TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rushawa20 Archive

View 0 posts and 85 comments by rushawa20 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We know that black and white people commit crimes at the same rates Sure, but can you show something that actually shows this to be true?
/r/MensRights15/03/21 06:14 PM
1

We know that black and white people commit crimes at the same rates but black people and neighborhoods are overpoliced which explains the overwhelming incarceration of people of color. Er, no, that's not right at all. But academics have noted that the proportion of black suspects arrested by the police tends to match closely the proportion of offenders identified as black by victims in the National Crime Victimization Survey. This doesn’t support the idea that the police are unfairly discriminat…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 01:14 PM
1

You presumably know how to read. Read it yourself.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 07:58 PM
1

Not everyone is from the USA.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 12:44 PM
6

Oh well if you doubt it, there we go. That's definitely more valid than the actual, cited methodology these people used! /s You're the problem with discourse today. You have an idea in your head, and you're willing to dismiss out of hand anything that disagrees with it, and when those dismissals are countered with further evidence, you fall back on "I doubt it".
/r/MensRights30/09/20 11:24 AM
18

99% of men had no voting rights or any rights at all for the vast majority of human history. Men got suffrage slightly before women, they were hardly some all-powerful beings, their life was still shit.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 11:01 AM
1

He is probably British, Australian, Canadian, Indian, or any other commonwealth or ex commonwealth country where they spell it defence. Quite ignorant of you not to know that.
/r/askTRP03/02/20 02:12 PM
3

Who cares? Why are Americans so obsessed with the military.
/r/askTRP11/12/19 10:44 AM
1

Idiot who has bought into memes done by roided up YouTubers. His legs are proportional to his upper body.
/r/askTRP15/07/19 01:02 PM
1

Delusional.
/r/askTRP15/05/19 11:26 AM
3

You think he hasn't taken tens of thousands of dollars worth of drugs to enhance his aesthetics? Oh dear, I didn't realise people's perceptions were this far out of whack.
/r/askTRP15/05/19 11:20 AM
3

So give a precise example of what he could say back.
/r/askTRP15/05/19 11:16 AM
1

What's funny about that?
/r/askTRP15/05/19 10:52 AM
2

It's meant to be 20% of the guys have 80% of the sex - not having sex with 80% of women.
/r/askTRP14/03/19 06:49 PM
1

What's wrong with it? "To be condescended to" is correct, is it not? It's just rarely heard.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:16 AM
6

Sound like you migrated from /r/incels after it got banned.
/r/askTRP02/12/17 09:15 PM
9

Because to do otherwise is to presume guilt on the other party, and that's not the legal standard anywhere in the developed world operates from. You start from doubt, and prove that doubt wrong.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:19 PM
5

The cameras are owned privately for the most part. Not by the government.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/17 08:55 AM
1

I'm not against circumcision any more than I am against infants having their ears clipped or having tattoos put onto them. It's just that only one of these is actually a thing.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:54 PM
3

That's actually kind of hilarious.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 08:15 AM
6

Not a very good point. If parents began having their children's ears clipped like a dog might have, or tattooing their infants or having breast implants done on their children to improve their aesthetics, I would protest against that too. Simply because it's your own child doesn't mean that it's your property that you can do with as you wish, if what you want is harmful to the child (or simply medically unnecessary) then such decisions should be taken into the hands of the law and made illegal, …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:32 AM
3

Found the American.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:28 AM
5

What a strange argument. Are you not supposed to be worried about children?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:26 AM
5

Good job, because if you weren't happy, like many people aren't, then there would be absolutely nothing you could do about it.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:25 AM
2

And if someone else in your position DID prefer his dick to be in its natural state, that's just too bad for him right?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:23 AM
2

All your argument boils down to is "me me me". Who gives a shit what some random dude like you feels about his own circumcision. The point is can you justify cutting off parts of a baby ethically? Can you clip their ears? Should you be allowed to tattoo them or give them breast implants? It's a question of morality and your personal view that you're fine with it is completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:20 AM
3

Good for you, how about the people who aren't glad about it?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:17 AM
2

More like surgically removing their earlobes because you prefer the look.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:16 AM
2

I suppose the Americans ITT aren't equally judgmental about female circumcision, right?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:15 AM
12

There's nothing hamstring about optimising your body for a sport you are good at. A really good bouldering athlete isn't going to want to get huge legs as it will just make him worse at the sport.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/17 08:56 PM
6

American Beauty is a pretty good one, of a guy 'waking up'.
/r/askTRP03/10/16 08:57 PM
1

My dad got braces at about 45 years old. You can definitely do it.
/r/askTRP29/08/16 10:21 AM
1

People would treat you better if you smelled nicely than if you stank of shit. Why resent them for that? Being fat is almost as offputting as a foul smell, if not equally offputting to many men and women who value their health and body highly.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/16 02:29 PM
1

Yeah, most of europe uses a civil law system and it works fine, within its limitations. The UK has also being using a common law system (like the US) for centuries, as has most of the commonwealth, and that is working fine too. Both systems have their positives and negatives. A law doesn't necessarily have to be absurd or unfair to lead to an absurd or unfair outcome, particularly when new technologies develop or situations arise that the the lawmakers couldn't have predicted. There are plenty o…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:50 PM
1

For another example, read up on the constitution of the United Kingdom. Unlike the US, there is no one written document which you can call "the constitution". However, it still obviously has very strict rules and hierarchy in terms of constitutional structure, but the rules are a collection or body of works ranging from important legal scholar's works from a long time ago, to royal decrees, to statutes, to accepted interpretations of leading academics. You might say it's "imaginary" but if there…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:40 PM
1

There are limits on how flexible they can be, and a strict system of hierarchy, which is often why a lower court will uphold what is a seemingly ludicrous decision. So they might be forced to award a ridiculous amount of damages in a clearly bogus claim because their hands are tied by the previous case law, and it's only on appeal where the court would have the authority to change the outcome. It has the benefit of being fairer in the sense that in the real world, it's very hard to make a sweepi…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:33 PM
2

The vast majority of law isn't in legislation though. That's what I'm saying. There is undoubtedly legislation regarding prenups but it is useless without understanding the current prevalent interpretation of it, as well as competing interpretations and the nuances of when they are to be applied, as well as defences and circumstances which change how they are applied. The judges don't open a big book called 'the law' and apply it, there is nothing to show you in black and white. The judgments th…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 01:19 PM
3

If you're from the US it's a common law system where asking for "the specific law and paragraph" makes zero sense, unless you are asking about a specific piece of legislation. The majority of the law comes from strings of entwined and related jurisprudence created when high court judgments are made. You would have to look at the facts of the case and how closely they relate to similar cases where judgments were made, what the dissenting opinions were, the obstacles to the legal opinion, any rele…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 11:09 AM
3

Anyone got an archive link for this?
/r/TheRedPill19/04/16 10:37 AM
1

Exactly, in practice being stoic just means that if you are told some bad news you don't start hyperventilating or crying, or outwardly panicking like a child would, and conversely that you don't start screaming at the top of your lungs like a girl if you win something or get some good news. Besides from that, you can still be a happy person. It makes me laugh, the people who interpret it as that you are supposed to be some sort of granite-faced statue who never breaks his expression, if you eve…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 01:17 PM
8

Are you sure typing like a 13 year old is a good idea?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 03:52 PM
3

That's nice and all, but it's nothing to do with the writing being casual or formal, nor am I saying 'to each his own'. I'm not saying it's a value judgement in terms of 'do whatever makes you feel happy', it's simply that the many authoritative sources are split on the issue. Sure, the Strunk and White guidelines are to always use apostrophe S, however these guidelines (despite being influential) are not commandments as you say. There are many other manuals of style and it's not possible to say…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 02:55 PM
8

As you say, when it's a singular noun ending in an S it's stylistic- however most sources I have read recommend that you only add an apostrophe (and not an S) if adding both makes the word cumbersome. For example, it would be "Odysseus's cruelty", but not "Achilles's heel". This can depend on your region and accent, however from my region it would most certainly be Buckets' and not Buckets's, unless of course you like sounding like Smeagol.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 09:37 AM
15

And if 0.001% of the world's population gave me a dollar, I'd have 7 million dollars. In my opinion looking at huge numbers like that and assuming that it will be attainable to get 0.5% or whatever number of it isn't the right approach. Why not focus on getting 1 user. Then 10, then 100. Then you can project growth figures from that, not infer them from some random company.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 02:01 PM
3

Some people aren't too bad. For example NA CS player Freakazoid, popular CS:GO team, incredibly muscular, confident, and good looking. High salary to travel the world and play a game, sponsorships, tens of thousands of fans on twitter and twitch. In time, I suspect more and more will be like this, simply because like with anything in life, being a shy awkward nerd isn't marketable. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=freakazoid+csgo&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJ_bWIntHJAhXC1hQKHQs_AFgQ_A…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/15 11:54 AM
1

But I mean in terms of body, being top 10% in size isn't equivalent to being top 10% in desirability in my experience, then again I've never been as big as you so maybe you know different.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 05:39 PM
1

You're much stronger and bigger than him but not necessarily more attractive. Size really isn't everything.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 04:42 PM
5

That reply isn't really a troll, just sounds like an insecure bitch. Silence and move on.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/15 08:15 AM
1

It depends on your grip width and body morphology. For taller guys using a standard grip, especially if they don't have a large chest/ribcage, touching the bar to your chest can make your elbows go very far behind your back and really strain your shoulders. With others, touching the bar to the chest is fine.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 11:18 PM
0

If you're a rather tall dude and don't have a very wide grip, touching your chest can tear your pec and strain your shoulders, and I'm not saying that to be a pussy, it's just a matter of morphology.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 11:16 PM
2

Just say something simple like "what you decide to do about those guys is completely up to you." or "what you do is your choice". Something like that. Don't elaborate.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 11:42 PM
6

Both, but you should never neglect your body. Your body is you. You think of it as separate to your 'self', which you see as a kind of entity that resides in your brain, but you amount to little more than a biological organism. It makes NO sense not to try to optimise the condition of your body since it is literally everything you are.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 02:16 AM
2

Yes, of course the same thing. Dating can suck when you're younger for a guy, especially when you're 18-21 as you're unlikely to have things women desire: money, confidence, status. That doesn't mean you should assume that it will get easier though, but it definitely will if you put in the work.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 02:15 AM
22

It won't be magical, you'll have to work for it. But presumably you're on TRP for self improvement. If your career is progressing nicely and you keep your body healthy + in shape, then when you're 32, with a nice body, good hygiene, fashion sense, a good income, house, car, etc.. you can imagine it won't be that difficult to date a 24 year old hottie. However, a 32 year old woman with those traits is not guaranteed to snag a 24 year old toyboy hottie. I mean, they might sleep with her, but they …
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 11:50 PM
3

You did well apart from when she asked why she couldn't sleep over, you should have said something like "I don't share my bed without getting something in return", given her a moment to process that, then depending on her response (shocked but positive) aggressively kissed her and escalated, or (shocked and horrified) shut the door and soft-next until she starts texting you.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 02:03 PM
2

All I'm saying is that Germany in particular has notable restrictions on free speech regarding issues that have happened in their countries history. Similarly, the US has serious restrictions on free speech to do with issues that have happened in their recent history. They just happen to be different issues. Other European countries have other such restrictions, such as the UK being particularly sensitive to 'racial hatred' speech with its large Muslim population.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 09:28 PM
5

In Germany, the issues of nationalism and racism are particularly sensitive. In the US, terrorism is a particularly sensitive issue. Bearing in mind recent history, both of these stances are understandable. As such, while you may be able to make racial statements more freely in the US than Germany, I highly doubt you would be able to get away with anything relating to terrorism nearly as easily. (source: http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-11-14/speech-isn-t-free-when-terrorists-are-invol…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 09:04 PM
2

I've jerked off 7 times today, and my voice sounds like I have inhaled helium. Am I doing nofap right?
/r/askTRP07/11/14 06:54 PM
1

As I mentioned in a further comment, it is a right that is balanced against other fundamental rights. Similar restrictions apply in the US.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 06:50 PM
8

Some of the rights in the ECHR are absolute. Some are qualified. This one is qualified, by being balanced against the other rights contained in the convention. Freedom of expression does not supercede the right to liberty and security of person, nor the right to freedom of religion and private life. Political speech is the most highly protected form of speech, while things like incitement to voilence are not protected. That doesn't mean there isn't a right to freedom of expression, on the contra…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 05:40 PM
1

Yes, that's a really obscure part of Land/property law called the 'right to light'. Being such an old country, and with land being permanent, our land law is a really strange amalgam of hundereds of year old principles mixed with modern statute. It can get messy...
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 03:56 PM
1

You said it yourself. The sale is over. In UK contract law, price tags and displays are seen legally only as an 'invitation to treat', meaning negotiate or open the contract. The price tags themselves are not seen as forming a binding part of a contract, as a contract needs to be agreed upon by both parties, whereas a price tag is visible to anyone who is passing by. It's wrong to say that every single person who sees the price tag is contracted to buy the item, similarly the store is not under …
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 03:26 PM
21

Any country signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights guarantees its citizens the right to freedom of expression, including speech.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/14 03:17 PM
1

My country is not far behind the US buddy. Unfortunately, the OP didn't say "top 1% of people who live near ConfidenceMatters who are also between 16-35 and into sports". He didn't say top 1% of people in New York. He said top 1%, most likely meaning the top 1% of everyone in the country, or even the world. I'm assuming the sample will include a diverse amount of body types, because that's how representative sampling works. If 3/4 people are overweight and obese in a country, a representative sa…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 07:02 PM
1

I guess our perceptions differ. To me, if you sit in a huge airport, seeing average people of many nationalities coming through, it would be rare to find even a single dude with visible abs. Thats my experience, anyway. I get the feeling you're thinking from experience, and imagining 100 fairly lean young men, when in reality 100 people will include everyone. What is the obesity rate in the US now, 30%? 40%? I can't remember the statistics, but that immediately eliminates 30-40/100 people. Then …
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 06:22 PM
2

I don't even live in the US. The point is, if you're sampling 100 people, why would there be high school kids everywhere? A high school kid makes up a small proportion of the population, and even then, it's not like all high school kids are fitness athletes. Go into the middle of any major city worldwide, and sit in a train station or a coffee shop. Count 100 people who walk past. Also count how many of them are fitter than this guy. Do it 10 times. Notice how few normal people are actually fit.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 05:48 PM
3

He will have the best body out of 100 people you find in the street nearly every time.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 12:17 PM
4

Actually, Scandinavians and those of Scandinavians descent aren't.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 03:24 AM
4

She kissed a guy she claims isn't her type, just because he flirted with her. Now imagine someone who was her type, and who was very persistent and alpha. You seriously think she would stay faithful?
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 05:18 PM
2

Hey, there are different timezones man! :D
/r/askTRP28/09/14 01:46 PM
2

Well then you just make up your own mind about it, take your time. Once you've decided, if you do, then just meet her, take the lead, maybe involve a few glasses of wine, and she'll hamster that the sex 'just happened' etc etc... If you don't, just cut her loose permanently.
/r/askTRP26/09/14 10:23 PM
1

To be fair, whilst I'm sure your disease sucked and right now you look a little bit too skeletal, you're at the perfect level of body fat and weight to begin a clean bulk. Figure out your TDEE (http://thefastdiet.co.uk/how-many-calories-on-a-non-fast-day/), download an app to record your food intake, and +200-300 kcalories onto your TDEE. Monitor your weight. If after 1 month you have not seen any weight gain, + another 2-300 kcals. All this at the same time as getting 1g of protein per lb of bo…
/r/askTRP25/09/14 03:56 PM
0

You could be right. Actually, the way I intended that to mean is somewhat lost in text. I meant it as "oh yes, I'm horny... and an awful lot more ;)". The way it came across in my sentence is a whining self-justification. So, don't take my advice on this one!
/r/askTRP22/09/14 05:59 PM
1

If you objectively look at what she's done, you must admit to yourself that it's irrational to 'love' her. Females are ruled by emotions, men are ruled by logic. At least, they strive to be. Sure, it hurts, but it will hurt a lot less when you're inside of a beautiful girl who is also not a sociopath without empathy. What you need to do is rid yourself of your feelings for this girl, whatever it takes. Do you need to cut contact? Do it. Do you need to be mean to her? Do it. After the feelings ha…
/r/askTRP22/09/14 04:52 PM
-4

"I'm much more than just that."
/r/askTRP22/09/14 04:48 PM
1

Being a jerk isn't alpha. Not necessarily anyway. The difference is are you doing what you're doing for YOU, or for someone else? Do you like the girl enough to want to pull her chair out, open the door for her, comfort her? If you do, then do it. If you feel obligated to her by her, by society, or by anyone else, that is beta. And therein lies the fundamental TRP distinction. Remember, TRP is not a bulletpointed list of appropriate actions. There can be hundreds of different RP/alpha responses …
/r/askTRP22/09/14 04:20 PM
3

*illegible :) Think you were getting confused with 'ineligible', just a heads up.
/r/askTRP22/09/14 04:16 PM
1

Agreed, then again I can't see the appeal behind scat play or watersports, yet it's somewhat common. Sexuality is highly complex, I suppose.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 06:01 PM
6

I found this comment from a RPW. "Longer answer: I'm dating a guy who is into pegging. I never thought I would be. I consider myself submissive. Why does it work? It's hard to explain but I can tell you this. He's very secure, dominates his work environment, doesn't ask me for validation, exudes confidence, and is inspiring to me. He's very red pill. When I met him I wasn't looking for anything serious, but he's magnetic. I'm not becoming someone I'm not because of him, but I am constantly tryin…
/r/askTRP06/05/14 10:22 AM
2

I agree with this. Therefore, what do you think is my best course of action?
/r/askTRP06/05/14 10:19 AM
2

I had a look but didn't see those threads. I'll find them, they sound relevant. Thanks.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 10:19 AM
9

This is why I like the binary system I saw someone mention in another thread- there aren't 1-10s. There are simply 1s and 0s. 1s being girls you will fuck, 0s being girls you won't. This way, no matter how attractive a girl, you treat her the same as if she were only just passably attractive to you, reducing pedastaling.
/r/askTRP04/03/14 08:20 AM
9

Hand holding isn't beta. Being her bitch is beta. I'm sure you're versed enough in RP knowledge to know about amused mastery, treating women as children, and a woman's desire to be led. Taking a woman's hand with initiative and purpose, or giving her a cuddle, or opening a door for her is not necessarily a beta move, so long as you aren't doing it for fear of losing her.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 11:12 AM
3

They are attempting to branch-swing, with you being the new branch. Have a high-enough value and they may just release their current vine and swing on yours for a while.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 11:07 AM
3

Read the links in the sidebar, and understand that it is not a binary thing. It's not like you will one day suddenly flip a switch and become "alpha". It's a sliding scale, and rigorous self-improvement, research, and experimentation will assist you on your journey towards the end of the spectrum that you desire.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 11:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter