TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

statusincorporated Archive

View 35 posts and 1,680 comments by statusincorporated on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
112

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience22/07/20 08:12 PM
85

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience27/10/20 12:43 AM
77

Question For Menstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 06:32 PM
69

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience23/09/20 07:09 PM
48

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 08:42 PM
38

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 09:26 PM
35

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience23/09/20 07:19 PM
31

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 05:20 PM
23

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:15 PM
23

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:40 AM
17

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience27/10/20 12:29 AM
17

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience27/10/20 12:31 AM
11

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:44 AM
10

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 01:02 AM
8

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 03:30 PM
8

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 09:24 PM
6

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/19 06:18 PM
5

Question For Womenstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:08 PM
5

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 05:45 PM
5

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 08:44 PM
4

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/19 09:06 PM
3

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/19 09:08 PM
2

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 07:08 PM
2

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:32 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 03:05 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience23/07/20 03:11 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 10:03 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/20 09:44 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 03:38 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 08:30 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience23/07/20 02:48 PM
1

CMVstatusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:30 PM
1

statusincorporated/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 05:57 AM
0

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 09:01 PM
0

statusincorporated/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 09:54 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,680 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Um. No it does increase attractiveness to masculinize a face
/r/BlackPillScience11/11/20 09:41 AM
1

(1) that's incorrect. The proximity effect actually more describes the stickiness of past behavior on present impression. A douchebag will find it harder to be liked by acting nice after 100 close proximity feats of douchebagging than a stranger. This and many more basic features of the shit you thought you knew something about down here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_principle
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 04:12 AM
1

Your studies don't contend with the main point dummkopf because they are all focused on THE INITIAL ENCOUNTER. " it appeared that in an initial encounter men liked nice ladies; women thought nice guys were kind of lame." But really...let's just cut through it with a few silver bullets. First physical attractiveness DOMINATES all for purely sexual relationships: (this study found that niceness triumphs over everything else in every other relationship type, however) https://www.drpeterkilmann.com/…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 05:34 PM
1

There is another way. Avoid her for a week. You must like drama. In reality she's a grown fucking woman and you assuming a parental role is just enabling her childlike behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 04:33 PM
1

Wrong again! The attractiveness ratings ARE REAL and turn non-dateables into dateables. This study shows that attractiveness ratings of partners failed to correlate --- at all --- when the couple knew one another for about 9 months prior to dating. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56c0eeaa7c65e465b5050feb/t/56c54e673c44d841ad4689c0/1455771239727/2015_HuntEastwickFinkel_PSci.pdf Meaning that the demonstration of those qualities over time likely compensated for whatever initial attraction ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 04:32 PM
2

While it's great that you chimed in with a stack of pseudo-evo-psych horseshit, what you said represents the worldview of a toddler with their head stuck up their cute baby ass. (1) No real link between any specific 'gene' and attractiveness found (2) The fact that facial attractiveness shows fairly high heritability indicates that it has NOT been strongly selected for... ...or that it is a moving target based mostly in local custom and culture. (3) Anyone who says life isn't fair is someone who…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 04:30 PM
1

An extremely low %...and exaggerated in the sense that even in that case she's just saying he's a bit of a pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 04:26 PM
1

Why the fuck did i pull over because i saw a dog? If i was driving faster than 10 mph now I have to walk all the way back there....
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:36 AM
1

And lo, there were none
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:34 AM
2

You got action finally? You used to whine about 0 action constantly
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:33 AM
1

How the fuck did i see all this about the dog while operating my vehicle? I would likely first learn how to fucking drive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:32 AM
1

Lol "Below average to average looking" for sex "Pretty to hot" for relationships Madonna/Whore it is not
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:31 AM
1

Idk I've pissed plenty of women off and not 1 dared say i had a small dick. Cause it's not even close to true. But they've called me out on a bunch of shit and guess what? It was all slightly exaggerated truth. Women tend to be pretty truthful about flaws when they're pissed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:28 AM
1

Go look at the study to see how wide the differentials were. Try more like 4 or 5 points.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:25 AM
3

Lol Well it's clear that this chick doesn't like IQ from the assclusion you just drew.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:25 AM
1

Prolonged exposure. And the proximity effect can be ruled out because other people who also were in close proximity saw their ratings drop due to bad behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:23 AM
2

Lol I gave several more than that... And your studies actually show that confounding correlations with the dark triad rather than the triad itself are what attract mates. Try reading what you read next time
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 08:21 AM
1

Yeah woowoo is fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 04:14 AM
-1

You're not really getting it. Being nice literally made the men MORE PHYSICALLY ATTRACTIVE to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 12:50 AM
1

Nah. The dudes at the top getting the most poon have been relatively stable over time: https://jaymans.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/numwomen-m.png For what you say to be true that percentage would have to be shrinking. Lol. I'd love some of what you're smoking. Obesity rates are rising every year. Men are getting less masculine every year. The disparity between Hollywood hot and reality is growing every year. It's not really up for debate. We are becoming MORE inclusive (women and men) in what we…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/20 12:03 AM
1

Ok, so what about the first link? regarding your contention: "In one study, participants rated the photographs of classmates in their high school yearbooks for physical attractiveness, familiarity, liking, and respect. The researchers then had strangers (of the same sex and roughly same age) who had never met the people behind the photographs rate the same photographs for physical attractiveness. In general, the more the people in the yearbook were familiar, liked, and respected, the more physic…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:57 PM
7

I kinda think this is an example of an empathy gap. Women do not experience sexual rejection on anywhere near the level men do. Ever. Not even close. Not even same star system or galaxy. Social rejection is on par with physical pain --- research has shown this. And it leaves a lasting mark --- again research shows this. So try to think about this from the other side. If the only way for you to do something you need to do --- or at least feel a compulsion to do far more than the average woman doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:46 PM
2

Not really but those looking to hurt their butts will always have their butts hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:36 PM
0

Nah that's wrong. " “The results showed certain trait combinations appear to result in higher sexual frequency and more offspring for select males. The combinations producing higher sexual frequency for select males being high extraversion and high agreeableness, high extraversion and high conscientiousness, and high agreeableness with high conscientiousness.” https://www.qut.edu.au/news?id=138269
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:35 PM
-7

I'm quite good looking, I won the genetic jackpot I think. [reveal that you are desperate for attention]... I love that kind of chemistry. That's not chemistry, dude. But even when I've been told I'm really good looking, I can't get women to enjoy my company when I'm the one trying to make the aproach. You are not as good looking as you think, then. If I am the one aproaching, is a lot better to behave confident and cold, even a little arrogant, than trying to be nice, funny and warm. Nope. If s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:30 PM
1

tbh in the real world reciprocal altruism is a thing --- the thing. there is no 'I'm nice for no reason' person who is both honest and exists. They may have killed the only one on the cross.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:28 PM
2

You're assuming the kids of these immigrants will be as religious as their parents. I already explained why that assumption should be questioned, i.e. assimilation, i.e. secular norms and values being necessary in a heterogenous society.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:27 PM
-1

The studies show they do appreciate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:26 PM
1

No. The studies show that just being nice increases attractiveness over time (not years, but weeks).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 11:26 PM
2

I mean the biological urge is a judgment about procreation...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 09:43 PM
1

doesn't matter who's immigrating... ...demographics are destiny and incoming immigrants contribute to those demographics. Secularism goes hand in hand with "diversity and tolerance"--- which I'm in favor of and all --- so a more heteroegenous population is likely a less religious one. Trend seems to reflect lower religiosity... https://www.pewforum.org/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 09:42 PM
1

I already made part II to this post. I think the incentive to be nice is right in the face: it does result in getting you more sex. You just can't ever let on that you're in it for the poon.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 09:29 PM
1

Yeah this is woowoo. You seem to agree that there isn't really much incentive. Cool!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:59 PM
1

It's not really that obvious since you didn't address it. At all. And I doubt you could.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:58 PM
1

Qui pro quo isn't exploitation. That's LITERALLY RECIPROCITY. Literally 'I do X for you to get Y in return' = reciprocity. In this case 'I nice to you so you give me X.' And yeah it's nice people 'feel' one way or another about STANDARD HUMAN CONDUCT.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:57 PM
2

Yeah you're wrong. Gen Z by the numbers IS more relationship oriented.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:56 PM
2

Gen Z also believes in soulmates to a significantly higher degree than other generations. Most of them don't want casual partnerships. I think we are witnessing a big correction tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:54 PM
2

You're actually correct. https://www.datingstudies.com/studies/generation-z-dating-statistics/ Gen Z wants relationships more than us Millenials do/did.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:50 PM
1

you're forgetting immigration...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:48 PM
2

The decline of the SMP was when Millenials were fucking like rabbits This never happened. Millenials have less sex with fewer partners and their college behavior by the stats is no different from that of their grandparents. Stop believing hype. The SMP will correct away from casual sex and it can already be seen with the younger generation. More emphasis will be put on finding a partner with high relationship value as opposed to sexual value. Until the cycle inevitably repeats. What do you think…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:46 PM
2

Then why were you in a relationship with them if they were horrible people and unattractive lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:38 PM
1

Calm down. It's just an honest question. Unruffle the feathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:38 PM
1

LMFAO It can be understood as the expectation that people will respond favorably to each other by returning benefits for benefits, and responding with either indifference or hostility to harms. That is PRECISELY WHAT RECIPROCITY IS. Exploitation is "to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage." So today we find out that you don't really know what reciprocity and exploitation are. Quid pro quo != exploitation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:37 PM
0

If you treat one woman like shit she’s going to tell people to steer clear of you- if you’re just that big of an asshole soon enough people are not going to want to interact with you Yeah this is how real life plays out. Women who are warned about bad men avoid them... ​ ...oh wait a minute... And lol, way to assume a bunch of shit. Not being nice to women != complaining about women to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:34 PM
1

No, I actually asked THIS: If it's all about attraction and that's amoral, then........ ....once a woman is attracted, what is the point of being nice? So no you didn't answer that question. If you are friends with a hot women and she tells the others how you such a great person, you definitely have more chances with the others. And yet this hot woman thinks you're so great but isn't sleeping with you... I disagree. Whatever you are presented as if what the social proof supports. In this case, y…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:33 PM
1

Okay, so then you're saying the central premise behind Nice Guy logic is flawed: being nice can create a reasonable expectation of sex in certain circumstances? Either it's orthogonal or it's not...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:29 PM
1

He's not preferable for sexual reasons, though, if Nice Guy reasoning holds. Same is true for the 'somewhat attractive' guy. So if the reward sought is 'sex' niceness has no effect. And honestly, there are so few guys who are attractive in the first place that it's not like an attractive guy will go wanting for sex just because he's not as 'nice' as some other attractive guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:28 PM
1

Who is 'ya'll?' I never said women like assholes. My point here is that nice OR NOT nice doesn't really matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 08:26 PM
2

hmm... but you keep picking these people... ...and hanging out with these people... ...who aren't so nice. Probably because.... .... they are attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:16 PM
1

There's pretty much 0 way I sound like that meme if you learned how to read. But hey, when an opportunity for a potential social shame arises... You are more likely to be introduced to her other friends It's more likely that you are invited to a party/dinner/social gatherings Other people recognice this and you Higher social proof More possibilities to hone your social skills More people to talk to, if you feel bored Kindness is normally met with kindness from other people, so they are more incl…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:14 PM
2

Oh...lol! You're too young I'm assuming to have gone through the trenches as a woman. Odds on that you'll surprise yourself with what you end up doing out there. Good luck to you staying on the good path though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:02 PM
1

But if attraction is orthogonal to being nice.....this has no effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:01 PM
2

Oh so you've never had sex with an asshole or dickhead? ... Lettuce be cereal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 07:00 PM
1

This is the first thing resembling an answer. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:59 PM
1

Nah they fail for not being attractive is my thesis :) Physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:57 PM
0

I mean, your facts are wrong. For all the glorification of hookup culture it's mostly overblown: https://time.com/88092/hookup-culture-myth-study/ And 'hooking up' can include just 'kissing.' (LOL!) And nah, I think your whole 'move the fastest' thing is more about rape culture than hookup culture. Definitely a lot of raping of the 'she's blackout drunk, score!' variety going down. It's mainly just the guys who are physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:57 PM
1

I just asked a simple question: WHAT IS THE INCENTIVE?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:54 PM
1

How do I seem to think that being nice is akin to being a "simp?" Literally nothing in my OP defines what I mean by 'nice.' The fact of the matter is that the nice guy complaint boils down to being 'nice' (WHATEVER 'NICE' MEANS) != sex and is independent of sex, zero correlation. THEREFORE.... If the reward one seeks is sex, there is no reason to be nice. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:53 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocal_altruism Ya stupid scientists. Broken!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:50 PM
2

So now the norm of reciprocity, considered the evolutionary underpinning for kindness itself in humans, is "creepy?" L M F A O Women are quite the hive mind when it comes to (1) physical attraction first (2) everything else a distant second and kindness not even related to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:49 PM
1

Yes the norm of reciprocity is now repulsive. File in: makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:48 PM
3

Yes because women have this 6th sense for that.... ...*indicates domestic violence, spousal rape, verbal emotional abuse, etc. stats*... ...methinks they do not, if the stats are any indication. What they have a sense for is who they have the physical hots for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:45 PM
1

If we assume both of our actors are acting as hyper rationally as that, then the 3 million difference after 40 years won't make much of a difference either. For reference the BW wage gap is 34 percent --- that's significant.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/20 06:43 PM
0

This is another typical reply that assumes its entire argument into evidence. Of course, it ironically proves my point. In 3, 2... there is at least some reward in maintaining that friendship In the case of men, women, and sex --- the point here is that the main reward most men are seeking from a relationship with the opposite sex is...well, sex. Research seems overwhelmingly in favor of this conclusion as men who have platonic female friends very often are attracted, etc. without any mutual int…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:35 PM
2

I didn't call women cruel sociopaths at all, so idk where you got that from.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:25 PM
1

Once again, this applies to MALE treatment of WOMEN. You're assuming 'don't be nice' must = don't be civil. It doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:24 PM
4

So someone judging someone else as unfit to reproduce isn't "personal" even though it's a decision entirely based off of personal characteristics --- this week in 'nonsense.' And um....way to add the social shaming toss-off at the end: 'well IF U THINK IT'S PERSONAL U MUST BE INCEL/INSECURE/NO CONFIDENCE/ETC.' Try thinking critically next time instead of kneejerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:22 PM
1

For ugly man at 100k and male model at 115k it's 625 bucks per check. Considering the wide spectrum of looks that covers...no, I don't think it's that big of a difference.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/20 06:21 PM
1

This is nonsense. Men who are 'good with women' also give empty compliments, fake interests, and etc. The main reason women don't like the nice guy is that he isn't attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:18 PM
1

Um. You're still crucially not saying anything. If it's independent of being attractive, then again...for getting sex there's no incentive for a man to be nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:16 PM
5

Deceptive? What does that even mean? Like if a man doesn't announce "I'm buying you dinner so you'll fuck me." He's being deceptive by doing so with that expectation? So all social actions and expectations must be announced lest they be deceptive? Give me a break with the high horse. And here we go with this woowoo, now it's an aura, huh? So if you're not talking about initial attraction you're not really talking about sexual attraction. It's kind of like convincing someone to settle for you for…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:16 AM
-1

Word. So there is no incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:07 AM
4

What you said is too inchoate to rebut so we disagree as to whether it has substance. I don't see any. Study after study has shown that initial attraction is pretty much based on the physical....
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 06:02 AM
4

It kinda is. "Yo, if it were up to me your line would die off and end with you but its not personal."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 05:59 AM
2

Lol yes women UNLESS they find you physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 05:57 AM
0

Okay so women will avoid men who aren't nice to them and so the loss will be.....platonic female company?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 05:56 AM
3

Yeah this reads like woo woo jive. It isn't nuance. It's just picking up social cues that she's attracted and reciprocating. I have yet to see a case of a woman who is actually attracted to a guy friend zoning him because he acted too nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 05:49 AM
1

Lol I really don't think the inserts matter that much outside of bodybuilding. The ratios I firmly believe matter. To the point of dogma religion. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 03:04 AM
2

A man who is nice and attractive has an advantage over a man who is not nice and attractive if said woman has any kind of self-esteem. Then you violate the entire supposition behind the 'nice guy' syndrome: kindness and sex are orthogonal lines. to a woman can become more attractive to her if he is perceived as nice. Which is it? Does being nice have something to do with getting laid or does it not? The thing is, a guy who is not at all attractive to a woman is not going to become any more attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:58 AM
1

not that simple. this is in the context of sexual relationships, so I guess I'm speaking to hetero men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:49 AM
1

No, 170 at 5%. 180 at 10-11%. No argument from me. Getting shredded naturally you will look amazing but you just aren't going to look like you lift with your clothes on. Or at least not to the extent a roidfreak will. I mean, lol...5'10 at 200 and he's probably 18-20% bodyfat at that point but sure. Yeah the greek statues are based on ratios, not mass. David is considered an Adonis and he's not a mass monster.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:48 AM
2

Except the morphs generated pretty variable attractiveness ratings and uniformly increased, which makes your addition pointless and you a little daft for thinking it would actually give us more info.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/20 02:42 AM
5

It's not a fallacy. It doesn't matter the face. Did you read the study at all? It made ALL FACES MORE ATTRACTIVE --- BY A LOT. Deal with it.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/20 02:23 AM
1

Yes. But simply the addition of a beard is a substantial increase in attractiveness. Moreso than that caused by the manipulation of facial features.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/20 02:22 AM
2

Yeah actually no you can't get that big naturally. Here's the daily reminder of how big a guy can NATURALLY get (5-7% bodyfat contest ready) bodybuilding --- so add maybe 5-10 pounds to get the 10-11% range: 5'10 at 170lbs + 10lbs = 180lbs. Give or take 5-10 pounds and \^ is the correct number. For every inch above or below 5'10 take away or add 7 pounds. Those figures come from GH15, the God himself. They are the gospel. Any one who contradicts them is either (1) a liar or (2) underestimating t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:20 AM
3

try creating a dating app profile of a fat bald man and a fat bald woman on tinder and see which gets more matches after a month. \^ thread winner right here. Seriously. Go put some average 'fat/chubby' woman's terrible selfie up on tinder and see the matches. Now go put a FIT but bald or short man's PRO pic on tinder. This experiment will reveal most of what ItsOK has said to be bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:16 AM
0

So much of this is wrong. Abs for men start to be legit at around 10% bodyfat, not 20% (lmfao). And no, women who are themselves not overweight or obese are definitely not interested in men who are 20-35% bodyfat. Stop lying. A woman can eat clean, cut carbs, exercise 5 times a week, for let’s say, three hours (HIIT cardio, and weight training) and get into that 20% body fat range, with mild muscle development and a man will still say she isn’t attractive because? Because “she’s too fit” and “sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:14 AM
1

How is this even a discussion? Did people look at the retardedly low percentages? Across the entire attractiveness spectrum for men it's a 14% penalty/blessing. The male model vs. the ugly guy is 110k a year vs ~100k a year. Hardly anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/20 02:05 AM
20

Breaking news: fucktard fails to read study, draws conclusion opposite it. "Goddamn, son." - Your dad, in dismay
/r/BlackPillScience27/10/20 08:55 AM
6

That was another study but still proves my broad point that facial hair works
/r/BlackPillScience27/10/20 05:47 AM
-1

You really don't take these studies in context.
/r/BlackPillScience26/10/20 06:41 PM
-2

That's a pretty weak effect to only be 15% for men and 9% for women between the entire spectrum of attractiveness. And this study didn't even address factors that strongly effect attractiveness that are completely within an individual's control. (I've already cited ample evidence to back this contention but I can do so again). Blackpill gets weaker and weaker.
/r/BlackPillScience26/10/20 06:34 PM
1

Ya that's nice you pulled some universal human rules of behavior out your ass, but address the evidence contra that i pointed out please
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 05:39 PM
2

"Hunter-gatherers tend to have an egalitarian social ethos,[18] although settled hunter-gatherers (for example, those inhabiting the Northwest Coast of North America) are an exception to this rule.[19][20]Nearly all African hunter-gatherers are egalitarian, with women roughly as influential and powerful as men." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter-gatherer
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 05:46 AM
2

Then why are hunter gatherer tribes --- our evolutionary 'original' society --- so devoid of this dynamic and strikingly egalitarian? Just shh with this nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 10:51 PM
1

More like someone who pays attention to real evidence... ​ These patterns were also observed in our population, although the strengths of these associations were weaker than previously reported strength of preferences. We conclude that while preferences for partner height generally translate into actual pairing, they do so only modestly. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546926/ Height accounts for a modest amount of the variance between male bodily attractiveness ratings, if it were…
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/20 10:39 PM
1

No it hasn't. There are several studies showing almost nil effect of height.
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/20 05:09 PM
5

Um...an Instagram fitness star = 100% on the juice. So, those dudes are still way bigger than what a normal male could be.
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/20 05:08 PM
2

"We expected that men’s preferences for muscle development would tend to mirror women’s preferences, but we found that ratings of size preferences were always higher than women’s ratings across all muscles." There are a ton of other nuggets that reveal this study to be extremely weak support for much of anything.
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/20 05:07 PM
1

In terms of actual lay count --- neither variable could explain much: "Using the number of sexual partners in the previous twelve months as an alternative indicator of mating success (as in Hill et al., 2013) with no overlap between T1 and T2, this association could be replicated only cross-sectionally, but not longitudinally. Neither male-male competition nor female choice longitudinally predicted an alternative measure of mating success, the number of potential conceptions ." Apparently manlet…
/r/BlackPillScience22/10/20 04:59 PM
1

pure cocaine is actually very common now as opposed to being an urban legend in the 80s while purity has seen a modest increase (IIRC 55 to 70 percent), no, 100% or approaching pure cocaine is rare unless you are a super baller.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:52 PM
1

LOL What do you think RAPE culture is tied to? What do you think happens at a lot of parties and how a lot of 'studs' seem to rack up notches? Hate to bring you out of the womb, boyo, but there's a lot of rape going round.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/20 03:46 PM
1

Cool you admit TRP isn't scientific or based on science. That's a start. And regarding pre or post agricultural...you don't seem to get THAT IT DOESN'T matter. If there were a strong biological hard wiring for women to select for X, that effect would appear in some significant form in post agricultural society. A lot of your post is thinly veiled complaining about what the standard for what "sexually attractive" means: literally sexually SELECTED by women. You cannot be selected for without havi…
/r/BlackPillScience25/09/20 09:16 AM
0

Definitely you can't make an argument so you're trying to assert your way out of one. Feel free to make a point at any time rather than hiding behind the cloak of condescension at any time. Until then you lose.
/r/BlackPillScience25/09/20 09:04 AM
1

I didn't get thrown out of any SMP community, wtf are you talking about? Women have access to birth control. Women can sleep with more than one man at one time. Most women don't want to have children with the most attractive man they have sexual access. (in a practical, not spiritual sense) The outcome of these facts is AF\BB theory. LMFAO This series of premises is a non-starter for saying anything biologically coherent. Alpha means high on the dominance hierarchy which means more and greater a…
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 05:06 PM
1

So, let's look at who has more chillenz! And let's remove that pesky birth control pill to remove that EXCUSE. Men 'at the top' with the highest partner counts have LOWER REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS THAN THEIR LOW PARTNER COUNT BRETHREN https://jaymans.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/child-by-playa1.png So...the percentage of men receiving the 'most' female love has remained roughly stable over time, the men who are at the top are LESS reproductively successful, and physical attractiveness is not significa…
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 04:07 PM
1

If anything, the swell we see in the 45-65 period where apparently a higher percentage of men were getting laid is an aberration. Before that time period and now after, things are back to more of the same. Baby Boomers just got lucky and lived in a time of abundance.
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 03:39 PM
-3

You don't seem to get it. The blackpill is predicated on (1) attractiveness being OBJECTIVE and (20 reducible to biologically determined features. If (1) and (2) are true, then a strong correlation should appear between facial attractiveness/physical attractiveness and reproductive success should appear regardless of time or place. DUCY? You made several statements that are false. Sex has always been distributed unequally --- that did not start with recent generations. https://ifstudies.org/ifs-…
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 03:37 PM
-2

Except that's wrong People have never gotten laid more or less equally. This generation as a whole is less promiscuous not more. And I have an OP showing that the share of women having more than 16 partners has grown, while the share of men reporting more than 50 partners is dropping, which suggests an increasingly equitable distribution of sex
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 10:48 AM
1

Observe the graph showing that the share of women with more than 16 partners has more than doubled. But the amount of men at the top reporting more than 50 partners is on a downward trend, still higher than 1990 but rapidly falling from a high point over a decade ago. So... The graph suggests less sex is being gobbled up by top men and is filtering down to the masses.
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 06:01 AM
-14

Lol........ ...ummm... If the blackpill is supposedly based on biological truth and genetics.... ...and attractiveness is objective... The time shouldn't matter.
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 05:56 AM
-5

K Well if Alfa = reproductive success (which is all that really matters and that biology gaf about) then.... :) Edit: The fact that I'm being downvoted for offering the real-deal definition of what is "alpha" is sad. Like, when scientists study 'alfa' ness in other animals, they are focused on reproductive success. If the god of blackpill theory (looks get you laid becuz muh biology) is NOT true then it starts to crumble really fast. If this were a biological phenomenon, it WOULD CONFER SIGNIFIC…
/r/BlackPillScience24/09/20 05:55 AM
5

Abstract: Three studies were conducted to determine whether physical attractiveness (PAT) is related to subjective well-being (SWB). In the first study (N = 221), unselected students were photographed and videotaped. In the second study (N = 131), participants were selected on the basis of extremes in PAT, and in the third study (N = 155), participants were preselected for extreme scores on SWB. Correlations between SWB and PAT varied from .03 to .33. In Study 1 the mean correlation between PAT …
/r/BlackPillScience23/09/20 07:19 PM
2

Abstract Physical attractiveness has been associated with mating behavior, but its role in reproductive success of contemporary humans has received surprisingly little attention. In the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (1244 women, 997 men born between 1937 and 1940), we examined whether attractiveness assessed from photographs taken at age ∼18 years predicted the number of biological children at age 53–56 years. In women, attractiveness predicted higher reproductive success in a nonlinear fashion, …
/r/BlackPillScience23/09/20 07:09 PM
2

Actually, go read your title: non-monogamous RELATIONSHIPS are either as happy or happier than monogamous ONES. Huge difference in assessing RELATIONSHIPS vs. assessing PEOPLE. This study assessed people rather than relationships --- my entire point. And yes that study TRP loves regarding marital satisfaction/divorce rates is stupid for many reasons. And hat tip then --- I thought you linked one paper five different times. My fault for assuming.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 06:41 PM
1

OP misleading. Here is what the study compared: "health of cross-sectional samples of persons who engage in alternative sexualities, especially consensual non-monogamy (CNM), and compares their health, happiness, educational attainment, sexual frequency, sexual health knowledge, marital happiness, experiences of discrimination and other adversities, and other variables with cross-sectional samples from the general US population. " Gee, I wonder if there are other variables that could make these …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 05:15 PM
1

But why boyo why
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:55 AM
1

Lol she was having fun. Idk it's hard not to think it's a insecurity thing
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:52 AM
1

If shes only pair bonded and loved you but had 30 partners is she more used than someone who has pair bonded with 4 other men and only had 4 partners? First love is the rawest
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:49 AM
1

That's a dumb analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:47 AM
1

Why that seems dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:41 AM
1

Nah. The issues in your stories have nothing to do with the past. They are all about the dude being a pussy and not dipping.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:39 AM
1

Past dont matter. Present matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:38 AM
1

Welp that guy got what he deserved
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:35 AM
1

Ok why did he stay with her if she didn't do that? U see how noping out solves all problems?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:32 AM
1

If your partner doesnt meet your needs then nope the fuck out. If they do who gives a shit about the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 01:28 AM
1

Nah. It's about to be Gibbons, bray. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4973188/amp/The-common-ancestor-humans-like-GIBBON.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 04:45 PM
1

Even if rare, men would rather raise their own kids. Sure. But you're framing it as an evolutionary thing. It really doesn't seem like it is. And still most men would not like to raise another man's child. Weird. "Hating black people isn't evolutionary, we're all the same." "And still most people hate black people. Weird." That's your 'reasoning' here. So... evolution found a way to make men raise children that aren't theirs even if they don't want to. Interesting. Yeah you can't assume those me…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 03:39 PM
0

No, I'll take a look at human beings living in what's closest to our natural state behave to figure out how humans in their natural first state behaved. Why the fuck would I look at chimps...oh, is it because humans are closely related to chimps in your mind? Because if I was going for the closest mammalian relative I'd look at Gibbons with whom we last shared a common ancestor with, chief. So you're wrong on where to look in two ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 03:30 PM
0

Energy spent on feeding a child that is not yours was a waste of resources even in cavemen times. That's not how it works in hunter-gatherer societies that are less gather more hunter, i.e. closer to humanity's origins. It's not 'your' resources. Everything is communal. Evolutionarily, the social structure of certain Great Ape species prevents paternity from being known at all, which is likely an evolved defense against infanticide. Cuckholdry is fairly rare. Even men who don't think they are th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 03:15 PM
1

I'll jack off like very rarely. Maybe once a year if that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 02:39 PM
2

To them, there's a way the social world is supposed to be. If these social world doesn't conform with that expectation, there is a problem. Yeah, that's called culture. All societies have it. It's the complete opposite of a "Live and let live attitude." Most people seem to not care about "value differences" and want to find someone they like. Does. not. exist. People associate with people like themselves and exclude those who are different. This is the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 02:38 PM
0

We need a lot of time to evolve to the point that the instinct to lock down a woman to ensure paternity dissapears. so this is wrong. we didn't 'evolve' to do that at all. the only reason it's a thing is because when MONEY AND RESOURCES are stake WITHIN a system of developed property rights, people do not want to combine families THAT ARE NOT REALLY FAMILY. you can see this trend even now in attitudes about female promiscuity: https://psmag.com/social-justice/evolutionary-explanation-fear-female…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 02:35 PM
0

The whole 'hard-wired paternity' stuff is bullshit. Paternity wasn't important until marriage became a thing. And marriage didn't become a thing until property rights were more formalized and property could pass between generations. HAVING SAID THAT... JEALOUSY -IS- A THING. However, jealousy relates to sources of our human needs being threatened --- I mean, if Pam gives me food and it's all the food I have, then if Jenny comes around and Pam starts paying attention to Jenny and shares bits of f…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 02:30 PM
1

The last type, that I'm going to call its own type doesn't watch porno b/c they essentially see masterbation as beneath them. That's me. I don't watch porn because why...exactly? I don't think someone has to be a 'Chad' to have this mindset. Someone just has to value going and finding a real partner over sitting around dick in hand. To me, this is the healthiest mindset to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 02:23 PM
1

But was she tho... Maybe grandma....was a hoe...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 03:40 PM
1

No they don't. They focus on attractiveness, sexual history, etc. etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 03:24 PM
1

Uh, men don't want to admit it but men suffer damage from the 'playa' lifestyle too. Pair bonding IS VERY MUCH affected. I mean, I'm going through a 'poly' (phase or not remains to be seen) because, I think in part, due to the variety of experience I'm used to. But I'm planning on doing a 'sex reset' sometime in the near future of abstaining from sex for six months to a year. I've heard that that heals some of that damage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 02:56 PM
1

I have never in my life experienced starfish sex. I think it's a myth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 02:54 PM
3

Yeah it's called self-selection, ding dong. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201602/the-surprising-truth-about-modern-hook-ups Hasn't been much change in bodycount --- except this generation has a lower bodycount, if anything and more 'celibates' (both genders). So ya, wow you encountered a hoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 02:53 PM
10

This isn't true. Women can and definitely do selflessly love. This sounds like Rollo 'I've been married 30+ years LOL BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT' Tomassi tripe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 02:51 PM
1

Yes. And in pyschology and in social science we find assortative mating = fucked up mindgames attract fucked up people. /fin
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 02:50 PM
2

No it fucking doesnt No research supports this. Fucked up mind games attract fucked up people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 04:48 AM
-2

I have a basic knowledge of wherever I lay pipe a pair bond and loyalty will happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 04:44 AM
1

Slow fucking clap. I think that she has to see you as some sort of God or something to fall in love.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 04:43 AM
4

Seriously. Powerful stuff Idgaf where she come from what she done..... ....as looooong as she wuvs me. Ahahahah
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 04:41 AM
1

Yes lmfao that's what I mean. Two way different skill sets.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 04:40 AM
1

Lol 1 for 58 kinda indicates shitty relationship acumen
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 02:38 AM
1

Yes. Attracting and relationship management are two different and almost perpendicular skillsets.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/20 01:18 AM
1

All of nature animals shit wherever they want, so why not humans? /Fin
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 11:41 PM
1

Not really. Drug dealers have status just by the rules of economics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 11:39 PM
4

Fucking stupid. Do whatever the fuck you want. If a girl leaves because you unload she can fuck off. A good woman stands by her man in his darkest times. Even wolves howl at the moon.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre28/07/20 11:38 PM
0

They dont offer that. Those are fairly rare qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 10:24 AM
1

Yeah by lowering their physical standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 06:19 AM
2

No I meant even as a general rule its untrue.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 06:19 AM
2

Ya.... So we are agreement time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:54 AM
3

Is that what they told you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:52 AM
5

Ummm.....no. that's a popular saying, boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:51 AM
4

LMFAO Oh child. You are not ready for this world. Dude...... Chicks will fuck for almost anything status related. You dont really see the power of status until you attain a fair bit. Let's say you're upper middle class. If you swoop down to a trailer park or ghetto or whatever...guarantee the hottest women there will do whatever for a night at your condo. Is it sad? Yes. But TRP only sees beta bux because they haven't really seen women get wet from a huge status differential.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:33 AM
-2

No. You were supposed to list what makes someone a good PARTNER
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:30 AM
2

Um a lot of those women are probably looking to get high for "free." Like...use common sense. I've turned down a lot of play just because of my addy script. So...if addy can get ears perking... imagine what other shit does. I dont have to imagine. I've seen it. Girls love to party
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:28 AM
9

Lol it's only creepy if you're ugly, junior.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:27 AM
3

Ummmm....drug dealers have status. Having access to an illicit but high demand substance = status. And uh these women probably idk....are trading one thing for another.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:26 AM
1

She sounds just psychotic bro
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:25 AM
0

No it won't. Many alpha dudes defer the house budget to the wife. Does she lose attraction? Nah. People are all different.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:24 AM
1

Good eye. Anyone who isn't settling is either going to have less power or equal power. If neither settles then power is constantly up for grabs. Ebb and flow. Yin and yang. Twu wuv.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:22 AM
2

Bro no matter what the rules for men are simple...if a man is truly in love and lust with a woman then he's dating across or up. She has the power.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:21 AM
1

This isn't true. Men almost always cheat with less attractive women. It's because men value someone who values them and is emotionally warm and kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:20 AM
-1

You were good until you boiled down value as a partner to superficial shit. Being open and honest, building rapport, being a good listener are invaluable relationship skills. Those alone can make the most attractive whoever completely dependent on an average whoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:19 AM
1

Except status is great short term game too per research.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:17 AM
2

Boom. My answer too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:15 AM
8

Being aloof IRL is fucking dumb. So no caring less does not equal more power. Power is who is willing to walk away. That's not the same as caring less about the relationship. There's a reason 'alpha' playboys become little bitches when their girl finally walks. There's also a reason guys tend to cheat with women uglier than the gf. Hear me now... If you are in a relationship with a girl you truly are attracted to and care about deeply...she has the power.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:15 AM
1

Ya for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:07 AM
4

Ding ding ding
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:06 AM
4

Nonsense. Teenage fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:06 AM
1

Not really. There's a small percent of men and women that are pretty promiscuous....then there's everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:05 AM
4

Srsly and remember research shows that unattractive women are MORE likely to be married. Men are committing to these fat women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:04 AM
1

Lol dudes fuck down and date across or maybe up. Even Chad's stacy is a gigachad's trash. Sorry bro...there's no escape.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:03 AM
1

Except in STR personality really doesnt matter so...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:01 AM
8

Ya it could be these guys are just oh so irresistible... Or because they lie. Srs. I used to misrepresent myself in all kinds of ways to get laid. Men commit to women with high n counts all the time. And if you're saying only betas do that then only beta females do what you're saying. Point is that people men and women who are going through a player/playette phase likely have some mental instability going on. Life isn't the movies. Also... You cheated because you're a lying coward. Go poly like …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/20 05:00 AM
3

Cultures where it doesn't matter don't survive. https://media.giphy.com/media/ypX8YZszkIXFC/giphy.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 08:12 PM
0

Blah blah bullshit back-of-the-napkin evo-psych (a redundancy but nevertheless...) blah blah blah my feelings will be hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 08:10 PM
1

Lmfao it has everything to do with it lmfao you really cant understand. No just no? Read the link dumpkopf: *This point can be expressed also by saying that, in a deductive argument, t*he premises are intended to provide such strong support for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, then it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false ' Deductive reasoning involves premises and conclusions that are necessarily true or follow. ' An inductive argument is an argument that is intended …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:17 PM
1

You don't get it. Saying a doctor said x regarding medicine therefore we should believe it is not a fallacy in inductive reasoning. Again answer the question: if a doctor makes a medical diagnosis is it more or less likely to be true vs a random person? And also you dont know the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves premises and conclusions that are necessarily true or follow. Inductive involves premises and conclusions that are more or less likely. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 06:02 PM
2

I love how you point to very oppressive cultures as your examples. Lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 05:27 PM
6

The research indicates that looks dominate everything for short term mating. The only time personality comes into play is over long periods of time and repeated interaction. TRP's advice beyond 'life and get good style' is useless for STR.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 05:21 PM
1

I did. It states that my way of thinking on fallacies is the dominant mode of thinking in philosophy. Next? Probabilities and inductive reasoning definitely have something to do with appeals to authority. If a doctor makes a medical diagnosis is it more or less likely to be true than if some random person makes a medical diagnosis? The answer obviously is that knowing the person is a doctor -- by itself --- increases the probability of it being true. The appeal is not a fallacy in that context. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 04:59 PM
1

Yeah I know in a single year. ... I didnt say you were clueless exactly. I just dont think you're worldly enough to have any real advice to give someone over the age of 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 03:41 PM
1

You definitely don't have a job that requires inductive reasoning. Otherwise you would understand that insults, however annoying to you they may be, that go to a person's ethos are perfectly valid when the premises and conclusions are probabilistic. Oh, you 'disagree' with a philosopher, eh? The LEADING one on fallacies? (check here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237963?seq=1) LMFAO. Hey I'm gonna g'head and 'appeal to authority' fallacy on this one. Maybe, just maybe, he knows more than you. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 03:26 PM
1

it was Ad Hominem. You're just doubling down on your fallacy. https://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~hitchckd/adhominemissa.htm For your own edification. Hint: anyone past Phi 101 who whines about fallacies outside of a deductive reasoning context, is a dumb-dumb. Have a good one. That's really me being nice to you and trying to educate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:39 PM
1

Dude, if you really tried in college and got only 15.... ...put it this way, college and school is when it is going to be the EASIEST time in your life to get pussy. because you're constantly around new women. I'm not saying it's bad. Far from it. Top 4%. But....it's also not like 'omg whoaaaaaa legend' either.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:32 PM
0

(1) Unless you saw all of them you have no idea (2) unless you were with him every night you have no idea (3)...even if he was those things, the above (1) and (2) apply. you've elevated a person to a myth
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:21 PM
8

he's probably not actually average looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:18 PM
2

this is very very true. my record-breaking pussy getting both in quality and quantity year was probably the worst year of my life in ALL OTHER SECTORS.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:18 PM
1

yes there is. attractive men have more partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:17 PM
-1

yes and no. technically true. like if some ugly guy just did NOTHING but hunt for pussy, he'd have some success. but where the effort/reward is worth it is if you're at least above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:17 PM
0

25 women over 4 years of college is NOT anything to be hot shit about. wtf lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:16 PM
3

SERIOUSLY. THANK YOU. Look, no shame in it. If you have a high n-count (I do)...there's gonna be some padding on that list. Just the way it goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:15 PM
1

(1) I guarantee a lot of those women were not so hot. (2) I guarantee if his 'record' was 5 in a night, there were many many nights he went home with nothing (3) His great skill was just finding whoever was looking for sex and pouncing. Not such a hard skill to master.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:14 PM
9

They like double standards and do not understand hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:11 PM
2

This is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:10 PM
1

Yes women should care. Double standards are the height of immaturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:09 PM
1

actually no that isn't true per research.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:07 PM
1

Did I say that? No I did not. People with low N's at higher ages also tend to be damaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 02:04 PM
0

Here... Let's say you found out someone consistently jaywalks....would that trigger alarm bells? Is that the same as finding out they murdered several people? I'm refusing to answer because it's prima facie a false equivalence and you dont understand what a good analogy is
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 01:30 AM
3

It isn't anymore. But ya untreated mania is it's own category.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/20 01:24 AM
1

So you'd turn away a woman who treated you like a king consistently who had a high n count as judged by whatever criteria you think are dispositive? Like tats or nipple rings whatever...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 09:28 PM
1

Yeah you're not even wrong pal. You dont seem to understand what "giving an example" means either. You're a moron no longer worth my time. Sorry for your brain tho. /fin
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 09:10 PM
2

Like I'm God. Because I am God.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 09:09 PM
2

And they dont want a female with a high body count because..... I gave my reason. Now CMV with your actual reason. You know. Be on topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:32 PM
1

If the only thing that predicts infidelity is how they treat you and their commitment to a relationship, then when you encounter someone what matters is how they treat you. Let's say people who rode bicycles from age 10-12 are more likely to cheat. But let's also say that this relationships is mediated by the same variable....how they treat you. Let's say that when first getting to know someone it's a little tacky to straight away ask about the bicycles. It only becomes appropriate to do so when…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:30 PM
1

The BP mentality is just that how someone treats you is the most important thing. So.....dont know how that's wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:25 PM
1

Lol dunning Kruger as fuck. I gave an example of why the type of reasoning does matter. As for ad hominem....if a very stupid person, such as yourself, says something is it more or less likely to be true. If them being stupid or whatever else affects the probability of their premises and conclusions being true, then it is not fallacious in that context. I don't need to answer it. If your comeback is there's no way to assess commitment even though they operationalize it in a study in a manner sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:23 PM
3

Hence the point... ...if you ever did get into a relationship that would be a rare rare guy, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:19 PM
1

I never said they are always high N.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 08:18 PM
0

Except almost half of women marry the best sex of their lives so..........how are at least those women settling
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:54 PM
1

Ok so then it WOULD be rare for you to be in a relationship of the type I described. No contradiction really. That dude would have to be off the charts in your eyes for you to even think of him that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:53 PM
1

No dude that's not how it works. Saying that because someone isn't willing to die to oppose x = they want x is seriously warped weird logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:50 PM
1

Lmfao That's like saying people want tyranny and injustice because they exist. Hohkay just worlder.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:45 PM
1

Yes the form of reasoning does matter. Appeal to authority is a fallacy in deductive reasoning. Not so in inductive reasoning. Just shh, at this point. You didnt prove anything. You're not even wrong. I'm pretty confident that whatever you've done I've done more. Whatever you've thought of I've thought of twice. Let's leave it there, boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:44 PM
5

Oh it's easy for you to get commitment from that kind of guy? Idk if you're avoiding relationships it sounds like you really haven't met many if any like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:42 PM
1

Lol no dude. Some women get off easily with just penetration no masturbation necessary. They're fairly rare but definitely exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:41 PM
3

Huh I thought we were agreeing
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:24 PM
0

Yeah they do when we're engaged in inductive rather than deductive reasoning. Ad hominem isn't a fallacy in this context because the fact that a dumb dumb said something in fact makes what they say less likely to be true. Like I said, boyo...leave the thinking for the thinkers. Uh they operationalize relationship commitment in the study so it can be done. And lol if you dont know how to spot when a woman is really on your corner....I cant help you there, boyo. Focus on learning that skill rather…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:15 PM
3

I have bipolar type 1 and yeah untreated esp mania attracts women like crazy and the hot and cold of the ups and downs keeps people around....but it's exhausting af. Finding someone who can actually understand and appreciate your condition is needle haystack status.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:13 PM
2

Virgin at 30 = damaged most likely
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:11 PM
2

Srsly. Women dont have savior complexes either....they just know it's rare for them to get a guy they really dig and are attracted to so will go all out for that guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:11 PM
1

Congruence and holding yourself and others to the same standard quiets cognitive dissonance. I think it's fair inference to say that increases happiness. No. I think its readily apparent that the ideals and deal breakers this culture provides make people unhappy. Male and female body image issues and mental health seem to agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 07:07 PM
1

Lmfao yes they are socialized to aspire to certain ideals that make them u n h a p p y. No I believe the y chromosome and testosterone also is a big diff too. So there are differences but the preferences people have and hypergamy itself is mainly cultural. Shoot the word hypergamy itself comes from behavior regarding LTRs and MARRIAGE.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:56 PM
0

If x predicts y and z fails to predict y when x is taken into account, it's safe to make an inference about the causal relationships, pookie. Leave thinking to the thinkers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:53 PM
1

It's not doublespeak. It's making sure your rules and norms match up well with your life. Theories to suit facts of life. Not facts of life to suit theories of life. Most peoples supposed dealbreakers cause them nothing but objective misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:43 PM
1

Hmmmmm..... This actually may have to be a technically true point to consider. I myself have been guilty in the past of cheating and it was in a relationship with a higher N woman. And I know a really bad instance of cheating where this high N girl fell really hard for this guy and went full Disney for him only to find he'd fucked like 50 women behind her back. And she still took him back. I dont know if it changes my view but there could be something to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:42 PM
0

You dont really get how knowledge of a situation changes probabilities. Once in a romantic situation with someone the only predictor of infidelity is relationship commitment per research. Therefore in that situation what matters is how they treat you...not body count. I'm the patient one here. You'll both catch up I hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:34 PM
1

Shhh boyo. Adults are speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:31 PM
0

Ya ok I'm being intellectually dishonest says the guy who cant understand why murder and n count are wayyyyyyy different "past comparison points." And here's the thing....all the extrapolations from the past that matter will show up in how someone treats you now. A dooooooy. Like you dont seem to understand that all issues are solved by living in the now and NOT RUSHING into anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:31 PM
1

Oh so you think people should never change themselves or their viewpoints. Yeah bro no one owes anyone anything which is why the only reason people dont shit while they walk is because laws exist against it, right? That's the only reason. No one should change anything about how they find themselves ever in light of new knowledge. I'm not demanding you change your viewpoint btw...I'm just pointing out why it's silly to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:27 PM
5

Lmfao ya okay. Men love borderline personality disorder women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:10 PM
1

I'm not wrong about anything I've written here and even if I was nothing you've presented would begin to show as much. And sure I've been in relationships with high N women who were great. Duh. That's why my opinion is what it is. Why do you apply double standards to people and rationalize hypocrisy? Are you bitter and angry about something and believe women are somehow deserving of unfair treatment?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:08 PM
1

My count is several times that and I've got several LTRs under my belt and several shorter term relationships....like when I say experience I mean really a good amount of experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:04 PM
1

Ya hohkay. I meant cum easily from intercourse
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:03 PM
0

Ok but this is why we do thought experiments. Again who's more used?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:02 PM
0

Uh no the latter obviously is getting that response for sex if she fell in love with you
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 06:01 PM
2

I mean I think it's the combo of a great sex and a great time that causes pining. But the close second is just a great time lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:59 PM
1

Yeah I assumed people understood the difference between general rules and always never statements. I think too highly of people...what can I say?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:56 PM
1

No THAT IS NOT TRUE. How they treat you is what predicts infidelity. Go read the article
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:55 PM
1

Yeah that's not a demand. Still waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:54 PM
0

Except people assortatively mate and high n men end up with high n women....
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:53 PM
0

No it would not be startlingly obvious if the research showed that in a relationship what mattered was x rather than past murders. Idk how you're not grasping the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:52 PM
1

Lmfao ya gonna DQ u buddy. Sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:10 PM
1

But all that matters in a relationship is how you are treated. How are you not getting this? No once in a relationship the only thing that matters is assessing how they treat you. Lol. Like I'm not sure how you're missing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:08 PM
0

Yeah but in a relationship the only thing that matters is how someone treats you. That x group has y trait higher or lower on average really isn't germane to the point. DUCY
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:06 PM
1

You're the one trying to change my view ace.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:05 PM
-2

Um you have yet to point out a demand I made :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 05:05 PM
1

What matters in infidelity is level of commitment. Therefore, how someone treats you is all that matters, pookie. DUCY it does not matter whether a group of people on average cheats more or has x statistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:58 PM
-1

I posted an article with the link to the study. 'Google it' bro :) I didn't demand anything. I said that the concern about sexual pasts is primarily borne from a lack of experience which ultimately results in a lack of empathy. Oh boy. Corporate masters. I do declare...settle down, boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:54 PM
0

NO. it is NOT. Level of commitment = how someone treats you in a relationship. That is what matters. That is ALL THAT MATTERS. Not body count. Not anything else. Get it through your heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:49 PM
-5

I've already won the argument by showing that attention on the now and how someone treats you is pretty much what matters in assessing infidelity. *shrug*
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:46 PM
-2

That doesn't really matter, chief. Because I've shown that what and ALL THAT REALLY matters is HOW THEY TREAT YOU, not their body count. DUCY?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:45 PM
2

I am 22. lol. look man, I hate to DQ based on life experience, but I have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:42 PM
1

It's an instinctual adaptation to the specific cultural environment. No. Culture is learned. It's not 'instinctual.' Stop it. If it "boiled down" to that it would boil down consistently. Lol, it does boil down consistently. I responded to this: it's a good GENERAL RULE. 80% is still pocket Aces, chief. And I was even gracious enough to explain the remainder. Only women's double standards (richer partner, taller partner, stronger partner) are acceptable no they're fucking bullshit too. See! I thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:39 PM
1

not my experience at all, chief. high-n women usually can cum pretty easy and are extremely sensitive IME. sorry that happened to you. I've come across experienced women who have burned themselves out with weird shit...like overuse of toys and stuff. But those are weirdo outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:37 PM
1

Dude, a woman who was just with one guy for 10 years and meets you at 26 probably has a shit ton of baggage just like the girl who fucked idk 4-5 guys a year for 10 years. It really isn't about the sex partners, it's about their life choices. Like there's a difference between a woman who always uses protection for every single casual partner and a woman who just goes through a series of risky encounters.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:35 PM
1

Except that the relationship between sociosexuality and infidelity is mediated by commitment, so....whatevz. The evolutionary reason How can it be an "evolutionary reason" if infidelity is a socially constructed concept? https://media0.giphy.com/media/aZ3LDBs1ExsE8/giphy.gif What’s wrong with studies from brazil? Are they representative of the population we're talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:32 PM
2

Cool so then men don't get better as they age, right? That's the thing about analogies. Who's more used? A woman who has been passionately madly in love with 3 guys before you but only slept with 4, or woman who has slept with 30 guys but you're her first love? Like, you're just arbitrarily picking what constitutes 'used' without demonstrating WHY that quality = used.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:15 PM
2

Heck, even if a woman does have some guy she's quietly pining for, which does indeed happen, the pining is probably not because of the sex. https://media.tenor.com/images/039b76f457e474fccd92a26f5562393d/tenor.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:12 PM
1

"On the topic of what predicts sexual infidelity, the authors found that it was relational commitment, not sociosexuality. They found this effect to be true even among individuals who were sociosexually unrestricted." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/201907/important-factor-in-preventing-infidelity So I mean...whatever. There's plenty of bullshit to throw around.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:09 PM
1

While we're on the subject, though, such aversion is found to occur in cultures where men are expected to paternally invest in their children. So then it's cultural. Cool. I'm sure you can Google it just fine if you actually care to have your beliefs challenged. 'hey change my view' 'go google stuff' doesn't work like that, hoss. I'm just telling you your assertion in the OP isn't universally applicable. You're right. It's a general rule. The remainder of men would just be some flavor of weird d…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:06 PM
1

So a study from Brazil with a mean participant age of 24 y/o is what you're resting this on? If you put on your thinking cap, you'll realize that it isn't promiscuity itself...it's RISKY behavior and low impulse control. And let's stop with the bullshit. You didn't read some study and your gut didn't tell you it was 'bcuz UNFAITHFULNESS LOL.' You just have an aversion. An insecurity maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 04:02 PM
-3

Okay, sorry...I mean 'casually' dated. "That's what white people say to black people. It's what abusive parents say to their kids after they've moved out." Okay but you're the one who said women behave in a certain way and would be offended if the shoe was on the other foot. They aren't. Regardless of whether they 'should be offended by the past.' And no, I've met women who were late bloomers too. They tend to have the SAME attitude, even if they're slightly more insecure. They are focused on no…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:43 PM
5

People can resent others for a host of reasons, not just 'BILLY BADASS WUZ HOTTER THAN U LOL'
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:40 PM
1

Yeah, slick you assumed a premise in that statement that you have yet to support. Are you assuming all men have a genetic aversion to a female's sexual past? If so, please cite the research.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:37 PM
-1

Men always want the hot,nice , non slutty girl for serious relationships. except people tend to assortatively mate on this score, too. so no. I would venture to say that for most men the woman they marry is the one they loved the most. ok....you're not giving any good reason that this isn't also true of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:22 PM
-2

Have you actually dated a lot of women? Srs question. Women make peace with this shit way faster and better than men. I've had several women who were pretty hot perfectly content with being 'average' in their minds. Women tend to be very focused on NOW, not the past. They want to enjoy the moment with you and life together in the present. For a man who grew up in that situation, knowing those women only "want" him now because they had their fun with the men they genuinely desired and now just wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:18 PM
-1

the logic in this thread borders on retarded. 'everyone settles' and 'all divorces come from u not being as good as her exes!' like both are dumb. IIRC a survey of married women said that 48 percent of them MARRIED the best sex of their lives. So....if about half are already number 1 in the bedroom, it's not a far stretch to assume the other half place pretty highly too. so the comparison shit is kinda dumb because women are marrying lovers they think are 'sexy' or 'good.'
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:14 PM
4

based on WHAT exactly is this information? You know exactly why all divorces happen? gtfo " The most commonly reported major contributors to divorce were lack of commitment, infidelity, and conflict/arguing. The most common “final straw” reasons were infidelity, domestic violence, and substance use." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4012696/#:~:text=The%20most%20commonly%20reported%20major,domestic%20violence%2C%20and%20substance%20use. gee doesn't sound like 'women up resenting thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/20 03:07 PM
7

Ohhhh a 2 gets no casual sex. A 5 gets casual sex with 3s. Major diff. Sorry they're not models but yes its a huge diff.
/r/BlackPillScience25/07/20 06:33 AM
2

Ya see the cited study about superficial attractiveness then kthxbai
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 06:31 AM
1

Ok then you can read the actual studies that have shown height doesnt matter much for ltrs for body attractiveness or body count. Idgaf.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 05:17 AM
1

Nah it's what I said. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637716/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 03:19 AM
2

Dildo, human genetic variation is mostly contained within SSA and our ancestors were in the HG context. If it were genetic you'd find it there. We dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:35 AM
1

Ya except this instinctual attraction isn't universal....in the Hamzda hunter gatherer culture height doesnt matter literally AT ALL. Like start accepting the fact that you've been brainwashed too
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:11 AM
0

Shortcels are just ugly. I just cited a study and can cited several more showing height preferences are pretty weak and have not that much impact on your attractiveness or body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:09 AM
3

Not so fast. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546926/ Height preferences in reality turn out to be pretty weak There's another study that shows SWR explains 80% of the variance in body attractiveness while height explains....5%.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:07 AM
0

This isn't true. Good looking guys pretty much always have interest from women. This 5'5 MAYBE mixed dude I used to know always had chicks around who thought he was cute and some were like a head taller.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:04 AM
1

It's just an undisputed replicated finding in the literature. So ya I'm fine
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 01:01 AM
1

Like I said keep denying reality
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 12:47 AM
1

Every study on the subject. If you're gonna deny reality be my guest pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 12:45 AM
1

Um no its being a pussy because you're not going for something you want and need as a man
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 12:31 AM
1

Um. Yes there is incentive. Are you dumb? I just laid out the incentives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 10:21 PM
1

No. It's not a committed relationship until AFTER all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 08:29 PM
1

LMFAO meet someone have sex within first three or so dates hookup for awhile proceed to doing activities together proceed to dealing with one another's lives and building a real solid friendship that all takes awhile, partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 08:20 PM
2

You're confusing time to relationship with time to sex. And uh...if they're interested they WILL wait. wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 08:19 PM
3

exactly. you have to see how people are when they are at their worst and you are down too. can they stick it out and persevere or do they withdraw or take everything out on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 08:18 PM
3

(1) guys without much RELATIONSHIP or other experience (2) guys who don't realize why their relationships have always been fucked. those are the two explanations for why the above sensible good view is the minority view.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 08:17 PM
2

People can lie in 10 minutes to every question you ask you $R#@%$#@%$#@%#$!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 06:12 PM
4

LOL OK 'love at first sight' disney fairytale princess. anyone who 'knows' they want to jump in with someone right off the bat is desperate. full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 05:42 PM
0

(1) Okay, what's wrong with that anyway? Women are still very fertile until like 40. (2) Most women don't even do the CC thing TRP greatly fears. (3) And no, I mean that women as a whole, even the higher impulse ones, will curb their appetites because they want a more long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 05:17 PM
3

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 05:00 PM
1

Um. 3x more sexless men than women? No. It's more like 30% young men vs. 20% young women. And um... It's safe to say dating apps and social media benefited women and the top 20% men the most. that's a hypothesis that doesn't have a lot supporting it. only 4% of men have more than 5 sexual partners in a year. and that number is stable over the last 20 years. so... ...the ratio of sex to the 'top' men is probably about the same or within a few percentage points. Will something like this happen for…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:54 PM
2

this is the most sensible answer on the thread so far. it takes time to really get to know someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:29 PM
20

LMFAO this is the dumbest comment on the thread so far. You can only get to know someone through iterated interactions over a fairly long period of time. wtf. 10 minutes. gtfo with that dangerous advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:28 PM
5

I never sleep with a woman I wouldn't CONSIDER having a relationship with. I used to not do that, but as I get older, I realize that that isn't cool to be able to DQ someone right off the bat because they fail to meet my physical standards. So right off the bat, if a woman is fat and the man is thin she's probably DQ'd from relationship status. In the 'hooking up' stage I'm looking to see if the person I'm with is a complete fucktard or not. (1) are they a flake and/or insane (think some weird n…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:27 PM
1

Nah man. IRL is where it's at.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 02:39 PM
1

All you can do is be yourself right now. You can change yourself into whoever you want to be. Represent yourself honestly at all times.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 02:36 PM
2

If a man has awesome sex (common) Okay, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:48 PM
5

I don't feel lied to at all. The bluepill is probably 80-90% correct. "Just be yourself." Correct. "Yourself" is largely UP TO YOU. Who do YOU want to be. "There's someone out there for YOU." There is. Whether or not you want them is on you. If you want a different type, become that type. "It's all about confidence." You DO have to put yourself out there and deal with rejection as a man. "No one's perfect, find someone who treats you well." Forgive people's faults if they forgive your faults and…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:44 PM
7

A 5 can have casual with 3's and get a 5 gf. That's a massive improvement.
/r/BlackPillScience23/07/20 03:07 PM
1

I'd say people can go up about 3 points on the hardcore LMS scale, provided they're fat to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 03:04 PM
0

Look no further than Japan.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 03:03 PM
3

There's probably 2 psl from 30-12 and then another 1 psl from 12-8/7 (bb/model bf)
/r/BlackPillScience23/07/20 12:36 AM
12

Google Jared Leto fat transformation and be amazed
/r/BlackPillScience23/07/20 12:33 AM
11

A review further supporting the strong link between facial adiposity and attractiveness: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6308207/
/r/BlackPillScience22/07/20 08:15 PM
5

Goddammit. Non-sequitur = NOT EVEN WRONG. It's not 'you're wrong I disagree.' And literally the reasoning behind 'muh n-count' boils down to 'she's been with better so she'll leave me for better' which is a fear of comparison. Holy shit TRPers can be daft.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:30 PM
1

You don't lose much more than you gain if you get divorced. You're about as happy as the never married: https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/nick1a-1-w640.png
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:26 PM
1

I'm a child of divorce too...and...? All I hear are sob stories and FEAR. Fine. Be scared.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:25 PM
1

Okay...by 8's? I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:24 PM
1

The point he didnt back up with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:44 AM
1

No, dildo the 6 CANNOT get an 8 :with ease: that's why 6's put out quick for an 8 like wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 09:48 PM
1

Women only like aka match with a vanishingly small percentage of profiles. Those dudes have tons of options shes not the only 6 who matched with that dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 09:15 PM
0

translation: b-b-b-ut wh-w-w-hat if it doesn't work out?! yes, divorce sucks and is hard on people. This boils down to 'if you pull this thing off you will have a much happier life. It's a risk and if it doesn't work out it will suck.' You are afraid of the risk. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 08:54 PM
1

Lol an 8 can bang a 6 in pretty much the same amount of time as a 4. Liike.....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 08:48 PM
-1

"Both men and women benefit from marriage, but men seem to benefit more overall. In addition to being happier and healthier than bachelors, married men earn more money and live longer. And men can reap such benefits even from mediocre marriages, while for women, the benefits of marriage are more strongly linked to marital quality." https://ifstudies.org/blog/why-men-resist-marriage-even-though-they-benefit-the-most-from-it/#:~:text=Both%20men%20and%20women%20benefit,more%20money%20and%20live%20l…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:27 PM
0

There's no real reward for going into shark infested waters. Analogy = retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 06:21 PM
2

You obviously don't understand the concept of 'better options with SAME investment'
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 05:28 PM
-2

Um, all marriages don't end in divorce and all marriages aren't miserable. Man up and play to win. Take a risk. Sorry life is about taking risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:55 PM
3

The 6-7's are also 'easy' for him....again no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:54 PM
0

Yeah hohkay marriage started with the boomers. Go against history go against your health. I dont give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:07 PM
1

They are single, dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:07 PM
-6

Not really . A mountain of research supports the benefits of finding a healthy marriage. Solid evidence. Human needs dont go away because you're afraid of failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 03:48 PM
-2

No I didn't minimize no fault marriage. Yup, it's a risk. And? Big boys play big games. Stop being a pussy. A good high quality MARRIAGE has proven health benefits for men. You lead a better life. So miss me with waah boohoo i'm scurred nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 03:02 PM
5

Neither MGTOW or TRP have much utility for men. Men all want to be loved, desired, and respected. The men who have this in abundance can afford to be careless with the love and attention they receive. The men who do not, cannot. MGTOW denies that men NEED this. TRP denies it too. A 'beta' male can have a HAPPY GOOD marriage to someone who LOVES him. It's possible. Not all marriages end in divorce and not all marriages are miserable. The highest utility advice for most men is correct advice on ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 02:46 PM
8

This. incels/lookists way overstate the SMP differentials. A male 8 has tons of options in the 6-7 range...it makes literally no sense for him to go off and fuck a 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 02:38 PM
1

TRP needs to decide what pseudoscience it's spouting. If women pursue a dual mating strategy, then nature actively encourages women to slut it up. If 'muh society' is the reason women slut it up, then TRP isn't following biology and instead has to admit that it is part of the problem it is so angry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/20 03:13 AM
1

Yes, and that is the prime example of a not free market with heavy government intervention and market distortion. And certain 'partners' have unfair advantages brought on by the equivalent of government intervention. Media depictions of certain phenotypes in a positive light versus others in a negative light, etc. etc. Not 60 years ago a brown person and white person couldn't even get legally married. The market is way distorted and with the way it's set up, unequal bargaining power is unfairly …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 08:09 PM
1

no i don't need to provide citations when you brought the claim. apparently you're not smart enough to understand why citing a study about plant seeds, without more, is insufficient to demonstrate anything about human beings, a species that is in an entirely different fucking kingdom.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 08:04 PM
1

those guys aren't chads, and the women who 'bend over backwards' are fat, old, ugly, and rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 07:49 PM
1

This assumes the market is free of distortion. Hint: whenever you see oligopoly in a market, that likely isn't the natural/free state of affairs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 07:48 PM
4

In no universe is a male >5-6 hooking up with a 3. Remember the 2 point iron law.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 07:44 PM
1

yeah seeds != people so who gives a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 07:41 PM
2

k well then how bout this: variance in sociosexuality (willingness to sleep around in men and women) is mostly genetic ---> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10743879 if the variance in a populous is mostly genetic, that suggests selection hasn't acted much, if at all, on the phenotype because selection REMOVES genetic variance. so he's technically right: nature doesn't seem to give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 06:30 PM
5

Lol... look ma, a long just-so story masquerading as science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_at_Dawn is a counter-thesis to the above. and women DO judge men for being players, wtf planet are you on? Studies show that BOTH SEXES ARE JUDGED NEGATIVELY for promisicuity: " Thus, contrary to the idea that male promiscuity is tolerated but female promiscuity is not, both sexes expressed equal reluctance to get involved with someone with an overly extensive sexual history." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/20 06:26 PM
2

Um.... And gentlemen, if a girl isnt 100% head over heels for you, next her. Never be with a woman that's not crazy for you. is common sense. TRP encourages guys to approach women and deploy a bunch of tactics designed to 'build attraction,' which is the dumbest shit that I've ever heard of in the context of short-term relationships. TRP will not help you for relationships --- either short term or long. It's really simple: what you can get in the short term is pretty much all about your looks. w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 06:45 PM
1

Chad is relative. A male 6 is a 'Chad' to a female 4. A male 9 is a 'normal' to a female 9. So no, because it's a relative quality, the entire idea that 'chad' can't be locked down is silly... maybe it's unlikely for a guy who is 'Chad' to someone to be locked down by that someone because, for him to be 'Chad' to that someone...he has to be much higher value than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 04:20 PM
1

so rather than pursue your actual looksmatch, you'd rather score the cool life of banging chicks who are uglier than you and lower value. #1 sounds cool until you're honest about what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:56 PM
3

So avoid committed relationships of all types. Have fun scoring casual sex with chicks at least -1 your looks level for eternity, brah.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:54 PM
2

Sexual attraction yes, but 'would I want to be seen with her' attraction ----- definitely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:54 PM
2

lol it doesn't matter what you do. if you're going for the hottest girl you can gf up, then your gf will necessarily have been some other better guy's 'slut,' unless you are literally the tip of the top LMS, which is beyond 99.9% of the male populace's reach. It's not a matter of if it happens...it's when.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:52 PM
1

Can you start citing some evidence (NOT just-so evopsych stories) for the reason women 'can't' and 'don't' enjoy diversity? If anything you're wrong by research because women disagree with one another about the attractiveness of members of the opposite sex than men do. In fact, this is likely the reason men come out with lower average ratings than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:50 PM
2

Where did you say anything about female reputations in that post? You're just assuming that because men are sexually attracted to a large cross-section of women this necessarily means their 'would fuck' standards are LTR standards. They aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:48 PM
2

With regard to sex men lose with regard to love women lose. Everyone loses!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 07:13 PM
2

Read the op
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 07:11 PM
0

Most women pass the boner test but not the "I'll be proud to be seen with her" test. The second one is for LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 07:10 PM
2

Yeah that's pretty much impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 06:46 PM
1

IME being good with women takes more than basic social skills. I guess we can agree to disagree. (1) be as good looking as possible (2) hit on women within your league (3) basic social skills = success IMO. This is why PUA is a thing. PUA is a thing for the same reason magic beans were a 'thing' to Jack --- it's a fantasy sold to people that honestly doesn't have much supporting it scientifically. So why doesn't this trigger your "vanishingly small population" filter? I'm agnostic as to the will…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 05:10 PM
1

dude the guy weighs like 150 pounds at what 6-6'2? it's gonna take more than a leather jacket and tattoo to change his look.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:10 PM
1

I'd say that with regard to women, men are in much more agreement. Women diverge in their tastes on men, and their ratings tend to diverge more and more the higher a man's overall attractiveness rating is --- which IMO is why men are almost universally rated lower than women on average. The hottest guys get ratings that are often miles behind the hottest girls. Someone please explain this thru the lens of Tinder experiments and universal Chad theory, or if I'm misinterpreting and oversimplifying…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:08 PM
1

good thing confidence makes no difference wrt short term mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:06 PM
2

he only got 'rejected' after getting blown. so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:05 PM
0

exceptions prove the rule
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:05 PM
1

There's no such thing as a 'genetic' Chad. Both personality and facial attractiveness aren't particularly heritable (.4-.6 range).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:04 PM
1

boys that are good at talking to women, but could care less about "chasing" them. Vanishingly small category. boys that care a lot about chasing women but aren't very good at talking to them (I was this one.) There is no 'good at talking to women' past basic social skills. What you saw were boys who didn't know their league. model tier looks but high RMP standards. Has a lot of opportunities with women but none of them are "the one" so has high N count. Fourth option: would like to sleep around …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 04:04 PM
1

I'd say the only real difference is in extroversion/introversion (the 'game' stuff is irrelevant for STR, as I've pointed out, backed by cites, several times). Ceteris paribus an extroverted man of equal attractiveness as an introverted man will have more success. Neither would struggle much more relative to the other, one would just reap more of the returns available to both. Personality maximizes potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:58 PM
1

(1) No. Never. Why? (2) I never put that kind of effort in. Why? (3) Fuck yes or bust. Don't waste your time. Plus, if she's difficult now, just wait until later. That's another weird thing about 'TRP.' If you had to wear her down to begin with, can you be that surprised that she's holding out for something better? Stay in your lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 03:56 PM
1

I said to the exclusion of almost everything else. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 06:31 PM
1

Yeah what a great example...Mick Jagger, celebrity, the ultimate example of 'x other factor WORKING OVER TIME,' i.e. EXPOSURE.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 04:30 PM
1

Lmfao have you even been in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 02:43 AM
3

Wide arousal windows not wide relationship windows, so....
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 01:02 AM
7

nah nice try. the method used to determine inter-rater agreement isn't the best way to do so: " Most studies report a high Cronbach’s α to show high agreement between raters. This, however, is not necessarily the best way of measuring agreement, or even the correct use of Cronbach’s α. Here, we will first review evidence for inter-rater agreement in first impressions across age, race, and culture. We will then discuss the most widely-used measure of agreement in the social literature, Cronbach’s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:43 PM
0

yes that's true. that's the only good scientific advice TRP gives.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:19 PM
8

' If a woman spent her last 10-15 years having ONS and dating certain types of men - hot, mysterious, dangerous, players, etc - then she hits the 30s and marries a kind of man whom she never was attracted before. How can you believe in genuine attraction towards her husband? ' If a man spent his last 10-15 having ONS and dating certain types of women --- hot/cold, attention whores, slutty, wild --- then he hits his 30s and marries a kind of woman to whom he was never attracted before...how can y…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:14 PM
2

That would entail TRP being macho. It isn't. It's outcome dependent and unscientific.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:12 PM
1

that in no way states that physical attractiveness doesn't differ between women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:07 PM
7

Nah studies point toward the opposite by a thin margin: http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2815%2901019-2 studies further show that the reason why men on average get lower attractiveness ratings than women is because women disagree far more on male attractiveness (they agree on ugly though)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 08:04 PM
1

Sure all abuse victims male and female are just cowards for fearing their abusers. I guess only the pussies go to war and get PTSD too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 06:58 AM
1

We got an alfa immune to PTSD badass over here guys
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 03:47 AM
1

https://media1.giphy.com/media/YzvPqrOVoS9tC/source.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:19 PM
1

Lol Go join a club you really like. Become friends with the leader of that club, who has 100 pounds of mass on you and is nearly a foot taller. He beats the shit out of you just for fun or to 'toughen you up' and tells you that if you tell anyone or leave the club, he and his friends will find you and fucking kill you. If you say you wouldn't remain at the club, you're a liar. Every guy is an alfabadass until life shows them that ya...ya ain't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:08 PM
1

idk...for some reason i doubt you'd care if a guy was first in his class or got a top 2% education or whatever else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:06 PM
1

She meant eloquence, not nerd glossolalia.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:05 PM
3

lmfao... made me think of https://media1.tenor.com/images/5cde24ad4671926a25456d46b3bfe3c1/tenor.gif?itemid=5132150
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 11:04 PM
1

I've already done so in the OP and several times in this thread. Go read if you want to learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:07 PM
1

Actually no, what I'm saying allows for objective attractive qualities. Please try reading the OP before arguing with yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 06:49 PM
1

If both people really like each other to start with it doesn't matter. So, if anything, confessions of feelings are great because they reveal where each party is at concerning the other. It's not about man vs. woman it's about 'do these kids dig one another or not?'
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:44 PM
1

That study supports what I'm saying, dude...about beauty largely being in the eye of the beholder. Read my OP, I never argued there was zero biological basis for beauty or that anything objective about beauty didn't exist. Just that it plays less of a role than personal preference, which your study self-evidently shows. No male in that study reached nearly as a high as a woman vis a vis attractiveness. Lol, and it looks like the more attractive men got a huge amount of disagreement in their rati…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:00 PM
1

As a matter of fact men tend to say it first: https://www.elitedaily.com/p/men-say-i-love-you-first-more-often-than-women-heres-why-8563363 women fall in love slower than men but when they fall in love it's with a lot more permanence than men, despite TRP's bleating to the contrary. women (high N low N whatever) pair bond very strongly but it actually takes them a bit. once you get 'em though, ugh...hard to get 'em off ya. men kinda move in and out of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:31 PM
1

Everyone finds it difficult to blame themselves for things. Personal accountability is the hallmark of good character. To be special it should be reasonably be obvious that it's an achievement of sorts that isn't easy to reach. TRP is laudable in this respect in that it offers men some path (however wrong or unscientific) to empower themselves via accountability. The black pill, while also wrong and unscientific, fails to do this, which makes it worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 04:28 PM
0

Cool so then being kind to a woman is sexy according to TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:27 AM
2

How do they even know it rather than something else...like lifting, or different target selection...is working? Occams razor suggests simpler things like the above explain these alleged results than complicated gobbledygook about female behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 07:23 AM
0

Lol all of that was already addressed...all of that can only be demonstrated over time taking it out of the STR meet and lay model.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:48 AM
1

Logic is repugnant to the irrational, so I'm not surprised
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:46 AM
4

Um the entire manosphere prides itself on being about how things really are, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:43 AM
1

Lol so now the entire support system for AF/BB is an insignificant detail? I don't have to present a worldview btw. The OP is just asking where TRP is as a matter of science. Stay on point, dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 03:11 AM
1

And the kiddo takes his toys and goes home after adding nothing to the sandbox. Good riddance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 03:09 AM
1

My view has already been stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:39 AM
2

Wow. You can't even. Get to citing or get away dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:38 AM
1

What you wrote is that you have nothing to offer this discussion but you still want to say something so you'll lob a half hearted cliche "critique" of the whole discussion. Like I said. You can't back yourself up and think you're above doing so....so leave then.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:37 AM
1

Yeah bro your individual sample size and an aggregate of angry men who were screwed over by women is a representative sample for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:25 AM
2

I'm disputing the entire dual mating strategy. No evidence for good Gene's hypothesis. No evidence for ovulatory shift. This = no evidence for dual mating strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:24 AM
2

"DO this or you'll he a cuck oh nooooo!" Argument from bad consequences. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:18 AM
2

The entire theory of AF/BB boils down to dual mating strategy and good Genes hypothesis so.....
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:14 AM
-1

Everyone knows exceptions dont disprove the rule too. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:11 AM
2

Yup. Have to convince someone to "give you a shot" within 10 or 15 minutes....seems like the typical interaction at a club or bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:09 AM
2

Cool then most of what TRP cites is subject to that criticism too. You're not saying anything original beyond "lol social science is way less rigorous." And cool you can't be bothered to back yourself up with cites. So kindly butt out then
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 02:08 AM
2

K well the speed dating studies seem to show that non physical stuff doesn't matter that much in "not that much time"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 11:40 PM
2

Um nope never said that. I said what mattered for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 11:39 PM
2

Well I mean, if you want to make that broad of a statement, genetics must play some role in masculinity --- see the Y chromosome for example! It's just meaningless without specificity. And the 'good genes' hypothesis is specific --- it refers to immunocompetence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 11:10 PM
2

Well.... ...personality can only be demonstrated over time anyway, so yes time is the necessary ingredient. And yes, in that study it says that length of time knowing each other is what reduced the correlation. No it's not black pill. TBP overvalues certain features based on bad science.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 11:09 PM
5

What's non-sequitur about it. The universality of a male 'casual sex' idea just isn't there. ' There isn't support for masculine faces representing good genes. There isn't support for a dual mating strategy anymore. (If anything there is a general CULTURAL preference for 'so-called' masculine faces and it doesn't change during ovulation. It's just always kinda there. And it hardly applies to all women or even most). There's only support for a) looks are what mainly matter and b) lifting helps yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 11:03 PM
2

Yeah another study I posted showed the relevance of game ---> if you know her for a long time, your 'personality' matters. Good talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:56 PM
6

lmfao. 'BUT THEN WHY DO WEIRD BAD THINGS HAPPEN IN THE WORLD SOMETIMES?' that's called an argument from ignorance kiddo. no sale.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:56 PM
3

cool find me some.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:55 PM
2

AF/BB != STR? LMFAO. alfas are supposed to capitalize on short-term mating opportunities cuz muh good genes and have a lot of them. like lol. it's nice that you admit you don't care what the reason is. just the bare assertion of what you think it is, tho. This isn't really blue pill Yeah it pretty much is -> masculinity != good genes ---> low bodyfat = more effect on attractiveness than masculinity. another victory for 'hey get fit man.' They've studied STRENGTH and the effect was linear Yeah I …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:55 PM
3

Um. How is speed dating not a short-term context? It's 3 to 8 minutes of interaction, and after that interaction, someone just says 'yeah that guy is my type' 'i like that guy.' Lol. That's as close to real life IN PERSON POOAH as it gets, holmes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:52 PM
6

Nice try. Once you control for physical attractiveness the effect pretty much cancels to zero. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1025894203368
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:51 PM
3

pretty much
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:50 PM
9

Lol, then why does TRP pride itself on being 'well this is just how the world ACTUALLY WORKS' bro, not like that FALSE WORLDVIEW of the blue pill. Now it's 'who cares if it's based in science or not?' LOL...THE ENTIRE MEANING BEHIND THE RED PILL DENOTES OBJECTIVE TRUTH GUYS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:49 PM
7

Cite some, hoss.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:49 PM
4

Oh ok so it's a religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:49 PM
2

You can not dismiss that Gene's play a role in stronger men with an article about the attractiveness of the face. It's not about attractiveness of the face. The study tested the theory that high T i.e. masculine faces signaled good genes via high immune competence. That was shown to be false. Selection bias in mating has an effect across evolutionary time scales, sure. We aren't really dealing with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 10:48 PM
5

Yeah dude, Richard "I invented PUA in my spare time" Feynman was such a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 09:03 PM
4

Please list which of my sources were in discredited peer review journals.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 09:01 PM
3

Yeah if by captain america you mean this type: https://youtu.be/WrjYXmZ6ZbU Lol the noble alpha. Trp fetishizes dickheads and bleats about the amorality of things. And pretty much all of it is contradicted by science anyway so who cares. Net negative.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/20 06:33 PM
1

That's a nice story. Where's the hard evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 05:09 AM
4

Because the burden of proof is on TRPers to put forward good reasons all these women are dating guys they aren't attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 05:05 AM
1

Lol you see nothing, boyo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 05:03 AM
5

This is the funniest Michael Scott level OP
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 05:00 AM
2

Lmfao it's so funny the lack of self awareness
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 04:58 AM
1

Bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 04:57 AM
2

Lol dude this is going to happen or has already happened to you. You're going to fall in wuuuv with someone else's "slut."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 04:55 AM
1

Yes, generally I'd agree that moves toward 'equality' and the aforementioned movements do tend more toward stability and the fact that those movements arose during times when society was becoming increasingly unstable sort of cements the point. It's not a blue pilled argument...it's just sort of an evidence-backed observation. And I don't really care if it is blue-pilled. I'm not affiliated with the red pill and think TRP is dumb so lol. The OP didn't suggest a solution afaik. It's just that ine…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 11:36 PM
1

This evolutionary trope is stupid in the context of civilized society...where we control what it means to be fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 04:07 AM
1

He's actually a genius...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 04:05 AM
3

Typically a move toward inequality of any kind tends to destabilize a society and any move toward more equality (yes in result) tends toward more stability. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hormones-and-the-brain/201811/the-scandal-inequality-and-its-effect-mental-health%3famp And it is well known that social inequalities like this discussed also show a sharp correlation with mental health outcomes: https://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/gulbenkian_paper_socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 04:02 AM
1

I think as a general rule they're all kinda shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 10:33 PM
2

Says someone who is also posting on Reddit. Loll.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 09:17 PM
2

it's not pushing different standards for different people. if two people run a race and one has to run with weights around his ankles, it simply is not fair to judge the race as simply who ran fastest as as matter of speed. You'd have to introduce some kind of handicape to account for the weights... the standards are already different, affirmative action attempts to make the standard apply equally. whether it does this is another story altogether, but the principles behind it are sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 07:03 PM
14

okay, some of those people are men and some are women, neither has more of a tendency to be decent than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 07:00 PM
18

ding ding ding ding! like, i've always laughed at this whole line of thinking. if you're with someone and they get your rocks off and you're crazy about each other WHO GIVES A SHIT
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 05:20 PM
10

LOL caring about N count is a sign of WEAKNESS AND INSECURITY high value men are not those things, so they don't tend to care. they aren't worried about what some other guy has done or hasn't done to his chick because in their mind they are the shit and are better anyway. it's so obvious that the N count stuff is par for the 'beta masquerading as alpha' dance that is TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 05:17 PM
30

All people are like this. What a silly post.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 05:15 PM
2

No, it isn't. Open your eyes and look around. Most men don't get better with age. They get fat, out of shape, and stagnate in their careers. The best bet is just to (1) start working on yourself and (2) evaluate yourself honestly and adjust your relationship/sexual goals accordingly. if you're the type of guy who can't get laid outside of a relationship, then you need to be in a relationship to have sex. it's okay, it won't be like that forever, but you need to do what you have to do. Just don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 05:14 PM
1

That's not even the title of the post nor the point of it. But nice years old post snipe. Explains a lot about you. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 04:16 PM
1

WRONG! First, the degree to which height is genetically "determined" is unknown. Variation due to genetic variation != genetically determined. Second, there are obviously several genotypes in existence that code for all sufficient developmental traits at differing heights which would allow differing heights to be subject to selection pressure. You're still wrong. Go read my source again...you aren't saved by the fact that the trait is complex. Try again, junior.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:48 AM
1

You're confused about how to read: " if most of the variation in a phenotype within a population is DUE to genetic variation" = measure of the amount of variation in a trait which is explained by genetic variation among individuals. You don't seem to get that adaptations, i.e. traits under heavy or strong selective pressure, tend to show ZERO heritability. " In general, traits that are not under selection can have substantial heritable components, because if they were under positive or negative …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 10:26 PM
0

You don't seem to understand that regardless of the type of selection, genetic variance decreases with it. Not only that, but if you actually reference the studies they're referring to the reproductive advantage is slight. Combine that with several studies showing that in reality height simply doesn't play as much of a role in mate selection as rote cultural blah blah would have you believe..(cites available) Keep going though, boyo. This is funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 09:30 PM
0

Stop projecting kiddo. Feel free to point out what's wrong with it if you want to get embarrassed
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 08:16 PM
1

Yes it does if you understand evolutionary processes. Pop quiz... At t1 100% of the variation of P is genetic. Selection acts on the population such that only one genotype can thrive. Will heritability increase or decrease at t2?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 08:07 PM
0

that you said what lets me know you know nothing about evolution. heritability is a measure of genetic VARIATION. if most of the variation in a phenotype within a population is DUE to genetic variation, then selection, which REMOVES genetic variance, is not acting much on the trait. ex: the variation in the number of eyes someone has within a population is almost 100% environmental (i.e. people have been injured or random accident) and almost 0% genetic, implying that genes which coded for less …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 06:29 PM
2

yeah it's called nutrition and first world living. christ, the dumbdumbosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 06:28 PM
1

Yeah slick that isn't evidence that's just you saying things. Height has a high heritability which indicates low selective pressure.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 07:57 AM
2

Wow someone who didn't talk out of their ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:07 AM
-1

Height is highly heritable which means that it was subject to almost no selective pressure....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:06 AM
1

This post is people talking out of their ass about biology. Height is highly heritable which is evidence of weak or no selection pressure on the phenotype.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:05 AM
2

Lmfao there's studies that show the height preference isn't universal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:02 AM
1

Please cite specific biological non just so story evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:02 AM
0

There's no evolutionary evidence that height was subject to any strong sexual selection...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:01 AM
1

Found the evotard
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 04:01 AM
0

No real evidence for any biological root in this case tho
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/20 03:59 AM
1

Damn. Maybe a little higher than a 6 then for not being fat
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/20 12:53 AM
1

Nah its because money and power are sexy. Deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 07:26 PM
2

Ya women say a lot of shit bro. Studies show they cum harder for rich dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 05:51 PM
2

I like how guys never want to consider the possibility that maybe they aren't at the level they think they are... ...rather than women getting with much better looking dudes. A non fat woman in America is an auto 6. Top 33%
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:59 PM
1

Maybe it's because money and power are sexy. Deal with it
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:56 PM
2

Jesus christ yes. Finally...real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 04:00 AM
3

...except studies showing more orgasms with rich dudes
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 03:55 AM
3

Lmfao Yet study after study shows that women cum harder controlling for all else....the richer dude. And lol....if you don't think money and power make chicks hot you really just haven't seen them in action.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 03:53 AM
1

You mean like the studies showing just that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 03:51 AM
16

Sure bro. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/20 03:49 AM
4

It didn't say clavicle to pelvis ratio. Case dismissed. Just for fun: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/29237852/ /served
/r/BlackPillScience21/02/20 01:05 AM
23

lol read the study " The shoulder-to-hip ratio, however, accounted for a much larger proportion of variance in attractiveness in our model (79.6%). " " Our study found no significant difference in the proportion of variance accounted for in our model by penis size and height (6.1% vs. 5.1%), " So lol height and dick size are almost irrelevant vs. muscles. coolstory
/r/BlackPillScience20/02/20 05:20 PM
2

Untrue. https://phys.org/news/2017-12-upper-body-strength-key-factor.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/20 08:03 PM
3

lol the amount of dudes who casually rape would fucking shock you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 06:02 PM
2

'not short' 'not too ugly' 'at least average dick' 'decent car' 'decent place' ....
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/20 04:35 AM
1

Hero response
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 01:56 AM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-attraction-doctor/201105/is-your-personality-making-you-more-or-less-physically-attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 06:57 PM
1

Loll wow old personals adds. Gtfo
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 05:47 PM
0

you miss that the causation and effect work in both directions, as shown by several studies
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 01:25 AM
1

please cite.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/20 01:24 AM
0

science also says the halo effect WORKS BOTH WAYS, DOUCHE. being charismatic and having a good personality MAKES SOMEONE MORE PHYSICALLY (NOT A TYPO) ATTRACTIVE. whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:17 PM
1

They won't understand that Prince became a rock star BECAUSE he was charismatic and just did whatever he wanted ​ EXACTLY. these dudes get famous BECAUSE they are sexy, they don't become sexy because they are famous. no one thinks people like andy dick are sexy because andy dick isn't sexy but he's pretty famous. there many famous guys who aren't considered sexy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:16 PM
0

dude multiple studies have disproven this canard. if you can't get laid, you're UGLY IN THE FACE and probably UGLY IN THE BODY. I have SEEN WITH MY OWN EYES, short men who slay.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:15 PM
0

Multiple studies huh? what about https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3546926/ (not a big effect), https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1474704915604563 (not much variation in sex partners across height), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558040/ (SWR accounting for 80% in variation of attractiveness, with ~5% accounted for by height), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29237852 (upper body strength accounting for 70% of bodily attractiveness) tl;dr multiple studies …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:13 PM
2

not a woman but have had a ton of casual encounters looks = threshold effect. once you reach it they don't matter that much; how she feels, what she wants, and how you make her feel with your persona are dominant. and tbh the main personality trait is being easygoing and non-judgmental and making HER FEEL COMFORTABLE. for LTRs there's two paths 1: if the LTR proceeds hot and heavy very quickly then it's the product of high physical attraction mixed with common interests/personality 2: if the LTR…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:08 PM
1

looks were far more important to me for LTR and falling in love than for sex this seems to be true in my experience. casual sex is more about a threshold, binary thing wrt looks in that they are super important until they aren't. LTRs that come on strong seem to be strongly about high high physical attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/20 10:05 PM
1

The Matrix = Marxism 101. True reality --- most people in society are slaves to a dominant class False reality --- ideology and false consciousness (think things like a '9-5 job' and other concepts like 'bootstraps,' etc.) that make true reality easier to accept. Pretty straightforward.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 11:01 PM
1

which is hilarious because all the concepts of 'game' have been around for at least many centuries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_the_Courtier
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 10:59 PM
1

The terms 'red pill' and 'blue pill' and how they represent a false worldview vs a true worldview. Given that the Matrix is a fundamentally Marxist movie --- that's where the similarities end.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 10:58 PM
1

Which pretty much all had methodical flaws invalidating them per a 2014 meta analysis....
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 08:05 PM
1

So.....this study cuts against the two main tenets of the dms and you're saying it is not a huge blow...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 09:30 AM
1

The increase in desire for extra pair copulation was dwarfed by the increased desire for in partner copulation....so no, the dual mating hypothesis would require the former not the latter
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 02:48 AM
1

Also: "According to the dual sexuality argument, the extent to which the primary partner lacks phenotypic indicators of gene quality moderates the strength of women’s extrapair sexual desire" That's a big part of the dual mating argument...and no evidence of this was found. So you writing it off strikes me as handwaving
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 08:03 PM
1

If you've read them all and don't see the hypothesis as in trouble it's more a question of personal bias in either direction, then
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 08:01 PM
1

Here's a new one: https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/29/1/51/4496683
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/19 02:42 PM
1

The dual mating hypothesis has suffered several heavy salvos as of late with several meta-analysis finding no significant difference in what women are attracted to during different phases of their cycles. TRP is not based on science....which is why I laugh when they say 'we're just reporting how the world works.' No you aren't, jabronis. looks are the main determinant of STM. behavior only matters after repeated interactions over a long period of time. so TRP's behavior this and that only works …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 09:19 PM
1

I'd wager most single dudes are mostly overweight/obese as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 09:16 PM
2

That's about the only good advice trp offers though. If you look good most of the behavior sorts itself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:23 PM
2

Then you're in a self selected group. Most dudes are fat
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:23 PM
3

Then the average age difference would be higher in couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:22 PM
2

This is correct except the kids part.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/19 07:21 PM
0

Oh look more just so stories...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/19 11:58 PM
1

Thanks for agreeing with me about you being incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 11:01 PM
2

For rapists maybe
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 12:33 AM
1

"People here often mistake jealousy for a rational stance which can be "debated" as such. It isn't, and can't. It's much more like physical attraction, kinks, or other things having to do with the experience of sexuality. Innate, involuntary, and no less overpowering for being so." Dumb out of the gate. All of those "innate" feelings according to the best evidence are highly plastic and molded by cultural norms
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 12:32 AM
1

Oh look ma a bunch of just so jive talk masquerading as evolutionary theory
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 12:31 AM
1

Race.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/19 12:28 AM
2

yup. feel free to argue with the study, though. i'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:36 PM
2

lol@ thinking Kings don't 'work.' wtf are you smoking. does the President of the U.S, not work, either? and yes, Emperors and Kings have historically given peasants 'free stuff.' go look up the phrase 'bread and circuses.'
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:35 PM
2

ok, and? that doesn't mean the aforementioned qualities are unattracive or that they aren't attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:24 PM
1

Thank you. This is truth. The bottom line is that a super hot guy isn't slumming it with some chubby plainface because he has too many hotter options to pick from
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:23 PM
1

guys underestimate how much of this is just the girl and not much the guy at all. a girl gets horny and just finds some 'this'll do' guy and that's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:21 PM
2

NEXT
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:19 PM
2

this is fucking stupid. you're confusing cad for alpha. the King provides for his people --- that's WHY he's a King. do you think Kings just provide nothing and people follow them. go read a history book. read how William the Conqueror actually came to rule England successfully after invading.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:18 PM
-1

yes they fucking are. https://www.nhs.uk/news/lifestyle-and-exercise/sex-with-funny-rich-men-linked-with-more-orgasms/ you have to be smart to be funny, fyi.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:16 PM
1

i never got more chasing from women as when I got my shit handled in life. moreso than when the fruits of me lifting and taking care of my style.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:13 PM
1

this is bullshit. several studies show that women orgasm more frequently when all other variables are controlled for high income men. deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:12 PM
1

Having money = alpha People have this idea that cad = alpha, which I don't know why that's the case. A guy who brings home the bread, can afford to do so, and is living his life like he wants (wants a family etc.) is an alpha. The only requirement to being alpha IMO is just doing whatever the fuck you want and going after whatever it is in this life that you want and saying fuck you to everyone else. it's super beta to define alpha as external markers of anything. that's an outcome dependent way…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/19 09:12 PM
2

Yeah it happens rarely. 2 points is the spread.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 01:35 AM
2

Ok the 2 point spread applies. Your chick was likely passed around by men better than you, too. So who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 01:34 AM
2

In girly man world maybe. Women value themselves based on validation for their attractiveness. So you are saying that living like a woman is the path of a real man. Lol Boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:17 PM
1

I agree with you. I think that women who are into nsa most often do it with men they know they have a low chance of catching any feelings for....whatever the female equivalent of a fat chick would be to a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:07 PM
2

Dude if you're banging unattractive women you are NOT Chad. Full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:05 PM
1

Since you were promiscuous in your past would you say that the dudes for the most part weren't hot or anything special which is why it was easy for you to next them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:04 PM
2

I'm sorry this fairytale has to go. A well known athlete isn't going to fuck a fat chick (unless he has a fetish) because he has scores of hot women who are dtf around him. The nsa sex spread is about 2 points. 4s are not getting anything consistent from 7s....5s aren't regularly banging 8s.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 10:00 PM
1

25 a year? Lol anyone can do that if they put in some numbers I'm sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/19 05:18 AM
1

Lol you can lump us together if you want company
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 09:38 PM
1

Lol you are the best
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 04:21 PM
1

Problem here is I wasn't trying to get Any. I mean you have the floor to talk about your personal stuff tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 04:20 PM
2

If its a bad test people don't have to use it. No one needs to believe me about my shit either.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 07:29 AM
-1

jealousy: a novel
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 07:25 AM
1

The test literally is getting those two things consistently across multiple bars where young cute women are..... ...I didn't exaggerate that toss away story at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 07:22 AM
1

Lol and this butthurt comment tells me that you're jealous
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 02:53 AM
1

Thought I specified cute women? And nah...whenever I have been out alone they usually make up an excuse for why me being there isn't weird. Like I'm waiting for friends, I lost my friends, I'm just chilling, etc. etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 11:14 PM
3

IMO a woman who starts talking to you = them approaching you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 10:20 PM
2

nah this happens to one of my short buddies too. can confirm that he is fit and good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 10:10 PM
3

Hmmmm....then that means it's not about n count it's about hotness. Cool story.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 07:28 PM
1

So not all alpha males are like that....gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 07:27 PM
1

Lmao Alpha males are outliers dummpkopf
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 03:51 AM
1

Ya I mean unless you have some personal demons I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 10:13 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19558447/ "The strongest predictor of attraction for both sexes was partners' physical attractiveness." Speed dating involves talking last I checked. Like I said....yawn.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 10:05 PM
4

Yawn https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519305/#S1title " Results suggest a large sex difference in trait perception; when women rated men, they agreed in their perception more often than when men rated women. However, as a predictor of romantic interest, there were no sex differences. Only the responders’ perception of the targets’ physical attractiveness predicted romantic interest; specifically, responders’ who rated the targets’ physical attractiveness as higher than themselves re…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 09:14 PM
5

THANK YOU I'm like 'lmfao 10? HOHKAY MR. PURITAN' i just hear a guy whining about n-count and I'm like 'is he that insecure about his ability to dick a girl down?'
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 08:56 PM
4

The problem here is that most 'alpha' guys don't seem to give two shits, either. Look at all the rockstars, rappers, etc. who marry women who 'slutted it up' with whoever or whatever. The only reason to worry about N count is insecurity about one's ability to fuck a chick straight into the mattress and one's ability to arouse a chick into wanting to be fucked into said mattress. No other reason (idgaf what TRP says, we all know it comes down to those two things). If you make a chick hot and fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/19 08:53 PM
1

Dude....no. Women approach men who are around 3 points above them. So look at which women hit on you. Fat/older 4? Grats you're a 7. Landwhale 2? Cool. You're a 5. Cute 7? Dayum. You're a male 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 12:10 AM
1

This is correct. But the 3 point reasoning is wrong. A guy won't usually even fuck a girl 3 points below him because he has better options for pussy. Keep in mind that a 5 is average. The average woman is 170 pounds and 5'4.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/19 12:05 AM
3

Ya. By choosing you mean they were SAYING who they would choose :D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/19 09:28 PM
1

Because it so apparently does not. You are here having to defend the notion that a semester of schooling makes any ind of significant difference in the real world. Should we talk about education and IQ's .65 correlation with that? Please, we can talk about any variable related to jobs, income, education...shit, life outcomes for the most part outside the dating world...
/r/BlackPillScience06/11/19 09:17 PM
2

.4 years of schooling? are you really going to say that means anything? Literally a semester's worth of difference. oooooooh whoa, oh noes. on the job, IQ shows the strongest correlation with ability and the correlation with income (IIRC .4) is way higher than any correlation between income and height or good looks
/r/BlackPillScience06/11/19 09:03 PM
1

No he jumped between the two arguments dummokopf. The effect is tiny and that's readily apparent.
/r/BlackPillScience06/11/19 05:07 PM
2

facial adiposity has a higher correlation with facial attractiveness than does masculinity. lower, prominent cheekbones are masculine. higher prominent cheekbones are feminine. blackpillers fetishize a lot of feminine facial features.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/19 10:57 PM
0

statistically significant != effect significance. go back to stats 101
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/19 10:53 PM
6

Um.....a .04 = r isn't shit.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/19 09:45 PM
1

Lol...for the most part men and women are loyal. Not everyone cheats...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 01:51 AM
1

You can't prove a negative....so.... The idea is that there's no real evidence supporting the ovulatory shift hypothesis. That's a big problem because the burden off proof rests on those who make the claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 01:50 AM
1

Lol ya the science must be wrong because it disagrees with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 01:49 AM
1

Uh ok....that's nothing no one didn't know so how is TRP helpful in that regard? Did you need TRP to aware of that? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 01:48 AM
1

Yeah that's a nice just so with no real evidence linking it to biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 01:47 AM
1

Bro...the burden of proof is on those who made the hypothesis. So inconclusive is damming for their side, not the null. And lol....what do you think the evo psych position is based off of? Lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 01:46 AM
1

TRP'S ONLY BIOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DUAL MATING STRATEGY IS THE OVULATORY SHIFT. otherwise, TRP has to admit that it isn't scientific and has no claim to 'how the world actually works.'
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 12:01 AM
1

you are dunning-kruegar as fuck, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 12:00 AM
1

there is no other biological reason given for the dual mating strategy. that post is just non-scientific jive, i.e. an opinion, i.e. utility of an A-hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/19 12:00 AM
1

lol.... multiple meta-analyses at this point have come to the same conclusion about the ovulatory shift. and the dual-mating strategy's sine qua non is the supposed ovulation shift. there is literally no other biological reason put forth by TRP for it. no ovulation shift, no biological dual mating strategy. TRP is dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 11:58 PM
1

lmfao. dude the dual mating strategy is based on the alleged shift women experience during their fertility window, i.e. ovulation. the idea is that during ovulation they want 'good genes' and at all other times they want 'BB.' That hypothesis has been destroyed. There is no hard-wired dual mating strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 11:57 PM
1

Better an autist than a retard, madame.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 07:28 PM
1

Bro, it's because anything BDSM reinforces patriarchy and oppressive hierarchical structures, which is why sex positivty is just patriarchy 2.0 --- now enforced by womyn!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 07:27 PM
1

This is one of the dumbest posts on here and an example of why statistical literacy is so important. The vast majority of men and women have average IQs. There's less variance in female IQs. So the odds of a male being a genius or complete imbecile are much higher than a woman being the same. That != 'generally either pretty smart or pretty stupid.'
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 07:24 PM
1

so you're saying that a piece of pop culture....stole something from another piece of pop culture? ...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 06:58 PM
1

Pill = worldview /solved
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 06:57 PM
1

Makes a lot of sense....a lot of sexual desire is in the mind, boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/19 05:25 PM
1

Lmfao Because older women go bang dudes in other countries because men in their own countries don't make them feel pretty anymore that means something? Strong IQ
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 09:49 PM
1

Yes it does. They've done studies controlling for other factors and women orgasm more frequently and more intensely for high income dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 09:46 PM
1

Oh but I said that doormats are attractive? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 09:35 PM
2

If you want to believe someone who tries to walk all over someone and tests boundaries like a child behaves the same way as an emotionally mature person (someone who can actually empathize and consider what someone else may or may not be comfortable doing), go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:24 PM
2

Bingo. More importantly...IT DOES NOT WORK FOR ITS STATED PURPOSE. LOOKS ARE EVERYTHING IN THE SHORT-TERM MATING GAME.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:17 PM
-1

that's fucking retarded. if you are an unethical piece of shit you'll just attract unethical pieces of shit. short term mating is all about looks. you guys are gonna have to deal with it sooner or later.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:15 PM
2

Lol the problem isn't being nice. The problem is going for women who are out of your league.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:12 PM
1

Full stop, TRP does not work in a short-term context beyond the advice related to looking better. The supreme irony of TRP is that its tips will only work over a long period of time getting to know someone, where your personality can halo your physical attractiveness. Also, if a guru doesn't LOOK LIKE YOU, his advice is worthless to you. The OP is dead on about Mark Manson or other gurus who are tall white muscular men. IF you aren't ALL THREE of those...then IGNORE.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:10 PM
1

whoever the most women are watching and paying attention to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 11:22 PM
4

lmfao the dating playing field is level women have a tough time getting into relationships. men have a tough time getting it in NSA.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 11:19 PM
3

Except people aren't cars and can actually improve in several areas over time, i.e. the ability to control said urges, have a good knowledge of the reality of men versus the fantasy (i.e. if you're the shit a slut will actually know it vis reference points of comparison and really appreciate you vs. a low N who doesn't know any better about what's out there). Not saying one or the other is better, but it's definitely not what you're making it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 11:08 PM
2

ya, because a low N woman can't meet a man who arouses her more than her current beau, right? and her inexperience with men and controlling said urges won't factor at all into how she deals with that? the dicks are coming, bro. whether you like it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 11:03 PM
1

studies and experience has repeatedly proven this to be accurate. cite some, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 10:57 PM
2

It's common knowledge that men lie about their size all the time and women don't really know much more about it either. Revise whatever numbers you hear an inch or two down.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 06:01 PM
1

Yes. Guide you to proper action. Faking confidence or faking anything is not the answer. Shoring up your weaknesses always is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 10:08 PM
1

Probably but if it's so boilerplate...why is there still so much woo?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 06:18 PM
2

One is lonely when they have no social group, one stops trying to create a social group when one feels insecure about making new friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 06:17 PM
1

Uh, explain how the decision tree for dealing with feelings of insecurity is somehow a children's cartoon.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 06:17 PM
1

your dick is probably larger than you think: https://calcsd.netlify.com/full
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:33 PM
0

dude fuck this 'muh genes' bullshit. facial adiposity accounts for just as much of the variation in facial attractiveness as facial masculinity and symmetry --- right there, something under your control you can fix. lifting greatly improves your attractiveness. and tbh, how bad do you fucking want it? go roid out, get extreme. nothing stands in the way of an iron will.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:28 PM
1

lol what a dumb point of view. this is like the rich kid who has never had to work hard for money berating a poor person who bemoans his lack of money as 'pathetic.' boyos, this is why you don't tell this shit to women. they can't understand. they never will understand. you must first believe you can be a king. then you must build a kingdom. if you don't have those two in check, you aren't ready to settle down. personally, validating yourself based on how many slores you bedded is womanly in and…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:24 PM
12

Here's the answer: they're not ready to settle down, boyo. The fact is that pretty much any woman can go out and just have access to fun times and sex. The same ain't true for dudes. So build yourself up as high as you can go to experience as much of that as you can. It seems important to you. Just because SHE's ready to settle doesn't mean you gotta be. If she's on the way down and he's on the way up and she snagged him, there's a high likelihood she saw the 'Chad-potential' in him. so fulfill …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 05:20 PM
13

Well they put you to the top of the cue when you first join
/r/BlackPillScience01/10/19 01:52 PM
0

Elaborate more. Especially on the sex and metaphysical thing, so TRPers get it. Would you say that just being around them is like a drug? What's the sexual attraction like compared to Chad? What's the feeling like?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 12:20 AM
1

I agree. Romantic attraction, like sexual attraction, is not enough to sustain an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 11:37 PM
10

ya, seems fair. that's what autonomy is, homeslice.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:23 PM
4

Ya it's one of those inexplicable BETA qualities that is somehow seen as sexually attractive. or maybe it's an alpha quality to have a kid? who knows? both probably. you have a kid and you take care of it. but you have to have some good SMV/RMV to snag a chick with no kids if you already have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:21 PM
2

People are fucking stupid. PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS = UR SEXY RESULTS. behavior ain't got nothing to do with it in the short term. below the first threshold, you're just a friendzone guy and maybe get some puss once in a blue moon. once you pass a certain threshold, you are fuckable but probably need a decent personality and a month or so of dating to close the deal. once you pass another threshold, you are hot and can get it reliably in a few dates/a week's time but can still fuck it up once you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:19 PM
3

how is it coping? you can't have the romantic attraction that I'm talking about without the sexual attraction. simple as this... you know how TRP is always like 'yeah when she says she wants a guy to give her flowers, she's talking about a super hot guy...NOT YOU.' okay, well the romantic attraction is like a super hot guy who gets her flowers. it's the fulfillment of a fantasy. or the potential of that fulfillment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 09:12 PM
2

I didn't respond to any thread as a girl. I'm not a woman but I've seen the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 08:58 PM
3

I mean, the thing is...people don't change that much. The shrew-y types have always been shrew-y --- which is why they have never been able to keep a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 07:30 PM
4

Holy shit. Is that wisdom in the PPD sub? Good job, sir. Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 07:29 PM
2

You don't get it. I'm a guy who has actually experienced both, boyo. The Don Juan thing is indeed, playing into a woman's fantasy about life in one way or another. It's a deeper attraction that definitely includes sexual attraction. But it's more than that...it's ehm...it's like you affirm their existence or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 07:26 PM
0

That isn't romantic. That's friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 05:35 PM
16

Chad has sexual attraction. Don Juan has romantic attraction. Romantic attraction is way more powerful. Romantic attraction, true romantic attraction, is like the Depeche mode song "personal Jesus." You are craved. Every aspect of you. A lot of people mistakenly conflate romantic attraction with the friendship component of a relationship. Nope. Romantic attraction is where chicks start saying weird shit like they want to fuck you just to feel you metaphysically....where they get insanely jealous…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 05:34 PM
1

It was less than that. Another really famous ppd cited study with swr height and penis size also found height explained about 5% of body attractiveness variance. Swr? 80%. Dick size explained as much as height.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 04:05 AM
2

Untrue. IIRC perceived strength alone explained 70% variance in body attractiveness ratings with leanness and height together explaining an additional 10% in that big study often thrown out around here.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/19 03:41 AM
1

But they aren't... Their theories get exploded in the real world. Behavior only matters in relationships or long term interactions...which makes TRP useless for attracting women. TRP ironically is most effective in the LTR setting.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 06:11 PM
2

Lol yaaaaaa There are some insights that are good....but they're pretty basic. People who are too involved have a bias in favor of their personal merit...and outsiders have a bias in favor of some overriding systematic process. The truth is a mix.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 06:09 PM
1

Pretty much. Maybe you go around measuring erect dicks but most dudes don't and only have porn to go off of.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/19 04:34 PM
1

You're not really getting it. The assertion is that a top 0.2% guy would know he had that and that isn't true. The depictions in the media of dick size are way out of step with reality. So you can have a top 0.2% dick and not know it. You just don't seem to understand basic concepts. And men generally are obsessed with cock size, whether they're the best, hottest, etc. You can have an abundance of these things and honestly not know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 11:37 PM
1

If there was an emoji for over the top expressions of I don't care but I do so who you trying to kid your comment would warrant it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 07:31 PM
1

You don't really get the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 07:11 PM
1

early 30's
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 10:30 PM
2

Not really, dude. A ton of guys with very large members don't find out that they do until they get some significant sexual experience --- me included. A top 0.2% dick according to studies is probably smaller than you think it is. And no, I didn't grow up showering naked with dudes in locker rooms. And uh HI THOSE ARE FLACCID DICKS...not erect ones. You're referencing porn as a good standard? LMFAO DUDE. Not only are the sizes unrepresentative, but the tricks of angle, perception, stature, etc. d…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 10:30 PM
1

how exactly would you know it, friend? remember, dick studies aren't exactly the best o'science. you go around measuring a bunch of erect dicks often? how exactly do you know where you stand in terms of erect dickitude?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 09:41 PM
8

Not much has changed with regard to WHO is having the most casual sex. Hawt alpha studs always got the most. And if anything, because this generation is having less sex, they got more. What's DIFFERENT is that all of this is out in the open and men are seeing that certain men are treated differently than others. Some men don't have to take people out to dinner, etc. to get sex. Not only that, but men have silly standards not present in previous generations thanks to movies featuring some loser s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 09:30 PM
1

Demographics are destiny, so we'd see a total reversal in gender roles surrounding dating. more women would be initiating, the onus of self-improvement would be more on women... ...HOWEVER... it wouldn't be as stark as some think, because we don't live in a 'you must get married and be monogamous' world. soft casual harems are more or less mainstream, so there would still be an 80/20...but maybe it'd be 80/40
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 09:22 PM
3

ake your man on a date to places with other men where he will have to mate guard to make him value you more. Make them wait for sex until he’s buying you stuff. Among some others lmfao. bye Felicia.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 09:17 PM
3

Yeah they do. The concept of alpha widow is about her heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 07:47 PM
2

Lol why?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 07:45 PM
3

it's fear. the fear she's been with better and won't be able to fully appreciate you. to be honest, i think it's a function of how desirable the guy is/believes himself to be. once you pass a certain threshold, you just stop giving too much of a shit. past a certain point, looks, sex, etc. can be better but not by enough to really care about.... to me it's the sign of someone who just hasn't fully developed himself to his full potential yet...to care a lot about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 06:26 PM
6

What's interesting is that people don't realize that women can sleep around like crazy and still have more of their hearts to give you than other 'more chaste' women. i remember being absolutely mindfucked at an LTR who like...had never really experienced or done non-dissascoiated sex...so a lot of things like open mouthed kissing, the holding, stare into one another's eyes, saying things to one another beyond 'you're hot' or whatever, etc. etc. were foreign to them. it's like they had completel…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 06:21 PM
14

bingo. it's when you get dead bedroom shit that guys get all rawr ur past! i've never had that problem, which is why i don't give a shit about her past. if the good times are rolling, let's keep looking forward, I say.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 06:18 PM
5

there are positives. the only women who can actually give a man the gift of delusional confidence are experienced women. some chick who has been with 5 guys says you have a big dick/best sex/hot bod/hot face/blah blah? who cares? wtf does she know? some chick who has been with 50, 200, 500 guys says that? ... well son, you must be pretty fucking awesome. But ya, I mean...it's a double edged sword. If you want to know the truth about where you stand as a physical specimen of man...well, those wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 06:16 PM
1

Ya. We're talking about casual sex physical standards here. Personality matters once a baseline level of attractiveness is reached. Now....your minimum standards you have that aren't so crazy pretty much leave around 80% of men out....you realize this right? Now imagine your not crazy standards but I would casual sex this dude guy....but shorter. The shorter he gets....for him to still meet the casual sex this guy mark....he would probably have to get more ripped, hotter in the face, etc. as his…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 01:31 AM
1

it's not incorrect, your literal ranking on the scale doesn't matter. also, 25 lbs of weight is not enough for a 2 point drop or rise, sorry. the point stands: your standard for 'hot' didn't change just because you gained weight. that's why no 'hot' men, according to you, looked at you anymore. even though, to women who had always been at that rank you were at, plenty of hot studs looked at them...because their standards hadn't risen. 'I'm allowed to look for men that are in shape and physically…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 11:59 PM
1

men don't value the opposite sex by appearance only, so that's another one of those canards. if men did that then the majority of women would be without an LTR partner. shocker, they aren't, and they all aren't supermodels and the vast majority are overweight or obese. and I mean, your situation is no different. Let's say you were a 6 when you were thin...to you a legit good looking guy is like an 8. Your weight drops you to a 5. Now the 8's aren't willing to look your way lustfully. To your bra…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 11:32 PM
1

Yes there is no designated male to make a point of view, but my point of view is one shared by many men. I'm not wrong at all. A lot of men are insecure in their marriages over those reasons...but I guess it's because they're bigots or [insert 'iwillnotengage shame slur' here]s?' Here's your chance to prove you're something more than a member of the shrill brigade. If your response is 'I don't have to prove...' then just bye Felicia.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 11:07 PM
1

male point of view: sexist bullshit. good to know, asshole, I'm not worth even paying attention to or listening to when speaking from my point of view. like I said, go back to your echo chamber
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 10:53 PM
1

way to gloss over the rest of the post where I explained myself more. but hey, kinda my point. /eyeroll
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 10:40 PM
1

OP's fear --- WHICH IS LEGITIMATE --- is that she gave herself to other men sexually in ways she refuses to give herself to him. now, is his fear more a fear or more a reality? ITT, the fear just seems like irrational fear...part and parcel of 2019 insecurities that empowered women love laughing at men about. but a husband should get the best of his wife and he has a right to be saddened or worried about why she chose to give her sexual self to others in ways she doesn't to him. that doesn't mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 10:24 PM
1

yeah found the 'feminist,' guys. by 'feminist' i mean 'refuses to view things from a male perspective at all because all men are evil penises who all oppress women with their evil penises and when women take part in oppressing men it's because of men and their penises' type. in this day and age, it's very hard to be a husband because a lot of men are saddled with insecurities and issues that they wouldn't have otherwise had; the burden of performance with regard to sex has historically been assi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 10:21 PM
1

go back to askfeminist where fairy tale ideas of human relationships such as 'when a man wants any quid pro quo from a woman he's a rapist' exist. how stupid. people engage in behaviors in hope of a reward. human nature. deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 10:16 PM
1

Hint: they far outnumber the supposed proof of chads unlimited power
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/19 10:01 PM
1

and then omit all the ones where chadfishing goes bad and the women demonstrate good sense and decency. don't forget that one.
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/19 09:49 PM
16

Jesus Christ. Wait, wait wait... ...if a man is even 'liked' on Tinder, he's in the top 5%? Because being 'liked' is far from 'battle is won'
/r/BlackPillScience26/09/19 09:48 PM
0

nah dawg. it's a bunch of cultural expectations and values that have been grafted onto a biological need (for sex). most guys can get boners for the vast majority of women --- pussy is pussy. but they don't want the vast majority of women because of cultural expectations that have been placed on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 09:00 PM
5

women shouldn't do it because it doesn't mean anything for a woman to sleep with a 'hot' guy. should men do it? idk...if a man manages to land a 'hot' chick, it DOES mean something. you gotta be doing something right and well to do that as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:58 PM
2

7 partners is pretty inexperienced, that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:26 PM
1

no that's not what the complaint is. the complaint is that even normal looking girls don't want them because they're too fixated on men way above them. so no, they ARE interested in the plain girl. the plain girl THINKS SHE CAN DO BETTER because, according to them, she's been getting railed by guys way out of her league. men and women are trying to punch above their weight. and they offer their most valuable gifts to do so. men offer their emotional care, love, and support, and women offer their…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:25 PM
1

the risk is that there are shitty dumb bitches/dickheads out there and you may end up with one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:20 PM
2

ya they just don't get it. mo money mo problems, s0n
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:18 PM
1

LMFAO ya because her being 'honest and open' would have somehow made her a different person? no that's just a shitty dumb bitch being a shitty dumb bitch. no amount of 'muh open communication' is gonna fix that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:17 PM
0

...LOL game recognize game, since you aren't getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:16 PM
1

DM me if you want a pic :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:15 PM
1

that's because there's a prevailing stereotype. and if you take TRPers 80/20 rule as true, then the stereotypes women propagate about men are based off a minority of men. if most men don't have choice when it comes to sex, then sex becomes more a matter of life affirmation for them and validation as a sexual being...in which case, 'doesn't matter had sex' doesn't apply...otherwise, sexless men would be HAPPY buying prostitutes. they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 08:15 PM
3

no. if someone past the age of 25 tries to put on the 'sweet saint' airs I'm immediately suspicious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:55 PM
0

You're talking to a triple digit partner count guy, here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:53 PM
0

it's stupid, what can i say? every time i run across a woman on a first date who has some silly rule or indicates that we'll be hanging out for awhile before we're having sex because she's been burned in the past... ...i peace out. why? (1) i have other options (2) her sexual hangups because of shitty partner selection are not my burden to bear. (3) the 'rules' implemented miss the entire REASON that she was treated poorly: she chose men who just didn't give two shits about her. it's not what sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:51 PM
2

the dark triad does not make anyone successful. people have to stop repeating this jive. it's the other positive attributes that some dark triad people possess that make them successful. even the one study that attempted to show that psychopathy in and of itself was somehow responsible for an independent effect in an increase of attraction could be boiled down to the way psychopathy was assessed and calculated (i.e. positive traits lumped in with psychopathy)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:50 PM
1

yeah cause it's so fun to try something with someone and have them be way not into it. do you LARPers ever hear yourselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:47 PM
2

30 partners is fine. It's so funny how TRPers lose their shit past 5 partners. Like, you wonder what they'd do if they ran across these women with triple digit body counts. And they exist...they just know which guys to lie to and which ones they can just be up front with. Also, TRPers believe that becoming or being a 'Chad' will take all the pain or fear away. It won't. It's like moving up to a bigger league. Now all your competition is that much better and you have to worry about the GigaChads.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:46 PM
3

exactly lmfao. nope, her partner selection sucked. not what she did for them. i have no clue why women adopt this stupid mindset. men don't give a fuck if you have sex with them on the first date, but the men who don't give a shit about you will leave the moment they get sex from you. and so on and so forth. pick your partners better.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:42 PM
-1

lmfao this is the dumbest post i've ever read. have fun with a marriage that goes nuclear if your bf finds out you purposefully withheld from him things that he wants to further your own agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:40 PM
1

lol idk man, why does it matter? you don't have to disclose your past to tell someone what you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:37 PM
3

Bro, the issue here is your lack of experience. See, I've had a lot of sexual adventures and misadventures and pretty much come to the conclusion that... ​ ...yup, it's official, I like vanilla sex. Leave therapy out of the bedroom. Leave the glorification of abuse and weird power dynamics out of the bedroom. Let's just fuck and get to it. Your wife is likely the same way. She tried a bunch of shit to experiment, found she didn't like it that much, and likes what you guys are doing. The craziest…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:37 PM
1

Yeah that's sort of a stereotype about men that isn't true. Men and women care about the quality and emotional connection of sex, and it comes down to being with someone you actually like, have a connection with, and are attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/19 06:09 PM
2

'get with' as in date, yes. but men will generally fuck down to about 2 points beneath them. so while i'm not on the 'fatties can get with chad' train...i'm saying that women have a much easier time getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 08:49 PM
1

dude, you're a lot taller than him...that's why you could compete. lmfao. edit: oh my mistake, you didn't say he was shorter than you. I mean you could be better looking in the face as well. and lol...the pic you posted isn't of a square body. lmfao wtf. when I reaching that level with my physique, that's where I started to get a lot of the 'superhero' 'greek god' compliments. sounds like you look like a greek god and he looks like fucking Hercules...which, at that point, diminishing returns
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 06:38 PM
1

well the extent to which 'personality' matters is so slight that the level of 'confidence' or 'chutzpah' required for one to make a significant impact... ...I mean let's do a little statz-ing Let's say 80% of attractiveness is just physical. That leaves 20% (if we're being reductive) down to 'personality.' So, 'personality' correlates .45 with attractiveness. For a normal dude to go from normal to 'top 20%' he has to have a 1 in 50 level personality (.45 x 2 = .9sd attractiveness). To seduce a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 05:56 PM
1

trp says a lot of other extraneous shit that does nothing but distract people from the key: LOOK BETTER.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 05:01 PM
1

I don't care whether or not it's real. When you look at porn, the brain makes it real. It's as if the person is right there in front of you, actually getting naked and being sexual with you. https://media.giphy.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/giphy.gif Ya hohkay morpheus anyone who's actually had some sex laughs at how fake and staged porn is. What do you guys think? yes and no. I think men have always just shot out of their league. Like women. TRPers are mostly complaining about the fact that hot, …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 03:29 PM
2

Yes, you can try to shame away your very real prejudice by minimizing it. The term 'heightist' isn't made up. It's a real term in use. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_discrimination Here is what the term prejudice means: preconceived judgment or opinion. You have prejudged all men below a certain height to be unattractive and even less so if they have muscles. That's a prejudice. Sexual preferences definitely are great examples of prejudices: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_racism Plea…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 03:19 PM
8

Lmao. Men will fuck women regardless of whether women conform to those roles. That's why women can afford to be less rigid.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 02:51 PM
5

Lol DOY. women are the ones sustaining old school masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 02:50 PM
1

You can have your heightist, ageist, etc. preferences. Calling your prejudice what it is isn't being bigoted against your agency. What a stupid retort. Part of agency is owning your shit...you're heightist. Deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 02:48 PM
2

Um....people are allowed to be angry over unfairness, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 01:01 PM
1

Um....you just described him as looking pretty much like a Greek God and he pretty much had to look like that to compete for women against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 12:59 PM
1

Um...ya they should ignore your opinion on the matter lol you're just a heightist regardless of what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 12:58 PM
1

Yeah let's not sully the Reddit Halls of Relevance
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 04:59 AM
1

If you're top 1% physique money career and top 10% face....you can do eeeet
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 01:48 AM
1

5'7 180 is pretty much a 4 to most guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 01:47 AM
1

Lol dude... let me reality you. An American 5/10 (average) woman is 5'4 and 170 pounds...maybe 160 pounds if she's in her 20's. That's average. That's a 5. An 8 is a woman who is actress level (10 is mythical and somewhat arbitrary...objectivity starts to fall off at around the level where someone could legitimately look really good onscreen/pics to the point of making a living off it). So nah...even if you're just waiting for 1% of 8's... just think for one second, bray. If you're only fucking …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 11:52 PM
1

Ok well your dick isn't going to be getting wet too often if your standard literally is 1% of 10/10 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 11:36 PM
1

Then why is the saying jack of all trades master of none though oft times better than a master of one? And yes, physically you will only be able to fuck so many chicks...HOWEVER...your odds of running into a chick you want to fuck who wants to fuck you are DRAMATICALLY increased if your pool is increased. If only 1% of women want to fuck you, then that's 1 out of every 100 women you meet. No thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 11:27 PM
1

everyone is aware of the ecological fallacy I hope. it's best to maximize your appeal to the broadest range possible. you'll have a niche no matter what your look is that you're a 10/10 to. I'd rather be a 10/10 to 1%, an 8/10 to 69% and a 5/10 to 20% and like a 0/10 to 10%
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 10:46 PM
1

god the 'not necessarily' reasoning HAS TO GO. YES THERE ARE SOME EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE. WHOOP DE FREAKIN' DOO. GENERALLY, tho, working out WILL give a man a great SWR
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 10:33 PM
1

The studies show it has an effect, but it's not THAT much of an effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 10:32 PM
3

I think the anger comes from the fact that a woman can be slovenly, unkempt, and whatever and still get sex from a man that is the opposite and indeed demand only that men like that get to have sex with her. Men can't do that. Thus anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 10:31 PM
1

a little more, sure. but it still doesn't matter that much, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 10:24 PM
1

I indicated where in one.And in the SHR one they talk about how attractiveness continued to increase with increasing into unnatural ranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 09:51 PM
1

Lol. If you have a linear relationship that shows no U effect in two studies, one of which features a range that is unnatural and the domain of bodybuilders, and a pretty robust correlation between musculature and sex partners across multiple studies....you can reasonably infer that chicks dig bodybuilders. Now, reasonable people can disagree as well...but its not unreasonable to interpret all that data in that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 09:48 PM
1

First, the BMI numbers in the sex partner study are definitely at the levels associated with bodybuilders. Second, the SHR numbers in the height penis size study are also definitely at that level.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 09:43 PM
1

I can make an inference about the real world based on empirical findings drawn from several studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 09:39 PM
1

I already explained why i think the inference is reasonable despite the lack of bodybuilders in one study.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 09:36 PM
0

that should be your first clue... ...fuck no that isn't a body that makes chicks wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:50 PM
2

That's nice. The studies show that dudes as short as 5'2 aren't really that bad off.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:49 PM
1

Bro, a true Chad has options that never have him say 'oh well, I mean at least she has...' 5'4 120-130 stacy with the athletic/aight body is pretty much always an option for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:48 PM
1

The reason I am saying that women finding those bodybuilder types attractive is a plausible inference to make rests on the fact that (1) the relationship perceived strength and attractiveness failed to exhibit any U effect within that study and (2) the SHR in the other study bore a linear relationship to attractiveness even in ranges that were 'UNNATURAL.'
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:21 PM
1

Actually, in that study male BMI correlated positively with number of sex partners. Now you could assume fat men get laid more, or you could more correctly assume that more muscular men get laid more. Here's another study: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2007-07-weights-resesarch-muscular-men-partners.html
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:19 PM
1

ok this is true....but 5'7 180 in most men's eyes is already like, what...a 4-5?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:16 PM
1

There's just no way a real Chad is gonna pump 5'7 180, even if she is throwing herself at him. He'll just make fun of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:14 PM
1

the shredded Olympia guys are modern bodybuilders with huge guts
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:12 PM
1

no my shredded is shredded...like golden age of bodybuilders shredded.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:11 PM
2

without exception, every short guy I've ever seen with a gf taller than him was at least fit and fairly good looking. there's one exception to that though...this one dude who was pretty chubby and ok looking had a hot blonde gf, but he was super funny and they were in lawl school together. ... and that dude got super jacked and shredded and good looking in the face a few years later, so....really without exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:10 PM
1

Yeah stop using exceptions...they tend to just prove the rule. dude I just pointed you to studies that had WOMEN rate male attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:07 PM
1

then why are more muscular and masculine dudes found to have more sex partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:06 PM
1

people are confusing his face with his body
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:06 PM
2

But the studies suggest that you don't need height.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:05 PM
1

I'd say mass is very important for short guys. I'm not sure what mass level is enough to say 'normal man' to women, but I can't imagine dropping below 150 will satisfy it. Ever. I mean being shredded with small muscles will probably be enough for even the shortest of dudes because of the benefits in facial aesthetics. But generally, just go by stats. The lower you are in one area, the more you have to bring up some other --- preferably weighted more --- area to compensate. Now, if our very short…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 08:04 PM
-1

Yes. GIRL's.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:28 PM
0

Yeah could you back yourself up with studies or something? Like I have data up above that contradicts what you just said. What you got, son?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:28 PM
0

'Yeah and I'd still fuck him' ya cause he looks feminine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:28 PM
1

the other 90% of whatever makes someone attractive I didn't say it was. I just said 'whatever' all that other stuff is combined into one thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:18 PM
-1

I said there's a strong hint. There was no sign that the relationship between strength and attractiveness was going to exhibit a curvelinear U effect. The study linked right after it just used drawings. Consider in the OTHER study I linked with the SHR, the SHR's depicted at the far right of the range were getting well into bodybuilder, unnatural territory, and the attractiveness ratings kept going up. ... at the pic you linked. lmfao that guy looks gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:16 PM
1

idk, shredded big muscled guys of any height always seem to be knee deep in pussy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:14 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:12 PM
2

it's not mass, dude. PERCEIVED strength. that's how a body LOOKS. which isn't just mass.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:10 PM
1

Well if height generally explains 5-10% of the variance in male attractiveness, then it correlates .3 with it. So let's assume our plucky shorty is 5'4 or -2sd. That makes him -.6 sd attractiveness. So he's below average (not bottom 20% yet). Assuming additional height isn't necessary for the other 90% of whatever makes someone attractive, then all that stuff has a huge correlation of .95 with attractiveness. If he moves himself up just 1 sd on that stuff, he's already sitting at .4 sd attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:09 PM
1

okay, there's a limit to this. Chad isn't going to pork some 5'7 200 pound uggo. Shit, probably not even 180 pounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:02 PM
1

um it doesn't equal size perfectly, but in the study they found a pretty high correlation perceived strength and actual strength ~.6.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 05:00 PM
1

dwarf is like not even .1%. bottom 1% male height is like 5'2. dwarf is 4'10.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 04:57 PM
0

did you even read the studies above? because there's the strong hint that they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 04:57 PM
-1

nah https://www.greatestphysiques.com/male-physiques/danny-padilla/ https://fitnessvolt.com/franc-columbu-death-facts/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 03:41 PM
1

There is an answer. Gym. Roids. Surgery. and you're wrong about money. There's empirical research showing women cum harder and more often with RICH guys controlling for physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:56 PM
2

dude, a mountain of research shows that casual sex is mostly about LOOKs. not your insecurities or CAWNfidence or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:53 PM
1

Joe Rogan wasn't born with shit. He juices. Like I said....compensate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:53 PM
1

My achievements? DM me :) and uh, I'm sorry your gfs have been shitty I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:50 PM
8

Bullshit. .women aren't super insecurity ninjas. Some of the times when I was killing it the hardest were some of my most pathetic darkest insecure days. Know why? Because I looked good.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:30 AM
1

Short men have to compensate. Just Like,iaverage looking guys. Just like fat guys. He's not compensating well enough
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/19 02:23 AM
1

then they still shouldn't read TRP and focus just on getting more physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 11:47 PM
2

So...let's get this straight: (1) marrying for love (2) treating women with kindness and respect and (3) marrying at all = beta cuck. Lol. ya ok, dude. Chasing pussy for the purpose of masturbating with pussy is gay. it's long been the mark of an inferior man to have a lot of sex without commensurate issue. and here TRP is...advocating that as 'alpha.'.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 11:46 PM
1

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/03/14/marriage-is-more-beneficial-for-men-than-women-study-shows/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 11:42 PM
1

LOL TRP is what says (1) and (2) are ATTRACTIVE, GUY.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 11:41 PM
1

Siring children is manly. Having the hetero equivalent of gay sex is not, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 11:40 PM
1

no one said not to work on yourself. shit, i didn't even say don't sow your wild oats. but the endgame seems to be the one most TRPers want but are too chicken shit to face.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:47 PM
1

can you stop with the just so stories?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:40 PM
1

no help ever was coming. ever. you need help? boyo. oh boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:36 PM
1

TRP...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:36 PM
1

once again. is being (1) a successful risk taker and (2) having resistance to social pressure 'alpha' in the sense that women find it attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:36 PM
2

More strawmanning
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:34 PM
1

Not really. Pretty much all empirical research says that physical attractiveness determines ONS/casual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:34 PM
1

Yeah you got hurt and rather than rally behind your ideals, you let some girls rock your worldview. How alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:33 PM
1

Yeah, it's to your benefit to have no children and to not get married (hint: marriage benefits men more than women)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:33 PM
0

You can claim the trait exists, just don't say it's the result of evolution when you have failed to produce evidence that culture, etc. have been controlled for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 10:32 PM
1

I'm not being hypocritical. A lot of TRPers wish the world was TBP. Do you prefer the idea of a blue pill world or a red pill world. If you have a preference for TBP...again, why would the alpha thing to do not be to fight for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:52 PM
1

Yes, my OP specifically addresses the huge subsection of TRP that wishes the world was one way. If you're not among those, then ignore it. No...I'm not making up my own definitions. An alpha trait is the resistance to social pressure, correct? Therefore... the man who pursues a vision of the world in the face of opposition from the world is actually more attractive than the one who more or less 'adjusts' to the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:51 PM
0

No, son. That's that inner beta Gollum voice reacting to the light. In your heart you want to be kind and good and just. You've just been hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:39 PM
1

The fact that you can't see that casual sex divorced from SIRING A LINE AND BUILDING A LEGACY -is- unmasculine.... ...is sad. Is gay sex considered masculine? Do you know why it isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:37 PM
1

So if TRP is built around said concepts and the fear of being a beta....what does that make TRP? I disagree with you about insults. They're only a fallacy in deducitve reasoning. No one does that in every day discussion. It's inductive...which makes the mudslinging fair game. Have to learn to fight the war on all fronts to be a champion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:36 PM
1

come at me with out stupid 'u want to be a slave LOL' or 'muh biology without proof but ill talk at you as if there is' strawmanning silliness and i'll be as chill as can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:35 PM
0

you offering to make me hard or something? guys don't do it for me, pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:34 PM
0

I am here in good faith...trying to give you sad sacks some faith in the things that are just and good. You all still believe. You're just scared, it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:32 PM
1

If a man wants his relationship life to be monogamous, what does that matter? Why does it matter beyond whatever that man wants. The issue here is that most, if not pretty much all, TRPers WISH and WANT the world to look like TBP. So if that's true...then the alpha thing to do would be to try to fight for it and bend the world to their will, rather than the beta thing to do and adjust to the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:32 PM
1

Old school ways, or any ways, make sense if that's what you personally want the world to be. Why isn't that the only consideration for you? Oh look ma, another strawman. Bottom line...do you wish and want the world to be one where you marry a woman, treat her with kindness and love, and marry for who she is and how she makes you feel rather than arbitrary stuff society tells you is or is not 'good woman?'
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:30 PM
1

So you agree that you would like it if the world functioned where a man could marry a woman, treat her with kindness and respect, and go with his gut and marry for love? Then again, why are you not fighting for it in how you live your life? You are letting the world win. Now, you're MGTOW, which isn't necessarily TRP, but if you buy into alpha and beta.... ...if an alpha wants his world to look like x, you think an alpha wouldn't fight? Alphas fight. They don't run. Betas see a tough situation a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:29 PM
1

I didn't say anything about establishing the world of old. Read the OP. Marry a woman. Treat her with love and respect. Choose her based on who she is, not some arbitrary criteria that society says = good or bad, i.e. go with your gut. Stop strawmanning me. 'Getting laid by those women, under those circumstances, in that world? That makes you a superior man' Taking your definition of what makes you a superior man from your external circumstances is womanly. It's pinging off your environment, whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:27 PM
-1

no one is coming at me in good faith. they're strawmanning my OP and expecting me to take them seriously. this fellow invoked science and no he didn't lay out anything. he admitted he couldn't meet the quantum of proof required for science, then proceeded to assert various things about the relationship between genetics and environment (i.e. this doesn't mean we're blank slates --- a claim made by no one), then: 'The root of the differences in behavior between men and women in sexual strategy in …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:25 PM
0

if it's actual science and meets that standard, I won't. But that doesn't exist, so you're right.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:19 PM
1

People who are banging to their heart's content quickly start searching for meaning. The higher things. The things to fight for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:17 PM
1

I'm not trolling. I'm wondering why so many TRPers wish the world was one way and refuse to take a stand for it. Maybe you can explain. I just hope the explanation doesn't involve being so afwaid of failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:15 PM
1

So being kind and good to people means one can't get laid? Wanting marriage means you can't get laid? I understand you have no vision beyond the world in front of you...like a woman...but suppose you could live in a different world by taking action. Would you take that action, or would you be a coward? Rhetorical question. You even shame like a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 06:14 PM
1

Lol poor people really can't fathom someone being both good looking and having money. I can just admit both help. You can't even admit you're poor...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:46 PM
1

has a lot to do with personal strength and morality, tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:32 PM
1

Men were already liberated. You could have chosen to be a cad in any age --- they've existed, so what you're saying makes no sense. Most TRPers on the inside long for the TBP world but are too afraid to fight for it. You know this. I know this. 'Fucking women is the quintessentially masculine act.' Siring many children and building a strong line is the quintessential masculine act, buster. Busting into a condom is beta. Busting into BC-pussy is beta. May as well be gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:31 PM
1

Lol spoken like a real beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:29 PM
2

This isn't tradcon anything. Treating women with kindness and respect isn't tradcon. It's just basic. The only social world that exists is the one that we choose to worship via our actions. Once you accept any vision of the social world as inexorable, you rob yourself of agency in that realm. It doesn't matter how other people act today. What kind of world do you want to live in? Then why not be that. And if your answer is about your fee fees, then you're just proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:27 PM
1

yeah no, TRPer dudes are the ones getting the most pussy. for sure. lolbtw.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:23 PM
1

You're just strawmanning what I said 'blah blah ur a slave lol.' How EXACTLY is treating someone with KINDNESS and RESPECT being a slave? Answer clear and direct, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:23 PM
0

Yes...they would be able to. The benchmark of 'economist prognosticating at 10 years out' is pretty low, man. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 05:22 PM
0

Evolutionary biology isn't a soft science. Wtf. Evolutionary biology makes testable predictions, and anything accepted as knowledge in that field has to meet the same standard of rigor as any hard science excepting maybe physics. The commenter argued that human behavior only makes sense in the light of evolutionary biology, i.e. the distribution of certain genes in a given population. The claim ignores other explanations (culture), ignores the rather high heritabilities of several supposedly 'se…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:56 PM
0

the point isn't to be a hero? lol, whatever nerd. have fun seeking validation from pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:52 PM
0

You made a claim regarding evolutionary biology. Let's use the standard of scientific knowledge in that field...I guarantee you it's much higher than what you've proferred and what exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:38 PM
1

Lol anyone who thinks that social sciences = science or that economics = science, is a tool.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:33 PM
-1

That study doesn't show anything at all of what I asked. It shows that a certain gene correlates with a certain trait. There's no A to B with regard to mechanism. Finding a correlation != causation != science. Did you read your own source? The effect they found was very small, and it doesn't sound like they controlled for physical attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:26 PM
-5

Holding scientific claims to scientific standards is a bad copout? Buzzer K, dealing with a re-tawd.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:22 PM
1

(1) yes men can forgo their biology completely (2) strawman, never put it on a timetable. And no, TRP doesn't teach men to have choice. It teaches them to go against their natural desire for how they want the world to be. Most TRPers are mad because they want TBP and think that world is impossible. It also isn't even true and contradicted by a lot of research showing that physical attraction and that alone determines casual sex time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:21 PM
1

I did make a lucid point. You asked a bunch of 'what if's' that amounted to saying 'what if you aren't human?' Your failure to comprehend ain't my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:20 PM
1

DM me nerd.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:08 PM
-1

it's an honor to have nerdos like you resort to stupid strawmen because inside they know... ...that they only embrace TRP because they are embracing their inner bitch. But it's okay, son. I know deep in your heart you wish the world was TBP. And i'm here to say that... ...real men go out and remake the world in their image. WOMEN TAKE THINGS AS THEY ARE AND PING OFF OF IT. DUCY TRP is inherently a betaboy/female mindset? TRP: this is just how it is and we're REACTING to it Alpha: get behind thee…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:07 PM
0

ya. for example... lol nerd.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:05 PM
1

what if you aren't human? you are human. stop trying to act fresh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:04 PM
1

boyo, you aren't taking anything you desire because you don't even know what you desire... ...your entire screed is bemoaning the fact that the path before you, any of them, require work. you're just choosing the path of least resistance. which is fine, but just admit you're a coward.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:03 PM
0

Oh, so you have no control of your emotions? LOL AND TRPERS ADMIT THAT THEY INDEED ARE WOMEN. GAME SET MATCH BETA BOY.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:02 PM
1

oh no. reddit commenter gravel roads, who likely will never achieve a tenth of what i have in life, thinks i lack credibility. still took the time to read and comment though. buster.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:01 PM
0

I have a dick. There's no way for me to become like a woman. Maybe that shit's not the same for you, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 04:00 PM
1

Ya... me: alphas do noble shit because it's dope trper: nuuu I may get my feelings hurt nu nu nu, womenz are mean, why, nuuuuu we should just fux women and let them kno who ees bawse! me: pussy pussy lady boy faggot, u must be a trans or something. context, boyo. context.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:58 PM
0

There isn't a schism. It's a bunch of men trying to be women and valuing what women value, i.e. 'zomg do u kno how many chix i'm fuckiing, lol! they all think i'm so hawt! yaaaaaa! that's how we spin dem plates!' sounds a lot like 'zomg, did u see that chad and derek were both trying to get with me? they both think i'm so hawt! yaaaaa! that's how we get free dates!' Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:56 PM
0

Anyone who replies to a TRPer must be mad, indeed. You gonna cite specific examples or sit there and bleed beta blood?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:55 PM
1

TRper, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:54 PM
1

"You owe it to your kids the chance to see how a man SHOULD treat a woman, which means being nice, being kind in all of those old school ways."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:45 PM
0

Yeah dude, being kind and treating everyone with respect is such a feminine imperative. Go sell the BS to someone else, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:42 PM
1

Yeah, you can fail to fulfill your basic biological imperative as a human being. TRPer is all about biology until it comes to actual, incontrovertible biological facts. You're such a beta. Look at you, wondering what everyone else thinks...'we're supposed to take heart because that workhorse is a "real man" for stepping up and breaking his back for others?' It's like the pussytude is built right into TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:42 PM
1

Why would I give you money? You have a dick but act like a pussy. You one of them transgenders? Am I giving you money for the operation? Therapy? Be specific son, ma'am, lad, lass...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:27 PM
-3

'The traits and behaviors they exhibit (e.g. AF/BB) and the qualities they are attracted to only make sense under the light of evolutionary biology' Is that right? Point me to a speciifc gene or suite of genes, along with a specific mechanism of action, that has been linked to these complex behaviors... or shut your mouth trying to science.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:26 PM
2

In other words, you don't care about your kids and will be glad to watch them flounder. Sorry, just another weak man sad over womanly things. 'waaaaah, she may have seen peepees other than mine...waaaaah.'
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:25 PM
1

you don't owe that to your children? Sorry, I know this is a CMV, but as we come to the root of it, it's just a bunch of weak man shirking off any sense of responsibility because 'oh noes what if it don't turn out so good, oh noes.'
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:22 PM
1

Please pick out specific examples, pseudo-int-interlocutor. :) Let's go.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:21 PM
1

ITT: Another person fails to read. "TRP also likes to say that their strategy is just 'the truth.' (It really isn't, they ignore any conflicting data) Let's say it is, as a matter of biology or whatever. What's the better world to fight for?" ITT: cowards gon coward
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:20 PM
1

You gonna mix and match sound bytes from several philosophies you obviously don't have much of a handle on. Hint: Nietzsche would agree more with my OP than all your whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:19 PM
0

Because alphas would write... "Fuck kids. Fuck a "legacy" (please explain what that means... you're dead.). Fuck a nuclear family. Fuck true love (again, define terms). Fuck the preconceived notions of how a MAN SHOULD treat a WOMAN. Fuck a "better world"." lmfao. Girly man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:17 PM
1

Yeah there's a lot of talking about Chad and his life from people who really just don't sound like they have anything approaching a reasonable amount of experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:16 PM
2

Evil is banal, it's true. TRPers think they're dark and sinister and hardcore... ...but they're just boring. Like most everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:15 PM
1

Men fail because they aren't brave enough, boyo. And no, an alpha doesn't take more than he gives. That's just you rationalizing your bitchitude. There's no reward...? Lol. Meaning. The pursuit of something noble for its own sake. See, this is why TRPers just come off like little sprats who have no business talking about grown man things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:14 PM
1

Yeah, like...change your partner :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 03:12 PM
2

No it isn't. Go sell your BS to someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:45 AM
1

Then you're a sackless wonder, boyo. Marriage, love, devotion....high risk games. Man games. For keeps. You see a culture that glorifies cowardice and emptiness...love and the higher things can only come from courage and effort. Not easy. Requires putting yourself on the line. A man who was shot in the head once said 'we do the hard things because they are hard.' Not you. You can't beat 'em, you join 'em....by going MGTOW and shrinking away from the fight. Pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:28 AM
2

Lol therapy can't help the real fear of sexual inadequacy. What's your therapist going to do? Make you stop that hardwired desire to be this or that to the person you love? Get out of here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:24 AM
1

YES Real life strikes back against the larpers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:12 AM
1

Dose is reality here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:09 AM
1

Larper 2
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:09 AM
6

Shh. Yeah bro, you...reddit commenter extraordinaire...are one of the outlier womanizers who are so sexy that they can just straight up tell a woman that they want to fuck and nothing else and that that is a consistently successful strategy without a high reject rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/19 09:07 AM
2

I busted my ass it's true. It has a problem shared by only a few....a crack down the middle boo boo. irule
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 11:07 PM
1

I didn't say that so the rest of your comment isn't worth responding to. I suggest you burn it with the other sttawmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 11:06 PM
0

Speak for yourself, weak brah
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 05:00 PM
1

Well stop sucking on it and it'll return to its flaccid state then
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 05:00 PM
12

Women raise their standards for casual sex and lower them for relationships. Men are the opposite. That's empirical, from studies. So it's a good guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 02:50 PM
2

You don't get to decide how others speak. Ad hominem isn't a fallacy in inductive reasoning, which is what we're engaged in. Your credibility as a speaker is always legit grounds for attack. People who cry fallacy when they're under fire personally scream "loser."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 02:34 PM
-6

Fuck you. You don't get to decide how people talk. If you can't even defend your basic credibility you're just a little nerd girl trying to talk. Alpha my ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:50 AM
-2

I talked about it in another post
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:48 AM
0

No it isn't. Lol. The first step to even be worth listening to is to be a credible speaker. Threshold. Fair game. Stop being a bitch and fire back or get out of the game. You think any supposed alpha would whine about this shit? And appeal to the rulez of debate? Lol. Trpers....
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:40 AM
3

If more men did this the problem would solve itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:38 AM
7

Nah. The feels are valid....which is why men should very carefully screen their partners
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:37 AM
1

Ya. The chick has to think of you either as a sports car or a beat up sports car that with some fixing could be a sports car.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:36 AM
4

So much this. I don't really worry about the past because I busted my ass to have a top tier physique, income, and career. When you look like an athlete yourself, athletes bother you less...and so on... Jack of all trades master of none though oft times better than master of one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:35 AM
-4

Lol attacking a speaker's credibility is valid, ace. Wtf do you think AMOGGING is? Men do it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:32 AM
20

Lol this is dumb. Those guys likely were above her pay grade so they tossed her aside...don't treat them like LTR options for her..
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:30 AM
15

Bro, you need to stop thinking of it like that. Here's how you know if she's settling.... ...if you were depressed to the point of near incapacitation, would this chick be your nurse....even to the extent of bathinf and grooming you? If you lost your job....would this chick step up and support both of you while you got your shit straight? Does this chick always want to fuck you? Does this chick put up with your shit....your insecurities, your meanness, your ugliness? You got a chick who's down f…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/19 06:25 AM
1

No he isn't you retard. The school receives money from the lender and the lender pays the bill. You don't know what you're talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 01:51 AM
1

WRONG YOU DUMBASS THE LENDING COMPANY PAYS THE SCHOOL. Go learn how money works.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 01:23 AM
1

Who pays the school? :)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 12:23 AM
1

By definition he doesn't. You don't seem to understand how debt even operates. The loan is an obligation, the actual spending is the monthly payment. So no, you're wrong AGAIN...the student did not SPEND thousands of dollars, the loan company did. The student created an obligation to PAY thousands of dollars SPREAD OUT over a LONG TIME PERIOD. Why is the loan structured that way? SO THAT THE STUDENT CAN STILL LIVE WITHIN HIS MEANS YOU FUCKING ASSCLOWN
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 12:18 AM
1

Yes, and you were wrong. You still don't seem to know how debt works. If my income allows monthly expenditures of 1000 and I'm spending 800...if I take out a loan that requires 300 dollars a month to service it, I am (1) spending beyond my means and (2) destroying wealth because I will not be able to pay back that loan. If I take out a loan that requires 100 dollars a month, I will (1) NOT be spending beyond my means and (2) not destroying wealth. You are wrong. Spending beyond one's means does …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 12:12 AM
1

from your own source: "Credit cards, loans, savings, and even emergency funds allow you to buy more things than your income would ordinarily allow. Unfortunately, that kind of lifestyle isn’t sustainable and, at some point, your reckless spending will catch up to you." If you spend 0 DOLLARS to TAKE OUT A LOAN for 15,000...how much have you spent, class? 0 DOLLARS YOU DUMBDUMB. If the payment on the loan is 200$ a month, how much have you spent per month on the loan? 200$... ...which means that …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 12:06 AM
1

So all debt is unaffordable? You're a fucking idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/19 12:03 AM
1

Again, spending beyond one's means = spending more than one can afford. Good debt is affordable. Bad debt is not. You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 11:59 PM
1

debt != spending beyond your means. But hey, nice attempt at conflating two totally different concepts. spending beyond your means = undertaking several obligations that have low chance of ever being repaid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 11:56 PM
1

Such behavior doesn't fuel an economy...it destroys wealth retard
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 11:41 PM
1

People spending beyond their means en masse isn't sustainable in a pure capitalist credit market dumb dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 11:30 PM
1

Which would be checked by the interest rate, which would be pegged to the market, i.e. no artificial 'boom' would happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 10:12 PM
1

It has fueled boom cycles which wouldn't happen under pure capitalism dummkopf
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 09:26 PM
1

Capitalism in what sense? Narcissism is the false projection of self beyond one's true value/worth/capability and the protection of that image at all costs. Narcissism would be spending beyond your means to keep up a lifestyle that appears high status to all around you, taking out loans for a big business project that is good for the ego but bad for everything else. This desire to preserve an image leads for people feeling entitled to things they did not earn by standard ancap logic, and when pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/19 08:56 PM
2

However, if you look in the real world, women are more likely to reject traditional gender roles in favor of equality. If you look in the real world, marriages where traditional gender norms are followed are happier: https://www.studyfinds.org/gender-roles-breadwinner-mental-health-marriage/ now is this because traditional gender roles are oh so great or because people who buck them are socially shamed? doesn't matter for our purposes --- your picture of reality is just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 02:29 PM
7

What can I say that Right Said Fred didn't already say?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 12:04 AM
1

It depends on your other attractive qualities. If all you have going for you is your strong frame or "game" or whatever, then yeah. But if you're a good looking guy great in bed funny hot body, etc. Then no...your partner may be annoyed but they'll still want to fuck your brains out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 07:47 PM
4

Lol. Men usually have accumulated more resources by their 30's. Plus it takes about a decade of lifting to build a fuck me now physique
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 07:30 PM
1

Idk what to do except tell you to read the wiki article.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 03:20 PM
1

FYI, this dude completely mischaracterized my position as being 'casual sex makes you want monogamy,' which I never said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/19 03:19 PM
1

Well if TBP says that looks matter and that your league is your league, barring rare exceptions (someone out there for everyone thinking), then a man following TBP would always be able to be blue pilled, because he would stay in his looks lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 04:20 PM
1

Does actual science say somewhere that human beings do not need sexual intimacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 04:19 PM
1

Didn't see a source, so I'm not sure this can really do much to CMV 'If you need mommy to give you compliments to boost your confidence, you aren't fucking.' Is the contention here that men don't need sexual validation?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/19 04:17 PM
1

Yes and then a higher need is sexual intimacy....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 11:53 PM
3

Then he's arguing against a claim I never made. I merely said sex with someone you care about is far better than just sex with someone you can get off with. If he's saying you can be intimate with those you don't care about, that strains credulity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 11:22 PM
3

I never made a claim about monogamy so....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 10:19 PM
1

Okay but you didn't fuck him on the first date. Literally my OP is waiting ANY time after the 1st date.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 09:56 PM
1

"Humans need to love and be loved – both sexually and non-sexually – by others" Really, it doesn't say that? That's a quote right from the article re: intimacy
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 09:36 PM
1

Lol, no dude. Sex alone is at the bottom of the pyramid. Sexual love is higher up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 09:36 PM
2

Dude, I'm sorry that those studies said what they said...you still seem to be butthurt about empirical reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 09:34 PM
1

Not asking for a solution. Read the OP please :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 09:02 PM
1

I've given it several times :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:37 PM
3

The funny thing is that neither of you would be disagreeing with me. All I said is that sex with someone you really truly care about is in a whole different ballpark than just sex with someone who you can get off with. Another poster made it about monogamy and marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:35 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs#Social_belonging "Humans need to love and be loved – both sexually and non-sexually – by others"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:34 PM
1

Do you have a survey of attitudes? Anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:32 PM
3

Here's the definition from Ask the Redpill: From The Matrix and its sequels. The path of conformity with Society’s expectations; the state of being unaware of the problems engendered by society. Compare with “Red Pill,” below. i.e. a certain view of how the world works. Says nothing about marriage or monogamy. And again, sex with the same woman != monogamy. I don't know why you keep conflating the two. 'A fulfilling intimate life can be maintained by causal sex with women and emotional connectio…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:31 PM
3

I wasn't aware that only 18-22 men in frats were successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:04 PM
1

You didn't really back yourself up with anything beyond your intentions for your future dealings with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:03 PM
1

Yeah okay, cite a study for that then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:02 PM
1

No, no no. If TRP gets to be amoral and just about 'how the world works' without any normative prescription, so does TBP, so nice try. TBP are just thoughts about how the world works. And yeah, that's fair, I am generalizing about men. I'm going by Maslow's hierarchy of needs --- one of which is sexual intimacy (different than just sex, which is listed on the bottom of the pyramid). And again, you keep conflating what I have said 'sex with someone you really care about' with 'sex within a monoga…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 08:01 PM
1

Lol, no one said attraction isn't important. TBP says that primarily comes from looks, which pretty much every study on the matter agrees with. And the nice guy paradox is largely a myth: http://www.drpeterkilmann.com/pdf/niceguy.pdf notice that in LTRs, niceness still won out over physical attractiveness, and the effect for STM just suggests that physical attractiveness can beat out niceness --- not that JERKINESS beats out niceness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 07:58 PM
2

And you think those guys represent the majority of men who are successful with women? The fact that they talk like 'I tapped that ass...' leads me to think not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 06:45 PM
3

I agree with you. Casual sex divorces sex from love, but that's not a bad thing, and how could it be? It's not hard to have good sex with someone --- casual sex can teach you that. What does seem more difficult to find is someone you can really relate to and enjoy spending the bulk of your time with. Do you find that to be true?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 06:44 PM
5

Where did I say that one desires monogamy and marriage more with casual sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 06:43 PM
3

How are you interpreting it that way when it literally says need to love and be loved BOTH...not EITHER.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 06:42 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs#Social_belonging Intimacy is right there: "Humans need to love and be loved – both sexually and non-sexually – by others"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 05:49 PM
4

Now, let's assume that they were behaving in a TRP way, what about their stated beliefs. It's true that many 'natural' men can be seen as being 'dickish' or 'TRP-like' to women (IMO that's from the outside looking in but let's assume for the sake of argument) --- were their actual stated beliefs TRP or TBP?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 05:47 PM
4

If we don't assign inherent value to a relationship just for being a relationship Now, I'm going to follow the rules here and be very very gentle, but how can you assert this in the face of Maslow's hierarchy of needs? Sexual intimacy, i.e. a sexually deep relationship, is a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 05:44 PM
2

For high-level civilization to exist, it must necessarily restrict sexual instincts. Lulz, sure. But why tho? Oh yeah, because men aren't stupid and if THEIR access to sex isn't restricted, they aren't going to waste their lives in a rat race they can never win, toiling to make some ivory tower dweller richer. High-level civilization tends to also be high level slavery.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 05:11 PM
2

Lol how about broadening the range of looks that can be sexy rather than foist a single unattainable ideal on both sexes. How about we stop assuming that single ideal has anything to do with a lizard brain and more to do with a conditioned pavlov part of your brain? The fact that there's such confusion about what to do illustrates how fucking dumb people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 02:25 PM
3

Please don't cite to human nature without any hard genomic evidence. And way to cite a disgusting cultural phenomenon in defense of another. Once again, only a small percentage of men have the choice to enforce the trophy wife standard. Not so with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 03:43 AM
2

Thank you. Some common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/19 03:41 AM
3

Biology is weirdest when people invoke it without much evidence that the phenomenon in question is biological
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 10:37 PM
9

Bingo. Women whine about men holding them to ridiculous standards when lol only a small percent of men can be so choosy. In these times few men are choosy enough to demand a non fat partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 10:36 PM
3

Lol, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 10:33 PM
5

Very good response. People like the above commenter overlook the fact that they're just shallow and will halo the living hell out if A good looking or popular guy to glom on to his or her coattails. The starfucker syndrome.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 10:32 PM
6

Jive. This poster admits the real game: something or someone to show off. If it has social status it = fun. Remember that boyos.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 10:31 PM
0

ya hohkay. laff.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/19 09:54 PM
1

Is that what I said? Food isn't a social construct to begin with dummpkopf.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/19 06:22 AM
2

I definitely am. A lot of people here obviously have zero experience with that life. You're not missing much.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 07:29 PM
4

You're not going to be on the top of any hill you dummkopf.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 06:25 PM
3

I would love nothing more than to take my shirt off and (all else constant) for it to have greater sexual power than it does now . "I want to be an object," the fool said. The fool, like most fools, thought he would benefit under a scheme with increasingly unrealistic standards that would devalue, rather than upsell, his current shirtless body --- because he would be competing with increasingly fit males that dominated the 'masculine sex appeal' market. He thought he would remain on the increasi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 05:57 PM
1

Dude, so many women are sugar babies and soft prostitutes that 'resource provisioning' is still a viable option for so many dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 04:53 PM
1

I'm more up front about what I'm looking for. If I want sex, I just say so. If I want a relationship, I just say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 04:52 PM
3

So much of being a hot guy in the top 20 or top 10 comes down to just being lean and muscular. and not even crazy muscular --- FFMI 21/22 and you're Gucci, as they say. There is a such thing as overdoing it (to unnatural levels). But as long as its aesthetic, you're good.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 04:51 PM
7

Dude I banged a girl off tinder not two weeks ago where I met up with her and within 30 minutes we were in her car --- in broad daylight behind the bar --- going at it. But these cases --- where they come straight to your apartment and things like the above --- are the exception. And it's USUALLY ABOUT THE GIRL. Has nothing to do with the guy. The girl is just in a hoe phase and down to do whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 04:48 PM
6

Because most of the advice is B.S. It's not going to work for STM. It will work IRONICALLY for more LTR-focused guys. STM is all about looks + non-sperg level social acumen. Lift Improve style Improve hygiene These will take you far. White or black, tall or short, clean cut or punk rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/19 04:46 PM
1

Facial masculinity is a moving target. Remember, the heritability of facial attractiveness is fairly high, meaning that the selective pressure on it has been weak, which could either mean it's not very important (which is still inconsistent with civilization up until recently being resource provisioning based due to the low economic status of women, because humanity evolved in an environment of abundance --- the hunter gatherer societies near the equator). and the same is true of other supposedl…
/r/BlackPillScience06/09/19 04:14 PM
1

the future is a matriarchy, eh?
/r/BlackPillScience06/09/19 04:10 PM
5

This is mediated by how threatened a woman feels that her partner will leave. A man is always best off marrying DOWN.
/r/BlackPillScience06/09/19 04:06 PM
3

How is this surprising? Positive traits can compensate for negative ones. Did they not control for any other positive traits vs. the negative trait of aggression?
/r/BlackPillScience06/09/19 04:02 PM
2

The traits you listed aren't themselves negative, either, and indeed could mimic other positive traits. disinhibition and sensation seeking looks a lot like confidence and the ability to shoulder risk. lack of responsibility looks a lot like strong boundaries.
/r/BlackPillScience06/09/19 04:01 PM
2

This is a study about bodily attractiveness, so...
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/19 08:41 PM
1

First of all, bodybuilding does focus on aesthetics but the aesthetic development of a body requires C O M P L E T E development of its musculature. A garbage man is probably less powerful than a bodybuilder overall because the bodybuilder develops his entire body, not just muscules used for garbage-doing, like the garbage man. Muscular development in the normal range is just the response to stimulus and represents increased strengths. PEDs change things and weaken the correlation due to (guessi…
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/19 08:39 PM
2

Not much of one according to the study. Leanness didnt really explain much of the variance.
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/19 08:34 PM
2

This is incorrect. It's linear within the range of the study. The study did not venture beyond normal FFMI levels (~22 IIRC). So in natural bodybuilding, strength does correlate very well with musculature.
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/19 08:33 PM
1

actually, leanness only explained about as much additional variance as height --- which is to say, not much, on the order of maybe 5%
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/19 08:32 PM
2

lmfao did they control for the positive ancillary constellation of POSITIVE traits that psychopaths have that non-psychopaths can also possess too, such as charm, etc.?
/r/BlackPillScience05/09/19 08:26 PM
1

He'll bang whoever is down to fuck at that time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 10:09 AM
0

For a night she can.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 09:48 AM
1

Well yes but most men aren't given the opportunity and will never have it no matter how hard they try. Even a below average woman has a good chance of sampling a top man. A below average man....even if he works his ass off...won't have that opportunity. Imo nothing wrong with him being insecure and screening his partners. Who needs extra grief in their life? My only thing is be honest about it. It is insecurity. And that's ok!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 09:21 AM
1

I mean, I don't begrudge men for feeling that way or insecurity shame them. As a man you have the entire world telling you everyday that you're nothing much...why bring that attitude into your home...the safe space...with a spouse who believes the same, regardless of how true it is? If the man doesn't love her and feels that way I say just walk away. But I'm a romantic....you always give love a shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 09:04 AM
1

$$$ is alpha. No ifs and or buts. The ability to completely rearrange the social environment in your favor = social power = social dominance = alpha. $$$ allows one to do this via means other than looks. People who bloviate about genuine love are just recycling poor people tropes. Poor people have no $$$ and make shit up to make themselves feel better...i.e. elevating non monetary related traits and devaluing the converse. Doesn't make it true. Does money not also buy happiness? Spoiler...it com…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 08:54 AM
3

I'm agreeing with you about the root cause. But I'm live and let live on it. I think your attitude about it is pretty callous...since what makes a lot of guys "unfuckable" are circumstances beyond their control or are nigh insurmountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 08:46 AM
5

Uses culture, a social construct, to demonstrate the lack of a social construct
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/19 12:05 AM
1

I didn't ask a question. But yes, your 'answering' has been very stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:37 PM
9

yeah but you're assuming the fuckwithery begins and ends with lowering N-count and downplaying how awesome Chad is in comparison to you chicks also lie in the other direction to fuck with your head as well for all you know you could be the biggest bestest hottest she's ever had and she's withholding that info to keep you in your place.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:33 PM
17

dude no guy would give a fuck if the guy wasn't locked in a no holds barred pants around the ankles competition with every other guy in his mind. it's fear. the more guys she's been with, the more likely she's been dicked better and bigger, laughed with funnier, been intrigued by smarter, etc. etc. girls like that will reflect who you really are right back at you. better to find a mirror with a less complete reflection so you don't have to deal with that shit, amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:31 PM
4

Sex is literally just a fun activity to do with someone ...like tennis. lol, naaaaah. there are two types of people who can indiscriminately sleep around (1) a minority of people who are just able to separate sex and love (or any other real psychological need). note, I said M I N O R I T Y. i'm not sure if more men or women are in this box, either. (2) people who are using sex to cope with or meet an unmet psychological need that's it. that's all. the people in (2) usually suffer heavy internal …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 11:27 PM
2

No real men are out there doing things other than that. It's almost as if real men aren't defined by you or something,
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 09:40 PM
1

Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 09:39 PM
1

lol 20...? A babe in the wood, aye, a sweet near-virgin. And um, as someone who has hooked up with, dated, and DATED SERIOUSLY the entire spectrum --- from women well into the triple digits to virgins... ...yeah it's mostly bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 06:04 PM
1

aka Big Mouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:57 PM
1

you're still missing the point, homie.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:56 PM
1

Ah but you know well my position on whether resources in and of themselves are attractive, and so little cat, I have evaded you again. - signed, Big Mouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:51 PM
2

Not all men get the point of my OP, either. It's not about the specific things, it's about being nurtured. And if you're saying that you don't want a nurturing gf then you're lyin', boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:51 PM
1

Yeah and it's like...dude, it's not like all of those chores and cheerleading and whatever else doesn't take effort. imagine cleaning up after someone/making sure their mood is in order/helping them with a business/etc. etc. whatever the nurturing thing is. that is effort. that's a full time job. and when a woman is really feeling and loving you, you won't be without sex either. how could anyone say the woman doesn't fucking love that dude and desires him way more than just the dude she'll use a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:46 PM
2

BINGO. OUT OF THE PARK. OUTSTANDING. I have said this before. All the sex guy is doing is screening for, you got it exactly right, WOMEN WHO ARE dtf. that's why sometimes I think guys are a little overactive in their imaginations re: retroactive jealousy of a chick's hoe phase promiscuous past. they just imagine it's all these Chads. and it really never is --- at least IME. it's just 'who's around.' the Chads or awesome dudes tend to be the ones they were in relationships with or at least had on…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:43 PM
1

lol.... ​ ... ​ well they should know that there's A L W A Y S a reason you never call again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:39 PM
0

Wrong women don't always Now, son, they don't have to always do anything for something to be generally the case. All of this can be done without withholding sex, sex is not the key for feeling and selling that lie won't make you have a LTR. If a woman really enjoys a man and his company she may withhold sex because she wants to just enjoy being around him before that 'is he just going to hit it and quit it?' moment later. sex can be "delay" for a while Ah so we agree. Spectactular.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:38 PM
1

So Idk what the point of saying this for you was beyond some kind of female independent woman thing. Hoo rah!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 05:35 PM
0

takes off your deductive reasoning hat and puts on your inductive reasoning hat Now, son, which is more likely to be the case... ...that the woman in question does a complicated algorhithm of what's most efficient and resource maximizing... ...or simply gravitates toward the man she's the most attracted to as the worthwhile time investment?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:54 PM
5

Don't have to look for anything. Women take care of men they love. There's a nurturing instinct. It doesn't have to be the above stereotypical tasks, but generally women use the skills they have in life to help the men in their lives. When they love those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:52 PM
1

lol ... lmfao ... I feel like I should take a bow as you prove my entire fucking point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:50 PM
2

beyond attraction? yes I presume that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:31 PM
1

you just said that in your experience there wasn't a difference. it's obvious that there is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:30 PM
-1

That isn't your brain. That's your pavlovian doggie conditioning in response to patriarchal gender norms with a dash of Madonna/Whore. Congrats, you're a conformist.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:08 PM
2

Results showed the average person polled would wait until date eight in an ideal world before taking things to the bedroom. The study by Groupon found men feel sex is appropriate at any point from date five onward, but women would rather wait until date nine, on average. https://nypost.com/2017/09/18/the-three-date-rule-for-sex-is-dead/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:07 PM
4

I'm a man. I'm just past the age of 13 so most of TRP can't understand me. And lol.... men should value R A T I O N A L I T Y It's simply unreasonable to take the contra view. Everyone should value his time as the highest possible value because it is a very limited resource. The man a woman wants to invest a lot of time and effort into is the man she desires the most. Seems obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 04:01 PM
1

it's not a rare scenario. there's tons of media about women making guys THEY REALLY LIKE wait. what, are they pulling it out of their asses? and i mean...all the bad shit you said about women is just bad shit about bad people in general. if you really have that childish of a generalized view of women...you gots de probleemz mang.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:59 PM
1

don't be solipsistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:58 PM
1

Yeah what I'm trying to illustrate is by switching your value system with the female's. YOU personally think banging ALFA chads are going to damage pair bonding for various reasons related to how highly you view raw sexual attractiveness. Women however insist otherwise. so to put this to the test, I tried to frame it in a way a man would understand (yes I am a man). the 100 fat chicks you don't give two fucks about, right? you're just jacking off with their vaginas, right? there wasn't gonna be …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:56 PM
1

eh there's variance...with the spread for the casual guy being 1-2 dates and the relationship guy 2-4 dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:49 PM
2

What you say makes no sense. Think FOR ONE SECOND. One guy = hot time Other guy = boyfriend potential The second guy has the girl WILLING TO INVEST MORE OF HERSELF INTO. How is that settling, how is that anything against the second guy? SHE'S ATTRACTED TO BOTH. Don't you think she's aware of what sleeping with/putting out fast does to the chances a guy will want her for a relationship and that maybe she doesn't care about having a relationship with the guy so she just forgoes convention. Don't y…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:47 PM
2

"What I'm saying, you can be a very horny person by nature and want to fuck everything that moves, but you can, at the same time, not be impulsive/learn or strive not to be impulsive" Ya because those are two different traits, so.... ...and okay, now that we've parsed out these two elements, let's still focus on the past experience. Return then to the 100 fat chicks example. Is there anything about the 100 fat chicks that would impact the ability to pair bond to the true blue hottie?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:44 PM
5

Please explain how having a woman take care of you and help you in life = being a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:42 PM
1

what do you mean 'BEING ABLE'.... and cool then, you concede the point that it isn't casual sex itself that's causing the impaired pair bond ability, it's whatever precipitates the 'ability' to have casual sex. we're talking about women and motherhood, yes. and the effect of casual sex on long term pair bonding ability, which I assume you're also linking to a mother's ability to bond with a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:27 PM
1

That isn't logic. That's your personal hunch, which is usually what people mean when asked to give a reason for their position and reply 'logic.' I didn't say a man would remain unaffected. If anything the porn addiction and prostitutes would make the man less willing to go out and find a mate altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:23 PM
1

You think so based on...? Visiting the prostitutes has nothing to do with what you're describing, the male sex drive does have a lot to do with it, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:16 PM
2

Why? Thought experiment --- imagine you bang 100 fat chicks and then you bang 1 chick who is young, extremely hot, sexually compatible with you, kind, sweet, smart, submissive (whatever ideal mate bullshit is in your mind)... ...do you really think the 100 fat chicks would ruin your ability to pair bond with her?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:06 PM
2

For casual sex that'd only be true if certain partners weren't a better fit for you than others. Some women are more what you're looking for sexually. Others aren't. It's a crapshoot with a new partner as to what you're going to get. And lol about simulated sex doing this. Until simulated sex replaces interaction with another human being and fires off the same validation receptors, then no...apples/oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 03:04 PM
1

And yet you committed another one
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/19 02:25 AM
1

You don't seem to understand continuum fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/19 08:36 AM
1

I didn't contradict anything. Go read my first response to better understand what I'm saying, since anything short of perfect egalitarianism must not be egalitarian according to your fallacious laden mind. And no it's not like modern society. Racism. Etc. Are not temporary hierarchies, genius. Ya cool rejecting an entire discipline. Refute it with better empirical data or get out of my face.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/19 11:27 PM
1

Attraction either exists or not. Now, you're right, there are degrees...and yes, that's where personality comes in
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 08:52 PM
1

No it doesn't work. It works when they're attracted to you and you're playing with that energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 08:36 PM
1

Going out and acting stupid is fun. Going out and approaching women is fun. Making dumb approaches toward women is dumb. We are in agreement on everything except that one point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 08:35 PM
1

Probably because the ecological fallacy is just as commonly committed?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 04:34 PM
2

no it isn't
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:44 PM
1

you mean psychopathic enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:44 PM
1

ehhhhhh they rarely report guys who actually rape them too, so....idk what this point is trying to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:43 PM
3

ok this is retarded. no that doesn't happen nor does it go down like this. the dude usually, if not ALWAYS, way overstays his welcome in a socially retarded way for it to get to this level. and even then it doesn't happen often
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:42 PM
1

it's called harassment. and it definitely can be a criminal offense. And just because cops aren't involved doesn't mean other less serious but embarassing consequences can't be. Getting tossed out or banned from somewhere is an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:41 PM
2

I'll tell you why TRPer/PooAh crap is harmful, because normal people can 'cold approach' flawlessly. The opener? Timeless....brilliant...magical, even: "Hi, how are you?" Does she stop, tell you, and keep the conversation going? Great! She's into it. Does she tell you out of politeness and let the conversation die. Oops! She's not into it. WOW! Cold approach done. No cops are likely to be called, she isn't likely to be offended, and you can go on with your life. PUAh-tech teaches a bunch of weir…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:39 PM
1

Cool none of the shit you mentioned as alpha is sexually attractive in the context of STM. Only physical attractiveness is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:54 AM
1

Please explain exactly why
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 03:25 AM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/archive/NATL-Women-Have-More-Orgasms-with-Wealthy-Men-Study.html%3famp=y
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:27 AM
1

Sure I have. Have you by chance realizes that wealth exerts an effect independent of those parameters?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:24 AM
1

Please cite to a gene encoding for bigotry or get out of my face with your jive about the human experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:23 AM
2

Woo woo jive. The other parameters are all proxies for social value and differentiating between them hierarchically is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:22 AM
1

Refute the studies or get out of my face.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:21 AM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/archive/NATL-Women-Have-More-Orgasms-with-Wealthy-Men-Study.html%3famp=y
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:21 AM
1

No feminism proper isn't a defender of that. You're just a level 1 world viewer and think that just because something goes by X it must be X. I bet you think Green Day is punk rock, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:20 AM
1

Refute the studies or get out of my face
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:19 AM
2

Or maybe people have different responses...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/19 01:18 AM
1

But I'm not. IF $$ = sexual attraction and 'whatever else you mean by alpha in TRP-land' = sexual attraction, then pursuing $$$ is pursuing an alpha strategy even under TRPer logic. The only way it isn't is if TRPers deny the obvious: that $$$ is sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:52 PM
2

I totally agree with you in terms of an instinctual thing. Like the thought of having a baby with X seems fine because the lifestyle would be good for the baby. Women are criticized for the same reason they're criticized as shallow for going after 'Chad' for his looks.... ...bullshit. $$$ is attractive so are good looks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:49 PM
3

I didn't miss the point at all. I explained why women would accept it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:47 PM
2

Either refute the multiple studies linking female orgasm frequency and intensity to $$$ having controlled for the other factors or get out of my face. I really don't care what TRP says about it because TRP, unsurprisingly, is wrong and utilizing a faulty premise. $$$ = sexual attraction = tingles. Deal. With. It.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:46 PM
0

how we find the world is how the world ought to be! reasoning master class, TRPer retardation. I mean, edition.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:43 PM
5

yeah because things like bias and bigotry don't exist!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:43 PM
0

Wow an M.D. wrote that? LMFAO The m'lady defense of oppressive patriarchy. Welp, pack it in guys....no more work to do here.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:40 PM
4

Because only a small % of men hold all that power. Beneath them are women, who essentially get to choose who to hitch their stars to. And beneath the women are the rest of the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:39 PM
2

how is the guy blue pilled, exactly? If he's driving a Ferrari and made money to score chicks...what's the blue pill? $$$ = ALPHA ALPHA FUCKS CAUSE ALPHA HAS BUCKS YOU NIMRODS
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:36 PM
7

no female ever thinks 'optimal genes and child rearing.' they think 'i like this dude...gonna check him out'
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:35 PM
1

With the Recent Contrapoints video basically admitting that patriarchy is upheld by women, I realized that in contemporary society Masculinity is basically a luxury for the rich. Rich = social value. Instead, it has a wittingly or not, created a type of feminism where gold digging has been legitimized. There is no such thing as falling in love; women make calculated risks. And feminist ideals defend such objectifications, even while pronouncing that male's should not objectify women in turn. Mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:34 PM
0

First, never use the term hard wired again without solid genomic biological proof of DNA that can be reliably linked to the traits in question. Second, the OP simply says that men should respond to female preferences. Not all women care about a man's experience. And not all relationships require daily constant interaction. should understand that women are not going to want to be your first, and learn to be ok with that. non-sequitur. this isn't 'hard-wired' anything, this is just a matter of whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:29 PM
8

Listen, I'll let you in on a secret --- if it's popular, it has been co-opted by all the wrong things. Sex-positivity, sexual empowerment, etc. are just Patriarchy 2.0: The Revenge. IF you go back and read earlier non-insane feminist literature, sexual empowerment was about women being able to choose other roles for themselves in relationships... ...i.e. being an independent woman who could have sex with a man without belonging to him and a woman who could sleep with and have relations with men …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:24 PM
1

are you asking if golddiggers exist? yes, they do. they are vastly outnumbered by the women who are legitimately attracted to men with means. deal with it. it's the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:18 PM
1

Yeah I can. We live in a very misogynistic society that routinely dismisses behavior like this as 'lol just a big SLUUUUUUTWHOOUUUUURE LOL'
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:16 PM
1

As it SHOULD be. lol what you want people to love you and give you goodies for no reason? lol talk about handouts amirite?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 08:16 PM
1

No. They are EGALITARIAN. I didn't misspeak. "the egalitarianism typical of human hunters and gatherers is never total (which I already said), but is striking when viewed in an evolutionary context. One of humanity's two closest primate relatives, chimpanzees, are anything but egalitarian, forming themselves into hierarchies that are often dominated by an alpha male). So great is the contrast with human hunter-gatherers that it is widely argued by palaeoanthropologists that resistance to being d…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:59 PM
1

There are exceptions that prove the rule, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:57 PM
1

I'm here for you bro. I've gotten a top 1% body and career (hmu for proof in DMs), and I know the struggle. It's NOT EASY. It's not something I would ever EVER fault a man for not doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:57 PM
1

I think you're agreeing with me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:55 PM
1

Check out the replies to me talking about rape survivors. You still think these retards are joking?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:55 PM
0

Um..... ....is the point of this post just to handwave away a real documented clinical phenomenon? Welp, see the last part of my post: this world is insanely fucked up and full of evil people like yourself. Gratz.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:54 PM
6

Dude are you dismissing the very real and documented phenomenon I just described here? This is based on real research. Did you really just think women like that were just 'LOL WHOA WAT A SLUT WILD LMFAO WHOA!' 90% of the time it's something like ^ happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:53 PM
1

Yeah well according to studies on the matter, there isn't any real difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 05:52 PM
2

under American almost-socialism that everyone who knows dick about Marxism equates to capitalism because muhpundits say capitalism ...that's the real fix :D
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:05 AM
1

Please name a purely capitalist country. Spoiler alert! It doesn't exist. All Western countries are heavily interventionist to the point of being almost de facto socialist states.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:04 AM
1

Well if you just assume a bunch of shit than anything is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:04 AM
0

how did you know it was happening, did you personally Skype in on all of these sessions?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:03 AM
2

Chad gets cheated on too you dumbass. OFTEN with a guy who has $$$. $$$ = alpha trait. I'm sorry you chumps can't accept it. Alpha = so much $$$ that taking her out and buying up the place is a penny to you Beta = doing all that shit and not being able to maintain it because you're living beyond your means.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:02 AM
0

The force is strong in you. Don't listen to TRPers. They're mostly poor. To any TRPer who doubts 'genuine attraction' from women to men with money, go save up $10,000 and spend it all in one night go buy up the entire bar scene in a moderately sized urban area. And behold the lord's blessings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/19 12:00 AM
2

"that kind of attention is superficial and not based on genuine attraction" this is woo woo. literally studies have shown that women orgasm more and harder for dudes with $$. it IS genuine attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:57 PM
2

Hunter gatherers were/are egalitarian, so yes hierarchies of an insignificant type have always existed, but the kind of today versus at humanity's inception are so different that they shouldn't even really be thought of in the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:55 PM
3

dude there is no such thing as 'loves him for his money, not him' anymore there's no such thing as 'loves him for his looks, not him.' to the outside world you ARE your external attributes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:54 PM
1

nah. under capitalism a woman is still property and so gains a lot by attaching herself to a top man and gaining his resources. once that model goes out the window, women will stop giving a shit about arbitrary male gender norms IMO. we've reached peak chad. the future will be a good one for all dudebros getting poos. will it be a good one for getting a sexually monogamous gf? ... stay tuned. ... lol probably not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:53 PM
1

We're moving toward a more socialist 'community' mindset, which is why more 'communal' forms of sexuality are being embraced, i.e. polyamory, female promiscuity (she's not yours, she's yours now). How we relate to one another as people is largely determined by economic ideology. It's pretty fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:51 PM
5

Lol I like how the only explanation you can think of is that she's just horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:49 PM
11

Rape victims. Early childhood molestation/sexual abuse victims. One of the PTSD responses is hypersexuality, and the rape/abuse victims with ptsd that go through this are quite wild. usually a lot of the stories about 'some slut who banged x dudes in a row' and blah blah are stories about a girl who has been raped and coping with her trauma (not that the peanut gallery would know any of that part). the hypersexuality is a way to reassert control over her body and decide who she has sex with. or …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:48 PM
1

Limited in that there tends to be only one right answer. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/19 11:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter