes…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:25 AM
1

Things were slower back when my 'zine was at the center of the MRM/FRM, and later when I moved it to the web, we were very sensitive to the fact that men had every right to be angry, and we ran some very angry (by the standards of the day) content, but it was carefully edited and we always ran the angry content together with more balanced and thoughtful articles. But things are accelerating, now, and there's less time to vet issues before running with them. In 1995 when we moved onto the web, we…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:46 AM
16

My only real beef with this article is the comment, "women have always had it hard." The implied context is: relative to men, and it's a lie. Life is tough; feminism is for sissies.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:05 AM
3

Look at the cycle as a sine wave, with awareness of the hatred increasing AFTER the hatred has peaked, and that growing awareness driving the pockets of extremists to more extreme demonstrations of their hatred in reaction to the growing antipathy of the mainstream. The reason Seattle has been a hot bed of MRM sites (and groups) is because, as Tom Leykis observed many times, Seattle has been one of the worst cities for men. Seattle is where I'm from, but not where I currently live. What I see, n…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:06 AM
1

Maybe the way Paul handled the interview will work. I listened to it, and how it gets written up and received will be the proof of how effective it was. Feminists generally were not "hard nosed" with members of the press. They marched and protested and raged against men, but they generally were and to this day generally remain on good terms with reporters and journalists. I did a lot of radio and several TV interviews during the 90s; nowhere nearly as many as the likes of Warren Farrell, Mel Fei…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:41 AM
1

Constructive debate with feminists is not possible. The last of these occurred in the mid-1990s. Feminists were getting trounced by MRAs on tv and radio talk shows, so they began refusing to engage, and soon thereafter Jerry Springer type shows began taking over. In other venues, they began shouting us down, as demonstrated by the UofT videos. A few minutes ago I posted the link to the Feminism: With and Without the Mask video, which has two themes: feminism is a hate movement (I'm now calling i…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:17 AM
2

Feminists represent the HATEriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:43 AM
4

Yes, of course. A lot of people in the MRM consider themselves to be gender egalitarians. Being a libertarian-leaning classical liberal (often lumped in with various flavors of conservatism in the US), I see liberty (economic, personal, political) as the answer and, even though I'm an American Indian, served for several years on my tribe's tribal council, and could easily benefit from identity politics, I reject the whole notion because the most benign forms of identity politics are invariably u…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:06 AM
2

Sunday the 31st I got an email from Policymic telling me I'm now a "contributor" and can post longer comments. Yea, right. I tried to post a comment to this article and nothing happened. That's when I found out my Policymic account has been disabled. Typical mainstream BS.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:41 AM
3

On Prof. Christensen's MERGE page the first of the resolutions is this: Be it therefore resolved that neither of the traditional sex roles, nor a single "androgynous" one, be enforced by law or social pressure; all three, and others as well, are worthy of respect if freely chosen. Most people here, I think, would agree with this resolution. Now while the rest of the resolutions are a mixed bag, with some advocating for government action, the overarching principle could be summed up in a single w…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:39 PM
1

You want links, go to my home page, go to the archives, there are literally thousands of links there. None progressives, feminists (on the left or the right) and fearful folk who want to be told everything will be all right will like, but everybody here is far too inquisitive, intelligent and fearless to be such as they. ;)
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:24 AM
1

This is a column I've been doing for almost 20 years, and it's like Tweets. Sometimes, links are appropriate, but only sometimes. They're intended to provoke you to think, and some I make intentionally vague to avoid triggering a knee-jerk reaction. For example, the second item is, "We hear of people jumping into cages at zoos so they can pet the animals. Sometimes the tigers and bears bite. Whose fault is it when they do?" You can put that into a number of contexts, but if you put it into the c…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:17 PM
1

The reference to the Iroquois is a feminist fantasy. With equal justification, Victorian England and all of the anglosphere to the present could be called "matriarchal" because our moral tradition--which is actually based on stories brought back from the crusades by the minstrels, such as Shahrazad--of putting women on a pedestal of moral superiority to men. Yet feminists assure us we live in a patriarchy. The simple fact is that ALL traditional cultures, including the Iroquois, evolved separate…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:11 PM
1

Go to the school administration and report it. If necessary, demand to speak to the school's EEO officer.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:58 PM
1

Not meaning to spam, but until I turned it into an archive this link was to my first book, What Everybody Should Know About Feminism: The Male-Positive Perspective. All the old chapters are still there: http://www.backlash.com/book/
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:02 AM
1

Ceasefire, by Cathy Young.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:58 AM
1

If by "paywall" you mean you can't read the article because the newspaper requires payment, that's an easy assumption to make, but it's not an article, it's a letter to the editor and the entirety of the text is right there on the page. It ends with the name of the letter's author.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:56 AM
1

What's paywall?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:53 AM
5

How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb? Two. One to do it and one to blame the evil male hegemony of the patriarchy for it.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 01:41 AM
4

Logic is an instrument of the evil male hegemony! ;-)
/r/MensRights26/03/13 01:02 PM
2

Roy Schenk, author of The Other Side of the Coin, is (or was) a socialist. I think there are a lot of MRAs who come to the party as a reaction against feminist hate and bigotry. I met Roy once and he seemed like a decent chap. Most socialists, I suspect, don't understand that socialism is inherently violent or that it violates human rights. Most of the MRAs I've known did not identify themselves as libertarians (or libertarian leaning) even though most of them were.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:35 AM
2

Most of my coworkers are women, mothers whose children attend public schools, and I hear the same thing from almost all of them: the public school system is progressive (in the political rather than making-progress sense of the word), hates masculinity and teaches girls to be self-entitled. The connection between that and the kind of behavior I witnessed at the fountain yesterday seems clear, to me, but you make a good point and in a future article I'll elaborate on that.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 04:37 PM
1

Feminism started with a good idea, as most mass movements do. But as Eric Hoffer wrote in The True Believer (everybody here should read that book): "Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without belief in a devil." Had the feminists not turned on men, the movement would have faded into the background as most of the real battles had been won. Most people believed in equal rights and it would have been a matter of time before life caught up with persuasion. But as w…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:57 AM
1

By the way, somewhat off topic but this evening while working on updating the page at this link I listened to a great speech by Judge Andrew Napolitano. Liberty really is the answer to feminism. Through this weekend the video will be embedded on The Backlash! homepage.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:25 AM
1

Chris Duane (TruthNeverTold on YouTube) suggests that before totalitarian rule sets in (i.e., economy collapses and government tightens grip) we need to establish private networks, and then once things go bad we should duck out of sight and rely on our private networks. Sounds reasonable, though I'm not the sort to take that kind of advice very well.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:56 PM
1

Your fist waving notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:14 PM
1

Yes, why not?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:07 PM
1

Okay. Where can I find it?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:06 PM
1

Had you actually read them you might have noticed that the dates on it are 1994 - 1996. I wrote the "Feminism Unclothed" column for my old The Backlash! 'zine and the dates for that were 1994 - 1995, and I then moved the column onto my website in 1995. There was no web to speak of in 1994 and in 1995 my site was one of the first, and there were certainly no links for the "articles," but then most of the quotes are not from "articles" but from books, and even today it would be a challenge to link…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:59 AM
1

Thank you very much, I appreciate that.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:04 AM
1

Intelligent people figure things out and frequently come to the same conclusions as those who have gone before. That takes nothing away from anybody. One of my college professors said that, even if your thought has been had by others before, if it's new to you then it's still an original thought. I think he's right. We all stand on the shoulders of others, some of them are giants, I've had the good fortune to connect with a few of them right when email and the web were brand new, and to share th…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:50 AM
1

What Everyone Should Know about Feminist Issues: The Male-Positive Perspective: http://www.backlash.com/book/
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:59 PM
1

Women who react violently like that--or even get angry--are hypocrites. This was driven home to me, recently, when I had an experience like that. At a bead store where I was shopping the young cashier was an attractive young woman whose breast were almost completely exposed. Yes, I looked. And while I appreciated the exposure, I was nonetheless surprised that she would be allowed to dress like that in a store that catered to families. When I got home, I emailed some of the guys in my family to j…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:46 PM
1

The cycle of sexism focuses on different things. For women, it focuses on their relative frailty and casts them as damsels in distress. For men, it focuses on their relative strength and casts them as heroes. As I wrote a couple days ago, however, the current cycle is going to be subject to some unusual global variables that could delay the male-positive phase: a demographic shift that is going to create a shortage of fecund females, and the possible development of transformational technologies.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:32 PM
5

Back in the day I named the column "Feminism Unclothed," because it exposed feminist sexism, but the name was inspired by Catharine MacKinnon's book, Feminism Unmodified, and as I was working on the compilation this morning I decided to use that title, instead.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:06 PM
7

Most of the quotes include sources so you can see them in context. That's what libraries--and Amazon--are for. Not that you should actually do any work yourself. No, I would never suggest that. ;)
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:04 PM
2

Atlas is Shrugging.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:28 PM
0

I bet she gets a dozen proposals a day, and that she would turn even the most extreme MGTOW into a believer. Feminists stereotype all men as evil. Some MGTOW tend to stereotype all women as an extreme hazard. I've been a MGTOW a lot longer than most guys but that doesn't mean I don't believe in marriage or that I stereotype all women, but that I believe you have to exercise extreme caution because marriage in America is so hostile to men. There are some women, however, who you can tell are good …
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:48 AM
2

The author of this piece was just about the only man in the (1995) MRM who claimed repressed memory syndrome is real. Feminists were using it to destroy men with no criminal record and as another tool in their war chest to demonize men. Most of us found the whole thing hard to believe. Little things, yes, and a tendency to be forgetful: as a child my only safe haven was my paternal grandparents's home, and due to the constant stress I tended to be very forgetful as a child--we now know that chro…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:50 AM
1

It's a very interesting series. In that particular scene he stops short of actually calling her that, but then she baits him: "Say it!" He does, and gets fired.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:48 PM
3

Feminism is a hate movement. I don't hate feminists, I don't hate bigots of any flavor. Feminism is as feminism does. This guy is promoting male subjugation to women and is guilty of kind of posturing he attributes to MRAs. At first I was tempted to write an article exposing this guy to warn the community, but I have a lot to do and it seemed more productive just to post it here, where folks can spread the word.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:00 AM
2

Toward the end of her life, Betty Friedan admitted that The Feminine Mystique was a lie. That she made it up. But good luck trying to find that on the web. There have to be records of this somewhere, but I've had no luck finding them.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:38 PM
3

In 1994 I started a column inspired by Arsenio Hall's "Things that make you go, 'Hmmm.'" It was like a collection of tweets long before Twitter existed. Although topics range all over, most are about gender issues. This is my first one in 2 years and I plan to resume doing it monthly.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:50 AM
1

Maybe it's because I'm on the autism spectrum but while I did notice that she seems a little obsessive about homosexuality, it didn't strike me as homophobic. Or maybe it's because I grew up when homophobia was the norm and I'm just not very sensitive to it. Regardless, my impression is that she's frustrated with the lack of "old time masculinity." Doubtless, she'd really like my dad. But then my dad doesn't talk to me and thinks I'm evil incarnate because, among other things, at a meeting in No…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:54 AM
2

I think she is still trying to figure things out, but her comment about the "Ruling class authorities" is not all that far from the truth. Many of the financial sites I haunt make similar comments. Of course there's Alex Jones and his infowars site, though I think he goes off the deep end as often as not. But The Daily Bell has a lot of very well written and researched articles that document the activities, efforts and goals of the global elite. To call them "ruling class authorities" may be ove…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:24 AM
1

That's a good question and I'll update the article to make it more clear that I'm not talking about spamming. The idea is that when you comment on an article about gender issues, that you put a plug to one of the MRM sites into your comment. I'm sure there are thousands of redditors here who comment on articles. I see a lot of links, here, to articles about women charged with making false charges of rape. Almost nobody ever comments on those articles. It would take but a moment for somebody to p…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:41 AM
2

Between your comments and a conversation with Paul Elam about it I had the idea for the article I posted here: http://www.backlash.com/content/sex/backlash_2013_0126.html Paul will run this article on his site on Monday. He gets a truck load of traffic and I am hopeful that it will inspire his readers. Because of what I expect to happen during the next 10 years I have grave concerns about engaging in Men's Rights Activism. I fear that engaging in such activities could put activists in danger. (Y…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:21 AM
0

Mel is great! I first met him in Boston where we appeared together on a talk show about hostile environment sexual harassment. I rank him with Warren Farrell as one of the most knowledgeable and articulate in the world. I am a huge fan of GirlWritesWhat, but candidly if Mel was a woman the world would beat a path to his door. You combine Warren's knowledge with Karen's ability to articulate issues and you've got Mel Feit. I'm a big fan and delighted to see him acknowledged with the article in Th…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:46 AM
2

This will also appear on Paul Elam's site on Monday. His site gets a huge amount of traffic and hopefully it will inspire his readers
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:47 AM
2

Following some of the leads you dug up I learned that Prof. Simon is one of the founders of the Women's Freedom Network (WFN) and a past-president of the organization. She is or was libertarian or libertarian-leaning. A lot of libertarian-leaning women's organizations from the 80s and 90s morphed into neoconservative organizations. What the WFN site indicates today is that they now have only 20 members. Nevertheless, I've forwarded this and some other info to Paul Elam to suggest that he might w…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:20 AM
13

Hey! I was not expecting that, either. Like a lot of MRAs I know, I can be pretty paranoid after being attacked, assaulted and publicly excoriated so many times and it looks like I jumped to the wrong conclusion, here, but maybe the thing to come out of all of this is that Paul Elam needs to get her on his show and start featuring articles from her! She sounds like our kind of..."feminist"!
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:03 AM
6

The possibility that it was a joke perpetrated by her students occurred to me but contacting her would be a tactical mistake. There are dozens if not hundreds of MRM and FRM sites, and if "young feminists" of each generation have been going around the web posting false contact information like this as a prank, we don't want to alert the contact people that we're onto the game. They'll find out soon enough. The best strategy would be to research this quietly and for many MRAs to start rooting aro…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:59 PM
6

I did not come across this listing while searching on my own name, but by searching on the name of one of the few dozen people who contributed articles over the years. Searching on my own name brings up an absolutely ridiculous number that's just a little scary considering that I'm not a public personality.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:50 PM
2

That's very interesting and good to know, thanks!
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:46 PM
4

The title was misleading? Not intentionally. My first suspicion was that feminists might be seeding directory sites with false contact information about MRM sites, thereby misleading reporters and others to contact feminists about our sites, so while it's not hijacking the actual site, it is hijacking or at least misdirecting public inquiry to the very people who would be most likely to lie about us.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:45 PM
4

Lawsuits cost money and I'm already saving up my pennies to file multiple defamation lawsuits.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:29 PM
10

Here's the link on the Zoominfo site for the profile of my site with the bogus contact information: http://www.zoominfo.com/#!search/profile/company?companyId=3736391&targetid=profile
/r/MensRights26/01/13 08:28 PM
3

Nonsense. Third-wave feminists are what I call "boys are icky, you go grrl!" feminists. Most demonstrate by their choices and behaviors that at a visceral level they do not believe in equality, but in female superiority. The women and girls of the third-wave generations are inundated with "boys are icky throw rocks at them" "humor" and grrls are super tales and images. Boys may grow up aspiring to be a super hero, but these girls often grow up to be women who feel that they are super heroes. And…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:05 AM
1

Thanks to pundits on both the right and left, many today conflate progressivism with liberalism, but they are very different. Progressivism is one of the paths to totalitarianism, and most feminists are on it. Liberal or Conservative, Democrat or Republican, Progressivism is the common enemy of all MRAs, as it is a threat to our freedom, our liberty and our prosperity.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:51 PM
3

In the broadest sense, rape is sexual assault. That is, a literal assault on a person's sex. How is kicking a man in the balls not an assault on his sex?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:08 AM
1

At the turn of the century I tried to get gay men in general, and gay organizations in particular, to get active with the MRM. The responses, such as they were, were that gay men already had several powerful organizations and that the MRM would benefit more from the alliance than they would and so they weren't interested.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:45 PM
2

Andrea Dworkin, Robin Morgan, Marilyn French, Mary Koss, Catharine MacKinnon and, of course, Susan Brownmiller were among the chief architects of the rape culture crisis hysteria.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:58 PM
10

Their estimate is based on a self-selecting population: alleged victims who entered or tried to enter into the system. Evidently, about 90% of them are women. Obviously, this generates very lopsided numbers that ignore the tens of thousands of male victims who put up with the violence and never seek help.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:50 PM
1

The same logic could be applied to men's reproductive rights. The sexism is in the feminist attitude that men do not have reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:35 PM
4

Seventeen years ago I had an infection on my L4 disk and was in agony for several days, with back spasms occurring every few minutes 24 hours a day for several weeks. The attending physician told me I was 100% permanently disabled and offered to certify me as such. I refused. Having no medical insurance and no job, facing homelessness, and without benefit of pain meds I did my own physical therapy and even though my back was still spasming every few minutes I was working within a few weeks of le…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:09 AM
3

No. There should be no draft. We should bring all the troops home. The Second Amendment should be held sacrosanct. And...what? This isn't the Ron Paul Libertarian-Republican forum? Oh...never mind. ;)
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:56 AM
1

You're both right, but the reason I chose Alan Scocca's story to update and post next is because it echoes the sentiment recently expressed so well by Karen (GirlWritesWhat) and Bern (Chapin's Inferno): "If men will not protect these young men and boys, who will?"
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:13 AM
5

Issues about sexual harassment accusations, false accusations of domestic violence and the high probability of divorce aside, the short answer is: No, I'm on "strike" because most American women simply do not meet MY high standards. That's not to say I have not met any who do. To the contrary, I've met several and I'm in love with a few of them. But most American women are simply not worth my time.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:55 PM
1

Could be. While second-wave feminism is decidedly socialist, first-wave feminism was solidly rooted in social conservatism. As for third-wave feminism, I sometimes wonder if it isn't the product of anime culture.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:57 AM
1

Men's rights are human rights. The Anglosphere global elite are using feminism to undermine men's human rights as one of the means to destroy the middle class. A men's rights movement would not exist without the second-wave and third-wave feminist movement, because then you're talking about human rights. So it is entirely appropriate for MRA's to put a great deal of emphasis on feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:18 PM
3

"True feminism"? Even "feminists" seem to find it challenging to agree on what constitues "true feminism." But that's because most feminists are loath to confront the facts or admit to the truth, which is really quite simple: First-Wave feminism was about equal rights for everybody. Based on their actions and advocacy, however, second-wave feminism is about stereotyping women as good victims and men as evil villains. While, again based on their actions and advocacy, third-wave feminism is about …
/r/MensRights28/12/12 12:09 AM
2

My grandfathers were white, my grandmothers were American Indian, growing up I was swept to the sidelines for being Indian and having Asperger's, but when I went to college (paid my own way working swing shift jobs) I suddenly became an "evil white man," and so I think I can speak from the perspective of both a white and minority man. Years ago, we said a movie in which women got cut up and killed was a horror flick but if men alone got cut up and killed it was action-adventure. Today, we see al…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:39 PM
10

No.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:59 AM
5

Kimmel is a smug, self-serving parasite who gets his by pandering to bigots.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:37 AM
3

BUT, I must add (now reading the article) that she's got it wrong about Stefan because, like almost everybody, she's confused about "feminist" libertarians. That's because for decades feminism has pretended--and has only pretended--to be libertarian. That's right. The pre-3rd wave textbook definition of feminism could be summed up as, "libertarian with respect to women's rights and responsibilities." But as everybody but the feminist trolls here, now, in practice and politics most feminists are …
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:08 AM
1

This is why most feminists have always hated the Libertarians, now hate the Liberty Republicans and (once the mainstream discovers them) will hate the Liberty Democrats. We have always supported real gender equality with respect to legal status, freedom of choice (not talking about freedom to murder, there), and so on.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:01 AM
3

Typical feminist blame and shame to control rhetoric.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:28 AM
1

I about barfed when I read Vince Emanuele's article in which he claimed, "We also know that since World War I, the vast majority of those killed in armed conflict have been women and children." source: Pornography and Gender Politics Within Neoliberalism at http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/12/07/pornography-and-gender-politics-within-neoliberalism/
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:26 AM
1

I'm curious, are the down votes from (1) MRM who do blame women individually for being part of the majority of blue pill takers, (2) feminist trolls, or (3) readers of above average intelligence who recognize bad writing when they see it and are just smacking me around for not doing a better job?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:09 AM
1

I rewrote the conclusion.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:39 AM
1

Thanks. Aside from being very tired one of the challenges responding to Kimmel was that he crammed so many of the nonsensical feminist complaints into his short article. It's a common strategy that probably everybody here has experienced: they throw in everything they can think of and then if we disagree it's up to us to disprove their assertions. At one time or another I've disproved all of the nonsense but it would have required several hours to dredge up and write a really comprehensive rebut…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:33 AM
2

This article isn't up to my usual standards but I'm a bit under the weather. I contacted Prof. Kimmel and had a brief conversation with him before writing it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:23 AM
7

Reads to me like John's teed off with the shadow banning, and writing from a place of anger. The anger is justified. Not being a feminist I didn't take anything he wrote personally, and I would encourage everybody else who is not a feminist to read his rant sympathetically, as I did. I have never hidden behind the anonymity conveniently offered by the web. I don't judge others who do, but I feel (as opposed to think) that it bespeaks a lack of integrity. "Yea but, the cost to my career if..." Ye…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:23 AM
1

I was one of the "four angry white men" Kimmel mentions in the first paragraph. It was on the Bertice Berry Show. I am a member of the Cowlitz Indian Tribe in southwest Washington State. Like so many American Indians, I can pass for white. After the show, I wrote about it, here: http://www.backlash.com/book/racistsexism.html
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:01 AM
2

Try the Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238515/My-generation-doesnt-need-feminism-Carla-Bruni-Sarkozy-says-womans-place-home.html
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:24 AM
1

Were the principles of Liberty put into practice, it would serve the MRM well. The Libertarian Party has always maintained a gender neutral agenda. Individual rights are the building block, identity politics has no place, and the policies promoted by the LP are, therefore, the most male-friendly. Unfortunately, as Gary Johnson demonstrated, libertarian candidates remain marginalized within the political system. Libertarian Republican Ron Paul would have won had he been the Republican nominee, bu…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:13 AM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:21 AM
1

Thanks to whomever posted the link to Stefan Molyneux's video, Is Feminism Is Socialism with Panties? I've read far more feminist books than any person should. From the sixties through the seventies the socialist theme was very strong. In addition to those Stefan listed, I would definitely add Shulamith Firestone's The Dialectic of Sex. The theme surfaced in several feminist books during the eighties and nineties, but Ayn Rand was such a force at that time that it was put on the back burner whil…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:16 AM
0

Never debate a feminist one-on-one. There's no point, it's a waste of time, and you risk becoming the victim of a false accusation if she gets mad at you. Only debate a feminist before a diverse audience. You are not trying to persuade the feminist, you are speaking to the audience.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:52 AM
1

Run for office. Not my idea. Several years ago Warren Farrell ran for Governor of California on a male positive platform. Get rich. My idea. Nobody pays any attention. Most people think they can't get rich. Hogwash. One wealthy MRA can do more for the movement than 1,000 poor MRAs.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:48 AM
1

Eric Hoffer's seminal book, The True Believer, explains it all.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 11:22 PM
1

Porter Stansberry argues that Michelle Obama will run in 2016...and win, because the oil and gas boom is, he believes, going to fuel an economic recovery, and Obama will be hailed as the greatest president in history. Stansberry does not believe this about Obama, this is just what he believes most Americans will believe.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:42 AM
1

Give her The Myth of Male Power for Christmas.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:55 AM
4

Not any more. Several years ago the SCOTUS found that if a man looks for longer than 8 seconds, it's illegal ogling. I'm serious. Nor is actionable sexual harassment "entirely subject to one person's perception." In the Ellison v. Brady case, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that, when the alleged victim is a woman, the Reasonable Woman Standard applies. So, whatever the lawyers can persuade the court a reasonable woman would feel, that is what constitutes sexual harassment. The law requ…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:30 PM
2

Feminists try to keep the definition of rape limited to penile penetration...except when conjuring up other ways in which evil men victimize helpless women. But when you use the term sexual assault...but feminists don't want to talk about sexual assault...unless it's women getting assaulted by men, then that's okay to talk about.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 09:13 PM
1

The male privilege bonds were all sold to fund the dalliances of Gnu, who, in the year 7237 B.C.E. spent the proceeds on courtesans, castles and grapes. The bonds have been accumulating interest and came due in 1966. It will take exactly 312 million years to pay off. Why so long? Because while the rest of us carry the debt, the wealthy elite continue to borrow against them. Welcome to your life of servitude. Try and enjoy it.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:10 AM
4

This article, with it's great "Men's Anger List," was written by James Novak in 1995. The anger list is still relevant, but the GOP has changed, and were I to write something like it today, I would change it to "Why All Men Should Vote Libertarian."
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:21 PM
2

Normally I don't write about what goes on in Alberta, but I do pay attention when Earl Silverman brings it to my attention.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:18 AM
1

Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gap -- and What Women Can Do About It, by Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:57 PM
1

Feminism is a finger puppet the elite use to divide and conquer the rest of us. It's oppressive, it has destroyed millions of families and (at least) tens of millions of lives, and we have to oppose it. But we need to recognize that it really is just a distraction, and put most of our attention on dealing with the larger context that pits the feminists against us in the first place. Some, gallantly in my opinion, have taken it upon themselves to dedicate their lives to opposing this evil and to …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:40 PM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:22 PM
6

In Who Stole Feminism, Christina Hoff Sommers exposed Naomi Wolf as a liar. She lied in The Beauty Myth. Wolf replied that she was very angry when she wrote Myth. Meanwhile, Myth continues to be a top selling book, and her lies continue to be taken as truth. So I would not make any argument for a parallel between the MRM and feminism based on that book.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 12:20 PM
1

Women aren't more safety conscious. Paul Shaner (deceased), who was a MRA and a counselor at a prison for sex offenders observed that a majority of women who have been sexually assaulted assume the same body armor (protective posture) that almost all men have. It's the way we carry ourselves, like we're ready for an attack at any moment. Women are generally more relaxed than men. A typical guy walking down the street is aware of other people, where they are, if they pose a potential threat. In D…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:53 PM
1

In the 90s I got at least a dozen death threats and lost several jobs due to my MRA activities. These days, I just get a lot of spam. Either I'm doing something wrong or things are getting less bad. I think Michael Savage actually coined the term, feminazi. Regardless, I just checked and the feminazi.com site I put up for a buddy is still there.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:39 PM
1

I think it's funny. I've carried a backpack in college, a briefcase when I was a stockbroker, but since then I've had either a bag or a backpack. Men were carrying bags, including purses, for millennia before somebody decided that only women could carry bags and purses. When I go jogging, I use a bag that slings over the shoulder bandolier style.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 11:59 AM
1

AVfM is a great site and I've resumed working to develop Backlash.com, but I agree with those who feel that it is important to continue to use and support the MensRights reddit.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 11:46 AM
3

Some men rape. Sexists use that to stereotype men. Some women make false accusations of rape. (There are numerous links in the archives of my site to proven cases of false rape accusations.) Sexists use that to stereotype women. Nobody claims it's sexist to talk about rape. But feminists viciously attack anybody who talks about false accusations. Feminism is sexism.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:07 AM
1

She also says that Rivard's father scared him INTO premarital sex by talking about false accusations of rape. Shouldn't that have been, scared him AWAY from premarital sex?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:06 AM
2

By 1999 several of us wrote articles in which we acknowledged that to gain legitimacy the "MRM" (that is, the real equalitarian movement) would have to be led by women. Even then, it had become obvious that to the mainstream of the anglosphere, women's opinions on the subject of real gender equality were viewed as more legitimate than men's. So we would never make much headway until more women emerged like Chistina Hoff Sommers, Cathy Young and Lisa Scott (TABS), among others. There are a lot of…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:47 PM
1

It's just a text post. Did I do it wrong? I thought you select "submit a link," then choose the text tab. No?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 08:57 PM
2

I call men "boys" and women "girls" all the time. But, sensitive to the fact that there are a lot of hate mongering feminists out there just looking for opportunities to play the victim, I am very careful, when in such company, to use them together so that there can be no claim of discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:34 AM
5

Paul Shaner Sr., a therapist and one of the founding members of the only US chapter of MERGE: Movement for the Establishment of Real Gender Equality, did a lot of work with incarcerated sexual predators and also with victims of sexual assault. He made a startling observation, that women who had been victims of sexual assault generally adopted the exact same "body armor" that most men grow up with. They get more rigid in the way they carry themselves, more prepared to be attacked...just like men.…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 11:11 AM
1

In a thread about my recent AVfM article, Some thoughts on our future, ignoring the main themes Grapeban fixated on and took umbrage at my use of the term, "slut" in a passage in which I was making fun of both feminists and white knights. In this great 1995 essay by Jeffrey Seeman, he argues that slut is a gender-loaded term that insults women in the same way that whiner is a gender-loaded term that insults men. And like the women who embraced their inner slut 20 years and more before the silly …
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:51 PM
1

Grapeban, I'd be interested in reading a well-reasoned rant from you. Note: I do not use the term "rant" in a negative way. Heck, I rant all the time. Appeals to emotion are fine in families and small groups where the goal is simply to get along, and according to Carol Gilligan that's where the female ethic evolved. But the male ethic involves the larger world, and in that world, where disparate groups collide, logic and law prevail over "feelings." So here's the challenge: mount a logical argum…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:45 PM
3

"Promiscuous Person Walk" just doesn't quite have the ring to it that "Slut Walk" does. Besides, it has been my experience that girls and women make more of the term "slut" than do men and boys.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:02 AM
3

Men throw around insults as a part of male-bonding. Something most women don't get. When I was a college student, lo these many millennia ago, one of the more common epithets we used toward one another was "sleazy slut." Now I get that politically correct types, feminists, and other hypersensitive folk take issue with that, and all I can really say is, I'm incredibly sorry that some people are hypersensitive, intolerant and hate masculinity, and I hope all the haters will forgive me.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:00 AM
3

Like most American Indians, I have a cynical view of the national conversation about racism. American Indians get racist attitude from everybody, including blacks. Insofar as making use the term "slut," writers write, the tools of our craft are words, words which totalitarian dictator types want to ban as a means to control.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:53 AM
5

I was using the term somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but I think the slutwalks are funny.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:50 AM
3

I pride myself on my paranoia. ;)
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:49 AM
2

In 1991 I was participating in an online discussion at Microsoft about rape. The discussion had gone on for several months when I suggested a scenario in which a man is driven to rape by an airborne chemical. I used very lurid hyperbole. My department head, who was looking for any excuse to fire me, used that and...fired me. Then she did a little thing they sometimes did back then when they wanted to legally blacklist somebody...whenever a potential employer called to verify my employment, there…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 01:54 AM
2

Feminism is puppet mortality, because feminists are puppets.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:38 AM
1

I think a lot has changed since I wrote this 20 years ago. The bit about "retard" is a play on words. I made an analogy between relationships and the ignition timing on an engine.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 12:06 PM
3

In 1993 I appeared on the Bertice Berry Show to discuss this very issue. I wrote a long article about it, which I will post in a moment under the title: Racist Sexism: History of White Guys in the Americas
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:50 AM
1

Unless the creepy 40-50 is a billionaire or a rock star or a (name your favorite category of celebrity)? ... uh-huh.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:42 AM
2

Conscientious bloggers try to get everything 100% right, but remember that most newspapers have a weekly corrections section to cover their weekly quota of bloopers. And they have staff who are paid to get the stories right. (Of course, they also have staff who are paid to get stories wrong, but that's a different issue.) MRA bloggers typically operate on a shoestring budget, often pay their own way, work day jobs, and then are held to standards that are often higher than those applied to the Ne…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:13 AM
4

This was one of my more ambitious chapters, and also where I introduced "Wilbur Wormwood's" infamous quip, "men will be nice when nice guys get laid." In late 1994 I was a call-in guest to a Seattle talk radio show in which I "appeared" with the co-president or co-chair of the Seattle chapter of NOW. Somewhere I have the tape of that interview, but the host (a woman) hung up on me when I responded to a comment with the "men will be nice..." retort. Some of the guys working at the station were fa…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:57 AM
1

Because I'm a lousy typist. :) Thanks for pointing that out to me.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 01:35 PM
1

During the past few years I was able to identify two psychopaths at work. One--a woman--quit. The other--a man--still works there. Both mock up false displays of emotion, including pretended sympathy. Both are charming. And extremely manipulative, backbiting, lacking in compassion, and so on. I was able to identify them as such only because I worked closely with both for several years. Others warned me about the woman, else I would not have thought about it. The behavior pattern of the man did n…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:22 AM
2

In the office where I work, the general rule is that applies is nicely captured by the image that was posted here several months ago of an obviously ultra-liberal young woman with the caption: "Your rights end where my feelings begin." So, "anything goes unless somebody finds it offensive." The net result is that most of the men walk on eggshells. There are some women who get pretty raunchy, however. Several years ago, knowing that one of them had a reputation for accusing men of sexual harassme…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:11 AM
1

Lisa is wonderful. If she did not actually pioneer the legal concept of Parental Alienation Syndrome, she certainly helped to make the family courts recognize it. She was the founder of TABS: Take Action Against Bias in the System, which may be defunct, now, but I have always counted Lisa as one of the good guys.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:34 AM
1

I remember those days. The Seattle Times crucified me for supporting Fathers' and Men's Rights. It was an incredibly painful experience for me because I had to suspend publication of my 'zine, but this was right when the web was just starting to catch on (1995), and I moved onto the web.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 01:05 AM
5

I don't know if it's considered spamming to post your own articles. I hope not!
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:37 AM
2

You're exactly right. The "rise of women" depends on government programs. When the economy either collapses or sinks too far to sustain the programs, the "rise of women" will collapse, too.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:26 AM
1

When I published a 'zine opposing anti-male sexism, I wrote about feminists (good) and pop-feminists (bad). Most of the (good) feminists ignored me and my detractors, while the far more numerous (bad) pop-feminists, who call themselves feminists then and now, tore my life to shreds. Today it's worse. As GWW said in one of her recent videos, the segment of the feminist movement that is the loudest, claims to speak for the entire movement, and is identified as "the" feminism, is a hate movement le…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:13 AM
5

Both of you are correct. The economic and gender policies of both are ruinous. They serve the same masters and are flip sides of the same coin. The economy is loaded with dislocations due to political meddling. To get better the dislocations have to be purged. Neither Obama nor Romney are willing to let that happen. But it will. Under Obama, it will happen a little sooner because his policies are a little worse. But under either one, it will drag on far longer than it should.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:37 AM
5

If you live in a swing state, vote for Obama to protest the disgraceful way Romney treated the Liberty Republicans and Ron Paul at the RNC. If, however, you do not live in a swing state, vote for Gary Johnson. I live in Washington State, which is dominated by Democratic King County (Seattle). So our electoral votes always go to the Democratic candidate. Consequently, I don't need to cast a protest vote and can vote for Gary Johnson. Voting for Johnson will not affect the outcome of the election-…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:28 AM
4

99 out of 100 feminists agree that we're all misogynists. The hold out just thinks she's a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:50 AM
3

I scanned the comments at the end of the article. It appears the magazine is getting slammed for running such a stupid article.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:33 AM
2

Egglicious and Rotting Christ are right, unlike feminism, the MRM isn't about ideology or blaming a particular sex. Fundamentally, the MRM is reactionary. We are reacting to oppression, not promoting an ideology.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 01:27 PM
1

Or maybe I'll just take your original advice. I've bookmarked the Wordpress.org getting started page and have started to read. Thanks!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:40 PM
3

I agree with the thread in response to somebody's deleted comment. Only misandrists think the MRM is an anti-women movement. Two of the people who came after me on FB a few days ago accused me of hating women--as others of their faction do--because my main website (backlash.com) is loaded with articles, essays and links to articles that oppose the hate male campaign and demand equal respect for men. They are the haters, not the MRAs.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:07 PM
3

I was trying to avoid being specific, but I'm beginning to think there's no point to that. I'm a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 10:49 PM
3

Very good to know, thanks!!!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 10:44 PM
1

Oh! Okay. Thanks!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:36 AM
1

Yikes, no! For several years I was, among other things, the volunteer webmaster for the...organization I describe below. The feminists (I refer to them as the sisterhood) harassed me constantly about it. I'm a writer by avocation and the only reason I learned html in the first place was so I could publish online. Ever since I resigned from all the committees and council, when I'm not at my day job I'm either posting links to the site, researching investments (I read most of the articles at the f…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:36 AM
3

I appreciate the critique. It's old, I never got past html 3, have no intention to, but eventually I do plan to hire a pro to do a redesign and convert it into a blog. I hope more people come directly to the comments, though, as I was really hoping just to start a conversation. Thanks!
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:25 AM
7

Until 2001 I was extremely active in the MRM. When people weren't calling Warren Farrell the "Gloria Steinem of the MRM," they sometimes threw me a bone and gave the label to me. Note: I'm nowhere close to the same league as Warren. He's a great man and if I knew him better I'm sure I'd love him like a brother, but I just admire him to bits. If anybody deserves to be called the "Gloria Steinem of the MRM" in a good, non-insulting way, he does. But late in 2001 I became very active in a hereditar…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:18 AM
3

I'm pretty new on Rddit and just wanted to talk about a feminist political coalition I'm dealing with and how I've been threatened, most recently by a mangina. But I see a link has to be submitted, so I put the link to my homepage. I apologize in advance. I do like the hits but I hate spammers. What follows is what I really wanted to post.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:58 AM
1

Ditto, so I learned to wear a bland mask. But that hasn't stopped feminists from accusing me of violence when I exposed their sexism.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:20 AM
1

Drink a little D-Mannose (a sugar compound in cranberries) in water and never get a UTI.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:15 AM
1

I grew up in Seattle, then Bellevue, now Olympia. The misandry in Olympia (Thurston County) is not as bad as Seattle and Bellevue (King County). Olympia culture is still a clash between progressive Evergreen College and rural Americana. But I have to agree with at least the title of the article. This is why Tom Leykis has always said that Seattle is a hotbed for MRAs.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:16 AM
1

Ironically, hops are loaded with estrogen. The fat cells in the "beer gut" that many older beer drinkers have produces a lot of estrogen. Drink beer if you must; just keep in mind that beer makes women out of men.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:11 AM
3

When I wrote my first book on gender issues, and for several articles and essays thereafter, I assumed that I wrote from a prototypical male perspective, and figured this whole notion of male privilege was a crock. I grew up in the sixties at a time when liberals looked down their noses as, with a sniff, they proclaimed how tolerant they were of nonwhites, and when the word "retard" was still socially acceptable. I have Asperger's, and although thanks to my two European grandfathers I'm pale eno…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:00 AM
1

Great parodies have a way of resurfacing. Ted Pong of NoCIRC suggested the same thing 20 years ago.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:38 AM
1

There are at least 2 and probably more aspects to asexuality. The two that immediately come to mind are celibacy and a gender-neutral attitude. I've been celibate since 2004 when my last girlfriend (now just a friend) broke up with me for being a Republican. (Before that I was a libertarian, now a liberty-republican.) My gender-neutral attitude dates back to puberty. Celibacy isn't fun, but it beats bad relationships. Common reactions to a gender-neutral attitude range from tolerance to hostilit…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:11 AM
2

In 1995 several people advised me to not post this on my website because the idea of financial abortion was considered too controversial. Now, of course, the idea is considered old hat.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:20 PM
1

In her book, In A Different Voice, Carol Gilligan argues that women evolved an "ethic of caring" in the context of the extended family, while men evolved an "ethic of rights" in the context of civilization. Both are necessary and fundamental to modern human existence. As for reproduction, nanotechnology has the potential to make gender irrelevant. In 2002, Maria Shriver showcased artificial womb technology and hailed it as a potential boon for women who might want to have children without going …
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:27 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:45 AM
3

Thought for the day at backlash.com: If student loans were not available for useless degrees, perhaps more men and fewer women would go to college and we would have parity.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:17 AM
2

No. Misogyny is not mistrust of women, but hatred of women. But setting aside quibbling over definitions, context is key. Dad comes from outside, where the ethic of rights dominates, into the home where the ethic of care dominates. Generally, he is the bringer and...um...layer downer of the law, while mom is the care-giver who, in the context of family, functions primarily and generally within the ethic of care. Kids generally trust mom more because they feel safer with her. Traditional cultures…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:10 AM
1

Yes and no. I knew it was going to get bad, but before I began research for this book I spent several years studying the Kondratieff Wave and Prechter's work on the Elliott Wave, so when I saw that social attitudes regarding gender were cyclic (it really hit me when I was reading Reay Tannahil's delightful book, Sex in History), I knew that it was going to get bad. But I also knew that the children of the feminists were going to rebel. In my mind, the consequences are that we have a majority who…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 12:59 AM
1

It's a scathing critique of Newsweek's March 29, 1993, "Paranoid White Male" cover story. As I was updating the page, I realized that almost 20 years before the "99 Percent Movement," in this article I very specifically wrote about the 99% of men who do NOT fit the stereotype that feminists apply to all men.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:05 PM
1

That's a very keen insight, and sadly true.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:37 AM
13

It's all fun and games for women to get raunchy at work and for men to enjoy it right up until one of the women, boss or not, flips it around and accuses the guys of sexual harassment and destroys their lives. That happens, it's not rare, and until it stops, until everybody starts acting like adults, the only thing men ought to do is hold women to the exact same standards that are applied to men.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:51 AM
2

Feminists persuaded the world that "all men are rapists." The result? Millions of young women now idolize rapists.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:09 AM
2

When the Gang of Six (the original group of Seattle Area MRAs from the 1990s who started The Backash! 'zine with me), most members of the group wanted to publish it anonymously. The group included psychologists whose practices could be destroyed if they became publicly associated with the MRM. But most were simply guys who feared losing their jobs. I chose to be the public face while most of the guys hid behind pseudonyms. We also formed the first and only American chapter of M.E.R.G.E.: Movemen…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:26 PM
2

In Who Stole Feminism, Christina Hoff Sommers exposed that Naomi Wolf's Beauty Myth is loaded with lies. When asked about it, Wolf replied that she was full of a lot of anger when she wrote the book. And yet, Beauty Myth remains a perennial bestseller today.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 05:01 PM
1

If you think the layout on that page is bad, you should have seen it before I upgraded it! Lots of people prefer pretty packaging over quality content, and my site isn't for them. It's one of the oldest sites on the web, I'm a writer, not a professional web designer, I learned just enough of html 3.x to get by, and until I can afford to hire a professional, that's as good as it's going to get. Sorry.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:53 AM
1

That reminds me of a cartoon from the 1990s of a Japanese husband and wife sitting at the table. They are wearing traditional Japanese garb. A solitary vase sits on the table, and the husband scowls as his wife complains, "My sister has two vases."
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:14 AM
1

You're absolutely right, and as I was updating the page I thought about tweaking it to address that. Maybe I still will. It's not women, so much, who have benefited, but feminists.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:11 AM
3

About 15 years ago a female coworker who liked Lifetime TV called it "the man-hating channel."
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:59 AM
2

I stopped trying to keep up with how to use tools and extensions. If it's easy I use it. Ever since the last update to Firefox, I've taken to using Chrome for most things, but I went ahead and installed DTA and Video Download Helper, but when I tried to download one of Karen's videos nothing happened.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:19 PM
1

The poster is a lie. Somewhere in the archives on my website I have a 1970s quote of Gloria Steinem saying that feminism was about equality for men, too. Followed by a 1990s quote of Gloria Steinem saying that feminism was only about women. The feminist fog will is worse than a crooked politician. They say anything to gain our support, and it's all a lie.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:15 AM
1

THANK YOU! These are precisely the data sources I have been trying to find for an upcoming series of articles.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:10 AM
2

Many times. The stereotype of the violent, rapacious male began in the 80s and its origins are racist. I don't have time to elaborate, right now, but I wrote about it here: Violence of the Rams; http://www.backlash.com/book/violence.html
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:34 PM
0

Most MRAs die too soon. Key activists fall, the coalitions they created fall apart. And some simply exhaust themselves and give up. I am not one of the "old timers" in the MRM. Richard Doyle probably qualifies as the grand daddy of us all. But a lot of MRAs who fought against the feminist hate-male campaign have died. We have lost many great women and men in the fight for justice. And more are dying all the time.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:23 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:00 PM
3

Feminism has turned into a mass movement based on hatred of all things male, or misandry, and it is ubiquitous. The milieu is misandrous. Is there nothing that can change this? The key is to eliminate government funded feminist programs and to eliminate biased constraints on men. That means we have to counter and destroy their power base, or develop our own. The key power bases are cultural, financial and political.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 04:56 AM
1

Pump Up the Volume, one of my all-time favorite movies.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:16 AM
1

It looks like when I originally posted the link to this late night rumination, I messed it up so the link disappeared and all that was left was the first paragraph that I posted as an introduction. Here is that paragraph, plus the next couple of sentences that I will edit slightly for posting, here, because some may take grave offense at it: I have not raped, yet I am suspect. I have committed no crime, yet I am deviant. I have not assaulted, yet I am violent. If a woman attacks me, I deserve it…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 07:19 PM
5

Jim Nibblett was one of the key participants in the Seattle MRM in the 1990s. His now-deceased girlfriend, Judith Bluestone, founded the HANDLE Institute, which treats aspies, among others. Shortly before I moved from Bellevue to Olympia, she recommended that I see a psychiatrist about autism. I did, and was diagnosed with Asperger's. As one of the key players, along with Jim, Gene Hopp, Paul Shaner, John Page, Arnie Knudtson, David Ault, John Sample, and a few others who preferred to remain ano…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 07:14 PM
1

I just noticed that the link I posted to the full "Truth is a Virus" article does not appear to be there, anymore. I don't understand that, but here it is: http://www.backlash.com/content/sex/rodvanmechelen_2012_0714.html
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:56 PM
1

Twenty years ago when I started The Backlash!, we thought that was the start, and that within a few years, ten at most, we'd be done. But everything takes longer and costs more than you expect. Which, I realized, is why to see this through we have to live longer, be healthier, get richer, and find more freedom. So when you visit my site, now, you'll see that I've broken it down into those 4 areas: sex, money, politics and health. I'm almost 60, but look and feel more like 40. If you have the mon…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:48 PM
6

That's good, Mitschu.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:18 PM
3

Because I believe in equal rights and responsibilities for women and men, I am not a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 10:29 AM
1

MGTOW 1992 (back when, yes, we did call it the "men's movement") Confessions of a (recovering) Gynaholic http://www.backlash.com/book/nice.html
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:19 AM
0

The statistic originated with the Mary Koss-Ms. Magazine Rape Campus Survey, which included reluctant sex and impaired judgment sex as rape, and counted women as victims of rape even when the women claimed that they had not been raped. A couple of years after the study was published, another study was conducted of male college students that found the incidence of "rape" of college men was even higher when the same criteria were used. (Basically, think of it as "coyote ugly sex. The guy wakes up …
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:25 PM
2

Oh, and I absolutely agree, this is an excellent video!
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:48 PM
2

The war against men and boys in public education was declared on March 23, 1992. I was there for one of the first skirmishes and wrote about what happened: Anti-Male Agenda of the AAUW http://www.backlash.com/book/educ.html
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:48 PM
1

http://www.backlash.com/book/affairs.html Affairs by me 1992 Bellevue, Wash. - It is a little known, but scientifically proven fact that men who have affairs, have them with another person. Yes, this is true. What's more, we now know that most of the people with whom they have their affairs are women. This may seem amazing, and it goes contrary to everything pop-feminists say about men...But here's an exciting new theory I call the "Theory of the Carousal Class": If heterosexual men are unfaithf…
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:10 PM
5

We used to have a saying at The Backlash! "Circumcision hacks men off."
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:00 PM
1

In the first draft I used taking precautions to avoid contracting a venereal disease, but that topic is very close to the whole debate on rape prevention and I wanted to use something that was in a very different context, very simple, and demonstrated the wisdom of taking personal responsibility when the other party was clearly to blame. Many others before me have tried to explain that men are socialized to be on their guard and ready for a fight, but this actually leads to more frequent alterca…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:24 PM
0

In my 1991 book posted here http://www.backlash.com/book/sexism.html I differentiated between "real feminists," which Christina Hoff Sommers calls "equity feminists," and the radical or "victim feminists," whom I called "pop feminists." Since then, all of the forms of feminism that have dominated in media, politics and government have been variations of pop feminism, while all variations of equity feminism could all be classed under a less gender-exclusive term, such as equalitarian. Most Englis…
/r/MensRights17/06/12 06:13 PM
1

Start by agreeing. "Can we all agree that women should be treated with equity and respect? No more of that sexist bs? Okay, good. And the same should go for men, too, right?"
/r/MensRights11/06/12 01:26 AM
-10

I don't date. In America, it's simply not safe to make yourself vulnerable to false accusations.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:39 AM
1

I agree. Daniel Patterson, one of the 3 men Crichton interviewed for the book, told me he had shared my story with Crichton. Certainly, there were many elements in the story that mirrored my own. The thing all men in America need to know, is that hostile environment sexual harassment is defined by the sex of the alleged victim. For men, that means our perspective of what constitutes conduct of a sexual nature rules. Feminists claim that showing cleavage, tight sweaters, short skirts and spandex …
/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:36 AM
1

As the article noted, it was "a rewrite of an old joke told during Bill Clinton’s presidency (thus the reference to Arkansas and razorback pigs), which used to include only one pig and First Lady Hillary Clinton." So all he did was to change the president from Clinton to Obama, and added Pelosi. The reaction serves to demonstrate the double standard: when women do it, it's okay; when men do it, it's a crime against humanity. That's a sexist double standard.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 06:35 AM
1

Years ago a buddy who wrote for my little 'zine under the pseudonym of Wilbur Wormwood wrote, "Men will be nice when nice guys get laid." I think that says it all.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 06:13 AM
0

Years ago a friend, who wrote for The Backlash! under the pseudonym, Wilbur Wormwood, dubbed Naomi Wolf's brand of feminism, "Feminism for Foxes." In the spectrum of feminist ideology, from the NAWALT end to the sadomasochistic pseudo-intellectualism of Catharine MacKinnon, feminism for foxes is the clique of gum chewing, hair tossing 15-year-old mean girls dominating the school cafeteria. Christina Hoff-Sommers exposed Wolf's first book, The Beauty Myth, as a tome of venomous lies. Wolf has no …
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:38 PM
3

Digital recorders are inexpensive and effective. In the state of Washington, recording without informed consent is legal except when there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy." I also agree that carrying a digital recorder is a good idea, I have a few, and I do carry at least one most of the time. For big venues, I use a Zoom H4, the older version. Works exceptionally well. For everyday carry, I have an old Sony that works well and is very durable. But there are many options, now, including …
/r/MensRights26/05/12 02:07 AM
4

The Safeway General Counsel told a funny joke that panned three prominent political figures: President Obama, Hilary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi. Other than that Clinton and Pelosi are female, there was nothing about gender in the joke. But as we all know, feminists are humorless, and so now they're making a ruckus about it. What a crock of cow poo!
/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:59 AM
1

This is precisely the kind of thinking that I have actively and publicly opposed for 24+ years. The reason it's a bad idea is the backlash. No, not my website, nor even Susan Faludi's book of lies by the same name, but the cyclic nature of social behavior. If the oppression of one class is elevated above all others, then eventually there will be a backlash against it. This is what the ruling elites want. Moreover, as outlined in Eric Hoffer's seminal work, The True Believer, the feminist movemen…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:19 AM
2

In the article she cites Suzanne Moore for suggesting that men go to prison more because men commit more crime. Is that sexist? Well, when some claim that blacks go to prison more because blacks commit more crime, the left calls that racist. And then there is the fact that women generally get lighter sentences than men for committing the same crimes. So I'm going to go waaaay out on a limb here and suggest that juuust maybe it is a little sexist. Just a wee bit. Tiny. Hardly worth mentioning. Un…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:49 PM
4

I'm glad to see others picking up on Ted Pong's argument: "Circumcising" breasts? by Ted Pong http://www.backlash.com/content/gender/1996/11-nov96/pong10.html Please excuse the color scheme. The page is 16 years old and I haven't gotten around to updating it, yet.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:53 AM
9

While working at Microsoft I made the mistake of telling my manager that I was writing a book critical of feminism. She had been hitting on me and I was trying to ignore her advances. She accused me of sexual harassment and fired me. Following this, I worked a series of temp jobs while publishing, with the financial help of several MRAs, a men's rights 'zine. When the Seattle Times ran a page-and-a-half hit piece on us, our support dried up and I had to suspend publication. A few months later, I…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 05:10 AM
2

There's also my Backlash Yahoo group, which has been active since 1998 and has 415 members: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/backlash/ But with 36,020 readers, I have no doubt that this is the biggest MRM forum in the world.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 09:59 PM
2

Twenty years ago feminist icons and feminist groups pretended they were diverse and represented different goals and values, but rather than repudiate or flat out reject and criticize the elements that were the most sexist (and most are sexist to varying degrees), they would simply say things like, "well I think we have to be careful about saying anything too extreme, but I think we can respect their point of view as valid even if it does not represent our own." Bigotry is bigotry. All feminism i…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:31 AM
1

I've noticed the MSM seems to be reporting more cases of adult women raping underage boys. I wonder if this reflects an actual increase, or a greater willingness to report and increased willingness to not laugh at those reports.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:59 AM
41

Whenever somebody hits me with something like that, I remind them that we are all females. The "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" bit. In biology, the fundamental template is female. The male is a specialized female. The primary though not sole purpose of the Y chromosome is to switch off that which makes us female. The species has called upon us, as men, to give up the joys of womanhood in order to fulfill our specialized role. So when feminists attack men, they are attacking an evolutionary st…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:41 AM
2

Well done to whomever escalated this to the attention of the MSM: Who says men can’t be raped? http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/who_says_men_cant_be_raped/singleton/ Daily Mirror Accused Of Being Sexist Against Men After Story About ‘Nymphomaniac’ Woman http://www.mediaite.com/online/daily-mirror-accused-of-being-sexist-against-men-after-story-about-nymphomaniac-woman/
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:29 AM
1

The very important thing to remember is that the case that originally created the "reasonable woman standard," Ellison vs. Brady, also stipulated that when the alleged victim is a man, then a distinct "reasonable man standard" applies. What that means in this context, is that men should demand that female behaviors that are the equivalent of "men's temper tantrums," such as passive-aggressive behaviors, also be treated as possible sex discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 01:09 AM
-1

Never heard of him before, but his video is a lot of fun.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:17 AM
3

This reminds me of the old joke about the headlines following discover that an asteroid is about to destroy the earth: "Asteroid to destroy Earth; women and children hardest hit."
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:05 AM
4

When the same techniques and definitions that were employed in the Mary Koss/Ms. Magazine Rape Campus Survey, that found 1 in 3 college women had been victims of sexual assault and rape, were employed in a survey of college men, the incidence of sexual assault and rape was found to be even higher, as college men reported high rates of "reluctant sex" and "coyote ugly" sex, both of which, by the Koss/Ms. Magazine definition, were rape.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:54 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:08 AM
3

Friedan's "problem with no name" was clinical depression, and shortly before she died, she admitted that to sell her book she lied that it was pervasive. That was in the late 90s, and though I've Googled for references I have found none. So it would probably require searching through old newspapers to find the articles about it. Also, I would not describe the war against men as feminists pushing too far for women's equality. The feminist core of the 60s was all about female supremacy and a lesbi…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:01 AM
6

That I'm Native American and challenge them to explain how American Indian men and other minority men are responsible for oppressing upper middle class white women.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:16 PM
0

No, but you're less likely to become a martyr if you are. When I published The Backlash! 'zine, I differentiated between (gender-equity) feminists and what I called pop-feminists (the evil, man-hating ones). Every month I featured one or two articles by guys who were majorly pissed off about being screwed, while the rest of the articles were all very reasonable, calm, and respectful of the (equity) feminists." When the Seattle Times published a page-and-a-half hit piece on me that got me fired f…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 02:38 AM
1

Were I 30 or even 20 years younger, I would move to one of the oil boom towns of the Bakken, where the unemployment rate is extremely low and the income is very high. Alternately, I would look into training to operate aerial drones. With less than 2 years of training, students are landing jobs paying well in excess of $100k per year. Soon, the FDA is expected to allow tens of thousands of drones in America airspace. My suggestion, consider this as an opportunity to take advantage of these fantas…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 01:43 AM
2

My father was enraged when he heard that I was upset about it. (He's the kind of abusive male feminists point to when they want to condemn all men.) Over the years, all of my girlfriends appreciated my staying power due to the insensitivity, but I resent losing half the nerve endings. Plus, as I mentioned in another post, it caused a cascade of inflammation that caused numerous health problems.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 12:55 AM
3

I'm circumcised, and aside from deeply resenting the loss of 50% of the nerve endings, there (although my girlfriends over the years have all appreciated the..."stamina" conferred by my relative insensitivity), it set off a chain reaction of inflammation that over the years sent me to hospital four times (the first when I was only thirteen). So I call it what it is: MGM. However, the gender neutrality of using the term IGM is interesting, it also distinguishes the non-consensual nature the pract…
/r/MensRights01/04/12 12:27 AM
3

Years ago I wrote an article with the title, "Men Unite, Take Back the Light!" That's not a typo. By demonizing men, they have taken the light from us. Personally, I would like to see that used by men everywhere. You can find my 1993 article here: http://www.backlash.com/book/light.html
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:16 AM
1

Shortly before graduating with a BA in 1981 at the University of Washington, I contemplated what to do. My LASAT and GPA were sufficient to get into Harvard Law...as a minority...but even as a minority they were not sufficient to get into Law at the UW. There was no chance I could come up with the money for Harvard, but my GMAT and GRE combined with my GPA might be sufficient to get into grad school. I decided to inquire at the Office of Minority Affairs about guidance and assistance. Now you ha…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 05:34 AM
2

The first suicide ever recorded on the Internet was that of my friend, Allen Wells, who was hounded by the courts at the behest of his ex who had previously stabbed, tormented and drove him out of his home. You can still find his posts in the old Usenet. His was a voice of reason. The year was 1990. The evil and vile ex-Mrs. Wells was a harbinger of the hatred and violence to come. For the law is violence. Harnessed for good, it keeps the peace and imposes order as unobtrusively as possible. Har…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 07:06 AM
1

Excellent book, Warren's books are all great and I highly recommend them.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter