TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rossraskolnikov Archive

View 30 posts and 595 comments by rossraskolnikov on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
580

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:16 AM
180

rossraskolnikov/r/PussyPass23/11/19 12:02 PM
129

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:08 PM
67

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:36 AM
52

Anti-MRMrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights23/05/16 10:28 AM
52

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:02 AM
28

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:05 PM
26

Social Issuesrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:15 AM
21

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights04/05/16 12:21 PM
16

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights24/05/16 11:01 AM
15

Social Issuesrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:03 PM
15

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights04/08/16 12:34 AM
11

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights02/04/16 04:25 PM
9

Social Issuesrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:30 PM
8

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:57 PM
7

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights01/08/16 05:38 PM
6

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:24 PM
5

rossraskolnikov/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 08:29 PM
5

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights01/05/16 02:05 PM
5

Generalrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:15 AM
4

Social Issuesrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:15 AM
4

Social Issuesrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:23 AM
4

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:08 PM
2

Social Issuesrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:44 AM
1

rossraskolnikov/r/PussyPass21/12/19 10:28 PM
1

rossraskolnikov/r/MGTOW29/02/20 02:49 AM
0

Generalrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:43 PM
0

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:58 PM
0

rossraskolnikov/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:45 PM
0

Generalrossraskolnikov/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:19 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So why didn’t he sue?
/r/MensRights06/06/20 11:08 PM
-1

If you put idpol crap above material concerns like healthcare and workers rights, you’re dumb af. 99% of the material lefty stuff benefits men hugely. The right lock up more men, make more men homeless, kill more men in wars, etc etc etc. Welfare and education disproportionately help the bottom % of men above any other group. The men with lower IQs, learning difficulties, addictions, violence problems, mental health problems, etc etc.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:01 AM
60

Trump has loads of such accusations against him.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:55 AM
1

No they aren’t. A tiny minority of lunatics are.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 08:46 PM
1

Sounds like every language lesson I ever had at school.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 07:40 PM
-5

The vast majority of fat people know full well they’re fat, are ashamed and hate themselves for it. They don’t need you to tell them.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 07:37 PM
0

Food is dirt cheap nowadays, even the homeless have too much of it. And it’s subsidized and price controlled in myriad different ways. In the UK we have something called housing benefit. Which subsidizes extortionate and greedy property owners. And the complete lack of council houses built for the last 40 years. Maybe move to a country with a basic welfare system if you want such things.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 07:28 PM
0

Fortunately your worship of corporations is a minority position. No, your beliefs mandate hugely increased costs of life essentials THAT ARE REQUIRED TO LIVE, such as healthcare. And your beliefs are flatly hypocritical because you’re okay with your money being “stolen” to pay for certain things, but not others.
/r/MGTOW03/03/20 01:02 PM
0

You ran out of arguments fast. Wtf Brexit has to do with anything I don’t know. Brexit was effectively a constitutional crisis where people had voted for something directly in representative system, where most of the representatives were against it. And it was created by mass immigration being forced on an unwanting population.
/r/MGTOW02/03/20 03:56 AM
1

Why are you happy for your money to be stolen to pay for those things but not other things? It’s completely arbitrary. Healthcare is more essential than roads. Dude, everyone has voted for “socialism”. No politician in the UK dares utter any word against the principle of the NHS because it’s electoral suicide. That’s how popular our socialised healthcare is. But then Western Europe evolved beyond the socialism vs capitalism debate about a century ago. Let’s ignore the UK having massively lower v…
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 01:29 PM
1

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-42950587 The UK spends about half as much on healthcare for better outcomes. Your warped anecdotal view does not jive with reality. https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/#item-hospital-admission-rate-for-asthma-heart-failure-hypertension-and-diabetes-2015 Your belief that essential services should be provided by profiteering corporations with a vested interest in starving suppl…
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 01:22 PM
0

https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/United-Kingdom/United-States/Crime/Violent-crime Because it would defeat the entire purpose. The rich would opt out. It would be like saying why can’t people opt out of the rule of law. Well, because only the most vicious criminals would. You wouldn’t opt out, unless you’re a multi millionaire. Because literally every service you’ve never even considered that you utilize or benefit from would cost as much as your healthcare.
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 12:58 PM
0

“Leftist” countries have much lower violent crime rates than the US. Progressive tax systems are enormously popular. If they were opt in/opt out, what % of the people do you think would opt in? If the alternative was having to pay a private company for everything every time you used it? From the police, to roads, to schools, to everything. It’s a great deal for everyone but the mega rich. And even they get to benefit from a safer and less resentful society.
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 07:18 AM
0

You’d rather pay far more? Okay. You have the choice to pay here as well. 11% of people have private health insurance. And it costs less, including the taxes you pay, than it does in the US lol. The “dreg” could easily be you.
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 05:53 AM
5

Lol Americans are so fucked up. “The state can’t take my precious money but it can take my body and my rights because they’re not my body or rights because I’m not one of those poor blackies and never will be”. It’s not like the more social programs, welfare and less economic inequality there is, the more social mobility there is and the greater the limit on how far you can fall on the back of bad circumstances/decisions. I’d I wanted male interests represented I’d be most concerned about the 5 …
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 06:01 AM
3

Feminism isn’t far left. It’s a smokescreen for neoliberalism. But stupid people can’t see past the diversionary and largely trivial social shit. Identity politics is a function of crony capitalism and corporatism. It’s “hey look at the shiny thing while I rob you blind”.
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 05:37 AM
0

I’m so glad I’m not American. I fucking love my guaranteed healthcare and neetbux.
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 05:35 AM
3

Yet every other country manages to find universal healthcare. Even dirt poor ones. It’s miraculous. But the richest country on the planet can’t lol. https://www.healthline.com/health/leading-causes-of-death#kidney-disease Where are you getting your stats? The drug war hasn’t reduced drug usage. It’s just created gang warfare. 80% of gun deaths are drug and gang related. Prohibition doesn’t work. Cocaine is hardly a hard drug. How are you paying for those who repeatedly OD? Do you have any idea h…
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 05:33 AM
-3

80% of child custodians are women. Most of that money is going to children, not women. You have to be pretty biased to not acknowledge that raising and looking after children is a core part of a functioning society. Welfare may benefit women more but at the extreme end it’s men who suffer more and need it most, in many ways. I gave you two examples. Because chivalry is a human trait, not a state trait. And right wing punitive policies impact men more. Men get locked up more, men are killed more …
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 05:10 AM
1

Just get both
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 02:45 AM
3

Is this guy supposed to be good looking or something? He really isn’t. By porn standards, sure, but by actual standards, no.
/r/MGTOW29/02/20 02:42 AM
7

We were playing kiss-catch at that age.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:30 PM
2

That isn’t how it works. You have no idea where on the spectrum they fall at that age as they’re still developing. And keeping them with the “normal” kids helps them develop “normally” and be less autistic, essentially. Segregating then has the opposite effect. I have a 5 year old nephew with autism. I wouldn’t want him separated from other kids for having the temerity to show affection to them. Like wtf. Affection is positive and normal. Kids are generally affectionate af at that age, as well a…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:30 PM
2

Like any woman anywhere has problems getting dates. Especially younger and hotter women.
/r/MGTOW27/02/20 11:15 PM
1

Attacking him trying to stop him? Those are two entirely different things.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:08 PM
5

Because it’s a fact. Blacks/Africans are innately predisposed to violence and crime in the same way men are. And it’s a simple and effective way to illustrate feminist hypocrisy and agenda. Most of their arguments against men re: violence or crime you can apply to blacks in the same fashion. It doesn’t justify discrimination against blacks just as it doesn’t justify discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 05:36 PM
10

Because blacks are 3 times as likely to be arrested.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:34 AM
13

Rape by deception.
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 02:00 PM
2

Nobody verbally asks to have sex. What weird world d you live in? And most women absolutely hate when you do, it’s a huge turn off. It’s all done via non verbal communication.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:17 PM
1

I’ve used a home hair cutting kit for 15 years. It doesn’t give a close shave but leaves you un-irritated. And only needs replacing every few years.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:04 PM
1

Whores are not available or affordable, that’s my point. That option doesn’t exist. Sex should be as state provided as other basic needs. To not believe that you have to be a willful cuck on some level. Male labor and taxes provide women with basically anything and everything they need or ask for. Far beyond true needs. From abortion to contraceptives to therapy to trash collection. Less so in America, but in the UK and most of Western Europe everything is at least price controlled. While sex is…
/r/MGTOW26/01/20 12:32 PM
2

Lol. Feels just as good. Yeah, buddy. Fucking a piece of plastic feels just as good as fucking a pussy. Sex is a need. I didn’t mention water. Sex is much more of a need than half of the shit you use electricity for. Sex is the primary drive of every living thing, after food. No, we should be de-rigging the sexual market so women don’t hold all the power. Not denying our basic needs and being ashamed of them, for fear of being demonized. Everything women need from men is mandated by society, pro…
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 11:07 PM
1

It shouldn’t, that’s the point. It should be subsidised in the same way that the rest of life’s essentials are. A guy needs sex at least twice per week. That’s at least 800 bucks. You don’t spend that on electricity, do you?
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 09:36 PM
3

It does, they’re all crazy. The social stigma is huge. Although it’s being normalised more and more. Being a cam girl warrants no respect. Girls hate you and guys view you as purely a sex object, and high value guys don’t want you. But being an insta whore who sells some nudes on the side is becoming the norm, and aspirational. Most cam girls make no money and quit pretty quickly. But, as their body is all over the internet, they usually feel obliged to make some more efforts, so they’ll try aga…
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 05:55 PM
2

You’re assuming he’d do it non-anonymously.
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 05:51 PM
1

The phrase “love to bits” makes me want to punch whoever uses it.
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 05:30 PM
11

50 bucks is too much.
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 05:24 PM
124

That was the joke....
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 02:44 PM
3

Women get away with this crap all the time. A lot of cot deaths are highly suspicious and a result of neglect, and are never prosecuted. Any crime which women commit more, you can rest assured it will be permitted.
/r/PussyPass25/01/20 11:39 AM
-6

As any rational man should.
/r/PussyPass05/01/20 03:48 PM
2

Lol. The west is Zionist as fuck.
/r/PussyPass31/12/19 07:37 AM
2

Is it important that they’re Jewish?
/r/PussyPass30/12/19 03:08 PM
-1

Does that mean you have a vagina? Not being a dick, just genuinely interested in the demographics of people who post here.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 10:11 AM
3

Anyone should be wary of identifying with any ideology. Including MRA. It leads to irrational groupthink. It's fine to associate with ideological groups, it's necessary to get things done. But just define yourself as an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 10:01 AM
0

Are you female or trans?
/r/MensRights29/12/19 09:57 AM
1

Okay, was it a guy or a woman who gave her Gold? Because if it was a guy, Jesus fucking Christ.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 09:56 AM
17

Laws can change at any time.
/r/MGTOW28/12/19 01:03 AM
10

Why would any man be a sperm donor.
/r/MGTOW28/12/19 01:03 AM
5

Someone should tell her that it’s men who protect her from violence.
/r/MGTOW28/12/19 12:59 AM
7

And feminists claim that India is misogynistic.
/r/PussyPass28/12/19 12:57 AM
5

They’ll never start approaching him. They’ll become amenable to his approaches when they’re shot out single Mums looking for a sexless wallet and slave.
/r/MGTOW07/12/19 08:34 PM
3

They don’t, they give women complete power.
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 03:34 AM
1

When women have had it they abuse and murder children. So the movie wouldn’t be very fun.
/r/MGTOW01/12/19 03:33 AM
9

Nor is Kevin Hart.
/r/MGTOW29/11/19 05:39 PM
2

He should have punched her in the face.
/r/PussyPass23/11/19 12:11 PM
1

There is no incel "white supremacy". The notion is absolutely absurd. And you haven't evidenced any. It's just a pathetic attempt by indoctrinated feminists to categorise incels as "alt right" and to fit them into their neat little hierarchy of evil-- which has white men at the top, whatever the circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 06:24 PM
1

Yeah, look at this poor incel still searching for his style: http://www.starstyleman.com/celebrity/jared-leto/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 03:44 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/malefashion/comments/dz8dft/wiwt_big_boy_pants/ Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 02:16 PM
1

Like saying money is more important to poor people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 01:27 PM
0

No they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 01:23 PM
0

Any woman can get knocked up if they want to. It's a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 12:25 PM
1

Yeah, but it's mostly assumed it was their choice. It isn't a failing, it's a bad choice. For men, it's assumed that they failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 12:24 PM
1

Because men have a need that the state hasn't stepped in to provide for them, but in fact prohibits the sale of, unlike all female needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 12:19 PM
1

A month lol. Try an hour.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 12:17 PM
1

So, to surmise, women with racist sexual preferences = society’s fault. Mythical incel white supremacy = evil incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 09:33 AM
1

One out of three ain’t bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 06:55 AM
1

Yet if it was women doing sex work you’d call it exploitation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 06:55 AM
1

They hired mostly unskilled men who would have starved otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 06:29 AM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 06:28 AM
1

Yeah, and they’re called crazy not creepy, and aren’t considered a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 05:42 AM
1

The effects of “colorism” they’re experiencing are women’s very racist sexual preferences. Are women white supremacists?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 05:41 AM
0

Two, invest in yourself. A court can take be away a house but not a law or medical degree. Why, when you can just not get married, procreate or cohabit?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 08:01 PM
3

Attractive and can't get any women? Good point. That's a dream scenario for a woman. The main reason they end up with average guys is because the attractive guys have too many options and it makes them insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 04:28 PM
3

A million miles from #2. Young, tall af, white, well above average face, and approaches probably thousands of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 04:26 PM
1

I asked for examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 04:03 PM
1

The fact that you had to go to lesbian relationships only verifies my point. Women are the victims of "creepiness". It's a masculine stereotype and pejorative.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 04:00 PM
1

Butch lesbians you mean? So you mean women can be creepy to other women? They can't be creepy any more than men can be slutty. Or women can be losers. You can call a woman creepy, but it will have no effect on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 03:24 PM
1

She doesn't need to, she can have her own.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 03:19 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Works_Progress_Administration
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 02:12 PM
1

I'm quite done suffering you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 02:11 PM
0

Pointing out your laughable hypocrisy = being triggered.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:23 PM
1

Anybody who refers to themselves as a "precocious child" is an insufferable cunt, I regret to inform you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:23 PM
3

Because they express interest in you. That's when you become disgusted by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:15 PM
1

Women abuse and kill children. Particularly mentally ill women. Consequently, men should hate and fear mentally ill women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:15 PM
1

Great flair + complete lack of self-awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:09 PM
1

A drop in the ocean compared to the people who died from state terrorism, especially US. Lets ban r/politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:08 PM
2

What is that supposed to evidence? There are ten different opinions in that thread. And the guy who broke out the "niggers shouldn't be able to vote" is now banned..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:07 PM
1

They spewed white supremacist propaganda. Such as what? Incels are literally the most "diverse" subgroup anywhere on the internet. They regularly conduct polls and almost 50% are non-white, consistently, in English speaking countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:04 PM
1

Indeed. One of the mods of incels.is is this guy: https://incels.wiki/w/Knajjd
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 01:02 PM
1

They disappoint me when they spew white supremacist propaganda This one is completely wrong. Almost half of incels are non-white. The only thing I can think you're thinking of is when they talk about how women prefer white guys and hate Indian and East Asian guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 12:55 PM
1

I'm a hermit with a voice disorder and a porn addiction who hasn't left the house in 10+ years. My life consists of multitasking porn, video games, chadfishing and a few predictable sites, of which Reddit is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:50 AM
1

Yeah guys don't care about any of that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:47 AM
1

even as a child I was a precocious And nobody IRL can stand you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:44 AM
1

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:35 AM
1

Physically. They're like a flower in bloom. They (usually) have all the curves of a woman but the perfect skin of youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:27 AM
1

17 is optimal female age. It's perfectly natural to be attracted to girls who have hips, tits and ass. That's the whole function of puberty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:08 AM
1

And women call men who fit certain criteria predators and creepy, not all men. Just men though, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 10:02 AM
1

No, it would be the equivalent of saying a Doctor can't turn away a patient. Because healthcare is a right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 06:58 AM
2

Women do that far more than men. As evidenced by the fact that women are anti prostitution and men aren't. Women call men predators and violent and creepy, in case you hadn't noticed. Men have the physical power and are judged for it (in actual systemic ways, see the 69% sentencing disparity). Women have the sexual power and are judged for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/19 06:57 AM
1

Paid sex is already available in almost every country at a reasonable price. http://i.imgur.com/WWAjuFd.png Spot the blue. And in none of those places is it genuinely affordable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 04:34 PM
3

No it isn't, it's hardly ever talked about in incel circles. It's a classic anti-incel talking point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 04:33 PM
1

No they aren't. Nowhere in the west. You made a ridiculous comparison of number of prostitutes vs number of clinics to disingenuously suggest so. Prostitution is illegal in most places and genuinely affordable in none (aside from developing countries). Abortions is generally available and tax-payer funded everywhere in the west (aside from the fucked up USA, where you have to pay obscene sums for private health insurance). When was the last woman put in prison for having an abortion? In the US o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 04:32 PM
1

But she went anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 04:28 PM
1

I'm talking about women being a part of the workforce in general and contributing more to taxes. As a matter of fact the professional roles women are moving into will have a much greater impact on large-scale social decision-making then a machinist or day laborer. What does that have to do with bodily sacrifice? You're just evidencing the fact that women don't want to, and aren't expected to, do jobs which negatively impact their bodies. That's for men. Jesus Christ. It wouldn't be forcing them …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 01:10 PM
1

14 % of the US military is female. The poor folks getting PTSD from murdering innocent brown people with drones are overwhelmingly male.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:57 PM
1

Lol. It's the same story all over the western world. Woman are still doing most of the childcare, men are still doing most of the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:56 PM
3

Men as a group do have to. As individuals, they don't. Although there have been government work programs in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:53 PM
3

Again, nobody is talking about not compensating prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:47 PM
2

Yet all are freely available, in my country. And women seem to be "entitled" to them, by and large.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:46 PM
1

I still can't process that question, no matter how many times I read it. Yeah, and Mothers would be happy being given Monopoly money for child support. It's kinda like real money, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:45 PM
3

Good counterpoint. Just scream "incel". Almost like an infant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:43 PM
1

Try again but this time answer the question, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:42 PM
1

Physical labor is becoming rapidly automated, same with combat. No, there's still plenty that needs to be done. And combat is only being automated if you're a global superpower or under the wing of a global superpower, and only to an extent. Russia has two years mandatory military service (for men). 85% of the half a million people killed in Iraq have been men and boys (women don't have to serve). 97% of workplace fatalities are male. Need we go on? Millennial women are even further ahead of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:41 PM
1

Yeah, I believe you. Now get the fuck out of your 1950s Time Warp https://fullfact.org/economy/are-women-paying-60-less-income-tax-men/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:36 PM
5

Nobody is talking about women being forced to provide sex. House building is heavily subsidised and price controlled, and have you heard of public housing?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 12:35 PM
0

As a reason why sex isn't considered a need?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:55 AM
1

How much of this is an actual need for sex itself and a need for nonsexual touch by men to not be feared or mistrusted? Idk what this means.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:47 AM
2

Are abortions, the pill and contraceptives a need or a right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:46 AM
5

It's not a need because it's not a female need. But the pill and abortion are needs. This is perfectly logical in the mind of the female.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:44 AM
3

How do you think shelter is "provided"? Do you think it requires male bodies? "Religion" lol. The right to believe in fairytales is more essential than sex-- the primary drive of all living things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:43 AM
3

You will not die without sex, you can function in society without it, and lack of sex does not violate your autonomy. However, placing the burden on others to provide you with sex impedes their autonomy. But placing the burden on others to provide you with protection, taxes, labour and a thousand other public services doesn't? There's nothing unique about sex-- except that it's a male need that would have to be provided by women. And women are infantilised and aren't expected to sacrifice their …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:40 AM
0

and many have access to prostitutes. No they don't. Are prostitutes as accessible as abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:36 AM
3

I'm hesitant to define a human right as access to someone elses body. Most other rights are provided by utilising peoples' bodies, usually male. A home is a right? Guess what, men have to build them. Healthcare is a right? Guess what, people have to build and man hospitals. There's nothing unique about sex. Except that it would have to be provided overwhelmingly by women, and is overwhelmingly a male need.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:34 AM
0

What about nutrition though? Vegetables are the cheapest thing in the supermarket. Even the homeless have more food than they can eat. Your definition of free is way off. No, it's simple. Governments ensure that the basic needs of their population are provided as low cost as possible. That's one of their main functions. Including many needs much less essential than sex. My boyfriend gives me sex for free and I don't have to pay any taxes for it. Woman can get sex any time she wants. Breaking new…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 09:02 AM
0

I didn't say "The West", I said "western".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 05:08 AM
1

No, you're arresting people, 50% of the time, for non violent drug crimes. ie for exercising their freedom in ways your state has decided they don't like. But you're probably cool with that. Taxation is theft, but kidnap is cool. Yes, we are arresting people for being mean on social media in the UK. Which is fucked up and most people think it's insane. But at least it almost never results in any serious prison time, if any at all. And our prisons haven't been condemned by the UN. So I much prefe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 04:32 AM
0

"Lets see, we have to head west to get out of here". "Excuse me, that isn't west, it's actually east. Come along".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 04:24 AM
1

If only you knew how genuinely grateful I, and most Europeans, are to not be American.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:43 AM
1

I don't think you do. Your country has the world's biggest prison population and you think it espouses "freedom" lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:42 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:30 AM
1

I'd hate to get lost in the woods with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:30 AM
1

People provide other people, men, women, and children with protection. last I checked there are women in the military and in first responder positions. It's overwhelmingly male. Especially in front line positions. Again, 97% of workplace fatalities. Men put their bodies on the line for the good of society, women do not. Men build and man the prisons, build the houses. There would be male prostitutes as well. But it would be overwhelmingly a better deal for men than women. As with most of the ser…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:28 AM
1

Well I did go to public schools, but I've owned my own home for well over a decade and pay the property taxes that fund education in my state. So yes I have repaid that debt. That isn't how it works. Your education will have cost much more. As well as the thousand other public services you enjoy. Unless you're a top 5% earner, you will have taken out more than you put in. That's how a progressive tax system works, and should work. Although the US is pretty anomalous. Interesting that you don't m…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:18 AM
1

Great argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:03 AM
1

Wtffff whereabouts in the UK are you? Since when is food dirt cheap? There's no fucking chance I could live on £1 a day in my city. You can. Maybe £2. 500g of Corn Flakes is 55p. 4 pints of milk is £1.10. That's breakfast taken care of for 2 weeks. 20p/day for breakfast. You can do the same for the other 2 meals. Also none of that is free, they skim money off my paycheck to pay for it. Yes. "Free" = tax payer paid. Are you suggesting that we nationalise the sex industry? It doesn't necessarily h…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:01 AM
1

It may happen on reddit, it doesn't happen all the time IRL at all. There's a huge stigma to sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 02:52 AM
1

Jesus Christ, are you stupid or just American? Do you not understand how a welfare state and progressive tax system function?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 02:52 AM
1

I pay more taxes than you Because you know a single thing about me lol. I'm sure a "reformed instathot" has a high earning job, and has paid off the huge state debt she incurred during childhood, going to school for 10+ years and absorbing healthcare. I'm positive you have a tax contribution and not a tax surplus. And listen to how pathetic you sound. Listen to how offended you sound. Men make other men sacrifice their bodies I'm assuming you're talking about war. No, I'm talking about everythin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:28 PM
1

Do you believe the government should force men to provide you with protection?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:21 PM
1

Basic needs aren't free; what are you talking about? Things cost money and that's a fact of life. Rent costs money food costs money, and clothing costs money. Good Lord. I forget that half of this site is American. You pay taxes. The state uses said taxes to provide services and to subsidise industries that provide services. Also if a woman was forced to give sex for free to whatever random guys who wanted sex from her by the law it would be rape. Right. Because that's how you're provided with p…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:20 PM
1

Someone caught terminal Americanism. Not everyone is happy to hand their balls to corporations.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:17 PM
1

In the fucked up US of A, yes. In western Europe, all of that stuff is "free" or heavily subsidised. Gas and electric are about £50 each per month in the UK. Healthcare is free, school is free, water is £35/month. Contraception is free. Even food in the west is dirt cheap. You can literally live on £1 day if you want to. We just have neoliberalism to thank for the high rent and housing costs. And when I say "free" or subsidised, I mean paid for with taxes, which are overwhelmingly derived from m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:16 PM
1

No, western means in the west lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 11:46 AM
1

“Cheaper than a date” lol. You don’t seem to understand. It should be free or basically free, like all other basic needs. If you had to spend the equivalent of your rent on the pill, or contraception, or healthcare, or school for your kids, or for electricity, gas, petrol, water, you wouldn’t say it was “affordable”. Women hate the idea of prostitution because it lowers their SMV. It’s elementary. Polls show that men are for it and women are against it. If a guy had a decently hot young woman su…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 11:45 AM
0

You've persuaded me with your definitive anecdotes. And go on then, tell me by what definition Australia is not western... Look at a map.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 11:31 AM
0

Nobody is saying it would turn all men into monks. It would obviously make men less thirsty. It's basic economics. Minimum wage here is about $20 an hour. $40 for a handjob is really not that much. It is. When you consider that sex is a basic need. A guy would have to spend the equivalent of his rent every month to get that need met. And I'm talking about Australia, buddy. I knew that. This is a western country. Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 11:03 AM
2

Or maybe they just felt awkward and compelled to give the ageing thot some pity compliments for her ludicrous costume.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 10:58 AM
1

It isn't a lack of self awareness, it's BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 10:54 AM
2

Or they're just honest about their preferences and desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 10:52 AM
1

A problem to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 10:48 AM
1

Men are no less thirsty here and women are no different. Super scientific. Also, $40 for a handjob isn't affordable. Presumably it's double for good sex. The average guy needs sex at least twice per week. You also say that it doesn't make a difference and then share an anecdote that would never happen in a western country, a girl openly talking about her sex work. That's normalising something, buddy. If she's more open to talk about it, a guy is more open to doing it, and girls are more open to …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 10:37 AM
3

The people who use the term "thicc" would call that "skinny".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 09:02 AM
2

"Thicc" is just code for fat. "Skinny" women still have hips, thighs and ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 08:41 AM
1

That's fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 08:39 AM
2

Imagine actually artificially inflating your height by 4 inches and then demanding men are significantly taller than your new, artificial height.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 08:17 AM
4

over half of men fail to meet. Try 80%.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 08:14 AM
2

Exactly. Its like me going to meet some bodybuilder guy and pretending I go the gym 4/5 a week and I take fitness really serious.....when really I'm out of shape. Perhaps they would of liked me anyway, but the fact I lied is going to set us off on the wrong foot...& then if I'm feeling insecure, well that's my fault. It's not like that because height isn't something you can control and alter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 08:13 AM
3

I don't blame the guys who lie about their height any more than the girls for their MySpace angles or myself for editing photos or fluffing myself up on my profile. That's just the game. Except one you can control and one you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 08:11 AM
1

The facts are that 80% of primary child carers are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 07:09 AM
1

Yeah, except that doesn’t happen. The woman wants to be a mum as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 07:03 AM
1

"Your" taxpayer money, shall we check the sex breakdown of who pays taxes and who absorbs welfare? Men would be for legalised prostitution, women would be against it. Guess why? Male bodies are to be sacrificed to provide for women, but any suggestion of reciprocation is heresy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 04:25 AM
1

Yes. The fact you find the idea so radical illustrates my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:29 AM
2

That means all those things women do that "men don't care about,", men actually benefit from and miss when they're gone. Like the women who go back to their abusers? They benefit from being beaten? It doesn't mean that. It means men have an innate need for sex, intimacy, companionship and a socialised need to provide and cohabit. And they're willing to endure all the other shit to get those needs met. It's like that stat that gets trotted out that men live longer when they're married. They'd get…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 03:29 AM
1

Men need sex and intimacy and this is the only way most men can get it. Women have the sexual power and society outlaws men buying it and has no interest in providing it. While the primary things that women need from men (protection, resources, labour) society goes out of its way to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 11:04 AM
1

The people who are "successful" in both business and relationships are invariably the people who are best at dominating and exploiting others. It's why sociopaths are so over-represented in positions of power.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 10:41 AM
1

What stats? Please include paid work stats. ie bringing money into the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 10:02 AM
1

They're more than rights, they're basic needs. And as men can't even pay for those needs to be met, much less have them provided by the state, what other result do you expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:57 AM
1

and a lot of the time work is still mostly for the women in the relation. What world is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:52 AM
1

You fail to understand that it's the "asking" (which is usually a direct order or a veiled order) that's the issue. If you do something voluntarily and then demand the person you've done it for reciprocate, you're a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:51 AM
1

You have 180k karma. You clearly spend all your time running round after your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:48 AM
1

Are you familiar with the male sex drive or the innate need for intimacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:47 AM
4

No evidence for this. Nor is there any evidence that said "filth" has any negative impact on anyone's life. Women like neatness, not cleanliness. Men shower more than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:44 AM
4

If you run simple Google searches, you'll see women disproportionately do more physical labor around the house, for the relationship, organizing & scheduling, aka the often-lambasted "emotional labor" in a relationship. It's been studied. There's data out there. It contradicts a lot of your points that women are demanding without offering much in return. It doesn't contradict his central point. Women are doing it because they want to, not because they're being asked/ordered to. Unlike men. Women…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 09:41 AM
1

What happens when kids happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 07:38 AM
1

Anyone with a neurologist called Tameka should get their head checked.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 07:37 AM
1

I don’t think that’s true about salesmen. Unless you live in the 40s.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:55 AM
2

Coding was originally 'women's work', fiddy-ish years ago. Rosie the Riveter became iconic during WWII, in the 40s. You mean while all the men were off dying at war?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/19 03:10 AM
0

Nah, their skin is perfect at 17.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 04:11 AM
1

It only helps if you were unattractive in your prime
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 04:11 AM
1

They are. The way you tell us by observing how women treat them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/19 04:10 AM
10

Time + weight
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 12:19 PM
12

I got fat and old.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 12:18 PM
1

I've noticed this too. There seems to be a deadness in their eyes/being that you don't really see with younger men. Halo effect in full effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 10:39 AM
1

But 17 year old females are peak attractiveness, by far. However old you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 10:38 AM
1

16-26 is a bubble. Anyone above that age range is on another planet, they aren't even considered as potential mates to 90% of young people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 10:35 AM
2

There's barely any difference between "pretty boys" and what guys think are "masculine" good looking men. They share all the same innate traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 09:20 AM
9

You're on the internet humblebragging about how beautiful you are but you think you're average. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 09:19 AM
2

They don't, they just have to fake confidence to have any chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 09:18 AM
14

No, he knows he's well above average, he's just displaying false humility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 09:17 AM
39

Attractive men know they're attractive. I've been attractive and knew. Now I'm not and know. It's very, very easy to know, by the way women and girls treat you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 09:16 AM
1

?? That's why average height has increased. Plentiful food and overconsumption of it. That has nothing to do with health. Being taller isn't being healthier. It isn't even a positive thing, it's a neutral thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 11:25 PM
1

I'll wait for an answer to the first question-- from anyone. As for reproductive equality. The fact that women birth babies is apart from the fact that men are responsible for said babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 09:40 PM
2

Yet obesity rates are soaring. Anyone with half an education can read nutritional labels Why the fuck should anyone have to read a 50 ingredient list for all the items of food they buy? And research a thousand different E numbers and chemicals? Do you know how society functions, at all? If you buy a savoury item of fucking food it shouldn't be packed with sugar. It's absolutely impossible to raise a child and have them not eat and be exposed to this junk if you want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 09:36 PM
1

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/alcohol-medicines-drugs-pregnant/ The Chief Medical Officer for England disagrees. I'll trust her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:19 PM
1

I didn't say they were. You think non-white women prefer non-white men? That's adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:17 PM
1

It is here in the UK in some form or other. Not infants though. Pretty sure that would fall under child abuse. But then it's legal for (mostly) Mothers to hit their kids. Most malevolent things that women (predominantly) do are legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:13 PM
1

Hence why we are collectively taller Nope. That's due to overconsumption. healthier Nope. That's due to modern medicine. and more intelligent Don't know about that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 08:11 PM
1

it is not a crime to have drugs in your system absent the physical external possession of drugs Nothing in this thread is about having anything in your system. Your responses are stupid sophistry which I cba with anymore. The law exists to persecute (overwhelmingly) men for using drugs-- an act which harms nobody but themselves. People are prosecuted for possession because it's assumed they intend to fucking use it. If they had to show that they had actually used it would be impossible to prosec…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 05:21 PM
1

There are plenty of dudes on this sub who are happy to handwave loads of issues away because biology. Such as? What allowances do men get, in law or society, for their biological differences? I've never heard a guy invoke his testosterone levels in court. When men can get pregnant, they can have equality. Getting pregnant has nothing to do with reproductive equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 05:15 PM
0

so finding a guy that a group can agree on as conventionally attractive is rare. r/ladyboners I don't think it's the fact that women "judge me on a number of factors" that makes it rare. It's the fact that conventionally attractive men are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 05:08 PM
1

In the past we ate a sparse diet of simple, real food: meat, plants, fruit. Now we overconsume a diet of processed garbage packed with refined sugar, salt, dozens of synthetic ingredients, etc. The former is much better for you, generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 05:04 PM
1

You mean they want equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 05:02 PM
1

Who cares if there are fewer white people on it. Going by women's sexual preferences-- women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 05:00 PM
1

They prefer immigrants. They don't have to spend 18 years paying for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:59 PM
1

What in the world are you talking about, diet in the past was awful. Nobody even knew what vitamins were until the first half of the 20th century. Have you looked at menus and meal planning guides from the 19th/20th century? Their food was strange as hell and entirely unbalanced. Yeah, that's all wrong. The modern western processed diet is horrifically bad for us. And then there's the overconsumption. Sure there were specific vitamin deficiencies in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:55 PM
1

Such a policy would be helping and accommodating women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:46 PM
1

no, thats not why theyre in jail. they're in jail for illicitly purchasing or possessing drugs preingestion Look up "pretext". "Possession" is a crime because it's far easier to prosecute than ingestion, you spectacular hypocrite. I love seeing "libertarian" freedom fighters arguing for mass government persecution and kidnap of its citizens. It's beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:40 PM
1

FAS didn't even exist until 1973.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:33 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqZVVvp95nc Any relation?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:31 PM
1

JFL @ the offence women take at any suggestion of accountability. Comparative to how the men are treated in the US, something like this is invisible. You literally have hundreds of thousands of men locked up for decades for choosing to put drugs into their own bodies. But the idea of a woman being prohibited from putting a drug into her body and objectively damaging and endangering the body growing inside her, is heresy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:27 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZITP93pqtdQ
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:24 PM
1

Do you think that pregnant women in the US will be lining up for ID cards that call them out as pregnant, regardless of what discounts they might get for it? Don't care about the US. I'm in the UK. And we effectively have ID cards here already. And pregnant women are already pretty touchy about being policed by strangers Couldn't give a fuck tbh. Being "policed" is what the millions of men in your prisons are. Being told you can't poison your unborn child is not being policed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:23 PM
1

Enriched = fortified with shit, often synthetic, usually low quality vitamins, which the body absorbs about a tenth as well as if they were in actual food. I didn't say with the goal of making it harmful. That isn't the goal. The goal is to make it cheap and last long.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:20 PM
0

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/analytical-chromatography/analytical-products.html?TablePage=109806885
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:19 PM
1

No. I think kicking the kids out of school who aren't vaccinated is fine though. So long as the parents are supported, financially, to home school.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:17 PM
1

Crazy how people's morals go crazy whenever motherhood or pregnancy is mentionned 🤔 Crazy how women live in a world where they're victimised in some way whatever the subject. How many million men are in US prisons for using drugs currently?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:16 PM
1

The facts are that any drinking is dangerous to your unborn child.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:13 PM
1

Doctors are fucking clueless about nutrition and diet. They barely study it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:11 PM
2

FAS is the extreme. There are hundreds of conditions and deficiencies babies can be born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:10 PM
1

I remember reading a story about someone's mother (in Ireland lol) who had a drink almost every night and all her kids were fine Great science there, I'm convinced. Diet was much better in the past. If people were eating plant-based diets with wicked green juices every day, maybe the odd drink would be fine. But that isn't how people are eating.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:09 PM
1

They're augmented. Science is a thing. Most things on this Earth are not edible, and aren't intended to be. For example, one of the binding agents they use is basically wallpaper paste. It would be like if houses were being built with bananas. Different earthly things have different properties and uses.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:03 PM
1

Not sure if you're American. But it's really amusing and perverse to see Y'ALL ranting about freedoms and whatnot. Given your prison population. Given that you lock up millions of men (95% men and boys, anyway), 50% for non-violent drug crimes, IIRC. Locking up males by the million, for very long sentences, for using and selling drugs, is apparently not an infringement on basic freedoms. But a barman refusing to serve a woman alcohol to damage her unborn child is. I can't help but feel a strange…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 04:03 PM
1

its literally not. its his business to go get what his customers order. period. Ah, classic capitalism. Detached from morality. The American way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:52 PM
1

I'm really glad I don't live in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:48 PM
2

It isn't just what people think is bad food that is bad food anymore. Even standard foodstuffs like bread etc are often packed with refined sugars and numerous toxic and synthetic ingredients. Even foods which a reasonable person would assume is "healthy" A tin of vegetable soup has refined sugar in it. Corn flakes have as much sugar in as Frosties. Etc. The nutritional supplements people are given in hospitals are packed with refined sugar. It's insane. no one's stuffing monstrous 5lbs burgers …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:46 PM
1

Yeah, like the disabled and pensioners. It's entirely the same. Perfectly valid comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:33 PM
1

Okay so you think pregnant women are dumb and can be easily tricked into being marked. As long it’s packaged as perks. It's more just incentivisation and compromise. It's what governments do as a matter of course, in a million different ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/19 03:33 PM
2

"processed" = any ingredient not found in nature, basically. Or ingredients which have been processed in such a way as to make them harmful to the body.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 09:43 PM
3

Alcohol is observably much more consequential. Society has already acknowledged this by banning its sale to children. Society steps in to protect children all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 09:24 PM
1

It has nothing to do with me personally. It's an objective fact. There are numerous studies that show how pernicious "processed" food is. It literally isn't food. Read the ingredients. It's businesses using cheap toxins in lieu of actual food ingredients to make money. It isn't equivalent to alcohol, cigarettes or drugs. If you mandated that businesses could only sell actual food as food, you wouldn't get a black market in McDonalds fries springing up. People wouldn't even notice. They'd just li…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 09:23 PM
1

I'm only in favour of a right to refuse to serve pregnant women, I think. And an encouragement to do so. But you could enforce it by, like I said, pregnant women being given some kind of disability status when pregnant. Give them some perks to incentivise them to display it-- like disabled people get a sticker for their car so they can park in the disabled spaces. You could give them a discount card for their shopping, so supermarkets would know not to serve them alcohol (you can say they'd simp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 09:18 PM
3

It is his business. Literally lol. She can do whatever she wants with her body. But why does he have to be complicit in it? The odds are that she wasn't getting an abortion, as only about 30% of pregnancies are aborted. What if it was past the point at which she could get an abortion?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 09:12 PM
1

The kind of tyranny that protects people from businesses poisoning them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 09:08 PM
1

Making it illegal to serve would be pretty impossible to enforce. Unless you made it illegal to knowingly serve. Or unless you marked pregnant women out in some way. Gave them disability status or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 08:59 PM
7

just as pregnant women are legally allowed to eat sushi, eat fast food, not exercise, drink soda, drink caffeine All of those things are legal for all. Serving alcohol to children is illegal pretty much everywhere. So there's your clear distinction. Alcohol is destructive on another level to anything listed. Should it be illegal to feed kids junk food? No. But it should be illegal for junk food to be produced. It isn't food, it's just a conglomeration of synthetic poisons and kills more people t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 08:56 PM
2

Oh good lord. Most OB/GYNs will tell you that a half glass of wine or so is fine, especially in the third trimester https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/pregnancy-and-baby/alcohol-medicines-drugs-pregnant/ The Chief Medical Officers for the UK recommend that if you're pregnant or planning to become pregnant, the safest approach is not to drink alcohol at all to keep risks to your baby to a minimum. Drinking in pregnancy can lead to long-term harm to the baby, with the more you drink, the greater the ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 08:52 PM
3

Plus, if you're gaining weight at such a young age, it's a big indicator that you'll gain more weight in the future. So there's that. But hey, everybody is fat nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 08:15 PM
1

You’ll see on the red pill a ton of examples of women “beta-izing” their men. Aka stuff like “why work out, let’s watch Netflix”. Or “stop taking your diet seriously” I interpret that mostly as just control and wanting him to spend time with her/not with other people. Women often have a tendency to want their men to basically have no life outside the home. But women wanting their man to have high SMV but also wanting them to have lower SMV than they have is one of those strange contradictions wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 07:39 PM
3

This sub isn't representative of anything. Even if you were correct. You haven't refuted anything I've said or offered any counterpoint. Women are judged for trivial shit. Men are judged for serious shit. Because women are infantilised. Man hits a woman = horrible crime Woman hits a child = not even a crime Women whine about every little problem and it's taken seriously by society and the media. That's why you think that women are "judged mercilessly". Meanwhile, the prisons are filled with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 07:32 PM
3

Strange that you give your weight and size in the past and your cup size now lol. Sorry, but I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 07:26 PM
1

Yeah, guys are shallow as fuck about women's looks. They want their gf/wife hot. Women are the same but they also like to nest and dominate the home. I don't think they'd deliberately fatten up a guy, but it could be a consequence. The people who do like to fatten people up are fatties. Misery loves company.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 06:12 PM
3

Are you sure he wasn't joking or trying to make you feel better?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/19 02:39 AM
3

This is ridiculous. Men get 70% longer sentences for the same crime. But women are judged mercilessly lol. Women are judged mercilessly by other women. Men are also judged mercilessly by women. we raise our boys to be brave and we raise our girls to be perfect. Right. That's why boys are diagnosed much more with all manner of pathologies, drugged much more, have their work judged more harshly by female teachers, etc. Girls aren't raised to be perfect, it's just that whatever they do is viewed as…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 03:28 PM
7

Lol this reminds me of men who fatten their SOs up a little bit, just enough so she’s less hot to other men, but not so much that they aren’t still attracted to them. Pretty sure that isn't a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 03:23 PM
8

Women = children. They're conditioned to air their complaints and whine because they expect men to care and fix their complaints. In the same way a child does its Mother. Men are conditioned not to because they know nobody cares or is going to fix anything for them. Why do girls scream at horror movies or when they're frightened? They're calling out for a man to come and aid them. The same reason a baby cries for its Mummy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 03:21 PM
3

Okay. Now scale up. Society was built by men. The house they're in was built and designed by men. Nothing you mentioned, aside from eating vegetables (which you haven't evidenced women do more of) impacts your life in any meaningful way. IME men have better hygiene than women, they shower/bathe more, mainly because it's a bigger to-do for women because of the long and makeup. Also, men mature slower than women. And, often times, the anarchic mess that men live in during their early 20s is an act…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/19 03:19 PM
0

in general it's a bad idea to date anyone who could make your job or career go sideways because you didn't put out when they wanted you to or broke up with them. Or someone you have to see and remain professional with after a breakup or divorce. Seriously, what kind of work environments do you people work in? Every one I've worked in is like a box of rats. It's mainly about women further controlling the sexual marketplace and having yet more power.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 04:19 PM
1

A woman having to take on the male role while the man fails completely at both the male and female roles How is he failing completely? He's staying at home and taking care of the kids, just not how she wants him to, which sounds very controlling on her part, and working one job(?). Chores are trivial and subjective. It's not my fault men will apprently put up with un-maternal shitheads and outright financial abuse for a whiff of pussy. Nor mine that women put up with "failures" of men for the ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 09:13 PM
1

How have you managed to turn an anecdote about a man WITH A JOB and a woman WITH TWO JOBS into bitching about sahms? It's an anecdote about a woman doing the male role and being an apparent hero, and the man doing the female role and being a bastard, evidently. He is supposed to be working. He is not. He is pretending to work and lazing around at home while his wife's parents look after his children. Again, that's the standard of the stay at home child custodian. That's why so many women prefer …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 08:08 PM
1

Basically what you're saying is "deal with men being inappropriate or go hide yourself from view". No, I'm saying enjoy the privilege of being paid for being desired, or do a harder job done by males for less.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 08:05 PM
1

Isn't that what all stay at home Mums do?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 08:01 PM
1

She goes to work and then goes to her other work and then comes home to feed and bathe and put the kids down... So who is looking after the kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:55 PM
1

Is there any detail about their private life that she hasn't shared with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:53 PM
1

both parents should be stressed from the new born. Sex is a stress reliever for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:51 PM
1

She sleeps when the baby sleeps. Babies sleep 14 hours per day.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:49 PM
0

But that probably has to do with the fact that women often are expected to take care of what comes with having a baby. The husband in question might simply have more spare time to worry about his dick not getting wet. Yes, in whatever fantasy world you live in where Fathers get more free time when they have kids, and don't work an extra 10-20 hours per week.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:48 PM
1

yep, never heard of a woman not being able to get it whenever she wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:46 PM
1

Same but mine still fucked every Sunday morning up until they were about 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:44 PM
1

You're not an outlier. Women loathe bisexual men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:37 PM
1

Customers aren't human beings?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:32 PM
1

You realise that women get paid far more than men in such service industry jobs because the customers want to fuck you, right? Go do harder work in the kitchen for worse pay if you don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 07:28 PM
0

You want to be protected from standard human interactions and control when and where men can approach women, and how men can talk to women. Because you don't have enough autonomy to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 06:27 PM
1

Male and female interactions are often inherently flirtatious. That's the point. That's how males and females interact. It's just small talk. Harmless small talk which you're pathologising-- as is standard with basically any male behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:15 PM
1

It's just the male equivalent of slut. A pejorative for male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:11 PM
0

"You're too cute to be working here" is not a compliment. It's a sexual advance combined with an insult about her job. If you actually had some fun flirty conversation with her nobody would care. No, it's a compliment. Anyone working at McDonalds knows their job is shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:08 PM
0

Workplaces are one of the #1 places people meet people to fuck. It's where most people spend at least half of their time. They're a perfectly valid place to have romantic interactions. If you can't deal with standard human interaction, that's your problem, not society's.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:06 PM
1

She'll also make twice as much as her male equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:06 PM
0

If a guy at my job told me I was cute I would think it's inappropriate. If a guy approached me in public and said I'm cute and then moved on, I'd be flattered. Then you have a problem. But never trap a woman or man into an uncomfortable situation when they can't leave. Like when they are at work. Good lord. Why are feminists so intent on women being treated like children?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 05:02 PM
1

Imagine if those construction laborers were women Yeah, imagine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:57 PM
1

You were talking about pretending to be wealthy before, yes? No, pretending not to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:42 PM
1

Lots of rich people don't live in big houses and condos. I know a rich guy who lived with his family into his 30s. There was a reddit post by a guy who hid his wealth from his girlfriend for a long time, she got bored with him and his "lack of ambition", left, and then found out later and was pissed lol. Spending 5 minutes around a girl's friends usually tell you whether she's a slut or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:12 PM
2

So Rey Mysterio against the Big Show is an abuse of power? No, there's no woman involved. And it isn't real lol. Male on male violence isn't an abuse of power, male on female violence is. The same way that women claim to feel around men, that they can overpower them and exploit their power at any moment. That's kind of how men feel about women re: their sexual power. I don’t know where you get the idea that women hate “sluts” more than men. Life experience. Reddit isn't representative at all. IM…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 02:04 PM
2

Using force is only problematic if you’re in a physical altercation with someone less powerful than you. Yeah. Same as with sex. Women just like having sex and it upsets the weaker, more pathetic men because women are generally able to get sex without having to lower their standards - unlike them. Like I said, it would be funny if it wasn’t sad. The only one apparently upset and desperate to hurl insults in this exchange has been you. It's overwhelmingly women who hate sluts, much more so than m…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:57 AM
1

You probably don’t understand what it’s like to be a high value man that women are really into. I do actually. I used to good looking. It's irrelevant to the point. The vast majority of men aren't attractive. Women with good looking boyfriends may feel somewhat the same, but women are conflicted in this respect in that they desire men who are successful with women and come pre-approved. So it isn't the same. Acquiring sex for a man is an accomplishment, for a woman it isn't, it's an abuse of pow…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:47 AM
1

How am I projecting? I'm an incel lol. Having a woman flirt with your ex is not equivalent to your girlfriend having a thousand guys desperate to fuck her at the tips of her fingers 24/7. Slut-shaming is a check on power. Women have huge sexual power and are consequently judged on how they use it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:33 AM
2

It's about as easy to lie about being rich as it is being a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:24 AM
2

You'd be insecure if your man could literally fuck any woman he wanted, anytime.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 11:22 AM
2

Not to mention seeking out the types of guys most likely to kill them. The types of behaviour women can justify by claiming potential victimhood is neverending.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 03:32 PM
2

And a lot of women revel in victimhood because it grants them privilege, power and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 02:36 PM
0

And men are punished much, much more harshly for committing all crimes. And men are overwhelmingly the ones risking themselves to prevent and protect people from violent crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 02:34 PM
-1

Played games with her? She was an instathot who toyed with guys and exploited lonely, desperate guys for attention. When men befriend elderly ladies and take their money, they go to prison. When ethots do the same to men, they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 02:32 PM
3

From what I understand of the case, she was a cunt who preyed on lonely, desperate men and treated them horribly. If you reversed the sexes, it would be painted as justifiable. Rather like it has been in the case of the woman who stabbed her "controlling" boyfriend to death while he slept and got a paltry 7 years. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-48967292
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 02:30 PM
0

Does that mean we can hang her for her husband's war crimes?
/r/MGTOW15/07/19 03:48 PM
1

They were damsels.
/r/MGTOW15/07/19 02:43 PM
1

It isn't a mgtow point. It's easily observable fact. Men have a protective impulse towards women in the same way that they, and women do, towards children. No such impulse exists towards men. And men get profiled for their sex's higher rates of violence in the same way that other races do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/19 06:40 AM
1

Yeah, it's a male, when everyone refers to said male as "she" and said male is allowed makeup and hormone treatment in prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 06:48 AM
1

Totalitiarian dictatorships are right wing by definition. Genuine conservatism is anti-war though. Just like genuine leftism and socialism is anti-war. There also isn't much of a relationship between a country's internal system and its foreign policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 05:12 AM
2

I don't think you have any understanding of Marxism or socialism. You seem to have conflated gender politics, which is a neoliberal invention, with the left. Marxism and socialism have never critiqued male suffering under capitalism? Das Kapital? That's literally all Marx did.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 05:09 AM
1

chelsea manning was not released because "woman" Yes, he was. (S)he was pardoned because he changed gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 03:26 AM
1

No they aren't. Assaulting children and child abuse is one of the most violent and egregious crimes there is. And women kill children as much as men. They're just considered lesser crimes because they're done by women. Paternity fraud? Not a crime. Doing drugs while you're pregnant and sentencing a child to a lifetime of horrific suffering? Not a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 03:20 AM
1

Fact. Also look at how crimes which women commit more of are treated vs crimes men commit more of. And crimes which men suffer more from vs crimes which women suffer more from. Women smack their kids at huge rates, perfectly acceptable. Sex crimes? The greatest crime there is, many consider it worse than murder. How zealously drug dealing is prosecuted vs prostitution. And so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 02:47 AM
1

They're considered women. Gay guys benefit from being more effeminite as well. It's illustrative. For women and actual women the privilege is even greater.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 02:47 AM
1

They don't. ~24% of murderers are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 02:37 AM
1

Gender then, whatever. (S)he was freed. None of the male whistleblowers Obama prosecuted/persecuted were.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 02:36 AM
2

The same dynamic applies. It's far worse in the US because of how obsceely punitive your judicial system is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/19 02:35 AM
1

Female captives in war have been sex slaves en masse throughout the whole of history. No they haven't. We were talking about the differential treatment of males/females captured in war. Ignoring the mass of men slaughtered in war. Women have been treated better (by some metrics) than men because they are more valuable than men. Both to society in general and to individual males making the decisions in particular. How are you defining value? Men are largely disposable in a way women are not. Whic…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 01:12 PM
1

Yes, but they're not doing it to "be nice" or otherwise "white knight for women", but because the women are "useful" to them in a way the men are not as sex slaves. Women have never been sex slaves, en masse, at any point in history. Women are treated better than men because women have been basically viewed as children throughout history. Like children, their wellbeing and welfare has been prioritised, they've been protected from work, war, violence and hardship. Also, men are just as useful for…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 11:43 AM
1

Being taken for "integration purposes" is beinng treated much better than being slaughtered.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:17 AM
5

and is undermining women's rights? Removing abortion would balance women's and men's rights. It would give men equal reproductive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:17 AM
1

Having women working be normalized was the capitalist move of the century. Doubling the labour force and destroying the unions in one fell swoop.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:16 AM
2

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:13 AM
1

93% of the people in jail in the US are male.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:13 AM
2

Bradley Manning was released when he changed sex lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:11 AM
3

Maybe he should have worn a blouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:10 AM
3

There was a documentary on female violence in the UK that aired on BBC3. It followed various women. One young woman was convicted for something like 20-30 crimes, including assaulting a police officer. She didn't get a custodial sentence. Until she sent some abuse online to a feminist. Then she did. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:10 AM
1

What % of planet Earth believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:04 AM
2

They are biased towards FAMILY and they extend that to women and children in general Men are in families and they get 70% harsher sentences. The only reason anyone cares about young women is as LIVESTOCK Do you think Mothers only care about their children as LIVESTOCK? Chivalry. Infantilisation. And men don't have in-group preference like women and races do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 09:03 AM
1

Pretty sure Rocky and The Karate Kid got the girl before they kicked ass. Although the bitch in Karate Kid started all the trouble, then had a go at Daniel for backing down (ie trying to avoid getting the shit beaten out of him). He should have just gone gay with Mr Miyagi.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 08:43 AM
1

Since there's a recent push for financial abortion, making the decision to have kids with you out of wedlock is completely batshit. Financial abortion doesn't exist. Women have complete reproductive power. The short answer is that it's much easier for a woman to get pregnant than to get married. All she has to do is find a guy to fuck her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 05:01 AM
1

if I'm not planning to get on welfare and garnish his wages for child support? Weird qualifier, given that's what the vast majority of single Mothers do. You get a child, full control of that child, and to spend most of your life raising said child instead of working in a shit job you hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 04:59 AM
1

Also a reasonably high number of pregnancies are unplanned. Sometimes life just happens. Almost zero % of births are unplanned. It's a choice the woman makes. She gets pregnant, then she chooses to abort or give birth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 04:57 AM
2

Children are already a bigger risk to women married or not at least statistically speaking. What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 04:32 AM
1

That's different. That's women having their own kids and just using the man as an involuntary sperm bank, usually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 04:31 AM
1

and even less attractive people benefit from fitness. They don't become attractive people. So you focusing on the part that cannot be influenced I'm focusing on the part that makes you attractive. It isn't my fault that it's innate. For males, facial aesthetics are the #1 that make you attractive or unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 12:22 PM
2

No you don't. You have limits on donations which are easy to circumvent. The two major parties in the UK spent about 15mil last election. In the US, your major parties spend 30 times that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 06:22 PM
2

Yes, we also have campaign spending limits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:30 PM
1

I said in another reply that physical punishment should never be practiced, but it is legal. Physical punishment towards children is legal, towards women (and men) it's illegal. Do you not think that's illustrative of how crimes done mainly by women are accepted and crimes done mainly by men are heavily punished?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:15 PM
1

Most people don't get fat in the first place, when young and in their prime anyway. Optimal male body is lean with broad shoulders. I went through the same transition as you at 17. Hit the gym, became chadlite, acne cleared up. Didn't get ripped or even super lean, I was skinny af so just broadened out and got a bit of muscle, but uncovered an attractive face. I felt like I'd "earned" my looks but it was just genetics. People have a compulsive need to believe in some form of just world theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:13 PM
3

https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000112 Data from 33 countries distinguishing the perpetrators of parental homicides of children under the age of 18 years showed that mothers committed just over half of all parental homicides Best I can find. Most homicides of children are filicide (done by parents). So Mothers kill kids more than Fathers. But it's probable men make up the majority of the remainder of child killers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:10 PM
1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:04 PM
2

The lack of any kind of free speech principle in the UK is terrifying. But also our judicial system is very lenient in terms of sentencing, so that mitigates it hugely. I'm sure Julian Assange would much rather be prosecuted and serve time in the UK than the US. I'd still much rather live in the UK than the US. I'll take healthcare and a functioning welfare state over some abstract concept of "freedom". You also have your corporations recognised as persons and their spending as "speech", which h…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:59 PM
4

https://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/content/1/1/e000112 Data from 33 countries distinguishing the perpetrators of parental homicides of children under the age of 18 years showed that mothers committed just over half of all parental homicides And ~70% of victims were boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:51 PM
2

The data disagrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:44 PM
1

You don't need to go to the gym to not be fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:54 PM
1

just travel to eastern europe bro
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:51 PM
6

96% of sexual predators jailed were men. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx Add to that the fact female victims report far more. Male victimhood in surveys is increasing-- and it isn't due to increased acts of abuse. You tell people they've been victims of something for long enough, they eventually agree, feminism's modus operandi. If you cba Googling. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/50349…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:49 PM
3

Why do you all point to one country's dumb law like it's some universal shenanigans? Because I live in said dumb country, and it's also happening all across western Europe. The world doesn't revolve around Trumpland. Also this law was most famously and recently used against a wife https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/domesticabuseinenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2018 About 80% female "victims" as I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:34 PM
0

and there's plenty of guys with ugly faces but the body of a greek god who do just fine. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:30 PM
1

The same laws concerning physical punishment apply to men and women. But, coincidentally, it's carried out far more by women. If a man cannot keep himself from leaving a bruise or welt, then he shouldn’t be laying a hand on his child. Lol. Nobody should be hitting a child. Imagine if I, or anybody, said that about a man hitting a woman? but legally it’s about how bad the punishment is and not the person doing it. Not true at all. Studies have shown that the gender bias in sentencing alone is ~70…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:29 PM
2

UK. https://www.thinkuknow.co.uk/14_plus/news/Emotional-Abuse-to-be-made-illegal-under-new-domestic-violence-law-/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:25 PM
5

....... the vast majority of violent crime inflicted on men and boys are committed by other MEN. Yes. It's overwhelmingly male on male. I’d like to see the statistics on women raping boys at high rates. Do your own research. Female on male rape is about 25-50% of the pie. Female leaders sending men to war is not comparable at all. Hundreds of other male leaders sent their men to war, how is that any different? Eh? Because they're women. Women didn’t fight in wars because MEN and society agreed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:23 PM
1

The last man on earth would be raped by hundreds of women every day until he dies. I very much doubt it. Unless he was good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:07 PM
-2

Women hitting children is legal, men "emotionally abusing" their wives/girlfriends is illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:05 PM
6

The vast majority of violent crime is inflicted on men and boys. And it's overwhelmingly men who protect women from violence. And women rape men and boys at very significant rates. As for women inflicting utter depravity on men, I'd advise looking into the history of female leaders who have sent men to war, the ultimate horror, nothing is comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:05 PM
5

Because they physically can't. Women kill children as much as men, and that is objectively the gravest crime. So I'm unsure of your assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 05:01 PM
3

Women are attracted to handsome faces. All that happens when an average/ugly gets jacked is he gets lots of guys approaching him asking about his routine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:53 PM
3

Then you were blessed with a good face. Getting in shape didn't make you attractive, genetics did.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:52 PM
-2

but if you are fit and look good a subset of women will approach If you have a good face.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:51 PM
18

"I wear makeup for myself"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 04:50 PM
3

"Chad" = attractive. Nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 01:30 PM
1

Or that turbulent time Charles Manson's acolytes had with their victims. Boy were those relationships turbulent.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:54 PM
4

Isn't blue hair appropriating the culture of the over 65s?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:48 PM
7

Definitely go no contact. Nanny cams and recording could be a double-edged sword. It could easily be presented that you were trying to record them inappropriately.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 06:08 AM
1

Interesting that it was his 2 sons involved in the previous arson/murder. Imagine if they'd been his daughters. No doubt they'd have been "somewhat victims" then too.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 11:20 AM
1

The other half are Feminists.
/r/PussyPass02/09/16 10:10 AM
1

From what little I know, both get a bad rep due to folks misinterpreting/representing their beliefs and ideas.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:39 AM
2

Did you just combine Nietzsche and Yoda?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 09:30 AM
3

A couple of people called him. One spoke to him for half an hour. Said he seemed high as a kite but had thrown up. And a couple of people called the cops in his area. One of those people said the cops seems uninterested (I fucking hate the system in the US, it doesn't seem to give a shit about anyone). Hopefully he's alright. It looks like he deleted all his posts from yesterday. Would it be worth setting up an online fundraiser thing? I'd kick it off. He got evidently got screwed out of $300 by…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:21 AM
5

I posted to r/suicidewatch He's in the US. He seems really belligerent. I don't know whether he's already taken anything.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:48 AM
2

In a court room? Nice idea, but practically impossible.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:12 PM
1

"A duty to diversity". That's a new one.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 08:57 PM
2

It took place on Boxing Day, hehe.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 04:36 PM
5

Brilliant. If this happened to a guy. They'd chalk it up to experience and move on. Perhaps with some begrudging respect.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 07:02 PM
1

Here's how it works: The victim can create a confidential record of what happened — who was involved, where, and when it happened, and any visual evidence. The student then has three options: Save it with a time stamp; return at a later time to add details or officially file a report. Report directly to the college, providing name and contact information. Select "match" and agree to speak to officials when another student has recorded a perpetrator with the same unique identifiers. Callisto prov…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 06:56 PM
1

It's a mixed bag TBH =)
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:32 PM
1

I suffer with serious mental health issues. I know mental illness is real. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying it's a matter of subjectivity which set of symptoms you choose to pathologise. Munchausen By Proxy, PTSD, Post-Natal Depression-- you could choose symptoms at play, for example, in cases of male serial killers or wife killers and christen them with a disorder or syndrome, and they might get treatment instead of prison. But it tends not to happen. Also. In terms of being observable an…
/r/MensRights05/08/16 01:37 PM
3

Not a direct corollary, but I instantly thought of the movie The Descent. edit: Just to expand. As I remember it, one of the gals, in a life and death situation, kills one of her pals when she finds out he'd been boinking her now-dead husband. It's hard to envisage that working with guys. Comradery is just an inherently male thing. Maybe a necessary one, historically.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 08:45 PM
1

But he's right, in a sense. (Almost) all the diagnostic methods are perceptual. It isn't like a broken bone, cancer, an infection, etc. Something tangible. That isn't to dismiss it or the suffering of those with mental health conditions, which are absolutely real. Saying something can't be tangibly evidenced and saying it doesn't exist aren't the same thing.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:30 PM
1

Those aren't hard physical facts, they're subjective experiences.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:23 PM
1

Anti-depressants are overprescribed here too. It's very common to get them prescribed on 1st visit. Typically it will be "answer these few questions, if you tick enough boxes, try these meds for a couple of weeks and let us know how you get on". I think it's more a case of resources here. It's cheaper and easier to just throw drugs at it than refer to a psychiatrist/ologist etc. You do generally get that stuff as well, if you're adjudged severe enough, but it takes time. The medical profession h…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:22 PM
2

But it isn't a fact. The fact would be "women are diagnosed at almost twice the rate". "Women suffer from almost twice as much" is an unsubstantiated conclusion drawn from a fact.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 11:04 AM
8

I was thinking of things like post-natal depression.. And the tendency to point to women's hormones etc. There doesn't seem quite the same intent to understand or pathologise men's mental health. Just as there isn't the same intent to prioritise men's health in practically every other area. I hang around r/depression and r/suicidewatch a lot, and the majority of posters seem to be male, many of whom express grave reservations about seeking help. It took me over a decade. And the diagnostic proce…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:51 AM
4

How is it "scientifically accepted"? TBH it seems like there are simply more disorders concocted for women than men. The science around mental illness isn't exactly hard science, is it? They collate a bunch of symptoms, and if you have them, you have whichever "disorder". It isn't like a broken arm, which is demonstrable with an x-ray.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:26 AM
44

In education they're definitely the minority.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:13 PM
-1

Mens Rights is inherently reactionary to Feminism, isn't it? Which isn't a bad thing.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:25 PM
1

Anyway, after a few hours I was shipped back onto the open ward because a female had arrived who needed her privacy This is blatant sexism. I don't know whether it's the same on female-dominated wards. The funny thing is that privacy simply doesn't occur in hospitals. The Doctors and Nurses make a joke of how you leave your dignity at the door when you enter. There were lots of occasions where there was a huddle of Junior Doctors crowded round my bed. A female Junior Doctor watched on as my geni…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 12:55 PM
1

Plus they're shorter, so don't get to eat as much in general.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:16 PM
2

What a poorly reported story. Why do they never include the actual allegedly criminal messages? Where did he actually directly threaten her?
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:55 AM
8

it was an absolute slap in the face to women across Australia,” she said. woah there, sister. Stop using language that normalises domestic violence.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:51 AM
11

"You say you would never catcall someone, so what does it matter if it's made a hate crime?" How very Goebells.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:03 PM
3

Thanks for contributing.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 10:47 PM
6

TBH Peter Hitchens persuaded me. I'm a lefty on most hard issues, but he speaks a lot of sense. When you look past all the nonsense and hysteria, it's perfectly sensible that the law should be as transparent as possible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9nM6todJoE Certainly there should be no anonymity in actual trials.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 09:01 PM
-5

There should be no anonymity in law. Except maybe for minors. It should be as transparent as possible.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:06 PM
2

I'd rather it was just classified as outright fraud, than some wish-washy, Orwellian form of domestic abuse. But I suppose you gotta play the game.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:32 PM
0

Plus, chivalry.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:09 PM
1

Inflammatory? Well, he is a bit of a flamer.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:28 AM
1

I enjoy how whenever you try to include men (as victims) in any Feminist buzz-topic, or attempt to broaden the debate to provide context-- you get hit with "we're talking specifically about x, stop diverting to y & z!". Is there a technical term for this? Beyond ideological myopia.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 06:08 AM
1

"the wrath of the internet" is pretty much oxymoronic. They're just words. Any sane person would laugh in the face of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 04:02 PM
3

What was the gender split of victims, just out of interest?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 08:29 PM
2

The majority of the electorate, the majority of spending power, the majority of tax spend, the majority of power in the family home, etc etc etc. Plus, chivalry. Men in power don't act in the interests of other men. Likewise women in power. See Thatcher. They generally act in the interests of other rich people.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:50 AM
3

Their recidivism levels are at least 10% lower in both the US and Australia. Surely that's mitigated by the fact women are significantly less likely to be charged with any crime.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 08:33 AM
1

Kaley Cuoco's seemed to work fine.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:15 PM
1

Can Depp still get monthly blowjobs?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 12:14 PM
1

Its a good show. If youre in the right mood.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:00 AM
2

Dont be giving Feminists ideas. The Guardian would be able to spin that as anti man somehow. "Men consume 24% more of the worlds food resources!"
/r/MensRights28/05/16 12:21 AM
-1

Who cares. Rich people problems. She can afford a 24 hour bodyguard if shes so terrified.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 12:09 AM
2

If anything, her career was advantaged by the publicity and connections.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 09:03 PM
2

Johnny Depp's chick is divorcing him after 15 months.. Days after his Mum died. Apparently he cheated and stuff. But really. Why do men do this.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 12:00 AM
3

Men need to smarten up.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 10:54 PM
1

I suppose if you were being positive you could classify that as some form of "balance"..
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:19 PM
2

It's a complete political and media consensus in the UK. Scary.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:28 AM
1

I am out of the loop here. I thought The Telegraph was right-wing? Is this chivalrous Feminism?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:02 AM
5

Which is where the term was derived.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 10:29 AM
25

Yep. It's endemic, too. In the UK it's written into law that you can pay younger people less.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:01 PM
58

Asians are more successful/"privileged" than white folk. So that explains their presence. The most striking thing is the age issue. They all look under 25.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:56 PM
308

It looks exactly like what I'd always envisioned.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:34 PM
1

Don't think so. There's evidence they were egalitarian. But once people start to be able stock resources, competition kicks in, and gender roles come to the fore. Even matriarchal animal societies, the females have physical prowess.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 07:09 PM
1

No. I'd say Cranston deserves more. But if Paul had pushed it and got equal pay, I wouldn't have a strong reaction. Because an argument can be made. And in a free market, in show business, people don't get what they deserve. They get what they can negotiate.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:53 PM
1

I'd say she's very important, and had become more so. I'd compare her to Aaron Paul on Breaking Bad. BrBa is undeniably Walter White's story, but Jesse's almost of equal importance-- and some are actually more interested in him.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:33 PM
1

lol. More people have heard of The Usual Suspects than have seen The Princess Bride.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:30 PM
3

Do you have any evidence to back up your "fact" that Spacey is more popular than Wright? Really? Spacey has been a high end A Lister for 15 years. He's probably the most prestigious actor working in TV. I like Wright, but she's far from being Meryl Streep or Cate Blanchett. And Seven, American Beauty, The Usual Suspects and LA Confidential aren't classics?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:29 PM
5

If you're selling something on Ebay, do you ask for what you feel its worth, or what you feel you can get for it?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:25 PM
1

Pacino had more screentime than Brando in The Godfather. It's not all that relevant. Spacey brings in the audience. Or, at least, initially did.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:53 PM
0

Eh. She's essential to the show. Not quite as essential as Spacey, but still essential.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:52 PM
2

You use whatever you can in a negotiation. People should be more pissed at Netflix for caving.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:51 PM
-1

Agreed. Spacey is obviously the bigger name and draw. But she negotiated. It's on whoever she negotiated to not bend to the "threats". She didn't do anything immoral or illegal.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:21 PM
9

It's funny that you'd try to assert her fame in its own right by referencing who she was married to.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:19 PM
7

Because the Womens side of the Golden Globes is infinitely less competitive.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:18 PM
1

"Women who stay at home are more vulnerable to earthquakes and tsunamis than men who sleep outside or work out at sea." Those privileged bastards.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:44 AM
1

Mother Nature must suffer from internalised misogyny.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:34 AM
5

If I was in the US I couldn't vote for either of these two subhumans.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:20 AM
2

What I don't understand is that outlets like Breitbart are pushing the exact same safety angle. Yet they complain about Feminism casting all men as predators. How can they justify such doublethink? Personally, I object to shared bathrooms on decorum grounds. A shared bathroom is the death of romance-- workplace romance is going to be hit hard. Imagine walking into the bathroom to take a leak, and bumping into that girl you have a crush on taking a dump. No thanks.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:15 PM
1

Technically, you're poisoning yourself every time you visit McDonalds.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:16 PM
3

They're also implying that they're using alcohol, etc to self-medicate mental health issues. Therefore it's on-topic.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:16 PM
1

Agreed. There needs to be more research into this. It's basically a mirror opposite of the Wage Gap, and we need to be careful about assuming discrimination, without solid evidence. More men need to fight for custody, whether they're up against a biased system or not.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:59 PM
1

Assuming this is the same story I read. It wasn't "revenge porn" at all. He took regular, clothed images of girls (which they'd put into the public domain) and photoshopped them (turning them into "porn"), and shared them on forums with other like-minded folk. But at least one of the girls was 15. And he'd allegedly harassed and threatened them.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:53 PM
5

Undergrad enrolment seems within the range of relative equality to me, considering male population is, what, 47/8%? Seems redundant. I'm sure there are more striking statistics within education. I'd do Life Expectancy and mortality rates for all the top diseases. And maybe health spending.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 07:29 PM
4

I'd have included Life Expectancy.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:38 PM
2

Still driven by economic and social factors. Racial minorities are overrepresented (I think), for that very reason.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:37 PM
0

The legend is the guy who made it, bro.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:36 PM
4

And if the genders were inverted? It would be the evil Patriarchal shitbag taking advantage of the poor, put-upon masseuse, right?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:56 PM
2

It's really more complex than that. I don't know how often rape is used in drama, but when it is used it's always presented as something very, very serious. And is often used for shock effect. It's the ultimate evil. Unlike all other forms of violence, which are presented in myriad different degrees of seriousness. Can you imagine a huge mainstream comic book movie entitled Rape Squad? Nope, me neither. Which evidences the exact opposite of "Rape culture".
/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:53 PM
1

I wonder how many suicides this hashtag campaign is responsible for. I encountered a post by a guy on r/suicidewatch whose ex referred to it in relation to their relationship.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:49 AM
1

And how many of those own newspapers or TV news channels? It's irrelevant how many of the speakers/"experts"/journalists that write/speak/host hold liberal/left values, because the subjects and framing of the debate is controlled by those on the right. The far Left did die a death. If the internet didn't exist, Corbyn wouldn't exist. What are the "hard left" media outlets, exactly. The Morning Star? Murdoch owns half the press. The rest of the "Left" press is firmly centre in most respects (asid…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 02:41 PM
1

It's not a very well articulated petition. He should be pushing for "made to penetrate" to be classified as rape. Women penetrating men with objects is relatively rare by comparison.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:56 AM
2

The people who bend to this nonsense piss me off more than those who instigate it. This guy needs to grow some balls.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:12 PM
2

Okay then, I'll simplify: the rich control the media. They are generally more conservative, and influence it for their own ends. Which means, at least economically, right wing policies are their aim.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:08 PM
5

Laurie Penny is.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:06 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYlyb1Bx9Ic Comedians and quiz show panellists don't set the agenda. edit: Just look how Corbyn has been eviscerated by practically all of the media.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:01 PM
6

With respect, I think everyone in the public eye gets abused. The media is just selective about who can cash said abuse in for credit.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:48 PM
1

Oh they exist in reality, just not in the media, where it matters. ie they have no platform/influence. There's a distinction to be made. You implied it was more evident on the Left. I disagree. It's trotted out equally by anyone, regardless of where they fall on the political spectrum, for political or personal benefit.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:20 PM
0

You mean like all those cunts on the right who've organised a systematic campaign to pain Corbyn and co as anti-Semitic to distract and obfuscate legitimate issues? The "hard left" barely exists. They have no platform. The media, even what's considered the "left/liberal" media is fundamentally conservative, and controlled by corporate interest. This is just another instance of that interest exercising its power and influence to delegitimise the left and its concerns. Everybody uses this Opressio…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:53 PM
-1

I think talking about this stuff in Left/Right terms is a misguided oversimplification. Jeremy Corbyn is "hard" left. The Guardian, who is pushing this, is Centre-left/Liberal. The BBC likewise. So it's illogical to define this as driven by the "hard left".
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:58 PM
13

This aggravates me so much. Obfuscating serious issues with this victim nonsense.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:17 PM
23

Because Nick Robinson has never been called a "dick" or an "asshole" on Twitter before..
/r/MensRights10/05/16 01:08 PM
2

Men's Rights disagrees with much of fundamental Feminist thought. The Patriarchy, rape culture, the wage gap, etc. Feminism has never really done anything specifically for the benefit of men. Prominent Feminist advocacy groups fought against equal custody becoming the default, for example. What has 3rd wave Feminism done for men? It's a neat ideal that we want the same things and that it isn't a "zero sum game"-- but the cold reality is that, in many respects, it is a zero sum game. When you tak…
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:04 AM
2

But it is a factor. That's the point. Compare, for example, the drugs business with the sex business (not an exact analogy), but observe how differently they're treated. There's moves in Europe to decriminalise women entirely and shift all prosecution onto the men with regard to prostitution.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:35 AM
2

Is there a similar law for hookers who give their clientelle STDs?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:10 AM
1

And nearly all drug dealers are what gender?
/r/MensRights10/05/16 10:09 AM
1

Not one mention of her own Mother. Presumably shes dead.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:35 AM
1

Sorry, I can't bring myself to care about this.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:11 AM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:43 PM
9

He's advocating free speech, is anti-Feminist and is putting mens' issues on the table. I don't agree with a lot of what he says. But he's pretty ideal for the uni crowds. Also. As he says. He's allowed to say this stuff.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:17 PM
1

His tour seems to be going well.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 02:05 PM
1

Most advertising is aspirational. That's hardly surprising. Do people think that advertising companies don't research and market test the fuck out of every detail?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 11:10 AM
80

I'm not sure that's true. Just the other day I was reading some research into how Womens Services treat male victims of DV, it was over the phone, but the responses were largely very negative.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 10:47 AM
11

Men have egos, women have self esteem.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 09:28 PM
0

I find the basic point ludicrous. Some of the great artists and thinkers have had a strong and visible interest in fashion. It goes hand in hand with music, with film, with art, with literature. Sport is broadly considered the antithesis of "intellectualism". Meh. Not my area of expertise.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 07:22 PM
1

I can't even grasp or agree with the thesis. Never mind the detail.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 07:00 PM
2

Wanting to change your gender = empowering Wanting to change your vagina = oppression
/r/MensRights30/04/16 01:30 PM
2

What's amusing is that the fact the woman/women not turning up is indicative of why women earn less than men, and are less successful in prized fields. Less dedication, more sick days.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 11:05 AM
4

We should institute an Equal Spending Power Day. Or an Equal Tax Spend Day.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 11:03 AM
4

Please subscribe to r/suicidewatch and lend a hand when you can.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:09 AM
1

That's interesting. I recall researching for the UK, and it being about equal, with women more often killing younger kids (0-6), and men more often older. But I'd have to check.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:03 AM
3

I'd say so. I just happened to be looking at the specifics yesterday. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361028/
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:40 AM
0

I'll leave it to your discretion. If anyone gets a spare minute, please swing by /suicidewatch There's a lot of posts, and most of them are by men (as you'd expect).
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:30 AM
2

Women get a third more spent on their health than men do.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:24 AM
2

Are you sure they were free, and it wasn't scaled pricing? It's possible she mistook you for a disabled, black midget transgender woman with learning difficulties.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 06:20 AM
0

And if TV is considerably more gender balanced than film, what are the reasons?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:52 PM
1

Dude. What are you doing to me? I actually had to pause my random Youtube crap and actually concentrate to read that. It's an interesting theory. I've no idea whether there's truth in it. There's always some fantasy fulfilment aspect (in wanting to be the kick/badass hero), and I don't see why it can't be cross-gender. But Buffy has lots of sex.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:27 PM
1

Ripley, I believe, was one of the templates, I seem to recall from a Whedon interview. Whether it's "Feminist" or not is largely irrelevant-- as well as being a long, complex argument I don't care to have (or even have a sturdy opinion on). But there's lots of, lets say, gender shit going on. Overtly and covertly. Things like the Original Slayer being essentially raped by a bunch of nasty men to instil her power. All the gals "bleeding" to open the seal in Season 7. Vampirism itself is inherentl…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:19 PM
-2

Yeah. It would be interesting to see some analysis of numbers.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:07 PM
1

One issue I have is with the Fathers. They retrofitted Buffy's Dad to be an absent cliche (literally what he was called); and Xander's to be an abusive asshole (though at least that had plot relevance). Whedon has some major Daddy Issues himself. Though I hadn't considered Buffy's predeliction for centuries-old vampires correlating with AWOL Hank-- makes sense. Yeah, Willow's best fit was Oz. Tara, while a likeable character, was too samey. She was Willow Redux. That'd be Season Six. It's undoub…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:56 PM
1

Sure. Those were factors. But Twilight's a harsh analogy. Buffy's very critically respected. Have you watched it?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:44 PM
-4

Valid points. Did most of those shows air during the day, while the womenfolk were home and the menfolk were out at work? Still, I think most of the better shows around, by today's standard, drama-wise, are more male dominated, and lean more on cinema than they do traditional TV. Another reason why Buffy was cool. It subverted the classic male/female roles in many respects. Xander had no physical prowess, Riley found himself in the emasculated, quasi-neglected-housewife role. Xander even gets so…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:40 PM
1

I wasn't being wholly serious. Just thought it would be fun and interesting to gauge the response to (IMO) a great piece of art with an inherently oppositional ideology at its core. TBH I expected this thread to sink without trace. And I downplayed its "Feminist leanings", really. It's perhaps one of the most overtly "Feminist" shows in modern times, and its Creator has labelled it as such.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:34 PM
1

Whedon overstretched himself, and was fixated on Firefly during those years. It's no coincidence both Buffy and Angel got inconsistent around that time.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:09 PM
1

Thanks =) I liked Angel quite a lot too. I never quite connected with it in the same way, though. I felt Buffy had stronger characters, better metaphors and better defined themes-- it was about growing. Angel struggled a little to decide what it was ultimately about.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:56 PM
1

I'm one of those rare creatures who has never seen any Star Wars; and only the odd episode of Star Trek. So I can reliably say I don't give a shit about your personal tastes either. =)
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:50 PM
1

He fell off in Season Seven, IMO. Never dug Faith all that much, as a character. Felt she fit in better over on Angel. And Dushku is rather a limited actress.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:47 PM
-4

Yeah. In others words, actual human characters. I do think media, film and TV, is a legitimate area of gripe for Feminists. Not in terms of opportunity, largely, it's mostly underpinned by childcare and the family angle, but there definitely aren't enough female stories being told.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:27 PM
-1

Really? You sure do a solid impersonation.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:15 PM
1

Yeah. No activity since. But it's a new account. Hopefully he's just had a lot on his plate and/or forgot his login details or something.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:50 AM
1

Thanks. Will do next time.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 05:48 AM
1

Nah, hes not Watson's type.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:17 AM
1

You know how facts work, right? I requested a citation, which you haven't provided. The opinions of Sony execs are irrelevant. What's a "lead" and what's "supporting" is largely subjective. As my example evidenced. Also, Amy Adams was nominated for an Oscar for Lead, while Cooper was nominated for Supporting.. Try being less angry, bro. You might be less of a laughable archetype.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 12:24 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/about Like I say, she's probably your best bet. She regularly comments and responds to comments on YT.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:49 AM
2

It's a rather quiet forum. Maybe someone could suggest somewhere else to post a request. I don't know where they tend to gather. A shame though. Those on r/feminism seem on the more reasonable end of the Feminism spectrum. Aside from the excessive banning.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:42 AM
4

Wow. Where did they find 5 Middle Class looking, youngish, sullen-faced Feminists to pose for this? The casting process must have taken an eternity. /s
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:13 AM
14

By which rationale, men are deprived of their kids until November. Women don't start committing suicide until October. Don't start dying from workplace deaths until Boxing Day. etc etc
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:07 AM
17

All the training in the world can't trump biology. Give me all the time and expertise on offer, I still wouldn't fancy my chances against a gorilla.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:58 AM
2

Why not email some of the Youtube "names"? Karen Straughan, Stefan Molyneux, etc. You might get lucky. Karen, particularly, seems very amenable to interaction with regular folk.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:47 AM
2

Moving the goal posts? You claim screen time and dialogue as the metrics and then, when confronted with Renner (who had less of both than Adams, yet still got paid the same as the "leads"), you dispense with them because they don't fit your rationale. My preferences are irrelevant. Did you watch the movie? Bale, Cooper and Adams were leads. They were the main characters. If you genuinely believe that Renner was more a main character than Adams (or even Lawrence); you either haven't seen the film…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:32 AM
1

In an "MRA" world child custody would be more balanced, and thus so would this type of thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:36 AM
1

Except Jeremy Renner got paid the same as the male "leads". Adams sure seemed like a lead when I watched the movie. I dont think Ameeican Hustle is the best example to illustrate your point. Which I broadly agree with. Single anecdotal examples, as usual, are pretty meaningless.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:26 AM
2

That's spectacular. Video and comments. I love the fact they can't even summon up enough bullshit issues to espouse. Cycling?
/r/MensRights26/04/16 02:21 PM
-2

The narrative that saw him convicted involved him apparently letting himself into his mates hotel room after they were already getting down to it. The fact she'd gone back to the mates room established implied consent, Evans deciding to hop aboard without said implied consent got him sent down. TBH I dont know the truth or really care. Edit: Also, the alleged tweet(s) dont mean anything. Do they, legally? They justaffirm the fact she was a money hungry slapper, which was already established when…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 12:40 PM
-2

Less wars. But as we see with the SJW movement and the desire to gnaw away at freedoms in favor of things like emotional safety. That lends itself to totalitarianism. It would be a Kafkaesque world.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:25 PM
58

The entire tone of that article is astonishing. Theres more written about her mental state than the victims.
/r/PussyPass20/04/16 04:32 AM
1

She was the Step Mum. For that reason the Father is definitely culpable in my eyes. Hes more responsible, its his child. He brought that evil into the kids life, and let it assume control.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:44 PM
1

Correlation is not causation. Its complex. Crime is underreported in the Middle East. Cultural factors such as Muslims drinking and abusing drugs much less; the marginalisation of sexual crimes; economic factors, etc. Do you really want to live in a society where you lose a hand for non violent crimes such as theft and drug possession?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 01:13 AM
1

Would someone facing 30 years in prison trade that for a hand? Probably. Would the possibility of losing a hand deter someone from commiting a particular crime? Probably not. Youre presupposing some deep rational thought on behalf of the criminal. Its usually strong environmental factors that trump that.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:09 PM
1

Because they dont function as either a deterrent or a place for reformation?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:53 PM
1

I truly believe a healthy proportion of those serving long sentences would trade them for a lost hand. Prison generally isnt a nice place. 23 hours a day lockdown with a dozen other animals, rampant violence and rape, 2 hours a week yard. North Korea has some pretty rough labour campsm Im not sure they function well as a deterrent either.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:50 PM
1

Its unlikely. The Drug Wars been going on for 30 years or so. Drug use has remained stagnant despite insanely disproportionate punishmemts and like 45 million arrests. The deterrent thing really doesnt work. I really recommed doing some research on the subject.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:15 PM
3

Often criminals are victims of ridiculous laws, in the US certainly. Isnt there a maxim about judging a society on how it treats its prisoners...
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:02 PM
1

Always be very wary of any 90+% stat, in basically any context. Especially where essenentially a binary is concerned-- men/women. Rape stats, according to equitable surveys (that include forced to penetrate, the male equivalent) are relatively equal. Women commit more child abuse. Id love to see the source for murderers, because I couldnt find such data in the past. But yes of course men commit more murders and violent crime.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:36 AM
0

Farrell? Whatever man, I get his name wrong every time I type it into Youtube.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 05:28 PM
-6

Yeah. He comes across as a nutty zealot. Wish we had a Warren Ferrel.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 05:23 PM
1

Reading that story made me nauseous.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 11:08 AM
2

They are proportionate to their % of the population. You also neglect the fact that the laws themselves and the selective nature of police focus are fundamentally discriminatory, at best economically, at worst, racially. BLM is a sham because it's priorities are self-serving, wishy washy university SJW crap. Not real practical issues hitting black communities. Disproportionate poverty, unfair and ludicrous drug laws and punitive sentencing (as well as the 3 Strikes Law and the crack:cocainr sent…
/r/MensRights07/04/16 09:37 PM
2

Well. Shared parental custody as the default would liberate women to achieve organic workplace equality. They'd be earning more than men within a generation. But Feminists dont want this. They want to maintain their maternal privilege whilst receiving positive discrimination in the workplace.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:10 PM
1

Are there any stats on this? Maybe female teachers shoukd be taught not to rape...
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:02 PM
2

Not sure thats true. You inevitably have to support rhetoric with action. In the UK we have gender wage transparency legislation coming in, kn the back of this bogus political consensus.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:59 PM
1

Youve finally identified one sport women could actually excel in.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:06 PM
1

Just say you identify as a black woman midget.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:03 PM
-5

Thr videos defunct for me. Like I said, you have to compare and contrast that to the conditions of being in care for it to have any merit.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 08:14 PM
-3

She also encouraged him to seek help. They were the same age. In what way was he mentally ill and "vulnerable"? Because he was depressed? By that rationale, what, 1 in 5 people are mentally ill, "vulnerable" and therefore not fully responsible for their own actions? Do you not see that as a dangerous precedent to make? This case, IMO, a potential affront to both personal accountability and freedom of speech. I feel the same about this case as I do about hate speechlaws and anti terror bills. The…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:55 PM
2

I dont like cases like this. Male or female. They make mr very uneasy. I encourage you to junp off a bridge, you do so, Im culpable?
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:31 PM
-4

Because women usually have primary custody. Fathers need to challenge that when these women become criminals. Lets be honest, theres logic behind it. If thr only alternative is putting a kid into care. Its generally better for them and society that their parent get out sooner, or avoid a custodial sentence. Unless its a serious crime. But Id love to see the data around thr circumstances of those cases. Id expect theres usually anothef relative ready to step in, be it a Father or Grandparent. In …
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:28 PM
2

Suicide is gendered violence?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:25 AM
7

Ask her if she feels similarly about female sex toys. Do they instill in women unrealistic expectations that can transfer to male insecurity? Given that the average sizes and respective skills are far beyond the norm. Girls watch porn too. And males in porn are just as unrealistic in their attributes and performance. Also, most porn is infact amateur, and thus not bound by this nonsense. 12-17 is a REALLY wide bracket. I know first hand porn addiction is a real and destructive thing. But also th…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:12 AM
1

I CBA but Im sure someone with a brain and 5 mimutes to spare can decrypt those stats implying that women bear the brunt regarding dangerous jobs in the meat industry.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:53 PM
-1

I lol'd.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 08:42 PM
4

How the fuck do you even connote gender on ebay? I assume most users to be male unless they have an ovetly female username. And Id be more likely to trust a female, to be honest.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 08:04 PM
1

Education isnt about the bottom line. And yes, Im including extracurricular crap as part of the education experience.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:38 PM
1

Hate this woman but I dont see why they cancelled. Just 8 tickets? So what. Universities shouldnt be bowing to protest and unrest whatever the circumstance. They should be beacons of free speech and should go out of their way to expose students to all forms of ideas, including crappy feminist comedy. Just my opinion.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:02 PM
2

All publicity is good publicity, that truism should have been invented for Youtube. If youre a moderately attractive 20-30 female you can stick any crap on Youtube and get a million views. A privilege many guys would kill for.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:54 PM
1

Women have never been oppressed, theyve been infantalised.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:44 PM
7

Ask her how much shes being paid. Think the scene in Donnie Darko where Jim Cunningham is speaking. Just substitute fear for misogyny. https://youtu.be/wE3hXKdTmRs
/r/MensRights11/02/16 03:26 PM
1

Gran Torino's good. Its parellel with Walts actual sons is deeply sad though, if realistic. The scene where he calls his son in an attempt to connect with him is painful to watch. IIRC.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:32 PM
1

Oh. In which case I probably misinterpreted the intent of the scene then. ☺ Still, the movie as a whole depicts a strong Father/son relationship.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:29 PM
4

Some are fine, some are silly, some have a bizarre sense of focus and priorities. The old misandrist woman is distasteful.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:42 PM
9

No movement co opts a cause quite like Feminism.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:41 PM
0

Who told you that? This is just my personal view. But I view the family court situation as a mirror of the workplace, with the genders inverted. ie there is some bias, but its mostly choices and people internalising social norms and expectations. Over 90% of custody isnt decided by the courts. More men need to challenge the accepted fact of Motherly superiority. There was one study which concluded that when men do seek full custody, they get it more often than not. But of course there are certai…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 03:07 PM
1

Yeah, my bad, I half misread. If a custody agreement is in place it would be a bad move. But as it stands hes doing half the childcare and not getting credit for in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:49 PM
15

Id lovr to hear the Feminist view on the Farrah Whateverhernameis allegation specifically. I suspect it might undermine some of the "believe women at all costs" tack.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:12 PM
1

On top of your taxes? Sounds crazy. My top priority would be trykng to find the funds for a lawyer. And then looking into suing for either full or shared custody.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:06 PM
1

Blah de blah. All underpinned by motherhood and being primary caregiver. Marrying well is excellent advice IF you plan on having kids and want to stay at home.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:13 AM
1

Its a political consensus.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:33 AM
2

She claims he said he was 17. Why shouldnt she be entitled to a trial? Her story sounds as plausible as his.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:31 AM
0

Why are you paying child support if you have them half the time? Stop and put that cash towards a good lawyer.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:46 AM
1

Neato. I await the big budget Hollywood adaptation.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:41 PM
7

Oh, tampon tax has been a major issue in the UK for months now.Its at 5% and we cant even scrap it due to EU law, still its obviously a symptom of patriarchy. Its not like every area of womens health gets infinitely more funding than every area of mens health.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:53 PM
1

What the crap is a "private prosscution"?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:42 PM
1

Whatever the truth, I hope he sues that vile Farrah character for defamation.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 08:50 AM
4

No doubt theres truth in this But the whole "the police" are evil scum who victimise alleged victims all over again is at least somewhat exaggerated. In the UK, at least, conviction rates for rape are around 58%, and attrition rates are 12% (ie 12% of reported rapes end in convictions). The only stat which is unduly low is the actual reported rapes. Partly due to the scare mongering.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 08:49 AM
3

Is there a term/law for when feminists invoke the race analogy? If not, there should be. Its so flawed in so, so many ways.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:39 PM
4

Honestly, I dont get this. Lying is a criminal offence now? It sets a dangerous precedent. Surely you have to do due dilligence in such scenarios. Like buying a car "as is".
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:07 PM
2

Yes. He has MTV host good looks. Feminists largely projected all that other shit because they wanted to rationalise their baser desires.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:17 AM
7

The BBC coverage was worse. A meme containing poll stats about breastfeeding alongside their Facebook post. Like thats the main issue here. How about some stats on false accusations and subsequent prosecutions?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:11 PM
1

In the UK they've recently relaxed the laws/guidelines around Doctors dating patients. Is it a coincidence that it'coincided with women flooding into the profession? I cant imagine it occuring in the current climate if the profession was still male dominated. Those dastardly Doctors taking advantage of vulnerable patients!
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:40 PM
1

Sorry īf this is this is tangential, but I watched an excellent interview recently with David Simon where he was talking, partly, about the negative impact the internet has had on the quality of journalism. It concerned the fuck out of me. More free news means a lot of part time internet amateurs trying to do the jobs of professionals, and surviving papers even more beholden to private interest.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:36 PM
3

Fair point. I've seen it treated as a joke a lot though. Visit the IMDb board.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:20 PM
3

Deliverance might be the most famous example in cinema.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:17 PM
1

What of the income tax gap? The tax spend gap? The consumer spending gap? People need to stop seeing tax slavery as a privilege.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:00 PM
1

Who/where?
/r/MensRights02/12/15 05:20 AM
7

Why is nobody campaigning to change the insane setup whereby the police dont investigate these cases? Surely Feminism should be on top of that.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:03 PM
1

She probably still lives with her Mum. Women and men cant afford to move out until much later these days. That probably compounds the "human contact, omg!" infantilisation aspect.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:56 PM
3

Subjective. I agree that it was inappropriate/unprofessional. It doesnt say how much they interacted prior to that. But relationships are formed in work environments all the time. It's normal. Doctors are even allowed to date patients theyve treated now. So they guy chanced his arm, whats the problem? He wasnt a threat, he didnt say anything disrespectful. Exactly. Its sad that there seems to be a significant group of women unduly terrified of men, and likewise men terrified of approaching women…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:46 PM
3

"An assault between". Ive never heard that term before.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:47 AM
29

Whats amusing is that his deification was 90% based on his looks and sexual abilities.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:41 AM
3

3 now.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:33 AM
2

Aurora Snow's Daily Beast article is one of the better ones around.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:09 AM
5

Pay transparency within companies/industries. Hidden names on CVs Default shared child custody.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:53 PM
1

Enquiring about specific allegations of abuse or neglect are quite different from broadly asking which parent they prefer, IMO.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:34 AM
2

Because 12 year olds know what is best for them.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:06 AM
3

Can you give some examples? Or would that be poster-shaming?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:26 AM
1

The Mail get a lot of justifiable flak, but I actually find their articles more detailed and reasoned than most other papers. And I say this as a loony lefty.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:25 AM
4

Thanks. I thought my post looked incomplete.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 11:17 AM
4

Didnt have to scroll far to find comments speculating about the mothers problems and pressures.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:59 AM
109

I didnt know Twitter solved crimes.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 09:52 AM
3

It means that some homophobia and misogyny (of the feely feely kind) are more or equally important as black men mostly dying before 30, or being locked up for life for non violent drug offences.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 04:59 AM
3

Thanks. That page turned me decidedly against it. Warped SJW priorities incorporating every aspect of asinine University femlogic. Just look at their "Guiding Principles." The focus should be addressing the practical factors underpinning racial injustice. ie the insane War On Drugs, the prison industrial complex, primarily. Campaigning to dismantle the 3 Strikes Law, the crack:cocaine sentencing disparity, or promoting jury nullification should be high on the agenda. Itd be nice if the cops stop…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:37 AM
4

A homeopathic computer programmer, curious combo.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:45 AM
8

A gross and misleading oversimplification if you actually read the story.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:38 AM
1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3336286/Horrifying-moment-mother-dangled-child-window-shouting-Wacko-Jacko-Michael-Jackson-song-came-radio.html She got 16 weeks suspended.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:04 PM
1

Presumably she gets to continue working with kids as well?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 10:47 AM
1

Right? Who are all these men co-habiting with men? And what of children? They seldom seem to get included. In the UK, the age at which someone is most at risk of being killed is under 1.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 05:50 AM
0

Forgive me if there are strains of Feminism in this argument, but theres a power and accountability disparity, though, isnt there? When Police do shit, they inevitably get let off. When black men do shit they inevitably get punished ten fold.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 05:36 AM
2

Then he mitigated that by saying 50% of perpetrators against men were also men.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:18 AM
1

Angel's a fine show too. It's a taste thing. I feel like the characters and themes are stronger with Buffy.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:27 AM
7

Her characterisation of Milo is pretty on the money, in fairness. :)
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:20 AM
2

Firstly, good for her. Losing weight and getting healthy is fucking hard. But the whole slant of the story is odd. The comments on YT are as Feminism-unfriendly as you'd expect. But on Facebook many were characterising it as "abuse" With buzzterms like "emotional abuse" and "psychological abuse" being tossed around. One even called her a "survivor". Another loosely compared her to a "battered woman". Feeding someone is as good as a fist, evidently.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:19 AM
1

Buffys a great fucking show.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:44 AM
6

Credit too to the Feminist writer of the article for making an effort to be objective.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:40 AM
7

Wasnt it filmed?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 12:34 AM
1

Yeah. Pretty sure I remember a Guardian article arguing that James Caan was the villain in Misery.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:30 AM
1

Jo Brand in the UK is like a female throwback to working mens club types, lots of useless husband jokes.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:48 AM
1

I think you should read the sub-header. Which they also led with on Facebook. It just struck me as eye-catchingly ironic, given The Guardian's tendency to paint DV, and most issues, as solely womens issues-- often warping stats and facts to do so. A semantics thing, more than a content one, I suppose. I apologise, oh angry MRA archetype. Misleading titles can be aggravating.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:43 AM
1

Men should do the same with regard to Womens Shelters.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:16 AM
1

Heforshe!
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:55 AM
2

Id raise it with him 1 on 1. Be very polite. Ask him why he believes that. State your opinion. Politely enquire if you can present him with some contrary information and get his feedback. If hes amenable, fish out some studies, which are easy to find. Maybe mention the gender bias of the term rape, all studies which conclude women make up 90+% of victims I find, define rape as penetration. There was a great Reddit thread where male victims shared their horrid experiences, which Id consider inclu…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:42 AM
1

Are they impinging on their privacy? I can stand outside an abortion clinic or any medical facility or department and reliably speculate about peoples medical situations. Id aasume theyre also trying to dissuade the women from aborting. It obviously serves a purpose to target such places beyond just being an asshole. Similarly, anti war protesters targeted the draft offices where young men were being drafted in the 60s. Often successfully convincing them to conscientiously object.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:40 AM
2

I find this concerning. How physically vulnerable are pregnant women, and how often is the line crossed? The measures in the article seem pretty sensible, but what caveats aren't mentioned?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:47 AM
1

This will also tackle racial discrimination, wont it? Which is much more prevalent.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:48 AM
1

Nor the accompanying 'facts' box.Bad facts and outright myths.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:05 PM
16

Hit with an anti-violence sign. Nice.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:02 PM
1

This one has little to do with Feminism. Just another Blairite desperate to oust Corbyn. Corbyn installs 50/50 cabinet, gets labelled a sexist. Trudeau does the same and is lauded. On top of which most of the women ruled themselves out of serving in his cabinet, including the two leadership contenders.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:48 AM
1

Hes probably talking about spree/rampage/mass killings. ie people who go nuts with a gun for no discernible reason. In which case hes probably correct.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:34 AM
2

Yes. Just to surmise, a woman had 20 convictions for assault, including 6 on cops. After all that she ultimately got a prison sentence for sending online abuse to a Feminist. You couldnt make this shit up.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:03 PM
1

Firstly, the Telegraph is a Tory rag, and, like most, it attacks Corbyn for simply existing. Here's a fuller story: http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/jeremy-corbyn-visits-liverpool-calls-10392802 that doesn't crop off the attacks on Tory cuts, which have led to countless suicides. I don't like the demonising language either. But "speaking out" is a part of the solution Whether it be seeking professional help, speaking to family and friends/establishing a better support structure…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:03 PM
2

Another: Guys VS Girls Rejection Experiment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmP1ier3R30 Be interesting to examine the other side of the "street harassment" debate. Wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:31 PM
11

More positive discrimination crap. The primary thing "holding women back" is the fact they get custody of the kids more often. Deal with the root causes. Make shared custody the default. Introduce more wage transparency (not selective "median gender earnings" crap) across the board, so everybody who feels aggrieved can challenge their employer.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:10 PM
1

TBH a little historical positive discrimination doesnt bother me.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter