TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thekarateguy Archive

View 18 posts and 728 comments by thekarateguy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
740

Fathers/Custodythekarateguy/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:48 PM
93

Social Issuesthekarateguy/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:22 PM
28

Storythekarateguy/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:33 PM
25

thekarateguy/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:32 PM
13

Questionthekarateguy/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:41 PM
9

Questionthekarateguy/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:46 PM
8

Questionthekarateguy/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:26 PM
6

Discriminationthekarateguy/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:08 PM
5

thekarateguy/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:58 PM
5

Social Issuesthekarateguy/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:13 PM
4

Social Issuesthekarateguy/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:43 PM
3

thekarateguy/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:05 PM
3

Generalthekarateguy/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:37 PM
2

Storythekarateguy/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:49 PM
2

Misleading Titlethekarateguy/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:49 PM
1

thekarateguy/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:50 PM
1

thekarateguy/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:40 PM
1

thekarateguy/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:34 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Frankly, I find it refreshing to hear a woman say "im not a feminist". Especially when it is followed with her preference for the term "egalitarian". Shows that she doesnt just swallow the gender narrative thats shoved down our throats.
/r/RedPillWomen26/01/16 10:08 PM
1

For me, hygiene is non-negotiable. If youre not washing or taking care of yourself then I dont want anything to do with you intimately. And what is a relationship without intimacy?
/r/RedPillWomen25/01/16 04:55 PM
53

And now the civil counter-suit begins.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/16 06:09 PM
3

Added in my first comment. :)
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/16 04:55 PM
5

The Big Lies are spot on, even today. Particularly "having it all" and "feminization of men". A former friend of mine is very much a Warrior and her fiance is very feminized and she walks all over him (and her contempt toward him for allowing her to do it is palpable). The 4 archetypes seem fairly accurate. Though, in the case of my exwife, I think there is a 5th archetype missing: The Child. That's not a dig against my ex (with whom I have a fairly good relationship with today); but it is a ref…
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/16 03:46 PM
1

And that's how dodgeball made its way to Russia
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/16 10:21 PM
4

How the fuck does someone become like this? It starts with two over indulgent parents, a cup of adolescent narcissism, and 5 heaping scoops of female entitlement. Then stir well. Next, set in the oven of an over-indulgent society and allow to bake. Once finished, let cool in a public education system that expressly forbids any challenge to the now firming sense of righteous self importance. And finally, serve warm along side gifted car and iphone. Garnish with "Bernie 2016" and "Coexist" bumper …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/16 06:54 PM
53

This. This right here. Spend any time online listening to feminists and you hear shit like "men feel entitled to women's bodies", but you never hear them acknowledging that this knife can cut both ways.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/16 09:01 PM
3

Wow. Just...wow. If you replace "have sex" with "buy me that Barbie" the the only thing that would discern this woman from a 6 year old child is the depth of her voice.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/01/16 08:57 PM
1

Press her to come up with any and all solutions, then put it to a vote. Odds are good that once they hear shit like "we need to stop allowing new males to join until females are 50% of our group" then they'll vote that down. And on the off chance the group votes against your side, then you and other like you may just have to form your own closed group.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:10 AM
2

Your splinter might just have to form its own group. Do your best to leave on good terms with the others
/r/MensRights17/01/16 02:07 AM
10

Be calm, civil toned, do not use profanity, and never threaten (these only give them fuel) Never apologize for anything they call "problematic". In fact, never apologize for anything they complain about at all. Apologies never do any good and only serve to legitimize their complaints Invite them to play with you, but be very firm with her that (and it will help you if you get others in your group to back this) this is not their space to dictate etiquette. And if she finds the environment not to …
/r/MensRights15/01/16 06:37 PM
32

I remember reading this when it was first published. Rational and reasoned response by a woman who lives the life and knows what it would cost to full integrate women into all-male units.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 03:07 PM
2

Hang on, guys, they might be on to something. I think we ought to give it a try: Get your purse stolen at 10pm? Too bad. 90% of the police force is home in bed. House is on fire? Well it better go out soon because it's almost curfew. Got in a car accident? I hope the ambulance service has staffed up on women to cart your crippled ass to the hospital because all us guys are at home getting laid.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 11:41 PM
7

Honestly I'm surprised they tackled this one and actually told the truth. They usually play softball whenever they come close to feminist issues.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:32 PM
12

"comedian" Most appropriate use of quotation marks ever.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/15 01:30 PM
1

Well, yeah of course its sexist. You're privileging your male lungs over the lungs of womyn.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:18 AM
26

The Rangers didnt change their standards either.... they just made sure that the two women who passed had huge advantages over the men who took the test along side them. Its was akin to having the teacher giving you hints to each question and you can take as much time as you like: same test, same test result, but does not yield the same kind of student. FWIW I'm fine a woman getting to be in a combat role as long as she's just as good as the men there.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/15 11:10 AM
2

I was really enjoying this until the I started to look at those kids; and especially when those kids took their cues from that woman and began to should and curse too. With a parent like that I dont think those kids are long before they end up in trouble with law enforcement.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/15 04:36 PM
3

That theyre a bunch of Lord of the Rings nerds?
/r/PussyPass17/12/15 11:21 AM
3

have an upvote, OP. I'm totally gonna watch this load of shit (and holy christ, theres like a dozen commercials in a 55 minute doc. greedy much, fuckers?)
/r/PussyPass17/12/15 11:18 AM
2

I had to double check and make sure I didnt post this comment to the r/archerfx sub
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:45 PM
3

You're really missing the point of that whole "equality" thing, Barry.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:19 PM
21

Excessive? Hardly. This young man exhibits the epitome of restraint. She repeatedly invaded his personal space while he ignored her taunts and disrespect and even fled to the corner of the bus to get away. When he would not engage her she then she physically assaulted him by grabbing at his face. It wasnt until she struck him that he determined his safety was at risk, defended himself, controlled his assailant, and then informed her that her actions against his person would not be tolerated in t…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/15 02:41 PM
2

Somehow I doubt that feminists have any kind of pull in any of the media outlets that picked her up when she was a rising star.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/15 05:12 PM
4

jesus christ... if i were ronda id be so pissed that all i ever get asked is feminist shit. fuckin hell, ask her about her goddamn training!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/15 05:09 AM
2

Fuck those caddy shack bastards!
/r/MensRights09/12/15 04:11 PM
2

Soooo, do you come here for the lulz or something?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:18 PM
2

Not that I'm on this cunt's side, but these guys are disgusting pieces of racist filth. Fuck everyone on this clip.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/15 03:26 AM
7

Mark Greene wrote this article... He is the author of Remaking Manhood. He writes and speaks on men’s issues at Salon And this tells you everything you need to know.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:59 PM
1

I love how you have an entire club house that gives themselves raises for no reason, mandates huge amounts of time off for themselves, promotes by cronyism instead of merit, and gives itself universal healthcare while at the same time trying to act like they're anti-socialist. SMH
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:41 PM
1

shouldn't be back till I believe February. Fucking lazy mother fuckers
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:10 PM
1

sigh...fuck. integrated units like the marines? or separate like the israelis?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:13 AM
1

Does this include the SEALs?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:58 PM
9

Wow, the 1 in 5 myth right in the first sentence. She's not even trying.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:19 PM
3

jesus christ. on the stage or off it. make a choice!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/15 01:26 PM
-2

Hilarious? Nope. Do I give one single fuck that a child rapist is gonna get raped? Nope. Do I care that most in this sub are too ideological to realize they place their dogma above the safety of children and will downvote this comment in an effort to "punish" my opinion? Nope.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 11:25 AM
9

"Because a woman cannot be charged with rape" these incidents all resulted in charges of unlawful sexual connection, the judge said. God fucking dammit, New Zealand.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/15 02:21 PM
4

in what way did you "appease the feminists"?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:16 PM
0

Rationality is not individually subjective. There are rational and irrational responses to stimuli and experiences. A woman who is nearly raped would be rational in taking a martial arts class and maybe buying a gun. She would be irrational to assume that every man who walks by her is a rapist. I'm just saying that this kid's response would be like me never leaving my house for fear of being hit by a car.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:37 PM
-1

If this kid's reaction (assuming it is genuine and not just trolling or clickbait) seems rational to people here then I think we need to admit that this sub has unmoored itself from reason. Please tell me this is not the case.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:12 PM
1

Here is a 5 minute video which will give you the basics of why there is a pay gap and why it is not the result of sexim, but of free choices. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58arQIr882w
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:40 PM
1

google america doesnt give a shit either
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:33 PM
5

This focus and desire to live up to the masculine ‘gold standard’ contributes to the devastatingly high level of suicide in men in mid-life. Riiiiiight. So what we have here is yet another article which tells men "dont be that bad ol 'typical male'". But this ignores that those typical male qualities are not only what keeps the world turning but gives us every major advance in technology for the past 200,000 years.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:38 PM
3

one of each - and they were a couple.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:14 PM
14

Thing is, they were friends. Real friends. We've been through some shit together. And that is what makes it hurt.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:35 PM
53

Ohh, fun! I get to tell my story. TL;DR: Lost my two best friends due to feminist indocrination Story: My two best friends of 16 years, goin back to middle school, abandoned me in December of 2014 because they learned I do not hold their extreme feminist views. What did I say that so egregiously offended them? To friend number 1: "I think its shitty that there are no mens DV shelters. If a guy is getting abused by his wife then he ought to have somewhere safe he can go". To friend number 2: "I d…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:11 PM
2

And now look up what she said about her ex having access to "her" children.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:53 PM
5

She doesnt think its proper to talk about money publicly, but she doesnt mind telling EVERYONE in the media that she doesnt want the father of her children to have access to them. Seems legit.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:52 PM
1

The "Gamergater" looks kinda like George Carlin.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:32 PM
0

Rule No. 1: Just do what you came to do and dont engage them in dialogue. Just watched the whole video...these students are the reason we need to bring back labor camps; anyone who actively fights against the freedoms of others needs to experience having their own stripped away for a time.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:16 PM
7

fair enough. just noticed the strange wording and thought i'd ask kinda telling, though, dont you think?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:17 PM
24

female equal rights activist... Do you word it this way (instead of just saying "feminist") to draw a distinction between the goals of male and female ERAs?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:11 PM
1

While there is a case to be made about "stating hatred vs calling others to violence", I'm just not ready to say that any tweets with shit like "ugh will someone just shoot justin beiber in the face?" are criminal offenses. I get your point, though. And I do believe this cunt did get off on a pussy pass. But because of this, men in the UK can be protected against similar charges.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:19 PM
-1

Italics and quotes are unnecessary at this point. By admitting that you cant be bothered to do the research you have admitted that you were talking out of your ass from the start, or else you would have been able to come up with an example right away. Scrape together the remains of your dignity and just walk away in silence.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:10 PM
-2

Lol. I'll take that as a "I'm full of shit and couldnt come up with a single example of the bullshit I was spouting".
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:53 PM
-2

This bitch lives in London. Now show me any of these "number of men" from the UK (where this legal precedent would be applicable) who have been brought up on mean tweet charges and had their lives "ruined". If you cant do this then just shut your scabby cunt mouth.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:31 PM
-18

Hey, smart guy, come here. Lemme tell you something... GO FUCK YOURSELF You know that there is this concept in law called "precedent? It means that when one person is convicted of a crime based on a legal interpretation of a law then it makes it easier for other people to be convicted based on the same interpretation. The inverse is true, too, for people who are let go. But you've got your head so far up your ass that, instead of seeing this a something we can use to protect men against future a…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:33 PM
38

Good. I hate this cunt as much as all of you, but I'm taking the long view. And if mean tweets are going to start being prosecuted then we might as well just give up on Free Speech entirely.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:55 PM
322

This woman is what every feminist should aspire to be: a no-bullshit badass that knows exactly what she's worth and works to earn what she keeps.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:00 PM
1

A win for equality, then.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:55 PM
2

"so I noticed you're a woman, how about that?" Its just insulting. I mean, you could at least ask her how she felt about taking on a role in which she'd be seducing a significantly younger man. At least that's an interesting question about how an actor approaches their craft.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 04:16 PM
10

..."strong female characters" (Natalie) clap clap eye roll Awesome " we dont give a fuck about your opinion" answers all around. Also, holy shit I didnt even recognize Samwell.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:05 PM
1

Thank you good sir!
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:01 PM
3

My office computer is stupid. Can you please paste in the long link? I'd really love to see her eye roll. plzthx
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:54 PM
1

Love this chick.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 12:53 PM
9

Well...whatever it takes to get this addressed. Right??
/r/MensRights27/10/15 08:20 PM
10

“Sure, teaching consent to college freshmen may be necessary in a culture in which kids are graduating from high school thinking it’s okay to have sex with someone who is unconscious,” This is the point of view that informs their opinions about not only sex, but men in general. Sickening.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 05:57 PM
9

Washington Examiner article? About poor treatment of men? Sounds like an Ashe Schow article. *clicks link * Called it!
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:44 PM
91

B-b-b-but false accusations are rare!
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:43 PM
1

Well, the proof will be in the pudding. But it sounds like they've got their heads on straight.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 05:24 PM
0

I can see you're incapable of a reasoned or mature conversation. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:48 PM
0

No need to get upset, buddy. I'm not attacking you. We are animals, as part of the biological category. But, as I said, we do way too many things differently for the "we're just like animals" argument to work the way you want it to work. Fair enough. I should have made it clear that I did not misunderstand your point. Anyway, the problem with the "we're not like animals" argument is that it ignores so many species in which we are very, very similar. Chimpanzees and Bonobos, for example, both exh…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:17 PM
1

lol, yep
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:15 PM
7

I won't downvote you, but you are very much incorrect here. We are not animals We absolutely are animals. We just happen to be highly intelligent animals. But our instincts come from an age when we didnt have reddit, or cars, or even architecture. It comes from an age when "fire" was a new invention. And this is why a cuckolded man us more unable to forgive his cheating wife - because he is then at risk of the worst possible fate, from a genetic standpoint: gene-death
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:14 PM
2

And in other "no-shit news"... Evo Psych explains that this is genetics 101: A woman's ability to successfully procreate involves not just copulation, but monopolization of the man's resources (protection, provision, etc) so that her offspring can survive and procreate also. A man's ability to successfully procreate (especially in the confines of a monogamous relationship) involves monopolization of the woman's sexual availability. So if a man goes to a prostitute to cheat on his wife, or if it …
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:04 PM
2

Well, OP, let me put it this way...if Macintosh told me the sky was blue, I'd still take a peek outside and check.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:43 PM
1

Holy shit. And it's in The Guardian, too!
/r/MensRights06/10/15 07:26 PM
3

make me less aggressive and help root me in quiet confidence Exactly the same effect here, as a competitive martial artist. The knowledge that I can likely put someone on the ground if need be makes me much much much less interested in trying to prove something to some idiot who got mouthy to me in front of my friends.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:08 PM
1

I'm not sure I see a conflict here. The MRM wants equality of rights (and responsibilities) not equality of outcomes. Make it so both genders must be eligible for the draft; should a dire war ever come then most women will end up in non-frontline combat due to general male superiority in battle. Equality established, problem solved.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:53 AM
7

My exwife was awesome about this stuff. We had separate account and I was in charge of paying all the bills through out the month (except her stuff like her phone, Rx, etc). Then at the end of the month I add it up and she transfers half the amount to my account. Perfect financial equality.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 01:22 AM
1

Well yeah, its obviously not from corporate, lol.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 06:07 PM
1

Diabolical plot!
/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:12 PM
2

Better version of same video
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:48 PM
2

I get that feeling, completely. Story time: In 2009 I got engaged and when I told a mixed group of coworkers there were several comments from the women along the lines of, "If she's going to marry you then she'll really need to train you [for domestic tasks]". The assumption that I dont know how to wash a dish or iron a shirt and that, as a male, I would need training just grates on my nerves. >:(
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:42 PM
2

You'd guess wrong, my friend. :) I can see that it is meant to be funny. I just simply find jokes like that, that assume I am incapable of tasks like this based solely on my sex as not-very-funny.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:35 PM
2

Sorry for the redundant post, I guess. I looked at the subs front page and didnt see it. Didnt occur to me to sift through 2 years of posts to find that one. I wanted to be circumspect, too (hence my use of "allegedly" and "hoax". No reason to crank up the "outrage machine". :) I dunno. This pic just rubbed me the wrong way.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:17 PM
1

This is what happens when you use gender and racial quotas in the workplace instead of a strict merit system.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:14 PM
1

I'm not a lawyer and these laws vary state to state but most states have a "public space" rule that means that if you're outside then you can be recorded without consent (this rule varies, again, when it comes to cops).
/r/MensRights21/09/15 09:12 PM
2

Its probably a "robot" once it has a head.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:51 PM
2

If boys were taught, as girls are, that they are victimized by these unrealistic toys then I could see them adopting that mindset and being harmed by it. Fortunately, so far, most boys aren't given the victim-narrative so they dont even think that Thor is giving him body issues. Pure feminist projection. Thats all this article is.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:41 PM
2

lol, nice.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:25 PM
13

Get in line, buddy :)
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:36 PM
6

Agreed. It is merely another proxy in the larger culture war waged by feminists.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:17 PM
5

Are they all doing the "Spirit Bomb" in the illustration? Edit: Yes, yes they are. Dude at the bottom right is clearly wearing a Scouter from DBZ.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:17 PM
3

I am assuming that the poster takes the 95% from the study by David Lisak which claims that majority of college rapes are committed by about 4-5% of college males. I am saying this is wrong because of the article quoted below. Plus that rape rates, according the the BJS, are lower on campus than they are in the general public. What’s remarkable about these surveys is that they don’t actually have anything to do with campus sexual assault (aside from the location where they were conducted)... The…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:10 PM
10

I would ask her what, if any, battles she believes feminism has left in the Western world.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:29 PM
2

This is discriminatory against conjoined twins.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:24 PM
1

The poster's heart is in the right place but I'm fairly certain that 95% is a little low.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:05 PM
2

Stop. Just stop. If the MRM starts getting its panties in a twist about suggestive lyrics then it has lost all sense of scope and priority and has become no better than feminists.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:22 PM
1

I wholeheartedly agree. Find them and punish them to the fullest extent of the law.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:05 PM
1

Can you just imagine the anti-bot protests? Man I really wanna see those picket signs.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:25 PM
5

These people are both yelling at each other like children. Whatever happened to mature debates? Indian TV news has taken a lot of cues from American news (remember CNN'a "Crossfire" back in the early 2000's?). Especially the shouting talking-heads. It doesnt drive debate, it drives viewership (bonus if someone gets smacked around). And that is all that matters.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:12 PM
1

I would encourage you to stick around this sub and judge for yourself, but sparing that, the short answer is "no". Straight, gay, trans, bi, femme, masculine...whatever. As long as you believe in equal rights for men and women then this sub wants you around.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:40 AM
0

dont know who downvoted you, but im upvoting just to even things out.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:55 PM
0

Sorry but I dont keep a catalog of the 4 or 5 times this has happened. Had no reason to believe that I'd need to prove a pretty un-outlandish statement like that someday.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:49 PM
3

A fleshlight in the tail pipe....it's so obvious now! Oh, so many wasted years!!!
/r/MensRights13/09/15 04:38 PM
22

You stay away from my truck's tail pipe.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:47 PM
1

People always lay that claim about this subreddit, but I never see these mystical "radicals" here. Unless they are being downvoted into oblivion. Well, any time I bring up that I didnt get raped in my divorce and I even kept the house I tend to get a dozen or so replies (and twice as many downvotes) telling me that I am some kind of magical exception. So, if we call characterize part of radicalization being "the refusal to acknowledge challenges to strongly held beliefs", then u/cyniccorvus has …
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:29 PM
71

Nah, guys, shes right. When I see jealous men eyeing my 1997 Ford Ranger I naturally put my arm around the hood to show them that this car is my property. And, likewise, when I walk down the street with a lady with my arm around her shoulder I am not simply trying to express non-sexual closeness and intimacy with my romantic partner. I am expressing my ownership of this female shaped object to all other males in sight.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:21 PM
5

England said he did not rely on Messina’s opinion but, instead, was guided by the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Suck on that, bitch.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:17 PM
0

"oh neat, a fact driven expose on supposed male privilege. maybe I'll discover another cool youtuber" clicks link (sees stefan molyneux face) closes window
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:13 PM
2

That's the only way any of this worked for as long as it did. I see someone here has read "The Selfish Gene" :)
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:09 PM
21

All of fatherhood in one simple picture.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:49 PM
10

Hang on, guys. I think he might be on to something. I think his suggestion merits proper experimentation. I say we try this out in Congress first and then see how it goes.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:20 PM
8

I'm a sucker for approval. I think we all are/were. We're raised this way (and not just by feminists). We naturally crave the approval of our parents, teachers, and peers. The hard part is, as we get older, finding internal approval in doing what we feel is right; especially when externally we are told what we are doing is wrong.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:45 PM
13

Hi OP I havent read all the comments in this thread but I hope you'll be understanding if it seems like some here are taking a "victory lap" in response to your post. Feminism not caring about males (straight and white ones especially) is one of the things that MRAs have been saying for years...quite correctly, as you have seen. I feel, and I hope, that this will be turning point for you and that you take this chance to diversify your sources of information, especially about gender violence (non…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:41 PM
36

This poster would have been so much better with sources in it. Not that feminists are good about sourcing their supposed stats, but we really ought to hold ourselves to a higher standard.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:26 PM
1

girlwriteswhat girlwriteswhat girlwriteswhat?! Senpai spoke to me! I'm never going to wash this keyboard again!!! Jokes aside, it is pretty disappointing how so many of these articles get soooo close to the truth...but die at the 1-yard line.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 07:53 PM
2

Kafka-esque nightmare where child is harmed by law created to protect children.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:23 PM
6

Thank you. Also, unless I'm interpreting this incorrectly, the author is basically saying that when women do it its way fucking worse.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:01 AM
3

I really dont care to read the article. Anyone wanna tell me what the "real reason" is? thanks for helping me be lazy. :)
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:21 PM
14

Sadder still that this group recognized that the only way they could do this would be to have women hand out the flyers. God forbid men stand up for their own rights. That would be misogyny!
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:59 PM
1

This should be leaflet-dropped by drone on to every college campus in America.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:50 PM
15

Somewhat off topic, but I've always detested the notion that "women become mothers when they become pregnant; men become fathers when their child is born". Tell that to a man whose wife had a miscarriage.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 02:49 PM
1

Yes, thank you. Stupid site-blocker here at work
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:31 PM
3

Well, ok. But wasnt there an article recently specifically naming how boys are being brutalized and turned into child-soldiers? Just sayin that every article that doesnt specifically contain the words "but things totally suck for the guys too" isnt an attack on us.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:15 PM
2

It's working!
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:09 PM
2

I am unfamiliar with DeCrow and was totally expecting this to go the other way. Hurray for surprises!
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:12 AM
4

Didnt you know, OP? We straight white shitlords ruin everything!
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:02 PM
-4

I'm fine with rape jokes. I'm fine with child rapists getting raped themselves. Where is the problem? Edit: Lol. That many downvotes and no one has a counter-argument? Once again select members of this sub act like feminists and let their feelings do the talking.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:30 PM
3

But it is still is important to protect yourself and understand the potential risks. Couldnt agree more. I didnt protect myself at all when I got married, but she's a good person and didn't have any desire to take half my shit, make false accusations, or any of the other horrible stuff you sometimes hear about. Next time, if there is a next time, I'll be much more careful.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:41 PM
1

no longer look at issues with the subtlety of nuance. Seems to be less and less of this lately. Especially when the subject of marriage is brought up. They seem to hate that I didnt get demolished in my divorce, as it breaks up the "divorce = financial rape" narrative.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:29 PM
2

I'm just very wary of us becoming just another version of feminist thought police. I get down voted half the time I bring something like this up on this sub.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 07:16 PM
2

sacrifice elephants to Satan Thats fine. But you stay away from the lions.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:40 PM
1

Well, I rejected my marriage because there wasnt enough vagina. Does that count?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:20 PM
4

Its because all these men are manspreading in their cars.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:13 PM
1

for instance, would never purchase stocks in a cigarette Yup. Even though Philip Morris's dividend is mighty tempting, I just cant bring myself to give them my money.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:12 PM
1

"Dont marry an antifeminist"....or, don't marry someone without a long and thorough litmus test.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:54 PM
1

Drat! Foiled by screengrab again!
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:17 PM
5

definitely not Wizzard Material! Should have studied Algebra instead of Arithmancy.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:42 PM
2

Something something something...complete.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:39 PM
32

Asked about her personal experience of sexism in her line of work, Dormer told Radio Times magazine: "My personal experience has been to work on phenomenal jobs in which the men are objectified as much as the women...It's a visual medium, so to a certain extent you get judged on the way you look. See how she takes the question, knows what the interviewer WANTS to hear, and then flips that right on it's fucking head, and back it up with fucking LOGIC? Love this chick.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:38 PM
2

Yeah, the old testament was pretty harsh. Good job pointing out the context in which my above example is couched in.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:28 PM
2

Well, depending on how far back you wanna go, you might consider it a "crime" of sorts. Back in the time of the ancient Jews, women weren't allowed to enter temple when they were on their period. They were considered unclean. Don't get me wrong, the feminist in the pic is ridiculous. Just sayin...
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:06 PM
3

Because there's only one bitch allowed in that house.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:53 PM
1

Anyone got a link to an example? I'd really like to see what feminists consider "porn for men".
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:51 PM
1

WTF. Kryptonite is green
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:44 PM
2

Only two of the four names given (by the accused) were interviewed because, as Kozak would later tell him, she had enough facts. WOW
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:38 PM
1

Sounds like she knows whats up
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:12 PM
5

With respect, are you just bitching about their treatment? I agree the anti-male bias in college is abhorrent, but I am at a bit of a loss as to what of my stance you are disagreeing with. As to the courts, no, it doesnt quite work that way. A high court doesnt just pick a cause and decide on their own initiative. They have to have a case brought to them (see: gay marriage, for example). Suing the schools, and suing the accusers is the only way this will change (and probably won't change until w…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:07 PM
2

Be the change you want to see, OP.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:04 PM
18

The lawsuit doesnt have to prove sexism. It only has to show that a student's due process rights are being violated. anyway, I don't think it will be easy - lawsuits rarely are. But with some 70+ lawsuits already filed across the nation, I think it is going to take only a few dozen of them earning multi-million dollar decisions for universities to petition govt to revise Title 9.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:56 PM
3

Well, legalized prostitution WOULD reduce the number of men and women who face charges for engaging in consensual sex.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:34 PM
31

If we want this Title 9 idiocy to end, every student who falls victim to their Kangaroo courts needs to sue the school for millions. That is the only way that the universities will lean on government to rescind the changes that the "dear colleagues" letter set off.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:32 PM
3

You can see his dishonesty right in the very beginning as he tries to place "being a good man" at odds with "being a real man". He separates the two, as if they are not fluid conditions that each man expresses at different times of his day and life dependent on context. First rule of sales, people, "Create a need" in the market.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 01:41 PM
1

The BBC? Well im sure that's gonna be fair
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:10 AM
1

In what respect? (I've only been on reddit for like 4 mo)
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:43 PM
3

So its like this sub, but with less circle jerk
/r/MensRights05/08/15 01:28 PM
1

Reasoned points, all. To be clear, this thread isn't something I firmly believe but rather something I've been kicking around in my head and wanted this sub's feedback on. Thanks for illustrating the "studs vs sluts" connection as the opposite side of this very same coin.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:45 PM
2

Why not both?
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:56 PM
3

Next, they will say that server rooms are kept cold as a conspiracy to keep women out of IT This is coming like a freight train.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:22 PM
4

I have a cold; which I blame on the A/C Well if you're willing to lie to us about something as basic as germ theory then I have no need to listen to a word you say.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:21 PM
1

Which one is it? With respect, youre ignoring my example of a non-virgin girl vs non-virgin boy and how only girl's are viewed as having "lost" something pure about them due to sex. My point is that women are given something positive, "purity", which is taken away by sex while men are not. To think that males sexuality is infecting others with impurity is bass ackwards. I agree. Surely you don't think this is my actual position. This entire thread was created as an examination of societal memes;…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:05 PM
1

Interesting thoughts. I'm not sure that it is only religious people who ascribe virginity to (lets just say "positive adjectives"). I believe that, given our nation's very religious past, such views have largely pervaded the masses as a whole. At least on an unconscious level.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 01:00 PM
1

Weird that 11-15 partners is a 29.61% risk while 17-20 partners drops to 17.80% risk. I can't imagine that logic. lol
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:58 PM
1

Well, that's a fair observation. And I agree that puritanical views of sex have much to do with how virginity is treated. (And for what it is worth, unlike many in this sub, I do not go out of my way to find ways to be offended by everyday life). However, for the sake of a healthy argument, let me ask you why a 16 year old girl is seen as less pure today, now that she had sex, than when she was a virgin yesterday, while a 16 year old boy isn't seen as any less pure today than compared to yesterd…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 12:48 PM
1

mental gymnastics on my part or on the part of society, you mean?
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:03 PM
2

The relationship is, without a doubt, tied to Christianity. But I don't see it as wholly responsible for it. For example, yes, male children are also seen (arguably to a greatly lesser extent) "pure", but this purity isn't, as far as I can discern, removable upon the loss of virginity but just erodes with age (a 16 yr old non-virgin isnt really seen as any less pure than he was yesterday when he still had his virginity).
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:02 PM
2

Bull Burr gives him his due, though.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 05:38 PM
14

Expecting a woman to give you the time of day because you chose with your own free mind, under no duress, to buy her a drink. Sorry, if she chooses to ditch out after that drink, take it as a lesson learned and learn how to spend your money better. Wow. When a woman accepts a drink, that is a common social queue that she is willing to speak to a man. When she declines the drink, she doesn't want to talk. So what this bitch is arguing for is take the man's drink, then reject him, and try to make …
/r/MensRights31/07/15 05:07 PM
2

First, let me remind that I'm not sold on that notion, myself. But, playing devil's advocate... When a culture does not protect its public morality then it becomes a culture that has separated from the social mores that allowed it to grow and profligate. Now, the above argument opens the doors wide to counter-arguments like Why would paid sex be a detriment to moral cohesion when free sex is not? This is a puritanical view of sexuality and not indicative of current social values. etc.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 04:33 PM
2

On top of that many Veterans commit suicide, On the plus side, if the numbers are to be believed, veteran suicides are down by 1/3. Don't get me wrong, thats still 2/3 too high. Just sayin that it is progress.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:26 PM
2

Well I dont think he is denying it. It sounds like hes asking a genuine question.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:26 PM
1

I think you'll have greater success if you expand beyond just libertarians. If you reach out to those who have different political views then you will not alienate those who find other aspects of libertarianism unappealing. For example, I am a "classical" liberal (someone who believes that an individual's rights are supreme, provided it isnt impeding the rights of others). So, while I can understand a business owner's desire to keep the right to refuse service, I do not think he should be able t…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:22 PM
2

I'm quite ambivalent about prostitution. On the one hand I think that it should NOT be illegal to sell what you can give away for free. On the other I do (sort of) understand the view of those who say that open prostitution is a sign of a culture in decline. I do lean pretty hard on the "legalize it, tax it, build some fucking bridges or something with the revenue" side of the argument, though.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:15 PM
6

Well, you know what you have to do if you want to burst their fucking bubble.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:10 PM
15

Ive always thought to myself that starting at birth a low-voltage, sustained, psychological campaign of "you're not a victim. people who tell you that you are only want to control you" would do a very good job to inoculate young women against feminism.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:08 PM
5

Do you change it?
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:06 PM
1

Wow...if this is truly a representation of our youth then our society, as we know it, will not last much longer.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 07:43 PM
3

I made the list!!!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:41 PM
2

TL;DR: Although additional research in this area is clearly needed, this study leads to the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action. Indeed, there may be nothing to correct. The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:56 PM
8

THIS IS AWFUL!!! ...there's no way for me to Ctrl+F for my username.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:49 PM
1

Nope. Just trying to quell the fear mongering that some dole out here. Were it true that all or even most women act in a divorce as we are lead to believe they do by members of this sub, then you could expect up to 40%* (half of the males married, because of the roughly half divorce rate) of the male population to have a similar stories. .* https://www.google.com/search?q=percentage+of+men+that+marry&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:29 PM
1

Ehhhh...I'll call it a "stick man" argument. Similar to straw, but sturdier. True, I WAS being a bit hyperbolic, though. But anytime I discuss my own divorce where I came out pretty well unscathed (didnt get falsely accused, didnt lose all my money, etc) I usually do get downvoted and told I'm this exception to the rule.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:09 PM
1

I feel the same way in several instances. Any time I mention that I didn't get raped by my divorce I'm always told that I'm like this golden unicorn of an exception. I'm like, yeah divorce law needs to change (and change a lot when it comes to custody) but lets not pretend that it is always a man's fate to get fucked over in divorce.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:43 PM
-2

calling your secretary "sweetie" and slapping her ass as she fetches your coffee You say that like it's a bad thing!
/r/MensRights23/07/15 07:27 PM
1

/s?
/r/MensRights21/07/15 03:54 PM
1

Side question: This article right off the bat mentions the racial pay gap. My question is this...is such a pay gay explainable by the same methods that the gender pay gap is explained? (Ex: hispanic women tend to have larger families than whites and thus will likely have fewer years in the work force; and also work in lower paying jobs, etc...)
/r/MensRights21/07/15 03:21 PM
3

"I should have asked my friends to have 3somes...and they should have said 'yes'". LOL
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:09 PM
0

Things aren't much better on my side of the pond, but I am so glad I live in America when I read stuff like this about the UK.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:18 PM
6

Jesus. India is so fucking fucked.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:25 PM
2

I would very much like to see that blood hormone study if you have the link.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:43 AM
2

Haha, yeah I've seen that a lot.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:21 PM
4

It isnt feminist propaganda to acknowledge that many of these women are the property of their father/husband/brother/next male relative. It is their unofficial status as property which makes them beneath consideration for the courts. To be clear I'm very well aware of female privilege that comes with what feminists call "oppression" in these parts of the world. Brutal and barbaric as many of these cultures can be, they understood the balance between "rights" and "responsibilities"
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:18 PM
1

That is probably, sickeningly, true for many of those 29 countries.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:14 PM
1

so thats a "yes"? lol
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:25 PM
8

Cuckoldry. Nothin new here. If women wants to dress that up in the clothes of "feminism" then I say go for it. Feminism will lose even more of its remaining credibility with the general public.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:28 PM
5

I cant believe I'm about to say this... ...In those countries, the laws are created by men. As such, either women in said countries are not treated as men's equals, by law and/or by culture, and thus are not even worthy of criminal punishment; or those men are falling victim to the "lezbians r hawt" trap. Basically it is their backwards cultures that are justifying those law making men to punish only gay men and ignore lesbian women.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:24 PM
2

When it comes to teaching boys about hitting girls (and I'm talking about children, not adults), I follow common sense: Don't hit her. Don't hit her back. Shove her away if you must and escape to find an adult. There is no "win" in this situation. As for the lessons girls receive around hitting boys, I was born in the 80s so things might be different now, but I seem to recall them getting similar "hitting is bad" lessons that we all did.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:05 PM
1

Fuck you! /s
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:57 PM
65

Dude...are you my parallel-universe twin? My ex had a job but didnt try to find a new one after getting laid off Her sex drive was almost nil when she was working (but didnt improve when she was leeching off me) She at one point (before we married) asked me for an open relationship too I just heard from her today.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:20 PM
5

It IS unbelievable that people are calling it out.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 12:54 PM
0

A bit confused. I did read them; did I break a rule somehow?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 12:15 PM
1

I'm going to assume this wasnt staged, even though we never see the person beating on the window and a cut like what he's got probably should have bled a LOT more and gotten a lot more blood on that tissue. He should have knocked her the fuck out for trying to murder him.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:32 PM
2

My thoughts about "respect".
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:27 PM
2

That's because they WANT the side effects (passivity, obedience, quiet, etc). This disgusting phenomenon is well documented in "Boys Adrift". I strongly recommend it to anyone who has sons or wants to have children in the future.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:40 PM
1

For the same reason that high school football is less popular than college football: the athletes are less impressive, and thus, the games are less exciting.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:40 PM
1

"EVERY NIGHT IS 'LADIES NIGHT!!!'"
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:38 PM
2

http://www.boysadrift.com/ http://ideas.time.com/2013/08/19/school-has-become-too-hostile-to-boys/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFpYj0E-yb4
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:35 PM
1

I am ignorant about this subject, so I am a little confused. How does the child's gender affect investigations, rescues, and arrests?
/r/MensRights05/07/15 12:10 PM
1

This pic is like listening to a 14 year old talk politics.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:38 AM
5

Cool with it? Nope. Would I call it rape? Nope.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:22 AM
1

Funny, because its YOU who sounds like the shrill feminist; so eager to call this rape as long as it fits into your narrative.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:21 AM
1

Oh. Well that IS fucking sick. Still, I stand by my remark about those 17 yr olds (provided that they weren't groomed as well).
/r/MensRights05/07/15 11:18 AM
16

We can call it "sex" because in 1-11 months all 3 of those guys would be full fucking legal adults. They all had brains. They all knew what they were doing. She didnt drug or use a weapon to coerce them, and unless you want to call all sex where there is a distinct power difference between the participants rape (which would include basically all men, by default) then you cant really call this rape like you could if those boys were 7 instead of 17.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:17 PM
23

I think we found their weakness: MAKE IT THEIR FUCKING PROBLEM.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:08 PM
3

Yeah, basically. Like pretty much all religions, really.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:22 PM
4

True. In my head I was more thinking about the guillotine or seppuku (e.g. beheadings "done right") rather than the more realistic modern equivalent of some moron hacking away at your neck with a dull scimitar.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:35 PM
8

Probably a joke. I was watching GoT the other day and The Hound had an exchange w/ Arya: Arya - "Didnt you steal money from Joffrey before you left?" Hound - "I dont steal" Arya - "You'll murder a little boy, but stealing is beneath you?" Hound - shrug "Man's gotta have a code" It was, as you saw on China IL, a joke. The exaggeration in the joke shows that they are, in fact, monsters because they believe that beheading all the men is not monstrous.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:02 PM
9

I'd imagine that it your nerve endings at your neck are still firing with intense pain, but without your lungs attached you cant scream and your brain dies of blood loss extremely quickly. Hence the perception that it is a "painless" death.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:59 PM
1

It's not It might not be. There was just as much fervor drummed up when they were throwing gay men off rooftops. The reason this is being shown is because it is new and "if it bleeds, it leads". And executing people for FUCKING WITCHCRAFT is some seriously dark ages shit. No Debatable misandry here. Edit: I read the actual headline and the "even lower" part certainly could be seen as misandrous.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:57 PM
2

I don't have the numbers on "% of men with eating disorder", but maybe the steroids option was chosen because the number is higher than the female eating disorder number? Anyway, glad you found a good community.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:55 PM
1

And in the mean time, they got MILLIONS worth of free advertising from the media storm.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:41 PM
3

This video was made from his subscribers, who naturally, more or less fall in line with his ideological slant.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:01 PM
2

A proper sampling wasnt really what Thorium was going for. This video is a response to one that some company did. This video was made from his subcribers, who naturally, more or less fall in line with his ideological slant. You should subscribe to his channel. He makes a lot of good arguments.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:59 PM
1

"But feminism is about equality!"
/r/MensRights30/06/15 04:35 PM
5

enjoy Full debate here
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:22 PM
2

Watch any of his stuff when he's debating women. It is where he shines.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 08:11 PM
1

This needs to be a meme.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:39 PM
6

That pic was probably deliberately chosen for the fact that it WAS an empty subway car. As in "he's not bothering anyone".
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:38 PM
2

On bathrooms... You know why those are labeled with pictures and words? Same reason there is a picture of a Big Mac next to the words "Big Mac" - so that it can be immediately understandable to the illiterate. And why is that necessary? Because you fucking harpies scream "stranger danger!" every time a man sets foot in a woman's bathroom!
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:31 PM
2

breastaraunts My new favorite portmanteau.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:14 PM
14

Best of all, he is going to opensource the course so that it can be shared freely!
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:13 PM
2

I'm leaning in your direction, too. Side note: I really think operating rooms need to be treated like commercial cockpits. Lives are literally on the line.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 04:12 PM
9

Misleading because it isnt the same Oberlin that gave C.H.Sommers that "warm welcome"? You can blame Milo for that. He got me with the same trick!
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:46 PM
-1

aren't adding anything to the discussion I did that in my other response to a different user in this thread. But I still dont care about downvotes. :)
/r/MensRights29/06/15 12:24 AM
-5

*went (I don't care about downvotes.)
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:00 PM
2

choose your own adventure!
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:58 PM
-3

But if I merely upvoted then what would I do with all my righteous indignation?!?!
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:56 PM
-5

Well, those were words. But I assume you wanted me to explain my stance using other words. This may be due to your lack of familiarity with the "this" internet meme. When a user says "this", as you see above, it indicates a strong agreement with the aforementioned opinion stated (in this case the OP). I hope this learning experience has been a pleasure for you.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:44 PM
20

I'm only a casual nerd. And due to my "normal" outward appearance it is easy for to pass among the masses. No one would know that I don't give two fucks about fantasy football unless they asked me. And I would very much like to someday learn how to play D&D with some friends.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:26 PM
-6

This. This! This!! FUCKING THIS!!!
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:23 PM
6

Jesus christ....Is that what MRM has come to? "There is a comershal about wimmins helth! Muhsandree!" I remember, back in the day, we used to complain about real shit and not just sound life feminists with cocks.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 12:36 PM
3

"Sooo...you come here often?"
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:41 PM
1

Didnt what-her-name from, the lesbian who played the coach in Glee, get raped in divorce court?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:32 PM
5

I was so scared for how this story was going to end...
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:20 PM
1

In shoes made from old phone books!
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:51 PM
25

I like how these women frame having STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE as a negative thing.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:21 AM
4

Milo isn't an MRA. Just that, as a gay man, he doesn't have any reason to kowtow to women.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:19 AM
1

I looked into it. 3-day hospital stay Pshhhh...sissies. I jogged home after I had mine.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:16 AM
1

but I think it's plausible that some idiot threatened them. "Plausible". Yes, agreed. Though the fact that they milk it for profit removes any shred of sympathy I could ever muster. I think we as communities should heavily condemn online harassment. Well, a few things on this... The First Amendment protects all speech, even douchey speech. This would depend on what you call "harassment". Tweeting out some stupidity about Doom and then having thousands of people tell you that you're dumb is not h…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 11:01 AM
3

Just like bomb threats, credible or not, you take them seriously. They were indeed taken seriously. That is why the police investigated them and found them to be nothing more than hot air. The danger these supposed threats posed was not real. But it is profitable for Sarkeesian and Wu to behave as if they are. Why else would they go directly against advice of the police and publicly publish their threats? Because they make money from the resulting donations that flow into their non-profit 503c t…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:38 PM
29

If youre talking about Sarkeesian or Wu then... Sarkeesian's threat was for a talk at some university. The police determined it was not a credible threat. She cancelled the talk anyway. (And got 6-figures in donations from promoting the cancellation!) Wu's "threat" was never even reported to the police (public record). Further, Wu is known for trying to get people to say mean things about her (like the time she used her own online handle in just such an attempt). This lends credence to the wides…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:40 PM
6

True that Clinton and Sarkeesian arent in the same ball park. But Sarkeesian has willingly made herself a public figure nonetheless (who's business model is being a victim). And all public figures are fair game for mean words. Hell, Sarkeesian has a direct financial interest in being harassed online. Every time she publishes supposed harrassment or threats then her donations spike. Sarkeesian only wishes she could get as much vitriol as Clinton.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:32 PM
9

massage a knee Man...I need to get more sleep or something. It took me like 6 tries to understand what you were saying!
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:28 PM
1

Ah, the office. Not a fan.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:39 AM
1

You are a hateful, petty, over-reacting bunch. Ehhh....Just like with feminism, you'll find that internet-anonymity tends to encourage people to act more douchey than they might otherwise. Hope you won't give up on men's rights just because of a few chuckleheads on reddit, though.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:15 PM
2

This thread tends to jump to conclusion any time someone appears to be putting a toe over the line. It's kinda sad, IMO, since we ought to be eager to differentiate ourselves compared to r/feminism. FWIW, I interpreted your statement as someone playing devil's advocate rather than making any kind of judgement.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:10 PM
14

Heh, watch them spin this as "Patriarchy protecting men only".
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:38 PM
9

So they arrest someone who was living vaguely nearby, make up a motive, and ignore the exculpatory evidence. The Central Park 5 come to mind.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 06:38 PM
1

No, I just know how this sub rolls when it comes to circumcision. ...oh, you meant that last part about "striking me down"? Guess you're not a Star Wars fan. It's a quote.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 01:00 PM
1

I don't know who that is.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:58 PM
1

Dunno what you thought I meant by "ladylike" but I was referring to not being an aggressive belligerent bitch with an overstuffed sense of societally enforced invulnerability. Try again.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:57 PM
2

Parks right in front anyway
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:50 PM
1

"Hey mom...can you buy me a pregnancy test?" Mom feints
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:45 PM
-9

The old saw, again? Sigh.. It is seen as "ok" because: Women on the whole are incredibly weak compared to men on the whole and often do not know how to actually hit to do damage. Thus, the damage done in an unarmed strike is usually nothing more than a red mark. (Yes, there are exceptions.) Since time immemorial, women acted much more lady-like. So if a woman smacked her husband it was presumed that he actually did something to earn that. And even though women have largely given up this lady-lik…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:43 PM
8

"Oh, your giving mom a break today..." that's a good boy! Me: (Turns to progeny) Do the thing. Progeny: (Plugs ears and begins humming) Me: (Turns to cashier) Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:33 PM
8

You know why this thread only has 9 other comments? Because this sub cant decide whether it wants to applaud this synagogue's efforts to help male DV victims, or derisive make a remark about the Jews and their support for circumcision. (Go ahead, downvote me. Strike me down and I'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.)
/r/MensRights21/06/15 12:23 PM
1

People including men, women, and others on the other hand are and always have been Fair enough. Though my statement wasnt intended to imply protecting women to the exclusion of others
/r/MensRights20/06/15 01:20 PM
17

Yeah, but who cares? 1 in 4 women, man!
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:53 PM
1

This is a thing because for the past several decades we have seen the roles of active fathers diminished, to the detriment of everyone, by academia, "research organizations", and society at large. This article is just one more call to reverse this sad trend.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:11 PM
1

We need to do this.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:27 PM
1

I think lads need to go on the offensive: Join, in large numbers, as many female-oriented groups on campus as possible. Aiming for ones that have a democratic voting system for leadership. Then 'Jon Snow' some lad to the top. Once power is consolidated then begin to engage is usual laddish behavior but doing so while wearing the regalia of their organization. Two possible outcomes: Exodus of female members leaves the new unopposed male hegemony with the power and prestige of a feminist organizat…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:20 PM
5

They should call it something else "Diet Rape - Same great taste, zero guilt!"
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:13 PM
2

pedophile
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:11 PM
2

Noob. I was washing my own clothes at 9
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:10 PM
6

Baking
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:01 PM
5

Fuck that, man. I will line up to buy advanced tickets for The Incredibles 2
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:00 PM
3

I think anyone, man or woman, who dives to this level of pettiness on any subject, coupled with public shaming of their target, has earned a punch in the face.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:42 PM
16

and men as their anointed protectors riding in on white steeds. Ya know...if they'd go back to actually being worthy of knightly protection I'd be down with donning my hounds-head helm. Shit, even Arya, mouthy and "unlady like" as she is knew the value of loyalty to others. (I like Game of Thrones)
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:13 PM
2

Well...cutting that girl's hair is pretty bullshit. I mean, shit, if you wanted to be an asshole AND let her know to keep her hair off your desk you could have just gathered it in your hands and, loudly, sniffed her hair. You can guarantee she'd keep her hair off your desk from then on.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:27 PM
-7

call me crazy, but i think "child sex" sounds worse than "raping teen boy".
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:09 PM
3

I feel like this is all just a clever ruse...
/r/MensRights17/06/15 02:58 PM
1

Holy shit. Thats great!
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:03 PM
5

And rightly so. It was a damned stupid thing to say. And, seriously? How does he not learn this in high school?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 07:57 PM
2

OP, if you wanna be a part of your kid's life, then you go ahead and do it. Stay in school and make sure you pick a career that's going to pay you enough to live on (so you can avoid jail if you fall behind on your CP payments).
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:51 PM
1

Without coercive or assaultive men, there would be no risk for women in any circumstances. Riiiiight. Because apparently female predators don't exist.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:48 PM
4

Actually they've got a point. I remember this one time me and my buddies were sitting around having a couple beers at a 4th of July party - I don't remember how we got on to the subject but this is basically how the conversation went: Buddy 1: Hey guys, did you hear about that new study they did? They studies pygmy rats in the jungle and learned that, in humans, its not "ok" to rape. Buddy 2: Yeah, but you can't take rodent studies seriously. They're just animals. Buddy 3: Nah, I heard about tha…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:41 PM
2

Water is the cause of wetness Or...is "wetness the cause of water"? I want to believe...
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:18 PM
1

THEIR* ftfy
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:16 PM
1

Sigh....its a start, i guess.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:38 PM
4

Bring this to your local news station. And if you really want to, go back to the office, with your phone recording it, and try to make an appt with the same doctor. Get them to tell you why on camera. Then upload to Youtube and watch the doctor get metaphorically lynched.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 02:35 PM
1

Sorry, I should have been more clear. My response is not regarding your blog, because I have not read it, but the GG movement as a whole. My arguments were not intended to reflect upon the contents of your article, which again, I have not read. No offense was intended.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 12:43 PM
2

I'm in the same canoe as you, OP.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:35 PM
1

No 1-3 are actually damn good advice. The rest of it is just funny.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:33 PM
1

I'm on GG's side but I am so woefully tired of it all. GG started with the blog post that what's-her-name's bf wrote about her cheating on him with a game journalist for the chance at a favorable review or treatment. Then, recognizing that this would not get them far, those that are looked up to in the collective pivoted to frame their arguments toward corruption in game journalism as a whole. (A good move, long term) Now, though, those same leaders are using it just to bolster the patreon/kicks…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:23 PM
1

Ah, thx. My above point remains the same, though. WNBA, WPGA, Women's Soccer...all political.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:18 PM
1

Literally (pun!) the only example I can think of of a woman tries to stop a man from being drugged was in Harry Potter & the Half-Blood Prince where Hermione tries to stop Harry from slipping a placebo into Ron's orange juice. Of course, later in the same book, Ron gets drugged with a love potion. But that's a whole other discussion. It's a good book! Shut up!
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:16 PM
2

In fairness I think we have far more black men than Germany, though. Not sayin this subject is unimportant (it is HIGHLY important), but just saying the comparison is probably not fairly representative.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:00 PM
2

I think we all know that, today, there is nothing that is not "women's only" that is not also political. By showing the women's team with their daughters it sends a better signal, in their eyes, about women than if they had their sons in the picture too.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:57 PM
1

I'm sure there is a statistic for this, but its so hard to find research that isnt tainted with advocacy. Does anyone have any hard numbers for straight vs gay DV with the male as the victim? Thanks!
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:30 PM
2

Signed.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:23 PM
3

Well that warrants a shove.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:23 PM
2

That's why it's so brilliant! /s
/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:04 PM
2

That caught my eye too. I think we're being soft-trolled.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:42 PM
-2

Just the other day I had to move an 18 wheeler in a car lot (even though I work I.T.) and people literally kept making bets I'd mess it up, but nope. Nailed getting it perfectly aligned with the dock bay the first time. Yeah.....I'm calling BS on this. If I am wrong can you explain how as the head of IT you somehow found it your responsibility to drive an 18 wheeler?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:41 PM
1

how do you think we can move inequality forward? I assume you meant "equality". And that will only happen when the feminists who lead their ragtag hashtag accept that the world is not peaches and cream for men. That we have struggles and atrocities as well. Until a conversation like that can be held without an attempt to silence the male, then we can't move forward together. why make fun of triggers For me, a few reasons: Because the overwhelming psychological consensus with regard to treatment …
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:36 PM
9

Yes. Now its 6 out of 5.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:22 PM
3

Should I feel proud that I realized this was a Silverman satire as soon as the man gave the name of the woman?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:17 PM
2

Agreed. Just also concede that 1st and 2nd wavers at least had other, legitimate goals (for all the other fucked up stuff they wanted too). 3rd wavers have NOTHING to complain about
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:15 AM
2

"Respect Women" so it's okay to disrespect men? I've never been of the mind that just because something advocates one course of action that it automatically forbids all other courses of action. Ex: Someone saying "Don't murder children!" doesnt necessarily mean that the supporter feels it is ok to murder adults. I mean, if I saw a button like that I'd definitely roll my eyes. But I wouldn't get worked up about it.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:41 PM
4

No argument here. 3rd wavers suck
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:32 PM
2

3rd wavers do, indeed, suck.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:33 PM
3

I agree. Tomato, Tomahto.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:32 PM
4

Troll! But for the benefit of anyone else reading this, men have always dominated the extremes of the intelligence bell-curve. We are over represented among dullards as well as geniuses.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:31 PM
12

Get ready for the down votes! I suppose one MIGHT argue that the bitching about feminism does have a place (it IS helpful to have the wool pulled from one's eyes), but I agree that it seems like half the posts here and in the MRM-o-sphere indulge in this rather than actual activism.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 04:25 PM
25

A feminist who believes in actual personal freedom and responsibility. My kind of feminist.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 12:51 PM
1

not being decided in a court of law Irrelevant. If a student is accused of a crime (even if the punishment is "mere" expulsion then due process is their right. There are something like 60 lawsuits underway from students who have been punished by their school but denied basic rights to defend themselves. addressed as a school rule violation, not a criminal offence See my point above. I would love to see it happen. I find it shocking that you would want this much government intrusion into your sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 09:27 PM
1

Couldnt have anything to do with the investigation being not yet finished. :)
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:46 PM
1

It's a start. It's a bad start. College students need more agency over themselves, not less. I find it shocking that these kid's parents fought to get the campuses out of their bedrooms only to have their kids clamor for so many new sex laws on campus. But I'm already 31, so that puts me pretty far out of touch with these young turks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 08:45 PM
1

But it is a woman getting in trouble. That's close enough for most people on this sub.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:40 PM
2

That is just my opinion though, schools make their own specific guidelines and it is important to be familiar with the rules of your own institution. So, if we go along with this, then what is "sex" at Yale might be "rape" at Harvard. That is a very deeply flawed system.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 08:33 PM
3

This is not a law that applies in a courtroom with lawyers, it is a rule applied on college campuses with a panel of administrators. They take statements and discuss among themselves to come to a conclusion. No lawyers are involved. Yes. I am aware of this and am appalled that: We are asking college administrators to adjudicate guilt or innocence in cases of RAPE. And do not allow due process for the accused. The law doesn't do anything except expel the accused, if found guilty. Which means, if …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 08:29 PM
4

How is what she did any different from my point about reciprocation being consent? We can't look at one person's sexual acts, independent of their partner's acts. In my above hypnothetical (assuming I was into her) I'd be reciprocating to her advances, and thus, providing my non-verbal consent. I don't see where you draw your distinction. and it is not your responsibility to physically stop her Understanding that strength differences between partners can be vast, I can sorta see your point there…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 07:55 PM
5

So...when she wordlessly pulls me atop her, unzips me, and guides me into her, how is that not consent?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 07:42 PM
6

The way the law is written, "Do you want it?" "Uh huh" is also entirely legal, as long as it is clear from the context what you are asking. Thought exercise: You have been accused of rape by a former lover and find yourself in court... "My client did not agree to sex but was scared and intimidated and only wished to provide a handjob in hopes that the defendant would leave afterwards. Furthermore the defendant left his question vague to confuse her about what she was agreeing to and deliberately…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 07:36 PM
1

Yup, i gotcha there. See my response below for my thoughts on that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 05:22 PM
10

Well I'm an average attractive man in my early 30s, am fit and in good health and was married until very recently. So, to your question....couple hundred times, perhaps. Never once have I asked that to anyone, nor been asked myself. Nor have any of my friends. Nor have they stated that their partners asked this of them. This is a new, and ridiculous, phenomenon. The answer, "Yes", is implicitly provided in the reciprocation of fooling around.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 03:32 PM
8

Forever? It was that way a decade ago. It was that way 2 decades ago. From stories I've heard of the 70s it was that way in the 70s. If you keep rolling back the clock. Wow...that's literally completely false. Two people dont meet, have sparks fly, begin kissing, begin touching, undress each other, and then stop and ask "do you want to have sex with me?" prior to the actual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 03:05 PM
10

no its not Can you give me an example where the question "would you like to have sex with me tonight?", just prior to coitus, has been a part of human sexual history? hasnt happened yet. So you claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:50 PM
1

The only useful thing I can think of at the moment is my exposure to Evo Psych through TRP. But all the "bitches are bitches" stuff gets tossed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:47 PM
3

Ah. I gotcha. Assuming it is real (or just focusing on similar scenarios that actually do happen) I think the exploitation goes two ways: The one in power (male or female) exploits that power in order to obtain sex from his/her supplicant. Once objective has been met, the power-holder cares nothing for the supplicant. In order the gain power/resources, the supplicant leverages his/her sexual attractiveness and exploits the power-holder's natural sexual desire. Once the objective has been met, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:45 PM
4

This is by far the best explanation of the two concepts I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:30 PM
2

They're totally different letters, OP. Jesus, go back to kindergarten. (sorry, I'll go sit in the corner now. lol)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:30 PM
12

That's not what I'm saying at all. I mean it the way you do; after the legwork has been done. I am saying that if you are charming enough to get her to want to bang you and then straight up say "do you want to have sex", then that is such a wild departure from normal human mating practices (outside colleges in CA and HI), established over tens of thousands of years, that she's going to think you're a freak.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:28 PM
1

Females have orgasms? Not any of the females I've ever been with. Clearly, OP, you are spreading terrible lies!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:25 PM
1

Interesting question, OP. Coming from an Evo Psych point of view I don't think it would be radically different though. Eggs are still expensive. Sperm is still cheap. Much would, of course, be different. Just not "bizzaro-world" different.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:24 PM
2

I agree that any further restriction against free speech is a serious threat against freedom. And I can, cautiously, agree that new laws that limit how I can sexually interact with others can be taken to extremes (sometimes quite easily) which also place freedom (in this case, sexual freedom) at risk as well. the state is the greatest threat to freedom today. I think that TRP is implicitly agreeing with you in their premise. Even though they don't specifically name The State, it is implied that …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:21 PM
8

Well, not all of us are Vulcans. Seriously, try this next time you're talking to a girl. Because unless she knows that youre asking the "yes means yes" question she is going to think you're some kind of creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:16 PM
3

Sorry...but aren't these COMPLETELY FAKE?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 02:12 PM
4

laughter intensifies
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:42 AM
0

Correct. Restraint and "morally appropriate" levels of violence.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 08:19 PM
1

Im asking why have size as a factor Because it is relevant to the amount of harm that can be done. Let's say my grandfather, frail as he was before he died, wanted to give me a thrashing. Now, as a full grown man in good heath, I would absolutely obliterate him if it came to blows. But even as the defender I have a moral obligation to do only as much harm as is required to stop him (which in that case might be blocking his initial blow and restraining him until he settled down). So, given that m…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 07:45 PM
1

I'm not going to go up and punch the largest person I the room You don't seem like a stupid person. So I find it difficult to believe that you think that this is what I was trying to advocate. So either you're deliberately trying to waste my time, or you are indeed an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:53 PM
1

Lastly you are using size as larger is male and smaller is female, though correct is still a differentiation between gender. You're trying very hard to not understand... When it is not in self defense it is wrong to hit someone smaller than you, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:43 PM
5

Dad-bod is just another media manufactured buzzword, about something that's been around for decades, for assholes to write clickbait articles about. Move along, people. There is nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:02 PM
1

Which is an gender neutral word. "Size" is a neutral word. Who cares about gender neutral language? mainly because of different cultures. Sexual dimorphism is not culturally based. Women as a whole are not shorter, less muscled, and possess weaker bones for any other reason than biology. I am sure in a lot of places it is perfectly acceptable, so I wouldn't be making broad rules for everyone. Name one.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:44 PM
1

Not all women are weaker. And some men are weaker. This is why I said "as a rule". Just because there are exceptions does not invalidate it as a general rule among our species. Further, my justification is not based on penis vs vagina but based on the size of the combatants.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:18 PM
1

Stupid question. And since OP didn't give any additional context to his thoughts on the matter I'm going to assume that OP thinks that "equality" means it should be OK to hit women. (I will edit my comment if I am incorrect about this assumption) It is wrong to hit women because (as a rule) women are physically weaker than men. And it is wrong to hit someone weaker than you, except in cases of: Self defense. Defense of those smaller than the woman she is attacking (children, elderly, etc). WTF i…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:04 PM
8

youre not gonna believe this shit. you're wrong. this is hardly surprising at all.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:56 PM
2

Care to elaborate on your position, OP?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:14 PM
5

Chillax, OP. There are a bunch of "wimmin are teh dum" stuff that I see in RL and online. Getting riled up over stuff like is is what a feminist would do.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:10 PM
3

I came here to basically say this too.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:09 PM
-3

For the first time ever - feminism does something to HELP businesses.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:08 PM
1

any idea who the author of that quote was?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:04 PM
3

As a 31 year old male this article pretty much describes me, too. I'd gladly sacrifice the corner office and the BMW in order to spend time with my children and family.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:04 PM
2

Two good examples. And let's face it, anytime something goes to court its going to be a coin toss. Any decent lawyer would be chomping at the bit to showcase those two examples as proof of why testimony alone isn't enough under our current jurisprudence.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:42 AM
1

I'm not convinced it could get that far...get to that extreme. To embrace "accusation = guilt" would require an abandonment of hundreds and hundreds of years of legal precedent and the very core of our justice system's framework. And if that day comes I'll be moving to Belize.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:24 PM
1

I agree with everything you said, except the part about convictions based on accusation alone. Can you provide me with an example where this happened (outside of college kangaroo court)?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:10 PM
2

20 years is absolutely ridiculous. That said... ...the justice system is not (yet?) like college courts. When evidence does not prove guilt, then you are innocent. That said, there will be huge and not insignificant cost in lawyering up, losing time at work, etc, in an effort to defend yourself anyway. My only point is that this won't result is huge swaths of guys getting rounded up and imprisoned.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:50 PM
13

Because in the US, judges are elected.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:20 PM
1

Agreed. We can keep some of the "new" stuff: universal citizen suffrage, women in the work place, hell, even paternity time off. But getting back to that baseline would be critical to reclaiming a balance between the sexes.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:01 AM
4

Notions of chivalry are fundamentally opposed to any kind of equal rights for the sexes. I get the impression that you and I probably agree on most this stuff, but let me offer a deviation at this juncture: I think in many cases we had more equality when chivalry/social code/whatever was alive and well. I'm saying that equality doesn't have to be "I cook half the meal and you cook the other half". It can be "I cook and you wash dishes". Each contributing to life, home, and family in the way natu…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:57 AM
2

appropriate everything. take away their words. their weapons. leave them without weapons or words.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:43 AM
3

if you don't bring up males to respect women...and girls behaving in ways deserving of respect... ...if [the sexes] cooperate you can make real progress And this is why I like CHS. She walks her walk and calls for real equality between the sexes. Now it can be argued over where the "line" of perfect equality falls, but it is clear that her overall message is that this "war" we have going on isn't helping anyone and that women need to meet us half way.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 12:42 AM
1

Which school do you attend?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:53 PM
4

Totally boss reply. zhe At first I was like, "that's an odd typo". Then I'm like "Ahh, I see what you did there".
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:52 PM
1

Was that "trigger warning" used ironically? I certainly hope it was. We're grown, fucking, men, here. We don't need warnings about scary content.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:50 PM
1

Ah, my mistake. I dunno about any connection between the two. I came to this sub only a few months ago.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:49 PM
2

Sounds like you came to this sub hoping to get your preconceived notions confirmed. Sure, a lot of this sub is "teh damm femminiztz!", which can get old IMO. But if you aren't seeing all the false accusation posts, legislation reform posts, Title 9 posts, fathers rights posts, etc, then you I can only conclude that you're deliberately missing them. I've been on this sub for maybe 3 months or so and I can tell you this for sure: I have never seen anyone here bash gays or trans. From all that I've…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:21 PM
3

Isnt this comment, in and of itself, a complaint?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:15 PM
1

Dude, DA-DT has been gone for almost....2 years(?) Try Google.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:13 PM
4

Take this shitty article for example: "3. Your Comments Make Others (Like Your Partner) Uncomfortable" My exwife knew I was a breast man. And being amply endowed, herself, it was a source of pride for her that I was intensely attracted to her wonderful sweater kittens.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:05 PM
1

Pshhh, nope. Not when I employ all the assassins.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:20 AM
2

Yes, grovel, peasant! Kneel before your eternal Lord!
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:17 PM
1

Different markets are more expensive than others (a $50k income would do you just fine if you're in, say, Mobile Alabama, but would be poverty level in Manhattan). It would be a based on your geography.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:54 PM
2

Were you not paying attention? I'm the Emperor. I would be the sole arbiter of what is considered "common sense". :)
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:52 PM
29

This author's self loathing and projection is palpable.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:03 PM
5

I didnt get to that part in the article. I rage quit reading after the 3rd paragraph about her smoking while pregnant. I agree. that is some serious BS.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:59 PM
2

Ah. Ok, that's pretty much what I figured the rationale would be.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:58 PM
4

Actually, "temporary sterility" for both genders is part of my master plan for when I am Emperor of Planet Earth. In order to be allowed to procreate you have to pass a few tests: Common Sense Test Financial Ability Test No Fat Chicks (kidding) Etc. Once you have passed these then you can get "unfixed" and have only as many children as you're able to financially support and love. I know, I know, its antithetical to our sense of freedom. But, dammit, it's good for the whole human race and there w…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:57 PM
2

Wait, so the brick throwing isnt being debated? He DID throw bricks at a civilian? That's a firing.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:53 PM
16

keep up the pressure. she's weakening. lambast Boston U for her continued employment. go for blood (metaphorically speaking, of course)
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:50 PM
12

Can you elaborate on this point? I know she said she'd quit if the govt paid for her patches, but how does this relate to govt run heathcare as a whole? Genuinely curious. Dont have a dog in that particular fight.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:49 PM
2

I agree wholeheartedly on all counts. I lack such wounds, myself. So when I talk about how I didnt get raped in my divorce people here will often speak to me as if I were a white elephant or discount my opinion because I haven't see "the real courts" (rolls eyes). And this is exactly what rad-fems do when a mod-fem says something moderate; hence OP's observation.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:40 PM
2

say no more, say no more. your secret is safe with me!
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:26 PM
1

I dunno how the courts are down in kangaroo land, but I'd be down with suing her but not asking the judge for her money, but for her activism. I'd ask the court to require her to accompany him on some talkshow circuit (assuming he has such invitations) and have her tell the entire world how you cant just assume a man is a pedo just because there is a child in his vicinity. come to think of it, this could easily be arranged out of court, in order to prevent legal action.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:20 PM
1

shalom hmmmmm, a jewish feminist that has a son and is sympathetic to the MRM... Is that you C.H.Sommers?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:12 PM
2

Quite true. What additionally troubles me about this sub is that there is so very little room for degrees of dissenting thought. For example, in this thread you will notice there is basically zero respect for the OP's decision to take back his wife. They just burn her at the proverbial stake without understanding the man's motivations. I recognize that this is a largely unmoderated environment (which has some distinct advantages) but lately it seems like this MRM sub is becoming more and more li…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:06 PM
1

At least the cops have their head on straight about this one.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:34 PM
4

"Rape Culture" - used to be about prison rape. Now it is about drunk college girls having sex and Protein World billboards.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:05 PM
3

Jeremy Kyle just made himself a new fan. Is anyone familiar with his positions? He's not homophobe is he? Young Earth Creationist? 9/11 Truther? etc
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:00 PM
3

Well considering your age and your disposition I find it very unlikely that youve done anything you need to apologize for; so, while the sentiment is appreciated, don't worry about apologies. I don't know how I'm supposed to It's not like I'm anyone special (and no one who should be telling you what to do) but if you are looking for ideas on what you can do, here are a few suggestions: Start up a Youtube channel and make contact with the Honey Badgers and other similar users. Youtube lasts forev…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 01:48 PM
2

Sooooo, good?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:58 AM
3

You might be right to lay low. But if nothing else, though, should you die before she comes to seek forgiveness, then I hope you leave her something that tells her you didn't die with bitterness for her in your heart. And a book, a video, a series of letters, diary, etc, could be that such gift to her. And would prevent her from a lifetime of guilt after youre gone. You'll do as you feel is best. Good luck, sir. I hope she comes to her senses soon.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:31 PM
1

Are you still here? lol.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:14 PM
6

My mother, too, was a victim of bad therapy. She was driven to accuse her father of molestation. I was maybe 8 or so when it happened. We were lucky, though - mom came to see she was being lied to and being fed "memories". When he died about 5 years later we had all been reunited for a long time. Have you considered writing a book, yourself? Or having a writer take your case and make a book out of it? Maybe your daughter would read it someday.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:09 PM
3

Bitter anger will not help me now, so I'm going to try a different approach. Good luck, man. And be careful of the advice you get about your wife and daughter on this sub. I've read some of what they've said above and it seems they're all too eager to burn them as witches instead of understand the situation. I'm glad this is over and I hope your family continues to heal.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:08 PM
3

Eight women and a 119 men failed to complete this portion of the course. WaPo WaTimes was very careful to repeat this fact, like 3 times in the article. Edit: correction
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:00 PM
1

I'm with you 100% OP. Politicians listen to two things: Money Constituents We don't have a specific lobby, like NOW, but we can vote intelligently. And that's a good start.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:57 AM
3

He was dismissed from Psychology Today in 2011, too. I was like, "Holy shit, did they have a seat change at the top of PT?" and then I saw the above. :(
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:55 AM
1

I agree wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:49 AM
6

Holy shit, yes. And do you remember the cartoon series for Street Fighter? Just terrible!
/r/MensRights12/05/15 11:48 AM
1

I googled "turtle fetish". I'm so relieved at what I found.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:18 AM
9

It's for such a good cause, but does the ends justify the means? Fair question. My response: "Yes because..." They're teachers and their goal is to get these kids to learn. Sometimes kids are little shits and need a bit of smoke and mirrors to get them to do what is best for them. I hate being controlled When you were K-5 I can promise you that a little manipulation was necessary to get you to do a LOT of what your parents and teachers needed from you. Kids don't respond to logic or think about …
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:15 AM
30

As an 80s kid who LOVED the 90s TMNT I feel compelled to admit that most of those episodes were just filler garbage. I think someone should create a list of the non-filler, or at least non-shitty, episodes so adults like us don't have to sit through the more childish ones.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:11 AM
2

Swing and a miss!
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:10 PM
2

What do you plan to do with the results? What is your purpose in all this?
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:10 PM
10

Well you gotta remember one very important thing: Selection bias. We all know that the kinds of women who frequent feminist subs are typically the type with an axe to grind. And so it is with many on this sub too. Thus you will naturally find comments that swing harder to the extreme than you might in a community that was less...topic-specific. (This, incidentally, is why anytime I remark that I didn't get gutted in my divorce my comments are down voted and people say that I'm one of the rare lu…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:07 PM
4

"Feminist".
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:54 PM
3

Hahaha, ok buttercup. Take it easy. First you accuse me of racism. I prove your claim false by your own standard ("the word wouldn't have been used if it was a white woman") and then you accuse me of misogyny. You're a troll. I'll give you 3/10 because you actually got me to defend my position the first time. Good effort. I think you're gonna go far.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:50 PM
5

Have a white female professor say the same thing and 'bitch' will never be written Fuck any racist white bitch who writes that kind of shit on the internet too. I dunno where you're from or what your experience with the word "bitch" is, but where I come from it is a non-racially specific derogatory term for any female of disdain. White, black, asian, whatever. A bitch is a bitch. Here a bitch. There a bitch. Everywhere a bitch bitch. Save your accusations for someone else.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:35 PM
4

They don’t have a license to indoctrinate students in their prejudices — whether those prejudices are right or left,” he said. Unless it's a conservative professor. But, yeah, fuck this racist bitch.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:48 AM
-1

Come on, OP. WHO. THE. FUCK. CARES?!?!?!!?! If it makes you feel better, the auto shop is probably trying to attract more women because they think they're easier to fool with unnecessary repair work. Seriously, are you the kind of person who sues a bar over Ladies Night too?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:37 AM
3

I'm not a doctor. In fact I can barely spell "doctor", but would it be biologically possible to steal an ova from a woman's sanitary products, and impregnate it and birth it through the various miracles of science and surrogates? And then if so, how much you wanna bet even the same judge wouldn't grant the father child support?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:55 AM
2

you're a radical liberal Oh my god! my sides! too funny!!! Oh man, that was great. But please, tell me more about my own opinions. You're quite the expert. Look, asshole, if you cant be civil why even bother to speak at all? And as for warrants, if drugs are "in plain view" (as is often the case when people are just chilling at home with a few bones) then the police needn't a warrant to confiscate them and use them as evidence to prosecute the accused.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:24 PM
2

Can you not imagine a dozen reasons for a cop to want to enter and search a home? Here's 3: Drugs Weapons "Terrorism" Don't misunderstand me, I'm not anti-cop. Quite the opposite; I very much appreciate having a mostly law abiding police force who will do a decent job of keeping citizens safe without requiring overt bribes to do it. BUT I am also a staunch defender of our Constitutional rights and will always side with the latter when the two are in opposition.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:42 PM
0

wasnt me who downvoted you. and who the fuck cares about downvotes anyway
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:20 PM
1

And what if the cops were just lying about the report of a woman screaming? What if OP is actually a terrorist sleeper? What if, what if, what if. The problem with accepting law enforcement violations of the Constitution based solely on "what ifs" is that they erode the respect law enforcement has for other rights too because they expect the public to say "well its ok because what if...". I'm not much for quotes, but there is one from Franklin that applies here "Those who would sacrifice freedom…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:18 PM
1

Nowhere in OP's description does she imply that she invited them in. Quite the opposite impression is given, in fact.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 12:18 AM
1

If your classmate interrupts, appeal to the teacher to shut her up so you can continue. Above all, remain calm and friendly. She may try to provoke you.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:00 PM
3

Plot twist: Oog invents masturbation. Gifts mankind for all eternity.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:22 PM
11

A - OP said she was sleeping. Reasonable to assume she wouldn't have been distressed or nervous nor have any marks on her body unless she'd got an abusive sofa, too. B - Now you're just being pedantic. And you're ignoring my point. I'm not making any statements about DV (from your words I think we'd largely agree on most points of the subject). I'm making a statement about a citizen's rights against illegal searches.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:21 PM
18

Well, since OP was not in any distress, had no marks on her, was not appearing nervous, then the police had no just cause to assume she was in any danger and thus no legal right to enter OP's home, against her expressed will, and search her residence for "someone hiding". This was an illegal forced entry and the police department should be sued in order to be reminded that citizens have rights they must respect.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:31 PM
1

Piggybacking on user DougDante's comment, you should also know that there is an organization called FIRE (https://www.thefire.org/) who's sole purpose is to support free speech on campus. Use them if your school tries to punish you for your presentation.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:21 PM
2

and I sure haven't clubbed some woman over the head and dragged her to my cave. See, and that's why you're still single.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:07 PM
257

Depends on how it's framed. If its framed as a feminist issue, then perhaps you're right. If its framed as a police overreach issue, then you might get some traction.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:06 PM
25

You're missing the point. In the US (and many Western nations) it is AGAINST THE LAW for the police to enter a citizen's domicile and search the premises without a warrant. DV aside this is another example of the police trampling a private citizen's constitutional rights.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:05 PM
3

It’s like that scene in The Holiday when Kate Winslet’s character realizes you’re supposed to be the lead character in your own life. And Winslet's character learns this from a man, I might add. Also, the fact that you're trying to base your life on a fucking kate winslet movie tells us a lot about your level of maturity and intelligence.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:01 PM
2

So this guy works hard all week and isnt all that into banging your fat...sorry "voluptuous", ass. Shocker.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:55 PM
2

Buh-duh-tsssss!
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:53 PM
1

enthusiastic consent I'm just waiting for the criminal suit to be brought forth by a girl who said that her screaming of "YES! YES! YES!!!!!" was a response to the physical stimulus, and not a consent to sex.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:43 PM
1

Well, that might actually be true. If a woman becomes a manager, and goes on maternity, then that's like 1-3 years where all of her decision making falls on the shoulders of the men who take up her slack. Thus, the company prospers.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:32 PM
4

You, sir, are quite the fool. This is not how gender politics works. Here, let me explain: When a story comes out that supports your narrative then you latch on to it, retweet it, and don't bother to fact check. But when one comes along that contradicts your narrative, then dig deep and uncover facts that Sherlock Holmes would have over looked. You want TRUTH?! In gender politics?! Don't be absurd.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 03:30 PM
1

I've been slowly and discreetly vetting the women I'm interested in nowadays. Little questions here and there, over days, as their topics come up in conversation. For example I ask: What she majored in. How her relationship is with her dad. If she has kids. And usually ask if she has heard about some recent news story (UVA rape hoax, for example) For number 4, if she hasn't heard of it then odds are strong she's not a feminist. Thus, she passes.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:51 PM
1127

Report their asses and call your local news outlet. I'm sure they'd love to get their chance to report on some police overreach.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:44 PM
0

Ok, but we have to at least admit, if thats how he usually appears then that IS a creepy lookin dude.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:39 PM
1

Oh sure, NOW they walk away. We're lucky we live today and not during the time where forced conversion was a thing. I know; not really relevant to your point...just got an axe with door-knocking proselytizers.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:37 PM
1

It is likely a confluence of several factors, but I would hesitate to discount the poverty/crime relationship. I also would be very interested to see some research that compares single father vs single mother households with respect to the crime rates of their children. Anyone know of such a study?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:35 PM
1

Good.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:01 AM
6

build 1000 bridges and no one calls you an engineer. suck one cock, and you're a fag forever Holy shit this guy is so spot on. I've never sucked a cock but I could easily see two college roomies gettin drunk at a club, getting shot down, goin back to their dorm, and deciding "meh, what the hell. let's just give this a try". (pretty sure that's a majority of gay porn plots anyway, lol). And then doing this would label them both as "fags" by anyone who ever finds out about their one-time experimen…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:33 AM
3

I like how she is so absolutely certain of her self importance that she includes "rant end" at the clearly obvious end of her post. It is as if she doesn't think we would know that when the words stopped the rant would be over. As if we'd still be waiting for more of her whiny monologue.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:25 AM
6

I havent seen Avengers 2 yet. So my criticism will revolve around Avengers 1. Where was all the feminist outrage when Loki basically brain-rapes Hawkeye and like 50 scientists? He straight up highjacks their will and forces them to obey his commands. And it wasn't until BW jaw-jacks Hawkeye that he comes out of his rapey hypnosis. Where were the feminists then?
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:23 AM
4

And they're not even good for business. I wasnt planning on seeing the new Mad Max. Now I know I will avoid it.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 11:20 AM
1

Thank you sir!
/r/MensRights04/05/15 09:24 PM
1

Agree. A lot of what gets submitted here is just bitching about women.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:30 PM
11

there are hotlines for this, friend True, but they'll only counsel you about NOT becoming a rapist, yourself.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:28 PM
16

I had a feminist English teacher in college too. She used to yammer on and on about women's struggles. etc. When we were reading Hamlet she remarked that it was likely that Ophelia had spent time at a nunnery to have Hamlet's bastard baby while keeping her "honor as a lady". And, to her interpretation, this is why Hamlet gave her the cold shoulder at the beginning of the play. To which I offered to the class: What if he loved her, but wasn't IN love with her? Getting that C- never felt so good.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 08:25 PM
1

I remember hearing about that with elephants. I wonder if it has anything to do with testosterone, or perhaps rather just that they know the dominant bull elephant will kick the shit out of them for stepping out of line. Do you happen to remember where you learned of this?
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:50 PM
1

Also a possibility. In both cases, contrary to the writer's assertion, you dont just go an stick your dick in Crazy.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:45 PM
3

We hear about the absence of black men from families, but what happens when they disappear from an entire community? The book "Freakonomics" talks about this. If i remember correctly, once you get to something like 1 in 6 men, from a particular community, in jail then the crime rate for that community begins to go up. It is simply the law of diminishing returns with respect to law enforcement.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:41 PM
10

My thoughts exactly
/r/MensRights03/05/15 01:31 PM
1

Read the rest on my Return of Kings article Skepticism intensifies.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 06:45 PM
1

Whats your thoughts on sons falling into traditional roles on their own?
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:44 PM
1

Speaking of her desire for her husband to be rougher in bed... “He was trying to do what I wanted,” she explained, “but he was so . . . careful. I don’t want him to ask, ‘Are you O.K.?’ I want him not to care if I’m O.K., to just, you know, not be the good husband and take charge.” And yet, she said, his caring and his concern that she’s O.K. with what he’s doing are what she loves so much about him in every other area of their marriage, ranging from which brand of toilet paper to buy to what to…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:42 PM
1

That's a lot of message coming out of two words. I think you might be over interpreting, here. When I was but a boy, my dad loved us dearly. Told us he loved us every day. But when my brothers and I would scrape our knee and such, and began to cry about it, he'd tell us to "man up" and not cry over small hurts. This treatment has never given me the impression that my problems didn't matter to society, or to him. Ever.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:15 PM
1

I was like "This sounds like Sheryl Sandberg wrote this". Then I looked at the URL.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:11 PM
7

"Women can do anything men can do!" unless you count acting as your own advocate, apparently
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:04 PM
2

"And in other news, the sky is blue and gravity pulls objects down"
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:01 PM
2

Wow. This is exactly what I mean when I say that some in the MRM sounds like feminists. "We need this game to focus on our gender because <reasons x,y,z>". And as a long, long, long time final fantasy gamer I can tell you that it's likely that most these guys are going to be pretty femme anyway.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:59 PM
1

hard evidence? not especially. but i can name a plethora of games in which these things are true: tenchu, hitman, gta, metal gear solid, etc. Basically, name a game and (if ive played it) i can back these two rules up. To collect evidence of this he would be best off viewing critiques of anita sarkeesian's crappy videos and citing those games as well.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:15 PM
2

Go to the source: Show her where the $.77 came from - the total aggregate lifetime earnings of all women in the workforce irrespective of career, hours worked, maternity time off, etc. But sorry dude, you're talking to somoene who is emotionally invested in her victimhood. No facts will change that. You can only hope to change the minds of those watching the debate.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:23 PM
5

Focus your argument on the fact that violence in video games is not female targeting: While it is possible to kill women (and other non-combatants) the player is almost ALWAYS punished for this. Often by an automatic failure of the level. While it is possible to kill women, there are nearly ALWAYS scores more men killed. These two rules are true for 100% of video games that offer both men and women to kill. Ask her to explain how this means that games target women.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:07 PM
3

at the University of California, Berkeley, where I teach... So you're a woman trained to be an engineer, and rather that work in the field you decided to seek a job in education. sigh... if the content of the work itself is made more societally meaningful, women will enroll in droves. So, rather than companies produce what will make a profit, they should gear all their work toward what will satisfy women's feelings of societal contribution. BRILLIANT!
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:03 PM
2

True. Innocent until proven guilty is our justice mandate (and that applies double to cops) and without the needed evidence of a crime he would be found innocent. Buuuuuut then, the feminists would have another false story to latch on to and this chick would have become the next "Mattress Girl".
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:17 PM
2

Document EVERY occurrence (what you were doing, what she said, how you responded) and ignore her. If that doesn't work, thank her for her opinion but inform her you're just trying to read and would like to be left in peace. If that doesn't work, and if you wanna make a thing out of it, then go to HR. You'll have all the documentation you need.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 01:09 PM
4

Bet she wishes she negotiated for higher pay now.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:51 AM
1

Nice to see them mocking the number one killer of men under 35.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:51 AM
2

vagina envy denote the unexpressed anxiety that some men feel in natural envy of the biological functions of females It's true. I, too, sit down to pee while simultaneously holding a doll to my nipple and imagine that I'm menstruating. . . Jesus...these fucking weirdos and their theories.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:45 AM
5

Well one good thing came out of this case. Look at that slut's arms! She's practically jacked compared to her pre-mattress days.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:40 AM
2

I'm not one to support vandalism, but if I saw this sign in a men's room I'd probably just tear it down and throw it away.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:33 AM
2

he tried to bully me into having sex with him Jesus Christ, dude.... I'm really sorry about all that stuff. Especially what happened at the bar. OK, so since you took the time to give us some of your story I'm gonna talk some truth at you. Take a martial art (I recommend boxing and brazilian jiujutsu) and you won't have to worry about some pushy asshole ever again. I dunno what the relationship with you and your bf is like, but if he's following you to monitor you then you may want to reconsider…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:25 AM
1

It was clear why this was done: Take a symbol of men and male power, the military, and compel them to feminize themselves in bright red high heels. Sickening.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:38 PM
1

I know a JudgyBitch post when I see it! (didn't even look for the author's name)
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:13 PM
-1

I get your point, and I'm with you on the message. I can also see why this gym would do this: they want to provide the product that each gender wants the most. Men, typically, want dumbells, free weights, machines, treadmills, etc. Women want stairmasters, treadmills, elipticals, and other stupid machines that waste your time and give you minimal results. And many want to use them in women-only environments. Capitalism.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:03 PM
1

I read some of his quotes in the article. Is he like the British "Paul Elam"?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:57 PM
2

But with adult rights and privileges.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:51 PM
2

Good.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:57 PM
1

I've got a decent sense for potentially violent situations and while that one had all the hallmarks, I more or less got this creepy "domme/sub" vibe from the group of them. You're probably right, though. I'll never know for sure, though, since I wasn't fool enough to follow her.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:56 PM
1

Ah, those look good. I've seen the one in your 2nd link but the first one is new to me. I'll have to give it look.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 06:48 PM
2

Well my ex wife's step father was a douche of the highest order, so if we're including parents then..... no.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:07 PM
1

I agree (even though I am on the same side as this girl). Very few people can give a coherent rant. And she is not one of them. It is also very light on facts and heavy of feelz.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:06 PM
1

with your eyeballs. lol
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:04 PM
1

Saddest fucking thing I'll see all day
/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:03 PM
2

Crap! I knew I forgot something today!
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:32 PM
1

I'd just bring her to small claims court and hope I get Judge Judy.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:31 PM
3

This has only happened to me once in my life. It wasn't a sting like in this video either. She didn't come out and say "do you want to have sex with me" but she was very forward and very overt. I was 19, she was close to 50. And with her 4 male "friends" standing in the background it was seriously creepy.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:27 PM
2

(The father) was awarded joint legal custody and visitation. Well I'd call that progress.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:23 PM
1

I know, and I agree. The ones on Netflix are almost all from the "old school" of TED. You can still find a few decent talks from TEDx but they're so rare. Here are two such examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO75AwvyIxs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcYEivl-NIM
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:55 PM
3

Thank you. I was hoping someone had already made a dissection video and could spare me the 20 odd minutes of watching her crap myself. Good ol' Sargon. Never disappoints.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:39 PM
3

I googled "tedmen" and google says "did you mean 'tedwomen'?" Google is teh missandree!
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:37 PM
2

me too!
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:36 PM
0

Yes. Just as phrenology is a branch of neuro-science. lolz
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:36 PM
2

drowning out the awesome science, engineering, and industrial design people that made TED what it used to be. I got into TED from talks like these on Netflix and was like "wow! techno-utopia here we come!". Then I found TEDx and I'm like "dafuq?"
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:34 PM
2

Anytime I see "TEDx" I know I'm probably going to be watching sub-standard bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:33 PM
-1

THIS
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:57 PM
5

Holy shit, I cannot wait until I have a child and take my kid to a park, and some harpy feminist mom tries to go all "mother hen" and question me about why im there while I'm minding my own business on the park bench. I've got a large vocabulary of curse words and a short temper. It's gonna be awesome.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:14 PM
8

yup, thats what i thought. confirmed troll.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:11 PM
25

Google "Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire". Educate yourself of what the deaths of only 123 women can bring in terms of fire code reform and new safety laws. Then consider the thousands of miners, loggers, and construction deaths of that time and how little had changed in the same era with regard to safety reforms. Here is a link. Read. Learn. http://www.encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/h-1135
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:28 PM
30

Is this a serious question? Because it is so remarkably ignorant of observable reality that I'm forced to conclude that you're merely a troll.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:17 PM
25

You misunderstand. The free choice to choose high risk professions is not an example of oppression. But societies acceptance of the rate of workplace deaths of men that they do not accept of women IS an example of the devaluing of male lives, and thus, oppression.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:31 PM
88

Well, actually, my entire point was that she was a bitch. Nothing else. And I referenced the tweet in question (the only evidence provided by OP) as evidence of said bitchiness. Ergo, my point is, in fact, supported by evidence. Or did you want me to talk about forced conscription of males, work place deaths, etc? Because while real, these things would be non-sequitur to my point about her being a bitch for not acknowledging reality.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:05 PM
73

Your sister is kind of a bitch, OP
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:49 PM
5

A pro-male article in Psychology Today? I'll now keep watch for flying pigs.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:47 PM
1

Oooooook there, chief. I think you may need some therapy.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:23 PM
6

I guess this is what a feminist would call "paternity fraud".
/r/MensRights20/04/15 02:28 PM
1

If it's true that jeans and a t-shirt are common attire for the employees then I don't find what she wore to be "unprofessional" (unless they wanted her to interview in jeans and tshirt). but if I were the hiring mgr then anyone who is late is almost always an automatic "fail", in my book.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:08 PM
1

I suppose if the person is already a feminist then you're probably right about the NAFLT rebuttal (which is why Elam isnt among the list). I guess I was more thinking about the person who is either on the fence or is just unaware, like I was. I grew up more or less sympathetic towards CHS-styled feminist goals (read: actual equality) but found the entirety of gender/identity politics annoying. I suppose several different "packages" would be necessary depending on the person they're aimed at. Goo…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:14 PM
7

What's she done? Continue to fight to preserve the shreds of legitimacy it had back in the 70s, against the shrill whining of 3rd wavers. I think you don't find CHS doing any "marching" because she seems to view that feminism has won all the ground that it should. Now she sees that it is overstepping fairness and she pushes back against that. So that's probably why it seems that "all she does is criticize feminism".
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:09 PM
2

Interesting. I would think that someone would be more likely to watch 5 or 6 videos than to read even a 1-page "giant wall of text". Going with your idea, though, which points do you think should be included?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:28 PM
16

BURN THE WITCH! Naww, just kidding. But as has already been pointed out, there won't be any co-op until the extremists are denounced and rational minds like C.H.Sommers, Cathy Young, and you (it would seem) are held up as the standard of what feminists should be like. It would probably also be a huge olive branch if some high profile feminists (Hillary Clinton, etc) would call for more equal reform in the family courts along the lines called for among the MRM.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:09 PM
1

very good idea. I started another post about this topic specifically http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/32t4ai/welcome_to_the_party_package/ do you have a video/web link suggestion for this?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:47 PM
1

Since the goal is to draw in new members I'm a little cautious about adding anything from the PUA community since this many of them are pretty douchey. But I wouldn't rule them out if they had one who didnt come off like an arrogant dick. Suggestions? MGTOW...many of them are pretty pissed off, and would fall under exclusion for the same reasons as Paul Elam. But youtuber Thorium would work. Other suggestions?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:40 PM
2

OP brings up a good point: We need a "welcome to the cause" package of links and videos. It would need structure and planning. You cant just throw them right into the deep end with videos from Paul Elam. They'll need to first see the ugly side of feminism. Here is what Im thinking: Rough order of videos... 2nd wavers like Fiamengo or Sommers getting shouted down by rad fems that toronto(?) protest of warren farrell's talk that video of "big red" screaming about patriarchy some of the lighter or …
/r/MensRights16/04/15 02:01 PM
39

All you shitlords should have just listened and believed. Skepticism is misogyny.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:49 PM
71

No. Because womyn cannot rape.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:47 PM
4

Holy crap..... Now, this video is from 2012. Do you think we've, in the past 2 years since then, reached "peak feminism"? That the absurdity of their extremes is causing more and more women to reject the label?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 01:44 PM
3

I was thinking penis stickers at first, but I like your idea better.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:42 PM
1

"How forceful can I get to get a seat on the bus?" Depends. If you're gonna start swinging on a guy can you take a hit back? Jokes aside I feel bad for this woman. She is a fish out of water. She doesn't understand that "the deal", the societal expectations that caused men to give up their seats and for women to cook/clean/whatever, was broken decades ago. She doesn't get that the situation has changed and wants to go back to the good old days. I cant blame her for wanting that.......but shes st…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:59 PM
3

We met each other in June and got married in October This past year? Dude, I'm generally "pro" on marriage but I'd say that you've already moved WAY TOO FAST. A legal marriage after not even one year of acquaintance is BEGGING for trouble down the road. Rhetorical: How well do you really know her? How well do you know her family? How did her past relationships end? How did she handle them? Does she have history of arrest? Does she have history of making police reports? I know this sounds paranoi…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:41 PM
5

well, not that i dont love me some high quality video but i'd guess its because she makes them for fun and doesnt monetize her audience.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:20 PM
0

Where do you think I got a taste for it? lol
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:55 PM
-1

I think in this case it illustrates that people will only read a headline, and go circlejerk about it if it reaffirms their beliefs. just like feminists :)
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:54 PM
-7

Ooook there, cupcake. Simmer down.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 04:12 PM
-2

Yes, the headline did imply that. Which goes to illustrate the problem this thread is talking about even more vividly: we have people in this subreddit who are more interested in vilifying women than supporting mens rights, even when in doing so they're lying or misrepresenting the facts. JUST. LIKE. FEMINISTS.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:36 PM
3

Well sure. No baby likes having their pacifier taken away.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:41 PM
1

ravaged by all the dick she could ever hope to handle I lol'd
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:49 PM
4

I've said it before: Find me a 3rd world feminist and I'll have found someone I can generally support.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:43 PM
-3

Sadly, a lot of people make their way here just to bitch and shitpost because they're mad at their ex or that they arent getting laid enough. Not saying that venting isnt valuable, but when that is ALL a guy contributes here then he's not helping the movement.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:41 PM
0

I don't know if just a PSA would do it A PSA to the MRM? Something like... "Come on guys, don't be like feminists. Evidence first. Outrage second". lol
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:40 PM
6

If you just had sex with a woman, and you think she seems happy, would you find it necessary to record yourself? That is, indeed, curious. We can only ever speculate but perhaps he's read about similar situations where the man got fucked over because there was no evidence of his innocence. Because, like you said, why would he have recorded it unless he thought he might need a record of her behavior in the future?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:38 PM
12

she was taking full responsibility on herself. I saw that, too. There was nothing in her words that implied that she was blaming the men, and yet scores of commentators piled on her instead of "Colleen" who was actually blaming the men at the party.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:34 PM
16

I agree, though I do get a smile everytime someone here, mockingly, calls me a shitlord and tells me to check my priv.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:32 PM
5

Quite right you are, OP. Gender activists, of any stripe, tend to view everything through a gendered lens. And they don't see how this "lens" is actual a pair of "blinders" in many instances. I have, unfortunately, said "this post/complaint/etc makes us look like feminists" far too many times since joining this subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:31 PM
1

I can understand the professional directive to do everything you can to defend/convict, but isnt it illegal to actively discourage the efforts of the opposing side? Maybe this is just a murky situation due to the defense needing access to "new technology" records like Facebook? sigh
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:14 PM
0

oooook, not sure why the sarcasm is needed but thanks for clarifying. was at work when i posted and genuinely wondered where the correlation between MRA at large and the episode lay.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:10 AM
1

Not that I don't like the show, but why is this in Mens Rights?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:06 PM
31

But prosecutors argued that it's not their responsibility to help the defense obtain the records, which can only be requested from Facebook by law enforcement, due to the social media site's privacy policy. And that right there tells you that the prosecutor is not interested in anything but a guilty verdict and will actively discourage the defense from doing their job.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:32 PM
1

DNRA, but I think that Nye might just want more people to be scientists, as his reason for this statement, rather than a desire to (for example) exclude extremely interested men in order to complete some draconian gender quota. His M.O. has always been "science first", not gender first.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:29 PM
1

Sooo, I am just not willing to slog through all that crazy to find her justification. If one of you is willing, can you distill her reason for this insane notion? Is it something like, "10% male pop is just big enough to ensure genetic diversity among women's offspring while small enough to make sure they cant start wars/oppress women"?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:25 PM
1

Sounds like the asker was more or less accepting responsibility. Colleen then proceeds to tell her that she was used. Interesting since it would seem to me that it was the asker who was, in fact, doing the using.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:20 PM
3

"WE WANT OUR FORESKINS BACK!" nearly wet my pants laughing.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:10 PM
9

I absolutely loved this. And the fact that they put Sarkeesian in the background just made it even better.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:35 AM
3

Feminists want the "juice" without putting up with the "squeeze".
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:37 PM
1

Fuck I hate poachers. Am I the only one who favors taking THEIR "horn" if they're convicted?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:27 PM
1

seriously.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:24 PM
9

Yes. Artist is literally sock-puppeting actual human beings who hold these beliefs.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:21 PM
1

They're all just carrots meant to bring us back in line. This was my exact thought when Watson was chosen as their spokeswoman. What better bait to get young males in lockstep than Hermione?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:52 PM
1

Provide examples of other things and ask how feminism would help. Such as: Terrorism Nuclear proliferation School shootings (gotta give them an easy one sometimes) Traffic jams Then ask them to lay out a general outline of how feminism can possibly help the underlying factors that lead to these issues. Be prepared for them to skate far and wide around the question.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:48 PM
1

"all divorced men get raped financially" My parents divorced and mom pays dad alimony. I'm divorced and she didnt get any of my money. Or my house.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:35 PM
1

Maybe all men should be given free body-cams. should cut down on a whole lot of shenanigans.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:30 PM
2

Because, you know, why should one's rewards be tied to one's labors, right comrade?.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:25 PM
1

4 Months, not 5. (Not that it makes it "ok") I've noticed that every professional cab I've been in has cameras in them, now, too. Smart that he recorded the convo.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:15 PM
1

Hello? Hi dear, happy birthday! Hang on, Mom, I have to start the recorder.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:14 PM
2

If she used coercion or drugs to bed those students then this is even more abhorrent (does anyone know if this is the case?) That said, if these young men were willing participants then.....I dunno. It's murky here since all I know is that it was teacher/student and they were 17 year olds (according to the first comment in the pic). Don't confuse this as me giving her a pussy-pass, either. I'm just saying that I'm not yet ready to burn someone at the stake based on a FB pic and a bunch of idiot …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:42 PM
1

I am so confused by this. On the one hand I am pissed that the is a Womens Officer and not a Mens Officer. But on the other, I hope he does a way better job than any of his female predecessors...just to stick it to those whining bitches.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:18 PM
10

I am ignorant about this, but why DO we have mens and womens chess? I mean, it's not soccer, so what gives?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:17 PM
1

Interesting you bring up stranger danger as it, too, is largely a phenomenon of social and media engineered fear. For decades, every serious study of this has proven that parental abduction and abuse FAR outstrips the rates of those perpetrated by strangers. And your other remark is a strawman. No one thinks that adults don't face danger from people unknown. But intelligent and responsible adults integrate strategies and facts into their view to mitigate their fear and prepare for that reality i…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:04 PM
1

Indeed. I thought it an odd question, too, but since the word "you" was used instead of "men" then I answered it as I read it. As to your question, no. I don't have a statistic for that. What was the purpose of your question?
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:26 PM
1

You mean me, personally? Almost zero. I'm a pretty nice guy so violence is relegated to "self defense only" status for me.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:55 PM
1

I think they'll take down Japan, next.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:09 PM
3

Yes...very suspect posting.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:06 PM
1

Men don't help strange men when they're being attacked by women. We know this. What I want to see is what kind of response would be the statistical norm when the man knows the man being attacked by a woman. What would you do if your brother/dad/cousin/friend was being treated like this in front of you?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:03 PM
1

Strong odds you'd see exactly the same thing. Reasons: Any girl crazy enough to wail on a guy in the open is probably going to wail on you too. Risk of getting sued by stopping her even using minimal force. Face it, women are physically weak and the amount of damage an untrained, unarmed, woman can produce is not that great. (exceptions apply to all points made in this statement).
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:01 PM
1

Welcome to the revolution.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:42 PM
1

Nothing. Some of the MRAs here act just like feminists. They bitch about basically the same things but think it's different because we're guys.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:39 PM
55

Please respect a runner’s right to feel safe You dont have any such right. Nor do I. The only difference is that I, as a man, am 4 times more likely to be the victim of violence, yet I don't live my life in fear of it.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:44 PM
11

Can't wait to see how this turns out.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:40 PM
60

"women don't fare as well as men [in salary negotiations]" That's today's idea of female equality: "Let's hold everyone back just because we found something women dont like to do".
/r/MensRights06/04/15 07:04 PM
2

she certainly was for me.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:57 AM
2

Not that I don't really really really really want this to be an honest and helpful project, do we have any reason to believe it wont be yet another piece of "patriarchy hurts men too" crap? Serious question.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:53 AM
7

This is a non-issue and a positive story. Come on, guys, let's not go LOOKING to be offended. That's what feminists do!
/r/MensRights03/04/15 07:24 PM
2

Same for me, buddy. Same for me.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:12 PM
2

I came here to say this. I watched 3 iterations and each of them straight up threw their wallets and then ran away. I mean that completely looks staged.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:09 PM
55

Men, we pride ourselves on our logic, so let's exercise some: This is more a comparison of pampered civilian life vs combat veteran life than a comparison of female life vs male life. I'm just sayin that posts like this are what makes Men's Rights Activism sometimes look like shrill feminists.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:02 PM
6

Holy shit. I never thought I'd say this but, thank god for facebook.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:34 PM
9

I'm just gonna leave this right here.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:28 PM
2

What they've sworn off is any relationship in which there's compromise, sharing or negotiation etc. I, too, am puzzled when I see things from them to this effect. What woman, even the most angelic and man-loving, would sign up for that? a surrender of your independence and ability to rely on yourself. There is a kernel of truth in that when you don't "live on an island" then you're going to be, at least a little, dependent on others. But I do agree with your point. Rad Fem nonsense about how men…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:17 PM
1

Yes means yes will be in effect not when the governor signs it, but when a university's own policies are amended. Non-sequitur. You said that this ruling is not a law. I said that it is. The time gap at which its effects become active does not invalidate its status of being "law". they do not take immediate effect for various reasons No shit, retard. If you weren't the type of dickhole who got his jollies from being an prick on reddit you'd see that my linking to fucking school house rock was a …
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:02 PM
1

Well according to the jury's "not guilty" verdict, that is exactly what happened. Sooo...yes.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 12:49 PM
1

ah yes, "involuntarily celibate". I don't think they like that name, though. Its much more empowering for them to say that they "quit the game" and went MGTOW instead of saying that they "lost".
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:10 PM
1

Ooook, but if it is voted on and passed by the legislature and signed by the executive then..... Ugh, here, you explain it, Bill.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 11:06 PM
2

Accuse some women of rape, you mean? Well, it would certainly catch some headlines and draw attention to how ridiculous this law really is.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:21 PM
1

With respect - says you. Under the "yes means yes" law student who doesnt get verbal consent is subject to the possibility of a rape accusation.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:53 PM
1

What reason do you see? From my experience it seems that there are 3 types of MGTOWs. Guy gets hurt and decides "F*** women!". Guy is like Nickolai Tesla and devotes himself to his pursuits. Guy just can't get a date for whatever reason and gets bitter. Maybe its because I mostly see them on youtube but the first and third variety seem to be more prevalent than the second.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:50 PM
2

Sounds like you've got a good sense of how important family is. If only more married people did, too.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:46 PM
2

This makes me so sad. I was hoping you were just making that up.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:43 PM
1

So, youre saying that her decision was to only go to the guys room. And then he raped her? Or are you just being pedantic?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:42 PM
3

Then why was it voted on and passed by the California and Hawaii state legislatures?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 08:40 PM
2

but one inevitably reduces the time and money for the other Quite true. I suppose, in those cases, you have to REALLY look at your own values and decide whether you'd rather have a family or the ability to completely pursue your interests. Hopefully we get a few Nikolai Teslas out of the ones that choose the latter.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 06:17 PM
1

Interesting notion. Undoubtedly there are is at least ONE woman. Probably this one.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:36 PM
2

Thanks for the excellent response. Let me ask you, though, do you feel that pursuing hobbies and interests is perpetually at odds with having a wife or girlfriend? By that I mean, do you see it as either pursuing "one or the other"?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:32 PM
1

Other than white knights, I dont know how many guys go into dating in order to "redeem" women. But maybe I misunderstood your point on that.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:29 PM
1

That really sucks about what happened to you and your daughter. I hope reason and justice won out in the end. Could you elaborate on how I can have progeny without said risks, though? Are you referring to surrogate mothers? Artificial womb technology?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:27 PM
1

Point for you, sir. Thank you for the reply and the interesting links.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:22 PM
1

Thanks for the thoughtful response.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:19 PM
5

you have to specify "with what".
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:18 PM
4

Her: (busy fellating) Him: hey, are you ok? I know you seem to be enjoying yourself but you were drinking tonight and I don't want you to feel pressured. riiiiiight...... Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights02/04/15 05:17 PM
4

That's a much more cogent way of phrasing exactly what I was saying. Thanks!
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:43 PM
3

ohhh that's a good one. Do you have a source? Seriously, I collect these little bits of BS to throw in feminist faces.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:42 PM
2

ANYTHING
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:38 PM
10

"To showcase good men from different walks of life who are fabulous positive non-violent male role models." I object to the notion that anyone who is not a good dad is automatically violent. I'm not a father and I'm plenty violent!
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:26 PM
2

I'm pretty well read up on this case and even I never heard anything about faked emails to a "Haven Monahan" created to make a guy she liked jealous. This fact, along with the fact that the guy she liked was one of the first she called after her make-up attack, lends a great deal of credence to the claim that this entire thing was fabricated to get a boy to like her.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:03 PM
20

Explicitly, no. But implicitly, yes. The law applies to anyone who is brought up on charges. And since basically NO man would ever accuse a woman of rape just because he didn't give "yes means yes" consent then the law, in effect, only protects women hurts men.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:48 PM
2

So really, what benefit does a relationship offer? Devil's advocate: companionship, fatherhood, a chance to help mold the next generation, pleasure in giving a receiving joy from one's wife/girlfriend. Not saying what you pointed out above isn't a reality for a very unfortunate some. Out of curiosity, were you falsely accused? Reamed in divorce court?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:46 PM
2

Agreed on all points.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:41 PM
14

Yeah, thats pretty much what the law calls for.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:41 PM
1

If you want to play a game where you know the deck is stacked against you...be my guest. This is what I want to know more about. Can you elaborate? In what ways is the dating game stacked? To be clear, I'm certainly not saying it isnt. I just want to understand your POV and rationale.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:27 PM
1

Did you break her leg and then offer her your seat?
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:54 PM
4

who cares? they were men!
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:50 PM
29

Not according to the "yes means yes" law. This law requires "affirmative consent" that means that the guy has to seek verbal (and often continuous) consent from the girl in order for it not to be rape. Thankfully the court didn't agree with this idiotic notion.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:49 PM
70

In the article it says that the accuser testified that she went to the accused's room and slept with him in order to make another guy she liked jealous. In my non-lawyer opinion I think this is the only thing that got this guy off the charges.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:04 PM
0

Not saying you're wrong; just saying I dont see it (possibly because I skimmed it). Where is the hypocrisy in wanting pants for winter running and shower stalls?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:19 PM
-1

I'll admit, I skimmed this article. But from what I did read it doesn't sound like she's complaining about how easy boys have it or asking for the funds she wants to come out of boys sports. So why is this on the Mens Rights subreddit? I mean whining about this woman's petty grievances is equally petty. Makes us sound like feminists.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 09:08 PM
43

My ex put on some serious pounds after we got married. When I told our councilor that all the added weight made her unattractive to me she (our councilor) was like, "yeah, I can understand that. we've all got our own personal tastes". And shes even a feminist, too!
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:47 PM
2

Very interesting. But surely it cannot all be socially engineered, could it?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:32 PM
2

Interesting. Thanks for the linked article!
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:05 AM
1

Solid advice if OP plans to write it from his own experience. Perhaps he will, instead, do a series of interviews.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:09 AM
1

My plan is to Lemme stop you right there. Unless your next five words are "write my mutha fuckin book!" then, for all your passion, you're just bullshitting yourself. You're suffering from "one-more-book-itis" - an impossible to self-diagnose condition that causes one to put off that thing they need to do because they're not researched enough. Research and write at the same time, but put writing above research in terms of priority. If you have only one hour to work today, then spend that one hou…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:04 AM
3

Can someone tell me who wrote the "no more white men" article? I'd like to know which fucking racist asshole to never read again.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:36 AM
1

I like this chick. I'd like to buy her a beer.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:33 AM
2

Don't confuse me for some male feminist or anything, but, while the "proof" in the quote is indeed BS, isn't men's potential propensity towards violence in general something extremely well understood and tied just as much to higher levels of testosterone as it is to his social environment?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:30 AM
1

She makes a lot of good points.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:25 AM
1

Holy shit...Am I the only man who kept his house and his money in his divorce? I mean, it probably helps that we have no kids, but still.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:21 AM
5

Part of the problem is that it is PRISON rape. Unless someone takes 3 seconds to think about it, it can seem like "well they're in there because they're murderers and rapists, themselves. why should i care?"
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:19 AM
1

We can (and for the record, I think Malala's got bigger balls that I do!). I'm just saying that it's pretty clear that her son's "activism" is just him saying what he thinks she wants him to say.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:14 AM
1

It used to be a high profile glamorous profession like being a doctor or a lawyer, so people were willing to spend huge sums of money training just to get in the door Probably no coincidence that this changed right around when stewardesses stopped looking like this and started looking like this.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:12 AM
1

http://s307.photobucket.com/user/hairy_lettuce/media/Patrick-Stewart.jpg.html
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:05 AM
2

I've been on the finges of this news story for a while, and about the world of pilots in general (since I'm not a pilot). A question: I thought I'd read we have too few pilots, resulting in many of them hitting the federal limit on how many hours they're allowed to fly, but still flying, and placing their passengers at risk. Am I incorrect?
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:26 PM
4

I have two thoughts on this: I wish all women shared her definition on what constitutes "large" (hurr hurr). Back in the day an actual comic book girl was the almost-literal-queen of whatever little nerd group she belonged to. The personification of in-group privilege.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:22 PM
1

http://www.pixietrixcomix.com/
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:20 PM
6

Holy shit she's raising that kid to be a little beta SJW. He just parrots back whatever mommy says because she's the one with the gummy bears.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:18 PM
9

I was afraid to watch this video, cuz I like Hanks, and was concerned that he was gonna go all Patrick Stewart on us. I am much relieved to learn my fears were unfounded.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:15 PM
1

It's up to 6 in 4 now.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 06:34 PM
16

Well, any progress is progress and I'm thankful for it. But damn, it pisses me off that nobody cares about this when it's men being abused by these laws. Not until it hurts a woman do they try to change it!
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:45 PM
2

Ahh, the women in the article. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:43 PM
3

mostly women who themselves are ensnared by the current messed up laws interesting. would you elaborate on that a bit?
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:33 PM
3

Clearly this is a sock puppet.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:02 PM
1

I guess I should have stated this at the head of my post, but I am not a teacher, nor is my wife, nor is anyone in my family. Nor do I have any ties, professional or personal to teachers unions (or any unions at all, for that matter). I don't actually have a dog in this fight. For what it's worth, I agree with most of what you're saying - that education culture would need to change to be more attractive to men. I focused on money because men, on average, favor careers that provide higher pay and…
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:59 PM
1

Not to drive this off track, but the "presumption of predation" is likely the most vile factor in this entire situation.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:22 PM
1

A woman?! In the MRA subreddit?! Somebody notify the mods, we've got a mole in our midst!!!! Kidding. And thank you for the thoughtful reply. (I lol'd at your handle, too). Your comment about how pay attracts the best and brightest struck home with me too. I mean, there's no way I'd want to be operated on by the lowest possibly paid surgeon!
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:44 AM
1

Agree and amplify: "Yes, absolutely. That's why I'm a feminist. I agree with <name favorite virulent harpie feminist> that we need to subject ALL men to the horrors some women experience, like <name 3 or 4 horrendous things that can happen to women>. Make experiencing these things mandatory parts of male children's education so they never do it to women". If she has a soul, then doing this will take the wind out of her sails and possibly make her question her ideology. And if she agrees with you…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:50 PM
2

Sounds good to me. Can you give me an example where men lack rights in the teaching field? I'm not challenging your assertion that they may be needed. I just can't think of where legal rights are currently missing.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:45 PM
4

I might argue that one of the reasons that misandrist ideas about predatory men in schools is so common is because there are so few men teaching. Because men are underrepresented, it is easier to malign them as a group. Still, what might you suggest in order to attract men into teaching?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 05:20 PM
1

You actually said that. If I actually said that, then please quote me. If you can, then I will then apologize for speaking unclearly and correct my erroneous statement to properly reflect my actual beliefs: that the strong should protect the weak (as I stated in my above reply). But if you can't quote me without adding your own interpretation, then I'd advise you to let that bone go since your assumption of my beliefs is factually incorrect. Now, since I can see you operate in binaries let me tr…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:32 PM
2

I too saw it as a step backwards (though, for feminism to embrace egalitarianism it needs to take SEVERAL steps backwards). I also, perhaps cynically, viewed the UN's selection of Watson as nothing more than a deliberate attempt to rally her horde of young and impressionable male fans. Still, given the shitty choice over who's form of feminism I'd rather take over the feminist narrative I'll take Watson over Dworkin, any day.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:10 PM
2

Which part is funny? The idea of male teachers? The thought that they can provide value to youth as strong role models? Or are you mocking my question as if it were some sort of pipe-dream optimism? I'm looking for ways to help. What are you doing?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:05 PM
0

Thank you for the long, and considered reply. Ordinarily I would provide a likewise thoughtful retort, but I can't seem to speak for all the words you've put in my mouth! Jokes aside it is pretty clear you've got some strong emotions on this topic. I can respect that. I would, though, caution you against arguing with things that you must interpret and infer that I believe, rather than what I have actually stated (I did not, for example, state that I do not wish for strong girls to protect weak b…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:02 PM
1

Of course, the brain doesn't always work that way. You should think about counseling and anxiety treatment. This has the added benefit of putting another bullet in your lawyer's clip: they will be able to prove that your ex and the school caused you harm. Most of the discrimination suits against colleges are vindicating the men who have been railroaded. The law is on your side. Can you record the kangaroo court? Even if you don't release it until after you graduate, you could strike a blow for m…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:40 PM
1

If you haven't seen it, look up TL;DR's video mocking some yes means yes "instructional" video. It is both sickening and hilarious.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 02:17 PM
1

True. And inconsistencies in Elizabeth Hubbard's story doesn't mean that Salem didn't have witches, either.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:56 PM
1

Full disclosure: DNRA. Question: can we rightly condemn this practice from our places outside Kenyan society? I am legitimately curious because if Kenyan society rewards males for their protection the way Western society used to for ours, then this could easily be a good thing if not taken to extremes. Men are stronger than women, after all, and evolutionary psychology teaches us that the drive for males to protect females is written into us at the genetic level. I am not without criticism, thou…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:54 PM
2

Agreed. I disliked her positive appraisal of Emma Watson's speech, too. Still, I wonder if the whole of feminism is so very virulent that Sommers was simply forced to choose the "shiniest of all available turds". Perhaps, I hope, she sees Watson's speech as a call for more moderate feminism. Because, frankly, I wouldn't especially mind getting back to a an understanding of exchange between the sexes that recognized, and not reviled, our unique contributions. One that doesn't criticize men for wo…
/r/MensRights25/03/15 12:49 PM
2

I've heard CHS state that she was once called a "female impersonator" her her heresies.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:12 PM
4

I've never gotten so much use out of this video since joining this subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:52 PM
12

Divine intervention.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 04:29 PM
14

Yes. I'd go as far as saying it is absolutely biological. What benefit is there to a woman of 20,000 years ago to take large risks when she need only be fertile, and moderately patient, in order to pass her genes into the next generation?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:31 PM
8

That's because you're enjoying all that straight white male cis privilege you shitlord! kill all men!
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:26 PM
1

We're talking about feminism. Examples don't have to be true as long as they're useful.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 04:10 PM
1

Seems that they're the same thing, most the time.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 04:09 PM
2

Damn. I wanna buy this guy a beer.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 04:07 PM
1

"Critical Thinking" was an actual class!
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:52 PM
1

WTF does he need your facebooks for?
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:43 PM
2

I can't wait for this report.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:40 PM
8

It's no surprise that these kids want safe spaces in college: The playgrounds they grew up with were soft, plastic, and low to the ground. Their parents covered them from head to toe in protective gear anytime they wanted to ride a bike or play baseball. They're taught, via osmosis from their parents, "stranger danger" and to fear the outside world. When they get to public school the entire social curriculum is centered around boosting their self-esteem. And with social media, it is so simple to…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 03:31 PM
1

Yes, he was deliberately trying to entice them to violence. And it only took one word to do it! (repeated 4-dozen times) Also, notice how those women walked away, and then walked back to try to reengage with him? They couldn't stand the idea of him not being in lock-step with their message. And one used violence from the very start to try to affect submission in him.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:48 PM
2

I enjoyed that way too much. This guy is a genius. "Carnivale! This is Carnivale!" "No it's not! It's a march against violence against women!" "Carnivale!" Whack! Well, they didn't say anything about violence against MEN
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:45 PM
11

pretty sickening. and one has to ask: what is the common denominator among those 4 men?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 05:38 PM
2

I agree on all points. This is why I am disappointed at much of the MGTOW message I hear. So very much of it seems to be "disengage from dialogue and retreat behind your walls". I mean, that's fine for them, but while they feel safe behind their moats the rest of us are out here fighting and losing the war. Thankfully some MGTOWs still actively engage. And that's why the loss of MWM was such a gut-punch.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:18 PM
2

Let's hope so. I also think all these "where are all the good men/men aren't getting married" articles are a reflection that people see that something is going wrong. They're drawing the wrong causes and conclusions most the time, it seems, but it's a start I suppose.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:35 PM
2

Nice use of that quote!
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:20 PM
2

True. And even after they're gone it will take longer still to undo their damage. Get rid of the tick and you're still left with Lyme Disease.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 04:19 PM
2

Now...if we could only get the Honey Badgers an interview on The View or Ellen. It would either end in a bump for our cause, or a blood bath.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:57 PM
7

Yes, losing Karen's focused attention was a significant blow. I mean, I like the honey badgers and all. But I just can't listen to an unfocused gaggle for 2+ hrs, no matter who is in it.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:43 PM
1

Ugh, sick dude! Jesus christ! Put up a trigger warning before you link to something that ugly! WTF is that on the left side of her neck?!
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:21 PM
5

According to his "i quit" video, Internet Aristocrat quit because he got pissed that people in GG were making money from their videos, patreon, and kickstarter, etc. Or am I missing some part of the story? I watched a lot of manwomanmyth, back in the day. But since I don't relate to MGTOW the way I can relate to MRM I wasn't much of a fan; even though he made a ton of good points. His stuff got kinda repetitive for me.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:18 PM
1

Well since his response had almost nothing to do with my original comment then I didn't feel that he merited a dignified response. Plus, I looked at his other comments in other threads and he comes across like a legit troll. Hence my reply.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:09 PM
2

Troll harder next time 2/10
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:37 PM
2

Pushy, sure. But unless the kid got the link to the video then she's done nothing to help her daughter's situation (and if he saw it I would congratulate her on publicly shaming and humiliating a boy who has done nothing more than be annoying). All she's done is act in a childish and passive aggressive manner. She could have at least spoken to the boy's parents and made THEM aware of his poor behavior. Instead she uses her daughter's minor life-drama as a prop on her soap box. I will give her cr…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:24 PM
3

Agree...mostly. Doing it via youtube is cowardly and passive aggressive, though.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:20 PM
3

And replacing it with ‘all people are unequal and should be considered based on their privilege or lack thereof’ is a destructive notion that should be confronted and defeated.” Fucking THIS! Affluence, and lack thereof, grants privilege. Being born white does basically diddly for me. And I can say this with certitude because I'm not a multi-millionaire, as privilege theory would lead you to believe is my right as a "cis-white-male".
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:17 PM
17

Excellent article. If men, decades ago after anti-discrimination legislation was signed into law in the US and UK, paid no mind the shrill complaints of women (stare rape, male gaze, manspreading, false 1-in-5 statistics, etc) then we wouldn't have a culture today that vilifies what for thousands of years was considered very normal behavior among men.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:55 PM
3

Stupid thing is that we already do give advice to men and women. I distinctly remember my parents telling me which parts of town to stay away from after dusk and where I shouldnt go alone. This death was horrible and senseless. But I see it as a disservice to women as a whole to imply that they are always at the mercy of men no matter what they do.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:19 PM
12

I can't believe they still use the black and white horizontal stripped outfits. Retro!
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:32 PM
2

10/10 Gender activist for a prosecutor.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:22 PM
3

This ought to be expanded and made into a pamphlet for anyone wishing to speak to feminists.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:16 PM
2

Interesting. Anyone think they might just be trolling the future? "Hey, lets all pose like gay guys and confuse the shit out of our descendants". I mean, its unlikely, but would be hilarious if true.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:52 PM
1

Holy shit, dude. Nice! I hope you write a book.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:15 PM
3

In other news, water is wet!
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:55 PM
1

If you are in high school then have your parents call your principle. If you are in college, appeal to the department head, or the dean. If you get pushback then call the ACLU. Then go to social media.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:52 PM
1

The Adam Sandler movie? Never saw it. Not much of a fan of his after "Big Daddy". Let's not psychoanalyze each other. I could just as easily say that your interpretation of my words is mere projection but that would be reductive and not advance an understanding between us. I replied with greater explanation because I saw that I was misunderstood. Such further exposition and qualification is warranted since I started this thread for the purpose of being a personal story. And what you see as an ap…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:00 PM
1

sigh This is another reason I can stand with MRAs but never count myself among them. You guys are just as in love putting people in little boxes as feminists are. When I said I was a "nice guy" that was in reference to how I behaved toward men and women as a whole (while retaining the ability to be a total asshole to deserving individuals). Being a "nice guy" never meant, for me, shielding anyone from harsh truths or hurt feelz. It is simply a default disposition for me; something like "until yo…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 03:16 PM
1

Glad to hear I was wrong. I'll have to give it a read.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:08 PM
1

I'll check that one out. thanks
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:07 PM
2

We are not "Red Pill" here Ah, good. I'm in the right subreddit, then. Sidenote: this belongs as its own topic, obviously, but I don't support the idea of women signing up for selective service in exchange for the right to vote. But not for the reason most would think. The combat side of our military is weaker for having all of it's 120lb soldiers who can't even carry their rifle (and now some are pushing to allow female SEALS!!!). Rather, how about, in exchange for female suffrage they are requ…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:54 PM
1

A whiteknight is a man who will ride to the protection or defense of a woman, even if she is wrong, simply because she is a woman; as if being a female renders all else moot. Never been a "whiteknight", bud. A "nice guy", yes, though.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:50 PM
-10

We have turned her. And now we must train her, arm her, and send her back into the camp of the enemy.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:11 PM
2

Hmm, then again it is pretty useful to not be too sensitive to mean words and life's troubles. Don't take that statement too far, though. I'm only saying that stoicism has it's place.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:45 PM
5

meh. if you're married to the kind of woman who treats you even better on fathers day then i've got no beef with a guy wanting to perpetuate the "good feels" by treating his woman special on mother's day. in fact, if she's treating you good on fathers day then you'd be a schmuck for not returning the favor on mother's day.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:41 PM
-1

You have two questions here: Do feminists actually elevate masculinity? Yes, and no. I agree with your point about making men the standard of achievement. But to understand that takes more brain power than most people (and practically ALL feminists) are capable of. But conversely, they actively denigrate masculine traits and accomplishments as a form of passive/active aggression. Should women be celebrating their own accomplishments as women, instead of trying to be men? Yes. But I also have no …
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:34 PM
2

Full discloser: I didnt read the article. But from the headline it sounds like more marginalization of fathers bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:29 PM
1

yeah that always bugged me too. women use that word, "dominated", because it sounds more deliberate and evil than "populated".
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:51 PM
1

True. I don't actually think I can convert any of them using logic. But I use them more as a sharpening stone for my own ideas and arguments. Sparring practice, if you will. Well, I guess there is always RoleReboot.com. lol
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:49 PM
1

shit! how could i forget about the DOJ report from december?! good save, thanks for adding this!
/r/MensRights14/03/15 04:25 PM
1

It could still be illustrative if it is just you, your opponent, and your teacher. All 3 of you would raise your hand when asked if you were taught that "rape is bad". You could frame your entire argument that we have a culture that (imperfectly) shields women. And cite the countless examples of laws being passed to protect women as well as ordinary acts by laymen.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:24 PM
1

Think of the paradox like this: You're an atheist and your job is to debate whether God is good or evil, based on the fact that he is all-powerful, but he allows evil to exists in the world. But as an atheist you would say "This whole debate assumes that there is a God at all". So for your case by being made to defend rape culture you are, by the rules of debate, being concede that it exists. And since NOBODY actually approves of rape then you lose this debate by default (unless you point this o…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:12 PM
6

Agreed. Get the audience to do the work for him. "Can I get a show of hands for everyone who thinks rape is ok?" "Now can I get a show of hands for everyone who was taught that rape is just a hootin-good-time?" drops mic
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:10 PM
4

Wait...your job in this debate is to "defend rape culture"? You would be well advised that such a task presupposes the existence of a rape culture. By being made to take part in this debate you are being forced to agree on the basic premise that a rape culture exists at all. I advise you to point this out. Anyway, if you need to bone up on the subject then try these links: one two three
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:06 PM
2

I'm Sorry
/r/MensRights11/03/15 08:17 PM
1

I apologize. How much self flagellation does that infraction require? Also, while I am a straight, white, male, I am also half jewish (a highly oppressed class in many countries). How man more strikes am I required by my SWM status and how many is mitigated by my family heritage? I really want to make sure I properly atone.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:53 PM
2

I think someone, somewhere, needs to make a list of journalists and scholars that can be trusted to write honestly, factually, when it comes to gender. I'll start that list: Christina Hoff-Sommers
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:10 PM
3

NPR reported a story on gender that favored men? Is it opposite day already?!
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:59 PM
1

We, men, like to blame women for treating us like children. But in any relationship (employer, spouse, friend, etc) the treatment you get is based on what you give and what you put up with. If the husband allows his wife to denigrate him then he is willing to accept said treatment (at least until he gets sick of it and starts cheating with a woman half his wife's age because she respects him and treats him like a man). The careless reader might take my above paragraph as if I were some male-femi…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:55 PM
1

Like the author of the linked post I find myself most often in agreement with MRA's on most topics. Sadly, though, there are a vocal many who sound just like feminists with cocks; whining about every little thing. Strangely, this often comes from the MGTOW community (I know, MGTOW =/= MRA) who contend to want nothing to do with women anyway.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:46 PM
1

In that video? It's called "being a cunt".
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:38 PM
1

"There’s a fallacy women need to “attract” men." How is that a fallacy? Men have to do the exact same thing! This is what normal people call sexual economics.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:36 PM
1

2 weeks ago? I'm not a doctor or anything but I think that is not enough time for even a physician's pregnancy test to give positive results. Am I wrong on this, guys? Anyway, save all communications from her and do not respond unless she provides you with medical proof (from her doctor, not an OTC test) that she is pregnant. Even if she is pregnant it doesn't mean it's yours. I mean, you banged from meeting off Tinder. Good odds you're not the first hookup. So if she insists on keeping the baby…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:06 PM
1

Fair enough. But I was more speaking to their adherence to the "blank slate" theory of the brain, rather than their stance on agency and victim status.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:40 PM
1

Haha, exactly.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:37 PM
2

Hmm...If we're talking Haldeman, Heinlein, or Asimov space travel then sign me up. If we're talking Elizabeth Moon, then I'll take the first rocket right into the sun TYVM. If you want a good picture of what feminists really want for humankind then you should really read "Forever War". In it...SPOILER ALERT.... ....the heroes leave earth at FTL speeds and return to find that the entire human race has been, voluntarily, genetically altered to be genderless. But even without the author's observati…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:17 PM
3

Don't forget its a multi-BILLION dollar industry. Feminists gotta get their mits on some of that too.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:56 PM
2

I had two friends who refused to speak with me after I called it discrimination that in the US there are nearly 0 male-DV-victim shelters. Their rationale? That any money allocated for men would come out of what is allocated for women. And to reduce women's DV resources is monstrous. The lack of self-awareness behind this logic is staggering.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:55 PM
2

Makes sense that reducing that stress would lead to better mental health. But when you say "transition" are you also including reassignment surgery? I ask because I saw a video on youtube (where EVERYTHING is always true) that John's Hopkins, the organization that pioneered the procedure, no longer performs them due to high depression and suicide rates among the post-op population. And if this is true then any shrink advocating such is putting their patient at great risk.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 09:04 PM
5

Interesting. As a side note, doesn't current medical research lend toward the theory that TG is a mental disorder and not just another alternative lifestyle?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:23 PM
9

dafuq? Is she literally talking about TG's in this quote? Or is she talking about biological female "gender-traitors"? Or something else entirely?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:11 PM
11

You're saying shes just bitter? Well duh, shes a feminist. lol.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:56 PM
58

"[Equality] won't achieve anything" Tells you everything you need to know about her.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 03:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter