TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theJigmeister Archive

View 1 posts and 295 comments by theJigmeister on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

theJigmeister/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:16 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Is this really the best comment you could come up with? Someone is actually taking suicide seriously and your response is to make flippant misogynist remarks? Get ahold of yourself.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:03 PM
3

I'm in the same boat. I started calling it out and would just get shouted down as a concern troll, whatever the fuck that even means. There is good news and interesting opinions here, but lately the toxicity has gone way up and it's pushing the more reasonable people out. Which is a shame, because a lot of this is stuff that needs to be heard, just not when it's shouted by incel shitbags.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 11:19 PM
0

Oh I’m not calling this rape by coercion, my point is just that if the legal system is going to draw that distinction, I think this should fall under it. It’s trickery to get guys naked and ogle them, at the very least, under current legal definitions, it should be sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:43 PM
1

Rape by coercion is a thing, I don’t see how this is any different
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:30 PM
-1

Well, I guess we just disagree on that, then. The joys of art. I think the piece is crappy in a number of ways, but that's not one of them.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:50 AM
-3

What matters is the intent, and the space was never part of the intent of the piece. You're making a mountain out of a molehill here. You mean to say the tiny girl statue like ten feet away "blocks the view?" Get a grip.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:43 AM
0

Again, very different to put something next to the Mona Lisa than to tape something to her face.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:29 AM
8

It was originally a piece of guerilla artwork and it's in a park. Furthermore, it's only there because the parks department pulled it out of the middle of the street where it originally was, but got a lot of requests for it, so they reinstalled it in a new spot. Your point is so arguable I would go so far as to say it's false. It's not like the artist incorporated the location in any way, it was simply placed there. The space has nothing to do with the piece itself. That's like saying the entire…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:27 AM
10

That's very different. In no way was his original work altered. This is the equivalent of painting something mocking the Mona Lisa and hanging it right next to the Mona Lisa. Tasteless, sure, but certainly not defamation or infringement of the original work in any way.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:12 AM
–

I find this claim of needing a judge, county clerk, and 5 months to buy a gun dubious. Unless you were buying a Browning machine gun or needed to expunge some felonies first or something in which case that's perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:42 PM
1

which scholars and academics were invited to the screening I'm sure they'd be reticent to show up anyway, after the shit at UoT and all the harassment and threats here.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:57 PM
1

What you're saying certainly is true, but sadly America, if it did unseat one of the major parties, would settle back into two major parties within a couple of election cycles, just with different parties. It's actually a pretty interesting phenomenon if politics is your thing. I'm not a political scientist or anything, but it's something I do take a strong interest in, since it's important as hell.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:02 AM
6

How is comparing New Zealand's parliamentary system to our political system an argument? You'd be better off just saying they both exist, that's about the extent of their similarities. You said completely different systems are different, then started insulting me. Or can't you fucking read? Here, let me help you out: https://www.google.com/search?q=why+anerica+is+a+two+party+system&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS590US594&oq=why+anerica+is+a+two+party+system&aqs=chrome..69i57.6062j0j4&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-m…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:49 PM
11

You're the one trying to compare foreign parliaments to our political system, so I'm going to wager I'm not the illiterate one here. A two party system is the logical end to our system of politics for a whole host of well analyzed reasons. But hey, if you think ad hominem and being a condescending asswad is the same as forming a cogent argument, feel free to continue.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:42 PM
12

our political system
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:32 PM
11

And it isn't going to change with the current political system we have. It will always settle into a two party system, even if we get a new second party.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:27 PM
1

Would you say the word is....problematic?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:26 AM
1

Death threats in 3...2...
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:37 PM
19

You could always just call it straight up sexism or racism, because it is.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:25 AM
3

I was in minimum with a guy down on murder 1. He'd been in for something like 22 years, but still. And we had a key to our cell and could come and go as we pleased between 7 am and 9 pm.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:21 AM
1

Sounds like a relationship you should get out of, but you may also want to reevaluate calling things you want her to do "duties." No one is obligated to do anything for you, same as you have no obligations to anyone but yourself.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:43 PM
3

I'd like to point out that in many places, being convicted of a felony does not disqualify you from voting, it's a state by state basis. Source: I am your friendly neighborhood felon who votes.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:47 PM
6

I think they meant to say "Women deserve better than men."
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:50 PM
2

I'm actually surprised we're still here now.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:11 AM
18

It's true that anything can be art. It is equally true that art can be terrible and not worth existing.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:56 AM
18

I'm very strongly socialist and got banned from /r/socialism for daring to question some benign shit someone said that was tangentially feminist, not even dispute it, I questioned their claim. Instant ban. That sub is a ludicrous caricature.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 01:37 AM
81

This is precisely my life. Happened when I was 18. As you can imagine, my life has been nothing but totally smooth and delightful sailing since then, fraught with happiness and prosperity. /s
/r/MensRights04/06/15 03:25 PM
10

I'd bet money that it can't be done.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:32 PM
1

Also /r/titlegore. It's indecipherable.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:26 PM
9

So you're saying we should do a Stern-Gerlach experiment and shoot him through a magnet, right? That should clear this right up.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:06 AM
1

Nah, just south of Canada. It leaks sometimes.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 06:53 AM
3

Then you maybe shouldn't say anything, eh?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:38 AM
11

There's a line between collecting statistical information and treating students as a number What exactly does this person think statistics are? This is clearly a person who has never even seen a math book.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:10 PM
18

10 years later? There are high school students who are currently on the hook for child support to their rapists. See the "Nathaniel J" case from California.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:51 AM
1

Mine isn't federal, and I have an attorney in the family who will file for me. It's pretty straightforward in my state.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:18 PM
3

Engineering. By the time I'm out of school it'll be expunged anyway though.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 12:52 AM
5

I have a felony record and have gotten into undergrad and grad school, so yes, most of the time. They've never even asked me if I had a record.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 11:47 PM
5

Exactly this. I feel like venting is fine, but the long standing members here should be the dissenting voice of reason sometimes. That thread was really bad, and I left it feeling pretty disappointed. I also knew exactly how it would make us look if someone with questions about us were to stumble on it. That thread would turn a lot of people off of our ideas very quickly. The people who have been here long enough to simmer down from the angry freshman mentality should be the ones who offer up a …
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:50 PM
0

He certainly is free to behave like an asshole all day every day if he so chooses. At which point the school or any of his professors are also free to tell him to beat feet and never come back. Just because you have a right to free speech doesn't mean others have to tolerate you.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:36 PM
14

"...from a university that promotes tolerance." I think they mean the gender studies department's version of tolerance. Also, did you see the acronym for sexual orientation? How long does that thing need to be?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:13 PM
11

Says the guy who posts on /r/coontown regularly.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:54 PM
–

Look at the crazy downvotes I'm getting for calling them out, too, as well as the upvotes for shill calling me a SJW and the guy below that says he goes on racist sites and finds them reasonable and supported by facts and reason. I didn't realize so many of them frequented this sub. That's disconcerting.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:49 PM
1

I'm not saying you're wrong, but can you cite a source on how common this is? I'd like to add it to my list of info if you can.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:43 PM
-3

The difference being I've been to conspiracy and seen the huge flux of "Zionist Jews are taking over the world" posts. I'm here a lot and don't see the neck beard thing standing up to scrutiny. Hell, the thread about a high percentage of billionaires being Jews was immediately cross posted to conspiracy and you should have seen the comments that were happening. It was as blatantly neo-Nazi as /pol/. Have you ever been to conspiracy and looked around there at all? If not you should go check it ou…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:55 AM
1

When you run out of real issues to fight for, but you still want the money to keep flowing, that's when you wind up with modern feminism. After all, there's a lot of money in victimhood, plus they get to hate a group of people for free and feel like special snowflakes!
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:50 AM
–

Suspicious of my posts? Are you fucking serious? You sound like a paranoid lunatic. It's pretty common knowledge that conspiracy is run by Stormfront. Sorry my opinions aren't unreasonable enough for you though. But really, if you could just stop hassling me every time I comment, that'd be fun. I try to help around here and support the cause, but dickheads like you make it hard for me to even want to. We could, I dunno, all support each other as MRAs, since no one else will. Or you could keep be…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:43 AM
-2

.....no? I thought it was common knowledge that that sub is modded by Stormfront people.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:38 AM
–

And I remember you saying this every time I see you in this sub. All because one time, one time I said that not every feminist on earth is the devil. Don't you have anything better to do with your time than just follow me around and be an asshole?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:34 AM
–

What? Why? Have you been to that sub? It's full of people hating on "Zionist Jews" who they think are secretly taking over the world. Edit: sometimes you guys are unreal. Because I call a sub that is well known to have been taken over by Stormfront racist, all of a sudden I'm a SJW scumbag? Really?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:33 AM
-8

Or /r/conspiracy. Edit: whoa, the brigade from conspiracy showed up.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:22 AM
14

Don't ever forget that victimhood in this case (and in this country) is a multi billion dollar industry. That's the tip of the "why," but it definitely goes much deeper than that. You said it perfectly yourself, it's frightening to have held an ideology and suddenly have the base of it ripped away. It's difficult to critically reevaluate the things you believe. And it's painful when some of them aren't right. Some people, when faced with that, double down and get angry that their beliefs were ev…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:22 AM
1

Wow, can you possibly be more of an emo teenager? Think beyond the tip of your own nose.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:02 PM
4

No, the reason men can't report is because groups like NOW fight for things like the Duluth Model and aggressor laws that make it so that if you report you go to jail anyway. It's not some mysterious invisible hand social construct, I can point you to a physical group that is responsible for a lot of this.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:46 PM
9

That's what's so silly about it. In this case, they got exactly what they wanted, and now they're all up in arms about having been given what they asked for.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:07 PM
3

Probably, but the DA is going to go for the neatest package they know they can get a conviction out of. They'll usually drop the myriad smaller charges that always come along with crimes like this in favor of the bigger conviction.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:00 AM
23

There's a woman who commented and tore the author a new asshole, then said this type of shit is why she doesn't identify as a feminist. The top reply is "Welcome to the men's rights movement."
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:02 PM
2

I'm not saying they are lying or telling the truth. How many times do I need to say that? You're not even reading what I'm saying. I'm saying we don't know one way or the other. What we think is, frankly, of little consequence. I'm telling you how it works in a court of law. There is simply not enough evidence to bring a case, even if they weren't past the statute of limitations. Either way, those making the claim must prove their claim, that's just how this works. Cosby doesn't have to do anyth…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:37 AM
3

What in god's name are you even saying? Prove what? They made accusations, the burden is on them and the state to prove them. That's how the legal system works. It just is. I don't even know what more to say to you. You're asking that he prove they're lying. You said as much, many many times in this thread, that he needs to impeach their character, ie he needs to prove his innocence. Are you just being deliberately obtuse?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:23 AM
2

Absolutely this. This is a very important distinction. Unsubstantiated != false. It means unproven.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:18 AM
2

You're saying he should prove they're lying. That's precisely what you've done.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:15 AM
2

It absolutely does not. Please, cite me some legal precedent that hearsay is evidence.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:12 AM
3

Absolutely not. It's circumstantial evidence, hearsay at best. Unless there is some hard evidence that person did it, possession of stolen property, video of the attacks, something like that, no, they should not be convicted. That isn't how our justice system works, and for good reason. I may well believe those people, but that simply isn't enough to convict in a court of law.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:10 AM
3

You're confusing evidence with allegations. There are a lot of allegations against him. There is no evidence against him. I'm not defending him or condemning him, because there just isn't any evidence. Edit: grammar
/r/MensRights23/11/14 03:08 AM
2

That's exactly what I'm saying. There are people making accusations and no evidence they're lying, and there is a man who is being accused and no evidence he's lying. Of course he's defensive, he's being accused of multiple rapes. And if the women attacking his character are good enough evidence for you, why is him attacking their character not equally good for you? Anecdotes and accusations are not suitable evidence. So I am making zero conclusions. It could be either way, and the fact is we wi…
/r/MensRights23/11/14 02:09 AM
2

I don't even understand what you're trying to say. You've already decided he's guilty without any evidence whatsoever, but his accusers can't possibly be guilty of fabricating allegations without it being proven? Your bias is showing.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:45 PM
–

Multiple allegations is not evidence. That's just several people saying the same thing. If 20 people stood up right now and said the Earth is flat, would you believe them too?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:37 PM
–

It absolutely is. Everyone is busy jumping to the conclusions they want to see, when the fact is there isn't a shred of evidence one way or the other. How are people seriously deciding what happened without anything concrete about any of it?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:12 PM
12

Is there any evidence they're telling the truth? I'm not saying we should conclude anything about any of them, in fact because there is zero evidence I'd say there are zero conclusions to be made here.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:10 PM
1

I see that. The way this is written is really obfuscating. I can't even find a lifetime stat for made to penetrate.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:37 PM
1

In the second paragraph under results it states that 1.7% of men were made to penetrate in their lifetimes, but the amount in the 12 months prior to the study was too small to be statistically significant or reliable. The 1.6% of women raped is from 12 months prior to the study. I think you might be misreading the study. Edit: nope, my mistake, I misread it. I see the statistic you're citing. Carry on.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:24 PM
1

I can't find the statistic you're quoting anywhere in your source. It indicates women are raped and sexually assaulted at much greater rates than men, even taking into account being made to penetrate.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:47 PM
2

You should see the team of astronomers and engineers working on LSST. I've been in a room with many of them at once. Hawaiian shirts as far as the eye can see. None of us wear professional shirts, and I don't think we should have to. It's kind of the culture of the space business.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:37 AM
13

By being a terrible person.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:19 AM
5

Don't worry, there's no source because literally no person has ever said that.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:28 AM
10

I cannot agree with this more. Well said.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:59 PM
4

We really just don't know because we have no real data to examine. What they are saying could be true.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 11:03 PM
5

Yep, whether it's Anita or some douchebag, I hope they find the sender and punish them.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:50 PM
7

Apparently. But that's totally not crazy or mean spirited or anything. It's a feminist. Sometimes, man....
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:49 PM
9

No. No no no. This needs to be taken just as seriously as any other death threat. No death threat should ever be ignored just because it's someone we don't like or we think it might be false. You treat it seriously and investigate later. That's when you decide if it was fake, and if it was, you deal with it then, but not before. If this was a threat against Warren Farrell we'd be all up in arms and ready for blood, but since it's a feminist who might, might have falsified a threat in the past, w…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:47 PM
3

A thousand times this. I'm amazed at how quick everyone in this sub is to dismiss these threats as bogus just because of who they are directed at. I get it, the threats she "reported" were never reported and were likely a sham. But any and every death threat needs to be taken seriously. Every single one. Just because it's a feminist receiving them, all of a sudden we just say "It has to be a lie, ignore it!" Good lord, sometimes we jump to stupid conclusions so fast here it makes my head spin. C…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:41 PM
25

Totally. Was this pulled straight from /r/tumblrinaction or what? I got like two sentences in and just said, "Yep, this bitch is off her rocker." Who gives a shit what some crazy nobody is pissed off about?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:35 PM
1

Yeah, it is strange wording, huh?
/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:57 AM
2

I actually have a remarkably similar background. I didn't have any real positive interaction with anyone but my mom until I was in my teens. My dad was an abusive alcoholic piece of shit who drank himself to death and left himself to be found bloated and rotting by me at 19. I still have PTSD from that. A part of me still believes I killed him, but that's a whole different story. For many years I was unable to function, drinking and using drugs relentlessly, hoping it would kill me. It almost di…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 05:55 AM
5

/r/suicidewatch There are also other subs specifically for support for this. Whatever you do, don't give up. Remember that suicide is a permanent solution to what is almost certainly a temporary problem. If nothing else, feel free to PM me just to talk. I've been there too.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:42 PM
1

It's not explicitly stated in the Constitution, but the SCOTUS has set forth precedent on it many times and has even ruled that it can be expressly given as part of instructions to juries if there is fear that they will convict based on preconceived notions. Edit: see Taylor v Kentucky
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:08 AM
2

Haha well I guess there are some benefits.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 04:51 AM
4

[citation needed] Seriously, I'm not being snarky, I want to know where you got this information. It doesn't sound at all accurate until college level. From what I've seen of schools, elementary and middle are overwhelmingly female teachers, with a slight uptick in male teachers in high school. And who can blame them? The schools don't trust men enough to let them speak to female students alone, sometimes it's a literal requirement to have another student or teacher present, or you can lose your…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 11:37 PM
0

Take your pick.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:56 PM
2

Dude, shove your head straight back up your ass. You never make actual points or discussion, you just derail with buzzwords and calling me a troll and then act all self righteous like you somehow made a valid point. I have no desire to talk to you, so just fuck right off ok?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:42 PM
1

You just can't argue with a lunatic. Why is any of this getting upvotes? Can't we keep TRP in their little crazy box?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:32 PM
0

No, most of us are embarrassed by this guy too, don't worry. Actually, I do worry, because he's visible.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:29 PM
0

It's one of the things that really made me start questioning feminism in the first place. It's upsetting to see it here, even if it is from some TRP douchebag.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:22 PM
1

Is it any surprise someone I remember as a dismissive, sociopathic asshole said this? Nooooope. I mean seriously, how is admitting that women do actually face adversity sometimes too being a concern troll? Are you fucking serious? Do you really believe an entire gender, 1/2 of the population, has it all roses 100% of the time? If you do you're a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 05:18 PM
11

I figured you were TRP.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 08:30 PM
26

You're the kind of MRA that makes us look like assholes. Rates are similar = both genders face the same things. Your reading comprehension needs work.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 08:01 PM
1

Lol ok
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:53 PM
47

"Men are the real victims of sexism." God dammit, sexism isn't a competition. It isn't one or the other, both sexes face sexism.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:56 PM
–

What you call unfair, literally the rest of the civilized world calls just and sensible. None of what you said discredited anything I said. You didn't even make a discernible point, other than saying, at best, that nobody should pay any taxes because that's exploitation, or at worst, only the rich should be exempt because they somehow are more deserving of money. You have such a black and white, ludicrous idea of how our country works as to be laughably absurd and easily outdone by even the most…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:07 AM
–

That's not even close to an accurate comparison, even if you did tout "freedom." A more accurate comparison is this: I have one billion pounds of candy. You have one Jolly Rancher. In order to give candy to the trick or treater that comes around each year, you should give up a third of your piece (or less, since you have so little), and I should give a little more to make up the difference, since it will impact me less. Maybe the trick or treater gives you some of your piece back even, so that y…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:54 AM
5

This is what I was looking for. Thanks!
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:17 PM
3

I want to know the origin of the 'cis' part of the word, personally. Is it an antonym to the trans prefix?
/r/MensRights20/09/14 04:59 PM
1

Lol yeah way to lay down the law there.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:12 PM
1

Don't worry, we have our misogynist assholes here and there, but they are a minority and we downvote them swiftly.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:12 PM
0

You obviously still don't get it.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 10:10 PM
1

Can you cite a source on that? That doesn't sound accurate, but I lack any sources one way or the other. Just from what I know of the law though, this seems inaccurate. Every sperm donor in the world would be paying support otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 08:37 PM
2

It's amazing to me how many people don't realize how closely they mirror what they oppose.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:53 PM
-2

I wish I could upvote it so much more. I'm so glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. For as often as I get dismissed outright for mentioning this here, it's so good to see it be heard.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:01 PM
1

Stop what? Calling you what you are? You're a paranoid bigot.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:56 PM
0

The problem is that we can show feminists doing shitty things, but they will do exactly what you said. They will claim that person isn't a real feminists and claim an abstract definition of feminism. Are we seriously going to pull them down one by one? Trying to swat at them like bees is going to get us nowhere.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:50 PM
19

Yes, thank you! There have been so many times that I've been talking to people about the MRM and trying to share our views and they say "Well don't all MRAs just hate women/feminism," or "I heard it's a hate group," or something similar, and I want to point them to a reasonable board with lots of issues being brought up and focused on, and it's....well, it's not here. I am very close to leaving this sub altogether because I'm tired of the constant Tumblr-esque whining about feminists. I get it, …
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:41 PM
28

Internalized misogyny as a result of patriarchy, shitlord.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:12 PM
6

I just got shouted down the other day for saying exactly this. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks we need the support of self identified feminists like her to really affect change in the academic and institutional feminist chain.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:32 PM
1

ok
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:24 PM
0

You might meet some of these "mythical creatures" if you left the house and had real conversations with actual people. If you're incapable if believing decent people exist in any walk of life, I'm truly sorry for you.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:26 PM
1

You might meet some of those "mythological creatures" if you ever went outside and talked to actual people.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:18 PM
1

You want to call every feminist on earth your enemy, fine. Have fun with that. See where you get with it. I've started men's groups where I am. Have you been to a CAFE, or a talk, or done anything at all? Yeah, I didn't think so. I didn't say all MRAs, I said YOU are cowering behind a screen. Join the real world, away from the internet, and then we can have a discussion. Your experiences? What would those be? Hanging out in this sub and watching videos? I've asked you several times what you your…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:02 PM
0

Dude, are you not reading what I'm saying? I have personally had lots of conversations with feminists about MR that received lots of understanding and sympathetic ears. Many feminists don't buy into patriarchy theory. Know why? Not all feminists are crazy or ignorant. Some are even very smart. gasp You're actually trying to tell me that the things I've experienced actively spreading MR can't have happened because feminists would have strung me up? Let me spell something out for you in simple Eng…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:01 PM
1

Red pill literally believes that women are a lesser breed of human. But that's cool, right? As long as it's women and not men?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:46 PM
4

I'm getting downvoted for advocating not doing what academic feminists tend to do and label a whole gender evil. MRA, I am disappoint. I feel like I'm being pretty reasonable.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:19 AM
2

We kind of do that with red pill though. Don't you see that? Those guys are extremists who will not change. So we always wind up saying "Those guys aren't MR." That's the exact same thing. This sub loves to criticize feminism for NAFALT and then turn around and do the same thing with our crazies. Here's the way I see it. Do you think that harpy nutjobs like Dworkin or Sarkeesian will ever have their opinions swayed, even by multitudes of other feminists? I doubt it. Will hardcore right wing luna…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:59 AM
1

Funny that I'm being ostracized here, don't you think? Edit: "Any attempt at discussion is shut down." No. I just told you I've had lots and lots of productive discussions. Discussions that start on the defensive, however, will go nowhere. You may get shut down sometimes, it's bound to happen. You have to choose your battles. And it wasn't a snide backhand. Look around this sub, or better yet, step away from it for a while and then come back and look around. I don't see enough proactive men's ad…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:52 AM
3

You're right about institutional and academic feminists, absolutely. And their voices are the loudest. But seriously, I take the MR message with me wherever I go, and when gender issues come up, I chime in. I have met way, way more people who are receptive to it than aren't. Many who aren't receptive think we sit on the internet and bitch about women all day, which, lately, is kind of what this sub has become. How many actual conversations have you had with women about men's issues? I promise yo…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:00 AM
1

Who, women? Lots of women listen to and empathize with men. So do lots of feminists. Don't label an entire gender based on a vocal minority.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:14 PM
9

I came sifting through all of the assumptions about her attitude looking for this. We don't know what it's like to be a woman any more than she knows what it is to be a man. It really frustrates me sometimes that this sub immediately tends to jump on the "Well fuck that bitch then she's a bigoted idiot!" bandwagon rather than having some actual conversations with other people about these issues. They'll never understand manhood, or want to for that matter, if they say something ignorant and we h…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:20 PM
8

Well those are vitriolic and horrible things to wish on someone. She is clearly a terrible person, but I'd much rather she be sentenced fairly and learn the error in what she's done than be raped with broken bottles. I mean, is that really the kind of message we want to send in this sub?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:15 AM
4

Representatives refused to go into specifics citing "privacy laws?" That's incredible, considering they basically plaster you all over campus as ACCUSED OF SEXUAL ASSAULT THIS GUY IS A MONSTER the moment someone files a complaint against you. No problem with people putting you on blast, but criticism? Oh, we better keep people's privacy sacrosanct.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:46 AM
2

Nothing gets people to take you seriously and listen to your ideas like being an insufferable asshat, amirite?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:21 PM
6

I have an honest question. Why do things like this show up so frequently here? Some idiot on the internet acting like a smug asshole is hardly indicative of any movement, nor does it have anything to do with ours or furthering our goals. This feels to me like plucking something from /r/tumblrinaction and posting it just to mock them. I really would like to know how this type of post benefits us at all. I get it, modern feminism hinders our goals pretty frequently, but couldn't we do better work …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:43 AM
11

Internalized patriarchy!
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:37 AM
1

I am not familiar with that use of "a bit." However, while the speech itself may be horrific and repugnant, the right to say it without censure is wonderful and important beyond estimation. WBC are dickheads and they can die in a fire, but I support 100% their right to say whatever they please. I will judge them harshly for what they say, but they need to be allowed to say it.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:41 AM
2

A bit? Saying free speech is good being responded to with death threats is way past "a bit" overkill.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:20 PM
10

But see, it's funny when it happens to men.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:20 PM
22

I also like how somehow sexual assault == rape. The two being different things couldn't possibly have anything to do with their statistics being different.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:40 PM
2

I'm not saying I'd jump straight to awful reviews and federal cases, but I would certainly bring it to the doctor whose practice it was to rectify the situation if possible. That's all I'm saying. I would place the onus on him or her to make it right, because they are responsible for how their practice runs, ultimately.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:56 AM
5

A doctor's private practice where they interact with their staff every day is a little different than a multibillion dollar corporation with offices in several countries. If my local pizza shop has shitty practices, of course I hold the owner responsible. Same as I would hold a doctor in their practice responsible. Are you at the top of that particular chain of command? Sorry, it's on you.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:35 AM
1

Because it's less "Be aware of men's health issues," and more, "Hey men, stop being bumbling oafs. Help men not be so stupid." That's just my take from it. I think they could have done this much better.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 07:04 PM
–

It's not really awareness though. It's wearing blue to "remind men to stay healthy." I appreciate the sentiment, but that's kind of a stupid message.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:50 PM
2

By that logic men's rights isn't for equality either.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:56 AM
-1

It doesn't matter. I'm simply pointing out that this sub is focused on men, making it the definition of not egalitarian. Just clarifying definitions. We aren't egalitarian. Neither is feminism. What I just pointed out is why.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:04 AM
1

But have you ever seen this sub have content that pushes any issue facing women? No, and that's fine. But that right there is the difference between MR and egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:34 AM
1

Lol ok
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:28 PM
10

To be fair, this type of radical feminist is hardly a large group of people. Vocal, certainly, but far from large.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:42 PM
1

Again, you're generalizing an entire group of people based on your weak assumptions. Not only is that completely fallacious, but let's just out with what you really mean: you think women as a gender are lesser humans than men. Don't beat around the bush, I've been to TRP and I know that's what you assholes think, so don't try to be all coy and act like you have some sort of higher moral agenda. It's a place for guys who have been screwed over by women to go hate on women with other guys who got …
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:36 PM
0

Again with the generalizations. You can't just label a whole gender as selfish brats. It's foolish on its face.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:31 PM
-10

Generalizations like how his whole comment is filled with sweeping statements of "women do __"? Yup, that'd be why TRP sucks in my mind. I can be autonomous and masculine without branding women as sociopathic weaklings. That's weakness in its purest form. None of those guys are capable of feeling big without making someone else small. I see TRP brigades just like SRS.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:48 PM
1

Even if you do have a recording device, it'd likely be billed as assault. Even in the best of circumstances, you have to prove that you used absolutely the bare minimum force to prevent bodily harm, and that you were in imminent danger of bodily harm. It's a very fine line to toe, and that's if it's man on man. If you're a man and try to prevent a woman from hurting you, I'd wager my next paycheck you're going to jail.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:35 PM
2

I have that same dent in my shoulder.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:32 PM
1

I totally agree, I just think those things stand on their own. There's no need to be misleading or tricky about it.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:16 PM
-4

This whole thing is stupid and misleading in my opinion. It reads like men have no access to anything, then in tiny print at the bottom it says that it's really only about the selective service. It's sensationalism at its worst. We can argue against the selective service easily enough without silly tactics like this.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:16 PM
1

Lol ok Edit: 2/10 would not troll again. Nice try though.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:37 PM
1

Lol ok
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:33 PM
144

I hear that quite a bit. It's not that we don't try, we just get immediately banned for any opposing viewpoint.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:15 PM
1

Ok guy. The fact that I know people who are victims of this exact thing makes it the actual literal definition of NOT an urban legend. And yes, teachers in high school told this to all the students, so unless you never went to school (which wouldn't surprise me given the content of what you're saying), you heard it too. Or is school also some vast conspiracy that doesn't real?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:53 PM
3

Roofies are an urban myth? Not so much. I also know victims of date rape. And I've been taught that by people ranging from parents to friends to teachers. Seriously, have you just never interacted with world outside at all?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:18 PM
1

Wait...are you touting the virtues of TRP?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:50 AM
5

Can't blame a guy for dreaming.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:28 AM
3

I kind of doubt that is limited to feminists. I know precisely zero people who don't detest her.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:15 AM
7

......Katy Perry, is that you?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:10 AM
13

I literally cannot think of a single person I know who was never told this. Do you actually know any other human beings?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:06 AM
4

Exactly this. I don't deny I am privileged in some regards. I also hold that women are privileged in other ways. And both genders suffer disenfranchisement. It drives me batty to have any struggles I face dismissed by 'privilege.' Just because I have to worry less about being raped than women does not mean life is not difficult for me because of my gender in other ways.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:44 PM
2

Wait, the left care nothing about truth or integrity? That statement is no better than anything coming out of the feminist propaganda machine. It's a huge, demonstrably false blanket statement about ~50% of the population. Now who does that remind you of?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:41 PM
2

For something to be controversial there have to at least be some people who like it.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:01 AM
4

Then it will be enthusiastic legally binding contracts. "I signed, but only because I felt bad for him, and he pressured me."
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:00 AM
38

1) Make accusation months later with zero evidence. 2) Complain when police do not pursue case with zero evidence. 3) Must be patriarchy!
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:18 AM
4

They get hated on because they are consistently untrustworthy. I don't like being lied to, and I tend to be skeptical of liars.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:37 PM
-2

Not really. Ann Coulter has a very lucrative career. Anita Sarkeesian seems to do okay. Hell, universities even seem to employ fairly radical feminists, if for no other reason than to avoid the inevitable discrimination suit. Being inflammatory makes you memorable, and a clever person can use that to their advantage. If nothing else, I'm sure there are plenty of radfems that own businesses or work in HR departments.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:59 AM
9

I got banned before I even commented.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 06:13 AM
1

But she didn't, that's my point. I say let them deal with their own.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:41 PM
8

But this has literally nothing to do with men's rights. There wasn't even a man involved in any way. This isn't a sub for just hating on feminism. At least try to keep on point.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:01 AM
2

What are you referring to? I've not heard of it.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:36 AM
2

Let's be fair, conservatives do exactly the same thing. Political affiliation has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:09 AM
1

I have no idea how all these crazy bigoted comments have upvotes and the people calling them out are negative. The only thing I can think is that all the rational people abandoned this thread and now it's just full of AMR trolls or something.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:20 PM
-1

I'd like to see one shred of evidence. Or is science too "Marxist" for you? Doesn't support your delusions, does it? Have a nice life, douchebag, just don't being your bullshit back around us please.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:14 PM
1

Are...are you Rick Santorum?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:13 PM
1

Hahaha ok bigot. Have fun with your mental illness.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:11 PM
0

http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientation.aspx
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:40 AM
0

Feminism turns men gay and women should submit to and obey men. That's plenty.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:51 AM
0

Why should any of that matter? What do my race, nationality, sex, or gender have to do with my point? You said that if a woman was directing people in an emergency, you would not do what she says because she is a woman. BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN. That is the literal definition of sexism. How obtuse can you be? Now fuck off, I won't reply to you again.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:01 AM
0

I might learn why women should never be listened to, and why you always have better ideas based solely on your genitalia? Nah, I'm good. You keep on being sexist though if that's working for you.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:51 PM
0

Yes, for two reasons. First, what if the woman has knowledge or experience you don't? What if she is a firefighter, or emergency personnel? Are you going to say, "Nah, you're a woman, I'll do my own thing?" That's idiotic. Second, the logical extension of that is that women and children should conversely do what you say in a dangerous situation. Why? Because you're a man? Personally, I wouldn't do what you say because you're a fucking idiot, gender plays no part in it.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:33 PM
0

What does that have to do with any part of the topic at hand? I live in the same world as everyone else. Please, tell me your justification, from your view of the world, for women submitting to men for "safety."
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:22 PM
6

I agree with everything you said. However, reasoning that it isn't real because women fantasize about rape is plain stupid.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:21 PM
-1

Good, I say. This "rape culture doesn't real because women fantasize about rape" and "women should submit to men" dreck has no place here. It's ignorant, irrational, sexist, and quite frankly the fact that it's posted here makes us all look bad. These kinds of posts are why so many people dismiss the MRM as misogynist. We can't be fighting for equality while simultaneously letting this horseshit go by unchallenged on our end.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:39 PM
–

How's TRP these days?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:35 PM
-1

No. Just no. That is not how homosexuality works. Many men decide to be celibate or remain unmarried, but they don't just "turn gay." So much of this post is horribly sexist and ignorant, it's borderline TRP.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:35 PM
–

Who said anybody needed to provide for or protect anyone? That's infantilizing. Part of equal rights means equal responsibility. It's on everyone to protect themselves. You're arguing against sexism by saying that a solution would be for women to stand down and obey men so we can protect them? That's asinine. I recognize that the world is a dangerous place, and I protect myself, as should any capable person. All you're doing is making yourself sound incredibly sexist.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:01 PM
–

Are you really suggesting that if women obeyed men, that would rectify something? Appreciate men, but nobody has to obey anybody.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:38 PM
1

Another thing: the proportions of things like Barbie and photoshopped women are literally impossible to attain naturally. A body like Hemsworth is not. There are shitty ideals for both sexes that work to make men and women alike feel like shit about themselves. Let's not stoop to playing the victim Olympics.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:06 PM
1

I never said anything about whether or not this should be the ideal. My only point was that it's stupid to point out an actual guy as an example of an unattainable body type. It's not easy, but it's completely possible. Quick edit: of course it's healthy for a man trying to gain mass to eat that many calories. That's what every nutritionist I know tells me. If your body is using those calories, then you give it how many it needs. If you're bulking, it needs a ton of protein. Why the fuck are peo…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:49 PM
1

People are seriously telling me that it is impossible to look like this or that it is unhealthy. I say bullshit. It's not easy, but it is attainable. Christ, I should have known better than to interrupt the circlejerk.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:41 AM
0

And you know this? Yes, I know several guys personally who look like this and don't juice. I'm guessing you don't hang out with a lot of athletic types. It's always possible. It just takes work. And of course he would lift before shooting, it makes you a little bigger and more defined, but it's not like that is some magic instahuge. Seriously, does anyone arguing with me about this know anything at all about nutrition and resistance training? Doesn't seem like it. For Captain America, Chris Evan…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:39 AM
-1

No. As I said, I know several guys who look plenty muscular 100% of the time. You can comfortably live your life with low enough body fat to look like this.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 11:12 PM
0

Bullshit. I know lots of guys who do look like this, and they are a hell of a lot healthier than you or me. They don't have bodybuilding competition levels of body fat, but have a Hemsworth physique. Are you really trying to tell me that being lean and muscular is bad for you?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:01 PM
-1

Yes, it is difficult. That isn't the same as impossible. What I'm saying is that if you make it your priority, you can look like that. People are jumping down my throat saying it's unhealthy and guys can't do it without steroids and blah blah blah. I have a good friend who is a body builder who disagrees. Lots of guys do this, and do it naturally, but of course it's much easier to sit at our computers being bitter because we aren't doing it. Seriously, sometimes this sub lives up to its reputati…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:58 PM
0

ok
/r/MensRights26/01/14 07:30 PM
-15

All it takes to look like Thor is dedication to lifting and eating as much protein as you can stuff in your face. Why would you think that getting in awesome shape is somehow artificial or unhealthy? Edit: Holy shit people, quit being so butthurt. There are a lot of guys at my gym who have this type of physique. It's not impossible or unhealthy, so stop pretending it is.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:17 PM
1

Correction: bad things that happen to women. We can depict bad things happening to men all day long, because that's not as serious.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:16 AM
4

It doesn't jive with equality.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:19 PM
1

Also, arrest the girls? You really think police want to deal with all that paperwork over something that is going to get dropped in court anyway? That's like demanding that police arrest someone every time they show up for a noise complaint. They have better things to do. I'd much rather they just settle it and get back to dealing with actual crime than spend all day booking two teenagers for some dumb shit like this. The teenagers were wrong, petty, entitled little brats. But seriously, you're …
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:03 PM
0

Of the two alleged crimes, which is more likely to escalate to violence? What were the girls going to do? Trespass harder? Police don't fuck around with safety, period. They are likely to cuff you if you so much as look angry. I don't blame them, either. Better to be proactive than have to deal with violence. I'm not saying OP was going to be violent, but given the circumstances and the information they had up until that point, they made the right call. If you're bound and determined to be outra…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:57 PM
3

ok
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:07 AM
2

ITT: terrible legal advice.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:01 AM
3

Cuffs != arrest.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:57 AM
3

You really think that's a good comparison? I'm not even going to bother explaining why it isn't.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:45 AM
0

Ok Ron Paul.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:33 AM
-1

Bullshit, and I know a lot more about it than you. I've been both arrested and detained, and my father-in-law is a former prosecutor and defense attorney and is now a judge. He was detained. No lawyer would ever take something like this to the box and you know it. Detainment comes in three forms: contact, detention, and arrest. Contact is an officer talking to you with your consent. Detention is what happened here. If they have reasonable suspicion or cause to believe you have or will commit a c…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:28 AM
0

Are you really being that pedantic? You know damn well the legal difference between being arrested and being detained, and the right that come along with both. OP was never arrested.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:22 AM
11

Those are two totally different scenarios. Police responses are almost always skewed against the man in domestic disputes, which is absurd, I agree. But in this case, it was a girl calling to report a man, who, as far as what she told the police, was harassing them. When they showed up, he wasn't in uniform of any private security. Of course they detained him until they could verify his business there. What about that is unreasonable? If I called the police to report someone harassing me, whethe…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:17 AM
-1

He was never arrested.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:12 AM
–

Right, but remember that it's the girls who called the police, not the other way around. As far as the police knew, he was just some guy.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:32 AM
2

I'm not even sure OP can press charges. It isn't his property. He can inform the owners about the incident and they can press charges, but I kind of doubt that's within OP's power. I'd say the cops acted reasonably.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:31 AM
2

You have been, but you're still on your feet, and I goddamn well admire you for it.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:48 PM
11

That would require admitting that men face issues in their lives as well, which doesn't suit the dogma of assuming us all to be oppressive overlords.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:16 PM
85

"If someone wants to discuss this, we should talk about sexual assault." In other words, if you want to talk about this issue, let's talk about something else that I can tangentially blame on you. Also, in what way could this possibly be construed as rape apology?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:08 AM
11

Yep, and conservatives never fling shit. Not ever.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:19 PM
4

........you've never been through child custody proceedings, have you? I don't think you understand how this works.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:46 PM
1

Ah, I misunderstood. Apologies.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:14 PM
1

Then you damn sure better make sure women account for 50% of workplace deaths instead of the 3% currently, and that miners and farmers and garbage collectors are 50% women too. You can't just be pissed off that CEO's are largely men. While we're at it, let's make sure suicides and homelessness are 50% women, too. See what I'm getting at?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:03 PM
1

That's really reductive, don't you think? Women and men both get screwed plenty in their own ways based on gender alone, that's the point.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 06:00 PM
3

Can you give an example of women not having bodily autonomy? Not some asshole republican trying to attack women's rights, but a lack of rights at this point in time? I'm not being smarmy, I want your take on it. Have you ever experienced a lack of autonomy?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:55 PM
1

And women don't?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:51 PM
2

Can you give an example of how they don't? Not how some politician is trying to attack their autonomy, but how women actually lack some aspect of bodily autonomy at this point in time?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:50 PM
2

Ok
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:41 PM
9

Unfortunately, no, you don't.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:29 PM
8

Explain to me how sitting around saying "Hurr hey feminism sux amirite?" to each other helps anyone.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:23 PM
1

I both agree and disagree. I get frustrated with "Hurr durr this woman sucks look what she said," but I also see how that mindset can spread and become stifling for men. I think that I don't have the energy to be upset about it today, nor would this example be worth it in the first place. I was just pointing out a generalization.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:35 PM
5

I think we're getting into the territory of views on government, not what's pertinent in today's society. I agree that some lady being obnoxious on the internet isn't the most pressing issue at hand, but the fact that our government is influenced by these people can't be ignored, whether you think it should be that way or not. When it's acceptable to shame men publicly, it leads to more nefarious treatment. Surely you can see how that's a problem. Personally, I feel like this woman was mostly ju…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:19 PM
5

Where do you think governments and courts of law get their biases? I think it's from a public that is informed by pieces such as this. See the connection?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:57 PM
1

You may not be, but a distressing number of people are.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:33 PM
15

That's the beauty of modern feminism: they totally can exist at the same time. Women are strong and independent until they aren't and then how dare you not help them?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:05 AM
4

Male row reduced echelon form?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:12 AM
6

To be fair, they also have a 100% failure rate so far.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:10 AM
8

"Tell muggers not to mug!"
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:08 AM
3

Rah rah real feminists etc etc.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 04:36 PM
1

Well then please, please prove me wrong. I know from experience that this kind of fight is 100% uphill, and almost always fruitless, but I hope for all our sakes that I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:47 PM
4

You're correct, but they can and will always argue that he was disrupting the educational process or violating some school policy or another. These policies are structured to give an out in almost any situation. On paper, of course he has rights. In practice, not so much. Let's be realistic here. He's a minor in a state funded institution.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:46 PM
-4

Not entirely, but schools have a much greater ability to restrict speech than the government. They could have expelled him, and there would be basically nothing he could do. Honestly, I don't think there's anything he can do about this besides making himself a target of the school administration.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:43 PM
40

Stop slut shaming me while I'm creep shaming. It's distracting.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:32 PM
3

I'm....kind of ashamed of my school right now. I really want to write something back, but I can't put something reasonable together that is cool, level-headed, and fair. If you guys help me write something, I will submit it as an open letter from all of us menz. Thoughts? (My first thought was isn't it the feminists who always cry "what about the menz?" I've never seen one of us say that.)
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:50 AM
1

I've been through the system personally, and I can verify that there is no justice present.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:16 PM
3

The legal code is given to jurors in a way that is intentionally obfuscating as well. Lawyers try really hard to confuse the shit out of the jury just so that they don't know what the actual basis for a conviction should be so they can then make it emotional and get them to forgo reason. Have you ever read the jury instructions given before deliberation? If you can translate it to English I'll give you ten bucks. Our legal system is a series of loopholes exploited to maximum gain. Source: I've b…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:05 PM
3

They have to have concrete evidence to convict you? What country are you living in?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:01 PM
6

In my opinion, whether it was MRA's or not is inconsequential. We should all be denouncing it regardless of who it was. It is unacceptable behavior from anyone, period.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 09:41 PM
4

http://imgur.com/vB9B5
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:35 AM
94

All those things would be sexist! Stop oppressing womyn!
/r/MensRights06/04/13 06:20 PM
7

That's the first thing I thought, too. If her rights =/= my oppression, then why do my rights always seem to == her oppression?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:52 PM
4

But they're guilty almost all of the time and 97% are never incarcerated and....and.....sorry, I couldn't keep a straight face.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:32 PM
1

She fucked another guy. Of course that guy was accused of rape.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:40 PM
2

I agree with you, but it's simply not true that there is nothing to gain from false rape accusations. There are enormous civil suit awards, as well as social leverage and raw power.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:14 PM
4

Remember that your average hardcore feminist has absolutely no sense of humor, so when anybody cracks a joke, they take it literally.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:22 PM
5

What part of that didn't make sense? The post said that feminists are racist, poor hating hypocrites. You said it is because they are liberal. I said I'm liberal, so are you also saying I'm a racist, poor hating douche? I'm aware I'm liberal. I said as much. If you can't read two whole sentences for content, god help you.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:12 AM
3

So am I. Am I a racist poor-people-hating hypocrite, too?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:12 AM
5

There's a poster on my campus that says, "If you believe in equal rights, YOU ARE A FEMINIST." The one-sidedness kind of struck me as an ironic statement.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:55 PM
2

Thanks! I've been trying to track down credible information on this.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:25 PM
3

That seems to suggest that the wage gap isn't nonexistent, but rather < 10%. That hardly "debunks" it. It says that the gap may be caused entirely by worker choices, but makes no definitive argument. It does say that there is no need for corrective action, but from what I can tell, it reports that a wage gap does exist.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:13 PM
3

Can you cite this?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:55 PM
17

I don't have a source handy (I'm on my phone), but some quick Google searches or SSS.gov should give you a bunch. Not only do you not get to vote or receive any government employment or aid, but you can actually be fined up to $250,000 for failing to register, and I believe they can put you in prison. So yeah, men have to register when they turn 18.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:23 PM
0

The problem isn't separation. It's that most of the time, there is a shelter for women and a curb for men.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:10 PM
6

Please, point me in the direction of a "men only" clinic. Go ahead. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:04 PM
11

All men didn't always have the right to vote, either, only land owners. Before that, men were under a monarchy, and didn't vote. That's not a point at all. Women have a better shake in terms of voting these days. Also, how many female specific pieces of legislation are there pertaining to health care versus ones that guarantee male specific health care? A bunch, versus not a single one I can think of. Again, what is your point? Are you honestly complaining about having it better in these areas t…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:46 AM
32

Women currently have the right to vote, and without having to register for selective service. Women also have exponentially greater access to female specific health care, so I don't see what your point is.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 11:58 PM
23

It's not "I've been up crying all night because I really fucked up and made my fiancé feel like shit when he needed support," it's "Now I'm single and have to cover the bills, oh woe is me." It seems to have taken her two weeks to even recognize that her fiancé's feelings even matter.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:06 PM
11

I feel rapey 100% of the time, and so should you.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:21 AM
2

It's fascinating to me that so often with dating, not being persistent enough is looked at as a flaw, and women (and men sometimes) will occasionally turn you down initially to see if you'll ask again. Then, if you are persistent and attractive, you're good to go. If you're unattractive in some way, you're a creep. That said, just to play devil's advocate for a moment, if I were out and a woman hit on me, even after I had explicitly conveyed my lack of interest, I'd be irritated. I wouldn't go a…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:04 AM
27

I like how "TO EACH OTHER" is pink and "ABOUT EACH OTHER" is blue. Subtle.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:31 PM
1

Right, because a collection of a few hundred of the most privileged people on earth is a great indicator as to how the rest of us are doing. It's not as though we have a monthly "Men of America" meeting where we decide how to wield our power and oppress women while cackling over cigars and brandy. Face it: most homeless, prisoners, suicides, etc are men, and there is no help for them. Abused woman? Tons of help. Abused man? Laughed back onto the street. Besides the 0.01% of men you're describing…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:24 AM
7

If it's that offensive, why does it keep happening? Wouldn't other women pressure these shitheads into not doing this type of thing? I'm not being difficult, it's an honest question.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:59 PM
3

Lolwut.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:57 AM
2

You should be doing the exact opposite of approaching.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:07 PM
0

TIL the term "mansplaining" is used in earnest.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:04 AM
1

I'm sure it did. All most of us wanted was to feel like normal folk from time to time. Having an authority figure looming over you every moment of every day is very dehumanizing, so having a chance to connect on that level does a lot to make inmates feel more comfortable and make you seem less like a faceless enforcer. When the guards would take a moment to BS or learn something about us or crack a joke, it conveyed respect, and that's 95% of what makes the GP run. As long as we were respected, …
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:05 AM
2

I'm always happy to contribute my experience.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:34 AM
2

Ah, I misunderstood. I get what you're saying. County jail while waiting for trial was a much different place than prison. In my experience, which was admittedly fairly minimal, the guards and staff were present, but minimally. The inmates controlled the minutia of the inmate population. The guards mostly made sure everything was fairly quiet. As long as you weren't rubbing it in the guards' faces, they let us do what we pleased, rule abiding or not. We got away with a lot, and the guards knew a…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:34 AM
1

I will say that there are a lot of pretty nice guys in there, just mixed up like I was. The strangest encounter I had was when I was transferred to my parent institution. I had just gotten off the bus and rolled into chow, so I sat at an empty table. This old man sat down across from me and chatted me up, and seemed very nice. After dinner, in my unit, a guy who would become a good friend of mine came up and said, "Hey, I would suggest you stay away from Cold Cuts, the guy you were sitting with.…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 03:28 AM
19

The degree of felony doesn't affect housing in many cases. During my stay in my state's fine institutions, I was housed with two men convicted of murder 1st, once during classification and once at my parent institution, one child killer, one serial rapist (who, through the general influence of the population was rapidly forced to move to PC), and an unstable man with a long history of violent assaults on other inmates. I was serving half time on one year for delivery of a controlled substance. T…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:18 PM
–

That's......really disconcerting. I think I'm done having sex for a while.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:15 PM
–

It's actually not bad advice, considering you can now be found guilty of rape on a mere preponderance of evidence. We should all be getting signed consent waivers if you ask me.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:48 PM
2

I have been deleted by probably close to a hundred people over the years on account of one or the other.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 07:06 AM
1

Ah, now I'm with ya. I like this approach much better.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 08:09 AM
0

Seriously, thanks for all the support guys and possibly gals. You folks rock. I was having a really hard time with this, seeing as one of these people was Maid of Honor at my wedding. Thank you for all the different perspectives here.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:49 AM
1

The shocking thing was that I said something to the effect of male privilege really isn't the privilege people say it is, and men have plenty of struggles of their own, and then shit BLEW THE FUCK UP. It was like I flipped the reason switch to off and then ripped it out of the wall.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:47 AM
1

It was amongst friends. I got so boiled I had to just end the conversation.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:45 AM
–

The problem with this is, any time I try this approach, it turns into accusations that I find their point of view absurd because of all my male privilege. I'm not capable of understanding their struggles because I'm a man and have never myself struggled. And around and around we go. I can't seem to get out of circular reasoning here.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:44 AM
1

Unfortunately, a bunch of people jumped in part of the way through, including a white knight. I clearly picked the wrong fight with this one. Part of my problem also is that I get so flustered by ignorant statements and attacks and deflections that I lose my footing on solid arguments. I was clearly never meant to be an attorney or debater.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 11:21 PM
–

I was completely caught off guard. These were mostly people are normally very rational and understanding.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:39 PM
–

The more I think about it, the more pissed I get. I got jumped all over for standing up for myself, because apparently men don't get to do that.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:35 PM
6

To be fair, it is an extremely rapid way into a lot of girls' pants. Which is equally disappointing.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 07:13 PM
3

I'm sure that in the interest of gender equality, the women's team will be more than happy to give up any money that they received that was greater than the amount given the men's team.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 09:43 AM
15

I used to know a depressing number of women who said exactly this. What's more depressing is that men keep letting women do this.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 08:50 AM
9

According to Karen, there are no innocent men. We are all rapists, and that's all we do is just rape rape rape all day long. She's no more than your common street corner lunatic.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:52 PM
2

I absolutely agree. Some people say I'm paranoid because I try to be prepared for every outcome, even the unthinkable. I say that's just being prudent. Everyone has a responsibility to protect themselves.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:05 PM
2

I had the benefit of seeing how my wife handled the dissolution of her first marriage. She handled it maturely and amicably, despite having every reason to be bitter and want revenge. Of course, I am prepared for the worst, but honestly, I don't expect it.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:46 PM
4

It implies, at least to me, that all men must be taught as boys how to not rape women, otherwise we revert to some baseline depraved monster. Nobody, man or woman, gets to blame others for their complete lack of common sense.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:35 PM
6

I hate that offering safety advice and common sense self-preservation is so quickly flamed as victim blaming or misogynistic. I don't walk alone at night in secluded areas because I know I'm putting myself at risk for all kinds of things. But the minute I tell a woman to do the same, I'm condoning "rape culture." It's absurd. Should you have to be afraid? Ideally, no. Are there terrible people out there who will hurt you if given the chance? Absolutely. It's infuriating that we can't point that …
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:42 PM
10

Women are apparently penguins, if I'm reading this correctly.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter