TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

snakelovermoraga Archive

View 3 posts and 48 comments by snakelovermoraga on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

or, some men have more sex than others, so men have more sex or, some men have less sex than others, so men have less sex. It can really be interpreted any way you want it to be. It's VERY ambiguous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 07:51 PM
-3

Women have sex more than men. For every straight, non group sex encounter, there is exactly 1 man and 1 woman...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/14 04:59 PM
-6

The article seems right. If the facts are as the article portrays them, then that's total bullshit. Now, the article is completely 1 sided, poorly cites and fails to acknowledge the other side. So much so that I really don't know at all what the other side is saying. It's an opinion piece that fails to present the other opinion. Maybe it would be a good response to an article talking about the facts, but I really can't figure out what's going on here... Tl;dr, The author may be right, but the ar…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:27 AM
2

The lesson to me is that both parties involved in a sexual encounter need to be present and aware of what they're doing and make an informed decision. The Men's Rights lesson is that we live in a world where if the woman is on the stupid side of a bad thing, the man suffers far worse than she does, and if the man is on the stupid side, he feels bad, and that's it. Someone tell me if that paragraph doesn't make sense, and if it doesn't, I'll rephrase it, I've been awake for 21 hours.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:25 AM
4

And apparently his school and his social worker...
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:20 AM
4

Take it in context.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/14 09:52 PM
1

...because it is sometimes. I put /r/theredpill as an extreme. The counter extreme to this is /r/feminism, and then /r/mensrights and /r/twoxchromosomes kinda skirt the middle, but both of them have a few extremists and get a little out there sometimes.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:29 AM
7

But... The world dongle is just funny. It simply is. Why would anyone have a problem with that???
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:27 AM
4

I posted it awhile ago. You're good though, I was intentionally aggressive/obnoxious/opinionated in my title
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:54 AM
-1

Did I suggest that i think the sexual torture of boys and men hasn't been an element in conflict situations throughout the entirety of human history ? Cause if so, it was not my intention.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:46 AM
-4

Honestly tell me that you believe in a kidnapping and murder situation such as this one that if men are in the situation they are just as likely to be raped as women in the situation. A significant part of the difference it makes is that it makes for better news. Rape is graphic, it's horrific, it's a media buzzword. Another part is just that like, to face that much humiliation on top of being kidnapped and murdered makes a situation to which shitty is an understatement even shittier.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:51 PM
6

I think the reason you're getting downvoted is not your message, but that you don't acknowledge that OP has a point. The double standard does exist, and certainly, had these all been women, the news would have covered it as women. The point that it doesn't really matter is relevant, but I think it's more important that had they been women, That would have been the story, rather than the fact that it was not mentioned that they were all men. Edit: smoke weed. But ya know, that's just my opinion, …
/r/MensRights25/10/14 06:10 PM
-5

It wasn't news, and yet we can read all these news articles about it. I agree that it's less news than it would be if they were all female, but let's be honest, had they been female, there would have been rape.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 06:08 PM
2

I'm pretty sure it's not a put-on... read the second to last paragraph.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 07:04 PM
3

So, apparently if party 1 and party 2 have intercourse, and party 1 regrets it the next day, party 2 is guilty of rape...
/r/MensRights17/10/14 06:38 PM
1

No policy makers that I know of go this farm, that's how. Extremists gonna extremify.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 06:28 PM
-1

IF men's salary were increased to 150% a woman's salary By plenty of metrics, it's already at 133%, feminists just reverse the figure to women make 78% of what men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/14 11:38 PM
1

11 words that explicate 75% of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 05:59 AM
1

Yeah, from a legal perspective you should be fine
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:46 AM
1

If she was drunk and she says you raped her, plenty of colleges are fucked up enough to expel your ass. As you say, you're not a student of the college, they can't do anything, and the cops should be okay, but look up the story of the guy who got expelled from occidental for being drunk and having consensual sex with a drunk girl who later regretted it. Fucked up shit
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:12 PM
1

Considering you're not a student of the college, I wouldn't be super worried. The cops are generally much more understanding of this type of situation. If you'd been a student there, I would worry about the college's sanctions
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:23 PM
1

My city is about 60/40 homeless men/homeless women... There are plenty of them out there. I think the disparity is probably that women are a little less proud and maybe more willing to accept significant charity
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:21 PM
6

Thank you for saving his life. Now, one point I'd like to make: I will admit my first reaction was to hit him, it passed as soon as it came because of r/mensrights. I thought about how I should treat this just as I'd treat any fight between men. My very good feminist friend initially taught me this idea, but you guys cemented it. I should not try to defend her just because of her gender. Specifically: I should not try to defend her just because of her gender. This is true. You should not defend …
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:57 PM
1

I'm going to simplify a very complicated point down to a few sentences. I don't believe men are "better" than women, or the other way are, just very different. TRP is about sex and romance, so it analyzes men and women from that perspective, but I firmly believe that women are smarter than we are. Scientifically, they think with much more complicated thoughts. Men are good at simplifying. Sometimes this is a good thing, sometimes a bad thing. That's just an example. It doesn't make men or women …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:43 PM
1

Where are you pulling that from? OP quoted the article directly and accurately.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 08:37 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:02 AM
1

Even if the students indicate their consent at the time, as Occidental determined Jane and John both did, they are both deemed incapable of determining the other's ability to consent, yet remain responsible for doing so. IT LITERALLY SAID THEY'RE BOTH RESPONSIBLE.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:44 PM
2

As noted in the police report, "Witnesses were interviewed and agreed that the victim and suspect were both drunk [and] that they were both willing participants exercising bad judgement." The cops got it right at least.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:37 PM
2

I'm noticing in this thread a lot of the same thing. We're all pretty much interpreting this the same way, which is understandable, as this is /r/MensRights. I went ahead and invited /r/feminism to the discussion, and this is that thread. I'm VERY interested to see what they have to say.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:14 PM
3

oh, her boyfriend is being displayed. I read that as the former pro players edifice is being displayed while hers is not. My bad. Is her boyfriend a minor though as well?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:05 PM
2

He did obtain consent. It is his responsibility to obtain consent, and he did. She does not dispute that she said yes at the time. The consent he obtained was exactly even with his ability to understand it. Now, this is not an argument I would use in court, but as a societal thing, I would accept this.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:56 PM
3

If you get drunk and kill a guy, you are responsible for murder. If you get drunk and have consensual sex as a woman you can accuse the man of rape. If you get drunk and have consensual sex as a man you are responsible for rape. Yup, seems fine to me.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:46 PM
11

Haven't read the article, not going to read the article, but the "former pro player" is a public figure, while the 16 year old is a minor, and not a public figure.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:35 PM
1

I disagree. I believe you over-complicated my argument, and over simplified yours to use an argumentative THEORY that is not the end-all, be-all of debate.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 12:26 AM
1

Reverse the genders. Proceed to laugh.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 04:31 PM
1

Most (source needed, but some definitely) rape starts with consensual something and turns into one party wanting to do something that the other party does not want to do, whether that be just getting really rough, or anal, or whatever, consensual sex turns into rape a whooooole bunch.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 03:42 PM
-3

*Women like to engage in one night stands much less frequently, and at a given time with a given woman she is less likely to want to engage in a one night stand.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 03:36 PM
3

No, I think we both just have simple arguments and we're at a disagreement. Good day sir :) My favorite partner in political debate and I always try to figure out the core of our disagreement. We know we're not going to agree with each other, so we work together to figure out what the core concept/idea/moral decision/opinion we disagree on Also, see, sometimes an argument is too simple. This is where Occam's Razor flops, because a good argument requires a rebuttal to, and a well structured argum…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 06:28 AM
3

You want me to simplify my argument? okay. Women are less likely to engage in a one night stand because they are afraid of being raped. 1 assumption to your one assumption. Have Occam's Razor suck my dick.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 05:42 AM
7

I'm gonna play blue pill advocate for a second here, because there is a somewhat reasonable explanation. I'm going to preface that advocacy by saying that I agree with OP 95%; women are the gatekeepers of sex and despite feeling physical attraction have been taught by society to be the way they are and despite dressing for attention will, 100% of the time, say no in this situation. Now, blue pill time. A good part of the reason this works the way it does is that men are (generally) physically st…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 04:29 AM
14

well, as the video demonstrated, you sir, are wrong.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 04:21 AM
1

This also creates a society wherein teenagers aren't prepared for the emotional commitment of sexual intercourse until well after their hormones wear off and they become less interested. Evolutionarily speaking, we should be making babies starting at age 14, but we are not prepared for that sort of commitment until well into our 20s. I'm not saying kids in our society should be having kids, I'm just saying that our society has made that so, and it shouldn't be so.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 03:39 PM
1

Purple pill here, I don't upvote on TRP very often. I did this time.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 04:41 AM
-1

Purple pill here. Thanks for adding to the side of me that thinks TRP is just a bunch of assholes looking to confirm their asshole ways with pseudoscience and peer support. What does this have to do with TRP? Why do you give a shit? Why is it so bad that the place you yourself go on and enjoy and use found a way to make money that doesn't involve filling our pages with ads? Sure, it's a little silly, but I'll take the little gold icon over enough advertisements to make them 4 bucks any day.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 03:27 PM
0

Your title is simply not explicitly true. Tell me you've never looked at a woman and not been attracted to her because she was too skinny. More often than not, gaining weight makes women less attractive, but saying always in that regard is simply not true.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 05:37 PM
1

I appreciate the answer. I don't really have a response to that, I think you can kinda see where that lack of response comes from
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 05:50 AM
1

Long time lurker and person who thinks TRP only sometimes makes a good point here. To me, the real red pill of society would be the fact that emotional commitment does not require sexual commitment. I'm right up there with the next guy that if a woman wants this sublime, perfect, sexually committed and exclusive relationship, and then she goes and cheats, she's a lying, cheating bitch. This article to me is every bit of proof that sexual commitment in our society is stupid. Sex is fun. a lot of …
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 05:10 PM
0

To clarify, obviously 59 year old women aren't very attractive, and yeah, this guy was being a little blunt, but this woman not being able to accept that a 59 year old body is a 59 year old body is silly.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 11:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter