TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skabbo Archive

View 0 posts and 157 comments by skabbo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Whats your argument exactly? That instead of doing both swaying and voting you're going to do just swaying in the hopes that someone other than you votes? Just fucking vote ffs and if you can sway a few people then do that as well.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 08:48 AM
6

Awful lot of pentagrams on that silver.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:21 PM
17

The lesson here is that people who start rumours are cunts.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:29 PM
0

I really don't see the harm in circumcision, I mean, its more hygienic, it looks better and ultimately the boys that live will be happier! Its harmless! Not like female genital mutilation though, its not even comparable. /s
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:56 AM
6

On the bright side, it means that any man that sees this will be much more careful due to the implication of being labelled a rapist for consensual intoxicated sex. On the down side, its indicative of real problem that wont get fixed anytime soon because its just how a lot of people like it.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 11:46 AM
3

Pff, look at this guy, mr comfortable in his own interests thinks hes better than the rest of us half eaten chicken wing types
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:51 AM
4

Hell I'D do it for 4 dollars and a half eaten chicken wing.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:32 AM
2

Its probably more because its one which is more readily apparent. Some of the guys in porn go off like a semen powered fire hose.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:26 AM
2

The subject object dichotomy is one of the most asinine concepts anyone has ever thought of.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:25 AM
3

I'm not even conservative but it aggravates me how quick people are to disregard certain ideas regardless of how much evidence they have PURELY due to the fact that the person who raised the idea is right/left wing. On reddit its typically disregarding anything a conservative says and treating them like retarded 6 year olds.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 12:21 AM
1

Its basically /r/communism users in denial about their stance on authoritarianism.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:46 AM
191

I like how the only thing we know about this woman's husband is that he wants a divorce and has a sexless marriage and the immediate response is "He sounds like a real shitbag."
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:43 PM
90

I am just so glad someone told me not to rape and murder. I had no idea they were wrong until society made sure to let me know that as a man I am the equivalent of a mindless animal and that I can't possibly be the victim of violent crime and will only ever subjugate poor helpless women and children.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 12:08 PM
1

It never ceases to amaze me how stupid some otherwise educated individuals will act just in order to show how 'progressive' they are. This is completely illegal, file a complaint and watch their stupidity get punished. Morons.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 02:47 AM
0

Tax benefits, getting to formally pledge yourself to the man or woman you love for the rest of your life. You know, pointless stuff. /s
/r/MensRights28/06/15 05:52 AM
1

It's still relevant enough to be considered. Not really, the original claim was that there wasn't enough male professors when the opposite is true. Primary and secondary education is a different matter. Thats not to say it isn't important, it just isn't relevant to this particular discussion right now.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 11:26 AM
1

The profession we're on about is university/college professors, not primary or highschool teachers.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 10:17 PM
8

Its like that 1 in 5 rape statistic. One misleading study is released and so other studies are conducted with the goal of matching that statistic. In the end its discovered that all of the studies conducted used almost the exact same flawed methodology and yet that statistic is all over the place now. Or hell, the wage gap. Because apparently by comparing the average wages of all women regardless of career to all men regardless of career represents the difference in the amount paid for the same …
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:37 PM
6

There are practically no male professors already. To reduce the number any further would land you at 0. Eh I don't know about that. At least at Cornell University, the University in this article, the faculty is 57% female and 43% male. http://diversity.cornell.edu/who-we-are According to the National Center for Education Statistics, there are typically more white male professors than white female. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61 Now I don't disagree with your sentiment, I don't t…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:30 PM
11

It is likely that a lot of female professors achieved positions that they were otherwise not as qualified for as their male counterparts due to affirmative action. That said, I've personally had fantastic male and female professors and shit male and female professors. The worst lecturer I've had was my female Medicinal Chemistry lecturer. She was constantly bitter, difficult to approach, mean and to top if off absolutely sexist. But, that of course isn't representative of all women in academia, …
/r/MensRights26/06/15 12:25 PM
2

Unfortunately the MRM has been painted as a movement solely devoted to the demise of women or even as an anti-feminist movement. Furthermore there is of course some anti-feminist sentiment here as a lot of men feel the feminist movement is not representative of men and has devolved into a female supremacy movement (it can certainly feel that way given all the legislature passed to the detriment of men, but I digress) so it isn't any real surprise that many individuals will see this subreddit alr…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 09:15 AM
2

Sample size of 4. Thats some real science you got there.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:52 AM
21

Honestly its funny. The new FPH subreddits are being banned one after the other, meanwhile Coontown, PanicHistory and SRS are still around. Furthermore the claim that this was about harassment is horseshit because I think one or two of the subs they banned had less than 200 members. There is no way in hell that these subreddits had more reported upon legitimate harassment than SRS has.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 01:10 AM
3

We need to find the mens rights activist and put a stop to him! /s
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:27 AM
1

Its disgusting and hypocritical. They will scream racism to the ends of the Earth but they can't wait to mentally erase the very existence of ethnic individuals capable of thinking for themselves.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:01 AM
16

I always love the "I bet you're a cis white hetero male." I am a cis male, obviously. We make up almost 50% of the population its a pretty safe bet to make. More often than not the people accusing me of being a cis white male are themselves cis white males. I am Greek. Weirdly enough Greeks are "PoC" when it suits SJWs and white when it doesn't. I've had an argument where Greeks stopped being "PoC" when I told the person I was arguing with that I was Greek. I'm bisexual. You know, the B in LGBT.…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:27 AM
6

Circumcision against newborn infants IS bad. Circumcision as a choice when you're an adult? Go nuts. Honestly I couldn't care less what people choose to do with their own bodies, I draw the line when they start pushing those choices on others.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:14 AM
7

Let's be honest. You're generalizing to the extreme and your opinion is by no means an objective fact. I'm saying this as someone that doesn't go to strip clubs but I don't look down on those who do, male or female.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:08 AM
11

Not mutilation in the slightest. Your nose can function just fine if you cut off the tip but thats still mutilation.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:54 PM
5

gr8 b8 m8
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:53 PM
29

It is genuinely terrifying talking to some of these people because they will say with a completely straight face: "Focusing on women's rights and inequalities means equality for everyone." They act under the presumption that men are on a higher echelon in society and experience no social pressures or discrimination of any sort and that by removing all responsibility and pressure on women they raise them to the same status of men. Nevermind the fact that the current state of the USA has it that b…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 01:03 PM
11

Over 1000 protesters were arrested and brutalized. Here, the kids are politely asked to leave and go back to their gender studies courses. Theres a key difference here and it explains exactly why the police behave differently, and it has nothing to do with protests threataening authority. Which seems more of a potential major threat to you, 1000 pissed off people, or 5 pissed off feminists? You can bet your ass if those 5 pissed off feminists had been stupid enough to stand their ground they wou…
/r/MensRights06/06/15 12:53 PM
3

Mmhm, conversely due to this women are more likely to kill their own children.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 02:20 PM
8

Thats awful! Which /b/thread did they get linked to? Just kidding. Thats a pretty fucked up thing to do to a person though.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:15 AM
5

Yeah nah thats not a citation mate.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:57 AM
2

That makes no sense and you know it. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills talking to you. The USSR did not attempt the backflip and fail, it merely said "Watch me do a backflip," then went and rode a bicycle instead. They did exactly what communism outlined and it deteriorated due to human greed. Communism has never been successfully implemented on a country wide scale but it has DEFINITELY been attempted before. To claim otherwise is to spit in the face of recent history.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:27 AM
1

What kind of backward logic is that. You know its possible to attempt to do something and fail at it? Say you tried a backflip and then managed to flip about 180 degrees before landing on the tip of your crown. You tried to do a back flip, you failed to do a back flip but you did TRY.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:03 AM
1

This is patently false. Communism has been attempted on a large scale as shown in the USSR and China however they ultimately failed to implement it hence resulting in horrible situations. The Communist ideal has never been achieved, that does not mean it has never been attempted.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:50 AM
4

Which definition of "communism" includes a small elite hoarding all the wealth and leaving millions to live in squalor? The one that naturally arises whenever communism is attempted on a large scale. Communism simply doesn't work due to human nature, it most likely WILL NEVER work. Capitalism isn't perfect but its better than communism.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:46 AM
7

countries with public health care systems don't have pharmas investing billions to improve medicine; to the contrary, they have a high reliance on generics, which are basically subsidized by the people who live in countries with market-based systems. [Citation Needed]
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:48 AM
16

I'm centre left. I'm an egalitarian, I believe regulated capitalism is the only practical way for a society to function, I believe equal opportunity is important while equal representation is pointless and I believe that law enforcement and federal governance is an absolute necessity in a successful society. I detest communism and I detest unregulated capitalism and I am a male atheist of Greek descent living in Australia. EDIT: I suppose I should add: I think public healthcare is a no brainer a…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:16 AM
-3

the most violent criminals are mostly male, but the people being killed by police are often non-violent, so the first point it moot. From the article YOU provided: The vast majority of victims — more than 80 percent — were armed with potentially lethal objects, primarily guns, but also knives, machetes, revving vehicles and, in one case, a nail gun. Unless you're suggesting that the majority those armed with lethal weapons were non-violent offenders I don't see how you could make the claim that …
/r/MensRights01/06/15 01:26 AM
-6

This seems more like a result of most violent criminals being male than it is any form of mens rights abuse.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 09:34 PM
13

Female nature is female nature regardless of a females' political affiliation. Ah come on man. This is just counter productive, there are plenty of men that act in the same way. Its asshole nature, not female nature. EDIT: Seriously this reads like something straight off of the front page of /r/TheRedPill so, refuse to play their game at all and don't marry them, don't impregnate them and take absolute control of your lives, gentlemen. I can take control of my life and marry and impregnate whoev…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:11 AM
56

Through the power of mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 08:45 AM
24

Jesus Christ this nearly brought tears to my eyes. The mother of the guy in the video committed suicide for fucks sake.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:57 AM
265

Whats more screwed up is that you can claim that women are paid less than men based on faulty statistics and everyone will applaud you. Point out that men get shafted with reproductive rights? You must hate young mothers.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:52 AM
2

Honestly I wouldn't call it evil, its just pathetic. They can't handle contradictory statistics and reports and so they get together and try to justify their opposition to these demonstrable facts with weasel wording and cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 01:15 AM
12

Yeah, heres the np link: http://np.reddit.com/r/BadSocialScience/comments/35w2y1/i_read_a_study_that_hands_down_proved_that_men/
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:20 PM
35

What a legend. You should see how he handled himself when this was linked to /r/badsocialscience the guy really did well coming across as mature compared to the kind of people dwelling in SRS subs.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:05 PM
54

Remember guys, we live in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:05 PM
8

Men aren't objectified sexually as much as women are, normally they're objectified financially, so 'FHRITA' doesn't compare in thay way. Ah yes, the old "Its different because he's a man." argument. Classic. Believe it or not, I don't actually appreciate getting objectified sexually by people I don't find sexually attractive, despite the fact that I am a man. Fucking crazy right? After a year of dealing with it all the time do you think you might get tired of it and have someone explain themselv…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:29 AM
3

These are the same people that hounded a teenage boy from youtube because he made a video about his personal preferences in women and had the audacity to suggest he likes women that practice proper hygiene as well as shave.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:10 AM
6

Before you say she doesn't, how would you feel about someone saying 'get married and have his kid then get a divorce to take everything in the settlement!' Honestly it wouldn't be as funny because it lacks in vulgarity and its a mouthful. Better example: "FUCK HIM RIGHT IN THE ASS!" I would find that fucking hilarious. And that just turned into a big meme constantly getting spouted off while you're at work. Would you be okay with that? Yes. Because I could see why people would find it funny and …
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:08 AM
47

Its not surprising seeing as a lot of entertainment media portray mental instability and violence as just a funny quirk when it comes to female characters while also poking fun at the male victim for being too much of a "pussy" to defend himself.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:51 PM
33

What the difference between white masculinity and any other colour of masculinity exactly? Its shit like this that demonstrates how little of the English language these fucking morons actually understand. Masculinity is masculinity, it doesn't differ between the races you stupid cow.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:08 PM
2

So really, she was like 55 in cat years.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:27 AM
79

It amazes me the hypocrisy of that attitude too. You can control your weight, it is difficult, but you can control it. So you shouldn't be indignant when a man passes you up because you weigh 400 pounds and need a forklift to get out of bed in the morning. You cannot control your height without potentially crippling cosmetic surgery. You just can't. However even then you shouldn't feel too bad when you get passed up, sure you can't control it, but do you really want to be with someone that cares…
/r/MensRights04/05/15 03:29 AM
1

Thats not the point of my comment. I was correcting an error in his example.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:33 PM
1

Breed A is inherently slower in your example. May want to edit it.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 12:25 AM
-2

By this logic you could grab a study claiming that most people are over 7 feet tall by using a sample size of two seven foot tall folks.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:10 PM
8

There aren't. There are mixed tournaments and a women only tournaments, no male only. Women are free to compete in the mixed tournament.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:09 PM
0

But you are unable to suffer if you are dead. I think this is the main point here. You are being ridiculous. If you're ONLY looking at the fact that the men were shot and killed it doesn't seem so abd. Factor in trench warfare, the constant physical and mental barrage leading UP to the death, you know, the horrors of war? Yeah, theres no competition. Hillary Clinton's point was moot, like the people of the early 1900's she remained blissfully ignorant of the sort of shit soldiers went through be…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:50 AM
4

No.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 10:18 PM
2

Fair enough
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:49 PM
7

And? That doesn't detract from my point.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:49 PM
21

even during the world wars if a woman lost her husband she was completely lost Yeah, and if the husband lost his arms or legs he was truly fucked too. For me it does soften the quote a tiny bit I can respect that but I think its misguided as its a form of reasoning that only makes sense if you completely disregard the suffering of the men actually fighting the war. No doubt it would be hard losing your primary income provider but it would not be near as much suffering as experiencing the horrors…
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:27 PM
14

You're both idiots.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:14 PM
5

Yes, but its very clear that some people suffer more than others. It is certainly hard to lose your primary income earner and caregiver but it isn't nearly as bad as being irreparably maimed both physically and mentally or even killed on the battlefield. The fact that Hillary Clinton ever tried to claim otherwise is truly telling of her pathetic excuse for empathy.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:12 PM
38

While I may be stuck with Abbot at least he hasn't ever equated suffering on the front lines of war with having to take care of yourself after a loved one dies.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:08 PM
81

From http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_Clinton Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children. In short, no, the quote was not taken out of context.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:06 PM
2

Are you basing that decision on the name or the policies?
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:03 PM
4

I don't agree, in the majority of threads I see the rational voices upvoted the most and I don't think it really matters what the shit at the bottom of a thread says at it isn't representative of the sub.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:47 PM
-1

Look Op this is a shitty situation and its indicative of an issue in society but I'm not going to avoid marrying a woman I love out of fear that something like this might happen.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:37 PM
45

Welp, thats illegal.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 12:19 PM
1

So, what, you'd rather just vote for nobody at all?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 07:37 AM
1

The system is broke. We need preferential voting so I can vote third party and Lesser Evil, at least until enough people realize how much support third parties really have and then people can start dropping the Lesser Evil vote. We have preferential voting in Australia and unfortunately it doesn't do much to curb the two party problem.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:08 AM
2

I don't think you're throwing your vote away by voting third party, in fact I respect you for doing it. If more Americans voted for a third party instead of just not voting at all as a form of protest you might actually make a change.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:58 AM
1

Vote third party then. If enough people do that as opposed to not voting you could actually make a difference.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:57 AM
1

So the solution is to stop voting? Sure. Whatever you say.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:46 AM
-2

You assume I haven't attempted activism; I'm a member of multiple on-campus groups that are politically active and I write and phone my representatives. On campus? Bravo.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:54 AM
-3

I'm sorry, but I think you're misunderstanding the logic of many who abstain. I understand their logic just fine, I just think its completely flawed. I don't vote to make a point that I'm not happy not only with the options available, but with the way the system works as a whole. So as opposed to putting your vote toward any number of other parties which aren't democrat or republican you abstain from voting to try and get a discussion on how to get change? I'm sorry but that is just really, real…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:13 AM
4

Good on you for voting. Nothing irritates me more than people complaining about the state of affairs in the USA and then go on to admit that they don't vote cause "it wouldn't matter anyway." As far as I'm concerned they made their decision not to be involved and have no right to complain about the outcome until they start participating again.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 01:11 AM
0

And?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 04:03 AM
5

Ah yes, clearly this is just the patriarchy infantilizing this poor wymyn. /s
/r/MensRights03/04/15 12:24 PM
6

Didn't the White House basically issue a memo or something that said that they retract this statement? I reckon Obama made this claim with the full knowledge that it was misleading because he knew thats what the crazy FAR, FAR left wants to hear, then to avoid being seen as an idiot by people who know better he had his office retract the claim. Either way, this statistic is just annoying. It is all over the place despite being based entirely on averaging the entirety of womens wages and the enti…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:40 AM
82

And this is why allegations should always be perceived as allegations until hard evidence is brought forward. There were SO MANY people demonizing people like Bill Cosby when all that had been brought against him were baseless allegations, the argument being "But theres like 20 allegations so he HAS TO HAVE DONE IT!" That isn't how reality works. If I really wanted to I could probably get a bunch of friends together and we could go accuse some random bloke of raping each and every one of us. Mak…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:36 AM
3

I made sure to unsub from TwoX when it became default because the articles and the comments are just filled with rot and garbage. That said, reversing the genders in this instance is a pointless exercise and theres no point posting about male issues in TwoX because: a) Thats not what the sub is for. b) You'd had better luck discussing philosophy with a ravenous salt water crocodile because tonnes of the people in that sub pretend male issues dont exist.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:12 AM
6

Basically more men are retards and more men are geniuses while women tend to be clustered more near the middle ground.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:46 PM
-1

70% of all suicides in 2013 were white me. Did you die?
/r/MensRights29/03/15 10:42 PM
4

Check the usernames bruv
/r/MensRights29/03/15 10:00 PM
2

As for less painful, what the fuck are you on about. Yeah when he said that I was a bit perplexed. The foreskin contains a fuckload of nerve endings and is one of the most sensitive sites on the penis. A baby has their foreskin cut without anaesthetic and in infancy your nociceptors are MORE sensitive, it is one of the worst pains you could inflict upon an infant.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 12:02 AM
2

No, you're parents did. I'm not so sure I'd take the same risk with my kids. And getting it cut off as a teenager... jesus, that just leaves a different kind of mark. No different than any other form of surgery. The difference is as a teenager they'll give you an anesthetic and you wont feel a thing, it'll also be your choice, they don't do this for infants. Which is odd considering its a stage in your life where your nociceptors are far more sensitive so getting your foreskin cut off as an infa…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:59 PM
3

It's obviously less bad than more common forms of female circumcision, but are there health benefits? The same level of health benefit for males. The removal of the clitoral hood means less of a breeding ground for bacteria and the female equivalent of smegma. 1 in 100? You take those odds then. I did. I am phimosis free at 21 years of age, even then if I had phimosis I would have sought other means of rectifying it than having my foreskin cut off. Leave people the freedom to allow a non-invasiv…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:26 PM
3

Yeah at this point I'm convinced its a troll, most likely an experiment from someone running an experiment of sorts to gauge the reaction of predominantly feminist audience to what is grossly evidence double standard of MGM vs FGM. Unsurprisingly none of the top comments criticize the mother for the MGM. EDIT: Oh goody, heres what a mod in the thread had to say This post is specifically about FGM and will be moderated for relevance accordingly. Please report off topic and derailing comments. Iss…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:11 PM
6

Removing the foreskin is less painful, invasive and is more sanitary. Some forms of FGM involve only the removal of the prepuce (the female equivalent of a foreskin for the clitoris). There are also forms that only involve pricking or piercing which are also categorically illegal. Should these hence be made legal then? Because the pricking and piercing is no where near as painful as having your foreskin removed and the removal of the prepuce is a near identical procedure. Additionally, it preven…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:01 PM
1

Accusing with baseless accusations in an attacking way. "Baseless" he says. You quite literally said that you respect people's rights to practice their religion even if that means infringing on another persons rights by cutting a piece of them off. The accusation isn't baseless, you literally don't respect the right to not have pieces of yourself cut off against your will for religious reasons.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:47 PM
1

This isn't a slippery slope as he isn't claiming that getting your child circumcised will lead to child abuse. You made this statement: A parent's decision how to raise their kid(s) is none of my business. Thus the questions "So child abuse in any form is fine with you?" is warranted as you suggest that regardless of the practices employed in raising a child, you would claim that its none of your business.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:45 PM
3

He's basically saying that under the foreskin wont ever be as clean as a dick without one. He's right, but a dick without a foreskin wont ever get those nerve endings back and is sure going to dry out like a motherfucker.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:42 PM
2

Our son is circumcised and that is all fine, we want him to look like daddy and not get teased and stuff. and I know it's cleaner and healthier for boys. Its cleaner and healthier the same way cutting off their fingertips is cleaner and healthier. They wont have to worry about cleaning under their fingernails if they don't have any.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:27 PM
1

Ouch, my feelings.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:18 PM
1

It's almost like people are also jailed for non-violent crimes or something.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 06:22 AM
2

oh that's right, I forgot this was a right wing/conservative subreddit. I'll keep my dirty liberalism to a min. Yes because hostile commenters must be right wing or conservative, there are literally no examples of people with liberal values who also want to see the mentally ill jailed, no no, all assholes are categorically conservative. /s You got maybe 2 or 3 downvotes max in the last 10 hours, and enough upvotes to balance it out to a grand total of 0. I bet that must be quite the heavy cross …
/r/MensRights28/03/15 06:18 AM
1

And people idiots wonder why this country is becoming a police state. Even though it isn't. FTFY
/r/MensRights28/03/15 06:14 AM
1

It is a men's rights issue. So talk about that Sorry mate but you can't tell me what I can and can't talk about in regards to mens rights issues. the fact that men don't have an unconditional right to vote, rather than constantly dragging feminism into the discussion where it doesn't need to be. Considering feminism claims to be for equality of the sexes when in this particular regard they very clearly display an immense bias for one over the other I think to say that it is unrelated is wrong. B…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:01 AM
2

The problem is that it crowds out actual men's rights-related discussion on a subreddit ostensibly dedicated to discussing men's rights. I didn't realize the requirement for Selective Services for men and not for women, thus creating an inherent difference in which women have more rights than men in the US by default, was not a men's rights issue. Furthermore feminism as a movement has commonly been against attempts at improving conditions for men, I would argue that it is a Mens Rights issue to…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:33 AM
1

This is honestly just a downright idiotic response to any form of discussion on the internet. I never claimed that explaining the hypocrisy of feminism was in some way a form of activism or that I expected it to fix anything. I do this with the intent to educate others as to the grievances some people have toward feminism and the general misconception that the movement was focused on ensuring equal rights and responsibilities as historically this has not been the case.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:35 AM
3

Feminist sayings don't convince us they hate men, feminist actions do, however. I dunno, Andrea Dworkin made her position very, very clear: Only when manhood is dead - and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it - only then will we know what it is to be free. Source: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/andreadwor154469.html#K3RHhPmQChUChEXs.99 Any man will follow any feminine looking thing down any dark alley; I've always wanted to see a man beaten to a shit bloody pu…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:05 AM
3

Is this propaganda war helping to advance men's rights in any way? It isn't really propaganda though, women fought for the right to vote WITHOUT the added responsibility of selective services. The current state of the US is that women are provided with all rights by default whereas men MUST sign up for selective services otherwise they are denied citizenship. The most pathetic part of this is that no feminist is fighting to have selective services abolished or to have a requirement for women to …
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:00 AM
1

Ah get the fuck out of here with that shit.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 01:52 AM
5

I think as opposed to claiming its natural, it should be called what it is, and that is "healthy". We live in a society with gender roles, roles that exist for a reason and shouldn't necessarily be torn apart as they are not inherently harmful. To raise a child in opposition to these roles when the child has expressed no desire to be raised as such would basically lead them to being in a bizarre form of limbo in which they may not be entirely satisfied with how they have been raised. Basically, …
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:06 AM
8

This has always been a problem of mine with some facets of Feminist theory in that they perceive differences in how children are raised based on gender as inherently wrong. I don't think it is inherently wrong unless one gender is getting completely disadvantaged over another, however this clearly isn't the case so I don't see the point in trying to make the way we raise our children gender neutral.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 08:58 AM
3

I don't see how thats relevant to this situation.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:02 AM
3

Heheh, fuck off troll.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:34 PM
1

Of course, however if that were to happen, burning off the genitals of the perpetrator would make you violent and insane and isnt even remotely justifiable.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:33 PM
18

Perhaps, but there are no men worried about women's continual advances on them, transparent and condescending attempts to 'correct' form or staring and potential filming (increasingly popular nowadays) while trying to work out. Well this is horseshit.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 10:12 AM
2

Yes but one is objectively a worse person and I am capable of feeling sympathy for both of them. No one deserves to have any part of their body seared off with acid for filming someone else. Thats not how the world works.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:55 AM
10

Right!? I'm seeing all these comments of aww poor guy! She had a film taken of her, he had his genitals burned off. Which do you think is worse?
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:00 PM
7

You haven't actually linked any of that evidence here.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:58 PM
1

It doesn't appear that way, thus the downvotes, it wasn't due to a hatred of women but due to a perceived downplaying of the suffering of men in war.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:45 PM
2

God damn I support the MRM and actively defend this community but wow some of you guys actually are misogynist fuckers. You're getting downvoted because what you said ignores the suffering of the men in war, going so far as to reduce it down to "getting blown up". War is horrible, and it isn't just because people die, PLENTY of men returned maimed, disfigured, mentally damaged. To even suggest that women were the primary victims is to completely ignore the suffering of these men. Theres nothing …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:23 PM
5

What a vile piece of shit, attempting to justify her hatred simply because she doesn't personally cause physical harm. I guess that means I'm allowed to demean women constantly so long as I don't hurt them physically. What a disgusting and abhorrent stance to have.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:16 PM
0

Of course all societies/empires collapse and ours will be no different. This is not really something you can say with any reasonable certainty.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 07:21 AM
2

In all fairness it isn't nearly as romanticised as it was back in the time period. But there is no doubt that these people in particular completely ignore the suffering and focus entirely on the mortality, thus leading to the erroneous conclusion that women were somehow the primary victims.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:08 AM
1

I would have stayed but you can guarantee she would've lost my vote regardless of what she said afterwards unless her opponent said something worse.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:15 PM
11

It also ignores the horrors of war prior to their death. Examples: Shell shock. Trench Foot. EVERYTHING RELATED TO FIGHTING IN TRENCH WARFARE I'd argue going to war in WWI and WWII was far worse than losing a family member.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:09 PM
4

I'm having a real hard time keeping my Toucan under control right now.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:10 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:56 AM
1

No, I'm claiming that the majority of the subreddit neither upvotes nor downvotes most submissions.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:50 AM
1

Still not representative. I'm not sure if you realise but 2000 is a much smaller number than 100,000.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:37 AM
90

No racism here guys, after all white men can't be discriminated against. /s
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:17 AM
1

Top thread of about 1700 upvotes, once again in a subreddit with over 100k subs. I didn't realise ~2% of subscribers was representative of the entirety of the subreddit, my bad. /s
/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:44 PM
22

There are over 100k subs of this subreddit and the post only has about 400 upvotes. But you're right. Clearly this post is a sign of degradation of this subreddit. /s
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:36 PM
1

So it stands to reason that everything you have committed to me doing, you have actually committed yourself as well. I never tried to claim an objective fact concerning the value of potential. That was just you. "Nice try" indeed.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:09 AM
1

Opportunity at life is the most valuable thing in the world Completely subjective. You can't make this claim in any objective sense. So still... you can believe whatever you want, but you are equating two completely separate things as fact. Its an analogy, heres the definition for you: a comparison between one thing and another, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification. "an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies" Its a comparison, not an equivalence.…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:29 AM
1

You care about monetary values. No, I care about everything gained including experiences, existing relationships with other people. At age 50 most of your family and friends are still alive with the exception of grandparents and such so there isn't exactly a huge disparity between that individual and someone at age 20. I care about potential and hours of life. Seems like an odd thing to care about really. Say you have a situation in which you can either save one baby or a Doctor. In that situati…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:34 AM
1

Obviously someone who has 50 more years to live surely has more to lose by dying than someone with 1 more year to live. Well no, it isn't obvious. Anything could happen in those 50 years and theres no guarantee that he'll gain anything that matches the value of what the person with 1 year left already has. Your argument is akin to saying that someone starting out in a business has more to lose than his boss if he were fired because that guy starting out has potential. I don't agree with that sen…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:28 PM
1

If we are purely speaking about how much stands to be lost, the younger body stands more to lose more than the older body. I'm kind of wondering what your criteria for this is. The older body could very well suffer irreparable damage due to being generally weaker than the younger body and thereby has more to lose in a situation of physical trauma. Whether it is more capable of protecting itself is unimportant and non-related to the discussion at all. It is entirely related to the discussion, rem…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:16 PM
1

Having a better and younger body means its less likely to be as damaged in comparison to the older one.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 10:46 PM
1

In terms of material goods and wealth, as well as physical health. No, they don't. The person thats been on the planet for over 50 years has spent those 50 years accruing material possessions, experience and of course the ravages of time. Push a 20 year old over he might graze his knee, push a fifty or 60 year old over and he might break something. In terms of family, friends and of course, time. Then yeah the 20 year old probably has a little more to lose. But they're also in better shape and c…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:24 PM
2

The acts were voluntary, though neither teen could legally consent to sexual activities since they were both underage at the time. But of course! If neither teen could consent then CLEARLY only ONE of them is the perpetrator! /s
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:57 AM
1

Be my guest. I will say that its an odd detail to leave out as it is completely relevant to his financial situation that he imllies is quite poor.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:04 AM
0

Uh huh.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:19 PM
0

Run along now Forrest.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:56 PM
0

Thats nice dear.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:51 PM
0

You were the first to resort to calling my opinion delusion mate. So don't talk to me about maturity, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:42 PM
0

Sure thing mate. Now run along and go play with your hotwheels.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 10:30 PM
1

Still you shouldn't assume hes making any payments especially considering he didn't mention them. Its likely that he was but you don't know that because out of all the difficulties he pointed out, paying alimony was not one of them.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:18 PM
3

And yet he didn't mention it.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:16 PM
2

He didn't say that in the AMA. Doesn't even mention child support. Also they were unwed. He couldn't have been paying alimony.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:02 PM
1

Regardless, he clearly wasn't an adequate parent for the child and cussing out an entire courtroom is just idiotic and most emotionally composed people appropriate to raise children wouldn't lose their shit and insult people as the OP did. This has nothing to do with Mens Rights, and everything to do with OP being an inappropriate parent. EDIT: Furthermore he provided no proof that his story is even true. Let alone unbiased.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 12:22 PM
13

Nah, OP was just an asshole. I finally snapped, after an hour, and told her, and every other lawyer in the room what I thought of them. I individually called them man hating bitch, one by one. The judge seemed to me to have no heart at all, whatsoever. There was no way in hell she would give any father out of wedlock more than every other weekend, ever, unless they got full custody. No NY state judge would. Important facts that OP himself brings up I did not live close no boss is giving every we…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:47 AM
6

Are you suggesting they can't be unbiased? Yes. In fact I would go one step further and claim its impossible for there to be an absence of bias in any individual no matter how neutral they proclaim to be. Those with the most emotional attachment toward something are most likely to be biased concerning it. That doesn't mean they can't be rational and reasonable about it but you'd be lying to yourself if you thought that meant they weren't biased.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:44 AM
5

ie. Everyone on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:40 AM
14

Either everyone capable must sign up for Selective Service or no one does. As it is, by default women have more rights than men due to the requirement to sign up for Selective Services.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 08:07 AM
2

It isn't even an accurate summation of modern legitimate feminism, I can't recall the last time 'legitimate feminism' fought for legislation that benefits both the sexes. For example, the draft, you aren't allowed to register for student loans, citizenship, federal jobs or federal job training if you aren't signed up for selective services as a man. All of these rights are afforded to women without the need to sign up for selective services. I don't think I see any legitimate feminists fighting …
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:25 AM
16

I don't understand the rationale here, how can someone be both the rapist and the victim in a case like this? THEY ARE BOTH UNDERAGE, IF NEITHER CAN CONSENT THEN BOTH ARE VICTIMS. To prosecute one over the other is asinine, we shouldn't be prosecuting tweens that fuck anyway when it is clearly consensual. This kids life is going to be ruined if he is forced to register as a sex offender all because he had an intimate relationship with a girl his age.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 12:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter