TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shadowbanned6 Archive

View 208 posts and 911 comments by shadowbanned6 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1217

Edu./Occu.shadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:26 AM
880

Reverse Gendersshadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/05/14 10:57 AM
739

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:44 PM
731

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:14 PM
689

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:39 AM
687

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:07 AM
683

Outrageshadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/01/15 03:11 PM
653

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:03 PM
651

Men's Rights Newsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:32 PM
344

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass04/02/15 11:46 AM
341

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:29 PM
327

Men's Rightsshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 06:33 PM
249

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:09 PM
246

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/03/13 06:13 PM
238

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass12/05/14 10:57 AM
236

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass11/03/14 06:04 AM
219

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:30 AM
190

Feminismshadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:41 AM
178

Storyshadowbanned6/r/PussyPass21/01/15 03:11 PM
168

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:35 AM
150

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:44 AM
142

False Accusationsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights11/08/14 07:17 PM
138

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:28 PM
123

Discriminationshadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:36 AM
123

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/01/13 09:42 AM
122

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass13/02/15 04:42 PM
120

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass04/06/14 05:16 PM
116

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights03/02/14 03:04 PM
112

Raising Awarenessshadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:27 AM
112

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:26 PM
104

Men's Rightsshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:44 AM
103

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:04 AM
102

Men's Rights Newsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:39 AM
100

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/02/14 05:06 PM
99

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:54 PM
97

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:13 PM
96

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass21/05/14 10:58 AM
92

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:56 AM
92

Red Pill Exampleshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 12:01 AM
82

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:26 PM
81

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass09/02/14 08:21 AM
79

Blue Pill Exampleshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 05:31 PM
74

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/06/13 09:07 AM
74

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:37 PM
74

Rant/Ventingshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:41 AM
72

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass19/04/14 08:55 AM
69

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:55 PM
69

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:00 PM
66

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:29 AM
66

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:22 PM
66

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass11/05/14 05:47 PM
64

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:35 PM
63

Newsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:07 AM
59

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:02 AM
58

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:46 PM
58

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights27/05/13 08:00 AM
57

Discussionshadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/02/15 04:07 PM
54

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:28 AM
53

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:22 PM
53

Social Issuesshadowbanned6/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:35 PM
51

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:36 AM
51

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:38 AM
51

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:28 PM
50

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:20 PM
50

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:01 AM
47

False Accusationsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:26 PM
45

Storyshadowbanned6/r/PussyPass12/02/15 04:38 AM
45

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass23/03/14 11:49 AM
44

Feminismshadowbanned6/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:16 PM
39

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:33 AM
38

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:37 PM
36

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:21 PM
36

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:46 PM
35

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:10 AM
34

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:25 PM
34

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:34 PM
34

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/11/12 12:31 AM
34

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:05 AM
33

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass28/08/14 07:35 PM
33

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:04 PM
33

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:40 AM
32

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass11/03/14 09:20 AM
32

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:25 PM
31

Red Pill Theoryshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 10:49 AM
30

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:22 PM
29

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:54 AM
29

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:29 PM
27

Feminismshadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:19 PM
26

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:04 AM
26

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:31 AM
24

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights30/12/12 11:08 PM
24

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:21 AM
24

Newsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:50 PM
23

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:49 AM
23

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/12/12 10:27 AM
22

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:45 AM
21

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:36 AM
21

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:49 AM
21

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/11/13 09:07 PM
20

MR Blogs/Vlogsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:23 AM
20

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:40 AM
20

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:38 AM
19

Red Pill Theoryshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 09:05 AM
19

Men's Rightsshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 09:18 AM
19

shadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 06:36 PM
18

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:33 PM
18

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:00 PM
18

Generalshadowbanned6/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:53 PM
18

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:36 PM
17

Discussionshadowbanned6/r/PussyPass14/02/15 04:09 PM
16

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:29 AM
16

Rant/Ventingshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 05:22 PM
16

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:24 PM
15

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/04/14 12:00 AM
15

shadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 11:48 AM
15

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:28 AM
15

Men's Rightsshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 05:11 AM
15

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:28 AM
15

Off Topicshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:44 AM
15

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:12 PM
14

Outrageshadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:38 AM
14

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:10 AM
14

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:48 AM
13

re: Feminismshadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:06 PM
13

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:14 PM
13

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:39 AM
12

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:55 PM
12

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:33 AM
12

Blue Pill Exampleshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 06:44 AM
12

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:46 PM
12

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:26 PM
11

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:35 AM
11

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:58 AM
10

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:28 AM
10

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:41 PM
9

shadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 09:49 PM
9

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:30 PM
9

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:29 PM
9

Men's Rightsshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:37 AM
8

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:32 PM
8

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:38 AM
8

Outrageshadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:34 AM
7

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:02 PM
7

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:26 AM
6

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:45 AM
6

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:20 AM
6

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:24 PM
6

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:51 PM
5

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:22 PM
5

Feminismshadowbanned6/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:46 AM
5

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:00 AM
5

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:58 AM
4

Questionsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights27/05/16 12:05 AM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:03 AM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:43 PM
4

False Accusationsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:27 PM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:18 PM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:59 PM
4

Legal Rightsshadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:23 AM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:06 AM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:45 PM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:36 PM
4

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:31 AM
3

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:40 PM
3

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:45 AM
3

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:47 AM
3

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:54 AM
2

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:39 PM
2

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:16 AM
2

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:31 AM
2

shadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 05:51 AM
2

shadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 05:15 PM
1

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:43 PM
1

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/12/12 09:19 AM
1

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass12/10/14 08:50 PM
1

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:32 AM
1

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:16 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:20 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:49 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:50 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:06 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights11/01/13 10:55 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:41 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:06 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:03 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:20 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:27 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights27/12/12 05:04 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:26 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:11 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:10 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass25/05/14 03:01 PM
0

Storyshadowbanned6/r/PussyPass14/01/15 06:08 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:03 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:34 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights13/01/13 10:03 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/01/14 12:31 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:58 AM
0

Discriminationshadowbanned6/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:19 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:44 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:17 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:11 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/PussyPass13/11/14 01:36 AM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:53 AM
0

Rant/Ventingshadowbanned6/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 02:47 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:30 PM
0

shadowbanned6/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:23 AM
0

Discussionshadowbanned6/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:51 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

maybe we are a pro-woman sub. Or pro-humanitarian. Or anti-violent-rape We are talking real forcible violent rape and gang rape. Not "I was sorry the next morning" rapes.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:06 AM
2

a) differentiating by ethnicity is racist b) warning women to behave carefully with refugees is about as much a no-no as telling a woman to stay away from Blacks because they commit more rapes, spousal murder, and domestic violence. c) MSM Media mislead women and cover up the danger d) if a group of migrants pull a woman into the bushes, street wise behavior could hardly have avoided that. Other than staying home.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:05 AM
1

Some feminists say that there also is groping at the Octoberfest .....
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:54 AM
6

well, 20 men groping at once, pulling off clothes and bras. Occasionally sticking fingers into orifices. Forcing kisses. Full rapes were just a few. Nothing that feminists would consider serious./end sarcasm Considering that feminists obsess about the slightest cat calls, half enthusiastic sex, or 5 second rape due to consent rescinded ...... if not perpetrated by a member of a traumatized disadvantaged minority
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:53 AM
9

Where are the feminists? Watch 11 other discussions on reddit. None by feminists nor other MRA groups So, to solve the Swedish rape problem, it’s up to the Swedes, you see, to stop drinking alcohol and make sure their women conform to traditional gender roles
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:22 PM
-1

The same video where a white meek Italian becomes a black muscular stallion is funny, not racist. See the second half of this video!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OC3hgCeZKeY
/r/MensRights27/05/16 12:46 AM
7

Nothing new. Women's track and field records get beaten by US 12 to 14 year old boys. Women should play against 13 year olds, maximum
/r/MensRights27/05/16 12:32 AM
1

Will the downvoters please speak up? Are they the politically correct that think that immigrant crime is a no-no to mention?
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:20 PM
1

add to that that a native man who beats an immigrant criminal risks: a) severe punishment as a Nazi b) being beaten into a coma by a group of immigrants.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:06 PM
1

i understand very well what you mean. Rape laws have changed the legal system, ended presumption of innocence, allow to convict on hearsay and one person's unproven statement. Normal legal norms should be reinstated. If there is very ample evidence, surveilance video and 30 witnesses, prior clear "no", including hitting with the purse, then it makes sense to punish groping and kissing.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 03:05 PM
1

Forced kiss on mouth, in subway. Police unfazed It happened between Reumannplatz and Karlsplatz. And: "It was quick," says Iryna L. "He was seated next to me in the full wagon, he stroked my hand and I screamed." Stop it ". I looked around for another place when he grabbed me by the shoulder, pulled me close and kissed me on the mouth. " The business consultant hit the assailant with her purse. There was little Help. "Two men stared stupidly, a woman advised her to call the police," said the vic…
/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:25 AM
4

Does she have the right to get close to the candidate, to accost him? It is a security risk. Security can move her to the appropriate distance. The press conference was over. No right for her to get a private interview from Trump
/r/PussyPass01/04/16 02:11 AM
1

Just a nice contrast. On the same page Moorhead man sentenced to 15 years for sexually touching young girl Vs. woman sentenced to 2 days jail for killing
/r/PussyPass01/04/16 02:02 AM
1

Just stop measuring, just stop talking about facts. Knowledge is embarrassing. I wish you would use your IQ to be interested in science and facts, not your knee jerk feelings
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:45 AM
1

Can someone explain me why we always see male/female pairs of police officers? Or two males. Has anyone ever seen a pair of two female policewomen on a dangerous street? I wonder why?? Because 2 women would become laughing stock of the criminals. When one man is there, he can do the hard and dangerous jobs. She still can use the radio to call in further help
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:53 PM
1

I wonder why they did not compare WOMEN ONLY combat Units. Any idea why? Any guess? My guess is they would be totally outclassed. We could start with mixed gender integrated Soccer, football and basketball teams in the NFL. That would be a good start. Another article about this http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/study-all-male-infantry-units-outperformed-teams-with-women/ar-AAe9qJg?ocid=spartandhp
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:49 AM
1

You did not read the article. Also, in no sport whatsoever do women have the faintest chance against men. Not even in darts, snooker, chess, and yes, cooking (check for women with Michelin stars). They just slow down the entire unit. It would be stronger if they left the woman at home. Even more if they actually replaced the women with men.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:47 AM
14

Note that the wife's word was needed. Men are not credible when they state a kid is their own child. A woman is needed. Oh equality.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:17 AM
1

Help! My 18 year old girl friend has raped me 298 times
/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:11 AM
1

Sorry for the late reply. The central Park five does not look like false conviction at all. Rather a politically correct hoax, deciding to throw out all the evidence. http://www.vdare.com/articles/it-was-fun-robert-k-tanenbaum-vs-the-central-park-five-25-years-later http://www.vdare.com/posts/false-confessions-and-the-central-park-five http://www.vdare.com/articles/ken-burns-the-central-park-five-the-new-to-kill-a-mockingbird-fiction-designed-to-induce-white-guilt
/r/MensRights02/07/15 10:39 PM
4

The title is somewhat misleading. The woman did not maliciously kill a child but was drunk and left the child die of heat in a car. I think the pussypass solution is not to be stricter on women. It is extending the same sensible kindness onto fathers and men. As in many such cases, I think the judge is being reasonable to allow her supervised visits with her children. I wish they were as reasonable with men.
/r/PussyPass17/05/15 07:45 AM
1

That is politically and religiously correct junk science. Tea Abuse: How a traumatic event impacts children depends on how the adults cope with it. (MRA Angry Harry)
/r/PussyPass17/05/15 07:04 AM
1

Right. And you can be a Lesbian too, if you happen to like women like a heterosexual man would. Defining as black when you are blonde and blue eyed may raise eye brows. You should define some non-binary gender identity, look some of them up in google. I believe you can be changing, varying, unsure of gender. That is hardest for anyone to dismiss. It would allow you to blame them for binary bias or whatever
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:55 PM
6

Will the father now have to pay CHILD SUPPORT to the strangers who are raising his kids and took the kid away from him? Of course he will have to! I am sure if the restraining order was for PROVEN violent behavior, it would say so. Quite likely to be a frivolous routine restraining order.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 07:51 PM
1

He is not a public figure. A victim of a false accusation does not become a public figure just because he was falsely accused. She is a public figure, because she chose to out herself. She also could have done a theoretical piece on date rape, not on her alleged acquitted rapist.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:10 PM
4

don't put up any hope. Quotas for women in the board room and at all levels of major companies are being put into law all over Europe. Where they are not law, companies "voluntarily" promise to have 20% or 30% women in pretty much all positions. Try that at Daimler Benz, for example. Men don't get promoted so underqualified women can be promoted past them. So this will not stop.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:08 PM
11

The bias towards women shocked the researchers!?? Next time they will rig the experiment so such an unexpected politically incorrect result will not happen again! Anyone here surprised? (Reuters) - When hundreds of U.S. college faculty members rated junior scientists based on scholarly record, job interview performance and other information with an eye toward which should be hired, they preferred women over identically qualified men two-to-one, scientists reported on Monday. The "candidates" wer…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:35 AM
2

you speak all the politically correct theory. As the article. it has been shown that women unjustly favor hiring women. Men are fairly unbiased and just in hiring (source?)
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:13 PM
4

any links, evidence, examples from news, web sites, research? How are these women and where are they from? It probably is all an immigration problem. Ukrainian women?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:49 AM
12

This is the guy who won the law suits against the tobacco industry.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:09 AM
2

This is why they make genetic tests illegal in many countries. If it could help a man. It reduces option females had all during human history.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 03:28 PM
2

that is a felony in Britain. You are violating the child's right to his genetic information, I kid you not. In Germany the law to declare it a felony did not pass. It might be a misdemeanor. Certainly the result is absolutely useless and invalid for legal purposes. Even as argument to order a test.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 03:27 PM
2

Promotion stop for men at Siemens to achieve "voluntary" women quota
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:18 AM
3

Christian Grey gets kind of neutered, during the film. His groveling with a woman who refuses to play by his rules, who does not sign his contract, is despicable. Politically correct film makers sanitized "50 shades of Grey": the heroine never submits, never surrenders. Movie heroine Anastasia Steele never enjoys the book’s spanking orgasm with Ben Wa Balls. She endures the climactic final heavy "six of the best" strokes out of morbid curiosity and stubbornness, not not out of submission. Anasta…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 06:24 PM
-9

Women in the military are a) totally voluntarily there (b) do have a way out (pregnancy) and (c) are usually kept out of harm's way. Anastasia is not even obedient to endure symbolic violence, rather insists on being rebellious. After getting medium spanking, much less than a boxer or UFC fighter gets in a fight, she immediately is rebellious "don't touch me" and "you will never do this again". It is amazing that a handsome socially skillful billionaire, the wet dream of all women, gets stuck wi…
/r/PussyPass14/02/15 04:17 PM
2

Women in the military are a) totally voluntarily there (b) do have a way out (pregnancy) and (c) are usually kept out of harm's way. Anastasia is not even obedient to endure symbolic violence, rather insists on being rebellious. It's amazing that a handsome socially skillful billionaire, the wet dream of all women, gets stuck with such a resistant woman and can not find a submissive woman. Not even if he offered a Million. The entire movie is totally politically correct with the hero always aski…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 04:15 PM
1

It is a fairly good description of the insane terminology of GENDER. It is about feminism, not pure bred feminism itself This is what makes the article interesting.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:52 PM
16

Great idea. Have a friend do a quality recording/filming. Then file a complaint and sue the hell out of the school if they don't act. You will need a major legal organisation to back you up. Ask COTWA. Some lawer might do it for the fame and for half the money you can receive. If there was a similar case where a woman successfully filed a complaint, your case gets better. You might actually set up the University to have a girl file a complaint, with no proof whatsoever. Her's will be pursued, yo…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:47 PM
4

http://www.thestate.com/2015/02/05/3971438_2-dead-in-murder-suicide-on-usc.html?rh=1
/r/MensRights13/02/15 04:44 PM
1

We need to construct an application that takes an encrypted recording and uploads it to a site. Only a court order can decrypt the video. This way the recording can not be abused, but is available in case of an accusation.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:46 AM
1

"Even if I press charges it is useless because it won't bring back my manhood,” he told Times Live. “Her being in jail will just ruin her future because she is still young and I do not have the energy to attend courts.” Pussypass even by the mutilated victim The injury has left him being forced to urinate through a tube and requiring further surgery. The girl, who was not identified because of her age, UNBELIEVABLE reportedly told Times Live: "I never intended to kill his penis. HOW CUTE. She di…
/r/PussyPass12/02/15 03:52 AM
0

the age of consent might be lower than 18. This creates the very common insane occurrence: You can f.ck her but you can not fotograph her. Of course, putting this on social media is a bit dumb. But not everyone is aware that photographing a17 year old naked, or in sexual ways is one of the worst crimes, punished more severely than forcible rape.
/r/PussyPass12/02/15 03:47 AM
5

Link is dead. Even after searching in the newspaper site, they link that shows up there is dead. Must be further pussy pass. Delete her record from the newspaper.
/r/PussyPass12/02/15 03:11 AM
3

You certainly have a good point and I agree. But let me be the devil's advocate and explain some counter arguments. In Rio de Janeiro there are street walking trannies. They are vicious, strong like a man, and a danger for any male client that crosses or offends them (or resists being robbed, occasionally). I would not want my girl friend to encounter these on a routine basis in the privacy of the women's bath room. I believe Rio de Janeiro solved the issue by offering a third bath room (male, f…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:32 PM
3

We need quota for women in prison. 30% of all prisoners must be women, and we should strive for equality: 50% of prisoners should be women. This is discrimination. What is the percentage of women among prisoners? Way under 10%. This is caused by the evil patriarchy!
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 12:22 PM
1

All these men were traumatized for days, or for life. Can you see the profound effect of the harassment? /end irony There is something strange here. Why no-one accepted the invitation. They must have cut out all the guys that answered "yes, let us go now and have fun". 3 cute young chicks can not invite 50 men without anyone accepting, not even stopping to have a chat. Any unaccompanied young man would at least get the conversation going, enjoy the chat, or check out if there is some truth about…
/r/PussyPass04/02/15 12:12 PM
1

See my comment. This is meant as a negative article that gives rise to concerns as to what quota crap will come next to hamper silicone valley inventiveness.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:52 AM
5

This is not meant as a positive article. It is meant to enlighten us as to what crap is being written in mainstream important magazines. I also wonder what could be done about this indoctrination of wide parts of the population with these lies. This can be negative outcomes for MRA: quotas for investment in women's great ideas, quotas for women in startups investments, quotas for women in silicone valley companies (google, Apple, etc are being harassed already)
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:51 AM
1

Oh good, if she initiated it then she was the rapist. I am quite sure of this. There was a youtube movie a while ago where a wasted drunk woman insisted on a man taking her home to have sex. She was trying her best to get raped, but the man did not rape her. She became really angry the man did not want to rape her
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:42 PM
3

I would be careful. Obama, VP Biden, everyone says this BS. And it seems they don't get into legal trouble. Analyze if this is worth the trouble you might get into. If feminists, and men, would believe in facts and proof, they already would have closed down all the feminst study departments in colleges.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 03:22 PM
2

The problem is that there is enoromous pressure, by feminists, and by government, to pay more to women, and less to men. Companies suffer boycotts, if they somehow favor men. Freedom to pay more to men has long been abolished. Now the same people who claim to be in favor of legally enforced "equality" now favor inequality in favor of women.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:57 AM
2

Women used to retire EARLIER then men, and in many countries still do. So they got much much longer years in retirement until their much later death.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:51 AM
1

Brazilian diplomats confirmed to Mary Claire, that Julien Blanc would be denied a Visa renewal and entry to Brazil. Consider that in Canada, Australia, women have a license to kill, get away with killing their husbands. Lorena Bobbitt got zero punishment for cutting off her husband's penis. Censorship for male thought crimes and speech, as opposed to freedom to kill and mutilate for women. Did Valerie Solanas, the author of the scum manifesto who tried to kill Andy Warhol, ever get evicted from …
/r/PussyPass13/11/14 01:37 AM
1

No free speech for men. Brazilian diplomats confirmed to Mary Claire, that Julien Blanc would be denied a Visa renewal and entry to Brazil. Consider that in Canada, Australia, women have a license to kill, get away with killing their husbands. Lorena Bobbitt got zero punishment for cutting off her husband's penis. Censorship for male thought crimes and speech, as opposed to freedom to kill and mutilate for women. Did Valerie Solanas, the author of the scum manifesto who tried to kill Andy Warhol…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:36 AM
3

this would discourage victims from pressing rape charges. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:58 AM
2

Very awesome indeed. My friend hired his girl friend as his secretary. That makes him a rapist then! And the age restriction, how are they defined? Do they expire on birthdays? So the 13y/15 y couple become rape at the 16th birthday? Or do they have to also calculate their birthdate, as the age difference is defined by 2x365 y difference? You are aware of the difficulty for the male to verify if ID is valid and not fake? You are aware that most minors in the US have fake ID to get into bars and …
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:55 AM
18

Feminist anti- rape campaigns rarely target unsafe inner cities. They bemoan the safest places in the world, highly policed Ivy leage campuses. Have you noticed that feminists usually obsess about I-drank-too-much-regret-my-consent-rapes and similar. Really ghastly violent rapes are rarely emphasized.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:45 PM
4

Can you add tax information? He makes 50 to 60 k gross, pays 15 k taxes, leaves 45k. Then he pays 3k * 12= 36 k alimony and child support!? And, when the children move to the father, is not mother supposed to pay child support? How can the system be so perverted?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:38 PM
1

True, and funny. But the intent of such a declaration is to make it abundantly clear that she was NOT coerced. It makes it kind of very ridiculous. Also the declaration, on purpose, should be worded to preempt such allegations of being ignorant or having been forced.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:03 PM
1

I am surprised that there is no comment, no support for the idea for a woman to be allowed to waive her pussy pass rights.
/r/PussyPass13/10/14 09:35 AM
2

She losts a spouse that she killed. And she is suffering from the guilt that she killed him. A pure victim, deserving pity. "I grieve for his whole family. His children lost a father," she said. "And his wife lost a spouse, the father of her children. And she's probably dealing with the guilt of taking someone's life."
/r/PussyPass12/10/14 08:22 PM
2

where are you where men still can put pinup photos on car mechanic walls. I thight that was 25 years ago
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 06:01 PM
-5

google SAID, sexual allegations in divorce. Usually false accusations of child abuse, but could also be of rape, to gain advantage in divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:44 AM
5

That is one point. Such a document, if totally valid, could make a woman marriagable even to a MGTOW. So there could be even selfish reasons for a woman to sign such a document. The other point is simple honest revulsion for feminist injustice. Some women would be inclined to not take advantage of such laws anyway, for finding them unjust. On the other hand, society, her friends, would do everything to talk her into suing, claiming bigger alimony, more child support, even making false accusation…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:43 AM
1

It is an attempt to solve the issues on a personal level. Some women actually have the decency not to take advantage of such laws anyway. Changing it politically is much harder and less immediate.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:39 AM
-5

You probably are not a regular reader here. Rapes alleged weeks later are hard to disprove, and arrests and condemnations happen frequently. marital rape: a man should not have to be scared that his wife files a complaint that 6 years ago she did not enthusiastically consent and thus it was rape. That IS the point. "Battered women syndrome" is a scandal, again you are a defensor of female privilege. Unless, again, in the unlikely event if the woman is held in captivity.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:37 AM
1

yes, with an extremely high burden of proof. If it is obvious that a rape has happened, because of serious injury. I think these cases get reporten immediately, not 7 years later. This renounciation mainly refers to issues like: he raped me 7 years ago when I slept at this house and was drunk, or similar.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:30 AM
1

How women can earn more then men: 25 life choices to get higher pay gives several links directly to Warren Farrells sites, speeches, book. If you are really interested, get Warren Farrell's book "Why men earn more"
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:43 AM
0

I am capable of saying a clear "NO" when I do not want to have sex. I waive any rights to complain or sue under California’s Senate Bill 967 [18]for not having given unambiguous, "enthusiastic" and ongoing consent to sexual activity. [17] A man that keeps asking if my enthusiastic consent is still ongoing is a total turn-off. My "Yes means Yes". I am responsible for my alcohol consumption and its consequences. I irrevocably declare I will not file rape charges when I regret *consensual enthusias…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:34 AM
3

Would this not be a great action by #womenagainstfeminism? To officially renounce feminist female privileges, in writing? Some waivers may not be legally valid, but the attempt to such a declaration would be a good start to show a woman's commitment to equal rights. I renounce all my female legal and societal privilege, in in an irrevocable, legally binding notarized declaration. As a strong, empowered woman, I am deeply offended by unequal treatment on the basis of gender. I can not change femi…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:30 AM
1

that is the point. And if you are not mature enough to be having sex, you were raped. /half sarcastic, half desperate
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:13 AM
1

That is interesting. What is rape in college is not rape in prison, nor at night clubs or anywhere else. Note also that the entire process hinges upon what the accuser says, and if the accused is read his Miranda rights, has good legal counsel, and does not say anything wrong that incriminates himself. Otherwise all depends on the accuser's allegations. Her saying she never nodded, nor moved closer. A legal nightmare
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:13 AM
2

Putting young women permanently into the Rape Factory is rape prevention. Is this female logic?
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:55 PM
4

two male police officers would have had a much better chance to restrain one single offender
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:44 PM
1

It is sad that even here are men's rights people are unaware of the feminist re-definition of rape with issues like "5 second rape" where the man took 5 seconds to stop a consensual sex act after she said stop, or Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:57 PM
4

This is Megan Urry, (quota?) department head of Astronomy at Yale University, a feminist activist: She wasn’t a born scientist. In high school, science classes weren’t her favorite. […] Urry had never played with batteries; she had no intuitive grasp of how electricity and magnetism behave. She bombed a test in spectacular fashion […] She spent the summer after her junior year as an intern at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, in Virginia. The freshly minted PhD who hired her said that wh…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:37 PM
5

That is because Blacks commit more crimes Proof is in the http://www.amren.com/archives/reports/the-color-of-crime/ it is not police bias, because crime VICTIMS report large number of black offenders. You would not claim that crime VICTIMS report the race incorrectly! You can find that in the above link or directly http://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/2005-Color-of-Crime-Report.pdf
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:44 AM
13

ever seen men getting anywhere with accusations of domestic violence? If she kills you, it is battered women syndrome.
/r/PussyPass29/08/14 02:49 AM
12

This is not just a special privilege for women, it is also an incentive to falsely accuse men of domestic violence.
/r/PussyPass28/08/14 08:30 PM
13

This is not just a special privilege for women, it is also an incentive to falsely accuse men of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:29 PM
91

Your are right. A man is required to give a women exactly the amount of sex and closeness that she wishes. Not more, not less. Though the entire definition seems gender neutral, it is unlikely that a woman ever will be charged with these crimes. Note also if you don't tell your girl friend about all your bank account, you are committing economic abuse. If she spends all your cash and overruns your credit cards, it is not economic abuse. Economic abuse Examples of economic abuse include: requirin…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:03 AM
6

feminism is part of a larger system in which women feel entitled to control what men can say and do.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:32 AM
1

Isn't it great feminists never generalize. /sarcasm All men are rapists, all men are danger to children, ..... All these fair MRA fighting unfair feminists. The result is: feminists win.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:13 AM
3

first: the lower earner dropped her secretarial career that would have gotten her a salary of $ 1500 a month. Why is she entitled to $ 50 000 a month? Second: maybe we should require, or at least allow, to make an agreement. I stop working, but only if you guarantee me a salary for life Third: in most cases it is outrageous. The wife does NOT work, and gets rewarded for it. Fourth: it is all an excuse. If the wife had a full time low paying job, they would give her alimony anyway.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:07 AM
7

I never understood why this is called divorce All the woman's obligations end, and the man's obligations are as big or even bigger then before. So she divorced, and he is not divorced. I don't get this.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:01 AM
4

I wonder, if you keep her in poverty, so she never gets used to the good life style? Always take her to McDonalds, live in a really shitty place, never give her nice things. Then she never got used to a good standard of living and you don't need to pay her high alimony? Right? Or maybe the feminist argument is dishonest, they just need an excuse to take the money from the man.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:58 AM
2

how do you systematically work through your alimony obligations? They often are determined when you are at the peak of your career, and it is hard to reduce them. It happens to many athletes, and other men with short and declining careers.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:53 AM
19

Thanks! It is saddening how MRA throw their fellow men under the bus, out of their deep desire to be totally fair and never unfairly attack women. While feminists have no qualms to gang together to defend fellow women who cut off penises or shoot sleeping husbands in the back. Robin Williams could have done a great service had he left a good bye letter blaming alimony. But, like most men, he probably was too chivalrous to do so. It is disgusting that a super successful super rich man can be driv…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:16 AM
2

Didn't Paul Elam start such a list? What was the url? ??? her.com
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 08:41 AM
1

sure, she is a victim. After all she felt raped, so she was a victim. On a more serious note: the true culprit are not deranged women, but the legal system that gives these women the power, that exerts revenge for these women. I keep saying: for every man that could PROVE his innocence and disprove his false accuser, there are at least 50 languishing in jail: those who did not film the event, or have other clear proof of their innocence. You know: guilty until proven innocent. Well, if you are a…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 08:40 AM
1

link?
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:34 AM
0

in the normal, non-feminist world, one can only claim self defense to defend against immediate danger, when there is no other way. Susan Falls, cited above, bought medicines and guns, premeditated, and took an hour to kill him with multiple shots. She could have simply walked out. In the normal world, with normal laws, this is not self defense. It is premeditated cold blooded murder
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:35 PM
2

are the signatures at that site VALID? I believe they need to sign at the whitehouse web site. Is there a time limit to get the signatures? We should prepare to get a petition all MRA sites can agree upon. I wonder how difficult that would be?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:32 PM
1

The only way to get 100 000 signatures would be if all MRA sites, PUA, everyone rallies behind it. Certainly it would be a worthy goal But I am afraid they might put a feminist to head the council. A very important issue would be to have men's studies, and in general, promote researchers to be able to fund anti-feminist studies. Which is pretty easy, basically to debunk the false feminist research, and to stress existing proofs about domestic violence, bias against men, etc.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:28 PM
0

In Latin America abortion isn't even available and there is rampant misogyny. nowhere financial abortion is available for men.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:18 PM
2

that is shocking. Poor woman! He must have abused her a lot to have driven her to such a decision. /sarcasm Notice that many women got away with ZERO prison: How to Kill your Husband! A Tutorial. (Susan Falls' Licence to Kill) Remember that Canadian feminst law professor that defends the right of women to kill, out of battered wife syndrome? It is enough if the murderess claims she was battered. The batterer will not be heard in court, will not be allowed to defend himself. That is truly blaming…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:20 PM
-7

Probably this will be downvoted into oblivion, as this topic is taboo among MRA Non-violent male consensual sex offenders have no support, are abandoned even by Men's Right's activists. Men lost their rights to healthy sexuality thanks to 100 years of feminist campaigning and smear campaigns against male sexuality. Angry Harry is one of the few MRA that recognize that the trauma from underage sex stems almost exclusively from the reaction of the parents, police, the courts and therapists who tel…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:12 PM
-5

Almost all MRA sites, like A Voice for men, and r/mensrights wholeheartedly support (or at least refuse to oppose) the age of consent increases imposed by 100 years of feminism. MRA refuse to notice that in almost all cases the male lover is older then the female partner, and thus almost always men get ensnared in these sex oppressive laws and get their life ruined. The pussy pass is not even needed, or only aggravates the imbalance even more. There are cases where a man must not live in the sam…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:02 PM
1

Although there have been many other reports on family violence, the People's Report is unusual in bringing all aspects of the problem together into a single document written largely in the words of the 113 frontline workers and almost 400 survivors and perpetrators of abuse who gave evidence. Didn't they forget someone? Oh, yes, a few victims of false rape accusations. Victims of SAID, false sexual abuse allegations in divorce. Like, probably, Woody Allen. Well, just a pesky little error.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:37 PM
1

"Independent inquiry into 'forgot-birth-control-pill' pregnancies suggests that alleged on-purpose-pill-forgetters are considered guilty of fraud unless they can prove they truly tried to take the pill and truly forgot it by mistake." /sarcasm
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:33 PM
1

"Independent inquiry into paternity fraud suggests that alleged cuckolders are considered guilty unless they can prove they are innocent." "Independent inquiry into false rape accusations suggests that alleged false accusers are considered guilty unless they can prove the accusation is true." /sarcasm
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:29 PM
2

"Independent inquiry into robberies suggests that alleged robbers are considered guilty unless they can prove they are innocent." "Independent inquiry into gang violence suggests that alleged assailants are considered guilty unless they can prove they are innocent." This would really cut down on gang violence. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:29 PM
1

the same burden of proof as in the medieval witch hunts. You have to prove you are not a witch
/r/MensRights16/06/14 05:28 PM
8

To make sure you are not clueless: Teenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel Also from http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/california-statutory-rape-laws.htm Named after Shakespeare’s young lovers, “Romeo and Juliet” exceptions are intended to prevent serious criminal charges against teenagers who engage in consensual sex with others close to their own age. In California, there is a Romeo and Juliet exemption for consensual sex betwe…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 10:02 PM
8

Some of these precautions, and some more, are analyzed here. Note that you need to keep records for at least 10 years, because she may decide to come forward a decade later and accuse you of rape due to lack of enthusiastic consent Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman Maybe it still is not good enough.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:16 PM
0

Some of these concerns are addressed here. Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman Lack of enthusiasm has not been addressed in the above article, that needs to be added ......
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:14 PM
1

All these precautions, and some more, are analyzed here Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:13 PM
4

Total impunity, of course. Retired from her rich foundation which had allowed her lavish world wide travels with donation money Oh, and of course, trafficking and prostitution still is a serious problem Somaly "Mam was one of Time’s 100 most influential people in 2009 and has over 400,000 followers on Twitter", spoke in the White house and admitted to lying to the UN General assembly. Another of Mam’s biggest “stars” was Meas Ratha, who as a teenager gave a chilling performance on French televis…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 05:24 PM
13

Total impunity, of course. Retired from her rich foundation which had allowed her lavish world wide travels with donation money Somaly "Mam was one of Time’s 100 most influential people in 2009 and has over 400,000 followers on Twitter", spoke in the White house and admitted to lying to the UN General assembly. Another of Mam’s biggest “stars” was Meas Ratha, who as a teenager gave a chilling performance on French television in 1998, describing how she had been sold to a brothel and held against…
/r/PussyPass04/06/14 05:18 PM
2

right. In Cambodia they are NOT enslaved, but in the USA and Europe they are. Read more about trafficking being debunked in Britain and US.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:45 AM
1

how can you know if the proponents always get caught red handed lying and deceiving? It is feminist strength that even after they are debunked, people still believe that they basically are right/
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:44 AM
1

the women were kidnapped, the men were all killed, burned alive, hacked to death with machetes.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:43 AM
2

they were bribed and coaxed by mam to lie. And most girls would rather say there were trafficked then to say they willingly chose to prostitute themselves because they were eager to make easy money to buy designer clothes
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:42 AM
1

Women have the choice to get easy money. They don't have to. Men don't have that choice That favors men and oppresses women Feminist logic never ceases to amaze me
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:39 AM
-2

where does that happen? In Italy or France where prostitution was just outlawed? In Sweden, where customers are criminalized? Did feminists there heroically resist? Where please?
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 09:22 PM
12

This fits this article: Nobody pities men who are losers, the virgin who got never kissed Men just have to men up. Maybe a good red pill attitude. But it needs to be pointed out that women care for their fellow women and would fight for their well being. 40 year old male virgins are considered funny and rarely pitied or offered reprieve. In Maslow’s hierarchy of needs sex is in the lowest, most basic level:"breathing, food, water, sex, sleep, homeostasis, excretion".
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:51 PM
24

feminists and religious zealots strive to take all sexual outlets away from men, be it prostitution, sex travel, or mere pornography for masturbation. Thus these politicians bear partial responsibility for increasing sex crimes against women and children, and probably for the mayhem created by Elliot Rodger.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 06:25 PM
0

it took him years of rejection and loneliness. And seeing many others having fun and success Had he been helped in the beginning, he might never have snapped. It actually surprises me that not more men freak out, after getting imprisoned for false accusations, their kids taken away, getting kicked out of their own house, etc.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 06:07 PM
0

Compare to another article blaming feminism: feminists and religious zealots strive to take all sexual outlets away from men, be it prostitution, sex travel, or mere pornography for masturbation. Thus these politicians bear partial responsibility for increasing sex crimes against women and children, and probably for the mayhem created by Elliot Rodger.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:57 PM
3

you are buying these trafficking myths? You are in the wrong subreddit. We are talking about adult empowered women who choose to earn easy and fast money by working as escorts, in countries where this is allowed.
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 04:02 PM
-2

not sure why I get downvoted. If such help could a) make some lonely men happy b) prevent some nutcases from snapping and killing, or snapping and raping, would that not be a good thing?
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 03:59 PM
0

sure, he is nuts. No excuses for this. But without excusing him snapping, let us analyze if male losers could not be treated more humanely, if they should not be helped. By prostitutes. By psychologists. By societal understanding. By teaching game.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 03:48 PM
-3

This article should not be misunderstood as a defense of murderous mayhem. Rather an attack on feminism who aggravates suffering and loneliness in men, does not care about male suffering. Many many men suffer. Nobody cares. Of course, this still does not justify the killings. Again, the issue of the article is that nobody cares about lonely male virgins. And again, shooting people is in no way a recommended solution to that problem. Could easy access to legalized prostitution have taken the wrat…
/r/PussyPass25/05/14 03:06 PM
1

This article should not be misunderstood as a defense of murderous mayhem. Rather an attack on feminism who aggravates suffering and loneliness in men, does not care about male suffering. Many many men suffer. Nobody cares. Of course, this still does not justify the killings. Could easy access to legalized prostitution have taken the wrath out of Santa Barbara shooter Elliott Rodger? Peer reviewed scientific research by Professor Milton Diamond conclusively proved that access to porn and, yes, e…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 02:53 PM
1

Men are, successfully, not just asked to forgive the woman who cuts of his penis: Lorena Bobbit forgives her husband (she cut off his manhood 16 years ago) They are asked to ASK the mutilator for forgiveness. After all, he had it coming
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:02 PM
1

certainly not because of men's rights activism.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:38 PM
16

a) do you think your country is the only one in the world? b) the US has some type of registration that is mandatory for males (for potential draft) and not for women. Or am I confusing this with another country? c) women claim that they have been injusticed HISTORICALLY. US feminists use India, the middle ages, anything to prove female suffering.
/r/PussyPass21/05/14 12:37 PM
6

amazing. Women can not even be called up to serve as nurses, or to serve food and stuff to the compulsory labor men.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:35 PM
1

the issue is that women whine how bad they had it. While nobody sees that men were enslaved, all over history, and even here at r/mr we are unaware of that If that is good, necessary, useful, or evil this is a different issue and not central to mensrights
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:34 PM
10

The International Labour Organization’s report Profits and Poverty: The Economics of Forced Labour [Full report] (Executive Summary) was just published and garners international attention. Forced labour is any work or services which people are forced to do against their will under the threat of some form punishment. AntiSlavery.org Sadly, no comment on two types of Slave Labor that 49% of humanity (men) are exposed to or threatened by. Military Conscription fits the definition of Forced Labour o…
/r/PussyPass21/05/14 11:00 AM
1

The International Labour Organization’s report Profits and Poverty: The Economics of Forced Labour [Full report] (Executive Summary) was just published and garners international attention. Forced labour is any work or services which people are forced to do against their will under the threat of some form punishment. AntiSlavery.org Sadly, no comment on two types of Slave Labor that 49% of humanity (men) are exposed to or threatened by. Military Conscription fits the definition of Forced Labour o…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:53 AM
1

Poor woman. How cruel /sarcasm Wasn't there a Canadian woman acquitted for TWICE having tried to get a hit man, the second one a police man who filmed her! Why would this woman actually be punished? this is so unjust /sarcasm
/r/PussyPass19/05/14 02:36 PM
3

you do need to feel endangered, LEGALLY She can accuse you of harassment, rape, anything. You are screwed. She can kick and hit you and then claim you hit her. You should be afraid, very afraid. A friend just got attacked with a knife, by a woman. The woman now has a little bruise and dragged him to police. You don't fight with one woman. You fight with the entire police and justice system, all against you.
/r/PussyPass19/05/14 02:29 PM
1

I think you owe it to your friend. Make a plan. Collect a bunch of reddit posts with scary stories about pre-nups, and about female violence. Maybe ask in pussypass, mensrights, theredpill, what to do and then act. You don't want to tell him: I told you so, after his life is totally ruined.
/r/PussyPass19/05/14 02:25 PM
3

but you are at this site and thus you know that women have the pussy pass and men have no rights. Even if you did as much as pushing her away, you would be in trouble. What is worse, she constantly spat at him, even when restrained, as you can see in the video. Does one have to endure getting spit with potentially disease carrying disgusting spit without responding? If this was a man, the body guard would have had to, at least, taken him down and put in an arm lock or choke hold. Did you see she…
/r/PussyPass19/05/14 02:22 PM
-3

Certainly, a man would have been punished even harder. She mainly got punished with 7 years because the living proof of the crime was born with DNA and all, and it was a repeat crime. Sure, a man would be locked away for decades. I wish you, and everyone else, took the conclusions I am taking: What is wrong are the sex laws that put lovers in jail and leave children motherless, or fatherless. They actually MARRIED. Any more proof that seemingly this was what both wanted? Who was helped by puttin…
/r/PussyPass19/05/14 01:59 PM
2

by that logic, if he were to hit the cops, then the cops were to be arrested. They are most likely to cause harm, they are armed /sarcasm I know this is not going to happen .......
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:55 AM
0

Quoting: What better way is there to highlight the truth that the feminist legislative creep that is leading inevitably to a sexual holocaust against men, has nothing to do with protecting women or young girls, but everything to do with artificially raising the sexual market value of feminists and the women who support them? It is taking the most famous and viral feminist meme ever created, turning it around, and using it against them. There can be surely nothing more potent as a weapon against …
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:15 PM
2

Right. No normal 25 year old woman wants to f.ck the pimple faced 16 year old boy, but all men lust for the sweet little 16 girl There also must be a reason that ever since women got the vote, they actively lobbied to increase the age of consent, which was 12 at that time. Note that there also is a confusion: age of consent means that in ALL cases it is MANDATORY that government puts the infractor in prison for years. Age of consent does not mean that sex at that age is recommendable or condoned…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 10:14 PM
2

I lost respect for her when she went onto the bash-George Zimmerman-bandwagon. I put that link because you might be misinformed just like her, or president Obama, about the true issues in that case. She seems just politically correct misinformed like 95% of the population
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:06 AM
1

One could be sexist or racist and conclude that people of certain genders or races have less self control /sarcasm /just joking
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:01 AM
2

it must be C. Anyone who pushes anyone normally lost control. Or not civilized at all and should be fired. Justin has lack of self control. Not a good person for a company.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:00 AM
22

if she cuts less and smaller trees, yes
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:21 PM
7

does that strength protect him from getting fed hormones so he grows boobs? very funny, right?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:20 PM
17

Exactly. But in reality, the only freedom there is is to criticize and ridicule white heterosexual males. You could not make a movie like this with inverted genders. This is the point. The only freedom left is to criticize the privileged repressor class.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 04:05 PM
1

http://theotherwomanmovie.com/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2610049/Leslie-Mann-looks-amazing-colour-block-outfit-husband-Judd-Apatow-daughters-The-Other-Woman-premiere.html
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 11:19 AM
138

Pussy Pass pure. Women get away with stalking, violence, mayhem. It is funny, it is justified, it is entertaining, it is funny. Reverse the genders, and women would be up in arms, world wide. Even Hillary Clinton, Biden, would interfere and call for the movie to be withdrawn. Men are sheep and allow to be humiliated like this. In Brazil the movie is called "women attacking". Question: /to remedy this unjust situation, Do you think the original movie should be boycotted, censored, prohibited (mor…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 11:13 AM
6

Pussy Pass pure. Women get away with stalking, violence, mayhem. It is funny, it is justified, it is entertaining, it is funny. Reverse the genders, and women would be up in arms, world wide. Even Hillary Clinton, Biden, would interfere and call for the movie to be withdrawn. Men are sheep and allow to be humiliated like this. In Brazil the movie is called "women attacking". Question: /to remedy this unjust situation, Do you think the original movie should be boycotted, censored, prohibited (mor…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 11:12 AM
56

Pussy Pass pure. Women get away with stalking, violence, mayhem. It is funny, it is justified, it is entertaining, it is funny. Reverse the genders, and women would be up in arms, world wide. Even Hillary Clinton, Biden, would interfere and call for the movie to be withdrawn. Men are sheep and allow to be humiliated like this. In Brazil the movie is called "women attacking". Question: /to remedy this unjust situation, Do you think the original movie should be boycotted, censored, prohibited (mor…
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 11:12 AM
10

Mutilating hurting men is fun. This is ThePussyPass: women can commit violence and mayhem. The reverse would be unthinkable, it would cause world wide protests and boycott of movie theaters and the movie company.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 11:01 AM
4

What better way is there to highlight the truth that the feminist legislative creep that is leading inevitably to a sexual holocaust against men, has nothing to do with protecting women or young girls, but everything to do with artificially raising the sexual market value of feminists and the women who support them? It is taking the most famous and viral feminist meme ever created, turning it around, and using it against them. There can be surely nothing more potent as a weapon against feminists…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 10:51 AM
8

kicking anywhere is less dangerous and less painful then kicking in the balls. I know a guy that spent a month in the hospital for a medium strength Karate kick in the balls.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 01:19 AM
1

what is badly cropped? how much, where? Looks good to me.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 12:54 AM
1

I don't get it. The boobs one is not meant to be displayed? The boobs one is the statement. The other one is there to show what misandric crap Hollywood puts into movie posters, and to show the motivation for the boob kick reversed poster. What are the doubts? The Hollywood ball kicking poster alone makes no statement, the boob kicking poster alone needs justification, that it is a response to the ball kicking poster.
/r/PussyPass12/05/14 12:53 AM
2

you need a link for the original poster? just a second http://theotherwomanmovie.com/post/76471859177/one-good-plan-deserves-another-go-see-the-other here we are Or do you say the official movie site has fake posters? Or you don't understand the gender inversion of the other half?
/r/PussyPass11/05/14 08:28 PM
9

Why do babies of rich famous people, conceived in a one night stance with a low income woman need US$ 50 000 per month? This is what the term "gold digger" is all about.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:08 PM
1

Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:08 AM
0

why would empowered strong women, who need men like a fish needs a bicycle, be able to support their own children?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:08 AM
1

exactly. To convict a man of rape for consensual underage sex: it is rape To force a man to pay child support to his rapist: it is not rape
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:07 AM
2

Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support. This was a woman who bragged to have had sex with a passed out drunk unconscious man. Not forcible, but pretty clearly non consensual
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:04 AM
1

empathy does not invent the transistor, not even the wheel. It does not build airplanes, not even cars. It might be useful for nurses, but even doctors better have some logic and not just empathy
/r/MensRights21/04/14 08:01 PM
1

It is actually pure logic. Poor white underclass suffer from Black privilege in affirmative action. A person with a mediocre SAT score or GPA has a 50% chance of being accepted when Black, and a 1% if white. I don't have the citations handy. So affirmative action leaves the lower rungs of Whites chanceless against affirmative action privileged Blacks and other minorities.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 07:50 PM
1

In many cases, there is no physical evidence, or victims cannot remember with certainty whether or how they were assaulted.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 07:17 PM
1

in elementary and high school, the really gifted could finish in 5 years but have to spend 12 years. It is getting worse with school taking all day for remedial teaching of the dumb, whose families does not give them a good learning environment. Then there is no time left for the intelligent to escape boredom and do their own stuff
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 09:22 PM
3

verbal skills are good for manipulating, obfuscating. Exactly what feminists and politicians do.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 09:14 PM
1

If there is twice as many boys at the top 2%, there probably is 1000 times as many boys at the top 0.001% (sorry, I am guessing, one would have to look up normal distributions, inserting the different variation for boys and girls). So at the very extreme, the difference is even bigger. This is why there is only one women among the top 100 chess players, and among the top 100 cooks.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 09:12 PM
4

very sad indeed. This is probably the reason how they managed to remove the gender gap on the top 5% in the nordic countries.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:46 PM
19

The report also reveals worrying gender differences in students’ attitudes towards mathematics: even when girls perform as well as boys in mathematics, they report less perseverance, less motivation to learn mathematics, less belief in their own mathematics skills, and higher levels of anxiety about mathematics. While the average girl underperforms in mathematics compared with the average boy, the gender gap in favour of boys is even wider among the highest-achieving students. These findings hav…
/r/PussyPass19/04/14 09:23 AM
2

Farrell argues police bought Gaubert’s story and issued a warrant for his arrest without checking it out, never questioning him. He claims he spent more than 27 hours in jail following his arrest and was forced to post a $21,000 bond and surrender his taxi permit pending an investigation. The city’s Taxicab Bureau got involved, and Farrell became the subject of widespread media coverage, suffering depression and emotional distress, the lawsuit states.
/r/PussyPass19/04/14 09:06 AM
10

Taxi drivers are often falsely accused when they insist on charging taxi fare. See the false rape society and cotwa.org What is never said: one percent of men have video recordings and get saved. 99% don't have exonerating video. These are rotting in prison and getting raped, right now. In this fashion Child rapist raped, stitched by medics, and re-raped by 20 prisoners
/r/PussyPass19/04/14 08:55 AM
5

The report also reveals worrying gender differences in students’ attitudes towards mathematics: even when girls perform as well as boys in mathematics, they report less perseverance, less motivation to learn mathematics, less belief in their own mathematics skills, and higher levels of anxiety about mathematics. While the average girl underperforms in mathematics compared with the average boy, the gender gap in favour of boys is even wider among the highest-achieving students. These findings hav…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:48 AM
4

The report also reveals worrying gender differences in students’ attitudes towards mathematics: even when girls perform as well as boys in mathematics, they report less perseverance, less motivation to learn mathematics, less belief in their own mathematics skills, and higher levels of anxiety about mathematics. While the average girl underperforms in mathematics compared with the average boy, the gender gap in favour of boys is even wider among the highest-achieving students. These findings hav…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:47 AM
2

in Rio de Janeiro a building manager had to pay serious money for offending a couple with his complaint about loud sex
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:14 AM
1

oh, and in that ideal red pill world, wifey would have to work hard at chores to convince hubby to part with some cash for her expenses.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 10:29 AM
2

absolutely. sugardaddy.com seekingarrangements.com But legalized prostitution would be much easier, cheaper, more painless. Or do both: get a few whores, plus a nice sugarbaby.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 10:28 AM
5

And tell wife that he found out that the young tarts have much better bodies and tighter pussies then her old saggy body. And that this is making him lose his attraction to her. In an instance his begging would be over, and she would start begging. Now, in an ideal world with legal prostitution, legal concubines, and no family court, no divorce where the man will have to bleed and pay, what would happen? The woman would see her low sexual value and do everything to get a slice of the man's sex. …
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 10:26 AM
40

While we probably don't want to look like we promote access of minors to porn, it is amazing that science could not find the ubiquitous access to porn to be in any way damaging to adolescents. It is also a fact that basically all male adolescents consume porn. Only a true police state could stop this from happening.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:18 AM
1

Right. It is good to question the institution of marriage altogether, and probably avoid it. About sluts: I have known lots of Braziian prostitutes who made great wives and girl friends and totally gave up promiscuity. And some others who were terrible, but they always had bad character. Personally, I also have nothing against open relationships. Lies are a problem, but everyone does, even Bill Clinton.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 09:13 AM
6

Sex for money was uncomplicated. The terms were agreed upon ahead of time. There was no awkward guessing. It was kind of like, come to think of it, enthusiastic consent. The men nearly always asked permission every step of the way. In my experience, no always meant no. If I didn’t like something, I could ask him to stop. Responsible for defining the interaction, I felt powerful and in control. Calling all the shots felt sexy and well, even if I didn’t enjoy the sex, at least I got paid. These da…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:44 AM
8

MHRA think that women should get equal punishment for having sex with enthusiastically consenting minors. Others call this "equal injustice", they think that adolescents should have sexual rights to choose, to consent and to dissent. No government in their bed rooms. Others think that women should deservedly get the pussy pass, because sex is only traumatic to female victims. Comments?
/r/PussyPass23/03/14 12:23 PM
2

MHRA think that women should get equal punishment for having sex with enthusiastically consenting minors. Others call this "equal injustice", they think that adolescents should have sexual rights to choose, to consent and to dissent. No government in their bed rooms. Others think that women should deservedly get the pussy pass, because sex is only traumatic to female victims. Comments?
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 12:23 PM
1

School districts across California are bringing their policies into compliance with a law that took effect Jan. 1 guaranteeing students the right to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that match the gender they identify with. Droves of boys will start identifying with the female gender so they can get into the girl’s locker and shower rooms. This will be hilarious. LOL Comedians will have a field day. And this really could lead to higher rates of assault. Let us see which PC special group will w…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:29 AM
-1

So a genetic female, who identifies as male, and frequents male bath rooms still enjoys the pussy pass when she falsely accuses real genetic males of rape. Anyone else finds this confusing?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:49 AM
0

This is cop family pass aided by Pussy pass. In such a flagrant violation of the law, a cop would have a hard time to get his son out of harm's way. Especially because the bystanders would have been even more outraged. Did you count the number of violations? Running a stop sign Running a police stop Almost running over half a dozen of people Driving drunk Disobeying police, repeatedly?
/r/PussyPass11/03/14 09:46 AM
66

Buying the gasoline, disabling fire alarms and covering sprinklers with plastic bags. Totally premeditated, cruel to the highest degree. The poor man tooks 5 months to die. Emergency services said they heard the man yelling, 'Why did she burn me, why did she burn me - all I was trying to do was love her,' when they attended the scene. Police said they found a 10-gallon bucket of gasoline, lighters and candles in the apartment, along with pieces of evidence that suggested Patel had tried to preve…
/r/PussyPass11/03/14 06:14 AM
25

Buying the gasoline, disabling fire alarms and covering sprinklers with plastic bags. Totally premeditated, cruel to the highest degree. The poor man tooks 5 months to die. Emergency services said they heard the man yelling, 'Why did she burn me, why did she burn me - all I was trying to do was love her,' when they attended the scene. Police said they found a 10-gallon bucket of gasoline, lighters and candles in the apartment, along with pieces of evidence that suggested Patel had tried to preve…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:13 AM
8

Violence against women undermines women’s core fundamental rights such as dignity, access to justice and gender equality. This is a sexist paper that undermines equality. Why are there no funds to research violence against men, violent deaths of men due to suicide, workplace deaths, .. Well, probably there is as much or more violence against men. For example, one in three women has experienced physical and/or sexual violence since the age of 15; Almost all men that I know have experienced physic…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:01 AM
-2

he needs some family discipline, get grounded. Not a judge, lawyer, prison threats.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:58 PM
2

that would lead to gender inequality Because men's resumes look better /s
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:45 PM
-4

The point is, the boy did not RAPE in the old sense of the word. Nowhere anyone mentions violence. He has been put in front of a judge for playing doctor with his sister! He raped in the re-defined definition of rape. He did some indecent sexual play. Even penetration is not mentioned. He was in COURT for playing doctor.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:41 PM
1

You can not compare Blacks to Asians, or Jews. Blacks have an IQ of 85, Whites of 100, Asians of 105, Jews about 115. Add to that Asian work ethos, and Black shaming of hard working Blacks, and things get even worse. Go and downvote me for citing facts.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 04:04 AM
1

Excellent. absolutely true. Most likely women will refuse to sell to the traitor, after she sold one or two of these. What would be the next step?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:57 AM
-4

Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:41 AM
6

And there were nagging stereotypes. Male soldiers fretted that their unit's readiness will be degraded because of what they term "women issues," such as pregnancy and menstrual cycles. Or they worried that women incapable of the physical demands would be brought in anyway. Well these pesky stereotypes. All untrue /s Officers were concerned about sexual harassment and improper relationships. And the idea of integrated units bothered both military wives and husbands. Plagued by an increase in repo…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:39 AM
2

Forgot to post the last line: How terrible. Men wanting to have sex with Brazilian women. Interestingly, men desiring sex with Brazilian men is poitically correct: Rio de Janeiro aims to become world capital of gay tourism
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 07:19 AM
1

A funny joking T shirt referring to "Looking to score" both goals in soccer, and MEN scoring with Brazilian women caused a Braziian press and government frenzy to successfully clobber Addidas into pulling a T shirt from the US market, for encouraging illegal (?) activities. and for being offensive to Brazilian women.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 06:01 AM
1

The head of the Brazilian tourism board is slamming Adidas for marketing a pair of tee shirts that play off stereotypes of oversexed Brazilians. In advance of the World Cup, Adidas has released a pair of tee shirts inspired by Brazil’s reputation for sexiness. One shirt features an image of heart that appears to double as a woman’s behind with a thong, while another depicts a thin-waisted woman with a giant rear against a Rio de Janeiro backdrop and the words “Looking to Score.” The “Looking to …
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 05:56 AM
1

I used to trust academia. I did learn and even teach scientific methodology. If all our Top Universities are corrupted, it is just shocking. I wish somewhere arose a true University. Someone propose it to Mr Putin in Russia, that one single University could singlehandedly obliterate most of social science research in the rest of the world. The wage gap myth, Domestic violence lies, acid attack distortion, rape lies, the blank slate lie, social constructedness lies, They all persist in the face o…
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:09 AM
1

I wish there was any reason for your optimism. The wage gap myth, Domestic violence lies, acid attack distortion, rape lies, They all persist in the face of clear rebuttal.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:07 AM
6

Could not someone open an anti-feminist University? Maybe Mr. Putin in Russia. They could, scientifically and academically, obliterate 80% of non-STEM research in the US and most of the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:34 PM
11

On another acid survivors website from Cambodia they have numbers from 1999 – 2013. There numbers show that 40% of the adult victims were adult males, 44.8% were adult females, 7.3% were male children under the age of 13 and 8% were females under the age of 13. Despite about 40% of the acid attack victims being male acid survivors foundation true to feminist form states: “Acid violence is a form of gender based violence that reflects and perpetuates the inequality of women in society.” And helpi…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:32 PM
0

don't forget, consent can be withdrawn at any time. At least by a woman. Whereupon the man has to stop instantly. you can google "5 second rape"
/r/MensRights21/02/14 07:21 PM
3

What the affirmative consent standard requires is not just communication about sex; it's constant awareness that you may be raping your partner if you don't read the signals properly and if you fail to notice that there's some ambiguity to be cleared up. (According to the California bill, "if there is confusion as to whether a person has consented or continues to consent to sexual activity, it is essential that the participants stop the activity until the confusion can be clearly resolved.") Whe…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 07:19 PM
3

I wonder, if female Olympic Athletes need to be protected from men's requirements, what does that say about the military, firefighters, ..... The Winter Games have always had dangerous events. But the Extreme Park, as the name suggests, is built on the ageless allure of danger. All of the events there have been added to the Olympic docket since 1992, each a tantalizing cocktail of grace and peril. But unlike some of the time-honored sports of risk, including Alpine skiing, luge and ski jumping, …
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:38 PM
1

what terrible human being? You don't like his nerdy ways? You heard too many lies about him, so you think he is a creep?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:15 PM
2

The word monstrous is there on purpose. Woody Allen is always treated like a monster. The accusations that long ago were refuted are believed as if they were true Many witnesses call Mia a manipulator and liar. Her own son, psychiatrists of the child, the maid. Plus, like all such accusations, it is implausible that a Woody found a 5 minute opportunity to take a child to the attic, in a house full of fiercely hostile people. And, like all false accusations, nobody gets indignation, outrage? Plea…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:36 PM
2

Will the downvoters please speak up? You don't recognize the traumatic experience of children used as pawns in parental conflicts? And children being weighed down by having false sex stories implanted into their immature mind, being questioned constantly? Parental alienation? Being taught to hate father? Or did a SRS brigade pass by here?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:31 PM
1

To believe Mia Farrow at this point you have to disbelieve: (1) her own son, Moses Farrow, who says the abuse never happened and he was there the whole time, (2) the Yale team, who investigated over the course of months and concluded there was no abuse (3) Dylan’s TWO therapists from that time in 1992-1993 who both had seen her for over a year and told the custody judge there was no abuse (4) Mia’s own nanny, who testified in an affidavit that Mia "set the stage to report the incident involving …
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:33 PM
5

make her spit it into a towel, in front of you don't let her go to the bath room alone
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:20 PM
19

Of course. /s I foresee in the future If they can steal a hair, get the dna, and clone a child, men will pay. And of course be denied visitation with impunity if they can not find a father, anyone can be declared father. The woman can choose
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:19 PM
2

These wage patterns are driven by the fact that women in the U.S. are 1.5 times more likely to graduate from college than men, says James Chung, president of Reach Advisors. The increase in educational levels among Generation Y women has resulted in the number of unmarried women in their twenties jumping 23 percent in the last 10 years, Chung also found. "While the average American women still earns 20 percent less than men, the gap is biggest among older women and smallest among younger women,"…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:50 AM
1

If he deserves to be whacked and physically abused, please promote Sharia law or at least Singapore's rattan cane. I object to unofficial physical punishment, like prison rape of males, who deserve it.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:25 PM
1

can you furnish links, so lazy people like us can verify the truthfulness of your statements. To tell the truth, it sounds unbelievable, but I am open to proof.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:17 PM
3

prizewinning fighters, even women, are not easily overpowered. Judo is especially efficient on the floor. You don't take the clothes off a non-consenting Judo fighter heavier then you are
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:49 PM
3

They got owned But the ex still pays alimony
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:44 PM
2

“One of the quickest ways to make people think differently about something is to change the visuals around it,” said Cindy Gallop, who started the United States branch of Bartle Bogle Hegarty, the advertising agency. “The thing about these images is they work on an unconscious level to reinforce what people think people should be like.” Tricky ways to program the unconscious of a younger generation to think "woman" when they think "soldier". As if they were as efficient, and as frequent as male …
/r/MensRights10/02/14 06:34 PM
1

the only reason the poor guy got ONLY disciplinary probation is that the girl did not lie. She just needed to say that once, only once, she kept saying no and he overpowered her. Or that once, only once, she was too drunk to consent. Game over.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 10:13 AM
0

the poor guy was still placed on academic probation. He was really lucky that Espinoza is very honest. She just could have said that he forced her, that once she did not yield and he overpowered her. Game over. You know, women are always believed because they never lie about rape. Amazing she did not say this. Maybe she can still change her mind and remember that she had forgotten about this one case. Sorry for mentioning this. I hope she does not read this.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 10:10 AM
1

there are rape shield laws. The total opposite happens. They are anonymous, often remain anonymous even when in court for false rape allegations.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 09:57 AM
2

Yes, but she was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in prison, pending appeal. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/convicted-false-rape-accuser-heidi-k-will-not-pay-damages-to-falsely-imprisoned-horst-Arnold
/r/PussyPass09/02/14 08:23 AM
2

Men usually don't consider themselves raped when a woman continues sex with him in spite of his protests. Men would not go to police if a date starts fellating them at night while they protest that they are tired. This is shown in this ironic piece http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/help-my-18-year-old-girl-friend-has-raped-me-298-times
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:24 AM
2

am I understanding this wrong? This article refers to anal rape in prison, which is rape, by all definitions. Add to this that these rape victims are required to live with their rapist for years, often as daily sex slaves. Prison rape often is gang rape, perpetrated with utmost cruelty. Or just repeated rape. The article also probably does not count all the power differential "voluntary" sex with the bully, in order to avoid being beaten or violently raped. Also, forced oral sex probably counts …
/r/MensRights08/02/14 10:15 AM
0

to be even less Politically Correct then you: girls seem to have genetically less interest in playing with cars, and genetically less spacial and mathematical skills then boys. To make it more palatable, girls seem to have better verbal skills.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:14 PM
1

actually, Bachelor and Master's level engineers are needed all over Europe and US. But to increase these numbers, it would be better to encourage those that show INTEREST and TALENT and willingness to work long hours all life long, instead of convincing unwilling women to learn the subject they would not really have picked, and occupy themselves as an engineer until she marries, whereupon she will work half time, or stop totally
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:12 PM
1

I would say 10% can make it into STEM, and it is 90/10 men to women. Or do you think that half the population, or half the women have what it takes to be an engineer or Mathematician? The courses I did, not even half that entered the college course would graduate.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:09 PM
7

because she once was a rape accuser. Seems to give her life long anonymity!? It is amazing because the courts really gave it to her when the man was acquitted, and later when she was convicted. It is absurd .....
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:04 PM
3

I sent this to a friend of mine, a MD. He said he is one of these men Marijuana helped him survive the crazy atmosphere in hospital internship
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:13 PM
2

Do you know of any other case where the false accuser got a higher prison sentence then the falsely imprisoned? Though I doubt she will stay till the last day like the unrepentant "rapist" who refused to confess and repent what he did not do She will learn to perfectly fake repentance
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:11 PM
6

her stories : Heidi K. had been abused by all husbands, suffered a miscarriage, lost a daughter in a car accident, was diagnosed with ancer and a brain tumor, , has been pushed down the stairs with a child on the arm. A friend with whom she had uncovered a porn ring, was murdered, and a fiancé received a shot in the head in action against al-Qaeda, remained in a coma, was cared for by her and then died. "A histrionic personality disorder of considerable proportions", Leygraf Heidi K. attested in…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:29 PM
2

every rape case that does not get prosecuted, is an injustice to the female rape victim. Because every woman making a rape complaint has been raped, and the man deserves a decade in prison. False rape complaints don't exist. /sarcasm. Actually, this is what these people REALLY think.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 12:40 AM
1

Gynecologists were PROHIBITED From treating men, on punishment of de-certification. After all, women are all that counts: “This change recognizes that in a few rare instances board certified diplomates were being called upon to treat men for certain conditions and to participate in research. This issue became a distraction from our mission to ensure that women receive high-quality and safe health care from certified obstetricians and gynecologists.” Gynecologists can treat men only to mutilate t…
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:38 PM
1

disgusting Beyoncé is totally PC she also participated in actions to persecute George Zimmermann
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:34 PM
5

Oh, there is no constitutional right to free speech in Canada. A few a few holocaust deniers and " racists" from Canada have fled to the US to avoid persecution. http://thefire.org/article/9790.html Too bad, the above letter solved such issues in the US.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:15 PM
5

thanks for these links Fire does not defend MRA's rights to free speech? Only anti muslim speaker's rights? Anyone contacted fire? for prior fees, too. I guess next time they can always charge 200 000 security fee to make sure the event does not happen /s
/r/MensRights03/02/14 09:03 PM
9

they can be arrested for resisting orders to disperse, for preventing people to enter the event. Of course, they would not do this to feminists. They certainly would do this to anti-abortionists blockading a feminist event.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:59 PM
14

men are never victims. The women are victims of this offensive speech and just use their right to self defense /sarcasm
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:58 PM
10

I propose a rape prevention fee from all female students. To pay all the rape prevention measures and " teach men not to rape" classes, and "walk in her high heels" activities.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:57 PM
8

amazing. Will they ever charge fees from feminist pro choice speakers, that need protection from religious anti-abortion fanatics? I think the problem is that MRA are too peaceful. Once MRA start attacking feminists, certainly feminist speakers will be charged security fee. For example Hillary Clinton. /sarcasm It is amazing how the US manages to circumvent the constitution with strange legal constructs. Security fee instead of speech censorship. And contempt of court instead of debtor's prison.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:54 PM
2

In "other discussions" see the feminist reddits "A man trying to endure the pain of child birth". I just wonder: do they connect any non-pregnant women, for comparison's sake, to feel the pain of the electric contraction, without endorphins, oxytocin, etc?
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:47 PM
10

That is a good point. Can a man request to be relocated away from a child? For safety reasons? If they don't let you relocate, you can always say you are a pedophile and wish not to be tempted. That should do the trick /s
/r/MensRights03/02/14 02:49 PM
0

A woman who gives an overdose of sleeping pills to a guy, then ties him up, tortures him to death, she gets less. Often zero. battered woman syndrome How much should the sleeping pill alone be? 14 years? What about panicked forced fatherhood syndrome, as an excuse?
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:58 AM
1

it is never about the foetus. It is always about the woman. And if the woman drinks herself into an alcoholic stupor and gives birth to a permanently severely damaged child, it also is not about the foetus.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:56 AM
1

well, if a woman takes the abortion pill, she gets zero punishment. Even if she is married to the father, and it is his greatest joy and wish to have a child. If a woman pokes holes into a man's condom, she gets rewarded with child support. If a man pokes holes into a condom, I think he got 2 years.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:55 AM
2

Women have rights. Men don't. Women are excused for the consequences of their behaviors. Men have to face the consequences. Why is this so hard to understand. /s
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:52 AM
1

Have the man carry a 10 lbs backpack. Or have a relay race of women, changing every 2 miles. This way they would actually compete side by side instead of the women leading for 25 miles and then overtaken, or lead all the time and never be seen by the men
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:45 PM
1

Did you follow the links? It leads to articles proving the inferiority in all these fields. Cooking surprised me, I must say, but you can not discuss with Michelin guide, led by a woman, barely giving stars to female cooks.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:30 PM
2

it is very easy for her to doctor the recording that it starts only after her initial altercation You should get information on how to get an expertise on the recording, how to verify if it has been cut and spliced.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:23 AM
0

Prepare for the worst. Your wife might have set the stage for a divorce. Maybe you never get back home. Maybe she will set you up for a violation of a restraining order and get you arrested for good. She might accuse you of rape, child abuse, whatever. Basically no proof is needed for such accusations. Everything is stacked against you. Keep reading the right side links here. If you have not been here regularly, you have no clue how laws are stacked against men. Sorry for bringing you bad news. …
/r/MensRights20/01/14 09:21 AM
27

perfectly right. This counts for driving. This counts for male behavior. Just women are not responsible when drunk and being with a male Even better, they don't even have to prove they were drunk. They can come forward, 1 year and 297 days after the fact, and claim they were drunk
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:33 AM
-9

well, if you are offended about the race card, them maybe you should wonder why you are not offended by the fact that one sex (gender) is treated very differently then the other.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:32 AM
-5

It is not just the definition of "rape" It is not that women are imprisoned, in massive numbers, for sexual assault for abusing drunk men who are not able to consent. It is the definition of consent, too. Men are always able to consent, women aren't. Furthermore it is the definition of due process, constitutional rights to face the accuser, presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:30 AM
1

All men with short legs, and men with resting pulse over 100 beats per minute, and men with body mass index over 25 also have severe disadvantages. I suggest to also let them run and give them a major time advantage.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:26 AM
2

see. and Marathon is NOT about upper body strength and women still can not compete. Equally, as the article states, they can not compete in chess, snooker, and cooking. Find the links in the article, I could not believe the female disadvantage in cooking either.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:20 AM
5

none clearly states it in the head line. A few don't state it at all Some state it at the very end. Most just startle you with the fact that the winner has a slower time then the second to arrive.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 08:16 AM
57

no because almost nobody knows. The press either does not mention the handicap, or tell it somewhere down on paragraph 8 And women go around posting that a woman won the marathon, ahead of all men.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:29 PM
1

This effect can be found everywhere. If a man and a woman are married, the man may get fired or just choose to stop working. Bad luck for the woman, ...... If they are divorced, then family court will enslave the man so he never may stop working, or else gets imprisoned. If he is a soccer player at the end of his career, and his income crumbles, too bad for him. The woman is entitled to continue the lifestyle she got accustomed to. If he gets a new wife, too bad for her. With the money left to h…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:14 PM
6

Prepare for accusations of child abuse and domestic violence. Do not let her irritate you and lose your cool. Screaming is domestic violence. But she needs no proof, you need proof that you did not beat nor abuse. Or proof that she did misdeeds, especially threaten false accusations. You might want to start recording, after you read your state laws about recording. Maybe you are lucky and I am just paranoid. But you should be aware that she has all options open. Oh, I forgot, she can also claim …
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:27 PM
113

The handicap was 18:35, and interestingly, the exact handicap was only decided and announced the last moment. They probably had to make sure a woman would win, but not too clearly and obviously 30 minutes ahead of the men. Imagine the uproar if the male winner would have won another 50000 dollars. That would not be equality and be a cheat by the patriarchy
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:20 PM
46

right. Especially, they don't mention the fairness and equality of her getting triple the prize money of the men's winner.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:17 PM
31

Yes, she really crossed the finish line over a minute before the male winner. In a surprising and inspiring race, a female first-time marathon runner won the 2013 LA Marathon. Aleksandra Duliba, a 27-year-old woman from Belarus, was the first runner, male or female, to cross the finish line Sunday, KTLA reports. Aleksandra Duliba, LA Marathon 2013 Record-Breaking Winner, Was A First-Time Marathoner Aleksandra Duliba of Belarus wins the 2013 Asics LA Marathon women’s race in her marathon debut to…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:16 PM
7

Why not discuss the usefulness of such laws. No naked photos of people under 18. Why not adhere to Sharia law, I presume no naked laws of anyone at all. A quick whipping is probably more humane then 8 years in prison, anyway. And, to tell the truth, it is really embarrassing to have to teach young children all these ridiculous rules about photographing themselves and their friends. Before you give a cell phone in the hand of a child, you need to give legal instructions, explain them the legal de…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:21 PM
0

Sure men can be financially raped, taken to the cleaners. Kicked out of the home, kept away from children, still obliged to pay the mortgage and giving support to the woman who lied to get him kicked out of the home. It is a bit strange that a woman has absolutely no obligation, but the man's obligation to feed her is sacred and often eternal
/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:16 AM
-5

Although a man who was 32 wasn’t breaking the law by having sex with a 17-year-old girl in 2008, he was by photographing the act, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday. Marshall Hollins was convicted in Stephenson County of making child pornography and sentenced to 8 years in prison. The two dissenting justices said that because the photos don’t show an illegal act, they shouldn’t be illegal. The dissenting minority has a bit of decency and common sense. ‘There was nothing unlawful about the…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:12 AM
0

Maybe one ought to review the pre-nup every 4 years. If one partner thinks he deserves money, but the other does not agree, there is a simple choice. Get a job and get your own carreer.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:48 AM
14

thanks, I did not notice this part. Remember women who help their husband through college and then feel triple entitled to his money?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:45 AM
29

Yes, that law has to be changed to make sure it only applies to men. No woman should ever pay alimony /s Of course, it is only just if men pay /s
/r/MensRights19/01/14 12:31 AM
10

You can bet that a woman would not be arrested for any such thing. Even if she drove by his house in her car 3 times per day Much less if she sent an email And much less if the email was sent automatically And, you can bet, a man would be very unlikely to complain for such a small disturbance as to receive a gmail invite.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:33 PM
4

a woman would not be sent to jail even if guilty of withholding the child and paying zero child support It is a mystery to me how law abiding men get arrested for such technicalities and minor misdemeanors. It is a mystery to me how they put back debtor's prison, only for men that somehow don't pay to women. Or in this case paid unequal installments. And how the system thinks a man can pay half his money to the ex, and the other half to her lawyer. Probably before taxes.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:31 PM
1

“The Hunt”: false accusation of child sexual abuse. A movie review
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:21 PM
-2

So you are white? For Equality's sake there are government and school policies to underreport black crime in school, not to arrest or penalize Blacks or else it would be racist to have more Blacks punished and arrested for misbehavior. As Blacks misbehave more, whites have to be punished more stringently I suppose similar things are happening to you. Just as White old ladies in Britain are searched so it does not look like young male muslims are targeted.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:37 PM
2

10 years in prison for male child because a woman took the initiative to give him a blow job. And MRA favor this, because a 15 year old CHILD girl is always a victim. When he was a senior in high school, he received oral sex from a 10th grader. He was 17. She was 15. Everyone, including the girl and the prosecution, agreed she initiated the act. But because of an archaic Georgia law, it was a misdemeanor for teenagers less than three years apart to have sexual intercourse, but a felony for the s…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:14 PM
1

look here. 5 upvotes, 9 downvotes. Taking away my and your upvote, it is 3 upvotes against 9 downvotes. The issue is taboo. And men rot in prison. The certainly get beaten up and anally raped, because it is a known fact that common criminals and gangs give "rapists" and "sex offenders" a taste of their own medicine. That includes statutory rapists that marry their victim and have a family thereafter. Well, they get a little Aids, in prison. And MRA downvote the discussion into extinction. It is …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:06 PM
2

Right, that is the point. The antifeminist is one of the very few that want to lower archaic age of consent laws, and that even inform us that they were promoted by women, as soon as they got the vote. It is barely tolerated here to promote free sexuality with age of consent of 16, instead of 18. Promoting age of consent of 14, like in most of Europe, or 12, like in Spain until a few weeks ago is reason for immediate ban here. This is the point. The issue is so taboo, it must not even be discuss…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:04 PM
1

will you guys please ARGUE RATIONALLY? I have not heard ONE person yet that argues in favor or against 17 year old boys getting 10 years in jail for getting a blow job from a 15 year old girl Or a 30 year old man getting imprisoned for having kept a video he took of himself f.pping when he was 11. Or a 23 year old man getting imprisoned for naked photos he took of his 17 year old LEGAL girl friend. He can have sex with her but not photograph her. Can anyone argue why MRA think these men MUST be …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:56 PM
1

Even Barrack Obama's mother was 17, borderline 18 years old when she became pregnant. You can bet that all of us have an underage great grand..... grand mother in the last 10 generations. Marriage with 17, or 15 was quite common ............ And naked boys and girls in Greek statues were also very common. Without 2257 proof of age, often obviously under 16, if not under 6 years of age.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:51 PM
0

Thank you very much. So many people think it is better to silence discussion then to openly disagree or discuss.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:51 PM
3

That is sad. The antifeminist pointed out that feminist's main goal around 1900, until today, was to close brothels and to increase the age of consent. So this certainly should interest the MRA. Especially as these laws mainly ensnare men. Except for some prostitutes (which is being fixed by the swedish law that criminalizes only customers) There are even sex positive feminists. Who think women have the right to make money as prostitutes, if they choose so. And adolescent women have the right to…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:50 PM
1

Will the downvoters please state their reason? Hopefully not just some knee jerk reaction but good reasoning.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:47 PM
3

that is equality! /s
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:12 PM
3

is NOW within the purview of the funds granting agency???? Just shocking
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:12 PM
59

If he wants to make a point burning himself. ok. He really should not have burned the child. A man killed himself and badly injured his son in a school playground apparently after divorcing his wife.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 08:53 PM
1

Hebephile, a newly proposed diagnostic classification in which people display a sexual preference for children at the cusp of puberty, between the ages of, roughly, 11 to 14 years of age. Pedophiles, in contrast, show a sexual preference for clearly prepubescent children. There are also ephebophiles (from ephebos, meaning “one arrived at puberty” in Greek), who are mostly attracted to 15- to 16-year-olds; teleiophiles (from teleios, meaning, “full grown” in Greek), who prefer those 17 years of a…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 07:28 PM
0

Not quite. If it is under 1%, as feminists think, then it would not be that relevant. Even though even 1 in 100 accusation being false is still disturbing. The main problem is that men accused of rape do not have constitutional rights to due process, cross examining the accuser, and presumption of innocence, necessity of corroborating evidence. 6 to 12 % proven false police think 35 to 80% are false, but can not be proven When rape accusations seem false, but are not proven false, often the man …
/r/MensRights25/12/13 07:10 PM
-2

I wonder why they freak out when they see the father Could it be parental alienation? Mother badmouths dad and the kids freak out How could someone get 2 rape children? Must have been "consensual rape", a consensual relationship with a minor, statutory rape. And how old was the pedophile's victim? 9y? That would be true pedophilia. 11y? 13y? 15y? 17y?
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:10 AM
2

good point. But this usually is not forcible rape but statutory rape Except of the one case of the woman having sex with a passed out man and then getting child support
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:06 AM
-1

great point. Very convincing. Add to that statutory rape with enthusiastic consent of the woman ...
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:06 AM
2

great point. Very convincing. Add to that statutory rape with enthusiastic consent of the woman ...
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:06 AM
7

At age 17 she claimed he molested her 7 years earlier. Didn't we hear about cases where someone claimed sexual assault 30 or 40 years ago? Men, be really afraid. Even if you avoid women altogether (MGTOW), some kindergarten pal can accuse you of rape and get you imprisoned. Do we have to avoid women since kindergarten? Coast originally claimed Montgomery molested her in Hampton in 2000 when she was 10 and he was 14. She said last year that she made up the story when she was 17 to explain her beh…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 08:22 PM
2

Does nobody see a problem in the fact that violently raping a screaming underage victim (be it male of female) is exactly the same as yielding the enthusiastic sexual advances of an enthusiastic minor? I don't want to discuss if consensual sex with a minor should be legal or not. I just think that violently forcing a minor is NOT EXACTLY THE SAME as having sex with a minor that is that is so enthusiastic that he (could be she) comes back for more sex a total 191 times Am I the only one that thin…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 05:05 PM
14

That happens frequently. Drug and shoot your husband, get the kids, get his property, get acquitted
/r/MensRights24/12/13 04:47 PM
14

The new laws will probably ensnare many "statutory rapists", 20 year old boy friends of 17 year old girls, who then will not be able to file suit to see the child conceived in a consensual long term relationship. Of course, the will have to pay child support anyway.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 03:51 PM
3

I heard about a similar case before, don't have the link I wonder how often such child porn framing tactics works out and gets the man in prison. It is like false rape accusations, only the dumb accusers get caught for walking past surveillance cameras kissing their rapist after the act and other flaws in their scheme.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:51 PM
11

What about promoting MALES in engineering. Probably would have a greater impact on the number and quality of engineers graduating. Males that really dig engineering. That do engineering out of passion. Help them with extra financial aid. Instead males get turned off by seeing that women get promoted unjustly.
/r/PussyPass19/12/13 06:19 AM
7

Very old law about male hurt honor have long been abolished. There is only battered WOMAN syndrome But can you see the difference? The guy lost his cool and killed out of anger. This clearly is NOT cold blooded, pre-meditated murder, a killing carried out over hours And he did not get freed either.
/r/PussyPass19/12/13 06:12 AM
27

Well, this is all self defense. http://www.reddit.com/r/PussyPass/comments/1t3yxh/how_to_kill_your_husband_a_tutorial/ She should have alleged that he was an abuser and gotten a free ride. The guy was immensely lucky. Could have died, or become immensely sick. It is hard to imagine that whatever you eat, it could be poisoned by your girl friend. Life is dangerous, with so many nutcases out there. Also quite amazing that she readily confessed to the guy who caught her.
/r/PussyPass19/12/13 06:10 AM
10

There is a special mental disorder created by lawyers and psychologists to get women off the hook It is "battered women syndrome". WOMEN who get battered lose the capacity to just walk away and see no other way out then to kill the alleged abuser. Usually they get convicted of manslaughter, in spite of clear murderous planning. Here they get away totally as this is, ridiculously, considered self defense.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 06:15 PM
22

Married men in Australia, be afraid. Very afraid. Pray your wife does not follow this advice: Just arm yourself with a gun, sharp knife or bottle of poison. Wait until your abusive husband is asleep or defenceless, then shoot, stab or poison him as the case may be. No need to hide the body, just call the police and claim self-defence. Get yourself a good defence lawyer who can bring a tear to the eyes of the jurors and you are home-free. You get the family assets and a new life. You simply claim…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:11 PM
2

This could be so simple. Repeated sexual assaults. Wire up the victim, or his living and working area, with cameras and voice recorders. Get HARD PROOF. With hard proof, beyond reasonable doubt, punish the culprits really hard. Just as hard as unproven assailants of women get punished. I mean, when women cry rape, the male alleged rapist has to prove his innocence, he is presumed guilty. When a man gets repeatedly assaulted, help him to get PROOF.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:47 PM
13

If he were a male, he would probably be maced and tasered. Or at least secured very roughly. The girl was an entitled princess who would not believe that police would actually dare to arrest her. Probably always got her way since kindergarten.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:38 PM
2

Right. In the case of a male "raping" or sexually assaulting an officer, any orders not to react would be moot. Women need to be protected at all times, with no restraint
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:18 PM
-2

This is about a father who saw a child he wanted aborted, against his feelings, against his wish. There are fathers forced to pay up for a child that they did not want. What is common: Men have no rights. Women alone decide.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:53 PM
1

One day before the 18th birthday is statutory rape in the USA, and child porn everywhere Mandatory 15 years jail for photos of legal girl friend: You Can Have Sex With Them; Just Don't Photograph Them
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:33 PM
1

it is child porn [Mandatory 15 years jail for photos of legal girl friend: You Can Have Sex With Them; Just Don't Photograph Them](http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/mandatory-15-years-jail-for-photos-of-legal-girl-friend-you-can-have-sex-with-them-just-dont-photograph-them0
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:32 PM
1

Seems you actually agree with these people You agree that Not all cases of underage sex necessarily require the ruthless interference of the justice system with its very heavy handed penalties of years and decades in prison. Age of consent laws know no exceptions. They mean that punishment is mandatory. They do not mean that in some cases it is unwise and unhealthy to engage in sexual behavior.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:46 PM
1

If people think that rape is a valid punishment, they could instead use judicial whipping like in some countries. At least the amount is measured and does not transmit AIDS Stop Prison Rape! Legalize Corporal Punishment Furthermore it is not like today: the weakest petty criminals get raped by the hard core gangs
/r/MensRights11/11/13 11:05 AM
0

they probably had to plea bargain because they ran serious risks to get convicted for murder. Shooting a pregnant's belly qualifies for murder, as far as I remember. And poking holes in condoms is assault, when done by a man So this title is not unfounded
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:45 AM
6

it is interesting to analyse the different cases Can we agree that a man could opt out if she lied about birth contol, or if she raped him while he was passed out unconscious? Then we discuss if cases could be studied on an individual basis.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:39 AM
8

A wife calling police on a man, on her husband. Lying to police. This is just despicable, especially if he did nothing wrong. If he gets convicted for the possession of the taser gun, not for the violence, that makes it even worse. You can not trust your wife not to call the cops?
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:31 PM
14

Amazing: feminists proposing equal rights for men? Over the past fifteen years, some feminists have argued that ending the current child support system is an important social issue. In the October 19, 2000 issue of Salon,Cathy Young argued that women’s freedom to choose parenthood is a reproductive right men do not have but should. Her article, “A Man’s Right to Choose,” identifies abortion rights and adoption as options that allow women greater sexual freedom than men when a sexual encounter re…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:27 PM
10

now feminists are screwing up wikipedia as usual: mainly men built it. Women hardly contribute because of patriarchy that did not let them /sarcasm and now that men brought it to success, they trash it They need college credit to motivate them to do what men did voluntarily. The only upside: I saw one place where they actually LABELED their comment as feminist position. Less bad. Now let us add the MRA position everywhere, too.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:14 PM
0

What about an open marriage? Polyamory? This subreddit would not consider anything different from traditional marriage? Please don't downvote, it might seriously be an alternative. Of course, if you accept her screwing around, you should have the same liberties, and you'd better DNA test any kids you two might have.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 08:39 AM
4

except if the accuser is a woman that claims rape. And the accused is male Due process does not apply to white males
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 03:10 AM
1

you don't get it If you are a man, whatever you do to a child can be used against you If you are a woman, whatever you do to a child is either well meant. If it is obviously bad for the child then it is caused by a traumatic experience a man caused you
/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:42 AM
6

right. Or feminists finally admitting that men and women are different. Only when it leads to preferential treatment for women, of course
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:04 PM
4

But most porn movies pass. Plenty of women, just have them exchange a few words or at least a few moans.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:24 AM
1

wait a while. Feminists will call for boycott of movie theaters that play even one fail movie. The slippery slope of all feminist projects never ends
/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:16 AM
1

They want to save the exploited prostitutes against their will. They are being abused ......
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 03:51 PM
1

women who work nearly as hard, as much, and as good as men outperform men. Because of official or unofficial quotas, these few women get hired and promoted much faster then an equally qualified man.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 03:49 PM
3

Women who work about as hard as men earn 12% to 20% more. This is considered progress. This article is one of the worst drivels about the wage gap: The fact that the average American working woman earns only about 8o% of what the average American working man earns has been something of a festering sore
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 03:47 PM
1

Do the test. If she dumps you, be grateful. At least you had a good lay Of course, if you marry and she takes revenge later, you have a problem
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 09:34 AM
0

Great. You are the only one that sees a positive potential in a liberal open minded woman in (d) Hard to find such a woman, though
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 09:33 AM
12

sure A man is guilty until proven innocent. He has to be ready to prove his innocence at every moment. Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/TheRedPill28/10/13 09:22 AM
8

men get arrested and imprisoned for not paying child support, even if they are absolutely unable to pay. Especially after long jail terms they still have to pay, or back to jail.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 08:32 AM
-3

actually, there is plenty of data that the majority of reported rapes is not real
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:09 AM
4

there also is not a false robbery epidemic
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:50 AM
2

it is not the same There are not millions of people who protest against robberies. No "reclaim the night" marches against robberies. And it is politically incorrect to mention that certain types of people are the ones that commit most of the robberies.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:49 AM
9

as a little kid, I (m) hated all this kissing, but did not dare to resist forcefully
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:20 AM
2

it is worse r/mr commented that major US Universities give credit for putting the feminist perspective on wikipedia. The only positive point is that they seem to honestly label it as feminist viewpoint.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:16 AM
3

It is a wise investment strategy to wait with divorce proceedings until the maximum financial benefit can be obtained /sarcasm
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:10 AM
5

can you imagine 3 grown men grabbing a girl and kissing her on the mouth? Even if the girl is happy about it?
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:10 AM
2

terrible and disgusting. MGTOW is the only way out. avoid marriage like the plague very sad indeed
/r/MensRights25/10/13 10:08 AM
1

Look at the down-votes, and you have the answer. Great comments. Please read the private message I sent and reply as I suggested there.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:57 AM
1

please read your private messages
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:40 AM
-1

They are totally non violent and withdrawns. Comparable to nuns that withdraw into a convent. They will, in the long run, destroy society. As would nuns, if they were the majority.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:34 AM
8

you might have a problem if she was drunk, unable to consent to even a blow job. Then all sex is rape. /sarcasm But true Sorry, this is not my definition. But yes, get all proof you have. If everyone knows she was happy and also knows she did not look terribly drunk, you have a good chance.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:08 AM
3

can you imagine the uproar among feminists (including the majority of males) if Verizon would put a MAN onto the photo, as victim? Saying some truth in writing was probably the maximum that they could afford to do without risking a huge backlash. Men don't complain. Or do you see a campaign against Verizon? Women have political clout and complain about the smallest issues
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:01 AM
2

some issues need a 4 word explanation. Or being split into 3-4 subissues The uninitiated would not know the details about reproductive privileges vs lack of male reproductive rights. Can always get out of child support by aborting or giving up for abortion will be called "victim" if they kill their spouse or lop off their genitals can kill their spouse with premeditation and not be called murderer (battered soman syndrome)
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:51 PM
1

don't fake Suicide is the only way out. If you don't work, debtor's prison. If you leave the country, you get on Interpol's most wanted deadbeat dad list.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:55 AM
2

It is worse for athletes, that earn 500 000 for a few years and then drop to 30 000. Or TV stars that might just fall out of grace.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:54 AM
1

needs good planning too. They tend to keep your passport, once you are a deadbeat. You have to totally comply while you secretly plan to leave. But even then, not way out, really. America's most wanted was a deadbeat dad that was extradited from Thailand. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:53 AM
1

You have to do this while still married If you do this after being ordered to pay her $ 5000 per month, then you get debtor's prison. You will be indentured slave for the rest of your life. No way out. And nobody to fight for the liberation of male work slaves to women.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:51 AM
1

how can you prohibit her that life style? Refuse to give her any household money? Stop working yourself? Beat her with a stick until she works, as the Bible recommends? What would be the judge's answer?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:44 AM
9

The patriarchy refuses to hire women who work for 70% of the salary and give you 42% of profit increase. How much spite to pay higher salary and get lower profits, just to keep women out. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:42 PM
4

read about the European Community, they are fighting to definitely working towards gender quotas. And they make companies to "voluntarily" comply with quotas they can set for themselves Even if some state or country holds them unconstitutional, they will work around it.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:37 PM
15

another sex law that is unnecessary. And that most likely will be used in biased ways against men. Real incest can result in babies that have more hereditary diseases. It is also problematic to have sex with someone you raised since they were a baby. But someone you first met when she was 16, and has no blood relationship to you, having sex when she is 21 does not look like a serious problem the law ought to be concerned about. What if you marry a woman with a 30 year old daughter?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:31 PM
13

Wilson is a sex offender and has a warrant for his arrest for failing to register that dates to 2008, according to court records. No matter how false the accusation, he is in deep trouble now and will be arrested because of his prior conviction Harwood was a witness in a case against Wilson, police said. extremely likely she framed him before Harwood, the false accuser who stabbed herself and her child to falsely accuse Wilson was a witness in a prior case against Wilson. Do you get it? Most lik…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:19 PM
5

Seems very relevant.. though the text does not say it. No matter how false the accusation, he is in deep trouble now and will be arrested Harwood was a witness in a case against Wilson, police said. Harwood, the false accuser who stabbed herself and her child to falsely accuse Wilson was a witness in a prior case against Wilson. Do you get it? Most likely, she already framed him before. If you stab yourself and your own child to get someone, it is quite likely you go through the pains of a few l…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 01:17 PM
1

mensrights is a sexist group. why hasn't that been shut down?! /sarcasm
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:23 PM
3

The poor guy was forcibly anally raped in ways that injured his bladder permanently. This rape seems to be conflated with heinous cases of women getting grabbed on their buttocks and breasts. Our modern re-definition of "rape" is very cruel towards true victims of true violent forcible rape. Their cases are being treated equal as other types of rape like non-violent date rape where the victim consented but was drunk.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 01:16 PM
3

Will Cafe sue to get the money back, if they pay? Or will they just set a precedent and always pay? Is there a free speech organization in Canada? Can the ACLU be engaged in this, or are they 100% dominated by feminism? In the past, the ACLU defended the right of NAZIS to provocatively demonstrate in towns where they are especially un-welcome.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:51 PM
8

So strange that nobody notices: This financial charge of $ 900 is the METHOD to purposefully repress free speech, to silence the entire MRA movement. This is not just "BLAMING THE VICTIM" but "CHARGING THE VICTIM". After all, if you engage in hate speech, you are to fault for the self defense aggression of the hurt and victimized feminists /sarcasm I said "sarcasm" to avoid downvotes, but this is probably the "logic" behind the fine. Add hate speech laws to this, and MRA is effectively silenced …
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:49 PM
2

Certainly. As many people as possible should take as many recording devices as possible. Would not surprise me if security patted everyone down, once they find the first recording devices Actually, smartphones will do. Especially for voice recording. NOTE: do your best to do STEREO voice recording. The difference in Quality is stunning. Mono has disgusting echo and makes noise much more prominent. In Stereo recording, the ear can filter out disturbing noises, especially when heard via headphone.…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:41 PM
5

It would be good if you could get somone to record who is NOT a student. Ideally more then one person, so someone will pass if one gets caught.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:34 PM
6

these numbers are from here All information taken from Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor, 2013, except where noted. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:33 AM
1

women survived because men protected them. Men did not fight women. Men needed intelligence to out-compete other men and to impress women. But most likely women had better verbal scores to better manipulate men and women.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:16 AM
12

But as Milton began arguing promi­nent cases in court, writing speeches for senators, and appearing in local magazine articles, her hus­band, whose start-up failed and who was now unemployed, indulged in buying fancy computer software. Soon he had acquired a variety of new programs, including airplane-simulation and home-design software. “None of which he needed,” says Milton, “I never expected I’d have to tell him to stay away from Best Buy.” When she asked him not to spend money on expensive l…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:53 AM
1

to ban means it has not yet passed But this is not an OBSCURE proposal, it might not pass, but it seems to be supported by many countries. And the others will have to follow. If it gets defeated now, wait 4 more years, and it will pass.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:23 AM
2

well if anti-feminism is a crime, then most of us go to prison. You are just finessing, if this protects feminism, or if it just imprisons those who are against feminism.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:21 AM
19

we will all meet in prison. For anti-feminist hate speech he purpose of this Statute is to: [...] e) Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia. For instance, campaigning against male circumcision can bring you criminal charges of “Islamophobia” under this law. from the law Examples: tolerance does not denote…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:49 PM
4

As we will soon see, feminists are also de facto part of the “group” notion – so holding feminists to ridicule, as they deserve, will now be a crime. We know this from the Section 2e of the document which says[6]: The purpose of this Statute is to: [...] e) Take concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:26 PM
1

we have decided that children of rich fathers need 30 000 dollars per month. We also have decided that mothers don't need to be accountable for that money We also have decided that courts do not oblige women to honor men's visitation rights
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:54 PM
3

Like being imprisoned and possibly raped, if you don't pay alimony on time. Did you know the #1 most wanted man in America was a deadbeat dad. He followed Osama Bin Laden as the most wanted man
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:51 PM
6

once family court orders you to pay US$ 4500 to your wife, for life, it is slavery. It is called indentured slavery, as opposed to chattel slavery.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:50 PM
1

as usual, men have more variance in the last 100 000 years, about 60% of men had ZERO offspring (citation??) And Gengis Khan had thousands. Most women had 2 to 8 offspring, I would venture. Less then 10-20% of women had ZERO offspring. in the EEA, 50000 years ago
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:49 PM
5

men invented medicines and surgeries to make childbirth safer
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:47 PM
12

right. Promote the cleaning lady to flight controller. Just to have a few women ..............
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:45 PM
6

did not dare to say that. More like a fish needs water. Without all the inventions men made over millennia, there would be no iphone, no car, no electricity, .......
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:44 PM
5

this is possible. This can lead to hypotheses that can be tested scientifically I bet this has been done, and people less ignorant then me could tell you. Warren Farrell, for example, or Roy Baumeister. Women seem to inherently have less interest and less talent in Math and Engineering. Women seem to inherently have less variance/ standard deviation in talents so the top talent are always men. So are the failures at the bottom.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:43 PM
1

the seniority list, I bet this has to do with quotas The only capable female will be promoted instantly to the rank beyond her capacity. But, certain females might be capable. But they only want quotas in GLAMOR jobs. Nobody prevents them from writing wikipedia articles or applying for patents. It just so happens that they lack either talent or interest or whatever. Or does the evil patriarchy stop them from applying for patents?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:40 PM
-3

Did not find it during a quick check. But this actually deserves being posted twice, seems to get enough attention.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:38 PM
2

I don't know, maybe I'm just blind to an obvious problem, but I've always thought that a white, heterosexual male in the United States has it easier than every other race, gender and sexual orientation on the entire planet Read more: http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-bizarre-outbursts-by-celebrities-you-thought-were-sane/#ixzz2fGOZdBJE US women don't have it easier. And maybe, men have created culture, fought wars, worked hard in mines and as trash collectors, invented technology, and law, to get th…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:45 PM
13

When MEN are on strike No electricity, no water, no garbage collection, no computer networks, no trains, no airplanes. Hope it doesn’t get too hot, or too cold the day men don’t show up for work. Even if you had power, which you don’t, you would be hard-pressed to get anyone in to take a look at your wonky air-conditioner or furnace. 98.4% of heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration mechanics and installers are men. Oh well. Guess you’ll have to mosey on down to the local café, which has no p…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:33 PM
30

My most basic understanding of men is that they keep you from starving or freezing to death. Perhaps the reason men have historically had the privileges they do is because they EARN THEM BY MAKING OUR LIFE POSSIBLE?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 04:30 PM
3

This is not really meant as segregationist. It is just to enforce a female quota, probably 60% as women are the majority at college. And minorities only get protected when they are not male. They just believe they can not get away with requiring everyone voting for women candidates. So they invented this mechanism. The next step will be to allow men to vote for women, to further increase the positive influence of women leaders. Historically, women were forced by the patriarchy to vote for men. T…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:28 AM
-3

right. While women don't get punished for lying about birth control. Nor for lying you are the father while they perfectly know who impregnated her. I thought this was just an example to show how shocking fake pregnancy test sales are
/r/MensRights06/09/13 03:24 PM
0

Financial abuse is if you don't give your wife all she wants Or if you put any conditions on giving her money That is what I remember.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:17 PM
4

the word is "gold digger". At least she is honest And in the world we live it, it is normal that a woman marries to have her financial support guaranteed for life. It is so normal that she is not even ashamed of herself No self sufficient empowered women, when they want male support for life
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:11 PM
17

Wait: [*] He goes to jail for contempt of court for not paying child support [*] She does NOT go to jail for contempt of court for not paying paternity test. [*] She has right to get his money though she is in contempt and refuses to prove she really has the right [*] the protest only works because the man's WIFE is protesting. If he protested, no one would care, nor the press would write about it This is male privilege in action ?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:11 AM
11

the feminist language distortion and manipulation is very fatal Man had inappropriate consensual sex with a minor and got only 30 days plus a major suspended sentence Does not sound that good.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:07 AM
1

good idea can you imagine 10% (or what is the number?) of US males fleeing to South East Asia? There ought to be a better solution. Change the laws.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:09 AM
4

They probably meant a woman without a job could not get a credit card without her breadwinning husband's signature I doubt a single woman with a good job could not get a credit card.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:58 AM
7

A few more details: There are many more single D grade men in China then A grade women. And D grade men would gladly marry A-Grade women. The article is about A-grade professional women who remain single as they can not find any partner that is up to their standards
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:56 AM
1

Not much left. Feminists have conquered the top: The European government and the United Nations. From there they force nations to adopt feminist laws about wage gaps, domestic violence, rape, etc. It is sad to say that Muslim Sharia law is one of the few that protects men against false rape accusations, requiring 4 witnesses.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:53 AM
1

good point I googled "police Inspector Diane Bamber" and did not find any major press organs reporting on that. But some sites were worth checking out if they are reputable Normally googling a few good key words immediately renders other press reports
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:56 AM
7

Right, this is the story I talked about. Blacks with low IQ and women with low strength now have to be hired to endanger other more competent fire fighters http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/racial-differences-intelligence/dangerously-incompetent-fire-fighters-weakened-by-gender-quotas-dumbed-by-racial-quota-nonsense
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:53 AM
4

It is much worse in the US. dangerously incompetent fire fighters
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:52 AM
1

Actually, there is data for most of the stuff. But yes, he does not write a dissertation, he does not properly cite all the data. google human-stupidity.com child sex trauma myth for example.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:35 AM
10

the problem is the lack of equality. \ Remember Elevatorgate? Inviting a woman for dinner can be a serious offense. Pinching a woman in the behind can easily get you arrested, sued, fired, beaten up.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 05:05 AM
4

Women MUST get the same salary, same promotions. No matter if they work less, and are absent more. It is not their fault to be born a woman. Women have different health needs and employers need to compensate for that. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:57 AM
11

I bet that nothing will happen to them Or a slap on the wrist, if one assault victim presses charges Everyone will understand that the assailants are entitled to presume that a woman persecuted is innocent.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:39 AM
2

She was booked into jail on four counts, including felony aggravated assault with a weapon, criminal trespassing and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. In court she admitted to using the baton to smash the computer but denied waving the handgun. She said the reason she was wearing a bulletproof vest was because of a deal she had made with the manufacturer. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2359911/911-Mets-pitcher-Kris-Benson-released-pleads-help-estranged…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:51 AM
2

Anna Benson: he can’t keep it in his pants. He can’t stop f*****g my friends, in my house. But that doesn’t mean that I don’t love him http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2359911/911-Mets-pitcher-Kris-Benson-released-pleads-help-estranged-wife-dressed-black-wearing-bulletproof-vest-breaks-home-brandishing-gun-metal-baton.html
/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:21 AM
43

He is so lucky his wife gives him a warning This is sarcastic, but true She is giving him a chance to stay in the marriage, to see the children, and not to get divorced After all, in our feminist equality world, she has all the power, and she has not used it, yet, to crush him. His only choice is to live an open relationship, as she wishes. Remember, women have all the power Of course, if he ever got a lover, his wife might wield her power and threaten him again. So he better enjoy a relationshi…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:09 PM
3

"Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am. We don’t deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 10:02 PM
3

http://human-stupidity.com/awareness/kachelmann-rape-trial
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:59 PM
5

Women usually have more time at hand to play doubles, thus finally earning more money then the men. Women lose to men in chess, darts, snooker, tennis, math contests, spelling bees, Wikipedia participation, patent applications, and, amazingly can not even compete in cooking. The original article has links to prove these statements Fire fighters are hampered by quota women who don’t have the strength to carry an injured comrade, to wrestle a ladder, or to break a door. But society needs quota wom…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:44 PM
1

Most women can't even manage the requirements of a normal firemen's unit. It is firefighters, you sexist pig /sarcasm
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:29 PM
-2

thus is the power of feminists Even MRA are scared to face them off on the iffier topics hear hear ================= I repeat my post above === There are very few MRA that share your opinion www.theantifeminist.com www.human-stupidity.com www.angryharry.com the rest you see at the antifeminist blogroll.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:21 PM
1

see my reply above
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:19 PM
-1

shhhht. This is a no-no There are very few MRA that share your opinion www.theantifeminist.com www.human-stupidity.com www.angryharry.com the rest you see at the antifeminist blogroll.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:19 PM
4

Interesting, after 8 straight downvotes, there are now 7 straight upvotes. Probably because of the other post here about 1 out of 82 firefighter deaths being female.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:07 AM
31

Today, Los Angeles boasts a dozen newly built locker rooms for women citywide. Most days, they sit eerily empty, and men sometimes use the space to study. The abandoned lockers are a testament to a social-engineering experiment gone bad, a failed dream unfolding from New York to San Francisco to Oakland — to Los Angeles. But those hundreds vanished after the first physical hurdle — the Candidate Physical Ability Test, which involves wearing 75 pounds of protective clothing and gear while climbin…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:25 AM
6

blatant falsification. But it will spread on facebook, because this is what people want to believe.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:58 AM
12

you know, if women shoot the sleeping husband in the back, it is self defense. Called battered woman syndrome I am not joking, just sarcastic
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:56 AM
6

as a great researcher can you check the data for 2012? I bet the percentage is much higher And while you are at it: Please check the US forces casualty numbers by gender and compare them to the percentage of women in the military.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:27 AM
11

If women want to join the fire fighters, they should not demand privileges at same pay. Fulfill the same requirements, same entrance exams, same danger. And allow the firefighters their danger pay and let them earn more then an office clerk.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:57 AM
12

Male deaths are inequality against men? I thought this is what r/mensrights is for, to oppose such propaganda. Believe me, among firefighters, when the going gets tough, men, women and superiors chose to put the men in harm's way, and keep women out of the way
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:54 AM
1

I actually looked this up, because amazingly, my prior post got only downvotes, massively. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1henye/19_firefighters_killed_battling_arizona_wildfire/ Because in today's news, (most likely) 19 FIREMEN died, and nobody mentions the fact they are all MEN. And even at reddit mens rights, this gets massively downvoted and nobody bothers checking the facts. I could not verify yet, but I wager a bet that at least 18 of them are male. I would bet that they are a…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:26 AM
10

Someone asked what the point is. I was actually waiting for people here to discuss the article. A few points: a) If the going gets tough, it is always the men who get put in harms way. But female firefighters get the same salary. And of course, lower requirement for physical fitness. b) such a glaring disparity. And nobody mentions it. Have you guys heard of it? c) political correctness. Until recently, these men were firemen. But language has been changed, now we think it is normal to call them…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:22 AM
22

Compare a British teacher who had a love affair with a 15 year old student, consumed while in France where the age of consent is 14 or 15. He got 5 1/2 years in jail, though the girl said she loves him and will wait for him. There IS Some Hope : Top Rated Daily Mail Comments On ‘Paedophile’ Teacher Jeremy Forrest
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:18 AM
101

Sayar is seriously ill and suffering from Lymphoma, a source told the News. Would anyone care if the defendant was male? "The complainant and his family are amenable to the offer," Assistant District Attorney Serena Horowitz said in Brooklyn Supreme Court. "They stated to me that they don't want to see the defendant spend time in jail." If the defendant was male, the family probably would want him in jail
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:54 AM
16

An Armani suit makes any man more attractive. Or a BMW or Porsche. Women have just different visual cues.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:48 AM
5

Gender. Of the 83 firefighters who died while on duty in 2011,. 82 were male and 1 was female. Multiple Firefighter Fatality Incidents. The 83 deaths in 2011 ... http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/ff_fat11.pdf Will the downvoters please comment? Is this a feminist subreddit? Any indication that 50% of the victims were female? http://www.fireengineering.com/health-safety/LODDs.html only males here
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:41 AM
21

if she had only lied about rape statistics, they probably would not have gotten her But on top of it she took money for herself, that was her downfall
/r/MensRights24/06/13 04:45 AM
-2

I think most men have been raped, if you count it as rape if a woman does not immediately stop after a man says: Not now, I am tired Not now, I already came 3 times, I don't want no more Or if a "stolen kiss" counts as sexual assault, when a woman kisses you while you push her away because you are unhappy about her You probably think about stranger rape. But imagine your wife has a little headache, says no, and you caress her in a sexual way and get stiffed for sexual assault. You don't even nee…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 04:42 AM
25

No report of this in mainstream press. Was hard to find in google: .Yolo-Count-Court-Room-600Yolo County Superior Court Judge Janet Gaard sentenced former UC Davis employee Jennifer Beeman to five years felony probation and 180 days County jail for embezzlement and falsifying of government records from the UC Davis Campus Violence Prevention Program. Judge Gaard also ordered Beeman to pay $9,153.50 in restitution. According to the District Attorney's press release, Ms. Beeman oversaw the Campus …
/r/MensRights24/06/13 04:02 AM
0

Utterly amazing. At r/mensrights this has been downvoted into oblivion It is totally unbelievable that r/mensrights opposes the truth on rape statistics. this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2013 3 points (55% like it) 16 up votes 13 down votes I deleted it so I could re-submit it. Maybe it was the title I used before (Have you been raped recently) May the downvoters please state their reason? This article (with links to prove it) actually describes how men are demonized by purposefully falsified s…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:44 AM
6

see also http://www.angryharry.com/esHaveYouBeenRapedRecently.htm
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:31 AM
1

absolutely which is sad because the research is probably there And Steve Moxon is a highly knowledgeable author
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:02 AM
1

If the woman looks like she has perky size C breasts and then it turns out she has saggy size A breasts The man's prior consent is obviously invalid
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:00 AM
0

oh really? he gets a reprieve till he is 18? I would suppose he is on the hook immediately In teenage couples, say woman 15, man 17, the man does not pay child support?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:30 AM
1

good intention, but ......... it is at 3 upvotes .............
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:27 AM
1

in other words, this woman has destroyed men's lifes before. And, courts have helped her to do so. And nobody is ever warned.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:27 AM
1

Ylen's credibility has been questioned before. James Grissom, convicted in 2003 of raping her, was released last fall after nearly 10 years in prison. He was granted a new trial after authorities learned that Ylen had made false allegations of rape in California, information that wasn't shared with Grissom's trial attorney. It is high time to have a false rape registry It ought to list all rape accusations, even if not proven false. That way it could be shown if a woman habitually makes rape acc…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:25 AM
5

DAILY EDITORIAL DIGEST APRIL 19, 1922[FULL TEXT]: Whether it is not wasting the money of the taxpayers trying women for murder in cases where the so-called unwritten law can be evoked is the subject of comment throughout the country. The discussion centers upon the recent acquittal of Miss Olivia Stone, the Cincinnati nurse, who shot a former corporation counsel of that city because she alleged he had failed to keep his promise to marry her. “If women who commit crimes of passion are always to g…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:32 AM
1

Can't the judge DEMAND she tell the whereabouts of the child. If she doesn't, put her in the slammer for 10 years for contempt of court until she tells? Isn't contempt of court the sad excuse they use to put "deadbeat dads" into debtor's prison?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 09:16 AM
0

Great point My experience, too. In higher classes, women seem to be as unstable as ever, and guys usually have their act together If not for natural reasons, if they are not peaceful and reasonable by nature, they have enough sense to avoid anything that could get them into prison And women are socialized to know they get away with everything. So they have not been taught to use severe self control
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:26 PM
1

you should have kept on reading Especially if you happen to be a man in Spain if you are from another country, you recognize that this is not much different from the US. But we thought Latin countries have macho men and women are not in total power yet. We were wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:22 PM
2

Stalin is a good example. An unjust terror regime that could imprison you at any time at a whim of the powerful. If you "only" lose your house, your kids, your job and a few months in prison, the Stalin example still is quite befitting It is called "hyperbole" I believe. Exaggeration.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:20 PM
54

Do we need more proof that our spousal support system is seriously sick? It was meant to support at home housewives that supported their man's career and would be unable to support themselves. Now if 12 Million are not enough for her, and she needs 19 Million per year, is that a reason to exploit a man? Would not surprise me if he had to pay half of his income, before taxes. So 15 Million, pay 7.5 Million to ex, pay 7 Million in taxes. 500 k ought to be enough for him /sarcasm
/r/MensRights27/05/13 10:22 AM
2

You know, it’s a pretty sleazy thing to do, but imagine if the tables were turned. Man doesn’t want his child aborted, but girlfriend does it anyway. Who believes she’d be charged with murder? No, it would be her “right,” because it’s “her body.” Using that logic, however, how could we come up with a murder charge agaist the boyfriend? If a woman can terminate a pregnancy at will and face no charges for the injury done to the child, then the most Mr. Weldon should reasonably face is a felony ass…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:21 AM
7

/sarcasm I hope
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:33 PM
1

pretty cruel to force a minor child to live with the cruel murder of one's father. I also wonder what proof they had that a) the poor victim man was an abuser b) it was serious abuse c) she had no other way out and could not leave d) the children were happy with the murder and happily will stay with the killer
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:36 AM
6

you are totally right, from a libertarian point of view BUT Feminism has, long ago, destroyed these freedoms. Men are NOT allowed to have men only clubs. Men are not allowed to hire only men. Men are not allowed to favor men. So if you have these libertarian attitudes, fight all woman quotas ....
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:45 AM
5

this is not a corrupt justice system It is basically the (corrupt) law. I understand your point, but as long as men can be imprisoned upon the whim of a child or a woman, it is relevant to ask if the same could happen to a woman
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:41 AM
19

women who kill their children are poor victims of the brute male who is guilty of getting them pregnant in the first place. Women don't kill children unless pressured and driven by abusive men, be it their fathers or the boy friends. \sarcasm They need due process, and feminists defend them with almost as much zeal as they defend victimized women who know no way out then to poison, or shoot their sleeping abusers /more sarcasm
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:40 AM
6

absolutely feminists even congregate to help penis cutting women like Lorena Bobbitt Imagine men excusing Jack the Ripper. "He has been hurt by female rejection! " Women defend women who shoot sleeping men in the back. Men try to be just and impartial. The differences are staggering. Soon it will be illegal to criticize poor victim Lorena Bobbitt
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:53 AM
1

you don't understand what EQUALITY means for feminists EQUALITY means what feminists FEEL is equality, not what male patriarch logic defines as equality. Have you ever seen a feminist being prosecuted for hate speech? This will be as rare as rape prosecution, and unjust arrest of women for domestic violence they did not commit (happens to men all the time) Equality is not what you think it is.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:40 AM
0

proof? links? Or is this feminist logic? If women aren't equally capable in boxing, it must be that they are not interested in boxing. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:31 AM
1

were these girls equally talented as the boys? or they just got in through quotas? Or did they systematically dumb down the boys?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:29 AM
2

why are more men interested in math? Probably because they have, well, more interest. And probably because they are better at it. And, if after decades of promoting women, the gap persists, probably there is a gap. duh Oh, never forget, men have a greater VARIANCE at almost all traits. That means they are overrepresented at the very top of almost every talent. And at the bottom. Even if the averages are equal. Google: Roy Baumeister variance
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:27 AM
2

knowledge is dangerous. If you find there is a reason why almost all chess grandmasters are men, then you can not cry discrimination any more And then there might be a inborn reason why most CEO are men. That is not allowed to be true
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:23 AM
1

as long as we have quota this is very relevant If there are not enough female math professors at top elite Universities, then by feminist dogma, it MUST be discrimination and some type of affirmative action must be put in place Equally, if there are not enough women in prison, something has to be done to reduce the number of men and put more women in prison /sarcasm And if there are not enough female chess grandmasters, that also must be discrimination: women are scared to get enough wins and po…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 08:21 AM
12

List of black serial killers just nobody cares about Blacks killing Blacks. Even black civil rights activists don't care.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:34 PM
15

The guy put a video up on youtube. He did NOT ask her Guess it is the fault of the 2 million people who upvoted this. Had everone ignored the stunt, nothing would have happened, slate would not write about it. Did the kid FORCE Kate Upton to reply? He did not even walk up to her. He did not talk to her. He did not oblige her to give him a second of her attention. It was HER choice to look at the video and to reply. So he is to blame for putting up a video on youtube. He is to blame that he manag…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:28 PM
11

I would not be so optimistic Feminists passed so many laws that nobody would have dreamt of rape laws, child support laws, mandatory arrest laws for men who get beaten by their wife, debtor's prison for men, Life in prison for possession of computer files with photos, prohibition of prostitution in sex liberal Sweden Nobody would have dreamt any of this 50 years ago. I hope you are right ........
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:09 PM
10

I heard that some other nordic county (Denmark? Holland?) actually thinks that it is good for mental health to provide an occasional prostitute visit to social welfare recipients. Anyone has links?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:57 PM
11

Changes to GCSE examinations in England could disadvantage girls and see their results fall, teachers warn. Girls have been outperforming boys in GCSEs at grades A*-C for more than 20 years, data shows Girls outperformed boys for 20 years. Their results must not fall, compared to boys. All is clear? feminism wants equality /sarcasm
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:54 AM
5

wrong example. We oblige companies to hire 25% people with short ear lobes. Ear lobes become a criterion in the choice of members of the board of directors. And midgets make up 1% of the population but 0% in the board rooms. We need a 0.7% quota for midgets in board rooms. It is a feminist fairy tale that men don't allow women to thrive. Women, on average, don't work hard enough to make it to the top. (google Warren Farrell) With rare exception, and those hard working and highly qualified women …
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:17 AM
24

What does that have to do with men's right? Someone really asked this in all earnest? Companies can not hire and promote the best, they have to promote women and stop promoting men that have higher qualification. For the sake of equality! And in this article they cite that this reduces the value of companies. Makes sense, if these companies must put unqualified, inexperienced women on their board of directors Promotion stop for men at Siemens to achieve "voluntary" women quota So, injustice agai…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:09 AM
3

exactly this feminist lie is being disproven by a host of citations in this paper.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:00 AM
6

r/mr had a story on the conviction of a man for poking holes into condoms I think he got a year in prison NO pussy pass for men ...
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:12 PM
4

welcome to the new world order It took feminists only 100 years to destroy 2000 years of men's progress towards due process and constitutional rights.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:06 PM
4

it should But it ain't This is what is wrong with our legal system And feminist rape hysteria and false statistics got us there. They lobbied to get the laws changed, and applied differently.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:03 PM
5

This is the essence of the problem. It seems feminists are the originators of such false myths, that women never lie about rape. Confounding therapeutic empathy with facts, with legal (un) due process, creating a presumption of guilt, destroying constitutional rights of the accused. And those who seek rape counselors are probably not the ones that maliciously level false accusations for petty revenge. These false theories led to the terrible situation that any vindictive, confused, or neurotic w…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 10:57 PM
4

read my other comment. Deterrence is needed to keep the false rape culture in check. Women know they can ruin a guy's life while taking no personal risk. This is the root cause of the false rape epidemic
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:26 AM
21

White knights at r/mensrights. A large number of non-violent, non-criminal, non-lying men are in prison or suffer through years of embarrassing and bankrupting court proceedings due to false accusations by lying women. Deterrence is needed to stop this false rape culture. Read Pierce Harlan's false rape society and cotwa (cotwa.org? cotwa.info? "community of the falsely accused")
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:25 AM
9

There might be a racial aspect to this too. Too bad the race of victim and perpetrators are not mentioned. I ought to say "alleged victim", but most likely a rape kit will show that violent anal sex has happened. A false rape accusation is not very likely
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:17 AM
53

Consider how rampant AIDS is in South Africa. And how you catch it much more easily via anal sex.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:15 AM
2

A real genetic father. Step fathers are not as good. Do you have the statistics if a step father is still better then no male in the household? I suspect that a civilized middle class step dad is better, a lower class drug addicted father is worse then none.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:54 AM
0

I am sorry to see that even MRA were totally brainwashed by feminist arguments. Even Scientific Research does not convince them. Why should men be told not to walk through gang area at 2 am wearing the colors of the rival gangs? Men have the right to wear what they want and walk where they want. "Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am. We don’t deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:49 AM
2

Ìf you don't marry me you don't get sex This is real duress The marriage is obviously invalid
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:21 AM
2

If she truly qualified as a strong athletic women: She still would try to avoid to get into serious danger white knights would still be the first ones to check out dangerous situations to keep the fellow woman worker out of harm's way check the military or any other occupation where females are making inroads.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:55 AM
1

While Kutcher moved on with 29-year-old Kunis in July, Moore struggled to cope with the split. She entered rehab in February soon after collapsing at her Beverly Hills home. She had been smoking ‘an incense-like substance’ as well as inhaling nitrous oxide. Her relationship with her three daughters with ex-husband Bruce Willis - Rumer, 24, Scout, 21, and Tallulah, 18, - also came under strain last year.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:35 AM
2

you give unlimited power to anyone, you have a risk. The girl has the total power to solicit police and courts to totally screw you over, arrest you, imprison you, kick you out of your house. It needs extremely good character for a person to never ever take advantage of such a power. Even if you cheat on her, even if you really behave like an asshole, if you get fat, sick, ugly and grumpy. Whenever something displeases her she has infinite power. Be scared
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:43 AM
7

Feminism can not change too much about physics. Except demanding that a women's studies major ought to earn as much as a physicist. But they change anything that has political relevance and where they can somehow fudge statistics and facts without being 100% obviously wrong.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 08:36 AM
1

do you have any basis for your optimism? Are you aware that the European parliament just rubber-stamps most of these laws? Who would vote against women? Which majority of countries would reject Equality for women? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:54 PM
3

not when there are plenty of white knights and girlies to help you If she is alone in a deserted forest, yes, she can choke him out Then she has to put him to sleep for safety
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:45 PM
11

And as this is a very under-reported and hard to prove crime, reduce the burden of proof to "preponderance of evidence" to make it easier to imprison women who sexually and monetarily assault men by sabotaging birth control Probably would put 20% of women in the slammer.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:27 PM
4

Don't downvote, this is a great explanation. Basas, you ought to end with /sarcasm or anything showing you don't quite agree with this interpretation. Especially, men can not decide about their wallets, bank accounts and freedom to stop working (go to prison as deadbeat dads)
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:48 PM
12

dream on. You think from now on women who sabotage birth control will spend a few years in the slammer for sexual assault or rape? And, maybe give money for the man for his suffering knowing he has an unwanted kid? Dream on. Will never happen. Not in the next few years You'd better pity the dumb guy for getting too much of a penalty for what women have always been doing
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:46 PM
1

Posted this in world politics and Libertarian, please lend support there I suggest you post elsewhere, like WTF!
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:13 AM
4

Are you aware that a large part of the world will be officially governed by feminist injustice against men, enforced by law and penalties? Porn, work, salaries, politics, company governance, elections, all is covered, all is determined to get EQUALITY for women. Clear equality of outcome. For unequal performance, unequal work, unequal professions, unequal danger, unequal strength, unequal work hours, unequal ambition. Women can just relax and the job offers will arrive. After all, for every high…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:55 AM
3

Call for Action First of all, we should use the service provided by Rick Falkvinge. By sending an e-mail to [email protected], that e-mail will be automatically directed to ALL members of the European Parliament. Write them and state your objections. Do it even if you are not a EU citizen. You can use any official language of the EU, though English, German or French are preferable. Second, if you are a EU citizen, contact your local representative in your national parliament and…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:48 AM
9

In the richest and biggest conglomerate of highly industrialized nations of the world, a group of commissioners without democratic legitimation put extremely anti-male legislation to be voted and approved next week. In the name of EQUALITY, women must get equal pay for unequal work. Higher pay is ok too, of course. women must get equal numbers of top jobs, even if they are not qualified, don't work enough, are not motivated enough or if there are not enough women all these quotas are BINDING and…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:47 AM
4

In Massachusetts a bill backed by a group called "Reform Massachusetts Alimony Laws Now!" has 72 sponsors and would require a spouse receiving alimony to become self-sufficient, or attempt to, after a reasonable time. That would establish alimony as a temporary payment instead of a permanent entitlement, as is often the case now. A second bill, in the state Senate, would modify the law less radically by adding "duration" to the factors judges can consider when setting alimony payments. LESS RADI…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:30 AM
15

** from your shocking link Paul and Theresa Taylor were married for 17 years. He was an engineer for Boston's public-works department, while she worked in accounting at a publishing company. They had three children, a weekend cottage on the bay and a house in the suburbs, on a leafy street called Cranberry Lane. In 1982, when they got divorced, the split was amicable. She got the family home; he got the second home. Both agreed "to waive any right to past, present or future alimony." But recentl…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:26 AM
7

I always thought so too. Divorce is an end to marriage, a separation. But in reality, divorce means: all the woman's obligations end The man's obligations continue, even stronger. Because now he has to support 2 households, being that the woman's household has to have the same status it had before His own household can lapse into poverty. His future second wife may be liable to participate in payment to his first wife If he is an athlete or artist whose income decreases, that is grounds for impr…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:25 AM
7

I always thought so too. Divorce is an end to marriage, a separation. But in reality, divorce means: all the woman's obligations end The man's obligations continue, even stronger. Because now he has to support 2 households, being that the woman's household has to have the same status it had before His own household can lapse into poverty. His future second wife may be liable to participate in payment to his first wife If he is an athlete or artist whose income decreases, that is grounds for impr…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:23 AM
1

He was ordered out of his house, for some domestic violence issue. He obeyed, he was ordered to lie on the ground and then heard the noise of the dog chewing on his leg. The officer said : "get him boy". The doctor first thought the leg would have to be amputated. ** from the victim's statement in the video.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:16 AM
1

Critics say the frequency and severity of bites on innocent people are tied directly to training. Most U.S. dogs are trained to “bite and hold,” releasing their prey only on orders from their handlers. In Europe, dogs are trained to track prey, but rather than attack, they are taught to circle and bark at the target — a technique known as “find and bark” or “bark and contain.” The dog bites only if the suspect attempts to flee or the dog or handler is attacked. Both the U.S. Department of Justic…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:13 AM
2

Note that Lagarde is only chief of International Monetary Fund because Dominique Strauss-Kahn was sacked for unproven rape accusations. I somehow suspect that she got the post because she is a woman but I can not find any evidence. She certainly has qualifications, but being a woman certainly helps to get preference.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:03 AM
2

As Minister Lagarde pointed out, she wasn’t always a fan of quotas, but some things are just too resistant to change. Legislation currently before the Senate in France would require that corporate boards be 40% female within six years. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ellengrasso/2010/10/15/womens-forum-christine-lagarde-favors-temporary-quotas/
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:02 AM
2

She has made it a part of her routine on her many trips to have at least one conversation exclusively with women, no matter where she is. Men, even her life partner Giocanti, are forbidden. She sends Giocanti and a group of other men to a seafood restaurant, along with the "staff" and several Malawian ministers, who tell him dirty jokes about life in Africa over a few bottles of Carlsberg beer and South African wine. Meanwhile, Lagarde and 26 women are sitting next door in the Golden Peacock, a …
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:01 AM
2

are you telling me that feminists think women do need no empowering in Europe and the USA? That men are under-privileged in these countries and need help?
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:29 PM
15

probably he was drunk. Also some people don't have reflexes I think everyone should have some martial arts training, then this would not happen.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 07:27 PM
3

It is absolutely amazing that a man gets off the hook: 50.01% chance that the did it ==> conviction add to that that all members of the committee are feminist inspired, and had mandatory classes teaching them then women don't lie about rape and when a man looks credible it proves he is an expert liar. That mens that if a reasonable person give 10% chance he did it, these people already would give 50.01% chance. In other words, her story must totally lack all credibility. Just think of it, how ma…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:24 PM
2

what the f... is the problem with the sexual objectification of female bodies? It hurts some feminist feelings. And being ordered to pay 20 years of child support to feed your ex addiction to buying expensive clothes? this does not just hurt feelings. This is TRUE financial confiscation, financial "rape". Catcalls and taking away 50% of earnings for 20 years are NOT the same. Only feminism makes you believe that catcalls or ogling are worse then financial slavery. We are all creatures indoctrina…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:23 AM
13

Nice description Unfortunately, it is not humorous. It is dead serious It is life. It is feminist repression. It is men going to prison, boys being disciplined. It is not a joke. It is serious. It is repression of boys and men. It has serious real life consequences Still, thanks for your clear description
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:19 AM
6

exactly this is an argument for never giving anonymity to rape victims, I mean accusers Or only in totally clear proven forcible rape cases where there is lots of corroborating evidence.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:07 PM
3

We need to reject new male editors to Wikipedia until at least 40% of editors are women. This is what they do to European boards of directors, and what Daimler Benz and Siemens do on all level. Don't promote men until you promoted enough women past them to get at least 20% women ( a difficult feat in engineering)
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:55 AM
6

The law is totally stacked against you. So much that even if the woman generously gives up all rights she could demand, the government still might take away child support moneys from you. Feminist laws make it impossible for good men to marry and have children. Or rather, you can marry and have children but you are absolutely chanceless if you ever have a conflict with your wife. If she has excellent character and resists the suggestions of the law and all her friends, you have a small chance to…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:02 AM
1

sounds good BUT do you have links to serious respectable legal sites or top rate newspaper articles that back up what you say? And what you say is valid in which states and countries?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:56 AM
2

right. And tax payers who pay for incompetent incapable people hired for ideological reasons, useless at the job they were hired to fill a quota. And the competent fire men risk more, because they have to pick up the slack and work double
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:53 AM
0

it is "these women". All the women that entered without the qualification to pass the men's entrance test. Probably 95% of the women. I would guess 90% to 98% of the females hired for their gender don't pass the entrance test for men. I would guess that 80% of the general population of men would not pass either.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:51 AM
3

it is about genders Feminists want 50% woman as fire fighters. If you add all the top athlete women, all the strong and heavy women, of all Sweden, you probably don't find enough women who would pass serious physical entrance tests to "man" (pun intended) the fire brigades. Passing equal tests men have to pass. Tests that prove they have the aptitude to be fire-women. It is funny how many people argue that there are the exceedingly rare women who actually can physically compete with men. When wi…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:49 AM
4

men don't get hired in the first place, if they don't pass historically valid aptitude tests Makes no sense to fire women who are too weak. They should not be hired in the first place if they don't pass the test with the same standards
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:44 AM
6

Don't think they lower the standards for males. They simply hire lots of incompetent females who are not up to the task. You must be referring to the 0.3% of the woman who can keep up with the 20% strongest men (and none keeps up with the 5% strongest men) I am making up these numbers, but you get the idea. Very few women have the power and strength, and skills to break into reinforced doors and carry 250 lbs unconscious victims.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:43 AM
8

That is the point. It was fairly customary that men had the greatest risks and sacrifices The opposite of feminist partriarchy theory That has a lot to do with MRA
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:20 PM
10

Dangerously incompetent fire fighters, weakened by gender quotas,
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:07 PM
17

http://www.d-intl.com/equal-rights-for-firemen-constitutes-a-public-hazard/#.USqazFfuqiN Peter Bergh says that the union, which represents around 9,000 of the 15,000 Swedish firefighters, has been watching with increasing concern how the emergency services in recent years have focused more and more on diversity, and accordingly less on professional skills. “In 2011, in cooperation with Centrum för Rättvisa (’Center for Justice’), we brought a case to court concerning a Swedish firefighter who, i…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:02 PM
11

How many lives is enforced workplace equality worth? This is an entirely fair question, because we must ask at what point the right to life is trumped by the modern privilege of pretending that men and women are exactly equal in every ability. Unfortunately, I doubt an answer will be forthcoming.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:58 PM
1

excellent. You might scare some readers here, though You forgot a few laws: Slavery has been abolished. People are allowed to stop working. To move elsewhere. To file bankruptcy and start anew. To pursue happiness. Not 20 years of forced labor under the punishment of imprisonment. These men can never start a new family, because which woman wants a husband who has zero money after paying his old support
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:55 PM
3

percentage of his PAST income. Were he still married he would be allowed to fail and make less money
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:32 PM
25

Somehow women think that guy's ordeal is equal or less then a woman who consented to sex at a date but who was a little drunk when she consented. Feminist re-definition of rape is a serious problem and diminishes true suffering
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:22 AM
1

there is one guarantee: the woman will get your money. With very rare exceptions, like if you don't have income and she does
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:28 AM
0

guaranteed sex? Be prepared for potential rape accusations. Guaranteed pay to your wife, yes. Even after separation. With no sex. If your wife stops having sex with you, what will you do? Now if the man stops having sex, I think it is considered abusive (anyone has the link?)
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:26 AM
2

what is the basis for your optimism?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:23 AM
1

From my memory (please google the literature) Condoms perfectly used have about 2% pregnancy rate per year. This can be increased by using one more method, concurrently: spermicides, withdrawal (not coming even inside the condom), rhythm methods like cervical mucus plus basal temperature (don't come in the condom during fertile period). Additionally make sure woman does not boycott your condoms. Don't give her a chance to puncture the condom. Make sure there is an air cushion inside the condom w…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:46 AM
29

Each year 100,000 men are jailed for alleged non-payment of child support, and many others lose their driver’s licenses, passports and business licenses. This is despite the fact that Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement data reveal that nationwide 70% of those behind on payments earn poverty level wages, and less than 5% earn $40,000 a year. Fathers who want to share in parenting their children face many obstacles. In a study conducted by Arizona State University psychology professor San…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:38 AM
1

Certainly you can. You get a paternity lab recognized by AABB (?) the American Association of Blood banks (?)/ They send you swabs or whatever speciment collection items. They can go anywhere in the world. Each one takes the specimen and sends it in. If you totally trust each other, that is it. Otherwise you can get it notarized, and shipped by a notary or other person of your trust. So nobody can send in false DNA samples. Again, it depends on what you need it for. If it is supposed to have leg…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:08 PM
9

Do you have press links?
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:39 PM
3

I keep reading headlines that women control 60% or more of world spending and shopping It makes some sense: women earn money of their own, and get money from men's earnings too. In Western Countries, Women's money = their own plus the one received by men Man's money = their own earnings minus what they give to women But, please help with research links
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:35 PM
2

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2106476/?ref_=sr_1 follow the links and you find trailers and more Of course, the movie is not from US Hollywood. It is made in Denmark.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:31 PM
0

A proper understanding of the basis of pair-bonding provides a clear window on the reality – rather than the deliberate misrepresentation – of domestic violence (which, when you factor in the huge sex-differential in under-reporting, is preponderantly female perpetrated; and by a large margin). With the pair-bond being primarily in the female interest, featuring male mate-guarding and male attachment as services to the female rather than male proprietorial control, then the spotlight shifts on t…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:21 PM
1

it is probably closer to 25% of male applicants and 0.3% of female applicants. If the same standards are applied. Including running at the same speed, carrying 120 lbs of gear, not suffering from monthly menstrual crises or cramps, Add to that that males get totally distracted by females who are injured or imprisoned by the enemy ..........
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:51 PM
2

link please? Also explain why recorded proof of being assaulted by a woman is totally useless. At least serves as a defense against HIM being arrested. I hope
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:21 PM
1

if you leave you might have to pay to her for a long time she could always file a restraining order and accuse you of assault, dv, or rape you can not win
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:18 PM
13

shocking interesting. But who is this guy that is visible on the screen? Really distracting and disturbing. If we can't see the victim, at least don't put another person into the movie. Leave it blank
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:43 PM
2

If you are really interested, here are plenty of links to the literature about underage sex hysteria and repression of academic peer reviewed research by the US Congress and Senate I know, I will be downvoted. Can not stop mentioning unpopular research
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:11 PM
7

Today, Judge Patrick Thomas QC said he did not believe the incident on November 29, 2011, 'arose out of paedophilia' but was a 'one-off'. How strange. A man who got fooled by a fake ID, or who picked up a 17 year old in a 21 and older bar, it is never a 'one-off' Do I see pussy pass and special privileges for the matriarchy? Wheeler, from Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, was given a two-year prison sentence suspended for two years at Birmingham Crown Court. Judge Thomas said the three boys had made …
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:07 PM
8

in their culture, the man probably wants to check out the unknown medical service before submitting wife and children to it. Stupid to change this.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:26 PM
4

The leaked draft contains a list of "taboo conversation topics" that soldiers should try to avoid, including "making derogatory comments about the Taliban," "advocating women’s rights" an "any criticism of pedophilia." Of course, the practice of child molestation is rampant throughout Afghanistan and regularly practiced by many Afghan men. In 2009, The Ottawa Citizen reported the claim made by a former Canadian soldier, that while deployed, he saw two Afghan police officers sodomize a young boy …
/r/MensRights30/01/13 10:39 AM
1

Mensrights downvotes this into oblivion. (3 down, 1 up, plus one up by the poster) Dont see it fit to discuss alternative life styles for men that want to escape the feminist dictate (I mean discuss, one may disagree) It is sad men don't even want to discuss, don't even want to spend their time to disagree with a well written interesting article ................. even 2x does not downvote this http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/17j6k5/the_luxury_rental_girlfriend/ also see here htt…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 10:30 AM
2

She says, “I have very long blonde hair & soft skin with amazing eyes & great smile. My outgoing personality will have you feeling very comfortable from the moment we meet, as if we have known each other for years.” And that’s the main ticket. That’s why guys like Jack hire Jessicas for $1,000 a night instead of paying $200 for dinner with the lawyer who’s got a CrossFit addiction. The Bai Xis give you the same thing. Why go out with a Wife in Training when you can go out with the Perpetual Girl…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 10:27 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dnv8gR9e8aA&NR=1&feature=endscreen this has some written text for those with a little spanish to understand the spoken words
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:33 AM
1

watch the total lack of respect the wife and the daughters have for the man. In a latin country a daughter is supposed to obey to the father. Well, guess they are obeying the mother .........
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:08 AM
3

what is the motorbike? I suspect the wife and daughter pulled the lover women off the motor bike, which would be totally clearly an assault But they drive away in the car. In spite of another woman having been victim of violence. If she cheated first, that would be an additional justification for him. But it is not needed to show and prove illegal violent assault by the family against the other girl and the man. I would be very worried about the future safety of the girl lover. She will be attac…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:06 AM
3

Great article. nondescript title. Rich handsome successful intelligent men choosing to spend 50 000 a year on escorts then getting girl friends ........ Comes much cheaper in the long run. At least the way feminist anti male laws are stacked against men
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:59 AM
3

shocking. The man uses the minimum violence to defend himself Not enough violence to get the aggressor daughter to stop pulling his lover's hair. And is instantly arrested. What weapon did the wife have in her hand towards the end?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:52 AM
2

Thanks to VAWA, once a father is accused of DV, his chances of keeping his family (or his assets, his reputation, his friends, often even his job) are almost nil. Conversely, most mothers have to commit “front page news” crimes to lose custody of their children. VAWA provides billions of dollars for programs that “protect women from their abusers.” Yet it provides virtually nothing to help men or children escape their abusers, if those abusers are women. VAWA addresses less that half of the DV i…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:38 AM
1

and if she can carry her own equipment on her back. or if the heavier guy should volunteer carrying some of the woman's equipment. If he weighs 250 lbs it is only fair if he carries the 40 lbs the woman can not carry /sarcasm
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:49 PM
2

right
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:55 PM
4

I did not mean divorce means the man has all obligations, even more. Work, pay, ... The man loses all rights: no sex, no child visit, no dinner at home, no right to sleep at his home, .......
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:32 AM
6

Right. Divorce should be just that Part Everyone goes his/her own way The End. Before reading r/mensrights I thought that no-fault divorce was just that. You decide you don't want to be together. So you part. divorce.. And live your independent lives. As any other single person would do. If you have kids, whoever wants to keep the kids pays for them
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:47 AM
1

well, are you fighting against male obligations to pay child support under all circumstances? Or do you only want to exempt women?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:42 AM
5

he probably is too nice to do that. Like most men. And the courts, of course, will not be too sympathetic But, for the sake of MRA, he should do it. To set an example, ....
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:34 PM
5

If you cannot get the name, you can send the press clipping and tell them about your (our) concern.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:26 PM
-15

And please, let’s talk about menstruation. It tends to happen around once a month for women of a child-bearing age, but the stress and physical rigor of combat can trigger disruptions to that cycle — leading to increased health risks. Not to mention that, according to one 2007 survey, women in the military reported worsened menstrual symptoms during deployment, along with “difficulties in maintaining both personal and menstrual hygiene” and “general discomfort,” both physical and psychological, …
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:11 PM
-16

while women are playing increasingly valuable roles in the U.S. military, our armed forces are still ill-prepared to care for the distinct needs of this growing female cohort. are the roles they play really valuable? I only see that there are huge expenses for their distinct needs. There should be no question that women are entirely able to serve close to the front lines, and even on them. As I noted in an editorial for The Guardian earlier this year, more than 225,000 women have deployed to Ira…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:48 PM
2

a libertarian would say, that free enterprise can hire and give salaries as they please But, it is not so, and women need to get special attention and advantage, by law So your question is very legitimate Are you WHITE male? then you have no chance If you are black and she is white, then you also have a trump card. Or are you gay, or some protected minority?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:45 AM
6

what reasons do you think there could be discrimination? are the bosses women?? do they have quotas for females?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:44 AM
7

maybe sit next to a FATHER?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:39 AM
5

Anthony's petition for bankruptcy laid out a financial situation drained by her trial, which became a media fixation. At one point, ABC News paid Anthony $200,000 for photographs, with the money then reportedly going toward Anthony's pricey legal defense. That money is gone now, replaced by debts to scores of people and businesses, many for unspecified legal fees and "consulting fees" from medical and forensic services, according to the disclosure. Most of the amounts owed were listed as "unknow…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:38 AM
6

Imagine the debt of all the men innocently accused of rape, abuse, .......... Legal defense is very expensive. In Casey Anthony's case, well, I wait for your opinions. Note also: there is no bankruptcy for men who can not afford spousal support. Like artists, athletes whose income plummets and alimony and child support don't. Because ex-wives must always maintain the life style they have grown accustomed to. The bread-winning men does not
/r/MensRights28/01/13 08:35 AM
8

good points. Really good points. See the points I made in my other comment: Why can strong empowered women with good jobs not feed their own children. And why does a man who pays automatically have rights: to check where his money goes, to see the kid, the determine what HIS money is spent for.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:07 PM
17

It always amazes me: feminism empowers women. They need a man like a fish needs a bicycle. So why can't they make enough money to feed their own child? Especially if they got a great professional qualification? Why do they need a man to feed them? How could widows, wives of prisoners or of poor guys survive? If women really want a man's money, why would they not, at least, be required to be nice to him, let him see the child and let him choose how to spend HIS money. Not for the woman's shoes, f…
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:05 PM
14

and usually does not destroy the life of the victim, especially if she is 17 and it was totally consensual
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:04 PM
1

when I did a mace class in California I was warned that aggressive use of mace is a felony, assault with a dangerous weapon.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:36 PM
1

Did the store clerk sound the alarm and get police for assault? If he did not, it is probably negligence and against store policy The victim was too stupid and did not scream for police. Pussy pass everywhere
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:34 PM
10

The same doctors who believed Bigham was insane at the time of her toddler’s death re-examined her and testified Tuesday that her sanity is restored. But prosecutors argue there isn’t enough evidence to support that claim, and say she’s still a danger to society. But the judge disagreed and released her immediately. Bigham can’t be re-tried for murder because of double jeopardy laws
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:14 PM
1

As MRA we are proud to be impartial and honest So we have #1 rated the youtube defense of Michael Ryan. Does anyone know if he is telling the truth? If he did not contest, and then by legal practice it is presumed true, then he has not much to complain Except that even battered women ought not hire killers with impunity
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:53 PM
1

you got a point. Anything about the libertarian stance towards mra? Probably non-interference in salaries, hiring, school, fire brigades, language, freedom to tell jokes, look at photos, have sex, ........ But I am not so sure ................
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:24 PM
1

http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01/21/nicole-ryan-michael-ryan/ What is the truth? Was he extremely abusive? or it is all unproven? Of course, even if this is totally true, this still leaves the question why women get the pussy pass and can hire hit men.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:16 PM
1

you can agree on some points, and disagree on others And if you are a man, ruined by family court and by false accusations, MRA is the main topic of your life. If someone supports your survival, you don't care that much if they have some other opinions different from yours. Also are you not afraid that all the liberal MRA scare off the conservatives?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:20 AM
2

Even if you are a democrat. With Biden and Hillary, do you see any chance whatsoever the democratic party dropping virulent feminism and embracing mra? That leaves only the republicans. And even if you think many of them are whacko, most tea party people do NOT support radical feminism.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:05 AM
1

aren't we lucky that gay boys don't usually make false rape accusations? I wonder why?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:06 PM
2

they still can charge you with harassment, while at work. You must not be at home alone with the babysitter either Men can not win Men can not be safe. Can be accused and arrested be it day or night. Similar to a feminist slogan, we need to start a movement "Let us take back the night, and the day"
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:04 PM
2

You are allowed to discriminate against whites, heterosexuals, and men, young to middle age. Nobody else. Old people, Blacks, gays, women, you must not even joke about them
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:57 PM
-3

Tried to post this to r/2x. "You are not allowed to post here" Anyone else is allowed? Or is it because it is from AVM? then someone could post a text post. Can a woman beg to be raped? | Video of a piss drunk woman begging, insisting, to be taken home and have lots of sex. Which, by law, is rape, because she is drunk. Woman angry about refusal to rape her. r/mensrights asks feminist opinion
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:43 AM
-5

Tried to post this to r/2x. "You are not allowed to post here" Anyone else is allowed? Or is it because it is from AVM? then someone could post a text post. Can a woman beg to be raped? | Video of a piss drunk woman begging, insisting, to be taken home and have lots of sex. Which, by law, is rape, because she is drunk. Woman angry about refusal to rape her. r/mensrights asks feminist opinion
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:20 AM
-2

absolutely right But don't you know, women are frequently not responsible for their acts. That is the law. /sarcasm (or is it just a true factual statement) If someone gives you 5 dollars, and was not able to consent due to total intoxication, you don't get robbery charges and 5 years in prison. Rather you give the 5 dollars back and that is it.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:13 AM
5

right There should be a designated driver, and a designated caretaker for drunk people.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:11 AM
6

How many women were ever charged, much less convicted, of having consensual sex with a drunk male? Has any male ever gotten reprieve from rape charges, because he was drunk when he CONSENSUALLY raped a woman? Why do feminists have to call everything RAPE, conflating the murderous Indian kidnap rapists with consensual acts between boyfriend and girlfriend?
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:09 AM
5

Court records show Shipman divorced her husband of 19 years last year and six days later married 17-year-old student Johnnie Ray Ison. His mother signed documents allowing him to marry while a minor. One might think of the divorce as immoral. Hopefully the divorce had no immoral false accusations or exaggerated alimony payments. But if she had sex with they boy, then the marriage probably was not in good shape anyway
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:03 PM
6

The marriage prevented prosecutors from compelling Ison to testify against Shipman. A spouse can't be forced to testify against the defendant in most criminal cases. There are very serious people who think the 17 year old is more traumatized by being force to testify in court, most likely against his will, then by sex with an older woman.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:02 PM
2

One of those rare cases played out in Rockingham Superior Court Tuesday when Joshua McDermott, 29, of Rochester, was sentenced to 10 to 20 years in the New Hampshire state prison for raping another male inmate assigned to the same cell, according to Rockingham County Attorney Jim Reams. The 35-year-old victim, said Reams, was incarcerated for being a habitual offender — meaning he was jailed for driving-related offenses. Rape for traffic offenses talking cruel and unusual punishment ........
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:00 AM
1

actually, if he spit into her face, this somewhat changes things she still was outrageously challenging him moving into his space too closely But if he replies with spitting to her moving in and screaming, then he escalated the level of violence But still, the girl behaved in ways that would get a guy, righteously, punched in the face, not just spit ........
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:51 AM
4

Isn't it nice how her face is being blacked out? We have to protect the identity of victims (ahem instigators) of violence. Pussy pass r/mensrights has her video without censorship elsewhere
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:39 AM
5

If the genders were inverted, and a recording existed, the aggressor would be suspended, or arrested.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:02 AM
1

What is needed is a good school environment Where the bullies get punished and controlled Which is hard, as proof is needed Your kid probly needs to carry a cam at all times
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:46 AM
3

It only took one beat down by me on three people to end the abuse, one was my older brother, one was my father, and one was a kid in school that called me a faggot. beat down on father? That deserves an explanation. Did you get into martial arts?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:44 AM
2

forgot the /sarcasm sorry
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:49 AM
1

If this was a woman: " all women are bitches" there would be uproar. Headlines all over the place. Hillary Clinton weighing in. http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/editorials/2002/0507a.html If this was a black man, there would be uproar. " All Blacks are bastards" or " all blacks are robbers" It is only funny if the stabbing victim is male, and white.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:22 AM
2

Remember that back in the 80′s women sportswriters sued the NFL because they were not allowed in the men’s locker rooms. They claimed that they were being unfairly discriminated against. The men’s right to privacy was completely abdicated and the women have been in the locker rooms ever since with naked men running around. The feminists argued that the right to privacy allowed them to kill their unborn children, but they did not see irony in denying a man to his right to privacy in the locker ro…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:15 AM
-8

The author does not even mention: Women say: My body my decision How come men can not say: my wallet, my decision?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:13 AM
2

original article about 89% of sex abuse cases false http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=pt-BR&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jutarnji.hr%2F89-posto-prijava-protiv-oceva-je-lazno%2F260583%2F&act=url
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:31 PM
-5

if they are women, they are not even guilty if the do damage He had it coming, he must have done something bad to her
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:27 PM
5

Croatia has the highest percentage of women being deployed to war zones from the entire NATO alliance, although women are subjected to lower standards than men (while being paid the same). Of course, 100% of the Croatian military personnel that died in NATO wars so far were men. But this doesn’t seem to matter for the countless offices and ombudspersons for ‘gender equality’ in Croatia. The Croatian government is currently “debating” a new initiative which provides that all women who have been r…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:24 PM
8

Judge overrides marriage contract of Maple Leaf Foods CEO Michael McCain The CEO of Maple Leaf Foods has been ordered to pay his ex-wife $175,000 a month in interim spousal support after an Ontario judge struck down parts of a marriage contract meant to keep the family's wealth within the bloodline. At its heart lies a marriage contract said to have been imposed by Michael McCain's late father, Wallace McCain, who co-founded McCain Foods. Court documents show the elder McCain threatened to disow…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:39 AM
8

G is general intelligence. The analysis of sex differences in cognitive abilities is largely confusing because these differences are masked by the pervasive influence of the general factor of intelligence (g). In this study a battery of five reasoning tests (abstract [AR], numerical [NR], verbal [VR], mechanical [MR], and spatial [SR]) was completed by a sample of 3233 young and old adolescents representative of the population. Using a latent variable approach, mean differences on the general fa…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:36 AM
5

Italy's Berluscioni pays this in a day, to his ex wife. This guy got away really cheaply /s
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:32 AM
1

The second half is from here: http://www.emirates247.com/bollywood/take-one/shah-rukh-women-get-raped-because-men-rape-them-not-because-of-what-they-wear-2012-12-30-1.489045 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki9XuPgYY8o
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:30 AM
9

I have a dream. Of a just world where women are held accountable for their actions. Where it is a crime to name a man as father, if she knows someone else might be the father. If she is unsure, it would be her obligations to do a paternity test. In some just world this would be, just for the 20 year old daughter 12 k per year for expenses for the child, times 20 = 240 k; add interest: 500 000 Punitive damages: double that amount, add 1 million 20 years of work to care for children, and a lost li…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:23 AM
1

. It's unfortunate that there have not been more, though we live in a diverse country in which white Americans are about to become the minority. Never in the 80 years of the FCC has a woman of any race or group been its chair, though women have been the nation's majority for a long time. It is good that whites are becoming a minority. And it is good and that women are a majority and thus need to chair the FCC. Am I getting this right? Becoming minority is great, being majority is great, whatever…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:32 PM
1

and the japanese are not filling up their ranks with low iq high crime immigrants. That will prove a plus in the long run
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:20 AM
1

literature and links, please!
/r/MensRights13/01/13 10:11 AM
11

Attorney Jennifer Forquer agrees, noting that "fathers will routinely be sent to parenting classes" by commissioners. "It doesn't matter if they took paternity leave, if they changed diapers. If a mother makes an allegation that a father's parenting is deficient, he ends up going." If a dad wants to make such an allegation about a mom, she says, "you have to be careful how you present that." Commissioners are not inclined to believe it, she says. By far, though, the most damaging allegation—the …
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:56 PM
1

you could get a written "slave contract" with a video recording of her authorizing you to slap her. That would reduce the danger for you Probably you would need a lawyer to be reasonably safe.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:16 PM
5

Similarly, it may seem hard to believe that “five percent of white men and 28 percent of black men born between 1975 and 1979 spent at least a year in prison before reaching age thirty five”, or that “28 percent of white and 68 percent of black high-school dropouts had spent at least a year in prison by 2009″.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 03:31 PM
3

women ought to pick wisely who they want to serve and obey. If they don't want to, they can stay alone. This is different from men who are drafted if they want it or not. And then have to serve and obey their superiors even if it means death. And disobedience means death penalty Thus is and was male privilege /sarcasm
/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:02 PM
28

The guy is lucky he was the grandfather. Were he a friendly neighbor volunteering to take some fatherless kids to the park, he could be in much more serious trouble The guy who called police was probably a victim of the relentless anti male pedophile campaign. Due to lack of proper information most people internalize this to the point to even see male misbehavior where there is none. I understand the anger against the guy who called the police. But the real culprit are the matriarchy, feminism, …
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:59 PM
17

While women clamor for protection from offense and hate, men have the right to equal protection. A knife block with a man full of knives could desensitize people to real deadly violence and thus this is a bit more offensive and potentially more damaging then a pinup photo at a car repair shop. Personally, I think government ought not to interfere in every single minute issue. I think anything offensive to women and other minorities should be equally allowed.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:17 PM
7

[Summary of] COMPLAINT: Objections, one via an MP, to an ad in a mail order gift catalogue, featured in The Times and The Telegraph, for a knife block. The ad was headlined "ALL MEN ARE BASTARDS KNIFE BLOCK" and showed a picture of the product which was shaped like a man with several knives stuck in his body. ........................ It was "shaped like a man", right? With "several knives stuck in his body", right? However, ... (my underlining) ... ........................ [Summary of] ADJUDICAT…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:01 PM
1

Is feminism an official creed you need to have, in order to be allowed to be in an indoctrination class? Like joining a course to become a catholic priest?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:36 AM
1

Aren't a large percentage of acid attack victims MEN attacked by WOMEN? And nobody talks about them? Sorry, no citation handy ..........
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:28 AM
1

What? Is this the law? Would she scream? Or are you risking to get arrested? Or just safer not to touch/ And don't forget the fact that men are not even allowed to touch women. I don't know, may be I am stupid, but isn't this just another form of untouchability? I have travelled in bus standing for more than 1 hour even though there was a vacant seat available, but the other side was occupied by a lady.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:25 AM
1

right, the killing was in no way intended, much less premeditated.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:42 PM
2

by the way, even if it was only half, that would increase women's violence by 50%. Still very interesting I would not be surprised girls in kindergarten and grade school already using this tactic. Use teachers, other boys, to scare other men. Maybe there are studies about that. Anyway, brainstorming is a good start in absence of hard data. Feminists do that all the time. If the data does not fit the fidget it until it fits. Like the 1 in 4 rape data ........
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:52 PM
1

just posted a defense of your approach next to your comment The name calling at the end was not helpful, but I am shocked you were downvoted so severely. Read my comment ......
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:50 PM
1

I really find it wrong to totally downvote that giegerwasright for making a guess at the women's proxy violence As long as you know it is a guess, it is a good start, if there is no hard data. It would be worth analyzing how many women would seriously beat or kill a man, and how many would rather entice a man to do so. Or even just tell their plight to a man and evoke a violent action in that man, even without intending to evoke it. As long as we know it is a guess, and not put it as the final d…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:45 PM
1

A divorce should be a divorce. Not a wage slavery If Berluscioni ever goes bankrupt, he still will have to pay or go to prison. Might not happen to Berluscioni but happens to other men, like the humorist what's his name
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:57 AM
1

I calculated that Ivana Trump got $ 30 000 for every night she spent with him. After divorce Still less then Berluscioni's wife ............
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:55 AM
2

and people wonder that educated men don't have enough children
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:44 AM
1

"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape There was a later article in inmalafide that increased it to 40 types.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:43 AM
1

"Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:42 AM
1

Well, you got it. All sex is rape (Andreia Dworkin) At least, when the sex is not totally initiated by the woman, it is rape. /sarcasm And as the patriarchy can not be a victim of women, any amount of pressure by a woman is legitimate /s
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:40 AM
1

very sensible. Pity nobody comments. Blame feminist re-definition of language, calling everything rape, and saying everything is equal. And everyone accepted it. Including MRA
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:35 AM
0

Most people imaging child pornography involves sex with CHILDREN under 12 or 10 years. Be aware that simple nude photos of 17 year olds, or young looking 22 year olds are child porn. Remember: feminists are re-defining our language.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:24 PM
1

First of all, 17 year olds are children, and their nude photos are child porn. Now Europe invented the concept of " apparently underage" for 25 year old young looking women with pony tails and small breasts. All this barely legal US stuff is considered child porn in Europe, too. Or at least at risk to be considered child porn. You don't even have to look at it, a thumbnail in your computer cache is enough.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:21 PM
0

Interesting comment. Even for those that disagree, it is interesting to question the firm beliefs and dogmas of one's society.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:44 PM
0

(CNN) -- A 70-year-old man in Saudi Arabia is disputing claims his new bride is 15 years old, and says her family has ripped him off for the large dowry he paid for the union. If he was ripped off, maybe it is a mens rights issue. If there is dishonesty about the age, then too.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:42 PM
2

this IS exceedingly rare. I believe these women recanted and confessed, falsely Normally women accused of false rape accusations fully enjoy their constitutional rights of "innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt". They enjoy due process With due process, there still are false decisions. That is lamentable But those accused of rape get convicted without due process rights. This is what encourages false accusers to come forward. and this what makes false convictions so more frequent.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:35 AM
3

The sampling bias comment refers to this statement Among the cases analyzed, it was extremely rare that women with a normal, "orderly" life (without psychological or social abnormalities) would plan false accusations – to take revenge on a man, to gain financial or other benefits. (p. 265) There is no sampling bias in the study, as it is all rape accusations over an entire year in an entire state 2) you can not know if 50% is ridiculous. You don't see a broad sample of accusers. You don't know h…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:31 AM
1

In the US: Every white person, or black person that lived next to a "ghetto" hears warnings from everyone, including police, not not carelessly stray into there. Especially at night Especially, not to wear red or blue clothes, the color of rivaling gangs. And whoever receives such notification, is grateful and usually tries to stick to such recommendations. Except if they have no other choice, like they have their home in that neighborhood. Then at least they carefully avoid wearing the wrong co…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:39 PM
1

in reality, about 8% are obviously and proven to be false. about 40-60% are estimated to be false, but for lack of prove the male is prosecuted anyway. One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Others are not so lucky
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:32 PM
4

how can you easily disprove a false rape accusation, if her word is enough to convict a man? Mainly dumb women's false accusations get disproved. If an accuser plans it intelligently, it is very hard to prove one's innocence beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:31 PM
1

did you check the link written on the bottom of the graphic????
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:30 PM
-3

She seems to think I'm betraying her by being logical. If feminists had ruled 50 000 years ago, we would still be in the stone age. No logic, no science, only womyn's feelings. This anti-scientific attitude is appalling. About rape apology: in reality, about 8% of rape accusations are obviously and proven to be false. about 40-60% are estimated to be false, but for lack of prove the male is prosecuted anyway. One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:27 PM
1

I saw it here on r/mensrights makes search easier ........
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:21 PM
5

I wish someone made a corrected graph Based on 50% false rape accusations, and whatever estimates are most damning for feminists Furthermore, the conflation of consensual-but-had-3-beer rapes with forcible rapes like the famous case in India is simply appaling It diminishes the experience of victims of real forcible violent rape
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:19 PM
5

in reality, about 8% are obviously and proven to be false. about 40-60% are estimated to be false, but for lack of prove the male is prosecuted anyway. One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Others are not so lucky
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:14 PM
3

worth looking at the pic. Great! Unexpected inversion of power relationship. Woman repressing man!
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:10 PM
6

Conclusion for shareholders: If the CEO's first child is a daughter, fire him/her instantly. S/he is implanting unjust salary policies, giving unfounded pay increase to women. Thus s/he will alienate the hard working successful men who will either leave or continue working but less motivated.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:46 PM
3

Questioning Gender as a Scientific Construct Through questioning science Anne Fausto-Sterling came up with alternatives to the concept of having only two sexes, male and female. She argues that through biological development there is a possibility of having five sexes instead of two. She believes there are male, female, merm, ferm, and herm. It is important to recognize more than two sexes because gender isn’t as black and white as the scientific community leads it to appear.[3]
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:11 AM
2

Questioning normal scientific reasoning is another form of Feminist Method. Strong feminist supporters of this are Nancy Hartsock, Hilary Rose, and finally Sandra Harding.[2] Normal ideas in science are supposed to be objective in reasoning, but this questioning of science draws attention to the fact that nothing can be looked at with an objective view. Instead everything is completely subjective especially when it comes to looking at women. Questioning science argues that science needs to be ap…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:10 AM
1

Yes means No! Forcibly raping a 17 year old is the same rape as consensual love making. "Yes" means "No" You have a girl friend under the local age of consent, and you (unwisely) want to have sex with her. Don't bother to ask for her consent to sex. Just ravish her violently, no matter how much she resists. It makes no difference if she consents or not. Her "yes" means "no", her consent is invalid.…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:07 PM
0

It may be good politics to look more respectable. But let me say that MRA are spineless and scared. But rightfully so, considering the might of feminists. And as I said, if you favor the rights of nazis to demonstrate, that does not mean you are a nazi. And if you are against draconian laws for teenage sex, that does not mean that you are in favor of actually doing it. You want to keep government out. Or you want to give a light punishment. Especially you don't want to criminalize half the the m…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:05 PM
2

Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children not a MR issue. Even though it always goes against BOYS.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:11 PM
6

your son needs to know. He will be on the sex offender list for life, when he gets out of prison Your daughter is less in danger. She will pick a boy friend older then her. And if not, there is always the pussy pass. Not a MR issue?? And again, you can be against teenage sex. But in favor of selectively IMPRISONING boys? Your son needs a lawyer at all times if ever he so much as kisses a girl Teenage sexuality: The immense complexity of local laws, state lines and international travel Do you rem…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:09 PM
2

Some people confuse the following A) wanting to legalize drugs, or homesexualism, or whatever b) promoting drug use or homosexualism or whatever Just keep government out of private behavior. So let fathers and mothers take care of their kid's sexual behavior. No government is needed. And even the staunchest religious conservative might have pity with a guy who spent time in prison for having sex with his future wife and mother of his kids. And then has to sleep elsewhere because as a sex offende…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:03 PM
0

this is just shocking. Feminism won this one for good. Feminists had as a main goal to increase the age of consent. They managed, and MRA just swallow it. Amazing! a) girls mature faster in adolescence then boys b) all over time the marriage age for girls was LOWER then for boys. They knew (a) c) all over the world girls like older man. Be it 2 years older or 10 years. And men like younger girls. So the law automatically catches men. It is directly geared against MALE SEXUALITY. Female sexuality…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:58 PM
5

In New Delhi, which is infamously called the Rape Capital, men are treated like beasts. Since the preconceived notion is that men are the perpetrators and a woman cannot lie about being troubled by a man, even the slightest hint of discomfort shown by a woman could mean doomsday for a man. The rapes that actually do happen are mostly at night when girls roam around unguarded in very bad neighborhoods, but the media portrays it as a crime that happens around the clock in every possible area. I do…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:09 AM
2

The problem that is never stated: the girl did not die of rape she died of being clubbed with metal crow bars or similar stuff Just as many men die of violent beatings every day Just people stress the "rape" part because it causes more outrage.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:00 AM
1

actually, only two can prevent rape a) the woman who behaves imprudently walking down dark alleys in skimpy clothing b) the rapist. Or maybe rapists in general, any rapist who would be prowling dark alleys. It is your guess which one has a better chance to be changed ....... Also would you. equally, say "Black men need to learn not to rob" "Black men need to learn not to loot" "Black men need to learn not to kill" US dept. of justice statistics clearly show that Blacks are overrepresented as rob…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:55 AM
2

two simultaneous assailants in an industrial kitchen full of knives and hot oil are always a threat unless immobilized
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:21 AM
5

I don't miss all the women at a new job instantly hating me and having to go overboard to show them I'm just a caring good friend. I have many great friends, but in my younger days I had to prove my sincerity and compassion so they could get past it. I don't miss being hit on in the elevators at the corporations I worked for. That was terribly confusing and uncomfortable. So with my little tale of beauty woes, it is not easy being that pretty, especially when you're as insecure as the next perso…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:24 PM
0

As discussed above, radical feminists feel that women are not able to make individual choices for themselves that will enable their liberation from men, until they fully understand the theories of radical feminism. They believe that a normal woman’s agency is an illusion. According to this doctrine, while women think they have choice, any choice they make upholds the Patriarchy. All forms of prostitution are seen as both violence against women and as an agent of patriarchy and oppression. Hence,…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:16 PM
6

Interesting But they REALLY teach college freshmen not to rape! If that ever was a reversal, it already became acknowledged feminist truth
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:06 PM
2

Actually, rape research concludes 6% - 12% proven obvious false accusations. The man is not charged, sometimes the woman is charged 40% to 60% judged as likely to be false, by police, but charges must be leveled against the man, never the woman The rest is considered as most likely true. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/one-in-two-rape-accusations-are-false-strauss-kahn-presumed-guilty-jailed-slandered-without-due-process-escaped-others-are-not-so-lucky
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:01 PM
6

It never ceases to amaze me why empowered, independent women can not pay for the upkeep of their child by themselves. Especially the richer ones that earn 100 k or a Million a year. Even move stars and rock star women need a man to pay child support.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:09 AM
54

Chief Justice MacDonald countered that it is unlikely a woman getting pregnant surreptitiously would be construed as assault, noting that pregnancy has much more serious consequences for mothers than fathers. getting imprisoned, having to pay for 20 years is pretty serious A woman can abort, can give the child in abortion, or have a man pay for 20 years for the baby and use the money for herself what is more serious consequences?
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:43 AM
1

can you get an ally that has power over the woman? Her mother, father, brother? If you do approach them, use a third party. If her father, or grandmother tells her to stop being a bitch, that might solve your case
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:45 PM
1

it is self defense, to keep multiple attackers under control You have the right to make sure they don't get a knife or a pot of hot oil to throw onto you. This was at a McDonald's kitchen Until you are sure someone else will keep them under control
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:42 PM
0

in other countries women have some responsibility to avoid dangerous situations. Like men have. Don't walk in bad neighborhoods, at night, with clothing that shows you are rich, and don't flash money and Rolexes there.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:39 PM
1

government money? The government can go after the REAL father. Or the empowered woman can support her own.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:33 PM
1

oh, also you or the animal protection people can get the press rolling (newspapers, TV, ...). Animal abuse is serious business If she did not do the killing carefully, it might actually be a CRIME
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:01 PM
5

the guys at men's rights know the truth of this statement. Men have no rights, google VAWA, violence against WOMEN act, and the Duluth model of domestic violence. Keep reading here at r/mensrights to learn more. Or google Lorena Bobitt cut penis Now it is known that people, especially women, go apeshit to protect little cute furry animals everywhere in the world.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:59 PM
6

Take two contemporary social problems: teenage pregnancy and the incarceration of young males. Research by Sara McLanahan at Princeton University suggests that boys are significantly more likely to end up in jail or prison by the time they turn 30 if they are raised by a single mother. Specifically, McLanahan and a colleague found that boys raised in a single-parent household were more than twice as likely to be incarcerated, compared with boys raised in an intact, married home, even after contr…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:22 PM
1

which is NOT in the best interest of the child rather mother's way to blackmail the cuckold. If you want to see the child you have to pay If you don't pay, I don't care if the child is heartbroken, I will keep the non-biological father away Great laws we have
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:51 PM
3

all this happens only because men and MRA are LAME and don't defend their LEGITIMATE interests. Instead they let women steal and defraud, and pass laws to punish male victims and to reward and protect female fraudsters.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:17 PM
4

another absurdity, The fraudulent woman should be imprisoned Not the male victim of fraud forced to continue to pay the fraudster
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:15 PM
7

The flaw in your proposal is that, of course, the woman will say: "if you do paternity testing, it proves you don't trust me" and all hell will break loose. If the man does not want to know the truth, just throw away the envelope and don't read the birth certificate. it is also in the legitimate medical interest of the child to know the family history of diseases.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:14 PM
3

it always amazes me what laws feminist manage to enact. Total self interest of cheating women, hidden behind the "right of the child to its genetic information" And MRA don't have the guts to hit back proposing laws to criminalize paternity fraud No women ever commits paternity fraud without knowing she COULD have been impregnated by someone else. It is always knowingly and intentional. If she never got near another man's sperm, she can be sure she did not get pregnant from another man. If she d…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:11 PM
3

In Britain, I believe, the man can get jail. In Germany, it is illegal and void if you test your kid, but the law about criminal penalties was defeated
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:55 PM
2

you are optimistic. They are not outdated. Feminists fight to make them worse every year. Read www.theantifeminist.com
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:43 PM
2

absolutely. There are women who have a kid with the statutory "rapist" and later marry him. No reason for leniency!! he is a man. Even the woman's pain of having the father of her kid arrested is of no concern to the law
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:41 PM
8

She very much needs this And she has performed a great feat: she landed a rich man. So she deserves more money then the top CEO"s in the world. Oh, there is a top CEO that makes more than 4 million a month? Guaranteed? For life?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:37 PM
3

So, in short, Lewis Wolpert is telling us that "Women are much more emotional than men. There is absolutely no question [about this]" and that "Men are unquestionably more aggressive than women" and that "Men will do almost anything for sex." So, how can it be said that women are more 'emotional' than men? In what areas? After all, men are not only just more sexy and more aggressive, they are also more enthused by sports, more addicted to risk-taking, drug-taking, alcohol-imbibing, more interest…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:34 PM
4

I always though feminist domination in academics was mainly in women's studies, gender studies, and moving into social science like psychology and, of course, anthropology. But a professor of natural sciences, of biology!? Talking about sex differences!? If this is what a leading male natural scientist has to tell us, ........ Quoting Stanley Baldwin, "I would rather trust a woman's instinct than a man's reason. (21 min 16 sec) Notice again the attempt to demean men relative to women. And, once …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:09 PM
2

He does not even mention that marriage and having children is a legal mine field for men. It exposes them to potential financial bankruptcy (without right to to escape by declaring bankruptcy) Potential indentured slavery to pay alimony to a wife that has the right to keep you away from your children. You even risk your wife goes to police and says you raped her once, 4 years ago. No proof needed to arrest and imprison you. Reason enough not to have family and children. And all this is squarely …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:52 PM
2

Academics, nowadays, are mostly politically-corrected, communist-oriented, feminist-fearing drones who would not dare to implicate feminism as a cause of anything that might appear to be deleterious to the well-being of people. Over and over again, we see them studiously refusing to make any connection between feminism and some very serious ills. For example, as mentioned in my pieces entitled Feminism causes traffic congestion and global warming and Feminists Destroy the Planet, neither academi…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:48 PM
1

Indeed, it was in about the year 2000 when I first realised that feminists had no real concern for women. I stumbled upon an article by two American gynaecologists who were complaining about the fact that no editor in a mainstream women's media publication would publish well-established findings that showed that many tens of of thousands of women every year were destroying their chances of ever reproducing because they were delaying too long to have babies. Their claim was that in order to encou…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:47 PM
0

Does the majority of men go to those free clinics to get the low quality cheap free condoms? Do they come with advice, by academic experts, how to use them, how to pick the best size, quality, material? Can you pick the best condom? Polyurethane for latex allergies, lubricated, spermicidal ones for more safety? Do they measure you to pick the correct size? If you answer no to them, you don't get the same service as women at their expert gynecologist. Like feminists who want to go to their doctor…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:43 PM
17

Great professional work. After the rape she first goes out, later has unprotected sex with husband. After all evidence has been destroyed, she goes to police Just forgot watching for surveillance cameras. Ooops. Will do better at next false accusation.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:53 PM
0

Nobody should be made to feel that by choosing a particular driving style through a particular neighborhood at night they are risking car jacking. If they are, the it's perfectly justified to call it a car jacking culture, since we admit the victim an bring car jacking upon himself, simply by acting a certain way, and that ghetto residents cannot help themselves, if they see a careless dreamy driver in a luxury car. Nobody should be made to feel that by choosing a particular dress style they're …
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:59 AM
3

getting piss drunk is probably a more important element then dressing slutty. Or dressing slutty while getting piss drunk Not a wise thing to do, if you don't have a legion of police to protect you and courts to imprison every man that comes near you You are probably from the US and have no clue how thing are in South America, India, Africa. There you better watch out for yourself and don't behave imprudently.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:19 PM
3

who up-votes this? Anyone sees the same attention given to men killed by criminal attacks? Or to men raped to death? You did not get it, did you? A woman raped, and clubbed to death: world wide headlines, law changes, politicians up in arms. A man beaten to death: forgotten, barely mentioned Got it now?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:12 PM
2

/sarcasm I hope!
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:09 PM
1

Links? In one operation mostly women AND children, which includes MALES Link? And in all other operations it is mostly males!?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:08 PM
-1

not quite Brutal societies are brutal towards men. Usually much less brutal towards women. How many women get killed in wars, revolutions, .........?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:47 PM
3

May the downvoters please state the reason? Except for the strange title, but that was chosen by the New York Times.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:36 PM
6

¶ “If it was five years ago, I’d want to see him rot away in jail,” Ms. Sand said. “Now I don’t care for that. I want to see him work, and pay his debt to me and my children.” She wants the indentured slave to work for the rest of his life to pay her off. How nice of her. She would rather have a working slave then an imprisoned useless slave. For him, no bankruptcy, no escape. He ought to have stayed in the Philippines. Stupid to come to the US.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:34 PM
1

¶ Though Mr. Sand, whom the Justice Department labeled the Most Wanted Deadbeat Parent, has become the face of that effort, he has plenty of company. In New York State alone, 23 parents — of more than 760,000 with child support orders — owe $1 million or more, according to the State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, which enforces child support. Most of those parents live in New York City. ¶ Many of them have the means to pay but openly scoff at the law, exploiting an enforcement sy…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:32 PM
12

The problem here is that although American women have managed to arrange society so that they may take risks with minimal consequences, this is not the case in most of the world, and female students don’t know that. Actually, the ideas pounded into their heads, particularly those that stress that women may do whatsoever they please and should not worry about the consequences, are a big part of the problem. Finally, there is the issue of the strict control of college males, who are already a high…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:28 PM
2

Very much a men's rights issue. So much that most men's rights activists shy away from it. They only asked over 18 year olds. Do you think the 16 year olds do NOT want much older men? So this squarely conflicts with feminist inspired age of consent laws. It intimidates and imprisons men, and traumatizes women who either get rejected or have their boy friends arrested According to the survey of 98,000 men and women across the country, 70 percent of women aged between 18 and 25 preferred older men…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 01:11 AM
2

link for dropped charges?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:59 PM
8

He kept them under control. He ordered them to stay down. If you fight 2 unknown assailants, you have to keep them under control. He only beat them when they tried to get up, when they disobeyed his order.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:58 PM
2

Imagine that you are in a divorce court in Moldova and your ex-wife accuses you of raping her and molesting the child. This is guaranteed to bring you a chemical castration sentence. Trust me – I know Moldova, I know its people and I know that country better than I know mine. The lack of due process, the conviction without real proof is the problem. Not the chemical castration. „But as someone who is no fan of pedophiles, rapists, etc., I think this topic is routinely over-emotionalized.” – I am…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:55 PM
0

In addition to that, therapists that work with offenders often contend that the predators drive is to achieve control over the victim and that sex is only one of the means to achieve that. This being said, lowering a predator’s sex drive doesn’t necessarily correlate with lowering their likelihood to assault, as they can pick another means to achieve control. This sounds like the typical feminist narrative about rape, that has no correlation with reality. Rape is not about sex? How come that rap…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:53 PM
-2

I really see no problem in chemical or real castration of true convicted dangerous violent child abusers and rapists. If they have been convicted beyond reasonable doubt, with due process rights. But, of course, neither of my conditions might be true. Court proceedings might be unjust, and it might be applied to men that did not commit any violent sex crimes. Also, women's sex drive is not being controlled by a simple hormone like testosterone. Though a bit of testosterone reduction might reduce…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:48 PM
1

I would care if innocent people go to jail Equally applied asinine laws still don't make good policy But yes, I understand if you want to apply the unjust laws equally. At least everyone feels them.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:12 PM
2

there is a reddit plugin for mozilla that allows you to see upvotes and downvotes separately https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/reddit-reveal/
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:05 PM
1

do you have details? Country? Newspaper reports? I know cases where a woman raped an unconscious male, and he had to pay child support Nothing happened to her
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:00 PM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSWomen/comments/14xv7v/so_angry_at_this_crap_in_the_huffington_post/ Even SRSWomen discussed this issue instead of downvoting into oblivion. Here the first vote already is DOWN. Let us see if s/mensrights has the guts to actually ARGUE or just downvotes to FORGET
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:36 AM
1

Frequently such things happen. Anyone never had a friend who admitted to such behavior? And occasionally such behavior has catastrophic effects on a man who will spend his life in prison
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:28 AM
1

google: jury nullification avoiceformen.com
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:27 AM
0

men get drunk to gather courage for sex too. But women don't get 11 year prison terms for having sex with such male "victims".
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:21 AM
-2

Voice your opinion. Should she be imprisoned for being a predator? Should all the men she seduced be imprisoned? *Should the sex restrictive age of consent laws be changed? Argue, discuss. Don't downvote! The Jimmy Savile child sex scandal is widening in Britain dragging in more and more personalities from the music industry of old. This has got me thinking about society's abhorrence and social panic about adult men having a physical relationship with a teenage girl. We read of the British schoo…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:19 AM
1

It varies from nation to nation. Seems Canada was always pretty choosy about immigrants The US not so much as they have illegal manual labor that later gets in through amnesty. Europe seems to be the worst. Even convicted Somali pirates get asylum when they get out of prison. Then they can even bring their family
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:09 PM
10

Paul Elam in avoiceformen.com makes a compelling case that any man on a rape jury should use nullification. Simply because there is no due process and it is impossible to make sure the accused has been allowed to present all exculpatory evidence.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:01 PM
1

that is 3 million Euros a month, 100 000 Euros a day. More then the world's top CEO's earn. Just for marrying a very wealthy man.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:39 PM
3

The problem is: a) people don't get drunk with the intent to gather courage to sell a car b) buying a car from an obviously drunk person is not punished equal to armed robbery or attempted murder. a) Women get drunk with the intent to gather courage to have sex b) men who have sex with such a woman are punished like the guys in India who viciously raped a women almost killing her
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:33 PM
1

well this is an important issue. People say these people never got their own country in order, screwed up their own country. Now they will do the same to their host country. They bring their genetic and cultural heritage. And they tend to be the least successful in their own country. Almost no country chooses the most educated and intelligent as their immigrants. It is usually economic refugees
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:36 AM
3

Islam even meddles in the affairs of countries thousands of miles away See the reaction to caricatures of Mohammed. Murder and mayhem, boycotts. Or the movie that led to attacks on the US embassy or consulate in Benghasi (?). Apostates get executed. That is the law in Afghanistan. This is what US and European soldiers fight for.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 09:33 AM
0

Muhammad agreed that assistance, rather than punishment, is needed to get the girl on the right track. "We know there are some underlying psychological issues that would compel this young girl to come forward with such a story," he said. "We vehemently condemn what she did, but we don't condemn her as a child and as a person. We believe she can be redeemed from this."
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:30 PM
1

"We are actually relieved that the predator that we were looking for does not exist," said Muhammad, of the Ministry of Justice-Houston. "One of the most egregious things that a female can do is to fabricate a story that she has been raped, when she has not. We don't want the cries of real rape victims to get drowned out in the lies that are told, such as the one that was told last week." Help, not criticism Imam Khalis Rashaad said the girl and her mother, a single working mom with two jobs, ar…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 10:23 PM
2

Good point If you absolutely have to continue, get notarized statements from her licensed therapist!! Have her co-sign!! Videotape her reading the statement!!
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:04 PM
3

That is the THIRD totally different version of the story The first was that she was not even at the location. Without a pussy pass, she would be chanceless because she lied several times to police 27 stabbings also are a bit much for self defense, except for a woman with "battered women syndrome" Now, as Arias’ trial quickly approaches, she's given a third story about that day. On June 22, 2010, her defense attorneys filed a "notice of defenses" notifying the court that they intend to argue that…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:00 PM
2

Judging by both current and historic trends, the future in Europe is going to be Islamic. Apart from the fact that the Muslims in Europe are having many more babies than are those peoples who make up Europe's indigenous populations, many Muslim men also seem to possess more courage, more energy and more passion than do European men. And so when, in a few years time, Muslim numbers reach some 25% of the population, those Muslim men will get whatever they want. And so it will surely not be too lon…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:21 PM
9

The problem is that feminism made men dodge fatherhood http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15ix5y/say_goodbye_to_your_country_feminism_destroyed/
/r/MensRights27/12/12 05:56 PM
-2

Feminism is probably one of the most wicked ideologies imaginable. Even Margaret Thatcher described it as 'poison'. She did not just dislike feminism, she loathed it. With much good reason. And 'poison' is, indeed, one of the most appropriate words with which to describe it, in my view - though I, myself, prefer to see it as a pathogenic virus that is regularly unleashed on to the population by those who promote it. Essentially, the disease of feminism manifests itself at the personal level by i…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 05:40 PM
1

Well, violent protesters that injure dozens ....... This is not a peaceful solution But rape justifies anything. Attacking police, any violence .......... How do you dare to even mention "peaceful solution"? These people disturbed the peace
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:49 AM
9

any proof? citation? Maybe she was violent since kindergarten, because she always got away with it. Maybe it became her nature. Ever read Erin Pizzey?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:48 AM
1

During the investigation, the detective reviewed surveillance video from Nelson's workplace, which showed Nelson leaving work and driving away in her vehicle. Neither the man she accused of raping her nor his vehicle could be seen in the video, court records state. Lucky for the man that the women was a total idiot. An intelligent women would fabricate a better story. (this is sarcasm, but actually true. A well planned false rape accusation is quite likely to succeed) Had she at least met him at…
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:46 AM
28

The assault, which took place in the victim's Northumberland home, last summer, was so violent that it pierced an artery, scarring him for life – potentially destroying his burgeoning modelling career. It also caused severe blood loss and permanent nerve damage to his face. Devastated Mr Aitken has described the incident as ‘tragic’ and ‘life-changing from that moment on.’ At the hospital where he received treatment, Slater claimed Aitken sustained his injuries from falling down the stairs, befo…
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:34 AM
0

This is what r/mensrights is about Feminists have enacted retarded laws world wide. See the side bar about such laws regarding domestic violence, rape, salary, child support and more
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:49 AM
3

Is it only me that gets shocked that demonstrators are against a violent crime of rape, but the same demonstrators are extremely violent, so much that they seriously disturb the peace
/r/MensRights24/12/12 08:24 AM
2

and what is at fault? Rape laws that abolished due process. That do not require corroborating evidence Because such laws invite women to use the power the law gave to them, to have men punished at their whim. The immoral woman, of course, is at fault. But society gave her unlimited power, that is the real fault.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:45 PM
-1

Earlier this month, a girl who was raped in her village by four men, was then allegedly raped by a police officer who was handling her case, according to medical examiners. She had to be rescued by a police team that raided the hotel where she was being held. Read: Indian girl seeks justice after gang rape The incident happened in Uttar Pradesh, which borders Delhi. I wonder if India is totally rife with rape. Or if they use some spectacular cases to further the typical feminist issues to clamp …
/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:16 AM
2

Nope They say the court system has been promoted by feminists. And, if you give women the power, with that court system, they may abuse it. Women with no court system to support them, they don't cause trouble
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:44 PM
2

interference in free markets is always a problem Insurances are forced to overcharge certain people who are obliged to subsidize other people. Only equality fanatics will appreciate this
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:42 PM
2

Isn't it for ALL insurance products? Women's health insurance costs more. Any type of retirement benefits like insurance involving a pension ought to cost more as they live longer.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:26 PM
1

agree totally
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:22 PM
1

computer files do not become consumed. They get copied indefinitely at zero cost. There are terabytes of CP available for consumption As I said, most of CP is harmless teen nudity ......
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:21 PM
2

maybe you can understand that I find it very sad that our laws drove two mature adults to suicide, just for suspicion of possession of indecent photos of minors.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:47 AM
-2

We normally have freedom of expression, freedom to have pictures of almost anything, like executions, torture, beheadings, child mutilation by nannies cought on nanny cams. The old greek depicted nudes of any age, non-sexually and occasionally sexually. So if child killing, mutilating, torturing pictures are not illegal, it is a bit strange if possession of pictures of child sexual abuse is illegal. Much more so if possession nude pictures of one's own 17 year old wife is illegal. And pictures o…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:46 AM
-1

accepted But men who don't like homosexuals are men, are they not? I think then they would be welcome in the Men's Rights movement.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:13 PM
1

pretty interesting We are at a MRA site and everyone wants to make sure that a deadbeat father does not enjoy the rights of fatherhood. Punish him. Is anyone interested in the rights of the child to have a father that occasionally visits him or her? Anyone interested what is best for the child? If the child does not have a stepfather or adoptive father, you want to make sure s/he can not see the father to punish him for not wanting to pay? If the child has a surrogate father, then I might agree …
/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:03 PM
-1

It is a well guarded secret. Women can not compete with men in almost nothing that is measurable. It is amazing. Even in cooking, they are totally out-competed by men. Only 1% Michelin starred restaurants have women chefs: discrimination? In that article you find the links that women are outclassed in tennis, chess, and snooker. There is a challenge to name anything where woman are superior to men. Seems even in wine tasting the best are men, even though women have better sense of taste and smel…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:02 PM
6

Azer Gat, the Israeli scholar of warfare, says, "In the USA, males comprise 83% of murderers, a similar share of those committing aggravated assault, 93% of druken drivers and about the same percentage of armed robbers." is that true? men drive drunk more often then women? or they drive more recklessly and get caught? or they simply drive more?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:28 AM
1

While we may not know the specific problems afflicting Adam Lanza, we know that by virtue of his gender he was already more likely to engage in horrific violence than if he were female, all other factors being the same. It is true, males engage in most physical violence and most victims of murders are men And get most workplace deaths And many more men get their life ruined by birth control fraud, paternity fraud and false rape and false abuse accusations then women murdered by men
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:26 AM
1

he did not say that BUT women are rewarded for lies, in our biased justice system. In Britain women get money for false rape accusations. Elsewhere they just get away easily when caught lying. In fact, there is no other type of crime statistics like that. There is no suspicion that between 5 % and 50% of robbery accusations are false accusations. Need links? http://human-stupidity.com/awareness/false-rape-accusations Also 40% (?) of women support other women's birth control fraud (link??). The l…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:20 AM
2

Absolutely Restraining orders should be given to protect a person. Not to be kept out of one's home So if the wife feels threatened, she can go to a safe place and order him to stay away. That would be something that does not require a big burden of proof. But kicking someone out of his own house? It is even worse because a recently moved in live in girl friend can expel a home owner and start a garage sale selling off his Bose stereo and stuff. This has happened.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:09 AM
1

This does not seem to be a comparison Feminists do not even call out Lorena Bobbitt for slicing off dicks. Or Andy Warhol shooters, women calling for gendercide and more. Feminists ACTIVELY defend murderers who shoot sleeping husbands and invent "battered woman syndrome" in defense. Feminists actively support scientific falsification of Domestic Violence, false rape accusation statistics. And you compare this to persecuting an MRA because he does not support "gay rights". Supporting gay rights i…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:56 AM
-5

Is the men's rights movement so dogmantic to disown and exclude a fathers rights activist who is anti gay? This is why we get nowhere. Splitting MRA into small factions. Disowning each other!! While feminists of all colors and shades firmly work together to take over world government, to totally control men in divorce court, primary school, parliament, sex laws, rape laws, etc. MRA are worried about excluding a fellow MRA who is anti gay Says AVM Chris is the owner of Men’s Rights Online, a sort…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:47 AM
-1

right. The woman does what she wants with her body. And finances the consequences The man does what he wants with his wallet. And still has the right to see his own flesh and blood. A bit less if he pays nothing then if he were paying.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 09:35 PM
2

a genius idea Actually, if daughter threatened mom with this, she might actually prevail with nobody in prison. If mom caves in. She could also threaten suicide Of course, relationship with mom will be ruined .... Did you hear about the girl that was arrested and imprisoned for weeks for contempt of court for not wanting to testified against her bf?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:14 PM
7

the problem is THE LAW Some overreaction can ruin your life OR rather the government ruins your life The problem is the LAW But who dares to change the law?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:12 PM
12

It seems only dumb women get caught with false rape lies. An intelligent woman thinks about CCTV recordings and invents a story that can not be disproven so easily Like she said no five times, and he forced her. Almost impossible to disprove. A certain win /s I should not give such advice, women might learn ....... As usual, the problem is the maxim "guilty until proven innocent". He managed to prove his innocence, because the woman chose a bad lie that could be disproven beyond reasonable doubt
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:48 PM
2

great comment Makes sense. Would be even better if there was academic peer reviewed science to confirm that Probably not in the interest of feminists to get such data "Those who really work and make it without quota don't support feminist logic"
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:16 AM
2

great comment "Why do we demonize pickup artists?"
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:14 PM
1

Economic coercion (withholding money, the car or other resources; sabotaging her attempts to work). The last one sounds a bit serious Claiming “the truth,” being the authority, defining her behavior, using “logic.” using logic is really offensive. Lying, withholding information, infidelity (having sex with others). Using pornography. how men lap up women's rules. I have been around when car repair shop men still had the rights to put up pinup girls. Now women still are allowed to read their nove…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:28 PM
1

After attending the information session, the Application Interview is the next step. This one-on-one interview determines whether or not a man is qualified to enter the 24-week course. r/mensrights need not apply. They would not fit into the mold, rather would try to educate the course leader The interview generally takes approximately one hour. 24-Week Educational Course: Men At Work One hour? must be real brain washing. The MSV 24-week course offers men the education and the tools they need to…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:09 PM
1

MBA have a profession already. They already make decent money They get a master's to make a lot more money And Stanford is among the top 5 Universities among thousands in the US. But yes. the pay is pretty amazing
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:02 PM
0

you may be right, but a link to the USDJ or other respectable source would greatly strengthen your argument
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:11 PM
12

The reason for the disparity has less to do with discrimination than it does with career choices and previous work experience. On average, women have about a year’s less work experience than men when they enter an MBA program. But the single biggest difference is the fact that women prefer jobs in industries that typically pay MBAs less money. Many of these preferences can be seen in the annual surveys of the most desired places to work for MBAs by Universum. In 2011, for example, Goldman Sachs …
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:07 PM
31

Although I've become more aware of it recently, I think I've always had the sense that men are particularly vulnerable to the judgment of “creep." Over a year ago, I wrote a series of blog posts on the problems of masculinity, and in Part 3 I noted that -- unlike men -- "I can be explicit and overt about my sexuality without being viewed as a creep." Of course, I could be labeled a slut, which could damage me quite badly. There's a reason I do all my most explicit writing under a pseudonym. We f…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:46 PM
5

So this is the explanation for A voice For Men's aggressive pursuit of hate mongering females. Like outing hate mongering people who try to prevent free speech. Which shocks some people here.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:29 PM
2

The other problem with automatic forgiveness and the benign offer of an open door and a clean start for our young hateful woman, and millions of her ideological fellows, is that this forbearance, this forgiveness, this indulgence is what created her. It is this kind of enabling that created two generations of women for whom no accountability was ever attached to speech or action. It is how we arrived in a world which young, attractive, middle class women can be reasonably expected to be, behind …
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:27 PM
-1

feminists defend and glorify dick slicers like Lorena Bobbitt. Defend her as victim http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/lorena-bobbit-forgives-her-husband No MRA, so far, has glorified the likes of Jack the Ripper.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:26 AM
0

Well, if she distances herself from that article, that sheds a bad light on her (from our point of view) But it further raises the value of the article.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:08 AM
0

there is no sign of this happening after all, women don't lie and if they lie, it is a good opportunity for the falsely accused to think if he could be a rapist /s The entire society needs to change. Not very likely Sorry, I wish you had a better chance
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:36 AM
0

why not be HONEST. If women are 80% or 95% of the culprits, let us name it. Maybe it is not even the average woman's fault, but the biased law and biased public perception of female agency and "women don't lie about child abusing men" But honesty and truth in reporting would help. Except if you want to hide the truth for ideological reasons.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:33 AM
1

The following challenge is still standing Anyone who can name a field where women out-do men in the very top echelon, please speak up in the comment section. And the same way men are over-represented at the top, even at clearly measurable fields like chess, snooker, they are over-represented at the bottom. It might be the risk takers that lost the gamble. The race driver that miscalculated a curve. It might be nature that takes greater risks with men, lost the genetic gamble. Most woman in the w…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:08 PM
10

One of the main reasons is not being mentioned: Greater variance of males on almost all traits So males are more represented on the top, or the bottom. So much that even in traits where women are better, on average, like certain musical talents, the top talent tend to be male All the issues about female privilege in social safety nets are right, but the variance/ Standard deviation issue is very very relevant. http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/E101.full http://www.uky.edu/~njdewa2/baumeistereta…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:02 PM
7

You mean to catch women and THEIR children /s why don't I hear this word more often? Glass cellar? Or glass floor? I always hear talk about glass ceiling.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:47 PM
5

The false acusation IS the child abuse. It does not just screw the man. The selfish accuser screws up the child's life. How disgusting "The children can really suffer significant damage for the rest of their lives. The claims can be absolutely incredulous, have horrific consequences and are quite a common occurrence." According to the judgment in the latest case, the man's seven-year-old son made the claims after a toy inducement from his mother.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:39 PM
1

Let us be devil's advocate Do men have better character, because they do less false accusations then women? Just asking a provocative question to provoke answers.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:36 PM
3

amen! And why is this so? Men probably are not believed blindly if they accuse women of child sexual abuse. And if women would be guilty, it must be HIS behavior that made her do it. So lawyers probably don't advise men to make false accusations, it would not be as successful the other way around
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:33 PM
1

That is a very stupid example. Traditional bullshit like incentives to keeping 2 parent families intact is different from voodoo and witchcraft
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:06 PM
1

this is where it gets a bit dreamy. The diagnosis and description of the status quo and the misplaced feminist efforts how to solve this, all this is right on
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:06 PM
2

The problem is that the woman's version: Equal pay for same effort even though the result is less (she carries half the weight) requires government subsidies, a sort of socialist society. The male version: Let the boss pay for the performance he wants, for the results he voluntarily pays Does not need government intervention, laws, subsidies. It just comes naturally
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:47 PM
1

I wonder if it is really necessary to push women into sports they don't want to do, or prevent men from doing the sports they want to do. Some is just definitional: it seems that cheer-leading and dancing are not sports. And should women pushed into more criminality to equalize prison populations? Equality itself is a problem, that seems to be Angry Harry's message
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:45 PM
3

if that was reversion of roles, if it happened to a woman it would be certain prison for the man if she complained Probably without proof, especially if he is dumb enough to admit it. With proof (recording) it would be 100% slam dunk rape conviction
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:05 PM
-1

right. Men can get hard-ons while sleeping Due to dreams, excitation, need for urination Certainly they get an erection when girlfriends blows them when asleep Lonely sexless young men even get spontaneous ejaculations when asleep
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:03 PM
1

well, if her diagnosis is right and her solution is problematic, she still deserves praise for raising awareness to where the real problems are.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:37 AM
-1

Downvoting without comment is avoiding discussion. Please comment. Criticize, discuss, find alternative explanations for what she writes. When i started reading I first thought the article was in A Voice For Men. This article is central to men's issues. If you think she is wrong, she deserves a reasoned argument, not being ignored. She is an honest person that observes problems all MRA agree on. I think her observations and explanations are pretty sharp. If anything her final solution is a bit s…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:35 AM
2

absolutely. The US constituion is being trampled. If Universities academic freedom was the one strength the US had, thanks to absolute freedom of expression That is why Silicon Valley and Hollywood beat the entire world in innovation. If the Universities become Gulags with speech code, the US strength will wither away.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:23 AM
-1

Downvoting without comment is avoiding discussion. Please comment. Criticize, discuss, find alternative explanations for what she writes. This article is central to men's issues. If you think she is wrong, she deserves a reasoned argument, not being ignored. She is an honest person that observes problems all MRA agree on. I think her observations and explanations are pretty sharp. If anything her final solution is a bit simplistic. But her diagnosis and description of issue is great. To tell the…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:17 AM
2

maybe it needs to be discussed if some "traditionalist bullshit" could be true or necessary? Discuss, don't downvote! Seems feminism has not helped families to flourish, marriage to work out. Traditional bullshit has created happy families with low divorce rate.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:12 AM
1

r/feminism comment I can't believe this was published only yesterday. It's in their DNA? I am honestly disgusted. If it was truly biologically predisposed for men to care for women as the head of household, why would women even be capable at all of defying their "natural" propensity toward sitting back and being cared for? We should have no struggles for equality at all if that were the case! Women are missing out because they NEED men? Honestly, is this a joke? Well, I'm not looking for marriag…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:09 AM
0

r/feminisms comment She's actually a well-known anti-feminist, right-wing author. I took a peek at one of her books, once. She literally blames everything wrong that happens to men on feminism, and how the movement damaged women (at least in terms of being voiceless, baby-making, at-home cooks for their husbands) on a whole. It makes me cringe, really. http://www.reddit.com/r/feminisms/comments/13rjq5/war_on_men_guess_its_all_we_wimminz_fault_eh/c76t5l2
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:08 AM
1

if the income drops, it is probably because the man sabotages the child support or hides income /s If it rises, of course then his EX has to participate in the HIGHER standard of living. Pretty obvious, is it not /s
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:50 PM
1

the difference is that there are very few women actually doing real fighting in the military But there are plenty of men threatened by psycho women. If you stay home they might cut off your dick, throw boiling water on you when you sleep or just shoot you while you're sleeping. This is self defense, due to battered woman syndrome
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:06 PM
-1

what make you think that my link's attack was not "unprovoked by a mentally unstable person?" Just because the perpetrator is a woman and the victim is a man, you automatically think it is provoked?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:01 PM
-10

This is what happens when a man hits a woman http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Uln9cwUFOs
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:54 AM
1

Brazil does not extradite if you make a Brazilian child British train robber Biggs spent decades in Brazil until he was stupid enough to return.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:06 AM
2

so the swedish gender neutral system is proven to harm boy's success in school and later in life. And US feminisation of boys seems to cause the same damages there
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:37 PM
2

Anthony Pellegrini, a professor of early childhood education at the University of Minnesota, defines the kind of rough-and-tumble play that boys favor as a behavior that includes "laughing, running, smiling, jumping, open-hand beating, wrestling, play fighting, chasing and fleeing." This kind of play is often mistakenly regarded as aggression, but according to Pellegrini, it is the very opposite. In cases of schoolyard aggression, the participants are unhappy, they part as enemies, and there are…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:36 PM
2

but subterfuge and propaganda appear to be the order of the day in Sweden. In their efforts to free children from the constraints of gender, the Swedish reformers are imposing their own set of inviolate rules, standards, and taboos. Here is how Slate author Nathalie Rothchild describes a gender-neutral classroom: One Swedish school got rid of its toy cars because boys "gender-coded" them and ascribed the cars higher status than other toys. Another preschool removed "free playtime" from its sched…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:33 PM
2

seems to be true that there is a small IQ difference between males and females. It is so politically incorrect that the issue does not get studied very seriously. but the main difference is that men have more VARIANCE on all features. Men take more risks, and nature takes more risks with men so is men are over-represented at the very top and very bottom. Women don't notice the failing men but get jealous of the top status top effort men that somehow make it to the top spots in business and polit…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:29 PM
1

The US is in decline. Feminist countries are in decline. There is no sign that anyone blames feminism for it, much less that they will abolish feminism to prevent the ship from sinking I would love your wishful thinking to be right. But it does not seem to be
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:25 PM
1

I have not seen any mention of the MAN having any issue. The judge says the woman will not obey judges orders, this is why he tells the man to stay away from his children
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:23 PM
3

great comment
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:15 PM
2

For some decades, a minority among feminists has taken up the cause of prostitutes in a thoughtful and generous way. One commentator, Patrick (Pat) Califia, has written that in an ideal world prostitutes “would be teachers, healers, adventurous souls — tolerant and compassionate. Prostitutes are all of these things today, but they perform their acts of kindness and virtue in a milieu of ingratitude.” (Public Sex, 1994; emphasis in original) That view, unfortunately, still lives in the margins al…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:14 PM
1

Men need not look for help. At least the British consulate cares only about men. Spanish police too, it seems. A summary of available support Women who feel they are in dander should call the emergency services helpline 112 For professional advice on support and services available, women can call the national domestic violence hotline 016 Women can get advice and information without making a report to the police from the following numbers: 062 – Civil Guard police 91 – National Police Local soci…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:07 PM
3

Nice movie, upvoted. Erin Pizzey is wonderful. Would be good if you had put some subtitles in the movie, so the uninitiated know who she is. ++ I posted this as separate comment, too. Sorry for the repeat. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/14he4b/the_unavoidable_collapse_of_the_fempire_is_coming/c7d5zg5 BUT what gives you the optimistic idea that feminism is on the decline? Only here at r/mensrights feminism is at decline I wish you were right. Europe is being reworked by instructions …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:26 AM
3

Nice movie, upvoted. BUT what gives you the optimistic idea that feminism is on the decline? Only here at r/mensrights feminism is at decline I wish you were right. Europe is being reworked by instructions from the central government to the countries. Anything from womyn quotas to repression of prostitution. Similarly, the United Nations are convincing more and more countries to become feminist. Even Brazil is becoming PC, feminist dominated. There are ever fewer places for men to take refuge, t…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:24 AM
5

The prettiest and richest countries are under the grip of feminism The more affluent, the more they an afford the luxury and cost of feminism Feminists think the opposite causality: feminists made Canada, Sweden, Australia rich. What a BS. But it is sad that the best, prettiest places on earth are being destroyed by feminism.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:16 AM
2

Compare here Al Gore, Mel Gibson, Oscar Pistorius, paralympic world record holder Trophies of feminism: 10 powerful men marred and destroyed by women’s allegations.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:08 AM
-4

amen
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:54 AM
1

http://blog.sfgate.com/nov05election/2012/12/06/watch-first-same-sex-couple-get-marriage-license-in-seattle/ http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/gay-issues/jane-abbott-lighty-and-pete-e-petersen-are-first-same-sex-couple-get-marriage
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:52 AM
7

extremely disgusting Pussy pass at its best. Woman disobeys court orders, so the judge lets her win. Man disobeys alimony pay order, because he has no money. So he goes to jail. Welcome to Equality
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:45 AM
8

Shadowbanning info: Note that you are a spammer if you post more then 25% about one site only. That makes PierceHarlan a spammer, for example. Not that anyone at r/mensrights would consider him a spammer. But by the asinine definition of reddit, he is. They should change this to calling people spammers if they don't get karma for their spam posts ........ http://www.reddit.com/rules/ How to find out if you are shadowbanned: Log out Visit www.reddit.com/user/(your user name here) If something com…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:31 AM
10

Shadowbanning was meant for spammers. So they would continue spamming even though nobody else would see their posts. Shadowbanning is being abused for political purposes, to ban people without them ever knowing why, and taking time for them to find out they were banned because all seems normal. Except nobody votes for one's posts. Did you know that you are officially a reddit spammer if you post more then 25% about one specific site? There is a general tendency. Human-Stupidity_com was shadowban…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:27 AM
1

I know several, now shadowbanned people whose posts were constantly blocked by kloo2you and ignatiusloyola
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:01 AM
2

no reply. Useless.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:56 AM
1

why do you think current age of consent is where it is? It used to be 12, world wide, before women gained the vote. According to theantifeminist.com increasing the age of consent, and closing all brothels and clubs where men can meet readily available women were the main goal of early suffragettes and feminists.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:56 AM
3

shadowbanning was meant for spammers. To ban them without knowing, so they would continue spamming without being visible shadowbanning is being abused by feminists and the pc crowd to silence politically incorrect redditors. It was not meant to silence people who make intelligent and varied comments.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:24 AM
-1

shadowbanning was meant for spammers shadowbanning is being abused by feminists and the pc crowd to silence politically incorrect redditors.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:23 AM
2

there should be a way for them to find the reasons AFTER they find out they were shadowbanned. It took me a while, a friendly admin told me that all my comments and posts did not go through, only after he explicitly authorized it. Probably he was not even allowed to tell me But I was wondering that the greatest links I posted got no votes.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:17 AM
2

Hm. Well probably the lack of family rights. Humans are very attached to their kids so the fact that a man can do what society tells him to, raise a family, love on his kids until they are the center of his world, and then have them ripped away in two minutes in a courtroom on the whim of some other person, with no fault of his, and that this eventuality is increasingly a very common scenario.... yeah that's a pretty big deal. Also because as men catch on to this they are refusing to have relati…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:14 AM
3

Another possible reason is that there are more female police officers, said Katharine Killeen, director of the California District Attorney Association's Violence Against Women Project. "They don't just let a woman go the way some men cops might," she said. "Also, men are learning how to work the system better and bring charges." Great. Police women are not feminists? If they actually made it into the police force out of their own qualifications. I wonder if quota women would not be thankful to …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:00 AM
1

I was going to say this. They should be arrested for child abuse.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:54 AM
1

and boys playing rough, playing with cars, and fighting, all this is just cultural!? Women being better verbally, developing and maturing faster in adolescence, all no difference.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:51 AM
4

yes, great article.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:45 AM
6

Accused drunk driver Tracy Smith, left, enters the Western Communities Courthouse Thursday How nice. A convicted drunk driver is being called "accused" to be fair. Compare that to guys who "raped" a woman, with no conviction, not even proof. Talk about double standard in News Reporting
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:40 AM
5

Mahenthiran, a 47-year-old information technologist for Maximus Canada, died when Smith’s car crossed the centre line of the highway and hit him head-on. According to police and witnesses, Smith was in a rage, intoxicated and hostile and blamed the crash on Mahenthiran. I always thought that DUI (driving under influence of drugs and alcohol) in itself is a serious crime, even when no accident happens.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:34 AM
1

they might suffer beatings or lynchings. It would be unsafe to stay.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:27 AM
1

it was a woman's event. That is why she said it. If she spoke to Veterans, she would say something else.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:24 PM
3

why do you think a 15 year old boy will not use deception to get into the pants of a 14 year old. This is probably one of these urban myths, that an immature 14 year old boy is less damaging to a 14 year old girl then a more experienced 28 year old. In the past centuries and millennia, this was probably about the normal age difference. So the man had the experience and the worldly goods to provide for the woman.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:01 PM
2

maybe everyone is unprepared for the emotions. Especially young adult men who get ordered to pay most of their income in child support for 20 years, or else be locked up. Or having father arrested for false or true accusations of abuse. Life just has a lot of disturbing events, ...... One has to live with it ...
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:57 PM
1

mainly to the sexual abuse, even of children Because physical abuse, beatings, etc. probably are hard to defend as being harmless. At least once the pass beyond minor slapping
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:37 PM
2

Here, at r/mensrights, and also at avoiceformen, there is a pretty clear attitude about age of consent. Nobody FIGHTS for lowering the age of consent below 18. But they TOLERATE if you think it should be 16. If you favor anything like 15 or lower, or that the government simply should keep out of adolescent bedrooms and let parents make the decisions, this would be grounds for eviction and banning. Or if you say people should not be imprisoned for possessions of drawings or photos of any kind, or…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:34 PM
7

an example, in my opinion (Not from Angry Harry) would be 14 year old daughter has sex. Enjoys it. No trauma, especially if she does not become pregnant. Mother finds out. Drags boyfriend to court and police. Screams at daughter. Grounds her for months. Tells her how her life is now ruined, how she is no good, how she probably got a disease. Tells her how her boyfriend is a creepy rapist. Tells her that she hated the sex and that she was forced and seduced. Forces her to testify at police. =====…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:16 PM
2

He is a little unclear, probably on purpose. I am sure he says that all abuse trauma is SOLELY caused by the abuse industry. But he is quite clear that a lot of trauma exists only because it is declared traumatic by society. Angry Harry was pretty short about this all.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:13 PM
4

But why-oh-why would they be going through all of this terrible suffering? Because their parents had drunk tea? No. Of course not. The very notion is utterly preposterous. They would be going through all this suffering solely because of the machinations of the abuse industry. I want to repeat that last sentence. They would be going through all this suffering SOLELY because of the machinations of the abuse industry. You can cause terrible pain and illness, and real, deep-seated, long term sufferi…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:09 PM
1

Will down-voters please state the reasons? Even if there is strong disagreement, the arguments could be out in the open.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:47 PM
1

Not interfering is not that bad But cheering when she gets away, without trying to zoom in onto her face once she stopped her violence, that is not good.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:40 PM
1

you can maliciously destroy marital property of high value? let the husband squander the bank account on gambling, let alone strip clubs or brothels. Can the husband at least slash the wive's designer hand bags and clothes?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:39 PM
2

If these were not quotes by Angry Harry (the universally acclaimed father of men's rights), I would not even dare to post this. Because feminists have totally won this war, so much that even talking about adolescent and child sexuality on MRA sites is taboo. Angry Harry is a widely admired MRA (men’s rights activist) from the old times, when MRA were not yet actively abetting feminist sex hysteria that imprison thousands of men for consensual sex with post-pubertal willing girl friends or for po…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:35 PM
1

always good confirming daily mail articles elsewhere. Just not sure if LebanonTimes is very authoritative.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:32 AM
51

she is not even ashamed of it but rather flouts it http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html The experience that you have gone through is in many ways comparable to what happens with domestic violence. Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently i…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:27 AM
14

exactly. Since when do reddit rules apply to private off-reddit behavior? I think reddit mods should be obliged to inform the full history of reasons why a shadowban was given. They can anonymize the complainant's names. I still have no clue whatsoever why I was banned. Oh, there is a legal reason for shadowbanning: SPAMMING if more then 25% of your reddit postings are about ONE site (probably your own), then you are game as a spammer. Anyone knew that? So if you are the head of FoxNews and just…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:17 AM
4

I wonder if reddit is equally concerned about the publication of name and photos of those falsely accused of rape. They would not shadowban the entire tv news industry.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:10 AM
6

did Paul Elam expose her on Reddit? as a reddit member? His behavior outside reddit should not count for reddit bans.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:10 AM
1

violentacrez ?? details with link!?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:07 AM
3

you lose your history, your friends, your privileges, your saved posts. Not nice
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:06 AM
21

I am very interested in this issue. I was shadowbanned, I had about half of avoiceformen's karma. There seems to be no way to discover who and why did a shadowban? Some people think it is easy to just make a new account. Well, you lose all your history, your saved posts, your friends and your good name, your privileges for being an old member. I think the mod who shadowbans should be obliged to give a reason when asked, with full history of complaints.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:05 AM
1

There was a whole crowd filming and nobody went close. Maybe someone had a zoom lens? Briga entre homem e mulher, não se mete colher. Many many years ago I tried to interfere in couple's fights. Even in a small village, nobody would help me when the tough guy would turn away from the woman towards me. And I was laughed at by police, once when I reported a couple's fight, and once when I reported a thief being beaten.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:09 PM
0

you can see that that they only approached the car when she was gone. They also did not try to get close to the woman to get a good mug shot of her. People just try to play it safe. Now if you messed with a car with the owner present, or a good friend, that is a different story.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:36 PM
3

I stand corrected. The final applause would not be given to a man. People would be concerned about a criminal man destroying property on the street and not cheer him on.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:33 PM
8

In Brazil, you don't easily interfere. You probably would not in New York or other big cities either. She is armed with a hammer. Why would anyone risk his health or life to prevent an anonymous person from doing harm to a car that might even be hers. Brazilians don't have the social obligation to risk their life for some abstract common good. And they have enough heavily armed thugs, or criminals with armed backup, to try to keep to themselves I think if it were a man, they would interfere even…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:31 PM
2

Brazil news Women Would Get 42% of Male Pension, if Unsubsidized! Brazilian Retirement Fund for Government Employees to Subsidize Women’s Earlier Retirement.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:28 PM
3

Did anyone check the statistics as to how many men want to receive baking books and animal calendars as presents? And especially romance books? Maybe Amazon is not interested in stereotyping women, but simple in recommending what sells best. They just want to make money. But opposing feminists is bad for business, so they just axed it. After all, who would boycott Amazon for obeying feminists? But, feminists are not interested in realities of life. They live in a theoretical ivory tower of total…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:41 PM
1

Strange: in the past millennia, young virile soldiers were perfectly capable of raping without need for Viagra. Is Rice paid by Elly Lilly, the producer of Viagra? Or did they invent the Viagra part just to make the story sound more shocking?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:23 PM
1

Now that Lybia has been "conquered" the data should be in, about the Ghaddafi's Viagra rapists. Any official reports? Or did it go the way of Saddams weapons of mass destruction? PierceHarlan, how come you post this now, over a year after the fact? Any new intelligence on it? It has never been confirmed nor taken back?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:23 PM
0

Angry Harry is widely acclaimed as the father of MRA, the very first web site writing about mens rights for decades (how long?) Examples of the questions deemed relevant to the measurement of 'empathy' include the following ... Do you agree or disagree with the following statements ... I can easily tell if someone else wants to enter a conversation. I can pick up quickly if someone says one thing but means another. I find it easy to put myself in somebody else's shoes. Well, I think that it must…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:33 PM
2

where did you see that? I did see no mentioning of that in the original article, nor in the article linked to from there
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:09 PM
2

was she there on some quota? Or at least to appease some voluntary quota attitude?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:06 PM
11

The 46-year-old had taken his malfunctioning, University-issued Blackberry to be repaired, and the technician discovered three videos featuring Hoffner's children, ages 5, 8, and 9, naked or partially clothed. It is always dangerous to bring your computer to repair, your cell phone to repair, or your photos to Walmart Employees are obliged to report anything suspicious that looks like child pornography. Especially don't bring your young kids' electronic gadgets to repair. If they photograph them…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:43 PM
1

I think among those they found that most did not have spiked drinks Don't have the quotes handy. but the main issue is that it happens very frequently that women binge drink, don't take responsibility, and blame it on non-existent drugs. After all, it can not be that it is their own responsibility that they passed out in drunk stupor.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:24 PM
1

here is the entire story http://abcnews.go.com/WhatWouldYouDo/woman-drops-powder-dates-drink/story?id=12354074#.ULzVWYb4SrA
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:40 PM
1

This is very serious. At a raid at a Rio de Janeiro bar, they found SEVEN girls that had rohypnol date rape drugs on them. Nothing happened to them, as far as I understand. http://www.worldsexguide.com/forum/showthread.php?79518-Seven-GdPs-carrying-roofies-%28boa-noite-cinderella%29 Women don't want to rape the guy, they want to steal all his belongings.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:33 PM
1

I think you got the answer I was shocked how they would let the guy be drugged and get taken home to be robbed, drugged, killed. It is not that people don't help if there is nothing in it for them. Just plain wrong. If 2 guys were there, or a lone guy, and he would ask to be taken to a hospital, someone would take him. The next experiment would be a man being drugged by a business partner. I think people would come to help, though not as eager then to help a woman in distress It is the taboo aga…
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:15 PM
0

You will have to search from here, I did not look at the exact links for exactly these points. Warren Farrell, eventually, will link to official government statistics or equally prestigious peer reviewed articles. How women can earn as much as men - Warren Farrell
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:14 PM
6

and Hillary Clinton or some lesser famous women would use it as an example.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:11 PM
3

after being ordered, by police, to leave, it probably is Shoving police certainly is violent
/r/MensRights03/12/12 12:10 PM
19

I wonder, had MRA violently blocked a feminist event, would police simply have cleared them away. Or would police have arrested them for trespass, resistance, disobeying police orders, shoving police. Would they have brought charges?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:03 AM
1

thank you At least someone who saw the "/sarcasm" Maybe I have to put it in a separate line so everyone sees it instead of downvoting me
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:20 PM
2

That seems less than amusing. For the sake of argument, let us imagine everything Watson believes is correct: Those who conduct research in the field are mostly misogynists who are dedicating many years to the pursuit of justifying harmful stereotypes and oppressing women. They’ve succeeded in compromising peer review, and the professional journals which publish them are mouthpieces of the patriarchy and scientific rigor is gone. They’ve infiltrated the top universities in the world- UCLA, Harva…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 02:12 PM
1

To Art Professor Pete Smith: one of your student’s works states “CAT CALLING IS PERMISSION FOR ME TO RIP OF YOUR DICK AND FEED IT TO YOU. OPEN WIDE ♥."
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:40 PM
1

While I have thought about it, there is not much I can do to stop other men from raping. Of course, all of my friends know that raping is not allowed under any circumstances. No one I know has ever been in a position to prevent a rape because none of my friends would ever rape. But, we can’t follow all women around to make sure that no men are raping them. It is just not feasible and, frankly, unsafe very nicely said. The guy has humor.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 12:40 PM
2

there is plenty of research that up to 100% of women complaining of spiked drinks were just too wasted and drunk and had NO date rape drugs in their system. Don't have the link handy, but it also was here a mensrights
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:29 AM
0

right. In the past they were standing up for principles. Even if unpopular. Defending constitutional rights of nazis and criminals But now they don't go for the principle of defending constitutional rights of men accused of rape and similar offenses or constitutional rights of "deadbeat dads". Now they are politically correct and not in defense of principles.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:27 AM
3

great. Good point I am sure feminists don't even get it They think you don't get it. One can not discriminate against the dominant privileged males. It is just impossible. While the ever repressed females, they need protection from any disturbance, such as "harassment" by being looked at or invited to dinner. So #killallwomen is reallly criminal, while #killallmen is just justifiable anger about centuries of repression should I put /sarcasm here or is it, sadly, true what I am writing?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:23 AM
-4

interesting point The question is: maybe these male feminists are less extremist and less violent. Maybe these males still can be influenced by arguments.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:18 AM
3

It is very problematic If a man and a woman are equally qualified for a job. And by all available statistics there is twice the chance that in 5 years the man is still working full time the man always was willing to work overtime the man is willing to be transferred to another city So statistically, it just makes sense to discriminate against the woman. Because an equally qualified young man has much better chance to be working more hours and for longer years.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:18 AM
-2

this is called "reverse discrimination" and entirely legal Look at your privilege. Men are writing everywhere. Women are prevented from being great composers (Mozart, ...) and writers. Women are being prevented from writing at wikipedia /sarcasm So it is only fair for Jezebel to give the repressed women an outlet.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:13 AM
1

Very interesting idea. I wonder how illegal this is or if this could backfire Probably one should make sure that the stickers come off very cleanly in order not to destroy public property. But it certainly is a good place to inform men about men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:55 AM
0

exactly especially because most men don't bother to report violence by women, unless it is exceedingly serious (like being shot while sleeping) So for en being hit, slapped, or having dishes thrown after one by a woman is probably severely underreported I never reported it when it happened ........
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:52 AM
4

Women made "rape" such a special crime it justifies doing away with due process and constitutional legal rights of the accused. Don't you think lots of men change University because they are bullied, threatened, beaten? And no special "Dear Colleagues" letter gives them special rights to anonymously accuse and remove their alleged attackers. An note: most "rape" in college is of the "consented but was too drunk to consent" kind. How many forcible violent rapes happen on campuses?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:33 AM
0

that harm has been stressed by feminist mis-information for almost a decade. I wonder why you don't bother about the scientifically proven harm caused by pregnant women's drinking and over-feeding infants with junk food and too much computer games. Adolescent sexuality in liberal Holland seems pretty harmless, due to sex education and absence of guys like you indoctrinating the girls how much they were harmed.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 11:40 AM
0

Great. Now we finally have a reason to put the age of consent up to 25years of age. You just gave us the argument Prison to the child abusers that have sex with 24 year olds. /s Not a mens rights issue. /s Why can't you separate your MORAL judgments that you may teach to your daughter from the LAW that gets a guy imprisoned and raped for 10 years for consensual sex with his girlfriend, often wife-to-be?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:47 AM
3

not for threatening. I don't escalate fights, I don't look for fights, I only insist on my right to self defense to avoid serious bodily harm to myself. Violent self defense is only for actual physical aggression that needs immediate reaction because it is potentially dangerous. Normally it involves a weapon, or, like in this case, serious biting. I just warn not to play-attack unexpectedly, as one can not tell the difference between play and serious attacks There is no danger in threatening (un…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:24 PM
5

That is a good start Of course, if the genders were reversed, the culprit would be in prison for contempt of court, and lose custody. , four neglect referrals were made to the Department of Human Services (DHS) because Mother made “veiled accusations” that Father was abusing the child and of redness of the child’s vagina and blood in her stool. Father further alleged that the child’s pediatricians determined that Mother was subjecting the child to excessive medical testing against their advice t…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:44 AM
1

oh, and the supermarket would not get away with filing the claim 2 years after the fact, without corroborating evidence.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:33 AM
1

actually, this does not really apply to true forcible rape. There usually is not much doubt if you get dragged into the woods by a stranger. The burden of proof is more difficult in date rape cases, marital rape, alleges-she-was-drunk-rape. Where a man really could have gotten consent and it is her word against his. And actually, according to old pre-feminist rules, she could have done something against it. Not gotten drunk, not gone into a stranger's apartment. Now downvote me. In order to defe…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:31 AM
19

State Justice Minister Beate Merk says Gustl Mollath was and still is dangerous. He was acquitted of attacking his wife, of course, nothing happened to wife, for possible suspicion of false accusations but sentenced to compulsory psychiatric care, after an evaluation found that he had developed a "paranoid system of thought." many people prefer to be in prison then to forcibly being injected with mind altering drugs and electric shocks. Three years earlier, in 2003, Mollath accused his wife and …
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:24 AM
6

oh, by the way, by most definitions you were sexually assaulted, not raped. But you were forcibly and violently assaulted. Guess by some definitions oral sex can be rape. Except that by many definitions men can not be raped by women (except with a dildo)
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:17 AM
-9

Just read your story We were fooling around, she was giving me a hand-jibber, when I asked her to use her mouth. Her reaction was to get really upset, burst into tears, and lock herself in my bathroom. She wouldn't talk to me at all, despite all my attempts to find out what's wrong. Eventually, she comes out of the bathroom, shoves me onto my bed, and starts blowing me (again, all without saying a word). I keep trying to pull her off of me so we can talk, she keeps hitting me. Finally, I grab he…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:11 AM
3

any movie that glorifies males raping females? I mean Hollywood, main stream? Except, maybe, the heartthrob hero that ravishes a woman, that is a female fantasy
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:01 PM
5

They have laws in Germany, or Britain You can not use a child's genetic material to do a DNA test to check if you are really the father. Invalid in Germany, prison term felony in Britain. Aren't feminists efficient? Genetic material is protected when it behooves them. when it would be a disadvantage for women it gets outlawed
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:57 PM
1

I think the difference with these other crimes is that the actions that constitue these other crimes are far less ambiguous. If you gave someone drugs for money you are drug dealing. If you punch someone, that's assault. Furthermore these types of crimes produce a variety of evidence: Witnesses, physical property (drugs, weapons, money), phone calls, and so on. Well, taking stuff from the supermarket, or from my friend's house, is similar. It happens all the time, it normally is perfectly legal.…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:48 PM
0

Imagine I got a bottle of juice from the supermarket. 2 years later someone accuses me of having stolen the juice. With no corroborating proof. I would have to prove, by preponderance of evidence, that I paid for it? As it just happens, there is a way to legally take juice from the supermarket.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:44 PM
5

Note: Angry Harry, the father of MRA is back, but in a different style http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/13pc2r/is_angry_harry_back_1_the_ordinary_people_are/ http://angryharry.com/Is-Harry-Back.htm
/r/MensRights24/11/12 02:38 PM
1

and we objectify cooks, street cleaners, everyone. Who would be a toilet cleaner if he did not need the money?
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:48 AM
0

please furnish links to such movies and sites. Most are fake rape sites. There certainly are sites with movies of mayhem, killing, burning people alive and executions.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:47 AM
2

I should have posted another title. Angry Harry, the father of MRA, is back. ....... I was unaware that many readers here don't know him.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:43 AM
1

everyone agrees that Angry Harry is the father of the mens rights movement. go to Avoiceformen.com and look at the banner. So different MRA like theantifeminist.com also list AngryHarry.com as the great example. For a decade or more he was the only internet activist for men. He stopped publishing about a year ago. Still, his site is worth browsing.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:42 AM
0

"Sexual influence is women's strongest tool and men need to know that so as to avoid scandals," Ssempa said, echoing the case of Gen David Petraeus, the former CIA boss who recently resigned following a sex saga with his biographer. For the CIA boss, who has been married to his wife Holly for the last 38 years, the temptation from Paula Broadwell could have arisen out of proximity. Broadwell was Petraeus' biographer and she was accorded unprecedented access to the general while he was in Afghani…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:17 AM
3

I still believe that one of the best ways to promote the MM is to run a site that has nothing much to do with the MM but which links to a few MRM articles or websites. My front page is beginning to look like such a site. Indeed, I would always recommend that MRAs who ever think of abandoning their own sites should do something similar to this; i.e. keep their sites going by just posting up any material that has interested them. In other words, MRAs do not need to devote their sites entirely to m…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 05:51 AM
3

If she reads the articles provided below, nobody is actually talking about the fact that this proposal is inherently discriminatory. Why not have 10% quota of left-handed people in the board-rooms? After all, they represent 10% in the real world, so they should be ‘represented’ in high corporate level too, right? Or why not have a mandatory 20% quota of German speaking people? They do represent 20% of the EU population, so why not? And don't forget a quota for short men which are proven to be un…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:27 AM
5

If women live longer, then the free market would either demand they work until higher age demand they pay much higher money for retirement. This is only logical, because if they had their own retirement savings, if they live twice as long they need twice as much money. give them lower retirement benefits. The same money is spread over twice the retirement time. And yes, young men would be paying higher car insurance premiums.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:09 PM
2

more about this topic Women Would Get 42% of Male Pension, if Unsubsidized! Brazilian Retirement Fund for Government Employees to Subsidize Women's Earlier Retirement.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:31 PM
1

what is worse: according to feminist credo, we would need quotas for short guys even in police and fire department, where height matters. But we have watered down requirements so women can join the fire department, though they can not perform safely and carry an injured heavy person. But yes, when height is of no relevance, like for a store manager, there should be no discrimination. BUT clients, subordinates, they all would respect a taller guy more. So the prejudice is self fulfilling.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:21 PM
1

We need quotas at the board of directors and in parliament for short people. The shortest 20% of the men deserve at least 15% representation in high paying jobs. We need new quota laws, urgently. /s But serious, I wonder if shorter people have less capacity, IQ, talent, or if this is pure prejudice. Or if it is due to women's prejudice (which would make it a mens rights issue). If women don't like short guys, you don't nominate them for political posts, you don't put them up as store attendants.…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:17 PM
0

well they are using some legal trickery to try to justify the inversion of the burden of proof. Do I have to prove, with preponderance of evidence, that I did not kill OJ Simpson's ex wife? Just because you accuse me of it? Do I have to prove that I did not steal money out of your wallet while you were in my house? Just because you claim I did? Do I have to prove I did not threaten to beat you if you don't hand over your money to me? Or do you have the burden of proof if you accuse me of a crime…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:34 AM
0

good info, though my knee jerk reaction would be to downvote this crap But it is not your fault ........ Of course, I wonder why this would not fit for bullying, drug dealing, mafia extortion or gang banging. And, of course, all this hinges on a big lie: women don't lie about rape, and there is only a 2% quote of false rape accusations. If the truth came out, that they are closer to 40% to 60%, certainly over 8%, then the entire argument would collapse
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:27 AM
11

A history how due process was taken away for those accused of rape. the fact that a woman came back a dozen times for more sex does not mean there was no rape, A husband can be accused of rape years after the alleged crime, No corroboration is needed, the word of a woman is enough to convict
/r/MensRights23/11/12 12:34 AM
0

exactly
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:52 PM
-1

great way to put it
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:52 PM
1

if he has the video recording to prove it.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:49 PM
5

great suggestion. But do the police have to watch every second? Because the woman can withdraw consent at any time, and if the man continues for 5 more seconds, he is a rapist. Google 5 second rape ......
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:44 PM
1

it is easier to prove you are not drunk when driving (passing a blood test) then proving there was consent to sex, and that it was never revoked. There basically is no sound way to prove that it was never revoked, not even at the last 5 seconds of the act.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:40 PM
14

not good enough A woman can withdraw consent at any time. You need proof she did not withdraw consent Google "five second rape"
/r/MensRights22/11/12 11:37 PM
37

Any legal experts here? As a lay-person I thought there were things like magna carta, constitutional rights, due process, etc. Can anyone explain how such dictatorial practice passes Supreme court muster? Read the article, it is incredible.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:17 PM
36

it is worse. The accused has to PROVE by preponderance of evidence that consent was given. So if you are a ugly nerd, most people would not believe that a cute girl gave you consent, thus you get convicted of rape because you could not convince the jury that she consented.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:12 PM
18

Sure. Men are wallets. Didn't you know? In old times women and children had to behave a little decently in order to get money out of a man. Now men have to pay, getting only abuse in return. A sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:37 PM
1

Interesting article Very sexist. /s To prove if this anecdotal evidence is true, research would be needed. This research can not be unbiased in today's feminist dominated University and Politics climate.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:26 AM
1

The problem is similar to CEO nominations. In spite of quotas for the board of directors, even quota boards strongly favor males for the chief executive spot. Now it happens that all members of the European Central Bank board are top executives of their respective countries. And it is hard to force any country to nominate a woman to the post. http://www.euractiv.com/euro-finance/parliament-votes-male-ecb-board-news-515672 http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/25/us-eu-parliament-mersch-idUSBRE8…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 09:38 AM
1

I was bemoaning that heterosexual males can be discriminated against. I was not alleging that gays are pedophiles and a danger as life guards.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:54 AM
1

It is better that 10 men get falsely convicted of rape, then on rapist escape escape unscathed. is that not the main rule of due process? /s Who was it that has said that famous sentence?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:08 AM
1

if a woman filed 9 false rape reports, this does not mean that this rape report could not have been true. If she files a lot of false rape reports, this does not mean she could not have been raped. /s These prior false reports are not relevant. This would be "blaming the victim". /s
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:05 AM
-1

gays must not be discriminated against. It is not ok to think a gay is a pedophile. Gays are a protected class. Now it is perfectly ok that a heterosexual male is a pedophile, a danger for little girls /sarcasm
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:59 AM
2

thanks, I corrected the mistake: most men don't even get the job in child care, because they get discriminated against Exactly because the parents (the customers) are wary of men dealing with their children.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:58 AM
8

No, men actually get excluded from these jobs, and when in these jobs face serious discrimination. So serious that they are in danger of criminal law suits as child abusers.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:54 AM
17

This is so tempting: women are so scarce in free software, so let us help them Well, women do not have the talent nor vocation to slave away in unpaid labor for free software. Nor for free Wikipedia, as it has been shown. We men are chivalrous, so it is good to get a few women into PAID (?) internships, in spite of having hundreds of more deserving men who worked for free for a long time. But are women equally chivalrous trying to get men into child care, nursing and elementary school teaching j…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:54 AM
7

if we had men's studies, without feminist repression in research, there could be scientific research: how do women react to these pictures. How do men react to the gender inverted pictures? I would wager $ 500, that men would not laugh and would not find bloody mutilation and killing of women attractive, worth passing on their friends, etc. Furthermore I would wager $ 5000, that feminists would make sure that these men would be shamed, if not arrested, and feminists would do all they can to have…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:09 AM
5

And women had less access to international experience, which Catalyst has found predicts advancement. But it’s not because women don’t want to travel – men are just as likely to turn down an international assignment, I doubt this is true. and among those interested in relocation men still got more offers to do international work. probably there is more chance of a man not getting pregnant, not wanting to return to his family, of his family following him to his new job. *companies make rational d…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:03 AM
5

What matters is the quality of these projects. The report notes, “We found that leading projects alone doesn’t predict advancement, but working on highly visible projects does.” Yet men consistently get handed the critical work. They got larger and more visible projects: their budgets were more than twice those of women’s, their teams had over three times as many employees, and they had significantly more C-suite visibility and carried higher levels of risk. Warren Farrell would be the right one…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:00 AM
3

I believe there is research cited in r/mensrights that 40% of women would lie to get pregnant and/or condone such behavior. So you are saying 40% of women are reprehensible? This is misogyny. /s Or maybe it is just realism. Or maybe you can join the women and call it is understandable infatuation. Or you may join my personal opinion There is nothing wrong with a woman wanting my baby. It is flattering. If only she would be responsible for her decision, with no state-enforced right for me to pay.…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:52 AM
2

Despite about 100 protestors blocking the entrance to my presentation on Boys to Men at the University of Toronto this past Friday, Nov. 16, I was ultimately able to speak. (You can see footage of the protest here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TLyRvmrdsJI) That video is interesting: "No hate speech on our Campus", they chanted. Being that that the chanters are the ones engaging in violent hate speech, blocking a academic event by a moderate famous researcher and activis…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:41 AM
2

kind of equally capable. Just in practice men have more ambition, men know they need to have worldly success and riches to get a sex or marriage partner. And males have more variance in almost all traits and thus are found among the most successful, which feminists note and consider unjust. They are also on the bottom of all traits, be it success, talent, but feminists do not notice male failures.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 12:33 AM
1

white people can not sue for discrimination. As I stated before, in order to sue against a woman being promoted or otherwise unduly advantaged, you need to be of a protected class. Women are, non-white races are. Whites need to be either gay, or old, or disabled, or something else to successfully counter female privilege in hiring, promoting, etc.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:47 PM
1

right. You need to belong to a protected disadvantaged group to get any protection. So if you are a white male, if you are gay, or disabled, or old, you might get protection. If you are non-white, you automatically belong to a protected class. So mentioning race has a little to do with the issue. I know this because a white male who was discriminated against when a woman was promoted in spite of him having more merit, he only managed to sue as a older person. One needs to be a member of a protec…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:45 PM
10

According to warren farrell, the only job discrimination he knows about is men trying to get child-related jobs. It is a miracle these guys got a job at all. Most men don't even the job in child care or child education. Correction: most men don't even land a job in child care or child education. They remain jobless, while all the female graduates get hired According to Warren Farrell, this is anecdotal evidence from his experience. According to him, no research exists to prove or disprove these …
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:41 PM
16

she was just stupid. Send text messages that prove she was not raped, then making a rape accusation. Had she planned better, all would have worked out as planned, and the guy would have gotten 5 years in prison for daring to have consensual sex and then rejecting her the next day. Her crime was bad planning, to have furnished the proof of her crime by thoughtlessly texting. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:30 PM
10

Careful. Remember the British wife that falsified a signature to get the ex-husband's sperm from the sperm bank? A few years later she got around 100 k British Pounds for child support from the ex-husband for the children she created through fraud.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 10:18 PM
-3

you should tell her that this is domestic violence and that you could go to police That this is a crime That helps her a little, to understand what she is doing
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter