TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rohan62442 Archive

View 60 posts and 234 comments by rohan62442 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
845

Discriminationrohan62442/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:56 AM
458

Social Issuesrohan62442/r/MensRights06/01/26 01:40 PM
431

rohan62442/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/26 03:00 AM
179

Discriminationrohan62442/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:23 AM
150

Discriminationrohan62442/r/MensRights17/03/24 01:45 PM
125

False Accusationrohan62442/r/MensRights01/01/26 04:47 PM
107

misandryrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/23 12:36 PM
102

Social Issuesrohan62442/r/MensRights11/02/24 03:09 AM
92

Feminismrohan62442/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:01 AM
87

Legal Rightsrohan62442/r/MensRights28/10/23 04:40 AM
87

double standardsrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/23 03:01 PM
81

Feminismrohan62442/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:36 PM
80

Intactivismrohan62442/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:46 AM
80

legal rightsrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/23 01:47 PM
76

Activism/Supportrohan62442/r/MensRights19/01/24 03:44 AM
71

social issuesrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/23 05:35 AM
65

social issuesrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/23 03:38 PM
47

humorrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/23 05:19 PM
44

social mediarohan62442/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/24 07:58 AM
42

articlerohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/23 06:40 AM
38

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies06/07/23 07:38 AM
35

social issuesrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/23 07:19 AM
31

Activism/Supportrohan62442/r/MensRights11/07/24 05:15 PM
30

social issuesrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/23 01:44 PM
30

Social Issuesrohan62442/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:45 PM
23

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies30/04/24 11:13 AM
22

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies09/08/23 10:35 AM
21

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies24/06/24 06:29 PM
21

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies09/07/23 03:26 AM
20

Social Issuesrohan62442/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:10 PM
17

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies09/08/23 06:59 AM
16

intactivismrohan62442/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 03:00 AM
16

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies23/09/23 05:32 AM
16

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies30/04/24 11:21 AM
16

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies18/12/23 09:05 AM
15

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies13/12/23 02:25 PM
14

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies30/04/24 11:15 AM
14

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies20/07/23 07:09 AM
13

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies09/07/23 03:30 AM
13

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies12/10/23 02:32 AM
12

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies05/08/23 02:04 AM
12

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies23/10/23 02:56 AM
12

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies23/10/23 01:21 AM
12

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies19/10/23 02:47 PM
10

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies13/12/23 02:03 PM
10

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies12/10/23 03:04 AM
10

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies08/09/23 05:26 AM
9

Activism/Supportrohan62442/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:32 AM
9

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies30/04/24 11:19 AM
9

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies10/09/23 04:19 PM
8

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies23/01/24 10:16 AM
7

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies23/10/23 01:17 AM
7

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies12/09/23 11:48 AM
7

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies29/12/23 11:21 AM
6

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies28/05/24 06:23 AM
5

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies22/09/23 03:24 PM
5

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies08/09/23 05:43 AM
4

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies09/02/24 11:54 AM
3

rohan62442/r/Male_Studies30/04/24 11:17 AM
1

rohan62442/r/PussyPass09/03/23 06:37 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
40

It's not women and children anymore btw. It's women and girls now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 06:31 PM
10

Now you know. They are your enemies. You don't negotiate or compromise with them and you show them no mercy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 09:08 AM
2

Here - https://drlinda-md.com/2016/11/men-patients-forced-man-medical-setting/
/r/MensRights16/06/26 07:29 AM
3

Look up Sally Miller Gearhart.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:25 AM
20

I would not feel bad breaking or defacing these.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 03:52 PM
1

If you've been paying attention, it's not "women and children" anymore; it's "women and girls."
/r/Male_Studies20/04/26 10:09 AM
15

What do feminists want? The powers of men, the privileges of women and the accountability of children.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 10:49 AM
5

You don't. They are your enemies, whether you like it or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 08:44 AM
19

Yes. Now there are bigoted statements that the mainstream is willing to make about men (in general) but not about black men.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 07:18 AM
71

Misandry is a larger problem than racism. People just don't like admitting it. The gender sentencing gap, for example, is larger than the racial sentencing gap, and that is true for every race.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:23 AM
18

If they cared about the child, they wouldn't give custody to a pedophile rapist.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 04:09 AM
6

They're projecting.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 07:21 AM
5

We all need to understand that these people are our avowed enemies, and we need to act accordingly. There can be no compromise with such people.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 11:11 AM
2

It never was. Even as far back as 1848, at its root, feminism is a misandrist movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/26 06:55 PM
5

One is that it supposedly safeguards the privacy of the accusers. Obvious bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 01:47 AM
11

Or wikipedia for that matter.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/26 03:49 PM
25

Jian Ghomeshi. The rules you're talking about is Bill C-51 passed by the Canadian government in 2018 and upheld as constitutional by the supreme court in 2022. What it does is force "reverse disclosure" i.e. if the defence has evidence that calls the accusers' reliability into question then it has to be revealed in advance (in cases involving sexual assault). This allows the prosecution to tailor their strategy and testimony accordingly and also request that the evidence be suppressed in advance…
/r/MensRights20/01/26 12:41 PM
1

Which is exactly my point. That's not an obligation for them so they shouldn't get to use that excuse; they should either make it an obligation or ban male-only conscription.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 07:30 AM
1

"Women can give birth." Well, they aren't in most of the world. Most countries have below replacement fertility. Why should men carry duties alone?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 04:55 PM
0

I would suggest to both you and u/YoKevinTrue that we stop giving our allegiance to labels (like left and right) and compare actual policies if that is needed. It's only a guess but it's possible that you may both have a lot of things in common in terms of actual policies. And you may be able to work with each other on things where you don't agree. Don't allow yourselves to be put into a box; it's counterproductive.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:46 PM
35

Yes, they will keep harping on about how trickle-down economics doesn't work and then offer trickle-down equality to men and boys.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:39 PM
59

Example: the recent push for male only conscription in Europe. One reason cited for this misandrist policy is that women are critical for birthing the next generation but all these countries also have below replacement birth rates. Obligations only seem to run one way.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:36 PM
7

Yes, agreed.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:31 PM
10

They're not just incompetent, they're malicious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 03:20 PM
2

Read about this case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferguson_v._McKiernan?wprov=sfla1 Understand that the man lost the case in the lower court and had to pay child support. The state supreme court case was only won at 3-2. You shouldn't play those odds. Tell those friends to adopt cats.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 01:55 PM
51

The economic left, sure. Definitely not the others.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 01:50 PM
1

It should be higher, IMO. That person is not only destroying a person's life and reputation, they're also wasting the legal system's time and gaming the people's faith in that system.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:50 PM
30

Which they do anyways.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:55 AM
18

If someone is filing for "no fault" divorce, then they should be compensating their spouse for years of life lost/wasted. They should also not get child custody as a person of poor character. There should be consequences for not keeping your vows / breaking a contract willy-nilly.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:15 AM
3

For the subreddit you moderate, see if you can add another regular poster as a mod too. It won't guarantee if the admins really want to nuke the sub, but it's an option.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 01:42 AM
62

Meaningless so long as the country's fertility rate remains below 2.1. You cannot legitimately impose gender roles on only men.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:53 PM
13

Now guard the institution so it doesn't get captured by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 04:34 AM
2

Which won't happen. What you will actually get is women's only carriages and mixed carriages. That's the norm in my country.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 06:35 PM
7

"Yes, the boy is clearly the victim of rape.." before adding "But the needs of the child must come first" If they actually cared about the "needs of the child", they wouldn't give custody to the pedophile rapist.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 12:44 PM
129

Men have always loved their families. That hasn't changed. They were expected to work and earn but most did that for their families. While it was different before due to societal pressures, women these days have abandoned family for the lure of money and power.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 01:15 PM
17

You're right. Though I'd say that fatherhood would easily survive, and even thrive, in gender equality. Men are usually more egalitarian than women in general. What it wouldn't survive - is systemic misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 03:37 PM
8

That's not why they do it. Child support is not present for the benefit of the child. That's just the excuse. The real reason is greed and misandry. The woman gets access to the man's resources without having to give anything in return, without any accountability and without much responsibility. The government and the swine involved in "family" court also get a cut. That's why child support exists. They don't care about the welfare of the child or they wouldn't regularly give child custody to pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 03:37 PM
7

I think the mods of r/MensRights should ban all the mods of those subs which auto-ban accounts that post here. Also ban all the auto-ban bot accounts from the sub.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:26 AM
2

These women are the definition of inspins (involuntary spinsters).
/r/MensRights24/07/25 01:58 PM
23

That's the best thing about genetic trash. It takes itself out.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/07/25 05:47 AM
15

Oh they know. That's why they're going for equity now. Means power for women and duties for men.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 01:23 PM
4

If they'd had the force and the gumption to seize the reins of power instead of men, I'd wager that we wouldn't have had anywhere near as much peace as we've actually had. The species would've been extinct millennia ago. They're just as stupid as they are cruel.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 12:55 PM
3

This substack article addresses the media's bullshit and hypocrisy with regards to the child abuse going on in the childcare industry in Australia. https://open.substack.com/pub/putourchildrenfirst/p/with-one-headline-the-media-casually?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=2iok87
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/25 11:25 AM
16

Reeves believes that we can negotiate or compromise with feminists, that status/equality/power is not a zero-sum-game. He is a fool.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 11:10 AM
5

"Don't dip your pen in company ink."
/r/MensRights16/06/25 10:36 AM
11

Women also have the right to demand that female healthcare workers (doctors, nurses) attend to them. That is denied to men; we can't demand that male healthcare workers.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 12:37 AM
20

It's particularly rich when the people who most often clump themselves with children are women.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 12:47 PM
3

When sex is the only tool she has, every man who disagrees with her looks like an incel.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 01:01 PM
2

What do you know, the sex which regularly clubs itself with children ("women and children first" etc) is making up insults calling men childish... It's projection. It's all projection.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/25 11:45 AM
16

Like much of reddit, nottheonion is also a misandrist shithole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 11:12 AM
10

It's the great lie of ad hominem: Bad people only have bad opinions. That's why they attack the person rather than the arguments.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/25 03:19 AM
70

When sex is the only tool she has, every man who disagrees with her looks like an incel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 08:16 AM
2

Worst is when you still end up reading a male feminist a.k.a a simp. Oh the main character is male, and the author is too, but that doesn't stop them both from being virulently misandrist.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/25 07:07 PM
3

Promoting hatred against men is okay as far as reddit admins are concerned. They will do nothing.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/25 10:58 AM
3

Feminists project their hatred into men. Always remember that.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 06:32 PM
24

The misandry is institutional. Eyewitness testimony is not as reliable as people think. In this case, there was no independent witness to the crime. Only the accuser. Dean Cage was convicted because he was a man. That he is a black man likely made the bigotry worse. But make no mistake, it was misandry. Remember that the gender sentencing gap in the US is way larger than the racial sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:13 PM
2

It's projection as always...
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:50 AM
3

The federal ban on FGM was ruled unconstitutional. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2020.100533
/r/MensRights04/07/24 07:09 PM
8

Because of the double standards. Women have sued for access to male only spaces and won. https://time.com/4061122/ludtke-kuhn-jaguars-colts/
/r/MensRights03/07/24 11:13 AM
9

Yet in 2015, we had a male college student removed from a college and denied access to all of the facilities he paid for because a female student said he resembled her rapist. I want to read more about this case. Can you tell us more; which college and the person's name if possible? Edit: Nvm. Found a reference here I recently assisted a young man who was subjected by administrators at his small liberal arts university in Oregon to a month-long investigation into all his campus relationships, se…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:42 AM
39

It's in the subreddit rules.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 06:26 AM
1

You can also read it on Wikisource https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Fraud_of_Feminism
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:57 PM
3

It is not just shame that stops men from speaking out; there are consequences for doing so and they are not always worth it at a personal level. Women and girls are coddled and protected from these same consequences.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:33 PM
2

Here's the problem with any such law based around consent. A fair justice system will enshrine the presumption of innocence of an accused. That means that the burden of proof must fall on the prosecution. If this is not true, ipso facto the system is not fair or impartial; nothing more than a kangaroo court. With the burden of proof upon the prosecution, they now are in the ridiculous situation of having to prove a negative; that is the absence of consent. All the defense needs to do is refute i…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 08:12 PM
9

she can always say she changed her mind between 3rd and 4th trhust, and if you finished the thrust- you raped her. Extreme example but in general this is the danger here. Not very extreme. Look at the Kevin Ibbs case in Australia. https://wiki4men.com/wiki/Kevin_Ibbs
/r/MensRights28/06/24 08:03 PM
39

The very existence of college "courts" seems absurd to me. How are supposedly criminal cases being investigated by unprofessional ignoramuses in college in place of law enforcement and the legal system? All of it is crazy!
/r/MensRights27/06/24 02:56 AM
3

You're right. The replication crisis is a term used to refer to widespread concern about the accumulation of erroneous studies in scientific literature. Psychology researchers arguably have played a central role in the replication crisis (Wiggins & Chrisopherson, 2019), but other fields including medicine (Gehr et al., 2006; Ioannidis, 2005), economics (Duvendack et al., 2017), political science (Gerber et al., 2001), and education (Makel & Plucker, 2014) also appear to be affected. Although muc…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:00 PM
9

I assure you that they are. I'm left wing on a lot of issues but I've swerved hard right on some others in the past few years. You likely wouldn't notice that because a lot of men aren't being vocal about it yet, especially to people who they know are themselves left wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 07:38 PM
3

Yep. You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 06:01 AM
2

I don't care about either side of this debate. Nobody cares about the sanctity of male-only spaces and so I don't spare an iota of concern for female-only spaces. There's not been a single space for men/boys only where women haven't tried to butt in.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/24 05:58 AM
1

I've had some success against that sub. Some pointers based on my observations: Target popular posts in the sub. The more likely it is that a post would reach Popular or r/all the more likely it is that reddit admins will take action. Report comments and posts that threaten/promote harassment and violence explicitly. It is reddit admins and not sub moderators who look at those reports so there's less chance of bias.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/24 05:32 AM
9

Same process as blocking a user.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:43 PM
23

I've avoided all of this bullshit by blocking the bots that are responsible for the banning. Unfortunately, I don't remember which bots... I'd honestly support banning the mods of such subreddits from MensRights as a whole, just as a matter of principle, until this misandrist rule is removed.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:52 PM
2

The crazy who shot Warhol was Valerie Solanas. She wrote The SCUM Manifesto which advocates for worse. SCUM stands for Society for Cutting Up Men. keeping about 10% of the male population globally, for procreation only. This was Sally Miller Gearhart, the lesbian feminist professor and pioneer of gender/women studies programs in American universities.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:31 AM
5

The death penalty should only be given in the rarest of the rare cases, and only in cases involving murder and such. Sentencing people to death for sexual assault crimes will incentivise future criminals to kill their victims to silence a potential witness, since the sentence is the same anyways.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:52 AM
3

Yes. Almost every decision that a man needs to make becomes a Kafka trap.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:46 AM
4

Women As Sex Vendors is in the public domain and can be read on Wikisource. Link is below. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Women_As_Sex_Vendors
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 04:32 PM
19

Honestly men like these cause more harm to ordinary men then any feminist ever could. Those men are feminists.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 03:16 PM
8

Why? Why do you care? The past week or so since this has been going on has been really revelatory for me. The misandry isn't a surprise, but I was shocked by how much more cynical and (it has to be said) selfish I've become. There have been men and women arguing against his question and opposing the misandry with facts and logic. They've been wasting their time; these misandrists didn't reason them into this answer and you won't be able to reason them out of it. And I don't care. Neither should …
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:10 PM
6

It's a professional troll
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/24 03:34 AM
9

You are on the Men's Rights subreddit mate. Who was banned for this? Or are you talking about the MensLib subreddit?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:24 AM
2

What else can you expect from tradcons.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:23 PM
3

Yup. The US govt stopped collecting data on federal spending on men's health i.e. health spending by gender, around 2022. It clearly showed how little was being spent on men compared with women. Then Biden goes on to say that very little is being spent on women's health, mentioning women/girls 81 times in his budget speech. Men and boys weren't even worth a mention for him. Millions of dollars more are going to be spent on women and girls.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:21 PM
-1

It's not going to protect you. You can be glassed for refusing to interact with women. Women can get pissy when they're rejected for any reason.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:51 AM
-2

Use inspin instead of incel. Stands for involuntary spinster.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 04:18 PM
1

Post it in the United Kingdom, Scotland and Ireland subs as well.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 02:48 PM
1

No sane man should care about Roe v. Wade in a country where Hermesmann v. Seyer is legal precedent.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 03:59 AM
12

And then they say men should go to therapy...
/r/MensRights21/03/24 12:41 PM
1

Yes. Correct me if I'm wrong here, it replaced the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 which was gender neutral, with this misandrist monstrosity.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 08:38 AM
8

Yes. Anyone who doesn't believe that can read The SCUM Manifesto.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 05:20 PM
4

Yes. It's the mindset of people obsessed with power, status and money. It's also very common in popular culture. Of course, it is going to affect people's relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 01:40 PM
17

I put it there. That's a User tag, not a flair. It's a functionality available in the Boost for Reddit app.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 09:01 AM
30

And in the GenZ subreddit, everyone is spitting on men and boys complaining about the loneliness epidemic as a societal issue. The feminists' so called solution is for men to reach out to reach other in platonic companionship. They don't mention, like here, that feminists have been demonising male only spaces for a century now, especially when those spaces don't serve women. Two faced hypocrites.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:10 AM
11

Don't expect honest support from most women. They will try to stop it, the politicians will push back, and then they will accept male-only conscription as a "compromise."
/r/MensRights14/03/24 07:06 AM
24

India is incredibly misandrist. Discrimination against men is enshrined in our constitution, not just in the criminal and civil codes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/24 02:13 AM
15

From what I've seen and experienced in my own life, feminism is an avowed enemy of men and boys. There can be no negotiation or compromise with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/24 03:16 AM
11

MensLib is a censorship heavy sub and will delete posts and comments and ban you if you do not keep to feminist talking points, or say anything that the mods don't like. MensLib is the controlled opposition of the men's rights movement by feminists. It is not about the rights of men/boys or about advocacy for them. It can be summarised as "Feminism first. Men, maybe." This sub, on the other hand, is about exactly what it says in the name. You will not be censored or banned for what you say unles…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 02:21 PM
1

What's even more funny is that men don't have a right to their own bodies, given the widespread presence of male genital mutilation and male-only conscription.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 08:28 AM
1

Love your username
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:41 AM
2

The author is a man; Brian Earp.
/r/MensRights23/02/24 02:22 AM
3

It's a spam bot. That's all it says on every thread.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/24 01:07 AM
1

Yes. The teachers subreddit is incredibly misandrist, too.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 12:13 PM
6

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/woman-murder-cannabis-psychosis-b2484703.html
/r/MensRights15/02/24 05:17 AM
3

Please do. Tell everyone you know to do that as well. And if they don't change, vote them out.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:27 AM
6

Agreed.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 07:37 AM
79

Richard Reeves is the MensLib subreddit personified: feminism first, men maybe. He's feminism's useful idiot, here to distract us from real issues by paying lip service while simultaneously getting ready to stab us in the back. All his words come from a place of fear, not love or care. They've realised that the party is over and the music is slowly winding to a stop. And they're terrified.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:19 AM
8

Staying at home in the 50s was a privilege that women employed (something that wasn't available to men), not some kind of oppression that they labored under.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/24 04:20 AM
1

This is pretty common in India. A sixteen year old porn addicted Indian girl repeatedly raped her twelve year old brother, and was caught when she got pregnant. The boy was the one who went to prison. https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/teenage-girl-gets-pregnant-after-forcing-younger-brother-to-have-sex/
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:08 AM
6

Prostitution is the only addiction industry where the feminists and other so-called progressives want to criminally charge the customers and addicts while protecting the actual dealers.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 05:22 AM
1

Please check Erin Pizzey and Karen Straughan.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 10:55 AM
2

People underestimate how much hate is casually and openly directed towards men and boys. There are people in positions of power and influence who want men and boys to suffer and die, and most others don't care so long as they or their own aren't directly affected.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:07 PM
13

I don't doubt it. The r/Teachers subreddit can be incredibly misandrist too.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 11:53 AM
3

A sixteen year old porn addicted girl repeatedly raped her little brother, and was only caught when she got pregnant. The boy was sent to prison. He was twelve.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 01:29 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:03 AM
3

https://web.archive.org/web/20210920031435/https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/431675A?tab=1
/r/MensRights01/01/24 04:50 PM
2

r/MisandryInMedia exists but is not at all active.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 12:25 PM
8

Because an ideology like feminism, something you willingly adopt, is the same as biological sex, something that you're born with...
/r/MensRights26/12/23 11:58 AM
12

The boy will have to pay child support even if the female rapist is convicted and sentenced. The courts see no issues with granting child custody to female pedophiles. And boys/men are sub-human in their eyes anyways.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:40 PM
6

The pill cannot work without significantly affecting body chemistry. That's certain given what its purpose is. Everyone will have to do a cost benefit analysis before using it when/if it becomes available.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 12:49 PM
39

It's just controlled opposition.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:44 AM
2

And because people make money off it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 12:33 PM
1

I'm calling the Harvard president rabid, not the donors... That's who the donors were "feeding". It's not like their politics were unknown to anyone who bothered to look.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/23 01:34 AM
-5

On the other hand, you shouldn't be feeding the rabid either. Edit: I'm calling the Harvard president rabid, not the donors... That's who the donors were "feeding". It's not like their politics were unknown to anyone who bothered to look.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/23 04:37 PM
15

Apparently, she's a quota hire who's only ever published 11 academic papers in her entire career. Most serious academics will publish that many in one year.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/23 04:36 PM
40

The funniest part is that the court sees no problem in granting child custody to female pedophiles.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:45 AM
5

Yup. Data, like people, will confess to anything if it's tortured long enough.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 08:04 AM
1

Not these ones. They're far too fat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 09:03 AM
16

Oncoming female pedestrians often do this as well, at least where I live. Some will walk in front of you after they cross the road, expecting you to move out the way. Anyone else notice this? Yup. They're like cows, indifferent to everyone else, expecting you to get out of their way. That's because they face no consequences for a lack of civic sense. I love your username btw.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 04:53 PM
2

This should be flaired Double Standards, not Progress.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 04:04 PM
9

Inspin: involuntary spinster
/r/MensRights06/11/23 05:48 PM
5

Another point is financial separation. Don't have joint accounts with her; honestly, use different financial institutions entirely. And get a hold of your identity papers and keep them secure.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 08:55 AM
1

Has the video been removed already?
/r/MensRights29/10/23 07:43 AM
4

Feminism is, and always has been, an enemy of men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 01:54 AM
6

Correct. The courts will use it as toilet paper.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 09:01 AM
7

Yup. Supreme Court decisions set legal precedent, unless parliament passes a specific law. So a man's family in India is fucked if his wife divorces him.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:33 AM
10

Same here
/r/MensRights14/10/23 03:23 AM
1

May Amy always find red lights on the streets and legos under her feet
/r/MensRights11/10/23 11:35 AM
2

That was a precedent setting case; which means that it was applied multiple times throughout America by the courts to force young boys to pay child support to their pedophile rapists. I like to call it the pedophile's stipend. So if this particular pedophile rapist gets pregnant, she could also force the boy into 18 years of slavery thanks to the courts. This is what real rape culture looks like.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/23 10:39 AM
2

Yep. Sally Miller Gearheart, the lesbian radical feminist professor who pioneered the gender studies programs in American universities, gave a talk outright stating that the population of men should be reduced to, and kept at, 10% of the world population. Mary Daly, another radical feminist professor, agreed with her and called it a "necessary decontamination of the earth." They were literally calling for a gendercide that would kill over 3 billion people. Not even the Nazis were that psychotic.…
/r/MensRights11/10/23 10:29 AM
3

Hermesmann v. Seyer, and that was in Kansas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/23 09:32 AM
8

Stands for Discrimination, Inequality, Exclusion.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 03:42 AM
1

The article does mention a non parole period of 20 years. How strictly is that enforced?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/23 12:52 PM
1

Did he actually end up paying the "missing child support"?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:43 AM
1

Especially true for human beings who are so varied in nature and experiences. 515 is a rounding error given the population of humans on the planet.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:33 AM
9

Is this evidence of systemic misandry withing the DNC? Yes, it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 01:33 AM
1

A major point that I have heard brought up is that feminism alone will not ruin countries' culture, but the acceptance of 'Baby Momma Culture' and the 'I dont need a man' mentality. That is a better predictor of behavior and the respect for the male place in society than feminism Eh. "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" has been a prominent feminist screed. What you're talking about is an inevitable result of feminism.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:07 AM
12

It's called controlled opposition
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:33 PM
12

I'm quite beyond prison time for MGM nowadays. Capital punishment, straight up. That "doctor" has mutilated thousands of children.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 03:31 PM
18

Send them the below link. Hermesmann v. Seyer The rapist Colleen Hermesmann got pregnant from the rape, and the court not only granted custody to the rapist but also forced the rape victim to pay child support. It is a precedent setting case in the US, meaning there are other boys paying child support to their rapists. This is the actual rape culture.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/23 02:35 PM
1

Because there are actual legal and financial benefits to targeting boys and little to no drawbacks. Never forget Hermesmann v. Seyer The rapist Colleen Hermesmann got pregnant from the rape, and the court not only granted custody to the rapist but also forced the rape victim to pay child support. It is a precedent setting case in the US, meaning there are other boys paying child support to their rapists.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:41 PM
1

Violence Against Women Act
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:33 PM
15

I dare say they're even beginning to actually care. After reading through that thread, I'm not holding my breath. Those people are practically a major part of the problem.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:14 AM
55

https://open.substack.com/pub/bariweiss/p/young-men-who-dropped-out-of-dating-pool This is the same article on substack. Read the comments there. So many older people are out of touch with the reality young men have to face everyday; they just can't see the misandry even if it's pointed out to them plainly.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:34 AM
2

Call what they're doing trickle-down social justice and say it's as effective as trickle-down economics
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:09 AM
5

Link to the post?
/r/MensRights10/09/23 05:09 PM
6

Open the link in Firefox or Chrome, put the page in Reader mode and then reload the page
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 04:49 PM
4

Yeah, I'm not gonna kiss the ring.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/23 03:51 AM
9

These people think that reality is their mommy; that's it's going to change its mind if they scream at it. It usually ends up hitting them in the face instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/23 09:52 AM
8

r/MensLib is controlled opposition for feminists. Check the subreddit user overlap tool for this. Most users on that sub are on the worst feminist subs as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/23 09:38 AM
9

Add India to that list too.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 02:28 PM
2

she hasn't really done anything misandrist except say stuff. Yet. She hasn't done anything yet.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/23 05:14 PM
11

Those safety nets are usually tailored for women. Men are either not eligible sometimes, don't get the help they need because those responsible don't care or don't know how to help them, or are simply turned away as low priority. Men and boys (boys especially after reaching puberty) are punished socially and emotionally when they ask for help, or show "weakness", mostly by people who should be loving them. They learn to keep their problems to themselves to avoid adding to them. Most men who comm…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:59 PM
6

The only reason they don't commit more crimes is that they have such a huge safety net, unlike men, so they usually don't need to resort to crime.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 04:00 PM
2

Which says a lot about them; they associate humour with violence. And so that's all they use it for. With the result that they're always so unfunny.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 12:31 PM
14

Report the video
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:27 PM
13

Report the video. Everyone should do it.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:26 PM
3

I do not know of other religions, but regarding Christianity, the New Testament explicitly states that MGM is not required. And it hasn't been a part of Christianity for a vast majority of the past two millennia. Also, there are other religious practices like "stoning people to death" that have been illegal. Just because it is a religious practice doesn't give it a pass.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 11:48 AM
2

Fair.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:41 AM
3

Interesting. Though I do think that we should attack MGM on both cultural and legal fronts.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:39 AM
2

Also, I never see in these petitions how the religious aspect would be applied without violating the first amendment. Can parents make religious claims on behalf of their infant children? I'm no legal expert but I doubt religious aspects will trump fundamental rights of bodily integrity. At least, they shouldn't or it would allow for a lot of obscene violations of rights.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:08 AM
1

That's true
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/23 09:57 AM
3

Khan, for instance, knows all this very well. He made the statement about a nonexistent epidemic of violence because, well, that's just what you do. It's just words to say. It's the current realpolitik. You prattle out those lines, and others, because doing so brings you approval. Adding to this point, I'd like to repeat something Jordan Peterson mentioned when he was talking about academics being forced to write DEI statements to get funding. "Do you think you can do that (lie, say things you d…
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:55 PM
1

There is a reason why this post is flaired "double standards". You can acknowledge it as much as you want; you'll also be the only one doing so and will still get demonized for your problems regardless. And feminists will never give you the same consideration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/23 10:12 AM
9

Read "The Legal Subjection of Men" by Ernest Belfort Bax. As a start. It was published more than a century ago and gives an accurate historical perspective. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Legal_Subjection_of_Men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/23 01:54 AM
32

It's fucking infuriating when I encounter it, and that's bloody often. Here's a message to all men and boys: Stop fucking apologizing for things you did not do, or for words you did not say. Never apologize for having problems and talking about them. And never ever apologize for who you are.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 01:56 PM
3

Yes u/downandoutinchicago, we don't ban people here unless they're breaking site rules. Even if they're misandrist trolls.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 01:32 PM
2

Yeah. And the author passed away this year.
/r/Male_Studies09/08/23 11:55 PM
1

These are specific to my own country but a lot of it will be relevant to most others. Give men the constitutional right to equality under law. Give men the right to bodily autonomy; make male genital mutilation illegal. Abolish the laws and policies which do not uphold the presumption of innocence before the law. Both in theory and practice. Criminalise rape and sexual assault against men and boys, when the perpetrator is a woman/girl. Make domestic violence against men and boys illegal (like it…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:38 AM
5

Pretty old article debunking the "benefits" of male genital mutilation, but freely available.
/r/Male_Studies09/08/23 07:00 AM
3

Yes. Data, like people, will confess to anything if it's tortured long enough.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 05:10 AM
4

I'll speak of my own country, India. The Right to Equality is enshrined in the Constitution in Article 14; it prohibited everyone from discriminating on the basis of religion, sex, creed, caste etc. That's good, right? You'd think so, but Article 15 states that the government is allowed to make special provisions for women and children. Yeah, it explicitly excludes men. So when an Indian boy turns 18, he goes from a second class citizen to a third class citizen. Men and boys don't have the right…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:48 AM
25

Well, it was Dunkirk but what you said has already happened... https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/08/dunkirk-feminist-review-women-absent-why/
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:11 AM
1

Better word might be "condescending"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/23 05:01 PM
4

If an adult engages in sexual activity with a minor Please just call it rape; that's what it is.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:04 PM
4

Has been going on since the nineties. I've linked the precedent setting case below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights19/07/23 05:26 PM
35

She needs to be registered as a sex offender and she should never be allowed in the presence of any children unsupervised. It boggles the mind that any government would allow a pedophile rapist to have custody over a child.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 10:17 AM
96

Ah, yes, the pedophile's stipend. Never forget https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights19/07/23 04:51 AM
6

Like a typical feminist, Moran says that men and boys need feminism because that will solve our problems completely missing the fact that feminism has been the primary cause of exacerbating those same problems for the past century and half. Typical bullshit peddled by the Guardian.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/23 09:54 AM
1

You're a plain retard. As is the woman who wrote this stupid essay. And you're both misandrists. And neither of you should be tolerated one bit. Religious freedom. She cites religious freedom as a reason for mutilating little boys. The same reason the monsters that mutilate little girls cite for their practice. For burning and stoning people to death, for throwing homosexuals off building roofs. But mutilating boys is ok. That's your agenda. Hatred of men and boys.
/r/Male_Studies18/07/23 03:08 AM
12

Please consider reposting this (and all your other posts) on other male advocacy subreddits (like r/Mensrights for example). We may disagree on many things with others, but the people there also have aims that we share and your posts are too valuable to not be shared widely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/23 11:16 AM
2

Agreed. All forms of MGM should be illegal, unless there's medical reasons (and even then surgery should be the last option). https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent
/r/MensRights15/07/23 05:24 AM
2

Who the fuck is justifying FGM? Are you retarded? Do you know how to read? FGM is already illegal, as it should be. You're the one who seems to be justifying mutilating little boys.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:34 AM
3

https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent It's a long shot with you, but here's an essay from a medical ethics researcher about the topic.
/r/Male_Studies14/07/23 12:54 PM
3

Sorry for that. I linked the wrong post. Correct link is up now.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 10:16 AM
11

But why can’t we agree that it’s not about what’s worse…it’s about the principle. Cutting and removing parts on children’s genitals without their consent is wrong! I don’t care how severe! Exactly! It's not the oppression olympics, but that's how those crazies treat everything because they're rewarded for acting like entitled children.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 10:15 AM
9

https://www.reddit.com/r/Male_Studies/comments/14s1or1/male_circumcision_and_female_genital_mutilation/ Edit: my bad. I linked the wrong post. Fixed now.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:50 AM
15

Oh, it isn't. But who's gonna make a crazy person understand that? There was a whole scientific paper linked too.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:15 AM
65

Recent example I encountered: Circumcision, AKA male genital mutilation, is not a legitimate issue because FGM is so much worse
/r/MensRights14/07/23 08:38 AM
3

We can’t tackle real issues men face every day because you can’t admit that female genital mutilation is objectively worse than male circumcision. Even if this was true, which it isn't, why the fuck should it matter? Nobody is talking about making FGM legal. My patience is wearing thin thanks to hysterical twats coming up saying that mutilating little boys is a-OK because FGM is worse. Did you even read the paper? You wouldn't be making such stupid statements if you were capable of understanding…
/r/Male_Studies14/07/23 05:51 AM
3

"Circumcision" is a real men's issue. And there are 0 benefits to circumcision either. I don't give a flying fuck about comparison. Bigotry is bigotry, and male genital mutilation is far worse than FGM given its wide acceptance and practice the world over. MGM should be illegal and people who mutilate boys should be in prison. Doctors who practice it should lose their license as well.
/r/Male_Studies14/07/23 04:46 AM
1

Yeah. Misandry.
/r/Male_Studies14/07/23 03:29 AM
4

If anyone has more information about this photograph, like the name of the photographer, please let me know. Edit: Why would anyone downvote this? I want the photographer's name to determine if the photo is public domain in certain countries so that I can legally use it and upload it where I want.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 10:39 AM
7

The article is satire, but it's getting hard to distinguish between satire and reality these days.
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/23 07:33 AM
1

Presumption of guilt is a problem in India as well; it's enshrined in law. The Domestic Violence Against Women Act, along with being basically misandrist by not protecting victimised men, also makes it so that a woman can send her husband and his entire family to prison (non-bailable) with a single complaint to police.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 05:15 PM
7

I agree with you, but it's not like law enforcement don't follow the Duluth model. They do. It's just that criminal cases are held to a higher standard of evidence than these kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 08:02 AM
7

This article is open access, so you can read it in its entirety.
/r/Male_Studies06/07/23 07:39 AM
34

I'm not American. It seems incredibly strange to me that schools and colleges are allowed to handle sexual assault cases given that they have no legal or investigative expertise. Why is law enforcement not the ones such cases go to? Why is this even allowed?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 04:23 AM
8

Supreme Court judges retire at the age of 65, unless they're impeached. Either House of Parliament can begin impeachment proceedings against a judge, but then both Houses have to vote to impeach by a two-thirds vote. Then, the President is empowered to remove the judge, and a judicial committee will be formed to decide whether to frame charges. It has never happened in the history of the Republic of India. I don't think it would be appropriate to impeach them in this case given that Parliament i…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:18 PM
1

What did she say?
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:04 AM
4

In single "mother" "families"
/r/MensRights02/07/23 04:28 AM
3

Chef's kiss. Do you have a link, by any chance?
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:27 AM
7

Yeah, they should be expelled at the very least.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 06:06 AM
3

I've heard "inspin" - involuntary spinsters
/r/MensRights16/06/23 08:52 AM
12

The Declaration of Sentiments was published in 1858 and the hypocrisy within is quite palpable. To claim being oppressed while so greatly privileged as women were... It just displays how gynocentric society always has been. "The Legal Subjection of Men" was first published in 1896 in the UK, and thoroughly details the disadvantages that men suffered under because of gynocentric laws and society.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 04:44 PM
14

Feminism was always like this
/r/MensRights11/06/23 01:05 PM
1

Their views are fringe and they don't matter.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 04:37 AM
26

"Is this a foodie call?" or something similar will have a greater chance of staying up.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:39 AM
33

Link below for those who don't know https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights26/05/23 03:25 AM
10

Not to mention, this neatly avoids having to pay child support to the rapist.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:06 AM
13

The book is also freely available on Wikisource: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Women_As_Sex_Vendors
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/23 01:18 AM
6

The troll you're talking about has created multiple burner accounts, with names related to "mind" and "brain", and is trolling multiple threads on the subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:25 PM
1

Likely a burner account
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:23 AM
7

"Exclusive same sex places for me, but not for thee!"
/r/MensRights28/04/23 05:21 AM
2

Wikipedia is a tertiary source of information. It relies on reliable secondary sources (ideally) for references in its articles. Given the rampant misandry in academia and mainstream media, it's hardly surprising that the bias is reflected in Wikipedia. That's not considering the bias in the editors themselves.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 05:14 PM
3

It isn't
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:37 AM
8

That is hilarious lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/23 02:40 PM
14

I'm clueless about the meaning. Would you mind clueing me in?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/23 02:25 PM
3

Follow it yourself. Don't impose it on others. That includes children.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 02:15 AM
28

The article is based on a campaign by the organization "Mothers of Sons" about new "coercive control" laws coming up that solely target men. It traces the history of the term and the feminist chicanery that had this misandry enshrined in law. Edit: Follow up blog post can be found here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/23 07:08 AM
1

Bit late, but Happy Women's Day, u/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights09/03/23 06:31 AM
12

And nobody is talking about the fact that the state sees no problems with a rapist being given custody over a child.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 03:19 PM
24

I've heard it be called the pedophile's stipend
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:52 AM
2

Personal anecdote here: I've seen a woman go crazy on her husband (in this case for money and property) after 52 years of marriage. She got him thrown out of his own house after 4 more years of living hell.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:20 AM
1

This is based on a post on the AITA subreddit. Link below. https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/10e2onq/aita_for_embarrassing_my_son_in_front_of_his/
/r/MensRights05/02/23 06:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter