TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sky33dive Archive

View 80 posts and 246 comments by sky33dive on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
262

sky33dive/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:21 PM
197

sky33dive/r/MensRights27/04/11 10:32 PM
67

sky33dive/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:10 AM
67

sky33dive/r/MensRights01/05/11 06:02 AM
51

sky33dive/r/MensRights29/04/11 05:44 PM
42

sky33dive/r/MensRights26/03/11 01:09 PM
41

sky33dive/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:11 AM
34

sky33dive/r/MensRights22/04/11 09:59 PM
34

sky33dive/r/MensRights21/07/11 09:29 PM
33

sky33dive/r/MensRights18/04/11 07:49 PM
29

sky33dive/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:33 PM
27

sky33dive/r/MensRights24/03/11 08:39 PM
26

sky33dive/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:34 PM
26

sky33dive/r/MensRights28/04/11 04:38 AM
25

sky33dive/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:43 AM
24

sky33dive/r/MensRights02/07/11 03:54 AM
24

sky33dive/r/MensRights27/04/11 06:37 PM
22

sky33dive/r/MensRights23/05/11 02:11 PM
20

sky33dive/r/MensRights19/04/11 11:57 PM
20

sky33dive/r/MensRights21/07/11 01:44 PM
17

sky33dive/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:43 PM
17

sky33dive/r/MensRights25/04/11 08:32 PM
16

sky33dive/r/MensRights26/04/11 04:25 PM
16

sky33dive/r/MensRights07/06/11 04:41 AM
16

sky33dive/r/MensRights25/04/11 05:12 AM
15

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:10 PM
14

sky33dive/r/MensRights13/03/11 01:56 PM
13

sky33dive/r/MensRights28/04/11 01:51 AM
13

sky33dive/r/MensRights15/07/11 05:19 PM
12

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:06 PM
12

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:05 PM
11

sky33dive/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:25 AM
11

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:50 PM
11

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/03/11 05:10 AM
9

sky33dive/r/MensRights21/04/11 05:49 AM
9

sky33dive/r/MensRights28/04/11 04:37 PM
9

sky33dive/r/MensRights26/04/11 03:23 AM
9

sky33dive/r/MensRights24/04/11 11:12 PM
9

sky33dive/r/MensRights14/03/11 02:06 AM
8

sky33dive/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:34 AM
8

sky33dive/r/MensRights05/05/11 10:18 PM
8

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/03/11 05:11 AM
8

sky33dive/r/MensRights24/04/11 07:24 AM
7

sky33dive/r/MensRights12/05/11 08:39 PM
7

sky33dive/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:12 AM
7

sky33dive/r/MensRights26/04/11 04:03 PM
7

sky33dive/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:30 PM
6

sky33dive/r/MensRights21/04/11 02:22 AM
6

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:42 PM
6

sky33dive/r/MensRights18/03/11 09:24 AM
6

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/03/11 05:12 AM
6

sky33dive/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:44 AM
5

sky33dive/r/MensRights05/05/11 10:16 PM
5

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 03:35 PM
5

sky33dive/r/MensRights14/04/11 03:54 AM
5

sky33dive/r/MensRights17/03/11 05:10 AM
5

sky33dive/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:36 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights18/03/11 09:02 AM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights05/05/11 03:29 AM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:00 AM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights26/04/11 06:12 AM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:33 AM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:36 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:35 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:34 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:34 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:17 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:49 PM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:43 AM
4

sky33dive/r/MensRights05/04/11 04:40 AM
3

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 07:24 AM
3

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 07:22 AM
3

sky33dive/r/MensRights02/05/11 10:24 PM
3

sky33dive/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:31 AM
2

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 07:26 AM
2

sky33dive/r/MensRights19/04/11 11:54 PM
1

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/04/11 06:22 AM
0

sky33dive/r/MensRights12/03/11 10:00 AM
0

sky33dive/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:36 PM
0

sky33dive/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:39 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's possible it could get a student in more trouble for what the University interprets as "retaliation" http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/law_student_sues_law_school_for_defamation
/r/MensRights22/07/11 05:30 AM
1

Got to love how people are assuming the guy did everything wrong because he didn't make an accusation http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/iw0vq/two_stanford_university_students_drink_and_have/c2742rz
/r/MensRights22/07/11 01:08 AM
2

I presume that it's a he said -- she said on whether the woman consented and that the panel used alcohol as an easy out to make a decision.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 10:17 PM
1

If y'all could upvote this, I posted a link for the petition/letter to President of Stanford page http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iw7rs/help_the_suspended_male_stanford_student_by/
/r/MensRights21/07/11 09:47 PM
3

I agree that all three groups were/are crazy. That said, feminists have not killed scores of people in concentration camps, so it seems silly in that sense to draw the comparison.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 07:47 PM
1

Not necessary. The odds of this stuff happening are still pretty low. That said, I'd say it'd be worth staying at home in order to save money. College prices are going up quite a bit (even when you adjust for inflation). The best advice for your son would be to avoid the mixing of alcohol and sex. 90% of the allegations at the college-level could be avoided with that alone, which is telling. But be honest when you give that advice, some college-age young men are naive about the realities of bein…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 07:42 PM
1

You both have points.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:03 PM
3

Read for yourself http://thefire.org/public/pdfs/e73a5d58a2d915cc3cd6bd24039843bc.pdf?direct
/r/MensRights21/07/11 05:00 PM
3

http://thefire.org/torch/#13404 - The accuser tried to go to the police, but they did not find that the accused had broken the law.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:38 PM
1

Did it get greatly downvoted? I don't see it on the first two pages. edit: nvm, see it at http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/ivxu2/drunk_college_students_have_consensual_sex_man/
/r/MensRights21/07/11 04:35 PM
4

mensrightactivist, I think you need to do some more reading http://thefire.org/article/13401.html and http://www.mindingthecampus.com/forum/2011/07/stanford_guilty_even_if_innoce.html
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:48 PM
3

This is how the student jurors are trained http://thefire.org/article/13401.html
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:45 PM
6

More Info: Let the President of Stanford know that you think this is wrong -> http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5896/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=7672 KC Johnson (of Durham in Wonderland) http://www.mindingthecampus.com/forum/2011/07/stanford_guilty_even_if_innoce.html http://thefire.org/torch/#13404 (blog post) http://thefire.org/article/13401.html (press release) http://thefire.org/article/13397.html (actual training materials)
/r/MensRights21/07/11 03:35 PM
18

The Brown University student featured in the New York Times a few months ago is suing. There is also a student at George Washington University suing for $6 million. I won't be surprised if UND and Stanford are next.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:33 PM
3

And those cannot teach get nonsensical government grant supported administrative jobs.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 07:07 PM
2

if you google the headline and then click the google link, you should be able to read it.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:57 AM
3

What do you say to the fathers who broke unjust laws, were wrongfully imprisoned, or were influenced to break the law by the unintended consequences of government interference? 800,000 people are in prison on marijuana-related crimes. More than half the country has tried marijuana and we choose to arrest mostly low-income men for distributing it, many of whom are simply trying to provide for their families with the means presented to them.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:06 AM
3

Define drunk. Drunk can be anything from .08 to puking in the bathroom to on the verge of passing out. You tell guys to stop having sex with drunk girls as if the decision rested only with the guy. When two people have sex it is a joint decision. Social norms usually dictate that the guy should make the first move, and for this reason, guys are usually accused of rape.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 10:16 AM
2

Read Isaac Brock's comments about his false rape accusation: "It's an allegation that was withdrawn, and of course that didn't get any press. It was complete and utter bullshit, and the whole situation was so complicated that it's hard for me to go into lots of detail. At the time, I figured I'd just shut up and give this young lady enough rope to hang herself, you know? It fucked up my life once, and I'd prefer to just let it go.... Before this all happened, I never believed that anyone would l…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 11:16 PM
2

Nailed it. ycombinator, you wouldn't happen to be from the bay area? It would explain the username and with how much ease you can break down the PC self-pity party.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 10:11 PM
1

lol, well-played.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 10:09 PM
2

Haha...all I can think of is that tyler the creator song on bruno mars that blew up a few months ago. Come to think of it, even I was put off by that song. God knows what the feminists and white knights would make of it.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:47 AM
2

I'd say there are male artists who touch on the issue. Modest Mouse has a few times (lead singer was falsely accused of rape...gives a whole new meaning to poppy "float on").
/r/MensRights24/05/11 02:21 AM
3

I mean they are a myth in the sense that there aren't documented cases across the country of people slipping drugs into others' drinks for the purposes of raping them.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 06:56 AM
8

date rape drugs are a myth developed by media hysteria.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 06:16 AM
10

There was the atlantic article a while backed titled "the loneliness of the civil libertarian feminist" that is by a feminist who stands up for due process and free speech rights for men.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:16 AM
2

There are only two schools in the country that do not receive federal funds -> http://thefire.org/article/13190.html
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:46 AM
3

Hey rantgrrl, it's hella interesting that you post this. Before reading MRM stuff, I was greatly interested in the academic work of Rene Girard. He is an anthropologist/philosopher who is huge in Europe, particularly France and Austria. His popular theory is that human society is dependent on a scapegoating mechanism for cathartically purging a community/society of its sense of wrong or sin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rene_Girard). It hasn't caught on as much in academia in the States because …
/r/MensRights14/05/11 04:04 AM
1

I've read your Tadmor prison example before and just googled it for the first time; damn, that's some messed up shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:58 AM
1

The thing is that people do not normally consent to punching each other in the face. The majority of sex is a consensual thing that people agree to. Someone does not argue that the punch was not consensual; they argue that they were or were not punched (for which there exists physical evidence).
/r/MensRights12/05/11 12:01 AM
1

The Universities I am familiar with set 1-2 day deadlines. Discovery gives you at least a few weeks. I am pretty familiar with how these University tribunals work. Trust me, you'd want a diversity of ages from a typical city over a group of 3 kids ages 18-22 who haven't had much life experience. A lack off cross-examination and lack of recording does not equally cross both ways. And I'll just leave it at that, a lot of my reasons have to do with experiential knowledge with such systems. Accusati…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 02:33 PM
1

Except an expulsion or suspension can render 1-4 years of a student's life wasted. College is about networking and potentially building your credentials for grad/law/med school. Most applications for higher ed require an admission of any past University disciplinary action taken (they do not however ask if you have been involved in a civil suit of any sort). The advanced degree competition is already so high that a finding of guilt is equivalent to barring a student from getting an advanced degr…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 06:00 AM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusta_National_Golf_Club#2002_membership_controversy The problem is that such clubs get labelled sexist all the time and threatened with lawsuits. When it's a female-only club, it's female empowerment. I am just pointing out the PC b.s. I think that the club has every right to exist. I'd encourage the man to do exactly what I'd encourage a woman to do when faced with a female-hostile environment, leave in protest and be incredibly successful elsewhere so they regre…
/r/MensRights09/05/11 03:52 AM
3

The track coach at my hs used to complain about it when guys would take off their t-shirts. The girls would complain about her complaining :-)
/r/MensRights09/05/11 03:42 AM
10

I would have no problem with this club if male exclusivity were to be allowed too.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 09:50 PM
1

http://on.msnbc.com/mdCv3U -> Video re-enactment
/r/MensRights06/05/11 12:32 AM
2

It doesn't appear that any of the results posted are statistically significant.
/r/MensRights06/05/11 12:27 AM
3

I lol'ed when I hit his paragraph: "On impulse, I bought my three-year-old son an expensive Swedish dollhouse, so clean-lined and modern that it could pass for unisex. He removed the furniture, turned it on its side, and found a way of connecting the bed to the armoire and the armoire to the sideboard. “Look, Mom,” he said. “A train.”"
/r/MensRights06/05/11 12:03 AM
2

Meh, who gives a crap about men?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 11:49 PM
2

Terrifying.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 11:44 PM
1

http://thefire.org/article/13142.html
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:42 PM
3

Cite the recent case of a UND student who was expelled but his false accuser was later prosecuted by the investigating DA (http://www.wdaz.com/event/article/id/6963/) Visit the FIRE page on due process and peruse the cases that deal with sexual misconduct and what letters FIRE has written (http://thefire.org/case/67.html). They have written very persuasively on why things should be different. Cite the recent University scandals related to sexual assault involving Stanford University (http://www.…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 05:55 PM
0

We are talking about reporters not football superstars who join the army. Daniel Pearl's week long abduction&ransom escapade, his beheading, and then the 3 minute video of his butchered body than whatever allegedly happened to lara logan.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 06:57 AM
-1

They are usually killed. Also, Lara Logan alleges to have been groped. She also claims to have been nearly scalped but photos of her after the incident show no evidence supporting this claim. Susan Milligan, a political reporter who has covered war in Iraq and the Balkans, said this about war: "It's a risk for everyone. I was at greater risk for being raped, probably. But [compared to her male colleagues] I was at lower risk of being killed."
/r/MensRights03/05/11 06:57 AM
0

Daniel Pearl was kidnapped, held for ransom, beheaded, and then a video of his butchered body was released. Lara Logan got briefly carried away by a mob who ripped off some of her clothes. Kind of different. Around 100 journalists die a year covering international news (http://www.newssafety.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17418&Itemid=100549), most of them being men.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 06:40 AM
2

Harvard has defied the OCR guidelines twice before in standing up for due process rights. They implemented an evidentiary standard that requires corroborating evidence for any accusation. Their system is highly flawed, but it could be worse. Harvard is a big deal because a lot of other schools will follow their lead. The fact that Harvard has not changed the standard of proof or made an announcement planning to is a strong sign that they will let the feds take them to court in order to defend du…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 07:33 PM
1

This is huge. This should be at the top of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:55 PM
8

This is really one of the greatest usernames ever.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:46 PM
1

If they make their way out, I am sure they will find their way here.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 10:33 PM
3

You're an awesome friend. Good luck in helping your buddy out. There is a mens rights subreddit on legal stuff if I am correct...kloo2yoo should be able to direct you there.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 07:07 AM
3

This.
/r/MensRights29/04/11 03:52 AM
2

According to a Forbes Article on University Disciplinary corruption, money is the only way to stop the Universities from trampling over your individual rights -> http://blogs.forbes.com/harveysilverglate/2011/04/22/liability-reigns-supreme-at-the-corporate-university/
/r/MensRights28/04/11 04:09 PM
3

This was recently mentioned in Inside Higher Ed and at The Fire (both are websites on academia http://thefire.org/article/13130.html), but I haven't seen mainstream coverage. If you see mainstream coverage, please post links.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 12:30 PM
1

Do you mean as a subreddit or across reddit in general?
/r/MensRights28/04/11 05:16 AM
1

Hm...I guess you're right by the traditional names of fallacies. When I say straw man, I picture someone building a strawman next to a person they are debating and then they start to attack that strawman as opposed to the person. If you are actually calm and are not flustered, but someone makes a strawman in your image using words to describe anger, then they are attacking a person who is not you. Yeah...huge stretch. That was my thought process though, even if slightly more than mildly irration…
/r/MensRights28/04/11 03:51 AM
-3

Why is this getting downvoted? Paul Elam can tick people off sometimes because of his "no nonsense" tone. I've disagreed with him on language. But he's got more spirit than any guy I can think of right now. And he gets a lot of stuff right.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 02:14 AM
4

Unfortunately, only the wealthy can do this with a reasonable chance of success. I would encourage young men without the financial resources and who have hit rock bottom to look into figuring out how to represent themselves, even if you do not win, you will have done a great service to the MRM by costing the University who has wronged you thousands of dollars in legal counsel fees just by filing an injunction.
/r/MensRights28/04/11 02:00 AM
3

Let's try our best to get this upvoted to the main reddit page (ambitious, I know), but this really something that I think Men's Rights should make a push on.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 11:08 PM
6

I agree that "dear" is patronizing, but I think it would be patronizing directed at a male too. I've known both male and female debaters who have used the straw man tactic. You are passionate about something but not angry, and then they tell you to calm down "dear", "son", "friend" with the intent of angering you so that you actually do look like a fool. Annoying tactic, but not a sexist one.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 10:38 PM
3

Totally.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 09:23 PM
4

Interesting cultural piece. “It does take away from the discussion a little bit when there aren’t as many voices being heard,” she said. “But I think girls, myself included, are more comfortable speaking in front of each other than boys.” A lot of catholic high schools are single gender on this basis. The belief being that boys and girls will be distracted and change their behavior around one another such that the emphasis may not be on learning. I guess this difference is that a classroom shoul…
/r/MensRights26/04/11 07:27 PM
2

While it is predominantly men who speak up for men's rights in the blogospere, I cannot help but notice that there seem to be a lot of rockin' female civil libertarians standing up on these issues.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 04:08 PM
1

And on a more positive advice note. Tell them that being a part of a sports or athletic/outdoor extracurric with other men will be one of the best decisions they make. I did sports all 4 years of high school and felt like something was missing for most of my freshman year of college when it came to bonding, particularly guy bonding. Once I started doing sports in the spring again things just started clicking for me. It may be what some call an overblown stereotype, but I think sports are necessa…
/r/MensRights26/04/11 03:47 PM
0

Tell them to stay away from hooking up with any girl who has been anywhere near alcohol even if she flings herself on them. Alcohol + sex = easy-to-make date rape claim. There is a more sensitive way to explain this. The guys at FRS have a great post called the elephant in the room on sexual assault accusations at college (http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/12/elephant-in-room-that-feminists-and.html): "The elephant is gray, and its massive, and both sides have trained themselves to insis…
/r/MensRights26/04/11 03:42 PM
3

http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/5440a2e837444b2082401f54280a5243/DE--Delaware-Athletics-Probe/ I wish these guys the best of luck. It seems they are attempting to use the "gender hostility" interpreted extension of Title IX in order to do away with the effects of the literal interpretation of Title IX.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 06:05 AM
3

Genius. This comment has so much win.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 03:07 AM
1

Genius. Now this is the kind of thinking I like to see.
/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:21 AM
0

These same Universities host events with titles such as "The Evils of White Males." The idea that men, particularly white men, are responsible for all the world's problems is spread. I take most of these stupid actions that guys like the fraternity do as a reaction to such event. Your allusion to an all-white frat is unfair. I presume the idea behind the chant is simply to say something would tick off feminists on the campus; I highly doubt any of the guys intended it to be a violent message. Do…
/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:19 AM
1

http://tusb.stanford.edu/2011/04/why-do-you-hate-justice-stanford.html 3 people just commented today that those who presented data/stats on false rape accusations are misogynists.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 07:58 PM
1

http://tusb.stanford.edu/2011/04/why-do-you-hate-justice-stanford.html 3 people just commented today that those who presented data/stats on false rape accusations are misogynists.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 07:57 PM
1

I actually think most people here are for "gender equal opportunity" with a reasonable definition - that is, if you are not legally barred from holding a position and it is a private company that is hiring you, then you have no grounds for a gender lawsuit, quota, etc - as opposed to "gender equality." There are differences between men and women (there are things superior/inferior about average men and average women). I think if we were to do away with affirmative action and federal quotas for w…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 06:05 AM
4

I cannot help but agree. I think we should let serious topics sit at the top of the subreddit until more serious topics and discussions come up. I know everyone is not of this opinion. Either way, we all get a vote. I am cool with the comics that do not stereotype men and women but instead highlight differences of legal rights. I don't think it's a dramatic issue, but I do think it would open this subreddit to being taken more seriously and attracting a larger audience (that may be less familiar…
/r/MensRights25/04/11 02:07 AM
2

You can thank women handing out white feathers -> http://www.avoiceformen.com/avfm-radio/ and chivalry
/r/MensRights24/04/11 11:11 PM
4

If you stay in touch with her it will give her hope that you may stick around and be there. If you cut off contact, then she'll realize there is a risk of you not even paying child support. She may be open-minded to an abortion, but might be telling you otherwise because she'd rather not. She also may not seek child support if she expects she is going to have to fight you for it. Take some time to meditate. This is an important time in your life. Go for a swim, jog, or a visit to the gym. And re…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 11:08 PM
2

Great point Celda. I think that's why I have stuck with MRM. MRA's call me out if I don't include citations. I think it's a strongpoint.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 10:59 PM
2

"Not that they're representatives of MR" I think that is a good point to make. "I just think it's important to realise that trans people get a lot of shit from groups you'd think would support them." I think this is an even more interesting point to make. Before becoming interested in MR, I was an overall avid human rights activist. I actively read about rape in the DRC, war in the Caucasus, civil rights being violated in the US, etc. I was always surprised though by how people would respond dif…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 08:11 AM
5

All violence sends a message. When the Unions would beat up & kill defectors or anyone willing to speak out about corruption, that sent a clear message. A team of bank robbers who are indiscriminately violent with any man or woman who attempts to interfere with their scheme sends a message to all non-bystanders/vigilantes that they will not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:24 AM
7

What is ultraviolence? What does it matter if two people are equally bruised up, but one was bruised up by a bank robber and another person was bruised up by a racist? I don't think it's the laws place to deem that one motive for violence to be inherently worse than another. I, as a human being, can actually make a case that the calm, violent bank robber who is able to suppress emotion in the act of violence for the betterment of the self is perhaps more frightening than the undereducated and em…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:34 AM
4

Well, it's noteworthy that feminists have a lot of problems within their regime on figuring out how to treat transgender people. Gay men kind of straddle the line when it comes to feminism. Some have been pushed away by the anti-male hostility; some feminists have claimed that places with gay men are the most female-hostile places of all (because women are truly not wanted). The hostility towards transgender people has been much more straightforward though.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 02:16 AM
12

I am actually just as against this being charged as a hate crime as I am any other act of violence being charged as a hate crime. The problem I have is what act of violence does not involve an element of hate? Using hate crime for white-on-black violence, and now possibly even black-on-white violence ranks victims. Is it not just as bad if it were two black people beating up another black person? Or two white people beating up another white person? Or what about a skinny kid beating up a fat kid…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:46 AM
5

It's unfair to use one horrific story and inaccurately extrapolate. Every group in the world will have a few bad apples. This is the same kind of mindset that led this country to put hard-working Japanese Americans in internment camps.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 11:39 PM
2

Citations please? I haven't heard your perspective. I want to know why people think he is guilty. InMalaFide/HumanStupidity make a good case for him being not guilty.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 08:47 AM
4

The problem with a suggestion like this is that those accused of sexual assault have been painted out to be the worst people in society before even being given due process. Granted most guys are accused with little evidence and when there is evidence that the person is making up the claim. There have been cases, where through prosecutorial misconduct and poor legal counsel, guys have looked really guilty despite being not guilty. I wouldn't suggest a punishment of stoning any person because I fe…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 03:23 AM
3

She is a "Women's Studies" professor. And if you are not familiar with what Women's Studies means then I suggest you hit up this link http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gve6x/essay_male_market_share_and_the_distortions_of/ This is the same major that spams my email account about "Stopping The Evils of White Males." Email spam is annoying, but it's only a professor of a pseudoscience subject that fails to coherently articulate their frustration in a respectable manner.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:42 AM
2

Look at the in mala fide link I posted. It focuses on datasets for young men that are contrary to the WHO data.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:37 AM
6

It's because she's a women's study professor who fits a pattern of feminist and women's studies professors who act in a way that is hard to take seriously. I hope my link amuses those in the men's rights crowd.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:27 AM
1

Is probable cause a lower standard than preponderance? From wikipedia: ""Probable cause" is a stronger standard of evidence than a reasonable suspicion, but weaker than what is required to secure a criminal conviction. Even hearsay can supply probable cause if it is from a reliable source or supported by other evidence, according to the Aguilar–Spinelli test." Wikipedia does not make it clear whether it is less or more than the preponderance or clear and convincing standards.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:21 AM
1

Not just an arrest. Even if someone makes an accusation against you and the police don't find probable cause, there is still a police report made. The person who makes the complaint is able to request a copy of the police report and it can be spread amongst the public.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:19 AM
3

The problem is that these judicial processes usually serve as a venue for those who were unsuccessful in bringing an accusation against another student through the criminal justice system or chose not to aware that the University process has no expectation of evidence.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:21 AM
1

Not really. No school handled such cases until Title IX mandated that such a process be established by Universities even in the absence of a criminal investigation against a student (and even in cases were the student has been exonerated by criminal investigation).
/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:18 AM
2

Stanford and Brandeis changed the standard of proof as an immediate response to the "Dear Colleague" letter sent out by the Obama administration. It was a part of a political plan laid out for Sexual Assault Awareness week. The April 4 "Dear Colleague" letter is sent out. Then a lawsuit was announced against Yale. Two days later Joe Biden gives a speech about the college campus rape crisis and cites the erroneous 1-in-5 figure. Lawsuits are then announced against Duke and the University of Virgi…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:17 AM
2

That's basically the same criticism made by the Minding the Campus quote in the Fire link. And I agree. I don't think this is a big deal. I think it's reflective of the lower standard that women's studies professors are likely held to.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:09 AM
3

I think the problem is that the employees are aware of how easily any act of defense could loose them their job. There was a video sort of like this posted here (or elsewhere?) awhile ago -> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/florida/meet-panama-city-bk-brawler-653092 But you're right, when two people are kicking someone else in the face who is already down on the ground. That's just sordid. I think the people who stepped in should have attempted to physically restrain the two women after th…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 12:07 AM
2

Sorry. I am multitasking between homework and reddit and doing a terrible job at both :-) Just added links.
/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:37 PM
1

I reposted it w/ link. apologies.
/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:35 PM
2

Massive props to you for getting that conversation going and doing a hell of a job of bringing reason and facts to the table.
/r/MensRights22/04/11 11:16 PM
2

Actually this corroborates a mountain of evidence that male suicide is a growing problem and a relatively new problem (since 1950) http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/03/24/modern-men-and-suicide/ For those mentioning that it's two data points, I think those markers are only meant to mark the endpoints. If it really is just two data points, then it seems silly that WHO published the graph. I'd be interested in seeing a clarified graph.
/r/MensRights22/04/11 10:12 PM
2

Bravo indeed (google translate is awesome).
/r/MensRights22/04/11 09:57 PM
1

I will try and find the court case, but there was a University that made such a program mandatory several years ago. A court case at the last minute ruled that they could not make such a program mandatory. I'll dig it up when I get some free time tomorrow.
/r/MensRights21/04/11 05:50 AM
1

Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:56 AM
6

Did you look at the debate? She did not provide a source. The OP presumed that she was using the typical averaging technique for achieving the 70 cents for every dollar stat which neglects the value of continuous working hours, labor supply, labor markets men in go into in large numbers, labor markets women go into large numbers. In reality, you don't even need stats or facts for these sorts of assertions. If women were in reality being paid that much less for a particular job then it would prov…
/r/MensRights21/04/11 01:55 AM
2

ahaha...it's both funny and sad. She really is quite thick. She is also relentless. Thick and relentless is a deadly combo because sadly just repeating misinformation is likely to convince a few idiots.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 11:02 PM
1

Eh, somehow I messed up on posting the link -> http://www.cavalierdaily.com/2011/04/20/law-broadens-assault-policies/
/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:27 PM
1

Buffoon...sounds a bit harsh?
/r/MensRights20/04/11 07:25 AM
-1

Don't get rid of your ability to have sex in which you eject sperm. If you ever do find someone you trust, love, and would like to have children with, it's worth noting that there is a correlation between unprotected sex and its positive mental health effects on a woman -> http://ricochet.com/main-feed/Truths-You-Cannot-Utter
/r/MensRights20/04/11 06:49 AM
1

"This one is so much scarier though, because at least with a sex crime there is some due process. With a domestic violence charge there is very very little." This. Most of us here read the feminist piece acknowledging how often DV claims are abused by women http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liz-mandarano/the-worst-thing-a-woman-c_b_837636.html
/r/MensRights20/04/11 06:46 AM
1

Very comprehensive and well-written post. Well done sir.
/r/MensRights20/04/11 06:06 AM
1

Well, it's unclear. No school has yet had its federal funding been withdrawn for being in violation of Title IX (http://www.sj-r.com/top-stories/x1271341658/No-school-has-ever-lost-aid-due-to-Title-9-violation). But each school that has been found to not be in compliance by a court (usually for sports team related stuff) has changed its rules so as to be in compliance. The OCR letter has also been criticized as not being legally valid (see http://www.openmarket.org/2011/04/11/education-departmen…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:17 AM
2

"Although some have suggested that many universities already use a preponderance of the evidence standard to resolve disciplinary disputes, this standard is often not protective enough to provide students with due process and a fair hearing, considering the seriousness of the charges. OCR's improperly thought-out letter, if considered mandatory, would place universities is an unfortunate bind: they can either ignore the guidance formulated in the letter, risking OCR's penalty, or dispense with t…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 05:40 AM
0

The threat of loss of federal funding and a civil or federal suit against the University. What is happening to Yale University and Duke University right now is what is scaring Universities into expelling any students accused. Schools never wanted to be deciding these cases in the first place. They only set up these processes once Title IX mandated it. They are now expelling students on little grounds because the Obama administration is threating to pull federal funds and sue any University (usin…
/r/MensRights18/04/11 07:48 PM
1

In cases where it appears there was no sex at all, and a person is made out of thin air it seems that the descriptions are disproportionately of black or latino men. That's the pattern I've picked up on from reading http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com
/r/MensRights17/04/11 08:55 PM
1

Not true. Most schools would not have implemented judicial processes for handling sexual assaults if it were not for Title IX. Title IX mandated that schools set up judicial processes to handle the sexual assault complaints of students. They are huge money sucker for schools too, so most schools are incentivized to do rushed trials to save on costs.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 07:39 PM
0

yes. I am not trying to argue for the sake of arguing. If you are innocent, you have every reason not to talk. More than you think you spew out inaccuracies. You may be truthful about the fact that you did not commit the crime and you were at place X when it occurred, but in your desperateness to prove your innocence you might say you were at place X for 3 hours when you were only there for two hours. Any small change in reality that you make (even unknowingly) will be used against you. When the…
/r/MensRights17/04/11 07:30 PM
1

Not true. This is based on the advice of numerous attorneys and police officers I know. Any good attorney will tell you to politely decline speaking with the police. Any honest police officer will tell you that speaking to them can do you no good.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 06:00 AM
1

Police involvement is likely if she reports to the police. We don't know what the odds of that are. If she reports to the police, the odds of arrest are based on which DA office receives the police report and the extent to which the police interpret probable cause. In some places, arrest is pretty much guaranteed. In other places, it's tough to say.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:58 AM
1

No. This is how you get in more trouble. Just look at what happened to the GMU somali kid who was arrested for sitting in a library room.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 05:55 AM
0

These two aren't men's rights website, but more male-friendly, antifeminist perspectives: http://www.inmalafide.com http://roissy.wordpress.com
/r/MensRights17/04/11 02:24 AM
1

Not true...Watch the video that I link to in my top post. This is very not true. It is never good to talk to the police. The only time to do so is if you have been carefully instructed by an attorney.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 08:10 PM
49

Visit http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com You need to understand how bad this may turn out for you. It seems like you are more credible than she, but there have many bullshit cases of innocent guys going to prison. Basically the best thing you can do right now is keep your mouth shut. DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE. Whatever you do. DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE. If you're not convinced by me, watch this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc and I am sure you will be convinced. If the girl fi…
/r/MensRights16/04/11 09:49 AM
1

Yeah. Very true. Another reason to reframe things (ex: don't say big gov. vs laissez faire. describe it as a long-standing debate of federalism vs. antifederalism that harkens back to our founding fathers). I think libertarians should sneakily rename themselves as Jeffersonians.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 05:54 AM
3

Lol. Well played. I find that some people have incorrect - sometimes even nasty presumptions - about libertarianism. Sometimes the names of movements and their associations with controversial figures (ann rynd) can put the powerful ideas (liberty, justice) in the shadows.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 07:20 AM
3

Thanks for adding this back kloo2yoo!
/r/MensRights14/04/11 02:24 AM
2

I think you've identified the next step for people wanting to stand up in the name of due process. Getting these students to write articles/op-eds in their local student newspapers. These student juries will otherwise be heavily biased against the defendant. Universities are fembot factories.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 02:21 AM
3

The Head of Stanford's Student Life program basically thinks that the accused deserve whatever happens to them for getting into a situation of being accused, "“For people who might be concerned about the change in the burden, the standard of proof, then [it is] probably an opportunity for people to be saying to themselves, ‘I need to be really educated about these issues because I don’t want to find myself in this circumstance,’” http://www.stanforddaily.com/2011/04/12/stanford-lowers-standard-o…
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:07 PM
1

Citation for the stat please. You need to consider that groping constitutes sexual assault too. Detailed information about these cases is rarely released. My guess is that expulsion is the punishment 99% of the time when the accusation is rape.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:01 PM
2

So true.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:35 PM
1

It goes like this: try to get guy arrested/prosecuted. that fails -> try to get guy kicked out of university or suspended. that fails or works. -> go to civil court and try to get the guy to settle for a sum of cash. Elite schools are full of brainwashed, overentitled liberals. Rich student consents to sex after a night of partying, regrets the next day, and calls it rape.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:14 AM
1

It wasn't ill-received. I think you are hitting on some focal points of an important conversation. I am merely pointing out that there are false accusations that are made completely beyond a man's control. I think you are right to point out that there are improvements that can be made by way of education for men. There are certain women who are more inclined to be an FRA and just scream out crazy. Men need to be taught that, despite following the law and social norms, it's in their best interest…
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:06 AM
15

hahahaha....b.s. You contradict yourself by using the word patriarchy. This fringe conspiracy theory that men are responsible for all the problems in the world is used against fathers and is propelled by feminists.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:44 AM
2

Not entirely true. I get what you are saying. There are circumstances that are more likely to lend themselves to a false rape accusation. But as the guys over at http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com have documented women have made accusations for the most insane reasons: avoid dui, avoid paying cabfare, for fun, etc. False accusations are not always just the result of regrettable sex. There have even been cases of guys who don't even know a woman getting chucked into jail based on a sketch/descr…
/r/MensRights13/04/11 06:33 AM
1

Rock solid comments man.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 05:01 AM
3

There should be a list of male-friendly colleges. It looks like this will make it harder to make such a distinction though...
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:28 AM
1

They won't for fear of the civil lawsuit that Yale is facing. That is why Stanford and Brandeis changed their standards so quickly. The "Dear Colleague" letter sent out to every University threatened removal of federal funding and lawsuits for Universities that have been applying any burden of proof higher than "preponderance of evidence." Granted, most schools have been working toward lowering the burden of proof anyway. The Stanford article linked in the FRS article links to discussions over t…
/r/MensRights12/04/11 11:15 PM
1

"that she was clearly totally obviously wasted," The problem is defining what this means. Maybe the accuser was acting wasted around other people but acting more sober around the accused.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 04:05 PM
3

They are awesome. We need to seriously upvote this topic so it gets more discussion. It will eventually be challenged and public (including reddit support) can help a successful challenge of the policy.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 04:00 AM
3

so true.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:56 AM
1

Thanks :-) I agree with you on your take of end of life healthcare. If I ever get close to the feeding tubes and all that, I am going to take one last nice base jump (and will hopefully have a decent life insurance policy...and will of course leave money behind for my body to cover the cleanup costs of whatever impending mess I turn into)
/r/MensRights11/04/11 06:33 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights11/04/11 06:30 AM
2

I should have been a bit more specific. I had my suspicions about discrimination against men for much of my life, then I became familiar with the law and had those suspicions fully confirmed. The law flat out discriminates against men. That's easy to see. When it comes to discrimination against black people in the last 20 years, I've always been suspicious of the race card. I believe discrimination exists and happens, but I've always had my doubts about how bad it really is. The innocence projec…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 06:29 AM
3

It is indeed a great project. Made me realize that discrimination is still alive and thriving.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:28 PM
5

This should get hella up-voted. If it were the other way around, feminists would be launching the fem-nukes.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:14 AM
3

"this subreddit isn't about hating women" Strawman. No one said anything to suggest that. This subreddit is not about hating in anyway. It's about men's rights and pointing out the occasional idiot. The occasional idiot is sometimes a man (typically a deluded white knight) and sometimes a woman (typically an overentitled nutcase/femnazi). There are also plenty of awesome men and women here who get praise (rantgrl and aetherealloy ftw)
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:44 AM
2

I am happy someone acknowledged how messed up the University courts are: Duke, Hofstra, GMU Somali student, North Dakota victim of false accuser, College of William and Mary victim of false accuser...the college courts take us back to the times of the court of the star chamber.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 10:36 PM
0

Awesome but incredibly scary find.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 04:15 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 05:03 AM
4

Actually, no. It's the child's body. I actually lean pro-life and would rather no one have a say in whether or not the child lives or dies. The ultimate unfairness lies to me in the fact that the woman can opt out of any responsibility with the adoption option (even if the man is against it), but the man does not have this same right. If the man opts for the child to be adopted, but the woman is against it. He is forced to pay child support. But really, I think we should look at it from the pers…
/r/MensRights29/03/11 08:13 AM
0

Why the downvoting? He's making a poignant point. There are both men and women who claim to be experts on things they are clearly not. Roosh's post is only misguided in the sense that he doesn't interact with the idiot men of this type as much. I regendered the post and didn't think anything of it either. Comes off as a simple advice piece in a cheap magazine. The truth is that when most people claim to be an expert on something, your b.s. radar should start beeping.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 07:40 AM
2

Totally true. I sometimes wonder about how much risk the male game bloggers are exposing themselves too. All of their views would be used against them in court. Granted, guys like Roissy claim that if you've truly succeeded at game the woman will be too obsessed with you to make an FRA.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 07:37 AM
0

Lol. Ignore cliffor. Cliffor is a feminist troll impostor.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 07:26 AM
1

What happened to you sucks. But I doubt girlwriteswhat would be concerned about equality for men if she were to do something like what your ex did to you. I take her story in good faith. There are a lot of male and female jerks. And the stories you two have told are evidence of this. Each one of you was the victim of a dbag of the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 07:09 AM
4

Yeah, I originally saw the same abbreviated version and was a bit confused. This one - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOXuvbT0eUo&feature=player_embedded - cleared things up a bit.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 10:02 AM
2

Let's be fair. She spat beer on him twice and threw ice twice. If you watch the full video he gave two separate verbal warnings. While you may not condone the violence, my question is why security didn't get rid of the obnoxious drunk woman. I've seen plenty of obnoxious drunk guys get ejected from concerts but it seems like there is a greater tolerance for obnoxiousness from women (http://glpiggy.net/2011/03/24/female-hecklers/) The woman is going to have a hard time gaining my sympathy. I woul…
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:29 AM
1

You're answering your own question. 99.99% of guys, like women, would never think of raping someone (and for those who do, I hardly imagine they are the type to do a cost-benefit analysis). Looking at the dynamics inside of prison is not all that relevant to looking at the dynamics of men. The guys in prison represent an extreme end of the normal distribution curve. A great many of prison rapes can be explained by there being a larger population of sociopaths. Would you look at female prisoners …
/r/MensRights27/03/11 06:19 AM
2

"I’m going to tell it like it is. And what it is is this: statistically speaking women have a huge advantage as entrepreneurs, because the press is dying to write about them, and venture capitalists are dying to fund them. Just so no one will point the accusing finger of discrimination at them." - Michael Arrington, Senior Editor of Tech Crunch. And please, I work in Silicon Valley. The place is full of effeminate men. It'd be plausible to say that the women in silicon valley are more misogynist…
/r/MensRights27/03/11 05:42 AM
3

Bands typically don't get paid to play festivals but people pay to go to festivals. There are a lot of insurance, clean up, and power costs. The left over money usually goes to charity. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOXuvbT0eUo&feature=player_embedded - that's as packed as you get before you start worrying about people dying from being suffocated from squeezing.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 04:50 AM
1

Nah, my conclusion draws on two decades of empirical evidence.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:53 AM
1

I love the anonymous downvoting. Fembots are so weak in confidence that they cannot even work up the courage to punch a few keyboard keys for a refutation. They just downvote for each notch of confidence my academic research takes off their belt.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:48 AM
2

I am sorry to hear about that. Fair enough stance. I believe in non-violence as well.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:38 AM
1

I'd venture that all but a few of the guys in prison would prefer a consenting partner. It's natural for a human being to be repulsed by the pain or misery of another. I think you are projecting. Women are more likely to see sex as a power tool. As for men? Men like sex. They can choose words, wits, or fists to assert dominance. And even then, as a guy I cannot say I've ever wanted to assert dominance over someone else. If someone challenges me and tries to assert dominance, I'll defend myself. …
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:26 AM
6

Someone pays $50 to see the guy, waits hours in line to be in the front row, joins a crowd of thousands trying to touch the guy, and then claims the man has a long history of irrelevance...sounds like there wasn't much risk for brain damage.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:03 AM
2

If that's your position, then complain about it every time a guy gets punched for being a dick (happens at every concert guaranteed).
/r/MensRights27/03/11 02:02 AM
1

Poignant examples: South Africa, Ghana, and Kenya.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 01:04 AM
1

I suspect blacks would be doing better had the government not forced them to integrate and be downgraded in their own school systems. Research shows that integration and early affirmative action programs lowered the self esteems of black students and turned education into a "white thing." Black students at top universities still suffer the stigma from friends back home of "acting white." I cite: http://www.slate.com/id/2257453/ http://www.jstor.org/pss/2112447 The other fact that you need to dea…
/r/MensRights27/03/11 12:47 AM
2

What constitutes a "power position"? Politicians simply do what the people allow (and encourage) them to do. Why is it important that women be in government? Malcom Gladwell's narrative of the successful Jewish business lawyer is particularly poignant, as corporate mergers was an area of law that virtually did not exist and was at first looked at as a scumbag law practice. Now it is considered elite and one of the most profitable areas of law. Perhaps you ought to consider that being the CEO of …
/r/MensRights27/03/11 12:26 AM
1

When you're using hate language that much, it's clear that you need to either get laid or get high. It's just not healthy to be that hateful. Chillax broseph (or brosephina?)
/r/MensRights27/03/11 12:19 AM
2

Looking forward to this.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 08:59 PM
1

When the Irish came they had the shit beat out of them like there was no tomorrow and were barred from doing all sorts of things (off the books of course), that didn't stop them from gaining power. And what about the Jews? The Ivy League treated them like a cockroach infestation up until the 80s and they still managed to find success in many walks of life. And what about the blacks? They were enslaved and explicitly restricted by laws for over a century. What did they do? They said fuck the ivy …
/r/MensRights26/03/11 04:42 AM
7

Black Privilege: No one asks me what it means to be a black running back in the NFL Black Privilege: I can say racist stuff but it's cool cuz I'm black Female Privilege: When I bitch people say I am talking about "my feelings" Right-Handed Privilege: I can open doorknobs with my dominant hand. People Privilege: I can walk into a building without wearing a collar. Being a Not-Tree Privilege: I Can Murder Trees and Make Paper Posters Out of Their Rotting Corpses.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 01:55 AM
3

mmm...I like it when you talk dirty to me.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:42 PM
3

Go to a bar and you'll hear a generalization about every "type" of person you can imagine. People say stuff like this all the time. The problem is when people act on prejudices, but everyone has echoed or made a statement about a stereotype at one point or another. The girl is an idiot for posting the video on youtube, but I still don't think it is right to scapegoat her for every stereotype someone has ever mentioned. To the feminazis downvoting my posts, are you really not even competent enoug…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:42 PM
2

The guy is a University Professor. He made a one-time stupid mistake. Now untuck you ball sack and stop being a whiny bitch. When I was a kid I mistook beer as root beer at a block party; nothing bad happened as I thought the stuff tasted like crap. Mike's Hard Lemonade is low on alcohol content (5%) and also tastes like crap. That's probably why the kid did not come close to finishing it.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:29 PM
1

At least they didn't try to come and downplay the topic. Usually there are at least a few trolls who try and twist the facts for every topic. I think even the most vile of feminazis realize that they'd be hitting a new low by vocally trolling this topic (so instead they just downvote it).
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:26 PM
1

I've never "leered" at a woman walking down the block. Albeit, I have received compliments from random women in public. And I know women who, like me, enjoy the attention.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 07:52 PM
0

lolz...you did some excellent math, expressed some healthy frustration, and now you are recognizing the absurdity of the world :-)
/r/MensRights25/03/11 06:54 AM
0

I don't see anything wrong with the girl's video. It's no worse than the stuff chris rock and other comedians who make racial jokes get away with (hell, Chris Rock talks about beating up and pissing on white people, but he's black so it's cool).
/r/MensRights25/03/11 06:39 AM
-3

TROLL
/r/MensRights25/03/11 06:38 AM
0

Look you got to draw out the relevant findings of any link you post. The last survey with 1-in-6 that we debunked had to classify incidents of rape as rape even when the woman did not consider it to have been an incident in order to get the number they wanted.
/r/MensRights25/03/11 03:38 AM
1

*It's more like 1-in-1877 -> http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/02/one-in-four-lie-demolished-once-and-for.html and http://communityvoices.sites.post-gazette.com/index.php/opinion/the-radical-middle/27667--one-in-one-thousand-eight-hundred-seventy-seven *Heather Macdonald -> http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_campus_rape.html *Dr. Christina Somers -> http://www.leaderu.com/real/ri9502/sommers.html
/r/MensRights25/03/11 01:56 AM
4

Of the many great comments on tech crunch, here is one that I think gets everything right: While I appreciate the information on how women are an attractive >target market for advertisers and products, if you want to get any >respect for the information, you really need to drop the "girls rule, >boys drool" attitude. The idea that certain functions such as shopping and being social, >both functions that are known to be favored by women in the physical >world, are translating into the digital wor…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 01:24 AM
1

Based on which TA you get from the lotto for a class, which professor is finalized for the class, if you make the cutoff for the small introductory seminar with the nobel prize winning prof, etc -- you are going to switch around your schedule a great deal during your first two weeks. You're better off waiting till your schedule is finalized before making book purchases/rentals. Finally, the guys I know are less prone to get a copy of the book at all (at least not the ISBN they recommend). We are…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 01:14 AM
3

"Women even shop more on Chegg, which offers textbook rentals on college campuses across the country. Males and females attend college at an almost even rate. Renting would seem an equal opportunity money saver, plus it’s better for the planet. But according to Chegg, females are 65% of renters. Why? Renting requires a little more advanced planning. Chegg’s research shows women are more inclined to plan ahead than men. And, they seem to care more about saving money, and are more likely to be inf…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 01:12 AM
4

I think troll might be a bit harsh. I checked out the poster's history. This is their first post here in at over 30 days. The poster does not usually post on social issues, but rather just computer and gaming topics. The point that aetheralloy was trying to make is that a feminist can make out a man dying into being harmful for the woman and use that point to push for a position that puts women's concerns first. Nothing in the extended quote you provide derails this point, but when you type "fin…
/r/MensRights25/03/11 12:56 AM
6

It would be difficult for a feminist to claim that women are the primary victims of high rates of male suicide as a great deal of male suicide past the year 30 mark is the result of divorce (which is initiated by women 70% of the time) and men not being allowed to see their children. Women, on the other hand, are not more likely to commit suicide after divorce (signaling that they could care less about their partner).
/r/MensRights24/03/11 09:01 PM
1

My mistake. I forgot to give due credit to Celda for schooling you as well. Both of them adequately replied to your disingenuous cherrypicking of a quote. Also, Pierce did not refer to you as a she but the gender neutral "her / his." I don't know why you would take offense to be called a "she," seems rather misogynist that you would...As for village idiot, is it not you in this video -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNBNqUdqm1E ?
/r/MensRights24/03/11 08:53 PM
0

This.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 08:50 PM
2

"I would love for you to school me, I really would." And school you he has.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 06:27 PM
2

Unrelated to the subreddit, but I do think this is an interesting topic. I agree that the more dense the population gets the more likely you are to run into rude people. I still think that some cities and regions will vary. Different industries, religions, races, etc will produce different overall cultures. Southern hospitality is supposedly alive and well in southern cities. Paris is known for being douchey to foreigners. Reykjavik is known for being super friendly to anyone. I believe stereoty…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:40 PM
0

So much win.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:29 PM
3

victim blaming
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:26 PM
1

I enjoy a great bit of your comments, but I think a_pathological_liar is right on this one.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:32 PM
1

so true. that line is full of winning.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:30 PM
1

I've always thought people in Canada to be a bit friendlier on average (or more like people on the west coast). When I am in the midwest I mostly get gratitude expressed when I hold doors open for men and women. On the west coast, I sometimes get an indignant nonresponse.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:14 PM
1

this page shows the pattern of other mens rights links that are oldish. It gets taken over by feminist trolls. Look at the downvoting going on.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:05 PM
1

I could eat a pan of general tso's chicken and shit out a better comeback than that.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 07:03 PM
-1

Uh...did you read the piece? The article directly references 20 police men dying. No one makes a fuss. One girl gets a threat and runs crying for the States. She gets called a hero. The bodies of the men have now been fully eaten by roaches: "Valles' predecessor in Praxedis was kidnapped and decapitated in August 2009, and 15 of the 17 officers he commanded were also killed. The church was firebombed in April last year. Burnt out houses dotted around town provide permanent testament to the trage…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 09:18 AM
3

I think this is simply the case of someone injecting gender where it need not be injected. The story for me was about three flawed characters somehow coming together for one another. Mattie starts off the movie as cold and not trusting of others. We see that she starts to develop a more convivial tone with her two compadres. Jeff Bridges finally awakens from his drunken stupor to develop a plan to save Mattie. Damon overcomes his ego and shows respect for both Bridges and Mattie at the end. This…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 09:06 AM
11

That line really cracked me up...except she moves on to pseudo-psych talk about "internalizing."
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:44 AM
5

It seems as if I run across a new troll every day posing as an MRA (sometimes calling others trolls), and yet they are usually too lazy to try and cover up. One look at the user's post history and you can see a pattern of trolling.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 08:37 AM
1

translation of nanomagnetic: "I have a small penis despite being a huge troll and still cannot muster up enough intelligence to respond to the initial topic"
/r/MensRights23/03/11 03:57 AM
1

I am sorry that your small penis is proportionate to your small brain. I posted two replies expressing what qualms I had with the video. And you posted two immature responses that were irrelevant to the topic. After realizing you could not manage an intellectual conversation I decided to demonstrate how you fail to even produce a satisfying immature comment. I am sure you are still struggling to get the first bit about your mother's dick-sucking habits.
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:56 AM
1

The irony is that I remember many of my female friends in high school would brag how claiming to be on their period could get them out of afternoon sports practices or sometimes showing up to a particular class hour. The teachers and coaches who most often called b.s. were female teachers. My female friends remarked that male coaches and teachers were much too scared of coming off as unsympathetic to dare call them on lying about being on their period (I should clarify that girls would lie about…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:48 AM
1

I get where you are coming from. When my black friends use the n-word, I feel a bit alienated. That said, when they make fun of white guys and I come back making fun of black guys, I get way more props for accurate stereotypes I joke about when it comes to black guys. Why? Prolly because they are happy to not be hanging out with a boring politically correct white guy who will go to the most awkward extremes to avoid saying anything that could be remotely considered offensive by a minority. Simil…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 12:32 AM
3

After reading through the first 5 piles of bullshit (paragraphs), I reached the crown jewel of bullshit, the actual explanation of the study -> "the men were instructed to imagine that they were employed at their place of business. The men were split into two groups. One group read a series of non-sexist jokes. Another read a series of sexist jokes. Both groups of men were then asked to contribute money to a women's organization. " Men feel pressured by political correctness and society to oblig…
/r/MensRights22/03/11 07:55 PM
1

The original article was written of by a GMU paper staff writer because the paper does not print stories over spring break.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 07:50 PM
1

The same cop doing his duty in the summer -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPEeCYPGjm0&feature=player_embedded#at=111 A brave man I tell ya.
/r/MensRights22/03/11 07:48 PM
1

Video of incompetent cop doing his duty in the summer -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPEeCYPGjm0&feature=player_embedded#at=111
/r/MensRights22/03/11 07:48 PM
22

Video Interview with student on local news -> http://wusa9.com/news/article/141659/77/Arrested-GMU-Student-Accuses-University-Police-of-Harassment Washington Post Blog -> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/college-inc/post/george-mason-student-cleared-in-library-study-room-abduction/2011/03/16/ABDfZRg_blog.html Washington Post Article -> http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/spat-over-study-room-leads-to-george-mason-students-arrest/2011/03/15/ABIKmVb_story.html James Madison University…
/r/MensRights21/03/11 07:02 PM
2

interesting. could you link me to a source?
/r/MensRights21/03/11 09:23 AM
-1

I get the sense that you are the load your mother should have swallowed (and trust me, she has swallowed plenty of mine, she's great at it). pardon? I shouldn't have went there. What's funny is that I can sink to your low and beat you there even as you struggle to rise to my level and have an intellectual conversation. No worries, I have no problems recollecting how I screwed your cum bucket of a mother.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 09:20 AM
1

Sure thing. The first time I became aware of the thesis that the persecution of jews was related to their success was from the book Outliers by Malcom Gladwell. I'll quote a book review that neatly sums up the idea: "Gladwell also devotes a whole chapter to New York Jewish lawyer Joe Flom. Because of widespread antisemitism in old-line Wall Street law firms in the 1950s and 1960s, Jewish lawyers were excluded and had to take work that the “white shoe firms” did not want – litigation and proxy fi…
/r/MensRights21/03/11 08:53 AM
-1

You're the load your mother should have swallowed.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 08:46 AM
2

Fair enough I guess. I just find it hard to see how either a man or a woman could enjoy having sex with a motionless body. But I guess that may just be my own ignorance of the cases that have happened.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 08:45 AM
1

Seems like a bunch of beta white knights are down voting this.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:28 PM
0

Thanks troll.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:27 PM
2

That's a worthless statement. You could say the same thing about women. You're just gender politicizing the topic into the ground.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:25 PM
8

A commenter on the article nails it on the head. If you are a man, start ups are the way to go. When there are only 8 people in the company and the bottom line is surviving in a competitive market, it's all about whose best. There is little room for you being discriminated against for being a man. It's also the only way you are likely to have a decent chance at getting an executive position. In the old days most executive positions were taken by those with top-notch connections and a few lucky m…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:23 PM
1

How the hell did 39 people down vote this? Kloo2yoo I think there has been some significant trolling in the last week. Whenever there is an article that reveals important research that sheds light on a men's rights cause it gets significantly down voted. I think this subreddit is getting targeted.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 06:38 PM
4

No worries bro. I appreciated your well-written article. As long as there are no pop-ups or pop-ins, I am down with the ads.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 06:32 PM
4

N. People drink so they can have an excuse and will feel more open to behaving in ways that are not considered as proper for sober people. To assume that being drunk and having sex means being taken advantage of is absurd. The whole "someone has a right to drink and not want to have sex" thing is true. Just because someone drinks it doesn't mean that they wanted to have sex. But if you accepted the girls moves on you and had the ability to verbally or nonverbally say yes or no, then it wasn't ra…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 06:23 PM
1

Yes, but it's about from where the humor is ultimately derived. This video does not attempt to belittle the damage done to the women. The humor is dark. The idea that someone would use an excuse like falling down the stairs for the high level of battering done is humorous because it is such an unbelievable excuse. The humor in the video on men is based around the idea that men ought to "man up" to abuse. It's funny to see a guy play the traditionally effeminate role of victim which involves admi…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 06:08 PM
-1

I am not saying there is anything "inherently" wrong with the video. The issue is the double standard. Abuse against men is joked about and accepted as a result of the "masculine gender role." People say the guy should have manned up.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 06:03 PM
1

The truth is i don't think any guy wants to have sex with a gal who is passed out. It sickens me how easy it is for guys here to buy that any guy would want to do that. Being drunk doesn't change the most fundamental rules of attraction. A drunk guy may hookup with a chick below his caliber in looks, but he will not be attracted to a chick who can barely move. Good sex is when people are goin' at it, bad sex is when either one of both of two people are timid. Think about good handshakes vs. bad …
/r/MensRights20/03/11 05:58 PM
0

I linked to the full bit; onion videos are 99% of the time only 1-2 minutes. How does posting a link to a video with an accurate title description constitute throwing a 'hissy fit'? Your presumptuous use of the first person plural wreaks of "troll"...After looking up your post history it's obvious that you are a troll of r/MensRights. I am open to someone engaging in a conversation on how much leeway comedy should have or if this link is trying too hard to show a double standard. Intentionally a…
/r/MensRights20/03/11 10:39 AM
2

How did have the people down vote this? I am starting to get the suspicion that people from out the subreddit come in and down vote important pieces like this.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 06:00 PM
0

It kind of reminds me off all the small hipster stores of the haight-ashbury strain. I am surprised this got downvoted so much
/r/MensRights18/03/11 05:59 PM
4

the other best quote -> "if you are not outraged, you are not paying attention."
/r/MensRights18/03/11 09:04 AM
3

Actually the reviewers are determining the movie to be quite misandrist: "So, okay, men are completely irresponsible slobs, which is why women need to be unceasing nags. Check. Great message for the kids." http://www.nj.com/entertainment/movies/index.ssf/2011/03/mars_needs_moms_review_missing_mother_inspires_minors_mission.html
/r/MensRights17/03/11 01:06 AM
1

I think I found a project for spring break. Gathering a collection of articles that clearly demonstrate a bias in the media to hide the gender of a group when the group is male and does something honorable; to make the gender clear when a female group does something honorable; and to make the gender clear when a male group does something dishonorable.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 11:16 PM
0

Regardless of whether there is a stat, murder is the result of variability. At the very far ends of any distribution curb, there are more men than women. If you look at the age of enlightenment, all of the major figures are men. If you look at music, the major breakthroughs have come time and time again from male composers. Does this mean that a man is more likely to be a genius/prodigy? Yes, but it's such a small subsect of men that it would be idiotic to judge your average joe as being smarter…
/r/MensRights15/03/11 11:11 PM
1

The Hardest Logic Puzzle of All Time -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hardest_Logic_Puzzle_Ever
/r/MensRights15/03/11 10:54 PM
1

I think just about everyone here is demanding that this matter be investigated further.
/r/MensRights15/03/11 07:07 AM
5

This is awesome dude. Major props!
/r/MensRights15/03/11 04:25 AM
9

Ok, good news and bad news. I heard back from The Broadside, GMU's student newspaper. Good news -> The student newspaper for the University is investigating. Bad news -> They will not be publishing until the Monday following their spring break (March 28).
/r/MensRights14/03/11 07:32 PM
6

It was well written, but I want to discourage people from visiting that website. Their business plan seems to go like this: -bash men's rights movement and pander to feminism -bash some more -bash some more -notice that the MRAs are sick of responding -invite MRA to write a piece -return to disproportionately bashing MRAs That's at least my perspective, and for that reason, I think we should avoid the website completely.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:29 PM
2

Simply ridiculous that Title IX has led to this.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:25 PM
28

The only person who has been abducted is the student in question, Abdi. Free Abdi!
/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:13 PM
16

At the least pressure the student newspaper or a local newspaper to report on this. I've posted contact information 5 posts below this.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:12 PM
48

I googled and could only find a CNN ireport for this story. The University newspaper should at least be covering this story. Let's see this get investigated some more. If it gets in the student newspaper, I have some contacts for getting the story to spread nationally. A CNN ireport will not do though. Emails of GMU's Student newspaper: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Phone numbers: (703) 993-2944 (Editor-in-chief Emily Sharrer) (703) 993-3874 (Son…
/r/MensRights14/03/11 03:16 PM
1

Yeah yeah. I gotcha. What I was trying to say is that when I read yours and aetheralloy's posts I could not help but agree. It really is just one comment on an obscure blog. And part of me thinks it is dumb to post the link. On the other hand, I think the strategy Pierce Harlan takes in trying to generate a healthy discussion of facts on regionally/communally localized websites might be brilliant. The feminists will send their brigades to the big articles and so will we. In the end everyone gets…
/r/MensRights14/03/11 02:01 AM
2

Completely understandable. A lot of the posts linked here at to WSJ and NYTimes. I thought that it might be a healthy reminder that college age kids are being fed these views as well. Nevertheless, if that's the sentiment,then I'll go ahead and submit major article links only.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 10:15 PM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 02:14 PM
9

No problem with your wishes. All sound completely reasonable. As reasonable as the wishes of men expressed on this subreddit. The problem, it seems to me, is that feminists with radical views have hijacked the feminist movement (or at least been loud enough to obscure what the true goals of the movement are). I've met women who think that men should have to pay higher taxes than women and propose other forms of discrimination against men. I've also met women who call themselves feminists who are…
/r/MensRights12/03/11 02:12 PM
1

I didn't define what feminism is or is not in my post. The point I was trying to make is that there exist more stigmas for men who break social gender norms than there are for women who break social gender norms. It's hot for two straight women to try out kissing each other, but revolting for two straight men to try kissing each other. Women are cheered on for taking on more masculine roles while men are derided. I agree that there was a time when both men and women were equally derided, but now…
/r/MensRights12/03/11 03:50 AM
1

my response continued... " As women acquire more power in society, their valuation of man's earning potential is less and less. Personality and compatibility become more important, and this is better for the average male because it results in more incompatibility between the elite and women, and thus a more equitable distribution, which definitely would reduce a lot of bitterness among lower status males." This is also not true. While personality and compatibility are undeniably factors in attra…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 05:35 AM
5

"And look, even if there is a slight statistical difference, perhaps that means that 48% of women are smarter than the lower 50% of men, is that really a good reason to stereotype and confine women?" No one on this subreddit thinks there is a good reason to "stereotype and confine women." Where are you getting that from? I, and I believe many others here, hold to a philosophy of people should be free to behave as they please so long as they don't violate another person's autonomy. And for me per…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 05:20 AM
5

The truth is that men exhibit what academic psychologists refer to as greater variability -> http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~baumeistertice/goodaboutmen.htm Men outnumber women at the bottom of society. Look at Texas. This year men outnumber women 307-to-10 on death row (http://www.tdcj.state.tx.us/stat/racial.htm). In the year 2007 the American military reached the milestone of 3000 deaths. 2938 of those soldiers were men; 62 were women. According to the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, 93% of peop…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 03:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter