TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theblitz6794 Archive

View 1 post and 46 comments by theblitz6794 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

theblitz6794/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:42 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

See people this is how you do it. Respectful but stern, reflective
/r/ExRedPill08/08/23 03:45 AM
3

He'd never heard of redpill? He was unconsciously redpill? Ah the plot thickens! If you see genuine hope in this man that isn't just cope and "I can fix him!", you're in for a long journey. But hey maybe it's worth it
/r/ExRedPill28/07/23 07:44 PM
1

I'd argue it's the treating you like shit part, not the redpill itself I'm confused though. Was he a redpill player that you fell for who just had an epiphany and decided to try not to be a douche?
/r/ExRedPill28/07/23 07:35 PM
1

The redpill is a red herring. Was he an edgy internet dude but basically harmless who subscribed to redpill ideology or did he go around actually harming women? His litany of other issues is what you should focus on. The redpill thing wouldn't matter to you nearly as much if those issues weren't present
/r/ExRedPill28/07/23 07:27 PM
2

Did you skip reading class? I don't care if someone is a virgin Edit: I should even clarify that hookups have a limited healthy place. Humans didn't evolve for perfect monogamy and were not in the wild. It's hookup culture I'm deeply skeptical of in addition to puritanicalism, which I believe hookup culture is a reaction to
/r/ExRedPill09/05/23 09:46 PM
-3

That's not how it works I'm still caught in the crossfire. I get lumped in. People DO apply it to me.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/23 12:53 AM
0

Yeah, but I'm still caught in the crossfire regardless
/r/ExRedPill08/05/23 12:08 AM
2

I feel attacked because you wrote "ANY man who cares about body count is worried about the wrong attributes imo and not mature enough to have a good relationship with a woman." And that's me. Whether you and others mean to include doesn't matter. You all do/you did include me. I am worried about the sexual experience of a potential partner. The reasoning is something like this: I want to connect with partners who share my values. Equality, diversity, freedom, feminism (yes, really) etc at a high…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/23 11:39 PM
-1

It is but your original comment was written in a way that it's not I'm not a virgin but I am inexperienced looking for inexperienced and feel regularly attacked.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/23 11:24 PM
1

I want to preface by saying your feelings are valid. As a guy I've never understood this, that to be masculine we have to have larger than average dicks. If you have 3" I get it. But average? Idk doesn't the average man have an average sized penis by default? That's why it's the average. (For the concerned I'm right at the average)
/r/ExRedPill04/05/23 04:36 PM
3

Its a tool for unindoctrinating myself by establishing the opposite extreme, its a shared interest with a female friend who also lurks (we both fencesit between liberalism and radfem&leftism), its extraordinarily interesting and refreshing to see things from a purely female pov, it gives me a certain negative depresso catharsis by feeding the more stunted parts of my self esteem, and for a certain relief that women are actually interested in genuinely decent men. I know TRP is ideological bullsh…
/r/askFDS02/07/20 03:12 PM
0

Do you want an individual female human that hasn't introspected on and overcome the harmful ideas she was raised with? Personally I do, and I've accepted its slim pickings. Better to be alone than settle though
/r/ExRedPill19/05/20 01:14 PM
9

"Women" don't exist. Womans do, individual female humans with different personalities and values and desires and life experiences. The individual female humans you attract will be filtered by how you attract them. If money is your shining characteristic, you'll attract individual female humans who value money as the most important thing. Do you really want that?
/r/ExRedPill19/05/20 01:11 PM
16

You don't owe her anything and she has her own life to live. A HVM isn't a demigod or a Buddha or a guru. They're just genuinely decent people who are emotionally mature and have their shit together. And those kinds of people aren't obsessing over people who gifted them the epiphanies they needed to pull themselves together. You might feel some gratitude but you're still holding on to her. That belief that you owe her gratitude and what if were right for each other I. The future...no. You're sti…
/r/askFDS18/04/20 03:46 PM
20

You're limerant and have serious growing up to do. Let her go; it'll be good for you in the long run.
/r/askFDS18/04/20 03:33 PM
2

I am jaded. My values and expectations don't match the society I live in. Making peace with my solitude doesn't make the pain of loneliness go away. I'm at peace with being in opposition. It's my role to play. I've already detached. This is me reattaching and coming back into the world
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 12:30 AM
3

I'm gonna have to accept that I'm MGTOW for now it seems. I don't get thrill of the hunt. In a population of 3.5 billion men, some are bound to be a little goofy. My ideal of sex is some free love commune where there really isn't any resistance or need to hunt, just enjoiment of the shared experience
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 12:20 AM
1

I think we're fools if that's why we built civilization. Then again, I don't think that's the only reason MGTOW appeals to me because I don't respect women that game works on.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 12:08 AM
1

Besides squeeze out a baby and breastfeed, what can't men do that women can? And frankly vice versa. There have been female marines. From my perspective, women aren't intrinsically weak. They're just raised to be prissy pampered princesses. I do physics for undergrad. I have a stronger intuition than most women and am quite in touch with my emotions. I don't see what the hell they can do that I can't
/r/TheRedPill08/03/17 12:04 AM
1

You seem like a decent chap. Could you enlighten me?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 11:48 PM
1

It's just pussy. I can buy one at Spencer's. But yeah I am drifting MGTOW
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 11:46 PM
1

I'm lean and tall but whatever you say
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 11:44 PM
1

I don't understand. I'm not gay but there is something idiosyncratic about my sexuality. I'm of an androgynous nature. Their shit just annoys me. I feel like I'm dealing with glorified children Edit: I'm lean and tall. The sex I've gotten is from being physically attractive. The second I start gaming a girl, my respect just drops
/r/TheRedPill07/03/17 11:42 PM
1

I argue back against them when it comes up. It hasn't really yet but I have defenses prepared including the definition argument, the simple support of other female feminist friends, the fact that as a long haired effeminate male I don't cash in the privilege they think I'm supposed to have, and good ole "opinions are like assholes". As for MRA labeling, it'll annoy some but if truth is on my side, reasonable feminists will come to understand it in time. Alternatively the feminist labeling could …
/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:57 AM
-4

Yes and? Both can be oppressed but one more oppressed. We have yet to disagree on "accepting both genders being oppressed"
/r/MensRights22/04/15 07:44 AM
2

Certainly. I'm not contending it's a perfect act or that NOW is a perfect organization. On the contrary part of what I'm saying is that feminists unknowingly get a lot wrong.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:53 AM
-1

I do accept that both genders are oppressed. "My theory is that both genders are oppressed"
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:51 AM
0

It's just a name. They updated it to cover men. "Although the title of the Act and the titles of its sections refer to victims of domestic violence as women, the operative text is gender-neutral, providing coverage for male victims as well.[28] Individual organizations have not been successful in using VAWA to provide equal coverage for men.[29][dubious – discuss] The law has twice been amended in attempts to address this situation. The 2005 reauthorization added a non-exclusivity provision clar…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:16 AM
-3

"Feminism has fought against sexual violence, including sexual violence against men. Feminists fought to change the federal definition of rape to include male victims, they fought for the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003, and they continue to fight to end sexual violence in the military. In 1994, NOW was a leader in the fight to pass the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). Though the law includes women in its title, VAWA protects male victims of domestic violence. NOW fought to expand the defi…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:56 AM
2

Could you link me to this? I have looked for instances of this in feminism websites and cannot find anything
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:47 AM
1

Do they? I haven't met any in real life, and I've been in college for 3 years now. Most acknowledge it is wrong. I think you may be attacking a strawman. Feminists I know, which mind you is Illinois (far from the most liberal state), are all opposed to the supposed (dwindling) lack of parenting rights for fathers, alimony, ect. If this were 1975 that would be another story but its not 1975.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:35 AM
-1

Later, you won't be missed
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:28 AM
1

Well, that's an example of censorship that you support then. I am contending that r/feminism tries to do that but, because it's impossible to be completely objective and bias runs rampant over there, they end up censoring much more than just outright trolls.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:22 AM
2

"Who cares what MRAs think? They're so fucking nuts, the work every day to alienate the publc, not to mention demonstrate their tyrannical procliviies. Hell all feminists gave to do is disagree, and wait for MRAs to melt down, which they alays do. You're not concerned about women, for example, you are simply ere to try and reconcile the hate cult you are part f, with the inhuman cruel message ascribed to MRAs by its detractors. You, like every other MRA alive, are FAR more concerned with MRA rep…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:16 AM
1

You've taken what I'm saying to an extreme. I've taken a strict pragmatic approach. Do you support or oppose censoring outright trolls? I don't support the ejection of that comic creator.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:06 AM
2

Merging them in principle is the first step, in my opinion, to merging them in policy. Let's get everyone on board towards a common goal then argue about how to achieve it without accusations that we're all enemy bigots. I don't think it's a flawed argument. The definition of feminism is often a belief in gender equality. Under this definition, we are in fact feminists whether we self identify as such or not, not that we have to self identify as such.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:03 AM
-1

"Why the hell would we want z 'male wing' instead of simply welcoming them o peak heir minds as fully included members? You MRA bigots are hilarious, especially considering you think a 'women's auxillry' of Men's Rights us some kind of leap frward. His fucking bigoted can you get? And telling whole time, us 'sexists' who have been including men as equals, with no need for 'auxiliary' wings (since men have always been fully included) that you MRAs, who expect women to run to fulfill our every whi…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:01 AM
1

Yes! We only need to build a bridge now between the two
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:40 AM
-1

There is no difference between the 2 except one is not a loaded term. Moderation = censoring trolls, derailers, people who don't belong, ect. All moderation is censorship. You're taking censorship as some inherent evil when we engage in moderation too.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:39 AM
0

Say quite a few of the feminists I tell all this too
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:37 AM
0

Traditional gender roles have males as providers, not caregivers. Thus it flows pretty free to have men pay child support to women raising kids. I do not know the main issues of women and men although if they are diametric, there is a larger problem at stake. You can call all feminists MRAs in principle and then call them shitty MRAs. Certainly there are MRAs that are misogynistic pigs who have no interest in equal rights and thus are also shitty MRAs.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:35 AM
0

Feminists say the same thing to me about MRAs. Unless you're looking to setup a female rights wing of MRA and then declare it equal to MRA, you're just as bad as the people you hate (which are not even the majority in my experience).
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:33 AM
2

"That being said, I don't see the need for a "men's rights" wing of Feminism. I'm totally a feminist as long as you accept that I am also a masculist. They aren't mutually exclusive, dude." That's literally what I'm advocating here. Glad to see you're on board
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:12 AM
-2

It is ironic that feminists tend to have more moderation but given our image as sexists, maybe we should too
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:17 AM
-1

Regarding incompatibilities, not at the highest level--they're both gender egalitarian. The difference is "merely" their individual members' interpretation of reality. It's not hard to stretch the concept of patriarchy to men's rights though. As many feminists friends I have talked to in real life say, alimony and child support are the result of a society not understanding the role of the father/disregarding the father as a caregiver/ect. My theory is that both genders are oppressed, women more …
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:15 AM
2

This is what I envision
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter