TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

slimydogs Archive

View 2 posts and 173 comments by slimydogs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And you also said it was 'irrational' or 'misandrist' to focus on one gender when working towards gender equality. Both groups can focus on one gender and still be working towards gender equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:39 PM
1

A better strategy is to convince women to support men. ...so, get women to do all the work for campaigning for both genders while men just...do...what? Reap all the benefits while giving none of their time, money or effort? Ludicrous. Much of that support was by women convincing men their cause was just Exactly. Women used their finite resources (time, money, effort) to convince each other and men that their causes were worth supporting. Men can do the same. It just also requires time, money and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 08:38 PM
1

you do realise feminism is made up of individuals, correct? Each person has a finite amount of time, money and effort. It's not wrong or bad for people to focus on one thing. Nobody has time to advocate for the issues of every class of person on the planet. That's like saying BLM is racist because it doesn't also have a branch for Asian people. You can work towards equality by focusing your resources on campaigning for one group. There is nothing to stop anyone being a feminist who works on male…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/20 10:31 AM
1

Google is about to get sued right now for discriminatory hiring practices against White and Asian men.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:52 AM
1

Ohh right I get it. I thought it was based off the weird Ca Ni Lo comment. I wasn't aware of qq. Thank you for responding to me so thoroughly! He does seem a bit...nuts...
/r/MensRights07/01/18 04:43 PM
1

Perhaps I'm just retarded but I'm not seeing the doxing. He's just threatening to cut out your organs ('just'...lmao).
/r/MensRights07/01/18 03:01 PM
1

I'm surprised the average starting age for men has fallen tbh to just 24, and that MILF has become the second most popular term following Teen. I know the average age for a MILF is 33, but that's literally when women are nose-pressing the wall. I expected MILF to be up there for variety, but 2nd? Above Cheerleader? And Wife is on there? Strange. The prevalence of Asian girls in porn with tattoos over Caucasion women is also very different to what I expected.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 02:29 PM
1

It's also against YouTube's T&C/policy/whatever the fuck it's called so at the very least Logan Paul did do something wrong in violating Youtube's terms with his upload.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/18 03:22 PM
15

All women have the capacity to cheat on you and be sluts. Most women have fucked and sucked a few dicks already - if she hasn't there's usually something weird going on in that head anyway. Women's inherent nature is to be hypergamous - this is true for EVERY woman. She will be that loyal, top tier wife until you lose frame and fuck up. Then she will jump branches or abuse her new position in power. She may not even mean to do it. But that's simply how women are.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/17 03:17 PM
1

Of course they have a problem with it - they secretly hate being women, but they hate men too...no wonder they're getting to confused over their genders and sexuality.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 03:15 PM
1

Ah, I see you did not bother to read my full comment where I mentioned WW2 is obviously an anomaly, and as we know from basic statistics classes anomalies tend to be ironed out.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 03:13 PM
1

Hah. Very true.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 02:23 PM
39

For oneitis you need to force yourself to keep AWALT at the forefront of your mind - it's hard to be specific because we don't know what it is about this oneitis that's making you become dependent and losing frame. Is it because she's presenting a challenge?
/r/TheRedPill30/12/17 07:15 AM
2

Because bla bla bla power structures bla bla misandry don't real whinge whine cry etc. I imagine it's because leftists can infiltrated academia and they tout misandry can't exist because we live in a patriarchy. Women can only be prejudice, not sexist, because they are an 'oppressed' class. Barf.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:08 AM
2

Being atheist I disagree with the premise of traditionalism being as a result of 'God's plan' and 'design' (it's simply our biology) but I do agree feminism is trying to force women to be like men, causing their own self-destruction.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:06 AM
1

This is the most comprehensive list I could find for battle deaths separated from civilians and the like which is for 1980-2010 for the US which has a low maternal mortality rate and engages in international warfare frequently. Pg 10 on the PDF/pg 6 by the report's own numbering has the total death toll of US battle deaths YOY. This is the maternal mortality rate per 10,000 births which goes from 1980, so for YOY in the same period. I couldn't find the amount of births in the US YOY, however giv…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:01 AM
1

I see giving birth as a contribution to the system in a way that women are naturally skilled at (after all, men can't do it). As I said, more women die in childbirth than men do in wars. Women have participated in war efforts, they just didn't put their lives on the line. Not nearly as honourable, but they would take away value being on the front lines, not add any. Taking up labour in their home countries, at most serving as front-line medics, is where they added value. Of course this more appl…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:10 PM
1

I'm from the UK where there isn't a draft or conscription, so I honestly wasn't aware of that. I don't think that's fair because you can't control your disabilities but at least it's consistent.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 10:18 PM
5

^^ Seconding this. If you're going to wear athletic gear don't dress in all grey loose trackies and some hoodie you haven't washed for 3 (or more) workouts. It's extremely trashy - unless you're looking to exclude every girl who isn't trash.
/r/seduction29/12/17 09:41 PM
1

If men have become that weak and are truly incapable...maybe we don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 08:32 PM
1

Women in the past did sacrifice. They took up the labour jobs men left to fight wars and allowed themselves to be dependent on their husbands to take care of the home. Yes, this doesn't involve the same levels of danger, but when you look at deaths from childbirth, more women die from childbirth than men die in wars. Of course this doesn't apply to the whores of today. We can and should draft them into supportive roles like nursing near the front line if we are going to draft them, but I do see …
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:44 PM
1

Prohibition ended, we can end feminazis too. There are women sympathetic to MRAs and fundamentally, it's still mostly men in power.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:40 PM
1

Why not remove men from the draft and work towards better standards for dangerous jobs? Women are physically weaker than men - they just aren't good for those kinds of jobs. However the person who will be changing your bedpan and bathing you when you're old or cleaning up after your kid's shit in nursery is probably going to be a woman. Because women are more nurturing. Instead of putting women in jobs where they'll fuck up and die to make things 'equal' and have men die at the same rate (just p…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 03:02 PM
6

There was once a time when people weren't so disgustingly pandering to women. In fact, it was the opposite. Disagreeable/difficult women were deemed 'hysterical' and thrown into asylums and/or given lobotomies or electric shock therapy. Obviously this wasn't ideal either. But if you want people to empathise with your cause then I fully agree with mwobuddy and thatninjagal - you can't be lazy and complain other people (ie feminists) aren't doing it for you. Because (1) feminists only care about t…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 02:44 PM
1

I don't really agree. Throughout history it's been 20% of guys who reproduce with 80% of women. Since there wasn't birth control and pregnancies occured less outside of marriage due to the cultural shame, that would logically mean women weren't really sleeping around with lower tier men. Now they do what the Chads, but they'll realistically get drunk and go home with some dude who can seduce her the right way. Yeah, it's probably not going to be her choice of a reproductive partner, but with so …
/r/MensRights29/12/17 06:59 AM
11

I can see what you're getting at here, but if you properly remember AWALT, then it shouldn't be 'torture'. It should just be a small unpleasantry.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 09:00 PM
1

To back up your point with numbers, if you're buying a single $2 coffee every day (which is pretty cheap for a cafe-brought coffee), that's $60. If you only buy it on work days, that's still $40. You could make the coffee at home, bring it in/bring in materials to make coffee at work and spend that on the gym.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 08:56 PM
1

Using a whore is also a good way to do it if you are fed up of women entirely. Sex bots will be great for those lacking in social skills, etc. Hell, I reckon I'd use one just for the novelty if they weren't so expensive.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:26 PM
1

I reckon it's one of those 'no publicity is bad publicity' type stunts.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:40 PM
1

I don't think so - someone else tried to pull a similar stunt with doing a women's only screening (I don't think it was WW because they didn't actually turn men away in the end but I could be wrong) and they got sued to shit too. People are getting sick of this shit and finally beginning to wake up
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:39 PM
2

People are finally getting itred of misandrical (a new word perhaps?) women's shit
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:22 AM
1

With women's 'sexual liberation' they are sleeping around more than ever. It is harder if you're less attractive, but (and I know this sub is wary of this) if you have game, this can be overcome.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:58 AM
1

Interesting - I'd only ever heard of how the taking of multiple wives negatively affected women while making it seem like it was a gold-paved easy road for men. As per usual, no one cared how it affected men. Good post.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:57 AM
1

Women generally find suits sexy, which aren't considered provocative.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:40 PM
1

Apologies, I thought you meant you had a study of some kind
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:40 PM
2

Ok? What an irrelevant thing to say.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 08:39 AM
1

This is all on the premise I'll be married which is already unlikely. Maybe she won't agree, but if she isn't going back to work she best be the most devout SAHM to walk this earth.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 08:39 AM
1

Women have 0 pressure to pursue men - there's way less incentive to take the risk of being inappropriate. Women's inappropriate behaviour is ignored or accepted when it happens, but i do think it happens on a much lower frequency because they can literally just exist to get guys.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 08:37 AM
3

She doesn't need to say that. If your boss gets you drunk and tries to fuck you, they don't need to say 'fuck me or I'll fire you/fuck over your career' for that to be a strong possibility from your point of view. That person has control over your future. If they take rejection as an insult (not difficult to do), well...what teacher/boss takes kindly to a student/subordinate insulting them?
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:58 PM
1

Eh, this won't be popular but more men are sexually inappropriate than women. What she's saying is dumb, but let's not pretend women have to pursue men even 10% of the amount men have to pursue women to get any action whatsoever, which means more mistakes and more awkward guys getting fucked over because Stacey the Receptionist is too sensitive Kyle looked at her cleavage when she wore the top to impress her boss instead.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:54 PM
1

I want to have children in the future but I'm going to wait it out. I will avoid marriage and will have them after I'm fed up of my (rather lucrative, but extremely time consuming) career I have now. Otherwise I'm unlikely to get custody and will pay child support - which I can see the logic of even if I don't agree. If she spends more time with them she gets them, but if I'm both bringing in the money and spending time with them, I get them. If I somehow fall into the kids trap it's time for a …
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:51 PM
7

She's his teacher. It's an obvious abuse of power.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:48 PM
5

When police got to individually judge rape cases they personally thought 40% were false. We'd see reported rapes very differently if police could speak freely
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:47 PM
2

Do you have a source for that? I 100% believe you and I need something tangible to send to people when I'm making that point but I haven't found anything
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:46 PM
2

Do it to a couple of awful women it stops stinging and you realise it's just part of the game.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:42 PM
2

Nope. And frankly, I don't think men are capable of loving a woman at her weakest either, depending on what that is. Although it depends on what your version of 'love' is as well.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:40 PM
2

That is very true. I was talking on an individual level. Personally, I don't mind giving up some of the 'win' to have children.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:39 PM
1

I want to have children too. However, if you're looking at it was men vs women and a 0 sum game, that's how you 'win'. If you have children, even if you aren't married, there's a risk she'll run off and screw you for child support. I'm ok with that risk, but it does mean I've given up some of the 'win'.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:37 PM
1

So do I. But then you accept you're not likely to entirely win - there's always a risk of divorce rape (alimony and child support), in which case, you haven't really won that much.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 09:36 PM
2

If you want to truly 'win', get a vasectomy and don't get married. Then we win - we can exploit the free sex we wouldn't have had before with no fear of children.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/17 03:21 PM
11

Polyamory is definitely on the rise. It's nearly here - people already consider 'dating' a non-exclusive phase of a relationship and continue to fuck around despite the intention of eventually getting into a relationship with the person they are dating at the time.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 09:08 PM
2

Very true - it's good to be reminded.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 09:06 PM
2

I imagine in this case it's a mix of 'oh it's little boys who cares' and the Church paying it off/providing a very good legal defense. UK doesn't have a statute of limitations so maybe some of the cases had lost some of the evidence, but with so many... I used to live near this school - they are a Catholic private school connected with the Church (St Benedict's Church) in a decent area so they probably make a shitload of money. I knew a guy who sent his kid there actually. Obviously withdrew him…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:26 PM
1

Well, I think the crime for that is slander and defamation. It's already there but I don't think enough falsely accused pressed charges on it. If we were to properly criminalise death threats we simply wouldn't have enough jail cells - people on the internet send those all the time. I agree if an accusation is demonstrably false (ie: can be proven beyond reasonable doubt - a 'not guilty' verdict of the accused is not sufficient to come to that conclusion) then I absolutely think at the very leas…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:24 PM
9

A man who has had those traits conditioned out of him is by virtue no longer a man with those traits, and is having his lack of those traits exploited. It's generally feminised men who end up getting abused. Psychopaths are generally not honourable because they are self-serving and don't mind pulling a few injustices to get their way. That's why Dark Triads are so successful and their lack of exploitation is because they will not accept the abuse because they are narcissistic. I do believe there…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 12:19 PM
2

However you'll see even less men coming forward. There's already a stigma against male victims - even more so if his rapist is a woman. I would rather more male victims came forward and less information revealed about perps. As I said elsewhere, we could instead limit the amount of information released about the accused to protect those who are falsely accused.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:14 PM
21

Instead of removing victim anonymity and bring the standards down for everyone, we should be fighting for better anonymity of the accused. I understand the logic of releasing information about the accusers to collect corroborating evidence and this aspect should be preserved, but I'm pretty sure victims of the same rapist/assaulter don't need his full name, photo, job title, and where he lives to put two and two together. I'm sure a simple first name and last name initial would suffice - no phot…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:08 PM
1

If you could somehow see the receipts and bank accounts of these women and the husbands they apparently provide for I imagine the reality would look quite different. Even if these men bring in less income, they likely still end up paying more in terms of say, date nights. Unless these are the career-women who accepted they had to marry down and went for an attractive poor guy (a sub-standard Chad) rather than unattractive beta-bux.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 12:01 PM
3

I see (high quality) escorts as a type of red-pill women. They aren't necessarily 'high-value' in terms of wife-material, but like red pill men they are exploiting sexual marketplace dynamics for their own benefit. They'll have enough money to buffer them until they can choose their favourite beta provider, but their sex appeal and willingness to be kinky might snag them an even better provider - potentially even an alpha who just wants a woman who will sexually satisfy him in every way, be dece…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:51 AM
6

Funny, we already have a system for women's time, support, validation, and attention to be rewarded. It's called PROSTITUTION ladies. Guys don't want to pay for a woman's 'knowledge' because it's pretty commonly known women have a lower variance of intelligence, so men above, lets say, 65% of the average IQ has 0 need to rely on most women for their 'knowledge' because by nature of IQ distribution, most women are simply beneath him in this regard. Even a guy at below-average intelligence, lets s…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:49 AM
30

I actually also think this is why so many high quality girls end up getting abused. A strong, honourable, courageous, gritty man isn't going to let some bitch treat him like trash. Someone generous and compassionate is usually manipulated, her mothering instincts of nurturing are easily appealed to by manipulators. Despite being high-quality, she's a bit vulnerable - like a beta male but with a far easier ride. It's why I don't try to make plates of actually decent girls. Maybe it can be seen as…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:37 AM
4

I think part of this is also women being torn between expressed what they'd like to do and that trying to please different ideas of what would get them the best response (ie: validation). Want to be a subservient house-wife? You're pleasing your target demographic by saying that, but then you're coming with the baggage of useless debt, feminists will screech at you, you look like a gold-digger. So you can pretend you want to be a career woman. Target demographic don't like that. Beta men think i…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:30 AM
8

Please do - I imagine it'll be great for fence-sitters.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:21 AM
12

Low-level troll post. Satire requires some degree of intelligence to be effective.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:18 AM
1

I've actually told my younger sister to do this because she has an instragram she made 3 years ago with about 4 posts. I haven't told her why (people think she's a loser who doesn't do anything), but if she has a shitload of good holiday pics she can slowly release and up her SMV for a high-quality guy because she's A) not addicted to social media anyway which is a big + but also B) demonstrably not some lifeless female-NEET.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:17 AM
2

Eh, I think that fear is pretty overblown in the US. Just don't go somewhere cheap where girls are obviously getting trafficked, on drugs, seem underage, etc. A very successful escort has an incentive to keep her business going and gives 0 shits about fucking up individual clients and sacrificing her entire business model unless you actually rape her or some shit. But yeah then you get into the money side because you're paying extra for a high-quality (IE trust-worthy as well as hot and clean) g…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:11 AM
3

It's not like these rich men are carefully considering how low they can go before flying out their favourite type of whore. They'll happily blow an extra hundred to know she'll not only be STD-free, but she'll keep quiet about it. They're getting the top escorts and it's far worse for their very successful business to have untreated STDs than it is for their clients.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:07 AM
3

If found guilty of falsely accusing then absolutely. Isn't that how it works with other crimes? If you found guilty of perjury you pay the other person's legal fees? Should apply here.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 10:34 AM
5

Shit I worded that wrongly, I went she abandoned the child like the step-father did. Both left together to get lunch, whereas in the article it sounded like only the step-father was with the child at the time and left him to go 'smoking and drinking'. If the situation was that she left the kid with the step-father who then left the kid, I would agree. The mother assumed the child would be fine because he was 'terrified of water' and therefore wouldn't go swimming. Despite this no one thought may…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:40 PM
3

Was the wife at the park with them? It doesn't sound like it: quote from the article which said the stepfather took Charlie to the park with no mention of the mother If she wasn't there ... Please show me where I made 'blatant false statements based on nothing'.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:38 PM
1

The original article does not represent the situation perfectly. It made it sound like the stepfather took the kid to the waterpark alone, and only talked about the stepfather walking off to drink and smoke. It's not me who doesn't want to see females as the obvious criminals. The OP posted articles which DID represent the situation properly where they show the wife did go to the waterpark and went with her husband to get lunch, leaving her son alone in the pool. Yeah, her kid should have been t…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:31 PM
1

So ensuring accuracy is 'trolling' now? 'Concern trolling' is literally the excuse feminazis use to police dissenters, right on par with "mansplaining". Anyway the OP posted additional articles showing the wife was at the park too but obviously this article was just trying to diminish her role in what happened - some Women Are Wonderful type of shit.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:25 PM
17

Fucking hell - thank you for the links. Maybe it's because the father petrol-bombed a witness for this charge so they just completely fucked him? Even if that was it, this is so fucking messed up I can't believe she wasn't found guilty for manslaughter... Well I can, I just really don't want to. Not even children are valued above women anymore.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:37 PM
1

Shit thanks for posting this - it sounded like she wasn't even there in the other article. Maybe she left him with the stepfather first? None of the articles are very clear on her whereabouts which must've been a big factor in whether she was found (not) guilty for manslaughter.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:29 PM
2

Was the wife at the park with them? It doesn't sound like it: In mitigation John Butterfield, representing Smith, debated the suggestion by Mrs Prior that his client was “self-centred” and said he had taken Charlie to the park so he could have fun. If she wasn't there then why would she be convicted - it sounds like it was just the step-father who took the kid there. Also, his sentence is made up of multiple convictions: As well as having pleaded guilty to manslaughter through negligence, Smith …
/r/MensRights20/12/17 06:21 PM
1

Yep - innocent before proven guilty applies to both parties. While you don't assume the rape happened, you also don't assume the accuser is guilty of perjury. (Not) guilty verdicts are based on whether there is enough evidence to prove the rape occured - a rape can happen without enough evidence and the accused walks free. Based on the justice system we would rather 10 guilty walk free than wrongly imprison 1 innocent person and it applies here. The only reason it doesn't apply to the accused is…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 03:07 PM
2

/u/2FAM0US pretty much covered it but one of the most fundamental aspect is rewarding the good and punishing the bad - mostly using her need for emotional attachment against her. If she fucks up on providing your boyfriend privileges, you immediately switch off boyfriend privileges. And you have to hold to this - wavering will shake your frame and you might have some issues with shit-tests afterwards. So if she screws up on something you had set out as something imperative then grow cold. Withdr…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 11:55 PM
-1

I was expected something different so I could post a relevant comment but even though it isn't so relevant anymore I'll post it anyway. Most girls love cats. Like they love the shit out of them and the younger, the better. In a sense this is good because we are shown to like baby animals such as cats for their baby-like features (thus you can get weed yourself out some more maternal girls for a LTR if you're looking for one). But more importantly, you can use it to get girls back to your place. …
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 03:43 PM
3

Of course it can. As men get older their sperm also declines in quality from around 37 and up. It can lead to the child being on the autistic spectrum of otherwise. Yes feminists keep trying to push it under the carpet, screaming that men don't matter- it's all about the woman...when simply biology says otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:21 AM
1

Odd doesn't mean non-consensual. We need to determine using the demographics involved if there is a power different that bans consent. How odd it is (or isn't) shouldn't factor into it. By odd I mean there is a stark maturity difference. Under 13s cannot consent on any ground anyway but in my opinion a barely prepubescent boy/girl should not be dating or having sexual intercourse with a young man/women who are almost completely developed and have a lot more experience + maturity. I would questio…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:14 PM
1

The very reason for an age of consent is because of the notion that someone above it has too much power for there to be consent with someone under it. Under that same logic, teachers who sleep with students should also be declared to have sexually assaulted someone. if she had slept with any 16 year old non-student (who consented), then she shouldn't have been punished. Well I have now heard AOC in between teachers and students is actually 18 so she did do something wrong and thereby the punishm…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 01:36 PM
1

Age of consent is higher if the pair are in a student-teacher relationship. It varies by location but is typically not less than 18 and can be as high as 21. I had overlooked this. My apologies - I still think 14 months is quite a long time though. I would have thought 6-10 would be more fitting (as she was in a position of power). You are absolutely right however I concede I made an error.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 01:34 PM
4

It's good that equality in the courts is finally starting to happen and women are facing some sort of consequence. However, I would like to point out that while this is a success, our work is not finished. Kilner was struck off as teacher and jailed for 14 months Now, I'm imagining if the roles were reversed...the guy would have got more than a mere 14 months had this been the case. It is alos nice to finally see male victims being regarded as such and described as a "victim" - something we don'…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 04:18 PM
1

It might have no real effect but I doubt it is anything that would make your marriage worse (unless it's a class about hitting people to get out your frustrations).
/r/MensRights28/11/13 01:46 PM
1

You are basically parroting anti-sex feminists, who have had a large impact on society's views, but it's still not reality. EDIT: Wrong person, sorry for the aggressiveness. :X Thanks for verifying that...I got a little confused there. most often with the dom performing it on the sub. I do want to correct this in that in all my BDSM browsing I've seen the man use toys but not licking out the girl. In femdom the women use their hands and sometimes mouths. I don't think it's "most often" at all bu…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 11:11 PM
2

Why would happy women divorce? Of course they'd be angry. The very title of that study is redundant: "Does Anger Management Lead To Better Marriages?" I don't think anyone seriously thinks anger management would make your marriage disastrously worse.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:36 PM
1

Twitchy fingers. Will edit.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:19 PM
5

Oh I know this. I'm just stating you shouldn't be able to.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:01 PM
1

I fully understand that this is alarming however do remember some of the downloads are people like me who are checking this app out for themselves ebfore making judgement. The app will soon die down and get forgotten but I understand your concerns.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 12:02 PM
14

Not directly talking about the video but getting caught cheating is humiliating - you've done something very, very wrong and now everyone else has seen it and can shun you for it. Doesn't mean you get to take up the victim narrative however.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 11:54 AM
1

Then that's fair enough. Don't give/recieve oral if you aren't into it - generally if one partner isn't into it the whole mood dampens for both. However one can't ignore the sexual dynamic we've been conditioned to have where naything not directly benefitting us more than the other person is seen as being plain old submissive (even if they do indirectly have slightly more power).
/r/MensRights27/11/13 11:52 AM
1

I've heard men feel insecure about it because they think it makes them look like wimps or pussies. I think it's because you are doing something for some one else that gies you not much pleasure yourself. In the me-me-me selfish culture we have now, doing things for other people you don't get at least equal or more enjoyment out of (aside from making them feel good) is seen as being a walkover and naive. It's stupid but that's how it is.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:56 PM
3

The same reason people think guys are submissive for licking out their woman. Doesn't make much sense tbh.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 07:14 PM
1

I think it's more directed to the whole guys-getting-girls-drunk-and-fucking-them. That is, more often than not, with male aquantainces or betafriends. Regardless, it's pretty easy code to crack so now we've seen the video it still won't be an issue for us - just the betaboiz.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 10:00 PM
3

2nd girl is right to be a bad bitch. Her hair is one of the few things she has to rely on beauty-wise and while she shouldn't slap (obligatory "how can she slap??") she did express regret almost immediately after - even before realising the guy was holding a phone. She even gave this random guy stranger a hug. She didn't handle it perfectly but she handled it much better than the black beast after her.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 09:56 PM
3

Apologies! I did check for that but I was clearly not very thorough :/ Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:51 AM
2

That was pretty amusing.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:51 AM
2

I would prefer if everyone just accepted we re all pretty much average and there isn't anything wrong with it. However we live in a me=me=me culture and that means we have to adjust and realise the younger generation probably doesn't share this sense of apathy.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:48 AM
1

WHy would he troll an underage 14 year old though? That's what I'm trying to say. There was no reason to contact a 14 year old. He could have done the same with any age girl and not force them into a "physical" relationship.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:47 AM
2

The idea that we all need supportive campaigns is bullshit, that is a pathetic, passive, victim-mentality crap. It creates Weakness, not strength. I agree people should be stronger than that. However, most teenagers are rather sensitive and in the kind of culture we live in now where how you look carries quite a bit of emphasis. We are very vain right now. This is just my opinion, but Men's right's shouldn't be about copying and co-opting this stupid whiny white girl feminist crap. "WAAAAAH, I'm…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:40 PM
3

I believe a man is worth so much more than how many hours a week he works out. I do think being overweight isn't healthy and I do not support obesity. However, I do not force my way on thinking onto others. Your health is your responsibility. People should have agency and be able to stand up to these things but I think particularly for young teenage boys it is hard as you are in such a sensitive time of your life when you have studies and friends to attend to - you not only don't have time for w…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:25 PM
2

I am thinking the same thing but we do get brigaded pretty often. We have an entire subreddit dedicated to brigading us.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:21 PM
1

"While chatting up a senior man". This woman is not only ad adult at 19, but she initiated contact. I'm talking about adult initiating contact with underage strangers. not having read the article in the second link, I believed there were no sexual relations of any kind, simply chatting online It is best to research things thoroughly to avoid coming to an uninformed opinion/decision. You are not a feminist; you can do homework. They were not just simply chatting online and now you are more inform…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:20 PM
5

This is what I mean. Perhaps I did not word it very well. I am very aware this campaign is just for money however it only emphasises how much interest people have in this sort of thing. Dove is owned by the same company who make Axe who have adverts like this. The victim narrative is the biggest issue here and how one sided it is. Despite it being beaten to death it has also only really been taking any sort of beating from one side in society.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:54 PM
2

Do link? I do not mean men just getting support "here". I mean with society as a whole men receive little support in terms of self esteem problems.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:50 PM
1

"He then “forced” her into physical relationship". This is pretty indicative of something sexual going on. 20 year old men or women should not be contacting underage strangers on the internet. There is absolutely no need for contacting a teenager for anything like this and I think the man's intentions were likely far from innocent. He may not have raped her, but if the "“humiliation” was too great for to her tolerate" coming from a girl in India then it is very likely he took her virginity and s…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 04:50 PM
1

It isn't used as a birth control. It's used as a last resort. Deal with the consequences Not if we are talking about something you can't avoid. I'm not paying for a kid the condom failed to prevent.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 09:38 PM
3

Even then it's still a 0.01-0.02% chance (this is all assuming everything works correctly and use absolutely perfectly which for starters, most condoms aren't). Considering the amount of sex people are encouraged to have these days even using two methods doesn't actually rule out the possibility of getting unintentionally pregnant. Some women can't actually use BC which kinda sucks for everyone due to their shitty hormone issues. Basically it's ignorant to think using one or two (even three) kin…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 09:44 PM
4

Except no birth control is 100% effective.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 09:22 PM
2

That's why I said don't wear em 24/7 and have some nice flats. I'm not a big heelman myself - in the appropriate situations they look great but in others it's a "wtf situation" (eg: 5"10 girl wearing them or going on a hike like in the article).
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 09:55 PM
4

I agree with all of these however I disagree with the implied notion that women should wear heels 24/7 just because I like a fully well presented women both in and out of her clothes...I am by no means a foot fetishist but I do notice women who wear heels all the time get hard skin on their feet (and personality wise, a heel wearer 24/7 is usually a bit eccentric). However, when not wearing heels I expect nice shoes - not your teenager converses when going out for dinner. American women really a…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 07:11 PM
7

I personally don't believe in that "any publicity is good publicity" - the knowyourmeme shit kind of defeats itself when it says it's FEMINISM that believes we are anti-women...that'll send alarm bells off for any sane person. Hopefully it'll just pique interest and we'll gain a few more followers. Might put a few people off but hopefully they'll find out for themselves that we are not just a mirror of feminism. We are an independent, individual movement out to help the rights of men and boys as…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 02:41 PM
1

This might not be red pill knowledge but it gets my vote for common-fucking-sense!
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 02:34 PM
1

While I fully agree that false rape reporting is absolutely disgusting, I still feel that it shouldn't be prosecuted. I don't want a woman to ever feel like she might go to jail if she has a bad case against an actual rape. I have considered this. I don't think the sentences should be heavy and I'm not saying anything with inconclusive evidence is a false rape claim. I'm saying if there is certain belief that it was a false claim, then it should be punished. Real victims should in no way be disc…
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:22 PM
11

Probably the most miserable thing about this is not only the lives that have been ruined, but just how many of these women faced completely inadequate charges. Not only did they destroy the life of the man they accused but their friends and even their family...yet only a handful out of so many examples faced any sort of "heavy" justice - most not heavy enough. THIS shit is why we sometimes question victims' stories. We look like assholes when we do, but I'd honestly prefer to be an asshole than …
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:38 PM
1

I agree with you - I suppose I was just being too blunt and harsh in my post (hence the initial downvotes - however it seems to have switched now). if you're in a relationship, it should be a red flag if your girlfriend/fiancee/wife is going out without you and getting shitfaced. Either she's trying to get with another guy, or she has a problem with alcohol. Exactly what I was trying to say with the whole wife/gf part. It's just not a good sign at all and something that should be avoided. Bring …
/r/TheRedPill19/10/13 07:28 PM
6

The thing is, most RP people should have an element of double-standardness about this within the various contexts. Not male-female (we've already osrted that out), but within relationships with other females. For instance, if alcohol is going to get me laid easier, I am going to encourage that women to drink. I might even buy her one if I am really interested (though that situation hasn't arisen yet). Drinking lowers inhibitions and makes things easier...I don't want college girls to stop drinki…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 12:26 PM
1

I was going to say that would get damn messy when she's on her period until I read properly and noticed they'd leave a little hole in there for the fluids. That would probably work rather well.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 08:53 PM
1

Do women serve in the military? I advocate for NO DRAFT. NONE. If we do have a draft, we include both men and women. Otherwise, I don't think people are disposable. On the front lines? Only if they are able and ready. The standard of the military needs to be kept high no matter how many hurt feelings there are.... Do more men or women graduate from college? Whoever is smart enough and have the means to go and make it through. Do men or women make more? Equal in those office blue-colour jobs. For…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:26 PM
2

I didn't even consider that until you posted it. This actually sounds like the most likely thing that happened. OP, I think you need to talk to your mum before this festers any longer and she thinks you're some incest-fantasising perv who thinks he has a MILF. If that isn't it then it's her preventing you from exploring your sexuality and demonising it. There's nothing wrong with jerking off. However if /u/vegemeister is right...there's something wrong there.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 02:55 PM
1

Holding doors open is just being polite. Remember that being RP doesn't mean being a dickhead. You don't throw your coat over a puddle for their precious little feet but if some one's behind you it takes a moment of two to prop it up and it helps to set your frame in a sense - it says you're traditional and chivalrous...hence, you're looking for women to fit their own traditional role and be sweet about it. Don't hold it open if they are ages away and if you forget and some one gets rude just sh…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 06:05 PM
16

Jealousy. Women are vindictive creatures sometimes who go green-eyed with "if I don't have it, neither can SHE"! You also have the problem of men using the average girl to get to the hotter friends. If too many men do this in an obvious way (fucking betas) the average friends become acutely aware that they are being used. If this is the case you just siddle up to her a bit to soften her up before moving on (can also make the hot one go crazy that the ugly girl is getting all the attention - putt…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 03:18 PM
6

1) No. And this applied for most things: LTRs: WOMEN want commitment, support (financial support is a big one here) and stability. This should be something their husband provides by being loyal, high-achieving and in control/dominant. LTRs: MEN want loyalty, compassion and consistant sex from a woman. This is something a woman provides by well...doing those things. Being a good cook/cleaner is another one. Being compassionate applied also to their maternal instinct - they will stay at home with …
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 03:15 PM
1

In one sense I'm pleased because there aren't many programs trying to get women into these nitty gritty jobs that men have to do - it's creating equality in some of the more laborious, dirty jobs that women are able to sidestep for the swanky office one. However it seems retarded not to have a guys mechanics course too - but then again I suppose their courses were always all-male since no female would show up to get her hands dirty. At least now we can see proof of willingness to achieve ACTUAL …
/r/MensRights13/10/13 02:51 PM
7

What's worse is some of it isn't based off the feminist ideology that directly. "Cougars" prey on younger men deliberately since it will raise their rock-bottom SMV, while younger men nowadays have no idea how high their SMV is - but easy pussy is easy pussy.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/13 09:52 PM
8

"I was hoping she was just some dumb blond hot girl but she turned out to be much more than that" - unfortunately for this lass, she's found out some girls don't just go the easy route and float by on their looks. They make themselves interesting - without the whole "I'm a ruthless career bitch" act. Of course they were going to plan on getting married - she's a very good catch. There aren't many western women (or most women you'd consider dating) that'll be more than just a "dumb blonde hot chi…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/13 09:49 PM
0

Hm. I agree that you should not have to do the test if you do not want to - but you're putting yourself in a worse place. Hence we don't have mandatory STI scans from age 16 upwards even though it would probably drastically improve all the problems we have nowadays with them. However, I think a paternity test at birth should be easily accessible, easy and convenient. I don't see why you'd want to have the test without your wife knowing since I would have thought you'd want to confront her about …
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:37 PM
3

Your post makes perfect sense - and your reaction to crying in an LTR seems like a reasonable and good way to react by providing no anchors but not being a bit of an dickface about it. Outside the context of an LTR, you are not a shoulder to cry on. You are not Captain Save a Ho. You do not listen to her problems. You are not her emotional tampon We need this as a national PSA to all betas and whiteknights on the planet.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 03:38 PM
2

So in your experience, weepy>silent, no crying. This is a very interesting opposition to what we most believe - which is a girl that cries should be dropped since she cannot control her emotions. Your viewpoint is quite an interesting challenge to that. I wonder, could it be because controlling emotions is considered a more masculine trait, therefore a warning that she might posses the same sort of manipulation and juggling skills as a man might (that we exercise)? Since a woman and a man's way …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 12:17 PM
4

That is very very true. By average I suppose I am referring to the older average. Being 5"5 and weighing 100-129 pounds sort of average. Not 5"5 and weighing 150 pounds or something like that.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 12:12 PM
1

Inability/Unwillingness to cry (This is for LTR.. If you've been with her for six months and never seen her cry, there is probably an issue) Just out of interest, why this? I hate it when girls cry since it's such a manipulative weapon in my eyes. I'm genuinely rather interested to learn more about this red flag.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 08:31 PM
8

They already lie. Some call themselves "normal" which means normal sized women who pick correctly end up lumped in with Mrs. McBeached-Wale. It's very hard to trust the sizing...just don't go into the "curvy" field...it's not full of curves so much as it is full of blubber. EDIT: After /u/salami_inferno 's reply, I should clarify that by "norma" I mean being between 19-25 on the BMI scale as opposed to competing for the 99th percentile of fat.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 07:29 PM
1

That's the best thing to do. Glad you found yourself an RP woman date - you must have good game to get all these dates - good job. Hope all goes well for you.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 03:50 PM
1

I cannot comment on this - my only knowledge of gendered nouns is in French as opposed to Spanish so I am unaware of the differences betwen adjective agreements when it comes to Spanish. I'll concede that due to lack of knowledge in that field.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:15 PM
1

Those unaccepting schools will be unaccepting if the child to them "appears male" (whatever that means) whether the gender is changed or not. I just think waiting until the child hits a double digit age like 11 is better since they have better awareness and connotations about the change. A six year old's ideas about themselves can swing since they don't actually know that much about anything really. In my view it's jumping the gun a bit. I can see the benefits, but it's a larger risk to take tha…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:36 AM
1

Fair enough. Maybe keep her number if it went that well - it's hard to get all those qualities at once in a girl. If all else fails, at least it's one more plate.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 07:18 AM
3

If you are continuously telling a woman to stfu, you're doing it wrong. After a while you just look like a beta asshole and she will grow resentful. As /u/onacho said, if she is a woman worth keeping around, she won't need your constant correction.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 07:02 PM
0

But you're going off on a different argument - name changing isn't my problem. It's changing the gender before it's required. The child can always pretend it's a masculine name if they get older and decide they are not actually female or go by a middle/last name. Changing gender would be a massive hassle that you can't side-step until a rainy day.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 06:00 PM
6

He'll be the one maintaining frame and slinging her around like a little ragdoll too while the beta searching desperately for a female to do his 3 and a half minutes of low rocking (making sure to give her the 30 minutes of boring foreplay he doesn't know how to do that she'll pretend to cum for - while he gets zilch).
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 05:58 PM
15

It isn't slavery - it's ignorance. Not being able to legally fuck some one while they are drunk isn't slavery....(yet). Other than that, you are perceiving it correctly. There is a massive demonisation of male sexuality. That some how, we are unable to focus on anything other than getting our pen0rs wet and when denied, we become horndog rapists. Part of this is to do with female vanity. They want men to want them that bad: it would mean their SMV is sky high and the world is at their feet. The …
/r/TheRedPill01/10/13 05:55 PM
2

It's not that easy as an adult to change your identity. In fact, it requires a shitton of paperwork. It's not as hard as a kid - especially when your parents do it for you. I also said before that if the child stays female then great - they can sort out a life plan and have their future in gear. However, at six, legally changing their gender changes nothing for one - I'm sure the school would be understanding of her using a female bathroom. As a child, your legal gender means nothing. As an adul…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:48 PM
1

They'd have to. I don't think many schools would take in a child labelled as "violent" - they'd take it as a foreshadowing of him being a sociopath or something. They don't know it was just a dumb reaction to play. Otherwise, I agree.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:43 PM
0

I would say it is both - would this kind of thing happen to a girl?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:42 PM
18

Yes! Despite extensively supporting them and censoring whatever is bad about them, the media are totally conspiring against them. Like, it's sooooo obvious. /s Sounds about right! Or Mr. Cameron needs to "man up" but he can't be in his "traditional gender roles" which make him refuse the title!!
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:08 PM
37

Wonder what the feminists will think of this! Oh wait...right... "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:02 PM
4

Exactly. Pandering to the feminismz for affection - they won't care though. They always want more more more.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:01 PM
0

Oh of course - that's what is so disgusting about it. They manipulate and coerce those who don't know any better: children. I do not want to alienate trans by eliminating the possibility that this child has gender dysphoria and whatnot therefore is mentally a female - but why take the chance so young? Things can change. But no. Their work is done and despite being so open to these trans people, if this little 'un grows up and decides they are a boy I can only imagine the amount of screeching the…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:01 PM
4

Exactly. Why is it always the boys who are so easily cast aside and demonised? Why are we the disposable ones? And why take out this insane misandry on a fucking child? It's horrifying.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:58 PM
8

I highly doubt (s)he identified as female the moment (s)he learnt how to speak. If the child is legitimately trans then that's fine. It's awesome (s)he discovered it sooner rather than later so (s)he can plan for the future in how to prevent their body becoming more masculine and figure out a life plan. However i am highly sceptical of all these young, 'perfect' examples that gender is a social construct. It's all quite...polished. How does a child even have gendered speech before learning to ta…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:34 PM
24

You know political correctness and child-smothering has gone on to long when we are harshly punishing a child for normal play behaviour. He's going to be held back and miss important classes that aid his development (how much compared to girls is another discussion) and a taint on his record that will prevent him from transferring schools easily - or getting into a good one - if he should be so inclined (I would after this). Having a child labelled as "violent" closing a great many doors for thi…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:14 PM
0

This isn't something you can do immediately. It requires actually maintaining some sort of platonic relationship with her. The idea of it being platonic is not that you don't make a move - it's how willing she is to give it up. How quickly will she sleep with you? Does she have a bf while engaging in this? How mature is she about her sexuality? Number of sexual partners and number of LTRs? If your game is good, she will probably sleep with you at some point. The trick is to see if she bothers ho…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 10:02 PM
1

That cup thing....is just...gross... The weight thing can't be helped I suppose. Nice she tried to make an effort. She should just stick with upper body work outs - abs especially to help with the tummy. As for Australians - Iv'e heard various things. Some say they are super bro and awesome - some say they are men with tits and even worse that girls in the US when it comes to entitlement. It's a mixed pool of opinions and I have no experience with them yet. For LTRs it is best to have similar va…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 09:54 PM
3

Older women with pets are either going to be bro-level are fucking creepy since they are using their pet to replace family/relationships. This can especially be true of Western places where pets are treated as replacement humans as opposed to practical but loving beings. Being overweight is certainly a deal breaker. If she can't even be bothered cutting a few calories (let alone going to the gym), what makes you think she'd be bothered making you happy, or cooking, or cleaning the house, or anyt…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 08:27 PM
1

Perfectly reasonable - we cannot improve if we do not hear criticism, after all.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:21 PM
2

Very true. Hence I can see the big appeal of sticking to the women in the mid-twenties. They are on the cock carousel so they will both be willing to do most things and also know how to make it feel good. Young women are only going to get even more annoying and entitled as the years go on - however mid twenties are a touch subdued. The same can be said for women well, well past the wall however I doubt you want all those rolls and wrinkles compared to the youthful hue of a younger girl.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 08:21 PM
1

I apologise for that wording. I didn't mean it in that sort of sense but I do see how it can come across.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:18 PM
2

Oh of course. I was just leaving it blank since I was too lazy to write them all out when it was obvious. You are correct, however.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:18 PM
1

You're very welcome :)
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:17 PM
3

I think you posted this on the wrong sub. /r/TwoX or something feministy would be far more appropriate for that link. For once, there isn't actually a men's rights issue here. It's some satirical parody of what strawpolice do to women (despite the amount of false accusations that land an innocent in jail, people like her still believe women are at a disadvantage when reporting rape). Also, when people say "don't dress slutty to avoid getting raped" we are obviously NOT referring to a long dress …
/r/MensRights30/09/13 06:31 PM
3

Long as you keep yourself in shape and take care of yourself then your 30s should be a good time - you are one example of many here who are doing it right. You could probably go younger, though the mid-twenties are generally the best. It's before the self-entitled yet insufferable wall...yet it's after all that immaturity and wondering why the hell you can't party with them ALL THE TIME. You're doing a good job - keep it up.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:26 PM
5

Admittedly, at 20 years old you have more energy and retain youthful looks. However, you (usually) lack the redpill at that age. Women will see you will a higher SMV since you are older (with more experience) and more likely to be wealthy.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:43 PM
3

Technically, due to advancements a long time ago, men aren't biologically needed. Women can have babies on their own - and they don't have to be clones either. Yet, I don't see the men running out - or the women that chase want them. It doesn't matter if men become obsolete. Women will still want men there for whatever reason - and in that, they will birth more men. Nothing will change.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:38 PM
14

30s is when a man hits his prime - while women hit the wall.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 02:32 PM
7

It depends. As /u/lordofthejelly said, it could be that they have an open relationship. Except for if by "compassionate and personal" sex is just dead starfish splayed on the bed in missionary then - open or not - that guy is a beta. Not like she hides it though, so it could just be another beta in a cuckold fetish. This could somehow tie into hypergamy...? Alpha fucks, beta bucks possibly? I'm wondering if this guy is a sugar daddy is all.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 09:57 PM
2

Good job on sending in the report. It's awful how disposable men are compared to women - of course they should get help too, but there are men who also need the many facilities they have... I'm very sorry about your past - I hope it can be rectified somehow. Know that here we are a safe haven and while I personally cannot offer any advice on this, we are large and diverse so I am sure some one can point you in the right direction. Stay strong.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 09:53 PM
0

Oh don't you worry...with the amount of women able to get away with light sentences/without sentences, the only women in the female prisons would be hard-fucking-core monsters. Add that to the whole maternal instinct thing and that evil woman will get her prison justice tenfold. Be a wonder if she makes it through the first year or so without having boiling water chucked over her face - it's a common enough practice in female prisons (since they can dodge blame with the victim card - an "acciden…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:45 PM
2

If adults choose to be circumcised for cosmetic reasons, it's just a body modification like those penis piercings or those wretched ear barrels. I doubt a law court would exactly support either of those happening to a baby without their consent - it's child abuse. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:39 PM
1

Exactly. But the motivating behind it is because men are considered always-horny rapists with no self-control. It;s disgusting every way you look at it.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:03 PM
2

I hope so. In some cases circumcision is required (my brother had to since his foreskin was too tight) and my mother, who is very anti-circ did it because he needed it. She said while the doctor claimed it would just be 3 days of soreness he had quite a bit of bleeding and his crotch was very painful for 2 weeks to the point where my mum didn't send him to school for a few days as just walking left him in a lot of pain. However, it was better than the alternative of his foreskin suffocating him.…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:00 PM
4

Why would some one offer to pay when they get in free? You're expecting too much off people. Humans, by nature - are selfish. If you got in free and they didn't, you'd leave it up to the other person to make an issue. What's it got to do with your free pass? The annoying issue is how double sided it is. On one hand the women in bars are being used as "advertisements" of sorts - generally the hot women get in free but in some cases the uglier, fattier, frumpier dressed women are charged at least …
/r/MensRights28/09/13 04:53 PM
2

This is progress. Not just for circumcision, but for attitudes towards men as well. The judge shut down her "he won't be accepted as a 'real man'" act. This strikes out to me as important. No long will women (both those in the feminist doctrine and those who are not) decide what makes other men - or even their son - a 'real man'.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:38 PM
1

Agreed. We cannot effectively tackle equal sentencing for men and women when the laws themselves are not equal yet. I am personally of the standpoint we should first increase sentencing for women, and then try to bring down both at once. Otherwise, you get the whole "woman-hater" thing going on which is a little insufferable.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:36 AM
18

Except those arguments are easy as shit to debunk. Erections are not something a man can simply control. Turn it back on them - that women wasn't brutally raped because she had an orgasm unwillingly. See how that somehow doesn't work? When nerve endings are stimulated, they will react a certain way. See what they will respond to that. Same as above. Women not only get wet due to a penis forcing itself into her (the vagina tries to naturally lubricate itself) but might end up orgasming (a means o…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter