TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sexydude01 Archive

View 16 posts and 648 comments by sexydude01 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Question for BluePillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:10 AM
15

Question for BluePillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 03:21 PM
11

Question for BluePillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:29 PM
8

Question for Blue Pillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:14 PM
8

sexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 08:53 AM
6

Question for Blue Pillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:05 PM
5

Question for BluePillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:59 PM
5

Question for Blue Pillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 06:13 PM
3

sexydude01/r/MensRights18/03/16 11:37 PM
1

CMVsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:31 AM
1

sexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 11:32 PM
1

sexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 11:20 PM
1

sexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 08:33 AM
0

sexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 05:51 PM
0

sexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 08:57 PM
0

Question for Blue Pillsexydude01/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Either way it screws them up
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 10:36 PM
4

its not "accepted" by most women in their 30s when looking for higher level guys in their 30s who date women in their 20s. Plenty of shaming language is still used for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 03:58 PM
7

Very accurate. The next question really is why would beta bucks want to willingly sign the marriage contract then when he obtains this knowledge? Ergo, the fear that women have of TRP. This knowledge of why TRP is so hated because "beta bucks" might wise up to this problem and avoid marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:08 PM
0

How did he go "back on his word"? He was ENGAGED NOT MARRIED. Ergo, he doesn't have to marry her if he doesn't. Engaged doesn't mean he will definitely marry.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 05:28 PM
7

What kind've omega male crap is this? The dude owes her NOTHING. Considering women wanted "equal" rights, they are getting it. This isn't like a traditional virgin woman that stuck with a guy during his med school years, cleaned, cooked, etc for him while he was "making it". This is probably an "independent" woman that did zero cooking, cleaning, helping during his "poor" years but wants to get in on the wealth after he makes it. Get the hell out of here with this White Knight crap.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 05:18 PM
2

This doesn't have any logical scientific argument behind it. How do I know the law of large numbers don't confirm AWALT? I can easily argue that the "exceptions" to the AWALT by BP doesn't prove anything away from the mean over the longer term, kind've like your example of coin tosses.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:27 PM
5

I think its been gradually getting worse with smart phones/dating apps worsening the situation significantly. Women are also mistaking their ability to get casual sex to their SMV, which significantly overprices their expectations when they finally need a relationship. Females who go through their 20s on tinder getting banged out by "chads" truly believe by their late 20s/early 30s when they are "ready" they can easily marry one of these dudes because of the easy access the obtain on the dating …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 07:26 PM
2

you won't do better down South. Tons of obesity among women, best women are paired off young, etc. Don't kid yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 05:49 PM
1

South has plenty of obese women though, so I fail to see how thats a much better dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 05:48 PM
12

Its not you. Your analysis is correct about American women Feminism coupled with obesity plus materialism is very toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/17 05:45 PM
3

The female should get zero benefit from the child support though. That child support should be audited with shared parenthood with the female getting zero benefit from that support.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 05:06 PM
0

Im speaking about the Biblical definition of Christian. Pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 01:47 AM
3

yeah but guys who make more usually want younger and thinner
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 01:46 AM
0

He doesn't talk about at biblical precept from the NT concerning marriage and the female role. Ergo, he is a pseudo Christian that uses to religion to make money through female narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 01:39 AM
5

As she should but she's postwall and unlikely to do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 01:37 AM
1

yeah well let's see if she can do better. Doubt it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 01:26 AM
2

Dave ramsey isn't christian lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 01:26 AM
2

he is making 30K to supplement. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:59 AM
6

Very simple for her to pay down his debt. Dave Ramsey often suggests for their husbands to pay down their wives debt. Why not the reverse? Here is beta cuck Dave Ramnsey suggesting the man pay for female 100K debt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5--RhjQR6c
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:55 AM
3

She clearly would've been gone if possible She is already 32 and getting older. Why isn't she gone? Do you honestly believe she would be around if she could get another guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:47 AM
5

Yup I agree. Let her work and make money. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:46 AM
3

Common sense. She clearly doesn't love this dude from her tone of voice. She is very upset with the relationship and uses the "Christian" excuse to pretend that is why she likes him. However, if she had better options, she would've already been gone. Why isn't she? Shes already old and getting older.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:46 AM
4

She is post wall and probably out of shape. She can't do better than a dude who makes 30K per year due to her low SMV or she would've already left. Read between the lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:35 AM
5

yeah but you don't know the full picture. She is post wall (past 32) and possibly fat. Ergo, she is unable to do better than him due to her low SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:34 AM
1

Correct. Feminists only believe me should be held to any standards. Also Dave "cuck" Ramsey doesn't realize something very simple about this "relationship". The female is past her expiration date at 32 and isn't likely a great looker. Therefore, she is UNABLE to attract a better level male or would've already dumped this guy. This is the BEST she can do, so she is whining to "shame" the dude to work harder for a post wall hag. Not a good deal for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/17 12:19 AM
1

It appears that she isn't doing the grocery shopping, isn't cleaning the house or even making meals when the guy comes home. Why is this a problem to expect and why is this considered "abusive" by feminist women but not the part of her being dependent on his assets/income?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 06:27 PM
1

I agree. So this guy's solution appears to work pretty well. Just avoid marrying them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 06:26 PM
1

Yes but it seems that the women in the comments section appear to believe its "abuse" if the man has obligations placed on the female housewife despite her depending on his income.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/17 06:20 PM
2

that doesn't prove feminism is useful
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:25 PM
1

Im asking about ANY civilization/society/country that BEGAN with feminist principles that made it strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:56 PM
1

I perceive BP as being mostly third wave feminists, ergo, I will continue to equate the two considering its pretty appropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:54 PM
0

you have called out nothing and have proven nothing my argument remains powerful and intact
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:53 PM
1

I have modified the argument so that I can argue in "better faith" by putting a concrete question that can't be easily dismissed with lack of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:52 PM
5

patriarchal societies such as ancient rome lasted for millenia Can't think of any feminist societies that lasted for even a few generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:47 PM
5

If this is the case, surely many powerful societies would've practiced this political system since their inception, yet throughout recorded history, I have been unable to find any evidence for this. Can you provide examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:46 PM
0

No electricity has been proven beneficial. Feminism has not
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:29 PM
1

That excerpt doesn't answer my question. I have asked a very specific question that basically sums up the lack of benefit from feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:28 PM
1

That is why I restated the question for a more concrete question that can't be made on "lack of evidence"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:27 PM
1

The movement gained legislative power around then. The ideas came far earlier. Ideas eventually gain legislative power often but not immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:26 PM
1

Since the start of the society NOT after it matures. During the beginning stages of such a society. Early Rome, Early Greece, Early Britain, Early Germany, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:25 PM
2

BP is mostly feminist is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:20 PM
7

1920s was feminist now? lol wow
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:20 PM
1

I have used a society from inception until peak. My argument is that no feminist society can grow until it becomes a leading nation. It can only come to fruition when men made the society extremely rich with abundant wealth before it can take place. it is a net negative not positive
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:19 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:18 PM
1

so your answer is "well they are happy" lol wow
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:17 PM
1

"Happiness" wasn't the question posed. You can make another thread about supposed happiness index though
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:16 PM
2

Feminism didnt really gain legislative power until the 1990s
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:15 PM
2

That doesn't prove it was incorrect though. It was deemed as "not in good faith". Ergo, I have modified the question to make it have "better faith" with ZERO ability to jump around with lack of evidence. This question can easily be verified through recorded history evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:14 PM
9

Modern day feminism didn't even start until the 1960s. It didn't have legislative powers until the 1990s. Betty Friedan would NEVER consider 1950s America to be feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:13 PM
7

Why not? Patriarchal societies have been able to flourish for literally 6000 years of recorded history. Why can't feminist ones flourish?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:05 PM
9

Incorrect America was already the biggest economy in the world before WW2 and conventional feminism hadn't taken hold yet. Remember feminists talking about the 1950s? They never talk about some feminist utopia. They talk about it being a "terrible patriarchy" where women were "oppressed" by their husbands. I don't remember ANY feminists describing the 1950s America as feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:03 PM
2

My argument was never dismantled and remains intact. This question is even more succinct and can't be gotten around by claiming "we don't know"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 06:01 PM
7

Cool story bro but thats why i said since inception. America was a very powerful nation that became a SUPERPOWER well before feminism ever took a hold. American feminism was only created after America had become a huge creditor nation with abundance in wealth and income. My premise was feminism can only take hold AFTER a society has become great and wealthy whereby it destroys such a society due to economics/demographics. Europe and USA follow that pattern
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:59 PM
1

This is an irrelevant point that doesn't answer the question being posed
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:58 PM
1

Thats why i clearly said from inception to prospectively answer this nonsense. Clearly, USA was already very powerful before feminism. Since feminism, USA and Europe have become huge debtors with low demographics and collapsing economies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:57 PM
1

eww
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:56 PM
2

Wasn't a feminist society though
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:55 PM
2

Also, the only answers to rebutt was that we could never "tell prehistoric times" due to lack of language and evidence. Ergo, I have modified the question to use only periods with verifiable evidence of civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:53 PM
2

yet here we are not answering the question speak on it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:51 PM
2

I simplified the question and removed any evopsych stuff to verifiable history. This way no one can argue there isn't evidence based upon not being able to tell in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:50 PM
3

Once again you haven't answered my very simple question. Name ANY society that was feminist in the past from inception and became strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:49 PM
2

Different question and simplified since the strawman argument from before was that we couldn't "determine things in prehistoric times before written language". Ergo, I have modified this to ask a question that is easily verified using written history. Since feminism is being purported as some big beneficial thing, why has no society ever benefited from it before?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:49 PM
0

All of recorded history shows that patriarchal societies are the only strong societies and have stood the test. There have been no recorded feminist civilizations.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:02 PM
1

Everything I have argued is 100% accurate
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:01 PM
1

Hillary Clinton has ALWAYS been a feminist and strongly states that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:01 PM
1

What percentage of people are college educated in Germany for instance compared to America. That will give you the real numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 05:00 PM
1

Nothing I can tell. Thought I was arguing in good faith since I strongly believe this stuff. What wasn't good faith about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 04:59 PM
1

sounds like it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:22 PM
0

they obliterated nothing because of the power of recorded history. Feminism has always proven to be a failure and always will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:22 PM
1

according to that link, they have also added "social sciences" to STEM as well. I dont consider psychology STEM since its a soft science at best
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:10 PM
1

my evidence is all of recorded history and yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:09 PM
1

Academic establishment that gives fake jobs to bull degrees and administrators with govt support
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:09 PM
1

LOL how do we know about anciet greek, roman and egyptian societies?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:03 PM
1

never said that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:03 PM
1

Why would I be bitter than you are dating a beta male during your peak fertility years in a relationship with a guy who is 8 years your senior?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:03 PM
1

A) Psychology is NOT STEM B) Yes I agree accounting is helpful overall although we have made that too complicated to increase jobs C) Its the good majority D) I enjoy those things too but we don't need to subsidize millions of degrees in those subjects from second and third rate places at trillions of dollars.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:02 PM
1

lol cool story bro name ONE society that was successful based on feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:01 PM
1

you kind've did
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:00 PM
1

Men still produce more in taxes than they take while women as a whole are the opposite. Ergo, women need men's production at the macro level big time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 12:00 PM
1

most business degrees are useless outside of top schools. There is also a glut of MBAs from second and third rate schools. I never said only women get useless degrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:59 AM
1

yeah except I linked labor participation rates for males of productive ages while you just yapped anecdotes
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:58 AM
1

Must've gotten to patriarchy in all of recorded history somehow
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:57 AM
1

well considering you are dating a male who is significantly older than you during your peak fertility years in a traditional type of relationship, you have an interesting take on feminism compared to your rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:56 AM
1

lol these feminists go in and out with their philosophy. Its truly a shitshow of insanity
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:55 AM
1

Name any productive feminist societies throughout recorded history then. Should be quite simple since feminism is such a powerful and positive force right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:54 AM
1

We have "feminist" degrees in America. They actually can get a PHD in "feminist studies" these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:51 AM
1

Program Name Total Degrees Awarded 1 Business Administration 314,345 2 Liberal Arts 292,741 3 Nursing 221,895 4 Psychology 125,880 5 General Studies 103,665 6 Medical Assistant 92,605 7 Cosmetology 82,278 8 Biology 79,040 9 Accounting 78,788 10 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 53,880 Basically half the degrees are in "liberal arts and business" which mostly come from second and third rate colleges. WTF are you going to do with that worthless stuff? Psychology and "General" studies also accounts fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:50 AM
1

I didn't say just women's studies. I said bullshit liberal arts degrees in general and general "business" degrees from mostly second and third rate schools
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:48 AM
1

Like I said, there is no such thing as feminist biology. So Scotland subsidizes millions of women's studies degrees? Got a source for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:41 AM
1

Hillary Clinton supported TPP and NAFTA
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:40 AM
1

Women don't seem particularly happy nowadays either post feminism: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/16/women-and-prescription-drug-use_n_1098023.html Guess being a post wall CC rider and single mom doesn't make women happy long term
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:40 AM
0

Everything is speculation before recorded history. However, throughout recorded history, my analysis has been accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:39 AM
1

I have easily defeated you based on facts, so the story is cool bro
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:38 AM
1

ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:35 AM
1

Look back at comments about STEM Source: http://www.matchcollege.com/top-majors
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:35 AM
1

You are an anonymous person stating anonymous anedotes. I am speaking about the macro level beta males are dropping out of the job force in RECORD numbers. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/the-missing-men/488858/ Ergo, my argument holds far more weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:34 AM
1

Men will not work hard to support post wall CC riders or single moms. Sorry to break that news to you I don't consider modern liberal arts degrees "education" either considering their average graduate can't read at an 8th grade level, do basic mathematics or do any productive job skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:32 AM
1

Feminism plus NAFTA/TPP/Billionaire class worked together on that Problem is America is running almost trillion dollar deficits per year due to this now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:31 AM
1

except they do: http://www.matchcollege.com/top-majors
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:31 AM
1

cool story bro but doesn't account for the large numbers I am speaking about on the macro level
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:29 AM
-1

That "source" never showed one feminist society in HISTORY that was successful. Ergo, you have refuted nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:28 AM
1

I clearly exempted STEM from the academic analysis. Since STEM is now a good minority of degrees, the majority of academia is useless nonsense. We don't need "business" students from third rate schools either since there are far too many of them. http://www.matchcollege.com/top-majors When you break them down, FAR TOO MANY college degrees are nonsense subjects.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:28 AM
1

Most of the degrees in college are now "liberal arts" and not STEM. Men DOMINATED STEM degrees, women DOMINATE useless liberal arts degrees. There is no such thing as "feminist biology". We have far too many lawyers from second and third rate law schools with zero job opportunities. We only need T14 law schools to really meet demand for lawyers. The rest of that gibberish about feminist law has nothing to do with our discussion and is another strawman that you made up to divert the conversation.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:25 AM
1

All of the above are from the STEM fields, which I said is the ONLY productive part of academia and DOMINATED by MEN. The vast majority of degrees are in useless liberal arts subjects dominated by women in college.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:22 AM
-1

Its the most logical one being shown with all the evidence of recorded history Yours is fantasy feminist nonsense with zero recorded historical evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:21 AM
1

People dont "enjoy" their work just to pay for some post wall CC or single mom. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/the-missing-men/488858/ Why do you think there is all this whining about "where have all the good men gone" and "men need to work more" in the past years? The shaming language has been doubled down on by feminists to get the betas to work but has been unsuccessful so far. Feminists have nothing left but shaming language to get these betas to work now. A man can live…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:19 AM
0

English Literature is mostly useless and only makes sense for richer people at Ivy League colleges. What will the free market pay for an English lit degree at 100K at a small liberal arts college when they graduate? There is a reason why the student loan bubble is exploding. Getting into college in America only requires a pulse for the vast majority of them outside of the elite. Even at the "elite" colleges, women receive much affirmative action programs that give them positions that are unearne…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:18 AM
1

We know there has been ZERO feminist societies in all of RECORDED HISTORY that has been powerful or a success. We also know all the greatest recorded empires/civilizations have been patriarchy. Wonder why?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:16 AM
1

they have fake govt jobs that are unproductive and require tax payer money to keep. Its an indirect form of welfare. Betas have cut back from working dramatically in recent years: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/the-missing-men/488858/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:14 AM
2

Actually you dont You have to have good scores and only a small segment of the society can get college educated based upon test scores/grades well before college. Also, they don't subsidize millions of useless degrees like they do in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:10 AM
1

How many degrees in women's studies, gay studies, hispanic studies, etc could survive without govt support through loans? Who needs these degrees in the free market by the millions? https://www.bostonglobe.com/magazine/2016/05/18/hopes-dreams-debt/fR60cKakwUlGok0jTlONTN/story.html Why can't these students pay off their loans and the bubble keeps growing?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:08 AM
2

lol you make absolutely no sense as a feminist. You are dating a male who is significantly older than you in a largely traditional relationship. I thought you feminists didnt date older men?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:07 AM
-1

Name one civilized society that developed on any model outside of patriarchy. All the great civilizations were patriarchal. Zero societies have ever been built on feminism throughout recorded history. Proof is in the pudding
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:06 AM
1

They will work enough to sustain themselves but not produce more. Average male can live in very low levels of money. Without that excess wealth to tax, who is going to pay for the single moms or post wall CC riders with zero job skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:05 AM
2

Beta is very clear. Its a guy who isn't sexually stimulating for most women but is a productive dude produces far more than he receives. With his surplus wealth, in the older days, he could support a family. These days, he remains in a sexual desert until his late 20s/30s where he is offered a post wall CC rider or single mom as his "reward" for working hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:04 AM
1

It is mostly a drain outside of STEM. Gay/Lesbian studies, women's studies, african studies, hispanic studies, etc produce nothing of value and require govt loans to sustain. No companies need these degrees in any large numbers. A whole industries of tens of thousands of second and third rate colleges has sprung up offering this useless degrees with zero productive value for the society. Ergo, we have an unsustainable student loan bubble with literally millions of full time students who are unab…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 11:01 AM
2

Also, weren't you advocating "patriarchy was for the beta males", why are you dating a beta now?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:59 AM
1

Yes but if you look at the labor participation rate of men between 25-54, those "betas" are becoming fewer and fewer. With each generation of feminists, the amount of sucker betas who toil for nothing becomes less and less. Ergo, productive capacity dwindles, deficits explode and demographics collapse. The fatal flaw of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:57 AM
2

Actually, women throughout their lives produce almost nothing of productive capacity. https://phys.org/news/2014-11-disparity-tax-paid-women-men.html This is becoming more acutely aware. How many women are in the tech, construction, manufacturing fields that actually produce the wealth of the society? Very few. Women gravitate to bullshit social work jobs, govt jobs, academic social science jobs, etc that are a net drain on the society with a cush lifestyles but zero production. Men can live off…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:56 AM
2

Most tatted up feminists like yourself (clearly a female) have zero productive job skills. Ergo, you will either need a play job with the government/academia that is a net drain on the society or just get on welfare/disability rolls. This will only work as long as those beta males continue to "do their part" with creating far more wealth than they consume. Under the feminist system, these beta males get zero reciprocity for that hard work. How long do you think they will continue to labor for mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 10:52 AM
3

Technology invented exclusively by beta males born in a patriarchy. Women have yet to prove they can invent shit
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:57 PM
2

Modern feminism is a state sponsored welfare program for single moms and worthless post wall sluts attempting to give them options based on the government dime through beta male taxes. Patriarchy was far more symmetrical in obligations between the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 10:56 PM
1

16% is very large percentage especially when you add in Medicaid single moms. What about food stamps, housing assistance, etc as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:04 PM
1

Look at the YOUNGER populations and birth rates. Don't include the 55+ year olds and then get back to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:03 PM
2

might be more difficult but the higher level men can do that. the lower level men should just remain single without marriage. very simple
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:02 PM
1

also a bunch of medicare for "disabled" women due to "mental disorders" or some other crap as well look that up
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:01 PM
0

Male sexuality evolved to dominant females and make them subservient to serve their man. See how that works
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 09:00 PM
-1

If we are going back to "cave days", women had no say in reproduction due to being essentially the chattel of the dominant males who won the wars. Ergo, yes women got to reproduce but didn't get to chose with whom and were subservient to the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 08:56 PM
1

they dont for anything but pump and dump
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:48 PM
0

Much of Medicare spending is on older women who are either "disabled" or never worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:45 PM
2

Not one of those countries is doing well demographically and are ALL being replaced by Muslims
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:44 PM
2

TRP isn't interested in the longevity of the Western world under its current feminism ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:44 PM
1

See thats the thing. Feminists don't want to allow men that freedom to avoid post wall CC riders or single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:43 PM
3

They're "angry" because they are being pushed by feminists into having to marry or LTR these women despite it being against their best interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:40 PM
9

This just shows the female supremacy that feminism has become. Men's lives literally dont matter
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:38 PM
3

I don't see men avoiding marriage or LTR with post wall CC riding women and single moms as "hate" but a wise choice for hard working "beta" males who get ZERO benefit in such relationships. So the answer is simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:37 PM
1

we know the post feminist West isn't doing well demographically or economically long term
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:33 PM
0

Neither are most Western women http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/03/opinion/holland-women-depression-drugs/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:27 PM
1

cool if she's happy with a poor dude where she has to pay all her own bills and possibly his as well, then im good with it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:25 PM
3

Actually they aren't a "drop in the bucket". Medicaid is mostly populated by single moms, which is a HUGE line item budget issue
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:22 PM
1

Dudes should think about this very happily actually. Takes pressure off their back. Why support a woman that is way past her prime or has kids from another man? Just live your life guys! Emancipation proclamation of MGTOW/TRP
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:19 PM
1

Are you taking credit for all those inventions of White men now?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:14 PM
1

Yeah I like America still Never said I wanted to live in China
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:13 PM
3

Europe is dying demographically and turning Islamic. Europe is also a welfare continent that is dependent on foreign labor due to demographic decline, therefore, Islam continues to grow rapidly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:13 PM
7

We are saying to avoid marrying post wall used goods CC riders and single moms. We also don't believe in paying for kids we didn't produce. What is wrong with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:11 PM
1

No, patriarchy is the only civilizational dictum that works. However, the Western world is gynocentric not patriarchal anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:11 PM
1

now they will just have to get used to very poor men that can't give them much
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:10 PM
1

Thats true but the Western world is collapsing economically/demographically.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:09 PM
3

Which ones are doing well demographically/economically that have become BP? Name them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:09 PM
3

How is that "fucked up"?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:07 PM
1

no they are just saying you will get a lower and lower quality male as you get older for LTR
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:06 PM
1

It is? Whose to say that feminism won't just peter out after the death of the Western economy and demographics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:05 PM
1

Nah I'll just stay here and enjoy the decline while pumping/dumping used goods CC riders while having my kids out of wedlock. As Islam continues to grow and exert benefits for men, I might convert as well to get a better patriarchal position. Im just enjoying the decline, making money, pumping/dumping useless modern women, etc. I've adapted already
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:05 PM
3

Incorrect, most are not having children due to feminism and wasted fertile years of the average Western woman since the 1990s. Im not bitter at all. Maybe it will be for the best if Islam takes over.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 05:03 PM
1

China's methods wouldn't work then. Its predicated that older women want a nice beta to marry. if old women didn't want that, none of this would have an effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:55 PM
1

But they aren't, they usually want a beta bucks to marry when they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:55 PM
1

Nah I just have to stay in the West. Between Islam and other patriarchal societies growing rapidly, I will be fine. Ill just pump and dump post wall CC women during the decline
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:54 PM
1

There are no rights without responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:53 PM
1

Nice strawman but the proof is in the economic/demographic pudding. Remember, feminist insanity has only really been the law since the 1990s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:53 PM
1

what? this isn't even logical woman
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:52 PM
1

Men can value women for relationships in ANY manner they want. Isn't that what feminists have been advocating for women in a deregulated market place? Why can't men do the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:51 PM
3

The society debt is over 20 trillion with entitlements out the wazoo, demographic death of the West and "patriarchal" societies with the only positive birth rates (Islam in Europe, Hispanics in America). Feminist societies dont last past two generations or so unless brought under control due to implosion economically and demographically.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:51 PM
8

Also women have no right to expect that hard working guy in his 30s to marry them or give them a LTR when they need it or to marry single mothers that get knocked up. The problem with feminism is they want to govt to pay for those single moms from the taxes of beta men they have been rejecting. Ergo, its really not a "free" market
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:49 PM
1

China has second biggest economy in the world with a 7% growth rate in terms of GDP and major surplus. I think they're doing ok
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:34 PM
1

All people have "shit" on feminism in every society throughout history outside of post 70s Western world. I guess everyone else got it wrong but feminists in the modern ages who are only a generation old?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:33 PM
1

They have over a billion people and the fastest growing large economy in the world. They are number 2 in terms of economy with a 7% growth rate with trillions in surplus. America had a less than 1% GDP growth rate ( probably negative) with over 20 trillion in Federal Debt thanks to Obama. I would love to have that "problem". Since CHina has over a billion people, I think they can manage with a declining population quite well
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:32 PM
1

Yeah I guess all that old wisdom and wisdom of current day China/Islam/Africa/Latin America are all wrong? The only people who have it right are post 70s feminists who have figured out true "equality" huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:30 PM
5

TRP isn't establishing a society that conform to anything. They are basically saying that beta bucks dudes should never marry older women who ride the CC and should try to get younger women. This is just free market SMV dating options that they encourage beta males to undertake. Do you have a problem with TRP preaching this message and beta males doing that? Surely you believe in men exercising their own interests as they perceive them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:29 PM
1

And yet they remain more picky compared to Western feminized men who are being told that these leftover women are "special" and they should wife them up
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:23 PM
3

So if men phrased their interests as younger women with few sexual partners would that make you feminists happy? Somehow I doubt it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:22 PM
2

Why aren't feminists worried about post wall CC riding women luring men into marriages to only divorce rape them a few years later?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:21 PM
2

Doesn't seem too small when you look at marriage rates
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:21 PM
2

Yet feminists continue to whine incessantly about the TRP. Why should they care? Men are only exercising their options to avoid post wall CC riding women for long term commitment. Are we trying to restrict men's rights and speech now?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:20 PM
4

What is misogynistic about men wanting younger women with low N counts for a longer term relationship? Are they not allowed their preferences or is that only something women are allowed? Also, Islam + China seem to be on a tear recently. Islam is taking ove Europe demographically while China is the second largest economy in the world now. Ergo, they are doing pretty well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:19 PM
2

What is misogynist about what was said in that video by China's own female agency? This is essentially identical to TRP opinions on women. Its probably even harsher because it starts at 26 in China.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:18 PM
2

Why should those men settle down with CC riding post wall sluts in their 30s though? See that is the problem here. TRP/MGTOW has taught these dudes to avoid these women. Feminist should support men exercising their own options like women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:04 PM
2

Then why are so many of them whining about "toxic" TRP or MGTOW? Its a big talking point these days. Also why is it "toxic" for those beta males to exercise their sexual game back to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:03 PM
3

Yes but those "bitter" guys are smartening up and not marrying these whores that rode the CC anymore. So I don't see why thats a bad thing. MGTOW/TRP is teaching those beta bucks men to not be a sucker. Why should feminists be mad at that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 04:02 PM
0

Yeah they should just pump and dump those post wall women though. MGTOW/MRA is teaching them that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:19 PM
27

Have you seen the obesity problems with women these days?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:18 PM
7

Actually no they dont agree. Feminists/Older women are VERY angry that MGTOW/MRA are saying that men should NOT marry that slut TRP is teaching those BB how to improve themselves to attempt to get younger women in their 30s while avoiding commitment to older used goods women. Ergo, the problem with MGTOW/MRA by feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:17 PM
4

Yes and she's not entitled to his commitment after being thrown off the CC when she gets older. MGTOW/MRA tells those beta bucks dudes to AVOID marrying one of these whores after she decides to "find a good man after dating the jerks". Don't see why that opinion is problematic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:16 PM
8

That is all MGTOW and MRA are saying. Dont be beta bucks who marries to older whore/slut. This seems to upset the feminists/older women though. They seem to think this is "sexist" and men aren't allowed that opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:14 PM
3

Once again, name one sharia country that allows homosexuality and feminist rights. I promise you can't despite all your game playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 03:13 PM
6

Who said women have a right to commitment? Men don't have to marry or give any resources to the female when she hits her 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 02:59 PM
7

Name any countries in the world that practice sharia that don't ban homosexuality or grant feminist rights. Im waiting
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 02:27 PM
2

Yeah trying way too hard to be a man with a "bigger D than you" nonsense moniker. Definitely a female bro, lets be honest here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/17 02:27 PM
1

what about men having more geniuses on the IQ spectrum or are stronger on average? Those a big differences too. Or you just like the differences that show female supremacy aka feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 01:36 AM
1

homosexual studies, lesbianism, women's studies, etc are all bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 01:35 AM
2

most of these university "professors" have no real world knowledge and teach bullshit liberal arts courses. Its not like most of them are doing quantum physics or something highly intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:17 PM
1

so there is no "difference" yet she "shouldn't put out till he invests with time and dinners first"? how come she doesn't "invest" in him with time and dinners for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 02:52 PM
1

Why shouldn't women give up sex right away? Are you saying women are different sexually than men? Not very feminist sounding
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 12:50 PM
0

The purpose of the beta talk is to wake up men to AVOID marriage so women don't take advantage of them. Why benefit does the "beta" get from marrying an older used goods women who has been pumped and dumped by Chad? Its the "alpha" that obtains the advantages in the current SMP
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 12:45 PM
1

How do we know she wont manipulate him? Or can only men manipulate women?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 01:36 AM
1

how come feminists dont come out in mass against these types of 30s relationships then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 01:35 AM
1

Actually, I'll show you petitions from angry feminists to that effect: https://diversitychronicle.wordpress.com/2015/01/13/progressives-seek-ban-on-sexist-age-gap-relationships-dating-and-marriages/ Far more than "three" are involved
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 01:09 AM
1

Yeah there was an epidemic of the more successful older dudes SUCCESSFULLY getting younger/hotter women than their ex wives. Ergo, the hamster developed due to jealousy to prevent this "travesty" and "molestation of young women"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 01:08 AM
1

There is a "power" imbalance anytime there is a wealth gap. However, the younger woman makes it up with a higher SMV that compensates for his wealth. An older guy has a BIGGER power balance difference with an older woman considering she has low SMP ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 01:05 AM
2

then this doesn't apply to you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:59 AM
3

Older gold digger women (vast majority of older women) do the same thing yet I see no attempt by post wall feminists to label this as "prostitution". They usually call it "standards"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:58 AM
1

yeah they were pissed that their ex husbands could get younger women than themselves and attempted to "regulate" it after they found our their own SMV collapsed. Feminism 101
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:56 AM
1

yeah studies show risk of autism increases from .001% to .0015%. Very scary!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:47 AM
1

some women in their 30s would disagree with that
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:46 AM
1

im bitching because post wall feminists are trying to make that situation "immoral"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:46 AM
1

yeah the risk is HUGE It goes from .0001% to .001% chance of autism. Scary stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:14 AM
2

im trying to have an argument in good faith. You are trying to say that feminism isn't that main force behind this movement. I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/17 12:13 AM
1

feminism is just an expression of preferential treatment for women in terms of sexual market place dynamics and academia/business lets not kid ourselves about the "equality" nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 11:58 PM
2

feminists seem to be bitching and caring alot. enough to cry about restricting those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 11:39 PM
2

actually good point, I stand corrected sir
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 11:39 PM
2

lol come on feminists are NOT like that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 08:42 PM
2

Correct, most people "pair up" for mutual benefit The problem is that the feminists are actively trying to DISALLOW it to occur by shaming older men/younger women out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 08:27 PM
1

Its pretty clear cut that the male is being bombarded with negative statements while the equivalent female got praise. Ergo, double standards are clearly apparent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:51 PM
1

thats correct ergo, my gf is 11 years younger than me and in her 20s just find it amusing the feminist bitching on the subject and the double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:48 PM
1

what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:48 PM
1

Why is it prostitution for an older male to date a younger female?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:47 PM
2

the basis of many relationships is largely money why makes the 30s year old female superior to the 20/F when both are looking for a "provider" as their biggest criteria?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:46 PM
1

Its pretty clear cut in the OKC example above. How do you explain that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:03 PM
2

I dont have an issue if a younger male wants to go for an older woman consensually. Just am concerned about the opposite issue being demonized by feminists
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:58 PM
1

Nice strawman argument that doesn't address what I just wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:57 PM
1

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441109/ Desperate HouseWives Bunch of them
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:56 PM
2

How is it different than a woman in her 30s wanting a "successful/stable" guy who can "provide", which appears to be the vast majority of them? Guess by your logic, the average 30s woman who wants to marry a guy who is "stable" in his 30s are prostitutes as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:55 PM
1

Oh crap I just missed this post lol I made a similar one. My mistake
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:52 PM
1

Yet it is celebrated in the mainstream press with television shows, talk shows, etc. Where are the shows that celebrate older men wanting to exclusively date younger women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:51 PM
1

I watch it to determine the mainsteam feminist/BP thinking. It appeals to the whims of fat women that are middle aged and can predict their thought patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:48 PM
1

I agree. Even more of a reason for men in their 30s-40s to go for women in their 20s. Why shame them?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:46 PM
3

Yeah I've seen a few of her previews on youtube. Woman promotes the cougar thing hardcore while shaming older men for wanting younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:46 PM
1

what?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:45 PM
3

Yeah they just don't whine about it like they do about older men/younger women. Ergo, they promote it by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:43 PM
2

So why wouldn't women in their 30s looking for rich/high status men in their 30s to help "provide" for potential future offspring not be "prostitutes" by that logic? Most women in their 30s want a more wealthy guy that can "provide". Ergo, they must be prostitutes as well right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:42 PM
1

Plenty of wealthy European aristocrats also practiced the older male/younger female mating patterns that were sanctioned by their families. Men NEVER traditionally wanted women in their 30s to marry. Ergo, successful older men usually marry significantly younger women during their second marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:41 PM
4

Cool story but clearly a professional male with a good salary would be far superior financially than "guilting" some bad boy's parents who are likely poor into helping with child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:38 PM
1

If they are marrying/dating the guy because they find him attractive, how is that prostitution then? By that logic, all of marriage is prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:35 PM
2

They just will tell you how they went for "bad boys" when they were younger and how those "bad boys" are very seductive. You NEVER see a feminist shaming campaign against younger bad boys banging women compared to older men/younger female dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:34 PM
3

you mad?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:33 PM
3

It seems that feminists are willing to support any kind of DEVIANT sexual behavior pattern that doesn't produce children but are STRONGLY opposed to older men with younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:31 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:30 PM
4

Not really. If he isn't gainfully employed, you won't get much. His parents aren't obligated to pay crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:30 PM
1

most women are largely infertile by 40 compared to healthy men of the same age. Men are able to have kids until death if they can find a fertile woman to impregnate. Don't make me go into the million celebrity examples of men. Also, which "men"? In most traditional cultures (including the pre feminist Western world), women ROUTINELY married significantly older men WITH THE FATHER'S APPROVAL. Only since post feminism has this become an "issue"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:29 PM
2

How is it "prostitution" if she finds the dude attractive/successful?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:27 PM
3

Women use feminist tactics to optimize their sexual strategy. One example is the shaming of "older" men in their 30s from dating women in their 20s by feminists. This is to encourage men in their 30s who are successful to avoid younger women and largely force them to marrying/dating a declining 30 something year old female. This benefits the sexual strategy of the older female. Plenty of these feminist standards are employed these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:26 PM
5

See according to feminist logic, if the 18 y/o female is banged out by some crackhead drug addict that is 19 y/o that leaves her to be a "single mom", that is "cool" because they are of similar age. However, if she dares to date an older male with a professional job, somehow there is a major problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:23 PM
1

Why would I feel that is bad if the 40 y/o is a good dude and productive? I would strongly prefer that over the 20 y/o old "bad boy" drug dealer. Lets get this straight under feminist logic: 1) Gay Guy banging/dating another Gay guy of ANY age is cool 2) Gay women with another Gay women is cool of ANY age 3) Guy cutting his penis off to become a woman and undergo HRT is cool 4) Older woman with younger male is Cool 5) Older male with younger female= perverted, disgusting pig male who is "abusing…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:21 PM
3

yeah I notice that she basically promotes older female/younger male relationships, gay relationships, transgendered, etc. So basically according to feminist logic: 1) Gay Guy banging/dating another Gay guy of ANY age is cool 2) Gay women with another Gay women is cool of ANY age 3) Guy cutting his penis off to become a woman and undergo HRT is cool 4) Older woman with younger male is Cool 5) Older male with younger female= perverted, disgusting pig male who is "abusing" the younger female. The f…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:20 PM
1

What do women that dont have children contribute?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 04:33 PM
1

huh
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 09:49 PM
0

evopsych is largely pseudoscience since its unfalsifiable with no internal consistency or validity
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 08:10 PM
2

Yeah but how does this analysis become congruent with the "male/male" competition where only the strongest win? It seems like the weakest, lowest IQ drug addict "partiers" are the "winners" in the SMP these days. From almost any metric, they are far from strong in terms of intelligence, longevity, productivity, etc. Yet here they are banging the most women and having the most children.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 07:24 PM
3

yet those "unvirtuous" dregs have the highest fertility rate. Ergo, they are the most "fit" according to this logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 07:11 PM
0

So unemployed druggies with low IQs are the best of men in terms of genetic fitness? Wow scary thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 06:24 PM
1

Those "stupid" Muslims still have growing demographics that will allow them to take over the Western world though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 06:23 PM
3

I would go back to restricting the vote. The biggest problem was noticed AFTER they started working in mass in the 1980s whereby they could influence the market through voting. The breakdown of the family structure followed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 06:22 PM
4

base it on low birth rates and extremely high deficit spending in the west due to the welfare system filled with single moms
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 06:21 PM
1

you made a claim that germans/protestants didn't prize female virginity historically. I have easily refuted that claim
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:49 PM
6

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:48 PM
1

lol yeah backtracking now huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:47 PM
3

How do you explain why druggies with no jobs often get laid alot then? Skinny druggies with no job prospects often get laid far more than the productive STEM guy until the woman hits her 30s. Are those the "winners of the male/male" competition compared to rich STEM dudes?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:46 PM
1

cool story bro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_Protestant_Reformation#Marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:44 PM
4

women have only went into the workforce in large numbers for the last 30 years or so very few of them are in the technology fields in terms of creation/development but cool story
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:40 PM
1

actually they had the concept of the virgin at marriage was quite powerful until recently https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_female_sexuality dont make up stories
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:39 PM
1

Why do you assume this? Because white men have become manginas?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:26 PM
1

they are PERFECTLY comparable and accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:26 PM
5

We had the industrial world far BEFORE women went to work in mass numbers. What planet are you on?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 04:25 PM
5

That is why the sexual liberation of women coupled with giving them the vote has been a DISASTER for the West. Women are able to VOTE in socialist politicians that will subsidize single mothers that make BAD mating choices, whereby productive men are being TAXED to pay for this. What incentive is there for being a productive male under such a system?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:36 PM
4

Women are good when in the kitchen and out of the workplace. Thats very good!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:32 PM
7

Very true analysis. The incentive structure breakdown in the SMP is the reason for the decline of marriage and birth rates. Its one of the main reasons Islam is taking over Europe as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 03:30 PM
7

And quite often women will lead on "nice guys" in the anticipation there might be "something more" in the future
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 12:36 PM
1

nope, they would've served during their early 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 01:52 PM
1

What countries in history gave everyone a "right to vote"? When did this become a "right"? It was always awarded for DUTY in the past throughout civilizations until extremely recently in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 01:51 PM
1

No. People should have to serve after hs for a few years like the Israeli military
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/16 01:51 PM
1

The way that we can do this is two ways: 1) Women and men both are drafted to FRONT LINE COMBAT as part of their ability to obtain the "vote". 2) Women aren't drafted and have no right to vote. I see no reason women should obtain the same "rights" of men without the same responsibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 04:29 PM
4

Except that the majority of people aren't getting married anymore. Also, couple the people from very rural areas that get married in their early 20s that bring the numbers down. He's about right in the analysis for most people, give or take a few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/16 03:01 PM
1

Good for the Taliban killing off those pedophiles. Unfortunately, the taliban are the good guys here
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:34 AM
1

Well the positive is that you appear to be able to navigate Chinese culture well. The negative is that you really don't have a niche whereby you can compete as an entrepreneur. Having an innovative concept to use would allow you to be competitive. Joining an existing business would be more positive at this point until you understand the realm of possibilities in the food space/hotel space. Those are very expensive markets that require high capital expenditures to be competitive in. Why would a V…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 04:54 PM
1

Have you lived in China for any substantial period of time? It might be hard to make inroads into China as a White American. What do you want to become an "entrepreneur" in. As Peter Thiel said about someone saying they want to be a generic "entrepreneur", means little. He states he doesn't "compete" he innovates. Do you have an innovative idea that would be a niche space that doesn't have competition?
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 04:47 PM
0

You need to get into a top 10 MBA program for it to be worthwhile, which would be difficult for you since you have little work experience. Getting an MBA from University of Phoenix would be worthless. Also, learn the difference between "hear" and "here" if you want to look presentable to an employer.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/16 04:40 PM
9

Its far worse than that. BMI dramatically underestimate female obesity due to low levels of lean body mass and overestimates male obesity due to significant differences in body mass. Therefore, the amount of female vs male obesity is far worse in percentages than given in the article Below is an article confirming this statement: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0033308 Therefore, a male with a BMI of 30 is often in far better shape than a female with a BMI of 26.…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/16 11:09 AM
1

Thats correct. That is what I have linked in the PLOS article. Female obesity is dramatically understated. My BMI is about 30 as a male but was in far better shape than an ex gf with a BMI of 26 in terms of body fat composition.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/16 11:06 AM
1

The marriage contract is a one sided affair. Ergo, there is no "interdependence" noted in the contract, just male obligation. But cool story bro
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/16 11:05 AM
-1

so true brother, preach it. Don't worry about these weak cucks that don't agree. Marriage should NEVER be on the table these days (especially without an iron clad prenup). Children out of wedlock= Child support only plus ability to reduce it and fight for custody Marriage= guy screwed out of house, alimony (especially lifetime after 10 years), half assets, AND child support. You do the math.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:01 AM
12

Its far worse than that. BMI dramatically underestimate female obesity due to low levels of lean body mass and overestimates male obesity due to significant differences in body mass. Therefore, the amount of female vs male obesity is far worse in percentages than given in the article Below is an article confirming this statement: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0033308
/r/TheRedPill08/06/16 10:07 PM
5

And you're dead to us males as well. Good luck defending yourself when ISIS comes to town "independent" strong woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/16 06:36 PM
1

Very true, they are both worthless. Farrell is claiming that he is voting for HILLARY!
/r/MensRights06/06/16 11:01 PM
1

These two whores should beheaded alive. Isis would know how to fix this problem
/r/MensRights04/06/16 07:00 PM
2

Paul Elam is a liberal scumbag. Milo and trump 2016
/r/MensRights04/06/16 06:36 PM
1

I already posted this
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/16 12:30 AM
-2

Milo is the biggest MRA we have. Who the fuck else is there? Paul Elam lol
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:34 PM
1

So how come that lying whore on the Dr. Phil show that stated on national TV that she lied about her husband, getting him put in jail for 10 months, isn't in jail for perjury?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:17 PM
1

I linked a Dr Phil piece where a woman openly admitted to lying about domestic charges agains there husband to get the upper hand in a divorce and had him put in jail for 10 months
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:17 PM
1

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/247705/americas-rape-hoax-epidemic-ann-coulter America's fake rape hoax epidemic. But cool story ladies
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:16 PM
1

So the woman openly admits to falsifying the domestic charges that got the husband put in jail on NATIONAL TELEVISION and your feminist says "both parties use whatever for ammunition, this isn't gender specific". How many husbands have their wives put in jail for fake domestic charges? Stop the feminist bullshit spin.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:15 PM
1

They are plenty comparable in terms of falsifying sexual violence/violence claims for personal benefit, which has become the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:14 PM
1

Yeah except women routinely pull this shit and get away with it. Here's Dr. Phil with a lying woman who got her husband put in jail for 10 months: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZXbl9_l38M
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:05 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZXbl9_l38M How about this woman on Dr. Phil? She lied and got her husband put in jail for 10 months without consequence. Don't tell me this isn't common.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:03 PM
1

Do you think the growing number of exposed cases are all of them or jus the tip of the iceberg?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 10:00 PM
1

Except that these are happening more and more frequently with Johnny Depp being the most recent example.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:59 PM
1

It happens there as well
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:59 PM
1

How else can she fake a rape charge without lying about it knowingly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:59 PM
1

Women use tactics in both to lie and get their way as a common method of behavior for a growing segment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:58 PM
1

What about all the men who have been exonerated by DNA evidence? Why aren't women punished for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:43 PM
1

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/12/09/coulter-if-theres-a-campus-rape-epidemic-then-why-so-many-hoaxes/ Why all the rape hoaxes if there is an "epidemic"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:42 PM
0

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/12/09/coulter-if-theres-a-campus-rape-epidemic-then-why-so-many-hoaxes/ Why all the rape hoaxes?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:41 PM
2

It shows a pattern of false rape culture. I spoke about both fake rapes and fake domestic abuse
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:39 PM
-2

Feminists like to deny a reality when it doesn't fit their narrative. However, these same feminists wouldn't hesitate to condemn "men for being bastards" if there was a provable case where one man beat up one woman
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:29 PM
0

No the Duke Lacrosse, Virgina fat rape false scandal, the Emma Columbia female scandal, etc. are my responses
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:29 PM
1

Duke Lacrosse, Virginia Frat, Columbia University Emma girl, etc. Everyday I open up the news there is another lying woman claiming "rape" that didn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:24 PM
0

These cases are happening with regular frequency from women these days. Often, they consider "rape" in the same manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:11 PM
1

Shit, I only know the MCAT from about 12 years ago. It had organic chem, inorganic, physicians WITHOUT calculus (concession for females) and biology. There was also a verbal section and an essay. Sounds like they are trying to water it down to increase the female levels. When I interviewed at schools in the past, the females were consistently getting into schools with much lower MCAT scores.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/16 03:13 PM
1

Yeah thanks for the info but there is really nothing here. Everyone knows to "sell high, buy low", just no one can really predict when things are high or low!
/r/TheRedPill27/05/16 12:52 AM
1

It was a setup by the depaul president telling the security to step down. The audience was told to avoid confrontation or they would get arrested! They should sue Depaul for this!
/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:27 AM
1

so its better if she's a whore then not? what kind of logic is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 10:09 PM
4

Hair Transplants don't work mostly. Just shave it, work out, get a good job and act "alpha"
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 05:00 PM
-1

If women hate that so much, why did they support Bill Clinton and Hillary?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 04:54 PM
1

lol thats funny liberal academia is keeping women out of STEM despite giving them affirmative action and scholarships? Stop the bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 04:52 PM
1

Only top level 40 year olds can do that. The good majority will not be able to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 04:48 PM
2

Its mostly a sexual strategy of older women to prevent higher level men of equivalent age from dipping down. Older women understand they can't compete with younger women, so they want to make it socially unacceptable so the higher level men will have to settle for them. Higher level men under normal conditions can easily date/marry much younger women due to their status.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 04:40 PM
3

Then maybe they should produce less gender studies majors and more STEM majors for women? Yet gender studies majors is going up for women while STEM isn't. Get the women into STEM ASAP
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 04:10 PM
1

doesn't matter the number of degrees that are awarded through affirmative action. it matters how many women work in the field
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 03:55 PM
1

cool story but the macro level shows women get major preference
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/16 03:54 PM
1

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 07:45 PM
1

Really? Is it an alternate universe using an earth like planet?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 07:45 PM
1

lol cool fiction. now back to planet earth
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 05:44 PM
1

Cool story feminist except for the facts: http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2010/06/mcat-scores-for-medical-students-by.html
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:34 PM
1

Yeah cool story bro. Or he looks like shit all the time and they paint on abs for him with photoshop is the most likely scenario. Ever see Wolverine on the beach vs in the movies? Jackman looks good but never that good
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:31 PM
1

sexism lol feminists gonna feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:23 PM
1

ya
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:22 PM
0

most women drop out after going through med school also they are "50%" due to affirmative action
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:22 PM
2

Dude aint going to look like photoshopped channing tatum with 4 hours a week. Channing looks like garbage on the beach in real life compared to his photoshopped picture. That can't be achieved in real life except for bodybuilders who take diuretics right before their stage appearance (including tren hard and eat clen)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:21 PM
-1

Photoshopping dudes onto other dudes photoshopped bodies lol Channing Tatum looks like garbage in real life. Dude doesn't have abs outside of his photoshopped magic mike crap. Don't see the point in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 04:06 PM
0

feminism 101 logic
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:04 PM
0

Don't see much wrong with his argument when you are speaking about Western women. Bravo to his perspective on Western women. I would disagree if he was speaking about Eastern or Islamic women though as they appear to have be much family oriented and held to standards in their culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:55 AM
2

feminism 101, attack the messenger
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:47 AM
2

yes but teaching the alphabet or simple multiplication skills can be done by almost anyone with a HS degree
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:46 AM
1

By that logic, Islamic women are far more productive than White Western women when you measure productivity. Maybe we should outsource our feminists then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:45 AM
2

That is why feminism and socialism have to go together
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 10:44 AM
2

wow thanks for arguing something I have already said
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 03:14 AM
1

cool story
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 03:01 AM
1

lol how could they put in three hours after work for multiplication tables? Stop the bullshit. I have been around plenty of teachers, none of them spent that much time working afterwards. That is a lie
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:53 AM
1

for profit in what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:51 AM
1

I have forgotten more information about economics than you have learned in 5 of your lifetimes
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:51 AM
2

I have already spoken about this
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:51 AM
2

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:25 AM
1

How can we determine if they are effective without testing? Taking their word for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 02:09 AM
1

Well having knowledge of the subject matter is of critical importance. Considering most teachers are terrible in knowledge of their subject by definition they can't teach it. Second, we can measure the performance of the students in testing to determine if they are learning anything like EVERY OTHER COUNTRY in the developed world!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 01:57 AM
1

The teachers who can't even pass basic proficiency tests in math and english can't teach ANYTHING since they don't know anything. Funny how feminist teacher unions are adamant against testing teachers lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 01:46 AM
2

Thats true but in its totality it should be positive unlike HR, feminist studies, etc which have zero value.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 01:45 AM
2

There is no correlation between educational attainment for elementary students and "masters" in education attainment. The amount of time that elementary school teachers put into lesson plans is negligible and inflated by propaganda
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 01:45 AM
1

Test scores of the students being taught plus basic proficiency exams for the teachers
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:28 AM
2

How can we judge if they are learning anything without standardized exams?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:27 AM
1

Dont need phony masters to teach basic things such as multiplication or the alphabet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:20 AM
1

Yes the productivity of the physician is dependent on getting people to healthy to partake in the productive economy. Without the productive economy, no one could pay for medical supplies, physicians, etc. Example: Venezuela
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:09 AM
1

Because modern women don't do real work, aren't good mothers and aren't good wives. Very simple
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:08 AM
1

Actually, kids being illiterate and poor in math is the worst part.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:08 AM
1

The "shortage" is due to phony "masters" degrees being required to teach basic stuff like the alphabet. Its a fake shortage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:08 AM
1

I posted an article that showed that 40% of female engineer majors drop out of the profession on another comment thread. Find it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/16 12:06 AM
6

or the government affirmative action policies
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:58 PM
1

Far more people are willing to become elementary school teachers than necessary at the current salaries. Under a normal free market situation, the salaries would drop due to an oversupply. However, due to the govt unions (cartels), salaries remain artificially high.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:55 PM
1

If she pulled a real job, I wouldn't expect her to cook/clean/etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:53 PM
2

Medicaid is a govt funded insurance for the poor people/single moms. Theoretically, these people are supposed to become productive in the future and pay their own way. Unfortunately, due to liberalism, there are generations of these losers now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:53 PM
1

There are a ton of other articles on the same subject. When hours are taken into account, they are far overpaid. Its even worse when you take into test scores of the students!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:52 PM
2

Physicians provide the service of keeping the population healthy so they can remain productive in terms of goods production. Ergo, it makes sense they are productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:16 PM
-1

she doesn't work real jobs, doesn't have kids and doesn't cook. What the fuck good is the modern woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:15 PM
1

I see no real necessary responsibilities here that are real world valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:14 PM
1

Teachers are overpaid for their level of skill and work hours. Stop the bullshit. http://www.forbes.com/sites/warrenmeyer/2011/12/22/the-teacher-salary-myth-are-teachers-underpaid/#7bfeca4b43a5
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:13 PM
0

so get their asses out there to do real work!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:12 PM
1

I have
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:08 PM
1

He clearly doesn't understand real world economics then lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:08 PM
1

TRP explains it well. Read the sidebar, too complicated to make one post about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:03 PM
1

Women aren't good at that anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:03 PM
2

doctors are productive but the majority of physicians are men, especially when you look after 10 years post residency. Women often drop out or work part time as physicians.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:02 PM
2

Source is that America ranks dead last in education in the developed world. Most other countries don't require a masters for teachers in Europe at the elementary level.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:00 PM
2

Women don't outperform men on the mathematical portions. Furthermore, at higher levels, men outnumber women >10:1 for >130
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 11:00 PM
1

Feminists never do
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 10:59 PM
2

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 10:59 PM
2

They are trying to correct it by getting more money for govt jobs and affirmative action, not by working hard and merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 10:55 PM
2

Actually, it doesn't prove shit. Most of the degrees are fake and don't teach much. This is why America is 27th in science, basically last in the industrialized world for education.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:52 PM
4

Thats only because of feminist credentialism to pretend they deserve higher salaries. The educational output has been horrible compared to other countries who use less "educated" teachers for elementary education.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:52 PM
2

100% correct based upon the level of education attainment when comparing countries Newsflash: Our masters education people are getting CRUSHED
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:51 PM
1

I said the vast majority of WORKING engineers are male. Most women drop out of engineering even when they get the degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:51 PM
1

Yes merit based pay, particularly for more sought after skills such as Calculus is fine. But testing and real metrics need to be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:50 PM
2

no HR is unnecessary. Hiring should be done by people in the field with real experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:49 PM
2

productive is that part of the economy that produces real goods or services that help production.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:49 PM
3

lol nice psychoanalysis there feminist champ but its totally wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:49 PM
0

Women are doing a very poor job in the reproductive front as per feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 09:47 PM
3

Red pill
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:57 PM
5

We have shown the vast majority of productive jobs are male dominated. Where else could the women be working?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:57 PM
2

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:56 PM
2

Elementary School is vital but can be done by HS educated people. The BLS stats have been posted in the comment section
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:56 PM
2

Men pay the majority of taxes because they make the majority of income. Men take less in taxes due to shorter lifespans including costs of SS, Medicare. Medicaid is disproportionately going to single moms. I have already show women get major preference in engineering jobs: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/14/study-finds-surprisingly-that-women-are-favored-for-jobs-in-stem/ Productive jobs are ones that produce real goods/services that are necessary in maintaining an eco…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:46 PM
2

Govt jobs that are in a productive sector can partially be tolerated (ex NASA) Govt unproductive work should be minimized as its always a parasite off of the real economy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:45 PM
2

Women are disproportionately teach easier fields of education that don't involve math that only require a HS equivalent. Many women teach non subjects like feminist studies that offer no value to the society
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:38 PM
1

which ones were less than 50%? cite them
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:37 PM
3

Not in most of the individual jobs he broke down being >90% male.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:35 PM
4

Someone posted the BLS stats. They are paying "taxes" on govt jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:34 PM
2

Social work shows no value despite trillions spent on the "war on poverty", most people are on food stamps, welfare, etc than EVER before. Education is a very broad field. I have already broken it down the parts women "teach" vs men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:33 PM
2

The dude sourced the labor stats with >90% for all the productive jobs. The 74.4% gave ALL employees but it broke it down into the jobs and many were >90%
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:33 PM
-1

Nah. Its because women like the high prestige and pay jobs that they wouldn't mind getting through affirmative action despite not being competitive. They are fine with leaving the "icky" jobs to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:31 PM
3

Correct, when you break down even in the production areas, most women work in HR or some other quota demanded part
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:30 PM
2

He is correct on that issue though. Most social work has to do with welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:28 PM
1

Yes but if you even break that down, most of the women who work in "production industries" don't do the actual productive work in the company. Due to affirmative action quotas, private productive companies have to hire many women in roles like HR to prove they don't have too many men in their organization. However, the women are given affirmative actin fake jobs due to govt pressure.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:28 PM
6

Actually, I see the lowest sector is 74.4%, with most being far higher. Furthermore, if you even break down that "74.4%" at tech companies, the vast majority of the women who work there are in HUMAN RESOURCES or other similar crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:23 PM
3

Yes but it doesn't break down where those "dollars" go and for whom. Theres are many single moms in those states too. So I fail to see how this refutes my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:20 PM
1

Huh? We would have to see the breakdown of federal dollars but I suspect most of it is for welfare. We would have to shitcan the women in those areas for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:11 PM
2

Studies show women with the same CV have a 4 to 1 advantage over men with the same credentials in engineering: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/14/study-finds-surprisingly-that-women-are-favored-for-jobs-in-stem/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:11 PM
4

The vast majority of women are employed in those fields
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:10 PM
1

You haven't proven any of these "skills"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:09 PM
-1

Feminism= female imperative unleashed
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:09 PM
2

1) Most social work is nonsense that doesn't improve anything. They like to keep people on welfare and promote single motherhood. Michael Savage on Social Workers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuCFoB50xTg Everything else you "know nothing about", so it doesn't have to be answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 07:09 PM
2

There is far more discrimination in favor of women in STEM than against. Visit any university in the country to see the number of scholarships for women in science, its outstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:49 PM
1

I have spoken about "teaching" as it isn't a uniform thing. Easier parts of teaching can easily be done by HS grads in an open free market. Planty of the countries in the world have "elementary education" taught by non college grads with far higher levels of literacy than in the US. Nursing is the only field I can think of that is "productive" as a female. That is the ONLY field I can think of actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:46 PM
2

I have no evidence for this assertion. I see no evidence that a philosophy major has better "critical thinking skills" than a STEM major. Show me real world examples of this "critical thinking" where a philosophy major outperforms STEM majors in real production fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:40 PM
1

I think women aren't good at technology fields, particularly in the higher IQ range.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:39 PM
3

I have offered multiple jobs already that have no productive value in the society and are largely non profit/govt sponsored.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:39 PM
3

State the productive jobs women are the majority in
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:38 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:31 PM
2

Mostly yes and blue collar people
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:28 PM
2

There is no evidence that philosophy majors produce anything extra in the economy or are true "critical thinkers". Most of them just become liberal robots.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 06:28 PM
2

Funny, America always "taught to the test" when it had the best scores in science in the 1970s. It amazingly correlated to having the best technology. Teaching to the "test" at least allows them to learn the stuff needed to pass the test. Currently, they know NOTHING, so bravo on not "teaching to the test"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:13 PM
1

I take the evolutionary model to be honest. I never claimed it spoke about SS, Medicare, Medicaid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:06 PM
2

There is no need for a "masters" in education at the elementary level since the subject is so basic. The "masters" nonsense is a recent development made by academia that shows no benefit for education. Many countries have elementary teachers that have no masters degree yet have children that perform at a far higher level than USA.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:05 PM
1

My post is about how money is transferred from men to women through govt. You are one that brought up that strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:03 PM
1

Correct but the problem is that our social workers don't really want to fix the problem and get these people to work or hold women accountable for bad behavior. Ergo, they continue to promote the welfare state for their own financial benefit. This money comes from productive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:02 PM
1

IQ is a very good correlate for mathematical ability. There is no way around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:01 PM
0

The supply of people who are capable of teaching elementary school is infinitely higher than Calculus teachers. This is so beyond obvious its really not debatable. Ergo, elementary school should pay far less under free market conditions but don't due to GOVT intervention.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 05:00 PM
4

Reading and Writing sections aren't correlated with STEM majors only the math part is. You "never use it" because you don't do a STEM field. https://www.aei.org/publication/2013-sat-test-results-show-that-a-huge-math-gender-gap-persists-with-a-32-point-advantage-for-high-school-boys/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:49 PM
2

I have given the elementary school teacher vs calculus teacher under free market conditions as the example of govt intervention that has improved female wages while stealing from men. The supply of elementary school teachers under free market conditions would be very high compared to demand (easy subject that a HS grad could teach), so the salaries would be low Calculus HS teacher would require at least a BS in Mathematics to teach this subject and would have to pass a rigorous mathematics exami…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:47 PM
1

Most people are single as adults. Ergo, that point is mute about who does the majority of the shopping, since most people are single entities these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:42 PM
1

That article was to prove that women in more FEMINIST societies show a BIGGER dimorphic choosing of unproductive fields. Ergo, "sexism" can't explain the differences since the MOST FEMINIST countries show a BIGGER correlation of these traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:40 PM
1

The only femsplaining method will be: 1) Sexism despite feminist countries still show overwhelming male dominance of STEM even with huge affirmative action policies for women. Its illogical but its their only option but the truth is too tough to admit. 2) Continue to double down on the shaming language.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:38 PM
1

IQ correlates very well for scientific and mathematical fields. Also, the psychology article is speaking about AVERAGES. The bell curve in bimodal, ergo high IQ males outnumber high IQ women by a factor of 10:1 when its at the >130 levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:37 PM
3

1) Women are admitted to medical school at far lower MCAT scores on average. They also go into the "easier" medical fields and work part time far more often. NHS is having a major problem with so many women working part time and not being productive for the outlaw of resources in training them. 2) CPA is far more men than women passing 3) Men still out perform women on the SAT on average in the math section. This problem is much more obvious at the highest math levels, with the ratios of men to …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:35 PM
2

There is no bias. Men generate wealth and women require it. Ergo, they have two options: 1) Be nice to men and offer men something they want in return for money. Old system of marriage. 2) Get govt to steal men's wealth. Feminism 101 tactics through the usage of shaming language, affirmative action, divorce laws, alimony laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:34 PM
2

The "war on poverty" has cost trillions of dollar with nothing show for it. The number of "poor" continues to grow despite all these "social workers". Ergo, something doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:32 PM
0

Tough, get the ability to obtain research articles then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:32 PM
2

http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:31 PM
2

Productive are the fields that produce REAL economic measurable value. Its really not that complicated. Job values in a free market should be dependent on supply/demand models. Women use the govt to skew these models in their favor. Ergo, an "elementary school teacher" is a far easier field than a Calculus High School teacher based on the subject material. Far more people would be capable of doing elementary school teaching rather than Calculus. Yet due to female lobbying, elementary school teac…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:31 PM
0

Women have IQs that are more around the mean while men are found far more often at the higher and lower ends. Ergo, its safe to assume that men will dominate the higher order physics courses through merit based systems. Women can only compete at that level through affirmative action and removal of standardized exams
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:28 PM
0

That doesn't negate the fact that the "positive" trend lines for women is dependent on the govt intervention to steal wealth from men. That just shows women's salaries have increased, which I agree with but it comes from stealing resources from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:26 PM
4

I have posted the stats through a research paper. No one has refuted anything. So women are hypocrites and that is fine by feminism. Thanks for the clarification and support of my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:16 PM
1

Ultimately, women work in unproductive industries that require govt support of their make shift work. This is how they have become "independent" of men. They still need men's money but just don't want to give them anything for it. If it wasn't for govt, women would have to be a lot nicer to potential husbands due to needing them for financial support.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:13 PM
3

The federal budget's biggest costs include Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security by far. Who are the biggest beneficiaries of these? Hint: Its not men
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:13 PM
-1

There is no evidence that these "masters" have conferred any benefit considering the very low educational attainment level of children in the US. In fact, random home schooled children, especially at the elementary level have higher levels of educational attainment than ones taught by these "masters" degree holders.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:12 PM
7

http://psycnet.apa.org/?fa=main.doiLanding&doi=10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168 Here you go. In fact, in more "feminist" cultures like Sweden, gender differences are EVEN GREATER due to female CHOICE
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:11 PM
6

LOL so the only nonsense you can argue that is even in FEMINIST Sweden where they are actively pushing women into these fields but yet remain overwhelming male is due to "sexism". http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/12/female-engineers_n_5668504.html Funny how surveys out of female engineering grads show that women don't want to work these jobs due to long hours, difficult environments, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:06 PM
6

Actually, its really not much more complicated. The huge increases in welfare spending for single moms including Medicaid, Medicare for "disabled women", SS Disability for "disabled women", etc constitute the majority of the federal outlays
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:04 PM
5

Every feminist society in the WORLD has the same issue. Sweden has far more male engineers. Name one country on EARTH that doesn't operate this way. In fact, the more feminist a society becomes, the BIGGER the gap becomes in STEM fields.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 04:00 PM
0

Nonsense. The most "feminist" societies in the world such as Sweden have very few engineers that are female. Show me ANY feminist country where women do the majority of the productive fields like STEM? Everywhere feminism thrives, it depends on male money for its survival. Feminism is largely a scam because women can't produce wealth and will always need men's money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:58 PM
2

My argument is that feminism is just a pumping action of transference of money from men to women. Women produce really nothing of economic value in general. Ergo, women require govt intervention in terms of academia, business and divorce laws to remain "independent" since they can't produce much on their own. Feminism requires big govt and large transfers from men consistently to survive. It also bankrupts the country that practices it over the longer term and destroys the birth rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:55 PM
-1

Nice strawman argument. Elementary "teaching" can easily be done by a HS grad that doesn't need some fake "masters". Only higher level subjects like calculus should require a masters degree. We really don't need that many social workers either if we did away with feminism and single mom issues. Social work is basically there to perpetuate the welfare state and finance another govt bureaucracy with phony jobs for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:54 PM
9

I'd beg to differ considering the huge increase in federal debt at almost 20 trillion and the huge increases in the welfare state due to single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:53 PM
3

Yes all the heavy lifting jobs are done by men as well. Also plumbing, electricians, mechanics, etc are mostly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:52 PM
12

Yes 90% of real production is done by men. Elementary education is a simple subject that doesn't require a Master's. A person with a HS diploma could easily do that. Most social "services" just promote a welfare system for single moms. It is a dysfunctional system that keeps a large segment of women on welfare while making a bureaucracy to give nice cushy jobs to other women. Nothing is productively gained through it. Human resources is totally unnecessary as people in real subjects can easily d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:51 PM
10

Society could survive fine without HR, women's studies, etc. 1950s America didn't have these bullshit "subjects" and did just fine. Society couldn't survive in any form without engineers, tech people, etc. Compare a society with no engineers, tech, etc but women's studies majors, HR personnel, communications, etc vs the opposite. Most of women's jobs are essentially hobbies that don't really need a college degree because they are bullshit subjects.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:47 PM
6

Most women can't compete in real production based fields through merit based standardized exams or the rigor of the subject. Ergo, they will instinctively support big govt to give money to unproductive sectors of the economy to give make shift work that is easy to do. This is their method of staying "independent". If it wasn't for govt stealing of men's resources to give to women, they would be forced to depend on men for money ultimately or be relegated to very low paying jobs in a real economy…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:45 PM
11

The stats show that the vast majority of programmers, mechanical engineers, etc are men. Even top level female MBAs often stop working. If everyone goes into "social justice" fields, who will do the real work? When will women decide to step up and pay into the system more than they take out? When will they do the productive work in the society?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/16 03:39 PM
1

For most men the most important value that women bring to the SMP are youth/appearance/sex status Just the way it is and is likely biologically driven.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 09:53 PM
1

very correct as per catholic doctrine
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 09:52 PM
5

Their value in the sexual market place is similar to cars though
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 06:23 PM
6

I love the feminist proclamation of "being threatened" by a woman sleeping with many men. No we aren't "threatened", we are REPULSED. Why would a man want to pay full price for a woman who gave away her best years/assets to many other men? Am I "insecure" for not wanting to buy a used car for 150K that has been rode hard?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 05:10 PM
4

Says feminist women lol Most men feel differently
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 05:08 PM
1

According to the New Testament (and old Testament), true "Christian" men really aren't supposed to marry harlots. A woman who has slept around with many men is a harlot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 05:06 PM
3

How long have you been married? Why would some "good Catholic" marry a woman who got banged out by so many men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 10:48 PM
8

Of course a sexual experienced female with >30 partners would be a very bad choice for a long term relationship. Considering the guy is "sexually inexperienced", he likely has low SMV, which exacerbates the problem. Its a classic case of AF/BB strategy by the female. Since she is hitting her late 20s, she has low her SMV value and is now looking for her beta bucks. Not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 10:32 PM
2

No one has been arguing that no attractive women enjoy casual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 09:30 PM
1

link it champ
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 08:23 PM
1

For betas with no money. For betas with money, they should still attempt to get top attractive women, especially with lifting that have low N counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 08:23 PM
2

Almost all feminist arguments are because they are devoid of substantive arguments or factual assertions. Ergo, they are mostly strawman tactics or ad homs.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 08:22 PM
1

so link it then
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 08:08 PM
2

Teachman's conclusion: The results presented in this article replicate findings from previous research: Women who cohabit prior to marriage or who have premarital sex have an increased likelihood of marital disruption. Considering the joint effects of premarital cohabitation and premarital sex, as well as histories of premarital relationships, extends previous research. The most salient finding from this analysis is that women whose intimate premarital relationships are limited to their husbands…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 08:07 PM
1

ok my interest in that statement was to refute a previous post made a BP person. I believe that either an average or above average chick with low N count is critical for a beta marriage to succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 08:07 PM
1

1% is a significant difference. Your argument was that average/below average women have a MUCH lower divorce risk for beta males. This study confirms a 1% higher chance on average between 5 to 6 partners. Ergo, the last post about beta males running after "attractive" women leading to divorce was incorrect based on the research.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:58 PM
3

http://atavisionary.com/premarital-sex-premarital-cohabitation-and-the-risk-of-subsequent-marital-dissolution-among-women/ This study refutes that claim with only female status being significant. The jury is still out on men with high N counts and divorce risk. Irregardless, women are free to avoid marriage with men with high N counts as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:57 PM
1

lol I have read most evo psych info. Most confirm my statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:52 PM
5

You had no point except feminist strawman circular arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:52 PM
2

The study shows a small but significant different between divorce risk between 5 and 6. The previous claims by feminist BPers was that unattractive/average women made better partners. Teachman's study confirms this to be untrue. That was the point of my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:52 PM
3

Where is the bias? You have proven absolutely no bias so far. The only refutation you have given is "what about the mens", which isn't an argument that would ever be accepted by any scientific journal as a valid rebuttal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:29 PM
1

you have linked zero evo psych studies that confirm that high N count women make good LTRs
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:23 PM
1

No it was rated as "thin" not underweight. You just changed the statement just like you did with "dating" lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:22 PM
2

Most men find thin women attractive. My goal posts haven't moved at all. The studies confirm everything I have written so far. You may claim that 1 partner count isn't significant difference by 22 but Teachman's research confirms a substantive divorce risk difference. Ergo, I will take the peer reviewed research opinion on the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:22 PM
3

lol I guess social science journals that are peer reviewed by PHDs are "biased" despite you offering no real refutation of any of their methods/sourcesbut some random internet anecdotal feminist rhetoric is sufficient to discount them? You have proven neither horrible research methods outside of "what about the mens" or bias in anything you've posted.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:20 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:19 PM
3

How is it incomplete? I am speaking about correlation between N count and female divorce rate. The study includes both of those factors. Ergo, the study is more than sufficient to answer this question in the affirmative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:06 PM
1

Cite me the evo psych studies that show high N count women make good marriage partners lol Never seen them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:01 PM
1

no I mean thin
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:55 PM
3

My argument includes multiple peer reviewed journal articles considering the effects of N count on female divorce patterns. Your argument is "but what about the menz!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:54 PM
1

I'd consider trump a low alpha. Betas can become high beta/low alpha in their late 20s to 30s often by lifting, gaining financially, confidence, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:53 PM
1

Yeah if peer reviewed scholarship is "high debatable" compared to anecdotal gibberish of BP, then yes its "debatable"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:52 PM
1

Money is just one component I've listed. Donald Trump is alpha due to his money. If he was poor, he wouldn't be conventionally attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:44 PM
3

There have been other studies on this subject that N counts for men don't affect divorce rates. I've cited multiple studies including direct links to the studies in the above posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:42 PM
1

Actually the difference at 22 for "thin" vs "heavier" was >1.3. Remember, this study includes some data from the 1990s when marriage occurred earlier. Regardless, the thinner, more attractive women had lower N counts on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:42 PM
1

Beta + Money + Lifting + Confidence= High Beta/Low Alpha= often hits successful betas in their 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:38 PM
2

yes and that usually the beta bucks
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:36 PM
2

It was never equal though, it was alway worse with higher N count. Ergo, the 6 vs 4.7 favors the 4.7 female, which coincides with attractive level
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:36 PM
2

Yeah a study on female divorce rates counting N partner counts only including women. Wow that sounds like a good study actually! Your only rebuttal is that its 21 years old? LOL Its probably worse considering the divorce rates have peaked later than that data. Thanks for proving my point further. Considering you feminists use domestic "studies" with data from the 1980s, most of feminist "science" would be totally negated by that logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:35 PM
1

Regardless, the N counts are higher for average/below average women and chunkier women. Therefore, by the logic of high N count partners being less desirable for LTRs, that attractive women win out. So that logic of the other post has been easily refuted scientifically. Yay me
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:25 PM
1

Plenty of women are happy divorce raping their husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:19 PM
1

Briffault's Law sums up female imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:17 PM
0

Correct for women at 5 and higher. I didn't say attractive women are vastly superior on average, I just said better. The argument in the other thread was that unattractive/average women make better marriage partners. From an N count perspective, this is verifiably false.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:17 PM
1

I venture to say the amount of women with that level of foresight is in the definitive minority. Therefore, the good majority of options for betas will be toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:16 PM
1

I like how you change it to "date" before marriage lol They weren't talking about "dating" only before marriage lol The difference in divorce rates were pretty dramatic, far more than 7%. http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 06:14 PM
-2

Regardless, the thinner attractive women at 22 have >1.4 less partners than these more overweight female companions. I said that attractive women area better bet on average in terms of N count that average/below average women. Nothing I have said has been negated. The Teachman study shows that the vast majority of American women aren't marriage material, with a somewhat higher level for unattractive/average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:47 PM
1

Personal anecdotes aren't really helpful in trying to understand macro trends though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:45 PM
1

Im speaking about divorce risk for the beta male. You are linking something about "happiness" and N count.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:40 PM
1

The concept of high beta is all over TRP The different between low alpha and high beta is nebulous. A beta that lifts and makes good money can become low alpha/high beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:39 PM
2

I would premise all women are gold diggers. Briffault's Law 101
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:38 PM
1

High betas/ Low Alphas are a weird threshold. Trump isn't a conventionally attractive man but only marries supermodels with iron clad prenups. He usually does the divorcing after he cheats on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:35 PM
2

No its like saying: Yo have high grades, then apply to Harvard (beta men with good financial resources) If you have low grades, then apply to state school (beta men with low resources) Avoid University of Phoenix regardless of grades (high N count average women)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:33 PM
1

Notice the >1.4 partner count different between slim and overweight women too lol Yeah extrapolate that to older age and the fact that this goes back to the 1990s.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:32 PM
1

That is why I have offered that caveat: Beta men who are average with no future acquisition of significant resources should aim for low N count average looking women or NOT marry. Beta men with significant financial acumen or potential should attempt to get more attractive low N count women depending on his level of financial success.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:30 PM
1

ya but once he gets confidence, he surely should go for a low N count female.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:28 PM
2

I am speaking about a high beta with good financial acumen that is somewhat older. Happens all the time instead of riding the CC.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:27 PM
2

you offer a post that negates nothing I have written and attempt to strawman around it lol bravo on that. feminism 101 tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:20 PM
1

Correct, all the studies point to this fact. That makes average women less desirable for LTR due to their high N counts on average. Low N count average women are the exception to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:19 PM
1

lol whose hamstering here?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:18 PM
1

I still agree with this. Previous post is acting like just some random average girl is better than an attractive female. This is far from correct. In fact, attractive women are far more likely to have low N counts, making them better relationship material on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:18 PM
1

This study confirms it: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Summary of the peer reviewed article below: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/ The above study actually correlates attractiveness and N counts for women. They showed a large average difference in N counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:13 PM
1

Yes if they don't think they can improve their resources sufficiently to achieve a high level of material success in the future, that is the best method. I agree with that assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:11 PM
1

Ok well that premise can be supported by the data for average betas with no money. Above average betas with money should pursue the attractive women I have stated. I can agree with this assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:10 PM
1

You haven't torn anything up. I have posted multiple peer reviewed articles that have been validated by multiple sources. All you can do is complain that it is a behind a "paywall" despite the media reporting the summaries online. If you are a student at any university, you should be able to access these studies. Nothing else I can do for you. I have far more peer reviewed links than any BP post I have ever seen actually. There is no contest actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:08 PM
1

You're following the multitude of studies I have shown to its natural conclusion. This is why BP can't win these debates. We have all the facts behind us.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:05 PM
1

So from all available information, betas should avoid marriage unless they can get low N count women to commit, preferably at a younger age.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:04 PM
1

This study confirms it: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Summary of the peer reviewed article below: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/ Here is the exact link champ and summaries
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:03 PM
1

I can't help that most peer reviewed studies are behind paywall. Thats the norm for almost all peer reviewed studies with only summaries given to the media. They want people to pay for the study. Got any peer reviewed studies to argue against this point considering I have linked about 3 in my favor?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 05:00 PM
1

So at least we can both confirm that low N count younger women are the best bet for LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:59 PM
1

The problem is betas don't become "high value" until they get older and acquire resources. Therefore, the low N count woman would have to marry a beta with no money in her early 20s to mid 20s Whats the chances of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:53 PM
2

Then why do attractive women have far less casual sex then? They are the most capable of achieving it by far. This study confirms it: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Summary of the peer reviewed article below: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:50 PM
0

This study confirms it: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Summary of the peer reviewed article below: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:48 PM
1

Fine, then they should go for AVERAGE women with low N counts if they are average financially beta bucks. If they are significantly above average, then attractive women with low N counts. Got my position now?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:48 PM
1

This study confirms it: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Summary of the peer reviewed article below: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:47 PM
1

This study confirms it: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Summary of the peer reviewed article below: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:47 PM
1

you can dispute anything you want but have no evidence to confer Here's a link to a peer reviewed journal article that confirms attractive women have far less casual sex than average women: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19485565.2011.615172?journalCode=hsbi20 Got any articles to refute that? This blog sums up the findings of the article if you don't want to read it through: http://www.beyondblackwhite.com/study-suggests-pretty-women-casual-sex/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:45 PM
1

I said top level beta bucks should go for low N count attractive women. Regular betas should go for regular low N count women. Regardless of cause/effect, the studies confirm high N count women make terrible marriage partners. Beta bucks gain nothing and expose themselves to high risk financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:42 PM
1

The science confirms that high N count women are terrible investments for marriage. Thats beyond reproach with three different articles posted confirming this. High N count women are more likely to be average in appearance: confirmed by the original blog article that links to the study and another one I have posted below it. The only inference made is that high count average women are getting banged out by Chads mostly. Either way, high count average women are a terrible investment for beta men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:40 PM
1

Risk factors include high N count women Another study out of University of Virginia confirms this as well: http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:38 PM
1

Here's another one out of University of Virginia confirming high N counts women are bad marriage partners: http://nationalmarriageproject.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NMP-BeforeIDoReport-Final.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:36 PM
1

Its good enough because I can't find the exact article online without getting the academic site. It breaks down the information further.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:35 PM
2

Source is in the blog. The studies are showing that the average women have far high sexual number of partners. It doesn't explain the reason for this. Regardless of reasoning, high count partners (mostly average women) are terrible investments for LTR minded beta males.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:35 PM
1

Its another one confirming the N count issues
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:33 PM
0

Either way, it should be a low count, younger female with no psychosocial pathology. How many of those are willing to marry/LTR betas in their early to mid 20s? Yes, I am inferring that average woman are casually sleeping with the top percentage of men in an attempt to get commitment from life experience. The study doesn't explain the type of men they are sleeping with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:32 PM
1

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.589.4575&rep=rep1&type=pdf Actually study link. Here you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:30 PM
2

I clearly stated its a blog that was linked to the peer reviewed study on the issue. Maybe you should read the blog to see the study that was cited.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:26 PM
1

If they can't, then they should avoid marriage to used goods women that offer no value for them and pose exceptional financial risk. That is my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:24 PM
2

The studies show this, so it doesn't matter what you "highly doubt" unless you can show otherwise. Hot women could potentially settle for an older successful beta bucks at a younger age. Have seen these cases before. If beta bucks isn't successful, his best bet is an average woman that is younger with a low N count and low psychosocial pathology. Outside of that, beta bucks shouldn't marry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:22 PM
5

Yes commitment to ALPHA/TOP men not average beta bucks, despite them being average. Once they get older and determine they can't get commitment, they want the beta bucks as a fall back option. Not that complicated. Why should beta bucks go for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:20 PM
3

Actually, the studies show very few average girls are getting married at younger ages. They are mostly riding the CC until they're older and then trying to settle down with the beta. Very few average women want average beta dudes in their early to mid 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:19 PM
5

Incorrect. There are very few average looking women who want to marry young to beta bucks that have low N counts and no psychosocial illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:12 PM
5

Yeah that is a decent option as well for less successful beta bucks. How many younger average women with low N counts and no psychosocial illness are there? The beta bucks that could lock down a hot woman would have to be a successful guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:10 PM
2

Then why are hot women avoiding casual sex the most? If he obtains a hot woman with a low N count ( or even average that is young with a low N count), he has the best chances of success. There are some hot women that will go for beta bucks during their peak years if the dude is successful. Outside of that, marriage is worthless with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:09 PM
4

Yeah thats another good method. Catch her when she's very young with a low N count as the best method without any psychosocial illness. How many of those are around?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 04:07 PM
9

Yeah basically they should only shoot for top level women with low N counts in their 20s or AVOID MARRIAGE entirely. Considering the vast majority of "average" women are spending their 20s riding the CC where they can't obtain a LTR with Chad despite offering him sex and then "settling" for the average male, this is NOT a good option for the average beta male. "Average" women have proven to be far biggest riders of the CC than their attractive counterparts due to them using sex to attempt to loc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 03:46 PM
1

I have given a definitive answer to this fallacy in another post I have just placed in a new thread. Can't write it all out here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 03:22 PM
1

The problem with this argument is that average and below average looking women have an overinflated sense of their RMP value due to casual sex in their 20s. Studies show that less attractive women have MORE casual sex rather than less attempting to get alpha males. Therefore, there is no analogy between these women and beta males who are genuinely "nicer" due to their circumstances. I have seen absolutely no correlation between female attitudes of entitlement and appearance. Therefore, it is act…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 03:15 PM
1

I think its important to know the sexual history of a female. There really isn't any issue with that except to give her the BOOT
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/16 08:03 AM
10

So the husband gets the woman after she had her "fun" and has been banged out in every possible way now that she is "mature". Wow how "lucky" of him lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:50 PM
2

As long as he has a prenup, why would he care?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:37 PM
0

huh
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:36 PM
3

The reason for the change is critical. If she's changing because she is forced to "settle", it is likely beta bucks will get screwed in divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:36 PM
3

According to feminists, men aren't supposed to be sexually demanding or assertive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:35 PM
2

When their preferences change coincide with their aging out of the SMP, its time for men to move on. Beware of them beta bucks
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 10:34 PM
0

lol simple and succinct
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 08:35 PM
3

and he doesn't owe her long term commitment or anything else either. Its his prerogative to feel disrespected and dump her now. I applaud him if he does.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:43 PM
2

I agree men should never do that and be militant about it like females. But they tend to get burned because they think they are being "traditional" and feminists have pushed this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:42 PM
2

Men marry unemployed women all the time in mass numbers. They also commonly marry women with low paying jobs over high paying jobs. So its not "people" that are attracted to good jobs for their mate but women!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:24 PM
1

Not enough to justify the cost for the male financially. Men would do far better financially without the female rather than marriage with divorce that often happens to beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:22 PM
0

Yes I was comparing the last with this one
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:05 PM
1

Who said that? I said women financially rape their husbands during divorce
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:03 PM
0

Actually, the last guy was aggressive in demanding anal, she just refused strongly. This is a different situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 07:02 PM
0

I don't see the AF/BB analogy here considering the last relationship was done in marriage. AF isn't involving marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 06:48 PM
1

The vast majority of women still marry men who make more money
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 05:26 PM
5

The lying part makes her a piece of shit
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 05:20 PM
3

Yes she is. She willingly let the alpha take advantage of her but never the beta. The alpha gets for free what the beta doesn't get that the beta PAYS for lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 05:19 PM
8

I'd venture to say thats the vast minority of female opinion lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 05:19 PM
1

nah, I'm looking at it directly
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 05:18 PM
1

Yes but thats not how the marriage contract works. A female doesn't have to do fuck all for the male and she still gets half the assets/house/etc since he usually makes the majority of the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 05:18 PM
3

Yeah, still makes her a piece of shit though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:56 PM
2

There is analogy there. The analogy of a TRPer would be a female that gave up sex to every beta without commitment and eventually getting a backbone. Females taking advantage of a beta bucks is not equal to TRP lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:56 PM
8

As a female, you wouldn't know. The analogy for a female would be the boyfriend bough a 10K ring for his ex upon consideration of marriage but with his new gf he won't buy her a ring because he found it to be a "waste of money" when he did it for his ex. How would his new gf feel about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:38 PM
3

She didn't lie because of that. She lied because she was worried beta bucks would leave her when he found out she got banged out by her ex. She was correct since beta bucks is now having second thoughts about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:37 PM
6

Not an analogous situation and you know it lol Why would she lie to her partner about it? Its his right to reject her based upon this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:36 PM
6

Well she clearly isn't and is a liar to boot
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:29 PM
3

Value for a LTR. Often men will have sex with a woman he won't commit to. Women confuse these two concepts thinking if she has sex with a guy, she is in the same "league". This is incorrect leading to AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:25 PM
1

there is no equivalence because AF/BB is a unique female mating strategy. Men don't go for women based upon provisional needs in the vast majority of cases
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:24 PM
7

yeah just lie to them sets a much better precedent lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:23 PM
0

So Adam Levine didn't just marry a Victoria Secret Model? Or Jason Statham? Wow no hot women get married lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:07 PM
1

True, I should use MMP/RMV for that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:07 PM
3

Yes thats called alpha bucks. Thats the ideal. Since its so rare, she pauses the AF/BB in the vast majority of situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 04:05 PM
1

Its called avoid marriage. Prenup at a minimum if dumb enough to marry
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:46 PM
6

Yeah guys often say anything for a short term sexual relationship with a female. The real SMV of the female is dependent on the men she can get to COMMIT to her. That is the true test.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:44 PM
2

Yes it is if she then goes on to attempt to marry a man that is a "good provider and marriage material" while not being sexually interested in him in the same manner. Thats the definition of AF/BB brah
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:37 PM
8

Yes but amazingly those "preferences change" when the woman hits late 20s to 30s which coincidentally matches her time of declining sexual market place value.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:36 PM
3

AF/BB paradigm remains in effect
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:08 PM
8

Most women marry men for provisional reasons. That is why women avoid unemployed men and mostly men who make less than them for marriage. http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/dating-tips-advice/do-you-need-a-man-to-make-more-money-than-you-if-so-why/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:07 PM
6

Not "new" enough to determine he is a good beta bucks material though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:05 PM
7

The fact that she was willing to do it for the last guy but not him speaks volumes. Bottom line.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:05 PM
0

A man "adopts" the children of a single mom when they marry by default in most states. Also, if a wife cuckholds a man during marriage, the kid is considered his by default. I consider a female taking the male's resources as "financial rape" since she didn't earn it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:05 PM
1

No, I am claiming the woman takes from the man financially in the vast majority of divorces NOT the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:03 PM
6

That "data" is self reported from females and still reports they want "assertion, strong" guys just not "dominating them" basically. Self reported data from females are notoriously unreliable (similar to sexual partner count)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 03:03 PM
2

No, its just rationalizations that aren't logically consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:56 PM
1

Still usually lose house, half the assets, etc. Considering women mostly marry guys with more income/assets, the guy loses in divorce. Woman still mostly gets custody of children and child support at inflated prices as well. Betas often get saddled with child support for the bastard children of a single mom they married as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:55 PM
4

Why would she do it for her ex boyfriend then but not her current one?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:50 PM
6

So she's willing to "marry" a guy that she lacks a sexual connection with? Why is that? Sounds like the definition of beta bucks to me!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:50 PM
10

Isn't it amazing that the "bad boy" unstable guy always gets that type of sex though and the "nice guy' doesn't? AF/BB paradigm appears to never fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:49 PM
8

She uses terms such as "long term relationship" or "marriage potential" for him being a good beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:48 PM
8

Well she was willing to do it for her old boyfriends "pleasure" but not the new one? Wow sounds very respectful to the "nice guy" lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:47 PM
1

Thanks to men's groups fighting it so hard. Feminists have fought tooth and nail to keep it. Look at Florida as the most recent example.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:47 PM
3

New boyfriend has smaller penis noted in comments
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:29 PM
7

She reports she enjoyed the anal with her ex
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:29 PM
6

She never mentioned that she "found it dirty". She states clearly she doesn't feel the want to do it with him in the same way as her ex due to sexual differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:28 PM
1

Most men get divorce rape with >98% of alimony paid by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:27 PM
7

I find anal disgusting but its the concept behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:26 PM
5

Why does she need to appear "clean" to the new boyfriend? Hmm wonder why.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:25 PM
8

Women often sabotage other women. She was more than happy to do anal with her ex and found it "fun" according to the comment section.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:25 PM
4

Yeah except the study shows: 1) It only studies people who REMAIN married over a long period of time. Once you take into account divorces, the effect is probably negative for men. 2) Over samples older people who remained married for >30 years in a different time/generation. Once you take this into account, marriage offers no benefit and is probably negative for men under the current system. Here is a paper discussing ways singles do better than married in 23 different areas these days: https://…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:23 PM
8

LOL But yet she finds him ok to marry for provisioning reasons at the amazing age of 31? Wow what a coincidence!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:03 PM
3

The ones that had the most upvotes were clearly BP dudes that knew the behavior was "common" but didn't have a good explanation for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:03 PM
3

Good at least you admit there is a significant number of females employing the AF/BB methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:02 PM
2

Interesting. So why hide that from beta bucks though? Let him know that right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:01 PM
5

The explanation of "big dick" is clearly wrong from the comment section. She brags about the ex's size NOT her current boyfriend. Why is he "better in bed"? Why should a man marry or have a LTR with a woman that doesn't want to do the same things sexually with him as an ex?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 02:01 PM
4

Of course. Feminism is about female supremacy and realizing the female sexual imperative without consequence. Beta bucks are needed to take away consequence for single moms through taxes or marriage (with divorce rape). This way they can continue to fuck the alphas in early 20s during peak SMP and then throw off consequences onto betas when they age out. Feminism in academia and business is all about special treatment and preference. If the betas realized their plight and revolted (even with MGT…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:49 PM
2

Where are all these "demure" women? They are the vast minority in the SMP and are usually married by their early 20s as close to virgins. The vast majority of women aren't like that these days but follow the AF/BB methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:47 PM
3

Correct, it largely represents the good majority of younger people in relationships that aren't "redpill" or "feminist" in outlook. Clearly, many of them see this trend without calling it AF/BB.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:44 PM
7

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2005/01/dont_worry_your_pretty_little_head.html http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/02/why-feminist-careerists-neutered-larry-summers/303795/ The Russia thing had ZERO to do with him being fired, particularly since it happened many years BEFORE he was fired. The timing of his firing came RIGHT AFTER his comments on females in science/math/engineering which are CLEARLY TRUE.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:41 PM
3

Thanks for admitting this is a common mating strategy for women. Unfortunately, this makes life pretty bad for the beta who is usually financially raped thanks to feminist divorce laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:39 PM
3

There are plenty of surveys showing the majority of women wouldn't marry the same guy again. Why is that? Remember these surveys include older women in their 60s and 70s who married as virgins in their early 20s, which clearly don't follow the AF/BB paradigm of the younger females. http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/01/04/survey-half-women-wouldnt-remarry-spouse.html This is of CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN! Imagine when you add the divorced ones into the mix, its going to be the majority of women! Thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:34 PM
3

How else can this be confirmed besides "field reports" and speaking with men who have been divorced. Its almost scientific in that I can see a beta bucks dude and his divorce is usually 5-10 years later after being financial raped. Its like clockwork actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:28 PM
4

White world's mating pattern has changed over the last 20 years thanks to feminism. It is starting to reflect the ghetto method of breeding with mostly single moms and harems. It leads to a breakdown of civilization and declining living standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:27 PM
9

Its very clear from the post that the new boyfriend is a "nice guy who she can marry or have a LTR with" compared to her ex who she knew there was an "expiration date" on her relationship with him. Funny, she gets banged out by the dude that she knows will likely be short term because he won't date her for a long term relationship. This is the clearest example of AF/BB no matter how you slice it. She feels "comfortable" enough with her new boyfriend to want to marry him since she is hitting the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:20 PM
7

Yeah the TRP must be making daily troll posts on relationship subs. All the BP dudes must be fakes too plus the many upvotes. When BP doesn't explain things, just pretend its fake or some rare exception lol No explanation for the reality of the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 01:18 PM
6

No scientist would do this study due to it making females "look bad" and feminists going nuts in academia. Look at Larry Summers at Harvard who implied women aren't as good at math/engineering (which is clearly true on average) as the reason for them being unrepresented. Feminists went crazy and had him fired.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:21 PM
1

LOL read the comment section
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:12 PM
3

Its AF/BB though by any other name. BP denies this by denying the "wall" or declining SMV of women that are thrown off the CC or the concept of AF/BB. Yet they are totally unable to explain the above OP using their paradigm with only denial being the method employed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:10 PM
6

AF is a factual thing that occurs frequently. AF only marries TOP women but fucks many others. That is the problem for the VAST MAJORITY of women as they AGE OUT. They go for beta bucks at that point when their SMV collapses in their late 20s. Its the norm in ghetto culture and its becoming the norm in the White world as well. This will become more and more prevalent as more "alpha widows" develop among millennial women with beta bucks men waking up to the game and avoiding marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 12:08 PM
3

You are in denial about the AF reality: 1) AF guys bang far more women than they can "marry". He will often bang a rotation of 5 different women at a time. 2) AF marries in his 30s often to a female in her 20s. AF would also marry a much younger woman in her prime. The vast majority of women would just be pumped and dumped. 3) AF will often cheat on the women even after married due to ample opportunities. How often are AF going to be loyal to their wives? Ergo, most women get thrown off the CC b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:58 AM
2

Oh I understand it plenty. Its in the interests of Western women to deny it though. Ergo, the typical BP method. You are unable to explain this female's behavior in this post though from your BP paradigms, rendering it useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:57 AM
7

She can't marry Alpha Fucks though. He would be unstable in provisioning capability and would be fucking many other women in his harem. You are attempting mental gymnastics to deny the obvious. The few "alpha bucks" type dude are off the market in a nanosecond.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:53 AM
2

You didn't really give a good explanation though. She isn't more "compatible" with the ex boyfriend in terms of resource provisioning or in terms of an LTR (most likely because the alpha dude is fucking other women in his harem). She appears to be using the new guy for resources despite not being really attracted to him sexually like the alpha. Ergo, he has been relegated to the "beta bucks" role that offers all negative for him. If he was stupid enough to get married, he'd be FUCKED. Why get in…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:50 AM
3

Yes, its "selection" of the average >26 year old American female
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:46 AM
4

I think its the norm for women who marry at ages greater than >26. I have seen countless examples in real life dating/marriage situations as a male in his mid 30s. Why wouldn't you define it as "smart"? She gets to fuck the hot dude in her prime years and throws the financial costs on the beta dude when her SMV has collapsed. Great strategy actually except for the beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:45 AM
3

Ok lets pretend this isn't common. How do you explain her behavior in her thread using blue pill knowledge?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:44 AM
2

Ok lets pretend this isn't common. How do you explain her behavior in her thread using blue pill knowledge?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:43 AM
7

and yet this would be more than enough evidence for most women about how "bad men are" right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:40 AM
3

I just stated there are many other examples that are daily posted on Red Pill links to women with the same exact story. The most UPVOTED comments are from BP people saying this is COMMON as well. Denial gonna denial
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:40 AM
4

These types of posts are constant on the relationship forums. Red Pill literally posts something like this FROM A FEMALE almost every day. This is also consistent with OkCupid surveys, etc. BP goes into denial about this because they can't explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:30 AM
4

There are MANY other posts of the same nature on the relationship blogs. This type of post is mentioned on RP reddit almost every day. Also, why are the most upvoted posts stating this is COMMON among women? This is coming from BLUE PILL men who can't explain it but mention it as common!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/16 11:29 AM
1

Child custody will start at a default 50/50 position. All those details can be decided between the parties if there is deviation from the "equal" position. Also, I noticed you didn't mention the lifetime alimony issue and the hypocrisy of "independent equal women" demanding this luxury from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 06:32 PM
0

Correct. Feminism's success has been to pretend its for equality though. Without the false assertion, most men would revolt against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 06:30 PM
2

By that logic, then women should be kept in the kitchen just taking care of the child as in the 1950s with fault divorce laws. Ergo, feminism would be obsolete if it was just for the "good of the children". Yet we would never state this because of "equality" for women right? So since "equality" is the most important value (according to feminism) by that logic 50/50 custody should be default.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 06:29 PM
0

50/50 custody is the only logical default position in an "equal" society. This can be changed based upon parental discussions and negotiations to a better arrangement if necessary. However, it allows the fathers to have a default 50% right towards custody of their child. How is that not equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 06:13 PM
3

Thats correct from any objective analysis. The success of feminism is largely due to it pretending to be about "equality" for women. It strongly denies that it is about supremacy but is just fighting for "equality". Men have been conned into believing that feminism is about equality between the sexes. Time and again, feminist organizations continue to fight for containing obligations on men that were considered "traditional" such as alimony despite their stance for women needing to be "independe…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 06:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter