TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

signals101 Archive

View 1 post and 127 comments by signals101 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

War on Mensignals101/r/MGTOW15/10/15 06:11 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

This is actually one of the more important posts to appear on this subreddit - especially for Canadian MRAs - but still important for everyone else because similar principles were probably inserted into your countries' laws too. It shows how feminists worked to rig the Canadian constitution to establish inequality in the law that favours them while claiming to be fighting for equality. It basically says Equality for Everyone1 1 Except people who are "disadvantaged". These people get special priv…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:56 PM
1

Yeah but when you see bullshit sometimes the only way to deal with it is to mock it by taking it to the extreme. All men are capable of rape ... especially when you extend the definition of rape. or Didn't you know, under patriarchy all heterosexual sex is rape?
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:49 PM
20

You seriously see no irony in creating a post announcing that you're quitting this subreddit because people are having temper tantrums? If you want to go then go. If you want to have better conversations then start them. People are going to disagree with you - this isn't a circle jerk. Sometimes they're right and sometimes you are.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:48 AM
1

he could still commit crimes? Actually the current model does this. All the current process can do is expel the "rapist". This doesn't remove them from society. They're free to go rape someone else. In fact, the current process is immoral. You've given someone you believe to have committed rape the opportunity to commit rape again. What about the counter argument that without imposing sanctions the rape victim would have to see his/her rapist on campus This entire notion is centered around the i…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:26 PM
1

It's not very long. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/3403/text The problems they probably have with it are: (1) Ensuring Due Process rights - i.e. you should have the ability to defend yourself and the college can't impose sanctions until after they've found someone guilty. (2) Requiring that Rape is treated seriously and is reported to the police. Nothing in it should be controversial. It just guarantees that these college tribunals don't turn into kangaroo courts where t…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:52 PM
1

Although the CBC leans heavily left there were two women who seemed to be decent journalists and aren't idealogical. Wendy Mesley - the moderator for this piece Amanda Lang - left for Bloomberg News Ian Hanomansing also seems like he may be impartial but as a guy he doesn't dare step out of the ideological line. In the print press, Barbara Kay, Jonathan Kay, Robin Urback and sometimes Andrew Coyne could be looked at for a non-ideological point of view.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:57 PM
8

I'm sorry if I come across that way. That's not my intention - to make you feel judged. I share the same frustration with the condition of the world as every other MGTOW. We're all here to get away from all the bullshit society keeps shoving down our throats while telling us it tastes good. Sometimes we bring some of that frustration here like you did when you saw this hypocrite of a woman. I just saw those pictures of her profile and her showing off her shit and I just felt "fuck it, I don't gi…
/r/MGTOW07/11/15 05:06 AM
6

I don't want to be the arbiter of anything. I'm just pointing out the contradiction. Are you really going your own way if you spend your time obsessing about women you don't like? My expectation is that whether a woman is a magical unicorn or the worst cunt to have walked the planet a MGTOW's reaction is the same, meh. Why? Cause he's going his own fucking way and has no time for that shit. But whatever, you're right. I'm not the arbiter of MGTOW. You do MGTOW how you want to do MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW07/11/15 04:35 AM
18

No, I do care. I care about me. I care about the MGTOW lifestyle. However, when you start using this sub to judge other people, then you're not really MGTOW. You're very much "Man Very Concerned About How Other People Live Their Lives" Anyway, I don't want to pick a fight with you. You're on your own journey. I just hope that you realize that MGTOW is about making your own life better and not caring what others do with theirs.
/r/MGTOW07/11/15 03:49 AM
19

Meh, why do you get hung up on women you don't like? I look at both of these web pages and have the same reaction - none. A big part of going my own way is not being bothered when other people (including women) choose to go their own way.
/r/MGTOW07/11/15 03:38 AM
5

Unfortunately none of these people are MPs in the UK parliment. Its this woman's brand of feminism that matters. Its her brand of feminism that makes the laws that discriminate against men. Lip service by some people in your class does nothing for anyone. In fact it"s worse cause it butresses criticism of the toxic feminism expressed by people like this MP.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 04:09 AM
6

I don't doubt that you think this is the case but it does beg the question why then does this feminist MP think talking about men's issues is laughable? I mean if it is as you say it is. That feminists address men's issues then what exactly is the problem with addressing men's issues on International Men's Day in the UK parliment? The answer is that feminist don't think men have problems they simply think men are the problem.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:33 AM
8

This is completely stupid. It is precisely because feminists ignore men's issues that we have a problem with feminism. If feminists truely believed in equality and addressed men's issues then we'd have no problems with it.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:03 AM
6

Don't forget Ashe Schow at the Washington Examiner and http://www.cotwa.info/ Community of the Wrongly Accused
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:58 AM
2

Pick an issue that is relevant to the student body, have a narrow focus and stick with it. Circumcision, Divorce laws, etc aren't relevant to most of the student body. Having a general MRA club can work against you. You'll spend your valuable time on issues few can relate to. If you're on your own, I'd suggest keep your focus narrow and consider something like the "Education System and Boys". (Actually this topic alone is fairly broad and you probably will have to narrow it further.) Anyway, you…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:42 PM
1

And I agree with yours. I guess I should have stated that more explicitly in my initial response. I went straight to proposing a solution with out expressing agreement with the claim. Anyway, I guess my tl;dr is: to disarm these "neo-slurs" we have to "re-humanize" the person they're aimed at.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:45 PM
2

There was a recent article, I think in the Washington Post in which the authors described three types of cultures: 1) Honor Culture - where if someone offends you then you physically attack them. 2) Dignity Culture - where if someone offends you then you ignore them. 3) Victim Culture - where if someone offends you then you claim victimhood and make an appeal for society to ostracise the person who offended you. Guess which culture we're living in now? These labels that everyone wants to slap on…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:23 PM
130

I think the source of your complaint should be around the fees. Use the same discrimination policy that they use to justify the women only hours against them. Say whether women choose to use the facilities or not is not your concern. Don't challenge women's access - it's not your concern. Challenge the less services you get for your money. What is your concern is that you are paying equal fees for less access and that is discriminatory towards you. Either charge me lower fees or grant me full ac…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:38 PM
6

With that type of logic I guess Nazism isn't that bad then?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:35 PM
13

Hmm.. Lets see where the Telegraph decided to file this story... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-health Looking at their title bar, they don't even have a "men" section.
/r/MGTOW18/06/15 09:02 PM
3

A campaign to put a woman on US currency so that the images would be representative of women in US society says this... “We would have liked a more diverse list that would have included Native-American women and Latino women, but we weren’t going to just put people in to be representative,” Howard said. Facepalms all round!!! Now, I don't care if they remove Andrew Jackson and put a woman of note (no pun intended) on the $20 bill. In fact, I encourage it. Jackson was a bit of an asshole and repl…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 11:40 PM
58

I thought the whole point of rp is to not commit while still having sex. No, the point of the red pill is to see human relations as they really are and not the fairy tale it's made out to be. What each person does with that information is up to themselves. Some are disgusted by the whole situation and become MGTOW, some use that info to become seducers, some use that info to enhance the attraction between them and their spouse.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 05:43 AM
21

You control the "fuck" (sex) and he controls the "dump" (commitment). Just be clear with what you want out of the relationship and don't give up the "fuck" until you find someone willing to commit. Every guy who says "next" was going to be a guy who was going "fuck and dump" you anyway so nothing lost. Also, if you fuck a lot of guys (which is your choice - but there are consequences), fewer guys will want to commit. Old fashioned advice and not PC but true all the same.
/r/askTRP27/02/15 05:23 AM
1

I've seen a lot of comments telling you to hide cash. This is a bad idea. If her lawyers find it in a divorce, you're going to get screwed. The only way out of this is: get her to get her own job so that she is financially independent of you. stick it out with her, as your slutty "roommate" till all your kids move out. (i.e. kick your kids out at 18) sell the house, split the cash, and ditch the bitch.
/r/askTRP24/02/15 03:59 PM
19

I would fuck with them. Start with saying... "Only 3% of fortune 500 CEOs are women. We should have quotas so that 50% of CEOs are women." Get them agreeing with you. "Only 20% of elected officials are women. We should have quotas so that 50% of elected officials are women." then when they think you're one of them... "Over 60% of college students are women. We should have quotas so that only 50% of college students are women." and... "Only 3% of military deaths are women. We should have all fema…
/r/askTRP20/02/15 07:54 PM
2

Troll video but funny, good job.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:21 AM
3

A pay gap between men and women does exist. The question is why does it exist and why does it persist? The answer is also obvious and well known, it is because of the different choices men and women make during their careers. These include: choice in career, time taken off for child care, willingness to take on demanding assignments, desire to retire early, etc. Feminists tend to have three strategies for closing the pay gap. (1) Encourage men to take paternity leave ostensibly so that men can b…
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:13 AM
1

How many people would rob a bank of $1M if there was no chance of getting caught or facing any consequences? Does that mean that society if filled with bank robbers? The question in the survey is obviously stupid.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:37 PM
3

Chem. Eng here with 15+ years eng experience (although not in chem eng). With a bachelor's degree, you aren't a specialist at anything. Don't try to be. A Chem Eng with a minor in Econ. is someone with a broad base, introductory, knowledge in a complementary field. A Chem Eng with a concentration in Petrochemistry with a B.Eng is someone who thinks they're a specialist but isn't. Do the Econ minor.
/r/askTRP14/01/15 11:05 PM
6

Anything that excludes men simply because they are men is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 11:24 AM
6

The students were required to write a two page essay on the legacy of Dorothy Hodgkin Are they really "upcoming female scientists"? A two page essay as the qualification for being called a scientist is setting the bar really low. How about they hold an open physics competition and the winners, regardless of gender, gets to go to Grenoble.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 11:23 AM
7

I'd be interested for something in the Toronto area.
/r/MGTOW22/12/14 07:25 PM
3

Totally agree. If the goal of feminists is to create equal numbers of men and women in certain professions* (because equality is important), you'd think they'd insist that their political action groups would be gender and sex diverse too. Unfortunately, they never are and they're more than likely to be hostile to men. *certain profession - still looking for the feminist group agitating for equal representation in coal mining or the infantry.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:29 PM
1

I smell a troll, an obvious one at that. New account and all.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:09 PM
8

Well let's look at how Men's issues are funded...hmm. You may be surprised to find yourself empty-handed here as well. Where as: every University has a Women's studies department, every government has an elected official in charge of Women's issues, the UN has a division for Women's issues, every major corporation has some sort of "Women's Network", hospitals have divisions dedicated to women's health, and not just maternity care. Generally speaking, none of that infrastructure exists for men an…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 11:02 PM
3

Paraphrased... I'm a feminist that's going to give your wife dogmatic feminist reading material at her book club - she actually says Audrey Lorde I'm a feminist that's going to turn your daughter into a slut by high fiving her for having her own stash of condoms. I'm a feminist that is going to open the door for you because I'm physically closer. I'm a feminist that is going to coldly respond to "street harassment" I'm a feminist that is going to ruin your life. It's all just straw oppressor stu…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:12 PM
1

"A billboard using women's bodies to sell beer/cars/anything is an object. It cannot objectify". Can you not see how this is ludicrous? By making this statement you've actually proven that the point it contains is not true. Such a billboard would not "sell" beer or cars or anything to you. You'd see it as sexist. You'd be less likely to buy the advertised product. You'll personify the image of the woman, project a sense of exploitation on her (whether true or not) and then form a negative opinio…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 01:20 AM
1

to objectify - verb - to make someone an object in someone else's subjective experience. With me so far? A shirt is itself an object. It cannot objectify. A woman is an abstract, generic concept of a female human and is already an object. Its a concept of a person, a thing, not an actual person. A specific, living, female human is a subject with her own experiences. Still with me? To objectify some woman, Taylor would have had to tell a specific woman that the images on his shirt represent her. …
/r/MensRights15/11/14 11:14 PM
-2

It's about the attitudes that the shirt represents. Stop and ask yourself if you are actually offended by that shirt. You're probably not - most people, if not all people, are not offended by this shirt. What you are is worried that the shirt might offend someone else. You're worried about some hypothetical person being offended. You're the one doing the objectifying. How about we work on a world where people are empowered to speak up if they are actually personally injured by someone else's beh…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:02 PM
4

If someone's shirt is keeping you out of a career in science, I'm thinking, maybe you weren't all that interested in science to begin with.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:59 AM
6

Wonderful. Funding for STEM is no longer based on results or even the potential for results but on some arbitrary equality standard. "Oh, you've got some promising results on this new cancer treatment. That's great, but unfortunately your staff doesn't meet our quota requirements so no funding for you." That'll do wonders for UK research. I guess that's another industry to be shipped off to India and China.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:05 AM
1

Holy fuck that was long!!! What'evs, hope you got what you're looking for.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:34 AM
1

Agreed and upvoted. It is their right. However, a segregated society is still disappointing.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 11:13 PM
4

It's not a bad issue, it's a bad tactic. The issue is very real. Male domestic violence victims are ignored and that's a tragedy. But the real question is why? Why do people think it's funny when a man is assaulted by a woman? Feminists call it patriarchy (they call everything they don't like patriarchy) but it's more appropriately called traditional gender roles. In this role a man is supposed to be dominant, if he isn't then he isn't a man and "deserves" any abuse thrown at him. We can't win a…
/r/MensRights23/10/14 05:03 AM
2

Krista, the femitheist devine, is certainly a controversial person herself but this type of analysis is far and above anything put out by the gaming journalism media. I highly recommend reading it.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 10:06 PM
3

If you're feeling excluded on inclusion day then you should petition your work to have a "Men's Health Network" It shouldn't be too hard to convince your employers that men need help with mental health, encouragement to get physical checkups, dealing with divorce and loss of contact with their children, etc. I'd also take the precaution to make it clear from the beginning that this network isn't a feminist friendly space. Otherwise, within short order you'll have feminists invading your network …
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:07 PM
25

Presiding Judge Bruce Mallonee reasoned that the sentence was intended to punish Goode without damaging her life prospects. I only wish if I, as a man, were to come before Judge Mallonee to be sentenced for manslaughter that he'd decide not to "damage my life prospects" too. Somehow though, I doubt it.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:56 AM
1

Male Privilege or Female Neurosis? Hard to tell.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:05 PM
0

Consider yourself lucky that you don't know. I don't have the heart to tell you.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:03 PM
-3

Doesn't the child deserve a father that wants it? Of the three people involved, why is it only the mother's concerns considered. If she wants a child she can. She can find someone else who wants to be a father and have a child with them. That way everyone wins.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:00 AM
6

OP, thread got brigaded by AMR. At least, you see what you're up against. If you had some paternal options you wouldn't have had to take the drastic measures that you did.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:56 AM
15

I honestly can't see why anyone would expect any better from Valenti. She's a known quantity - vile, hateful and more than willing to use her podium to spread her bile. she probably loves David Futrelle As for Futrelle, I don't think even Futrelle likes Futrelle. Think about it. It explains his constant need for approval by apologizing for anything done by his overlords.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:01 PM
19

"... because the murder of a man is a crime against his mother." These feminists have no shame.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:23 PM
1

I can assure you that no one pays $800K on a baseless claim I can, with an equal measure of proof, assure you that they do. Paying off a lawsuit isn't just based on their likelyhood of winning. They could win the case in court and lose in the court of public opinion. $800K to make a potentially highly public and provocative case go away is not unreasonable - regardless of the merit of the claim. The entire point of tenure is to secure academic freedom in research and teaching Maybe you should te…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:17 PM
0

A 38 page report that included slander How do you know it contains slander? You're just spouting bullshit. Not even the journalist saw the report. Tenured professors are not allowed to go on unauthorized witch hunts The entire point of tenure is to be able to speak the truth as he saw it without fear of retaliation from the university. He saw that his former student was railroaded by the kangaroo court and he wrote about it. Barnett, however, said through his attorney that he never investigated …
/r/MensRights10/08/14 08:50 AM
3

feminist irony: "I bathe in male tears" retort:"I use a woman's tears to wash her blood off my dick. Good times." That should shut them up but more likely it'll get them shrieking.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 10:28 PM
-2

Cunty cunts are going to cunt - the mistake is to expect anything worthwhile from these sorts.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 10:08 PM
5

Women want to get married because even despite all the feminist garbage they get fed on a daily basis they still want a "protector and provider" and a marriage just cements your commitment to that role. To side step marriage you basically have to make her feel that same level of security without actually getting married. You can do that by being proactive about your future. Talk about where both of you are going to live, finances & retirement, kids, etc. Then actually start doing these things li…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:51 PM
3

Meh. An idiot makes a You-tube video. Apparently, OP thinks we should care. The only thing I thought that was sorta amusing is feminists instance on calling us fedora wearing neckbeards.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:27 PM
6

Yes and No. Yes because we fully accept and welcome people who are homosexual. No because a person's sexuality (i.e. sexual preference) doesn't have any bearing on whether they deserve human rights. In other words, your rights stem from you being human - not because you identify with one group or another. This way we all have equal rights.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:30 AM
29

They can never afford to shatter their delusion. They've unwittingly (all except darkhorseswore), falsely branded you a rapist. To admit that they participated in a false rape accusation that has had some serious consequences on an actual person's life would be to admit that false accusations actually happen and they have consequences. These zealots will never do that. I wouldn't hold out much hope for decency from this bunch. Just hope they stop perpetuating it and try to put your life back tog…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:08 AM
44

I've been following the witch hunt on you since it started and have been meaning to comment but haven't had the chance until now. One reason the police won't charge a person with murder unless they have a dead body that looks like it had been murdered is because they don't want to look stupid if they charge someone and a week later the person who is supposed to have been murdered shows up from vacation!!! The idiots in /r/againstmensrights aren't the police however. They have no fear of looking …
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:35 AM
2

College disciplinary boards are supposed to rule on a preponderance of evidence. However, since they don't have subpoena power to collect evidence, nor expertise to evaluate forensic evidence (if they even have access to it) doesn't that mean that a lot of evidence is either ignored or misinterpreted? Doesn't that make the standard of preponderance of evidence even more absurd?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:23 AM
4

Ah, a man of conviction and grace. I like you.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:56 PM
7

I'll take your defensiveness as an admission of being wrong. Now on to your new points that you've just brought into the argument to try to cover up the fact that you were wrong about my initial post... "men have been complaining for years....." Sure they have, but no one gave a damn. There was no AC360 special for men. That was my point - the outrage is that now women have to pay men. demographic changes it becomes news worthy... Sure a demographic shift makes it news worthy. But it's not a dem…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:49 PM
10

You need to also re-read what I wrote. I'm not talking about the law. It's gender neutral and I'm glad that it is. It equally affects men and women. However, because of historical differences more men are affected and historically because they were men nobody cared. What I find disturbing is why would Anderson Cooper hold a special called "man-imony"? Why not a special on Alimony and have men and women on the panel discussing how paying alimony has negatively affected their lives. My point is (I…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:12 PM
8

You need to re-listen to 6:37 of your concise version video. "Most alimony payments are made from husband to wife" The gripe is that no one gave a damn when men lived in poverty because of alimony but it's all of a sudden a super important issue now that this is happening to women.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:52 PM
13

Hopefully they'll see that when they stop portraying one gender as "the problem" they'll get more universal buy-in and positive results.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:46 AM
5

In theory and often in practice, advancing women's rights shouldn't mean freezing out men or vilifying them as a group. But frequently, at the levels of both discourse and policy, it does. That should be confronted and rejected, in my view. This right there is how I feel about current feminist advocacy. But it should be done in a way that acknowledges the legitimacy and necessity of many pro-female perspectives and campaigns. This is what I want too but after talking with your average feminist f…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:01 PM
-1

HOLD THE FUCKING FRAME I agree with the substance of what you said but I would have been even more blunt. This is what the OP should have done. the tray Say nothing. Just walk away. If she confronts, then chuckle as if she's being ridiculous and say "I'm not your bitch". If she escalates the next time she has to do something for you by saying back to you "I'm not your bitch". Then say "That's right, you're my brother's bitch". the car Keep your cool. Just say "I did realize you were so insecure.…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 01:01 PM
1

You should watch the amazing atheists video on that kid. He was messed up all on his own. Society did very little to him.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 12:11 PM
5

That Elliot Rodgers kid was messed up. He had nothing to do with TRP. Instead he was subscribed to PUAHate - he hated guys who tried to improve their game. Moreover, TRP teaches you that life isn't fair but you have to make the best of what you've got - if you fail, dust yourself off, learn from the experience and keep trying. This was the exact opposite of what Rodgers thought - he hated women who rejected him and he hated men that were successful with those women. In the major media outlets, w…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 11:25 PM
1

A lot of TRP is about honesty with yourself, self respect and self actualization so in that respect it's the same for everyone. With regards to other people, the red pill is more about attraction than relationships. Attraction is basic and primal. Relationships are complex and influenced by culture but ultimately secondary to attraction. So at this basic level, women will desire what all women want for themselves, whether hetero or homosexual, and all women are equally limited by their biology. …
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 10:39 PM
1

Don't you just love it when evidence is just three links away... No, Fruzina Eordogh, you're wrong. Misandrist, racist feminists do exist, they're not just fabrications of 4chan, meet Yasmin Alibhai-Brown.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:39 PM
14

IT isn't a Men's rights issue though. If it involves men, then it's a men's rights issue. How the fuck does feminism become so broad that when you "question his bullshit [it] is a feminist action" but trying to question how this affects men, and it clearly does, it isn't a men's rights issue? It forces women into a submissive role to men and forces men to carry the burden of implied responsibilities to being accountable for the ones submitting themselves to the man. and Men have the burden of be…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:52 PM
18

While some feminists tend to off and on say things that make you question their sanity this woman actually does seem to have some mental health issues. Watch a few more of her videos and I think you'll agree that we shouldn't focus on the feminist jargon that she uses. Instead, at the very least, show her some compassion and not provoke her illness should she find this thread.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 04:23 AM
2

It's a weak assed attempt to troll. Alternatively, if the genders were reversed feminists like /u/Loreilai would launch a "devastating" twitter campaign, bus people in to protest and write some threatening letters to Pixar so maybe it is an earnest attempt to get us to do the same. One can never be sure with nutty feminists.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 04:01 AM
2

Oh, look, another Elliot Rodgers wannabe. I guess when PUAHate shut down all their members needed to create their own sites. To the owners of neckbeard-news.com: Just because nobody likes you doesn't mean you have to go on a killing rampage, OK. Get some help.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 10:32 PM
6

Aren't gay men men? They certainly are. Moreover, this case puts a spotlight on current societal views with regards to men and fatherhood. Without a woman in the picture the children are apparently orphans according to Texas.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:39 PM
3

You're wrong dan. If they were women their names would automatically be on the birth certificate. It's because they are men who aren't married to the biological mother that they are denied paternity.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:35 PM
37

This is so vomit inducing. Still I encourage everyone to read the list of 50 things men should do on "Feminist Father's Day". You'll notice something quite disturbing quite quickly. There's nothing in that list that celebrates masculinity neither is there anything that encourage boys to feel good about themselves. To these feminists, Father's Day should be about encouraging boys to be feminine and putting the concerns of women and girls above their own. In fact there is more in that list about i…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:55 PM
5

I'm a man, I want a safe platform to talk about male issues OK, if I were to take you at your word that this is actually what you're about why don't you repost this thread and start off the conversation from a Masculist's perspective. Ask questions that direct the discussion towards the ideas you want to discuss. The community only is what it members are willing to put into it.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:27 PM
2

I'm personally glad for my circumcision. I'm glad for you. I'm not opposed to an adult male making that decision for himself. I'm opposed to having it done on infant boys. I hope you see that while even though you may feel that the procedure is beneficial to you, there are others who don't feel that way - and they were never given the choice. So I'm not opposed to male circumcision, I and many MRAs are opposed to infant male circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:32 AM
2

Women are human beings just like us. We demand our rights as human beings. As such nothing we demand reduces the rights of women. For example; Female Genital Mutilation is a crime, as it should be. Male Genital Mutilation (circumcision) should be too as both violate the autonomy of children. Etc. Feminism on the other hand is an ideology held to varying degrees by women and men. Many of us disagree with much of this ideology and find it harmful. Some of us consider themselves both MRAs and Femin…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:03 AM
53

These are so frequent now we need to keep an archive.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:43 AM
2

Very different from his other videos and also very well done. I think he made his case very well.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:36 AM
4

Of course not, soldiers aren't men. They're just soldiers. /s
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:55 AM
1

This piece was neither.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:53 AM
2

That was not a good piece of journalism. It was crafted to make it seem that way. You know how you can tell it was a heavily biased piece? Without clicking on any of the links you know exactly where and when the protest is but you only know vaguely when the conference is. Also, do you remember any of the three lines describing the conference indirectly or do you remember the big block quote in the middle. That's about as biased as you can get while still having enough content to make a weak asse…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:52 AM
13

Say: "I have the expectation of intimacy, that's why I chose to be in a relationship. I'm not ashamed that I want to have sex with you but I am disappointed that you're trying to make me ashamed of my sexuality."
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:40 AM
3

You should have given a concrete example. "What about the thousands of veterans coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan. Many of them have PTSD caused by being forced to be in a situation where their lives were in constant danger. Where they were terrified of a pile of trash at the side of the road because they didn't know if it was covering up an IED. How do you think they would feel when they come home and see #killallmen?"
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:29 AM
3

Too much anti-feminist hatred. Well lets see. They are making an all out effort trying to associate Elliot Rodgers with the MRM. However, no where in his manifesto did he talk about male circumcision, legal paternal surrender, rights of a father to their children after a divorce, etc. No reasonable person would consider him an MRA if they bothered to find out what an MRA actually is. So every time I think I'm maybe being too harsh in my criticism of feminists they find a way to make me dislike t…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:43 AM
6

So according to feminists, the only role for men is the promotion of women. You know what, I didn't like traditionalism because I thought the traditional male gender role was too restrictive but somehow I think the feminist male gender role might be even more restrictive. So I'll have to pass. Thanks for the tip though, it was worthy of a chuckle.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:36 AM
11

But that's kinda the point of this article. To tar this subreddit with Rodger's crime. It's lazy, despicable reporting.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:50 PM
6

I made the decision to refuse to let it dictate how I live my life I was glad to read this. I hope you're able to be an example to others so they can overcome some of the pain from their assault. “I know you’ve been hurt, and I’m sorry. I will listen, but please also listen to me.” Yeah, we wished this worked. Unfortunately, most people aren't as compassionate as you. We don't get listened too, we get mocked. A few of the cliched response we get are: "What about the menz?", "Why do you have to d…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:24 PM
7

We urge the men's rights community to respect the important balance we always speak about. It is not enough to insist on respect for the rights of the accused. Great work Pierce and thanks for making the statement that I quoted above. The rhetoric is often heated and unconsciously people end up picking sides. It important to remind ourselves that the only side that we should be on is the side of justice for all. Accusers should be taken seriously and their claims fully examined. Victims should b…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:45 PM
1

My grandfather is struggling with prostrate cancer I'm sorry to hear about your grandfather's struggle. I'll pass along your message to the group, I'm sure they'll appreciate it.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:03 AM
32

First off thanks for posting in this sub. There's a lot of anti-MRA messages out there right now and it takes a lot of courage to find us out and investigate for yourself. We're definitely not perfect, this is a discussion site and the discussion is fluid and evolving. The mods here keep a pretty open forum and we welcome all sorts of ideas - even ideas that directly challenge commonly held beliefs (you may get downvoted - but not banned). This sometimes leads to some "interesting" threads but I…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:46 AM
3

There are a bunch of guys at my work in their fifties and sixties that are beginning to get prostate related problems. It's not something they spontaneously bring up but at least if I initiate conversation most are willing to talk about how it's affecting their lives. A couple months ago I networked them all together and it spontaneously became an informal support group that allowed them to open up. Now I've got a new problem, everytime they walk past my desk they stop and have a 5 minute convo …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:56 AM
2

I don't know that you need to continue it. It seems like a lengthy but fairly respectful discussion. I'd just go over it and investigate claims made by both sides further. (yes, investigate your own claims too and learn how to make them clearer) The point of an argument is to educate yourself by learning about diverse opinions. It's not about beating your opponent into the ground.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:34 AM
-3

You sound like a feminist. Right in the feels. That's the shittiest thing anyone has said to me all week and that's in a week that some one has told me to (1) "Go fuck yourself", (2) "Go die in a fire, scum", (3) "I'm going to skull fuck you, you god damned rape apologist". So no, I'm not a feminist. You missed my /s (sarcasm tag).
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:32 PM
2

I can't speak for agent_of_entropy, however, I sympathize with the frustration you're feeling when dealing with people who identify as male feminists. However, I think it's important not to dehumanize them and make it clear that you dislike their ideological position and not them. Also, I know that it isn't a courtesy our interlocutors offer us but we aren't them.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:51 PM
9

Your title is misogyny. The fact that he said that he wanted to kill all men didn't mean anything. It was just a joke, just ask /r/AMR, they tell this joke all the time. I mean the entire thing is just a joke, it's not like anyone actually says they're going to kill men and actually kill men. Silly MRAs. /s Seriously, if you saw this post on /r/AMR, you wouldn't think anything of it because all their posts look like this.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:34 PM
7

I suffer from depression. In some of my worst episodes, I rationalize to myself that it is better to starve to death than get out of bed and have a bowl of cereal. I've gone as much as four days without getting out of bed. The point of me revealing this very personal anecdote is to tell you that you can't make sense of the thoughts of someone who is in the throes of mental illness.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:19 PM
5

Never let a good crisis/tragedy go to waste. There are two themes that are emerging from this event. (1) Our opposition's tortuous logic and the depths that they're willing to sink to try to link this tragedy to us. (2) That men are truly invisible. 4 men dead, 6 men injured. They're completely invisible to the media. They've been a number of cases where they're confused in the reporting as being women - because women are the ones that matter. Dead women matter - dead men don't.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:01 PM
1

You're not a passive object in the world. If you are offended, engage the other person who is offending you but recognize they are human as well and have their own baggage. Also, try not to be offended for other people - you have no idea what's going on in their heads or the history of their relationships.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:50 PM
5

She has a narcissistic world view that the world is about her or should be about her and that attitude is enabled by feminism. An appropriate response would be: "Ok, you're enraged. Good for you. Does that mean that I'm obligated to provide a sense of security for you? Kinda like Elliot Rodgers felt women were obligated to provide sex for him?"
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:34 PM
1

Is consent of both parents required to give a child up for adoption. No. If the father is not married to the mother then he has no automatic rights to his child. Some states have putative father registry but most don't - the utility of the registry assumes that he has knowledge of his child's existence. Are there situations, post-birth, where a mother can give up a child, but the father cannot? Yes, most jurisdictions in North America have the concept of legal maternal surrender also called a "s…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:37 PM
3

Actually he visited ANTI-PUA sites. He felt PUA sites took advantage of guys like him. A not-so-subtle point that these anti-MRA writers purposefully confused. Step 1. Conflate Anti-PUA with PUA Step 2. Conflate PUA with MRA Step 3. Advocate to get MRA sites shut down It's really demonstrates what kind of people we're dealing with.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:13 PM
5

Women should not have the right to choose who to mate and breed with. That decision should be made for them by rational men of intelligence. Er, nope. They may have ideas about the "true" nature of men and women that you (or many others) may not agree with but none of it is about imposing their will on others. It's more about understanding their own nature and the nature of others and using that to their advantage/personal happiness.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:05 PM
0

a mentally ill one.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:51 AM
1

Any publicity is good publicity. People that are curious about men's rights may find that wiki article and then lookup this sub to find out if any of it is true and then they'll make up their own minds. People that make up their minds before reading this sub, well we wouldn't want them anyway. What's interesting about those sources is how they all reference each other. Talk about the woozle effect.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:22 AM
2

Despite the fact that he's a difficult character and has routinely rubbed people the wrong way, for various reasons I rate him quite highly. Thanks for taking an interest in a man that has trouble integrating into the workforce. These people do exist and as you can see even on a sub like mensrights they can be marginalized. this guy seems to have a bit of an attitude problem "An attitude problem" is a bit vague and can be many things. However, I've found that it's best not to engage the attitude…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:01 PM
6

Do you feel that gender roles are assigned by society In the west, no, gender roles aren't assigned. However, they are indirectly reinforced by society. A gender role is a meme that you play out. When you play along and act as according to what people expect they understand you (or at least understand the rules of the role you're playing) and tend to resist you less. It's a low effort way to live (which is fine if that's what makes you happy). Furthermore, if you see someone playing the same rol…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:14 PM
9

Forcing someone to perform a gender role is dumb. Forcing someone out of a gender role that they choose is also dumb. A gender role is part of a person's identity. If two people choose traditional gender roles for themselves and are happy with each other I don't see it as my place to convince them that one is "oppressing" the other. Personally, the women I choose to be with don't perform traditional gender roles but that's just me.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:09 PM
7

Also our grievances are with feminism and feminist policies that hurt men. Not with women or strictly speaking individual feminists themselves.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:36 PM
1

No. Random people who don't have any idea what the MRM is would join and the the discussion would be watered down. Plus the people in /r/AMR would have a brain aneurism and die. I dislike them but I don't want to see them die.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:44 AM
9

Adam Lee did not check his facts To a feminist, facts are an inconvenience that gets in the way of their agenda. That is why feminism is incompatible with skepticism.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 11:00 AM
16

The best part of these articles is always the comments. They always circle jerk and wonder what would an MRA say/think. When one shows up and tells them - he/she's derailing. However, in this particular case this was my favorite exchange: I know that women are one of the most oppressed minorities in the US Minorities. Right. You have a problem with using the word "minority?" The problem isn't the term, it's the usage. There are more women than men. Because "minority" in this context means an und…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:57 AM
1

Right, don't spend a dime on men on the fringes of society helping them to build a better image of themselves. Instead spend $6.9M, trying to shame and belittle men because "only women are victims of domestic violence".
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:59 AM
3

Ban them all! Wait, wrong subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:53 AM
15

If you can say anything about polygamy it is that it's anti men. Unless Kenya has some screwed up male/female ratio then polygamy would mean that many poor men will be be unable to find wives. These aren't MRAs. These are traditionalist Kenyan men writing laws to give themselves benefits over everyone else, including other men. If anything this type of law is akin to what feminists do. Write special laws that privilege one group over another. To be an MRA, means that any law/privilege that you a…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:37 AM
3

Save a few bucks, I'll summarize it for you... Step 1: Hate yourself. Step 2: Attack anyone who disagrees with the gospel of feminism. Step 3: Only things that affect women are legitimate issues. Step 4: Wonder why everyone, especially feminist women, think you're pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:45 PM
45

Jusk ask any of them "Is it right for someone else to force you to be a mother? Then why is right to force a man to be a father?"
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:29 PM
3

No, I don't think all feminists are the same. I do read a lot of feminist articles, papers and books and I know that there are many people who identify as feminists that: MRAs would consider egalitarians, are sympathetic to issues that concern men, or understand that we're one species and that none of us can progress unless we all progress. However, as the OP's story attests, it is not uncommon to encounter feminists that are in fact examples of the caricature feminist I described. you believe t…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:57 PM
198

When a feminists says they want equality they're not lying they really do want equality. It's just that they also have the unshakable belief, resistant to any argument, that women are permanently victims in all situations and at all times. They're also quite willing to make up "feminist facts" to prove their state of permanent victimhood. So logically, they advocate for privileges and rights for women and only women. They believe granting any concession of any kind to men is only to grant yet an…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:07 AM
17

TRP ultimately gives license to everyone...to do whatever the hell they want whenever they want I think you've missed the point of the red pill. The red pill is about understanding yourself and others as we truly are not the bullshit fairy tale that's fed to everyone. There are definitely limitations and consequences, it's just that they aren't the ones you're told about.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 12:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter