sudo_make_install Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
14	TRP and racism.		sudo_make_install	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/11/13 03:02 AM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Race in TRP I created a similar topic earlier, and that discussion might be interesting to you: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1q5fri/trp_and_racism/ I wouldn't try arguing with theredpill school. He uses a classic rhetorical tactic of "white nationalists" and "race realists" and claims to be impartial, rational, and encouraging debate because openly espousing racist beliefs is a sure way to lose all credibility in the modern age. However, as a moderator, you can silently and subtly manip…	/r/PurplePillDebate	17/12/13 05:03 AM
3	TRP and racism. Upvotes and frequency are a good proxy for measuring the general beliefs of a community. And the topics that get support, even outside of the classic enemy of feminism, is even by cursory inspection very extreme. Look, you are obviously open to entertaining these ideas, but I see it as very irrational and conspiratorial. I'm not even sure why you're bringing feminism into this discussion.	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/13 11:56 PM
1	TRP and racism. Sure dude, you can basically label anything you disagree with as concern trolling. And it is blatantly obvious that you (and by extension your moderator team) practice selective enforcement on off topic issues that it's kind of laughable that you claim to be fair. Any inflammatory post (this really depends on your viewpoint) that offends you is labeled as "disrespectful" and ones that don't "contribute to the discussion". Let's be clear. There is a bar past which an idea can be considered racist…	/r/PurplePillDebate	16/11/13 11:44 PM
3	TRP and racism. The posters in TRP are so extreme in their positions that normal people would want nothing to do with them. Why should I tolerate these bigots who ignore reason in preference to a conspiratorial and adversarial world view?	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/13 06:49 AM
2	TRP and racism. Funny how you manage to reply this deeply in this subthread, but are conspicuously silent on why I was banned. You claim that you want "discussion", but I see hateful remarks on certain topics upvoted and ignored all the time on your subreddit. Somehow, mine was worthy of a ban. How convenient is it that comments that are not "politically correct" are left alone, while posts like mine arguing against are downvoted and the poster banned. You can claim to be rational and impartial all you want, an…	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/11/13 06:40 AM
6	TRP and racism. Here is the thread. I think some of the comments has been deleted, though: http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1pr8k1/pentagon_training_manual_white_males_have_unfair/	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/11/13 03:48 AM
14	TRP and racism. I was recently banned from /r/TheRedPill because I opposed white nationalist comments on the subreddit. These comments were heavily upvoted and mine were downvoted. This implies that these ideas are possibly held by perhaps even the majority of redpillers. This leads me to believe that there is a very strong racist and white nationalist attitude in the community that colors their entire ideology. Although, there is nothing really racist in official ideology, the entire "conflict" against women s…	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/11/13 03:03 AM
-2	Pentagon training manual: white males have unfair advantages No, you think about what you're saying when you claim wars make nations great. This is an idea that is disturbingly popular with nationalist movements, and conveniently ignore the indisputable fact that industrial, agricultural, scientific, cultural, and societal development is what makes a nation great. You can point to instances like WWII that lead to advances in technology, but by and large these developments are done in times of peace. There's a reason that no one in the international commun…	/r/TheRedPill	02/11/13 11:44 PM
1	Example of irrational female solipsism: National survey finds that fat women prefer to be called "normal," "average" and "beautiful" ("curvy" is preferred term only when forced to choose real description) Very few people are genetically fucked and it's pretty obvious from the get go. Most people are just doing something wrong and would rather take the excuse that it's harder for them for some special reason than admit being wrong and trying to do better. What else can I infer from this other than that you don't recognize that people can have vastly different responses in the same obesogenic environment that extend beyond crippling disease? Maybe this article says it better than I do: http://www.n…	/r/TheRedPill	24/10/13 01:39 AM
1	Example of irrational female solipsism: National survey finds that fat women prefer to be called "normal," "average" and "beautiful" ("curvy" is preferred term only when forced to choose real description) It seems very naive and simplistic to assume that everyone regulates or respond to food the same way. After all, humans vary genetically in almost everything, from lactose intolerance to hair color. Why then, is it so hard a leap to recognize that people may genetically respond to the modern diet in different ways? This documentary explores some of this observation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6-A0iHSdcA Do you believe in this genetic egalitarianism for appetite because you don't want to bel…	/r/TheRedPill	23/10/13 01:47 AM
1	Example of irrational female solipsism: National survey finds that fat women prefer to be called "normal," "average" and "beautiful" ("curvy" is preferred term only when forced to choose real description) You're taking two examples and asserting a truth from them. Have you considered it might have been easier for you to lose weight than the average person or that your friend has a more difficult time to quit smoking than the average smoker? If you go to any fitness community, there is one striking observation that you'll immediately find. There are those who are classically overweight and those who are "hard gainers", who are unhealthily skinny. Each group seems envious of the other, but the affl…	/r/TheRedPill	22/10/13 01:21 AM
4	Fewer Men Graduate College: Obama says it’s a “Great Accomplishment.” The biggest problem is getting funding, and these sci-fi technologies will not be pioneered by college dropouts.	/r/TheRedPill	11/10/13 05:24 AM
2	Rant about TRP pathology and why I empathize with them. Tell me what you think. What I'm saying is that TRP claims to encourage rational thought, but from what I'm reading in the submissions and comments, a large number of people in the subreddit do not seem to apply rationalism.	/r/PurplePillDebate	08/10/13 08:04 PM
8	Rant about TRP pathology and why I empathize with them. Tell me what you think. You described what I am feeling right now with haunting accuracy. Despite TRP's casual racism, confirmation bias, and flimsy applications of rationalism, its message has been resonating with me very deeply. I feel like I did everything society says how you should live a responsible and successful life. I have never had much success in social situations, so I devoted all my efforts into intense study. I found a very good 6 figure job after I graduated and am very secure financially. I don't drink…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/10/13 05:23 AM
2	Idea for an educational/hilarious website At best, you can probably make some kind of model to estimate the numbers based on published statistics or from crawling public Facebook profiles and extrapolating the data.	/r/TheRedPill	03/10/13 04:23 AM
1	So I just finished having lunch with one of the biggest djs in the USA.. Yeah, but the analogy still makes some kind of sense. Pre-agriculture, the average hunter-gatherer probably didn't have much starchy carbohydrates in his diet.	/r/TheRedPill	01/10/13 10:18 PM
3	When "No" is a shit test Someone clearly doesn't understand Bayesian probability. You can't take these things as independent events, man. For example, the probably of getting kill in traffic is way greater than 1/9300 if you are drunk at the moment.	/r/TheRedPill	01/10/13 10:02 PM
11	Game theory and getting laid That scene is horrendously misleading in explaining what a Nash Equilibrium is. First of all, agents in a non-cooperative game obviously can't cooperate, so they can't each choose a unique target. If the men can't coordinate, the Nash equilibrium will be some kind of mixed strategy with the blonde having the high probability for all players. Moreover, I don't see how mating can be realistically modeled as a noncooperative game. Who are the players? What are the actions and payoffs?	/r/TheRedPill	26/09/13 05:50 AM
1	What the shitty Economy means for Hypergamy I thought hypergamy isn't just about money. Doesn't the effect financial success only start to matter as women grow older?	/r/TheRedPill	13/09/13 04:23 AM