~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | This had my stomach hurting for the longest.🤣🤣🤣He forgot to add "Not" in the beggining of the statement. Then I agree. | /r/MGTOW | 13/06/20 11:01 AM |
| 1 | The People's Army warns the western corrupt elitesChina is the boogieman, the scapegoat to satanic freemasonry generalized corruption in the west. | /r/MGTOW | 11/06/20 05:47 PM |
| 4 | As a 19 year old, I need help.Never marry someone until dating them for atleast 3 years. Wrong answer. Don't get married under the current laws, it's just a covert move for unscrupulous women to loot your assets before marriage and during marriage. The current feminazi laws are bad, especially in the west. You're going to have a marriage of appearances where you are made the clown from the start and where things can quickly go south. She will likely cheat on you when she feels like it, hide it from you while pretending to lo… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/20 10:28 AM |
| 2 | Meet Karen!#HelpKaren "You Go Girl" | /r/MGTOW | 09/06/20 10:32 PM |
| 1 | Satanic hypocritesThe answer was not for you but for NordicYorgi. | /r/MGTOW | 08/06/20 11:23 AM |
| 0 | Satanic hypocritesBut leave Satan and Christ out of it. They’re old Abrahamic philosophies and have nothing to do with the modern day. You are very foolish to think of Abrahamic origins and traditions as old dust with no application in the present times, especially in such deviant, narcissist, hypocrite societies who worship decadence and dare to fool God. Read the scriptures in order to understand the concept behind Abraham's teachings, in them will find out that you cannot befriend God and the Devil, as the ind… | /r/MGTOW | 06/06/20 10:55 PM |
| 5 | Satanic hypocritesI had a post just like this on /r Christians, they banned it under the satanic censorship argument of "conspiracy theory". If you can't debate the content all these influencers are allowed to spread, it's dictatorship . These scoundrel satanists all follow fascist agendas, they meet with satanic people behind closed doors on undisclosed location, perform satanic rituals away from the public eye (group sex, orgies, ceremonial sex rituals) , win contracts, fame, assets or money in exchange for bei… | /r/MGTOW | 06/06/20 04:53 PM |
| 2 | HmmmmmPiece of hypocrite scum. | /r/MGTOW | 03/06/20 08:52 PM |
| 1 | Every life mattersPeople need to realize that you are liable for your conduct and public statements as an individual. Mob context cannot by any means exempt you from accountability. If a legal adult, under full consent, decides to jump into a hatred wave bandwagon and later claims he didn't knew it was hateful, or he thinks he's unaccountable or less accountable for his conduct because others are doing it, he's still liable for criminal conduct. People claim what's convenient to them, and this is why we don't bel… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/20 01:15 PM |
| 0 | Do you ever wonder why beautiful people seem to have the "right" to hate or dismiss you without your regard?Assert yourself, have yourself respected by the people you have to interact with on a daily basis and let them know you'll go after them in case they feel entitled to harass you. | /r/MensRights | 03/06/20 09:45 AM |
| 0 | Every life mattersIf as you said it, it's true why should any person in good faith listen to hypocrite scumbags making racist accusations? What kind of hidden agenda all these trolls are not telling? Have you noticed how all celebrities following satanic sects are all rallying under the hatred wave of violence. Some do it for money, to receive gifts or be awarded some kind of benefit career or socially. I tell you, you either act firmly against those entitled cunts who play the victim card and side with this wave… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/20 11:40 PM |
| 3 | Found out about a new show today so...Delusion. Hypocrisy. Self denial. Film made by delusional lobbyists for an even more delusional audience. Calling men stupid and thinking it's ok. It's not going to happen. | /r/MGTOW | 27/05/20 10:41 AM |
| 1 | A woman learning the consequences of inventing accusations. Invented defamation should not be tolerated, it undermines the credibility of any accusation.Lock her up or... give her a rope! | /r/MensRights | 26/05/20 08:26 PM |
| 6 | I am so sick of reading about how my sex is the worst thing that ever happened to modern societyI'm sorry for the men in Europe, what you refer is also taking place through similar manners in others parts of Europe. This is a globalist agenda, artificial and satanic and it comes from corrupt corporate leadership, feminist hate groups and allied corrupt politicians. Men are being silenced under gynocentric laws, feminist political parties and complicit women refusing to take an active stance against all the gross abuses, discrimination and segregation practises towards men. You should speak… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/20 06:02 PM |
| 1 | Women have lost credibilityIt's westernized in origin, coming from feminist movements, corrupt politicians, dirty sex cults and their secret societies, not forgetting corrupt gynocentric corporate leadership. All these are behind the globalist degeneracy agenda forced into other cultures. And the millions of women who went along with this agenda? Anything but innocent. | /r/MGTOW | 26/05/20 05:37 PM |
| 3 | Women have lost credibilityNot all "men". Some even know far well about this yet they still take the blue pill. They don't do it because of innocent ignorance. They generally do it for social convenience reasons, to «look well» and «fit in» in the group and attempt to get benefits, status, keep reputation in their jobs, or promotion within a social group. Those "men" obviously serve gynocentrism and they're criminals. | /r/MGTOW | 26/05/20 03:47 PM |
| 1 | The Unicorn Strikes Back (Part plus infinite plus one)Are you reading this reply Sir? Just want to confirm one thing | /r/MGTOW | 25/05/20 06:41 PM |
| 1 | The Unicorn Strikes Back (Part plus infinite plus one)I voted No. You don't marry sluts. | /r/MGTOW | 25/05/20 06:22 PM |
| 2 | Feminist claims the virus isn't killing men fast enough, then plays the victim when called out.I don't see any provision in Australian laws stating women are unaccountable for criminal conduct or when engaging in credible threat of violence. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 05:55 PM |
| 2 | Should clenintine Ford be put in jail for encouraging violence and genocide against menI beleive there are legal challenges being put forward on this subject. Challenges in the hundreds of thousands of cases, perhaps millions considering the biased corporate policing taking place since online social networks began operating. The moral damages are there. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 11:35 AM |
| 313 | Feminist claims the virus isn't killing men fast enough, then plays the victim when called out.Should be more than enough ground for the mother to lose custody over the kid immediately. If she supports the killing of men, she can kill her own son. What kind of court and atorneys could allow such criminal scoundrel to threaten a child? | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 11:26 AM |
| 1 | Prison for hate speech against menYou don't know me from anywhere and you dare come slander me free of charges, making free hate statements out of nowhere. Wrong move pal. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 11:16 AM |
| 2 | Marriage withdrawal: the hidden reasons hypocrite corrupt societies refuse to uncoverFree sex is what Chad gets Flashline. There is no such thing as free sex. Eventually "Chads" are too delusional, arrogant and blind to see that they're actually paying for the "free sex" they claim to get. It's not free, if you have to give your time and energy to futile pursuits like sex or sex cravings, no different than an addicted junkie. How important is the word sex in your daily life, how often you have thoughts leading to sex? If sex is a constant in your thoughts more often than not and… | /r/MGTOW | 25/05/20 10:58 AM |
| 2 | Prison for hate speech against menI too am against indiscriminate violence. This means I am against indiscriminate violence and incitement of hatred towards men, based on sexist hatred under fascist banners. I just say men cannot trust a society that publicly says it is against violence but sees no problem in shaming, mocking or threatening men because said society is in the mood of it. It is here I advocate the inalienable right for men to exercise their self defense in case of any acts of agression, should they be placed in su… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 09:33 AM |
| 0 | Prison for hate speech against menLook at what happened to jews in Germany between 1930's and 1940's. Hate was allowed to go rampant in the then Weimar Republic, because the powers complicitly remained neutral to the wave of undiscriminate hatred from the fascist movements. Needless to say where that neutrality led. Persecutions, public shaming of jews, crystal night, forbidding marriage between jews and non jews, forbidding the exercise of professions to jews, confiscating property from jews, enprisonment and indiscriminate act… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 09:23 AM |
| -8 | Prison for hate speech against menCF's hate speech here looks to me a very earth practical problem. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:44 PM |
| -1 | Prison for hate speech against menYou are doing far more harm than good here. Passive agressive tactics, bullying individuals with the intent to expel them. Blocked for inciting hatred towards individuals. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:40 PM |
| -1 | Prison for hate speech against menI don't see any. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:37 PM |
| -1 | Prison for hate speech against menPassive agressive reply, completely ignoring the fact that Clementine Ford should face charges for bearing of criminal conduct. Blocked for calling me an idiot and thinking I'm too stupid to see it. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:34 PM |
| -7 | Prison for hate speech against menTrue, explains why there isn't any free parking. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:28 PM |
| 2 | College class teaching false statisticsIn that case, keep your scepticism on that data to yourself without making any open statement. At least not before you got some evidence to back your claim. :) | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:26 PM |
| -21 | Clementine Ford's apology is awfulThat's free speech violation, message the admins for that. Technically it's possible to sue them for free speech violation in their forums, when censoring free speech is done on arbitrary grounds, without credible threat of violence or incitment to exercise criminal conduct. At the same time, I think it may be possible to file a lawsuit requesting a provision for the immediate closure of any public /r/ rooms and making their admins liable wherever there is incitement of hate speech or criminal c… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 06:20 PM |
| 8 | College class teaching false statisticsFirst gather some data, and only then force the professor to discuss these statistics but publicly and in open class. Avoid confronting him alone one-on-one over this issue in case other students are not present. I suspect your professor knows the statistics he says are made up and that he is using his teacher position to influence students on false data. At the right point in class, speak clearly with your data and then confront the professor on the statement over where he said "90% of crimes a… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 05:56 PM |
| 3 | Prison for hate speech against menAre we afraid of standing for ourselves or do we need to ask permission from the feminists who opress us? The moment men stop defending their person against the threat of others is the moment they accept living in tyranny. I say every man has an obligation to fight against bigotry. For every sub banned three more will appear. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 05:34 PM |
| 85 | Clementine Ford's apology is awfulBesides being a pathetic apology, it only shows she is just putting an unsincere apology, to just look good. She doesn't mean it, she shows no remorse for her criminal conduct (I still stand 100% of my fury against men), thus she clearly shows she is willing to continue inciting violence towards men. You can't state a malicious version of "kill all men", disguised as a "coronavirus isn't killing men fast enough" and expect this to be taken as a joke. You can't commit a hate crime and then just s… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 05:30 PM |
| 11 | Ever wonder how feminists as vile as Clementine Ford get away with so much hate speech year after year? The support of politicians like Footscray's Katie Hall, that's how.To hell with them. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 04:57 PM |
| 11 | Ever wonder how feminists as vile as Clementine Ford get away with so much hate speech year after year? The support of politicians like Footscray's Katie Hall, that's how.Sack her immediately or the Australian Labour Party will be deemed an accomplice in this hate speech against men. This Katie must be accountable for supporting hate speech as well. Here is what I found on Wiki Kathryn Ann Hall is an Australian politician. She has been a Labor Party) member of the Victorian Legislative Assembly since November 2018, representing the seat of Footscray. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 04:55 PM |
| 8 | Ever wonder how feminists as vile as Clementine Ford get away with so much hate speech year after year? The support of politicians like Footscray's Katie Hall, that's how.Sack her and sue her. Supporting hate speech is a crime for everyone, especially if you're member of parliament. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/20 04:49 PM |
| 1 | Not sure if this is a repost but going to a shithole in the Middle East with a select group of pricks trying to kill you isn’t grounds for your wife to fuck other guys and the notion that you would then have to support that kid is fuckedPaternity fraud is a crime. Mandatory paternity testing upon birth, the only way to stop it. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/20 11:34 PM |
| 39 | Clementine Ford is awfulHate speech. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/20 08:44 PM |
| 102 | Vegan Café that charges men higher tax is closed down.No respect, no stupid customer. No stupid customer, no smart business. Guess who's stupid now. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/20 04:17 PM |
| 19 | Tinder Experiment, a women in men's shoes; interesting, i think some incel-haters must see this. She survived a week but clearly pointed out some suffering.When an algorithm or a series of algorithms decide who you're worthy to date, match or message, not only you're not playing under fair rules, you're playing in the most rigged casino. The solution is to not play a game where you have already been previoulsy decided as the loser. The solution for men is this: 1- Don't use dating apps. In case you want to date online, do not use them. 2- Boycott dating apps (Tinder, Bumbles, etc.,). In some of these apps, men can only start to message women only i… | /r/MensRights | 21/05/20 07:42 PM |
| 1 | Women participation in MRAWithout changing my view on the issue, this is the only thing I need to correct. If 1% of women refuse to side with the sheeple heard view of the 99% others, the idea that women don't care about men becomes a fallacy. That is all. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/20 09:42 AM |
| 2 | Women participation in MRAIn group bias, doesn't mean I allow myself to fall for it. I'm not a hive bee or a toddler looking for excuses. I'm supposed to be an adult conscious of what he's doing and not dodging responsibility for my actions to others. It's called being accountable. As an adult, I don't need the group herd to tell me what's right, it should be my responsibility to figure that out for myself. Wrong is wrong, especially if there are people doing it. There's no possible sugar-coating on that. To my knowledge… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/20 05:24 PM |
| 1 | Women participation in MRAIndeed, much well said. Thank you ma'am. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/20 05:02 PM |
| 1 | Women participation in MRAThe bigotry of double standarts and those who practise them is unacceptable, definitely to be shamed upon. Thank you for your view. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/20 05:00 PM |
| 3 | Women participation in MRAI guess it's fair to call you a lady. Thank you for your insight. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/20 04:54 PM |
| 3 | Women participation in MRAVery powerful story there. Much respect, I wish the best. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/20 04:51 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudLooks good to me. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/20 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudNow, within this frame, I can adequately reply the questions. If in the previous case, a man can be socially (or legally) ostracised for demanding a paternity test, is it not possible in this case that he faces the same consequences for not wanting to be part of the child's life As a rule, the father has a first line obligation in providing the adequate moral, financial and educational suport for the wellness and upbringing of his own children. This can not be an optional responsibility subject … | /r/MensRights | 19/05/20 12:35 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudThank you for your questions. They raise interesting matters so I will have to elaborate on the issue before coming to your points. I will separate this answer on more posts, due to character limit (which is not a good idea in what concerns this legal subject) Considering the interest of the child, which is the fundamental criterion all legal officers, lawmakers, responsible parent-minded, and communities need to account for, I advocate that such decisions could only be made after delivering mor… | /r/MensRights | 19/05/20 12:35 PM |
| 1 | US Presidential Campaign - Men's rightsI'm not surprised, it's as I thought. For me and I've had this view for quite some time, the democrats don't care for Men, unless it's to attack them further under increased bias, discrimination or legal tools. Democrats are up to no good and I don't like it, enough said. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/20 09:30 AM |
| 2 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudThat's three insults you are calling me. Mental scyzophrenic, conspiracy theorist and sovereign convinced? Those three names would be enough for me to go after you with no mercy. We are online, so you're lucky I just block you here. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/20 08:58 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudExacty, as you well said it is a matter of individual choice, thus it necessarily requires that the relevant parties posess all applicable information, which, if it were not present, fully informed consent could not be obtained. In the situation where individuals would be forced to make choices based on absence of critical data, or worse if such information would be purposely or negiglently concealed from them, this would amount to ill consent, depriving the individual of the effective ability t… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/20 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudYou dare come here making free mental health accusations ? This is the definition of Apophenia on Wikipedia, (/æpoʊˈfiːniə/) is the tendency to mistakenly perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things.[1] The term (German: Apophänie) was coined by psychiatrist Klaus Conrad in his 1958 publication on the beginning stages of schizophrenia.[2] He defined it as "unmotivated seeing of connections [accompanied by] a specific feeling of abnormal meaningfulness".[3][4] He described the early… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/20 07:30 PM |
| 3 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudAgree, with this Not only are the risks to leave paternity tests subject to the request of the apparent father too high, but real situations tend to proof that these apparent fathers could be facing subtle threats the legal system cannot shield them from (employment loss, reprisals in their social circles and family systems). By making the tests mandatory, we are avoiding the two problems I quoted above: first, the risk of an abusive burden of proof for a man to exercise his fundamental right to… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/20 03:10 PM |
| 4 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudThat capital M It's just about formal contextualizing and phrase style. The quotes have a material context, and reffer people from male of female gender but who do not act with integrity towards their peers. As for the second part, all agreed. But my aim is not just "if we agree" - obviously I'm not surprised we agree here - the aim is we need to get something done to stop this monstruous attack over men. Somehow, at some point in time this debate has to take place publicly, and it's likely to t… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/20 03:04 PM |
| 3 | Men's Rights are incompatible with paternity fraudI'm not going to dispute the second part of your reply, which is quite eye opening, I'll be focusing on a matter I found while reading the first part. Paternity tests should be done if the legal father suspects that the child may not be his. The government shouldn't have any say in it. To place the burden of proof on the apparent father is unreasonable, because if paternity tests would have to be done only on grounds of suspicion, you have two issues. One, determine what is a legal cause for sus… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/20 02:41 PM |
| 28 | How I got my children backI just want to express simpathy for your case and shame a valueless society, courts systems and current lawyers, that forced you to bear this horror. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/20 11:19 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter