TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

scyth3s Archive

View 0 posts and 2,341 comments by scyth3s on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,341 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Apparently the poster has elsewhere Beware trusting random internet comments. If you're seen it, link it. feminists and SJWs (they’re linked at the hip) use the term all the time regardless of whether the issue is racialised or not. And we would criticize them for it when they do. But feminism at large is very much not anti black, that's just folks here going overboard. If anything, feminism is largely anti white. I still wouldn't call a feminist racist until they actually say or do something ra…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:51 PM
0

This isn't r/incels or r/4chan, try to stay focused
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:17 PM
1

I object to calling people racist when they have demonstrated no such propensity. That is all.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:48 PM
1

But objecting to it being about a man does not have a raceist element to it
/r/MensRights22/11/21 03:08 PM
-4

I don't really think there's a racist element to objecting to a video being about a black man instead of a couple of black women
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:54 PM
15

I just don’t see the same kind of constructive work being done on the men’s side when something as critical and problematic as incels exist I just don’t see the same kind of constructive work being done on the BLM side when something as critical and problematic as looters exist I just don’t see the same kind of constructive work being done on the women's side when something as critical and problematic as the 'kill all men' crowd exist Do you see the problem with your logic? or our successful sui…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:51 PM
-13

You can't just say buzzwords, you should try to have them make sense.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:25 AM
3

Uhhh... No it isn't. Wtf are you on about?
/r/MensRights20/11/21 02:38 PM
1

"other groups are horrible so we should be too"
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:41 PM
1

That's all well and good until you realize that you, alone, can do fuck-all and need the support of others to meet any of your goals. But the second you say MRM, you're discredited.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:06 PM
0

You didn't shut anything down, you wooshed in a refutation of your own point. If those views were not representative, you would expect people to combat that. The OP explicitly states that the opposite happened. It's high level stuff, I know.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 06:02 PM
-1

Ewwww pro life idiots let's not
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:38 PM
2

So it's an open free channel and anyone can join, and you assume that everything said there is representative of the MRM? She explicitly brought up that others joined in to gang up rather than to correct the user in question. Reading is hard, I know. If it wasn't representative, you'd think someone would have come out of the woodwork to dispute such conduct and views.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:36 PM
2

I have seen people on this sub unironically say women aren't fit to vote... I don't know how we get rid of this sort of shit in the MRM, but we definitely need to make it happen.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 05:33 PM
4

Best of luck. I wish you good health and happy life through your struggles.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 11:21 PM
5

Waaaaat
/r/MensRights07/11/21 11:15 PM
11

Oh they don't understand that language when men do it. Crying aids perception of honesty for women, but it does not do so for men.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:30 PM
1

You're the acusee, she's the accuser.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:28 PM
-1

I'm not the one making up a life story over a costume photo
/r/MensRights03/11/21 10:27 PM
3

They're taught this stuff before they can even reason properly. Once "knowledge" is rooted in, it's very difficult to undo.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 03:27 PM
7

Top shelf comment right here.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 09:56 AM
8

Men make up far fewer college graduates than women. Go to r/Feminism and make a post asking how we can fix the gender disparity in higher education, report back to me on how long your ban is.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 09:55 AM
2

It's a photo op, get a grip dude.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 09:52 AM
8

It's a Halloween picture, holy shit. Take a step back and recognize that you're extrapolating to a ridiculous degree.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 09:41 AM
1

No, feminism definitely was needed in the past. And still is in many places, and it still has legitimate grievances in western society, though not nearly as many as they think.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 07:41 AM
3

JFC stop using that word for everything you don't like. Just call him a disingenuous asshole and move on.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:34 AM
2

I am waiting
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:49 AM
1

Ok good luck with that
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:38 AM
2

Again, that would go right into the "give thanks that they don't prosecute false accusers" bucket.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:34 AM
1

And those investigations would likely lead them back to you being full of shit, and then you could thank your lucky stars that false accusers almost never get punished.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:25 AM
1

As you say yourself cost sharing is inherent in insurance but you also don't think it reasonable that men should share costs with other men just based on gender A man shouldn't take on greater cost because he is a man. The factors should be things the person can control or influence, with very few exceptions (one of which is age; others could be visual impairments). So you seem to think anything that an individual has no control over should not be taken into account Generally speaking, yes. Exce…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:02 AM
1

You agree garage vs street (is it a choice or a reflection of wealth?) but questioned Chicago vs Houston. No, I questioned being born in Houston vs Chicago. That makes about half of your post superfluous/irrelevant. I still believe that the purpose of the insurance companies isn't to treat people equally it is so provide insurance based on a risk assessment of the individual And gender should not an eligible factor for the same reason as race, birth place, nationality, etc. you could equally cla…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 12:20 AM
3

I wish I was controlled by my genitals a little bit more. I was raised in a female controlled environment, and it's made me a grass eater. Same bro, pretty much every sibling, cousin, and parental figure I had was female. I don't quite know what you mean by grass eater though... I don't speed, I don't do anything dangerous at all, but I'm being punished just for being a man. Yep, this is the problem. I easily the most patient and defensive driver I know. I allow a ton of following distance, sign…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 12:14 AM
0

And I'm not defending sexism But you are. That is explicitly what you are doing, and to say otherwise is laughable. The least you could do is be honest and say you're defending singular case of justifiable sexism. There is no need to deny reality here, put it all on the table. I'm defending profit motive. You're using profit motive to defend sexism.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 12:05 AM
2

Do you think a 50 year old woman who lives in a low crime neighbourhood and parks in a garage should pay the same as a 20 year old man in a high crime neighbourhood who parks on the street? 1) age is an equal opportunity thing. Everyone ages at the same rate (until they die, but we can't control that), I have no issue with age being used as a factor. It is one of very few immutable characteristics I'm I'm board with. Discriminating against everyone is effectively discriminating against no one, a…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 12:02 AM
2

Doesn't matter if it is correlation not causation. If there is a strong enough correlation to make insuring that demographic more likely to result in a payout then that is sufficient reason for more expensive premiums to cover that higher risk So why stop at gender? Should we charge Asians more? Black people more? White women? Should we charge those born in Houston more than those born in Chicago? Gender is an unfair predictor--same as race, birth place, nationality, etc--and no one should be pe…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:52 PM
2

YOU ARE CONTROLLED BY YOUR GENITALS, AND WE WILL CHARGE YOU ACCORDING TO THAT.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:49 PM
3

But being a man is not a risk factor. Not every man drives poorly or aggressively or whatever. It's a correlation, not a cause, and no one should be punished for a correlation they have no choice in.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:41 PM
2

If you're under a certain age, the color of your car matters? When you're slinging claims like that you gotta back it up with a source. Never fear, though. The myth that red cars cost more to insure is, in fact, a myth. While auto insurance companies take a number of factors into account when calculating your insurance rate, the color of the car isn't one of them. It's a myth.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:11 PM
1

Testosterone makes us take greater risks than women Every single man? Can I get a low T discount? Stop defending sexism. They need to find a different way to determine pricing--gender is not an OK one.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:06 PM
-1

Right, but it's 100% indisputably sexist to lump the safe male drivers in with the aggressive ones. There is no context in which "you're a man, you pay more," is acceptable.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:04 PM
-1

You know what... I don't think it is sexist that men pay more if we as a gender and age group have a higher $$$ volume of claims It's not sexist to lump people together by the actions of other members of their gender? Fuck outta here. You should not be able to charge extra for an irrelevant trait no one has control over.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:01 PM
2

You have to pay more if you drive a red car. Myth. Your car being red does not, and never has, made insurance cost more. It is possible that there's a correlation, as in sports cars (which are more expensive to insure) are disproportionately red, but you will not pay more in insurance for a red F-150 than a blue F-150. Color is not a casual factor in your insurance prices.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:57 PM
0

Bad take. The best male drivers are being unfairly lumped in with no choice of throw own, do not defend such misandry.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:54 PM
26

That's not unpopular. The unpopular part is that mistakes are irreversible, at least this guy was freed eventually.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 12:01 AM
2

Hold on, we can work with this. If you simply charge the hospital bills to the baby's credit, you can get them put in debtor's prison, and once they're in prison you can use them for slave labor. You can use that as a de facto way to own a child!
/r/MensRights28/10/21 11:27 AM
2

Take video of her leaving for work healthy and unharmed. Once she's gone, Run. Fucking run. The video is so that when she punches herself in the face a few times to tell the cops you abused her, you have proof that she was fine the morning you left. Protect yourself and get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 11:18 AM
1

You won't win any arguments ever by ignoring the main point of debate. Fucking moron. What is the main point? That you're deliberately misinterpreting his point?
/r/MensRights27/10/21 03:08 AM
1

Your point is that being an option is somehow a bad thing, my point is that it isn't and you're dramatizing a nothing burger.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 03:01 AM
1

You're making it into something it isn't. Every action we take is an option out of several options, including whether or not you pursue a woman. You're being ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 02:48 AM
1

Sure, if you want to be deliberately extra sense
/r/MensRights27/10/21 02:30 AM
11

Nobody would care and he knows it
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:56 AM
2

Options available = the women he is in semi regular contact with or could potentially initiate things with
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:51 AM
1

No need for profanity. Even though you disagree, I am allowed to have an opinion. Its ok. And that opinion was 5IQ bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:24 AM
1

He clarified his statement, he doesn't buy products that advertise female involvement. If you make it a thing that you're woman owned, woman made, etc, he'll steer away. If you're a woman who makes a product and doesn't try to use womanhood for free money, he'll consider your product insofar as he would consider any product.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:20 AM
1

His meaning is perfectly obvious, and you're deliberately trying to find something nefarious in one is the most mundane things he said. Stop that. I'm pretty darn sure you know exactly what he means by his options, and you know that that is not a comparison to grocery store commodities.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:17 AM
2

Yeah I really do with this wasn't the only gender sub that doesn't ban all dissent. I'm supportive of much of the core stuff here, but there really are a plethora of delusional people and outright misogynists. It's frustrating
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:12 AM
1

Yeah I don't know about more prevalent than ever... Just different in fresh new ways
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:06 AM
3

Those are physical awards for categories where women are either just different (voice) or outright inferior (strength). These are not comparable to writing ability, unless you also want to argue that women can't write as well or write the same stuff as men... And I don't think that's where your head is at
/r/MensRights27/10/21 12:58 AM
1

I’m a great programmer, but I don’t get recognition because people are biased against me I'm dating a girl who is part of the diversity and inclusion department of her company, and I can tell you that her company and many others 100% will prioritize women (and minorities to a lesser extent) in hiring, promotions, and awards. To just dismiss this guy because you think he's playing the victim is incredibly shortsighted, because this shit is real and it happens, and I don't think it's as rare as yo…
/r/MensRights27/10/21 12:20 AM
5

I’m a great programmer, but I don’t get recognition because people are biased against me I'm dating a girl who is part of the diversity and inclusion department of her company, and I can tell you that her company and many others 100% will prioritize women (and minorities to a lesser extent) in hiring, promotions, and awards. To just dismiss this guy because you think he's playing the victim is incredibly shortsighted, because this shit is real and it happens, and I don't think it's as rare as yo…
/r/MensRights26/10/21 11:36 PM
2

In sports it's fine due to biological differences... In fictional writing? Fuck off with that nonsense
/r/MensRights26/10/21 11:26 PM
1

Investigating someone already puts a man under judgement of social opinion This is in no way inherent to the nature of an investigation, it has far more to do with how our media is handled. She must bring verifiable evidence. What exactly do you think the point of an investigation is? It's too (wait for it...) verify evidence. This is a really half baked thought process you have here.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 10:23 AM
1

Doubting ia not sexism But doubt all women sure is. Trust is not something she is entitled to. Who said otherwise? You do realize there's some middle ground between "doubt all women," which is sexist, and "believe all women," which is sexist, right? Or is this just a binary thing to you?
/r/MensRights25/10/21 09:55 AM
2

BelieveAllWomen is sexist It sure is, which is one of the reasons I don't advocate for it. used to be this concept in this country of "innocent until proven guilty". That means that someone is considered guilty if found that it was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, due to a preponderance of the evidence, in a court of law that the person committed the crime. Almost like my previous statement of "investigate all claims." believe all women is sexist doubt all women is not sexist you're the indoctr…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:05 PM
1

Treating women as if they're all dishonest because they're women certainly fits in the contempt category. It turns out you are sexist, I'm sorry you had to find out this way.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 04:20 PM
2

It is when it's explicitly and exclusively directed at women, which the statement in question was.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:07 PM
5

Why do you keep talking about misogyny then? Doubt all women. That's what I responded to, and it's pretty damn misogynistic. Did you lose track of what this whole conversation was about...? We hate female privilege here, we don't hate women just because they're women. That's not what doubt all women means. Go bother feminists in feminist communities about their misandry, Got banned over there for calling bullshit on the wage gap myth. Prior to that, I absolutely did hassle them about double stan…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 06:37 AM
9

Nobody here inherently hates women Did I say anything of the sort? We hate female privilege and what it's done to modern women. As do I. You know what else I hate? Misogyny. Sexism like "doubt all women." That's feminist style thinking. That's "suspect all men" type stuff, and I'm pretty sure you're against that. It's sexist, it's toxic, and it will not help our cause.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 06:22 AM
7

There's no way you're an actual MRA and not a concern troll. Because I don't tolerate outright misogyny? If that's what it takes to be a legitimate MRA to you, then no I won't pass your muster. There should be more to men's rights than "women r liers thx 4 coming to my Ted Talk"
/r/MensRights24/10/21 06:04 AM
9

How come feminists never have to deal with comments like these in their communities when they're constantly employing horribly bigoted rhetoric against men, while laughing in our face? Are we feminists? Do we ban everyone who disagrees from this subreddit? Do you want to ban everyone who disagrees? That's what they do, that's the source of the difference you point out. This is the only gender sub that doesn't heavily censor. We're the only one side who constantly have to check ourselves. Because…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:46 AM
-5

my motto is: doubt all women! Yeah maybe not that... How about something not absurdly misogynistic, like "investigate all claims."
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:30 AM
0

Definitely not always...
/r/MensRights18/10/21 01:27 PM
1

I only read reddit comments from men
/r/MensRights18/10/21 01:04 PM
8

Then as long as you don't consider stealthing to be rape...
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:42 AM
1

However its as understandable that men who’ve been destroyed by divorces might think that way isn’t it? Reasonable? No. Understandable, pardonable, forgivable? Sure. But to have the sub in general support and defend that viewpoint? That's fucking crazy. As understandable as women who’ve been raped and abused having very negative views of men don’t you think? Same answer. Sometimes bad circumstances cause people to turn to unreason, and in those cases we should be able to count on the regular fol…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 10:49 PM
1

The upvoted comment is misogynistic as fuck, no way around that. And the folks here seem to love it.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 07:41 AM
1

Since I did not respond to the OP, it's irrelevant to what I did respond to. You can't just derail a conversation and then say the original discussion never happened...
/r/MensRights15/10/21 04:09 PM
2

Placing too much importance on a child's looks instead of their deeds. who is doing that Please refer to original post. She said that when strangers thought she was a girl, they would tell her how pretty she is When that's what you get complimented on, that's what you learn to think it's important, what you start to place value on.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:50 PM
0

Yeah that must be what it is
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:43 PM
0

Yeah, equality sucks, women 5ever
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:08 PM
2

That was exactly what she did. No, it isn't. She's letting her child live her life, she is not deliberately soliciting comments from strangers. This kind of stuff is what leads to eating disorders and body image issues. The short hair or the long hair? Being taught that your value comes from being pretty What exactly are you complaining about here? Placing too much importance on a child's looks instead of their deeds.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:54 PM
2

Oh senpai I'm so ashamed to be caught out like this
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:36 PM
2

Ethical? Yes. Risky for your job and career because our society has shitty biases? Also, absolutely. Your classmate is sexist as fuck, no two ways about it, but she is far from alone, which makes actually letting a kid sit in your lap an extremely risky proposition.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:27 PM
2

LOL....oh yeah unhealthy children are definitely "pretty"...lol. You really are functionally illiterate.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:22 PM
1

Yeah man you got me, I just hate men. That's why I frequent this subreddit, obviously.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:13 PM
1

Especially in children, it isn't much an indicator of anything.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:12 PM
1

Yeah, that's how you debate. Very smort.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:05 PM
2

Oh yeah, being pretty indicates a shit lifestyle and obesity. Please quote where I said anything it the sort. You literally have no leg to stand on except double standards. You are functionally illiterate.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:01 PM
2

I don't care to name every body image disorder under the sun, but they do matter. We just don't need to mention all of them in this conversation.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:00 PM
-3

Lmao at the downvotes you got... Tells you everything you need to know about this sub
/r/MensRights15/10/21 09:57 AM
41

Yeah, they're feminists. They lump men together in exactly the way they tell us not to lump women. "You share a gender with your attacker" is as victim blaming as it gets.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 09:43 AM
5

I'd have been VERY concerned about the conflict of interest of her personal therapist being friends with your couples one Of all the red flags in the post and the ones that you outlined, I can't say I agree with this one. Especially if they're using the same practice, I'd expect them all to know each other, and some as more than just coworkers.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:44 AM
2

I'm saying it's not anymore toxic than the other compliments we give children There are plenty of other toxic compliments we give to children on a regular basis, but I don't care to endlessly widen the scope of this discussion. Use your brain to extrapolate a little, here. Just let the compliments focus on effort first, results second. It's OK to tell a kid he she is pretty/cute/etc in moderation, but it should not be one of the go to compliments.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 03:00 AM
2

Is that not exactly what she did? What about "She said that when strangers thought she was a girl, they would tell her how pretty she is, and when they thought she was a boy, they would tell her how strong and fast she was" is deliberately putting her child in a position so that other people make the comments in question? Should she not take her child out in public? Do you not understand the difference between "I did X and Y happened as a result" vs "I did X to make Y happen"? Nothing happened t…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:51 AM
1

Complaining about something happening to your child is not the same as using the child to make a point, especially a political one. Intentionally putting your child in positions to have these things happen to them so you can complain about it is using your child to make a point. Big difference. One is complaint about circumstance, the other is deliberately putting your child in those circumstances to complain. What OP described is the first one, not the second.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:33 AM
1

You have no problem insulting young boys WHAT??? WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT?
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:01 AM
3

If you're pretty you have a significant advantage in life and plenty of people grow up fine knowing it. I don't know what you think you're disagreeing with here... I didn't say this isn't what happens, I said it's toxic. It's toxic to value people for their looks over what they can do. On the flip side, telling a kid they're smart, fast, or strong could also lead them to think they don't need to try or are better because of it so it's essentially the same. Absolutely true, but I can't be bothere…
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:32 AM
5

That's just flat out false tbh
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:26 AM
2

Nothing in this post indicates she's using her child to prove a point... Her child is living life, and these are the comments she gets from other adults. That's it.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 12:14 AM
10

Strong and fast are generally good indicators of healthy lifestyle and hard work/practice, which are things we should value in a developing child. Being told they're pretty is not, and it reinforces some toxic attitudes that will surface in ugly ways during the teen years and beyond.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 12:11 AM
15

I gotta disagree on this one. Strength and speed are often indicators of good health and lifestyle, can be built naturally, and they're solid compliments to give (if genuine). Being told you're pretty constantly, especially at a young age, definitely reinforces some stereotypes with toxic outcomes; it indeed reinforces the notion that a girl's value is dependent on her looks less so than her deeds, and that's not how I want the world to run. Mother has a legitimate complaint imo.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 12:09 AM
3

Men die in war, women are primary victims Now reread my comment
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:31 AM
3

Come on dude that's as obvious as it gets
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:41 AM
5

Men didn't rape women, women most harmed
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:37 AM
2

Don't act like i'm the one who's disconnected with the world It seems like you are. Seriously, how many of your women acquaintances have you actually asked about these things?
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:39 PM
1

Go have these conversations and report back to me.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:05 PM
4

I don't think there's such a thing as autoban based on your subbreddits Oh there definitely is. It's called shadowbanning, and it'll happen to you if you try to comment on the wrong sub and an auto mod checks your history or in some cases they have a web scraper that periodically checks this sub and bans you before you even know the other sub exists.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 05:10 PM
5

This isn't from being online lmao. It's from talking to women I work with, have gone to comment college with, my own mother, sisters, cousins, etc.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 04:27 PM
6

Go around your social circle and ask how many women want to see more women in sewage work, how many want women to register for the draft, how many are concerned with getting more men into nursing... And especially ask how many want men to have the right to financially abort a pregnancy, absolving themselves or responsibility for it. There are many things I side with women on (ie: abortion, general splitting of assets during divorce, getting rid of catcalling and harassment), but ask them to supp…
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:58 PM
4

No one said all. It is a large enough majority that calling it the group's tendency is fine.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 05:43 AM
1

No, it's just you being needlessly pedantic.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/21 10:13 PM
1

Even then it's still not good, it's just better than the alternative.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/21 07:35 PM
0

That distinction is pretty irrelevant to the current discussion. It's not the bullet that killed him, it's the lack of oxygen to the brain after he lost all that blood
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/21 07:26 PM
1

I'm saying no country passed the 3 years in prison for not affirming gender identity thing
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:03 PM
10

Sarcasm
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:45 AM
10

Accidents happen
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:25 AM
2

No country passed that. There is a 100% chance he is severely over simplifying something.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:23 AM
1

Are you a man or a woman? Cuz if you gay sex'd her husband instead of fucking the wife and sending him pics, that's next level.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:27 PM
3

Waiting 20 years to fuck my elementary school bully, then sending his wife pics still brings me great joy. That seems backwards...
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:36 PM
1

It's crazy to me that this is downvoted
/r/MensRights24/09/21 11:16 AM
4

There's no rationality in a woman accusing a partner of rape in order to get him to stay with her: he's going to be beyond her reach in prison more than if he was an ex. Are you serious? It's called revenge. Malice. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 11:01 AM
1

Bye Felicia
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:20 AM
3

This situation is misandry though, you must have been referring to other situations, but we are not talking about other situations. Your comment is irrelevant and stinks is an agenda you're trying to keep plausible deniability about.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:27 PM
2

It's only benevolent if it doesn't actively harm someone. Giving free drinks to girls is benevolent sexism, forcing men to work longer before retirement is misandry.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:16 PM
3

Men favoring women is still misandry
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:07 PM
3

A situation that is unfavorable to men is not "misandry", likewise for women and misogyny. But this situation is indubitably misandry, and no one said "every situation where men are unfavored is misandry..." So why the did you comment that irrelevant tidbit?
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:01 PM
3

Yeah, there's a lot of people that will go to any length they can to keep all conversations focused on women, all the time. Trashing anyone and everyone who talks about men's issues is the most common way to evade the topic.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:49 PM
6

That doesn't answer the question...
/r/MensRights03/09/21 04:18 PM
1

I don't find a lot of crazy feminists because they banned me from their subreddit. One of their mods did NOT like being told she wasn't informed on the $0.77 on the dollar thing, and that that statistic was never about equal hours or even the same jobs--it was just a mass aggregate. I'm just here because it's the only gender sub that doesn't ban dissent, but I'm not really far out enough to blend in sometimes...
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:30 PM
1

Then what are you saying? From my previous comment: If you're a 200lb dude with 80lbs of gear, 90% of women probably can't haul your dying ass out of the line of fire. With the right training, most men probably can. You are against women being drafted. Then who is going to get drafted? From earlier comment: At best, we can try half of the military's noncombat positions be women, which is generally fine... But the combat positions will still need to be mostly men, which will naturally skew the dr…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:19 PM
1

There are very good reasons women are not generally placed in combat positions, chiefly among them is typical strength. People, men will needlessly die because most of the women next to them cannot haul their wounded asses out of the line of fire. The front line is no place for gender inclusiveness. If you can't do the job, you don't do the job. And far more women can't do it than men.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:36 PM
2

That's really not ideal, I'd no one register than everyone.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:13 PM
1

It is important to remember that some seriously detached people frequent this sub. I've argued with folks who think sexual harassment is a feminist framing of rudeness that purposefully only includes what women get upset about and ignores anything and everything that might upset a man. Some things I see here are very yikes-ey. And all but the worst ones are very upvoted... This guy doesn't seem all there tbh
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:12 PM
2

Whether I think we should have a draft is a much shorter discussion. We're talking about changes to the current draft that I think we all know we're powerless to remove.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:02 PM
2

Children have been forced to fight in wars I don't think child soldiers is the argument you want to use to justify anything... If your aim is war and misandry, then go ahead and stand on the line against us. An ironic comment to a former enlisted member of the United States armed forces who has been many places on behalf of Uncle Sam. My goal is to not have my fellow enlisted die because their squadmate couldn't drag their unconscious body out of the line of fire.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 01:17 PM
1

It's really funny that you think all men are strong enough. Not once did I say that. I didn't even say anything close to it. So are they going to leave out those men who are not strong enough? NO Some, sure. Others they will staff in other jobs, which I've said before, those positions can be reasonably split. And I don't get how you think that forcibly drafting random men is a functionally sound idea. Again, I haven't said that. You should work on responding to what is said. We are talking about…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 01:06 PM
1

Agreed on most counts. Trump left a no win situation for Biden, and I firmly believe that was intentional. Biden never had a chance to responsibly withdraw and maintain an agreement we made because Trump sabotaged it. For that, I blame Trump.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:47 AM
1

But it's pretty obvious that you would have different responses considering that you have different definitions of equality. equality of opportunity equal outcome I favor equal opportunity, and have no issue with women doing whatever they are capable of. But you're delusional if you think drafting filling 50% of front line combat jobs with women is a functionally sound idea, let alone that you could find enough women physically capable of doing the tasks the typical infantrymen use (let alone sp…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:38 AM
2

Sorry I don't pass your purity test dude, your attitude is fucked. The bottom line is not all situations require the same response. Combat is a wee bit different than regular jobs, and a lot of the military is combat based. And in case you thought I was a feminist, here's what a feminist had to say about me: You claim you aren't a right winger. But you you spew misogynistic horseshit like one, and try to amplify obvious BS claims and false equivalencies like one
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:17 AM
2

Since war is your priority over equality, are you against women getting into those same organizations? No room for nuance, eh? That's how you know when someone is arguing in bad faith. War is the military's priority, not mine. No point in putting further effort into conversing someone who isn't ready for nuance. Good luck in life with the all or nothing attitude.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 09:45 AM
-1

If you want to sabotage all of our future war efforts, you're free to vote for that. I'm not going to.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:33 AM
3

Well... ideally we want equality, right? In most cases yes. In an organization largely geared towards combat and killing... Less so. And why do you think women aren't as capable as men? Is this a serious question? You realize we're talking about war, right? Not computer science or diesel mechanics. At best, we can try half of the military's noncombat positions be women, which is generally fine... But the combat positions will still need to be mostly men, which will naturally skew the draft towar…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 07:26 AM
3

What kind of parties are you going to where these crazy paranoid ideas is expressed without dispute? Sounds like a... Political party
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:07 AM
1

Screw what up? The withdrawal that Trump negotiated and started? That he left just 2500 troops in Afghanistan for, knowing the politically ignorant would try to hang Biden for it knowing that Biden's options were "put troops back in" (unpopular) or "finish the withdrawal without the manpower and territory coverage to do it right" (also unpopular)? Cuz it sure seems like that's what you're getting at. 90% of that withdrawing was Trump's work, and if you want to bitch about screw ups, you should s…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:10 AM
3

Stop being irrational. We haven't had a draft in half a century, nothing even remotely suggests an impending one, and Biden just pulled us out of conflict. Someone is putting ideas in your head.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:09 AM
3

I doubt they will draft an equal number of women it will be mostly male. Well... Yeah, we want to win the war ideally
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:07 AM
2

No. There is no movement with traction to do so.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:07 AM
1

Locally, someone I know married a good woman he met at a Church. All was going well till she got a new friend, a feminist social worker. The result was a divorce of course and I have no idea what happened after that. I wouldn't take your friend's story at face value on this one... It sounds like scapegoating for other issues
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:33 AM
1

I think you have the wrong idea about what it means when someone types like T H I S H I S It's used almost exclusively to mock an idea that some other party thinks is intelligent but is actually not. They'll say women don't want to go into male dominated fields because culture/harassment/etc, whatever they think will dissuade from the fact that women don't want to do the dirty, difficult shit that men will do for money. Or sometimes they'll even say that those fields are only valued higher becau…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 03:45 PM
8

Good
/r/MensRights31/08/21 10:26 AM
-13

M A L E D O M I N A T E D F I E L D S
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:31 AM
11

Hopefully all the men left and applied for whatever jobs the women were getting.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 03:22 AM
-2

People may say that this is because WA has mining, which is traditionally a male occupation. However, Equal Pay Day isn’t about getting the same pay for the same job. It’s about women being valued equally in all work forces, women not being short-changed throughout their entire careers because they work in “female” industries. Women not ending up with substandard superannuation.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 03:20 AM
1

However I do know that sexual harassment is a feminist framing of rudeness that purposefully only includes what women get upset about and ignores anything and everything that might upset a man. Wow. JFC that whole comment is one of the most yikes worthy comments I've ever seen. As to what is the best equivalence, it would depend upon what aspects of cat calling you think are what make that thing interesting as a topic, and that's not clear to me and might vary between people a lot. I mean why ex…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:21 PM
2

What do you think is the equivalent? You're the one that seems to think their is one and that it happens at a similar rate.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:10 PM
2

There really isn't an equivalent that the average man regularly experiences. Super hot guys, sure, but not so much us regular folk.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:35 PM
1

Daily harassment? Yes, many women deal with this. The survey is supposedly has this EVER happened. It could have happened once. Sometimes on reddit, the conversation branches out beyond exclusive focus on the original post. How would you feel if I went around saying that gays were perverts who constantly sexually harass straight guys citing those incidents as proof, or that women harass guys all the time, because of a few occasions I’ve experienced that? What part of the study in question does t…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:33 PM
2

Removing rape would not significantly change the numbers, you'll have a hard time finding a woman who was raped who hasn't sexually harassed. The best way to look at this study is "women who've been sexually harassed or worse."
/r/MensRights25/08/21 02:05 PM
-5

Who is saying they're similar?????? No one said any such thing, stop being a fucking dumbass. My initial response was targeted at That's fine but I get the impression 100% of men would have been harassed under the same terms if men had been asked. Anyone who thinks typical men are ubiquitously harassed at a similar rate to typical women is delusional. It happens, of course, but not with near the same frequency. Y'all are a bunch of bad faith dumbasses here.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:21 PM
-18

That's an interesting takeaway that makes zero sense given what I said. A lot of women deal with straight up daily harassment of various types, and catcalling is one of the mainstays. There's a reason it's "97% women have experienced harassment" and not "97%of women have experienced rape." Those who have been raped have probably been harassed, though the reverse is not true. If you removed rape from the states, you would likely not see a large fluctuation in the numbers.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 08:50 AM
-27

I really just don't think you know how prevalent stuff like cat calling is...
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:28 AM
1

A) I don't think you understand what syntax is B) you didn't provide anything contrary to what I said
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:27 PM
1

Could it be that more men join the Taliban at greater rates and put themselves in front of American bullets at greater rates? more men resist the Taliban and die as a result women have longer life expectancies in general (worldwide) and this may be largely biological
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:21 PM
2

Why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:30 AM
1

All I'm saying is that there's basically zero connection between feminism and Afghanistan. Using one to make claims about the other is... Questionable. I'd be trying to get the fuck outta there too if I were there. Everyone who doesn't want to be oppressed would be.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:43 AM
1

All five of the feminists over there?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:23 AM
-8

What you're doing is comparing what method of execution is worse No, what I'm doing is comparing the likelihood of execution. Men will generally have to commit some sort of "offense" to be targeted, women likely won't have that "luxury." You're badly distorting what I said, and I can't help but think that's intentional. A woman who follows the rules is a lot more likely to be tortured or killed anyways, even though the rules for women are far more restrictive.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:32 AM
-7

Do you think the women over there call themselves feminist?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 11:48 PM
-16

Uhhh... The Taliban is a lot more eager to torture and kill women for no real reason. Individually, the consequences are similar, but statistically a woman is a lot more likely to be victimized without having don't anything wrong. That's just how the Taliban brand of Islam is.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 11:46 PM
1

And he doubles down lmao... Assholes/misogynists like you are why this sub gets such a bad rep
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:26 PM
1

Those people have not done their research. The cost is at worst, slightly more expensive nationally. Like 5%. Almost the entire cost would be made up, both individually and nationally, by people paying for health care that actually cares for their health instead of private insurance who can tell you to fuck off when they don't feel like paying. Most of the people who say that stuff are deliberately misrepresenting the cost to make it sound scary, they'll say "your taxes will raise by $600/mo" wh…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:27 PM
2

You original comment seemed to draw a line between universal Healthcare and you being far left. I will shout to the sky every time it's brought up as being far left that it's a startlingly common idea, not far anything. The more people who can break the "it's a crazy idea" bubble, the more likely it is to come to fruition. Universal Healthcare is popular and mainstream.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 03:54 PM
5

Far left is stuff like abolishing private property, universal basic income, enforcing racial and gender quotas. Universal Healthcare is inarguably mainstream, given that 59% of Americans want it to happen per the Pew Research Center and at least 50% per Gallup. Universal Healthcare is a mainstream opinion that right wing propaganda has convinced people is fringe, but it is not fringe. I'll eat as many downvotes as I need to but I'm spitting straight fax here. Bear in mind that this is a very rig…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:13 AM
1

One of the worst retorts I've ever seen. Feminazi is a well understood word, especially in the gender politics sphere. Even the hardcore feminists know what it means, even if they want to terminate its use.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:42 PM
1

we train the majority female-teaching staff like dogs so that they treat boys with dignity and respect. This is cringe as fuck dude, really not a good look to say we should train women like dogs.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:39 PM
0

I'm not seeing where the insult is...
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:36 PM
3

Honestly, my (male) science teacher did really good at that stuff. He had a knack humorous but neutral and understandable word questions. One of them stuck above all else, and I'll paraphrase it as best as I can: Bash is a German Shepard guarding is home. Every day, the mailman brings him a biscuit when he comes to deliver mail. But today, as the mailman opens the gate, the neighbor dog Cleo sees the mailman too. Bash, who weighs 30kg, wants to get his biscuit first, so he runs at the mailman at…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:34 PM
-4

That's not far left. If right is 0 and left is 10, that's like a 6.5. Pretty much every rational individual who cares about society should be at least moderate left.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:22 PM
13

Not “feminists" But from my experience, it is most feminists. Feminism is a women's advocacy movement. Nothing more, nothing less, and it has been for a long time. Most feminists aren't as bad as the OP, but they are generally not for equality. They are about eliminating men's advantages while preserving women's.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 08:18 PM
5

What did you do to earn it?
/r/MensRights07/08/21 02:14 AM
0

There's a lot of folks on this subreddit who just straight up think women's problems don't exist. I dealt with one a while back who thought it wasn't a big deal when a woman gets followed home, it just means a guy likes her. There's some real assholes on this sub with no concept or empathy of what it's like to be a woman. The whole sub isn't like that, obviously, but there's enough of it.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 05:09 AM
1

Equal rights, roles, and responsibilities is not a part of the conservative platform. Every once in a while they pay some lip service, but it's just not a part of the ideology that promotes "family values," which is just another way of saying gender roles.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:51 AM
-1

Hold on... You think preventing a quorum isn't a good response to sabotaging voting rights? They did exactly what was necessary and I fully support it.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 09:21 AM
1

No, I don't. But it is generally what I see happening, at least for the Americans on this sub.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:10 PM
0

The people who still think Hunter Biden is relevant? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:33 PM
-1

Republicans and also the "centrists" who vote Republican every election.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:18 PM
-3

Damn you people are obsessed with him
/r/MensRights16/07/21 10:29 AM
1

Mainly infantry is what I'm referring to Many of the support jobs women will be fine in: supply, medical, logistics, mechanical/maintenance, heavy machinery, etc. Pilot viability is probably airframe specific, I believe some ejection seats require a specific weight or you risk breaking your back during ejection. But the needs of the military should be tilting the draft algorithm to recruit a decent number more men. Probably 60/40ish.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 03:23 PM
1

They can do some of the jobs as well as the average man, but not a lot of core military duties with the same effectiveness.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 03:08 PM
1

No no, it effected his career /s
/r/MensRights15/07/21 12:08 PM
1

Confucius say homeless man with nuke still dangerous
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:48 AM
1

Women straight up aren't as helpful in a time of war. They can do some of the jobs as well as the average man, but not a lot of core military duties with the same effectiveness. It would make little sense to do a 50/50 draft.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:47 AM
-1

Answer the question. Why would storing be ashamed of enjoying cuckolding?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 03:30 PM
0

You're an ego driven simpleton.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 03:24 PM
0

What you're suggesting is a very short stepa way from full sharia law where adultery is punishable with death, lashings or worse depending on where in the world you are unfortunate to be born. Western conservatives are often in a good bit of denial about how many opinions they share with the Muslims they hate so much.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 03:16 PM
4

The main reason I frequent this gender sub instead of any of the others is because it's the only sub that doesn't moderate and ban dissent. It's frustrating to see bats hit crazy stuff like what he said, but at least we don't get banned for disagreeing like on most of the other gender subs (ask me how I know).
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 03:14 PM
-4

This is cringe as fuck, too
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 03:11 PM
0

Society definitely pushed people to have kids, and I know several who've regretted it after doing it because of societal pressure... Idk what you're smoking
/r/PussyPassDenied13/07/21 02:58 PM
1

You are the slowest redditor I've ever had the displeasure of debating. Everything I've said has been about being followed home and how dangerous that kind of thing is. I have no idea why you are so focused on the irrelevant catcalling part.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 05:17 AM
-12

That's controlling as fuck
/r/MensRights05/07/21 04:58 AM
1

I didn't say anything about catcalling. Here is what I quoted and responded to, in bold, with the part preceding it not bolded. "We are afraid of the guys catcalling us and following us when we go home". And I understand them. Being afraid in that situation is normal as anything is possible. But a majority of those assholes are doing what they are doing because they like you, and they want to get your attention. You will get home safely. You lumped catcalling and being followed home together. I …
/r/MensRights03/07/21 03:54 PM
1

I don't know what logic your looking for. I explained why the part of your comment that says (paraphrased) "it's nbd you'll get home safe" is a very inaccurate simplification. If you're looking for something else you're gonna have to ask.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 01:59 PM
3

My previous comment just did... But maybe reading a second time will help you here You said women would be fine if someone followed them home, it just means a guy likes them. That's a terrible fucking take. Someone who follows you home is probably planning on casing you and your home for vulnerabilities and opportunities to rape or assault you. Being followed home is a HUGE red flag.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 02:07 AM
-1

If by 'like' you mean 'want or intend to sexually assault or rape', then 'people who follow you home just like you' is an accurate statement. Being followed home is a really bad sign, even if they don't bust thru your front door right then and there. Anyone who follows you home is most likely very dangerous.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:18 PM
1

You think cops should be immune from the law or something?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 11:11 PM
-3

Quote what I said that indicates that. Being followed home is dangerous. Maybe not right now, maybe not tomorrow, but that kind of behavior escalates. Being followed home is a really bad sign.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 05:21 PM
-36

But a majority of those assholes are doing what they are doing because they like you, and they want to get your attention. You will get home safely. This is a laughably bad take.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 04:34 PM
4

I doubt she cares tbh
/r/MensRights29/06/21 01:53 AM
1

Yeah, like I'm not qualified to diagnose lead poisoning, but that shit is real, has permanent affects, and can indeed cause aggressive tendencies. If the evidence is there for that, so be it.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 05:48 AM
0

Lmao dude you're straight up delusional. You're writing a false textbook on a low effort insult.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 02:10 PM
1

Like most insults, it doesn't feel mundane, but it's very much mundane from the giving side. Most people who use it don't give it nearly the weight that you do.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 01:55 PM
1

My agenda is to not allow bullshit to go unchallenged. You're spewing convoluted bullshit. You're ascribing ridiculous motivations to a rather mundane insult.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 12:47 PM
1

I do not have to defend this view, nor does any man on this forum, it is reasonable to presume the woman is acting out of a complexity derived from her own sexual experiences and their own sexual dichotomy that this has created. It's a lot more reasonable to think they use it as an insult because it hits at the ego of men who've tried to lose their virginity and not yet succeeded, or implies inadequacy of those who have succeeded. Your view is convoluted and ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 06:12 AM
0

You haven't disproven this is their motive. I'm not the one claiming a motive. You haven't proven anything you've claimed. The point of issue here is that men can remain virgins so to keep sex special in an LTR, there is nothing wrong with such a value system as sex has responsibilities incumbent on men. Indeed there is nothing wrong with it. This has no bearing on why it is used as an insult. Women who think it is a slur to call a man a virgin, these women have not experienced a meaningful sexu…
/r/MensRights21/06/21 03:23 AM
-1

Read FDS, what they want from a sexual relationship seems fairly reasonable, but it's not what they are getting or doing. Care to elaborate on that? What are you saying they want, and what are you saying they get? And do you think this is representative of a sizeable chunk of the women population? She is envious of relationships who view sex as special Yeah no. I'm sure there's the one in a million case where this is true, but by and large this is completely off base.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 02:56 AM
-2

It means your sick shower comeback isn't reflective of reality. That sick burn doesn't drive them crazy from envy lmao, what a load of nonsense.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 10:31 PM
2

Every I've seen use it has definitely not been a Virgin, just an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:06 PM
2

“You will never get insulted by someone genuinely doing better than you.” People who insult you only do so because they hate something about themselves and they see you’ve got what they haven’t, so they become jealous and attempt to convince themselves that they are fundamentally better than you, This is feelgood bullshit. There are lots of assholes out there who have it better than you and me, and they talk down to others simply because they enjoy it. It gives them satisfaction. That doesn't me…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:05 PM
-1

Just tell them you are saving your sexual experiences for someone special! This drives them absolutely crazy from envy. Did your shampoo bottle tell you that?
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:38 PM
0

"Slut shaming" lol. Take responsibility for your behaviour. This is whooshing hard on the issue behind slut shaming. Would you say "take responsibility for your actions" to the gay kid whose homophobic father calls him a fag? The shaming is the issue, not the action or responsibly for them.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:37 PM
1

If u see a car as an utencil-yes but ppl like that are the same as ppl who abuse animal. You definitely take the short bus to school every day.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:32 PM
1

They're trying to change the definition of that to "Non-male identifying people attracted to other non-male identifying people". It's another push to try and force lesbians to like dick No, they're not. No one with relevance or traction is. You're giving too much credit to irrelevant tumblrinas.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:30 PM
2

Respect should be a default. You can earn more, you can lose it, or you can even earn disrespect, but everyone should get basic respect by default.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:27 PM
3

If you're a "loud pipes save lives guy," they think you're an inconsiderate ass, and they're right. Otherwise they probably don't care.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:24 PM
7

Oh your penis was never going to scrape rocks /s
/r/MensRights20/06/21 07:18 PM
-10

The mere fact of calling it a lifestyle says enough about your views
/r/MensRights05/06/21 12:43 AM
2

Just the discussion, which was specifically about what happens within our borders.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 02:47 AM
0

No I just like seeing feminist meltdown. Classic conservative policy. Do nothing to benefit anyone, just do asinine shit and hope it pisses off the undesirables. In fact they can have it as long as they give back control of society to men There's the blatant misogyny this sub is so famous for. This is as close to "I'm a blatantly sexist pig" as you're likely to read on a public forum. Take note r/MensRights, this is the kind of sexist and dehumanizing attitude that we should be ostricizing from …
/r/MensRights03/06/21 01:04 AM
2

Let me give you a little context on this conversation. Here is a portion of how this started: It is honestly ridiculous how much people buy in to the politics of fear in the United States. Trump was president for 4 years and abortion is still legal. So, was Trump your president? Was the conversation about you?
/r/MensRights03/06/21 12:55 AM
0

All that is a good thing lol We get it dude, you don't want women to have a choice. If conservatives (the only ones who care about mens rights btw) took control of America in every way we would be better off Poverty would be 100x more rampant OSHA would mostly vanish and worker deaths would skyrocket, owning your own home would become an even more distant dream for most Americans than it is now, our federal budget would be destroyed because tax cuts mysteriously don't pay for themselves, your He…
/r/MensRights03/06/21 12:48 AM
-1

You're fucking dumbass. Men have issues, which is why I'm on this sub, but there's no need to be delusional. https://news.trust.org/item/20201231112641-qfynt/ Texas just barred abortions after 6 weeks, which is ridiculous Mississippi is going back to the Supreme Court scheduled next year to try to ban abortions after 15 weeks Louisiana approved a similar ban that will go into effect if Mississippi wins its case Arkansas passed a law banning abortions in all cases but medical necessity and rape, …
/r/MensRights03/06/21 12:23 AM
1

Abortion has been steadily restricted over that time... But I'm fairly sure that's not what you were getting at
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:49 PM
27

Oh I have my doubts that it was an honest mistake. That woman used very clever framing of events to ensure she shifted all blame when it came to his family, and I'm sure we we aren't getting an even handed version of the story.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:05 AM
48

It's too close to the timewise to the original and too close to word for word...
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:02 AM
1

Maybe going back 23 years isn't the best way to go to help people realize that it's still a regular problem for both genders...
/r/MensRights28/05/21 10:04 PM
2

What do you think he was going for if not mocking those who think being a white male means you get everything and can't be discriminated against?
/r/MensRights27/05/21 02:22 AM
1

lying on the stand doesn't work, at least not according to Devin Stone, the lawyer from Youtube. It definitely does, though, especially in he said she said situations. I never said that it did. Why did you bring it up if you didn't think it was relevant? The fact that you even mentioned it implies that you think it matters.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:33 AM
2

Nah she deserves it and I'd do the same. If the law will not protect you, you gotta get justice yourself. There is no one hear to blame but the system.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 10:51 PM
1

You're not winning any court case with "she told me X." "No I didn't." Plus, we don't know that this was a woman who discriminated against him. That straight up doesn't matter
/r/MensRights25/05/21 02:02 AM
1

It's short bus level thinking to assume the woman would confess in court.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:27 AM
1

Can you count out your IQ on your fingers? It sure looks like it from this comment.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 12:24 AM
0

Talk about missing the point
/r/MensRights25/05/21 12:23 AM
1

If he didn't record it it doesn't matter
/r/MensRights25/05/21 12:21 AM
1

Doesn't really apply given that "seems legit" is a longstanding method of saying "that's not right..." Seems legit: “Seems Legit” is used as a sarcastic reaction in situations, where something deceptive or questionable is happening Or Seems legit: Appropriate response to a Nigerian sending you millions of dollars.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 02:51 PM
1

You were not funny! It wasn't intended to be funny. Not all jokes are, some are merely intended to mock/make fun/demonstrate a point using irony/etc. It was not misunderstood by more than maybe 2 people or so It was though
/r/MensRights20/05/21 09:31 AM
0

You might be autistic. The first one, with its "seems pretty legit" was obviously sarcastic and not actually supporting the woman's point of view. The second should have been even more obvious tbh.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 12:37 AM
8

It's hilarious to me how many people took both comments seriously. I figured it was obvious enough, but reddit is filled with autists after all.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 04:11 PM
-9

ARE YOU DEFENDING SLAVERY?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 02:14 PM
-35

In her defense, there are slaves that used to clean houses. Seems pretty legit...
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:21 PM
-48

In her defense, there are slaves that used to clean houses. Seems pretty legit...
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:21 PM
-53

In her defense, there are slaves that used to clean houses. Seems pretty legit...
/r/MensRights19/05/21 12:20 PM
3

Not if dad's around to die first she isn't
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:12 PM
2

I have no idea why we just ran in this circle tbh. Probably because graveyard shift slowly eats my brain and I misinterpreted something you said, but I'm not about to go reread everything to be sure.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 03:10 PM
2

You do understand that women are infinitely more important to the propagation of the species than men, yes? That's how all this started, that is the topic of discussion. If we are not in danger of extinction, why would we prize women over men?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 03:03 PM
4

If we aren't, what relevance does it have this conversation?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 01:41 PM
5

I was talking about the entire species going extinct We. Are. Not. In. Danger. Of. This.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:31 PM
3

Why isn't it a strategy? Why is it? There are already more women in the world, and we're not hurting for new kids. but humans no longer existing is a bad thing The fact that we aren't anywhere close to being in danger of not existing notwithstanding, why is it a bad thing? is death a tragedy because people care? What do you think a tragedy is? It's pretty literally an event that causes suffering. Who is going to suffer because humans go extinct. Our dogs? I hardly think that's what you're referr…
/r/MensRights18/05/21 12:02 PM
4

If humanity went extinct that would not be good news A death is a tragedy. Humans no longer reproducing, not so much. Who do you think is gonna care after the last human dies? Will the dead ones care? Reproductive capacity is not a reason to pick one life over another. At another time it may have been, but we are so far past that I can't fathom how any adult can think that way.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 11:46 AM
10

It's literally not about any of that-- it's about how men are expected to sacrifice themselves and women are not.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:58 AM
10

Go away. We are not, and likely never will be again, in danger of not propagating as a species. And even if we were, who the fuck cares? You think humans are some divine species that must exist for the sanctity of the universe or something?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 07:57 AM
-1

I don't really think that's worse tbh
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:59 PM
-1

Jajaja I ban him from there too
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:21 PM
2

I was, I know absolutely nothing about club penguin
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:18 PM
-24

So you agree you want to be exclusionary for no real reason beyond being an asshole?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:03 PM
121

This is about the only gender sub that allows actual dissenting conversation
/r/MensRights15/05/21 01:02 PM
20

Yeah they're pretty progressive over there
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:50 AM
-34

So why do we even call them "trans" women Do we? Or is that just you and others like you who just want to be exclusionary? Are they "women" or "trans women"? If we have trans-women, can't we also have born-women? The times where you need to differentiate between those two types of women are few and far apart. Unless you're their doctor, about to have sex with them, or you're specifically talking about the trans experience, no distinction is usually needed.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:48 AM
41

You have been permanently banned from r/ClubPenguin, such sexist comments are not allowed here.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:36 AM
24

You have been permanently banned from r/Politics, such sexist comments are not allowed here.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:35 AM
22

You have been permanently banned from r/FeMRAdebates, such sexist comments are not allowed here.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:35 AM
350

You have been permanently banned from r/TwoXChromosomes, such sexist comments are not allowed here.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:34 AM
18

You have been permanently banned from r/MensRights, such sexist comments are not allowed here.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:34 AM
-33

You're allowed to have it, I'm allowed to tell you that's a shitty opinion and it doesn't reflect well on you. What do you gain by being exclusionary and telling someone else what gender they are or aren't?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:33 AM
-33

X
/r/MensRights11/05/21 02:32 AM
4

What the fuck
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:22 AM
10

You'd be amazed at how many people don't get this
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:19 AM
4

She wants to tear you down. Don't let her get under your skin like that. Her saying "You will never understand because you are priveliged. You will understand when you are older" is because she has absolutely no argument and nothing to back up her hate. Keep speaking up and say that this is the exact reason why you can't talk to her on why you are silent on how you are feeling. Demand her respect. Terrible advice. Nothing positive will come from interacting with her in any way, and anyone who ha…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:16 AM
11

That's how Google knows. Google doesn't tell you.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 09:19 PM
2

I am also concerned for the welfare of the child going into a single parent upbringing. Without the promise of child support, there will be a lot fewer single mothers out there.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:27 PM
1

Yeah don't do that
/r/MensRights25/04/21 04:23 PM
14

People subscribe to twitch and only fans because there’s an essence of connection or intimacy that they don’t get from just having sex watching porn Fixed that for you. Most of them would much rather have sex, but do the twitch thing (in lieu of sex) because it's much more personal feeling than porn.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 04:22 PM
-1

deny it all you want, them is the fax. Republicans loved him.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 08:15 AM
0

What do you think he did that isn't popular with a literal record number of republican voters? Donald Trump is the most accurate version or what republican voters want. That's what they told us with their votes. The current party has never seen that level of enthusiasm before. He is what Republicans want, and the party members may be annoyed because he played the game too loudly, but he is still very much playing the same game.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:31 AM
-2

Not even close. The republican party base literally chose him, and by more votes than any republican in history. Everything he did was mainstream republican goals, he didn't change anything about the party platform except for its stance on Russia. He is as republican as you can get. The only difference is he didn't try to hide the xenophobia, he said the quiet parts too loudly.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:10 AM
-6

Yeah this sub is pretty pro Trump though. It's died down a bit, but it's still there.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:37 AM
-13

It's bold to say that in this generally pro Trump sub, I hope your karma hole is lubed up.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:33 AM
11

and for some reason it changes slightly each time. the officer asks her what exactly the boy was wearing. first she says he was wearing a suit with a black blazer. then it changes to a blue blazer. ultimately, her story is flawed This is not the kind of detail that discredits a story, nor should it be. People get the colors of things wrong from memory all the time, and this is not evidence of falsity. People's memories in general are inaccurate on details, especially memories of traumatic events…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 11:38 PM
2

Evidently you, you're the one who brought up (not) being an alpha male.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:45 PM
2

No one sounds less like an alpha male than the man who uses the term alpha male in a serious fashion.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 07:27 AM
1

No, nobody here means that except you, and you sound fucking gross.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 04:13 PM
1

That doesn't fit on the sub at all. It's not bragging farfetched, etc.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 04:04 AM
0

Nah, it's for attention That's... That's what he said. I don't feel like you appreciate the effort that I put into my appearance She wants acknowledgement for her effort... Attention. Acknowledgment is a firm of attention.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 04:00 AM
1

Go talk to a typical woman on the street, dude. I can't help you if you don't know any regular feminists.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:46 PM
7

But saying something kinda dumb isn't justification for death threats and blacklisting, which is essentially what happened to Gina. A very valid point. If I lost my job every time I said something stupid on reddit...
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:52 AM
-5

It's highly conservative with lots of jaded folks whose empathy ran out.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:47 AM
-11

There wasn't a joke about the holocaust in there. It was a comparison between how Germans hating their Jewish neighbors for being Jewish is similar to people with different political opinions hating each other today. No, it's not. Political views are a perfectly valid reason to hate, ancestry is not. Political opinions are not harmless opinions in a vacuum (at least if you vote), they are real actions by proxy that one chooses to enact-- and its OK to hate those whose politics seek to make your …
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:46 AM
42

For the ones in power, sure. But there are tons of regular feminists who are just ignorant rather than malicious, and we need to acknowledge that.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:39 AM
1

You suck at reading, you should probably work on that.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 03:34 PM
2

That's like saying I should hang out with my racist dad because I'm white. Fuck outta here. If she's a sexist piece of shit beyond persuasion, it's best to cut ties. Just because they're good to you doesn't mean they deserve you. Treatment of others matters.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 03:30 PM
1

Jesus no wonder you sound like such a fucking douche/eugenics advocate in every comment
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:18 PM
-11

BTW this is so similar to how nazi Germany started that isn't funny anymore. LMAO K
/r/MensRights14/03/21 04:11 PM
4

People who work for a living shouldn't even be paying taxes in the first place IDK about you, but I prefer to live in a society.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 08:14 PM
5

If you want to tell me you think that the types of jobs women generally do today are equivalent to the types of jobs men did circa 1920-1960, I would entertain your question.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 06:38 PM
6

Given how many jobs have inflated requirements well beyond what's actually required, I'd say it's a great thing that men apply to stretch jobs.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 06:34 PM
1

Facts really hurt your feelings, huh.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 12:58 AM
1

Wait a minute. The employee has the choice, the tax payer does not have that choice You bring this up, yet you later demonstrate that you understand I was referring to you moving to other countries with tax programs you believe to be more moral... Curious. Now you would condone slavery by suggesting that it is alright, and you should move to a different country? My answer to this question would matter if I in any way thought I was a victim of slavery, or if you're claims to being a victim of it …
/r/MensRights22/02/21 06:45 PM
1

You laugh? What else do you think tax redistribution is? Of course I laugh, such a statement deserves mockery and ridicule. By your own words, The employee has the choice, the individual liberty, to work wherever he may choose. You should just go choose to work somewhere that doesn't tax you for things like that. Cayman Islands, maybe? Go get a job somewhere that suits your views. You would like to keep up the perpetual circle of slavery, and keep the poor battered LMAO your dumb ass has it so b…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:29 PM
1

Slavery is unacceptable LMAO Confiscating the fruits of one person's labor to serve another is immoral and unacceptable That is literally what happens to the poor, each and every day. No I'm a pragmatic individual that has and continues to deeply study the histories of the 20th century and the implementations on a global stage the effects of redistributing wealth. Sure you do, bud Sure you do. Any form of mandated wealth transfer is nothing but tyranny And it seems that any form of comment from …
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:01 PM
1

My management, or lack thereof, has no bearing on the fact that it is still unacceptable for my wealth to be redistributed in such a fashion. It literally is acceptable. Go be a sovereign citizen somewhere else if you want to live without paying taxes that go to the general welfare of society. Of course you'll wish to disagree, the wealth is going in part towards you, and you're likely not bearing the brunt of paying for it. No, it isn't. I make plenty of money which plays a large part in why I …
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:19 PM
1

However, the act of taking taxes and redistributing those taxes as direct investments into an individual's business, tax credits, subsidies, or other handouts, is unacceptable Agree to disagree. I'm sure you'll manage just fine despite your complaining.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 06:38 AM
-1

Absolutely. I do not, however, condone the usage of those dollars to be redirected towards investments that I do not believe in The nature of a large society means that you cannot have many (if any) causes that every individual supports. Everyone is going to be against their tax dollars going to something. And while I agree with you that gendered support initiatives is not how I want my taxes spent, it is still absolutely retarded to resort to the "taxes are theft" nonsense. If I want to invest …
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:52 AM
-8

If you've paid 6 figures in taxes, you're pretty fortunate lol.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:27 AM
-10

Give me back my wealth that you have stolen from me in the name of taxes Oh great, we have "taxes are theft" morons on this sub now, too.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:39 AM
1

we're dealing with a purely scientific issue. The reasons why men suffer more from covid are extremely important, scientifically speaking. Much like the gender pay gap, it is almost certainly not due to some sort of sexism, but the habits and preferences of men in general. Participants were asked about their intentions to wear one while engaging in social activities or meeting people from other households. Women were almost twice as likely as men to say they intended "to wear a mask outside thei…
/r/MensRights20/02/21 11:08 PM
1

That honestly doesn't make any sense as a response. I didn't dispute any studies, just provided some context that pure statistics do not.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 12:48 AM
-1

I gotta be honest on this one: I see a lot more men not wearing there masks around. My work place is male dominated, covid absolutely ransacked the place in November/December, and still most people don't wear or half ass the masks. It doesn't align with the spirit of the sub, but on this one I have to say what I see. Men don't wear masks as much, they hang out around other men more often, covid spreads more among men. I'm sure things like men being majority of essential and at risk jobs is a fac…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:08 AM
0

Yeah they're saying women don't know how to budget so they need more money for shopping! So chauvinistic,
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:35 PM
2

Probably because rattling the door hard is rude as fuck. It takes one light to moderate push (or pull) to see if the door is unlocked.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 10:58 PM
2

I accidentally quoted the wrong sentence... Read it again now that I've corrected it
/r/MensRights11/02/21 06:33 PM
3

How can I best defend men’s rights in this situation without risking my grade? You can't.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 06:23 PM
-2

That just says a woman is suspected in her husband's shooting at a hotel, it doesn't give any details to corroborate your story despite being from two years ago (so the details should probably be out by now). No mention of daughter, no mention of "while asleep," etc. Where did you get those details? And what makes you think they're credible?
/r/MensRights02/02/21 02:45 AM
0

They do, but I'm sure at least one would have the basic details about "shot in back of head while sleeping, not guilty by self defense," etc. Yeah, I'm not buying his story.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 08:56 PM
13

Yeah I'm not buying that story without an accompanying article. People lie on here all the time.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 06:54 PM
-3

Yeah this being taken seriously on this sub is rather funny tbh. These ideas have absolutely zero widespread traction.
/r/MensRights01/02/21 04:24 PM
0

Where the fuck do you hang out where these people seem to congregate?
/r/MensRights01/02/21 04:19 PM
2

Kicking someone out of their home at 1:30 in the morning is wrongdoing. It doesn't matter if you broke up, that's not how living together works, even if only one of you is on the lease. You literally legally can not do that, and morally should not, and the attempt to do so reflects extremely poorly on her character. How you can deny is is baffling to me. Barring other evidence of wrongdoing by him, let alone evidence beyond the accusation, it is nonsensical to assume anything about drunk bellige…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 06:07 AM
2

Your argument is that it was an assumption and we don't have enough evidence to make one. Mine is that we do have enough evidence to make one. That's all it could down to, really. Assumptions aren't inherently invalid because they're assumptions, so when you say "that's an assumption," it doesn't mean jack shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 05:53 AM
2

That isn't a magical refutation. Everything you think you know is an assumption, starting with you assuming your eyes and ears don't deceive you (or didn't deceive you in a particular incident). At the end of the day, we all have to interpret evidence to make the best assumptions we can. The evidence here supports the assumption that no such accusations were made.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 05:15 AM
1

If he got kicked out because he was drunk and belligerent, you can bet JJ's speech would have been very different.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 05:04 AM
2

You can know a lot of things by what specifically was not said. For instance, no accusations of physical harm, threat, belligerence, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 04:55 AM
2

You are making assumptions and leaping to conclusions. She may have come home drunk, and being belligerent...or he may have If he'd have come home belligerent, it would have been evident in the court case. She would have mentioned it, Judy would mentioned it in her tirade, and she would not have been so sympathetic to the man's cause. I don't always agree with her, but she doesn't bullshit, she would have called that out if the woman had claimed it happened. Until you have better information, th…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 04:35 AM
1

You're an idiot
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:59 AM
2

So uhhhh... What's wrong with the post?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:58 AM
2

One very very very important piece of information that Judge Judy is not addressing is weoponizing the child. There's nothing to suggest anyone except the mother is weaponizing the child. By demanding he separate from the child with no notice and no preparations, she demonstrates an emotional instability and volatility that none of us should be comfortable leaving a child with.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:56 AM
2

No, he's not as much of a cunt. A woman who can't be reasonable and not expect her brand new ex to leave his home SAME DAY is demonstrating irrefutable unreasonability. You cannot simply kick someone out like that, and if she'd do it to him, who knows what she would do when upset with the child. I wouldn't be comfortable with leaving any child with a parent who thinks a no notice immediate eviction is OK, let alone my own.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:51 AM
1

Bad bot
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:47 AM
1

Bad bot
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:46 AM
1

Don't encourage this thing!
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:44 AM
1

Bad bot
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:44 AM
2

Bad bot
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/21 02:43 AM
4

It's rare that someone is willing to truly engage and internalize a new perspective like this. I grew up in a house with 3 women so I got to see their side of things a lot, and that helped me really understand some things that I think a lot of men just don't get and helped me get wise to some common experiential differences between the sexes. It is much harder to learn this stuff later in life, so I commend your open minded attitude on it. I try to encourage other girls to approach guys instead …
/r/MensRights16/01/21 08:23 PM
3

Thank you for actually explaining it to me. I understand now :3 Glad I could help. Many of us here can be a bit gruff, and others are just plain misogynists, but overall the goal of this community is to make the world a better place. However, I don’t think you should just trust random women who walk up to you in the street I'm assuming you're a girl, so this response has that in mind: women get walked up to on the street all the time (and in clubs, on the bus, in line at the DMV, etc). Men don't…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:50 PM
2

... That's why they're called scams, why they focus on tourists, and why they often employ intimidating bouncers to aid in payment collection.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:28 PM
3

What does he mean by cooperating? Having sex?? They don't have to go through the pre sex rituals: ice breaker, establish interest, trust, etc. Men don't generally want something from other men they don't know, so they've got no reason to go through the pre mating process. If he means having sex by saying cooperating, who said you’re forced to have sex with a stranger? Most don't have female friends who will just bang when we want to. If a strange man approaches a man in the street, he isn’t goin…
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:24 PM
0

Because establishments hire women to order exhorbantly priced drinks and count on the guy not asking how much it costs.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:17 PM
2

Yep, you asked a question, and he was right to call out your trolling.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:10 PM
5

Yeah if you continuously accept free drinks from a guy you're not even interested in considering... You deserve whatever names they call you. They are effectively using their money to purchase an ice breaker in the hope of a breakthrough, and if they never had a chance, you effectively just stole their money. Like, if you take the drink and good faith, give em a shot, and it doesn't pan out, whatever. But when you go to the casino, you need to have a chance of winning.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:08 PM
1

There are a lot of girls out there where if you don't a move within a week (slight hyperbole), you become "like a brother" to them.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:03 PM
2

I clearly specified But you're taking the cake on this one Which explicitly discounts things not in this context (ie: your comment history). You may be unaware, but yes you have trouble with understanding context.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/21 06:59 PM
2

Looks like you have trouble with context, common for idiots.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/21 06:55 PM
3

I'm not gonna deny that there are plenty of idiots on this sub... But you're taking the cake on this one
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/21 06:06 PM
5

Go be an idiot somewhere else
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/21 07:55 AM
1

Yeah I'm with you on this one, this post has no business here.
/r/MensRights30/12/20 07:50 AM
-1

No one cares if you have a yacht, we care if you own 4 yachts, dodge your taxes, and have employees on food stamps while you make m/billions.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:58 PM
2

A loser at a show
/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:55 PM
1

The rule is that for every toy I get, we get an animal. So as long as I don't get anymore bikes or cars, we should be good... sweats in Ford bronco
/r/MensRights30/10/20 11:53 PM
1

We have these, this, and a fetchy boi. Please help.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 07:11 PM
20

HE SEXUALLY HARASSED ME OVER SKYPE
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:54 PM
2

Sounds like your lovely lady is a good recruiter though and actually gives a shit about people. Hold onto women like her, they make you better!! This woman is a gem bruh, you have no idea. The only problem is that she wants to adopt every dog, cat, and human child she sees. I'm gonna roll home one day to a zoo house with 10 kids.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:51 PM
4

They don't believe in the scope of transferring skills to a slightly different area This is so fucking true. Listening to her work from home has been eye opening. Also, don't get me started on the fucking ghosting tactics a fair share of them pull. Yeah its bullshit that most won't give you a courtesy call to just say "sorry, you didn't make the cut." Even a fucking text message would do. My gf left the place she was at recently, it sounds like things are on fire there because she's gotten a cal…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:41 PM
10

My gf is a recruiter, and I get to hear some of the dumb shit her coworkers do. She often combs over passed up resumes to find hidden gems. In one case, a guy was denied an interview because his resume didn't specifically list html. Instead, it specifically listed 7 years of web development, which obviously is so different from html. She called him up and offered to apply him to other internal openings where he'd qualify. Unfortunately she can't spend all day fixing the other recruiters idiocy, …
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:29 PM
0

There's zero scientific backing for this.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 06:04 PM
2

The term "transgender" is variously defined as people who "have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from the sex that they were assigned at birth," So... Almost exactly what I said. Your birth sex is assigned by what body parts you have, and I said Transgenderism is clash between what your body has and what your brain thinks your body should have. Yes that's not a perfect, all encompassing definition, but it's a generally accurate and functionality useful one, and in practice it'…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 07:06 AM
2

Transgender identity, specifically, consists of an affinity toward cultural factors traditionally assigned to the opposite sex Incorrect. You seem to have being transgender mixed up with being effeminate for a male or masculine for female. There is a reason we have separate terms for trans people and, for instance, cross-dressers. Transgenderism is a very specific identity clash between what your body has and what your brain thinks your body should have. What, precisely, do you mean by "validity…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:45 AM
2

First, transphobia is defined as hateful or negative attitudes against trans folk. Negative attitudes like effectively denying the validity of trans people? Because that's what "does (s)he have the right chromosomes?" does.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 05:07 AM
3

How is denying the thing that makes transgender people transgendered transphobic? If you can't figure that one out, I can't help you.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 03:49 AM
2

If you can't handle the shift in language where sex and gender have taken on different meanings, you're transphobic. There isn't much more to it than that, dude.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 12:44 AM
3

It's not transphobic to say that if someone has XY chromosomes, they are biologically a male. Sure, but I once got banned from that sub on a post about how tranny men are women because I asked if they had XX chromosomes or XY. Is transphobic. The whole point of being transgender is that your brain and identity conflict with your genes. To say a trans person can't be the gender they identify as is as cut and dry transphobic as it gets. You are transphobic, that's against their subreddits rules, t…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 08:28 PM
0

Probably because that's transphobic and a dickish thing to say.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 05:14 PM
23

Yeah they seem to think men don't interrupt other men and it's some mysoginy issue
/r/MensRights29/10/20 05:11 PM
40

What kind of stuff did they try to get her to say? Why? What do the social workers get out of it?
/r/MensRights25/10/20 09:44 PM
1

I'm saying that once it's shown that right wingers are known to impersonate the left for the sake of discrediting them, it becomes much more difficult to take accusations of leftist violence or inciting violence at face value. You literally can't anymore, because it's been astro turfed so many times. It is virtually 100% certain that the impostors have not been fully rooted out and the phenomenon is still happening, so any rational human has to wonder over a given individual incident: "is this l…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 10:42 PM
1

The difference that you are to dense to get is that we know of lots of instances of right wingers impersonating lefties. We know there are entire fake "communities" that have been removed. In order to insinuate the same about the left impersonating the right, you need to prove that it actually happens before you can try to equate them. You're using unfalsifiability to hide the fact that you have no evidence and an invalid point. We have the evidence of the right doing it, just show me that the l…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 07:02 AM
1

you seem to be implying that far left violence isn't really far left violence because it's all secretly being done by the far right No, I said we don't know how much is actually far left because the right has been caught so many times impersonating, especially online. You just suck at reading and seem to equate "It's anyone's guess as to how many of those "cells" are actually right wing agitators" with "I know 100% are false flag." But I thank you very much for ending the conversation here becau…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 02:50 AM
1

You would sink in a pool of mercury. There is no such thing as a legitimate argument with folks like you who equate "trend we've seen in action" and "unfalsifiable claim." There is nothing more to be said, your skull is just too impenetrable.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 01:41 AM
1

Actually, you made the original unsourced claim. By the same reasoning, any of the far right violence you are complaining about could just as easily be far left agitators pretending to be far right. It's on you to prove that the same logic can be applied to both directions. I proved that the right often impersonates the left with sources containing literally hundreds of examples. There is known precedent of it happening in a fairly large scale. If you think the opposite is happening, you need to…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 06:10 AM
1

It's on you to prove that there are left groups impersonating the rights, there's nothing else to it.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 05:28 AM
1

Can you prove that there are no unicorns wearing MAGA hats? No, because that's an unfalsifiable claim. It's not on me to prove that something isn't happening, it's on you to prove that it is. If you think leftists are impersonating right wingers, it's on you to prove that. You can't prove a negative, this is basic shit, and you should already know that if you intend to debate in good faith.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 04:57 AM
1

Facebook Inc FB.O said Tuesday it has suspended accounts associated with white nationalist groups after some advocated bringing weapons to the current wave of anti-racist protests. Company officials also said they removed accounts falsely claiming allegiance to antifa in order to bring discredit to the anti-fascist movement. Right wingers impersonating left wingers to call for violence. Facebook suspended "hundreds of accounts." Facebook on Tuesday removed hundreds of accounts and groups associa…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 02:49 AM
1

Except that there are quite a few documented, proven cases of one and not so much of the other. That's the difference.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 12:51 AM
4

This is the place that doesn't ban everyone who disagrees, so it's where I come.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 07:45 PM
2

stable genius
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:18 PM
3

Calling someone a retard that doesn't agree with them. Found the Marxist... If you think Marxism is just disagreement, it's no wonder you think these protests are about Marxism. They certainly are about your incorrect definition of it, I'll give you that.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:17 PM
2

What are you gonna argue with LGBT about? If there's an argument, chances are you're just an asshole. What disagreement could you possibly have with a gay, lesbian, or bi person that couldn't be summed up as "Well I don't think you're sexuality is moral/normal /etc?" or in today's political climate with a group of BLM supporters. What is there to argue about? Either you want police brutality to be curbed or you don't, and it sounds like you don't. The most racist things being said today are abou…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:31 PM
3

Dangerous and problematic agenda. This foundation must have their offices stormed and their people silenced for the greater good. Not gonna happen, storming government buildings to kidnap or kill government officials is a right wing thing, and only a right winger would be dumb enough to think any of the quoted things are under attack from any direction but the right.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:23 PM
2

This sub is a Conservatrump cesspool, never forget that.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:20 PM
3

The people who think anything going on right now is about Marxism are retarded. Since you're retarded and may not have gotten the implication there, that was referring to you. You're retarded.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:19 PM
1

Students identifying as Republican or Independent were more tolerant of speakers than Democratic students: 71% of strong Republicans support Biden coming to campus, compared to 49% of strong Democrats reporting the same for Trump. Yeah, no one with a brain would want trump speaking in any official capacity. The guy is an intellectual dud with zero credibility and an addiction to self praise. This is hardly an equivalent comparison, it's pretending that these people have remotely equal similar cr…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 05:13 PM
3

We don't need someone who takes care of horses as president
/r/MensRights13/10/20 04:50 PM
2

It is true. This sub is full of jaded men, and few love Trump more than a jaded man. It's a combination of terrifying and comically stupid when seemingly regular people buy the bullshit spewed about the protests. Some of these people will believe literally anything just so they can avoid confronting the fact that we have a severe Policing issue.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:07 PM
2

This sub is all over Trump's dick, they'll buy whatever he's selling no matter how delusional.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 02:48 PM
1

Barely anyone is in favor of police brutality. As I said on my other comment, most are just passive enablers. But every once in a while, you get one who just outright hates protesters enough to say they deserve police brutality. In case he deletes it, Screenshot
/r/MensRights13/10/20 02:46 PM
-2

Good luck finding credible sources on that one. I don't think it was leftists who just tried to kidnap the Michigan governor...
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:41 AM
1

Anyone claiming that "the right wing" wants to promote police brutality is either lying or is misinformed. No one is ever going to say "I'm pro police brutality." What I said is that they enable it. They instead say things like "George Floyd was not a good man, he had a lot of PCP in his system." Victim blaming is much more subtle than praising violence. They say things like "when the looting starts, the shooting starts," and proceed to ignore the fact that nonviolent protesters are being brutal…
/r/MensRights13/10/20 06:32 AM
1

I care a lot about this country and the people within so I try to get the most accurate information I can and formulate the most improvement-instigating opinion I can. On this topic, that opinion is "we've got a police brutality problem and a lot of the right wing wants to enable it. We should try to curb that shit." People who are being duped by the right wing don't like being called out on it.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 08:58 PM
-7

Oh wow, Twitter cells! Let me know when someone runs over a protester in their car on Twitter. It's anyone's guess as to how many of those "cells" are actually right wing agitators, how many are satire, and if more than 2% of them are actually the real thing. I got to drive through an actual faked event in my city (Las Vegas). It was supposed to be a big event and was spread around town, but nobody showed up, because everyone promoting it was a fucking fake. Shit like False rumors that antifa is…
/r/MensRights12/10/20 06:35 PM
-11

Firstly, antifa isn't an actual thing. Antifa isn't out protesting, antifa isn't out doing anything. It's vaporware invented by trump as a scary buzzword. You'd be extremely hard pressed to find an antifa member at a protest, because it's not an organza. But still, if you want to compare the danger of the left wing vs the right wing: More broadly, the database lists 21 victims killed in leftwing attacks since 2010 , and 117 victims of rightwing attacks in that same period – nearly six times as m…
/r/MensRights12/10/20 06:00 PM
-1

It's usually through code words like "antifa" which really just means "predominately black protesters who disagree with me." It's a dog whistle because they can't come out and say they don't want black people protesting and don't care about minority issues. It's a lesser version of lawmakers scrambling to disarm the black panthers. They can't say "we just don't want black people holding guns," so they use under the table methods (COINTELPRO) to avoid a racist agenda coming to light. The game is …
/r/MensRights12/10/20 05:44 PM
-3

bullshit. i never once seen anyone ever say "only whites allowed" Because that's what they'll say... Fucking lawl mate
/r/MensRights12/10/20 05:27 PM
-9

Is that why antifa hasn't been attributed to much of anything? You might have them mixed up with the proud boys
/r/MensRights12/10/20 05:04 PM
0

I disagree. It's a focused and damning piece that illustrates how the same situation is treated so differently by gender. Expanding the horizons makes it less focused and imo makes it less powerful.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 03:21 AM
1

No, men will absolutely go for this shit
/r/MensRights08/09/20 03:06 AM
3

Deep down, I want everyone to be happy... Sometimes I lose track of that long enough to be an asshole, but it's still my main goal
/r/MensRights04/09/20 05:11 AM
4

That's great to hear! I hope your future is full of laughs and smiles; I'm sure having your brain chemicals fixed up will help with that, and good on you for finding some help.
/r/MensRights04/09/20 04:14 AM
11

Your life must suck, I'm very sorry about that
/r/MensRights04/09/20 02:26 AM
2

A giant dude like that? Yeah most people will observe, record, and report. Unless you stand a serious chance of your intervention working, you shouldn't intervention, then you just have two victims who got beat the fuck up.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 03:23 PM
1

Wanting others to not promote unhealthy lifestyle is probably at least a little bit biologically rooted...
/r/MensRights29/08/20 04:49 PM
1

Yes that would be a psychological issue. If your brain is wrong about what your body is, that's a disconnect between your brain and reality, close to the literal definition of a psychological issue. We don't have the tech to fix the brain, so we default to adjusting the body to close the perception gap. There's a reason it's called gender dysmorphia.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 04:48 PM
3

If it requires a doctor, they can't fix it. We shouldn't be treating cosmetic modifications that cost thousands of dollars as a reasonable or widely applicable solution to any normal condition.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 04:46 PM
5

Most people who think they're thicc are morbidly obese. Our perception is obesity is hilariously warped, at least in the United States.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 04:43 PM
1

Come on man, there's a huge selection bias there.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 03:07 AM
4

No dude, the quality is lower and the play is slower. The women dominate because their competition isn't up to snuff. I'll watch a US men's game over US women's games any day.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 03:40 AM
1

Lots of jobs have strongly worded "smile a lot" policies.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 10:30 PM
1

No, he's saying you can't just prosecute every girl whose charges don't stick. Unless you can prove beyond reasonable doubt that she wilfully lied, she shouldn't be prosecuted. Insufficient evidence is not sufficient evidence that she lied.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 06:46 PM
11

Ima ideot who can't read good Yes. Yes you are.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 04:26 PM
28

Men's rights doesn't have to mean "hates and denigrates women." Leave that shit at the door, we're here to try and solve some problems.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 04:25 PM
5

ALERT ALERT USERNAME CHECKS OUT ALERT
/r/MensRights12/07/20 04:21 PM
1

At least then you can leak it and sway public opinion
/r/MensRights11/07/20 04:25 PM
2

If you don't understand child support, you're an idiot. The rest of the post is good.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:32 AM
2

She said "kill the shits" in reference to protesters. She is literally the totalitarian one, here.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 09:39 PM
2

So why are private businesses forced to make gay cakes if they are private and can do whatever the fuck they want? I'm with you this far So it was for business to blacklist banded Jews by refusing them work to starve them into submission. But now you went into short bus territory. So what if it involves raping some Iraqis and boot stomping them? Also can rape your counterparts and hold 'trial' under corporate policy. Just private business things. Aaaaaand you're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 09:38 PM
2

She literally made a quip supporting totalitarianism ("kill them all," loosely translated). The club literally doesn't like that she advocated killing protesters. That is the polar fucking opposite of promoting totalitarianism. Tldr: you're delusional
/r/MensRights06/06/20 09:36 PM
3

In general I think it should be illegal to try to control employees outside of work hours Generally, I disagree. Companies have the right to not associate with those whose morals don't align with theirs so long as it does not violate existing discrimination laws.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 09:34 PM
41

It literally says "men's right groups that insight violence" Pretty sure she thinks all men's rights groups do that
/r/MensRights06/06/20 08:02 AM
7

It can call attention to the fact that they have no fucking idea what they're talking about, it can be relevant in a small subset of circumstances. It is wildly overused though.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:53 AM
14

At least half of us don't pick the right person
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/20 06:20 AM
1

Nobody ever focuses on the 12 Chinamen that Hitler killed, it's always about the Jews! Yes, tiny minorities often get left out of discussions like this because no one wants to name every little demographic.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:55 AM
1

Based on what you said, yes.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:16 PM
1

Your initial response basically screamed that you didn't understand the metaphor.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 05:00 PM
2

That's fine. You do you man, it just means your responses were mostly superfluous.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 04:06 PM
-1

My response to your whole post can be summed up as follows: do you understand what "broken clock and all" means? In case you're from a place where that metaphor isn't commonplace, it refers to how a(n old fashioned, two handed analog) clock that is stuck (so the hands don't move and it always indicates the same time). For instance the clock always says 9:53. The clock is broken, but it's still 9:53 twice a day, so the clock is right twice per day. Buzzfeed is a broken clock that indicates the wr…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 03:56 PM
-1

No, they're not right on the first half They absolutely are right on the first half. If you're out searching for nudes of people that never wanted them released, you're a fucking jackass. they're just shaming men because they don't like men And yet still, they are right on that one. Broken clock and all.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 03:38 PM
1

They're right on the first half tho, shame that as per usual they can't see the reverse is bad too.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:41 PM
3

he was talking about seducing, and claimed he would just start kissing them and grabbing them by the pussy. He didn't claim he would go and ask them, or flirt with them, or get any indication that they wanted it in any way. He was pointing out that women will let you do these things because you're famous and rich, by way of bragging that he does those things to women. And that he's gotten away with it, because he's powerful and rich. This is a better version of what I was trying to say, thank yo…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:05 AM
-3

That wasn't out of context...
/r/MensRights17/05/20 06:27 PM
4

because kissing someone is totally the same as sexual assault.. Without consent, it literally is.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 06:27 PM
-8

I’m automatically attracted to beautiful women — I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. There's no such thing as "letting" if you don't give them a chance to resist or request some form of consent.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:14 PM
1

Someone "letting you" do something when you "don't even wait" is not them letting you do anything. A lack of physical resistance is not the same as consent, especially when you sexual assault blitzkrieg style.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:12 PM
6

I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything He literally states he gets no form of consent, he does it before they have a chance to prevent it. The "they let you do it" is probably more of a power dynamic thing, or trump doesn't get that a lack of physical resistance isn't the same as consent.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:09 PM
-11

He bragged about groping women before they had a chance to resist. Don't even wait.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:44 PM
1

LOL So I can just go and grab any woman by the pussy, and as long as I let go before they say no I'm good to go? Fuck off dude, that's not how consent works.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:42 PM
-3

"let you do it" is Trump's way of saying they didn't get a chance to resist. It's like a pick pocket saying you let him take your wallet.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 03:41 PM
2

In finance and accounting It doesn't matter what it means in finance and accounting, it matters what it means when the average person hears it. The term "earn" has already been co-opted, as in the phrase "women earn less for the same work." Earnings has a loaded meaning that is very synonymous with wage to the layperson. the term income has no such baggage, and is not implicitly tied to an hourly wage (and hourly wage is the discrepancy they whine about, so we want a term that is fully separate …
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:43 PM
1

*income gap
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:21 PM
-1

Earnings implies the same thing as wage gap, and the two words are virtually interchangeable in most contexts. The proper term would be income gap.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:20 PM
4

About the one good thing to come from trump admin
/r/MensRights08/05/20 07:02 AM
1

Take from it whatever you want, that's why I said what I said. You can cry over semantics and implied meanings that weren't there for as long as you want to.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 07:36 AM
1

Your reply is "what a stupid comment since a cursory glance through my post history..." implying you think it's reasonable for other people to stalk through your post history I actually just phrased it that way to make inclusion of a link fit in naturally, to show proof that my opinion is literally the opposite of what you said, and to prove that it wasn't just me disagreeing or changing my tune in response to your comment. You looked a little too deeply into that.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 07:19 AM
0

You don't have to click through my post history to not make a baseless assertion.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 07:07 AM
1

to the irrational the rational look irrational Which is exactly why you think I look irrational. good luck with the rest of your whatabout political hackery tho kiddo When you have two political choices, everything is a comparison between them. Who is better, who is worse. That's what we have an election to decide. you totally really care about men's right... you know except when you can actually support men's rights I always do. I just happen to think Trump is far worse for people in general th…
/r/MensRights07/05/20 06:34 AM
0

What a stupid comment, especially since a cursory glance through my post history would tell you that I think exactly the opposite.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 06:30 AM
1

Yes, yes completely, to anyone who looks at things remotely rationally.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 06:25 AM
0

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy[3] which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.[ You're just straight up objectively wrong.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:45 PM
0

Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy[3] which came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe.[ You're just straight up objectively wrong.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:45 PM
0

Multiple. Which ones? You haven't pointed any out. Now you are completely discredited and you can have a great day being foolish. You're a dumbass who can't actually point out a lie from my comments.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 10:30 PM
0

Wow, that was a volcano of lies You actually haven't pointed out a single lie, probably because I haven't told any. Stop GOProjecting. I did my part by pointing out how foolish it looks, but you rebuffed it so there we are. You mostly just showed that you have your head in the sand and will defend anything that he does.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 09:40 PM
0

LOL
/r/MensRights06/05/20 09:39 PM
1

For many people who are voting right, it's because they don't like how dangerously left the left is going. From what I can see, there is only one issue with a far left stance in this county with any sort of mainstream traction, and it's the one in this thread: the way rape accusations get handled in the public sphere. We have no one advocating far left Healthcare, far left economic policy, far left gun policy (again, with mainstream traction-- O'Rorke tried it and got politically destroyed over …
/r/MensRights06/05/20 09:38 PM
2

It makes me embarrassed to come here... But it's the only gender sub that doesn't censor everything and everyone.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:12 PM
0

If it were a priority, those voters wouldn't vote republican.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:11 PM
0

Both of the claims you made were ridiculous lies based on misinterpretation of what was said. They weren't though. They're just what he said taken in a reasonably literal sense, as we expect any public briefing on a serious topic to be intended. Is that fun for you No, it's not fun to watch a moron lead our country backwards, call a pandemic a Democrat hoax, incite his supporters to beat up Asians as revenge for "the China virus." It's embarrassing to be an American right now because of how blat…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:10 PM
1

Any man.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:02 PM
0

Hahaha you just quoted a right wing authoritarian and tried to credit it to the left. Classic right wing projection.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 08:00 PM
1

It's not hard to understand why one would vote for a man with one dubious accusation vs one with 20+ when they're the only two real possibilities... It's textbook lesser evil.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:58 PM
1

Or are you listening to a ridiculous misinterpretation of the truth? I just listened to the words he said. Trump's goal in saying those things was to get you to think, talk, and screech about him as often as possible. It obviously worked. Jokes on the libs... Who looks stupider? The puppet master, or the puppet? Definitely Trump, and whoever follows him. Bonus round if you go full retard and angrily begin attacking me for pointing out that your claims are untrue. Which ones? Windmills and cancer…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:52 PM
0

This sub sucks Trump's dick, and a lot of the guys here are very mysoginist. You won't find a lot of sanity from the bitter men here when politics comes up.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:26 PM
1

If you don't think Republicans are eroding safety nets or sabotaging minorities ability to vote, then your level of stupidity is too far gone to argue with. The shit they do is blatant.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:24 PM
1

You think it's better that they want to strip everyone's rights and turn them into tax cows while they crack the whip to keep people on their plantation? JFC you're a moron.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:23 PM
0

It is very true.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:22 PM
0

You don't have to be smart to get idiots to vote for you. Many will do that based solely on the fact that you're relatable because you're almost as stupid as they are.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:17 PM
-1

Trump is a moron with or without the press. He suggested injecting disinfectant, claimed windmills cause cancer, etc. Our media isn't great, but they aren't the reason trump looks like a fuckwit: that would be because he's a fuckwit
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:08 PM
1

Multiply that tenfold and change it to RNC/trump, and you have a statement that is far more true.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:59 PM
1

Like him saying he did it? Like him saying "when you're a star they let you do it"? Hint: Trump's "they let me" is the same as the victims "he did it before I even had a chance to resist." Or perhaps on the Howard Stern show when he stated he goes into locker rooms at miss TEEN USA pageants....
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:58 PM
0

Nah, most are just extremists.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:55 PM
1

It's useless, this sub has a lot of bitter men that admire their strong man too much to look at things rationally. Even trump knows his supporters aren't rational-- he said himself that he could shoot someone on fifth Ave and not lose a voter. He knows his voters are not swayed by facts.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:54 PM
1

russian agent. Except that he trusts Vlad over our own intelligence agencies, begged Russia on national TV to hack the US Secretary of State (and Russia obliged within a fucking day). Held secret meetings in trump tower with Russian officials to discuss "adoptions." a rapist He publicly admitted to invading teenage girls locker rooms... He publicly admitted he grabs women by the pussy before they have a chance to resist And now he's sabotaging our Corona virus response so he can steer profits to…
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:53 PM
0

She wasn't less credible lol
/r/MensRights06/05/20 05:48 PM
1

You do understand they don't literally mean nobody... Right?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:47 PM
9

He should of forced the police to remove her lol.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 12:59 AM
3

I think they waited till the kid thawed out
/r/MensRights04/05/20 03:10 AM
1

Yep, you attempted to imply that.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/05/20 09:37 PM
-1

You're dumb as fuck and this sub is worse for having you
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:48 PM
3

sb?
/r/MensRights26/04/20 09:29 PM
6

There's almost never a reason to gender laws, and this is no exception.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 09:28 PM
2

In advance of what? Serving his wife. He specifically says he played normal for 3 days while all his shit is in the works. And for what, if not to ensure she has downtime on utilities, no phone, and to make it extra difficult for her to get them back due to canceling cards? This is a fantasized shock and awe campaign that caters to bitter men's revenge fantasy, and it's just that--a fantasy-- and following the advice therein will not go well for you in family court because the judge will see rig…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:56 PM
1

Sure, as soon as you point to where I said you said anything to do with a phone company obliging. those are legal contracts between the person on the contract & the service provider. No third party not mentioned in that contract has any say in the execution of that contract Right there. Implying that I was saying he literally couldn't just cancel. If that's not what you were saying, I have no idea what you brought that up for. You seem to be labouring under the false belief that the second you c…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 08:10 AM
2

See those are legal contracts between the person on the contract & the service provider. No third party not mentioned in that contract has any say in the execution of that contract, no, not even a court of law. None of this is relevant to what I said, which is that any family court judge will destroy you for that sort of behavior. Please point me to where I said a phone provider wouldn't oblige? If you give proper notice to your wife so she has warning to get her affairs in order (heh), get util…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:31 AM
2

So, now we are bitter because we choose to fight for our rights too? No, you're bitter because you're supporting blatantly abusive revenge porn. This isn't fighting for your rights, fucking lol. Advocating that false rape accusations be properly prosecuted is advocating for your rights. Lobbying to stop the promotion of female centric schools and end the free points for women in job applications is fighting for your rights. Ending circumcision. Fixing family court, fixing the sentencing gap, tha…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 07:17 PM
3

This sub, and especially this thread, has a lot of people with zero perspective on the issue. I'm not terribly concerned with popularity on a sparsely moderated sub that attracts very bitter men. The OP is a revenge fantasy, not a realistic story about how to get custody of your kids in our facility court system. Cutting the phone and utilities from your wife with what is implied to be zero warning is abusive and controlling behavior, and will get you absolutely gutted in court. Bitter men don't…
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:43 PM
1

Interesting how that's what you got out of it... Don't be an idiot, I said nothing of the sort.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 04:33 PM
0

You're a fucking idiot if you think that's how it works in a marriage in US/UK. This sub is honestly ridiculous sometimes, and you're a prime example of it.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 04:30 PM
-56

Except the story is almost certainly didn't Hakeem happen (at least on the US/UK). Cutting the wife's phone and utilities will get you ruthlessly lambasted by any judge in court and you'll get hammered for abusive controlling behavior. And rightfully so. That kind of thing is controlling and abusive and should not be done without warning.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 09:46 AM
2

I like your style
/r/MensRights14/04/20 09:35 PM
2

/s=sarcasm
/r/MensRights14/04/20 03:02 AM
3

Thank you for an honest and reasonable answer
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:34 AM
2

And yet here they all are, still on reddit, giving them advertising money and all that. People are too fickle to really enforce a grudge on this stuff.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:33 AM
3

I do not think that CPS taking the children from their parents, then making them pay child support so they can profit via Title IV-D is the right answer. Just like I do not believe a court that literally profits from child support orders should be the one dictating shared custody versus one parent that's slightly better in the eyes of the law having full custody, with the other being relegated to a weekend visitor. Were pretty much in alignment on this on the for profit nature of these corrupt s…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:04 PM
5

If a girl criticized that on my first date I'd order 3 more appetizers and no meal. But I'm pretty sure next to zero women over 15 and under 45 actually think like this. Maybe it's different elsewhere in the world.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 11:00 PM
1

Lol at the downvotes. I'll say it again for emphasis: RT is literally state financed Russian propaganda.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:58 PM
2

But with that said, it should be a decision the parents (plural) make, and not encroached on by the state at the whims of a bitter parent. If the government shouldn't be involved in a preventative Healthcare decision... How do you feel about vaccines? If one parents job puts the kids at risk of the 2020 plague, I think it is in the governments wheelhouse to suggest that the other parent should generally keep them until this is over. I'm not dead set on this, but I think it's a reasonable suggest…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:49 PM
4

The what? /s
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:08 PM
2

This will then pretty much force them to get rid of us and it will look very bad for them. No it won't lol
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:05 PM
8

Skit is funny. Some people enjoy offensive humor, get over it.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:39 PM
2

Atheists that aren't hardcore don't tend to group up
/r/MensRights12/04/20 11:00 PM
1

It's a proximity thing. Christians definitely pose more threat to me, for instance. Muslims don't have a stranglehold on the government here and try to put their religion in places where it doesn't belong. If more atheists were around Muslims, I'm sure you'd see the scales tilt.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:25 PM
2

Hahaha have you ever been to r/atheism What percentage of atheists do you think frequent that subreddit? What percentage of those do you think ascribe supreme importance to it? You're just wrong, dude. You haven't shown in any way whatsoever how atheism fits the "supreme importance" necessary for your definition. You made a claim, you haven't backed it up, you look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:04 PM
2

You're being a total idiot. MJ practiced/played basketball every day for most of his life and trained relentlessly to be the best in the world. One could say he even ascribed supreme importance to it. If you think most atheists ascribe supreme importance to the lack of belief in a god... I don't honestly believe you know any atheists. The vast majority don't really think about it, dwell on it, etc-- it's just a small footnote in life. We don't go to atheist churches or live our lives by some ath…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:46 PM
1

That does not in any way support the notion that we can assume accusations are false until proven otherwise. We cannot assume they are true OR false until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:44 PM
2

There is no supreme importance in atheism... You seem pretty misguided on what atheism is. It's just lack of belief in a god or gods.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:27 PM
1

This makes sense until you realize that conservatives actually do this about 10x as much
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:30 PM
2

It isn't a religion. Literally.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:23 PM
2

I think that assuming a false accusation is not a problem. And the rest of us who are have a semblance of rationality on the topic would say that's a fucking retarded opinion to have.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:15 PM
1

Atheism is ironically their religion Literally incorrect
/r/MensRights12/04/20 07:07 PM
-1

This sub has serious issues, but it is still the only gender sin that's not heavily censored. The men's rights portion is good, but it's still very regressive and often quite mysogist in nature.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:13 PM
1

"yeah how dare this person get all uppity about trans shaming?"
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:11 PM
4

Go away
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:06 PM
1

If you think the republican party is the party of the working class today, you've reached a level of stupidity that I can't possibly break you out of.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:20 PM
1

Lyndon Johnson stole his first Senate election, Oh great, an example from the 1940s when the party's ideologies were completely flip flopped... Very convincing lol. Even all, that absolutely pales in comparison to the widespread, coordinated, and party sponsored election tampering that the GOP is constantly doing today. and JFKs family paid Mafia chiefs to get the union vote out in the Midwest. I've only been able to find tentative stuff at best on this but even if we assume it's completely true…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:11 PM
1

Oh man that's so widespread, it's surely greater than the number of votes deliberately suppressed due to coordinated efforts of the republican party. /s Do you not understand scale? That doesn't even remotely compare to what Republicans, as a party (and not just individual actors) are doing.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 03:25 PM
1

election fraud, Firstly, I'm going to assume you're encompassing voter fraud in with election fraud here: That's all Republicans, dude. Trump literally dissolved the voter fraud task force because he couldn't find evidence of Democrat voter fraud. On the flipside, North Carolina had redo an election due to proven election fraud on the part of Republicans.. Republicans consistently resort to tactics like closing polling stations in minority areas, forcing poorer and minority voters to wait in dis…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 07:29 PM
1

I don't really know what that means
/r/MensRights11/04/20 04:43 PM
0

The crazies on the right are widely villified and condemned, and often rightly so. They're generally poor, powerless, and very marginal You say this as the right is in the middle of the biggest power grab in our history. This is the delusion I'm talking about: the right controls the presidency with a dangerous, unhinged individual, stole at least one SCOTUS seat to slap in an idea Logue, they constantly try to gut necessary programs to loot the country and help their buddies. The idea that the f…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 04:43 PM
1

Same, was confused.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:50 AM
-5

You're straight up nuts, dude. When a literal neo Nazi can win a republican primary, you look like a real fucking retard spewing dumb shit like what you just said. And He's not the only Nazi who identifies more with republican policy. Are there crazies on the left? Absolutely. Do I like their discrimination against men, think we should believe all women? No. But Nazi and fascist tendencies are much more mainstream in the republican arena-- for fucks sake, the president they elected was sued by t…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:37 AM
2

You're on the right track, but that's an extreme example
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:40 PM
3

young women would be earning more than men. Young childless women are out-earning young childless men.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:35 PM
1

femoid Go the fuck away you neckbeard
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:48 PM
-2

His gambling debts alone should have disqualified him from SCOTUS. Oh shoot did I say gambling? I meant baseball tickets.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:41 PM
3

YES THIS IS JEFF
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:11 PM
1

Yeah that's a solid point that I really can't argue with. That's the kind of joke you tell your real life friends when sensitive people aren't listening, you have to know your audience there. You are correct in that I wouldn't post anything near that brazen on my public facing pages.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 03:52 PM
2

So I stand corrected on this instance of its usage, but my point very much remains. I hear guys joke about "what do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Nothing, you've already told her twice." Do any of us beat our wives? Fuck no, but we enjoy crude jokes.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 03:38 AM
-2

I don't know what the context of the photo is (if it's real, from a movie, etc), but this is probably a joke and some people need to lighten up.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 03:41 PM
4

... Threat of violence, potential police involvement definitely is a form of violence. Is "I'll have you (falsely) arrested" really any less violent than "I'm gonna hit you"?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 03:05 AM
1

Additionally I am a registered independent so I have no obligation to defend anything I'm registered as unaffiliated. I have plenty of criticisms for democrats, but I will not mince words here: their corruption and shortcomings pale in comparison to the corruption and malice of the republican party.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 08:54 PM
1

Interesting your solution to guns is more laws, with over 42,000 gun laws on the state and local levels what law that doesn’t exist will “fix” the issue? Interesting that you condemn that idea without offering a reasonable suggestion. Typical. Republicans may only pay lip service to the second amendment but at least they don’t run for President by promising to violate 30% of the bill of rights. At least the democrats don't run on making the lives of poor people shittier. Or xenophobia. Or trying…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 08:47 PM
-1

It's hilarious that you single out democrats and not the party of "HE'S A KENYAN MUSLIM" on the identity politics nonsense. Do democrats do it more often than id like? Absolutely. But Republicans (and trump in particular) base huge parts of their political campaigns and capital on it ("OMG HE'S A SOCIALIST!"). So forgive me for calling you either uninformed or dishonest. As far as constitutional rights, I assume you're talking about the second amendment. If Republicans offered any solutions, dem…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 05:28 PM
0

He wouldn't, because he has integrity and a sense of accountability.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 05:19 PM
-2

Look how many votes he got tho
/r/MensRights14/03/20 01:31 PM
-11

Just a guy who got conned by an astro turfed movement.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 01:07 PM
-11

You do realize that there is no requirements for claiming party membership, even if your ideals and policies don't line up with the party at all, right (especially in the "voters of that party would actually vote for me" sense) ? Sanders could have run as a republican, would you be calling him a republican?
/r/MensRights14/03/20 01:06 PM
-27

Bullshit, Bloomberg isn't a fucking Democrat. And If you think the #WalkAway movement was a real thing, Russia has already infiltrated the empty space between your ears.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 12:34 PM
1

That's not digression, that's right on topic.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:15 AM
1

There are definitely things that men have advantages in. I don't get sexually harassed even 10% as much as my girlfriend does, as an example. It's a huge issue for a sizeable portion of women, less so for men. Not having assertiveness confused for being bitchy is another good one. Gender issues are a lot more nuanced than "only one gender has privilege."
/r/MensRights02/03/20 07:11 PM
0

It literally isn't hypocritical. Look at that famous Russell brand quote When I was poor and complained about inequality they said I was bitter; now that I'm rich and I complain about inequality they say I'm a hypocrite. I'm beginning to think they just don't want to talk about inequality. Just because you're rich doesn't mean you can't call out inequality, and it sure has hell doesn't mean you can't call out gender inequality. Being a rich woman doesn't make that so either. Being an exception t…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 03:49 PM
0

We're only pointing out the hypocrisy of nailing on male privilege when you make more money than 99.9999% of the men on the planet. My point is that this isn't hypocritical.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 03:06 PM
1

Do you? The women's bathroom is a legit hangout place at nightclubs and parties
/r/MensRights02/03/20 06:44 AM
7

While she is obviously very privileged, having one type of privilege doesn't make it hypocritical to call out another type. Granted I don't really believe in make privilege beyond in any large scale, but the fact that she has rich person privilege doesn't make it not ok to call out what she views as a gender privilege issue.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 06:41 AM
1

"but bigoted is just hateful plus power!" /s
/r/MensRights01/03/20 03:23 PM
4

The words “racist” and “sexist” have been specifically defined in their sociological contexts to only apply to bigotry against groups of people with “systemic” oppression. I prefer to simply state that the sociological definitions have been artificially manipulated for a political purpose, and I refuse to utilize that incorrect definition.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:35 AM
5

No matter how much we improve the world, there will always be people who deserve to be insulted.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:29 AM
14

It's free to not be here. It really wouldn't cost you a cent.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 02:06 AM
8

Hmm, I wonder why he perceives that Redditors men are angry people wife and children murderers Go on then, follow the standard you just set. Tell me whey he thinks men are murderers.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:48 PM
4

You spelled wot wrong. It has an O when it's said in response to something asinine.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 02:46 PM
9

They chose to skateboard, they get the consequences.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:27 AM
-1

Yeah, you should probably take your meds.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 05:10 PM
-1

You sound like you're off your meds
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:54 PM
4

No, it's definitely spelled barba... Wait
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:44 PM
0

This cake place would've been out of business already if this perfect world worked like that.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:41 PM
0

The protections of a business come with some loss of control. If you don't want that loss of control, you don't get those protections (most notably the separation of personal/business finances). That's not tyranny, you can still do what you want, you just don't get to hide behind a shield anymore.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:38 PM
0

My stance on this is that a business is not a person. In protecting your personal assets by operating through a business asset (as opposed to personally selling things), you forfeit certain rights like the right to discriminate against certain types of people. If you want to be able to discriminate, you don't get to operate a business, you just get to sell things as you, and you don't get the protections that a business entity offers.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:21 PM
2

And all the nice businesses can sing kum ba yah. Get real, lol that's not how it would work out in large parts of the country.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:18 PM
2

We want the white men to be able to come here and be white men without having to worry about what they say or what they talk about because there's a black man present.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 04:14 PM
1

Obviously, imo the father should get right of first refusal in such cases.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:16 AM
1

Obviously, imo the father should get right of first refusal in such cases.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 10:15 AM
1

Can you clarify what you're telling me women get to do?
/r/MensRights16/02/20 01:58 AM
1

She didn't get a ring, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 07:13 PM
-1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joke
/r/MensRights15/02/20 06:06 PM
-1

No, no he shouldn't. No one has a right to use a woman as a forced incubator.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 06:03 PM
5

I would never do that. You don't have to. It happens by default if you apply for pretty much any sort of government assistance.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 06:02 PM
1

There it is, the fucking puritan shows his face. The 1700s sent a parcel, they want your attitude back.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:57 PM
0

What if the man and woman both agreed to have a child? However, after having the child, the man changed his mind and did not want to support his family Tough luck for the man. You don't get to revoke your half of the deal after the birth.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:55 PM
1

The universe ain't that simple. I've had an ex secretly stop taking her pills with intent to get pendant.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:53 PM
0

No. You have absolutely no right to force her into an abortion, that decision is wholly hers for better or for worse. Likewise, she has no right to force you into parenthood. This is the closest we can reasonably come to equality on the topic.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:51 PM
-9

Sure they are, they're trying to sabotage funding and destabilize poor families so girls can't graduate either!
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:11 PM
15

Textbook case of liberalism going too far.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 06:25 PM
1

There are two types of jokes: jokes, and "jokes" with meaning/intent/belief behind them. What may be just a joke to you can be encouragement, normalizing of a view, to someone else. Just be careful with this stuff.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 08:55 AM
7

Yeah I'll take a few black eyes over a prison sentence, that's not really even a question. If my life isn't in danger and I'm not losing a limb, I'm not retaliating.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 08:51 AM
-3

That's hilarious and despicable at the same time.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:50 PM
2

Men do that here a fair amount, too. It's not as rampant as in mgtow, but it happens.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:48 PM
5

... No
/r/MensRights31/01/20 07:46 PM
-1

While I feel you in this one and have my doubts, there's really no way to prove it without giving out information that not everyone is willing to share.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 06:23 PM
3

Idk man, I just don't think you can really quantify all the things that are good for a kid. Mountain bike? Video game system? Math tutoring? 4th of July fireworks? The list is too large and flexible for such a system to work imo.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 06:13 PM
5

This is honestly one of the worst ideas I've ever seen posited seriously on the topic. Every kid has different needs and trying to standardize it well not help anyone.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 05:32 PM
1

Dude... You're deranged
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/20 06:11 PM
1

lol ok
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/20 02:23 AM
1

It was as thought out as was warranted, given that you can't assume any of what you said from what we can see.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/20 02:08 AM
1

lol ok
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/20 01:51 AM
1

He's a white knight beta cuck and so are you for defending him, case closed. Oh that hit me right in the self esteem. Please just softer words next time, white knights aren't real knights and we aren't built for this!
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 07:35 PM
-11

Yeah, shits ridiculous.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 07:06 PM
2

You have no idea how far he was from initial part, what he was doing, if he saw it, etc.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 05:33 PM
-16

Look at the sub name... They live love violence and have no interest in reasonable force or deescalation
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 05:32 PM
3

He could have, you know, been more than 4 feet from the initial altercation. At the very least, there is nothing wrong with being a deterrent to further violence after justice has been served.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/20 05:27 PM
3

I'm a shorter guy (5'7), and you know who takes the middle back seat in a crowded car? Me. It's not about respect, it's about what makes sense and generates the least discomfort across the board.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:39 AM
2

I think the casual feminist is far closer to an egalitarian than a full-time feminist is This. There are a lot of feminists out there who don't have the first clue what feminism is actually doing and advocating for, they just passively embrace the label. You'll find a fair number of these at a women's march, but also a higher concentration of the enthusiastically crazy ones.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 11:36 PM
1

My last unsolicited comment was being told I looked "fresh" by another dude when I was trying on a polo. Shit was like 4 years ago and I still wear that polo whenever I can.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:57 AM
3

If you're a girl and you're friendly, people are going to think you're flirting. It is what it is. There are a lot of men out there (especially under 25 or so) who have literally never had a woman extend friendliness toward them, and the first time they see it, they figure it must be flirtatious. Unfortunately as a woman (it sounds like you are from your comment), you have to decide how you want to deal with that. I had a former roommate that basically became obsessed with my girlfriend because …
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:55 AM
1

A) By going there, you are asking for compliments, which devalues them B) They are from internet people, which devalues them the compliments. C)You cannot count on the information being honest
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:51 AM
2

Oof.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:49 AM
3

Blessed mod. Maybe gay.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 07:34 AM
1

Would you say the same thing if it’s a small man and a large man. Absolutely. If she was a man and the man spat on him, would you say it’s ok that he punched her. Depends, again, on how much force appears to be behind the punch. Giving someone a black eye might be "reasonable," but hitting someone as hard as he did is not. The immediate tensing signals they she may have been unconscious before she even hit the ground-- that isn't reasonable force given the context. Men shouldn’t have to take eve…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/20 12:11 AM
1

That sucks and I feel for you, but at some point you have to understand that you're the exception, not the rule. It should be you communicating that "I have _______ issues, I need you to ask explicitly before doing anything new." As an adult, we should reasonably be able to expect you to state your exceptional needs when they are relevant. I don't know anyone who would want to live in this world.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:19 PM
2

Shame that doesn't hold up in court
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:10 PM
2

JFC that's cringe as fuck. I have a hard time believing it's not made ironically...
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:43 PM
-1

"How do you feel about this?", "Do you LIKE this?" or "What would you like?" The first and third are very clunky... The second is moderately so, and very annoying if used more than once. Bad take.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:37 PM
2

Not really, you just gotta clarify it. Lots of women have that fantasy, it's probably one of the most common tbh.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:34 PM
3

There's no extreme when a simple misunderstanding can land you in prison and destroy your life.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 05:21 PM
0

Of course, no one controls anyone else's motor functions. And yet they can be the ones who decide on the justice system's counter reaction to his blatant overreaction.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 07:28 PM
0

If her response is out of proportion and her safety is not in danger, yes. But if this guy's hit was a 10, her max is probably a 3. Like it or not, magnitude matters and you're retarded if you think otherwise--especially where the law is concerned. To think otherwise is to think that all assaults (battery, technically) are the same and deserve the same punishment, which again is retarded. All of these things go into an "is it self defense" jury proceeding.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 07:11 PM
-1

We get it, you don't understand how self defense works.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 05:08 PM
-1

It's not bullshit, that's literally how the law looks at self defense. And if this woman tries to press charges, they will stick.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 04:37 PM
-1

Self defense must be proportional and reasonable, both to the offense and to the assessed capabilities of the opposing party in the situation to actually be self defense. There is no way to seriously argue that this is self defense. She committed whatever offense spitting would be, he committed battery with a mitigating circumstance. would they know that rule as well? Would I be granted that luxury? I have no control over other humans, what a strange question in this context. The bottom line is …
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 08:11 AM
-1

Really? I never knew people retaliated with modified levels of force. If he had a baseball bat on him, should he have used that? Don't be a fucking idiot, you know people are perfectly capable of using less than 100% of their strength. I knew if I spit on some dude, I'd probably get hit in the face and would deserve it. No one said otherwise, you should try to read more carefully. How should he have retaliated back to her, an equal? She's not an equal in a physical confrontation. Not even close.…
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 07:53 AM
-6

There are levels of force, and the level he used was completely unjustified.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 07:34 AM
-15

Yeah that's a bit overboard... Dude needs some legal trouble in his near future.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/20 02:16 AM
4

This sub generally stands for good things and I come here for those, but just because I frequent a group doesn't mean I'll give members a pass when they're shitty. Now, give us an example of such happening on r/feminism or r/againstmensrights. Sorry, I'm banned from those. I got banned from r/feminism, r/twoXchromosomes, and r/femradebates because I told a mod that she was unqualified to debate the $0.77 wage gap if she didn't understand that those numbers were un-adjusted for any meaningful fac…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:59 AM
3

I intended the world fringe to be interpreted with dictionary.com definition #3, an outer edge; margin; periphery It's hard to argue that by that definition this sub is not fringe. I did not intend it in the "extremist" sense, just that it's not particularly mainstream.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:06 AM
0

I would refer you to a slight clarification I made. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/elaqkg/found_in_ragainstmensrights_they_call_this/fdicebp/ Tldr yes, a ton was a bit of hyperbole. But we have our share. Enough that if you frequent, you'll see it, but you won't see it on every post.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:57 AM
1

I expected to be asked.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 11:30 PM
9

I've seen like 3-4 of those comments in my entire time here, so I think saying "a lot" is an exaggeration. I don't really have room to criticize here though, since "a ton" was also overboard when I said it in my comment.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 11:28 PM
3

I did, actually, and I said exactly what I meant in my answer. You are welcome to put in the effort to look at my past encounters with misogyny on this sub any time you choose. Right now I'm more concerned with reading politics topics than going through a series of threads in a fringe sub to prove to one man that a male focused movement might have a disproportionately high number of sexists.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:54 PM
2

I'm not gonna go scouring through every old post on here. If you want, look at my post history in the sub and you'll see that I try to call these people out when I see them.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:36 PM
2

He just severely sabotaged our diplomatic credibility as a nation.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:33 PM
16

I do any time I see it
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:57 PM
0

the more they hate him the more I love him they have no substance lol.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:23 PM
3

BUT at least admit you're a Trump HATER, most Trump hater have zero substance, they just HATE him and everything he does. You actually just described Trump lovers. They don't care what he does, only that it's him doing it.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:20 PM
22

There's a ton of mysoginy on this sub tho, we have our share of woman haters. Edit: examples aren't easy to find because reddit's comment searching functionality sucks fucking balls, but here's a thread based on a misogynistic concept (slut shaming) and two comments (there were many more, though) supporting said slut shaming. A user insinuates that slut shaming is a good thing. 24 Points. Implying slut shaming is a negative. A similar comment with fewer upvotes Both of these comments, and the or…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 07:19 PM
3

There is no case where a man can expect to be hired regardless of qualifications, yet those situations exist for women.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:22 AM
1

As a white woman I have never been denied a job I applied for no matter if I was well trained or not. This does not exist for men, anywhere.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:30 AM
3

Male customers don't generally care, don't feel as threatened, etc.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:46 PM
4

insinuates other person is sexist I think a lot of men need to feel above women as part of a sexual drive OK hypocrite.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:37 PM
1

There are pretty much no jobs in developed countries where a man can get any job he applies for...
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:33 PM
1

Honestly in their situation I don't see any issue with their policy
/r/MensRights05/01/20 07:17 AM
1

Innocent people generally don't hide their faces. You had me in the first half, but this part is flat out ridiculous.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 08:08 AM
3

Not the answer I expected, but a satisfactory one nonetheless.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 07:13 AM
5

For fucking real. Sex isn't disrespectful and to think of it as such is misguided.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:46 AM
4

“I think we’re both better than that. At least I know I am.” Which again, implies having sex early is bad. This is just a roundabout way of saying the same thing: you respect women less who have sex on the first date. I’ve had some one nighters that went okay, but looking back I still wish I’d waited It's fine if you want to wait, but don't turn it into a character judgement of her of she doesn't.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:45 AM
0

It's OK to be gay, you don't have to blame women for it.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:40 AM
2

I don't believe he USA has ever declared an official language, and the time where that would be acceptable has passed
/r/MensRights29/12/19 06:04 PM
7

Accurate. Logan Paul bad.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 05:37 PM
-1

That's a great theory you have there.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 07:41 AM
-1

Reread my last two comments, cite where I say anything in favor of circumcision. I'm asking for a citation of where you got the idea that I think circumcision is wonderful.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:49 AM
-1

and you're okay with using kids' bodies to uphold an ancient and barbaric religious tradition? Citation needed.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 12:18 AM
4

Using kids as political props is bad. Neither of those kids truly understand what they're protesting.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 09:39 PM
16

There is no justification for either at a university gym. People need to be able to work out on campus when their schedule allows, no bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:45 AM
15

There's no audience where "let's destroy father's rights" is reasonable. I'm not gonna hold a seminar on how to rape discretely just because it's all men there.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 10:41 PM
1

so is feminism misandrist Generally yes.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 05:49 AM
0

When one partner works and supports the other, the other is getting the benefit. And some of those benefits need to be returned, you don't get to take a product and run. This is why the very concept of alimony is broken and should be scrapped or reworked entirely. It's almost like that last part is what I said
/r/MensRights13/12/19 09:59 PM
0

Your idea is worse... Encourage people to split to gain alimony. That's actually not my idea. My idea is to create a basic framework of situations that justify alimony, prorate it based on the length of the marriage, and go from there. Basically, anywhere one spouse sacrifices earning potential or real earnings to help the other achieve higher earning, some form of alimony may be justified, based on the amount of value gained by the other party and the length of the marriage. Example: one spouse…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 09:17 PM
-2

Again you don't call feminists misandrist and they only lookout for themselves. Again, because I'm banned from the places they hang out. Like, forever. Tell me when any feminist group has advocated for women signing up for selective service, closing the education gap, or pushing for equal employment in all the shitty jobs that men do. You simply think that is ok. I'm sorry, please tell me where the fuck I said any of that? You literally just described most of the reasons that I come to this subr…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 07:44 PM
1

And asked woman to show more respect and listen to their husbands. The one universal trait, i.e stereotype of woman throughout time is they neveristen or respect men and have to be reminded and encouraged to do so. That's bordering on some really slimy views dude... Just change "respect" to what it actually meant historically, and we're right back to "wives should obey the husband." There's a reason boomers have a stereotype of hating their spouse: they married too young and got themselves trapp…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:29 PM
-2

I disagree that advocating for [fixing] male inequality is misogynist. I assume you mis-phrased that, and I'm assuming you left out the word fixing/solving/correcting/etc. With that in mind: A lot of the people on this very topic have no interest in fixing inequality-- they are only interested in what benefits men. You can spot them because they say things like I'd give it [alimony length cap] MAX 1 year.... or That's the problem. She's independent the moment she files for divorce. That's what f…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:22 PM
1

Though the more secular a society moves the more struggles and obstacles people face in relationships. Or... the stigma around divorce is dying, so couples that are miserable can split off. Religious "commitment" made people miserable so we could have nicer looking statistics.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:20 PM
-2

Yeah, the 1700s really want the "sex has to be punished" line back. Please transport yourself back to the timeline you belong in.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:08 PM
0

The 1700's just sent a parcel, they want your attitude back.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:05 PM
5

If that's your viewpoint, then a woman shouldn't be able to get an abortion without the man's permission.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:01 PM
4

Things happen no matter what precautions you take, that doesn't mean we should be forcing anyone to be a parent.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:00 PM
3

As a guy who strongly believes in the right to a man's ability to forfeit rights and responsibilities during the pregnancy... THIS IS NOT FUCKING IT, CHIEF. Equating what he did with abortion is ridiculous, and OP should be ashamed of making the comparison.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:58 PM
-3

Like I said, you're completely blinded. You can't even fathom the myriad of circumstances that would justify more than a year's alimony. spouse #1 pay's spouse #2's way through college on the understanding that #2 will return the favor. #2 gets a degree, high paying job, and bounces. #1 is most definitely deserving of some alimony to get their own degree/stability/etc Spouse #1 is a SAHM/SAHH; as soon as the kids are old enough to not need full time care anymore, spouse #2 files for divorce and …
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:47 PM
0

Do you go there and call them misandrist? No can do, I'm banned from 2X, r/feminism, r/femradebates, r/gendercritical, and pretty much every other gender based sub... I wasn't feminist enough for them. There are a lot of jaded men on this sub with a vendetta; I understand and empathize with the anger and pain behind a lot of it, but that doesn't mean that I can advocate things that aren't right just because they typically benefit men. There are plenty of examples where alimony (to expire based o…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:24 PM
-2

It's pretty mysogistic to exclusively promote (what is typically) men's interests in a divorce,and a lot of the people on this post are doing exactly that.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:03 PM
-5

Great idea, just trap people in broken relationships. This shitty system will just incentivize people to sabotage their relationship or make it so bad that their partner is forced to initiate. It's just a terrible idea all around.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:44 PM
-1

There's a big difference between generalizing a gender and generalizing members of an explicitly political subreddit with a stated goal such as this one. Are you really that retarded?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:40 PM
-3

He's not wrong. This very thread is filled with them.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:37 PM
-2

That's because you're so blinded by self interest that you can't look at this rationally.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:32 PM
3

Ok
/r/MensRights11/12/19 11:30 PM
4

This sub is about solving issues, go be a sexist prick somewhere else.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:03 PM
4

I heard from my cousin his story of his gf trying to traumatize him by saying she will commit suicide if he leaves her, obviously it didn’t work Suffered through dating a girl like this. She would pretty much always pick some form of strangulation, which of course would be plausible as a murder as well. I can confirm it does happen, and some people are extremely manipulative like that.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 07:00 PM
5

So yeah, another task. The final task. The final solution to his problems... Wait what?
/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:57 PM
9

Some of these women do it to control or punish their partners as well I had one of those back in the 2010-2012 range. It dragged out what should've been a 2 month relationship into a 3ish year one, and was probably the most miserable time of my life. When I got to the point that I just didn't care, I said I don't care and I left. Miraculously, that manipulative bitch was alive the next morning.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:36 PM
7

There is literally nothing wrong with that. It's about patients (general), not patients (specific). This is neither unprofessional nor illegal.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:26 PM
2

Oh yeah totes
/r/MensRights03/12/19 02:44 AM
-1

Yeah I'm pretty handy with the jokes
/r/MensRights03/12/19 02:35 AM
3

Sick burn bruh
/r/MensRights03/12/19 02:24 AM
3

acts like asshole why is everyone so mean to me
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:46 AM
1

I was only joking. I don't believe you for one damn second.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:45 AM
2

Booooo Stop resorting to this low effort irrelevant bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:44 AM
0

I'd never let my hand diss me like that
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:39 AM
2

I'm banned from twoX, feminism, femradebates, and probably more, they aren't my biggest fans.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:33 PM
3

I had an ex gf bite the shit out of my shoulder. The cop straight up told me if there hadn't been a physical mark, it would've been me getting arrested.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/19 03:26 PM
1

Do you understand what the word if means? As in if the procedure is safe, effective, and 100% reversible
/r/MensRights02/12/19 02:13 PM
-1

Go ahead and explain, then.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:22 AM
-3

I don't know why you thought I was suggesting not using condoms.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:34 AM
11

A vase is removed from your anus.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:23 AM
-7

Mandatory, of course not. But should it be encouraged if the procedure is safe, effective, and 100% reversible. I don't know what the mishap/complication rates are for vasectomies, but that would be a huge factor in just how much encouragement should be given. We should also be encouraging women to use equivalently effective contraception methods.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:22 AM
1

respecc++
/r/MensRights28/11/19 04:19 AM
3

Since you don't know what SpongeBob mocking font is, it means that you're saying simmering stupid whilst mocking those who say it seriously.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 02:57 AM
3

It's stupid, but to claim self-defense you have to apply the same force to the attacker than he applied to you No, you are very much allowed to use reasonable force in whatever the situation is. If Mike Tyson is attacking you, shooting him will still very much be covered as long as he is not already incapacitated, running away, etc.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 02:39 AM
2

Obligatory reddit "not all men/women"
/r/MensRights28/11/19 12:39 AM
3

Lots of feminists aren't actually aligned with what feminism is doing at the large scale systemic level. This is why many people on this sub rail on it so hard.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 12:29 AM
12

The source of a mental health issue is not always the brain, sometimes its circumstance. This is one of those cases.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 09:26 PM
14

Her side: my children’s father is suicidal and I cannot trust him around my children. Bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 08:53 PM
148

I can see why he was seeking comfort elsewhere
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:55 AM
2

You probably mixed 2 comments together in your head. It happens to the best of us
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:53 PM
2

I'm not sure if you're referring to someone else sarcastically or if you read what I wrote incorrectly
/r/MensRights24/11/19 06:30 AM
2

It seems like you think you're disagreeing with something I said
/r/MensRights23/11/19 11:41 PM
3

I'm not sure why you felt the need to add that but ok
/r/MensRights23/11/19 08:01 PM
4

I wouldn't lump changing positions in with being a liar. There are perfectly valid reasons to switch sides in a debate like abortion.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:42 PM
7

I said candidates, but what you gave is actually a great data point to combine with what I was hoping you'd find. That wave of women candidates has sent the share of candidates who are women skyrocketing...to 22 percent. Along with the number of women candidates climbing sharply this year, the number of men running for office has risen. As a result, the number of women candidates — despite a large spike — is still dwarfed by the number of men candidates. That's the finding of a new analysis from…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:28 PM
3

No you fucking dumbass, it's saying that slave owners gain more from having men as slaves and thus have more incentive to capture men. Not "I think we need more male slaves." That's next level stupid as far as interpretations go. A statement of fact is not the same as a statement of desire.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:54 PM
4

Read it again, but this time pretend that you your IQ can't be counted on your fingers. Also
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:42 PM
4

Compare the number of male/female political candidates and then get back to me.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:40 PM
-9

The titanic was like 20 years ago, so I can see why you haven't heard of it
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:00 AM
1

It clarified what otherwise seemed like an out of left field deus ex machina, explained a bit of why she was absent, why she showed back up, and what her power is. The other complaints you mention are still very much valid.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 07:53 PM
0

Captain Marvel was a bait and switch that Disney put between the two biggest films in the franchise and told everyone they needed to see it to get the end... You kinda did need it though. I saw infinity war and end game without it and thought her role was the stupidest shit ever... Saw captain marvel and it made sense and felt a lot less retarded
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:24 PM
1

It's a law that cops can and do enforce selectively, and that's not indicative of a good law. There really isn't a reason to factor alcohol into a law that should be about creating a public disturbance, being violent, etc. We aren't a puritan nation.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:07 PM
1

So yeah... My previous comment. I'm not going to suggest we seriously enforce a law that judges can't drink in public.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:44 PM
1

Crimes such as...?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 04:05 PM
1

Oh wow, judges trying to enjoy life outside the bench, how heinous.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:17 AM
1

It's pretty absurd to try to demonize someone for responding to what was probably a catcall or other lewd comment from dudes in a passing car. No one, literally no one, has high standards of behavior all the time in all circumstances. Edit: the italicized part
/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:16 AM
8

What the fuck is your problem?
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:47 PM
2

It certainly isn't right wingers that tend to seek new knowledge.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 07:02 AM
2

I want you to read what you wrote again, try to find the stupid part You can’t just say that “most men like getting their genitals touched when they sleep” not all of them do
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:07 PM
1

Then maybe they should get a better job You can't argue with this level of stupid. It's the economic equivalent of r/wowthanksimcured. ESPECIALLY not to someone that will just take it for granted, and not put in any effort to get their own income You realize that's basically a complete myth, right? You're blinded by a complete alternate reality. But hey, don't take my word for it. Take this article And now, across the world, a fleet of studies are converging on the consensus that even radical we…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:09 PM
1

This is why you max out out to 1/3 to 1/2 the length of the marriage. You don't get 8 years of assistance from a 3 year marriage (if you get any assistance from a 3 year marriage).
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:08 PM
1

Most female single mothers choose it as a choice, it is usually the woman kicking out the man That's a hilariously one dimensional way to look at it. As I said in my previous comment, context matters.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:06 PM
2

Society is made up of people lmao. By helping individuals, you help society. And lots of single mothers work one or more jobs you nitwit.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:10 PM
-4

We're gonna have to agree to disagree there. Helping those in need is and should be a taxpayer problem.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:32 PM
1

It's not just about retraining, it's time for the person to get experience to move past entry level. If they lost years of experience in their field of choice due to an agreement in the marriage, they deserve years to get some back on track.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:18 PM
2

This is not black and white, and you look incredibly stupid when your response is yay "they should know better than to become a single mother." Context matters. You know women don't always choose to be single mothers, right? Or sometimes a husband turns abusive and she has to leave. Most women don't just get up one day and think "man, I'd love to be a single mother."
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:16 PM
5

Stop using that word on every idiot you don't like. It's not some magical counter argument, it's just you being a moron.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:14 PM
-2

This is not black and white, and quite frankly you look incredibly stupid when your response is yay "they should know better than to become a single mother." Context matters. You know women don't always choose to be single, right?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:13 PM
4

No one can tell me that single mother women don't fuck up kids on purpose. Yes we can, the majority of single mothers are doing the best that they know how to do.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:35 AM
7

The title is fine and it's meaning is clear
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:34 AM
5

Alimony in such cases should be limited to at most half the duration of the marriage, not to exceed 5-10ish years. Closer
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:32 AM
6

Projection is not a good look, you should try self improvement instead.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 05:06 PM
1

Probably a combination of posture and distance from mirror
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:58 PM
1

I don't really think that the title is saying he was fat shamed online... More that if he were to go and ask a woman out, he'd get the "get lost" stare or some other type of rude comment. I still don't really think it belongs in this sub though.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:56 PM
1

If it's karma you want, your can reply to your own comments for free karma. Go get em, tiger!
/r/MensRights27/10/19 09:39 PM
1

Still with the retard insults because you know its actually you who has nothing to gice It's actually just because you keep bringing it up Youre a karma farm for me buddy. Nothing more You're doing great, you have one more karma per comment than I do, all because I didn't bother to downvote every comment you made... Good luck with your farming job my comments are still there for you to read They sure are, they just don't address the core issue... There are more people in poverty than available j…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:57 PM
0

Every person who got out ofnpoverty will tell you the same thing, they got off their ass, got a job, and worked hard. The problem, which you have repeatedly ignored, is that lots of people do this and are still in poverty. There isn't room in our economy for everyone to get out of poverty. You still literally have not addressed that. Just because 10 can do it doesn't mean all of them can. There is competition for very finite, if elastic, number of spaces, and not everyone can just work their way…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 05:02 PM
0

It happens every day to people who chose to go the extra mile and put in the work that needs to be put in. It sure does, but that doesn't mean it happens to all, or even most, of the people who do the extra mile and put the work in. That's the problem. There's lots of people who work hard as fuck and still can't get ahead. You're looking at the 10 examples of success and ignoring the 30 who tried the same shit and never made it. Stop being fuckin lazy and demanding everyone bow down to you and g…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 03:29 AM
0

There was literally no inaccurate comment Except the whole "nothing is stopping anybody but themselves" thing, the line that I challenged and that we're still stuck on. when you join an argument, you dont join the last half, you join all of it No, I join the part I disupted. I let the other parts lie intentionally. you came in hostile as fuck immediately calling me a "You're a fuckin' retard." claiming i didnt understand how poverty works when you literally right before that commented on me bein…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:14 AM
0

It's hard to get anywhere with someone as daft as you in tow. Youre only stuck on the employment part and ignoring the entire first half of our conversation lol. You were arguing with someone else before I came in. But that aside, you know conversations can go off on tangents, right? I'm sorry, you probably don't know what a tangent is. In this context, it means a conversation taking a turn into a different, but usually somewhat connected topic. The current tangent is about whether or not there …
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:59 AM
0

Where have you disputed literally the only core point I've made, that there are fewer good jobs than people who can do them? Hint: the unemployment statistic ain't it, chief. That's not a measure of good employment. Oh and keep taking things out of context Such as? You literally have not disputed the fact that there are fewer good jobs than qualified workers. I'm still waiting for that.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:40 AM
0

You haven't actually challenged much of anything I've said about the imbalance between good jobs and qualified people, yet you claim to have disproved what I said. Unemployment is at an all time low dude Yeah, and shitty employment and underemployment are booming. That's the cause, not because people have found awesome jobs. Lots of people work 2 shitty jobs instead of one good one and still don't make what they would need to rent a simple one bedroom apartment in a moderate COL area. That's fuc…
/r/MensRights27/10/19 12:06 AM
0

Yeah no shit but whats stopping you now from getting that job now? 10x slots, 40x people. I'm literally dating a recruiter. There are more people than good jobs. If I get that job, someone else didn't. Maybe 10 other people didn't. Is it all 10 of their faults that they aren't #1? When there are fewer good spots than good people, people are going to get screwed thru very little fault of their own. All you did was prove my points really. That's a good one. but thanks for thinking you know me so w…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:35 PM
0

There aren't enough well paying jobs for everyone to have one. It's really that simple. Every time you get one, you've stopped someone else from getting it. You have taken a piece of a finite pie. Take some self responsibility in your life. You shouldn't make assumptions about other people like this. You have no idea what my job is, how much I make, etc. Trade jobs are in the 6 figures right now. And the second they everybody starts going that route, it ceases to be true. Salaries will drop, per…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 02:47 PM
-2

im barely over the poverty line. Guess what? Im not a fuckin criminal. I'll take "doesn't understand how statistics work for $500." It has nothing to do with poverty and everything to do with peoples life choices that they refuse to take fuckin responsibility for because they were never taught how. If you think poverty doesn't affect development and shape how people make life choices... You're a fuckin' retard. Now obviously it doesn't affect everyone in the same way, which is why obviously not …
/r/MensRights26/10/19 05:08 AM
1

I wish my tired as shit brain could parse through the meat of that right now, it seems pretty interesting.
/r/MensRights26/10/19 04:52 AM
1

I appreciate the sentiment. I know my English isn't retarded, but I appreciate you wanting to be able to read it anyways. Oh, I forgot, you need it translated. Ie appreciata teh sentiment. Ie kenew my english isn't retarded, but ie appreciata yoo wantenng to buh ablele to read it anyways. I wouldn't want to exclude a retard such as yourself.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:35 PM
-8

In that case: criticizing grammar, clearly the intellectual move
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:45 PM
-10

At least 2 different redditors have made reference to you needing physical help. 2 makes a "we." You ready do need help.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 04:26 PM
-18

We can see that you need professional help
/r/MensRights23/10/19 03:20 PM
-2

It's good to see a reasonable take instead of those fucking idiots who come here and claim they're just trying to destroy western civilisation... Which they live in.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 03:19 PM
2

I've never been told any of that, by anyone. You listen too much internet.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:28 AM
5

The overarching goal of the ideology is to bring down western civ so they can fight it out with other ideologies for who will follow. This is a sub for men's issues, not for dumb shit like this. Take this nonsense to r/conspiracy where it belongs.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 04:57 PM
3

That's not relevant to the current discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/19 10:13 PM
9

Just keep trying for equality, despite the best efforts of bigots like you and hurgablurg.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/19 02:06 AM
11

Yeah, fuck gender equality when it's men who are suffering
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/19 10:34 PM
2

You’re asking for opinion from folks on the Internets. He told his story on r/MensRights, not on r/shortbus. No one would normally anticipate an opinion as retarded as yours coming up on a thread like this.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:52 PM
7

You’re asking for opinion from folks on the Internets. He told his story on r/MensRights, not on r/shortbus. No one would normally anticipate an opinion as retarded as yours coming up on a thread like this.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:51 PM
-1

Cuntplaining is the only one we should be endorsing because it's much better
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:49 PM
-3

This one doesn't really work though, what weird is it supposed to replace?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:46 PM
1

One S too many Cunt fusing actually works
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:44 PM
5

No way. If someone is sexist and demeaning toward you, call it out. Never let that shit slide.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:29 PM
5

So much this. We unfortunately have our share of genuine woman haters on this sub. On the bright side, at least this sub doesn't just ban all dissent like most of the other gender subs.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:46 PM
0

You're a toxic piece o' shit, mate.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:44 PM
8

Your reading comprehension is shitty, I have no idea how that is what you got out of the comment you replied to.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:42 PM
1

It's more about feminists being the main opposition to shared custody being the default in divorce cases. .
/r/MensRights13/10/19 08:43 PM
1

Yeah...... I hope not
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:43 PM
-1

That's a bad metaphor. Men's issues and women's issues aren't inherently opposed like minority rights and Jim Crowe laws. We can tackle most men's issues without harming women, and visa versa.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:32 PM
1

I'm sure most of the ones you interact with say they're for equal rights, most probably even believe it. But when push comes to shove, they brush men's issues under the rug.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:30 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/derds1/slug/f31jega
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:26 PM
1

You can be an egalitarian and a feminist, you can be an MRM and an egalitarian, bit you cant be both an MRM and a feminist. The fundamental definitions of each group are at odds. I don't agree with this. See my comment for my point of view.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:24 PM
1

Feminism is a women's advocacy movement. Men's rights is a men's advocacy movement. Realistically, you should be a little bit of both-- both genders have unique and pressing issues relevant to them. The problem is that feminism often takes it too far, seeking to go well beyond equality. You should be an MRA and a feminist at the same time. Just, you know, keep the feminism bit in proper perspective and do the same to the MRA side should the hive start overstepping the bounds of equality.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 11:21 PM
0

There is a certain type of condescension that certain men generally only display towards women. The term has been blown so vastly out of proportion as to be near meaningless... But it's origin story had a reasonable case behind it.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 12:01 AM
3

Organization works a lot better when it's not at the gas chamber.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:45 PM
3

Needing a job to have a home
/r/MensRights04/10/19 11:45 PM
3

And that's a great explanation of why it "decimated" would more intuitively mean "reduced to 10%," not by 10%. Aka, almost completely destroyed. You know, how pretty much everyone uses it.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:49 AM
5

That's not what he said at all
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:44 PM
6

It's not "he's innocent," it's "he got away with it."
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:08 PM
1

No. Absolutely no, and please never suggest that again.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:04 PM
0

I don't give a fuck what the dictionary says, that's not what it means anymore. Most dictionaries are slow to catch up with the times.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:01 PM
1

I'm worried that there are sexist idiots like you out there casting shadows on the good causes that this sub is supposed to stand for.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 04:27 AM
-1

Many businesses require heels, and most pants with pockets don't fit women very well. Offer than that, good list.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 09:30 PM
2

Aaaaaaaand you're why this sub gets mocked.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 10:46 AM
7

Ah, the Two Wrongs Make a Right policy. I dig it, in a "that's a terrible idea" kind of way.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 09:56 AM
2

Good news, they got him and he's been arrested!
/r/MensRights27/09/19 08:37 AM
7

Neither should be held to that standard... And women aren't unless theyre doing something for a litigation fearing business
/r/MensRights27/09/19 07:41 AM
1

Feminism is a women's advocacy movement. That's what feminism does. When you start saying "well all those people aren't feminists," you're firmly in no true Scotsman territory. Feminism is what feminists make it in the real world, not what an outdated (if it was ever actually accurate) dictionary says.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 02:24 PM
9

You're firmly in no true Scotsman territory here. Feminism is what feminists make it, just like Christianity is what Christians make it, even though 98% of them don't follow 98% of the Bible. The vast majority of feminists have no interest in men's issues and would rather just advocate solely for women.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 02:22 PM
1

It isn't though
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:13 PM
2

That's what they say it means, that doesn't mean that's what it actually means.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:04 PM
17

Feminism does care about the rights of men because feminism by definition cares about equal rights and opportunities for everyone. North Korea is by definition a Republic.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:00 PM
6

You presented a definition. We're not talking about dictionary feminism, we're talking real feminism. Huge difference.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 12:11 PM
11

feminism is just the belief that women and men should be equal That's what they say it is. In reality, it's a women's advocacy movement. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 11:55 AM
9

No she definitely showed him red flags. If you think women should get the same pay without doing equal work, you're not for equality, and nobody should want to date a sexist like her.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/19 01:17 AM
100

And that's a perfectly fair setup, you take some of his duties, he takes some of yours. Everyone does work they're more physically suited for without anyone getting more shafted than the other.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/19 01:11 AM
3

Mostly just others
/r/MensRights20/09/19 08:14 PM
2

It isn't, though. It's about raising women's status. In areas where men aren't equal, it's silence. Women want equal representation in cushy jobs, but they never ask for it in welding, garbage collection, etc. Feminism is about giving women the benefits of equality without the drawbacks. They want women to be equal to upper class men, but the lower class men... Ewwww
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:51 PM
2

And that idea is "promoting women," not equality. There's nothing wrong with that until they proclaim that it's about equality-- feminism is perfectly fine with women having the upper hand, and that can cause problems for men that feminism loves to ignore.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:13 PM
3

It's the point of an advocacy group. Feminism is a women's advocacy group, not an equality movement. Generally that's fine and dandy, but then they try to claim they are for both genders and then proceed to ignore or shut down male issues. Then when anyone tries to address men's issues they shout "feminism is about everyone!" as they promptly ignore men's issues and demonize those who try to address them.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:34 PM
5

No, it's feminism. Women's issues being more important is peak feminism. They throw out old ideas that hurt women but keep the ones that benefit them.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:16 PM
3

No, it's feminism. Women's issues being more important is peak feminism. They throw out old ideas that hurt women but keep the ones that benefit them.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:16 PM
3

Are you insulting people who go to school, people who say "let the taxpayers bear the brunt and they'll complain, or the people who don't know where their tax dollars go? I'm ready not sure.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:46 AM
22

People always say this, but I'm pretty sure you and I both know that 99.7% of taxpayers have no idea where their tax money goes.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:26 AM
1

I don't think you're dumb enough to not understand why a nation would want to sabotage a rival.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 03:33 AM
-2

Stop pretending you're stupid.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 01:32 AM
2

Like most things that feminism combats, it's not actuality discrimination
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:37 PM
6

It doesn't have to be for the money, the money just has to be there as an enabling factor. Everything is more attractive when you get free money from someone else. Women will make different decisions when they know there isn't a man to finance it.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 10:53 PM
1

The most important thing is that both of them get to make their own decision and preserve their autonomy to the greatest extent possible. You know, freedom.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 10:50 PM
-1

If you can't beat your enemy on the battlefield, go into your adversary, win over their populations and help elect officials that are sympathetic to the Russian viewpoint, and tie up your enemy, essentially, with politics and infighting so that they cannot resist you on the foreign policy playing field. "They love things like 'America first,' because if everybody puts themselves first instead of their alliances first, that allows Russia to rise on the world stage." But I think you knew that alre…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 10:49 PM
2

The federal minimum wage for women is only $7.25/hr...
/r/MensRights14/09/19 07:07 PM
5

I think it's pretty obvious in the discussion at hand that the folks in this thread, myself included, generally are not in favor of outlawing abortion...
/r/MensRights14/09/19 06:55 PM
6

Here we disagree again, the woman doesn't put the responsibility on herself by not choosing an abortion, it doesn't work like that. Yeah we're not arguing about how it works, we're taking about how it should work. And her decision should put responsibility squarely on her shoulders. Her body, her choice, her responsibility. The responsibility is shared by them both, since none of them had sex on its own OK then, outlaw abortions and we can all be equal. It's her responsibility same as his, don't…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 06:21 PM
1

Yeah he is not a good person to listen to on this topic.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 06:18 PM
1

Oh boy, you're serious... RT is literally a Russian paper aimed at promoting Russian interests. One of Russia's interests is sowing discord in America.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:47 PM
5

You think that throwing all the responsibilities of raising the child to the woman In choosing not to have an abortion, she's putting that responsibility on herself. Her body, her choice... Her responsibility. woman (who could also not want the kid If she didn't want the kid... Why the fuck did she carry it to term? If you're not part of the your child's life, you should at least provide financial support Stop guaranteeing free money and there won't be a child to support. Stop the train and the …
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:40 PM
2

A woman deciding to abort basically nullifies everything. Do you think the choice to keep the pregnancy = accepting responsibility? The father gets right of first refusal. If neither wants the kid but the mother won't abort... Yay foster care system If abortion is off the table, pro-life men can reject responsibility, but pro-life woman cannot. What do you mean "off the table?" if you mean illegal, then neither should be able to avoid responsibility by any means except putting it up for adoption…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:36 PM
4

Stop promising free money and these "accidents" will mysteriously stop occurring.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:15 PM
6

Absolutly but we as men are not the ones left carrying the baby, sustaining it, going through the huge physical and emotional changes Nope, we're just expected to become wage slaves against our will for 18 years... In case you're bad at math, that's approximately 24 times as long as a pregnancy lasts, so pardon me for not having pity for women who try to force men into it. Stop the guaranteed money and the number of single mothers will plummet, coincidentally in about 9 months.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:12 PM
2

This only makes sense if you're against abortion in all cases.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:10 PM
3

Yeah it fucked me up for a while. She immediately shackled up with someone else and had a kid pronto. Luckily he looks nothing like me and the timing was several months off. I dodged a bullet, someone else jumped into it behind me though. I hope for the kid's sake she fixed her shit.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:04 PM
4

Stop promising free money, and there won't be a child. This happens all the fucking time because women know they will get money out of it. Take away that guarantee and I promise you the number of "accidental" pregnancies will go down, as will the number of single mothers.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 05:00 PM
6

You don't think being forced to pay 30+% of your salary for 18 years for a child you didn't want and had no say in isn't a form of oppression? Lawl mate, you're delusional.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:58 PM
0

Not the "for life" parts, but the core points are true.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:57 PM
9

How is it delusional that women can freely abandon a pregnancy but men cannot? Why should a man be responsible for a woman's decision to carry to term if he doesn't want a child? Where is the delusion?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:55 PM
3

Man gets 2 choices: Option 1: yes I want rights and responsibilities Option 2: no I do not want rights and responsibilities They would be given a time frame to decide, the timer starts when they are notified (to encourage early notification, and not punish men who were not told). That way, a responsible woman (who notifies the man in a timely fashion) can make an informed decision knowing his stance, and irresponsible women (those who intentionally or unintentionally delay notifying the man) can…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:52 PM
1

It's cruel to raise kids knowing that the other parent doesn't want them and you can't do it on your own. Stop giving out free money, and women will (almost always) pick the smart choice: abortion.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:47 PM
2

It's cruel to raise kids knowing that the other parent doesn't want them and you can't do it on your own. Stop giving out free money, and women will (almost always) pick the smart choice : abortion.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:40 PM
6

Yup. There is no insurance with these things, if you dont trust your partner then you have to come to terms with that or find someone you do trust JFC you're an idiot. You literally glazed over his whole point: people you trust can lie to you, betray you, etc. Some people are great at that kind of manipulation, and often there's no great way to tell.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:31 PM
3

There's about a 50% chance she changes her mind when she accidentally gets pregnant anyways. Had a girl do that to me (she stopped taking birth control because she thought I was planning to break up, which I was...), I told her nothing in this world would make me stay with her, and that's what it took to finally get her to abort. I'm lucky that strong arming her worked. That conniving bitch had all the power and she knew it.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:29 PM
7

Except that it's, you know, a felony, and felons can't vote in most states...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 06:05 PM
1

I definitely meant to respond to someone else... Whoops Where the fuck was my head at
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:03 PM
15

"don't reveal privileged information that could taint the trial" is hardly equivalent to "if you criticize me you go to jail." Where the fuck is your head at?
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:57 AM
15

That is literally a government employee using their official capacity to violate a citizen's constitutional rights. She needs impeachment, end of story. No government official should ever be beyond criticism, that is a terrible precedent.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 06:55 AM
1

I have been very up front with my gf of 6 years that I have no interest in marriage until it's time for kids at which point she will be on my healthcare. There simply is no upside to marriage from where I'm standing.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:36 PM
6

Not remotely the same. Wanting your spouse to be healthy isn't an oppressive gender role.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:34 PM
7

Yeah they still don't really work like that
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:56 PM
10

after dozens of men have had their turn, they begin to realize their vaginas are physically being torn up. r/badwomensanatomy That's a ridiculous thing to say, and it the sheer stupidity of it hurts your credibility. Luckily the other stuff you said was fairly bulletproof.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:55 PM
53

Your wife sounds like top tier ex wife material. If she treats you like an ATM, treat her like the short term pump and dump she deserves to be. Respect begets respect.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:50 PM
1

!Remindme 16 hours
/r/MensRights06/09/19 05:53 AM
1

What specifically did she perjur herself on? I doubt she lied about "everything about her mail server."
/r/MensRights06/09/19 05:38 AM
1

Presses X
/r/MensRights05/09/19 08:18 PM
1

Why wasn't hillary clinton charged with perjury For what? When did she lie under oath?
/r/MensRights05/09/19 08:18 PM
28

Yeah that's a clear, clear violation of the first amendment.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:36 AM
1

You can't shit on feminism for being more for women's rights than equal rights if as an MRA you find yourself doing much the same. Yes you can. We aren't claiming MRA is about women's issues, too, so we don't try to silence feminists with the whole "but men's rights is for women too" nonsense. That's the issue with feminism: it's a one gender advocacy claiming it's for everyone. MRA doesn't have that problem.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:38 AM
2

Presses X
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:30 AM
2

Have I characterized this point accurately? I don't really separate decisions/actions and responsibility for them into two separate ideas like that, but it's close enough. For me it's just one thing: whoever who smelt it dealt it. You make the decision, you bear the results of it. If so, then I think this can actually get really complex. It absolutely can, and often does. Responsibility for actions and outcomes is often a multilayered affair with several people sharing various amounts, and in vi…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:23 AM
3

I think I understand the basic assertion, but on what is it based? On what is "people are responsible for their decisions based?" Are you serious? Anyone who makes a decision without coercion/force is responsible for it. How so? I'm not disagreeing per se, just would like to know more about why you think this belief is gross It infantilizes women and demonizes men. If women aren't as responsible for their actions that's treating them like children and implicitly placing blame for women's actions…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:46 PM
5

but I'm also not very familiar with it. If possible, would you please direct me to some resources that would help me understand it a little better? It means women are equally capable of making decisions and should be held equally responsible for the decisions I make. in general, though certainly not always, women are the fairer sex. That's a pretty gross belief dude.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:21 PM
1

Go away
/r/MensRights28/08/19 10:17 PM
11

No, they only want this for accused men.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:47 PM
1

I love wraps
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:26 PM
11

You do you. That's free
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:17 AM
4

Or... The world shouldn't care so much
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:13 AM
8

I'd do that shit for a grand a night. I'll wave my money at anyone who tries to insult me.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:12 AM
18

These gender studies nutcases can't even get the math right. If one bag has 20% less, the larger bag has 25% more. Let's say the women's bag is 10 Oz. The men's, 20% less, is 8oz. That's a 2oz difference, but 2oz is 25% of 8, and 20% of 10. They didn't think this shit through at all.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:34 AM
-13

There are plenty of ogre DV statistics that don't lean the same way. You can't say that from the given data.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 09:40 AM
4

Women have had these opportunities for decades
/r/MensRights16/08/19 01:20 AM
1

You're buying what you want to buy, nothing I say will change that. If you think an incident that she bright up with her counselor 6 years prior was just a long con, there's nothing that will convince you-- you simply aren't evaluating the evidence. If you aren't aware that until reporters were literally knocking on her door, she never planned to go public and put her name out there, and her only initial goal was to soak to the Judiciary Committee, you aren't evaluating the evidence. There's not…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:21 PM
1

You're buying what you want to buy, nothing I say will change that.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:04 PM
1

Because sexual assault in a closed room never turns into he said she said, right? It's you who can't be taken seriously at this point.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:21 PM
1

No need to start lobbing insults. I read what you wrote. If I go and say something about someone to a psychologist that doesnt make it true But it does make it not new, which demolishes the usual "made up to sabotage a nomination" theory, which is basically why I commented in the first place. To combat that misinformation. If she provided evidence then I would. If that crime happened yesterday there probably wouldn't be evidence beyond circumstantial. Unfortunately that's the nature of a lot of …
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:59 AM
1

For people who think Kavanagh is innocent, that's the go to. I don't necessarily think he's guilty, but I do think that Christine Ford believes the story she tells. She may have a case of mistaken identity, or some other continuity issue, but I do not buy the narrative that she's a political pawn who knowingly lied for political gain, which again is the usual go to for Kavanagh defenders.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:49 AM
2

You must've missed the part about counselors notes from 2012. It's not your fault, most of the people who think she made it up aren't very good at reading.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:41 AM
2

FYI, extremely long post incoming Also didnt the main accuser suddenly decide not to pursue it further once he became justice Ford only wanted to speak with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, her attorneys told CNN on Friday. Ford does not want the situation to "drag on into the next Congress should Democrats end up winning control on Capitol Hill," the network reported...What she did was to come forward and testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee and agree to cooperate with any in…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:21 AM
-3

The women with Kavanagh didn't just randomly come out, they came out because they thought an evil man who sexually assaulted them was about to get into a position of extreme power. I don't go around spouting that my neighbor from 15 years ago tortured and killed small animals, but if he were about to become a Supreme Court justice, I'd consider it.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:42 PM
1

No... Like not at all. Since when is illustrating the hypocrisy between male and female sexual harassment an incel thing? GTFO here if you hate equality so much.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:35 PM
6

My girlfriend works as a recruiter. Her company straight up asked her how to hire more Asians...They definitely would give preferential treatment to desired demographics, and they aren't the only business that would do so.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 06:03 AM
1

I don't know what I'll do if I'm confined to this subreddit for that long! At least give me a weekend r/all work release!
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:50 AM
2

He deserves my pity. The false accusation didn't tear the marriage apart, a wife who trusted a stranger over her husband broke the marriage. She made the decision, end of story. No one forced her to take a stranger's words at face value. We aren't the police of people's personal lives and we won't advance mens rights issues if we focus on people like the wife in this situation. Shame bad behavior. Women will only do this sort of thing because they know society won't judge them for it. Make it un…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 08:47 PM
1

And I will judge shitty people as what they are
/r/MensRights10/08/19 08:40 PM
1

I think someone in her situation has every right to make the same decision she did. You're right, she has the right to be a fickle bitch with no loyalty.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 08:24 PM
1

And I think she does deserve it. This behavior, abandoning those who depend on you without an extremely compelling reason, should be ashamed wherever it is seen. In refusing to condemn it, you are encouraging the next person to take the same action. The whole point of shaming is to discourage a behavior, and that is 100% my goal here. If you're going to abandon someone in their time of need, you better have a damn good reason to believe they deserve it. The unsubstantiated word of a stranger is …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:56 PM
2

What if she believed the stranger, or even doubted her husband, even a little. The tiniest bit of uncertainty here would be enough to scare anyone in a relationship, how someone acts in a situation like this is probably not a very good reflection of our real selves. It is her fault, 100%, for jumping to conclusions. Whether or not someone trusts their fucking spouse is a HUGE indicator of what kind of spouse they are. If she regrets her decision, imagine how much she hates herself for her choice…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:52 PM
1

Yeah, lots of people stay in jail until trial is over because of our shitty pay to play system. That literally means nothing. If you abandon your spouse because they are going through hard times due to no fault of their own, you're a shitty spouse. It's that simple. It would take extremely strong evidence to get me to believe someone else over my girlfriend, and I'd hope for the same from her. She chose to be a shitty wife and abandon him in his time of greatest need, there is no defending that.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:45 PM
1

It's hard to imagine that someone you married would abandon you over a literal nothingburger. She made her choice and I hope she loses a house and doesn't get a cent in the divorce. She has earned nothing, and her marriage was a sham because she never truly trusted her husband.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:08 PM
5

You mistake a statement of how things are for what I think things should be. I thought that was clear from context, but I guess not and I could've/should've been more specific. I very strongly believe in presumption of innocence, that accused person's names shouldn't be made public until conviction, and that not all (or possibly even most) accusations are credible.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 06:08 AM
3

In what way?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:49 AM
7

Lots of men would do the same shit if it worked. My own fucking father tried to tell a court during their divorce that my mom stabbed him several years prior (he stabbed himself working in the garage). Don't be a sexist piece of shit. If you want to be, feel free to move to the middle east where women are as respected as you feel they should be.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:36 AM
5

It's wholly her fault. No one forced her to trust a stranger instead of her husband.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:32 AM
7

Abandoning your significant other in their greatest time of need on the word of a stranger absolutely, 100%, makes you a bad spouse at least. And if you're that bad of a spouse, you're probably not a great person.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:31 AM
6

Yeah, the wife is absolutely the bad guy. Who the fuck would listen to a complete stranger instead of their spouse without strong evidence?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:29 AM
6

Western society running on a presumption of innocence
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:28 AM
0

So should women have demanded equal pay in 1776 along with independence from Great Britain? Goalposts move. Things change. Objectives advance. If you think the objectives are unreasonable (as in some cases they are) focus on that. The fact that items get added that weren't there original doesn't mean each new item is unreasonable. First you wanted a job. Then you wanted a car, since you had money. Now you want to own a home? And eventual retirement? Of course your goals grow as your achievements…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 04:13 AM
1

Short hours are typical of the parts of medicine that women are dominating. Like nursing? I'm gonna need a citation from you here.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:49 AM
0

Maybe you haven't realized it yet, but big journeys are made with baby steps. Of course when they get A they probably have another goal beyond that! You don't have to make just one request and it's all you get. Get out of here with that nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:47 AM
1

Sounds like my wife
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:41 AM
1

Anyone who takes linguistic cushions like that seriously is an idiot. Idiots are unfortunately in charge of a lot of things.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:38 AM
1

Go away troll
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:32 AM
3

That seems well calculated
/r/MensRights29/07/19 04:20 AM
6

No no no, just sex after flirting. You gotta get consent without any words exchanged, and especially not compliments. Basically just whip your dick out and see if she hops on... wait that's not right
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:17 AM
1

He didn't read it, just wanted to see that hot naked lady. /s
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:07 AM
-1

That's not the average women. Get the fuck out here with that ridiculous level of misogyny. The upvotes on your comment are an embarrassment to the sub.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 10:26 PM
2

Imagine if it were liberals who wanted that to happen...
/r/MensRights23/07/19 02:27 PM
5

I disagree on the moderation thing. I come here specifically because it's the only gender related sub that doesn't ban and censor all willy nilly. Low moderation is one of the best parts of this sub. That just means it's up to the users to downvote and condemn.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 08:48 AM
1

Again, you're trying to refute "we think businesses are sexist" with "but if women are cheaper..." The proper refutation is about how the reason women generate less value is due to choices they make (profession choice, hours worked, failure to negotiate wages, etc), not "accountants know your value!" It's a moot point though, 96% of them will be in denial no matter what.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:21 PM
1

You've offered a counterpoint which is not really related to the stated argument.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:34 AM
0

You're trying to refute "we think businesses are sexist" with "but if women are cheaper..."
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:26 AM
-1

You're trying to argue facts against an argument that isn't based on them. Im not saying you're wrong, I'm saying that the whole "Why would anyone hire a man, when you could hire a woman for 3/4 of the price?" argument is a mischaracterization of the opposing point of view. The whole idea is that women are perceived as being less productive, negating the savings. The opposing point of view is that women generate 100% value, but business think that women only generate 77% which is why they pay th…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:30 AM
0

The assertion is that women are getting paid less for the same work. The assertion is that women do the same work. The assertion is not that business think women do the same work.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:11 AM
-8

I specifically characterized what I said as the establishment thinking process. Their thought process is flawed, but that doesn't change the fact that he mischaracterized it. It isn't just women are cheaper, but the fact that they think the people who pay women less think they are worth less. Thus there is no gain gain (in a businessman's mind) for hiring cheaper because they assume they'll get less value. You characterize it as "why wouldn't you hire cheaper " whereas to them it's "the business…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:10 AM
-36

Why would anyone hire a man, when you could hire a woman for 3/4 of the price? It's fundamentally flawed thinking and no serious economist gives it any credence. This is a ridiculous assertion tbh. The point is that they think that the people paying women less think women are less effective and that's why they pay them less. You wouldn't pick a less effective worker, would you? Please apply more thoughts to your assumptions about them than they do their assumptions about us.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:29 AM
3

She won before the divorce though. Chances are pretty good that it's why she divorced. "I don't need his money no more so I can divorce him and keep mine." Like no, you don't get to mooch off someone and then block them out because you finally got a payday. That's what this looks like to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/19 06:04 AM
55

"I no longer need to mooch off of him, time to blindside him and never pay any of it back." Bitch move.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/07/19 05:50 AM
9

https://youtu.be/7wQJVXa2IkA?t=56
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:30 AM
0

To even compare the 2 as if the amounts and their effect on people are remotely similar is 100% laughable.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 06:41 PM
-4

If I don't like pineapple why don't I just play basketball?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:34 PM
5

That downvote tho... who and why?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 02:33 PM
-27

Ooof, bad take.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 12:29 PM
-39

Why would people like you rather shy away from an extremely important topic? That kind of conduct is pretty close to what the president bragged about doing, and a fair number of people from this sub support that... not very nice person
/r/MensRights27/06/19 11:49 AM
1

Yeah I don't believe you
/r/MensRights21/06/19 09:48 AM
1

As someone whose had to clean both: women's are virtually always worse. If they're cleaner, it's probably because the place is male dominated and the women's restrooms don't see as much use
/r/MensRights21/06/19 09:47 AM
3

but surely you’d concede that men have it much better than women, no? No, I absolutely would not. I'd concede that men and women have different sets of problems. The reason you would think men have it better is because society promotes and prioritizes women's issues whilst minimizing men's. It's fairly extreme framing bias. but women have much more toxic gender roles imposed on them Such as? Specifically the ones that men don't have an equally toxic role from across the gender aisle. especially …
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:25 PM
2

Top notch comment right there
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:17 PM
7

It was never about true gender equality, it was always about women's advocacy. That's fine, women need advocates, but they largely ignore issues that wouldn't benefit women if fixed, and they always have.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:20 AM
3

Imagine thinking there should be a comma there
/r/MensRights16/06/19 03:23 AM
1

And why do you think women pick different jobs.... Probably about 70% biology, and about 30% what you're saying.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:45 PM
0

He's a man who yelled at women on 2 occasions (that I know of) for not sleeping with him after a house party despite his "best efforts" at entertaining them. You clearly do not understand what bigotry is if you think that a character judgement based on someone's actions (repeated actions, no less) is bigotry. This is a man who got fat doing nothing but playing video games, never left his recliner chair (except to work, basically), and would then try to woo any women who would come to house gathe…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 10:34 AM
0

I'm interested in what gave you the idea that he never said that... Maybe you knew the roommate, whom I specifically brought up in a discussion about guys who espouse that point of view, better than I did? I can assure you, he did say as much. Interesting angle, though, going for the "he never said that" thing on someone I lived with and you didn't.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 10:24 AM
1

Tbh I see the idea behind latent conscription (what the USA does now; selective service act). I am more specifically speaking against a mandatory service commitment for every male (which I think they do in Korea, Germany, a few other places). I just don't trust our government to pick the right times to activate latent conscription; I don't trust them to pick the right wars, etc. I'd err to the side of "never" over the side of "more than necessary."
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:24 AM
3

Social security doesn't threaten your life, take you thousands if miles away from your family for potentially years at a time. It won't destroy your livelihood or give you PTSD. Social security will enhance the society you live in (you know, enhance the general welfare) of the country, by not forcing old people to resort to robbery or suicide to save their families money. What an asinine competition.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:00 AM
0

Where did I say anything bigoted? And this guy wasn't taught to be an asshole, he chose to be that way. He was just a bitter man who blamed the world for his bitterness (not just women). He felt entitled to women, sure, but it didn't end there.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:20 AM
1

There was indeed, but people were lining up anyways. Same for ww1.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:19 AM
2

If the people want war, they'll enlist on their own. Did you miss that sentence? Recruitment ws not difficult at the time because people wanted war. That was a very different time.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:26 AM
1

I doubt it. The logistics of a world government would be near impossible, and too many regions hate each other. Rich people also need places to flee when they upset a given government... also too much profit in war Break up the family unit, subdue the working, subjugate selected populations, I buy it. I don't buy the one world government angle.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:59 AM
1

Im mostly not onboard with the one government thing. I don't think we'll see that in the next hundred years (!remindme). Everything else I was ok with. But I ran out of foil and needed someone to blame.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:45 AM
7

The important thing to know is that feminism is a women's advocacy movement, not an equality movement. As long as you understand that, there's nothing inherently wrong with feminism. The issue comes when you bring up men's issues and they go "evil! Misogyny!" Then you go to men's rights and they go "evil! Misogyny! Feminism is about men too!" Nothing the previous poster said was misogyny. They were statistics that support the fact that women pick different jobs, work fewer hours, and choose diff…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:42 AM
5

Oh no... a literal retard has entered the sub. We should attend it back to r/ feminism where it belongs
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:25 AM
3

Conscription is terrible. War is ALWAYS for mega rich war profiteers, and very rarely serves any tangible benefit to the country in question. If the people want war, they'll enlist on their own. No one should be able to force you into a war you don't want.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:22 AM
3

Oh shit, IT WAS YOU WHO STOLE MY FOIL.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:17 AM
0

Nope, just a roommate. Cool baseless downvote though.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:09 AM
2

A simple "yes that was sarcastic" could have avoided all this.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:08 AM
0

There is no one that thinks being nice to a woman makes them deserving of sex. That's a lie used to demonize men. I can tell you that's wrong, as I've personally lived with one.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:03 AM
1

No one is saying to let men abort. Please spend more time trying to comprehend what you're reading, because you obviously need more processing time than the rest of us. There is no way to have a serious discussion with someone like you who cannot consistently track the topic and the arguments made. Please come back when you've surpassed a 6th grade reading level.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:28 AM
1

A person with a penis has the right to a vasectomy, a person without a penis neither does nor does not have that right It's crazy how this computers as OK for you yet you see issue with what I suggested.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:26 PM
1

Your question was obviously rhetorical in the sense that it was also a statement. It neither needed, nor was it genuinely requesting, an answer, and we both know that. What wasn't rhetorical was the other user asking if you were being sarcastic and instead of saying yes, you gave an inconclusive reply. Pretty big difference between the two.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 10:46 PM
2

It isn't unconstitutional though. If a woman got another woman pregnant, she'd be able to sign the form just fine. Never mind that that's not how the 14th amendment works. After all, women can get abortions but men can't. Rape laws and sexual assault laws (and in most places domestic violence laws as well) are applied and written differently based on gender in many jurisdictions... But that's not equal protection! it just so happens you aren't very smart.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 10:36 PM
2

You are so fucking dense dude. OF COURSE THERE SHOULD BE AN OFFICIAL PAPER, PROCESS, ETC. The specifics of that are not particularly important at this point, and I don't think you're bringing that up in good faith. Don't pull that red herring bullshit; Do you think when people say they're declaring bankruptcy they just do this? I shouldn't have to specify "informs the mother via notarized Child Acceptance/Rejection Form 787B." Do you think when I say "I bought a car," that I don't also mean "I s…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 09:38 PM
4

You realize you can answer when someone asks, right? Don't blame me because you're too autistic to properly answer a yes or no question someone already asked you.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:53 PM
2

Given that other folks on this thread have had issues with you misinterpreting, or pulling arguments out of thin air, I don't think it's equally likely that it's my fault. The message of the OP is pretty simple: women can shirk their parental rights and responsibilities (R&Rs) after sex should an accidental pregnancy occur. Men cannot, but should be able to. My point of view on this is basically the same idea fleshed out a little: A woman can abort if she so chooses, a man should be able to abor…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:47 PM
4

Without the probability of free money, a lot fewer women would choose to be single mothers.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:21 PM
1

Don't say period, it upsets them
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:19 PM
1

In what way is my argument supporting one person being able to override another's decision?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:16 PM
5

You realize the severity of the symptoms was wildly different, right? Who am I kidding, you probably don't. It's like comparing a paper cut to a dislocated shoulder and then saying the guy with the shoulder can't handle pain, but the paper cut guy handles pain just fine.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:13 PM
5

I lol'd pretty hard man, thanks.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:10 PM
2

Calling my point of view “retarded” is a great look into your level of maturity though! It's harsh, but your constant mischaracterization of arguments before I even got to this thread, and your inaccurate interpretation of the OP back up the accusation pretty well. If it isn't stupidity, it's dishonesty, or maybe a language barrier (but your grammar itself seems just fine). Take your pick.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:04 PM
2

That's not how that works... Equal protection doesn't mean "one person's decision can override another," which is what you're arguing for.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 08:00 PM
1

Do you remember the second half of your own sentence? Do you read and comprehend the words you write? an additional legal right afforded to only half of people. It's not afforded to only half of the people, every person would have this right. It's like I'm arguing with 10 second Tom over here. Your reading comprehension and apparently even your comprehension of your own words is at an unbelievably low level. Arguing with you is like arguing with a mentally deficient potato. I think we're done he…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:54 PM
2

It only takes one to lie about birth control (which has happened to me personally), to stealth, etc. There are plenty of cases wher one party clearly never wanted a child, and yet they can be forced into it via dishonesty or other means. Your point of view is absolutely retarded.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:47 PM
2

(unconstitutional) Citation needed
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:41 PM
1

The OP What about it? If that's what you got out of the OP, you misinterpreted something very severely. That calls your basic reading comprehension into serious question, and I highly doubt your interpretations of past arguments on this topic given you clearly don't understand the point on this one. Normally I'd give you a pass and assume a language barrier, but your English is solid enough. You just straight up aren't processing the arguments in front of you. if either side wants to care for an…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:40 PM
2

What are you having trouble with here? No one is suggesting that an additional legal right afforded to only half of people. If a woman knows the father has forfeit R&R, she can decide to either do the same or carry on on her own. Why are you making this complicated?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:34 PM
1

uhhh... The number of single mothers vs fathers is completely irrelevant to whether one can forfeit responsibilities but not the other.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:30 PM
3

The situation becomes problematic when one half wants a child, and the other does not. No it doesn't. A man gets a time frame after notification to state his wishes, and a woman gets to make a choice after that. You're imagining complications that don't exist. Should a man not be able to sue a deadbeat mother for child support, for a child that he wants and she does not? If she informed him in a given time frame during pregnancy (the same I'd expect from a man, notification in a given timeframe)…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:27 PM
2

The situation described in the OP would result in children being born to mothers who want to keep the child who are then solely responsible for that child (which, if we’re being honest, is what happens more than the reverse as it is) and have no recourse to seek child support from the other person responsible for creating that child. That's the point. If it's solely her decision, it's solely her job. Should a woman have the right to a paper abortion, unilaterally foisting the entire financial re…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:23 PM
2

In most cases women can already do that...
/r/MensRights14/06/19 07:20 PM
1

We're just doing the reverse now. Sometimes all it takes is a mirror
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:42 AM
5

Look at how they stretch out to assert their dominance over the space available so that no woman feels safe to enter the space. This is a beautiful comment if I've ever seen one
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:39 AM
5

This is pretty true. My gf actually goes to the gym and stuff, and her basic grip strength still isn't anywhere near mine. She likes to test it, and I can always crumple her grip very quickly, and my grip is not strong by men's standards at all.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:33 AM
16

Referring to the singular woman in question, it had no bearing on the genders of his other victims.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 09:40 PM
3

And yet the idea that there's zero rape in any country is nonetheless ridiculous
/r/MensRights09/06/19 05:45 AM
1

It's not comparison... It's a sequence. If a woman doesn't abort, a man pays child support, ie wage slavery. If we force a woman to carry the fetus to term, suddenly she has to be "child support" for a child she didn't want. How you missed out on that comparison, I don't know.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:29 AM
3

The child's best interest is not being born into a home where the mother can't afford it and the father doesn't want it. Carrying a child to term that you cannot support is selfish.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:25 AM
1

It takes two to have a child. But you act like “power” is our right to bear a child and “selfishly” request help to take care of one. It is selfish. You think "I want to keep the child, and I need his money to do it." You're being downvoted here because your point of view is completely gynocentric. You're not even trying to be unbiased, you are refusing to even look at this from an equal rights point of view. Women can abandon all responsibility for the child if they so choose within a given tim…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:20 AM
3

I do not feel that paying child support and the likes is anywhere similar to forcing women through pregnancy and childbirth. You're right. Being a wage slave for 18 YEARS is much worse. Having your income slashed, your standard of living sabotaged, your autonomy over your own life is decimated for YEARS. I know men who pay more for child support than they pay for their own home and car combined. That's absolutely fucked. If you gave me a choice between being pregnant for 9 months or losing 1/3 t…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:10 AM
2

Men who are forced to be fathers almost always have very little to do with raising the child. Women who are forced to be mothers usually have an 18 year commitment on their hands on top of the physical commitment You realize like 80% of the country doesn't think women should be forced to be mothers, right? Something like 75% of Americans are pro-choice. If they had they would be using that rubber. I had a long term GF quit taking birth control pills without telling me with intent to trap me in h…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:01 AM
1

It sounds nice in theory, but often times speaking in a technically precise fashion would require an increase of effort (increased verbosity) that most people view as not worth it for casual conversation. Typing exacerbates this problem, and typing on mobile does so even further. English speakers fudge a lot of the language, and you're not going to accomplish much by willfully misinterpreting people.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:22 AM
2

All teachers female Mabe on average...but not all. I happened to work at a primarily African American school. Here's a life pro tip: if they don't say all, they don't mean all. If they do say all, they still probably don't mean all. People use all encompassing language as a shorthand for "the vast majority of." Everyone does it. And of course, I don't mean everyone, I mean the vast majority of people, and by people, I obviously mean native English speakers. This guy knows Male teachers exist, an…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:18 AM
1

You definitely seem pretty upset
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:13 AM
-1

OK then just provide a defining line based of the distinction you make, the point at which the unborn transition to become “fully human” This is where the only serious debate can be had. I'm open to opinion on this one, as I don't really think it has a set line. We're all just gonna have to let this one fall at a reasonably agreed upon spot. I'd have to do more research into comprehensive development from embryo and beyond to come up with a more precise time frame. I would put it at a certain le…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:51 PM
1

Usually you can argue whether you are sentient while asleep. many say no, many say yah. but there is no argument whether you are sentient or not while you are say....rendered unconscious by total anesthesia, or blacked out drunk, or in a coma. you simply are NOT. This is simply ridiculous. You're comparing temporary incapacitation to complete lack of functionality and the parts required for it. I wouldn't go around saying someone who just rolled their ankle doesn't have a fucking foot. I wouldn'…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:18 PM
0

becasue the value of an unborn child’s life is not determined by whether or not her parents want her or will be good parents or whatever else excuse. But it's quality of life will be HUGELY affected by all of these factors. That, and it isn't really a child with any actual sentience until well into the pregnancy. we arent suffering from over population either. Not relevant. Just because you aren't starving doesn't mean you need to eat more. We don't need more children.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:56 PM
2

You could, but it wouldn't be accurate. I'm not the one that thinks a fetus is a child at the point of conception.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:38 PM
1

Why should we be forcing people who aren't ready for or don't want kids to have them? Nothing positive will come out of it. Why do we need more kids? We're not suffering from underpopulatiom.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:31 PM
2

murder of children So like I said, you don't know what you're talking about
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:27 PM
22

NO ABORTIONS, EVER. Pretty bad law for anyone who has any clue what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 09:08 AM
-4

Even a broken clock and all that
/r/MensRights24/05/19 09:07 AM
2

Because per just about every rule in the English language, it should be spelled "loose."
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:17 AM
1

Most of the ones I talk to, both online and in person, have been the "abolish minimum wage, taxes are theft" types, SSI maybe I've just dealt with the dumb ones. I've known taxes are theft types working in government, like how stupid can one be? Most of them don't get that their policies seek to replace government power with business power, and that we'd have no real say in the kings of that system. We'd just be swapping in new kinds of operation. One of the people in another thread tried to say…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 04:47 PM
0

Set on a per state basis based on the poverty line in that state. The reduction in taxes that other libertarian policies would bring would lower the poverty line and increase individual's wealth and the standard of living. This is laughable. If private bodies show themselves to be corrupt or incapable, government steps in. If? Fucking lol mate, we have a lot of history to see what happens when Gov has let business handle own safety. Some new form of black lung would make a resurgence within the …
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 04:44 PM
1

I asked about your opinions to see if they were as stupid as the handful of libertarians that I know. If they weren't, I'd have said so (such as with emissions/environmental regulations.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 04:34 PM
-4

Minimum wage in short is bad This level of stupidity is why people don't take libertarians seriously. This is about as broad of a category as you could name. Regulations to do what? Think OSHA type regs. Should it be on employees to find a safer workplace, or should laws mandate things like lock out tag out, safety glasses, kill switches, fall protection from heights, etc Subsidizing should almost never happen What about roads? Education? Police and military? Pollution laws might be a necessary …
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:34 AM
5

Men and women believe abortion should be universally illegal in pretty even numbers.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:19 AM
22

Gallup shows that women and men believe in similar numbers that abortion should be illegal.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:18 AM
1

Most of those non democratic things are actual problems that need to be fixed. Our system is horrendously outdated.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:15 AM
1

Every form of government is tyranny by someone over someone if you're going to apply that standard. At least tyranny of the masses would theoretically benefit the most people, as opposed to the tyranny of the minority that we have right now.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:13 AM
-1

What is your opinion on minimum wage safety regulations in the workplace subsidizing certain industries (ie green energy) no cause firing of employees forcing business to serve everyone regardless of race/sex/etc (ie the gay wedding cake story) emissions and pollution laws
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 08:10 AM
-1

Probably because libertarian is downright stupid, the free market won't solve everything.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/19 07:59 AM
1

Yeah if you go to social media but not to the police... you're lying
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:14 PM
1

Have you ever been to TD? They are the most ban happy sons of bitches I ever saw. There is no one I trust less to handle managing censorship than Donald Trump. For him end his peeps, anything they doesn't make them look good is fake and should be censored.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:04 PM
3

No it wouldn't. Most of feminism's issues aren't based on facts in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:29 AM
3

Chances are high that he just had no idea of such a thing, since I'd guess 99% of redditors aren't intimately familiar with the Complete History of CondomsTM . This is a pretty good case for that razor blade that everyone is always using on reddit.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:28 AM
1

He didn’t say that and that makes no sense. I literally quoted him... Why is he not allowed to talk about it? Allow me to quote my previous comment: "It's ok to bring up your own issue, it's not ok to downplay someone else's." It's like you didn't even read my comment. Talking about someone else’s problems doesn’t minimize our own. No, but saying this does So You are very lucky and Your situation isn't so bad. It’s not like him bringing it up is hurting anyone. I didn't tell him not to, I said n…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:02 PM
0

You don't just go around minimizing other people's problems. Nobody likes a 1upper. It was fine until this So You are very lucky and Your situation isn't so bad. I wouldn't go up to someone who just lost $500 gambling and tell them I just got evicted, their struggle is small and they are lucky. It's ok to bring up your own issue, it's not ok to downplay someone else's. That's just basic respect.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:39 PM
8

AND THE PAY TREE ARCHY
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:39 AM
0

You sound like a caveman who never learned to properly manage his sex drive.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:07 AM
1

Your grasp of English is solid, but your grasp of these concepts is not. There's a huge chasm between "women must be kept from power" and "feminist." As a wise man once said, only a Sith deals in absolutes.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:51 AM
1

i'm pro-patriarchy Exactly why I called your views ass backwards. you sound like feminist Incorrect.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:42 AM
23

she argues her points in an incredibly logical and straightforward manner Yeah, internalized misogyny will do that to you. Edit: Evidently the sarcasm was not apparent enough...
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:09 AM
1

That what you said is so asinine that I do not believe it's your honest opinion; it seems to me that you came to this sub to bring discredit. Maybe you are just ass backwards, it's hard to be sure.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:03 AM
2

Yeah I'm in a pretty vulgar profession , so the offensive language you used didn't even register for me. The draft is ridiculous. You're spot on that if people don't want the war, the government has no right to force it.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:49 AM
2

We got a real sly double agent here...
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:27 AM
3

He showed as much respect as was deserved.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:26 AM
-4

"My problems are bigger" Go away.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 09:25 AM
2

Teacher is right, nobody wants to see you sag your pants. It's stupid and pointless. It doesn't mean she didn't pay a kid to sexually assault someone. This is something you complain about in the teachers lounge, not something you commit sexual assault over. She has no business being a teacher.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:56 AM
2

That's fair. Im not familiar with the Loyalist dialect, such treason is beyond me.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 07:54 PM
17

Would you call it a month long event? No? Then fuck off. Drag your dumb ass to some other sub that's ok with morons trolling around.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter