TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

slideforlife Archive

View 6 posts and 1,076 comments by slideforlife on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,076 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

thanks. I hope he's ok
/r/MensRights24/09/17 07:55 PM
1

"penetration" is simply a bugaboo that people love to toss around to vilify men and exonerate women when they sexually assault and rape. there is no intrinsic difference in the displeasure that each gender experiences when being sexually victimized. however, because nonsensical symbolism has been usurped politically to posture innocence from an unassailable alter of passivity
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:17 AM
1

untrue. you needn't fear for your life to legally engage in self-defense. merely to avoid becoming someone's punching bag is standing enough to use reasonable force to repel a physical attack. Gender, size, class, religion, race, etc... all irrelevant.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 11:15 PM
1

weight bearing exercise will do the trick without pharms
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:04 AM
12

her attack began the conflict and it was ongoing. his moves against it were defensive and meant to repel it. why is this even a question for the police?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:57 PM
4

horseshit, he used reasonable force to repel on ongoing attack
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:39 PM
0

in a normal world, the woman would be charged in this case. Only in cuckoo-land is any conflict between a man and a woman the man's fault by default.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:38 PM
1

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/muscle-building-supplements-linked-to-testicular-cancer/ i'm sure you've seen this?
/r/MensRights08/07/15 10:10 AM
2

mrs... BUELLER!
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:01 PM
1

bigotry of any stripe is lazy, cowardly, and ignorant.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:31 AM
12

unfortunately in this day and age, you'd have to have an incurable death wish to be a male and want to marry.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:28 AM
1

we got that 10 blocks ago. when are people like you going to get that sexual servitude is gender-blind?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:56 AM
2

""and i love you too cuz, just don't ask me to stomach that feminist claptrap""
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:44 AM
2

fasting or a calorie restricted diet has been shown to be very healthy. steroids never have. not funny.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:35 PM
1

i agree, he pushed her away and then decided to go for it. i think this is regrettable sex.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:40 PM
4

she's just 'leaning in'
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:57 AM
3

but when something goes bump in the night, guess who's going to get pushed into manspreading down to find out what it is?
/r/MensRights30/06/15 12:21 AM
2

i probably should do the same with my biological mother. she gave me up for adoption and I never've even dropped her a note that said, hey, don't worry, everything turned out all right. I probably should like right now. well, I hope you can figure out your stuff. best of luck with it all. -a fellow men's rights subreddit contributor.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:50 AM
6

you'd know better than me so I'm not saying he didn't do as you posted, but i bet that's exactly what my kid's mother told her for most of her life too. if you haven't already, finding out his story might make it easier to understand why what happened happened.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 11:39 PM
10

bitch and courts made me go 16 years before I got 20 minutes with kid. she's at school now and we talk all the time. keep the faith.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:31 PM
1

i only have psychic sex over the internet. concentrate.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:38 PM
0

straight what? oh, if that is a proposition, i'm not interested.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 01:07 PM
5

Supporting what are traditionally thought of as masculine traits (and defending them if they come under attack) can be done even while allowing the great nature vs nurture debate to go on without taking sides. Maybe it'll turn out that these traits are not masculine at all, maybe it's just that girls are less inclined to think independently because they've been instilled with irrational fears and insecurities. Or, maybe not. But in any case, all kids should have the freedom to harmlessly express…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 01:06 PM
9

that kind of sarcasm is stupid. it's more like when teachers told my 7 y/o son that he wasn't allowed to wrestle with his friends at recess.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:52 PM
3

no dumbass, you should roll her over and tickle her under her arms. irreverent creativity - one of the bastions of maleness and masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:48 PM
6

i'm a jew and I'll do both. and that's another comment for you too, beancounter.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:43 PM
6

oooh, the tendrils of rape culture.... oooh.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:40 PM
-10

kill to keep that pussy, amirite?
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 11:40 AM
2

but it IS! -sort of like pin the tail on the donkey.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:55 PM
8

yeah, right. that's why NOW fights against presumed shared parenting, the bedrock of equality.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:54 PM
1

another example of the pussy pass
/r/MensRights17/06/15 11:20 PM
1

like I would ever buy a book published by this house
/r/MensRights16/06/15 11:16 PM
1

The vengeful responses to the innocuous musings of Dr. Hunt are nothing less than utterly unmitigated and hysterical garbage. To think that University College caved to the metastasizing demands from no-talent harpies gathered around the internet to carp over their phobic paranoia is another reason why a degree from this kind of institution isn't worth the paper on which it's printed.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 12:27 PM
1

As I understand it, Men's Rights advances the issues that men face regardless of their sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:24 AM
1

of course it's possible. anything is possible. you needn't ask that. but really responding with that kind of violence is exponentially more sick and depraved than any false accusations.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:21 AM
1

ANNNNNND you mean metaphorically, of course. -Just to enlighten them to the error of their ways no doubt. See if anything really happened to them, it'd just be used as reason .... "why we need feminism".
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:16 AM
1

I realize the consequences of this problem. I'm not saying it isn't deadly serious. I'm glad you were being facetious. I agree that false accusers should be prosecuted fully. But I still think an even larger problem is how the court system is turned on its head for this particular crime and also how easily women turn guys into white knights over it.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:11 AM
6

you impugned the worth of her most valuable commodity. FOR SHAME, FOR SHAME. -These kinds of women will fair poorly in life.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:47 AM
1

totally true, feminism would die a whiny bitchy death if it wasn't for the white knights that keep trying to lap it up.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 02:37 AM
1

how is compelling the physical injury of someone's genitalia a just consequence for their simply telling a lie? if anything, the fault lies with a set of dynamics that create a legal assumption of guilt and a widespread extra-legal social stigma based with nothing more than an accusation.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 01:28 AM
1

and why's that?
/r/MensRights14/06/15 11:55 AM
1

it was hostile because i think you're parroting a political comment Rand Paul made that sorely needs to be corrected. The MDs in your example are not being forced. They can put away their shingle and go home. This is not slavery. This is a violation of something that should be on the short list of basic and inviolable civil rights and it can not be defended by asserting the principle of control over one's labor. Otherwise, you're saying that it's ok not to serve blacks at the counter at Woolwort…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:23 PM
20

it serves him right for making fun of women crying. women would never make fun of male tears..... uh.... nevermind.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:09 PM
4

what a bullshit article.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:44 PM
1

That is insane. The doctor has a choice. He or she can treat all equally afflicted people regardless of their group or he can try another line of work where his or her prejudices and bigotry will do no harm - like maybe an assembly line worker or something. Please do not insult the real experience of slavery by attempting to portray this very lucrative choice with the utter and complete lack of self-determination that slavery entails.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:38 PM
1

the topic I was discussing was mutilation and neither mastectomy nor orchiectomy
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:44 PM
1

and should they be legally sanctioned? in my view, yes. btw, who said anything about slavery?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:39 PM
1

A DISCUSSION of mutilating either the male or female body, which when actually practiced is relegated to only the most brutish and repulsive forms of humanity, can have socially redeeming value, if for nothing else, by insuring that the principle of free speech extends its bounds to include imaginary or abstract portrayals, descriptions, and illustrations of subject matter that is held in virtually universal opprobrium. And in this particular instance, it bears emphasizing that a discussion of f…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 12:50 PM
2

it isn't as difficult as would seem. excluding an entire class of afflicted patients is purely discrimination. MDs should be able to choose among equally afflicted patients, but not based on gender, race, religion, etc.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:57 AM
3

worst case to an already horrifically bad scenario: he contracts hpv from her and dies from a throat cancer that she forcibly transmitted to him.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:53 AM
6

this story was on the front page until mods determined it had no merit to be there
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:50 AM
1

Given the discussion of amateur penile amputation, the public exchange of these ideas MUST be socially acceptable if we are, as a society, to give credence to the understanding that all human beings have a basic and intrinsically equal worth.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:47 AM
1

people like this are so messed up in the head that offending them in the harshest manner possible may be your only choice to keep them very far away from you
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:42 AM
1

my facebook page says it's all deja moo: when you know you've experienced this bullshit before
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:40 AM
3

how about slicing off a woman's breasts? is that about equal to cutting off a penis? probably not because of the constant utility a penis provides whereas for the most part, tits just hang there. maybe sowing together vaginal lips AND slicing off a breast is about equal. I mean, this is about equality, right?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:32 AM
6

i don't know, i think it ripens the ground for a magazine to earnestly endeavor to raise some comments about how vaginal lips can be sliced off and made into ties, wallets or what-have-you.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:29 AM
4

One sign that your wife will cheat on you: she's a despicable and worthless slut.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:24 AM
3

and the reply: 'How pathetic that being female, to these parents, means reducing a child to a cliché of pink tutus" Too bad the author of the column couldn't show even a smidgen of concern for the abused boy instead of treating everyone to a self-indulgent display of sanctimonious cuntrospection.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:21 AM
0

all the news that fits the story
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:01 AM
1

you mean a gender-bias pervasive throughout court proceedings makes many legal outcomes a poor reflection of reality? you don't say...
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:23 PM
1

yeah, i saw that talk. i think she's pretty brilliant. so it looks like Canadian police policy is to rather tolerate this kind of ugliness than make an effort to disperse it? and the next time the feminists have one of their gatherings, disrupting it with bullhorns and fire alarms would be the norm?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 06:18 PM
2

so anytime there's a disturbance on campus, the students are held hostage?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:33 AM
3

where's the security to escort them out?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:12 AM
1

there's a mirror site to watch it, but she's not very hot
/r/MensRights06/06/15 02:09 AM
2

she's the real victim
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:34 PM
2

what, no feminists yelling for equality here?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:07 PM
-1

i've been in similar situation. perhaps you can accept and assume the day is yours as soon as it is offered. kindof ignore the bartering part.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:54 PM
1

waive nearly a million dollars? that can't look too good. the storm clouds look rather ominous. -better get ready to move this sub somewhere else.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:23 PM
4

disgusting
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:19 PM
1

kids do grow up fast. but you'd be surprised at how well they appreciate principles and ideals.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:16 PM
1

interpreting the comment at sarcasm seems to fit in with the rest of her outlook (at least that's what I want to believe.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:46 PM
3

yeah, crazy to think that a woman can't pursue a man in power (if that's what she's attracted to) without victimizing herself.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 07:45 PM
3

another reason why more of less evenly shared parenting needs to be the norm and expectation. if it's done before the divorce: poof, no alimony. if it's done after the divorce: poof, no child support.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:32 AM
1

that piece of shit for a judge needs to be removed.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:14 AM
13

“We’re not saying women do not face discrimination in academic science...." Because if you did you'd lose all that money. Pssst.... THEY AREN'T, DIMWIT.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:12 AM
29

pussy pass
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:09 AM
1

what? "men are disproportionately targeted" AND penalized by the DOJ? really?!!?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:09 AM
3

of course she unfriended you. you refused to profess allegiance to the same mindless cult to which she has membership .
/r/MensRights28/05/15 09:37 PM
1

i wonder what would have happened if you caught her punch and pulled her arm behind her back, pushed her and broke her arm in the process? reasonable force, according to the law.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:56 AM
1

presumed shared parenting and do away with this indentured servitude forever
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:30 AM
1

yes, yes, yes.... everything is always about women. the idea that the world should give more of a shit about women than it does about men is foundation to the dingbat idea that "misogyny" is anything more than an extremely rare phenomena manifesting as often as its opposite does. But the frothing displays of conspiracy theorists sell well to themselves so I doubt their fog of illusion will lift anytime soon. And whatever you think is laughable about Bill Cosby (and there's plenty of it, btw), re…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:34 AM
1

ummm.... has bill cosby been found guilty of rape? do you believe in innocent until proven guilty?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:18 PM
2

isn't carrying a mattress around the cliche'd advertisement for sexual availability?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:10 PM
7

good fucking riddance
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:21 PM
1

yeah, I'd be ok with that but the threshold could be much lower. Pretend that there's evidence that by falsely accusing someone of rape, someone specifically intends to have that person raped while in jail. sex offender, no?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:27 PM
1

and btw to be perfectly honest, sometimes I do get off on rape fantasy - especially good with my partner when she gets off on hers.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:19 PM
1

something like this: perfectly understandable that this pisses you off into having evil thoughts, but writing that you'd go rape those bitches as revenge plays right into feminists' stereotypical and idiotic portrayals of men.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:15 PM
0

haha. First off he's an "asshole who makes us all look bad", then "i'm a fan of the "feminist advocacy of false accusations", and now i'm "a limp dick faggot getting off on a rape fantasy"? and this is all due to the fact that i think bitching at certain virulent (but harmless) elements in comments expressing outrage over the injustice of a teenager already having been locked away for a year when the only publicly available evidence points to his innocence ends up catering mostly to feminist sen…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:57 PM
0

chill out, my stance's original disclaimer (see above) that the idea was in fact ridiculous lends it the credence of an excited utterance or exclamation of the "oh shit" variety rather than a sustained campaign of deception. Fantasy serves function and there's no harm involved so long as everyone knows it's simply fantasy. That is, unless we're all turning in our space ranger helmets for the ribbons and curlicues that wilt with the first sign of hurt feelings.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:40 AM
0

i understand that, but i'm also concerned with supporting and safely satisfying the inevitable rage that is triggered by this kind of injustice
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:52 AM
3

if someone intentionally seeks to place another in harms way, it's appropriate for the consequences of these actions to reflect the type of harm that was caused.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:15 PM
5

it depends on the case. If a false accuser doing it for an alibi to try to save relationship then it's a stretch. But if they're looking to inflict damage and sexual damage is done, that's exactly where they belong.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:25 PM
24

to my mind (albeit a non-legal one), you are also a sexual offender if you enable, facilitate, or otherwise conspire to have someone sexually assaulted. And again, with the real rape culture pervasive within prisons, the "lesson" that they admittedly were seeking to teach him seems likely to include sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:45 PM
0

it's the old story of "cry wolf" http://www.mediaradar.org/research_on_false_rape_allegations.php
/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:41 PM
35

actually it does, the likelihood of HIS getting raped in jail could not have been lost on them when they devised this scheme.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:34 AM
10

accusing a person of an act that you are aware he/she didn't commit is de facto malicious intent
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:32 AM
7

none of them were proven.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:30 AM
1

abhorrent, abshmorent. it's just blowing off steam and of course, it's ridiculous -but an imaginary scenario much less ridiculous than this real life abomination
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:29 AM
2

uh... either that or these chicks already know from life experience that they can act like complete pieces of shit without being held accountable for their behavior
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:28 AM
6

lynch mob mentality
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:26 AM
2

jesus christ, it's time to form an underground railroad if this is the way most women act. i deliver food for a living and heard this same kind of shit last night dropping off a delivery. It's perfectly understandable why a guy wouldn't want to be a mutilated slave. When it's time to get out, there should be people willing to help.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:08 PM
2

how about just pelting her with rotten fruit?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:56 PM
-4

Maybe if pregnancy is an accepted happenstance in the military, armed forces service could be made a requirement to collect welfare. Wouldn't that be great?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:53 PM
25

agree
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:44 PM
1

-just wait until you have to pay alimony to an android because the judge is also robotized (even more than they are now)
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:41 PM
1

thanks. yeah, as messy as a forest
/r/MensRights17/05/15 01:55 PM
2

down votes are fine, what irks me is that someone earnestly posts to this sub and then gets told his experience is not a good representation of a men's rights issue. have a look at some of the comments in the 'This might be cherry picking, but I had to point out this double standard.'
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:49 AM
3

this is nothing less than an attempt to prearrange human sexuality
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:45 AM
2

Breaking down and classifying post is fine - but to simply say, this post doesn't belong here because it's too trivial or its exposure won't result in a political crystallization of the MRM is way to presumptuous for my mind. there are plenty of people struggling with acute injustices that simply don't stack up to some kind of class action. But when they are merely screwed over in a personal way by the manifestation of a large scale dynamic that adversely effects men and boys (as well as all the…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:18 AM
1

this SacUp guy is so invested in subversively maintaining his delusions of superiority that he forgets that participation in civilization, culture, society, etc is utterly consensual. "Privilege" is but another artifice manifested by these imaginary paradigms that are called social organization. Engaging even through coercion, regardless of how hypnotic it appears to be, is exercised through choice and free will. But they are no more sin qua non than is wearing a tie or hat.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 06:40 PM
6

The ignorance of the article's author and its rabid and gleeful scorn heaped on MRAs is utterly misplaced. Return of Kings no more conveys the salient positions of the Men's Rights Movement then is Charlize Theron's action doll fantasy character emblematic of women's attributes. But until women's capabilities necessarily rise on their own merits, distorting the MRM will make it easy to justify the need for the crutches of special treatment rather than the hard work required for a truly egalitari…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 11:06 AM
0

i don't think so. i don't buy into your assertions that your actions reflect on others. that's just the same bullshit parents tell their children to try to shame them into doing what they want them to do rather than having the kids go out and have a good time. Anyway, lets get down to brass tacks, you really believe someone should be fired from an utterly unrelated job because he says, "Fuck her right in the pussy"? Because if you do, it's a goddamn slippery slope you're standing on that makes w…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:02 PM
0

it must be easy to write someone off as defective when your emotional security is threatened. awww, poor baby.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:53 PM
0

fuck you too, wise-ass. and while you're at it, go ahead and keep refusing to yield to the world's infinite possibilities by wacking off with a close-ended definition. i'm sure there's a circle jerk out there somewhere that's glad to have you.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:29 PM
2

asshole
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:08 PM
2

blow me
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:06 PM
0

bullshit, have fun with your religion
/r/MensRights14/05/15 12:01 PM
1

what is that a movie code? look man (and i mean that in the androgynous sense), I have been in places where privilege doesn't exist and your premise is based on the belief that it's ubiquitous. so if I sound offended, it's because you're contradicting my existence.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:29 AM
2

You think so? :) this is me being friendly. but go ahead and run. don't let me stop you.... chicken.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:14 AM
4

bullshit, you'd love to know. you've got compassion just written all over you, don't you? you're so invested in that airtight view of the world you're walking around with, you'll just chalk it up to your own special purpose if you happen to stomp on someone as you blindly stumble by.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:09 AM
0

who's mad, you scurrilous puke? your passive-aggressive coupling of "you can't read, can you" with "I hope the best for you" doesn't rate any polite-isms (actions, rather than static). No shit violence doesn't mean racism. But violence USUALLY means hate. Furthermore, racism's got nothing to do with promotion of any kind no matter how long you want to quack about it. In fact, it's veritably impossible to promote anything with ignorance - of the racist or any other variety. Passion, logic, etc, e…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:56 AM
1

"...redefine your way out of anything." i.e. bury your head in the sand and lift up your ass for the world to see.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:47 AM
1

it goes back to the basic dichotomy. do we want to level the playing field and work to make sure everyone has as equal opportunities as possible regardless of race or gender?Or do we want to perpetuate a system of inequality and jury-rig it by choosing a few token exceptions to insure that egalitarianism remains a dirty word? These idiots who alternately attribute and lay claim to "privilege" do nothing but delude themselves with grandiose pretensions.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:30 AM
1

and fuck you too, you self-loathing illiterate cunt. I assert that hate is by no means static because thoughts or ideas do not intrinsically contain anything. they are empty, abstract, and though they may be derived from a hateful action, they in themselves are nothing. EDIT: The abstract ideas of Mein Kampf, distasteful as they may be to consider since they were so cited in their use by the nazis are not examples of hate. Their actions, of course, were driven by hate. Violence is very often dri…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:23 AM
-2

The sniveling, worthless, frightened assholes who fired him need to actually work instead of pretending to do whatever job they think they're doing.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:08 AM
6

TROLL ALERT
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:04 AM
1

how in the fuck can someone lose their job for what they do on their own personal time!? FUCK HER RIGHT IN THE PUSSY!
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:03 AM
1

neither. your excuses just don't make any sense to me. influence is purely relative and it's this kind of weak-minded mealy-mouthed rationale that excuses racism because of the progenitor's so-called social position. Racism or being racist is simply an action. It is not a social dynamic.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:12 AM
2

the dingbats are on the loose again
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:21 AM
2

WRONG. denigrating a race IS racist. irrelevant whether the intention is promotion of your own.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:15 AM
1

canadian horseshit
/r/MensRights10/05/15 03:20 AM
5

This is nothing but racist, sexist ignorance. As a current product of academia, it seems hardly worth its exorbitant price tag.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 03:20 PM
1

assessing child support here is like charging automobile makers for highway deaths
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:29 PM
1

why is a physician representing himself?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:27 PM
1

Same as you, "political, social, and economic equality between the sexes". -'cept I'm trying to avoid social manipulation by working to insure a level playing field for opportunities rather than worry about the outcomes -which will fluctuate organically.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:44 PM
5

only people that can't play fair need to fix the game
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:05 PM
4

this woman just gets more and more piggish
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:15 PM
11

horseshit. baring substantiated instances of abuse, kids belong with their biological parents if at all possible.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:12 PM
6

and to me, you do.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:11 PM
7

this is more than disgusting. this is family court instituted parental alienation from beyond the grave.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:10 PM
12

But when feminists pull fire alarms, scream obsenities and REALLY disrupt events, Canadian police are nowhere to be found.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:19 AM
9

what's wrong with having sex? is this some kind of guilt trip?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:07 AM
1

prlly not :), but i think i might have started out that way. i don't begrudge the animal rights activists their righteous indignation even though I don't share it unless someone forces the subject. I'm pretty much a to each his own kind of guy but you got to give them some credit, it's hard making the transition to ANY diet and recent converts are always fanatical to keep from slipping. Wow... i didn't plan on talking about this ! haha
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:36 PM
2

i've been vegan for about 30 years!
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:07 AM
7

she's gone around the bend, that's for sure
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:18 PM
3

a universal presumption of equally shared parenting (baring mitigating circumstances of abuse) can do away with child support once and for all
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:52 PM
8

'cept it wasn't committed in the town (according to the report), it was committed at the base barracks. so she was all well and good going past the guard (assuming there's one) at the entrance to the base. probably thought she was just going there to do something innocent but titillating like play naked scrabble with them, right?
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:47 PM
1

that's great. so she'll wage war as president by sending males who've registered (as required by law) for selective service to their dismemberment and deaths while making sure to take care of the "real victims" who haven't.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:40 PM
2

i'll stand by the belief that any significant other living side by side with their loved one over the course of years and privy to intricacies of their personality that no occasional interviews and testing by physicians (or their plebeian assistants) could ever reveal is in a MUCH better position to determine mental competency and ability to make personal choices.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:26 PM
2

Dementia, Alzheimer's and other age related/end of life mental impairments are oftentimes labelled as such even while they are very poorly understood sequences of events. Ascertaining the degree to which these afflictions impair and effect the person going through this experience is best done by those closest - if possible. In more earthy vernacular, the "brain" specialists treating my mother didn't know jack-shit about her or the details of what she was experiencing. They made broad-stroke gene…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 02:20 PM
4

maybe he thought the "professionals" didn't know shit about the women he loved. and he was probably right.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:44 AM
5

which means, when there is resistance and when there is complaint. Not posthumously and a figment of someone's imagination.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:40 AM
5

i was married and divorced and according to you, I just raped my ex-wife a couple hours ago. requiring affirmative consent between a married couple?! not just absolutely insane, but completely insane -and I'm wondering about you too, robotiger. I took care of my mother for the last two years of her life as she was slipping away with dementia. Sybaritic pleasures are sometimes all that is left. To take that away under the guise of inappropriateness is not only sadistically cruel, but barbaric as …
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:37 AM
13

actually that is sexist - what makes anyone think that women receive death threats and men don't? or that men can run internet companies and women can't? in any case, the online threats that I've seen are laughably sophomoric and innocuous. Is this what the brouhaha is about? expecting to find the constraint of proper decorum on the internet isn't just naive, it's stupid.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 04:45 AM
2

bullshit. women shame men into going to war (see white feather campaign). women direct armies and wars (see female country leaders). women actively participate in armed conflict (innumerable examples throughout history). the fact that men are drafted and men are not (legislated by women and men) makes men doubly the victims of war.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:01 AM
1

sure, now all you need to do is categorize all forced sex as rape
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:14 PM
11

Silverman: you're "maniacs" if you stop believing just because I got caught lying.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:52 AM
2

I'm confused, why isn't is rape (according to the law): "(a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, ANUS [caps mine] or mouth of another person"
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:42 AM
2

because of the anal penetration or the broken broom handle?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:42 AM
1

wow, rape is only with a penis in England? I guess Abner Louima wouldn't have been raped according to english law - cops used a broom handle on him
/r/MensRights15/04/15 09:00 PM
2

Perhaps my wording was harsh, but it seems rather obvious that the issues grappled with here have real consequences. Deferring to people asking for help with them as they manifest seems more than obvious. Even if there are other legitimate perspectives on this, your reply was pretty hurtful.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:56 PM
0

probably, it works more as a social commentary than a real life situation.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:58 PM
1

true that
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:56 PM
8

prime target for graffiti. Cross out the she and write he. Cross out the her and write his and him.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:56 PM
0

female admins aren't the problem. Unadulterated bigotry is. And now reddit is fucked.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:52 PM
1

"A woman "forcing sex" is a much lesser offence than rape." please explain how you arrived at this gem
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:51 PM
8

the state of justice in England
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:50 PM
1

still, if I knew anyone involved and it's even half-true, i'd be posting it everywhere.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:44 PM
3

It's not so scary that this guy "let" his wife do this to him. it's an anomaly. But I think what is scary and not an anomaly at all is that so many women (who have been as a class the recipient of unending assistance in their struggle for equality from egalitarian-minded males) relish and without hesitation treat men who can be pressured into these kinds of situations this way with abject glee. And why shouldn't they? Popular culture nearly goes so far as to mandating this betrayal as a female e…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:41 PM
4

nevermind the idiot alt-f-x who tried to give you the cold shoulder. You asked for help in the right place. You definitely need legal help. Get an interview with a criminal lawyer - maybe with your guardians, if they are being supportive. Usually the initial consultation is free.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:33 PM
1

Yes, but is this study driven by the same belief system that purports that well-constructed and reasoned defenses are evidence of sexual assault guilt? That is, are these boys being conditioned to be submissive through social norms? Are they being taught to repress their ideational expressions with socially punitive labels rather than by regarding them as what they are, tools that reflect the errors of bias, prejudice and injustice? If I read the short abstract of this study correctly, it's noth…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:29 PM
2

doesn't everyone know that having sex just because it feels good is VERY, VERY WRONG. SHAME ON YOU, right?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:07 AM
-4

yep, so do i
/r/MensRights13/04/15 11:50 AM
9

she's a worthless piece of shit
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:21 AM
2

just like she doesn't need to be into you as a romantic partner, you don't need to be into her as a friend.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/15 04:48 AM
16

Frankly i don't even understand how women have the right to vote when they aren't required to register. Women can elect people likely to re-institute the draft and lead the country to war without worrying about having to serve.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 01:18 AM
2

of course defending yourself isn't your own responsibility.... what do you think we have a government for? I mean, geez.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 09:31 PM
1

female exhibitionists aren't very rare (strippers, porn actresses), but they're usually welcomed
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:17 PM
3

build that gender-balanced and multiracial team-- uh.... what are they supposed to do again?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:14 PM
1

goes back to the fact that calling a woman a fat lardass under this definition is sexual harassment and calling a man fat loser is good for laughs
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:57 PM
15

damn, i forgot to put in a trigger warning.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:49 PM
4

i knew you were out there!
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:48 PM
4

i believe that fruitcake belongs in a rubber room.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:10 PM
40

even if she wasn't raped, just the fact that she thinks she was raped means she was raped, right?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:04 PM
1

how long have you been a communist, pinko?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:24 AM
1

hope so
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:24 AM
1

No, false rape claims are not rape -though the wide spectrum in which feminist theory defines rape might accord inclusiveness. False rape claims belong in a pantheon of horrors all their own.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:30 PM
1

Ummm.... either that or that the jury thought what happened wasn't rape. Between your demonstratively uninformed opinion and a jury's access to the results of a police investigation, guess which one is more plausible?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:27 PM
5

idiotic comment
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:29 AM
1

cool, i'll make sure to mention to all my lesbian friends busy rimming each other that they aren't really having "butt-sex" (!?!) and that's why they aren't "icky". I'm sure they'll be very happy.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:34 AM
6

the lopsided acquiescence with which (and it seems that the phrase "most, if not all" is appropriate here) cultures accept female homosexuality while condemning male homosexuality makes this article reflective of how little men's personal choices are valued compared to women's. yes, this example explicitly stems from a gender issue.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:34 AM
56

another case of women never lying about rape
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:00 PM
4

the hysteria certainly is a real thing http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/us/police-to-release-results-of-uva-rape-inquiry.html?_r=0
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:57 PM
3

and presumably you'll find men there who haven't "learned" not to rape?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:54 PM
4

Call my perspective typical of MRA or not, it is different than yours. I don't care how men are treated in fiction so long as it isn't used as a basis for collective (governmental) policy. In fact, I think it is a healthy society that permits NO RESTRAINTS on imaginary and fictional portrayals of any kind. Regarding the other part of your comment, Sarkeesian herself is beneath contempt.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:51 PM
5

Calling Sarkesian a cunt disparages female anatomy.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:44 PM
2

you get what you pay for
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:44 PM
3

Anita makes shit, Karen is a diamond cutter. the clear winner? depends what you like.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:40 PM
7

totally off-base: women have innumerable protections beginning with their freedom of how they decide to respond to this fear. Whereas, a man in prison is confined to this reality.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:20 PM
3

ugh, another daily dose of nausea
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:16 PM
1

it's like the fat thing. it's easy to say that fat is unattractive - and for many it really is. But fat is attached to a person and to rule out the POSSIBILITY that a human being can carry something unequivocally unattractive in an attractive manner before actually meeting them is ignorant.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:31 PM
4

legal advice is probably your best course. i had to file a paternity suit against the mother of my daughter (but i did it myself and made too many mistakes in the timing). I "won" but the mom was still able to keep me from contacting my daughter for much, much too long.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:45 AM
6

the longer she can keep you away from your child (if you are the father), the easier it will be for her to keep you away from your child.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:33 AM
1

has nothing to do with fairness. it has to do with honesty -prlly to yourself most of all. try not hedging on the wonderfulness thing and you may not have to plead for acceptance.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:09 AM
0

this all must be coming in with the age of match.com the infinitude of variables that account for the chemistry between me and the people I end up being intimate with is way more complex than a predetermined set of qualities. but hey, you think you already know what you like? great, go be happy.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 05:04 AM
0

of course, you're absolutely entitled to be narrow-minded and bigoted. by all means enjoy your psychological hygiene. you want to call it "equality"? Go ahead. :)
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:59 AM
1

the reason why I'm ok with women that have a healthy urge to orgasm with like-minded individuals and why I'm not ok with a woman who has the need to bargain that urge as a commodity is because I enjoy people for who they are rather than what they're worth.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:54 AM
-6

it may not be rational, but you owe it to yourself to take a hit of acid or something to make it a tad less neurotic
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:16 PM
1

i don't feel that way at all. the number of sexual partners a woman has had is utterly incidental to whether or not I'm attracted to her. It's just as likely that I'd be repulsed by a vestal virgin and turned on by a happy hooker. If she's hot, she's hot.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:13 PM
-7

"I just didn't feel attracted to her anymore, regardless of that she was a wonderful woman." there's too much here to tackle on an internet thread, but you might want to talk to someone who can get into this with you.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:08 PM
-2

call it what you want, but i don't think it's a particularly nuanced approach. I'm ok with a youthful period of sexual exploration, or even a post-divorce period of multiple partners so long as it's strictly for sexual pleasure rather that trying to use sex for partnering up with sugar daddies.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 02:40 PM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights01/03/15 03:44 AM
2

how do you comment on the "Articles for deletion/Violence against men" page?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:32 AM
11

you mean a popular actress unthinkingly repeats what she's been told without worrying if she sounds like an idiot doing so? yeah, well, that's showbiz.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 07:51 AM
1

believe it or not, fundamentalist theology appeals to a certain percentage of men and women
/r/MensRights22/02/15 10:03 AM
7

Requirements for people who feel an unbridled need to disparage MRAs: 1) ignorance; 2) salaciousness; 3)an overriding sense of bigotry; and most of all, 4)selfishness
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:38 AM
2

I was in China for a year in 96 and went back again in 2000. My in-laws are there and my kids are going there for 3 weeks on vacation. My kids' mom was the first born of a two child family. Girls aren't "routinely" aborted for their sex. As far as I know, the female infanticide that had been going on in the countryside was due in large part to the necessity of manual labor for work in the fields. Gov't campaigns against it coupled with the relaxation of the one child policy is bringing it to an …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:24 PM
21

nice to know that one of the people deciding the most important legal issues in the nation isn't swayed by silly notions of gender bias.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:41 PM
2

you have no idea. the fact that young men outnumber young women to such an incredible degree guarantees that this insanity becomes common place
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:39 PM
-1

should have stuffed it down her throat and told the bitch to choke on it
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:37 PM
18

Your honor, my children and I are accustomed to undeserved wealth. By law, the court must insure that we continue to enjoy it.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:22 PM
-3

frankly, i wouldn't care what my woman did in the past so long as she's honest and I love her
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 07:14 AM
2

"if it's a big deal to you" - that is, human butchery is ok if it's done to a man by a woman.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:15 PM
2

another incontrovertible feminist statistic coming soon to a podium near you
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:45 PM
1

the joke is funny. the fact that it's on a sign that must be routinely viewed by people living there is not.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:35 PM
9

i forgot... the invisibility thing again!
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:31 PM
20

it's just a dead boy, nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:50 PM
7

after seeing the video, it looks like she'd deserve around 6 months in the slam. Of course, if the genders were reversed, it'd probably be about 3 years.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:41 PM
1

herbivore men? I'm a vegetarian (actually a vegan) and as about as libidinous as you can get.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 08:42 PM
2

brushing hair!? what kind of kinky freak are you?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 01:49 AM
3

me too. always have been, always will be (according to this)
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:43 PM
0

so funny
/r/MensRights26/12/14 06:19 AM
1

ummmm..... you might want to actually do something about this.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 11:36 PM
1

rather die free than live to be someone's slave
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:23 AM
2

fair game to point to media sources that do release her real name -or is reddit just another tool of censorship?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:16 PM
2

i think it does point to the emotional irrationality that is oftentimes socially entitled to women - rather than having them be held accountable for it. but i would like it more if it pointed to some dynamic this prevents this from being addressed instead of being left with a feeling of: this is how it is and isn't it bad.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:13 PM
1

"Calm down? Don't tell me to calm down." amazing how popular infantile behavior has become.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:34 PM
1

break out the patchouli and the unicorns :)
/r/MensRights06/12/14 04:18 PM
6

"Hyper masculinity is a toxic culture ...one that not only teaches men to ... deal with violence, that they should learn to protect themselves and stand up for themselves." I don't think this part is toxic at all. It's either stand up for yourself or get a nannystate to do it for you.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 03:57 PM
0

"revenge porn"? how about just plain embarrassing photos, videos or anything that portrays said x in less than the most positive light - definitely felonious, amirite?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:52 PM
1

you certainly seem to like to call people names and dictate what is and isn't appropriate. i think those two factors go a long way belittling any credibility your arguments MIGHT even have before you get started explaining them. So apparently the truth is that you're not confused about my point of view - you simply seek to deny me my right to it. This kind of approach is the hallmark of ideological feminism. Excuse me, but do you happen to be a feminist? If you can't see the social acceptance of…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:45 AM
1

maybe you should try asking a question if you are confused
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:01 AM
1

irrelevant
/r/MensRights02/12/14 12:29 AM
1

yet they prevent parents from being with their children when there's no place else to go? i'm not saying that they don't do good. i'm pointing out what needs to be addressed
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:54 PM
1

twit? they don't have to have anything to do with each other. The sexism at play here is an accepted cultural norm. If you're poor and need a roof over your head and you have a family with a teenage daughter, you get to stay together even if you have to go to a shelter. If you have a teenage son, DCF gets involved because family shelters don't accept teenage boys. That is the kind of traumatizing and damaging sexism that sets the stage for the rest of a boy's life causing him believe that he's d…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:02 PM
1

WTF are you talking about? I took my kids into a shelter and no "DCF". Convent House is only for those under 18, right? So a 14 y/o girl can stay with her parents at the Sallie, but a 14 y/o boy has to go to Convent House and be separated. Guess which one is more traumatic? Guess which circumstances make DCF more likely to intervene? And even some one as knee-jerk acrimonious as you can figure out the sexism here.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:25 AM
1

so taking your y/o daughter to a shelter won't trigger a DCF investigation because she's allowed to stay with the family, but taking your 14 y/o son will because he's not allowed in the "family" shelter and has to stay alone at ... what did you say it was.... Convent House? If so, sounds like some pretty heinous sexism to me.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 02:32 AM
1

done and done
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:58 PM
1

in this case, that would mean breaking up his family, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:57 PM
17

women lie about being on the pill men will have to lie about not being on the pill.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:54 PM
4

and in other news, man is sent to jail for truthfully reporting to police that he was physically assaulted by guilty wife.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 07:48 PM
6

yes, double standards suck. but please, can someone tell me why ANYONE (man or woman) should go to jail for a single, stupid slap?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:26 AM
1

only as easy as they "take it" with women who have sex with teenage boys. I think determining whether or not the threshold of criminality has been crossed must include the mindset, expectations and intent of the teenager involved. Making a one size fits all rule for these kinds of encounters and relationships is bound to lead to "it's wrong because I said so" kind of atmosphere that only can produce more social sickness.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:29 PM
1

i'm not so sure it needs to be objective. what about an emotional evaluation? of course, the prejudice that creates a double-standard would have to be eliminated.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:40 PM
1

i'm a stickler for accuracy myself. that said, i've been wondering about this teacher student thing lately. Yes, there is a double standard that definitely needs to be addressed to maintain the idea of justice. But what kindof bothers me is the focus on the perpetrator. I'm not so sure that mandatory knee-jerk long sentences for adults that have sex with teenagers is the way to go. If the focus is on the teenager, I think that counselling is a better approach. And if the teenager insists that th…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:24 PM
1

an arguably light sentence would be something like 24 months in jail and 10 years probation. this goes beyond that. The social opprobrium visited upon a judge who recently sentenced a teacher to 30 days for the statutory rape of a female teenager is noticeably absent here.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:36 PM
1

I'm not so sure it matters. something this out of whack makes me think (and I am not privy to the court records so all I've got to go on is what appears to be trends) the judge might have made his decision the second she walked in the courtroom and patched together whatever law was available to justify it.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:09 AM
34

why don't they just call it the MIT white knight society?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:14 AM
2

there is, but it speaks to an insane notion of dictating to people how they should feel. sure you can object to the shirt - but only as much as you can object to those objections.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:04 AM
1

the difficulty that men have getting jobs in female-dominated fields isn't a lack of qualifications, it's almost always suspicion.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 10:14 PM
1

Interesting
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:43 PM
2

Actually, I would be all for it if this were the case. But if you look to the advantages given to women considering entering STEM fields and the dearth of incentives (and some disincentives) given to men considering entering professions of social services, teaching, secretarial, nursing, etc, you'll suspect that "reverse" discrimination isn't covered by it.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:41 PM
1

http://www.pay-equity.org/about.html
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:30 PM
2

According to the National Committee on Pay Equity, this proposed legislation prohibits pay discrimination among workers performing dissimilar work in equivalent jobs. Exactly how and why the act determines equivalence is likely due to the personal desires of committee members attempting to rationalize their own prejudices.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:20 AM
3

i don't mind marxism so long as it's consensual, like in a commune or a kibbutz or something.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:19 PM
3

I think this could be depending on the leanings of committee members who determine what jobs are "equivalent" and what aren't.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:18 PM
1

i posited a possibility. if it disturbed you then you know the answer better than I do.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:42 PM
1

fuck that, i'd rather lose friends by telling the truth.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:36 PM
12

Feminists (and those that sympathize with its air-headed ideology of social engineering) are never going to understand why they are being such ignoramuses about this. Becoming a genius (or usually achieving a celestial level of expertise in any field) requires an absorption that makes superficial crap like fashion completely irrelevant. What does the world need more of: brilliant scientists without a care of what people think of their clothing choices or appropriately-dressed but ineffectual and…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:32 PM
8

POLO SHIRTS ARE INTRINSICALLY OPPRESSIVE TO HORSES! Like "POLO", you know? Jeez, what a speciest.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:25 PM
1

ah yes, the context of rationalizing hypocrisy. I almost missed it.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:22 PM
6

so true. and what's more, mass population gender reassignments should be mandatory (for men) so that they can begin to understand how difficult it has been all these years having people hold the door open for you.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:20 PM
3

oh, so the wonderful experience of seeing you flaunting your tits is supposed to make up for all the bs? I doubt it, but ok, let's see them.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:03 PM
3

it comes from the "I am not! YOU ARE!" playbook.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:00 PM
1

it's not anecdotal evidence (a paradox if I ever heard one), but the reason why I think criticizing an irrelevant aspect of this guy's public accessibility is way off base. Like I said before, explicit and blatant statements of violence and harm are sure to arouse the ire of any decent human being. But this was none of that.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:47 AM
1

i don't think you're right, but I'll have to research it some more.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:42 AM
3

in this case, it's not censorship but demonization. In the cases you cite, I'd bet that there was no opprobrium or devaluation regarding sexual depictions of men, just a reminder that it's hypocritical to indulge in it when the subjects are men, but to cast aspersions upon it when the subjects are women.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:40 AM
1

You're right, it isn't comparable at all. Being told that wearing a specific shirt is an affront to civilized society and being told the clothes you wear are sexually provocative are world's apart. The first one seeks to cloister and dampen freedom of expression. The second seeks to stimulate it.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:38 AM
1

:) and i love you too, sweetheart.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:56 PM
-2

i don't know if it's the same. I don't think what this guy did is the result of male-centered culture. But you can be damned sure I think that what that attention seeking puke-stain did is the result of female-centered culture.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:52 PM
1

again with the "inappropriately" business. If the choice is one or the other, the world needs expertise about a gizillion to the gizillionth power more than it needs appropriate dress. Maybe to get YOUR accolades you need to dress appropriately, but I wouldn't care if he celebrated by getting up on the podium stark naked and danced around. IT'S HIS MOMENT -AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU SEEM ALL TOo HAPPY TO SPRAY SOME KIND OF WEIRD SHIT-MIST ON IT.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:42 PM
1

Personally, I have gone to jail for wearing the wrong kind of clothing. (i'll tell you about it some time if you are interested.) So i'm squarely in the camp of judging people's actions rather than their costumes.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:39 PM
2

yeah, he deserved criticism along the lines of a muffled "what's he going to a bachelor party afterward?" rather than this screeching non-stop character assassination purporting to epitomize the very reason that women won't dare to enter the fields of science and technology.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:37 PM
5

double standards are an issue, but I'd hasten to guess that an attempt wasn't being made to censor them, just merely demonstrate that social demonization occurs only when its done demographically on men's behalf.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:33 PM
0

100% agree. and others are free to say to those others, fuck formality, this guy just did something so incredibly exceptional that it wouldn't matter if he stood up on the podium in a crotchless tutu and did pirouettes.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:30 PM
1

ummmm... because they're idiots?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:28 PM
1

you can have my shirt when you can pry it off my cold dead torso
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:27 PM
1

actions speak louder than shirts
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:25 PM
-1

"appropriate" ?! fuck you and rigidly stultifying notions of sensibility and taste! Go get on "Piss Christ" or elephant dung Mary and tell me that that art is inappropriate. If it covers your body without blatant and explicit messages of violence and harm, it's appropriate.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:22 PM
1

maybe that's because all you think about is rape
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:19 PM
0

which one? because I find the freedom and liberty expressed by sexual-entendre much more refreshing than some censoring fascist arrogant scum. One says yes and the other says no. I prefer yes.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:17 PM
10

"/If a woman was wearing a shirt with a bunch of half naked firefighters and lumberjacks, would anyone care?/ I bet they would have, and I can guaran-fucking-tee you that /r/mensrights would have." no, unless the lumberjacks and firefighters were portrayed as being murdered or otherwise violently attacked, nobody would care.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:14 PM
1

please tell me how you can equate the shirt he wore with a blatant racist epithet?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:13 PM
1

horse-shit. the shirt was a piece of art. Fuck those idiots who can't stand the human body and the various accouterments that carries with it.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:11 PM
1

start by destroying Michelangelo's sculptures of nude women and then you can have the shirt.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:10 PM
-1

god, you must carry around the idea of rape all the time.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:08 PM
4

yo! stupid ass feminists! you probably can barely help yourselves, but the comparison isn't about sexual assault or rape. It's about being judged by your choice of attire.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:05 PM
-3

rape? who the fuck is talking about rape (again)?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:04 PM
-1

who the fuck said anything about sexual assault except you knee-jerk reactionaries? the comparison is regarding being judged because of one's attire.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:01 PM
3

how about comparing "you deserved to get 'cat-called'" and "you deserved to get criticized for a shirt"? Not too insane in my view at all if you can put the old stand-bye of the rape-card down for a second.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:00 PM
1

oh? getting upset and getting aroused must be soooooo different.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:57 PM
1

it only took me one day
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:56 PM
5

reverse genders and imagine what would have happened to the guy who pepper sprayed a woman for asking him to turn off his cell phone.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 10:19 PM
1

again, what's the info blocked out then?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:49 PM
1

really? i thought there was some identifying info blocked out on top.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:27 PM
6

It's so totally male-privileged normative for the AFI to assume that "everyone" is ok. Almost all trauma victims suffer from at least some type of PTSD and she'll undoubtedly need extensive counselling with rehabilitative support.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:25 PM
16

what a valiant woman struggling against the dictates of the patriarchy. some MAN telling a woman to do anything? how ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:02 PM
2

i'd guess democracies that were under constant attack from surrounding dictatorships/kingdoms would have to do that. Perhaps Norway does so to instill a notion of civic service.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:25 PM
2

Is there any other country that even requires both men and women to be conscripted? For sure, it isn't exactly 50-50. But this gets closer to it and that's what's important.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:42 AM
1

twitter going down
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:13 AM
6

the reason why they want to give her a pass is because her behavior (which I think is vastly under-reported because of her gender) conflicts with the feminist narrative of privilege/power dynamic creating a "toxic masculinity" endemic to sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:09 AM
5

sounds like she confessed to assault. report her to law enforcement?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:06 AM
4

4 day delayed VICTORY
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:01 AM
2

how wonderful knowing that my tax dollars are used for this insipid stupidity.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 06:56 AM
0

what this does is further marginalize boys who should be free to academically explore all the available subjects in the 10th grade. maybe there should be girls only english and girls only math too? the preferential treatment makes me sick!
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:18 AM
5

there are plenty of guys who fit into that category. They're curious but have no experience at it. Guess there're out of luck for having penises.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:17 PM
0

i believe you'll have to consider yourself corrected. men aren't an oppressed class (except that this kind of thing is a blatant example of why men are).
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:15 PM
1

short term solution, but makes the problem even worse in the long run.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:14 PM
0

Holy fucking shit. I'd be tempted to start throwing bricks.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:12 PM
1

it's a matter of training
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:22 PM
4

Leonidas telling Ephialtes that his help wasn't needed battling the Persians because his physique made him sub-standard for the Spartan's phalanx.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:47 PM
2

that's crazy talk. Remember this scene? Stupid! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akLzeBE7QR0
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:45 PM
-2

you would if she had just saved your life by shooting the enemy dead
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:01 AM
45

about fucking time. Even if women aren't drafted into combat (which I assert that they should be if men are), they are already in the military performing valuable functions and duties to the extent that they should be included in any emergency call-up if we are going to require that men do so as well -if equality is something that's supposed to be a valued principle, anyway.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:05 PM
1

just watched it. on a whole, really enjoyed the movie. liked the action and the cool effects, but i wish it was a little more techie explaining the theory of the premise.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:55 PM
1

According to Roger Waters, Barrett came into what was to be their last practice session with a new song he had dubbed "Have You Got It Yet?". The song seemed simple enough when he first presented it, but it soon became impossibly difficult to learn and they eventually realised that while they were practising it, Barrett kept changing the arrangement.[79][82] He would then play it again, with the arbitrary changes, and sing "Have you got it yet?". Eventually they realised they never would and tha…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:34 PM
1

there've been enough of cases of switched babies to make a case for mandatory DNA testing for BOTH parents
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:39 PM
1

Child support is a remnant of the stereotypical belief that only women should take care of children. An understanding of default shared parenting should enlighten you in this matter. Neglect is a criminal issue. Having the poor judgement to create a child with a man who neglects his parental duties doesn't mean you win the lottery.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:33 PM
1

what movie was that?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:42 PM
1

you sound like syd barrett
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:46 PM
0

it's really quite ridiculous to base any sort of plan to address problems on how those who might be effected "feel" about them. It's like giving the patients the keys to the asylum.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:43 PM
0

a woman who wakes up the day after she was horribly raped has a lifetime to recover from it (oftentimes with an incredible array of support infrastructure collectively financed by taxpayers). A man who wakes up the day after he was murdered doesn't. yes, both are horrible. But one is unequivocally and demonstrably far worse.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:40 PM
1

if you're saying that women get innocuously propositioned more often than men, you're correct. but if you're saying that women get violently attacked more often than men, you're incredibly wrong.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:36 PM
1

mace
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:50 PM
1

sometimes I need to be hit over the head to get it
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:43 AM
1

Later I married another woman and had two sons. We divorced and the courts initially granted me custody (later they switched custody to my ex but my ex and I decided to ignore the courts and salvage the only good that was left of our relationship - our love for our children- and bring them up together. This somewhat brought us back together too, but we still live separately and my sons go back and forth from my house to their mom's almost at their whim.) Anyway, my sons were very interested in t…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:40 AM
1

I was forced to represent myself and she was given a court appointed attorney who stalled my every move. It took quite a long time and a number of hearings for the court to order the DNA testing. I paid for the swab because I didn't want my daughter stuck with a needle. After the testing, it took months to get the results. All through this, I was not allowed visitation. As I mentioned earlier, the entire process took about 2 years. When I was finally granted one visitation (!), the mom fled with…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:31 AM
1

since they've already bonded to you as their Dad, it'll be much harder for the mom to disappear with them without them eventually creating some serious problems for her.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:21 AM
2

please tell me that's an example of your dry humor
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:16 AM
5

i hope you have better luck with it than i did
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:41 PM
1

actually, i'm not too big on punishment. people who do these things have a pretty miserable life. I'm just glad I'm past this stuff now and it only comes up in these kinds of conversation. thanks for your well wishes. i guess when things are bad, we blame our past and when things are good, it's easy to let it go.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:36 PM
9

i spent years waking up in the middle of the night in a blind fury that I couldn't even tell her that I loved her. But when we finally met after all those years and started regular communication, the anger all dissolved. Of course, I'm still sad that I missed her growing up and wasn't there to help her through it.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:33 PM
1

I'm an average guy that's had his ribs broken by a woman and has been punched in the face by another (both smaller and "weaker, btw). I've been stabbed in the back by a guy and punched a few times by others. I would have loved to have had a can of mace to spray before these things happened. screaming (if you're a woman because nobody gives a shit if you're a guy) is a good defense, so is running (if possible), carrying a weapon like mace is a good equalizer. it really doesn't matter about size a…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:12 PM
3

so there you go, size and strength don't mean shit
/r/MensRights07/11/14 04:51 PM
6

nice bigoted and stereotyped cliche. got any more?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 04:48 PM
2

since when is an adult kissing an adult's hand sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 04:02 PM
61

The mom contested that I was the father after admitting that she hadn't had relations with anyone else. So the courts appointed her an attorney free of charge. After 2 years (!) of my daughter remaining fatherless due to mom's neglect, the paternity issue was finally resolved. When that happened, mom left the state without a forwarding address. It took me 16 years of looking for my daughter before I finally found her. She's an adult now and we have a fairly good relationship though there're issu…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:57 PM
70

i had to file a paternity suit in an attempt to get visitation rights for my daughter. Even after I "won", mom was still allowed to refuse me them.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:47 PM
3

that whore was asking for it!
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:09 AM
1

a fist ripping through flesh and bone has a measurable and observable effect. a name-calling episode resulting in someone crying has no physical mechanism. in fact, one person's insult is another person's praise. Regardless of a person's very real emotional manifestations, there is a choice involved here. You can't choose not to bleed/contuse when punched, but you can chose not to care or to laugh at the idiocy of being name-called. That's what I meant when I said that all these types of offense…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:36 AM
10

"i thought it was the most amazing thing ever" "i'd never want that for my daughters" there's a pretty intentional disconnect of reality here
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:23 AM
12

oh right, i forgot. and those poor misguided men who insist that none of that is true, feminism can help them too.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:48 AM
3

that guy's a little beggar, isn't he? is this video for some kind of kinky dominatrix service? maybe once in a while for a taste of something different, but deviant shit every time? no thanks.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:43 PM
129

but but but, it's different for guys because.....umm.... it just is!
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:02 PM
1

Goddamn those base, poor, crass, thoughtless street trash for telling an attractive, young, seemingly affluent woman "god bless you". They had better learn their place pronto.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:56 PM
11

whining about whiny guys?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:30 PM
1

about the one below, here, let me write it for you: "smart-ass".
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:39 PM
-2

i love threads about cat-calling because they always bring out women who state unequivocally how horrible it is - and then subsequently get to get cat-called!
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:29 PM
1

no problem, here's an internet kiss (an upvote). hopefully that's just salacious enough to overwhelm your delicate sensibilities.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:23 PM
1

ok, i get you. i think i kind of outlined why i think it is. i guess that makes me one of the few people. there are some of us out here - just so you know.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:19 PM
2

"bitter men" LOL "anti-anything-female" LOL "you feel the enjoyment you derive from being a complete jerk to strangers" LOL
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:17 PM
2

i thought a little more about it and there are at least some people who engage in this type of interaction who are looking for nothing more than an indication of camaraderie - the beginning point of any relationship.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:16 PM
2

a "particularly female problem"? LOL
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:12 PM
3

i reserve the right for my speech to be anything I want it to be. How you respond to it is your business.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:10 PM
1

many people and anyone are different. I can accept it. In fact, I have. what do you mean by acceptable, anyway? the world doesn't change because someone's picture gets splashed all over the internet (male, female, clothed, unclothed)
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:08 PM
5

so you enjoy harassing people who you think harass women every day? Scumbag piece of shit.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:05 PM
1

acceptable to whom? god?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:01 PM
0

MBS, you are awesome. The camaraderie of a good-natured smiling reply like "fuck off!" when someone tells you that your ass looks hot is exactly the momentary bonding experience that some of us cat-callers are looking for. Transcend those stupid social taboos and get into a real human experience. Praise, praise, praise.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:59 PM
1

regarding your last part, there are some of us who'd rather have the cold unvarnished truth be the rule of the day than some socially adumbrated version sans any incisive wit. But it's a matter of taste, i wouldn't want to fuck with your socializing style any more than I'd like you to be trying to fuck with mine.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:19 PM
1

your stance is popular and i'm not indicting it. i merely don't completely share it. i agree that people should have control over their identity. But I'm not so sure that any of things you mention have any real impact. Teen sexting is the example that immediately comes to mind. i think it smacks of an unease our culture creates when it comes to sexuality. Yes, the teasing can create embarrassment and discomfort. But these effects rely on the "victim" to consent to being embarrassed. They aren't …
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:01 PM
1

"society" thinks women are unfit to work?! LOL ok, einstein, your logic is spot on. have a nice day.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:45 PM
2

i upvoted you and even while I think it is wrong, i'd hate to see it criminalized.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:13 AM
1

the fewer laws the police have to enforce, the better that they'll be at it
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:08 AM
1

and while you're at it, make sure you do an infographic on workplace fatalities. you know the one that shows more than 90% of them being male - must be that pesky privilege again.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:55 AM
1

yeah and don't forget the infographic that demonstrates the preponderance of male plumbers, garbage collectors, delivery drivers, mechanics, dishwashers, cooks, construction workers, firemen, taxi drivers, etc, etc, etc. Yeah, men work more than women do. You know why? THEY HAVE TO BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO ACCESS TO THE "SOCIAL PROGRAMS" THAT WOMEN HAVE EVEN WHILE FINDING THEMSELVES IN IDENTICAL ECONOMIC CIRCUMSTANCES.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:52 AM
2

yup, a gender-reversed scenario would result in a typically social-mob fueled frenzied sanctimonious shit-storm - which probably demonstrates that people react with their screwed-up emotions first and then maybe, just maybe, think about what they've said later. personally, i don't really care whether people take offense at my personal expressions or not. i look at it like that's their problem not mine.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:49 AM
2

for every person in the world, there is another intention. you wanna go crazy trying to figure out everyone's intentions? Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:43 AM
14

welcome to the asylum run by the patients
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:58 AM
1

yup, i deliver food every night to local campuses and i agree, they're WAY safer than the neighborhoods surrounding them.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:56 AM
1

yeah, maybe, but i'm not so sure that photos (even with info) cross the line either. for harassment to exist in my mind, you have to physically interfere with someone attempting to go about their own business. For example, I think it would be harassment if every time I attempted to walk down the sidewalk, you moved in front of me to block my path.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:41 AM
15

to think it's uncool (a very backpedally and subjective term if I ever heard one) and to think it's harassment is worlds apart. "social backlash"- you mean lynch mob mentality? you can think it's uncool that I shout, "wow, nice tits" to someone across the street, but you had better not try to infringe on my right to say it (or anything else for that matter)
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:34 AM
18

horseshit: your personal space and privacy doesn't extend into another person's mouth. if you're offended by what other people say, wear earplugs.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:05 AM
1

an incredibly big "BULLSHIT!" to your insinuation that the first (saying, "hello beautiful, have a nice day") is in any way, shape or form harassment.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:02 AM
1

"society's biases and ill treatment" - again, NAME ONE.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:57 AM
1

not in the west? you still claim that women are disadvantaged in every society on the globe so I'll write you off as a loon
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:10 AM
0

even if it's fake, you can see by the comments that the idea has traction and that's utter bullshit
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:59 AM
1

and by the way, I'm prick enough to appreciate all kinds of people - even impertinent, hot-headed, conclusion-jumping SJWs like you. not accessible to the disabled? tell me, oh amazing karnak, if all bathrooms are accessible to the disabled, must every one of them be marked? Or perhaps you can discern that by your special brand of privileged magic?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:56 AM
1

male victims of rape? they've been defined out of existence (if the perpetrator is a woman). the only male victims of rape allowed into dialogue are the victims of other men, thus bolstering the man/bad, woman/good false dichotomy. And as far as the other issues you bring up, there is a time and place for those to be discussed as well. So what?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:50 AM
1

Please name one. Because you have no idea who i am or where i get my knowledge. Furthermore, it would seem that you have no interest in anything but your own predispositions and preconceptions since you assume that you do. i really have no idea why you want to argue. People concerned with Men's Rights have been abused by the sort of "social welfare" that you feed off of. If your country is in the developed West, you probably think you're some sort of hero. But to many here, the resources that yo…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:41 AM
1

"men are WAY MORE privileged than women in every fucking aspect of society" perhaps you should read up on what's trying to be accomplished with Men's Rights. I don't really want to bother starting from scratch with you.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:38 PM
1

because men have such calloused sensibilities, right? Here's news for you, women can take a leak whenever they please too. One posture is just as good as another.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:42 AM
1

there are plenty of people that find that this kind of invasion of privacy is typical of the double standard that most men have to deal with on an everyday basis. Be a man? What a joke saying. A man (or woman, for that matter) can be anything they want without having to conform to any preconceptions. So fuck you with your bullshit notions of chivalry - you want to win over lady friends with your white knight gallantry, go screw yourself before you start making it even more difficult for the men …
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:38 AM
0

that's great, a self-loathing guy. congrats
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:58 PM
-1

why don't you act like a fucking human being, you spoiled piece of entitlement, and build some more toilets for your crowded precious butts instead of infringing on the space that suits those who were designated to use it just fine.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:56 PM
2

she seems like a POS to me.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:35 AM
2

and men are supposed to take that insult because they're so privileged, right?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:31 AM
1

actually, it'd be better to gender-neutral the women's (only) toilet by pissing on those seats
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:27 AM
1

plenty of guys can't
/r/MensRights03/11/14 03:09 PM
2

and we "know" that he raped her because the father said his daughter said so, right?
/r/MensRights03/11/14 07:34 AM
1

give a woman a gun and train her to fight. no reason why women can't.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 07:25 AM
1

modern technology allows women to go into combat, and hey, they draft "weak" men and train them to fight. if men get drafted for combat, so should women.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:27 PM
8

it could be the most hypocritical insane markers of sexist bigotry existing today. men are disposable. women need to be protected. why? because we said so.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:17 PM
1

wow, apparently this gentleman is content to broadcast his misanthropy.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:13 AM
5

the idiots have no clue. adults simply have no right to intrude on a minor's (below the age of consent) sexual development -especially a person in a position of authority.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:15 PM
1

edited.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:01 PM
1

I'd like to see studies demonstrating that pressed breast milk fed from a bottle is detrimental to development compared to milk straight from the breast. Is there any other reason why "tender years" doctrine could be valid?
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:22 AM
8

the investment that a belief in feminism makes has more to do with intentionally structured norms than an understanding of the human condition. any indictment of feminist beliefs can't be seen by those who support them as the desire to generally point out hypocrisy and discern truth, but rather as a dangerous attack on the foundations of a closed-ended project to prevent human nature from manifesting itself.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:09 AM
10

great, kudos and congrats. so why isn't this the default (shared parenting)?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:07 AM
1

decisiveness is culturally instilled in men more so than in women. in this case, it's not doing us any good. most people who are prevented from committing suicide can recover and will not carry it out.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 12:08 AM
1

The governing structure of our society is democratic. However, the social forces which are currently instituted within this framework have a very strong matriarchal current. Token males that position themselves as examples of "patriarchy" are taken down by the most powerless of women -the very obviously hypocritical flourish notwithstanding (Clinton-Lewinsky comes to mind immediately). However, the varying degrees to which every one of our entire gamut of influences exerts pressure on us to beha…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:52 PM
2

because the person being made to penetrate isn't physiologically penetrated (discounting fluid-pore mechanics) this definition excludes males being made to penetrate females. The omission fails to adequately address the identical violation of genital propriety that occurs in both cases.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:40 AM
-4

that's why it's bullshit. made to penetrate is rape.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 06:15 PM
1

wouldn't be a men's issue except the overwhelming number of homeless are (disposable) males.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:13 AM
2

another adventure in cuckoo-land
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:05 AM
1

right in there with free taxpayer paid birth control
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:04 AM
1

(FEMINIST LOGIC)....because objectifying men never takes away their immunity from ever being objectified
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:03 AM
3

stupid joke and unfortunately for feminism, she's probably right. but there's a big difference between being anti-feminist and being AN anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 04:57 AM
3

Like was said below, just the tip of the demographic iceberg. Probably the reason why this is big news is because of the football angle.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:14 PM
1

oh, scads. let's start with Danielle D’Entremont
/r/MensRights17/10/14 07:19 AM
1

undoubtedly. but like you said, these are human rights for which everyone is responsible -and this goes to why selective service is a repulsively ugly blotch on our society. the query i am attempting to make is whether there has EVER been an attempt to harm any feminist for her beliefs here in the West. I cannot think of one and that makes me even more suspicious of the death threats feminists claim to receive.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:25 PM
3

i don't really think you can include people that are murdered for performing abortions or killed in combat fighting the Taliban as targeted for their support of feminism. Sarkeesian is an abstract theoretician that claims her viewpoint is being met with threats of violence. It is the modern western world with which she takes issue. I'm just wondering if there is a precedent for feminist theoreticians like her to have been been harmed in any way recently.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:17 PM
3

Please name one western woman in the last 50 years who has ever been injured or killed for publicly advocating a feminist slant?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:45 AM
2

you wish "this community" would "make light of a violent threat". That would play right into your preconceptions, right? what many here have seen time and again is the crying wolf ploy played out to white knight suckers who run like lapdogs to protect the poor, defenseless women-folk.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:42 AM
1

AVFM just posted a reward. What do you want to bet that after the media hoopla, this "threat" will all somehow dissappear?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:38 AM
1

News reports deemed this to be not a credible threat - perhaps because they believe it to be orchestrated by Sarkeesians supporters to gain publicity for her cause
/r/MensRights16/10/14 11:36 AM
1

the purpose? the purpose of it is so that men can avoid putting themselves in dangerous situations with avowed false-accusers.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:41 AM
1

i'm guessing you're referring to male rapists and in any case, no more so than they target blind, deaf or dumb people so to better the odds to get away with it. I think considering rapists that methodical is interesting, but a rapist's limited available consciousness prevents accumulating the confidence to face the consequences of getting caught. Otherwise, we'd be regularly seeing rapes carried out in broad-daylight in the middle of a crowd that was more interested in ignoring it.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:12 AM
1

is this thing going to be restricted to those who admit to being false-accusers or will it include those who genuinely believed that they had been raped though the truth of their accusations could not be found beyond a reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:55 AM
2

It matters not a whit whether or not reporting rape makes one FEEL as though they are being blamed for the rape. Criminal investigations aren't touchy feelie self-esteem boasting exercises. They're real life efforts to determine (as best as possible) facts through a cavalcade and torrent of feelings and emotions. Feeling blamed? To fucking bad because everyone knows its the rapist (not the victim) that bears the horrific stigma of the crime for the rest of his or her life.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 06:44 PM
1

Actually, I think you're missing the point(s). Though many here would indict foolish behavior, the sympathy here is always (and I don't use that word lightly) with the victim regardless of the circumstances. It is utterly disingenuous to propound that "Men can stop rape" after 1) defining male rape victims out of existence ; 2) having semantically established a gender-monopoly on victimization by violence; 3) making no mention the overwhelmingly male police majority that have been working both w…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:30 AM
-1

women can stop divorce
/r/MensRights04/10/14 09:15 AM
1

she didn't have one.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 09:14 AM
0

i like that picture
/r/MensRights04/10/14 09:11 AM
3

who care's if it's offensive. it's equally incorrect.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 09:10 AM
2

secret?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:44 AM
16

it would be a disgusting post if it wasn't true
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:38 AM
1

this crazy woman definitely has cooties in my view
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:37 AM
0

whether this post is true or not, you have problems that you need to address before you interact with your "boyfriend" again. my humble opinion, of course.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:34 AM
0

no, but apparently you do. if you establish that women taxi drivers needn't pick up men because of their fear of something whether it is in your opinion legitimate or not, it also establishes that male taxi drivers needn't pick up women because of their fear of something whether it is in your opinion legitimate or not.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:26 AM
2

eeewwww.... you smoke.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:58 PM
2

bye, bye. gotta go to work now so I can afford to go to the prom
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:25 PM
1

quoting is flattery. so go on.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:22 PM
1

wow, you're really working that. so tell me, miss-i'm-not-a-feminist, why is a female only taxi company any different than a male only brokerage house?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:20 PM
1

that's what I love about feminists.... their "feelings"
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:16 PM
-1

so men can exclude women from their lives so that they know for sure that they won't get falsely accused. this is the kind of logic you're supporting.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:15 PM
1

stop with your hedging. you're a feminist, right? and btw, i change them all the time. that's what the "edit" button is for. but anyway, that's some detailed imagination you've got there. you should try to remember, however, that sexual harassment isn't a women's issue. bash? if you can't stand the heat....
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:09 PM
1

why? i'm trying to understand how your thought processes can justify trying to establish some mutant separatist dystopia.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:08 PM
-1

and thank you, defgh, for not leading, following or getting the fuck out of the way.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:03 PM
3

women only. no men allowed. bigot: one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:02 PM
1

logic must be too tiring for you
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:59 PM
1

let me guess, you're a feminist. "discussion over": rhetorical emotionalism. women only. no men allowed. bigotry: one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:56 PM
1

i'm sorry that you are incapable of understanding the importance to prevent sexist bigotry
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:53 PM
0

wow, you cut and paste that all by yourself? nice job. it's horseshit to conclude that conditions are dangerous enough to merit the institution of sexist bigotry in order that they be addressed.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:51 PM
1

the presupposition that I refer to was that you accused me of denying that cab drivers make "inappropriate" comments. your solution is sexist bigotry. A solution? ummm yeah, but no.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:26 PM
-1

take a break from the presuppositions. the world's a wild place. all sorts of things happen. unseemly comments from cab drivers are one of the more easily addressed inconveniences.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:56 PM
1

mangina is out of style already. I suggest using mussy (man-pussy) or munt (man-cunt).
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:52 PM
1

Horseshit. Taxi drivers' name and license numbers are prominently posted to passengers. Filing a complaint is just one step away.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:10 PM
2

abject stupidity. if it's a private business, they can abrogate the US constitution? uh yeah, but no.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:04 PM
2

so can male drivers refuse to pick up women now -because who wants to let a strange woman in the car with you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa5kQbUl5_o
/r/MensRights28/09/14 04:02 PM
2

It's not so much the bad arithmetic that's ridiculous, it's the latest version of the mantra, "women (fill in the blank) are simply better" -just another example of sexist bigotry with the Economist this time to thank for it.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:53 PM
3

amen.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:34 PM
2

Sometimes the strength I think feminists gain simply by mapping out territory makes people in the MRM think competing for what's left over is the only game in town.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:57 AM
1

I can respect your viewpoint -even though by positing that "society already had feminism to speak for women", you perhaps unintentionally codify a flawed theoretical construct that many women clearly reject. Though I understand the need to address specific issues that are traditionally experienced by men, I assure you that these issues are not, or at least will not, be exclusively male. Egalitarianism seems inevitable when both men's and women's issues are adequately addressed without creating s…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 08:55 AM
1

you do realize that that kind of thing doesn't fly at the ATM unless there's some display of overt force.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 11:39 AM
2

i think you have to log in from the outset with a password -not foolproof, but it makes it more difficult to falsely accuse.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:52 AM
5

unless there's a password code
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:24 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QEDb3xzdec
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:44 AM
1

me too. but i'm not trying to trash you. i was genuinely wondering. i also had to stop for a while and blow a joint to remain focused.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:21 AM
1

C'mon upvote AussieTower below because it's so unbelievable ridiculous
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:13 AM
1

that's crazy funny, I also heard that death is the leading cause of suicide.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:12 AM
1

And i say welcome to it because the news of its death is greatly exaggerated.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:11 AM
2

Moral of the story: accusations shouldn't be believed without corroborating evidence.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 12:08 AM
4

it's a paradox. she volunteered to stump for HEFORSHE. You think someone put a gun to head and she snuck in this speech like some kind of prisoner's morse code? she says one thing and does another. Gee and what does that remind me of?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:41 PM
5

you think they were just strung together sound bites? I thought they were pretty continuous -and seemingly way more so than Emma's. so where did you see the jumpy-ness?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:38 PM
2

so I think that the social conditioning that causes these kinds of consequences are also and especially present while responding to reciprocal domestic violence episodes. But sometimes when this is brought before police or first responders, they're like -what, do you think we're stupid? The entrenched prejudice to side with women (especially attractive women) is so deep EVEN FOR OTHER WOMEN that removing it requires viewing and discussing a video like this repeatedly. -And what's even more insid…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:25 PM
2

an in-depth critique consisting of one of the most incisively written perspectives I have read on a popular actress stumping for a popular cause.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:44 PM
6

it's not trust in women that needs to be lost. it's trust in the idea that our social construct provides justice for all equally. it's a cliche, but I believe that all you can do is tell the truth.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 09:29 PM
5

please don't interfere a campaign of hysteria with common sense.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:48 PM
2

team up? how presumptuous of you. protect and serve is more like it.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:36 PM
2

"damn fine" making sure it's the same as it ever was: he does for she. yeah, way to overcome those stereotypes.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:36 PM
-1

i see that too. what an utterly ridiculous way to spend time
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:41 AM
-1

true that, but it doesn't matter too much as long as it gets replied to as the utter nonsense that it is.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:40 AM
2

The comment above demonstrates how she gets it SO wrong. In large part, men are not imprisoned by stereotypes as much as they are vilified for any allusions to them. They are not imprisoned by needing to express masculinity - they are ostracized and demonized for it. men don't gain by being able to act more like women. men gain by being able to act more like men without being portrayed as harmful.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:30 AM
2

that's the difference between consensual s/m and a crazed violent bitch.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 06:21 AM
-2

and which likely contributes to exploding the human combustibles on the planet
/r/MensRights22/09/14 06:13 PM
4

that's the whole point. this is not a business. this is a government agency. productivity is only necessary so long as the busy work justifies their function.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:13 PM
3

and what happens after your fantasy is over? do you think she'll just smile, disappear into a puff of smoke and only come back when you're in the mood?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 06:33 AM
4

heforshe? where's the sheforhe?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:55 PM
1

"i came in like a wrecking ball"
/r/MensRights21/09/14 03:54 PM
2

it's not very nice having a president that's so visibly pussy-whipped
/r/MensRights20/09/14 02:37 PM
1

i understand your rationale. but i guess i'm pretty much against the death penalty. we kill countless innocent people in the name of war. if we execute her, we might start having to execute ourselves too.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:29 PM
1

executing her has costs as well. some monetary, some ethical. lifetime exile or imprisonment seems to incur the least burden. she wouldn't be around and the world would be a nicer place if she needn't be executed to make it so.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:47 PM
1

ok, i checked it out and it seems pretty funny.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 10:05 PM
1

i wouldn't mind if she was put away somewhere that would prevent her contact with any other humans. i feel like executing her would lower the executioners to her level.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:58 PM
1

wow, so articulately referring to scholarship and study in such depth! what a brilliant retort to my contentions.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:38 PM
1

yeah, you said that already. but it still isn't over for people like yourself and other feminists, the nfl, and plenty of white knights. i don't have a problem with the verdict, but i do have a problem with the courtroom bias that favors women in these matters as a whole (as I've already had to explain to you several times). whether that effected this specific verdict itself is possible, but not really too much my concern. Is the fiance still with him (not that I particularly trust you to divulg…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:25 PM
1

kindof presumptuous of you to dictate what i think. like i said, to what degree what he did was reciprocal or self-defense i'll leave to the courts rather than drag in a whole bunch of personal biases from who knows where. whatever they think, i'm ok with except how the manner in which the courts dispense justice is effected by institutional bias- which i see is plainly gender-centric on the whole.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 06:42 AM
1

let's see, i'm disgusting, have issues, don't have a good grasp on reality... etc, etc. i guess you aren't really interested in a discussion (albeit one full of diametrically opposed viewpoints) as much as venting your emotions. the link demonstrates that men are held accountable for domestic violence even if they are the victims of it - pretty ridiculous
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:30 PM
1

but somehow, it didn't end after that. and like i said. that's the best that can be expected so that's where it ends for me. unless, there's a double standard somewhere..... http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2gggv0/i_want_to_know_what_he_did_that_prompted_her_to/
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:16 PM
1

did your crystal ball tell you that he was not being threatened? you had better hope you are never in a situation where you're being physically attacked or according to you, you'll have to ponder just exactly how hard you should hit back to get it to stop before you do so- a very poor method of self-defense. Have fun with your disgusting predispositions. i'm going to stand by my point that NO ONE should be judging what went on except a court of law that has the resources for the most thorough in…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:59 PM
1

don't agree with you for a second mostly for reasons cited above. Pretend that she was a he, that it was a guy of similar weight and height than his fiancee that got into it with Ray Rice. Do think that if Rice knocked some guy out that was this smaller than him everyone would be up in arms? I bet that they wouldn't care very much at all. Everyone loses their mind when it's a woman like they are some kind of protected class - when they're not. They're just human beings like men.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:20 PM
1

thanks for the diagnosis, doctor. but you know what you can do with your "serious issues" shit
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:06 PM
1

he gets close to her and might spit at her and she slaps him at :09. At :25 it looks like she hits him and he hits her back. then at :28 it looks like she lunges at him and he hits her to keep her away. It seems like she hits or tries to hit him before each time he hits her. Also, you should take into account what's been posted before:Witnesses at the casino said she was drunk and belligerent and verbally & physically assaulted him for an hour before they finally left, including spitting on him.…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:04 PM
1

you have no idea just how disgusting i really am. because you don't know shit, you knee-jerk, pretentious, know-it-all. and from what i heard, he didn't punch her, he slapped her (not that it really matters). but that's just from a stupid grainy video that NO ONE can use to determine what really happened.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:16 PM
1

ooohhh, i'll give the sub a bad name with my perspective? great. if she attacked him, he has a right to defend himself and we don't know what led up to the little bit of video so fuck you again.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:55 PM
1

i think the mocking is perfectly acceptable, but i must confess that i did spend time scanning the article for what was in those quotes.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:36 AM
6

only the quote marks make it confusing
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:49 PM
2

no need to apologize , plenty of heated argument about this topic. i'm still not convinced of anything. i think people with greater access to the facts of the evening can be the arbiters. i'm just watching the show.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:38 AM
1

yeah, probably right
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:23 PM
1

feminist issues? such as? the wage-gap? rape-culture? what?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:08 PM
2

or any two men of similarly disproportionate weight size and strength. i'm betting nobody would care very much at all.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:49 PM
1

it's relevant to her. not to the salience of the observations themselves.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:47 PM
1

it's a marginal difference. (i hope) MRAs stand more for principles than perspectives
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:46 PM
1

selective service, yes. but combat has certain physical prerequisites, some women have them, some women don't. simplistically though, men are more likely to have them than are women.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:44 PM
1

wtf is "you know, being a woman" mean?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:42 PM
1

i watched the video over and over but there's more to it than that. witnesses at the casino say there was quite a bit of preamble to the short snippet that was caught on tape.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:40 PM
1

we don't know what really happened so please stop with the absolutist "no excuse to hit a woman" crap
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:39 PM
1

what i don't get is how it is the NFLs business to mandate sanctions against him before he's convicted of anything. why is this any different that a university expelling someone accused of rape based on their own "investigation"?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:36 PM
2

whatever happened with Ray Rice, it is really for the courts to decide. i'm hoping that there are unbiased people in positions who can use taxbase resources to investigate the incident much more thoroughly than can individuals that have their own private axes to grind. it may be wishful thinking, but there are enough people defending this principle to make a broohaha if it veers off enough on a political agenda. Of course, many people here believe that the court system is already stacked against…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:30 PM
1

'rape culture' relies on defining rape as the act of penetration to exist. conflating penetration with a conscious decision, it is made to seem that only the penetrator is the perpetrator. those who support this rely on stereotype and bigotry to maintain this fallacy -i.e. a man "gets" a woman drunk to take advantage of her- and misconstrue the physiological differences between men and women as an inextricable source of oppression.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:24 PM
1

"society" allows.... sounds like feminism to me. wear what you want and make it look good. complaining about it is a poor substitute.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:15 PM
1

media portrayals of men being idiots allowed because it's universally known to be untrue?! hardly. what's universally known is the comparative lack of social support/empathy given to men who either cannot sacrifice themselves for others or who are not able for a variety of reasons to support themselves.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:13 PM
2

a woman need not be either a narcissist or a sociopath to chose not to have children.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:51 PM
2

if that stuff happened in a casino, there should be videos of it too. someone needs to make it come out
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:23 PM
1

all i know is what i saw on the video. where does this information come from?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:08 PM
-1

i watched the video over and over, it looks like his spitting started the whole thing and he's got himself to blame for it.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:42 AM
2

when i first watched the video, it seemed like he was defending himself. she smacked him, elbowed him and came at him to, what looked like, attack him again. but then i watched it more closely. he starts off by spitting on her and she slaps at him. then he gets really close to her in the elevator and spits on her again and she smacks at him again. When she does that, it looks like he hits her for the first time and that gets her mad so she charges at him and then he strikes her and she collapses…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:34 AM
1

by keeping them folded and being quiet?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:21 AM
36

Ryerson: sexism is always wrong unless it favors females
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:25 PM
1

I'm referring to your stance that reproductive rights should be identical. Wouldn't the specific "rights" need to be based on the physiological experience undergone. This isn't so much a slippery slope as it might seem if there is adherence to the same governing principle for both groups.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:04 AM
7

there is no way on gods green earth that colleges and universities can even remotely hope to garner the resources it takes for even cursory investigations of these kinds of serious wrongdoings. Another political witchhunt.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:01 PM
2

is there any way to demographically acknowledge gross physiological differences?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:32 PM
2

another self-loathing miscreant
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:29 PM
18

i understand the need to protect sexual assault victims (male and female) from their perpetrators (male and female) during criminal investigation and trial. But why make a wholly independent, private and separate adjudicating apparatus to mete out discipline? Isn't this exactly akin to being tried twice for the same crime?
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:20 PM
2

But it's true. Feminists already know that unless a man prefaces any criticism of a woman with a disclaimer that "no matter what, BOO-YAH-YAH, isn't she wonderful for fighting the good fight against the patriarchy with her sheer presence (no matter how incompetent [may be thought but not said] her performance) in this male-dominated oppressive genderocracy", the hidden agenda behind any merit or truth of the criticism is obviously to relegate women to a subclass of domestic servant/sex toy.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:54 AM
1

It's a male orgasm. Female orgasms are more like this: i, i, i...
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:23 AM
2

I also included an exclamation point at the end to simulate maximum decibel level.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:52 PM
2

No-fucking-shit boys and girls are different. But there's one way that they're not - for a multitude of reasons revolving mostly around emotional maturity and psychological vulnerabilities they are incapable of consent in the eyes of the law. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEIR PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES AND/OR PROPENSITIES!. Got it now?
/r/MensRights06/09/14 01:52 PM
1

i don't know exactly how bad. it's a fine line. i think to treat all accusations (rape or otherwise) as in need of substantiation before proceeding with arrest is a prudent course.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:29 PM
1

that's exactly what I mean. the situation sounds wacked from the get-go and if she's wondering why the cops didn't jump to it, she needs to fill in the blanks.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:23 PM
1

none of that matters if the drivers crash anyway
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:46 PM
0

Excellent links to an important issue. Thanks for the repost. .... but the other stuff is uncalled for. issues are brought up in an organic fashion here in cyberspace - neither is there specific criteria guaranteed to garner attention, nor does the lack thereof mark an ineptitude and/or laziness. Sometimes quantification must be accomplished through comparison - hence the degree to which feminism is taken into account.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:44 PM
1

if they would give women discounts for not driving (which would be in response to rate of their accidents per mile driving), I'd feel a little safer.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:30 PM
1

and it's interesting how the newspaper didn't want to publish the idiot homicider's picture. Perhaps to forestall the retribution?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:28 AM
1

Let alone being female, this paragon of cultural hope and the future sits on the very essence of what it means to be bourgeoisie (in the anthropological rather than political sense). Favored? This doll is worshiped!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:26 AM
2

"Affluenza".....There was utter outrage when some idiot lawyer got some even bigger of idiot judge to let a shining example of an idiot kid off with the kind of masturbatory consumptive reasoning that made a mockery of equal protection in the eyes of the Law.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:13 AM
1

the judge is probably hoping she gets into one of those girls-only coding programs - oh, wait.... you don't have to compete to get in as long as you're a girl.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:03 AM
10

Tell me one instance of a teenage guy not being absolutely vilified as the scourge of Western Civilization for exactly this kind of behavior. Shit, it happened in my HS only the driver (male) AND his passenger (female) were killed. Too bad it was their FIRST OFFENSE (!!!??) Yeah, it looks like that extra-special kind of PUSSY PASS reserved for teenage girls - ya know, the one that keeps jamming "girls only" programs down the country's throats to insure we get used to seeing how their social engi…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:01 AM
1

i did. so she passed out and her friends left her available to anyone who happened to come along? I've never heard of friends like this. doesn't sound right.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:22 AM
0

if my bitch wants to fuck around on me, all she has to do is say so. honesty is the best policy.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:53 PM
2

exactly what has been already said by others. your view about duty and conscientiousness is pretty interesting. i hope you develop it in writing. Good luck
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:46 PM
1

more bullshit
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:04 PM
2

what the fuck are you talking about?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:17 PM
2

you're an asshole with all your blather
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:15 PM
1

the story doesn't make sense. she passed out while with her friends and they just stood by while someone raped her?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:42 AM
1

it's completely different. the crime is in taking the photos or pulling clothes off, not exposing an prefabricated image.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:35 AM
1

the FBI? I thought that they at least purported to be smart.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:32 AM
1

OH NO! it's that privilege (us) to be oppressing the privilege (Gay) to be opressing the privilege (hacker) to be oppressing the priviliged (celebrities) again.... goddamn it
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:27 AM
3

funny
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:22 AM
2

all the time
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:22 AM
2

I don't know, I can appreciate that (il)logic. Therefore, all people should be put in jail until they "get in touch" with their creativity.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:11 AM
2

it pisses me off that people are arguing about whether or not to call what she did "sexual" assault (below). From the video, it appears that this woman is violently and deeply disturbed. One would therefore think that simple probation is dangerous to the community and particularly to the male members of the community.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:05 AM
1

POS feminiolgisms
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:01 AM
4

asshole
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:00 AM
0

LOL -open discussion (so long as it occurs elsewhere)
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:57 AM
2

is she making any sense at all besides the senseless squirming after she got naked in front of strangers?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:58 PM
1

what's so great about Vassar?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:05 PM
1

the privilege of oppressing privilege is the the privilege of oppressing privilege.....
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:00 PM
1

soviet russia, i.e. communism - the paragon of mediocrity
/r/MensRights01/09/14 02:52 PM
1

come on everyone, give her a break. she's a woman.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:58 AM
8

unmitigated horseshit - place an obstacle in front of someone who wants to do something badly enough and watch how fast it is overcome. social engineering is best at producing mediocrity.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:57 AM
2

oh, you mean the poison mms thing? but the diff is that that posits a percentage of men with an element of inextricable evil against women (due to some sort of social engineering that is too vague and nebulous to be demonstrated as cause and effect; OR, simply a product of chromosomes). Contrast the above with the fact that women have been immediately and artificially elevated to arbiter position over men due to very concrete and specific laws and policy (selective service, duluth model, etc) wh…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:36 PM
3

what school?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:29 PM
4

isn't this guy out of jail already? March on the fucking jail!
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:00 PM
17

yeah, but the problem is that the "justice system" has given women ability to screw men over on whim - that makes them dangerous.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:58 PM
0

right is left, up is down, and north is south. who needs language anyway? let's just all go back to grunting.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:11 PM
12

and it's not only the empathy gap, it's what happens when the inmates run the asylum. people who "feel uncomfortable" around other people need shrinks rather than a platform from which to insure that everyone else shares their insanity.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 02:23 PM
37

this is what real sexism looks like
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:44 PM
8

only a repulsive excuse for a human being drags kids along to steal - but this is why. jackasses are so ready to put the hurt on anything that remotely impinges on the "maternal" instinct.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:40 PM
16

just one step from whoredom
/r/TheRedPill29/08/14 04:33 PM
6

it looks like she's a total ass. but for other judges, unfortunately, it's an uphill battle if they wish to ignore gender bias. Any sense of fairness puts them at the immediate peril of feminist criticism -and more likely risks mandates against them due to its political cache.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:38 PM
1

yup, the ones you have seem like idiots
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:40 AM
0

death penalty
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:38 AM
4

uh, no. they'd enslave you.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:36 AM
3

you are fucking crazy. if he doesn't document how fucked in the head this wackjob is by having them take pics of the injuries, she's going to make her next play like she's pure as the driven snow. get it on record, NOW!
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:28 AM
8

Call the fucking cops and report it to the cops immediately. if you don't, you have no one to blame but yourself. She's not done with you yet, dude.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:26 AM
1

oh-oh say can you see, our maligning dumb idiocy....
/r/MensRights24/08/14 01:26 PM
7

only creepy to your "honest" mind. My kids spent time growing up in clothing optional hot springs cavorting naked with not only myself , but non-family members in a totally wholesome environment. so I guess what I'm trying to say is .... FUCK YOU
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:59 AM
6

welcome to the united states of neurosis
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:56 AM
1

rape fantasy is pretty hot and that's what it is advocating - not, duh, real rape.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:33 PM
2

totally right on. I hope those two pieces of trash crawl under a rock and never come out.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:50 PM
2

and even so, as it is feminism has flown so far up its own ass that it's actually hurting women as a demographic by making them walk with crutches when their legs are perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:25 AM
1

Occasionally I get through to "true-believer feminists", but more often than not they're way too heavily invested in the victim-mentality to be coaxed out by mere rational sanity. I actually have no problem with feminism- so long as it's understood by all those involved as to be concerned with things feminine. It's when I get the rabid fanatics that insist that it's the be-all and end-all and the world would be a better place if we all just cut off our heads and poured in sarkeesian/greer brain-…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:23 AM
1

You're talking about outcomes rather than opportunities. The gov reps cater to their constituencies - the majority (I believe) which are women. bring yourself to understand the common denominator among all peoples rather than standing under an umbrella of unique special snowflake-dom. Abortions and birth control issues are not any different than other protections and social regulations that government offers. It is completely unnecessary to know what the effected party "feels" -an entirely subje…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:16 AM
1

Wow, did your post really piss me off! and to that I say, "THANK YOU". RE: "I'm just curious about why someone who might choose "male" in this scenario would then turn around and say that men need more rights than they already have, or that women are wrong for battling for more rights than they already have." Try and think about the infinitely changing social constructions that more and more directly communicating with an ever growing number of people create. Now try and think about what schemat…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:11 AM
1

so OP, you're a woman. why don't you let everyone know what's at the bottom of your question: what YOU think is different about being woman than being a man?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:56 AM
1

You are asking MRAs (predominantly men) if they would choose having the same fundamental bio-mechanics that they have experienced throughout their entire lives or completely changing them so that even basic bodily functions would need to be relearned and gotten accustomed to from square one? Gee, that's a tough one.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:50 AM
1

wrong. i'm defending a hypothetical person accused of "verbal abuse" in a situation that simply calls for a separation.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:33 AM
1

Bullshit.... you spend many years with someone who YOU feel is constantly putting you down, it is your own fault for not leaving. All this vague crap is utter nonsense. When does it become abuse? 1, 2, 3, 4 ....25 years? It's only when the "victim" feels that it does. That's not abuse, that's blaming someone else for your own weakness.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:26 AM
1

Why? Because "verbal abuse" is only abusive if interpreted in that manner. I mean, what are we talking about here? Someone saying, "you stupid, worthless asshole!"? It all depends on the tone and the manner in which it is said. It can be the most loving, most endearing compliment if a relationship is geared toward that type of exchange.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 11:41 PM
1

"Verbal" abuse by definition infringes on freedom of speech/verbal expression. But even if we say for a moment that a particular but REPETITIVE verbal expression expressly constitutes abuse, the "victim" is required to enable the "abuser" to perpetuate it after the first (more or less innocuous, but annoying) incident. Hence, self-victimization.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 06:42 PM
-1

11:00 am All you can eat self-victimization buffet brunch. Retainer fee included.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 05:40 PM
4

no, hairaware just doesn't give a pass to self-victimization being anyone else's responsibility but the victim's.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 05:38 PM
4

the whole system is set up to punish - it's totally whacked. Had my share of difficulties with them folks too. All you are to them is a number.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 08:14 PM
3

was your passport application rejected or did you just get a notice that it would be denied?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:05 PM
9

conspiracy to commit fraud?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:04 PM
5

Wow, this speaks to almost everything that is utterly horrific about the Family Court System. Can you share some general details? US? State? Judge? Some states consider these cases public record. If yours does, I'm guessing you can access all the records and do with them what you like. I wish I could give you a safe house to hide (but then you'd wouldn't be able to see your kids), a ticket to someplace safe (same problem) or a magic solution to this problem. Please keep posting. Word of this kin…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 07:02 PM
3

it's not just random. there's a very specific dynamic at work here.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 04:57 AM
1

it is funny. it's like saying back, " you are a woman, so don't tell me what I should say"
/r/MensRights19/08/14 04:55 AM
27

wow, and not a moment of self-reflection that these shrill shewish women aren't helping the "war effort" themselves
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:35 PM
7

i'm going to call bullshit. there's a very real sadistic exuberance that the "i bathe in male tears" women take in disparaging men's emotions. what's worse, it exploits an already ubiquitous benchmark in our culture that insists that men stoically sacrifice themselves and that anything else is the whining that comes from less than a real man. so fuck you when you say that women can't get decent paying jobs. what they can't get is the demographic gumption to risk their soft, protected, pampered a…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:23 PM
2

nowhere in the insipid excuse of an article does it indict the stupidity of people thinking that lying (especially to an intimate partner!) is somehow justifiable.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:25 AM
2

poignant. shared.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:09 AM
6

and this shit happens EVERYDAY - only difference, no video so the guy goes to jail and everyone rallies around the poor "victim"
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:06 PM
3

I had two different women physically abuse me when I was injured. As soon as they know they can get away with it because you can't defend yourself and the police won't care anyway, they get real nasty.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:54 PM
33

why isn't she arrested? This is obviously assault
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:13 AM
0

puuulease, illegal immigrants are legally prostituted, enslaved and tortured? gee, which ones of the hundreds of day laborers standing on street corners competing with me for manual labor when i need a few extra bucks does that happen to? Or maybe the restaurant help does double shift as crash test dummies for Torquemada when they're not serving moo goo gai pan? Atrocious treatment definitely does occur to the most vulnerable in our society. But it's far from accepted and mandated. In fact, it's…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:43 PM
2

nope to your nope. he's not talking about the worst of humanity has to offer. he's talking about what's been enshrined in social mandate
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:00 PM
11

because they don't want any (female) purported victims to suffer the discomfort of due process
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:58 PM
1

MRM, shmemrm. Feeling like your heart is being ripped out over alimony is on target enough for me.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:02 AM
1

it's not all that. it's just that according to the definition they've sexually assaulted me by withholding sex and affection.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:00 AM
1

i'm put off by your vehement denial that alimony wasn't a factor in his depression. The article speaks exactly to it. "Last September Williams, who had moved into a relatively modest bungalow in Tiburon, near San Francisco, which he inherited from his mother in 2001, spoke about having to “downsize” his life and take roles to “pay the bills” following his divorces from Valerie Velardi in 1988 and Marsha Garces in 2008." AND He went on: “Divorce is expensive. I used to joke they were going to cal…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:40 PM
-1

great, two no-talent women cost him his life
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:33 PM
3

Most of the women IN THE WORLD have committed sexual violence against me. I probably should start filing charges.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:06 PM
3

the rape card is the only one they have left in their decks
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:39 PM
23

looks like they are getting ready to get started happily raping each other
/r/MensRights10/08/14 06:06 PM
14

Just to be the devil's advocate to the devil's advocate: maybe she asked him out, maybe she ordered the drinks, maybe she's his boss (or has some kind of more powerful social status) and can leverage control of the situation, maybe she's been a drinker all her life and he's just trying his first drink, maybe she's planning on his getting drunk from the outset, maybe she's snorting cocaine in the bathroom to sober herself up, maybe a million things that could work to her sobriety's advantage when…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 06:03 PM
1

cash what? "appropriate"? I don't care about that either. someone I know? doesn't matter. I could say to a complete stranger, "yo! gorgeous, your ass is looking mighty fine today". So what? I also happen to believe that walking around naked is not an invitation to rape - yet I, personally, wouldn't walk around naked unless I thought I could do it safely.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:52 PM
1

i don't care what you have. If you're offended when I say, nice ass or nice breasts (TO ANYONE), too fucking bad for you.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:46 PM
1

nor would I attempt to do so (nor have I) on the same token (as I've said numerous times), I really don't care how they feel about it. You can go walk through a prison yard and then come back. How about this FUCK YOU. If you're offended when I say, nice ass or nice breasts, too fucking bad for you. Get this through your thick skull: i think your being offended is your problem, not mine.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:42 PM
1

like i've mentioned numerous times, i really don't care how YOU feel about verbal comments made in your presence. I'm writing about how I feel. So if you don't like it, too bad.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:30 PM
1

i hope you're enjoying your experience
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:00 PM
1

"normality"? and who's definition are you using? groping is something completely apart from an observation regarding someone's appearance. verbal statements are utterly innocuous with few specific exceptions: threats, shouting fire in a crowded theater, etc groping (or any sort of intentionally uninvited contact) is an invasive derogation of another's autonomy.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:58 PM
1

your projection, your fear, your paranoia
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:44 PM
1

I am, huh? How so? In generalizing the three means by which humans may respond after encountering sounds they do or do not find appealing? On the other hand, demonizing men specifically for their self-expression (and sexuality is certainly a component of self-expression) under the misnomer of "street harassment" is by definition a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:35 PM
1

one of the less well thought out responses perhaps. "dominant" response? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:28 PM
1

well, i'm an MRA to the bone, and I think that indicting a woman for how she dresses or looks is absolutely antithetical to everything this movement stands for. I didn't check out the links very thoroughly. But I'll tell you this: I've never heard even a hint of this ignorance from even one of the people who spoke at the recent conference in Detroit. You know, the most accessible pundits in the movement. So take that stuff and stick it up your ass.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:21 PM
1

I equate "inappropriate"-ness with any one of an infinite number of subjective interpretations that result from a self-indoctrinated history of personal decorum. So fuck you very much for trying to project yours on me. And where was anything being dick-tated anyway? Feel however you want to feel. Believe me no one gives a shit about making you feel any different. What people say "really wears you down"? Boo-hoo-hoo. Either get in and start swinging or stick your fingers in your ears and sing "la…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:17 PM
2

well, i'm glad you're at peace now and I hope you stay that way. Undoubtedly, you have some very real concerns that need to be addressed. Getting the water going, electricity going, rebuilding.... etc, etc. meanwhile, when the article continues to emphasize the importance of the number of women's injuries and death , it reinforces the belief that there is nothing important about these things happening to men.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:26 AM
-1

i yell at people who are far away so that they can hear me. I try not to let someone else's sense of decorum interfere with my self-expression regardless of the content.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:46 AM
-1

yes, i do (though i don't call it cat-calling). if i see a woman with a remarkably shaped ass or set of breasts, i usually tell her that I find her ass or her breasts remarkable. Motives? I usually say what's on my mind without embarrassment.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:44 AM
1

(Hopefully this remains theoretical enough to avoid crossing the line into the intentionally manipulative aspects of PUA ) Now rarely used properly as the preliminary enticement for a much more involved interpersonal experience, making a blatantly articulated true disclosure of attraction (often referred to by the misnomer "cat-calling") as an initial statement to a stranger is, in fact, a dying art. Very often people mistake these statements as harbingers of insensitivity and callousness -and i…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:28 AM
1

and it doesn't even matter whether you are interested in someone's "attention". It's not attention. It's their self-expression that you seek to prohibit.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:46 PM
1

thanks guy, but i think i already conveyed that i consider it a belief that no thinking person would reasonably adhere to
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:43 PM
1

bullshit. unless you live in a vacuum, you should have no reasonable expectation of not being interrupted.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:41 PM
1

but lets talk about "harassment" - ya know the topic of this thread? when I say to someone on the street, "Damn you have a fine looking ass", surely this can not be considered harassment. There is no threat, implied or otherwise. There is no intent to cause distress, implied or otherwise. There is only observation and what could only be construed by standard use of the English language as a compliment. Of course, there are bullies in every walk of life. And some people use their ability to insin…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:56 PM
1

i don't know who says it, who's been saying it, or who'll continue to say it. i have thought, think, and probably will think that it is pretty much bullshit
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:52 PM
1

sorry, but getting mugged is a little bit different than "getting all this attention". -commenting on a person's appearance is like the clown suit. -assaulting (sexual and otherwise) them is like the mugger. there's a difference here.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:39 PM
1

there's a titanic leap beyond logic required to equate the method in which a criminal chooses victims and an assertion that mere possession equals consent.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:32 PM
1

looking hot is like waving cash around?! uh, no. i don't think so.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:36 PM
2

i don't mind a woman acting like an animal in heat. i don't mind a man acting like an animal in heat. there's only a problem when one physically does something unwanted/uninvited to the other.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:02 PM
1

while I reserve the right to do anything I want with my fingers and tongue (and all of my physical apparatus) without coming into contact with anyone else, uninvited intentional contact with another person's body part (ass or whatever) is more than just distracting, it's an invasive derogation of another's autonomy.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:53 PM
1

i doubt anyone seriously says looking hot is per se dangerous - what i hear most saying and agree with is that to demand that comments and other verbal exclamations regarding appearance (hot or otherwise) be prohibited or repressed is nonsensical and immature.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:46 PM
1

The gender and race of theoreticians are irrelevant within the framework of debate. Check your facts, not your privilege. Christina Hoff Sommers
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:59 PM
1

been looking at lots of HR Giger lately
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:21 AM
1

an increase of risk to a woman's life? Oh, this is a homeland security issue, right? hogwash.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:54 PM
-2

Fucking bitches feeling self entitled not to hear sounds and bitch about people making them. Fuck you and your world of repressive passive aggression. Go live in a monastery if randomly hearing what people say is so distasteful.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:49 PM
0

who said that? What really needs to be remembered is that simply making an observation (saying someone looks hot in whatever words are chosen) is NOT harassment. There needs to be some kind of threat or an action to intentionally cause distress.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:45 PM
-2

I have a right to say anything I want anytime I want -with very few specific exceptions (threats, shouting fire in a crowded theater, etc). It has nothing to do with frustration. It is a healthy outlet and perfectly valid form of self-expression. Ignore it or respond to it, the choice is yours.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:41 PM
0

i call that crazy. when a man verbally attempts to attract a woman's attention, it's the same thing that likely happened when your father first met your mother. And you can thank heaven that he did, because you wouldn't be here to complain about other people doing the same thing otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:26 PM
0

Sexuality isn't something women have to give. The truth is that women spend their entire lives passing through a gauntlet of penises in various degrees of erection and men spend their entire lives slipping through a tunnel of vaginas in various degrees of lubrication. All this works in reverse as well for those attracted to their same sex. The almighty libido powers our existence. Be thankful and appreciative that it does. Without it, you wouldn't be here.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:46 PM
-5

"my god, you have such beautiful breasts" -said by me on the rare occasion of their appearance. i'm beginning to think that gracefully accepting a compliment is a lost art.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:49 PM
-2

"Sweetheart, you've got one killer ass" only an ideological cretin could take offense at that.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:44 PM
-5

"dehumanize" WTF is that? you mean murder? personally, i don't care how a woman is dressed. Provocatively or not, I'm going to remark if she appears remarkable. Hopefully, her tender ears won't explode when she hears it.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:42 PM
1

1 1/2 miles in 18 minutes, that's a slow walk!
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 06:43 AM
-3

It was self-defense - he was threatening her with patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:18 AM
1

if I were you, I'd grab a backpack and my passport and get a one-way ticket on the first plane out of there.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/14 04:22 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWlvYpJ5pRo nothing wrong with grass huts
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 12:41 PM
3

"a woman invented the computer" what are you, a fruitcake? this is the kind of shit that makes women seem more stupid than they are.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 12:40 PM
5

Bitch be giv'n you shit for a longboard @ 20? Hahaha! She's a turd! My kids had longboards before they turned 10. SK84life
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 12:20 PM
5

and demographics demonstrate their unmitigated social success?
/r/TheRedPill02/08/14 12:16 PM
1

Regardless of the documented circumstances of an event, it's necessary to promote scapegoating by disregarding them and inventing others in order to substantiate a predetermined scenario- police said.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:10 AM
1

yeah, cheerios have no genetically modified organisms in their ingredients
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:49 PM
1

put it up. what are we waiting for? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d8aB8Moxos
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:30 PM
3

come on! The effect of virtually all medications aren't consistently reproducible in human bodies, yet I'm hoping there's some science behind their development.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:27 PM
-5

so long as cheerios have no GMOs, I'm ok with it
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:11 PM
-6

at least we could have a post of her butt
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:02 PM
3

two women and me, the perfect sandwich
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:59 PM
1

TOO FUNNY!!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:30 PM
1

If both parties were afforded equal protection (as the Constitution guarantees), I'd guess you'd see this conundrum quite often. I've yet to hear of a case that involved a woman drinking by herself into oblivion and then being raped by her "designated driver"
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:16 PM
2

i have many problems with a sanctimonious attitude defying the incredulity of an unsupported accusation made unlikely by surrounding circumstances.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 03:06 PM
3

Hopefully the law should work to uphold the notion that self-defense is not domestic violence. However, it could be viewed as an assault if it exceeds the reasonable force necessary to repel an attack. I don't know why the stupidity of a gender variable was allowed to be introduced to any social norms. There are women who are stronger than men and men who are stronger than women.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:28 PM
3

"Just take it"? Fuck that, asshole. Self-defense is gender-blind.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:25 AM
3

by acting natural, you mean inviting (!) him to have dinner with your family? you might just be as crazy as this woman is.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:16 AM
1

i wish she at least demonstrated some sexual independence rather than just doing what's she's told. i love hard working female porn stars and even submissives like Madison Young have an incredibly more insighful perspicacity than this empty headed trollop.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:51 AM
3

hahaha, impugn a sacred myth and be prepared for its defenders to respond with their projection of failed intimate relations.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:55 AM
4

and that's what makes it unconstitutional (equal protection clause)
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:06 PM
5

love how our hallowed legal system is founded on nonsense like this. i'd say a good 1/3 of my sexual encounters between the time I was 20 -30 involved the mutually liberal use of alcohol. Lets say average of 2x week -that's a whole lot of me raping a rapist.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:45 PM
36

wait, so mutually drunken sex is mutually non-consenting?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:51 AM
1

Simulation? you think that porn actors and actresses don't really do it? But I get what you're saying -although it might be that you have put a premium on sexual intercourse more so than any other interpersonal activities. It's not necessarily the case (sex might be no more or less important than every/any other activity in which we partake). This doesn't derogate the physical sensitivities involved. However, the psychological attributes regarding an elevated valuation being placed on sexuality …
/r/MensRights20/07/14 04:24 AM
1

(i edited out the first 'rather' in the above message, maybe it's easier now) what's going on now between Israel and the Palestinians is people doing what they naturally do (too).
/r/MensRights19/07/14 05:35 PM
2

given that porn is the explicit portrayal of human bio-mechanics that is founded on the giving and receiving of pleasure, I find it sacred rather than profane.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:27 PM
9

"what am I supposed to do?" fuck him at the earliest opportunity, you dolt.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 07:24 PM
4

partially right about porn culture? bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:01 PM
2

this is so unbelievably batshit that if I hadn't seen women act this way with my own eyes, i'd never believe it. I'd vocally refuse to allow it right to her face and try to record the encounter especially her reaction. THen post it on a social media site so that the world can know that yes, monsters truly do exist.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:23 PM
1

I used to work as a cook at a world famous ski area. I always took my 6 and 7 y/o kids with me to work (homeschoolers). They'd go off and ski the mountain all day BY THEMSELVES.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:55 AM
0

Fuck a lot. I'm addressing those few who've got a unique set of perceptions -even if its slanted feminist. besides why would anyone think I'm implying women have a sense of humor about rape, when as a jew i can laugh at holocaust jokes - and because they lighten the load of life. Nah, none of that shit should unstuck the catharsis.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 05:20 AM
-2

dear artist, re: "trigger warning breakfast" it's all about tone. there's a tone, a particularly and intentionally flat tone that would make it seem like a "no" was being said sarcastically. It kind of appears like you've got that tone down pretty well in this comic. Good luck with brunch, sfl
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:25 AM
2

Kum ba yah. Now don't worry about the theory-pigs hashing it out. You can think of it as inter-gender wrestling.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:14 AM
0

(acceptance!!) now i love you
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:55 PM
0

"inappropriate"??!? hah-hah... you mean your subjective interpretation of a self-indoctrinated history of personal decorum? To me, it's worth about as much as the splooge stains I left on my ex-wife's sheets last night after we fucked. But ok, let's say I put some "thought" into "it". maybe if i'm lucky i'll please people like you. wow, isn't that just what i'm after.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:53 PM
0

i don't deem anything. i just say what i want whenever I want. You want to pretend you don't? Fine. -Just don't expect me to jack-off to your exhortations of prohibition.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:35 PM
-2

fuck congress. if you want to comment on a comment, you should at least be creative.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:05 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX4tOsQnZTQ
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:53 AM
1

actually I call out the calling out of cat-calling as a violation of free speech.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:43 AM
1

and what about keeping a journal of underage sexual exploits and then reading it years later? is that fucking illegal too? what a bunch of nutcases.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:30 AM
1

well, I have some sex vids me and my girlfriend made when we were underage teenagers. I watch them every once in a while when I want to have a walk down memory lane. Fuck trolling. It's exactly the same. You think that there's harm there?! Bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:29 AM
1

right!??! I jack off all the time to memories I have of my childhood sweethearts. I guess I'm a child porn thought criminal. Fucking wackjob virginia cops!
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:27 AM
1

and so fucking what if he lets his friends see pics of his old teenage girlfriend? where's the fucking harm that rationalizes the utterly unjust cruelty and insanity that passes for justice these days?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:26 AM
1

awesome!
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:14 AM
2

so ya wanna go out for a drink?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:20 AM
1

prlly not too concerned with a legal scenario that favors women regardless of whether it infantilizes them at the same time.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:18 AM
1

this is just done to humiliate people and to keep them docile and used to following orders no matter how egregious and outrageous. -what they don't know is how nasty a hornets nest that they're stirring up.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:24 PM
4

i knew that, but the high horse was about to go galloping off so I thought I'd better climb on
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:22 PM
-1

the feminist perspective is so far silent on this.... and i'm pretty sure i know why
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:20 PM
45

send and sent, send again.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:29 PM
1

sent to all
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:29 PM
5

what's the problem!? the problem is that america is streaked with a puritanical lynch mob mentality of sexually infantile paranoia that keeps our courts running on ignorance.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:24 PM
1

-sent this clip to the Virginia Attorney General congratulating him on his office now becoming a national laughing stock.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:20 PM
1

If it wasn't so repulsive, it would be funny. We have become a nation ruled by Ms. Balbrickers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzwQ8_H3DFw
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:16 PM
3

This is an incredible set of injustices that if allowed to stand, sets the stage for a further erosion of the mere ability to pursue happiness. First off, two teenagers sending each other explicit photos of themselves is hardly immoral, unethical or unnatural. Only in the most pusillanimous mind could legal statute be used against either of them to shame and guilt their normal adolescent sexual explorations. Secondly, to solely hold the male criminally culpable for this non-crime is beyond sexis…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:50 PM
1

It's the fucking indulgence in these self-important divas that exacerbates the likelihood that the next one will feel as much right to do something like this as to spend a little extra at the hair-dresser. You want to twiddle your thumbs and sit around on some pacifistic moral high ground? Go ahead. But this bullshit ain't gonna stop till things gets turned around starting with the understanding that there is no "maternal" instinct. You either love your child or, like this poisonous leech-rag, y…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:57 PM
-13

string her up and draw and quarter this bitch. this is the first time I've ever advocated a lynching, but justice is truly failing here.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:54 PM
1

collective punishment is the precussor to genocide
/r/MensRights06/07/14 03:49 PM
1

that's where I was at in my head, hence the outrage. sexism as defined men/oppressor, women/oppressed.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:04 PM
5

self-defense isn't about equality. it's about repelling an attack. backing away invites another shove - if there is a place to go at all.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:31 PM
3

yup, needs an edit
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:29 PM
5

i got tripped up by the Case Western Reserve Department of Psychology backing making me think it was actually something somewhat scientific. oh fuck, thanks. My bad, totally.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:23 PM
8

i don't know the details, but punching someone who shoves me to keep them from shoving me again doesn't seem excessive at all. In fact, I can't think of any other way to defend myself. what to your mind makes it excessive?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:22 PM
1

I am so sorry that you are going through this. I was separated from my kids for quite a while too. Can you get them notes or messages telling them that you love them and that you'll never stop trying to see them?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:28 PM
10

reciprocal my ass, that's reasonable force to deter a further attack
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:17 PM
10

so sorry to hear about your friend. Definitely contact a lawyer specializing in this as the below post reads. i'm losing count of these cases. is the number approaching class action?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:10 PM
5

Imagine: women feeling preferential being called "benevolent" and men indicting this bigotry being labelled as "hostile". Same as it ever was.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 05:50 PM
3

yeah and don't watch hollywood either.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 09:58 PM
10

-just another pair of scumbags who enjoy festooning their own soiled panties in public and the media lapdogs that can't stop sniffing at them.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:26 PM
0

guy's a complete kook and is just venting his bile. cooler heads will prevail. those responsible will be brought to justice with minimum harm to innocent bystanders.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:18 PM
2

it's a pretty crappy article and even crappier that that's the best that can be expected.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:10 PM
1

hahaha, that's the same title I was thinking trying to read the tweets!
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:40 AM
1

I never unfriend anyone. They can do it to themselves if they want. And if something offends me, I usually say so and why -so long as I have the time and the inclination. It's usually quite a cathartic experience.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:24 AM
0

ok, ok, sorry, maybe what i wrote was out of control. the only point i was trying to make was that escalating someone's touching to intentional violence brings much more unpleasant consequences to everyone involved than could possibly occur as a result of the original touch.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:53 AM
0

LOL, what an idiot
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:05 AM
-1

if it was accidental and you try that, you'll end up missing a few teeth.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:07 AM
1

it would be repetitive and stupid if she'd ever addressed its incredible insensitivity, myopia and bigoted ignorance. but she leaves it out there - ostensibly as a benchmark on which many of her policy positions rest. She needs to answer for it and hammering her with it over and over again until she does is the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:21 PM
2

someone said something stupid 16 years ago and has intermittently followed it up with more of the same unvarnished stupidity since.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:23 AM
6

plus she gets commiseration from the rest of the fruitcakes like her who feel perfectly justified pulling this kind of crap
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:45 PM
1

sure, but stats gotten that way are, like the fake IDs you can buy at gift shops, good for.... "entertainment purposes only". Attempting to formalize an informal infrastructure of support for people who can't be troubled to engage the formal infrastructure of support encourages abuse, deception, and manipulation.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 09:22 AM
1

Why do so many people think it's about bitterness, and 'not getting laid'? Freud would probably say that it's a defense mechanism to deflect their inability to satisfactorily resolve childhood penis envy.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 03:54 PM
2

sent
/r/MensRights18/06/14 07:41 AM
1

unfortunately there's still a strong current for decontructionist legal studies
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:26 AM
2

I'm a VTer and I'm sick to my stomach.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:56 AM
1

un-fucking-believable. it's a boy, so she just can't help herself, right?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:38 AM
1

"Derailing the conversation" - presenting an opinion reflecting real-life circumstances rather than passively encouraging people to recite scripted lines while giving approval.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:28 AM
3

unmitigated child abuse. so, so very happy to be homeschooling my boys
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:23 AM
1

sarcastic humor?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:35 AM
3

name something
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:37 AM
1

it was on a link connected to the petition but it's been taken down
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:35 AM
6

calm down, deep breaths. now don't anybody do anything even if someone says "David Futrelle"..... Oh shit.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:13 PM
7

this article is such a load of unmitigated bs. Even RAINN is questioning "rape culture" as delusional caricature and fantasy.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:30 PM
4

don't be stupid, be a smarty
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:16 PM
2

Dr. Paul Nathanson cancelling? Back story please.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:57 AM
16

these two 'newscasters' are exactly what's wrong with how the media vilifies men. not only do they cackle over the fact that a woman assaulted a man, they rejoice in her distributing "her brand of justice" . It's amazing that such ignorance is used to sell commercial time.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:59 PM
2

how do you make a hormone? don't pay her
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 05:17 PM
2

tb even more h, it sounds like he's sick of having to work with a bunch of people who think sucking up to someone else is better than determining your own goals and how to reach them.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 05:09 PM
1

Me, i go to the Y to lift. I love it, but i'm sure we both know it's not the end all. Hey, it's awesome you're doing something for yourself instead of depending on someone else for your happiness. Big Congrats. But don't forget to get out in the wilderness too. Kill it, dude.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 05:06 PM
3

she should have been jailed
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:21 PM
2

Everyone is different, but using gender as a baseline for these differences is simply bigotry.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:15 PM
6

you must really like reading my shit.. ok, feminism requires greater social controls and mandates to insure that no inconvenience interferes with its goals. RPs seek to overcome their own personal adversity, failures and challenges by confronting them and learning from them.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 04:34 AM
2

REASONABLE force to insure the attack stops. gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:44 PM
3

well, shit on that
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:41 PM
1

can you be a little more detailed in "establishing dominance in a relationship"? is it different from unapologetically acting from the strength of your own autonomy?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 06:39 PM
11

the difference between feminists and red pill'ers is that RPs seem to want to damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead and feminists want to gum up the ocean so that no ships can sail -just in case.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 06:30 PM
0

ab-so-fucking-lutely
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 06:23 PM
2

"I see in many of these posts women are generalized as manipulative and emotionally unstable." you could at least point to a few of them. but perhaps what happens is that the vehicle that activist/academic/political feminism places in women's hands (for example: false accusations at the initiation of a divorce to gain the upper hand) creates a situation that is very difficult for women NOT to act in ways that are manipulative and emotionally unstable. Are MRAs that characterize women like this o…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:41 PM
10

unfortunately negating consent with a bare minimum of alcohol consumption is gaining traction as a ploy to bolster the campus expulsion rates with the speciously concocted statistics cited by a pandering federal administration to pressure institutions of higher learning to get in lock step. depending on the judicial branch to uphold due process is a fragile ideal at best. besides the time and cost spent reversing a college or university's legally prohibited expulsion, the distraction from studie…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:13 AM
2

She's right! Subjugating men shouldn't be thought of as women's work. Men should be conscious enough to do their fair share of their own debasement - like during the Q/A after Fiamengo's presentation when men knew to introduce themselves first by citing their privileged bias.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:58 AM
1

state court ordered a 'stay'? so is 'john doe' expelled or continuing to study?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:30 PM
4

"boxers always hit harder when women are around" kenneth patchen
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:48 PM
2

1) feminism is definitely off the rails so there's no way I would trust anything that academic feminism produces to adequately address the gender-specific issues that men face 2) men's rights specifically deal with injustices that are very often ignored and even derogated in the media - so to ask MRAs to deal with gender specific issues that women deal when there is a perception that there is an overabundance of support for them already is pretty preposterous.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:30 AM
3

i'm all for a more sophisticated articulation of what the MRM is trying to signify, but at the same time keeping it accessible (and colorful) makes identifying with the issues easier for someone unfamiliar with gender dynamics. Plus, there's the sanctity of maintaining free speech. So go ahead and define words and imprint your personal opinions of their respective values on them. Just please don't get into a "ban bossy" campaign because if we start saying what words are good and what words are b…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:48 PM
4

needs to be reported to law enforcement
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:24 AM
3

matriarchy and patriarchy are binary oversimplifications that fail to adequately describe the complex set of social gender dynamics that take place due to the manner in which we collectively invest our time and activities. men's rights seeks to address those dynamics that disadvantage men due to their gender and are most times ignored.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:21 AM
2

I think this accusation is bullshit, however death threats should be a law enforcement issue and verifiable.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:30 PM
2

Holy Shit! This is one of those it-happened-to-my-friend BS
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:26 PM
1

please all of you chill out. it's no big deal. i think demanding verification is good no matter if its insistence comes from someone who's views are antithetical to my own. Maybe the feminist camp can start behaving that way as well.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:24 PM
2

what you do and don't want is immaterial. you have provided the number and pointed out the possibility that claims of threats might be fallacious. Other than that there's nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:21 PM
0

i'm not too happy that this bullshit article was removed. Leave it up so it can be exposed.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:13 PM
2

i read through your wall of text and though I'd take umbrage with the tone of the invective hurdled at you because of it, i'd agree with their sentiments. anyway, if you are objectively trying to point out that the possibility exists that the threats reportedly made against the conference and the facilities could be a ploy to gain further funds, fine. I'm glad you provided that number and verification is never unappreciated. However, the bad faith you are trying to instill leaves your motives su…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:06 PM
1

It's amazing how frightened purveyors of feminist ideology are at any attempts to delineate loci of power that oppress men. When the proponents of any belief system demand that its authority is ubiquitous and unquestioned, the belief system itself is in need of reform. If this fervor insisting on recognition of a temporal and transitory social construct manifested less in bombastic caricatures and more in a detailed approach to the inequalities that each gender faces respectively, the conference…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:14 PM
1

i usually don't sleep with a woman i've 'just met'. and i'd argue your original example doesn't constitute a double standard. It reflects, instead, an incredibly dangerous dynamic. In the case of the fear of rape vs the fear of false accusation, men fear not so much the act, but the lack of social support for healing and recovery AND THE TIGHTLY KNIT NETWORK OF APPARATUSES THAT VICTIMIZE THEM IN SPITE OF THEIR INNOCENCE. Women fear the act (no matter how unlikely that it will occur). However, no…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:05 AM
1

and a "neckbeard" is a derogatory term for what again?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:15 AM
2

And the reason for that is because the legal system will come down like a shit-train on a man who attacks a woman. A man falsely accused? Ex parte orders presume guilt first and insist on proof of innocence second.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:12 AM
2

being a male is far easier than being female!? Or would you like to swing on a star, carry moonbeams home in a jar, or BE BETTER OFF AS YOU ARE... or would you like to be a Donkey?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 08:21 AM
1

I am only inquiring about the PUA. I have very little interest in the Roger case.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:07 AM
1

I appreciate your being so frank and open with me. It sounds as if you are making headway and I don't want my experiences to influence the way you have determined to proceed ahead. After having several family court cases, I've come to think that all the procedures are so that the judges can try to get a good idea about how each of the parties behave under stress. I hope that your experiences are short and productive. Best of luck!
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:04 AM
1

The term "Pickup Artist", as I understand it (and I'm admittedly not an expert), charges toward a sexual encounter for its own sake without being bound by honesty. This is something that seems selfish and I'd rather hope it derives from human weakness that can be overcome rather than becomes a sought after personality trait. Is this incorrect?
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:54 AM
6

I am sorry for your predicament as I have been through somewhat similar circumstances. Can you explain what you mean by risky?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:13 PM
1

throw puas under the bus? can you please articulate the redeeming qualities of the PUA theme?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:08 PM
1

i often try to engage with feminists (because I believe that everyone is ultimately seeking an egalitarian community whether they know it or not) at various sites but am almost uniformly censored and very often banned.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:00 AM
-1

you do acknowledge that it is a theoretical construct, right? You do know, of course, that theoretical constructs are merely models, snapshots and momentary descriptions of a forever changing set of circumstances, ideas and objects and that they are completely and utterly imaginary? You do know that, right?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:42 AM
1

maybe it doesn't to you. but to me, it has absolutely nothing to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:38 AM
2

If you feel more comfortable spending time justifying your fears rather than openly experiencing life with love and trust, nothing I write will convince you to do otherwise. good luck.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:37 AM
3

guess what? the occurence isn't gender specific
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:54 AM
2

i hope you know no females
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:52 AM
20

i definitely agree. the only way universities will reform their horrendous procedures (or lack thereof) is if it costs them.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:47 PM
0

Individuals who have suffered multiple times at the hands of persons who share a similar characteristic are very likely to harbor resentment toward that particular group on a reflexive level -perfectly understandable- and sometimes need to blow off steam in utterly unintelligible and ignorant ways to release the pent-up rage that comes with it AND come to terms with the idiocy that it is. But these are private moments of primal therapy that must be cloistered from open exposure. Unfortunately, t…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:48 PM
2

nope, not at all. perhaps you could better allow gestalt by parsing a projection of anger when it reveals itself.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:11 PM
2

it's true: all men ARE potential rapists. all women ARE potential murders. all men ARE potential murders. all women ARE potential rapists. etc, etc. To allow one's life to be shaped by any one in particular of the infinite possibilities/potentialities that exist is a hallmark of mental instability.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:50 AM
6

i wouldn't put it past him to say yes
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:11 AM
1

I've seen this factoid so many times already that I would tend to agree that it isn't new information. I don't think that the social engineering of feminist theory can begin to adequately address the dynamics that cause mass murders. There are many less "media sensitive" issues that cause at least as much suffering and harm of which white men are not the predominant actors. These killings are not isolated cultural phenomena. These are the inescapable aberrations derived from layer upon layer of …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:44 AM
2

it's always tempting to ostracize anything that runs counter to one's world view. to those who feel threatened because the men's rights movement seeks to indict any of their foundational beliefs, try to see beyond what it "comes off as" and why it's "hated". those reactions are due to an inability to understand perspectives that have no investment in much of what usually gets termed 'feminist' preconceptions.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:34 AM
1

please insure that you mix the genders appropriately.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:18 PM
3

not so strange given that the overwhelming majority of people don't have an incredibly unrealistic set of expectations regarding self-deserved entitlement. Moreover, these symptoms were by no means the only (or even the most important) symptoms that manifested. I was only commenting on the single-minded approach with which many people mistakenly assume that a paradigmatic social construct of misogyny propelled his frustrations into a murderous rage.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:12 PM
3

doubtful, the major part of his problem seemed to stem from an incredibly unrealistic set of expectations regarding entitlement manifesting symptoms along a heterosexual dynamic that, at 22, gave him no way to keep them in check.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:16 PM
4

hopefully people will. unfortunately, i've come to believe that any tangential facts, no matter how remote, feed paranoid tendencies once they manifest.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:12 PM
7

Amazing how much focus you place on the 2 women victims while ignoring the 4 male victims. This guy wanted to kill every man on earth, remember? perhaps your comment stating "if society wasn't so misogynistic...." comes from your own personal distortions.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:08 PM
4

Solanas is required reading in college courses
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:10 PM
2

the economic cohesion of a personal relationship shouldn't depend on a payoff should the relationship fail. do what you want when you want and be responsible for your own choices.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 07:06 PM
1

judge who?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:54 AM
5

ya think?!
/r/MensRights20/05/14 05:13 AM
1

it came out at the very beginning and then it became completely hushed up. From what I heard, the DAs completely harrassed her to testifying against him and I got an inkling from a report somewhere that she had real feelings for him and refused. but when they kept at her and at her, she couldn't handle it anymore. It's a story that definitely needs investigating.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:50 AM
1

make love, not theivery
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:47 AM
-1

It's human nature that's to blame? Born into a life of crime? I don't think so. There is no system. There are only individuals using a variety of coercive forces to get what they want. You don't like it? Choose some other individuals to with whom to associate with and when the assholes come knocking on your door, decide whether you're going to be an asshole to or whether you're going to take one for the cause.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 03:27 PM
6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H19uKs99vIw
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 03:15 PM
1

so it's ok if a 45 y/o and a 17 y/o are in love, but you don't think it's possible for a 33 year old and a 16 year old to be in love?
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:07 PM
1

pretty heinous
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:03 PM
1

as much as I hate meth and opiate abuse, incarcerating people for that length of time for trying to sell something that people want to buy and/or choosing to put substances in their own body doesn't sit very well with me.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:58 PM
1

thanks man. the fact that the kid was a cooperating witness makes a huge difference (for me). i'm all for determining guilt/sentencing on casebycase depending on the level of maturity of the younger party. Judging by the articles, it seems like this kid wasn't too happy afterall about having a sexual relationship with this particular adult. and that's all it takes for me, negatively impact a a borderline age of consent minor/youth/youngadult and one should expect incarceration. How do you see th…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:51 PM
1

woulda coulda shoulda. anyone's capable of anything that's humanly possible. whatever. like I said, all i'm hoping for is that Canada gives refugee status to the next guy over 21 that has a consensual relationship with a 16 y/o and gets sentenced to 30 years for it.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:15 AM
1

what are you? another one of those internet skanks that wants to lick my balls and takes paypal? You wanna come around here, get it straight. nobody needs to apologize for shit.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 04:44 AM
-1

yeah and fuck your mother, you elephant-skinned-cunt-lipped-whore - that is if you can stop steaming for the shag she's munchin on.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:46 PM
-7

you don't respect women? no shit, what'd you just wake up from being a moron? fuck respect you dumbshit motherfucking twat. eat shit and die. ok? feel better now?
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:39 PM
1

just saying it's not uniform and for a 30 year sentence, the crime has got to be pretty heinous. that's why i can understand that Canada gave her refugee status AND I'm hopeful (but doubtful) that the authorities would do the same thing were the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:29 PM
1

In the United States, the federal age of consent is 16. States have ages between 16 and 18.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:23 PM
1

easy, cowboy. if it's not a felony in Canada, her persecution in the US is reason enough to give her refugee status.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:08 AM
1

so if this case were to have taken place in Canada with the genders reversed, everyone would have gone home certain in the knowledge that they were richer for the experience?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:06 AM
3

Canada: if you're gonna stand up for 16 y/o boys' sexual self-determination, you need to do it for girls as well.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:19 PM
1

the felony isn't a crime in Canada.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:17 PM
2

I don't know if GWW is the "intellectual power-house". I think that she is incredibly intelligent, but IMO her popularity stems from an ability to skip digression and provide accessibility to those find including it ..... inefficient. The format in which her vids appear usually (if not always) contain an area to rebut any of her assertions virtually devoid of censorship (her's, at least). So it's hardly, "because I say so". It's more like: "Here's the naked truth. Poke holes at it, if you can. "…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:11 PM
3

Your points are interesting, I haven't seen this particular video since it was first posted so I'm going to take your quotes at face value. In any case, I'm wondering if you and Karen are discussing different concepts. For example, you're talking about villages and it seems that Karen's talking about clans. But in either case, do you find error in the assertion that reproductive possibilities were more greatly decreased due to death of child-bearing females than males? Also, prehistoric survival…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:40 PM
1

It's definitely true that name-calling of a certain variety can elicit a knee-jerk feeling in third-parties. It IS a pain in the ass -especially when you're trying to do your job and feel constrained from responding suitably. But I am wondering if the political dynamic behind this kind of remark (one that specifically arouses in an audience a targeted hostility) can be rendered meaningless? Ignoring the situation is a fine line to tread. Certainly the crowds we move though are concerning should …
/r/MensRights17/05/14 02:50 PM
-2

free speech dude. Honestly if you immediately tell someone to fuck off (or words of a more "professional" nature) when they say something to you that you don't like, i can assure you it'll feel much better than having everyone on the internet (and all your "support network" friends") rally around you for support. You can't change people, but you can direct your expressions toward the source that inspires your feelings that cause them. Ya HEar That, people who complain about wolf-whistles, lewd r…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:39 PM
-1

go be pissed off then. and while you're at it, try handling the truth.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:32 AM
1

don't follow links and comment? what kind of stupidity is that?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:31 AM
2

i thought she was going to start crying because she was so offended at having to contend with her ideas being questioned.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:18 AM
2

true that. assholes will always be movitaved to act on the wildly inflammatory insensitivities that arise from free speech
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:39 PM
4

I disagree, the MRM opposes the belief that feminism "is for everyone". The MRM opposes the notion that feminism is concerned with more than simply that which is feminine. The MRM is opposed to the notion that feminism attempts to address any more than the gender specific issues that women face. But even this isn't the reason for subreddits like this one. Subreddits that concern themselves with Men's Rights simply attempt to address gender specific issues that MEN face. It would be greatly appre…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:45 PM
1

"reverse sexism" politicizes (corrupts) morality. I think the reason she is a feminist (in this instance) is because she doesn't want to be held to a standard of rational thought
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:33 PM
1

the whole thing just reeks of bathroom gossip. Utterly meaningless, utterly slanderous, but ultimately utterly inconsequential.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:21 PM
1

Nowhere do I write that the MRM "is just a reactionary movement to feminism" And nope, whether pre-feminism, post-feminism, or devoid of feminism, there have been very few instances (and virtually all of them being very small communities) of egalitarian societies. Feminism concerns itself with that which is feminine -that is gender specific issues women face. The MRM concerns itself with that which is masculine -that is gender specific issues men face. Though some fault "the other" for their sit…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:19 PM
1

it'd be more apropos were a list of women who've had abortions appeared. or women who have sex for money appeared. Doesn't have to be true, mind you.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 11:38 AM
2

occasionally I get through to "true-believer feminists", but more often than not they're way too heavily invested in the victim-mentality to be coaxed out by mere rational sanity. I actually have no problem with feminism- so long as it's understood by all those involved as to be concerned with things feminine. It's when you get the rabid fanatics that insist that it's the be-all and end-all and the world would be a better place if we all just cut off our heads and poured in sarkeesian/greer brai…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:56 PM
7

advocating violence is stupid, inefficient, self-destructive, and just plain illogical. Blowing off steam by throwing darts at a picture of someone, punching a heavy bad and pretending it's an object of rage, etc, etc. can be cathartic IF it doesn't stimulate a further need to carry out real violence.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:43 PM
3

please name one case of a conviction of rape based only upon the word of the accuser.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:39 PM
4

I also was very suspicious of the story. Red flag went up when he didn't say how he was found guilty. That's not to say that this is impossible by any means. Just that Lucy's got some splaining to do.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:37 PM
1

i know, right. you can tell by their heavy breathing when you come even remotely close to them. and then who can blame them, look at their peers. i only wish the spambox wasn't always overflowing with scumsluts just begging to turn themselves inside out for a piece of credit card.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:43 AM
2

dickish? and i thought it was pussy-ish. perhaps it was genitalia of a hermaphrodite-ish?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:36 AM
1

unlikely that this comment will make it past moderation: Young men feel compelled to sing about rape in public at one of the best universities in the country when faced with an onslaught of institutionalized feminist indoctrination that is more nonsense than academic. Of course they are going to aim for the most sensitive touchstone they can find to make their rejection of feminism as obvious as possible. These boys don’t advocate rape, but they don’t see it as the sacred cow that cripples socie…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:34 PM
-1

rate of occurrence! relevance?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:15 PM
1

when she starting cursing at him (pretty early in the thread) is when he should have ended the conversation forever
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:13 PM
1

There are no 'anarchists', which by its philosophical premise can simultaneously adopt and negate every political stance by its concept of freedom of action. So yes, anarchism itself IS inherently Feminist - but no more so than it is inherently MRA. However, I critique those who would advocate a fettering of the freedom of speech in the name of morality/anarchism/etc for failing to allow others to access the philosophical rubric that they espouse. That is: the process by which they arrived at th…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:05 PM
7

no. unequivocally, no it is not. Please see the concept of free speech for more info.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 02:40 PM
1

i agree. i just hope he gets his kids back
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:45 PM
8

so disgusting. the guy definitely had a right to restrain her until the cops arrived.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:54 PM
1

I don't think so. I mean it's more like the inextricable moment of passion before copulation. There's very little of decision making at that point. it's an interesting perspective to think that life begins with mental activity. i don't think I'd make this a habit, but were i married and considering a family, it might provide an added degree of pleasure. of course i don't think it is unavoidably true universally, but it may be why traditional Catholicism prohibits contraception (do they still?).
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:05 PM
1

whether they do or not, it is not unreasonable to expect policemen to uphold the law
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:30 PM
1

According to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act: No other court from another state can modify a custody determination of the issuing court except in the following cases: The jurisdictional requirements of an emergency order are met, or The court meets the requirements to make an initial custody determination (one of the four requirements in paragraph #4 have been met), and one of two determinations have been made: (1.) The original issuing court no longer has exclusive co…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 07:20 AM
3

this "article" is unmitigated claptrap, the MRM is the predictable outcome of a non-egalitarian society. The binary insistence that men oppress and women are oppressed unilaterally and ubiquitously is nonsense and the MRM attempts to address specific areas of gender inequality that have yet to be addressed and are even exacerbated by the current political climate.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:37 PM
2

fuCK THE POLICE, IF YOU KNOW WHERE THEY ARE, GO GET THE KIDS. MAKE AN EXTREME HUFF WITHOUT RESORTING TO VIOLENCE -MAYBE BRING A FRIEND. YOU HAVE SOLE CUSTODY. EXERCISE IT.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:10 PM
1

is anyone calling for shadowbaning in Men'sRights? why are you here?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:34 PM
2

no one's asking you to. but the effect of socially engineered "empowerment" creates entitlements to perpetrate physical violence that would never exist otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:31 PM
1

cool of him to serve her? i don't think so. let her find her own goddamn glasses
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:33 AM
7

all student accounts state that the victim was trying to break up a fight between two girls -one of which was his girlfriend
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:30 AM
2

i'm crying for this kid, he could as easily have been my son.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:29 AM
3

an incredible (but predictable) miscarriage of justice. women get shorter (and sometimes non-existent) sentences for virtually every crime for which men are imprisoned and demonized.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:35 AM
0

sometimes the turds float at the top of the bowl
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:36 AM
0

yelling and screaming do not equate to threats. the content is much more important. it also is almost irrelevant how close the two of them where while yelling and screaming. they could have been touching noses as do people who sometimes refuse to give an inch. but i think that none of that is in itself threatening bodily harm. She definitively carried out bodily harm with no reported justification. Yes, it seems like a big mistake was made.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:07 AM
2

this is where i'm coming from: she told the police stuff that would make her sound like the victim. whatever he said, he's got the injury to prove that she punched him in the face. they both say that she did this. the cop comes and based on this takes him away. Unless he said I was trying to scream in her ear to pop her ear drum, i can't see how what he was doing could even remotely cause her injury. She on the other hand, demonstrably caused him injury. What do i think of the reporting, it's po…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:02 AM
1

i just saw a woman much smaller physically threaten a guy on a college campus (i deliver chicken wings at night) last night. She was acting drunk and he was cowering in fear probably because he knew if there was any contact and she made a to-do he'd be carted off.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:58 AM
0

and other than in self-defense, what conditions could those possibly be?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:43 AM
-1

Florida, zip code 34608 and by the way, it appears that this guy is also on the sex offenders registry there so (if this is true) perhaps an arrest won't be such a smirch on an unblemished record as it otherwise could have been.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:41 AM
0

oh, i see your point. (like, duh)
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:38 AM
2

please make sure that you include the fact that what was reported were simply her accusations about his actions (which nevertheless still didn't amount to physical violence) as opposed to the very real evidence of her actions (a bleeding contusion). it's a no-brainer unless there's something very important that they're leaving out (which they almost never do because of their need to sensationalize danger).
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:37 AM
2

"women and children are usually the victims" well, there's YOUR bias. all i have to go on is my personal experience and what was reported. in my case, my ex-wife played on the prevailing bias which you so eloquently illustrated and manipulated the system almost without lifting a finger. and i'm sure the way she did it is not entirely unknown to other women who find themselves inconvenienced by a disagreement with someone who's male and larger. but about this case, it's hard to argue that it's an…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:32 AM
1

exactly
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:13 AM
0

hahaha. save your hostility for the video games.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:11 AM
7

its needs to be thrown in the dumpster for the idiocy that it is
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:07 AM
0

yeah, just keep quiet with your hands folded and sit still. the problem with that is that cops took an oath to uphold the constitution and no one is supposed to be treated any differently in the eyes of the law regardless of their physical attributes
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:05 AM
0

you make too many unfounded and unreported assumptions to be credible. The worst of what he did is based only on her accusations. Meanwhile, the evidence is clear that she definitely attacked him while apparently he didn't lay a hand on her. Best evidence says you expect more of the same. The cops should have arrested her for physically attacking him. Yelling isn't necessarily a crime. Unless it's self-defense (and her admission was that he wasn't and didn't physically attack her), a physical at…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:01 AM
3

and btw, an arm is usually more than 1 1/2 feet long.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:55 AM
5

or unless she was standing over him while he was sitting , duh
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:54 AM
0

happened a couple days ago, geez
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:51 AM
1

I claim an exception because we're not discussing nazis/hitler's use of violence, but rather the irrelevance of their leader's physical stature when it came to committing it. Every law has at least one exception
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:51 AM
1

Nowhere in the article does it say that he threatened her. "He probably had other evidence...." (that he was the aggressor - your bias). BULLSHIT. He got arrested because the police thought he could damage her if he hit her- not because he did. And they didn't arrest her, because they thought that she couldn't damage him if she hit him - even though she obviously did. The bias looks to be on the part of police and police training
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:47 AM
-1

hitler,hitler,hitler,hitler,hitler,hitler. Fuck y'all. (i'm a Jew by the way so i claim special victim status to say "hitler" so long as i don't say "nigger" WHOOOPS, I meant Kike! I meant Kike!)
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:38 AM
3

I'm 5'11 and got the shit kicked out of me by my 5'2 wife (now ex) because all I would do against her was try to block her blows. Guess what she did? Showed the cops the bruises on her arms where I blocked her punches and said "look what he did to me". Guess who the judge believed in the divorce?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:35 AM
2

it's a fucking lopsided fight if she's the only one doing the physical violence -which in this case is what exactly was reported. She belongs in jail and he belongs at home.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:32 AM
2

This is so fundamentally unjust. It just screams sexist bigotry. Where are the lawyers yelling about the constitutional right to equal protection in all of this?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:30 AM
4

no you stupid asshole. in a domestic violence situation, the only use of violence that is ever morally justified is self-defense. And don't worry, you'll be going to jail anyway if you so much as defend yourself if you're male. But at least you'll be alive.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:26 AM
7

how the fuck do you make an assumption like that? if someone hit me in the face, you can be damn sure I'm going to yell my lungs out for them to stop.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:24 AM
0

i was thinking that he probably started yelling AFTER she started punching him
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:21 AM
2

obviously can't defend themselves? i guess nobody over 6' should have ever yelled at Hitler, right? He was only 5'8
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:19 AM
2

"under the right conditions" is probably too inclusive. i.e. the universe sprang from nothingness. but i think that under what is to be understood as to be left to its 'normal' or natural condition, that which can grow into birthed baby is viable enough for me to consider human life. I think the personal distinction between that time and the advent of consciousness is at the crux of the matter.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:24 AM
0

have you done it?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:18 AM
1

the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:16 AM
-5

this is such bullshit. don't comment in other subreddits? what is this crap, a feminist echo chamber?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:40 AM
1

garbage. but i feel like I need to familiarize myself with it so i can properly respond to the fembots
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:18 AM
2

"the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls/studio wall" Depending if you listen to Simon and Garfunkle or Rush
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:56 PM
2

yes, a misnomer. but in this context, it is commonly understood to be not just life, but human life.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:48 PM
1

and now our top story of the day: President Francisco Franco is STILL dead.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:46 PM
1

each seems equally valid. i can see why considering the beginning of life to be the moment of fertilization would seem logical. I can also see why considering the beginning of life to be the moment of the first detectable consciousness would also seem logical. Personally, I think that with accessible and available contraception so abundant virtually everywhere in 'developed' countries, it is utterly irresponsible, cold and callous to make an assumption regarding the origin of life to rationalize…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:21 PM
1

sir, i didn't think you were. i was under the assumption that we were theorizing an appropriate response in the case of Brunei's beginning to murder individuals for their sexual orientation. I really don't care where or why something like that would occur. If there is something that I can do to stop it without endangering my life, I will.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:30 PM
1

who cares
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:58 PM
1

and another
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:57 PM
0

so's shooting people in the head with M-16s
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:56 PM
3

It has nothing to do with legislating for others. This kind of human conduct (even if it is somewhat collective) is not excusable no matter where it occurs
/r/MensRights06/05/14 08:52 PM
1

metaphysically speaking, it's possible to even view that which sparks the desire to copulate as the origin of life. And I think this is the viewpoint of those who would prohibit contraception.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:23 PM
1

and then of course, there is the matter of consciousness itself. considering that its development is a gradient makes the determination of its significance during the very early stages of gestation most logically discernible to its host.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:09 PM
1

science gets closer. regarding the origin of life, i don't think it'll ever get "there"
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:01 PM
1

because I think that no matter how advanced our scientific methods become, there may be some form of consciousness that is not detectable by them. but that's just a personal idea. i have no evidence to support it. so while i reserve the right to act in accordance with this belief, I support the rights of others to form their own beliefs and so act in accordance with them.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:57 PM
1

maybe brain activity
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:14 AM
7

I am someone who is avowedly anti-abortion yet supports an individual's right to determine the behavior of his/her own body. And since it is impossible to factually and scientifically determine exactly when life (brain activity?) begins, I believe every individual must do so for themselves and live with the consequences.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:58 PM
12

i'm jewish and believe that circumcision is not only cruel, but the source of a completely avoidable trauma that haunts boys for much of their childhood.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:52 PM
2

i sympathize with your feelings. physically protecting children is something very instinctive for a parent.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 06:48 PM
-3

if a state decides by popular vote to outlaw abortion, why shouldn't the will of its inhabitants be respected?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:27 AM
1

I don't mind if someone spraypaints my commercial truck. my personal car, now that's another story
/r/MensRights04/05/14 08:21 AM
0

when you start caring about what you look like, you stop caring about what you're doing
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:46 PM
6

bullshit, i am man enough to reserve the right to behave like a woman anytime I want (if such a thing were possible).
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:44 PM
0

example?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:42 PM
2

excuse me, there are plenty (myself among them) who believe that graffiti is to be held in as much esteem as any other art-form.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:13 PM
1

but on the other hand, I'm always grateful for something to read when I forget to bring a book. I just wish I could always remember a pen.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:07 PM
0

how about scrawling on the ballroom wall, "tired of listening to feminist bullshit? get your ass over to r/Men'sRights" Fuck being nice and fuck worrying about whether shit looks trashy.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:05 PM
2

because?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:00 PM
1

it's a knee-jerk psychological reaction that people have whenever anything threatens to dismantle the defense mechanism that they've built to protect their neurosis. And that and $2.50 will get you on any subway in NYC
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:16 PM
20

and of course, the backhanded slap: "An aid agency might focus on female victims to increase donations. But these donations would presumably be spent disproportionately on men, who are more likely to be famine's victims"
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:48 PM
8

I certainly don't need feminism to stand in the way of having the assumption of shared parenting to be legally enshrined, it certainly doesn't help men seeking protection from sexual abuse and/or domestic violence, it certainly doesn't help men who suffer over 90% of workplace deaths, kill themselves 3x more often than women do, HAVE TO REGISTER FOR SELECTIVE SERVICE, seek to protect their reproductive rights, etc, etc. Feminism cares for women's needs. It views men as the oppressor and women as…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:40 PM
0

"Creepy"? fuck that. if it's hanging out in full view, i'm commenting on it. And guess what, the recipient is welcome to comment back that it's "creepy" or whatever....
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:08 PM
9

It's not "rape-culture" that the poster is really trying to address. It is trying to shame male sexuality for being aroused by a provocative stimulation. When feminists begin to realize that male sexuality is just as much cause to be celebrated as female sexuality, its normal expressions will stop being fodder for their cries of "rape culture". I remember seeing an errant bra strap during a lecture a few seats ahead of me. So today is black, I said smiling at her. Only a priggish stick in the mu…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:00 AM
9

"Let’s hope that long before your child is born, your husband will have returned from what turns out to be a temporary derangement."
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:41 AM
1

this prudence bitch is fucked in the head. i believe that a husband can legally demand that a pregnant wife take a paternity test to insure the child is his. Corrections?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:23 AM
4

"The task force's recommendations help remove due process from the accused by branding students as rapists based on limited evidence and allowing accusers to appeal a not-guilty finding by campus disciplinary panels. -Today's Washington Examiner
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:26 AM
2

They just deleted mine too, but then I re-posted it in three short sections and it went up (so far)
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:22 AM
1

what was the comment? Did you save it? I'd be willing to repost it for you if it was as you say,.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:29 AM
2

women group identify. if it's good for women, they'll vote for it. Men group assassinate. If it's bad for men, tough shit.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:09 PM
1

what's so problematic about it?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:55 PM
1

if you said "pony up", you could say you weren't perpetrating speciesism
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:52 PM
1

There is no finally. So long as attention is being given to insuring everyone's equal opportunity to exercise their individual potential, I'm ok with vicissitudes.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:40 PM
2

Exploring the definitions of popular ignorance (cliched phrases) to allow a more incisive response when encountering them is great, but they can well do without the repressive prohibitive bent on the campaign if it's to have even a shred of credibility
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:30 PM
2

so i read this and i think that it's ok to question the story to find out more details but i also think that anyone who claims to be victimized by non-consensual sex deserves compassion unless the story is proven to be a fictitious construction. There's a huge difference between unequivocal acceptance of people who say that they've been raped and the automatic and unquestioning persecution of those they blame.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:03 PM
3

Now, now, now... just because he set out to find out something and ... low and behold... HE FOUND IT (!) is no reason to impugn the findings. "Survey of /r/mensrights turns up pretty much exactly what you’d expect. White, male, 17-20 years-old, and disconnected from reality." God, what an ignoramus.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:55 PM
1

all i know is what i read in the article and convicting someone on years old testimony without corroborating evidence is pretty Salem-esque
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:13 PM
1

burn the witch!
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:06 PM
10

undoubtedly you were thinking of something inappropriate and needed to be monitored.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:04 PM
21

and ... gosh.... they were left adrift in the cold cruel world with no one to protect them or provide for them.... sob
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:02 PM
6

both my kids who were cut at birth kept having nightmares about someone cutting their penis- finally i realized that they were reliving the trauma -and realized that plenty of the anxiety i felt when I was young probably came from that ordeal as well. The operation is utterly horrific. What's wrong with it? Don't you mean, what's right with it?
/r/MensRights05/04/14 02:40 PM
2

it's great to know that there is a woman out there that understands that your husband's giant jokes are nothing more than a way for him to show his affection for you. it probably seems strange, but you describe him as caring so i'm thinking that he is doing this to give you attention. Men oftentimes punch each other in the arm and rough-house to show camaraderie and a unity of spirit. so long as you feel loved by him, that's all that matters. don't let the idiots get you down.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:55 PM
1

great display of MRA posters though. but comments that disagree with the article are scrubbed.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:50 PM
5

hysteria sells newspapers
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:11 PM
1

and here i'm far from impugning your chops, but why has honeybadger (all female) replaced a voice for men (somewhat mixed gender)?
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:53 PM
2

just left a few of cunt jokes in the comment section ie. a vagina so big that she doesn't need a parachute to skydive naked, etc etc,
/r/MensRights31/03/14 01:11 PM
1

yup, i think you have to be invulnerable to social ostracism to be angry about it because even that is admitting that you were no longer dominant and sexually in control. The humor seems like a passive aggressive "haha, you thought you were using me, but that was only because I wanted you to! hahaha, got you!" which doesn't go very far as a self-deception like the video guy's teeth gritting smile demonstrated. I can see why guys would look for a safe place to get angry at other guys for making f…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 01:16 AM
1

yeah, that seems pretty reasonable. there were some interesting and subtle points that I think he was trying to focus on and i'm wanting to vigorously get into discourse regarding these issues without worrying about a little salty spray of spittle. Course, at the same time, I don't want to disregard or belittle anything personal if its involved either. Hopefully, he reads this and appreciates where this thread is at and re-engages soon.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:23 PM
2

definitely sending to all
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:55 PM
2

i think, by its nature, the men's rights movement is not so much interested in 'thought crimes'
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:46 AM
3

this article is horseshit from the get-go. Stating that the Men’s Rights movement immediately associates gendered analyses of society with the hatred of men, hence promoting disregard for and ignorance of the suppression of women, is absolutely wrong-headed logic One thing has absolutely nothing to do with the other. Can’t feminist theory stand alone without inventing attacks from other theories that approach gender issues differently? I got as far as the ridiculous assertions made about abortio…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:16 AM
3

it was all good until the end text edit-in from the youtube poster said something about loving 'white' women.... totally ruined a compelling video with racist crap
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:04 AM
3

falsely accused me of rape (well, not in divorce, but in a custody battle)
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:06 AM
2

thanks
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:45 AM
1

-just sent an email to the university notifying them that as a parent of two college-bound children with many friends, I hardly think that this policy will encourage applications.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:44 AM
3

if there was an address posted, i'd definitely trick or treat there on halloween
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:08 AM
3

what university?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:37 PM
12

i was lucky. when i was falsely accused of rape during a custody conflict in family court, the women who did it was so ridiculously obvious that she was making it up, the judge just smiled at her and said sure you were, nodding. however, if she had given her accusation some thought in advance and framed it without an agenda, I might not have been so lucky.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:18 PM
1

ok, i'm going to get a little weird. i'm confused why withoutamartyr kept resorting to ad hominems. i mean i could see he wanted to focus on how expected norms of masculinity create attitudes that insist on a paradigmatic hierarchy of male dominance even in instances when men and boys are utterly subjugated by the dictates of socialized power dynamics. So you attempted to clarify the necessity to explode these mechanics as you stated you intended to do from the outset -ostensibly so that their s…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:31 PM
2

so i read through this thread and it seems to me that withoutamartyr wants to point out that men's need to perpetrate 'rape culture' by negating the damage done to men and boys by female rapists is in order to maintain a version of patriarchal masculinity from which they themselves benefit. What withoutamartyr fails to understand (and typhon reiterated this numerous times) is that without legitimate channels for redress and support, the only defense mechanisms left for men is to view the experie…
/r/MensRights29/03/14 01:17 PM
8

female prerogative to have a soon to be ex-husband murdered by the police - just an extension of an ex parte restraining order
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:46 PM
6

i, for one, wanted to hear the professor talk. any chance she'll speak from a remote location on campus and take questions via the internet?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:37 PM
4

i thought the college was supposed to provide security to at least catch known perpetrators of this kind of stuff
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:34 PM
4

POS DV corruption!
/r/MensRights28/03/14 03:24 PM
1

we're talking about a socialized context where people are surrounded by others paid to jump in if one victimizes the other. In this context, claiming offense is, to me, by no means playing the victim. Other than a threat for which only a proactive strike can be used to prevent being carried out, there are no verbal cocktails that create a necessity for a physical attack. so aside from the above, there is virtually nothing he could have said to make this anything but a violent aggression wholly h…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 03:00 PM
2

i got a couple of assholes once, but then i also called the cops once and a decent guy came over. there's a lot of them, they're not all asskissing white knights
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:23 AM
1

certainly not. excusing abuse is just an invitation for more.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:21 AM
4

worse case scenario: your wife comes back (maybe just to get some of things) and you're there. All she's got to do is accuse you of something and the court's will give her a TRO and then it's good luck charlie trying to keep your life, your career in the service and your resources together. You need to prevent her from sucker punching you- that is what the legal system has been set up to allow women to do to men with the bat of an eyelash. It happened to me, don't let it happen to you. I CAN'T E…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:24 PM
1

don't be scared and tell the truth. taxes pay for cops to document statements and take evidence. if there's a complaint they are bound to investigate it.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:13 PM
3

you are such an idiot that it's a waste of time to explain it to you
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:10 PM
3

dude, you don't get a restraining order and she comes around again and ANYTHING happens it'll be your fault, she'll get a restraining order against you and you'll be out on your ass
/r/MensRights27/03/14 09:06 PM
5

true that
/r/MensRights27/03/14 06:30 PM
11

Like I said below, call the cops and tell them you were physically attacked by her. I know it might seem weird, but your combat experience and size have absolutely nothing to do with the truth. Get a restraining order so she's culpable if she comes anywhere near you. Do not resume the relationship until she completes anger management counselling. Might sound overly burdensome, but this is the way a civilized society deals with real domestic violence.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:35 PM
6

awww, but the poor little girl is in such a fragile emotional state that having her feelings hurt might cause her to lash out. yo! masterrod dumb-ass! we don't encourage women to abuse men here.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:32 PM
53

call the cops and get a restraining order against her to insure that she comes no closer. insist that she get anger management counseling before you'll resume the relationship
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:29 PM
9

chill out dude, it's a given that the preface to that is "if everything you state is true then...."
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:27 PM
5

yeah, anything is possible. All rocks are potential rapists too, what a dumbass
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:25 PM
2

supported, sent to all. please update as appropriate.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:15 PM
5

piece of shit restaurant
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:07 PM
1

hey... business is business. it's nothing personal. the bloodied girl reeks from the stink of sweat and passion. nothing rational about it all
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:56 AM
10

Teaching boys that disrespecting women causes them to fall victim to drugs, crime, and poor academic performance rather than addressing the real causes of the manner in which boys oftentimes act out of pain and frustration is just plain ludicrous.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:00 PM
1

that's as amazing as this women's studies escort i knew from "FOOD NOT BOMBS". You're not alone. Keep pounding those drums!
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:22 PM
1

just another responsibility that women enjoy exemption from. And please spare me the women are more reproductively valuable than men. Women can make the same commitment to duty without being at the front lines. There's plenty they can do to support any war effort (as reprehensible as that is) and the first that should be expected of them is the same obligation to register as is required for men.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:18 PM
1

Well, I think it's a horrific mistake to consider gender self-determined. To me, being a man (or a woman) is determined by chromosomal composition. It can not be altered by behavior. Of course, work is being presently done on gene splicing and other forms of genetic engineering that might make available real gender re-assignment. On the flip side, I think that by no means are we enslaved by the impact our hormones have on our personalities. So long as the raw desire or intellectual determination…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 01:29 PM
2

i don't know.... can't I believe that gender norms ARE social constructs and still be MRA? I think it would be great if there were more women doing dirty dangerous work and more men having the option to do something safer and cleaner.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:30 PM
7

“The truth is that schools don’t really teach anything except how to obey orders. This is a great mystery to me because thousands of humane, caring people work in schools as teachers and aides and administrators, but the abstract logic of the institution overwhelms their individual contributions." John Taylor Gatto, New York City Teacher of the Year
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:24 PM
1

thanks
/r/MensRights16/03/14 09:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter