TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

shingaladaz Archive

View 4 posts and 135 comments by shingaladaz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

We don’t need to accuse them of anything. It’s here in black and white.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 11:39 AM
10

Kudos to you for acknowledging it but it’s not a basic mistake, it’s your entire argument that you ignored and then got loaded with a bullshit term for how wrong someone is. That number is based on only the net upvotes. It doesn’t take in to consideration the people that downvoted because they “care” (your word not mine)… your 99.9868% doesn’t take that in to consideration. Think man, THINK.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 10:31 AM
11

Now I see that "They’re not groundbreaking numbers that represent the entire movement" is a perfect answer to "What does that say about this sub and the men’s rights movement?" No, that’s just someone showing you that your rationale is daft….and pointing out your attempt at gaslighting….which is ironic, all things considered. I mispoke in my comment; it was not a strawman at all. Yeah you should unlearn twatty Reddit argument terms when they can backfire on you like that. Yeah it says a lot abou…
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:58 AM
12

Strawman argument. I never said any of that. You can't do better than misrepresent me? Also you: What does that say about this sub and the men’s rights movement. Seriously, keep up with your own argument and accusations. Fucking strawman argument 🤣 While those numbers are groundbreaking, they are still more upvotes than downvotes. That says a lot. Yeah it says a lot about net 248 people. …that’s 0.06685% of the subs members. Seriously man, behave.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:28 AM
15

The first post you shared has a comment by a mod saying they will remove the offending post and ban the person that put it up. Said offending post has a net upvote of 215. The second was removed by a moderator with a net 33 upvote. They’re not groundbreaking numbers that represent the entire movement. Seriously - don’t be a twat your whole life. Support the cause or don’t support it.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:10 AM
25

It sounds like you aren’t here for men’s rights, but to keep men in check. Typical misandrist behaviour.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:01 AM
51

Same goes for women that decide to keep a child against the man’s wishes. They shouldn’t be liable for child support.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 10:15 AM
4

Most shows that have a man as the protagonist have him as a criminal or weasel. I’m watching Sneaky Pete at the moment and he’s both. He’s not heroic at all. The last time I watched something where the male was heroic was 24.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 08:33 AM
2

Knitting?
/r/MensRights01/10/25 05:46 AM
3

I don’t mean to insult. Let’s leave it there.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:30 PM
4

As mentioned, my Mrs has 3 degrees (and a Masters, as it so happens). Both her parents are lecturers at a London University and they have written one of the most popular education books in their field, so on paper they sound like the type people that would have a passion for education. They really don’t. Your situation comes across like someone that has a passion for something because they’re in it, but only because they’re in it - and this doesn’t affect everyone, evidently. Like war veterans a…
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:19 PM
7

I’d love to see the stats on people that have a passion for education. That really is a niche market.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 09:04 PM
22

The problem with being this narrow minded is that you rule out genuinely intelligent people that don’t have degrees. It’s literally classism. My Mrs has 3 degrees but got them because she’s a study hard, not because she’s hugely “intelligent”.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 08:43 PM
3

Can’t say I have, no.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 05:41 PM
8

What a load of crap. Your Italian “analogy” isn’t even an example of what might be considered “mansplaining”, and all you’ve done is strengthen the idea that this is how men sometimes speak to each other. If you want to exclude yourself from your instincts then you be you, but don’t palm it off with bullshit labels and Gen this and Gen that (my eyes are rolling), and don’t call a social person an asshole for no reason….that makes you the asshole, doesn’t it.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 06:54 AM
3

Bitchsplaining.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 06:49 PM
7

You’ve gone off your own track. Where’s the “you’re making it worse” element of this?
/r/MensRights14/09/25 06:48 PM
6

Explain how that relates to mansplaining.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 06:29 PM
11

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 04:58 PM
10

I saw the posters that were put up in mens toilets in Scotland telling them to not speak to women, cross to the other side of the road, not sit next to them. Mad.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 04:14 PM
12

I think it’s just women thinking men are being patronising when they discuss a matter. They’re confusing the way men talk with being condescending.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 03:52 PM
4

Yeah, I totally saw the joke. That’s why I got involved. We’ve had enough of our instincts denied, so to deny the way we naturally talk is peak misandry.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:28 PM
5

This deserves upvotes IMO, guys. One of us!
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:20 PM
40

It’s a strange place to be when helpfulness is met with rolling eyes. And women wonder why men don’t give a shit any more. Everything that makes us men is ridiculed or denied.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:17 PM
5

Think man, think!
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:12 PM
109

It’s so true and I’ve said it for years - that’s just how guys speak ….be it to a woman, or to their mates down the pub.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 01:01 PM
4

TIL that the word incel is a portmanteau.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 03:50 PM
3

You’re fighting the good fight, bro, thank you, but don’t let it ruin you.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 01:37 PM
51

And it’s just us men that objectify women, apparently.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 10:51 AM
1

Can you get the link to work?
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:32 AM
15

On what?
/r/MensRights08/09/25 05:42 PM
5

What did they cry about?
/r/MensRights07/09/25 04:34 PM
90

Agreed. Uber-left wing men actually side against themselves.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 08:03 AM
5

“TM” is society’s way of not being able to deal with the natural instincts of the male human species. I’m not talking about the really bad things a few men do. I’m talking about the genuinely natural behaviour the male sex of any species show.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 10:05 AM
21

Men have been told to leave women alone for a couple of decades now, and it was drummed in to us around MeToo. So we do. As for your experience - fuck that. If that‘s what dating is, then it can do one.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 08:50 PM
1

They did it to themselves helped along by the elite who were happy to take their slavery.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 12:45 PM
8

I don’t think so. But you can respect women and their values whilst also being a MRA
/r/MensRights04/09/25 04:55 PM
20

Married man with two kids here. I’m lonely as hell.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 08:20 AM
172

Pure blatant misandry.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 02:37 PM
123

More choice for us then /s But seriously, what can be done about this? I’d suggest not a lot.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 01:17 PM
1

r/StupidWoke
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:43 PM
5

The title is my relationship.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:03 PM
1

What does OP’s subject matter not do that it says it does? For clarify, I’m not being argumentative, I’m genuinely wondering.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 08:11 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 01:03 PM
79

It’s considered “up-punch” “humour”, and it’s pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 07:42 PM
31

It’s proper dystopian.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:01 AM
48

They took the American Dream a little too literally.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:00 AM
1

Ooof
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:05 PM
1

Seriously what the fuck are you piping on about? I read the fucking article and my point around it being a bigger picture is valid when you consider my point around the potential of this becoming case law. If you know how that works then you’ll understand why this is bigger picture material. Now bore off.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 11:01 PM
-1

I know. Read my comment again you nitwit. Hint: “bigger picture”
/r/MensRights04/08/25 10:55 PM
1

What detail makes you think that? Be precise.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 10:42 PM
1

No. And Women shouldn’t do it to men.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 09:22 PM
62

HE is a relatively wealthy man that can afford it, and he may end up even wealthier - he’s putting in to get out. His sacrifice will hopefully mean a better ruling for all men. Bigger picture stuff going on.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 10:22 AM
218

A small win. Let’s hope this becomes case law so it can help all men in divorce cases moving forward.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 08:49 AM
2

Yeah, gotcha now.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:46 PM
2

I genuinely don’t know what you’re referring to, buddy. Edit: ah, tested on desktop and this post here by you has been removed. It works fine on mobile though, which threw me. Irony indeed.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:42 PM
1

Your post was removed?
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:35 PM
2

Echo chambers.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 12:02 PM
2

I had the same happen to me. This sub actually forewarns of this in its details area. I like it. It means I’m not shy to support my beliefs (even though there’s absolutely nothing wrong with being a man and supporting men’s rights) and not pussyfooting around in subs modded by snowflakes.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:50 AM
1

Very well done, OP. How did you find out your details were on there to begin with?
/r/MensRights25/07/25 08:45 AM
37

“By saying that, you’re proving it does”
/r/MensRights20/07/25 11:38 AM
4

Literally told us to leave them alone. So we do.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 10:31 AM
110

Should have got a prison sentence.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 08:40 AM
1

Measured thoughts.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 06:41 PM
3

Yup. Reading this reminded me of that poster that was put up around Scotland in men’s toilets that contained a list of things men need to do to make women feel safe. It included crossing the road if you see a woman coming towards you on your side, not sitting next to women on public transport, and not speaking to women you don’t know. In a post-#MeToo, post feminist, post woke mind rot world this campaign was dead serious.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 09:30 PM
3

🎯
/r/MensRights05/07/25 01:22 PM
1

The thing about issues related to Men’s Rights is that material is constantly presented to us. Whereas with, say, feminism, they constantly discuss matters based on conjecture that’s upscale and up weighted to include the suffering of every single female that ever lived and ever will by every male that ever existed and ever will.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:40 AM
1

I’d love to see what’s deemed “abusive male behaviour”.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:36 AM
1

Brilliantly said and is a much fuller version of my own comment.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:56 PM
1

Doesn’t it just mean that men should be able to go on their natural instincts and behaviours (to a point, obviously), without being shut down by the likes of feminism and the media? You say they don’t have the power, but it’s already happened.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:55 PM
158

Sums it up.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:35 AM
317

Men having been bitchcoping for fucking eternity.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 10:34 AM
1

Not even close to being right, a. About the point and b. About the existence of “toxic masculinity”. A bullshit term invented by feminists and failed men.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 08:31 PM
1

While I agree, I was just talking about the lions there :)
/r/MensRights16/06/25 08:04 PM
30

Belongs in r/StupidWoke, too.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 12:49 PM
1

It’s just masculinity. Society has made it toxic. Is it toxic for a male lion to have a multiple females in the pride and is it toxic for them to mate with them all? It it toxic for those males to defend their pride through combat? Switched to humans and these behaviours are considered toxic masculinity. Humans are too intelligent for their own instincts and have developed a society that doesn’t match them.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:17 PM
1

Do Democrats pander to everything but men? I’d suggest so.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:30 PM
14

I’ll rephrase, because I didn’t mean it like that; it’s a shame we got to a stage where we had to use it - at one point it felt like the only way women would allow men to “meet” them.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:37 PM
68

Imagine using it in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:39 AM
4

Misandry towards me? Quite possibly.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 10:27 AM
2

Saved this post so I can come back and read it from time to time. Fuck.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 02:27 PM
23

I mean, sex without consent is already illegal - that is rape. I’ve been saying for a while now that we’ll end up having to sign mutual consent forms before sexual encounters, and it will get even deeper than that - maybe even having to agree to it being recorded with the recording being handled by a specialist securities company that’s made available to the police/lawyers, and when there’s an issue.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 11:21 AM
6

mAL3s h4ve HaD tHeIr tIME
/r/MensRights07/06/25 09:46 AM
24

Not even casual. It’s blatant, normalised and encouraged. Even men encourage it against men. It’s bizarre.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 04:06 PM
6

Jail time needed.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 11:23 AM
3

1, 5 and 7 are spot on for me and my Mrs. I’ve also been accused of something I didn’t do to a woman and I was, indeed, guilty despite overwhelming evidence that I didn’t do it at all. Lost my job and career.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 06:10 PM
9

“Body count” filter.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:03 PM
0

Definitely all men, but you daren’t also be white and straight. Then you’re asking for trouble!
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:57 AM
1

Yeah and you can imagine it now - a room full of men and women all writing a show and all agreeing that men should be written this way. That’s men saying men should be disregarded, vilified, weak and outcast. All because of a few bad eggs, the media, feminism and the woke mindset.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:56 AM
1

I think you’re missing the point. Here, you have a 40+yo woman that’s had sex with a 17yo child. The headline reads: woman has sex with boy and blames husband. If it was a 40+yo man that had sex with a 17yo girl he’d be called a groomer, a pedophile and a rapist. And if he blamed his wife he’d be called a cheat and abandoner. This is r/MensRights and this post highlights the difference between how men and women are treated for exact same thing. What’s stupid is irrelevant to the context of the p…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 04:00 PM
0

Yes.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 01:34 PM
1

Rape is rape, no matter the age. If this was reversed and it was a 17yo girl and a male teacher then the story would be that the teacher groomed and raped her.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 12:03 PM
2

An 18yo with some issues is ranting about his family. Nothing else. If you’re around the same age, your lack of understand is understandable and I wouldn’t expect anything else from you in response. If you’re older, then you should know better.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:13 PM
1

There’s so much going on here. Your particular situation - the one you’re describing, anyway - seems less about men’s rights and more about family dynamic, age and your own mental health. I hope you can speak with someone that you know (and can trust) about what you’re going through and get the advice and help you need. Best of luck, friend.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 11:14 AM
1

Yeah. That dude needs to reverse that invite and get his cousin to give us an update!
/r/MensRights13/04/25 07:18 AM
2

Wow.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 07:18 AM
7

Completely agree.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 09:02 PM
2

Ah, I’ve mis-read OP, I thought they were talking about female rape centres only having female staff there. My bad, and thanks for inadvertently pointing that out for me.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 08:58 PM
-3

They should be female-only IMO.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 08:24 PM
12

I can’t see things going in any direction that doesn’t lead to something like this. Body cams will need to be the norm.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 07:56 PM
35

If I wasn’t with my Mrs I would never seek a relationship again….and things have been pretty rocky between us last couple of years. I’m just fucking DONE with relationships of any kind due to the way normal men are treated.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 04:43 PM
8

At this point are there even goal posts? Making it up as they go along since #MeToo Anyone see that poster that was put in men’s toilets in Scotland that told men to cross the road when they saw a woman on their side. Not sit next to them on public transport etc. Written by a feminist, for sure, but the main issue is that this shit was signed off and is being normalised. Soon not crossing the road or just sitting next to a women will be deemed assault and/or rape.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 04:42 PM
31

If true, that’s ridiculous. Just been reminded of this real anti-rape campaign. Utterly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 06:44 PM
25

We’re heading towards a fully policed state, so things like this don’t sound totally crazy.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 06:37 PM
7

Can’t, here, in the UK, but body cams should be more normal.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 06:17 PM
59

If there’s no evidence, then yes it’s worrying. Women will have to worry about the men that do rape and men will have to be careful not to be charged with rape after consensual sex. I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw consensual forms being offered to partners before sex and things like body cams being more normal (up to the point of just before intimacy), with agencies being in control of the sensitive footage, which is made available to the police if needed.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 05:56 PM
0

Can’t think of a single one.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 12:30 PM
2

Means well for her boys, I meant, but yes - you make a valid point; these people don’t care about men, and they’ve lived in their little uber-liberal echo chambers circle jerking off to how men are scum, men aren’t needed (she literally reminds us of her view on that in her main post, the piece of shit), men are the problem, and they wonder why men aren’t represented.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/25 02:25 PM
2

There’s those double standards at work again.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 10:41 AM
6

Use your strengths. Attraction is extremely complex.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 10:05 AM
1

I love how it takes a woman to have a son to realise men are practically invisible today. r/MensRights would have a field day with this. I know you mean well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/25 09:12 AM
10

How is someone discussing their own body anything like the issue discussed in this thread? Someone being vulgar is just someone being vulgar.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 09:27 PM
9

Jesus wept. We’re in r/mensrights, of course we’re going to focus on this particular double standard. You’re getting hung up on the subject matter and not understanding that this is just a post to discuss the issue in general. Eurgh. So tedious. Love the ad hominem. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:54 PM
12

You’re really struggling, aren’t you. The issue in question is a quite big one, and I’ll spell it out for you once again; DOUBLE STANDARDS The double standards and liberties afforded to women (by the media and general public) when it comes to discussing matters of privacy and sensitivity. In this instance it happens to be a woman freely and publicly discussing a man’s penis and getting zero backlash. Stop getting hung up on the subject matter, and look at the fundamental problem that relates to …
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:36 PM
20

Wait ‘til you hear that they still teach school kids about Emily Davison. Why and how should we move past it when double standards is STILL an issue? It’s a current matter to discuss. Further, I literally explain in the very comment you replied to that I saw it now, so posted it now. Your assumption that I posted this for clout is so cliche and boring and is grossly misplaced; just because you don’t understand the negative effect this particular men’s rights issue has on wider society it doesn’t…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:17 PM
12

You’ve literally made my point for me, thank you. Let’s see how much misandry the media suffer post #MeToo, shall we? And who’s this “we” you discuss. Speak for yourself. It’s not my fact. It’s just fact.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 03:02 PM
12

Oh look, another one that’s missed the point. It’s about double standards - a very relevant issue today relating to men’s rights. It’s not hard to understand ffs.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:52 PM
12

What are you blabbing on about?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:26 PM
54

Imbalances to men’s rights have no time limit when they’re still relevant, and just because it happened 7 year ago doesn’t mean it didn’t happen …but the simple truth is I actually only saw the article and story now, so posted about it now.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:20 PM
24

I bet you think 2+2=unfair to women.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:09 PM
25

Where’s that meme that has the word “point” flying over Superman’s head when you need it.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 02:07 PM
-2

Why are you being downvoted? “”Where it came from, for me,” explained Graham in a recent interview with Radio Times magazine, “is there was an incident in Liverpool, a young girl, and she was stabbed to death by a young boy. I just thought, why?”” From the horses mouth. Edit: am I missing something?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:54 AM
3

You’ve gotta play the card you’re dealt. Que remedio?
/r/MensRights01/04/25 09:39 AM
-5

It was inspired by two real life incidents according to Stephen Graham, but yes.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:21 AM
1

It’s a trendy word. Much like bigot. Most of the people calling people bigots are missing the irony of their bigotry, but because it’s a trendy word, they ignore their own wrong doing just to get an accusation in.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 05:18 PM
4

I have a Mrs, but if I didn’t I wouldn’t peruse a relationship of any kind. I don’t speak to any other women for any reason if it can be avoided.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 04:35 PM
3

Guilt tripping and selective memory is the BS that riles me the most.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:59 PM
0

If I knew I was going to be accused of what I was accused of at work, I would have worn a wide angle camera around my neck at all times. To be accused is to lose.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:31 PM
2

A delightful combination of low testosterone, chronic anxiety and sleep apnea ruined my sexual desire. I fixed all things but the appetite never fully returned.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:59 PM
9

Women are turning against women and their individual rights in record numbers.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 11:27 AM
10

Misandry is ignored on account of men being “strong” and “powerful”….but never human. There are double standards everywhere. For example (and I appreciate this is completely off topic, but I’ve just been reminded of it); Netflix has removed one episode of Mad Men due to it portraying an element of “black face”, but continues to show the movie White Chicks. The Mad Men episode portrays racism as a historical fact, while White Chicks is just downright racist …but there’s no such thing as racism ag…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 01:09 PM
1

Only cunts run zoo’s anyway, so she’s already a cunt in my book, but if I did visit zoo’s with my whole family I’d make sure this one was avoided.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 06:13 PM
1

Well done.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:29 AM
5

So many of my friends have been ruined by this.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:27 PM
1

Reminds me of that poster campaign about rape where they were both drunk but he raped her.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 10:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter