TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

splodgenessabounds Archive

View 117 posts and 2,229 comments by splodgenessabounds on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
354

Fathers/Custodysplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:11 AM
139

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights02/02/18 09:54 AM
110

Marriage/Childrensplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights04/01/18 10:47 PM
89

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:50 AM
82

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:49 AM
79

Marriage/Childrensplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:25 AM
79

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:54 AM
77

Discriminationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:48 AM
76

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/10/19 12:49 AM
71

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights22/03/18 06:55 AM
58

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/01/18 02:56 AM
53

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:35 AM
53

Discriminationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:09 AM
49

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:06 AM
49

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:32 AM
49

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:56 AM
48

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:03 AM
48

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:18 AM
45

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:46 AM
44

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:58 AM
41

Humoursplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:51 PM
41

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:39 AM
39

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:20 AM
35

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:08 AM
34

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights21/01/18 11:07 AM
31

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights01/10/18 12:47 PM
31

Humoursplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:24 AM
29

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights19/01/18 10:01 AM
27

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:34 AM
27

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights08/03/19 11:37 PM
26

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:41 AM
26

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights12/11/16 09:06 PM
25

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/01/16 08:10 AM
24

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights05/12/17 11:04 PM
22

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:21 AM
21

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:40 AM
21

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:34 AM
21

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights12/03/20 09:29 AM
21

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights28/08/17 08:54 AM
20

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:22 AM
19

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights07/02/17 08:38 AM
18

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights13/12/15 04:54 AM
18

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:26 PM
18

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:19 AM
17

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:08 PM
17

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:13 AM
17

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights16/03/20 07:15 AM
16

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:39 AM
16

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights16/10/16 11:25 AM
16

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights29/10/16 09:47 AM
16

Anti-MRMsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:10 PM
15

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:10 AM
15

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:50 AM
15

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights21/08/16 09:34 AM
14

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:53 AM
14

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights08/03/17 08:22 AM
13

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:09 PM
13

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:50 PM
12

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:20 AM
12

Humoursplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights23/03/20 08:16 AM
12

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:34 AM
11

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:51 AM
11

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:20 AM
11

Questionssplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:35 AM
10

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:54 AM
10

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:26 AM
10

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:04 PM
9

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:00 AM
9

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:44 AM
9

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights05/04/19 10:24 PM
9

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights04/06/17 09:44 AM
8

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:18 PM
8

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:00 AM
8

Discriminationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:45 AM
8

Humoursplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:05 PM
7

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:55 AM
7

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:49 AM
7

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:32 AM
7

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:28 PM
7

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:37 AM
6

Fathers/Custodysplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:28 AM
6

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights13/10/18 10:49 PM
6

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:44 AM
6

False Accusationsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:52 AM
6

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:51 AM
5

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:46 AM
5

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:34 AM
5

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:49 AM
5

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:47 PM
5

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:47 AM
5

Marriage/Childrensplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights15/12/17 06:15 AM
5

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:44 AM
5

Legal Rightssplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights03/05/19 08:07 AM
5

Legal Rightssplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:26 AM
5

Progresssplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:52 PM
5

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:26 AM
5

Edu./Occu.splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:25 AM
4

Fathers/Custodysplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:39 AM
4

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/01/18 02:54 AM
4

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:20 AM
3

Humoursplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights11/02/19 09:58 AM
3

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:15 AM
3

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights31/12/15 09:33 AM
3

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights27/02/12 05:39 AM
3

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:40 AM
2

Feminismsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/11/17 02:40 AM
2

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights31/12/18 11:22 AM
2

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:37 PM
2

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:14 AM
1

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:01 AM
1

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights22/10/18 09:32 AM
1

splodgenessabounds/r/MensRights06/04/19 10:31 PM
1

Social Issuessplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:36 AM
1

Humoursplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:44 PM
0

Generalsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights20/01/17 09:33 AM
0

Activism/Supportsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights11/08/16 11:08 AM
0

Anti-MRMsplodgenessabounds/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:02 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,229 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Original video by Stalker Sarai Tu: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wC6i2aStxM
/r/MensRights12/03/20 11:09 AM
2

An antidote to whatever the latest fad is about how rubbish men are.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 09:35 AM
2

Perhaps one day this bloke will wake up to the fact that women are human too, and that whatever he's been taught about men is mostly secondhand rubbish (but may contain some truths). A (sym)pathetic soul might wish him a gentle awakening: I hope he wakes up to the truth with a really startling event. Why? Not because I wish ill on this chap, but because the lessons that last longest are often those that are hardest learnt. Ask any man who's loved and lost (his children, his home, his money, his …
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:22 AM
11

My standard response to all these "debates" about male circumcision is this: 1) If any male over the age of consent chooses to be circumcised of his own volition because he wants to align with this religion or that culture, I have no problem with it; 2) Consequently, barring a serious medical condition, there is no justification whatsoever for hacking bits off infant boys (and extremely sensitive bits at that). To do otherwise is an act of barbarism and is no less barbaric than some cultures' pr…
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:45 AM
1

"Welease Woger!"
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:31 AM
2

You should write copy for Reddit Thanks for the offer, but I'll pass ;) Too many years spent writing technical reports for clowns who insisted the way I wrote didn't "align with ACME LTD's Mission Statement" etc.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:28 AM
11

I have NFI why your comment is being downvoted. Have an upvote to redress the balance.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:45 AM
51

This sort of asinine bollocks about suicide drives me up the bloody wall, it really does. Women actually attempt suicide more but are less successful 1) Source please. 2) Let me guess - women are less successful because toxic patriarchy (or something) prevents them from being as successful as men. Women tend to use methods with less violent means because they think about whoever might find them Claptrap. 1) How many successful suicides have you interviewed re: what they thought about the effect …
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:41 AM
3

Why was I singled out? Was it maybe.....the subreddits I frequent? or The keywords that come up in my posts? I don't know, but it seems to me like its probably not far off. I was on an entirely unrelated sub earlier today (can't remember which, but possibly r/australia) when I came across a collapsed comment (with children) tagged "Potentially Toxic". Me being me, I clicked on it and found nothing other than a few f-bombs and some pretty average centre-right opinion - nothing to frighten the chi…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:04 AM
4

Bettina Arndt has used this hashtag for ages.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:04 AM
1

Some subs (I'm guessing /feminism is one of them) auto-ban anyone who posts on /mensrights or /KiA or any any other sub on their hit-list. My posting history got me auto-banned from r/AskMenOver30 - it's Reddit, it's Reactionary.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 09:01 AM
1

I don't live in Alabama, but otherwise you're spot on.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 08:38 AM
1

I can imagine the chorus: "WTF does this have to do with mens' rights?" Here's the thing: the rights that boys and men have (or do not have) do not occur in a vacuum. IMO this discussion is quite valuable in any attempt to understand why 'Western' (and several 'Eastern') cultures no longer value men nor our (largely) workable traditions (The Enlightenment, the rationale behind scientific enquiry, the technology that enables Feminist Mathematics). Both of these people are IMO worth listening to: …
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:24 PM
2

The Feminist movement has spent some decades building momentum (and TBF decades ago there were issues that women faced that needed addressing). The problem (or one of them) is that their narrative has become the mainstream opinion, much of it supported as the default one by the apathy of nearly everyone who isn't involved in gender politics. It's not difficult to figure out how we got to this absurd (and corporate-sanctioned) world-view: the difficult bit is how to move things beyond where we ar…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:01 PM
2

If so, why not house them? At least everyone knows where we all are.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 11:12 AM
1

Haven't men always been more comfortable with living alone, or just being alone in general? I honestly can't say. But I can say that there's an increasing number of us who are working out ways of doing so - whether or not society benefits from that impetus remains to be seen.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 11:10 AM
18

I propose "take women seriously". I propose: take people seriously. Leave sex out of it.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:17 AM
11

Isn't that the credo of "men going their own way"? Bar swapping the sexes, it's no different: e.g. ...marriage has historically presented women with two options, neither good: marry a man and sacrifice your autonomy and career goals to become financially dependent on him. Or marry a man and maintain your own career but be prepared to have a “second shift” career taking care of him and the home. Or: ...marriage has historically presented men with two options, neither good: marry a woman and sacri…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:07 AM
10

Pretty much that. I came across the MGTOW thing a few years ago via this sub and although there is some sensible advice within it, it's not something I've ever "identified" with - I simply live without needing a female partner. Generations of blokes did it before me.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:54 AM
18

...the residents of College Point have been unequivocal that a shelter for 200 single men would be wholly inappropriate for this residential site in close proximity to several schools," State Sen. John Liu said What on earth has temporary housing for 200+ homeless men got to do with schools? Presumably there will still be hundreds of homeless men in the area (so the risk of whatever it is that got the locals' knickers in a knot still exists), but now without shelter. NIMBYism at its worst.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:38 AM
1

Wilco.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:56 AM
2

New link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPfhASOano8 Worth watching the video and reading Vogel's Master's thesis. Bear in mind that the policies apply to the state of South Australia, not the whole country, although I should not be surprised to discover that Vic, ACT and other states have adopted similarly biased policies.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:38 AM
1

The video is back up again. New link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPfhASOano8
/r/MensRights03/10/19 06:33 AM
1

The sexual contract changes with marriage. See also: Bettina Arndt with Karen Straughan
/r/MensRights05/09/19 10:37 AM
2

That doesn't solve the problem. True. As an example, de facto relationshits here (Oz) are, in law, regarded the same as an official marriage in most cases, but particularly when it comes to separation and children.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 10:04 AM
2

I even think happiness is overrated It's a panacea we're all being sold nearly all the time, from films to endless hours of TEDx lectures to shelves straining with the weight of "self-help" books; what all of them steer well clear of is that what they're selling is placebo, not panacea. What most of us want (IMO) is not happiness but contentment. I believe the MGTOW path is a bitter one IME it's not so much that as it is a bitter pill: once swallowed it gives you reflux from time to time, but th…
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre02/09/19 10:53 AM
1

EYEIsBloke explores the social and cultural reasons why the disadvantages that men and boys face are not taken anywhere near as seriously as those facing women and girls.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:42 AM
1

I'm curious how everyone here deals with depression, when it's (at least partly) caused by stuff relating to this sub Others have mentioned this before, but I'll repeat it - if you're down, stop reading stuff about MR (everywhere, not just here). The second thing to be aware of is that (IME) a depressed/ down mindset can draw you into reading/ watching/ thinking about the cruddy aspects of life. Doing so can drag your frame of mind down further, which... rinse, repeat. Thanks for the post - this…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:33 AM
2

All-round solid advice/ info - I've not got much of any use to add, but I do want to highlight this bit: Avoid dating apps. In general but especially when you're depressed, they make money off of battering men into buying subscriptions. Try and avoid external validation until you're satisfied with yourself where you're already at. ... and your allied earlier comment: if you're struggling with depression you honestly shouldn't involve a romantic partner Couldn't agree more. For one thing it's unf…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:23 AM
1

Righto. I look forward to the day when multiple re-posts of pointless faceboo/ twatter/ Pox Media get booted off this sub. And I repeat - my post was not flagged as a re-post when I submitted it.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:35 AM
1

1) It's not spam; 2) If you're going to come down this hard because it's a re-post, at least fix the fcking software so that it shows up as a fcking re-post. I look forward to your reply.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:14 AM
1

Mary O'Brien works as a specialist in agricultural spray technology. As a result of years of contact with, and exposure to, appalling rates of male suicide in regional and rural areas of Central Qld and discovering how woeful support for blokes was, she decided to push for action and better support. She has set up a national help forum for blokes in rural areas. See: Are You Bogged Mate? I'm sure many who live and work out in the sticks or in agriculture will find what Mary O'Brien talks about v…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 07:48 AM
1

As long as the purpose is to increase competence, not hire more women. And that's the test, whether it's FDNY or the London Fire Brigade or the NSWFB. Why not have an actual test where you actually drag bodies around in a smoke filled room? I don't know that that's not a test that the NSWFB and the London Fire Brigade (and all others like them) don't apply to all candidates (notwithstanding the instances you previously referred to) As far as dragging "dead" weight around goes, I'm 5'8", have had…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:36 PM
6

If everyone passes the same (presumably stringent) tests, I couldn't give a two ha'penny toss what sex/ gender/ whatever any fireman is, as long as they're there and they help get me out.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 09:32 AM
4

I see what you're driving at. At the same time, a bloke who's got a lot of muscle strength but can't flex and bend isn't much use in an emergency evacuation either. Secondly, even someone with a light build (male or female) can lift far heavier weights than themselves (when they're trained how to).
/r/MensRights01/07/19 08:54 AM
4

Agreed, it's a very thorough and adept job at tracing the roots of the term and its more recent misuse/ abuse. At 2m30s: well fancy that - Michael Kimmel in 1993 leading the charge against the MRM: ..We claim that only by developing an explicitly pro-feminist politics can men's lives be meaningfully changed." I can't argue that there's no truth in that...
/r/MensRights01/07/19 08:37 AM
2

And before doing that, you should define what constitutes a problem Not to mention define "alt-right" and show how this sub is "a weakness to alt-right manipulation" (whatever that might mean). I also object to /fudediluji's constant equating of those science disciplines that study quantifiable matters with the "sciences" of sociology and behaviour - they are quite different, and his/ her sleight-of-hand has not gone unnoticed.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 07:12 AM
8

it sends infants into shock I'm glad you wrote "infants" because that is what most of them are - most of those who get cut AFAICT are mere days old and still adjusting to the trauma of being squeezed through a passage so tight it squashes their skull. Like an infant needs another (mostly) unnecessary shock.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:15 AM
9

How does the old joke go...? "If you were a gentleman, you'd offer me your seat." "And if you were a lady, I'd let you have it."
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:05 AM
2

kinda like Winston’s cautionary note after El Alamein: ‘This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.’ On the odd occasion I'm optimistic, I'm inclined to agree. When I'm not [And] after Dunkirk: ‘We must be very careful not to assign to this deliverance the attributes of a victory. Wars are not won by evacuations. But there was a victory inside this deliverance, which should be noted.’ Whichever and whatever, We are the luckiest men …
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:49 PM
1

You cannot look at an accusers history because you know, it might prove people innocent. Just the accused (male) history is microscopically analysed. Something presumption something innocence.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:57 PM
2

[Roy went through] two trials before a witness revealed [that] his false accuser was a serial fantasist, and [wrecked] a life that cannot be returned to... Priest (retd.) Roy explains how the false rape accusation industry can cause terminal cancer.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:39 AM
1

Or just finish.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:09 AM
2

she stopped producing her woke content. Or the sort of "wokeness" other people wanted to hear about, at least. Time and tide wait for no man huperson and all that.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:09 AM
1

Presumably she'll shriek that the free market is a Pastryarkle construct, at which point it would be entirely appropriate to reply: "Money is a social construct, but that didn't stop you trying to make shitloads of it hawking specious bollocks to the gullible". It couldn't happen to a more deserving person, but I bet she stashed a lot of cash when the going was good. ETA: Sarkeesian’s group, which had two employees plus a producer, has raised and spent about $1.6 million over the past five years…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:58 AM
1

I'm so moved by that that I don't stop crying and doesn't know where to start You being that moved is your start. Your son needs to know that.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:25 AM
11

I'm glad to see that Patrick Graham's original film has been mirrored by Mike. It deserves all the publicity it can get.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:18 AM
1

Simon is one of the many innocent falsely accused of rape every year, driven to suicide attempts by the stress. A contributor to "We Believe You", on this channel, this is his story of how he was abused. Thank you Simon, for coming through and being brave enough to talk about it. Simon was accused of a sexual assault by a woman who apparently did not realise it would be physically impossible for him to do any of what she described due to his leg disability. Please pass content like this on (and …
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:58 AM
2

I bet if you look closely you'll find that these "sources" are all friends or co-workers or at least ideological allies of the authors of this paper, and that they all set out to prove what they already believed to be true That's one of the core problems right there. u/fudediluji likes to bang on about "the scientific literature" as though human interaction was as hard a discipline as maths or physics or chemistry, whereas sociology is much less about quantifiable data than it is influence and i…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:46 AM
4

a redditor will skim down to the references and find just the title of the source. Then he'll post just the title like "see! I told you they were biased!" I made it very plain that I'd skimmed the paper and that I'd read it fully and come back with further, more informed comment. FTR, I said I was sceptical, not (as you claim) that I'd found the smoking gun. But thanks for exaggerating. It's completely unscientific thinking. We're discussing people and opinions and values - "unscientific thinkin…
/r/MensRights20/06/19 07:16 AM
11

I've skimmed the pdf (thanks u/iainmf) and I'm not convinced: either by the "methods" or the authors' claims of any sort of objective analysis. I'll reply later, once I've had time to read and digest, but as an entree they cite "Massanari (2017)" very frequently in setting the context for the framework of their paper and for their interpretation, so I went and had shufty at their reference list... Massanari, A. 2017. # Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture …
/r/MensRights19/06/19 10:08 AM
5

For those who don't know, Mark Pearson is the bloke who ~4 years ago was arrested and charged with sexually assaulting a woman at Waterloo Station (London), a crime he could not possibly have committed. This is his short summary of what happened to him, the way in which the police, the Crown Prosecution Service and lawyers handled matters, and the effects upon him. Snippets from his interview appear in Patrick Graham's We Believe You which I thoroughly recommend. Even if the true rate of false s…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:34 AM
1

what should I have done, let it slide? talk to him? I didn’t do anything but maybe I should have. Unless you'd already known what the content of his presentation was going to be, there's probably not much you could/ should have done at the time. Now that you've reflected on it, perhaps - rather than going head-to-head with him - you might begin sending him some factual articles about men's rights issues (e.g. suicide, homelessness, imprisonment, workplace deaths) and say "Have a read of these an…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 06:43 AM
4

I can't recommend this video enough. This bloke (EYEIsBloke aka the Glass Blind Spot) nails this. As a rule, I don't spruik youtube channels, but in this case I'll make an exception. The Glass Blind Spot:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7kHX39cBk5goUrh3H5qAKg
/r/MensRights05/06/19 01:16 PM
1

Thank you for your reply - I'm happy to hear that my rough thoughts rang a bell with you. I am by no means optimistic (I don't think I have ever been a "positive thinker"), nor do I think of myself as possessing inner strength. My continuing existence is partly habit, partly bloody-minded persistence and (latterly) the lack of a decent excuse to finish matters. It isn't that I seek to be happy (whatever that loaded word means): I don't even know what 'fulfillment' means any more. What's the word…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:57 PM
2

Or even an occasionally odd one?
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:11 AM
1

I will no longer help women. They earned that Yeah, nah. If I think someone is in desperate straits (bleeding profusely/ not breathing/ unconscious etc.) I'll do what I can to render assistance - it's a natural human instinct. If the situation is less serious I might stop to see that they're on top of things.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:51 AM
1

Absolutely everyone who can, SHOULD take a first aide course that includes CPR I agree with you completely. First Aid ought to be taught to teenagers at school (and uni students): whether or not CPR/ EAR always helps a casualty is neither here nor there - one day, it might be your loved one or a close friend who needs urgent help.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:44 AM
2

Competition will sort out anything wrong in the market I admire your optimism, if not your naiveté.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:36 AM
6

An immunization does not require an infants consent What the flying fuck does that have to do with mutilating an infant boy (or girl, come to that) unnecessarily? Better trolls, please.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:28 AM
7

Getting yourself cut as an adult is fine by me, and I have no problem with boys having to be cut because of a medical condition. Mutilating your infant son on the grounds of "religion" or "my baby, my choice" is barbaric.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:25 AM
5

The Hypocritical Oath in her case...
/r/MensRights03/06/19 08:19 AM
5

This is his account. Whether or not you or I believe it is not the point: he is entitled to the same essential rights everyone should be afforded, regardless of sex, race, religion or upbringing.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:43 AM
2

This is the same Meryl Streep who backs the US Equal Rights Amendment, I presume?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:17 AM
1

Falsely accused of rape or serious sexual assault - the number of victims of lies is rising exponentially. This film tells a small sample of the reality. Find out more https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZWpArkAeudzyqXYKY67TCg At the risk of repeating myself, The Glass Blind Spot is a channel more people should follow.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 09:59 AM
2

I can’t promise you that. I’m sorry but I can’t. A few years ago, I was in the same "headspace". I won't offer platitudes because I know how fcuking irritating they are (despite the other person intending the best). I don't know what factors got you into the place where you are or were, but my Dad's death, splitting up with my partner of 23 years, moving house and the collapse of a partnership business combined with isolation and long-term severe depression and a few attempts at suicide got me t…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 07:25 AM
3

It's always encouraging to read or hear a woman who's not just fed-up with the way men are given the sharp end of the stick and who's prepared to stand up and say so. Who wants a pregnant (no birth control until relatively recently) soldier, roofer, pipeline worker etc, and what pregnant woman or woman with children would want to do that anyways? The paradox is that I (59yo man) and blokes like me wouldn't want you there, even if you would or could. All of it is nasty, dangerous (if not lethal) …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:36 AM
3

women were sent to asylums simply for acting up No: PEOPLE were sent to asylums ... [ETA] Women were abused and way way more. I won't ask for a reference because I know you couldn't provide one, but which is worse: domestic abuse or being sent to war as a conscripted soldier to die in a freezing cold muddy ditch (along with millions of other ordinary blokes)? Which is worse: dying in the Somme or surviving it with a leg or an eye missing, gangrenous infections, deafness or "shell shock" (called …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:00 AM
2

MeToo has been a hard body blow to men My personal view is that it's got to the point where more and more women are speaking up, not just criticising MeToo but the general anti-male zeitgeist. I could be wrong, of course...
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:55 AM
1

Until men decide that it's worth threatening or realizing revolution to make that root condition change Yes, but: 1) gynocentrism (esp. among men); 2) generally men exhibit much less in-group preference than women (partly a corollary of higher levels of competitiveness between males). This isn't to say that a large enough minority of blokes at certain times in certain places couldn't cause a significant shift, just that it's unlikely IMO.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:50 AM
1

Well I'll be buggered. I was thinking of posting this here but I couldn't work an MR angle into it so I posted elsewhere. Nonetheless, here's a copypasta: See also: Jeannie Suk Gersen at The New Yorker As an (ageing) Englishman living in Straya I am well down the list of people to consult on this issue. Nonetheless and notwithstanding, it strikes me as peculiar that Prof. of Law (Harvard) Ronald Sullivan ("an African American law professor and faculty dean with a long history of freeing marginal…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 11:10 AM
2

Thanks for the links - I've been reading and re-reading the entries on that blog so I can get my head around the subtleties and it's been very, very worthwhile.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 10:03 AM
1

Because the BSA is providing experiences and resources to one group of the population but not another group, based on a single trait. It's not the fault (or the responsibility) of the Boy Scouts Assn. if the Girl Guides Assn. aren't doing their job, much less the fault of the boys. The fact that those running the GG aren't competent does not mean that the BSA should compensate.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:50 AM
6

“Why do you expect women to fight your battles for you? Start your own movement”. Also: "MRA's are misogynist arseholes"
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:03 AM
6

Like a name. We deal in truths not generalizations here Men's Sheds in Australia: 1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVx_SOxM78A 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJRnZ6KBNEo In the UK: https://www.gardenbuildingsdirect.co.uk/blog/women-demanding-entry-mens-sheds/ [edited to add context]
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:28 AM
3

And makes the wrong move...
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:07 AM
17

Two legs Useful but not necessary. Vagina Optional: see "male feminist". Also required: one mouth (the bigger and shoutier the better); filthy attitude toward anyone who proclaims not to be feminist (men especially); blindness to their own privileges; ability to move goalposts on demand. Optional: obese; bad hair/ badly-dyed hair; gender studies "qualiification".
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:05 AM
2

"Don't you oppress me..."
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:42 AM
6

Get a ticket in a line of work that is male-dominated. I'll be 60 next birthday, and I've never been out of work. I've done all sorts of work over the years (up to and including running a consultancy partnership for 15 years), and one of the trades I have that I can always rely on to get me work is as a (competent, professional) truck driver. If a truck licence is beyond your interest or means, get a fork-lift ticket - you will never be out of work again.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 11:25 AM
1

Thank you - not on my account, but on behalf of all those men who will be affected by this should it come to pass.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 11:16 AM
24

"Bettina talks to sex educator Tracy Sedman about new sexual consent courses teaching girls that 'regret sex' is sexual assault and consent can be withdrawn after the event"
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:58 AM
3

"Men" with more money than spine?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 07:28 AM
4

At the bottom of the front page: ALL PROCEEDS FROM WOMEN TEACH MEN WILL BENEFIT FEMALE EMPOWERMENT CHARITIES CHOSEN BY OUR TEACHERS. Well of course. I mean, having browbeaten the saps men who paid to learn how to be a man from a bunch of women, where else should their money be directed?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 07:26 AM
5

"One swallow doth not a Summer make" (Attributed to Aristotle)
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:53 AM
3

If you've got any good rhetorical tips, leave them below I'm not sure that this counts as a good tip, but here goes anyway. Quite recently, a (mostly pro-MRM) youtube channel I'd been subbed to for a couple of years posted a vid whose principle objectives I disagreed with; in the same vid they plugged what was essentially an advert to get cheap copies of some books by an author whose fundamental tenets I could not - in all conscience - have any truck with. I wrote an honest (if terse) comment in…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:40 AM
2

Roxanne Gay in spandex & a cape A subscribers-only feature on PornHub, I suspect.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:26 AM
3

fat superheros On Marvel next month: obese gender-fluid persons who are Survivors of Pastafarianism - see how they scale and conquer the Lasagne of Pastariachy.... by eating it. Raw.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:24 AM
20

A) Male tears or misogynistic vitriol from men's rights activists. We're lesbians, we're quite used witnessing [sic] the fragility of the male ego which literally cannot compute...[yada yada] Because we are (lesbian) Feminists: we are strong - hear us mewl about men. Honestly, I'm fed up to the back teeth with two things: 1) the demise of this silly cafe and its (optional) "man tax" and its rubbish coffee and its piss-poor service being hoicked on this sub - thrice is twice more than enough; 2) …
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:17 AM
2

Why does every woman know another woman that was raped... ...? It's who darling, not that - 'that' refers to things, 'who' refers to people. Grammar aside, how do you know that "every woman" knows "another woman" etc. etc.? Have you spoken to at least 49% of all women? A representative sample of 50% of all women? Something extrapolation error something.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:15 AM
1

The author of this tried but, in the final analysis, failed. Both the stairs and the escalator exist because there are at least two levels and levels and hire archies are all down to the work of Teh PatriarchyTM. In a truly equal-outcome world, everyone would be on the same level, thus obviating the need for stairs, escalators and lifts, and the Glass CeilingR would be replaced by a pretty rainbow.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:04 AM
1

Teh Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:54 AM
1

most men have no interest harming, controlling, or "having power over" women I wish more women (not just Feminists) understood this.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:58 AM
2

Do you mind if I quote you in an edit to the piece? Not at all, use my reddit name if you wish.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:53 AM
3

Dad lets you stay up late. He doesn't care how much "Fortnite" you play. Doesn't check to make sure your homework is done at night. Because divorced fathers (in the rare event they even get to spend with them) don't give a flying one about their children. Blow it our of your arse Michelle.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:28 AM
3

I concur.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:22 AM
4

if there [were] an ideal Men's Rights organization, with a budget comparable to NOW, what would you want it to do? What would its strategy be? What would its focus be? To draw from early analysis that this long-term study of MR suggests: 1) work on male suicide: address prevention, causes, long-term support; 2) push/ lobby for changes to legislation that address the unfair (and unconscionable) way fathers are treated in family courts/ divorce proceedings/ access to their children/ (so-called) fi…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 08:00 AM
2

Terrific work, geezer. I'm still reading through the piece, but - at first glance - your analysis of the data seems to be bearing fruit, especially regarding those aspects of men's rights issues that might be most profitably pursued (i.e. suicide rates, bias in family court, and bias in the criminal justice system) in public non-MRA spheres. In fact your observation Another interesting detail that I want to point out in the figure above is the relative distribution of first rankings among MRAs a…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 07:34 AM
63

Poor family Poor family my arse. They could have exercised their obvious and innate right to not have their 18-hour old infant son mutilated (in, I daresay, screaming pain).
/r/MensRights07/04/19 12:26 PM
3

I was going to post this very vid myself but you beat me to it. It is - as u/JohnKimble111 says - long but it is well worth the time since he explores not just the double standards within the UK Lib-Dem party on DV/ DA but how easily mass and social media accept that double standard.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 12:19 PM
1

Strange, it didn't get flagged as a repost but no probs
/r/MensRights07/04/19 07:17 AM
2

In terms of custody, they may be initially denied access while the parties deal with what has happened. But to be completely denied visitation would have to be for a very serious matter OK, fine. As I wrote elsewhere, IANAL and I have no direct experience in these things. Now, given your reasoning (and I don't doubt you're quoting the principles in good faith), explain why a retired senior copper would say what he said about the way the system is being used - largely by women - to both deny fath…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:12 PM
2

I can see from your perspective how in some situations they can be gained for the wrong reasons. but they still have a chance to explain their side. I have no direct experience in these matters, and IANAL. Nonetheless, if ADVO's can be issued regardless of any sensible interpretation of the circumstances, what difference would "explaining your side" (as the bloke to whom the ADVO applies) make? It's simply howling into the void. Also who profits in this situation? The party (usually the woman) w…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:01 PM
2

only if they breach the conditions Which, of course, depends largely on whose definition of a breach holds sway. One comment on the youtube vid went roughly along the lines of: Woman issues ADVO against bloke; Bloke objects (to no avail); Bloke can't see his children (because ADVO) but sends Xmas/ birthday gifts to his kids; Woman calls Polis, which automatically counts as a breach of (arbitrarily declared) ADVO. As the senior copper in the video says, it's no longer the case that the police hav…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 11:54 AM
3

she asked me how come I don't volunteer and that very few men do as well. In her particular location and in her particular field, it may well be true that more women than men volunteer. But who turns up in her field of volunteering in her locale is no guide to anything. When I was a volunteer for the NSW Rural Fire Service some years back, it was >9:1 male:female firefighters and a similar ratio applied in every other unit I came across. Does that mean that Australian women are slack b***hes whe…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 08:12 AM
2

She tried to deny that men work more hours per week Well that's because Teh Patriarchy. Also "Muh Wage Gap!!!"
/r/MensRights03/04/19 08:01 AM
8

What about us foetuses then?
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:46 AM
76

Did you know (#3141592654) that the adult male antechinus (an Australian marsupial roughly equivalent to the Eurasian mouse) only lives for a year because it essentially shags itself to death? Typical bloody males...
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:46 AM
60

But matters are actually worse than any of these numbers would suggest, according to a 2018 report by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR), a think tank that looks at public policy through the lens of gender. No bias there then, none at all. Move along, nothing to see here...
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:40 AM
3

Why are you always on about women, Stan?
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:27 AM
3

The Rape Event Horizon beckons...
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:20 AM
3

I’m so glad I’m no longer having sex outside of marriage (Self-love excepted, that is)
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:19 AM
4

Eeee, tha's askin' a lot, aren't thee.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:17 AM
0

NFI why your post has attracted so many downvotes cos it seems quite reasonable to me. But then, reddit ...
/r/MensRights03/04/19 07:10 AM
7

Well worth listening to this chat Bettina had with an anonymous retired senior copper and his views on the injustice doled out to partners slapped with Apprehended Domestic Violence Orders (men, mostly) in Australia. If you know people who don't believe that some women abuse the system, get them to watch this... EDIT Oops, sorry, the link above starts the video partway through - it starts here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHGdOjbtaSA /edit
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:52 AM
1

See also: The Sex Recession.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:50 PM
0

No, he's making himself look like a mug.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:40 AM
2

the entire function of the app is to oppress men Cobblers. It's a dating app where women initiate contact. Wind your victimhood status in.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:39 AM
1

EYEIsBloke delves into the White Male Privilege myth (as invented by Peggy McIntosh).
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:20 AM
2

Not to forget that many MSM/ social media/ blog articles misrepresent facts and issues, even to the point that they misrepresent (unintentionally or otherwise) a study they cite (e.g. the recent post here citing The Times of San Diego and its horseshit claim that women must register for the (US) Draft).
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:14 AM
1

Being English living in Oz and since this is a contentious issue that's been raised in the USA, I don't know if the top comment on this subject from r/news counts for anything or not, but I've copy-pasted this from (u)/VoicesAncientChina here: The writer of the article is mistaken when he interprets this decision as “ordering the government to register women 18-25.” The judge denied plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief, granting only declaratory relief instead, so no one has been ordered to…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:59 AM
1

VAG (VW Audi Group) have previous form in this sort of claptrap.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:16 PM
2

They infested academia, gathering tools from certain questionable methods of philosophy. See Camille Paglia
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:25 AM
1

When I posted this link I fully expected to find that it had been done before. To my slight surprise it hadn't, but perhaps that's because this bloke is - as Karen aka u/girlwriteswhat said - his channel is unreasonably under-subscribed.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:10 AM
2

I've never been a member of a gym, but I'm pretty confident of the following: 1) weights cost shitloads less than a treadmill or an exercise bike or any of the other complicated, electronically-adjustable, counterbalanced kit that a typical gym contains. 2) Women use weights too. 3) Regardless of who uses it or who uses it most, every bit of kit in the gym - the weights, the mats, the treadmills, the mirrors on the walls, even the bloody lighting and the decor - are tax-deductible, depreciable a…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:34 AM
3

Then see someone outside your family - your doc, a helpline, a counsellor. You're not done yet, not by a long shot, though you WILL have to act on your own behalf. It's your choice.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:03 AM
2

I'm pleased to see that almost none of the blokes on the train paid her any attention whatsoever. Perhaps, just perhaps, younger men are starting to realise that shouty, belligerent bitches women like this can be dealt with quite effectively by ... ignoring them.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:57 AM
1

My only substantial objection to your OP is this statement: I believe that the feminist movements was originally created for the empowerment of women in a patriarchal society, and helped pave the way for equality for men and women. Please define what you mean by "patriarchy". My belief is based on the history of legal inequalities between men and women - right to vote which then developed into them trying to gain cultural rights To follow on from the points u/mikesteane makes, in the UK women wh…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:40 AM
66

She may be telling the truth about that claim; she may not. Either way, get some handy facts and figures under your belt (e.g. male suicide rates, homelessness, workplace deaths, funding for breast cancer vs. prostate cancer, number of female-only vs. male-only DV shelters) because even if your tutor gives you a fair hearing, there's a fair chance some of your classmates won't.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:17 AM
2

Get counselling, pronto. See a doc/ GP, get them to refer you to appropriate counselling services. Write down everything - all the details - of your encounter and any subsequent interactions you have. You don't mention your family or friends - is there anyone you trust who you could talk to?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:05 AM
57

What if women do twice as many visits during a year as men, would that make it even more unfair? How about if women do half as many visits and have a much higher rate of complete dropout early on? All entirely irrelevant. Members - male or female - are charged an annual renewal fee upfront - they can go once a year or twice a day every day, makes no difference. But which gender is being discriminated against? Women $400 vs. men $500. Well whaddaya reckon, Einstein?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:54 AM
2

By Daniel the Spaniel, aka Daniel Bostock. See also Feminism with Annie Lennox.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:11 PM
2

For those living outside Oz, most of the bushfire-fighting is done by a volunteer force (Rural Fire Service in NSW, Country Fire Service in other states).
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:03 PM
6

To be fair, quite a few (volunteer) bushfire fighters are women.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:59 AM
1

See also Independent Man's commentary - take a glass... no, a bottle... of '19 Schadenfreude with you.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:47 AM
14

All very well, but the question we all want an answer to is: what brand of razor do these blokes use?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:10 AM
1

(and a literal PhD in romantic comedies) Gosh, tough field to get a Doctorate in. I mean, never mind all that maths, physics and engineering involved, and never mind inventing the Saturn V rocket and re-entry and whatnot. The toughest question that faced the Apollo 11 mission was: which RomComs would they watch on the journey? BTW what the hell is a "literal" PhD? Are there metaphorical ones?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:05 AM
3

In which First Dog on the Moon (Teh Graun Australia's "satirical cartoonist") shames all those appallingly spoilt man-babies who objected to the G*llette ad. If the cartoon makes you roll your eyes, wait till you see the comments... NB - live link. Normally I'd give an archive link but in this case I'm making it easy for people to comment.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 08:09 AM
3

Perhaps she took the Hypocritical Oath instead.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:47 AM
22

Because it's not like she'is "blaming the victim", is it...
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:32 PM
3

Perhaps the primary reason I posted this is that - even now - the old canard that's still doing the rounds is that, until Pankhurst & co turned up, men had the right to vote and women were disenfranchised. So far, so meme. In fact, it's nothing like as simple or as black-and-white. Up until the ascension of Queen Vic, <5% of men had voting rights at national elections. At the same time, any ratepayer - be they man, woman or goat - could vote at local and regional elections. In the pursuit of "eq…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:15 AM
2

No, Creasy et al use women as a credible mask for their own political purposes. None of her ilk give a two-ha'penny toss about the lives of ordinary workers, regardless of their sex.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:06 PM
1

It might appear to be about women, but it's actually about power. Creasy herself admits it.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:57 AM
1

I reject your reference to the term "ladies" in preference of "women", but otherwise I agree. I sincerely hope women and men alike take objection to the views of both and all their ilk.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:55 AM
8

At the very least, it's an honest, unprompted statement about the aim of Feminism spoken by an elected member of Parliament. See also Jess Phillips
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:03 AM
5

Because powerful, successful, financially-independent women are victims of Teh Patriarchy. See also The Glass Elephant's excellent takedown.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:59 AM
2

The 'Empathy Gap' writ large. The Glass Blindspot
/r/MensRights31/12/18 11:27 AM
5

Leaking emails doesnt help a court case it's a smear campaign to hurt victims of his crimes. I dont understand why you don't see the difference. Hes trying to paint a picture that they were all asking for it. So you've seen the emails in question? No? Then how do you know that What they said to him was irrelevant ...? People like you do this subreddit a disservice. Noble of you to be so concerned about the reputation of this sub but let me assure you that the moment this sub stops defending the …
/r/MensRights17/12/18 02:05 AM
3

On average, one woman a week is murdered by her current or former partner in this country and one in three have experienced violence by an intimate partner or ex. Sauce please (especially the 'one in three" claim). So, how do we discern potential perpetrators from the average bloke? I'm not sure, but I bet you, Mz. Squires, have some suggestions... ... the guy you think has got his act together, the one who outwardly seems just fine, who would never hit a woman actually can – and do. It can be t…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:07 AM
6

Defending the principles of the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial is not the same as defending Weinstein. I really do not understand why so many people cannot see this simple distinction.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 07:31 AM
19

I have a lot of time for John Waters. I'm happy to see that he is allowed a voice beyond his books, because he knows what the gig is. To be honest, I didn't finish reading the linked article, because the first half or third or whatever was enough - loud bells rang, my eyes went a bit misty, all that. I know, I know - her body, her choice. To force her (as if I could) to carry the pregnancies to termination would have been wrong, even if I could have (I didn't). I know, I know - it's all in the p…
/r/MensRights02/12/18 12:45 PM
2

IMO it's partly what u/aj_memes writes, combined with the fact that his agents are trying to rehabilitate his public image and that Gloria Hunniford (one of the co-presenters) is a close friend. It's a pity, however, that it takes an up-close-and-personal experience for someone with as public a profile as Cliff to stand for principle in public (but better late than never).
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:44 AM
1

I'd prove my innocence at the trial, as is tradition And if the jury found you guilty... what then? Would you still be squealing about "10 rapists" set free to visit their evil upon the innocent? as is tradition You mean the tradition that sets you (and "10 rapists") free because the jury exercised "reasonable doubt"? That tradition?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:33 AM
1

I don't particularly believe in the argument that ancient philosophical justifications for a legal system we won a revolutionary war in order to escape has any real weight outside of historic context I don't particularly believe this "revolutionary war" that you claim you fought has any relevance either, except as hyperbole. The adoption and adaptation of English common law by the US (and Australia, Canada, NZ, most of Europe...) is not the same thing as adopting or acceding to British rule. I s…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:25 AM
1

Yeah, no. Those 10 rapists you let free are going to rape again, What "10 rapists" where? Does the phrase "presumption of innocence" ring any bells? And what's the basis for your assertion that any or all of these ten "rapists" will harm others? The only thing the justice system cares about is whether the defendant is guilty of a very specific crime as judged by 12 peers beyond a shadow of a doubt. Fundamentally wrong. The standard of proof (in countries whose judicial system is based on English…
/r/MensRights29/11/18 07:02 AM
3

this is how corporate america fucks the system even more For "America", see also Australia, Canada, the UK, the EU, NZ etc.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:38 AM
1

HHHOOOWWW omg just what the hell holy fuck omg I can’t comprehend this level of of just, wrongfulness It's this level of analysis and reasoned response that makes reddit what it is.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:31 AM
2

I don't know how common this sort of thing is, but for those of you considering marrying/ having an LTR with a partner from overseas, it might be worth watching this.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:30 AM
3

So its just being alone from here on out. If it's of any use to you, I think the knack is to find some way of making peace with that probability. In my case, it's taken me some years to get the hang of it (and I still get the blues now and then), but if I can reconcile myself to the single life (58yo, ~7 years out from a 23yr LTR, long-term melancholic depression) then I'm sure you'll find a way too. Also One of the few things that make me happy is working on cars. Not expensive cars either ... …
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:54 AM
1

you don't need a woman to be happy And if you hook up with the wrong one (and there are plenty of those) a relationshit with them will probably make things worse.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:33 AM
1

There is nothing here but loneliness, failure, sickness, pain, and death. There is nothing to look forward to, nothing to enjoy right now. Nothing. Around me, the people have everything. They still complain. Their complaints are listened to. I am not a human being. This is a one day old account, so there's a minor risk you're trolling. Otherwise, posting a para like the one above shouts "depression" at me - if you haven't already, go seek professional medical help, starting with your GP.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:31 AM
3

Wait a minute, wait. Who said "Janice" identifies as female? Tsk tsk. Clear your desk, go straight HR, do not collect $200.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:59 AM
5

Janice Fiamengo is easily one of Dave Rubin's better interviewees; she covers a range of subjects, many of which are directly relevant to men and boys, and the last 5mins or so "inflammatory comment" are worth the entry price alone. Go watch.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:26 AM
1

I am not posting this link for any other reason than this: that it's well past time that people recognised and remembered that it is blokes who designed and built every rivet and every wire of the infrastructure we all take for granted, and it's pretty much blokes who were all of the deaths and crippling injuries suffered during the building of the Sydney Harbour Bridge, the Snowy Mountains Hydro project, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Hoover dam and so on and so forth. I'll be 59 shortly: I've worked…
/r/MensRights22/10/18 11:32 AM
1

IM's title for the video is based on the Commonwealth Govt's RESPECT Initiative.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 11:02 PM
2

It's important to differentiate between incarceration and making a person bear the social stigma of a sexual assault. What "sexual assault"? The social stigma should have a lower standard than 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. Why? Given the numerous examples of men (it's nearly always men, isn't it) either having their jobs "terminated" or their reputations permanently stained (if not terminally damaged) purely on the basis of (so-called) social media and MSM speculation, and the mob-rule effect so …
/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:42 AM
0

The majority of people who consider themselves "in favor of men's rights" while still remaining leftist are the r/menslib crowd. Sauce please. I'm sick to my back teeth of this tired rhetoric that people like me who lean left-wing are white-knighting (r)/menslib pansies who couldn't distinguish principle from the hole in their arse. As some wag once remarked, "There are more things twixt Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy, Horatio"
/r/MensRights11/10/18 10:20 AM
2

Before you go into battle, see also PASK (Partner Abuse State of Knowledge project) - I did a summary here; See also publications by Murray Strauss.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:50 AM
1

Yes, typo on my part.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:33 AM
30

Not without paying, no. They really did get this (and many other equally absurd papers) published in peer-reviewed journals, to the extent that SpingerLink at al will charge you 35 Euro for access. But you can read the authors' potted history of the entire saga here
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:08 PM
35

The people who wrote this (excellent) paper are both taking the piss and making a serious point: that the humanities "literature" is so far up its own arse it can see daylight. But they've done a lot more than just this paper. See also the Dog Park paper in which they posited that "we should train men like we do dogs—to prevent rape culture"; arguing that '“a fat body is a legitimately built body” as a foundation for introducing a category for fat bodybuilding into the sport of professional body…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:00 PM
11

When even the Australian ABC (not noted for its work for the rights of blokes) acknowledges the role that dogs can play in the mental and emotional well-being of men, you know there must be some truth to the old adage about "a man's best friend". And if this article's overtones of "toxic masculinity" get under your (flea) collar, Paul Elam's take on the bond between men and dogs might provide some relief. Ingo, my last faithful canine mate, died 4 months after my ex left some 6 years ago - suffi…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:02 PM
1

The accompanying youtube vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uaCljuywkY
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:11 AM
5

1) Define "lefties". In some respects I'm "leftier" than most "lefties"; in others many "lefties" regard me as only slightly left of Margaret Hilda (bloody) Thatcher. 2) The friends I have (of my generation or younger) are bloody decent human beings and would tell anyone who tried to shoehorn them into "liberals/progressives/socialists" or the polar opposite where to get off. Most people I know of operate on much subtler premises than "far-left loonies vs alt-right nutters". the most superficial…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:11 PM
1

See also: http://robtiller.com.au/
/r/MensRights13/05/18 02:07 PM
1

Bettina Arndt's interview with Rob Tiller: Part One and Part Two.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 01:01 PM
3

We wouldn't have to worry about hypergamy at least in terms of reproduction. We wouldn't have to change anything about Western society. Women who want children will go where the viable sperm is. It would also reduce the likelihood of genetic bottlenecks (not that that's anything other than a hypothetical problem with ~7.5bn population) that breeding with a limited subset of men or women would bring.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:01 AM
1

Cream and scum alike rise to the top.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:50 AM
1

Interesting angle - got any decent evidence?
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:48 AM
2

If they're in a LTR, that is. If they're childless and single (separated, divorced) it'd be an extra impost and thus they'd either have to work more or take home less.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:35 AM
1

After 3 years on this sub this has been an eye opening experience for me. I've never been on the receiving end of the group-think mob here before. It's Reddit; this sub is no less subject to mob down-voting than any other I've been on, though it is less narrow-minded than many.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:28 AM
2

I don't know if we're referring to the same thing, but I do remember a thing here (Oz) where a woman had parked in a bus lane somewhere in Sydney, and when the Polis finally turned up and investigated her BAC was something like 0.4 (legal limit is 0.05). Plod didn't prosecute because they couldn't prove she had driven her car in the last 2 hours, but as it turned out she had already driven her kiddies to school a bit earlier (or something like that, I'd have to dig up the article to be certain).
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:21 AM
3

It's been posted 3 times in the last year (the latest a month or so ago) but never gets any attention - go figure.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 08:09 AM
7

Just to reinforce the mindset that RAWA (Relationships Australia [Western Australia]) has, read their Family Abuse Integrated Response (FAIR) page, especially the "services" RAWA offers to male victims of DV. "Integrated" they certainly are. Bettina Arndt's article also mentions a CaFE event in 2016, in which Dr. Tonia Nicholls gave an excellent presentation entitled "The uncomfortable facts on IPV" - if you haven't watched it, I recommend you do so, and then reflect on the fact that a governmen…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 10:47 AM
1

It sounds as though he's got himself hitched to someone who's not shy of manipulating to get whatever it is she wants and - if she's prepared to go this far this early - he's in for a rough ride (and so are the children). I wish I could suggest a fix, but as you say there is no short and easy one - he's got himself most of the way up Shit Creek. I don't think it's hopeless though - he's got you as a confidant and right-hand man and he's a copper; if anyone's got access to personal counselling an…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:11 AM
11

Perhaps information like this could be used to distinguish r/mensrights from other groups? I can't see how. The analysis (by the originator's own text) is based on: 1st-degree subreddit moderator relationships [which] were overlaid to make this network graph. 1st degree, here refers to degrees of separation. For each of the subreddit neighborhoods, I started off with the target subreddit (listed below), and searched outward based on the moderators of the target sub. I stopped when I found the se…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:54 AM
3

I've lost count of the times men have rejected or insulted me simply because I was brighter, wittier or cleverer than they are. Could it be they rejected you because they realised what an insufferable, pompous arse you are? And does your complete failure to even consider that confirm how insufferable and pompous you are?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:02 AM
547

Unless my eyesight is much worse than I thought, I can see no reference to Feminism at all in this photo. She seems to be a young woman holding up a placard declaring what sensible, well-adjusted women stand for, an outlook she seems happy to endorse.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 10:34 AM
1

I knew that this would happen. Women gaining a voice, swiftly followed by an impassioned plea for them to pipe down for the sake of vulnerable men. Those impudent women, making their allegations outside of a courtroom (and within it), with no regard for the impact on men. Because no matter what it is, it’s always about men. This time, we are hearing about suicides of alleged abusers, following the increase in reports attributed to #MeToo. Hyperbolic nonsense. The reasonable arguments against wha…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 06:37 AM
18

The whole thing puts me in mind of that Graun article a few days ago in which Cathy Newman (yes, that Cathy Newman) had a big fat whinge along the lines of "you can't trust any Wikipedia article about any woman because men write the interwebs and it's all so wrong". Here, an undisclosed number of "women's studies" undergrads are editing Wikipedia entries on the basis of alleged "gender imbalance" (criteria unexplained). Let's assume Newman's argument that you can't believe a word of "a woman’s W…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 10:52 AM
2

The other issue that comes to immediate mind is that while it is true that the smaller subject will get hurt (often worse/more often)in a straight up brawl, what is the breakout of weapon usage versus not in violent confrontation,how many convert from one to the other, and how many are followed by a converted confrontation ( 2 different confrontations. e.g. non-weapon confrontation to a weaponized confrontation) And that is very much the problem with IPV reporting, IPV stats and especially how I…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:03 AM
1

I've seen increasingly studies saying that a large percentage (certainly not all, though) is reciprocal with no obvious single direction You can try reading through PASK Partner Abuse State of Knowledge project (which is a meta-analysis of IPV studies), I can't give you a direct link but that's a resource worth keeping to hand. Your principal point (that DV isn't entirely a one-way thing), however, remains true. when things get physical in such an environment, the smaller party is usually going …
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:56 AM
3

The Agenda was discussed at the last meeting of your local Patriarchy Chapter. If you keep missing meetings we'll have to rescind your Male Privilege card.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:18 AM
3

But for the lobsters, she would. Happy cake day.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:15 AM
1

agenda Ah, but which? Maybe it doesn't matter, it's all fluid nowadays (though it still stains the sheets).
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:13 AM
3

“The internet is being written by men with an agenda,” she says. Tumblr is a tool of Teh Patriarchy? Really?? “Look at a woman’s Wikipedia page and you can’t believe a word of it.” Because there are no female Wikipedia editors - that's how sexist the internet is. Newman and Peterson had argued over the existence of the gender pay gap (which he denied as a qualitative fact) Wrong again - he attempted (no thanks to Newman's constant interruptions and derailing) to qualify an unqualified claim. the…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:00 AM
2

Labour is better for traditional Left causes right now, like workers rights Well, that's what they claim their policies wrt workers are: what they deliver usually falls some way short. Tony B Liar saw to that.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 06:35 AM
9

Excellent, thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 09:30 AM
3

all parties involved keep the rape in one place without moving On paper, yes...
/r/MensRights01/03/18 09:26 PM
6

Oh I see, you couldn't type what it was you meant. Well, we all make mistakes. Now, how have you concluded that western societies did not consider women and non-whites to be full persons for a century or two after the advent ... given that the Declaration you now cite states that it "pertain[s] to human nature itself"? Before you reply, you might want to look up terms like 'coverture'.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:30 AM
9

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was proclaimed in 1948. So yes, your a century or two after the advent ... claim does warrant explanation. And you still haven't answered my earlier question.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 09:15 AM
3

Ow
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:54 AM
3

No, men were not always protected. Then, human rights appeared. Which covered men. But did not cover those other categories which eventually arose. So the definition of "human" didn't - according to you - include women and children? Interesting. Got a source for that, or are you just pissing into the wind?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:53 AM
3

Your first four have covered the questions I thought of off the top of my head, but if I come up with anything else I'll post later. On a side note, if you're not familiar with Cal Poly (or "progressive" college campuses in general), you might want to do a bit of digging on that campus' politics just to get a general idea of what sort of reception Cassie Jaye's film will get. I did a bit of digging around on this event's sponsors and posted the results here
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:33 AM
3

A few people are asking "Who are 'Men Against Violence'?" (the event's sponsors) which I thought was a fair question, so I did a bit of digging. AFAICT there is no website that directly relates to any query I concocted that might yield results; that said, there are many "Men Against Violence" groups at state and county level, including: one closely connected with The Men's Story Project1; another with connections to CALCASA - Californian Coalition Against Sexual Assault; another based in Florida…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:24 AM
10

Good on him. Thanks for posting to let us know - this also belongs on the UK reddit sub, it'd be worth doing a cross-post if only because more sponsorship.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:45 AM
8

Auld said the Center’s events are used to be typically well-attended, with roughly 20 students at weekly meetings, 50-60 at film screenings, and 200-300 students at its flagship annual events. FTFY.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:26 AM
3

jobs don't provide the same social cohesion as they did in the past That's pretty much what I was getting at in my comment (the long-winded one below). Unless you're in some field like medicine or law or academia, you can be out of work tomorrow regardless of how good you are.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:49 AM
1

So you're saying we should live as mendacious, suicidal gay lobsters?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:38 AM
6

women have usually had the edge in terms of forming social support and creating a sense of belonging. Men tend to lag in that respect. And I think that may be a factor in the suicide disparity. I've seen commentary in a number of places to this effect and though I couldn't put my finger on research that backs this and your allied points up, I'm sure it exists - I'll have a rummage when I get time. As well as being less adept than women at social "networking" (or being brought up to be so, at lea…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 05:33 AM
2

Partner Abuse State of Knowledge (PASK) project: Facts and Statistics at a Glance. Claimed to be "The world's largest domestic violence research data base, 2,657 pages, with summaries of 1700 peer-reviewed studies" it's the best compendium on IPV I've found so far. Whitaker et al (2007): Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence; Am. J. Pub. Health. Kelly (2003): Disabusing the Definition of Domestic…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:52 AM
8

What do you say? "Cash only, no cheques".
/r/MensRights23/02/18 12:35 AM
1

n+1th'ed
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:56 AM
9

I appreciate the predicament you and your BF are in, and I hope you get it fixed soon. But this: my boyfriends ex accused him of rape when he broke up with her. [... ... ...] She comes over one night with booze, and initiates a threesome. ... has me scratching my head. Why the hell would you/ your BF want to have anything whatsoever to do with someone as apparently off the deep end as this, let alone invite them over for drinks and other fun? It's like inviting a sabre-toothed tiger over and com…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:55 AM
2

Alternet is 110% proof concentrated Feminist/ SJW bilge. Unless you're going to comment, DO NOT use the hotlink: use the archive link u/thrway_1000 posted. Same goes to OP: please use archive or similar (or post screenshots) for this sort of tosh - they get enough publicity as it is without traffic from here adding to it. Note
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:42 AM
3

Yes, it isn't difficult. Ditto your identical comment on the other alternet thread doing the rounds here: alternet is like the worst of Teh Graun, HuffBlow, CNN et al distilled into one convenient barf-sized package.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 05:32 AM
15

No, it's a ban on a harmful, dangerous and unnecessary practice - that's all.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:30 AM
4

Glass this, glass that. And yet not a mention of the "Glass Cellar". I'm sure it was accidental.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:24 AM
8

cough #MeToo cough cough
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:54 PM
3

If some women enjoy dressing like that, and some men enjoy looking at them, who loses? It's the same attitude that got darts and F1 grid girls banned (not that I give a rat's about "celebrity" women in multi-thousand dollar outfits attending expensive, fatuous glitterati events).
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:52 PM
8

How dare you tell women what they should be, you misogynist pig.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:45 PM
3

Excellent work, shortarse ;) Obviously I know nothing about your school (other than what you've said): while I hope the support you've witnessed so far continues and the group grows, beware of potential opposition to its existence - see for example the nonsense that went down at UC Berkeley and U Toronto. I hope your school is beyond that sort of sh!te but it's as well to remember that some objectors won't be rational. Good luck.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:50 AM
1

Both, come to that...
/r/MensRights14/02/18 11:37 PM
16

Something darts something Formula 1 sexism something.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:11 PM
8

From what I can gather, there are a few aspects at play (I daresay there are more): 1) Attractive women are attractive - to men certainly, also to other women. If they weren't attractive to both sexes, advertising wouldn't work half as well as it does. Yes, toned, tanned, fit young men are also used in advertising, but not on a scale that approaches attractive women. 2) The "problematic issue" is less about the use of women as "adornment" (though see the Darts walk-on and F1 grid girls nonsense)…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:36 AM
1

I think I read somewhere that Joanna Williams is a speaker at ICMI '18 (in Britain).
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:07 AM
3

The audio isn't all that, but she gets her message across. One of these days I'll get to a gig she's doing and thank her properly for what she does for blokes everywhere, and particularly in Straya (she's the only Australian woman I know of who does this stuff).
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:56 AM
1

Can anyone think of a disadvantage to this rule in today’s climate? Other than that there's going to be many, many fewer "office" romances and thus many fewer LTRs/ FWBs/ ONS (I've read somewhere that 1/3 or more relationships come about through workplaces), not really. This, however staff must disclose relationships which could lead to a conflict of interest. ... bothers me for some reason I can't out my finger on. Something about "my private life is none of your business" - I can understand th…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:24 AM
5

Computer engineering students at the Stockholm-based Royal Institute of Technology cannot complete their education without presenting their reflections on the benefits of being a white heterosexual man. In addition to Implicit Association Test to reveal one's subconscious prejudice, first-year students are required to write an essay of 500-900 words reflecting on the benefits of being (or at least being perceived as) male and heterosexual, growing up in Sweden and having a Nordic or generally We…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:20 PM
3

I was being tongue-in-cheek with that remark, but all the same... Not that Australia has much to boast about.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:04 AM
5

"It's peoplekind, not mankind" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7IchhU-o-A And Trudeau should know. [what the hell have you done, Canada?]
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:26 PM
5

Please do not hotlink, use an archive link instead: http://archive.is/fNlH5
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:03 PM
1

"who needs men anyway" Their sons do.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:57 AM
3

As an observer with no expertise in the field, you seem to have hit the target. I hope OP reads your response.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:54 AM
1

good bot
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:10 AM
3

Unless they're pursuing (and have a talent for) graduate+ level STEM subjects, trade/ technical college qualifications are more useful and less subject to (though not completely inoculated against) SJW madness. And if push comes to shove, the demand for skilled trades always outstrips the need for graduates.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:09 AM
2

That's my take as well. Some people's reaction baffles me - I mean, it's hardly a controversial view.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 10:03 AM
2

"So you're saying we should live like lobsters?"
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:57 AM
1

Every time the "enthusiastic consent" flag comes up, I can think of no better, more succinct response than Hannah Wallen's Rant.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:33 AM
2

I think that there needs to be a strict standard at a school or work environment that focuses on allowing people to do their job and not be put in uncomfortable situations where they have to choose between keeping a job or staying away from a creep [...]Everyone should feel safe to go to school and learn dont you agree? AFAIK schools, colleges and unis already do have systems and policies in place for exactly that purpose, indeed many overstep the mark and encroach on individual liberty - witnes…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 09:28 AM
1

I'd also be interested in reading your take on where Peterson gets it wrong/ is off-beam. He sounds convincing when he talks on postmodernist philosophy, but I'm both reluctant to swallow his take hook, line and sinker and not well-enough informed to poke holes.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 03:47 AM
2

Defending a guy intimidating a woman into doing things to the point where she is afraid is kinda sickening. Talk about stating the bleeding obvious... no-one here has said or suggested anything to the contrary, so why bother bringing it up? some guys just really dont know where the line is Some. Most of them are young and/ or inexperienced. Neither of those are grounds for shame or guilt. The point is to teach men that healthy relationships involve happy consensual sex where both people enjoy it…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:53 PM
7

increased tribalism Which is what leads to such apparently diverse things as white nationalism and jihadi members. They are more similar than they are different: both depend on and breed resentment and exploit young men for their own ends.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 10:20 AM
2

As the old saying goes: "If you've got it, a truck brought it". The whole international shipping gig would grind to a shuddering halt if us truck drivers walked off the job, much as it would if the almost entirely male crews who work the ships did.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 09:08 AM
1

learning to drive a truck is not as easy as driving a car, but it is something that can be picked up relatively quickly by someone not specifically trained to do it. This is a myth that needs to be shot stone dead and buried in an unmarked grave. Being a professional truck driver is not about getting your licence. Whether you're doing long-haul or doing 70+ drops a day, it's long hours, wall-to-wall hassle, not well-paid and you have to be on top of your game ALL DAY EVERY DAY while simultaneous…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 08:59 AM
44

You don't have to look very hard to see what happens when younger men fuelled by resentment get together: white supremacist groups, extreme nationalism, gang wars. Throw in fatherless children, 12+ years of SJW nonsense at school and deteriorating job prospects and watch the fireworks.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 08:47 AM
1

To the extent this anecdote is accurate, and to the extent #MeToo and the like continues, we're going to raise a generation of /r/ niceguys. Under that scenario yes, some young men will adopt that path: others might go MGTOW. But never underestimate how readily people - adolescent boys and young men particularly - can turn to revolt. Words like "revolution" get thrown around a lot, often inappropriately; but if enough young blokes feel that they've been backed into a corner for too long, one day…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 08:34 AM
1

I'm sure I missed a bunch One of them being work. Except in a few sinecures (tenured professor, the upper echelons of law and medicine), the whole notion of "a job for life" on which the male breadwinner model was erected vanished decades ago. These days it's predominantly short-term contracts, casual employment, commission-based earnings, self-employment, cheapest-bid-gets-the-contract. That's not to say some can't make a decent quid - obviously they do, otherwise FTA TV wouldn't have much to a…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:47 PM
5

Yes. I've had this vaguely-assembled notion in the back of my mind for years on the connection between de-industrialisation/ workforce cuts/ off-shoring of skilled labour/ blah blah shareholder profiteering and how men are still brought up with the expectation of being both proud of themselves through their work and primary breadwinners supporting their families. One day I'll corral all the half-connected ranting that goes on in my head into something cogent; in the meantime, I am convinced that…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:21 PM
1

I understand the feeling of guilt. I suggest you get it for two principal reasons: 1) You're still young. It takes quite some time to work out the mechanisms by which others are able to manipulate your conscience (I'm much older than you are and I'm still learning). It's much more difficult to figure out when much of your waking life is spent in - and working under - an institution that is held as a place of learning and authority. 2) It's entirely correct and reasonable to question the principl…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:56 PM
6

one of the big ones advocating for men to stay single and avoid marriage and having children. Just to reinforce something that's already been pointed out, that's more of a MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) POV; certainly some in the MRM are of that view, but it's not fundamental principle. I know things like that can happen as court systems seem to be lenient towards women, but those kinds of ideas of fear and anger towards women I feel are detrimental toward the men’s rights message. As a newcome…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:25 PM
14

If I were an optimist, I would welcome the advent of such male-oriented communities since they would be prime movers in reducing the numbers of unskilled and hopeless men (like the ones that the article talks about) by providing mentorship for young men and boys. Given how (apparently relentless) the infection of school and university education by post-modernism/ SJW/ Feminism is, I'm increasingly in favour of gender-segregated education.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:50 PM
20

This is a longish article but worth the read. In the 20 (yes, twenty) years since it was published, shit's only got worse. [edited for clarity] This is a copy of an article originally published in the Sydney Morning Herald in 1998, back in the days when Fairfax Media still had a backbone. /edit
/r/MensRights02/02/18 09:56 AM
1

[Generic post appearing on numerous other subreddits ends]
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:26 AM
8

You have to view it all in the context of a Bond film. It's not the same as real life. The Bond genre is - like any movie - fantasy. Most of us like spending a couple of hours at the flicks indulging in fantasy, whether it's Bond or Star Wars or Mrs Miggins Visits the Tea Shop (see your local cinema for pre-release viewings). Apparently, Ben Children (not his real name) hasn't grown up yet and thus cannot differentiate between fantasy and Real LifeTM
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:05 AM
8

Please use archive instead of hotlinks to The Graun See: http://archive.is/Hod6T -- If OMG SEXISTISM RAPEY TOXICOPATRIARCHy really is such a hyooooge problem: 1) What has happened to all the millions and millions of innocent women who've watched the Bond films since 1963? Have they had therapy? Have they recovered? 2) How did Sean Connery, Roger Moore and Daniel Craig ever get to be pin-ups? 3) Why do Bond films still make $hitloads$ of ca$h? Supplementary question: Why is Ben Child [@BenChildGe…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:53 AM
1

Watch Hannah Wallen's rant on enthusiastic consent.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:59 AM
3

It totally wasn't evolution or anything Evolution is a branch of science. Science is sexist.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:26 AM
4

Where do you think those cultural concepts of gender came from? Teh PASTARIARCHY. Obviously.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:00 AM
6

Given that modern Feminism continues to push for rights women already have, and given the inequalities (at law, in health, homelessness, codes relating to sexual consent) that men are subject to resulting from that continual push, I would like to know why you state "we" should support an ideology that not only does nothing for men and boys but does much to subordinate us. FYI most of us here recognise there are legitimate issues that affect women.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:51 AM
3

gender is a lie, its a social construct So, social constructionists lied? Colour me shocked. [ETA] Also, gender vs gender roles; and does a social construct thats decided by the society it exists in, that basic science and anthropology, and its not up for debate ... mean you do NOT accept biology? /edit
/r/MensRights31/01/18 08:34 AM
1

For some reason, Bill Burr the muffin murderer springs to mind.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:09 AM
3

...and convinced of the physical superiority of lesbians by Martina Navratilova's speed. This has to be parody, Shirley? you will come home to the last of the day matches, which is almost always men, or to the beginning of the night match at 7pm, which, with the exception of two matches, has been men. It's not just outright sexist, it's also often tedious: a game of 200km/h serves is a yawn fest compared to the strategy, skill, intelligence and power of women's tennis. Because male tennis player…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 02:06 AM
1

People judge other people, regardless of gender, and there's not an awful lot you can do about how others judge you. Your most pressing issue is how you judge yourself - and you can do something about that.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:30 PM
3

You're feelings are yours to deal with. How you choose to deal with them will set the road to the rest of your life Most depressives already know this - the problem is that reminding them (or telling them, if they don't know) is that it becomes (yet) another aspect of life you know you're no good at, another reason to beat yourself up.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:26 PM
2

Find something simple that makes you happy I realise you're writing this in good faith so I'm not having a pop at you, but one of the biggest hurdles with depression (the real thing, not temporary blues) is anhedonia: nothing, but nothing, holds any potential for happiness, joy or even temporary relief - it's as if all the colour has drained out of everything you ever once enjoyed. One thing necessary to start to move out of a depressive phase is motivation, but if there's no joy in anything, ba…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:23 PM
1

Lots of sage advice has already been offered, so I won't repeat it, save to say get in touch with the Samaritans, Lifeline or whatever the helpline is where you are; and get professional help - see your GP, try medication (they come in different formulae, some work for some people but worth trying), get professional psychological help. Also, talk to friends and family - they may not even know you've got the black dog. I can't guarantee results but you need all the support you can find. It's a na…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 02:14 PM
2

From r/ menlib's own wiki meta thingy (I won't hotlink because obvious reasons): From time to time, you may see / MensLib described as "pro-feminist," "feminist," "feminist-allied," "not anti-feminist," or some other variation. These terms can be confusing. When we say we are a "pro-feminist community," we are referring to several aspects of our mission and approach: We use many of the tools created by feminism to discuss and address men's issues. Feminism as a subset of the gender studies socia…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 03:02 PM
2

[hashtag]MeToo has uncovered all sorts of heinous, appalling and vile acts of indecency which occurred as far back as the 1980s, whose exposure has unseated and usurped any number of philandering recidivists masquerading as cultural icons. But why stop there? Of course Rabbie Burns should undergo scrutiny; if found wanting, he should naturally fall off his high horse and onto his sword (if, that is, he has any vestige of honour in him). Up next: Shakespeare - How Sexist Was Romeo and Juliet?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 01:28 PM
7

If you discount someone solely because they agree with someone you dislike you are wrong. End of story. Far from discounting her, I agreed with some of what Greer said. That does not - and should not - mean I ignore other statements and beliefs she expresses. The ability to discriminate matters.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 03:08 PM
1

And the trouble with Thatcherism is that in pursuing it you ruin people, communities and sometimes entire regions. For generations. SheKnew Yes. Yes she did.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:58 PM
14

real wealth inequality discussion Rescinding the loophole that grants corporations similar rights to an individual citizen would be a useful start. Not that I'm holding my breath ...
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:25 PM
29

And in that sense, Feminism does no woman - least of all genuine victims of serious sexual assault - any favours at all. One of #MeToo's essential faults is not that it blames men: it's that its loudest and most prominent voices refuse to recognise the meaningful distinction between a gauche manouevre and serious personal assault. It is no coincidence that its most strident and effective critics are women - I just wish more women would step up and criticise the much more pernicious and much more…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:20 PM
10

Somewhere someone recently (I'll have to dig back through my browsing history to find out who/ where) explained to me something I hadn't clearly understood before: I'll do my best to recount in my own words what I remember (which I acknowledge may be faulty); here goes... -- The person showed that there are two core principles in establishing a crime - actus reus and mens rea - and that these are well established in criminal law and the judiciary. The second part (mens rea) is (roughly translate…
/r/MensRights22/01/18 02:06 PM
24

She's of a similar age and mind-frame as Camille Paglia - both are older, both speak bluntly and both (AFAICT) are regularly attacked by contemporary Feminists who appear to be victim fetishists. I agree, it's good to hear them puncture the balloon that is modern Feminism, but they are both still Feminists and they both still campaign for the movement.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:38 PM
41

Up to a point, yes - compared to the pearl-clutching madams on the fainting couch of contemporary Feminism, she's a heavyweight champion. OTOH she's still saying things like 'I have seen the police working up a rape case trying desperately hard to build it up so it will stand up in court - and wasting their time,' she explained.' 'The burden of proof [for rape] is too high and that's because the tariff is too onerous. Rape is a daily crime, it's not spectacular. *edit formatting
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:24 PM
18

made to look vaguely sane by modern feminism And given it's Greer, that's no mean achievement.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:19 PM
5

When white men feel they are losing power, any level of nastiness is possible, and much power has been ceded recently.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 11:10 AM
11

From what I see And there's your problem. Come back to us when you've spent some considerable time reading this sub.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 08:48 AM
6

Use the archive link: http://archive.is/R5LZx
/r/MensRights20/01/18 03:54 AM
1

It's a shame those of us across the ditch aren't eligible. Excellent post but.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:34 PM
7

I just think Sweden has gotten to the point where they don't care how it looks because the men there don't complain about not being included Then I suppose there are two options: 1) Swedish/ Scandinavian men reflect the global (at least in Western nations) trend and opt out of further education in increasing numbers (which is not going to help them or their families or Scandinavia in the long term); or 2) realise that they must co-operate with each other and stop the rot before their education a…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:09 PM
1

The more I read, the more I realise that what I (and probably many others) think of as the "Left" isn't what it means to most people on Reddit, and probably isn't the same thing to younger generations. Conversely, I'm beginning to realise that "the Left" these days (at least in Britain, Europe, Australia and N. America) seems to represent political stances I (and those like me) find reprehensible, if not revolting. I have NFI where to begin winding back this wholesale abandonment of long-held, h…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:02 PM
7

No worries. Thanks for the clarification. The question then is: on what grounds are you not permitted to enter this course (bearing in mind Sweden's very clear policies on "equal opportunity")?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:45 PM
1

the left are still there And we are incandescent with fucking rage about the way our principles have been hijacked by post-modernist opportunists in pursuit of their own ends. Deep state did this No. No, no, no. Thatcherism, Reaganism (and their bastard offspring, New Labour) did this, in the name of "making Britain/ the US Great Again" but at the behest of those who wanted money and power. It was these political movements (and their puppeteers) who created the fertile ground on which Social Jus…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:35 PM
1

The party has deserted it origins and betrayed it's heartland. And every ALP leader since Keating has sold the average working bloke down the river. But the ALP faithful and that coagulation of fuckwits at Sussex St. will NOT acknowledge any of it. And they wonder why they're bleeding votes. Traitors, the fucking lot of them.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:11 PM
4

I need context. What is "KTH"?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:59 PM
4

Well that escalated. . . . . . Fuck me, it's almost as though those who claim that men can't get together and fight for each other had a point.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:55 PM
1

his obsession with Jung, Hero's Journey myths and Christianity-as-a-positive-metanarrative-construct-to-give-lives-meaning is highly contestable to say the least His emphasis on mythology (Christian, Jungian or otherwise) is entirely understandable IMO since it diverts from whatever ephemera is the issue du jour and points attention back toward the underlying motives at work. Mythology works in this realm since it invokes pictures and themes that - once understood - present themselves time and t…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 11:39 AM
7

Setting aside all of that, I'm pleased to see that the Beeb (even if it's only 5Live) interviewed him with some measure of reason and actually let him speak.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 10:52 AM
3

See also https://redd.it/7rhcdh
/r/MensRights19/01/18 10:07 AM
6

or other inappropriate behavior. That had better be very, very clearly defined. I agree with other points raised above, the scope for abuse is limited only by people's imagination.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 12:39 AM
2

And here's your Toxic MasculinityTM badge - in the event you find yourself up to your neck in par-boiled SJWs, it will suddenly cause you to post images from PornHub onto Lena Dunham's Tw@tter stream.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 11:14 AM
1

If you truly are for equality of the sexes, it’s much more beneficial to both your views of what men need and of what women need to be a feminist who doesn’t ignore the situations where men feel they are disadvantaged. Says who?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 03:03 PM
1

I’m for male equality just as much as female, I can still be a feminist. Not without proper examination of (and agreement with) what contemporary Feminism stands for.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:58 PM
1

1) Women don’t hate men (1% may) Conflating Feminism and all women - fail. <10% of women in the UK (and similar proportions elsewhere) identify as Feminists. 2) Having a longer maternity leave / people buy you drinks does not cause to women be more privileged than men. Question: is it men who pay for the majority of maternity leave schemes, or women? In formulating your answer, bear biology in mind. 3) In UK/US for example, women are far far better off than in other countries, however just becau…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:53 PM
21

He said men who want to be women should be treated “as the women they are,” adding that to consider transgenders sexually undesirable is “exclusionary.” Some people are not attracted to some other people. Up next: baby boys are typically dressed in blue therefore a clear daylight sky is sexist. Or something.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:28 PM
3

I understand not wanting to support them because of the harm they have causes but celebrating their downfall is petty and distracting Worse still, "celebrating their downfall" on the basis of mere accusation alone. This is not the sort of men's rights I will have any part of.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:19 PM
2

No, we should not "be celebrating". If - and only if - these "male feminists" (whoever they might be) are convicted after a fair trial, then those who have some cause to "celebrate" might do so. The principles of the presumption of innocence and proof beyond reasonable doubt either hold for everyone, or no-one at all.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:15 PM
2

They should be supported because they are men. The principle that they are innocent until proven otherwise is what must be upheld. Gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:09 PM
2

because of the men you want to defend Defending someone's right to a fair trial is not the same as defending their version of events. Jesus. How many fucking times.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:06 PM
6

due process for everyone This is all that need be said. I do not care who it is or what it is they are alleged to have done. Weinstein included.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:00 PM
11

I don't always agree with Peterson, but bless him for his patience. Same here. And, as many of us know, his "interviewer" adopts the same old same old approach that we've all watched umpteen times over on every media outlet from Breitbart to HuffPo to Straya(cunt)'s Channel 7/ 9/ 10 (they're all the same) to CBC and beyond - interrupt, deliberately misinterpret, erect strawpersons. Peterson frowns right through this half-hour, as if saying "Why are you asking me anything when you either refuse t…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 01:05 PM
3

I don't have children of my own, but FWIW: 1) boys are not defective girls, despite what the education system might try to instill in him and his peers. Jordan Peterson issued a useful video on what he thinks a parent should look for in a good school. 2) By your account his father is AWOL or useless; that being the case, do your best to find him a couple of good male role models (given the ways things are it's probably not worth bothering with school teachers) - relatives are best, sound family …
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:45 PM
9

Lifted almost verbatim from the Wikipedia entry on Moral Nihilism. D minus for plagiarism.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:05 AM
1

have the man lay on his back and have his arms and legs tied up whilst live streaming the whole act You've been on PornHub again, haven't you...
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:32 PM
7

dolphin trainer In all my time on PronHub (and xh@mster and...) I've never come across that one. Just goes to show you're never too old to learn.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:38 PM
1

Seriously guys. If you don't denounce this awesome retard, then I'm going to think you are all as a collective, this level of stupid. So much this ^ ^ Because when it comes to men and the Mens Rights Movement, I AM ALL OF IT.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:43 AM
1

But of course! I live in StrayaCunt, I beg forgiveness for my ignorance.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:49 AM
1

You've got to be mentally retarded. I cannot dismiss the possibility; however, I can - even in my (potentially diminished) mental capacity - state two things: 1) that you claim to be victimised by my assertion that there are much more pressing issues for most men than sex says more about your narrow view of manhood than I think you wanted to reveal; and 2) If you really believe that The reason women are catered to comes down to men having a higher sex drive. That's it ... then you have a lot to …
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:47 AM
3

For you, yes.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:33 AM
2

I posited several bigger issues that face men than merely where to put their penises, and you think I'm "shaming" you? Only in your head - grow up. All those problems you listed will go away if men stop pandering to women To the extent some men (mostly, but not entirely, younger men) worship the golden vagina, your opinion may have some utility. But here's the thing: a man is a lot more than just his penis. Shocking, huh?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:20 AM
3

Something tells me you didn't read the comment you replied to properly...or at all.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:13 AM
2

You guys know of course, the only way to win mens rights back is to sexually liberate the common man. Believe it or not, there are bigger issues bugging most of us blokes than what to do with our willies: divorce rape, child custody trauma, workplace death rates, suicide, unfavourable HR practices... none of these are what I'd call erotic stimulants.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:07 AM
3

My opinion is solely about my take - I do not speak for MRAs or the MHRM. what beliefs do you stand on regarding women That they're adult human beings and are as responsible for their actions as I am. Excepting various hell-holes around the world, they have equal (if not better) rights at law as I do. I expect them to be decent and if they are not, I reject them. Some of them I am attracted to, many I am not - I expect the reverse holds true. It is true that dating and sex and relationship is di…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:56 AM
33

"He stole my phone"/ "He made me tap 'yes'". Not that either of those cases would ever occur...
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:22 AM
3

A thoughtful, useful reply IMO - I thought about putting up a reply earlier, then decided against on the basis that I'm decades older than OP. One thing you wrote is worth expanding on: If she says she's a feminist, that might not be too bad. There are a lot of people who call themselves feminists who aren't monsters, they just don't understand what the label means due to lots of disinformation. This is where social media has its uses. OP's potential dates will nearly all have snapchat/ instagra…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:18 AM
79

Consent can also be withdrawn at the touch of button, effectively ending the legal agreement. No loopholes that anyone could ever exploit here then, none at all...
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:58 AM
9

31? I thought it was 70-something. How regressive is NYC?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:50 AM
2

Without going into too much detail, what is it in those subs that you can't live with?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:49 AM
2

Bindel is two things (probably many others, but I can't be arsed): 1) a man-hating Feminist; who 2) derives income from typing deliberately provocative Feminist polemic. So far, so what? Well, a little while ago I took her lesbian TERFism as read, and listened to what she said, and when I did that an odd thing happened - I realised she had little clue what she was on about and almost none about the very terms (Social Constructionism, gender fluidity) she litters her speech with. Watch this youtu…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 10:11 AM
26

Contrast Deneuve and her straight-talk with the hours of right-on hand-wringing from Natalie Portman & co. - I'd have loved to have seen Deneuve giving it both barrels at the Golden Globes.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 01:45 AM
5

Also consider: one partner A is emotionally abusive; after a while, the victim B snaps and strikes out physically Been there, done that (as B). It gets to a point where - after years and years of drip, drip, drip and despite years of conditioning and despite one's internal reluctance to escalate - it really does "just happen". I know it sounds odd, but I'd much rather she'd just belted me one. But that was the past, and I was no angel either.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:49 PM
2

All women should get free tuition in STEM courses. Science is, after all, a tool of the Patriarchy, and the sooner science accounts for lived experience the better.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:35 AM
13

For years, I've held (and expressed) the view that DV/ IPV is at least as much about mental/ emotional/ psychological abuse as it is physical, yet it's almost always the case that official stats record instances of physical abuse only, and discussion of DV always revolves around physical violence. To focus on physical abuse alone is to miss at least half of the picture, especially since women are generally far more adept at psychological abuse than men. The fact that psychological violence leave…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:11 AM
7

Natalie, Babs and co. I'm here to help you and all those strong, independent women in your trade. Here's my idea (it's ground-breaking, it's a winner, you'll love it): why not get female directors and producers to make films that people - punters, critics - WANT TO WATCH and will pay real cash money to do so? Whaddaya reckon? Gone awful quiet in here suddenly...
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:48 PM
1

A friend of mine believes that this was all orchestrated by insurance companies Your friend has a point, but it's stretching it to state it's all "orchestrated" by them. There was some merit in the original principles of HR when it started up 20+ years ago, but HR departments, HR law, HR arbitrators and so on have burgeoned since - it's now a money-pit and those who make money in it and from it aren't going to do themselves out of the filthy lucre. Same goes for the whole "workplace safety" hors…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:38 PM
2

The gender pay gap is the pay discrepancy between men and women irrespective of their job or position. That is distinct from equal pay - when companies are required to ensure that men and women carrying out the same or similar roles are paid the same for the amount of work they do. So companies are obliged by law to run around collecting meaningless, useless data and report to yet another useless authority instead of getting on with their business. And all in aid of reporting on nothing of any u…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:26 PM
4

He's not wrong.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:24 AM
1

the initial drive behind Men's Sheds which, as I understand it, largely began as a place for older men dealing with chronic loneliness and isolation That's my understanding of the movement too. A lot of the initial push in Oz was to unite a lot of retired/ redundant older men who found solace fiddling around in their own backyard sheds (there was even a book published in Oz years ago, called something like "Blokes and Their Sheds" I think) but who had very little contact with other blokes in the…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:17 AM
2

I can see what you're getting at, but it wasn't on my mind to alter the title at the time. I'll re-word cross posts in future. thanks for sharing this! No worries - there are happy endings out there.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:00 AM
10

It's a crosspost from r/pics - it says so in the title. Simple. Where you get the idea I'm "stealing credit" from I don't know.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:36 AM
1

Why ask me?
/r/MensRights04/01/18 01:16 PM
1

The Men's Shed movement started in Oz and is now international (Oz, UK, NZ, US, Canada, Finland, Greece) and it's growing, rapidly in some places. It's also largely run by volunteers. It's a meeting place, a sanctuary, a support network and much of the stuff that gets made, fixed and done is donated to worthy causes nearby. Just don't tell anyone who volunteers their time, skills and patience there that it's "therapy".
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:57 PM
2

You are one person, you cannot overturn the lot. Do one thing at a time and do it well.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:46 PM
4

It strikes me that you and your interlocutors (bufedad, espiix, NibblyPig) are talking past each other, if for no other reason than that in amongst a lot of reasonable points, there's too much generalisation and false dichotomies. 1) Everyone's different. 2) Notwithstanding that, it's fair to say that men in general don't relate (about themselves or anyone else) like women generally do. 3) In general, psychotherapeutic practice assumes talk therapy as its fundamental premise. That's all well and…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:43 PM
3

Thanks Prim, dead useful commentary and it's good to know you read this sub.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:20 PM
3

No worries. I rambled on a bit longer than I planned, but I think you know that patching up the symptoms (male suicide rates, for instance) will not and cannot work in the long term unless and until multiple causes and factors are addressed. And I only mentioned a few of them.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:18 PM
3

I'm not in the business of slagging off Rayner, because she has at least said part of what needs to be said (and should have been said decades ago) - good on her. My objection is that even she can't bring herself to recognise and understand that almost none of this poor, male white trash (my terminology) will learn anything if they have nothing to "aspire to" (as she puts it). Given that the education system from primary school onward is increasingly organised around notions that boys don't gel …
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:12 PM
1

There is no hiring discrimination case Except the innumerable (public and private sector) "we must have 50:50 women/ men" rules, even when hiring more women means ignoring merit and the whole section goes down the shitter. But then, that's not "discrimination", is it.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 09:24 AM
3

Agreed... up to a point. On one hand, she's at least stuck her head above the parapet and said some part of the bleeding obvious, which is more than 95.4% of the rest of the spineless time-servers in the (so-called) left-wing Labour Party (in truth the Labour Party [and the ALP here] wangled a decree nisi from its working class roots decades ago). Conversely, saying trite tripe like [boys] ... need to learn and they need to aspire ... is tantamount to telling them to "man up" and "grow a pair".
/r/MensRights04/01/18 09:05 AM
4

Rayner even questioning the zeitgeist in British politics is encouraging, let alone the event of a Labour politician talking to The Spectator. Nonetheless, this “They have not been able to adapt. Culturally, we are not telling them that they need to learn and they need to aspire.” ... is the sort of drivel that she needs to stop mouthing. How does she - or anyone - expect boys in scum class to "adapt" when no-one listens to them (or even asks them)? "Culturally, we are not telling them that they…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 08:50 AM
1

There's more than one thing going on with Johnson, and it's not the ways he killed. In the first case (36 years ago) he was imprisoned after being convicted of manslaughter. The implication from the article seems (IMO) that his sentence was reduced because "OMG when we will take violence against women seriously" when it's more likely that there wasn't enough evidence to convict him of murder. In the second case, he also did time for manslaughter in "a secure psychiatric institution", which is no…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 08:28 AM
6

This is a broad question and that necessarily means discussing numerous issues, factors and approaches: in fact, you could write several books on it. I'm not qualified to do so and no-one would have time to read books on here, but I'll put my ten penn'orth in anyway 1) Gynocentrism is a thing - it takes different forms in different cultures, but it remains a fact that our biology and ancestry mean we (society generally and men especially) put - and are brought up to put - women and children firs…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 07:08 AM
1

Is it just me or do (insert literally any other demographic) take up too much space in public pools? Land whales, you mean? Some are that fat I'm astonished they get through the turnstiles.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 06:02 AM
2

MEN CAN'T HANDLE SMART, SUCCESSFUL WIMMIN!!1!
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:41 PM
-2

Yes. And no. For explanation, see this video by the Ministry of Sexual Equality. (yes, they did make that 40 years ago)
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:26 AM
22

It is dawning on women that men can't fix this for them, since it's their own relationship to power and the truth at issue. I think the outfall of the last decade or so of Feminism's lurch into barking insanity is beginning to annoy a lot of women, many (most?) of who have had very little to do with Feminism (other than some vague allegiance to the word which they haven't examined). Those who have paused and dug around a bit have - when they've had the time and inclination - begun to question pu…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 02:24 PM
3

Two probable follow-ups: 1) "lulz look at all the hurt manbabies who can't recognise a joke" 2) [tw@t post deleted] Either way, this is just shameless SocMed whoring by someone whose profile (and probably career) is going down the shitter. After all, if whoever this person is had any real clout, they'd have had it published under their own name in the media outfall outlet they claim they run. This smells more of desperation than anything else.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 02:00 PM
68

Without reducing things so far that they become trite and fatuous there is a point here that bears repeating: to the extent that us blokes have some work to do cleaning up our act (and we do), women need to clean up their side of the fence too. Without giving men a free pass, the more women get off their complacent, apathetic arses and start making noise about how modern Feminism doesn't represent most (or any) of their lives or what they stand for, the quicker the mess we're in will get cleaned…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 01:47 PM
2

But Fiamengo seems to be saying that all the normal non-criminal social and business ways we reward and punish people should suddenly be blocked if someone has been accused of sexual crimes, and they are given an invincible shield which lasts for the rest of their life, unless they are convicted at some stage. That makes no sense to me. I agree, it wouldn't make sense... if she'd said that. Hyperbole is as hyperbole does. Nobody was , or convicted by anything except normal court procedures, if p…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:09 AM
1

Do you agree with her? I agree with her stance that conviction by accusation alone is not how to behave in a civilised society and that, until arrested, charged, brought to trial and convicted he is entitled to the benefit of reasonable doubt. You, apparently, believe that we should do away all that presumption of innocence" and "reasonable doubt" mucking about: I suggest you emigrate to N. Korea and see how that goes.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 05:21 AM
1

Should I abstain from fixing my bicycle puncture because no court has proved the tyre is flat? Given your apparent inability to distinguish between a serious matter and an inconvenience, yes, you should.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:34 PM
1

so it's a combination of hormones, genetics and socialization that drives our brain structures Yes and no. Here's a TL; DR. This vast gap in T between male and female humans you note is her Achilles Heel As an initial condition it needs some explanation, and I would hope Fine provides adequate evidence that such a significant difference existed in our early ancestors. Beyond that, it's possible (probable) that female mate preferences selected for males with higher T levels, which, over thousands…
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:23 PM
3

If your experience is simply lugging boxes or being on the other end of a chest of drawers, then yes it might seem easy. No-one who's had any real experience of household or commercial removals would ever say any such thing.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:31 AM
2

Abso-bloody-lutely. Moving people's stuff is hard yakka - I know this because I used to do it as a full-time job. I have no problem at all with helping a mate or even a mate's friends move their stuff, I've even offered my services. But there are conditions. The principal condition is quite simple: offer tea, coffee, water and food freely - after all, you (the recipient) are getting many hundreds of dollar$ worth of labour and expertise for nix. And, once you've got your shit moved in, at least …
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:23 AM
2

It was funny in a pitiful sort of way I'm certain there are many men who act in similar ways to your example: I suggest that these men are 'chancers', who will use any opportunity - no matter how slim and how much work might be involved - to get themselves laid. Conversely, those blokes who turn up and lend a hand are doing so because they are willing to help. One of the problems that the outfall of #MeToo is creating is that the distinction between the two, and that between someone who's a care…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 10:13 AM
1

What's puzzling is why the Guardian still publishes her articles. Because shit-stirrers generate clicks, clicks generate advertising... profit.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:33 AM
2

Annoys me as well. It takes <20sec to copy-pasta a link into an archive site and use it as the default link.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:30 AM
6

You can lament the way our culture makes it harder for men to look after themselves emotionally or you can hate feminism, which has been saying exactly that for years… but you can’t do both. You can say that domestic abuse against men is under-reported or you can ask yourself why men find it particularly difficult to report. You can complain that boys are under-achieving in schools or you can question the unruly, disruptive, “reading is for queers”, “don’t be a girlie swot” stereotype that the c…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:22 AM
1

He and David Mitchell (often on QI and Would I Lie To You) did a few series together in the about a decade ago, e.g. That Mitchell and Webb Look. Compared to Mitchell, Webb seems to have disappeared though I no longer live in Britain so I may be wrong.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:17 AM
3

qualified women will be the ones to suffer from all this No. Primarily men will be the first (and probably last) to suffer, if for no other reason than quotas. Actually, scrub that, the real deficit will be that hiring on merit will be the first casualty, and thus company/ departmental utility and output. Unless and until some sort of radical change is effected on a sufficiently broad scale, Feminism will re-write history and mass/ social media will assist in the re-write, if not in removing all…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:18 PM
1

Please don’t! What about the rest of us? So stand up and be counted. Not just you, but all the women you know who are reasonable people. And not just in response to #MeToo, but every time its facsimiles rear their head. And get those female friends to tell their friends, and so on, and then maybe after some time some sort of sense and proportion will come about. If, that is, you and your female friends really do mean it when you say you value the men in your lives. We're doing our bit, but until…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:59 PM
6

Before I go on, your questions lack context. Who is arguing which point in which context? The arguments you pose are ones that go around on here and elsewhere all day every day but cannot be resolved without specific boundaries to the conversation. Nonetheless, I'll put my ten penn'orth in: Is it not true that women are raped by men far more often than they are raped by women? Until and unless the definition of rape is consistent across all jurisdictions and includes anal rape of a man (especial…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 01:52 PM
9

feminists will blame men for the fallout And conveniently whitewash their role in pouring fuel on the #MeToo bonfire next week, next month and next year. Already there are dozens of op-ed pieces in the media written by Feminist-leaning "journalists" claiming that women will "suffer" because the backlash (run by men, of course) will mean companies will not employ women (because only men recruit employees) and men will not "mentor" women (because women can't be fucked to only men mentor). But igno…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:52 PM
2

It's certainly brought a lot of scum to the surface (in many senses), but I wouldn't call #MeToo a "game changer", certainly not yet: if it continues to expand and enlarge, then maybe. What it has done is: 1) wake a lot of blokes up, not just to their potential vulnerability to future damaging allegations following risqué comments or actions, but also to who has the real power in contemporary society (clue: it isn't men). On balance, I think this is a good thing. 2) highlight (or further expose)…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:04 PM
5

The Simpsons vs Feminism Compendium.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:28 PM
0

the widespread issue of male toxicity Feminist Bingo! What do I win? Also: ARCHIVE.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:04 PM
1

In contrast, in our current circus atmosphere of media coverage, there is no such thing as due process. Non-legal charges are broadcast against persons, often beyond a statute of limitations, with little, if any, discernible attempts to corroborate the charges before they are made public. Due process is something I had thought of, but Statute of Limitations I hadn't. If anyone knows what these are in the US (and elsewhere) wrt sexual assault allegations, feel free to post them...
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:03 AM
5

Daubney is the only columnist I can think of but, not living in Britain any longer, there may be more. It may be easier to list those publications that won't publish such an article, not that that's all that much help.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:40 AM
1

Bacon, mmm...
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:42 AM
2

In which Prof. Janice Fiamengo inadvertently foresaw the current panic around Weinstein and #MeToo two years ago. *spilleng
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:57 AM
1

Outcry after university expels 2 anti-rape activists violent arseholes for life FTFY One tw@tter response: With Rhodes University choosing to expel those womxn for protesting against rape culture,after 16 days of activism is not a surprise. Society is no longer feeling obliged to pretend that they care about womxn and their rights. Because nothing shouts how just is your fight against "rape culture" like employing a group of rabid, violent lowlife scum. Also, 'womxn' - is your kxyboard brokxn?
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:51 AM
1

Here's a radical idea: in any case involving alleged criminal acts, the uni should pass the whole thing on to people with training and expertise in the law. We could call the investigators "the police", then hold a hearing (we could call it "a trial") in a place ("a court") where all involved are bound to tell the truth ("an oath"), and so on. And once all that's sorted, uni's can get shot of lots of meddling idiots, save money and - perhaps - get on with the business of educating the students W…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:32 AM
3

http://archive.is/JnsmV
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:23 PM
3

Thanks, I didn't know that.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:12 PM
1

That was close to my take on this vid as well. Yes, modern Japanese culture is by no means perfect; yes, those who have a significant youtube presence usually have a barrow to push (I would too, if I could be bothered). Nonetheless (and allowing that one video doth not a cultural truth make) it does seem that the Japanese are much less bothered by the PC/ SJW/ Feminism Zeitgeist, and wouldn't pay much attention to it if it turned up tomorrow. It's also a reminder that although Japan is frequentl…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 09:53 AM
6

I didn't realise that this was posted in several places a couple of years ago; all the same, it's so well scripted and played that it deserves a repeat airing. Kolhatkar does a tidy line in stand-up as well - see his YouTube channel
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:47 AM
2

Here's a more detailed version
/r/MensRights15/12/17 06:36 AM
2

PATRIARCHY!!1!
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:22 PM
5

She didn't #MeToo hard enough, obviously. But then, if Tinsel Town is the stinking cesspit of rape and misogyny they're claiming it is, why would you want an award from them?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:21 PM
1

Story outline: Barrow-pushing TERF attends Crimble Party for Women; annoys people; gets shown the door. Whinges on tw@tter under hashtag 'IdentityPolitics'. Irony lies in the gutter, bleeding profusely.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 11:04 PM
1

Because no-one on this sub never ever posts articles more than a week old, right?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:26 PM
-1

Oh look, ad hominem, how... predictable. Try arguing rational objections.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:24 PM
1

I've found a grapnel and a retractable rope works quite well...
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:17 PM
3

Wow. Some seriously un pc shit here Recorded AFAICT ~30 years ago - it was different then. At some point she contends that Feminism co-opted the Civil Rights movement, and that really made me sit up and think.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:15 PM
3

Weird - I watched the same vid half an hour ago, even though I'd never heard of her. She is very good on a number of subjects that resonate here; at the same time, she's mostly an activist for black rights and a TradCon - I'm not criticising that, just pointing it out. Bear in mind also that this was recorded ~30 years ago.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:12 PM
1

Yes, I've seen that one, it too is worth watching if only to understand how woefully inadequate is Ms. SJW in arguing anything of substance. In some respects I could tolerate her and her ilk if they knew how to argue a principle properly and stay on point, but they don't. Why? Because the very "safe space/ microaggression" orthodoxy they promulgate necessarily disbars the honing of their arguments through competitive discourse. The likes of Betty Friedan and Camille Paglia would wipe the floor w…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:14 PM
4

Well caught that man.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:33 PM
1

math is a construct of the patriarchy. And it's not just maths, it apparently applies to a thing called 'Science'. Oddly, I have never yet seen or heard of a Feminist whose conviction about the mutability of scientific principles extended to them voluntarily stepping out of a 43rd story window. Perhaps I'm not reading the right sort of news.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:32 PM
3

In which case one can look at the ratio of 'false' accusations to 'true' ones and see that the ratio is way higher than 1:50. In fact by that standard it'd be around 1:3 or 1:2, making the rate of false accusations of rape higher than for virtually any other type of crime. But but but lived experience. And besides, the judicial system was invented by men, so PATRIARCHY.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:26 PM
4

narrative Bingo!
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:22 PM
3

[thread derail] As far as I can determine, the most commonly accepted meaning of 'weasel' in the old nursery rhyme Pop Goes the Weasel is that it refers to a spinner's weasel, which 'popped' when a set length of yarn had been measured. Even if that explanation is not completely satisfactory, it's very unlikely it's got anything to do with over-inflated mustelids. [/derail]
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:14 PM
2

De Rigueur Please - italics yes, capitals no. In circles I have no familiarity with, your archaism may be de rigeur. I suggest, however, it is not en vogue elsewhere. As to my weapon of choice, it's lasers my dear, and I'm aluminiuming 'em Mum.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 12:04 PM
3

Excepting that I have no idea of the circles you mix in, "tar-laden brush" is hardly contemporary. Actually what you need is a blunderbuss.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:48 AM
5

There are two other aspects that stand out: She also conducted interviews with judges who hear family law cases. Most indicated an intense dislike for the emotional context of family law, and said they found disputes over arrangements for children difficult and sometimes distasteful. Her findings indicate a staggering ignorance of the emotional and psychological dynamics of relationship breakdown, and an absence of judicial training. Whether these findings apply to other jurisdictions I can't sa…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:36 AM
2

To head off any parties saying "relevance???" at the pass, this (long) conversation between Peterson and Haidt goes a long way to explaining and informing a number of issues relevant to MR. 1) They swap notes (learned, informed ones) about the roots of the SJW movement and its apparent mushrooming in recent years; 2) They talk about the how and why of the rise of SJW/ Feminist/ women's studies camps in uni and the way alumni of these institutions spread the virus; 3) Haidt in particular is very …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:20 AM
2

"Raising respectful people prevents violence against everyone" But... but... muh Patriarchy!!1!! How DARE you invalidate OUR victimhood, you shitlord.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:54 AM
-1

Likewise, have you never heard of "drawing a long bow"?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:49 AM
0

It isn't an issue of men's rights or anything close And that's my reaction too. But hey, this is Reddit, and upvotes and stuff.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:47 AM
4

Cunning stoats.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:44 AM
1

Yes, but OP's spelling works just as well - if Teh Graun is going to peddle the SJW brand, it'll have to do some reversing when the product turns out to be rotten.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:33 AM
4

And did this make a difference? I can't really say as I don't live in Ireland; the only recent reference I can find is this Irish Time article describing O'Shea's role in setting up a pilot family mediation centre based on the principles she wrote about in her PhD and which seems to have found a lot of support.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:26 AM
3

I’m not in the game of policing the thoughts of fictional characters, nor do I turn to literature for moral guidance. And boy does it show. Shakespeare, Milton, Chaucer, Wilde, Orwell - nothing they ever wrote contained or pointed to any fundamental human truths or morals. But who needs great works when you can read the distilled drops of wisdom from Rhiannon Whatever-her-name-is? (emphasis added)
/r/MensRights13/12/17 04:35 AM
12

This article (from 2013) was written by John Waters, an Irish journalist who had his own battle with the family court system in Ireland (and who is at risk of prison if he ever makes details of it known). He's the bloke on the left in this video "Is masculinity toxic for boys?". He writes about a paper by Róisín O’Shea on the Irish family law system: O’Shea said she owed me an apology. For years she had read my articles about family law, becoming more and more certain I had lost the plot. She st…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:33 AM
2

TIME published this??? Jeepers. Whither the Fourth Estate? Also: There are angry women, too, but they’re only beginning to claim this emotion that has long been denied them. Bahahahah!
/r/MensRights12/12/17 04:25 AM
5

And you could be a complete tool. Not that I'm judging, mind...
/r/MensRights09/12/17 09:54 AM
1

Ooo, Clammy, she's such a tease.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:25 AM
2

the Holy Church of Screwballs! (sigh) The least you need to do is get the title right. It's The Sisters of Perpetual Grievance. I'd vote for Clammy Fraud just for the delight of seeing her with a bishop's hat on her head.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:08 AM
1

good bot
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:59 AM
2

Taking a leaf from the mainstream SJW/ feminist handbook, he must have done something to deserve it. Side note: in Britain and Australia, there are homeless people selling a weekly paper called The Big Issue. If you see someone selling copies, buy one: it's less than the price of a take-away coffee, and it's always got something of interest in it. Why this isn't a thing in N. America I don't know. See also their website.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:56 AM
2

Ah, that explains things. If your ex is that looney tunes, better all round she's kept at arm's length. Seems to me a few others on here (no names, no pack drill) could do with being told that.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:30 AM
1

Probably because you linked/ crossposted the same post between here and (r) /feminism - this place is (I think) on their auto-ban list.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:23 AM
1

See the sidebar under "Mod policy", linking to other subs...
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:19 AM
4

Hint: use "np" when linking to other subs, unless you want the Mod Squad kicking your door in.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 08:48 PM
1

I'm not asking for US-centric bias or age bias to be eradicated - simply not promoted either deliberately or unwittingly due to Systemic Bias. I do apologise; when you wrote earlier I got the impression you wanted something done about it. You seem to be taking a view that I hold views and am making requests that are not mine! Again, my apologies. When people write things that appear to convey some meaning, I usually take it that those words express their view. One more thing: "Systemic Bias". As…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 08:36 PM
2

I note that you have not addressed the concerns of Bias and US-Centric focus rather than Global and Age-neutral progress. To be fair, Reddit itself is US-biased because it is a US-based business/ media platform. Likewise, its user base is young (predominantly teens/ 20s - sauce), so it's a bit unrealistic to expect a sub-reddit to buck that overall trend. I agree with the plea for a "Health" flair though.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 01:48 PM
1

A lot of thought packed into 11 minutes.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:30 PM
5

It's called free speech. Adults deal with it appropriately.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 10:22 AM
3

"Watch this space" as the saying goes. As an aside, I'm enjoying the delicious irony of a Murdoch-run right-wing shitsheet being named as the respondent.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 10:12 AM
3

I'm not convinced either - the whole thing seemed incoherent. Also, this doesn't gel: The alternative to trading an endowment like beauty takes considerably more effort, but remains well within the realm of possibility: trade accomplishments instead. I won't put words in JB's mouth, but what does she mean by said hypothetical woman's "accomplishments"? If she means "being a decent (female) human being" then why not say that? If she is implying something else - money, job status, political/ socia…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 10:03 AM
6

In her previous relationship, [Emma Dignon] dropped everything that made her happy and made life all about her boyfriend. "I lost all self-direction and motivation, and when the relationship was over I had to shake myself to look at what I had become — a shell of my former vibrant self," she said. Insert Ernie for Emma and he for she and... bingo! many men's experiences of LTRs with women. Emma said she wasn't swearing off relationships forever — just approaching them with more caution. "As a si…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 09:45 AM
2

Except for some tangential involvement a while ago I've never edited wiki, but - as suggested above - I'll certainly refuse to donate the next time round, and go to some lengths to explain why. Thanks for the post.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 09:17 AM
1

I'm only up for giving accused people so much benefit of the doubt Benefit of the doubt doesn't come in measured spoonfuls - it really is (or should be) all or nothing. If otherwise, then who's to say what measures of doubt apply in which circumstances? In the case of Weinstein, there is so much testimony from so many different sources, you have to engage in conspiracy theory to start making a case for his innocence. Whatever your or I use to base judgement on, we have at best third-hand account…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:55 PM
2

the ends justify the means. And there's the rub. As much as all of us with both sides of our brains connected decry and declaim about justice and a fair go, we are apes and thus (at root) clannish and inclined to mob rule.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:43 PM
1

Don't let right wingers like /u/girlwriteswhat define you. This is a bit of a personal rant, but bear with me... You've made some good points about collectivism (is that a word) in the workplace and unions supporting men and proper "socialists" (for want of a better word) and so on that I agree with, as below. For all that, your initial (and subsequent) approach to Karen has bugged me a bit, and though I sort of put it aside it still nagged me. Now that I've reflected a bit, this is what I think…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:29 PM
3

But that would never be allowed as 'everything other than white men' is a protected group that we are not allowed to criticise in any way. In social media (and I include reddit in that) and far too much of the mainstream media, that view holds sway. Regardless of the moods of public opinion, the fight boils down to this: it's either a fair trial for all, or something tantamount to a witch hunt. No exceptions. So which is it to be?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:43 AM
2

In some measure, this #MeToo carnage does trouble me (and, I suggest, most rational people), particularly the instant dismissals that appear to be based on nothing more than someone's allegation/ accusation based (in some instances) on events alleged to have occurred many years ago. I mean, innocent until proven otherwise, due process, reasonable grounds and so on. Where I diverge from your POV is this: I've gotten to the point where I'm actually supporting people when there's proof they did it,…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:47 AM
1

They used Taylorist principles, and the union "leadership" were a bunch of paid lackeys for the corporation. That isn't a fault of unions per se. It's a fault of people like you who insist that unions aren't necessary, and that we should all succumb to the tyranny of capitalism It's actually both: firstly because your employer flouted basic mandatory(?) safety standards; and secondly because the union ignored the breach. It gets worse. In my case, when some years ago my ex effed off with another…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:03 AM
4

Unions are like anything else. They're corruptible. They can become too powerful. They can outlive their usefulness. They can become obsolete. Corruptible, and megalomaniacal, yes; obsolete, no. I know too many people who work union jobs where they'd literally have to show up for work drunk and fuck their secretary on their desk 5 times before they'd get anything but a paid leave of absence and paid therapy. I worked in a union shop. We had one dishwasher who was infamous for stealing from the c…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:37 AM
2

so it's a moot point for now If you've got no skin in the game, this entire post is redundant.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:36 AM
5

All that's accomplished by the whole debate is dividing men into two camps when we should be one. Any such division is one that you (and people like you) create.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:33 AM
6

Any time some dude argues that we shouldn't be "mutilating" baby boys I feel honestly triggered. Awww diddums, did they hurt your fee-fees? 1) Grow up. 2) Stop harming infants without due medical cause. 3) Repeat.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:31 AM
3

Same here. I've just spent 20min browsing titles and abstracts and... I'm none the wiser. I mean, there seem to be English words but they're arranged in a form that appears to be a species of gibberish. But what would I know - lived experience, right?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:12 AM
1

OP posted the same thing in r/offbeat. The comments there are... informative. Here's one pearl: In the wake of being in the real world, men should know if they're fucking creepers or not. Class, intent, and openness are rarely misconstrued. ... as if that were all there is to the Weinstein/ MeToo thing.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:58 AM
1

BETTER TROLLS PLEASE
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:13 PM
14

She's a foreign student with an exceptionally poor grasp of the English language So even if this ridiculous Title IX claim gets through, she still won't be able to do the required work to get the ticket. I'm all for giving people a chance, but this is just taking the piss.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:25 PM
1

No worries. Have you looked at Jordan Peterson's stuff? Some of his rants about post-modernism, social constructionism and what you might call the "looney left" seem to mesh well with your subject matter. [edit] Critical Theory is also relevant (e.g. the Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism) /edit
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:18 AM
4

As you say it's a WIP, so before you go too much further my principal question is: who's your intended audience? If it's for those who already have a grounding in these things, you're fine: if it's for any Joe Public to read, many would find the technical style and language too much and not read it (and thus might miss out on things they don't know or haven't thought about). Some "technical" terminology is inevitable; my suggestion is to keep it to a minimum an re-phrase things so that it's an e…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:24 AM
6

While you're there you can cross Australia off your list as well...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:57 PM
5

It's the way he put his hand on her back. I'm astonished you need to have this pointed out to you /s
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:52 PM
8

The baying mob are accusing have found her guilty of "victim-blaming because: she neither wholeheartedly denounced those accused nor applauded the bravery and innocence of those coming forward with accusations of harassment. Instead, Lansbury told the Radio Times: ‘There are two sides to this coin.’ ... She continued, ‘We must sometimes take blame, women. I really do think that. Although it’s awful to say we can’t make ourselves look as attractive as possible without being knocked down and raped…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:48 PM
13

Yet while Takei might be an irritating presence in the Twittersphere, the current online persecution of him is nothing to celebrate. [...] However, just because Takei contributed to a climate in which guilt is very often instantly presumed, that doesn’t mean we should cheer the presumption of his guilt. #MeToo is undermining due process, and that should worry us all. People are having their lives and careers turned upside down on the basis of allegation alone. [...] No longer do we believe, as d…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:35 PM
3

CGM instead of circumcision it is. Thanks for your post, and thanks for the way you've done done this.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:15 PM
4

You can't say this isn't cutting-edge research... wait, I just did.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:29 AM
5

Im just as angry at women who don't date short men as I am at men who don't date fat women (or tall women)... Which is to say not at all. Leaving aside personal preferences, the difference here (and I think you realise this) is that when it comes to dating being fat is something any (wo)man can do something about: there is not an awful lot anyone can do about their adult height.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:56 AM
2

aka hypergamy. It's not that (IMO) all women follow it all the time; but it is a natural tendency (if not a conscious one), much as men naturally tend to seek younger, reproductively fit women.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:52 AM
1

My only hope and this is wishful thinking, is that maybe this storm needs to happen. Maybe it vectors itself back to some of these piece of shit SJW's out there. When some of these pansy ass pro-feminist men who all been taught to find their inner pussy get bit is the ass with some false claim. Its not until these things start happening to multiple people and more become victims then people's discourse on this whole subject change. Some pro-feminist men in media and politics have already been sn…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:44 AM
3

A cautionary tale, you might say. At least you got out of it without too much damage, though that doesn't compensate for the ordeal. A couple of points I think need reiterating: THE HR MANAGER IS NOT YOUR FRIEND!: Of course he's/she's not and we all get that. But you might get comfortable with him/her in your first meetup. You might think he is a personable guy, you might have had some idle chit chat as he wants to get to know you. You may think he is a decent person who you can rationalize with…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:17 AM
19

Other than observing that Patriarchy (as feminists use the term) is a weasel word that can be applied to anything they see as "oppressing women", and that it's all but unfalsifiable, I'll just leave this comment here written by someone called Karen Straughan: Patriarchy, however, is not an inherently oppressive idea. It is simply a way that the base-unit of society--the family--was organized. And it's been the way that societies, large and small, have been organized pretty much since the dawn of…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 06:43 AM
1

Thanks. Well worth the read.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:45 AM
1

Fuck off Van, Van Badham's tacky, derivative smear piece is on the Graun for anyone who cares to find it (I can't be asked to link it). Suffice to say: surprise, surprise, it's nothing more than dog-whistling. Needless to say, loonies with whom she agrees (Valenti, for example) who want to come out here on tour... well, that's different.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:44 AM
6

Justin Case: I'm not mounting any sort of defence for the woman who wrote in - she was an adult, voluntarily accepted his advances and used him as a reference on her LinkedIn profile. As a human being I might have some empathy with the discomfort she professes, but she has no grounds for even #metoo, let alone making an official complaint. In her response Frostrup at least tries to inject some subtlety into the incessant male-bashing #metoo-ism.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:43 AM
11

To be fair to Frostrup (with whom I've vehemently disagreed in the Graun comments section in the past) she at least tries to infuse her reply with some nuance (though I have my doubts about her motive), to wit: We are at a watershed moment where we really can change the climate, but if we reduce it to petty sexual politics we will fail in that mission. Seduction comes in myriad forms and opportunism is a natural component of physical desire. It’s important that we have a sensible conversation ab…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:20 AM
4

how is a guy to know unless he asks her out? We don't, and that's always been the risk. The difference now - especially in the fallout from Weinstein and #metoo - is that the risks are riskier and the consequences much greater. Blokes (especially younger ones) really do need to start thinking with their big head about how they socialise and interact with women, and learn to weigh up the cost : benefit thing.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:03 AM
1

Understood. Presumably the raw stats must be somewhere in INSEE, but the "true" situation would take a lot of work to uncover.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:57 AM
5

I know this is no consolation but this practice is rife in Sydney (esp. inner suburbs, North Shore, Northern Beaches, The Shi(t)re) - I should know. Same applies in Wollongong and CBR and I doubt it's any better in Melbourne or Brisvegas. Can you get a share thing going? Any mates at work who could help? Other than that, try Parramatta or the like (somewhere close to frequent trains). Best of luck.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:52 AM
16

I feel like complaining or voicing this opinion will just get me fired Nothing wrong IMO with leaking the info to the media anonymously.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 12:44 AM
2

Excellent response. If femmes.gouv.fr exists, there must be a govt agency or department that collects stats on crimes, arrests, prosections and so on, no? For some reason I think that might be a less biased source than the French Ministry for Women (but maybe I'm being naive). Failing that, what's the French equivalent to the ABS in Australia that collects census data and so on? There must be one, and it would contain relevant data (mind you, being French it wouldn't surprise me if they kept all…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 12:38 AM
13

your chance of becoming president is 0.000018% higher Maths is a TOOL OF TEH PATRIARCHY.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:18 AM
2

I don't disagree with you: it makes quite a lot of sense. What I was highlighting was the fuss being made, as though the 1/5 of the survey sample who hold this view was akin to the Four Horsemen Of The Apocalypse arriving. despite all the propaganda to the contrary, women want a man to lead, a man they "can look up to." There is some truth in that but - as ever - there are a helluva lot subtleties and contexts and nuances. If an LTR is going to last, both parties have to be strong enough to nego…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 11:13 AM
3

And on top of all that, it's an outside chance that any of your actions (or mine, or anyone else's) would stop any of these muppets in their tracks and have them change their ways.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 10:21 AM
44

He took care with how he expressed himself, because I suspect he also knows that the judicial system is biased, not least because family courts the world over preferentially place children in the care of the mother. Nonetheless, he's not wrong.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 10:10 AM
5

It's worth watching the series. The blokes weren't without fault - 3 left within a few days - and there were a few women who showed a fair wodge of spine and determination. Nonetheless, the contrast between the two islands (shelter, water, food and group spirit) was stark.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:55 AM
1

If you want to know more, you could browse around the sub and see what we talk about Not to mention (COUGH) sidebar ----> (COUGH).
/r/MensRights25/11/17 09:48 AM
8

Or one in five [Australians] thinks "men should take control in relationships and be the head of the household"? Ignoring for a minute the high probability that that statement is a misrepresentation, by my maths that means that four out of five don't. So the problem is... what, exactly? Do you blow the whistle when you hear sexist comments? No, because men take the piss out of women, and women out of men - it's one means by which both groups tolerate each other. Secondly, even I know what a dog-…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:23 AM
18

TIL - there are too many Daves, they obviously breed like flies and we need to start culling them. Up next: millions of women worldwide kept out of employment as powerline workers, scaffolding riggers, sewerage maintenance workers, roofers, truck drivers and foresters - Boo! Sexism!
/r/MensRights25/11/17 08:10 AM
1

There may be some worth in thinking about some of the issues raised, but the questions and the claims are unclear. My main beef is that the whole of it is of marginal relevance to men's rights - why it's been stickied I have NFI.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:53 AM
2

it's fundamentally up to the mothers and it doesn't apply to half of men anyway! TIL. Still, I'm sure this was a one-off and that they'll point this out next time...
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:31 PM
2

Paywall
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:21 AM
4

Well, who else is there to blame? Don't forget the Three P's Patriarchy Privilege Penis
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:17 AM
12

I won't downvote your post OP, because that would be petty. But this article is as supportive of men as any Grauniad article - IOW, not very. In fact, no, it's worse - it pretends to be about men and for men, and in fact isn't. See, for example: Just 1.6% of men have given up work altogether to take care of the family home. New rights for fathers to share parental leave with mothers have poor take-up rates. Which is men's fault, obviously, and nothing to do with things like: piss-poor paternal l…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:59 AM
1

Maybe it's my OS then. Works fine with FF but not chrome.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:37 AM
11

Not possible to control how someone else interprets anything. Quite. The issue is that certain sectors of society appear to have the upper hand when it comes to which interpretation is paramount - Listen and Believe. And it wasn't always like this and it seems to me to be getting worse: when I look at some event - Mattress Girl, for instance - and think "well that's about the bottom of the barrel" subsequent events prove me wrong. This will lead to more separation. And discord. And as much as I …
/r/MensRights21/11/17 12:37 PM
2

Do we really expect meaningful relationships to start with a man unzipping his fly and coercing an unwilling female colleague to give him oral sex? one hell of a slippery slope The end of the office Christmas party - a tragedy for humankind. Just as well perhaps - women from HR or accounts grinding their pelvis against a bloke's leg was never my scene.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 12:26 PM
3

Or twitter or snapshit or whatever. Years ago (before email, when computers took up entire basements), young blokes who were awkward and a bit clumsy with approaching girls (yours truly, for instance) would inadvertently do things that were gauche. As a result, we would be the laughing stock of the disco, or the village, or the school. No, it wasn't pleasant, but there was not a thought that that clumsy act would be revisited decades later, let alone be re-interpreted. The game has changed since…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 12:20 PM
3

If a "regular" woman could accuse a "regular" man of sexual harassment, and be believed, then maybe the Weinstein Effect could happen to anybody. Ahhhh, so that's where the "#MeToo" campaign idea came from, they were hoping to cause so much terror to celebrities they knew that ordinary people would think twice about questioning them. That's an outside possibility, but IMO you credit them with more foresight than they warrant. IMO a lot of the article is retrofitting the facts and - now that Kase…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 12:03 PM
2

Better not to be in a situation where a woman even might do this. And that's the very aspect that is either not addressed or, if mentioned, is dismissed as men failing to deal with "obvious boundaries". Much (if not most) of the initial contact between men and women is a dance in which each hints or suggests and the other reciprocates, and the dance floor is dimly lit and the two are there on their own. Wind forward some years - decades even - and you are, without notice, on the sharp end of an …
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:25 AM
7

“What we’re seeing now is men are backing away from the role that we try to encourage them to play, which is actively mentoring and sponsoring women in the workplace,” That's because men are the primary agents of a cynical backlash against #MeToo
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:09 AM
3

Because any man who objects is by default a rape apologist.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:32 AM
5

Avoiding feminist criticism, probably. Not just that - it's a dead-set winner with the meeja and especially social meeja (re-tweets, facebook shares), all of which guarantee webpage clicks, which [{...} kaching Profit!] [edit] men's growing reticence to be alone with women In light of the incessant blame game (which is not over yet), who can blame men for not consorting?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:26 AM
19

It’s not the extremists that are the problem.... It’s all the career professional feminists that influence government policy, academia, mainstream media, etc etc Very much this. IMO Feminism has (voluntarily or otherwise) joined with SJW'ism' and certain other factions in order to increase its social and political clout. Feminism has been a political movement since its inception: the difference these days is that it really isn't interested in the very constituency it claims to represent - women.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:20 AM
3

Maybe the research is legit and it's just poorly written, but these things do matter. They do, and thanks for pointing out a couple of problems. It's been a long time since I did Stats and I've forgotten much, so I couldn't quite grasp why I had loud warning bells sounding. it isn't written in scientific style. It's odd. The style (poor writing) was one thing that set my teeth on edge, but what really bothered me was how poorly they set out their methodology. Peer review would have fixed such ba…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:06 AM
4

To be non-sarcastic for a minute (I admit it's an effort for me), I suspect that: 1) it's going to take some while before most of us know what the wash-up of this whole #MeMeMe...Too bandwagon-jumping will be; and 2) that virtually none of it will make the minefield that men and women navigate to get together any easier. Office Christmas Party? Thanks, but I'm busy.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:58 AM
1

Briffault's Law
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:47 AM
2

The Mike Pence Solution.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:45 AM
6

Archive here: http://archive.is/aywXy Why not use the archive link as the source? Because Google Chrome REFUSES access to archive.is. Next we started hearing about "witch hunts". Apparently calling out sexual predators is fine if they're a rapist, but when you start objecting to arse grabbers and knee fondlers well, then apparently "it's all gone too far". But "minor" harassers do not deserve a free pass just because other men have done worse. This is Lesson 1: How to Conflate. Lesson 2: How To …
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:43 AM
3

Also this from a blog whose author needs no introduction: Feminists tend also, as the author of this piece has done, to consistently misrepresent the statistics. 2-8% is the lower boundary, derived from rape reports to police that can be determined to be definitely false (or definitely unfounded) to nearly a criminal court standard. I could just as easily flip that around and say that "only" 6% of rape accusations are true, because that is the percentage of reports that result in conviction", ho…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:00 AM
2

May not be the best, but this Fact Checker article from WaPo might provide some leads.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 06:27 AM
2

Why does he have to be such a twat? I don't know for certain, but I bet his middle name is Oedipus.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 05:59 AM
13

Interesting paper, though poorly written (I am no PhD supervisor, but sloppy referencing, poor grammar and a failure to explore limitations of methodology would have me send this back to be re-drafted). Nonetheless, just reading the abstract a couple of factors leap off the page: 1) That men (of all age brackets surveyed) rate mental health at least as important as (and often above) physical health. If these trends hold beyond this study, they are crucial in (a) arguing for, and ensuring, signif…
/r/MensRights20/11/17 11:45 AM
2

Did you read the part about excessive drinking? Angry disposition? That's not healthy stuff, and the thing with the girl, however trivial, was a manifestation of that... It's not the beef itself that's the problem so much as why & how it happened. From what you've written (not just this comment but elsewhere) I think that you're probably most of the way to fixing your dilemma. Yes, it is reasonable to ask people to stop and ask themselves if what they're doing is the right thing or not, and aski…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:23 AM
3

With the incessant media and social media racket around #metoo in the wake of Weinstein, and with new accusations against males turning up every 5 minutes, I think it's touch-and-go. I shouldn't be at all surprised to see a sharp increase in the number of men going MGTOW in the near future, not that that's any guarantee of immunity. Whichever and however, I'm glad I was a young fool in the 80s; I wouldn't be a young male nowadays for all the tea in China.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:17 PM
5

There is that.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:58 PM
2

I have a friend who is 80, and mad at women Lots of women of that generation would have the same view, but then living in poverty (the Great Depression) and surviving WW2 makes people a lot hardier and much more inclined to be grateful. Not that I would wish 1930s-style poverty or the horrors of global war on anyone, but sometimes I think having to face real hardship over extended periods would eliminate most of the petty whingeing that contemporary young women (and men) indulge in.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:56 PM
4

(upvoted for username)
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:48 PM
-3

I know. It's almost as if the voting patterns on Reddit sometimes make absolutely no sense at all.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:32 PM
6

Repent!
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:27 PM
6

Apparently the mere idea of requiring a reasonable standard of proof is itself a form of oppression, and the whole (so-called) judicial system is because Patriarchy. It's a hard habit to kick.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:26 PM
13

I know. Those who, like me, have had this whole "innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt" schtick beaten into us are clearly victims ourselves. Pity us, for we know no better.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:42 AM
5

Certifiable lunacy if you ask me.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:11 AM
3

A few select quotes: Instead of advocating that women compete with men on masculine terms and men mix in just enough femininity to distance themselves from the most toxic versions of masculinity, we need to start being honest about what being a man has come to mean. Trump’s rise has made it terrifyingly clear that his toxic version is not at all peripheral to 21st-century modern masculinity. It is central. It is authoritarian. And it is lethal. Because all American men wish they were Trump. And …
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:33 AM
1

Archive: http://archive.is/MRKea
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:45 AM
69

While our first instinct is to listen to every woman’s story, our insider knowledge of Murray (Miller)’s situation makes us confident that sadly this accusation is one of the 3% of assault cases that are misreported every year. 3% huh? 3% of which, exactly - sexual assault, or all forms of assault? Assuming the former, one article from the National Review (one of many a quick google search turns up) points out that: The linked academic study actually concludes that false rape allegations occur a…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:42 AM
2

And a castle.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 09:51 PM
1

Arise, Sir Chad Thundercock.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 09:50 PM
5

The oft-cited OK Cupid 80/20 survey thing holds here. And IMO that 80/20 thing held a long, long time before OKC and the internet. Men pursue, women choose. Many (most?) women chase the top 10% of men (however you measure that). Men have two choices: get used to it, or drop out. These days, and although I don't count myself as MGTOW, I don't blame blokes for giving the game away.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:08 PM
2

So the question is, what to do? The implications of all this #metoo bandwagon-jumping for us mortals have been floating around in my head for some days, so I'm glad someone asked the question. I suspect we're at (or nearing) peak #metoo, although doubtless more of the Rich and Famous will either fall onto their own swords or be pushed. In the case of the aforementioned, that's their problem (and they're comfortably well-off anyway). In the case of those here who are well-acquainted with the RP o…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/17 12:33 PM
1

One of the BTL comments got it right Kathy refers only to male MPs, who run on fear of losing their positions by upsetting women, the majority of voters; and male commentators in the MSM, who largely get and keep their jobs by toeing the PC line, or who simply don't write on these social subjects which are dominated by women. [...] Men also have plenty to say on various other sites, and there are many articles and videos out there that speak out for men and have been demolishing the PC brigade f…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:45 PM
1

Remind me - how does that old trope about not arguing with a pig go again...?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:24 AM
-3

The "forced to apologise" is what I don't get. It could simply be a misrepresentation of what this Kit bloke (whoever he is) wrote, I don't know. Regardless, when are males like this Kit Harrington person going to grow a spine, stand by what they said and tell whoever it is who's leaning on them to go fuck themselves with a rusty breadknife? Or is he, like that clutch of hysterical female wannabes who willingly tagged #MeToo, more interested in principal than principle?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 10:06 AM
1

And I know you know fuck-all about science and even less about reasonable standards of proof. As I said, sod off.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:42 AM
1

I ask for reasonable evidence and you link to a short, pixellated video of what appears to be children at a birthday party. Sod off.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:39 AM
1

On what basis are men not victims of sexism? Provide references to peer-reviewed literature in your attempt to back up your claim.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:31 AM
1

Being an adult is hard. Try it sometime.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:26 AM
1

telling lies like that And what "lies" would those be, we wonder?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:24 AM
3

One of the biggest problems with feminism is that it fundamentally misunderstands how men operate. And in many instances, its more militant elements deliberately misrepresent men and masculinity - see, for example, "toxic masculinity". feminism has been revealed to be a supremacist movement In some aspects, yes. My view is that it is also (these days at least) a political movement in and of itself. That bloc within it who are career feminists (including the likes of Marcotte and Sarkeesian, but …
/r/MensRights12/11/17 01:33 AM
5

I'm sure there would be shouts of "sexist!" but it really isn't. Many women ought to be reminded (even if they haven't worked it out for themselves) that they're there to work, and that an office or a showroom is not a nightclub (unless it is, of course). Besides, it looks trashy.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 09:15 PM
1

I think instead she's quoting the feminist position and despairing at it That's the way I read it. My reservation about it is it's too little, too late.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 08:57 PM
1

Reasonable disagreement and discussion can be had with some feminists, though it's not as common as it needs to be. Perhaps in this instance the relative cordiality has something to do with being English (or British), or maybe they were told in no uncertain terms that if they acted up they would be chucked out - I dunno. I understand Joanna Williams is on the potential guest speaker list for ICMI '18. (tagging u/Optickone who makes a similar point)
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:45 PM
1

You're welcome, I'm happy to know I've helped in some small way.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 09:19 AM
0

Bettina Arndt: The Politics of Cleavage
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 07:01 AM
0

But if you're constantly reading articles on power dynamics and self improvement, it's nearly impossible to have said attitude. So stop reading about it and figure it out for yourself. As my Sensei used to say before every session: "Practise, please."
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 06:59 AM
2

thinking others are constantly laughing at you, watching you, and judging your every move Maybe they are: after all, we all like a laugh at someone else's expense. Even you. So, now what?
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 06:56 AM
2

Unless they're friends of mine, I won't have anything to do with anyone - male, female or anywhere in between - who utters or types weasel words like "toxic masculinity". None of them is worth arguing with, and - even if there is an outside chance they might learn to think differently - life is too fucking short. walk away The only sensible strategy.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/17 06:52 AM
1

Gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:13 AM
1

But but... gender is fluid, donchaknow
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:05 AM
1

... Maybe Next Year? [(current year) edition]
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:02 AM
2

I got a crush on her and she seems so much put together than other chicks. What do I do? I have no advice other than to point out that the key word here is seems.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/17 11:45 AM
3

Like u/womans_algorithm says, do stuff. 1) Physical activity helps a lot. Run, ride a bike, go rock-climbing, take up boxing or martial arts, go to the gym. If none of those suit, do a half-marathon on one foot. Whatever. Physical activity both diverts the mind and changes hormonal levels (which affect what goes on between your ears). 2) Your attempts to control the racket inside your head** will probably fail; and besides, you're throwing good money after bad. Even Gautama Buddha had thoughts t…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/17 11:41 AM
3

ask not what others can do to enlighten you, but rather what you can do to enlighten yourself. And no matter what (apparently) insurmountable thing it is that you face, this approach always works.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:40 AM
3

I'm sure it wouldn't. It wouldn't go down well almost anywhere in mass media these days. And all of that only underscores a thing that's been lurking in the back of my mind (and there's a lot of room to hide there): what most annoys me about modern gender politics is how bloody humourless it all is.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 11:52 AM
2

A Two Ronnies sketch featuring the inimitable Ronnie Barker.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:31 AM
2

If you've nothing useful to contribute, be quiet.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:51 AM
2

at least November is prostate month where we forget to shave And there's your cue. Tell them that you support their campaign aimed at women during breast cancer month, and wouldn't it be a fabulous thing if next month the company ran a campaign on men's health to coincide with Movember. If you can appeal to their profit motive without making too much of the "men's health" thing, you may find their marketing department more amenable.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:49 AM
1

Was there anything comparable to that point which affected women, where regardless of choice, they simply could not fulfill their roles to be "good women and nurturing mothers," due to situations out of their control? The first thing is poverty. If Mr J. Public can't find work then there's no money coming in. And if there's no money and 5 or more kids to feed, Mrs J. Public is under a lot of pressure - she will be in her 20s and under family and societal pressure to be a good mother and like all…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:49 PM
13

You're tired and frustrated and feeling under-appreciated; she's in some place in her head where she feels under-appreciated. By the sound of it, your frustration lies in her not understanding the efforts you go to. So explain yourself and the things you do - calmly, fully. Do not make her to blame. And then listen to her frustrations and what she goes through. You're both adults. Giving each other the cold shoulder is an understandable reaction, and it's not going to help anything. You can, bet…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 12:18 PM
1

I want to get out but I'm so afraid of not finding someone. I need to get out but I'm afraid. You say you want out and have wanted to leave for some time, yet you're still there. IOW you choose to stay. And staying is an option - not a very desirable one, but still an option. Afraid to leave? Of course, that's entirely understandable, especially to anyone who's gone through similar experiences. You and she have developed habits and routines that - no matter how harmful - are comfortable (in the …
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:50 PM
10

She makes me feel like I'm the psychopath No. She doesn't make you feel anything - you do. She may well be mad or psychotic or whatever, but you are responsible for your reactions You're in an unpleasant and unhappy situation, and it's probably not going to get better (and you either know this or suspect it), and it's been going on for a while. And you're still there, so there must be good reasons why (benefits). So what are those reasons? (No, I'm not asking you to bare all here, just talk them…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:10 PM
5

Just needed to vent I guess Vent all you like. In the end, though, it's not going to be enough, or anywhere near it. The thing is this: your situation is not going to get better and there's good odds it will get worse (I speak from experience. Lots of it.) You have a choice: ditch the bitch (short-term pain and disruption, no sex) or put up with things (long-term pain, misery, no sex). It's your life, you decide.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:29 AM
7

As u/Ordinate1 points out, your sin is not your party-political alignment; it's that you dared question The Way Things Are on that sub.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:42 AM
8

One comment from that thread sums up most of the BTL love-in: MRAs don't care about men's rights, if they did they would be feminists. I'm not here to slag them off, their opinions/ beliefs are their problem. Nonetheless, an alternative rendering is: "Feminists don't care about men's rights, if they did they would be MRAs wouldn't be feminists"
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:37 AM
3

I've come across almost identical "social experiments" but AFAIK none were done by the BBC. Given how disinclined the Beeb generally is to consider the plight of men, this is quite a step.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:21 AM
9

Also: The sympathy I received when I was the ‘victim’ compared to Will was astounding. It’s made me want to fight for male victims of domestic abuse, and to help end the stigma around their experiences. Now that's a step in the right direction. Thank you Eline Van Der Velden.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:15 AM
13

Some teenage boys even came over and started taking photos and posting them on Snapchat. They were laughing, saying, "Look at him getting beaten up." Now there's something to ponder. I'm not blaming the boys entirely (anyone who's been a boy at school knows how this works), but if this is any reliable indication then it's obvious there's work to be done. I suspect (I can't be completely certain), however, that their attitude is a result of modern schooling (with its emphasis on how girls learn a…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 08:11 AM
2

It is reasonable and rational to be a member of both camps Nearly all of my posts are on here, but I read TRP (and MGTOW) because, among the dross and the PUA stuff, there is sense and reason to stop and think. Likewise, there's a lot of dross posted here but there is useful stuff if you look. I don't give a flying toss about any of the labels (MRA, RP, MGTOW) but there's always that thing with people with wanting to be part of an identifiable group, so I don't knock others if that's what they l…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:37 AM
2

Of which only 56 were randomly selected for one study; the other merely looked at data from 40 people undergoing brain imaging. Hardly the last word in random/ representative etc.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 11:03 PM
1

Got it, thanks for the explanation (why it is that people downvote someone asking a perfectly straightforward question instead of answering I don't know. But then, this is reddit). There are always problems when it comes to wielding supreme executive power.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:54 PM
1

Not that I'd ever give a miserable penny to this mob, but where's the option in the dropdown menu for "Shitlord"? And that's Sir Shitlord by the way, and be sharp about it.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 01:07 PM
1

So give me your subtle question that should be asked by researchers. Before I get to my question, I want to make it perfectly clear that I make many generalisations in what follows: nonetheless, generalisations don't hold for long unless they contain some appreciable truth. One common thread goes like this. In any mainstream meeja article or following any lead comment on a forum that talks about male suicide, there is inevitably endless commentary to the effect "ahyesbut women attempt suicide mo…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 12:56 PM
2

Just to take one issue alone. A main justification for denying men [family violence ] care is that they aren't generally harmed by dv. Suicide is a Form of harm There is a not insignificant body of evidence that points to two things: 1) that while males less likely to even consider reporting DV, nonetheless several studies show that men are almost as likely to report suffering DV as women (the general consensus seems to be 1 in 4 men vs 1 in 3 women). Granted, the "1 in 3" thing is contentious, …
/r/MensRights10/10/17 12:22 PM
4

There are two things going on (probably many more than that, but space and limited attention spans). 1) As far as men's mental health is concerned, any publicity is good publicity in my book. And if a legit member of the Royal Family lends his weight, so much the better. Believe it nor not, I still (superannuated and sentimental as I may be), like many people like to believe that some members of that family have a good heart and do listen. 2) I don't put too much weight on things said that are t…
/r/MensRights10/10/17 11:52 AM
-3

I am miles behind this particular issue, principally cos I live in Straya. Nonetheless, has this Bill gained assent from the Senate? If not, then what exactly is the ACLU having a tanty about?
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:47 AM
9

regressives generally Just as a sideline, I appreciate your use of "regressives" rather than the usual epithet "leftists". It's an important distinction.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:40 AM
3

Leader of the attack pack was Polly Dunning, daughter of professional feminist Jane Caro, and mother of a toddler about whom she infamously wrote last year, recounting her horror at finding out she was pregnant with a boy: “I felt sick at the thought of something male growing inside me.” Ah-hah. That figures. North Shore Mums Facebook group Just for context, the North Shore of Sydney has long had a reputation for being the sort of place the riff-raff can't afford (and even though there's still m…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 06:26 AM
6

“Stuff that, hubby is a grown man. I already do his laundry and keep his children alive.” “My role is childcare during working hours and that’s it.” And here was me thinking that good LTR's were about give and take. Imagine how something like this would go down: "My dear, darling wife, I'm at work 12 hours a day 6 days a week. If you want the fridge moving, move it yourself."
/r/MensRights09/10/17 06:07 AM
1

I've no idea where the downvotes are from but I can tell you it wasn't me - I've only just read your reply.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:40 PM
1

Sauce?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 12:47 PM
0

So what do you guys think? Has the delayed child rearing, reduced childbirth rates, declining marriage rates and breakdown of family structures created the mess we have today? None of these factors on their own has created the current confused state of things, nor even all of them combined. But they are all - of themselves and especially in combination - significant contributors. Watch, for example, Professors Camille Paglia and Jordan Peterson in conversation NB - I am well on my way to 60 and …
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:01 AM
3

I'm happy that this sub gave you both reason and encouragement to dig into and evaluate your past. People like you giving positive feedback helps keep this sub (and MR in general) going.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:48 AM
3

Maybe their entire strategy should be - if you want to get laid, use Tinder; if you want a charming man to buy you dinner, use something else? The problem here is that you are employing a strategy which appears to have elements of logic in it. Logic (and rational thought and reason) are tools of the Pastry Archie which must be eradicated.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:35 AM
3

Or maybe the corporatocracy and feminism. Either way, yer average Joe Public is the one who gets the wooden pole up his arse.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:30 AM
1

Bettina Arndt: The Politics of Cleavage. Also: "BOOBS!"!!1!
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:24 AM
14

The bloke who asked for her phone number had a lucky escape.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:06 AM
2

I hope this "campaign" is a rip-roaring success, because as we all know all the women love a NiceGuyTM Up next: women on Tindr complain "Ugh, guys on Tindr are so boring"
/r/MensRights04/10/17 11:13 PM
4

And for the love of Dog, get it printed properly. It's pointless going to all that effort if you then use a clapped-out inkjet printer.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 10:59 PM
3

In an earlier pressbot release, a spokesbot for the Department of Ritual Mutilation monotoned: "This was a procedure that was carried out in accordance with international best practice guidelines. In any routine procedure there are inevitably occasions where - due to circumcisioons circumstances beyond our control - errors arise. In light of the allegations presented (and without admission of any liability, in part or in whole), we advise that we, of our own goodwill, will appoint an internal bo…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:14 AM
3

Related: Bettina Arndt on "sex-starved men"
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:41 AM
1

I am no Peterson fanboi - he shoots from the hip too much for me (judging by his youtube videos that is - I have never attended one of his classes, but then I'd bet neither have you). That said, he talks about archetypes a lot, and the Mother archetype is but one of them. So while your AVfM article might be some sort of precis of his talks on motherhood, it is selective and thus is no basis on which to label him gynocentrist. Note: I am not saying he is or isn't gynocentrist, just that your piec…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 11:15 AM
2

Here's a .pdf of the whole NHS guide. It seems to be a national template, not restricted to any particular region.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:42 AM
2

Helicopters? Pah. I'm a Harrier jump-jet.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 10:33 AM
3

Slightly o/t yet nonetheless relevant: The Politics of Cleavage by Bettina Arndt
/r/MensRights01/10/17 10:23 AM
1

Because women with custody of the kids spend all of the alimony/ childcare they get from their ex on the children, don't they...
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:33 AM
1

but that's the problem, we don't live in that kind of world anymore, this isent the 50 True, but that doesn't invalidate the points u/PillTheRed makes. The behaviours are ingrained in men and women alike, for all that many preach about equality and sexism and blah blah. So while the mouth says one thing, millennia-old strategies and behaviours kick in almost automatically. isent this what men's rights is for? fixing this broken system, Primarily, MR is about addressing fundamental imbalances, es…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:10 AM
4

It doesn't even criticise your driving.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 09:54 AM
0

But yeah, let's just hand government more money they can spend on women and girls while continuing to neglect and marginalize men and boys. If your previous claims (about what one or two Canadian Provincial govts do with the taxes raised) are correct, and if those examples can be assumed as a reasonable proxy for other state and federal govts (it's a stretch, but let's fly with it for the minute), then we are faced with two options: either get governments at all levels (and their bureaucracies..…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:39 PM
2

Barf on their desk - at least they'll have got something back.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:11 AM
1

Excellent post. A much-reduced poster of this needs to go on the wall of the gents' in every nightclub/ pub/ meat market.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:09 AM
2

stuff like that has been a real wakeup call for lots of previously unaware men, and for the women who care about them Slowly, blokes are beginning to come out of their torpor. But it's a long, slow, incremental process. The reason I emphasised your last clause is to reinforce the notion (that I hadn't thought of) that us blokes won't get anywhere meaningful very fast without the women who we know and love and trust. As Feminism succeeded on the backs of countless men who either agreed with its n…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 03:39 PM
4

You have two things to get over: 1) your infatuation with her; 2) your infatuation with her.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:30 AM
3

You presume more knowledge of this bloke than even his family and friends. Have the only downvote I can give... with relish.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:27 AM
3

He put his political messaging ahead of the wellbeing of his children. Have you ever heard of the expression "putting the cart before the horse"?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:24 AM
2

"I am just saddened by a man who had to go through this alone ..." Well, at least someone noticed - perhaps that's a start.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:21 AM
2

I suspect that is partly a function of the relative newness of the MRM (at least as a mainstream idea); partly because the movement gets tarred with the "far right, misogynist losers" brush; and partly because men are (as a generalisation) much less inclined to look after other men than women are other women. All of which obstacles need to be acknowledged and dealt with.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:48 AM
2

Extremist sjw feminists see a problem (real or perceived) and they are trying to get others onboard to spread their message. Ignore the "extremist" tag, and you've more or less summed up a large part of what's been going on across the globe for 40+ years. It's not that women and men woke up one morning, looked in the bathroom mirror and discovered they were Feminists: it's that they (including me, up until a few years ago) joined a bandwagon, a big one that got bigger and bigger until it was all…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:41 AM
2

IDK how about building the sub a legit wiki? I think that idea has been floated here before though I have NFI what came of it. Regardless, I am about the last person to speak to about it; though I'd contribute what I could, even basic html looks like witchcraft to me. One other issue is how we get such a wiki to become the default resource, and not just for this sub, nor reddit, but for trustworthy sources beyond. Nonetheless, one step at a time Grasshopper.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:09 AM
3

a couple seconds here and there to post about this issue and defend it to others and put information out there is something that I can do, and that I think does matter. Which is a useful point to reinforce: if each of us does what we can, when you add up all the individual contributions it starts to amount to something. With luck and a following wind, others within our collective social circles begin to think and read, who then do their small part and pass it on to yet others [reiteraten+1]. The…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:51 AM
2

Go look here: https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/ There's stacks on DV/ IPV. Also: Bates et al (2014): Testing Predictions From the Male Control Theory of Men’s Partner Violence; Steinmmetz (1978): The Battered Husband Syndrome; PASK (The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge project), a meta-analysis of over 1,000 studies on IPV from around the world. We need a handy, one-click, go-to reference site that collates all this stuff by subject.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:38 AM
3

Just because women are diagnosed more doesn't mean men don't suffer more. It just means men are not diagnosed as much as women [...] and there's no way to prove the second without men actually being diagnosed. Exactly. And it's this that annoys me whenever I read (yet another) article that blathers "women suffer depression more" every time there's a discussion about male suicide.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:14 AM
5

Clinical, major depression is a disorder that makes you - often lie in your bed and feel gloomy I know that, I have it. That kind of depression, that gets diagnosed, is more common among women. It's fair to state that more women are diagnosed with depression; in my view, it does not necessarily follow that women suffer depression more than men.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 02:10 AM
1

I've got nipples and I'm male. CHECK YOUR DAMN PRIVILEGE! I did, and do you know what? I'M NOT EVEN GOING TO USE THEM FOR ANY USEFUL PURPOSE, GIRLS.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:53 PM
21

research has found women are more likely to suffer from depression, If anyone reading this can point me to peer-reviewed, valid research that supports this, please feel free - I'm all for being educated. In the meantime, I call bollocks. If we are to believe the trope that says men are incapable of expressing their emotions (likewise, bollocks) then it is entirely predictable that men suffer depressive states more, and thus top themselves more. Prof. Deshpande said: “this may support the fact th…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:42 PM
2

I wonder if it's even legal for the Guardian to call itself a charity, since it is a political lobbying organisation. The Guardian (the media outlet) is a media outlet: like all media outlets (Breitbart included) it has political views. So far, so totally predictable. If you believe otherwise, I will end the conversation right here. Your non-trivial error is in conflating Teh Graun with theguardian.org which, according to the blurb, How is theguardian.org connected to Guardian News & Media? theg…
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:17 PM
1

When you make an assertion back it up with evidence. I know it's Breitbart but they even linked to the Guardian's own announcement saying they had registered as a U.S charity. Thanks at least for asking. Yes it's true that the Graun has registered a charity under US law. Even I, a "Lefty", am deeply sceptical of its gender-political manoeuvring. Nonetheless, and even disregarding the fact that Breitbart is hardly an impartial critic, the simple truth is that the Breitbart article linked to does …
/r/MensRights25/09/17 12:54 PM
4

there would still be a large majority of domestic violence commit by men against woman. No. Most surveys show it's roughly 50-50 or that women initiate DV more often than men. See for example Bates et al 2014; Steinmetz 1978; PASK http://www.domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:38 PM
10

Whereas with these posters, sure, some men who are victims of DV probebly feel alienated (and I do honestly feel sorry for them), but on the whole it is not really causing any harm Are you seriously stating that psychological abuse, physical abuse and social isolation don't cause men harm? Are you aware of a thing called depression? Are you aware that the male suicide rate is 3~4 times that of females, worldwide?
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:27 PM
-3

Thanks for confirming what some of us were wondering, and you're right in saying that stuff like this doesn't help.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:19 PM
1

Calling out major media companies when they employ dodgy tactics I support. In this case, however, you misrepresent things.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 09:50 AM
9

From a casual reading, EIGE looks like a pale facsimile of the UN's Commission on the Status of Women. The EIGE's About page lists members of its board, its staff and its "experts forum", at least 80% of whom and regardless of nationality are (surprise, surprise) women - in particular, women whose personal pronoun is "Ms". I think that tells you all you need to know about EIGE, really.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 09:31 AM
1

Also, the Empress has no clothes.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 01:33 AM
3

a Tsunami inspired by auto-erotic orgasm Now there's a metaphor that should never be visualised. I think it's well past time the LGBTQI (whatever whatever) acronym was extended to recognise the struggles of another oppressed group - the Onanists.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:57 AM
7

the historicization of masculinity Ineffable twaddle. If anything needs abolishing it's the school of Transnational Masculinity ... and all who sail in it.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:51 AM
1

will do
/r/MensRights24/09/17 12:40 AM
2

I've got the .pdf and though I can't help with references I can (with a very rough-n-ready squizz) see some claims that don't seem to add up. If you think that (inexpert) input might help, let me know.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 09:12 AM
5

I could spend some time rummaging for stuff in a day or two, but in the meantime I recommend you see if you can speak with Bettina Arndt. She did a fair bit of homework herself on this very subject for her media articles. Her youtoob: https://www.youtube.com/user/bettinaarndtaus Blog: http://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/ email: [email protected] Relevant articles etc: http://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/news/great-news-no-rape-crisis-on-our-campuses/ http://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/news/2801/ htt…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:38 AM
38

Good post, geezer. The whole "event" is run by the Australian Women's Network, "in conjunction with the Australian Men's Network".... which, by some extraordinary coincidence, happens to be a brand name owned by (wait for it) ... the Australian Women's Network. The agenda for this prestigious event (a snip at AU$298 for general admission) includes: a 20 minute address by the CEO of White Ribbon (Australia); what it means to be a Respectful Man (can you guess, children?); and Masculinity is Flawe…
/r/MensRights23/09/17 07:22 AM
1

I was /sarcasm
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:08 AM
3

Including talks by: Warren Farrell, Karen Straughan, Cassie Jaye and Fred Hayward.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:10 AM
7

NCFM has the video up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5krok2B9auo
/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:06 AM
1

"Bi-sexual" also begins with 'B'. Just saying...
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:30 PM
5

Agree with others above - this is flat-out wrong. If the head/ principal won't deal with it, take the matter higher up.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:29 PM
1

What are your thoughts on this? Essentially, they're using a lot of words in pursuit of one term most of us know about: hypergamy. Similarly, Lu (the author of the article) fills several pages with elaborate prolixity in circumscribing what most here know as the Apex Fallacy. Neither is all that illuminating IM(NS)HO.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:02 PM
3

Is there some way we could make their lives easier? Like, say abolish alimony and let them spend equal time with their children? Abolish alimony??? Equal time with their children??!?? What kind of heresy is this? Are you mad? What will the poor Wimminz do? Now go and rinse your mouth out with soap and water, and in future keep your weird notions to yourself.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 10:47 AM
8

Dr. McGrath said a bigger problem [than low pay] was the perception [teaching] was not a masculine profession... "teaching is seen as women's work" Seen by whom Dr. McGrath? Children? Other teachers? Mrs. Trellis from Oswestry? Regardless, McGrath doesn't explain why the big drop in the male: female teacher ratio in the last few decades: couldn't have anything to do with the syllabi and governance of schools and unis being over-run by PC/ SJW/ Feminist claptrap could it? Wouldn't have anything t…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 10:36 AM
1

ARCHIVE this shite.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 10:11 AM
2

This article isn't quite as dismissive as it first appears. Example 1: Professor Sir Cary Cooper... said ... "men were struggling to adapt to a changing work environment after hundreds of years of being expected to provide. Which is perfectly true - my parents' generation was the last to have the stability of "a job for life". Largely thanks to Thatcherism and global corporatocracy, secure lifelong work has gone and nearly everyone is susceptible to being laid off tomorrow. Being the major earne…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 10:47 AM
2

Why has "The Red Pill" done so well in online sales, yet I never hear anyone talk about it IRL...? Partly I suspect because it's a documentary rather than a major romance/ CGI fantasy/ action blockbuster thing - the latter are usually the subject of idle chatter and whatnot; partly because its subject matter (gender relations); partly because it's about men's rights (which, rightly or wrongly, is frequently cast as misogynist, extreme right looney-land). Remember, Cassie's film did get a fair bi…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 09:57 AM
4

Please don't show the Big Think "author" of this film of sperm actually swimming: all that frantically enthusiastic wriggling - almost as if they're enjoying it - will upset him deeply. I'm not on tw@tter, but as is my wont, I went and chased the tweet and it links to this article by Philip Perry from a year ago (archived link). In it, he writes as though he has "discovered" some heinous plot by Science and Scientists to discriminate against Wimmin - oh! the outrage - so I naturally assumed he h…
/r/MensRights13/09/17 10:07 AM
1

So I'm told. It's enough to make one feel quite faint.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 09:27 AM
3

I think you've got the cart before the horse. If, per your statement, you are consistently dismissed and/ or ridiculed for expressing yourself, it's inevitable you will learn to hide whatever emotions you are going through. Seems like he's just trying to sell an ebook on a subject that didn't actually need one He can hawk his e-book all he likes - none of us is obliged to buy it. The subject is, however, worthwhile.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 10:04 AM
1

Your Tory mates presumably hold self-determination in high regard. On that basis then, their infant is entitled to choose who and what they become for themselves: barring sound medical grounds, they do not deserve to have sundry parts of themselves excised by some external agent, whether they be born male or female; nor is there any authority that has the fundamental right to choose for said infant (again, barring medical necessity). Tradition, religion and "well, everyone does that" are not eve…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:56 AM
1

I told her it’s less of that and more the fact that this guy was a working professional who had asked me to meet him (I could have stayed in and deep conditioned my hair). Then, Georgina darling, the next time simply devote your time to your hair - after all, its deep lustre will give you much more jollies. Come to that, if you ditch Tindr (or Grindr or Simpr or Pashr) you'd have even more time to "deep condition" your hair and, with luck some of it might leak through your skull into your brain …
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:34 AM
2

http://archive.is/J0bLF
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:17 AM
18

Well archive it then: http://archive.is/J5Mfa
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:15 AM
1

1) Relevance??? 2) How much does their age matter to their family, loved ones and friends when a man dies by his own hand? 3) Deflect all you like. You may not think people are watching you say, but they are.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 12:44 PM
1

She's not bad. Not bad at all. /English understatement
/r/MensRights06/09/17 12:11 PM
3

I've more or less said what I think in replies below so I won't bore you by repeating it here. I do want to thank you for "putting out there" so to speak, and to urge you to consider carefully before taking any tough decisions. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:17 AM
1

I have NFI why you got downvoted for that post, seemed perfectly reasonable to me. Have a +1.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:11 AM
2

The problem is, I still love her like a mother (I haven't seen her or talked to her since I got this info but it has only been a day) but I feel so much anger and hatred towards her right now, I don't know which side will win If you've only just realised what's gone on (or may have been going on), anger, disappointment and resentment are entirely understandable natural reactions: by what you've said so far, there's probably more to come. I know this will sound wanky, but let yourself feel those …
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:08 AM
2

Very well put. Anger, disappointment and (often) bitterness are entirely understandable reactions in situations of this type, and confrontation is common. Obviously that can go a number of ways depending on those involved, but as you say, those confronted with a list of their wrongdoings usually react defensively and nothing is really achieved. This is not to say that someone should not feel anger, resentment etc. nor that they should not express themselves; if, however, one or both parties cut …
/r/MensRights06/09/17 08:43 AM
1

As well as heart disease suicide is behind the likes of Lung cancer, Dementia, Flu/pneumonia and Liver disease. Wrong: suicide is also the single biggest cause of death of men aged under 45 in the UK. Suicide second after "unintentional injuries".
/r/MensRights05/09/17 08:24 AM
2

It's not unreasonable to want to know your ancestral line. All of us want to know from who we are descended. Barring exceptional circumstances, no-one can mount any reasonable counter-argument. I was raised by a clan that's not really my own. As are many. Their (non-blood) parent(s) raised and loved their children regardless, and that must not be forgotten.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:42 AM
3

Heart disease is the main cause of death among men Excluding suicide, that is. And a "natural" lifespan 5+ years shorter than women. And the 95% workplace fatality rate. And the 75%+ homelessness thing. And...
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:34 AM
-2

In contrast to this kind of pissy whining, this is how you do men's rights**. Good on him. [edited to add] We need to stop taking cheap shots and act**. It matters not how humble and trivial the act is.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 11:21 AM
1

Stop using being offended as an argument Don't put words in my mouth. You do understand that what you consider decent is dependent entirely on the expectations you place on that person, right? You do understand what a basic humanitarian urge is, right? Discussion for the sake of better understanding of issues shouldn't evoke such a visceral response, Even allowing that that was your original intent, you do understand that Houston is dealing with the mother, father and bastard son of all weather …
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:33 PM
2

Prove that he helped her unnecessarily. Next...
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:04 PM
10

Nor are many men. Your point?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:03 PM
10

If you look at the comments to these types of circlejerk posts, you don't find Hardline MRA's, but jokes and often blatant sexism against women I think what a lot of it is is "Me too"-ism and some sense of belonging. And TBH I can't find it in me to blame many blokes for wanting to be "in" on something, even if it's only an online forum: after all, it can be pretty bloody rough out there, and this sub is one of those places where blokes can come and get a little support. Godnose there aren't tha…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:01 PM
1

Those who actually give a toss about what matters must, at some point, learn to discriminate. Which I am, if slowly. The thing is to keep to principle: once you've got that into your head, staying on r/ mensrights or leaving is neither here nor there.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:39 PM
1

Ta.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:28 PM
1

Thanks for chiming in. I admit I skimmed your paper, so feel free to correct me if I misrepresented things.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:27 PM
9

Do you disagree that this is quintessential masculinity? What it is is quintessential humanity. Period. Stop making a humanitarian act a political point, lest I bag you as the obverse of a RadFem. When shit fits the fan, men are expected to act for the good of others, even if it means suffering and sacrificing. No. When it comes to things like the dire shit going on in Houston, decent people act for for the good of others, their gender, religion or sexual persuasion regardless. I believe it is g…
/r/MensRights28/08/17 01:15 PM
10

I agree with you, but that's redundant. What makes this post wholly unnecessary IMO is that it's trying to make mileage out of the same basic humanitarian motivations all decent people have. And it really, really annoys me.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 10:14 AM
3

Thanks Doug. Will cross-post to r/suicidewatch and r/australia (if it's not already there).
/r/MensRights28/08/17 10:01 AM
84

to drive moderates rational people away FTFY ;)
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:56 AM
2

If there is one (a resources section) I can't find it. Mods?
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:38 AM
2

E's norra whippet, but 'e's a canny 'ard dog mind.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:35 AM
2

"Millicent "Millie" Buckridge Tant" Ahh, Millie Tant: probably the best skewering of RadFem bollydicks ever. I love Viz. Anyway ah'm off ta get a packet a tabs...
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:14 AM
923

I detest shitposting like this, it does no-one any good. She needed help, he's doing his job. Any decent human being would have done the same - male or otherwise, paid or not. For all anyone here knows, that might be his wife and baby. Give it a rest.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:03 AM
1

Much better.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 08:17 AM
8

I take my hat off to you for the way you conducted yourself throughout that AMA: the coup de grâce was your response to Hartmann's rather pissy comment This is why so many women give up on the web because of these kinds of conversations. Bloody funny...
/r/MensRights24/08/17 08:55 AM
3

By the look of it, you would benefit from the advice of a friendly land-shark legal expert versed in family/ custody law in your neck of the woods. Seek advice from legal aid types by all means, but bear in mind they are not well-versed in fathers' rights, nor even sympathetic. Some fathers' rights subs/ websites/ forums would also be worth investigating. Beyond that, it can be useful at times to find a place (like here) where you can blow off steam. FTR a mate of mine is in a similar shitfight …
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:56 AM
7

WTF DOES HR DO? Whatever its original intent, these days it's effectively a crèche, a Safe SpaceTM where all the Gender Studies/ Workplace Management types are kept away from those who are actually performing a thing called work.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:38 AM
2

Making exceptions in every single one of these issues for every single case where it may or may not be true would be silly if you ask me I'm merely pointing out that your blanket statement(s) need fine-tuning: you will certainly get worse criticism from lots of others when you post this elsewhere. they are all true in 99.9% of cases throughout history Precisely the sort of casual generalisation that you cannot reference or back up, and that will get hammered outside this sub or the MRM in genera…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 08:21 AM
1

what the f does any of that have to do with women getting exclusive use of shared facilities because vagina? Exactly. Next thing you know there will be women-only toilets while men will have to use "any-gender-you-like" toilets. Oh, wait...
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:38 AM
3

95% of cases of Down's Syndrome are the result of random mutations, not inherited traits.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:29 AM
2

[women] Have never been forced to fight and die in wars. Not entirely. The Soviets had all-female combat units in WW1 and WW2, the British and German militaries had females manning AA units. Currently, there are women serving in frontline positions in the Afghan and Israeli military. I think you need to re-word your entry: your claim may be true in certain countries, but you need to be clear which nations/ cultures you are referring to in this instance. Come to that, there will be exceptions som…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:12 AM
1

Perfect.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 09:52 AM
1

I do remember seeing this a while back. a female employee raised concerns that the construction company’s sign was too biased. Too biased toward the truth, presumably. What would she have had the sign say? "Flying pigs ahead"? "Lean, fit males ahead, their firm muscles highlighted by the sweat on their bronzed skin"? “There was no women in the crew working on the building, it was politically correct," she told WKEF. (sic) Sod the PC angle - it was factually correct. The other thing is that any w…
/r/MensRights17/08/17 08:26 AM
2

What is it that your Mum is so implacably angry about when it comes to you (and men generally)? See if you can find out. Tease it out of her if you can. If she won't divulge anything and you are on good terms with relatives, see what you can extract from them. On the assumption you are not misrepresenting the real situation, no-one is that irrational without cause.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:32 AM
3

We've not accomplished anything Piece by piece and brick by brick. Evolution, not revolution. Patience, Grasshopper.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:13 AM
1

I fail to see how corporations running the government is any better than a communist system where the state runs everything. I have never lived in a true communist state, but I suspect the truth is that, as far as yer average Joe Public wage-slave is concerned, it wouldn't make a jot of difference whether the State was kicking your arse up the road or Big Corporation: either way, you're still getting kicked. Kropotkin recognized the problem hundreds of years ago when he noted that cut throat com…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 11:36 AM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/sex/comments/6t6x5p/why_i_am_against_routine_infant_circumcision/ It's one thing for a mod to bin a post/ ban a user for offensive conduct or flouting the rules of that sub (even if they are ridiculously narrowly-defined). It's quite another for a mod to wade in and go to town on someone based on their personal hang-ups - what that mod did and wrote is not what moderating is about and they need their arse kicking.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 11:21 AM
4

moving the left to the right. aka the shift of the Overton Window the the political right. It's been going on for decades (since at least the 1980s IME), and its rightward shift is one reason I have not voted for the ALP (the so-called left-of-centre party here) for years.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 11:07 AM
3

Two things about your post: If she carries it to term she will NEVER regret it. If she kills it she will be filled with regret. IMO that's not universal. Some, perhaps most, women would - sooner or later - be glad they went to full term. But not all, and there are often very good reasons for not doing so. I love my kids. I would do anything for them. I begged her to carry the baby to full term and I would raise it on my own. This, though, is glorious. I wish women, no, fuck that... everyone knew…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:14 AM
1

To me, this particular case is not a clear-cut instance of "her rights, his wrongs". Any sound LTR with kids and mortgages and blah... and then an unexpected pregnancy needs a lot of thought and negotiation and compromise. It's quite right that OP expresses his wants openly, and it's quite right his partner wants a bit of space to consider. In the end, it is her decision and IMO rightly so, especially given prior complications (IVF in the first instance) and her age: pregnancy is a big risk for …
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:02 AM
1

Can't +1 this enough. I realise sorting out reposts etc. if you're on a mobile platform may be a little complex, but try - it makes it easier for everyone.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:38 AM
-4

As foul as this assault was, I can see nothing in the linked article that states that it was the woman who punched the victim. The woman went inside a nearby bank and came out with a man, and the pair followed Page-Vincelli into Starbucks. (emphasis added) Why no-one was prosecuted for the death of this young bloke is certainly cause for great concern, but (unless other info comes to light) please leave off ranting about how "she" got away with it.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:49 AM
2

So? ;)
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:38 AM
2

One (or both) of you should whack up a post about this. Pronto.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:56 AM
1

Hell's bells, where are my manners? Through a combination of slackness, tiredness and ineptitude, I completely forgot to mention where I came across this BigThink claptrap. It was, of course, on HBR here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TM_JzovUrhc
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:18 AM
2

Splendidly ranted. The chunk you quoted These are being called “deaths of despair.” Harvard public policy professor Robert D. Putnam, told the BBC, "This is part of the larger emerging pattern of evidence of the links between poverty, hopelessness and health.” ... gave me a dose of the screaming shits, but on different grounds. 99 out of 100 of articles like this one make it read like "they" (whichever policy nerd they're quoting who's got their snout buried in the grant funding trough) have 'su…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:11 AM
1

Rant away, fill yer boots :)
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:35 AM
2

From the schools, where boys are treated like damaged girls and they feel like the teachers hate them? From the male role models that have been disappearing from young men's lives? There once was a time when a boy who lacked a decent male role model at home could always find one at school: these days male teachers are all but non-existent; those who remain are either products of the current university system (i.e. any mention of boys' rights sends them into a tailspin) or are seeing out their da…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:34 AM
3

Can you guess what "This" might be, children?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:45 AM
2

It is, as you say, a matter of taking the time to write and lodge your objection, and recognising that incremental change is still change.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:36 AM
2

I always look for the absolute numbers broken down by sex - and almost never see them. It's highly unusual to get the actual numbers, as has been presented in this CNN report. That's progress... how well can you expect to deal with a problem if you omit part of the information? So kudos to CNN. Yes, it's progress... of a sort. But "kudos"? No, IMO. Piece by piece and brick by brick, the mainstream meeja is incrementally learning to tone the rhetoric down, but it's agonisingly slow and no amount …
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:15 AM
26

If they'd said simply: "Virginity is a social concept" ... and left it at that, they might have created a wide-ranging and interesting discussion that could have included subjects such as: the relative social merits of female vs. male virginity; female virginity (and, by extension, chastity) and why all cultures venerate it; the bargaining power that female virginity grants (e.g. dowries in certain eastern cultures); and why mothers and female peers are significant powers in encouraging chastity…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:51 AM
6

I'm a woman, and I tried to comment on here once in favor of an article posted... Thing is, don't let the shitheads influence you - they're everywhere, here included. Tell them to blow it out of their arse (if they can find it) and move on. Life's too short, and MR needs all the support it can get.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:28 AM
1

FMG is totally different than circumcision. Irrelevant: your stupid argument is still stupid.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:12 AM
1

I want to own pepper spray when I'm off to college. I want to own a gun and learn how to use it properly. All this is because I do not want to get raped If you typed this as a joke, it's in poor taste. If otherwise, you would appear to have bought into the uni rape culture myth.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:40 AM
1

Firstly, it's not called the Daily Fail for nothing. Secondly, all of these "articles" are clones of each other. It doesn't matter who "wrote" it, or which esteemed, long-established pillar of lowest-common-denominator bilge the Fourth Estate publishes it, or which country - they all "feature" the same sort of women (assuming that is that "Jane" or "Helen" or "Constance" actually exist) who are all "vivacious" and "successful" and "gorgeous" and... And all of them - every single one of them - fo…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:19 AM
2

"So? She also has no say when she is vaccinated for life threatening diseases. She also has no say in wearing a seat belt when riding in a car." [Where "she" was subject to FGM as an infant.] Do you see how irrational your point is?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:44 AM
1

it's a poor substitute for a reasoned argument Which point seems to have shot over the other commenter's head. Nonetheless, your approach and arguments were clear and well worth reading.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:29 AM
1

unless I misunderstood weren't they civilians simply taking their own personal boat across the channel to help the evacuation? I think it was called "The Little Armada" or something like that - civilian craft (fishing vessels, ferries and so on) manned ("personned" I suppose I should say) by any number of unnamed people. I think most of the BEF would have been evacuated by navy ships but the private boats would have been a welcome sight to any Tommy stuck on French soil. Where exactly would a wo…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:07 AM
2

The problem is that they [feminists?] don't have rules like MRA groups do. Rules for MRA routinely follow "no brigading, no harassment" etc. Where people calling for everyone to dogpile on a video and flag it is considered a violation of those rules. "Brigading" is frowned upon here (and perhaps other subs, I don't know), but Reddit can't do squat if a number of its subscribers get together on other platforms. YouTube content creators often go to some lengths to ask that commenters don't dogpile…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 10:45 AM
3

What else can be done with her that won't result in her getting in the way?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 10:06 AM
3

No worries. I got on and - against my own better advice - went to town on a couple of the tools objecting ("but you're a man", "harassment of women is everywhere"). Doubtless I shall face an inbox full of stupid to deal with tomorrow, and serve me right. But fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 10:55 AM
5

thread about it in the Australian subreddit Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/6qvwpj/sexual_harassment_in_universities_misrepresented/ The OP did a bloody excellent job skewering the AHRC "report".
/r/MensRights02/08/17 09:40 AM
3

Whereas I've only got a mini USB stick. Still, them's the breaks...
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:02 AM
1

Elam waffles a bit, but somewhere around the 4:20 mark Warren Farrell starts. And for the next 8m or so he does the gentlest of effective demolition jobs of the PatriarchyTM swindle I've seen.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:27 AM
3

It's simply smear tactics, nothing more to it than that. Get corrections where you can: where you can't, flag the source as publicly as you can and shame them.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:31 AM
1

To add to what others have said, one big snag you have is arguing on so-called "social media". Whether Failbook or some other site, these places are usually (but not always) echo chambers for whatever is the dominant view on any particular subject. Every time someone like you puts their head above the parapet and says something that doesn't conform, they will be shot at by everyone and anyone within 6 degrees of separation. I am not suggesting you or anyone else should not challenge the rule in …
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:20 AM
1

Luckily that means men will be hired with less education or experience. Or not hired at all. I'm in a technical job where my peers have degrees and I don't. In a previous incarnation a little while ago, I was co-running a consultancy in a professional/ technical/ science-based field. Not to blow my trumpet too loudly, I was bl00dy good at it, to the extent that after a decade doing it I began teaching aspects of the field at tech colleges and, with my business partner, created, developed and del…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:31 AM
1

I grant that. Really, I was taking the piss out of OP's interlocutor and their garblage.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 08:59 AM
1

I can almost sense the fury and frustration. It's just as well you kept a lid on yourself, trying though the ordeal was. It seems weird that the health system you dealt with won't talk to a father who isn't legally married about his own infant son, yet I'd bet the same system would hold a man responsible for child care payments even though he and the mother had never formally married. As to the 'circumcision as default' thing, I'm glad I'm not an infant male in the US. Good on you and your wife …
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:03 AM
1

That they smear into their faces and...
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:48 AM
1

Well caught, sir.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:34 AM
1

The government is already controlling the narrative. In some instances in some places, that may be the case. In so-called Western countries, it's Big Media Corp who control what gets said and how, and they, with the acquiescent governments they helped elect, won't have any talk of independent adjudicators.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:32 AM
1

I don't think this significantly misrepresents the meaning of her comments Possibly not, but it is still an act (and presumably a deliberate one) of misrepresentation, and one which is likely to mislead a reader. Not that the meeja take antiquated notions like accuracy seriously any more...
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:27 AM
1

Complaints regarding the print media are handled by the Australian Press Council. In my experience, they are about as effective as a chocolate teapot.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:19 AM
3

@ OP, this response to one of your comments: My gripe with this entire MRA thing with circumcision is the emotionally-charged arguments that literally blind you from hearing anything that's not your exact same extreme opinion on the matter. ... has me beaten, doubtless because I've been hoodwinked by the MRM propaganda machine. If you have the time or the inclination, I have two questions for them: 1) What matters of fact have those of us who object to infant male circumcision missed (aside from…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:16 AM
2

TIL - women buy foreskin cream.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:04 AM
12

WTF is wrong with these people? Millions of men die in wars: women most affected. Didn't you get the memo?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:02 AM
1

Then there are all the pron films, like... Ummm, sorry, wrong sub.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:58 AM
42

And a brief look at tomorrow's Swedish newspapers: following release of figures that show women are 99.99997% of graduates, columnists say young Swedish men need to "man up" and enrol in uni. On page 9, female students most affected by lack of marriageable male students...
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:53 AM
2

raw, uncut recording clips To wit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8e8D5ctqKkQ
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:37 AM
3

she didn't think it was appropriate because she's not actually an activist The term MRA is also used to denote "advocate", though she probably doesn't know that. (Not that whether she thinks of herself as an MRA matters to me.)
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:34 AM
12

If Cassie Jaye wanted to identify as a satellite of Mars I would have no problem. She's done plenty to get the conversation going in a thousand and one audiences.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:08 PM
1

Well Tolkien was, after all, a misogynist: it's true, I read it on the internet.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:31 AM
1

More likely is it's an(other) entry for Pseuds Corner. Polysyllabic periphrasty and liberal use of Latinate words doth not a better argument make: in this case their juxtaposition makes Lindy look like the dilettante she is. Makes for bloody funny reading though...
/r/MensRights29/07/17 01:08 AM
2

And, no, it’s not the mostly male colleges where the hookup culture reigns supreme. How do I know this? Because the way today’s heterosexual college students describe sex and dating at their own schools matches up with the scholarly research on gender ratios and how they affect behavior. As I explain in my book “DATE-ONOMICS: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game,” when men are in oversupply, the dating culture emphasizes courtship and monogamy. But when women are in oversupply—as they are t…
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:30 AM
3

I'll take Patriarchy for 1000, Alex.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:03 AM
3

Someone needs to check the source of whoever made the quiz I'd go further and say that the source of this "fact" should be cited. If they're serious about accuracy and truth, that is...
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:54 AM
5

“Do you ever stick up for me?” sounds childish... And there's a good reason for that. Can you guess what it is, children? Our society has engineered robust consequences for squeaky wheels Such as giving them space in the NYT to tell the rest of us about what thoughts enter the void that is their mind, for example. a verdant pantheon A what??
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:47 AM
6

From which: On 27th July 1967, the Sexual Offences Act became law. For the first time, gay and bisexual men in England and Wales could have sexual relationships without being automatically criminalised. Which was a large and legitimate step in the right direction, no question. This claim, however The six billboards in the series refer to demands made by 1960s activists that still warrant action today ... is 100% bollocks. P.S. I went and had a rummage on the interwebs for that day. Did you know …
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:37 AM
4

Sometimes, just sometimes, I want a tiny sneak peek into the delusional hive-minded people who come up with stuff like this. You don't. You really, really don't.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:26 AM
2

Great another one of those "men fucking teen girls is regularly mislabeled rape..." Where, exactly? Please point to the arseholes who say/ have said this on this sub so that I can abuse 17 types of shit out of them, and then get the mods to ban these smears from Satan's anal sphincter from reddit forever.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:06 AM
1

I am confident it requires way more complexity than comparing peoples ages. I'm certain there is a lot more to this than mere arithmetic. I'm also confident that the trial investigated much of that complexity.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:59 AM
3

Some can act or look pretty mature. To a 30-something year-old? I think not. we should figure out if the adult was coerced I wasn't there at the trial, but I would wager that that hypothesis was explored in some depth.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:55 AM
12

I used suicide statistics as an example Which was probably the best choice, whether consciously or not. To my surprise, instead of negative responses, a bunch other students said that they felt the same way Sometimes, all it takes is for one person in the crowd to put their hand up and voice their objection. One step at a time.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 09:51 AM
2

I forgot to mention Murray Straus (google will throw up quite a bit of his work). See Straus, M. 1986. 'Domestic violence and homicide antecedents'
/r/MensRights28/07/17 08:06 AM
2

less reliable than AVfM, College Fix, etc. I see your point; however, citing AVfM etc. in any discussion (rape, divorce, DV for example) invariably draws the "well, they would say that, wouldn't they" response, and you don't need me to tell you where the discussion goes thereafter. Unfortunately, as you point out, what research there is on these subjects is largely - if not entirely - instigated by uni social "science" departments and advocacy organisations, with grant funding provided by sympat…
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:58 AM
1

To echo previous comments, get a professional psychological/ psychiatric diagnosis and the appropriate help. I stress appropriate because PTSD is complex and needs a treatment regime that addresses your individual circumstances. When you've got that under way then perhaps you might want to consider taking civil action, but (going by what you say here) you are in no fit state to make that sort of decision. HTH
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:06 AM
5

See also: Steinmetz, S. 1978. The Battered Husband Syndrome. PASK (aka the Partner Abuse State of Knowledge project), a 2,567 page meta-analysis of 1,700 global DV studies.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 08:53 AM
2

BBC iPlayer is n/a here in Oz (fcuknose why, but probably something profit something), so if someone could link to the transcript that'd be grand. Oddly, the Beeb also has this article from 2 days ago entitled "Sperm count drop 'could make humans extinct'" which reports on data from the Human Reproduction Update. The upshot of this is that whatever sarky remark was made on Newsnight it's not just trivialising a serious matter but is also contradicting another article on the same subject by the B…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 08:38 AM
1

In mild to moderate cases, and for some people, meditation can help. Ditto CBT. Neither is much use for severe and long-term depression except as adjuncts. My experience and research suggests that CBT is not effective for men (or not as effective as it is for women at least).
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:42 PM
1

I've tried several years of therapy including CBT CBT is the default method in many places - the US, UK, and here in Oz. I've spent the thick end of 3 years with it, and while I found found it useful to have someone to talk with, the CBT stuff didn't make a dent in any meaningful way. I am aware that many with depression have found CBT to be as much use as a chocolate ashtray.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:37 PM
1

As far as I can tell there are (at least) two factors in that: 1) Beyond direct medical treatment and perhaps some (often ineffective) CBT-type therapy, there is usually sod-all support for anyone living with major depression, regardless of gender, age etc. 2) Men generally get less funding/ support for any medical condition than women and children. I've spent a while looking, and I've not come across anything useful online as a means of support.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:31 PM
1

If you and your girl are mad on each other and this is a fly in the ointment, treat it as an intellectual exercise rather than a make-or-break matter. 1) As u/Lethn says, watch The Red Pill. It's as good a way of introducing her to an alternative POV as I can think of. 2) When/ if an argument comes up, have your references and sources ready and introduce them. Do not set any store in how she reacts but watch as calmly as you can. Sometimes it takes a while for people to digest an opposing viewpo…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:46 PM
1

And because you're getting paid to bitch about a thing the rest of us already know already.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:18 PM
2

Whether she identifies as a feminist because she believes she is or because doing so makes life easier at uni, she is no idiot.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 01:03 PM
6

Well said, and thanks for taking the time to say it.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 10:32 AM
1

you should be able to see the difference right away. Prison rape is vastly different than rape in the outside world due to several factors; negligence by the current prison system, the fact that prisoners have committed past crimes already so they have a higher probability of raping others in general, and many prisoners will never leave said prisons as they have life sentences. All of which are irrelevant. Someone convicted of an offence that carries a jail term should not be more liable to suff…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:13 AM
1

A debate I watched in the past with Milo had him debating a president of some kind of college club or student government. Responding to her claims that the rape of women, especially on college campuses, is alarmingly high, Milo responded by saying the amount of rapes against men is actually higher when you include prison rape. Anyone looking at that should be able to see that has two glaring problems. I can't see any, but do enlighten me... One, prison rape is vastly different than rape out in t…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 11:39 AM
2

the major issue of rape culture You know, it's as if you just put this comment here without even reading the OP. ...
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:59 AM
2

If toxic masculinity is to blame for male suicide Very good, carry on then an increase in rates of female suicide indicates that toxic femininity is on the increase and feminism is failing. (sigh) No, no, no. You started so well, and then lost it entirely. There no such thing as "toxic femininty" let alone the "failure" of Feminism - it is all the fault of PatriarchyTM which devalues women. Haven't you learnt anything?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:28 PM
1

Or: you've got this child you've kidnapped and now you have to go and get it some new clothes. What are you going to do - get in your car/ on the bus and go miles out of your way (at significant risk of being hauled up by the Polis) when there's some perfectly suitable gear on offer (and at very reasonable prices too) right in front of you? I mean, what would the Reasonable Person In the Street do?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:11 PM
2

"I can't say WHAT the true intentions were...." but...
/r/MensRights12/07/17 12:00 PM
3

Some years ago, when I was younger and fitter and sillier, I was wont to call myself a Personal and Industrial Relocations Technician. Since then, I've stopped doing removals for a living.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:33 AM
1

You'd think the brother at least would be wiser, or at least more empathetic. Empathy among siblings is how things work most of the time for most people. But not all of the time, nor for everyone.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:24 AM
1

Either you haven't been here long, or you haven't been paying attention. Which is it?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:44 AM
1

For what - Cheesiest Entrée of The Month? Clichéd Cunning Stunt of the Fortnight? Lifetime Award for My Dog Ate My Homework?
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:42 AM
1

To be fair, there are a few women (emphasise "few") around in the thick of things - truck drivers, construction workers and so on - I've seen them and so have many others. But they are the minority, if not a rarity.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 09:33 AM
4

It goes without saying that they do (he says, obviating his own point). We even let them say things although, this being a civilised place, there are limits.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:34 PM
8

OK u/mort47, I think I've seen enough. I assumed you were communicating in good faith, but numerous of your responses (not just to me personally) indicate otherwise. If there is any vestige of truth-seeking in you, I wish it the best of luck and may it prevail. In the meantime, goodnight.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:13 PM
10

Sorry but that's a piss-poor response, particularly given the context (the questions you asked) and the effort I made to reply to them. I assumed you were communicating in good faith, but now I'm wondering.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:08 PM
8

Then why aren't they?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:02 PM
10

What's APEX? Apex Fallacy - in this case, the fallacy that because (majority)% of board members are male, then the fact that 80% of the homeless or 75% of suicides are men can be ignored.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 12:01 PM
4

Who else is going to do it? Women?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:53 AM
1

Oh come now, a piece typed by a (self-confessed) feminist blogger? Please tell me you can do better than that.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:52 AM
16

Fewer opportunities, Where? Women outnumber men in undergrad classes, even The Graun admits that. lower expectations, What?? overwhelmingly higher percentage chance of being raped or abused by a partner, [reference required] (given the PASK report I cited elsewhere). Also, rape of males by females is not recognised as rape. pay gap (still real in some places, despite laws against it) [citation needed] institutionalised sexism in many industries [citation required]. Gaming? See Gamergate. Do you …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:33 AM
4

Why do you think men die more at work and are more suicidal? 1) Because more men work in all the most dangerous jobs - construction, forestry, truck driving, walking into Fukushima a few hours after meltdown and so on. 2) Type "suicide" into the search bar (and limit the search to this sub) and you'll find multitudes of posts and multiple reasons. Do some research - none of what I refer to is hard to find.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:30 AM
2

Those who don't end up dead are beaten half to death, or have their car nicked, or... This is not to suggest that women do not suffer it, merely to point out that being harassed on the street isn't the sole province of women.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:26 AM
4

Also, Patriarchy Theory is Bunk.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:21 AM
6

I think, generally, women are disadvantaged compared to men How, specifically?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:10 AM
9

There's a hell of a lot of feminist-bashing in this sub. This is called tone policing. For a rebuttal specific to mens' rights, see Hannah Wallen.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:09 AM
2

Ask any bloke about street harassment.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:55 AM
3

Too busy swilling a beer mate. Sláinte
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:53 AM
2

Ignoring the gender thing for a minute, one of the best illustrations of how trivial the impact that socio-politico-cultural diktats make on biological drives is climate change/ environmental degradation (yes, I know the mere mention of these things is considered heresy on this sub, but fuck that). Most of us know that 7.5bn+ and growing is not sustainable, especially given individual and collective aspirations to an increasingly materialistic life. Does that knowledge temper (let alone meaningf…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:51 AM
8

Hello and welcome (I detest the "'sup bro's" thing, but whatever). Firstly, "meninist" is and always has been a parody; it's only ever used here as a satirical reference. Second: women got problems too The majority here know that. Those who don't don't last long here. This sub isn't about denying those real issues women face. Feminism has accomplished a hell of a lot over the past few years on which we can all agree. Decent stuff. That's a bold claim, and one I'm sure many here would take issue …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 10:32 AM
3

Where? Point to it.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:37 AM
0

So what are the reasons men are committing suicide? Type "suicide" into the search bar (limited to this sub) and you will bring up hundreds, possibly thousands, of posts on the subject. Those are the reasons. What is a proper counter to the mainstream notions of toxic masculinity? See above.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:35 AM
3

Why mention it then?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:29 AM
6

There are plenty here that want to ban these entire religions There may well be, but they're unlikely to be the majority. Even in the unlikely circumstance that they are, it does not even follow that all of reddit is like that, let alone the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:21 AM
7

And this isn't 15th century Spain and the mutilation of infants is barbaric. Adults can practice whatever religion they choose to, I have no problem or issue. Infants have no such choice.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:17 AM
6

there needs to be protection for the most vulnerable in our society. Babies fall directly into that category. Bingo! The only argument required. If, when the infant male becomes an adult, he decides he wants to be circumcised or have one ear a different colour or have bone needles inserted up his arse in accordance with whatever religious or drug-induced or cult-worshipping belief, that's his choice. Infants have no such choice.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:12 AM
6

"have you illegally downloaded music in the last 5 years" and "have you used marijuana or other drugs in the last 5 years" Not to trivialise the matter, but those two questions (I'd bet there are others) alone would exclude about 99.999% of applicants under 25 ...
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:03 AM
3

See, the problem here is that you're using a thing called "logic". This is your first and last warning: if you persist in doing this, you will be punished.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:47 AM
2

I'm a nuclear equipped military submarine Ping.... Ping.... Ping....
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:42 AM
5

Consequently, any motor vehicles on these Autobahns (or motorways, freeways and highways) are Weapons of a Dictatorial and Oppressive Regime, and anyone driving them is a Fascist. Mr. Hitler also made the trains run on time, so don't you go getting any ideas about taking the train instead. Walking, by the way, is Communist.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:36 AM
6

But also pay me more because muh wage gap Precisely. If it weren't for Teh PatriarchyTM and 77c in the dollar, more women would be able to afford cars.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:24 AM
1

I think there are many here similarly frustrated, and yours is not the first post (nor will it be the last) to point the matter out. Firstly, the tastiest bait will always hook the largest number of fish, whether the bait gets the post onto r /all or not. What makes the bait tasty to so many fish I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't involve a lot of reading. Or thought. Secondly, there is a common assumption that the number of upvotes a post attracts (often a function of its appearance o…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:53 PM
2

"Intactivist" communities are absolutely overflowing with antisemitism, islamophobia and of course misogyny" I don't know about the rest of you, but every time I see even the mere mention of a post about circumcision I want to hack my foreskin off with a rusty breadknife in front of a crowd of Jewish and Muslim women while screaming my hate at them. Perhaps it's just me.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:17 PM
1

Anything that has to do with helping people should be rewarded with a high salary in my opinion. And yet it's not what the societies you and I live in do. See also: those who look after the aged.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:07 PM
3

Recently a Redditor tried to defend this by claiming that the lower paying jobs were paid less because they were performed by women Which claim somehow ignores the fact that many (most?) of said low-paid jobs are performed by ... by... oh ferchrissakes what's the word? Like the word "women" but shorter, what the hell is it... ummm... Men! Yes, that's the word. Most shit jobs that award shit pay are done by men. Come to that, most shit jobs are done by men, regardless of what they pay. It's what …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:03 PM
2

From a deleted article by Arndt: That's a great read, thanks for posting it. I respect Arndt because she's done a lot of reading and thinking, and done a lot of research off her own bat, and she writes and speaks all that knowledge entertainingly. Last year The Sunday Age published a sweetly amusing story about men's sexual fantasies, written by a man who describes himself as a ''respectable, married'' man who has spent the last few years taming what he calls his ''inner goat''. There's no place…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:49 AM
2

You certainly would have and it's well-known. Of course most of their clientele just want a shag or to do things their partner won't let them or what have you, but there are many (male) clients who simply want need to be held by someone. I suspect most men know what that craving feels like, even if many won't admit it. I know I do.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:58 AM
3

*nail ("Hit the nail on the head." Sorry be such an awful pedant ;))
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:48 AM
1

I often wake up in a morning and lie wishing I had someone who would just give me a hug and tell me things are ok. If it's any consolation, you're not alone - I occasionally have the same stabs of loneliness myself. Oh, and long-term depression as well. Which is a bitch and no mistake. It is, however, possible to get some of that much-needed support from close friends, and it helps me to remember that however shit my life appears to be and sometimes is, I could be a lot worse off.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:44 AM
1

I know what "gatekeeping" is thank you. I'm asking why that was your response to my comment.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 09:23 AM
25

"Oh it's easy (said the third man): I set my alarm for five o'clock and when the alarm went off I nudged my wife and said: 'Golf course or intercourse?' and she said 'Don't forget your sweater'" An oldie but a good 'un. But there is much truth in what Bettina Arndt says, summed up (particularly for me) by that bloke who left an otherwise "good marriage" because he "couldn't bear the idea of going through my whole life never holding a woman in my arms again". How many, many divorces have gone thr…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 12:33 PM
3

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:55 AM
7

I have NFI why "some other guys" had a post taken down - perhaps ask them what reasons they were given. Either way, none of my business. This, though Idk what is with some people who are indifferent to mgm or support it and are in this sub ... is easy to answer. This sub is - for all its faults - one of the few (AFAIK) that is not heavily moderated. That means all sorts of people are allowed the space to express all sorts of opinions about subjects related to male rights, and whether I agree wit…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:45 AM
11

I looked at the Screen Australia pdf (as linked). I admit I skimmed it, but nonetheless I think it's sort of telling that no-one was willing to admit to being its author(s). Call me cynical, but whenever I see some document published by an "authority" purporting to "reveal" some sort of "truth" that goes without an author's name, I get this loud ringing noise, as though there were alarm bells sounding nearby.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:24 AM
1

I get your drift and I agree. But OP says he(?) has only been in Oz for a few months (and most of that involved in film) and I think it's fair to cut him some slack - if nearly everything they've heard or seen or been exposed to is rote SJW/ Feminist/ gynocentric horse-pish, it's not unreasonable that they would assume the entire country is some sort of PC nirvana. Of course, as anyone who's been here for a while and got around a bit knows, Oz is not the sort of place Karl Marx would have had on…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:16 AM
8

Signed. Thanks for the heads-up.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 08:46 AM
1

In which Prof. Janice Fiamengo eviscerates the CBC's misrepresentation of the research on male suicide. Worth every second it takes to watch.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 02:13 PM
7

Here's a question: would you rather have AIDS with your foreskin, or no foreskin and no AIDS? Your restrictive options ignore the obvious: that male infants who went through indescribable pain become circumcised adults with AIDS. spreading of STIs can be mitigated by circumcision. Which STIs specifically? Mitigated by how much? And at what cost to the thousands (millions?) of male infants who must undergo excruciating genital mutilation in less than sanitary conditions? Sources, please.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:30 PM
5

1) that's an awful argument. The body has an appendix for a reason. Which seems to be blowing up. False equivalence. Yes, there are some features of the human body (not merely male bodies) that are relics of our ancestral lineage: in some cases, these relictual artefacts play up; in the majority, they don't. Appendectomies are not the rule. But let's make this gender-related. Male nipples are also a relic (a feature of mammalian DNA) and perform no useful function. By your "reasoning" we should …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:19 PM
5

I haven't exactly figured out why most of you are so against circumcision. Because, in the absence of any significant medical reason to do so, the deliberate act of slicing off a male infant's most sensitive tissue is not merely unnecessary, it is barbaric. As a circumcised man myself I don't mind it If an adult male decides, of their own volition, that they want to be circumcised, that is entirely their decision. Infants have no such volition. It is bad enough that male infants have the weirdne…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:56 AM
3

All I'm saying is that doctors say it's for medical reasons In the minority of cases where there is a real, significant health risk to the male infant, heeding professional medical advice is entirely appropriate. I do not think anyone here of sound mind would argue otherwise. Everything else is merely barbarism.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 11:30 AM
3

There are (at least) two ways of looking at that statistic: 1) Men are the majority (if not the only) abusers; or 2) More men turn up because the majority (if not all) of abuse campaigns posit men as the abusers (of women). Correlation, causation...
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:58 AM
7

What are some tips you have for a man who needs to live in this type of world? I don't know how old you are or where you live or what your life looks like, so I can only suggest a few general things. 1) Find and develop a sense of self-worth. How you do that is up to you: it could be a primarily internal process reinforced by external actions, or a series of external interests that reinforce and clarify your values and inner self. Whichever and whatever, a realistic sense of self-worth and a rea…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:58 AM
2

As the cliché goes, "There is no such thing as bad publicity". And Fraud knows this.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 11:57 AM
3

I wonder what the chances are that any number of these silly, clueless "critics" had a male, white-skinned ancestor who fought at - and perhaps even died in - any WW2 invasion. German and Russian invasions included. For those of the modern generation for whom the question "What did you do in the war, Daddy?" is an irrelevance, there's always Ancestry (dot) com kiddies.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:56 AM
2

Later that day, the outdoor Portaloos still take whatever shit is dumped on/ in them, but the indoor reticulated sewage system is... ... ... well, let's just say it's overstressed and needs a "safe space" to vent.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:44 AM
1

while a woman's clock will strike midnight, and she can no longer reproduce, a man's clock will slowly start winding down... and only stops when he dies. In principle, yes. In practice, however, there is a time limit on men's ability to father children, though it's not the same one the article makes up. And it's this: For one reason or another, I've never had children (and it's not because I'm firing blanks), though I have had (and still have) times when I do wish I had*. The other day, I wonder…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 09:33 AM
3

Sperm count declines in both quality and quantity from ~35 -->. So there's that...
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:04 AM
2

Anything positive for boys' schooling can't come a moment too soon. Here's hoping this isn't merely another gabfest.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 07:39 AM
1

Another excellent presentation from ICMI '17, this one by Dr. Greg Canning who explains, without hype or hullabaloo, how disadvantaged male health is throughout life cf. females. Bear in mind Australia is one of the wealthiest nations in the world. Well worth watching.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:29 AM
1

This isn't a good question Further, it's a meaningless distinction.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:50 AM
1

Question: what's the difference between two day's worth of facial fuzz and the early stages of a beard? Fancy rhetorical footwork aside, grow a beard. If your employer objects, get another job.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 09:46 AM
1

But I need him just in case What she doesn't mention is that this bloke she sidelined last year is also a dealer. But we all need a Plan B, right?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:49 AM
3

Also: "Walking dead" "Love loosing myself [sic] in Barnes and nobles" Next time, simply ask someone where the toilet is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/06/17 08:40 AM
3

Be fair... she may have other "talents" ...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/06/17 08:38 AM
1

AFAICT there's nothing on the left-hand card that could not apply to blokes. Especially #7.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:26 AM
1

She's not just good, she's bloody good. Well worth the watch.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:32 AM
1

It's even become a meme in the UK that feminists/women are supposed to play with men by, LITERALLY, not looking them in the eyes and walking straight into them in the street just, seemingly, to test how subservient they are to women. Wha...? Eh? Is this really a thing back home? If so, I'm glad I left (I live in Oz), cos that's sick. Also: I therefore ended up abusing my partner a few years back, whilst all my family and friends and therapists were telling me it was his fault. Nobody suggested t…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 07:04 AM
1

Perhaps so. I don't know. Here's another thought. Given that males are taught from an early age that it's "wrong" to hit a girl, and that girls are less likely to be taught the same about hitting boys, how much do those learned behaviours affect the data cited? IOW how likely are boys/ men to admit to hitting a girl/ woman if they "know" it's a shameful thing to have done? In the end, I don't know. Nonetheless, twice?? That's no mere statistical insignificance.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 12:04 PM
4

From Table 1 (my emphases): (n = 11,370; male n = 5,129; female n = 6,151) Variable: Ever victimized by IPV? [number, (%)] (total) 3,046 (26.8) (male) 1,269 (24.8) (female) 1,777 (28.8) Variable: Ever perpetrated IPV? [number, (%)] (total) 3,121 (26.5) (male) 884 (17.3) (female) 2,237 (35.5) If I'm reading these figures right, more than twice as many women committed IPV as men in the survey cited. Twice as many. I mean, Holy Duluth Model Batman.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:22 AM
4

Good find. Seconded. It's also uncommon to have the full paper publicly available, rather than just the abstract.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:07 AM
9

Firstly, for the love of Sarkeesian, I wish people would ARCHIVE THIS SHIT. Please. If every woman in the world woke up one morning, slapped herself on the forehead and said "I am fine just the way I am", entire economies would crumble. And if every man woke up at the sound of the alarm clock, turned over and went back to sleep, there wouldn't be any economies to crumble. Huge multinational enterprises are built entirely upon the exploitation of female insecurity, particularly the fear of growin…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 11:09 AM
2

Quite what you thought you would gain from posting on (r) /SocialJustice101 I don't know; perhaps you took it that the title indicated actual "social justice". Ultimately, as Joe Walsh sang, you can't argue with a sick mind.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:33 AM
2

LIVING IN THE DESSERT *Desert. Dessert is what you get after the main course.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:16 AM
1

Eh he got lucky. Because you could have done it properly, right?
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:12 AM
1

By your account, you did more than your level best for longer than any reasonable person could have asked for. Walk away with a clear conscience - the fact that the organisation is now primarily inhabited by people who are more interested in grinding their own axe than fulfilling their responsibilities is regrettable but apparently out of your control. EDIT: [...] I was asked by a white woman who was organizing the conference not to come because I am a white man. She said it outright - didn't ev…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 09:52 AM
2

at some level, I think the biggest perpetrators will, in some karmic sense, get what they deserve I somehow doubt it. What (more than likely) will happen is that those for whom the NPO was created will see decreasing levels of service. I'm not criticising your principled stance; just saying that the widespread assumption that "karma will get them" is naive, at best.
/r/MensRights19/06/17 09:37 AM
3

Well done, that man. I hope it goes well.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:12 AM
2

Bloody good article that, thanks for the post and link. We need to help men believe life is worth living. Those of us in the media need to have special courage and sensibility in this regard. One thing that ICMI 17 (and particularly the presence of Cassie Jaye in the Strayn MSM) has done is demonstrate the gulf between Bill O'Chee's words vs. how blokes (and the shit we go through) are treated day-in, day-out here. I hope that, as a result of ICMI and Cassie Jaye, more people here in Oz begin to…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:09 AM
2

Michael Flood In some cut-n-shut job on gender on the ABC? How surprisement. Thanks for the warning: I have plenty to be legitimately effed-off about, I don't need extraneous sources of shite.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:47 AM
1

Honestly, I did not understand what the fuss was about when this women-only screening of WW was first flagged, and I do not understand it now. If there were a Mrs Splodgeness and she had told me in advance that she was off to some fillum or other and I wasn't invited because it was "girls only", I'd be cock-a-bloody-hoop. I'd ring round my mates, get the beers in and get them over for an afternoon (or evening) session of watching the football/ MotoGP/ some "adult" films you won't see at your loc…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:38 AM
18

Haha this sub is pure shit Thanks for your comment. We at r/ MR value all our customers' feedback. Have a Nice Day!
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:17 AM
5

What's "bad" isn't that Gerard Henderson's little club of silvertails hosted it: it's that no-one else did. I don't see the point of not working together with political groups one disagrees with on common concerns Agreed, though there are exceptions.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 08:13 AM
7

Strayan for Australian. Cos we're too fkin lazy to enun... whatever the fkin word is.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:23 PM
16

And she's right - it (the Strayan MSM) is hostile: to anything outside its (extraordinarily) limited view of what constitutes not just an acceptable PoV but what is acceptable as a challenge. It is also (though she didn't say this) extraordinarily parochial and largely "right wing". None of which has been helped by successive (federal) guvmints over the last few decades diluting (or outright removing) the last few legal constraints aimed at ensuring diversity in media ownership. There's some sli…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:15 PM
1

When you name call it communicates that you lack any better argument... It can, but not necessarily so. In this instance, the "hosts" of this "show" deserve all the calumny they get. And more.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:42 AM
2

They're just blue pill idiots. It's not even as base as that. They are merely mouthpieces for a popular (if erroneous) bias. Welcome to Strayan FTA television, by the way.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:39 AM
79

I know she's delivered this speech (or one like it) several times, but it's always worth a listen. It's a pity that, in this country, only a reactionary thinksink like The Sydney Institute would ever host such a thing, but better that than it never be hosted at all.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 10:34 AM
1

Responses like this (and even adverts stating "female applicants only") are dead common here (Oz). There is no legal instrument or code of practice (federal, state or local) that bans it. That this practice is commonplace does not make it either reasonable or fair (except in particular and special circumstances), despite what many on this thread are saying, and it is thus a form of gender discrimination. Period.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:41 AM
2

"Delicate" maybe (in certain circumstances), but "a non-issue" it certainly is not.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:32 AM
6

Useful link - as the author of it points out, the fact that a piece of writing isn't funny doesn't mean it isn't satirical.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:27 AM
1

The answer is not feminism. The proportion of people who identify as feminist in the US, Britain and lots of other places is <0.2, and probably around 0.1 (I know there are reputable sources for this but I'm too lazy to dredge them up). If Feminism were the answer, that proportion would be increasing, but it isn't. The answer is not MRAs In the long term, no. But for now, active rebuttal of, and resistance to, the wholesale denigration of males in many spheres of modern life is needed - desperat…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 11:44 AM
6

Not to mention that de facto relationships count (as far as the law is concerned) as "married" in many legislatures.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 11:00 AM
3

I broadly agree with u/EricAllonde: the status quo is far from perfect, but until men can have children without the necessity of a human mother, biology is biology and the mother has the right of veto. Where I disagree is in the effect a woman's decision to abort has on the potential father when he wants the child: it is not trivial, and it is presumptuous to say that his life won't change as a result. Furthermore, I think many men (I have no idea how many) long for children of their own, yet th…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:49 AM
3

I should be most interested to find out: 1) How they propose to police this. After all, what spread of one's legs constitutes an offence? Is it merely an absolute measure, or does it account for the length of the man's legs vs. his pelvic width? Perhaps there's some system in place every time a male walks through the barrier that recognises his travel pass and registers his leg length: hip width ratio (and calculates his permissible knee spread, which information will be passed on to the Inspect…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 10:25 AM
1

Yes, there's a way to go before (whatever destination you had in mind). But then: 1) Rome wasn't built in a day (as the saying has it); and 2) Go read about the impact and effects Cassie Jaye's The Red Pill is having. There are more voices there are out there questioning the current Zeitgeist and putting forward the view from the male side of the fence than before. And the more others read or watch or think, the more they realise that they too have a right (if not a responsibility) to dissent. T…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:45 AM
1

Unfortunately, Ms. Hagen has evidently never heard of a thing called "research". Had she been aware, she would have heard of the PASK (Partner Abuse State of Knowledge) report. This report conducted a meta-analysis of numerous published papers on DV from multiple countries and showed that DV is more-or-less a 50:50 thing. But that's much too much like having to do work when it's much, much easier to trot out a (tired) cliche.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 09:20 AM
3

This is circular "logic" at its zenith (or is that nadir?), a text facsimile of an Escher artwork. Whatever your starting point, it always ends with Feminism as the answer. Unlike a piece of art by Escher, however, it's not in the least mind-expanding.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:56 AM
11

Of all the charitable organisations in Oz, Lifeline is one of two I regularly give to/ donate to/ support (the other being the Salvos, aka the Sally Dabs where I was born). Of all the "men's rights" issues, male suicide is the one I will not shut up about, to the extent that I have lost (and will probably continue to lose) "friends" over it. Lastly, a slight re-wording of a question I posed to Karen (via Mark Latham's Outsiders livestream): while I accept that any publicity about the male suicid…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:38 PM
7

She has to be attract people who are sitting on the fence. They can be put off by superficialities I get your point entirely. But Karen is Karen and she is AFAICT entirely uninterested in appeasing other people's aesthetic preferences. I would wager that she would be the first to say that the content of your engagement with people is everything.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:21 AM
7

I think the point about respect doesn't get enough attention. I think you're right. I also think that much of day-to-day modern life and "culture" either ignores or takes for granted men's essential contributions to life and culture. As OP said: men will always do the most dangerous jobs ... to which I would add we also do the shittiest, filthiest, most demeaning jobs - these are also often dangerous but don't have the glamour of a career as a deep-sea diver - as well as risky but apparently mun…
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:08 AM
1

That just means the people who did the choosing have a form of racist misogynist ESP! That or they had Internalised Misogyny, the poor things.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 09:11 AM
2

A few papers: 1) Yang et al 2011 2) Plastics and Testosterone (article by Anabolic Men from 2014) 3) An article by The Independent from 1995. There's no doubting the effects.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 08:54 AM
4

The oestrogen-mimicking effects of (man-made) compounds in plastics, pesticides and even caulking paints on boats have been known since at least the early 90s. Do keep up.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:11 PM
5

Women are better equipped to rule because women are more caring than men. Margaret Hilda Thatcher, anyone? Indira Ghandi? Queen Mary the First?
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:55 AM
3

1) Dr. Elizabeth Celi on DV against men 2) The One in Three campaign 3) Ask her: if feminism really is about equality between the sexes, and that it's unacceptable for men to lash out against their female partner when they've lost control of her emotions, why is it nothing to her when women do the same? she deflected and couldn't examine that Not couldn't - wouldn't. Lashing out in anger and frustration is a thing many (most?) of us in close relationships do, for a multitude of reasons. Whatever…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:14 AM
3

it felt like more people had been in the recovery room pressuring me to agree to a circumcision than had been there to provide after-care for the baby & me following a birth that was labeled "traumatic" & "emergency" The one aspect of this ritual infliction of (largely) unnecessary excruciating pain on a male infant that most bothers me is that the case for it is, at best, equivocal (barring obvious medical necessity, that is). "Barbaric" about covers it.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:24 AM
3

What regular people think about climate change is irrelevant given that qualified scientists overwhelmingly accept its reality – and that it is already happening. Similarly, to question the existence of male privilege is also a form of balance as bias because it is an indisputable fact that women remain at obvious disadvantage. Indeed, according to the World Economic Forum, at current rates of progress, the gender gap will not be eliminated until 2095. Linking actual real science with so-called …
/r/MensRights02/06/17 11:00 AM
5

Thanks for the reply. The reason I ask is because I'm wary of blanket statements like "doing X causes Y". I'm not especially well-informed on this subject either (but I'm learning). The link you gave says: Circumcision might have various health benefits, including: Easier hygiene They then say that cleaning an uncircumcised is easy. Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. Maybe, but by how much? UTI's are common and widespread in males whether entire or circumcised: the prevalence has much m…
/r/MensRights02/06/17 10:33 AM
8

Archive: http://archive.is/Bu7Cq
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:51 AM
10

there are demonstrated benefits of circumcision in men Sauce please.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:40 AM
2

i feel like im walking on eggshells with my current girlfriend, constantly trying not to hurt her feelings or get her mad, yet she doesnt hold punches at all. If this is a recurring or long-term pattern, you need to gtfo, quickly.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:36 AM
2

I do like what you said about taking care of yourself though It's critical, simple as that. Let me put it this way: if you aren't looking after yourself, you're not going to be able to look after others very well, or at all.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 07:35 AM
3

Having a "different" opinion doesn't necessarily make it worthy.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 12:48 PM
3

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:53 AM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:32 AM
5

^ ^ Wot he said To OP, among the many points raised above, two strike me as most important (assuming your wife gives birth to a son): 1) Assuming there are no sound medical grounds for circumcision, he will be an infant, a baby boy who's been born healthy and whole. What reasons are there to subject an infant to unnecessary pain? 2) As to my penis, I'm as I was born. I got a pretty hard time of it at school (a long time ago) for various reasons, but none of them had anything with me having a for…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:29 AM
3

Who is it that I'm sacrificing my sanity for? Who is it that I'm worrying myself to death in trying to appease? There is a thing called WAW - the Women Are Wonderful effect - which is probably part of your problem. Along with that it appears to me that you assume all women are flesh-and-blood incarnations of perfect beings; unfortunately (or fortunately, depending), they're not. Some are lovely, some are the dregs, all are human. It would be easy to say that it's all just in my head, and no woma…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:47 AM
1

True, but scepticism in Laci Green's case is both healthy and IMO entirely warranted.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:28 AM
2

I've seen a few posts and many comments on here in support (sometimes enthusiastic support) of her recent Damascene conversion. Maybe they're right, she really is all about a new, inclusive approach... maybe. I remain, like TL;DR, sceptical. Something leopard something spots something.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:23 AM
5

I think we're going to see more and more feminists trying to co-opt men's rights and ingratiate themselves with us. We need to be careful that we don't let them corrupt our movement like they have their own. Well whaddaya know, it's Laci Green everybody. Hi Laci!!1!
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:03 AM
2

Several response options: 1) Ignore 2) Unfriend. Facebukkake is annoying enough without having to see that sort of tripe. 3) Come out as an MRA and see what shit hits which fan. 4) Challenge. Cite stuff like the 95% male occupational death rate, the 80% male suicide rate, the 80% male homeless rate, the bias in divorce/ child custody courts blah blah and ask them why it is while Feminism claims "It's For Men Too!!!" it has done 3/5ths of fuck-all about any of these matters. 4) Argue the freee sp…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:57 AM
2

(nods sagely) You know, I've had a bit of a think about this, and... Well, the plain fact of the matter is that I don't entirely trust myself and, combined with the fact that I think peculiar thoughts from time to time, I have decided that I should round myself up, put myself in the middle of a paddock and shoot myself. Because you can't be too careful these days.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:36 AM
2

here on mensright I read a lot of conflicting opinions As someone else said, that's the nature of this sub - it's one of the more open subreddits, which means differing opinions. Which is a good thing. this guy told me on his post that traditional roles are bad, and they are the reason why today men commit suicide at unprecedented rates... So he said this: The traditional roles have us in a society where men commit suicide at unprecedented rates. The traditional roles have left us with men being…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:29 AM
1

I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at with this comparison. Give me some more clues.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:43 AM
6

the woman told The Irish Times she was “deeply saddened at the outcome of this whole situation” I'm sure that makes Mr. Murray feel much better about the whole thing, and he'll be moving to wherever this shit hole is asap. but ...it was “better to be safe than sorry”. Quite so. In that vein, every male who might resemble someone who might be a kiddie-fiddler - even someone driving through the village (after all, he might be casing the joint) - should be rounded up and shot. After all, won't some…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:32 AM
1

Also... a bit of background reading on gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:12 AM
1

"Women and children first" and gynocentrism stems from that. As does Feminism (or once did, at least).
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:02 AM
1

socially women tend to hate each other and compete, and biologically they don't group and cooperate lika men do Two questions: 1) What are the women you refer to competing for? 2) What are the men you refer to cooperating for?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:57 AM
1

women are to each other way more cruel and competitive than men are to other men, and this is a dichotomy which always confuses me. I don't doubt this at all (I've seen it many times myself), but this phenomenon does not disprove gynocentrism: as you can see from the link to a published paper that u/ JestyerAverageJoe posted, in-group bias is much stronger in women than in men (and the reverse for out-group bias). This is not to say that men can't form alliances or bonds with each other, nor tha…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:45 AM
1

Archive this Grauniad shite, please.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:55 PM
5

I doubt that would go down well. After all, science is misogynist doncha know.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:31 AM
1

It's chivalry. More accurately, it's gynocentrism (on which chivalry is based). See also the link u/JestyerAverageJoe posted below.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 08:08 AM
3

some if the stuff I read here is why feminism needs to exist Actually, it's the other way round. With more facts and less emotion? There's plenty of that here, should you care to look for it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 07:20 AM
2

"Woman, get back in the kitchen and make me a sa... ... Actually, forget I asked"
/r/MensRights27/05/17 01:14 AM
6

By your own admission you are an attack helicopter. Violence is systemic in Toxic Masculinity and Teh PatriarchyTM. Besides, your blades are mounted on a shaft that penetrates the bodywork.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:54 AM
16

A few random thoughts, in no particular order... Rant away, that's partly what this sub is for. Blow off steam - it won't fix everything but you have to start somewhere. Chew the fat with your mates and mutual friends. It doesn't have to be any sort of organised "let's all have a group hug" thing, go easy on the Deep And Meaningful. Blog about your experiences. Do it on social media. Write to MSM outlets. Exercise - your anger and frustration are legitimate responses to loss and grief, but don't…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:42 AM
6

Typical male attack helicopter, always bragging about how big their equipment is...
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:16 AM
1

And if teacher comes up with contact details, please pass them along to this sub. Many of us here seem to have forfeited our Privilege somewhere along the way, and we'd like it back please. If they can also send over the backpay I'm owed due to Muh Wage Gap, that would fab. TIA
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:12 AM
1

50 quid says he's no angel, and another 50 says he regrets his mistakes. So he's an ordinary, fallible bloke. And he loves his children. There are days when I regret never having had the opportunity to be a father. And then I see stuff like this, and I think "there, but for the grace of God, go I". Not all men are great fathers, but most are. And for all the hype and hoopla about men not expressing their emotions and not being open and not this and that, we love and we feel pain.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:37 AM
1

What a horrible sentence though. 15 days a year spread over six years? I don't know what constraints Judge Asphaug was working under (at a guess, maximum penalties?), but I think the way this sentence was interpreted was quite clever. Instead of the "mother" doing all her bird (what little there is) in one stretch, she gets to spend a fortnight and a day in the clink for several years, beginning on the day she illegally removed the two daughters from the family. IMO that's a very effective way o…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:41 AM
2

As I said elsewhere, 15 days a year for the term of her probation isn't alienation, certainly not on the scale of 944 days straight not knowing whether two of your children were even alive.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:31 AM
1

He's in bits. Give the bloke a break.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:29 AM
2

So...solve it by depriving them of their other parent? The mother's sentence is to serve 15 days a year for the term of her probation. Hardly "deprivation", and nothing compared to the 944 days the father went with no knowlege whether his duaghters were still alive, nor those girls' close contact with their dad.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:27 AM
1

First, it's true that some men really do need to be told to do obvious shit around the house. Some men, not all men. That out of the way, what this (apparently endless) so-called cartoon doesn't even hint at, let alone mention, is what the bloke is doing while all this utterly essential domestic labour that the poor, oppressed woman is slaving tirelessly at. Has he had his feet up watching the footbal, beer in hand? Or has he just got in from fixing the car (that she broke the other day, again),…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 09:03 AM
2

Oooo, now there's a keeper. Thanks for the post and the link, I await that showdown with eager anticipation.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:44 AM
2

u r all just a bunch of whiny manbabies, girlpower rocks!!!
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:21 AM
2

Where do I begin? You already have :) What can I do? How can I help? I don't exactly know, other than to say: keep doing what you're doing. Keep questioning (even some of the stuff that gets posted here). Keep talking to people about what you got from The Red Pill. Get them to watch it. You will be challenged, so be ready - get facts and research behind you: there are any number of links in the sidebar and then there's posts to further info in the archives. Thanks for being open-minded and prepa…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:41 AM
22

Actually a big win for the bloke and his children, but I get your drift.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:48 AM
2

I haven't gone through what you have; conversely, you haven't gone through what I have. That is not to say, however, that we don't have things in common. I have felt trapped. I have felt ripped off by the system in so many ways and I do not have a voice But you do have a voice, otherwise your post wouldn't be here. It's not the whole answer, but it's a start. I have no choice but to stay there or my life falls apart even more. So stay there for now. Remember - it's temporary. it is defining me w…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:45 AM
2

This has nothing to do with the "far left". I come from a family of Chilean communists, so I know what far-left politics actually are. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:23 AM
5

Me and my brother aren't close (reasons I won't go into). You obviously have a lot of time for your brother, so... If you love him, make sure he knows it. He needs it and he probably needs you.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:29 AM
36

Sorry geezer, I didn't intend to dredge up bad memories.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:20 AM
1

First, good on you for having a mind of your own when it comes to the so-called Patriarchy and all that claptrap. And for watching Cassie Jaye's film. I don't have any real "advice" for you, since you seem to be perfectly capable of working things out for yourself, bar the following thoughts: 1) Keep questioning the narrative we're all fed about men and boys, and women and girls. That could be anything from policy on DV (no, it's not simply a matter of men beating women) or divorce/ child custod…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 09:18 AM
49

Judge Karen Asphaug, Dakota County MN: "I'm not a psychologist, a social worker or an expert on child development. I am, however, a mother, a grandmother and a judge. I believe without hesitation that our community, our children - your children - need and deserve the guidance and love that a father brings to their lives." And so say all of us. I don't have children of my own (that's another story), but even so I do understand how many men must feel when they are denied their children arbitrarily…
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:29 AM
5

You guys will do anything to spin your shit Says the person who cited Rosie the Riveter, as if today was the 24th of May 1941. He said those things would not get done without men, I said women have done it before and you all lose your shit Here, now, in [current year], men are all but a tiny proportion of the workforce in every single dirty, dangerous yet essential occupation, from frontline armed forces to forestry and mining to powerline maintenance to trucking to sewage maintenance. Women cho…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:23 AM
7

Dear Dave (from GMP) For your information and amazement, here's Hannah Wallen on Enthusiastic Consent. Again. Watch and learn.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:49 AM
5

I believe we're already seeing it on the dating scene where women are experiencing difficulty finding someone That's been a thing for a long time, certainly in "western" societies - the number of "Where Have All the Good Men Gone?" media articles is legion. It's partly the hypergamy thing, where women generally seek men who have higher social +/- economic status (no, I'm not saying all women); it's partly that men's jobs are most affected by economic slumps (in realms beyond exec status); it's a…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:38 AM
7

During ww2 almost every female in my family were working construction, steel mills, welding at the coal mine and so on Maybe so, but a) it doesn't answer u/Sernie___Banders points; and b) NEWSFLASH: this is [current year], not 1941. BTW is this the Rosie the Riveter you had in mind? The one who ditched the job after a fortnight "....because she was an avid cellist, and she feared she would injure her hands in a machine accident"?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:27 AM
6

Religious/cultural reasons Yawn. If your preferred religion/ culture said it was The Right Thing to throw infants off a cliff, would you do it? and for perceived hygiene/medical/maintenance reasons Maintenance? MAINTENANCE?? Jesus, Mary and Joseph...
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:42 AM
2

Absolutely not. After all, I have a job and a willy (sometimes both at the same time), and no woman I've ever heard of has that privilege. PS If you know of any such woman, I do not want to see pictures.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:33 AM
1

Disposability Which is another way of saying "gynocentrism". And it leads to any number of manifestations of male-centric problems, including elevated rates of suicide (cf. women), shorter lifespan (and poorer health in old age), lack of consideration in divorce, lack of consideration in child custody disagreements, elevated workplace death rates, rates of depression and alcoholism, and relative lack of health services that focus on male health. the life of a man is not valued as highly as the l…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:10 AM
1

She's right though. Well, yes. But... My objection to this article (and the n+1 like it) is that stating the bleeding obvious is about as far as they usually go: rarely, if ever, does any MSM/ blogosphere piece give reasons for this phenomenon (aside from "Its TEH PATRIARCHY!!1!1" and its derivatives), and even rarer is the article that digs deeper. Men exiting stage left via their own hand at 3 or 4 times the rate women do deserves - needs - MSM pieces that take the issue seriously and treat it…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 10:19 AM
2

"Men notoriously don't seek help," said Julie Cerel Cerel said that most men hesitate to see doctors And because many adult men don't seek professional help one of the challenges of combating suicide in middle-aged men is that they are difficult to reach through traditional methods men are ... less likely to tell anyone that they are struggling I don't know about you, but it seems to me as if this article is trying to get a point cliché across, something like "If only men would help themselves".…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:36 AM
1

men don't ask for help not only because of the stigma but also because the type of help that they get in a typical talk therapy session doesn't HELP them to concretely solve the problem they have. An entirely valid point that's frequently brought up on threads about male suicide, and one with which I generally agree. IME, however, if the only form of psychotherapy easily available to the severely depressed and/ or suicidal is some type of "talk therapy" then take it - it may not be ideal, but it…
/r/MGTOW21/05/17 08:18 AM
3

when you don't see any way through the hell hole your life has become you begin to think that "maybe it's time" Been there, (almost) went and got the certificate at 51 - a LTR that'd gone from bad to worse + my dad dying + a business partnership going down the gurgler + etc. etc. Suicide in mid life is nothing like suicide in youth. The causes are not the same. The solutions are not the same This is certainly something that rarely, if ever, gets the attention it deserves. This is not to downplay…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 08:07 AM
2

They should be gathered around in a cauldron. FTFY
/r/MensRights17/05/17 07:10 AM
3

Geezer, thanks for posting. I can understand the shit you've gone through and, regardless of anything else, it's always an irrevocably nasty experience to be where you were with your "life partner", especially with your daughter right in the middle of the war zone. Some years ago a(nother) nasty row erupted between me and my ex; she is about an inch taller than me and heavier (at least partly because she is big-boned) and after a lot of verbal argy-bargy it came to blows. Suffice to say her elbo…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:51 AM
16

start humanizing feminists Oh they're human alright - they're at least as likely as the rest of us to stereotype "others", and to adhere to an ideology while conveniently ignoring its gaping flaws. The question isn't whether they're human but whether they are humane.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:17 AM
3

it has to do with individual choices based on societal expectations which are presently affected by systemic sexism in hiring practices. Call. Let's see 'em. Personal and/ or anecdotal evidence doesn't count. It isn't patriarchy, it's systemic misogyny and it perpetuates the patriarchy Yawn. Next...
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:02 AM
1

Probably true, but irrelevant. I'm addressing (and hoping to coach) OP given the description of the situation he provided, that's all.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:51 AM
2

On those occasions I read threads like yours (and there are plenty on here) I usually go have a rummage around on the OP's comment profile, just to get an idea of where they're coming from so that, if I decide to throw in my tuppence-worth, I have some idea who I might be talking to. Unlike many, you seem to be legit, so I hope you are generally treated as such. The Feminist bit of your question I'm going to discount; it would take too long to go into the whys and wherefores (and it's been done …
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:18 AM
1

Some marine biologist once opined that there is more fish in the freezers of supermarkets than there is in the ocean*. *Apocryphal, but one day...
/r/MensRights15/05/17 09:54 AM
2

pastryarchy Bakers - I always had latent suspicions about them. All that kneading and messing about with yeast, buns in the oven and so on.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 09:48 AM
2

Are you saying I can't freebleed because you think I am male? It's obvious from your sense of entitlement (fish and chips) that you're male; and if you're not, you should be. Check your privilege codpiece.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 09:43 AM
3

Yet another re-working of the tired old Where Are All The Good Men??!? trope - simply changle the names/ location/ ages, hit "Send to printer" and viola, a freshly-laid turd that neatly fills the word limit and that gap in the page. I swear there's a computer somewhere that churns out these pieces of recycled electronic padding every 10 seconds. The overweening sense of entitlement this piece (and every other one like it) is marinated in is one thing; it's as if these women (assuming they even e…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 09:35 AM
2

So you want fish and chips? Typical selfish bloody male.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 09:01 AM
4

There are a few comments here accusing OP of stalking, which I think is OTT and uncalled for. Yes, he could do with thinking about how his actions might come across to other people, but AFAIK stalkers don't generally talk about their actions to others, and they certainly don't post their experiences on Reddit.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:51 AM
34

Let me be Devil's Advocate and say that, dude, you were waiting outside her place of business just to talk to her for the third time that evening. That's a bit weird. More or less my first reaction when I read the OP too. Big bloke + in the shop twice (one more than necessary) + waiting outside in a truck in the dark = really not very happy about this at all. To OP - from your post I get you meant no harm, and maybe you're a bit awkward around women, but you sound like an intelligent bloke so it…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:45 AM
5

As suggested elsewhere, EverydayFail is not much more than a blog that does for Feminism what [your local tabloid scandal sheet] does in [your neck of the woods], and much of its "product" comes from bloggers and freelancers. How much can it cost to run that? (Answer: not very much at all). Sounds to me as if those who set the site up have realised they're not making the fast buck they thought they would (at the expense of both men and women) and are now passing the hat round. I trust common sen…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:29 AM
3

... the other one is for homeless people. And since males are ~75% (or more) of the homeless, that shelter is 3/4 occupied by homeless men, right?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 08:10 AM
1

For instance I don't think a 12 y.o boy getting raped by a 30 y.o woman is the same as a 12 y.o girl being raped by a 30 y.o man; and hence I don't think it'd be justified to grant the offenders the same sentence. Because...?
/r/MensRights12/05/17 09:45 AM
2

Apart from its reputation as a drug-marinated hippy paradise, Nimbin is about as Green Left a town as you'll find anywhere in the country. That this, of all places, intends to show the film and give the SJWs in Shitney the middle finger is irony of the most deliciously fragrant sort: it's also an excellent example of the difference between a community of real "lefties" and a cabal of assorted rent-seekers.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 09:06 AM
1

it is only to be expected that women would side with their own gender when given the authority to do so in he-said-she-said cases. Which is understandable, if not reasonable. The (rhetorical) question, then, is: why don't men males in HR have the same "in-group preference"? Edit It's one of the most addictive "one-hit wonders" ever (along with Martha & the Muffins Echo Beach and The Passions' I'm in Love With a German Film Star)
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:17 AM
1

all socialists look alike Much as all Jews do.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 10:03 AM
4

For those non-Australians reading the article, bear in mind that these events took place at Sydney Grammar School, which has a long reputation as one of the poshest, most expensive and most exclusive boys' schools in the country. You would imagine, then, that candidates applying for teaching positions would be subject to intense and minute scrutiny. Meanwhile, out in the western suburbs of Sydney (or Melbourne, or Brisbane) at Scrotes Creek High Skool ...
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:58 AM
19

This is a sexual predator who will evidently continue to prey on emotionally and, in this case, mentally vulnerable boys I was listening to a report on the radio earlier today about this case. Aside from the fact that she (the teacher) appears to have an established record in what might euphemistically be called "professional misconduct" (given that, why was she still even employed?), the most unsettling aspect was her habit of picking on boys who had mental health problems (which in the latter …
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:42 AM
1

As I was reading your post, it dawned on me that in all the years I did heaving furniture and over-weight boxes up hill and down dale I've never come across a female doing domestic and/ or commercial removals. Funny that. The other thing is HR: it may be true that the majority of HR are women, but I've come across plenty of men "males" who are at least as piss-poor at managing people, if not worse.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:19 AM
2

Picsorban. Umm, you were talking about female models, weren't you?
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:08 AM
5

geert wilders party This article is talking about the Norwegian FrP; Geert Wilders is Dutch you muppet.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:58 AM
18

A coroner has raised concerns more must be done to protect people from internet dating scams after a lonely bachelor killed himself following being fleeced of thousands of pounds by fraudsters posing as potential girlfriends... The shopworker from Grimsby in Lincolnshire [...] was finally found dead at his home and died penniless. Poor bastard. I hope the nasty scum who did this die in a ditch.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 08:53 AM
1

No he wasn't.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:50 AM
2

No, u/IamaspyAMNothing isn't a girl: by their own admission they are a gril. Which is an Entirely Different Thing altogether.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:41 AM
1

Ying tong iddle I po
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:36 AM
1

The (attempted) rebuttal is in the same 1977-78 issue of Victimology Thanks, all I can get hold of is Steinmetz's paper; if I ever turn the rebuttal up I'll post a link.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:32 AM
1

down/up votes when a post reaches /r/all are not brigading. Oh but of course there's no brigading on r/all. This is called a reality-check What you deem "reality" may have no bearing on reality. And that's a "reality check".
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:28 AM
7

1) This sub is about men's rights. 2) Feminism does 3/5ths of fuck-all for men. You work it out.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:19 PM
5

Thanks to you and the downvote brigade for confirming my suspicions. Especially the bit about ignorance of your own movement's history.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:10 PM
4

yes, because in my faith it is ascribed to be done at 8 days, not doing it is committing a sin against my son selfishly because i have decided the social norms of non-jews matter more then commandments from my god If your faith declared it was a sin to not cut your infant son's toes off, would you have his toes removed? If your faith declared it was a sin to have a daughter with intact genitals, would you cut her labia off? Yes or no? those people do not care about my family and dont care about …
/r/MensRights08/05/17 01:03 PM
2

Yes, Karen's text stands on its own. But 1) context 2) references matter IMO to exclude a reference on the grounds of "brigading" is weak - this sub gets brigaded anyway, so do the right thing and sod the downvote morons.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:45 PM
2

You could also point out that this 50:50 parity (and it is 50/50) has been going on for decades. If, that is, you imagined that actual data and evidence mattered.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:37 PM
1

Statistics are one thing, but politicians care more about showing off how much they care about women. Australia is absurdly chivalrous. My take on current Strayan politics is this: if you're at all interested in the rights of men and boys, or in counterbalancing the heavy listing of the ship of state to the distaff side, it makes not a skerrick of difference whether you vote LNP (Lying Narcissist Party), ALP (Alternative Liberal Party), One Syllable or anyone else. They all sing the same dreary,…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:32 PM
4

Bollocks he is. Besides, I'm skint.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:17 PM
8

The people you talk about are in my limited experience a very loud but very small minority. Irrelevant. Feminism has core beliefs and principles and a shitload of history behind them that are fundamental to the term "feminism". That you (and those like you) choose to ignore them or wave them aside is your business, but don't expect everyone else to believe this NAFALT claptrap.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:11 PM
3

154 upvotes in 2 hours? What a cunning stunt. What you and your brigade conveniently ignore in your "you can't judge Feminism by its extremists' utterances" claptrap is that the ideals you hold Dear and True are based on dodgy (if not outright false) premises. Hannah Wallen puts it better than I could. Watch and learn children (yes, that means all of you in the brigade)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:46 AM
4

You are Rick Astley and I claim my £5 prize money.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:27 AM
46

But it's covered in mashed potato: what sort of spy is that? Answer: a shepherd's pie (adapted from The Goons c. 1957)
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:25 AM
0

So what's wrong wiv us grils then?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:21 AM
1

I think that what bothers me more than Feminism's angle is the blanket assumption trotted out in almost every MSM article that it's a male-on-female thing, not to mention the approach of White Ribbon et al. But then, given they're informed (if not funded) by Feminism HQ, I suppose you have a point.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:20 AM
1

The rebuttal argued that DV against men should be taken less seriously than DV against women Got a link for that?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:15 AM
1

Good work. Can you park it in the side bar?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:14 AM
4

Bear in mind when you read this paper that it is 40 years old, and see how (bar a few references) it could have been written last week. Wolfgang (1958), in an investigation of homicides occurring between 1948 and 1952, found that spouses accounted for 18% of the incidents and that there were virtually no differences between the percent of husbands or wives who were offenders. ... The data reported suggest that at least the intention of both men and women toward using physical violence in marital…
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:39 AM
2

In which Janice Fiamengo dissects a breathtakingly biased article in a higher education magazine. *edit: forgot the link
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:52 AM
6

a growing feature of political line drawing over many issues. It's not pretty.... ... People like you, and me in my conversation with Elam, will get caught in that fire from time to time. Don't take it personally Not that I look at AVfM at all these days, but I think that's a good part of what is happening there and (to a lesser extent) here. Anyone who is a "traditional" leftie (whatever that might mean) or is ambivalent about a lot of the reactionary rhetoric in many MR/ RP/ MGTOW forums and s…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 07:15 AM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights05/05/17 06:29 AM
1

I really want to start a non-feminist men's issues group on campus Good on you for wanting to get a men's support group going - any support for men's rights is needed. Just don't host it on campus. You already know why.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:13 AM
10

When it comes to performing surgery on an infant, religion (any of them) not only has no say in the matter, it has no rights to a say. Period.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:09 AM
8

Source? Link? It's the least you need to do.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 10:00 AM
2

The line "Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine." ... Gives More Prufe That Wimmin Are Drunkards.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:58 AM
2

News at 11 (February 30th edition)
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:52 AM
5

In this case, men. ... and anyone and everyone who dares to disagree with Feminists; women especially. That last clause is not there to get brownie points (I'm too old anyway): I say it because I've had, over the last while or so, some conversations with people who disagreed with modern Feminism and got wholesale abuse and calumny for their trouble... and who eventually revealed themselves as women. From what I can see, it is certainly reasonable to assert that Feminists despise men; but the wor…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:44 AM
3

Well said. Especially this bit: if we're allowing women to opt out of parenthood, I think it's only fair that we allow men to opt out of parenthood too. There's also the obverse: when he wants the child and she doesn't. It's happened to me (with my ex) and though I knew it was her inalienable right to abort and that biology is biology and all that, I really did want children. I still do, 20-odd years later, even though I know it would be bloody hard work at my age. Still, there it is, and I 'm c…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:31 AM
1

Which is pretty much what the reddit RP sub is - thinly-disguised PUA Actually, I take that back. I've just been on the RP sub reading a very worthwhile thread and I realised what I said the other day was far too generalised and thus largely horseshit. At my age I know better, but since when was age a barrier to saying stupid things?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:18 AM
25

Or "LOSER!!"
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:14 AM
1

Please read this AMA by Karen Straughan on /r/TheRedPill Thanks for the link, I'd not come across this thread before - well worth reading. I'm amazed at the compassion and understanding she has for the guys over there. Men in general, come to that.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:42 AM
43

If you don't want to have sex with women, you're a misogynist, so bad Or it's cos "you've got a microscopic willy", or "you can't get it up", or ...
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:26 AM
1

Good rant geezer. The Motte & Bailey thing aside, I've lost count of the number of times I've read or heard Feminists instruct or demand that men - if they are really interested in righting whatever wrongs they imagine exist - should get off their lazy, privileged backsides and form their own movement. All well and good, yet the day after that instruction, they tell someone else that a men's rights movement is unnecessary and pointless because Feminism IS ALREADY HELPING MEN ALREADY YOU IDIOTS o…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:17 AM
1

Good analogy, I hadn't thought of Original Sin but it makes sense. I wonder what the odds are that some "academic" Feminist somewhere has written a paper (part of a PhD in Feminist Sociology I daresay) on the rampant misogynism that is the Book of Genesis, and that which forced Eve to give Adam the apple in the first place was Patriarchy. But perhaps they're right: perhaps Patriarchy is one of them there Fundamental Principles of The Universe or something, without whose operation this universe w…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:56 AM
3

Ask them if men can speak/know about a woman's experience. Ask them if a man should be the leader of Feminism. When they say no, then you just turn it around and say: "That's why there needs to be a separate movement." That's as good a place to start as any, and better than most IMO. To OP u/jesusesblood, "Patriarchy" is a weasel word - every time you hear a feminist utter the word, think of it as a set of goalposts on wheels. For a bit of light relief, here's a short rant by Milo Yiannopoulos o…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:58 AM
1

Yeah, I wonder what the problem could be? I mean, a man working with children all day 5 days a week in a workplace that's 99% female - what could possibly go wrong... ... ...?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:18 AM
3

The criminal *justice system is far from perfect, but it's heartening to see evidence that it still works, despite the best (worst) efforts of the SJW/ Feminist factions to usurp due process. Not only was I able to testify that she was never present at the time, I spoke for his character as a a father and friend. There aren't that many women who would go into bat for their ex-boyfriend, so take a moment to give yourself a big pat on the back (figuratively I mean, unless you're a contortionist...…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:50 AM
1

I googled this term (because I'd never heard of it before) and found out it's some PUA bullshit about touching women that you meet Which is pretty much what the reddit RP sub is - thinly-disguised PUA. I have no personal beef with that sub, nor MGTOW; on my occasional visits there I take what's interesting/ useful and ignore the rest. Unfortunately, most people and almost the entire MSM +/- Failbook, Stumblr, Slapchat cannot (or refuse to) recognise the distinction between the PUA army and the M…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 09:03 AM
45

A quick goggle trawl reveals that this revolves around a nasty crime which took place in 2014. Two adolescent females were brought to trial, the elder of whom, Lauren Bush (aged 17 at the time), admitted to a lesser charge and was sentenced to ... (wait for it)... ... ... A stay in an out-of-state secure facility until the court determines she can be released, but in any case before she is 21. To save you the mental arithmetic, that means she's due out any day now (if she isn't already). I'm sur…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:52 AM
2

i'm shorry but your (hic) riteing keepsh wobblling all (hic) over the pl(hic)ace (hic) and I dunno what a Fartel...Furtiv... Putrelle is (hic) Pleash (hic) help (belch) ish it your round i'll have a double (slumps on floor, vomits, passes out).
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:27 AM
3

No, because "they started it first!1!!" Besides, only men commit rape - women merely commit sexual assault.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:18 AM
2

Equal rights for rams, obviously... Jebus, didn't you read the memo?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:05 AM
3

I for one welcome our Ovinelords.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:04 AM
6

I think they have some ideas that are valid, like the "sexual marketplace" or "shit testing," but most of it is crap Pretty much my take on RP as well, and the same goes for MGTOW. There are some useful (and occasionally insightful) points in both, so long as they provide some actual value or an angle on male-female relationships I hadn't considered before or indicate another way to being a better bloke/ human being. The rest of the RP and MGTOW stuff that is no use or value to me I discard or i…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:02 AM
7

I sound like a realist. What you kid yourself you sound like is your business. What you look like to most of us is merely a defeatist.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:25 AM
3

To me this seems the abject failure of Feminism to actually be a movement that critically seeks equality for everyone and is self-critical. I wouldn't actively say I am a part of the MRM, but I consistently find that regardless of disagreements I have with MRA's, never am I told I don't belong, and almost no rebuttal becomes a personal thing; it's simply a disagreement or an attempt to show me where I have things wrong. What you describe is one of the effects of Feminism becoming (IMO) a politic…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:17 AM
2

Logic is an Tool of Teh Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:38 AM
2

It didn't happen. She has just lied brazenly Invent Publish (something) Profit!!!
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:37 AM
1

Very much that. Or... (turns to face Valenti) "Fuck off you nosy cow"
/r/MensRights26/04/17 08:34 AM
2

she knows the vast majority of her electorate do not consider themselves feminists. She might, she might not, but her initial statement seemed more like a genuine expression of her own POV. But when faced with an audience of left-wing SWJ intellectuals she has to lick some ass Probably, but I'd suggest it was more likely that she knew she was on camera and that whatever she said would be endlessly dissected and reconstucted, and to her detriment if she said The Wrong Thing.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:26 AM
6

I'm not convinced you can "convert" anyone to any cause - social, political, religious or otherwise - because at some point any decision to "convert" to The Cause has to be theirs (assuming we're not discussing totalitarian regimes, that is). That is not to say, however, that you can't guide them in the general direction, either by persuasive rhetoric or by presenting critical facts (but preferably both). In the case of MR, a few points I think might be useful: don't waste time and effort with t…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:05 AM
0

Had I known of that information when I wrote what I wrote, I would indeed have been guilty of being unreasonable. But I didn't. I am, however, grateful for the information and the education that others have bothered to provide without sanctimony.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:43 PM
2

Any "ism" come to that. Anyone who isn't part of the "ism" is one of Them, and it's Their fault.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:35 PM
2

TIL on the interwebs part 994,590.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:33 PM
0

I didn't know that. TIL on the interwebz today, part 994,589.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:32 PM
-1

Downvotes for stating reasonable doubt? Fuck me. Oh well, this is reddit after all.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:31 PM
2

thanks
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:30 PM
2

Got a link? Not just for the sake of argument, but data is data.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:54 AM
8

There is a tendency to tie all goodness a theology Or a political ideology - it makes no difference in the final analysis, since both thrive on converting as many of the Great Unwashed to the Cause as possible. Propaganda is as much part of global theologies as political ones. Like any widespread political/ theological movement, Feminism has its credo, its True Believers, its sacred texts and its missionaries, not to forget its Faithful. And, likewise, it has spent a lot of time, effort and mone…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:52 AM
2

There's got to be a word or term for this sort of neurosis. Some of it is depression. Get a clinical diagnosis and then get medical help. I can hear the state of mind you're describing, it's one I've been in myself. Do it.
/r/PussyPass18/04/17 08:41 AM
2

Honestly - dogs are the absolute business when it comes to companionship. Look after them and they will never be anything other than loyal and steady.
/r/PussyPass18/04/17 08:38 AM
1

You still can be abused without being beaten. It is not domestic violence though The definition of what constitutes DV varies between legislatures. Nonetheless, you are right - psychological abuse is abuse, period. And its effects can be much longer-lasting than even broken bones.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:27 AM
-1

I don't know that I'd go as far as saying "more men are victims..." since nobody really knows (because psychological abuse is both hard to define and is in any case significantly under-reported). But it is certainly true that men are at least as likely to be subject to it as women. And, as others have said umpteen times, there are no obvious bruises.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:23 AM
8

To the extent that that is true, Feminism is an even bigger political con.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:14 AM
10

They both showed up to a brawl, ... he's no hero and she's no victim. That's about my take on this too. I've been on many demos over the years, thankfully none of them got nastier than some verbal with some opposers. But had any of them started to get nasty, my instinct (and that of anyone with their brains wired up right) would be to GTFO fast. Yes, I accept that sometimes innocent people can get caught up in the middle of something by accident, but I don't get that that's what happened here.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:48 AM
3

"We created this hashtag to troll MRAs and anti-feminists who think bad things about feminism that simply aren't true." That has the sniff of truth about it (though it isn't clear where you got the quote from). Some might take her views as serious (= web hits = profit!), some might assume it's parody (= more webhits = more profit), whereas it's much more likely there's another agenda (or maybe more than one). It's trashy, poorly organised, and created in bad faith. She obviously thinks very poor…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter