TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theothermod Archive

View 109 posts and 3,019 comments by theothermod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7289

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights28/05/17 09:22 AM
2231

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:53 PM
1640

Moderatortheothermod/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:08 PM
1509

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:46 AM
523

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:08 PM
518

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights29/08/17 11:59 PM
396

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:44 AM
368

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights11/11/17 04:22 AM
306

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:02 PM
293

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:10 AM
283

False Accusationtheothermod/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:41 AM
225

False Accusationtheothermod/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:19 AM
220

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights05/07/17 08:32 AM
183

False Accusationtheothermod/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:26 AM
169

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:54 AM
158

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights01/04/18 03:23 AM
140

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights08/06/18 07:41 AM
140

Moderatortheothermod/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:11 AM
134

theothermod/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:33 AM
128

Moderatortheothermod/r/MensRights29/05/17 01:38 AM
122

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:36 AM
120

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights01/12/17 08:27 AM
118

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:31 AM
113

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:49 AM
111

Progresstheothermod/r/MensRights23/12/17 11:34 PM
96

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:58 PM
89

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:24 AM
89

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:49 AM
82

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights04/11/17 06:35 AM
80

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights19/08/17 12:30 AM
80

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights22/02/18 02:03 AM
78

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:25 AM
74

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:11 PM
73

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:02 AM
72

False Accusationtheothermod/r/MensRights08/04/17 12:15 AM
70

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights24/01/18 04:28 AM
70

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:26 AM
69

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights16/11/17 11:03 PM
68

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:28 AM
68

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:25 AM
66

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:20 AM
65

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:49 AM
60

Progresstheothermod/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:05 AM
60

Fathers/Custodytheothermod/r/MensRights29/04/17 07:37 AM
58

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:23 AM
56

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:00 AM
56

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights07/12/17 08:33 AM
55

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights19/06/17 03:33 AM
50

Discriminationtheothermod/r/MensRights17/06/17 12:28 AM
49

Moderatortheothermod/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:27 PM
48

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights02/10/17 12:33 AM
47

Moderatortheothermod/r/MensRights04/06/17 01:54 AM
45

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:18 AM
42

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:30 AM
42

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights04/07/17 11:59 PM
39

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights06/06/17 08:34 AM
37

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:25 PM
35

Humourtheothermod/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:21 AM
31

Intactivismtheothermod/r/MensRights30/04/17 06:46 AM
27

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights24/07/17 07:08 AM
27

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights29/08/17 12:38 AM
26

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:46 PM
25

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights11/05/17 11:00 AM
25

Anti-MRMtheothermod/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:12 AM
24

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:40 AM
23

Anti-MRMtheothermod/r/MensRights03/06/17 08:56 AM
22

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights28/09/17 07:14 AM
22

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:46 AM
20

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights27/04/18 09:53 AM
20

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights20/11/17 08:27 PM
20

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:43 PM
20

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:14 AM
20

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:57 AM
19

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:11 PM
17

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:33 AM
17

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights25/06/17 07:18 AM
16

Legal Rightstheothermod/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:07 AM
15

Humourtheothermod/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:47 AM
15

False Accusationtheothermod/r/MensRights17/12/17 01:12 AM
14

Eastern Culturetheothermod/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:20 AM
14

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights24/05/17 09:13 AM
12

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:12 AM
12

Anti-MRMtheothermod/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:52 PM
11

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:29 PM
11

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:44 AM
11

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:53 PM
10

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:46 AM
10

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:28 AM
8

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights27/04/17 10:45 PM
7

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:11 AM
6

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:02 AM
6

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights09/12/17 10:34 PM
6

Marriage/Childrentheothermod/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:33 AM
6

Fathers/Custodytheothermod/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:17 AM
6

False Accusationtheothermod/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:20 AM
5

Feminismtheothermod/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:27 AM
5

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights07/09/17 04:38 AM
5

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:10 PM
4

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:05 PM
4

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:58 AM
4

Questionstheothermod/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:57 AM
3

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:39 PM
3

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights06/06/17 12:58 AM
1

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:26 AM
1

Social Issuestheothermod/r/MensRights25/06/17 07:15 AM
1

Activism/Supporttheothermod/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:05 PM
1

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:51 AM
0

Generaltheothermod/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:24 AM
0

Edu./Occu.theothermod/r/MensRights01/04/18 03:54 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,019 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No worries. I encourage you to post this again with an updated title. :)
/r/MensRights17/06/18 12:16 AM
1

That wasn't the only reason your thread was removed. The title was wrong.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 12:14 AM
1

Here's another link you could post, too. Just have the title say what happened. http://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/mcgill-music-student-awarded-350000-after-girlfriend-stalls-career
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:17 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:15 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:06 AM

Removed due to inaccurate title. The linked article says nothing about putting the focus on women. Don't post made up things.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:19 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 12:05 AM
5

Phimosis is a condition in which the opening of the foreskin becomes too small to allow retraction. It can be treated by non-invasive methods, but if left untreated for too long or in extreme cases, circumcision may be the preferable option.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:44 PM
8

Wow. They have a real hate-on going there. I wonder if they realise that their own rhetoric is more hateful than anything which would be allowed in this subreddit?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 10:48 PM
7

I'm surprised that nobody commented on the good thing about this link - the fact that the journalist actually researched the story and presented it fairly. That's a huge leap forward!
/r/MensRights14/06/18 10:42 PM

Repost.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 10:30 PM
12

Because I can't. Moderators can only hide posts, not change them. This is a good thing. Imagine what could happen if a hostile moderator had the ability to change your words.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:08 PM
3

This is the most civil political discourse I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:58 PM
13

I wish there was a "standing ovation" button next to the upvote button.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 05:54 PM
5

Google?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:08 PM
3

This link was originally posted by /u/imnotmrabut with a title in ALLCAPS. I have reposted it with an improved title.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:04 PM
1

A poster. I'm still posting now, just on reddit instead. :)
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:02 PM
1

I'll even do it for you: Female Sex Offenders Are More Common Than You Think, Reveals Study If you don't repost within ten minutes, I'll do it myself. :)
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:45 PM
1

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:43 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:13 PM
18

This story was originally posted by u/Imnotmrabut. It was formatted for mobiles and the title didn't include the interesting bit about the Suffragettes, so I replaced it with this improved version.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:48 AM

That's a mobile link. I'm going to replace it with this web link - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5840817/Stop-teaching-girls-men-enemy.html and add to the title "the true history of the Suffragettes" unless you want to do it first. I'll post in 10 minutes.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:14 AM

This thread has been removed because it links to OP's comments in another subreddit. This can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which is against reddit rules and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link. In addition, the title is wrong because quotation marks must only be used to denoted the exact words used in the original text.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:23 AM
1

I'm pointing out that context and biological roles literally make it impossible to judge men and women as being "superior" or "inferior". It's a meaningless question. The words "superior" and "inferior" don't exist in a vacuum. They can only be meaningful in regard to a specific characteristic, such as kilowatts per litre of fuel. Therefore a general statement that people of one type are superior or inferior to those of another type is not just wrong, but meaningless - unless the statement is ve…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 08:20 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:59 AM
0

It would have been better if you'd said "most". But what's done is done.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 07:07 AM
0

Didn't say "some do that" either.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:35 AM
6

Considering the idea hypothetically: The West is currently engaged in destroying itself through feminist social policies. Russia has already destroyed itself through 70 years of communism. Brazil and India are largely unknown to me, but they seem content to mind their own business. Under Trump, the US appears to be charting a course away from its traditional allies of the past century. The obvious power to fill the vacuum is China. It has a strong economy and a growing middle class united under …
/r/MensRights14/06/18 06:32 AM
3

That's overgeneralising. Not everyone does that.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 04:17 AM
1

I hope your handwriting has improved since then. :) Back in the 80s I found it easier to use capitals, but I'm way too old for that sort of thing now.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 03:34 AM
11

Okay, thanks. I'll wait till then to post it.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:31 AM
13

Okay. Are you going to add any more to it?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:27 AM
69

Can you make a post of this? But give it a more descriptive title, like "Male Privilege: The reality behind the myth, with sources". I want to sticky it, but first I'll see how many votes it will get. Reddit handicaps stickied posts from getting to the front page.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:24 AM
8

Last week they said women should have a shorter working week than men. I suspect that didn't include paying them less.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:50 AM
7

Bingo! Men earn more than women, so they pay more taxes. And I suspect that governments spend more on women and girls than they do on men and boys.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 01:48 AM
1

I just remembered how when I was little, I was extremely frustrated with how girls can hit boys and boys can’t hit girls, along with the whole “Ladies first” thing (kinda petty 5 year old shit but hey) Me too. I don't think it was all that petty, though. It was the beginning of indoctrination into seeing women as a superior class: They get all the good stuff first, they can assault you but you can't assault them.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 11:55 PM
2

Ever since I was five years of age, I noticed that girls were treated differently than boys. I thought that this was unfair. In the late 1980s I found soc.men and alt.feminism on USENET. From then I was lost to the Dark Side.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:52 PM

Removed because the title is wrong. The article refers to all Netflix staff, not just males. Also, the part in quotation marks is incorrect. Quotation marks mean that these are the exact words used. The exact words used are actually Netflix film crews 'banned from looking at each other for longer than five seconds' in #metoo crackdown The original title misrepresents what the article said. We can't do that if we want to have credibility.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:49 PM
2

The article refers to all staff, not just males.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:41 PM
1

Thanks. I should know better than to trust titles.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 10:39 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:49 PM
1

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:48 PM
1

Brilliant. All their films will be out of focus from now on. Is this even legal, unless they apply the same rule to women looking at men?
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:45 PM
1

The most attractive ones - makes sense. My own recollection is that from age 14 onward I was so horny I would have fucked any consenting woman. I doubt I'm the only one. This of course carries many risks. As an immature 14 year old I cared nothing for the possibility of STDs or unwanted pregnancy. That's why I wasn't considered legally of age - but of course I didn't know that then.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:38 PM
5

These female teachers are often attractive ones, such as the present example. They would have no trouble at all finding a man for casual sex or something deeper. So why resort to illegally doing it with their students? I think it's because young people just past puberty are very attractive to many people. They are considered legally too young for sex, but their bodies have already developed the physical characteristics associated with sexual attraction. High school teachers are surrounded by the…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 09:16 PM
1

I suspect that a majority of people in many countries believe that women assaulting their husbands is justified in certain circumstances. In reports of domestic violence against men, I've seen some commenters asking "I wonder what he did to deserve this?" There's also spousal psychological abuse, in which women are often more effective than men. However, I suspect there has not been much research on domestic violence against men, because researchers in this field tend to have a feminist agenda. …
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:39 PM
2

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:11 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:00 PM
7

I think you've portrayed her piercing intelligence quite well.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:07 AM
4

Work with who you can. Yes.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:41 AM
6

Have you read this article? It's a pretty good explanation of why a lot of people hate feminism.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:10 AM
10

They did actually delete the post. If you look at their "new" page at about 20 hours ago, it's not there. There is no point in MRAs posting anything on r/feminism, ever. Even many feminists get banned from it. Posting there will achieve nothing aside from possibly upsetting reddit admins. So please don't do it.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:04 AM
11

I think we make ourselves look silly by calling for a boycott of a film (unless it explicitly promotes violence against men). Let feminist directors remake all the movies they want to - the market will decide if they are to succeed. If a lot of these "femakes" lose money, there will be fewer of them. I'd rather see women making their own, fresh new stories anyway. Hollywood has too many remakes in general; there are lots of great unfilmed stories out there.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:21 AM
2

Not to worry. I go through and put flair on everything anyway. It makes me feel useful.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 12:02 AM
6

Soon.TM
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:55 PM
1

I've flaired this as "Anti-MRM" because the publication chose to put a video at the top of the page entitled 'Daryush "Roosh" Valizadeh is causing a firestorm because he wants to legalize rape'. It's completely irrelevant to the story and can only be there as an attempt to smear both Jordan Peterson and MRAs.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:54 PM
1

Well, now that they're considered dangerous by many people, there might be a bit of motivation for trying to fix their issues.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:32 PM
0

Is it real?
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:10 PM
2

Thank you. :)
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:07 PM
2

He's worse than a spammer. He's an actual misogynist. He gets banned for saying that women who are the victims of domestic violence always did something to provoke it. He gets banned for other very ugly statements against women as well. That's not only wrong, it's hatred of women in general - and therefore against the rules of our sub. It's unfortunate that he refuses to change, because sometimes he raises good points. But he always gets around to expressing pure hatred of women eventually, so w…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:56 PM
1

Exactly. That might actually help them fix their problem.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:43 PM
5

The fact that the quote contradicts itself in one sentence would have led any competent person to check its origin. Many did.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:22 AM
1

That's true. The tiny minority of men who are in power tend to see other men as competitors and women as prizes to be won. Thus they don't do much to help men, but do a lot to impress women.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:18 AM
4

Hey, you got an honourable mention!
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:15 AM
1

That's a good point.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:22 AM
0

And that's why we have the ban function for trolls and morons.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:19 AM
1

One problem is that due to advertising and capitalism, images of beautiful women are almost everywhere. And they're usually depicted as sexually inviting. Men didn't evolve in an environment where they face constant sexual stimulation. It's no surprise that some become obsessed.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:29 AM
1

I think incel is not an issue of rights, because there is no right to have sex. But it is a mental health issue. Sometimes that might be because a mental problem leads to being unable to find a sexual partner, but I think that's a smaller part of the problem. The major part is that loneliness itself is very bad for mental health, and even physical health. I'm sure it also plays a part in male suicide. It might be worth doing some health research into this, both for the health of those affected a…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:18 AM
3

Feminists opposed it recently in Australia. Why? Probably because it takes a power that mostly belongs to women, and attempts to share it more equitably with men.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:45 AM
2

It could also be fun to analyse feminism in terms of Freud's concept of penis envy.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:41 AM
5

I think inceldom is not a men's rights issue, since there is no right to have sex. However, it is very definitely a men's mental health issue. In some cases mental issues may be responsible for the inability to connect. And in almost all cases, loneliness is very damaging to mental health.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:23 AM
1

As you wish, so mote it be.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:57 AM
2

Well, reddit is a private company and the admins decide what's allowed on it. It would be nice if we were all on a distributed, censorship resistant forum, but people go to where the action is.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:55 PM
2

Because it annoys the reddit admins, and it's a bad idea to upset them.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:45 PM
2

I think it would require a huge anthropological-historical study to answer that question. First of all, feminist interpretations (and sexist male ones) would have to be removed as much as possible, and the whole of history re-assessed. The answer is not as simple as seeing who the king was at a particular time. Society is complex, and to imagine that the kings were not influenced by the women they slept with every night is preposterous. Then there's the whole area of child rearing - women contro…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:32 PM
6

We prefer the term "Morlocks".
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:13 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:06 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:52 PM
2

Of course, how could I have missed it?
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:01 PM

Stop posting stuff in feminist subs just to annoy them.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:59 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:42 AM
7

Mothers and fathers are omnipotent as far as small children are concerned. A baby of one year can't even feed itself and would die without it's parents' help. Up until the age of four to six, everything in the child's life and environment is controlled by the parents. That's as near to omnipotence as makes little practical difference.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:45 AM
3

That's a good point. When I was young I read the usual fiction, but I also read about great engineers, inventors and explorers. Presumably that would be discouraged today, on account of so many of them being white men.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:32 AM
8

I am not an expert in this area, so I could easily be wrong. But even if my theory is wrong, it should still be easier for two parents to keep an eye on what the kids are up to as a simple matter of numbers.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:18 AM
10

That's hilarious. Of course the Freudian feminists conveniently leave out the bit about penis envy. And you're right of course - men are far more obsessed with women's sexy bits than their own.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:05 AM
12

Masculinity in boys can be grounded in rebelling against their mom and defining themselves by being the opposite of what she is. But moms, being moms, can usually cut young boys down to size if the rebellion gets out of hand. This works while the boys are young and weak. But around the age of 14, boys often grow beyond the ability of their mothers to physically control them. This is also when boys are at their most rebellious, and just beginning to be obsessed by sex. In a traditional family, a …
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:00 AM
14

It's not even postmodern. It's Freudianism, which has been mostly obsolete since the fifties. Feminists like it because it tries to resolve everything in terms of gender and ego, which are handy to bash men with. But actual psychology has progressed far beyond what it was in the 1930s.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:50 AM
1

No worries.:) I'm sure you have many cogent points directly related to men's rights among your videos.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 08:44 AM
12

Every week there are more women like you expressing their dissatisfaction with feminism. I'd suggest not to worry too much - you're just at the front of the new wave.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:58 AM

Removed because the title of this post assumes its premise. First it must be demonstrated that women are more easily offended than men. Yet there is nothing here but the title. Make a proper post without assuming an unsupported generalisation in your title.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:48 AM
1

Of course I'm a mod. It's even in my name. Just stick to the rules and you'll be fine.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:44 AM
1

We have a rule against negative generalisations of birth groups - men, women, blacks, whites, gays, straights, what have you. If you want to talk about how bad feminists are, that's fine.But if you're going to talk about how bad all women are, that's against our rules and you'll have to do it somewhere else.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 07:05 AM
14

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 03:05 AM
1

I've removed all comments below this one because they are mostly just personal slurs. Such behaviour is not useful.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:22 AM
2

I've removed all comments below this one because they are mostly just personal slurs. Such behaviour is not useful.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:21 AM
1

I've removed two comment threads under this one due to their having degenerated into personal slurs and accusations. There is no point to such things.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:20 AM
1

I'm not butt hurt. I'm just informing you that videos attacking women in general will be removed from this subreddit. If you continue posting such material, you will be banned.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:00 AM

Removed - bad link.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:39 PM
1

Then put it on r/MGTOW. This isn't the women haters' club.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:38 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:33 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:46 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:02 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. Also, this story has been posted several times already.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:48 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:21 AM
2

Fair enough. I'm just of the opinion that there is no single person or group running it all behind the scenes - it's lots of people and groups with similar ideas.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:28 AM

Stickied because a leading feminist with impeccable credentials finally said what we knew all along. This deserves to be bookmarked, saved and spread. Also, comments are open.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:10 AM
-1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:50 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:33 AM
2

Also, "fat feminist" jokes are way overdone and only help feminists with their propaganda.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:31 AM
1

The placement of posts on the page is decided automatically by reddit algorithms. Mods can't do anything except hide posts.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:29 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:28 AM
2

There is no man behind the curtain. It's a social movement with no centre, just like the MRM.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:27 AM
1

I've removed several comments' worth of pointless back-and-forth name calling. It accomplishes nothing except to waste time. Please don't do it.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:24 AM
1

Repost it with the same title as it has in the newspaper. Then more people will know about it. Having a title that doesn't mention what she did is not helpful.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:08 AM
2

It's against reddit rules, and it's easy to do if there's a direct link to click on. For this reason, screenshots are preferred.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 03:01 AM
1

It's people from one subreddit going to another subreddit, to vote and comment on something they don't like.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:59 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. In addition, it can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which is against reddit rules and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:57 AM

Stickied as a clear example of discrimination against men, codified in law. There are others, such as Argentinian laws which make it a greater offence for a man to murder a woman than for anyone else. There are probably more such laws around the world which explicitly discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:54 AM
1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:48 AM
3

In future, it would be helpful if you stated your question in the title of your post. You're more likely to get a relevant answer that way.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:19 AM

Your posts are not suitable for this subreddit. Stop posting here.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 08:32 AM
1

No, it's still here. :)
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:44 AM

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:40 AM
4

Take a break from the Internet for a while, especially the parts that deal with injustice towards men. There's nothing wrong with taking a month or a year off - we'll still be here if and when you come back. Find a place where there are positive women - some Facebook groups are pro-men and there are others that have no relation to gender politics at all. Develop a hobby that requires a bit of concentration, so you can think about that instead of the unfairness of life. Maybe even see a psycholog…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:39 AM
2

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:37 AM
1

This isn't really a men's rights issue, so I've removed your post. You'd probably get a more relevant response if you posted this in /r/AskMen or /r/relationships.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:11 AM

This post has been removed because it's a low effort meme and because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:07 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights08/06/18 01:03 AM
1

Try r/conspiracy or one of the mental health subreddits.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:10 AM

Stickied because the discussion may unearth some interesting facts or sources.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:19 AM
1

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:05 AM

That title is not appropriate for this subreddit. Regardless of its purpose, it does not belong here.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 07:07 AM
1

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:49 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:06 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:05 AM
1

Hiding assets is illegal, and posts advocating illegal things are not allowed here.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 07:27 AM
1

Stop spamming us with this shit.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:16 AM
1

Log out of reddit and look at your profile. All the posts you made in feminist subreddits have been removed. Feminist subreddits always remove posts that aren't exactly in line with their single allowable ideological position.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:05 AM
1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:34 AM
9

She's on a 33-year holiday now!
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:32 AM
1

Go to the police and tell them exactly what happened.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 08:04 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:51 AM
6

God that's a massive amount of drivel! must be 5000 words of it.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:22 PM
7

At last! Someone posted this with a proper title! Good on ya! Edit: Oops, I pressed the wrong button and this comment got stickied.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:17 PM

I've removed this because the title isn't descriptive. Please replace it with a post that shows your question in the title. That way you're more likely to get answers.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:15 PM

This belongs on /r/MGTOW - not here.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:10 PM
25

Many feminists love to smear the MRM as being responsible for psychopaths who kill women. If they're consistent, they'll accept responsibility for this one.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:52 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:20 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:18 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:58 AM
6

I don't have time to write a specific reply right now, so here's something I wrote for someone who was feeling down because of the negativity online and in the media. Take a break from the Internet for a while, especially the parts that deal with injustice towards men. There's nothing wrong with taking a month or a year off - we'll still be here if and when you come back. Find a place where there are positive women - some Facebook groups are pro-men and there are others that have no relation to …
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:57 AM

Removed due to misleading title. There's little or no "outrage" on the page, and most commenters (and bystanders) are criticising the woman. Don't just make up things. Leave that to the feminists.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:52 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:19 AM
-1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:19 AM

Removed because this is a low-effort image post - the second part has no relation to the first.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 01:02 AM

This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:04 AM

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 04:57 PM
13

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:32 PM
21

It looks like Australian charities have had a meeting and decided to run on this theme. I'll have to stop giving to Vinnies. What will I do with my surplus stuff now? It used to be a good way of passing on things I'd tried, and decided weren't for me.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:23 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:09 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights26/05/18 05:35 AM
4

Thank you. Posts by shadowbanned people automatically appear in the moderation queue. I keep a text file which I copy and paste on such occasions.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:29 PM
1

It doesn't matter. It's against reddit rules and so we have to remove it.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 06:22 PM

Removed because asking for upvotes is against reddit rules.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 06:05 PM
3

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins. The moderators have to personally approve every comment you make while you are shadowbanne…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 02:38 PM
15

slandered by feminists and virtually all of australia slandered by feminists and virtually all of the Australian media FTFY
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:59 PM
8

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:51 PM
3

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:09 PM

Removed due to editorialised title. Please post the link again using the article's original title.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:53 AM

This post has been removed because the title is clickbait and does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go ov…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:52 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:47 AM
268

Update: The reviews are back I had a look at a couple of other documentaries linked from the same page, and they had lots of reviews. As of now, The Red Pill has only seven reviews, all dated 24 May. Can some readers please confirm the numbers/dates of reviews for The Red Pill and similar documentaries? If only the reviews of The Red Pill have disappeared, it's a big story. Don't reply to this comment as your reply will be difficult to see. Just post a comment to the thread with your findings.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:26 AM
7

I had a look at a couple of other documentaries linked from the same page, and they had lots of reviews. As of now, The Red Pill has only seven reviews, all dated 24 May.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:21 AM

While you're reading the rules, learn how to make a post.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:26 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:47 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:46 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:17 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 08:11 AM

This thread has been removed because it directly links to OP's comments in another subreddit. This can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which is against reddit rules and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:54 AM

Removed because this is a satire site.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 04:37 AM

This post has been removed because it links directly to another subreddit, and because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you…
/r/MensRights24/05/18 02:22 AM
3

That's unfortunately true. It's why I'm trying to promote the idea, but it's hard to get interest.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:31 AM
3

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:10 PM
5

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:09 PM

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested. Edit: I'm thinking about posting a sticky thread to help people who are looking for others in their local area, or topic of interest. Ideally MHRAconnect should serve that purpose, but it seems that posts on the sub attract more attention.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:09 PM
6

/r/antifeminists then.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:44 AM
8

Depends what the convo was. If it was against feminism, there's /r/antifeminists. Ifi it was just a regular discussion, then r/askfeminists. If you post to r/feminism they will ban you.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 06:34 AM
5

The crowdfunding campaign for Mr Tiller's legal case is linked under the video. Since its beginning on 10 May, it has raised $9300 of its original $10000 target.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 03:21 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:02 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:05 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:00 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 01:59 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:22 AM
1

It's sadly all too typical. All I can say is good luck to him.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:32 PM

Thanks for not posting the gofundme link, as we would have had to remove it. I hope you can find some help.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 11:28 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 08:18 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:41 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:51 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:10 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 03:50 AM
0

A post about homelessness hit r/all just a few days ago. I'm pretty sure that there have been posts about other serious issues that have hit r/all.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 03:48 AM
5

Probably not.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 03:03 AM
1

It makes no difference. Asking for upvotes for any post is against the rules. Just keep that in mind when you post or comment.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 03:02 AM
4

I don't know. The only way to find out would be to try to place an ad there. You could ask the admins but I doubt they'll answer.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:01 AM

Don't ask for people's identity. That's against reddit rules. Don't generalise about all American women from one video. Also, this post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:57 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:51 AM
1

You can still repost this article. Just use a more descriptive title.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:46 AM

Please bear in mind that it's against reddit rules to ask for upvotes. Be careful not to step over that line.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:40 AM
12

The sub is on a blacklist maintained by the moderators of certain other subs, such that anyone who posts here is automatically banned from those subs. This blacklist is not an official reddit policy, but an agreement between feminist mods of certain other subs. IIRC, these include /r/TwoXChromosomes, r/rape and some others. This sub is on a reddit blacklist for advertising. You can't buy an ad on this sub without a special exemption from reddit admins. As far as I know, we aren't on any other bl…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:39 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:33 AM
3

That stuff will mostly get people banned. Yes, it's not a strictly men's rights issue - but neither is suicide or male homelessness if you used those criteria. After all, who has a right to a satisfying life, or a right to own a house? When a large number of men - and women too - are hurting, I think it's something that should concern us. Even from a strictly strategic point of view, it's not good for the violent end of that spectrum to be linked to us. We should do what ewe can to prevent viole…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 02:30 PM
5

Maybe you should actually read it. There are men and women out there suffering, who could do with a bit of compassion. The creation of angry incels isn't good for anyone.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:37 AM

This is satire. It isn't real. I've removed it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:47 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:47 PM
3

We can only deal with spam if we see it. The mods can't possibly read every comment on every thread. You are our eyes and ears on the forum. Click the report button for spam. But don't abuse it by reporting someone who just has a different opinion.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:30 PM

It does fit here, but it's a repost with an uninformative title so I've removed it. Thanks for the thought, anyway. :)
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:24 PM
8

If they only spam that line over and over, please click on the report button. Mindless abuse contributes nothing useful, and will be removed. But we need to know about it first.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:10 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 02:07 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 01:26 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:53 AM
5

Well, it won't do any harm. In fact, it might be good for them to know that this case has attracted international attention.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:24 AM
2

Thank you. That's exactly what should have been referenced in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:32 AM
2

I'd be the one reading the report anyway. It wouldn't be the first time that I've been reported to myself. XD
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:31 AM
1

That's the US spelling. I use the British version. :)
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:21 AM
16

It still should have a source. If we're going to use something to make a point, we should be able to show that it's real and where it came from.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 11:34 PM

Here is the source, with thanks to /u/iainmf. Posts like these should provide a source for the image, to avoid the proliferation of fakes.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:44 PM

Source, courtesy of /u/93re2: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/6308104/sandra-bullock-penis-facials-stays-young/ In general, a source should be provided for images such as this.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:42 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:28 PM
2

That felt like four days. :3
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:23 PM

This entry has been removed because it's a repost, and also because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about -…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:11 AM
27

Signed. This case is disgraceful.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:21 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:42 PM
12

This email was posted here a few days ago. This subreddit may possibly have had some effect in this change.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 10:41 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:21 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:10 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:07 PM

Removed because the title of this post is terrible clickbait. The words "misogynistic racism" appear nowhere in the quoted text. Quotation marks are meant to designate the exact words used, not something you made up. This was a good catch, but the title is so bad I have had to remove the post. Please post again with a better title.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:05 PM
9

Nothing wrong with a little joke, especially since I'm likely to be called names for stickying this. I have actually seen some new trends that I don't like. For example, there has been a rise in "women are awful" threads, possibly associated with the demise of r/incels. We shouldn't become r/menslib, but neither should we become r/MGTOW.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:58 PM
2

Self examination from time to time is a good thing.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:53 PM
1

That's a good one.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:52 PM
3

There have been a couple announced on this forum, but none of them became very popular. Perhaps we should decide on the best platform for audio/video conferencing, and create an official channel for this sub.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:17 AM

Stickied because I'm a feminist shill. Seriously, though, I have seen an increase in people being reported as "shills" and similar names, simply because they have a slightly different approach to the issues. Some hot-button issues are guaranteed to create a shitfight if there is even the slightest deviation from the line. Intactivism is the most sensitive one, with people being called Nazis or paedophiles on a pretty regular basis. A variety of opinions is healthy, but it should be possible to h…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:09 AM
5

I hope that someday a virtual version of Meetup.com would be available -- where people with the same interests would be able to meet in online audio or video chat rooms. Discord enables audio chatrooms, and it's not too hard to set up. There are probably other programs for video. It's not as good as real life meetings, but it is a bit more natural than typing.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:28 AM

Troll or not, calling out individual subscribers on a front page post isn't allowed.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 02:18 AM

Don't post shit like this.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:52 PM
4

The headline is from the article. It doesn't necessarily represent my opinion.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:06 PM
9

Good point. I'll change the label. It's probably worth reposting that old link because many new members won't have seen it.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:44 AM
2

Only people who have a direct link can see it. Anyway, you should set up the reminder bot. Then if Snapchat fails to cover fathers you'll have a real story.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:20 AM
1

This post still exists, it's just hidden. If it didn't exist, we wouldn't be talking here.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:13 AM

The title of this post is speculative. This shouldn't be stated as a fact because we can't know for sure (though it's a pretty good guess).
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:11 AM
1

You could use the remind me bot to mark it, then.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 10:41 PM

This is not an issue until such time as Snapchat fails to give fathers equal recognition. Your post is entirely speculative.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 10:37 PM
6

That's a very good essay on the use and misuse of violence.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 12:43 PM
25

Everyone should just work as much as they need to cover their costs and desires.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 12:33 PM

IT'S OVER 9000!
/r/MensRights13/05/18 10:58 AM
3

I suggest that you post a link to that video on the main page. If it hasn't been posted in the last year or two, it should be.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 12:21 AM
1

Name checks out.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:03 PM
0

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:49 AM
13

That would be an incentive for childless men to work less. They don't have to support their own families, after all.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 12:20 AM

The linked article is about the unfair dismissal of Rob Tiller from Relationships Australia for having personal opinions that did not follow feminist doctrine. It provides information about a protest campaign, which includes letter writing and fundraising. Bettina Arndt is a well known supporter of men in Australia, and in my opinion she is trustworthy enough that I have made a donation.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:50 AM

Removed because the title is speculative as well as uninformative. Post a link if she actually gets a slap on the wrist, not if you just think she will.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 05:36 AM
2

Triggered speshul braindead cuntservative republitard orange shitler asslicker snowflake You only have that one line. Try to be more original.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:01 AM

No. Just no.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:32 PM

Sorry, but this app violates reddit's rules against doxxing - even if it is intended for a good purpose.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:32 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:46 AM
2

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:41 AM
1

Okay, I'll restore the post and the commenters can decide what to make of it.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:39 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:37 AM

This is a repost and has been removed.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:37 AM

Stickied for discussion.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:11 PM

Stickied for discussion.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:09 PM
5

Great! :)
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:53 PM
17

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:48 PM
2

That's an improvement over "the man is always guilty".
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:45 PM
2

How do you know it was made by a woman? How do you know the first caption isn't a fake? Doesn't it look a little too ridiculous? I'm calling shenanigans on the whole thing.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:42 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:05 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:05 PM
1

There is no point in posting something that indicates it's fake right in the same image.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:56 PM
1

Don't accuse people of paedophilia.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 04:18 AM
10

Thanks! If possible, it's good to have a source for anything that's posted.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:33 AM
14

Where does this come from? Please provide a link.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:28 AM
3

ALL HAIL THE MODS I like your attitude!
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:43 AM
3

Of course it's okay. I said you could talk about your options. My post was meant for your information only.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:34 AM

You can ask about your options but direct requests for funds, such as links to gofundme pages, aren't allowed here. Good luck with your case!
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:27 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:24 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:23 AM

Don't post fake shit.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:33 PM
2

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:11 AM

Removed due to editorialised headline. Unless you provide evidence of discrimination, it's a non-issue.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:37 PM
3

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:34 PM

This does not belong here. Try r/MGTOW.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 10:25 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 03:57 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 02:34 PM

This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:40 AM
4

Welcome, stranger! It could be because we have a lot of posts about "rape culture" and "false accusations of rape". There is, in fact, a group where you can vent about rape - r/rape. There is also a group specifically for male victims, but I can't remember its name just now.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:55 AM
6

At least you bothered to use a flair. :) "Discrimination" is a good one for this. "Feminism" would also have worked. Quite often there is more than one correct answer.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 11:27 PM
1

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 11:24 PM

This is a repost. Also, it has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go ov…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:22 PM

This is a repost. Also it has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go ove…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 07:36 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 06:30 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 06:09 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 06:08 AM

This is a repost. Also, this post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don'…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:48 AM

Yes, it is a repost. :) Also, This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - bu…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:01 AM

Sorry, but we don't allow requests for individual funding.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:50 AM
3

NOtable Logic Unit™, with adjustment knob for male voice penalty and connectors for up to 9 seat modules Oh well, so much for the idea of software neutrality. I wonder if some nerds could hack this device, or make a better one?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:47 AM
1

Despite its being promoted in sexist terms, I love the idea of an actual, objective measure of conversational dominance.1 Wouldn't it be interesting if the results show men not dominating conversations? 1 Assuming the software is fairly written. Ideally, it should be open source - and I would be suspicious if it wasn't.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:45 AM
4

Why are people downvoting this? It's good that someone wants to learn through the use of respectful questions. The more people who see good questions with good answers, as we have here, the better. It may begin to look repetitive, but there will always be newcomers with genuine questions and we ought to make sure that the answers are visible. Fun Fact: The very first thing right at the top of every page is a link to our FAQ. Hardly anyone ever notices it. Did you? :)
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:38 AM

Two are enough.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:25 AM
5

They didn't actually get away with it completely - they got called out in public. Which is as it should be. Men can be jerks too. A lot of it is alcohol related.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:55 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:35 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:34 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:32 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 12:59 AM
3

Guess what - they hate those, too. Even if they are rich capitalists themselves.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:43 PM
1

Thank you. We need more projects.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:42 PM

That was a joke and the video guy took it seriously.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:37 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:06 PM
7

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:02 PM
2

Sounds good to me. Of course, anyone who posts disagreement with intactivist doctrine here will be heavily downvoted and probably personally abused, so he'd have to be prepared for that.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 02:56 PM
1

Of course there are differences. But your post simply made negative assertions about women based on anecdotal evidence from one person. That's not a serious attempt at discussion. Go and find a research-based, published paper and post that if you want to discuss differences.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 07:22 AM
36

Don't worry. Feminists are already working on that.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 07:13 AM
1

Well it sure doesn't have anything to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:49 AM

This belongs in /r/MGTOW, not here. It's also contradicted by my personal experience - so now we have a total of two data points.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:35 AM
28

Well that for sure won't give them any more motivation to hate women if they already do.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:48 PM
1

Be that as it may, we can't call for a brigade here.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:05 PM

This thread has been removed because it directly links to OP's comments in another subreddit. This can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which is against reddit rules and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 05:02 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:50 PM
1

It is indeed a copy and paste. I have about ten different ones which I can use depending on the situation. Saves a lot of time. Sometimes I think about making them into keyboard macros so I can save even more time. :)
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:05 AM
1

No worries. It's just a general tip to help improve future titles. :) It's a great resource, so please repost it. There's actually a better formatted version of the title within the document itself, which you can just cut-and-paste.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:08 AM
2

Discrimination is treating people differently due to some unchosen, irrelevant characteristic. While it may be accompanied by hatred, it is not the same thing. I was thinking of "Misandry" as covering not merely discrimination, but actual acts of hatred toward men.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:34 AM
1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:29 AM
1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:28 AM
16

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:28 AM
10

MRM is by default everything on this subreddit, therefore covered by "General". "Feminism" also covers anti-feminism. One flair I often feel I'd like to have is "Misandry". But we don't want the flair list to get any bigger. Come to think of it, we only use "Moderator" once in a blue moon.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:09 AM
6

That is shitty artwork.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:02 AM
2

Might I suggest that you message the person privately, and explain that the post offends you? Just a suggestion, of course. You would know best.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 12:12 AM
6

So now we can claim that feminism causes murder - as some feminists are saying about men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 10:54 PM
24

Can you write to the paper, or contact the Mayor's office? Maybe also contact the main Canadian men's rights group: https://equalitycanada.com/
/r/MensRights02/05/18 10:51 PM
1

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 10:48 PM
0

The original title of the article is descriptive enough. Alternately, something like "Accused female rapist: 'it was only an accident'" would work too. Both of these include the punchline, as well as saying what the story is about
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:36 PM
4

That's okay. Under reddit rules, we couldn't post a link to a personal page anyway (unless the person agreed).
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:29 PM

/r/MensRights is not a forum for relationship advice. This post is more suitable for r/mgtow.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:06 PM

This post has been removed due to its title being in ALLCAPS. Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reas…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:53 PM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:51 PM

OP's identity has not been verified. We have no reason to doubt it, but no proof either. Use common sense in evaluating questions and answers. For any legal advice, consult a qualified lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 10:40 AM
1

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 10:09 AM
11

Post a link to the originating page if it's a business, and more of us can report it. Perhaps as a new post, with a more specific title? Send me a PM if you do it, because Facebook links need to be moderator-approved. If it's just a private person's page, it probably can't be posted - but businesses and groups are okay.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:57 AM

Stop shitposting.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:52 AM

This post has been removed because the title does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with ever…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:50 AM
6

The title can be made pretty short using the technique I described. First, just say everything that is needed to explain what the post is about. Then, look at it for a couple of minutes and see if any words can be removed. You can also catch typos at this stage. My version: "T-shirt depicting penis mutilation is celebrated on Facebook. What if it was female genitalia?" That's 14 words, compared to 22 in the original - and it carries more information! It could probably lose another three with a b…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:19 AM
3

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:09 AM
10

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:06 AM

The links to Facebook in the comments were removed by the Automoderator. I have restored them now. The address in question is https://www.facebook.com/chase.tkach.39 This is not doxxing, since the page owner has posted it herself.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 02:51 AM
2

That's a great story - and a really good magazine. I'm not all that into sport as such, but the stories there got me interested and reading.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:01 AM
6

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:43 AM

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:12 AM

You can turn off thumbnails in your reddit preferences menu.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 05:18 PM
1

Sarcasm doesn't work unless you mark it with a /s.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 04:39 PM
1

Describe what it's about and post it again. "Men" is too vague.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:41 AM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:38 AM

Removed due to misleading title.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:36 AM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:24 AM
3

I wonder how porn stars talk to their kids about what they do? "You want to know where you came from? Here, let me get the video ..."
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:04 AM
11

In a spirit of constructive criticism, it would be good to specify all the sources explicitly on the poster (which is excellent!). If one person can't find the source, then there will be more.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:09 AM
4

A sticky would be good. I'm reluctant to leave one up for more than a few days at a time, because I think old stickies get disregarded. But we could have more than one.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:45 AM
2

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:40 AM
8

That sounds more promising. One of the things we need is a means by which MRAs can find others in their area. It would need a built in trust system to minimise infiltration and sabotage. MHRAconnect already attempts to do this. Perhaps a phone app that connects with it would avoid duplication.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:07 AM

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 06:38 PM
2

wymynynyty Word of the week!
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:23 AM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:22 AM
35

The World bank is using a number that was pulled out of thin air by feminists in the UN a few years ago. It's a woozle.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:51 PM
87

This is the counterpart to the "pay gap" that never gets mentioned. Men earn more than women, but women gain more than men in net transfer of value.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:26 PM
1

Have you told the teachers that you were offended?
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:02 PM
1

This thread has been removed because it directly links to OP's comments in another subreddit. This can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which in turn attracts attention from reddit admins and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:54 AM
8

Having read some of OP's comment history, I believe her.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:33 AM

Removed due to editorialised title generalising Indians as ignorant. Not All Indians, etc
/r/MensRights28/04/18 07:23 AM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 06:45 AM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 12:45 AM
2

They definitely existed, and still do. You can find the sane ones on /r/Braincels.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:48 PM
2

This was originally posted by /u/greytortoise without a link. Here is the story in question.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 09:54 AM
3

Good work, and an encouraging response! The skeptics would do well to observe your example.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:31 AM
3

Thanks. I'll have a read.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:03 AM
1

I haven't followed the case in any detail at all, so I have nothing further to say. I would only be speaking in ignorance.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:51 AM
8

Regardless of the linked subreddit, in general we should link to the original story.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:43 AM
6

I'm pretty sure there were claims made against him before #metoo began. But I could be wrong. Anyway, I agree that this should be considered over, unless some substantial new evidence appears.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:35 AM
2

I was going to pin it, when I noticed that your post expressed personal opinions about incels in general. I rewrote it to be neutral, since this subreddit has no official position regarding them.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:21 PM
18

He was convicted in a court of law. If we are going to hold false accusers to account, we should be consistent and accept the verdict unless there is a compelling reason not to.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:17 PM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:13 PM
10

Now he can be called a rapist in public, without the risk of false accusation. The justice system did its job.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:12 PM
1

So? The BBC established he was strongly mentally retarded-so what does a single social media post from the actions of a single unbalanced person have to do with men's rights or an online forum? Nothing. Which is why we should respond to the people who say he was associated with the MRM.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:09 PM
6

Do you honestly think comment sections sway that many people? Yes. I've been working with the MRM online since the early 1990s, and I can unequivocally say that one of the main reasons for its progress today has been activism in comment sections. Any message that reaches an audience outside our own forum is a chance for growth.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:07 PM
3

Aren't you the SAME mod that banned my post for suggesting people should take collective action to dispel lies from feminists?! That post was removed because it appeared to be advocating for breaking reddit rules. I've explained this at length. You were offered a simple solution that would have allowed you to repost it without any problems. You decided you'd rather argue instead. I'm not going to argue further with you here. Why are you trying to push us so hard to damn an entire group of people…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 11:04 PM
1

You could sign up. Or go to a different one.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:58 PM
3

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:38 PM
4

That's not the only thing we can do. There are comments sections and discussion forums on the Internet. That defeatist attitude is not realistic.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:30 PM
4

And our troll here wants to make sure we don't even try to change that.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:28 PM
3

Not always. If you try, there's a possibility that you might make progress. If you give up without trying, you are guaranteed to fail.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:26 PM

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:23 PM
6

I don't get all this incel talk. He supposedly made a Facebook post identifying himself as an incel.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:15 PM
6

Again, forums and comments.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:29 PM
3

Terrific!
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:29 PM
4

Comments sections have been very fruitful for us.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:28 PM
22

If you decide to do nothing, you've been defeated before the battle has begun. Don't forget the comments sections.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:28 PM
1

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:26 PM
29

Sometimes they are, and sometimes maybe not. It isn't difficult to compose a short email and send it to several different outlets, recycling the same text. Similar tactics can be used for comment sections. If ten people each send their letter to ten outlets, that's a hundred letters with each media office receiving ten different ones from different people. It's worth the effort. It feels a lot better to do something than to stew in anger and frustration.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:47 AM
6

I suggest that you make a post with a brief overview of The Privileged Sex. I hadn't previously heard of it, and I suspect that there are other MRAs in the same boat.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:16 AM

Please consider sending emails to the media, and posting in comments sections where these are available. Discussion here is well and good, but it doesn't affect the opinions of those who aren't readers. Now is the time to reach out and calmly explain the differences.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:55 AM
2

A link to the original would be helpful.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:42 PM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:38 PM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:38 PM
14

Can you link to the page so readers here can respond? That should be standard practice.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:35 PM
2

He actually posted in MGTOW first, but you're right. This one belongs in r/braincels. Or probably nowhere at all.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:30 PM
2

Please post it again, but this time link directly to the article and not to the subreddit. It's a great find and really deserves to be known about.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 10:25 PM

This belongs in r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:49 PM
2

In situations such as going into change rooms, or taking their children to a playground, some fathers have been accused of paedophilia. So, sadly, it is often necessary.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:47 PM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:38 PM

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check i…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:38 PM
99

This is actually a good thing, because it reminds people that fathers are parents too.. Let's not get upset just because it isn't perfect.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:58 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:51 AM
1

That makes sense - but without knowing the intent, readers could assume that you were supporting the man's action.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:51 AM
1

Then your post is pointless. Archive sites exist -use them. And don't call it the "Toronto Truck of Peace". There's nothing peaceful about it.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:29 AM
1

Also, what the fuck do you mean by "Toronto Truck of Peace"?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:17 AM

Removed because there is no link or text to support the title. Where is the CBC doing this?
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:15 AM
1

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:01 AM

Removed because title is completely unsupported by the article,
/r/MensRights24/04/18 03:00 AM
9

Here's a relevant screenshot. Seems he brought 4chan into the picture as well.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 02:53 AM

We do not recommend actually giving your real name in response to these questions. As if you needed to be told. :)
/r/MensRights23/04/18 03:20 PM
1

No worries!
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:21 AM
1

Unfortunately the admins don't like it when it comes from r/mensrights. While moderators can remove posts, there is nothing we can do about the behaviour of individual subscribers.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:21 AM

This thread has been removed because it directly links to OP's comments in another subreddit. This can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which in turn attracts attention from reddit admins and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link. No, I'm not picking on you. This is a regular occurrence - here is another thread that I removed today, for the same reason.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:08 AM

This thread has been removed because it directly links to OP's comments in another subreddit. This can be taken as an attempt to encourage brigading, which in turn attracts attention from reddit admins and may result in shadowbans. In instances such as this, a screenshot should be used instead of a direct link.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 12:59 AM
88

New Scientist has been political rubbish for many years now. Even so it looks much worse now than the last time I picked up a copy. Not one of the main stories has any science in it. They're all propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:32 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 03:27 PM

Removed due to misleading title. Nobody is seriously saying little boys should be in a war zone. These are just three comments by people who didn't get the joke.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:35 AM
3

This is a relevant academic paper: Female forms of power (full text).
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:24 AM
5

This is a response to the feminist poster that has tips for men on how to avoid being a rapist. Quite nicely done. (Found on r/MGTOW)
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:20 AM
3

Men have not always dominated women in every way, contrary to feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:16 AM
3

Please stay and act as a countervailing influence. We try not to expel MRAs for having opinions we don't like, but prefer to add more with different opinions.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:04 AM
4

This post would fit well on /r/MGTOW.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 12:44 AM
1

There's also /r/OneY - though it's barely active at all.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 12:08 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 12:03 AM
2

That threat might have been an SJW admin speaking for himself. I don't know what the position of thew current admins is, so it's all I have to go on.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:00 PM

I'm sorry, but I've had to to remove this. One of the admins told us that the site was against reddit doxxing rules, and threatened to ban the subreddit if it was mentioned. That was a few years ago, and the person involved is no longer an admin. If you wish, you can contact the admins and ask whether it's okay to post. Mentioning the past is probably not necessary.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:32 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:44 AM
1

One of the admins told us that the site was against reddit doxxing rules, and threatened to ban the subreddit if it was mentioned. That was a few years ago, and the person involved is no longer an admin. If you wish, you can contact the admins and ask whether it's okay to post. Mentioning the past is probably not necessary.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:39 AM
1

One of the admins told us that the site was against reddit doxxing rules, and threatened to ban the subreddit if it was mentioned. That was a few years ago, and the person involved is no longer an admin. If you wish, you can contact the admins and ask whether it's okay to post. Mentioning the past is probably not necessary.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:39 AM

Removed since this is against reddit's doxxing rules according to admin.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:32 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:51 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:48 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:43 AM
2

So because he made a mistake 50 years ago, you dismiss everything he's learned since then?
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:25 AM
2

The book is much, much easier to read.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:20 AM

This is an essay which was later expanded into a book. A direct link was originally posted by u/bufedad, but the format made it difficult to read on a big screen - so here it is in archived form. If you still have problems, try making your browser window narrower. The book expands greatly on the essay and includes references. It is available on Amazon through Kindle. I seem to recall that it was published on the net some years after its commercial release. It's much easier to read than the badly…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:37 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 05:33 AM
1

Calculators for some other states here.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:37 AM

Removed - this is an old story, made needlessly annoying by a robot voice.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 03:32 AM
1

You have to click on the link to "Full Moderation Policy".
/r/MensRights17/04/18 11:09 PM
1

I mostly agree on the facts. However, they can be stated in an inflammatory and hateful way, or in a neutral way. The hateful way is not good for the health of the subreddit, and helps nobody but our opponents.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:18 PM
1

It's a fine line to tread. Certainly men and women are different, and that's fine to post here. But saying that women are inferior to men runs afoul of our policy against hate speech: Extreme cases of misogyny or misandry will also be removed - this does not include discussions about general traits of women/men, but attacks on either gender as a whole (ie: "Men are all potential rapists." or "Women are disgusting and can't be trusted."). Note the use of "extreme", which indicates that the purpos…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:47 PM
2

This link was originally submitted by a user with the intention of saying that women are inferior to men. The linked article makes no such claim, so I have reposted it with its original title.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:43 PM

Removed due to shitty title.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 11:06 AM

Sorry, but this isn't really a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 11:00 AM

Removed because the name of the Twitter user is showing. Names on Twitter posts must be covered up.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:46 AM

This is not a subreddit for dating advice. Try r/okcupid.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:11 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 08:51 AM

Your posts are being automatically removed because surveys need to be pre-approved by the moderators. Please message us at https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FMensRights.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 02:48 AM
1

See the sidebar.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 02:38 AM
1

Because I want people to be able to read this subreddit with ease and efficiency, and because I'll delete your post if you don't have a proper title. I'm finished with discussing this.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 02:35 AM
1

Like me. I can't read the thumbnail. If I can't, then neither can many others. How are they going to know what "Oh ok" is about? Just repost it with a title like "Wikipedia discriminates on genital mutilation". We have a special flair for posts like this - "Intactivism".
/r/MensRights16/04/18 01:41 AM
1

It still needs a descriptive title. Many readers can't see what it is.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:46 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:23 PM
1

This comment is against our rules on hate speech. The user has a consistent history of posting hate against women, and has been banned.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:02 AM
1

Please post it again in this subreddit. I'll keep an eye on the trolls. I'm really mad that they almost drove away a new ally with great potential to help men. If you receive private abuse, send a copy to the moderators.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 01:01 AM
6

Yes, please put it up again. I think it deserves wider attention. I'm a moderator and I've banned one of the people who was attacking you for breaking the group rules. Please click on "report" if anyone posts saying that women are evil or inferior. You will get criticism from some of the people here and you need to be able to take it. But there are limits, and those limits will be enforced according to our rules.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:58 AM
2

Stuff like this: women are not equal to men. No matter how many government policies that force men to see women as artifically equal. Women are roughly equal to teenagers/children. Women always pull men down. Women in by nature can not raise men. Equal wage act pulled men's wages down to subsidize women. Another is giving women the right to vote created the welfare state that stole the income from men to predominantly lift women. The best thing to help men and women is take away the woman's righ…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:51 AM
4

It appears to have been removed by OP. You can find the remnants at https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8bwhya/how_women_could_be_treating_men/?depth=4 and https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8c6u3t/how_to_view_men_according_to_a_girl/?depth=4 /u/Europesupportsrape has been banned based on their comment history.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 05:29 PM
5

I can't be sure, but it appears to have been removed by the person who posted it. Some people were needlessly rude to OP, which may be relevant. Driving away people who want to help is a stupid way to behave.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 04:48 PM
4

I think she did, in a way. She has become the public face of feminism for many people, and has probably helped create more MRAs than almost any other feminist.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 11:29 AM
1

Unfortunately there is a bit of lady-hating here from time to time. We try to eject the haters, but some of them keep coming back.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 10:53 PM

The missing link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reborn_doll
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:58 PM
1

Just make up a more descriptive title and post it again.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:28 PM
1

No worries. I don't like doing this, but I have to be consistent.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:36 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:17 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:17 PM

Your post has been removed because its title makes no sense. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:16 PM
1

Your post has been removed because its title makes no sense. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 01:16 PM
2

What is it about? How women could be treating men. :)
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:44 AM
10

This is great stuff. I hope more women (and men) will take these messages to heart.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:45 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:45 PM

Your title is pointless and sexist. Don't make shitposts.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:41 PM
1

Of course you can. Just make the title say that you're talking about that specific group. "This" could refer to anything.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 04:38 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:50 AM
1

Do not post personal attacks on the front page. Continuing to do so will result in a ban.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:52 AM
1

Seriously? Is there a link that you could post?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:47 AM
2

You're harassing him by making front page posts attacking him personally. That is not acceptable. If you make a post like that again, you will be banned. I'd suggest also that you refrain from personal attacks in general, and stick to the topic under discussion.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:45 AM

Do not name the person who tweeted this. It risks breaking reddit's anti-doxxing rules. Note that wee have a zero tolerance policy toward suggestions of violence.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 02:39 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:26 AM

This belongs in /r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:35 PM

Please note: As this is an anonymous forum, there is no way to confirm whether OP, or anyone else, is actually a lawyer or not. Therefore, nothing on this subreddit constitutes legal advice. Always consult a known, qualified lawyer for advice regarding your own situation.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:28 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:09 AM
1

Your first link goes to your blog, not the woman's post.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:37 AM
2

Stickied so that the people who are disgusted by the heavy handed censorship here have somewhere to go.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:25 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:21 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:20 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:19 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 11:25 PM
7

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:10 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:29 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:25 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:10 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 02:10 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:39 AM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:27 AM
3

I'd lean toward making it a sticky, but the other mods need to be consulted first. I suggest that you send a message to modmail, where all the mods can discuss it.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 12:51 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:03 PM
2

Could be Bearing?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:02 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:01 PM
22

You could try r/askfeminists then.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:28 AM
1

Sorry, this is a repost.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:17 AM
39

Most feminists don't like their dogma being questioned. You're meant to listen and blindly accept.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:04 AM
44

As is typical, the question you posted in r/feminism was removed almost instantly. This says a lot about their views.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:40 AM

Removed: This is a fake news site.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:02 AM
2

At least their mods aren't lazy like ours are
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:45 PM
6

Try Dr Tara Palmatier's advice videos.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:33 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:21 PM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:54 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 07:15 AM
1

Thank you for posting, but this is already on the front page.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 06:49 AM

The official stance of this sub is that we try to allow for a wide range of discussion around the issue of men's rights, with minimal censorship. That's why you won't find a consistent policy but many, often contradictory ones. Everyone here has their own opinion, and as long as they express it respectfully and don't break the rules, they're free to speak. And others are free to argue against them.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:51 PM

Please link to the original article, not to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 11:42 PM
1

It is a sexist quiz.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:27 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:23 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 03:15 AM
0

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 01:26 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 03:30 PM
3

Interesting idea. Of course, now that you've stated your aim, they may be looking for your parody attempts. Which could be fun, because it's going to be difficult for the radicals to determine which stupid poetry is fake.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 07:18 AM
19

After she had explicitly threatened me in writing via email for refusing to date her. Copy that and keep the original as well as all other correspondence with her. It's evidence. You probably don't need to be told, but there might be some readers who could use this advice.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 01:16 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 01:08 AM
4

You're right. Maybe you should email them and sggest a change?
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:48 AM
1

Okay, I'll re-approve the post.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:34 PM
-3

It's useful advice that everyone should take. But it applies to anyone you're in an accident with, not just women. Anything we say can and will be held against us, so we should frame things in gender neutral terms where applicable.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:16 PM
-8

This should be in /r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:39 PM

This is a post for r/MGTOW, not r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 04:27 PM
1

Yet some people think you're a Nazi. Go figure.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 10:34 AM

Removed because "Lefty Linda" is an obvious troll.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:55 PM
2

And if you want to see even more proof of Nazi influence - just look at the URL at the top of this page. When you see it ...
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:30 PM
5

The user's name is gasoline-rainb0w, that must mean he's a pool of water with some gasoline spilled on it.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:28 PM
7

The fact that I don’t even know whether the sticky topic I’m talking about is by a nazi or not is an issue. Considering that you made the claim that that person is a Nazi, it is entirely the issue. Now how about providing some evidence for your claim? And by evidence I mean an actual, linked quote where that user attempts to justify Nazism.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:21 PM
5

I've noticed that the people who make these sorts of claims rarely provide any examples. Please post three examples of the behaviour you're talking about, with links.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:19 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:15 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:11 PM
6

This is certainly a good start. My main criticism is that it's rather lengthy and requires a fair bit of attention span, and that the multi-step process can be too easily derailed. For example, Step 1 requires that your opponent makes a reply in good faith with a realistic number. Most won't co-operate, so it needs to be planned in a way that is independent of your opponent's reaction. Perhaps we could collectively refine it to be as short and sharp as possible.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:17 AM

Please don't post fake news.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:42 PM

I think even showing his face here is perilously close to breaking reddit's privacy rules. You can post it again if you cover his face.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:17 PM
2

I am in full support of women getting their benefits taken away Say what?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:48 AM
40

I read somewhere that men are three times more likely to be randomly assaulted on the street than women. I'm not sure if it's true, but it may be. I'd expect that assaults against men would tend to be violent rather than sexual in nature.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:32 AM
1

Okay. A 4chan link is likely to disappear quickly. It's good that you made the effort.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:10 PM
2

Thank you for your post. In future, when posting screenshots like this please link to the original source so that others can cite the information.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:01 PM
2

It uses fonts that clash with each other. That's bad design.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 06:58 PM
3

Mansplaining Manspreading Manterrupting Any other bad thing with "man" tacked on to the front
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:46 AM
4

It's "femsplaining", and she was doing it right there!
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:40 AM
0

That is a huge violation of privacy. I will not discuss this further.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:43 PM
0

Because asking for personal information about someone, such as a name or address, is a breach of their privacy.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:38 PM

Sorry, but this post breaches reddit's privacy policy and so I've had to remove it.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:32 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights25/03/18 01:34 PM

This isn't really a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:16 AM
1

Take it to /r/MGTOW.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 04:49 AM
64

"In the future, everyone will be Hitler for fifteen minutes." - Beautiful Atrocities
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:32 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:51 PM
1

It's pretty good, but we've seen it before. If you post it with a more descriptive title, so people know what it's about, I'll flair it under Humour.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:36 AM
1

This is a repost, and it's been all around reddit already. Also, you shouldn't use clickbaity titles.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:26 AM

I'd like to make this post a sticky announcement, but I've removed it because the vague title and rambling text make it very difficult to read and understand. It needs a more specific title, something like "Share your manhood moments and stories" or similar. It also needs a TL;DR summary of no more than two sentences at the top. You also should cut out almost all references to your buddy except for one right at the beginning. If we've read it once, we don't need to read it again in every sentenc…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:40 AM

This post has been removed because there is no source provided for this information. Please provide context or a source for this, and post again. Note that content from Facebook or Twitter must consist of screenshots with the names covered over.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:20 AM

Removed because there is no source provided for this information. Please provide context or a source for this, and post again.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:18 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:43 PM
1

Stop posting on the Internet and get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:11 AM
6

I suspect there are few NGOs at this stage that deal with men's rights specifically. However there are probably many more men's support groups of one sort or another.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:01 AM
1

I have removed this post because we don't allow requests for donations unless they have been approved by mods. Please repost this without asking for donations. Then I will sticky it. You may ask for donations on your own page. I suggest that you make a text post that links to the introduction. P.S. The site is informative, but difficult to read. I suggest that you specifically ask for volunteers to help with the formatting of the site. WARNING: Don't use anything other than pure HTML, and don't …
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:50 AM
2

The rules in that subreddit are as stated by the mod. Since we can't see the comment that was removed, it's not possible to see what it said. Accordingly, I've flaired the title as"Unconfirmed".
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:33 AM

Removed because there is no source for the image. Please provide context or a source for this, and post again.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:27 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:21 AM
1

“This woman is a political prisoner, persecuted because of her race” adds the DA, who plans to drop all charges. “I too suffer from WGP [white girl problems] and am sick of people trying to hold me accountable for my unreasonable, borderline psychotic reactions to tedious things. Her boyfriend could’ve been doing anything during those 11 minutes, like sleeping with other women. I can’t even imagine the level of anxiety she must’ve felt while sharpening that selfie-stick, waiting for him to retur…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 02:02 PM
2

No worries. The title doesn't say that it's about the court case. Plus "fuck yeah, bitch" is a bad look for us. :)
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:11 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:45 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:43 AM

Don't post fake news.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:38 AM
3

Please make this a post on its own. It deserves wider readership. The sources should be posted as a comment in reply, as you did here, because some of them trigger a filter and need to be manually approved.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:50 AM
3

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go ove…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:46 AM
1

I know it's ambiguous because even in the short time it was up, one user thought it broke the rules. It's not a matter of what you or I see - it's about the impression that others get. How about Suggestion; Each of us creates a new social media account outside reddit and use it only to post Men's Rights issues anonymously to generate momentum and spread examples of inequality in the social sphere. The title is very long already, so the second sentence should go in the body of the text post. You …
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:12 AM

Removed because your title is untrue. Don't post false titles.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:52 PM
3

I've provisionally approved this post in order to see if our subscribers consider it relevant. You may find it well received on /r/MGTOW.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:50 PM
1

You didn't break reddit rules. I didn't say you were. But your post had a title which was sufficiently ambiguous for some readers to think you were advocating to break reddit rules. You already had a comment from one reader who thought this. All I'm asking is for you to change the title and maybe some other words to make it completely clear that you do not advocate breaking reddit rules
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:34 PM

Saying "they" in the headline is misleading. Only a tiny minority of feminists really believe this.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:41 AM
5

The echo chamber of support that this moron has is unfathomable. Until you realise that she removes any comment that doesn't support her views ...
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:38 AM
2

You have been shadowbanned by reddit admins (not by mensrights moderators). See /r/ShadowBan for information about shadowbans. I have approved this comment so I can reply to you. It seems reddit has a bot that looks for certain types of user behaviour that indicate spamming or brigading. Sometimes innocent users get shadowbanned along with the bad guys. Usually they can fix this if they contact the admins.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:31 AM
3

Please make this a post on its own. It deserves wider readership.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:05 AM
1

It's the reddit rules. We don't want to give them any excuses to ban our subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:39 PM
1

It's mainly a problem if you follow a link from another sub, and quite often not even then. You don't need to worry about it.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:35 PM
1

It seems that OP has deleted their post, which is a shame because some good points were raised. I suggest that you make this a post on its own (with a suitable introduction). It will generate debate - and probably a lot of hostility - but open debate is usually a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:45 AM

Reminder to readers: Please don't vote or comment in linked subreddits unless you are a subscriber. It's considered bad rediquette.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:36 AM
1

It's best not to give any attention to this shit.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:27 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:23 AM

I've had to remove this because the ambiguity of the headline has led at least one person to think you were advocating to break reddit rules. It should be easy to fix by reposting with a re-worded title. In order to be effective, social media accounts need followers. How will these proposed new accounts attract readers from outside the existing men's rights community? I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just that it needs to address this problem.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:18 AM
3

And that is the answer we don't know yet. The image macro jumps to a conclusion without proof.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:04 AM
7

That comment criticises feminism, which is a political ideology. It's not the same as criticising women, who are a group of people who happen to be female.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:59 AM
3

No, you got downvoted for implying - albeit jokingly - that facts and logic are exclusively male characteristics.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:57 AM

Reminder to readers: Please don't vote or comment in linked subreddits unless you are a subscriber. It's considered bad rediquette.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:48 AM
16

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go ove…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:44 AM
45

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In this case, simply mentioning Katy Perry in the title would have been enough for everyone to know what it was about. When making a title, it's be…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:48 AM
1

Your changes were exactly what I wanted. I've made it a sticky now.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:46 AM
1

It's the title that's important. "This is bullshit" doesn't tell us what "this" is.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:22 PM

I'd love to sticky this, but the title is too vague. If you can delete it and post with a fresh title - something like "growing up as a man today" or similar - then I will sticky it. P.S.Don't ask for upvotes. Readers will decide for themselves. P.P.S. It would be good if the original author could be acknowledged, though not compulsory.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 06:17 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:10 PM
-1

How do you get any of that from there are enough real things to be angry about. There's no need to make up things.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:26 PM
10

The original definition of a meme was a self-replicating idea that is passed down through human minds, by analogy with a gene. However, like "troll" and "hacker", the word has mutated to something considerably different from what it once meant.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:24 AM
5

I have no idea where this meme originated. All I know is that it's been posted here, on r/MGTOW, and reported on Squawker.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:20 AM
14

Take a break from the Internet for a while, especially the parts that deal with injustice towards men. There's nothing wrong with taking a month or a year off - we'll still be here if and when you come back. Find a place where there are positive women - some Facebook groups are pro-men and there are others that have no relation to gender politics at all. Develop a hobby that requires a bit of concentration, so you can think about that instead of the unfairness of life. Maybe even see a psycholog…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:15 AM

Removed for false title. Don't make up shit. There's plenty of real shit.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:59 AM
23

Of course there is some anger. But there are enough real things to be angry about. There's no need to make up things.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 01:05 AM
1

No worries. Just remember to add a few words of description - you can even steal the original title!
/r/MensRights17/03/18 12:23 AM
26

Indeed. That's bad enough on its own - there's no need to make up stuff.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 12:16 AM
18

I didn't know that the engineer was female. Nevertheless, it's way too early to be sure of the cause and blaming it on half the human race is not useful. This is not the Women Haters Club. (I'm not suggesting that you're doing this)
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:43 PM
1

It's not forbidden, but we don't encourage it. If it looks like a user wants people to come over to the thread and support him in an argument, then it's bad and we remove it.. In general, screenshots of other subreddits are fine.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:30 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:26 PM
83

The meme that's going around doesn't say anything about engineers. It just has pictures of random women in high-visibility shirts. In any case, it will probably be months before a definitive investigation into the cause of the accident is finished.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:22 PM
1

I wasn't sure either. In the end I decided to just go with the warning instead of removing the post.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:20 PM
1

Sure. It's just a precaution so our subscribers won't be shadowbanned for brigading. It doesn't apply to subscribers of that sub.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:19 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:15 PM

It's almost certainly a troll. Reminder to readers: Don't vote or post on linked subreddits.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:14 PM

Removed because it is untrue.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 11:03 PM
2

Couldn't it be both? Oppression for everybody!
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:53 PM
1

Someone beat you to it by 29 minutes. :)
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:11 PM
9

I like this idea!
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:38 PM
4

Some years ago I read about an Air Force study which suggested that pilots could hear artificial female voices more clearly than male ones. No source for that, sorry.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:34 PM

Removed. Without statistical support for the implied claim that the company's "diversity" was responsible, this is just agitprop and not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:28 PM
5

Please put some paragraph breaks into that. Just hit "Enter" twice to make a break.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:11 PM

This belongs on rt/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:04 PM
1

Feminism isn't egalitarian in practice. The name should give you a clue - it advocates in favour of women. Every attempt to reduce the female tilt in courts has been staunchly opposed by feminists.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:40 AM
1

This belongs on /r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:13 AM
1

No need to apologise for asking a good question. I hope you can find it.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 02:11 AM
3

These things change depending on context. In my city, in the 1990s, it was a term commonly used in the trans community and it had no negative connotations. It was just easier to say than "transsexual".
/r/MensRights16/03/18 12:39 AM
1

What is it, then?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 12:28 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 12:19 AM
2

Somebody posted a reddit-formatted version about a week ago.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:44 PM
8

There was one posted about a week ago. Here's a non-reddit version with working links.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:38 PM

Removed because there is no source for the image. Please provide context or a source for this, and post again.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:55 PM
1

Better humour than that though.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:58 PM
8

Please sign up for some paragraph breaks while you're there. :P
/r/MensRights15/03/18 03:32 AM

Don't post pointless shit like this.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 03:30 AM
2

It accepts anyone. It's written in English, though.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 03:05 AM
5

So don't vote for women or women-like men even if they align with some single topic you care about. That's stupid and sexist. It's the way feminists think. Voting should be done on the basis of a candidate's policies, not their gender.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 03:03 AM
1

Fair enough - do what you think needs doing. Good luck!
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:18 AM
2

That's the beauty of this idea - your location doesn't matter! It can all be done over the Internet. The only things needed are some time and effort.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:14 AM

This is an area that needs work done: creating an organisation to help student activists help each other. And that needs a suitable website - MHRAconnect and, more importantly, someone to start getting in touch with everyone and bringing them together. If you want to help, I suggest that you skim through the last few days' worth of posts, and contact the other students who are also seeking advice on starting campus activism.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:51 AM

This is an area that needs work done: creating an organisation to help student activists help each other. And that needs a suitable website - MHRAconnect and, more importantly, someone to start getting in touch with everyone and bringing them together. If you want to help, I suggest that you skim through the last few days' worth of posts, and contact the other students who are also seeking advice on starting campus activism.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:48 AM

You're about the fifth person to ask today. :) There's nothing wrong with that; it's very encouraging! But it does show an area that needs work done: an organisation to help student activists help each other. And that needs a suitable website - MHRAconnect and, more importantly, someone to start getting in touch with everyone and bringing them together. If you want to help, I suggest that you skim through the last few days' worth of posts, and contact the other students who are also seeking advi…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:45 AM
6

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects to promote men's rights. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:11 AM

Stickied because it's good to practice coming up with counter-strokes to common feminist attacks on men. Ideally we should have a website or other resource that can be easily searched for rebuttals when needed. I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:11 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:01 AM
1

New people get born all the time. Please let's not assume ignorance because someone asks a question; that's how they learn.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 07:48 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:04 AM
1

So there's no hope in having a civilized conversation with these folks. Not if you hope to convince these folks. But there is still a point in doing it. In any given online forum, it's likely that there are far more watchers than active participants. Those people, who follow both sides but rarely say anything, are often open to persuasion. When they see your behaviour in raising points backed by evidence, against ignorance and insults from the other side, you may begin to win them over. You coul…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:44 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:21 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:19 AM
8

You should make that into a post of its own. We need to rescue history from the feminist rewrite.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:13 AM
1

I’m not sure feminists have proposed that sex robots are teaching rape. They have. I'm not sure anyone else has. :)
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:01 AM
1

Removed because we have a zero tolerance policy on advocating violence. If you rewrite it to remove implied violence, you can post it again.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 01:20 AM
2

Feminists, not women in general.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:01 AM
1

Who are they, and why did they get suspended?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:59 PM
3

Google confirms.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:56 PM
1

There's a link to a formatting guide just below and to the right of the text entry box. I know people use caps for emphasis, but we don't need that on the front page. I don't want it to become a shouting contest.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:29 PM
2

The topics are the same because the issues are the same. If you want the writing to be different, then write something yourself.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:25 PM
1

Thank you. Just be aware that there are some people who will be intolerant and hateful toward you. We have a wide variety of readership.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:23 PM
6

Because it's not a link to the archived post of the original, with links intact. OP should have posted this in the first place - and still could!
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:17 PM
5

I agree.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:14 PM
1

To be brutally honest, it will probably be something like "when I remember to".
/r/MensRights11/03/18 03:52 AM

You don't need permission to post things that are on topic. The personal positions of mods on this issue are irrelevant. We're here to enforce the rules, not to impose an ideology. You were encouraged to post this question as a general topic for everyone to discuss, and that's how I would approach it.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:42 AM
2

We could give it a try, I suppose. The demand for sticky space is quite high at the moment, so maybe when things are a bit quieter?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:38 AM
13

Try contacting the Canadian Association for Equality. They have done a lot of good work already, but could use more support.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:30 AM
1

The title should summarise the issue. You could have used the original title.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:12 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:11 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:10 PM
2

Yes. If it was an instruction it could be enforced by removing the post until it complies - but it isn't. Allcaps aren't such a problem at this time that they would need tougher action.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:08 PM

This belongs on r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:04 PM
1

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 06:37 PM
5

I haven't seen anything by this Peterson guy but this article makes him sound like a boring conservative misunderstanding everything and lashing out Looking solely at a critical article is not a sound basis for a multi-paragraph screed purporting to analyse Peterson's thoughts. If you're going to put in that much effort, you should at least look at what Peterson actually says, rather than what he is purported to have said by his critics. On the Internet, there is no excuse for not having gone to…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 06:31 PM
14

The thread has probably hit r/all, but even so the voting pattern is unusual. That's all I can say, since mods have only the same access to voting information as any other user.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:45 PM
3

Is it right when I think of conservatives, I imagine overtly macho men that make penis jokes, was or wished they were in the service, wear ball caps, wranglers and a goattee? No. It means that you're thinking in stereotypes that don't reflect reality and therefore mislead you.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:39 PM
7

His sexual and gender politics are straight out of the MRA playbook: he is staunchly against masturbation wat
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:09 PM
8

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:03 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:22 AM
33

The way it is used, in context with other feminist attacks on men, "toxic masculinity" is very much a part of a concerted campaign to demonise men in general.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 11:15 AM
4

Your honesty is refreshing. I hope you won't be put off by some hostile responses.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:38 AM
11

Well said. If you add a few paragraph breaks, this would make an excellent post on the main page.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:33 AM
11

Mentioning past episodes of abuse in other subreddits as a means of seeking understanding and healing is not "revelling in victimhood". OP did not attempt to claim any sort of victimhood in her first post. It's okay for people to ask questions. We should welcome all those who are open to hearing our stories. That's how a movement grows.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:28 AM
37

The choice of words implies that masculinity is toxic. Feminists know what they're doing. They object to terms like "fireman" and "chairman", since they imply that these are typically male positions. "Toxic masculinity" implies that masculinity is toxic. Like "mansplaining", its existence is a deliberate sexist attack on men.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:07 AM
36

Nevertheless, the choice of words implies that masculinity is toxic. Feminists know what they're doing. They object to terms like "fireman" and "chairman", since they imply that these are typically male positions. "Toxic masculinity" implies that masculinity is toxic. Like "mansplaining", its existence is a deliberate sexist attack on men.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:03 AM
2

No issue. I just thought it would be good to have your opinion on the main board, not just hidden away in a comment. I often encourage people who make good comments to post them separately. I like positive posts from self-identified feminists because they encourage tolerance and discourage hatred. Though there will always be some haters around. But it's no big deal.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 10:56 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:23 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:22 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:20 PM
5

This is an excellent point. Please make it a post on its own, so I can sticky it.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:50 PM
3

If you have some time to spare, you could skim our FAQ.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:48 PM

If you want it to be real quick, put it in the title! :)
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:46 AM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:45 AM

Removed because it's a repost. More importantly, because it's a needlessly blurry graphic that's difficult to read. Copy the image from the original page, and use a free tool like IrfanView to crop it. Then save as PNG or GIF so it is clear and easy to read and copy.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 01:47 AM

Do not suggest that the author should be doxxed! Stickied because the excerpt is quite thought provoking.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:52 AM
3

It's meant to be np, not n.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:42 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:39 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:00 AM

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:57 PM
1

There's a domain name in brackets after the title of each post. If that name is another subreddit, then it's a linked post.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:45 PM
1

No worries. :)
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:30 AM
1

You don't have to describe every detail - just enough so people will know what it's about. And the point is that people shouldn't have to click the dropdown button to find out - they should know just by reading the title. In this case, clicking on the post just gets a picture of Brazil with a caption "how to stop sexist ads". What's that even supposed to be about? How is it related to google? The whole post doesn't make any sense to me.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:19 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:00 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:58 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:57 AM

Remember, don't vote in linked subreddits. Look, but don't touch.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 11:12 PM
3

No worries. :)
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:53 PM
9

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:51 PM
3

Yes, that was definitely one. Our fundraising works, as long as we choose our causes wisely and don't try to spread it too thin.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:40 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:38 PM
3

Is this the one you mean? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1813087158/american-circumcision-release Currently about 10% past its funding goal.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:37 PM
1

That better be for great social justice!
/r/MensRights07/03/18 04:08 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights07/03/18 02:03 AM
1

I'm pretty sure the doxxing rule doesn't cover someone posting their own information. Even if it does, OP has said that it isn't his real name, so there's no doxxing involved.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 01:57 AM
1

Readers won't see the crosspost unless they click on the relevant link. This is an important issue, so you should link directly to the study using a descriptive title - one that will show up in future searches of this subreddit. Stealing the title from the TIL post would work. ;)
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:40 AM

You need to click on the image twice to see it full size.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:22 AM
2

You need to click on the image twice to see it full size.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:22 AM
2

But it is useful sometimes to show how they think to reasonable people.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:20 AM

Though far from conclusive, there is some evidence to suggest that posting a last-week sticky helped several other projects reach their funding goals: Honey Badgers court case, the Red Pill Movie, Honey Badgers ICMI '17 tour and a couple I can't remember at the moment. You all deserve thanks for your generosity and support. It really does make things happen.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:19 AM
1

Please post it again, because it's a great cartoon. With a title something like "The feminist state explained in one image", it wouldn't rely on a thumbnail that not everyone can see, and it would be easy for people to find it in future.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:02 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. It also makes searching impossible. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with eve…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:57 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 04:25 PM
1

It isn't searchable. What if someone wants to find it a year from now?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:56 PM
1

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:54 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 03:03 PM
8

My own stance is classically liberal: People can do pretty much what they like, as long as they don't harm others. So I'mm happy for transsexuals to live the lives they want to live, and I won't attempt to dictate how they must act. By the same token, I assert the right to live the life I want to live, and not to be forced to speak or act in a way that is demanded by someone else. This is at least close to Peterson's position on gender pronouns - though I would use the requested ones if asked ni…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:37 AM
10

I heard him being called transphobic. What about his stances lead to such an accusation? Probably the event that first led to his appearance on the public stage. He declared that he would not let anyone dictate to him what pronouns he must use. This led to accusations of transphobia, on the grounds that refusing to use a trans person's preferred pronoun was oppressive. On a slightly different note - I don't like terms such as transphobic and homophobic. They're propaganda words that carry the im…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 11:17 AM
409

There is also a position called the Sex Discrimination Commissioner, which has existed for a few decades now. It has never been filled by a man.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:18 AM
15

And of course, the male has experienced discrimination - from the very feminist who is claiming he never has!
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:15 AM
12

You should make this a post on its own. It deserves wider readership.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:45 AM
5

You should make this a post on its own. Then I could sticky it.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:39 AM
2

Thank you for posting this detailed overview, and welcome to /r/MensRights!
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:16 AM
3

Hiring people fort political reasons rather than competence probably won't go well in the long run.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:05 AM

Sad, but not really men's rights. You could try r/mgtow instead.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:01 AM
3

You didn't come across this - you're posting your own song everywhere. Stop spamming.
/r/MGTOW05/03/18 01:02 AM
3

He panders a lot - but the significant thing for me is that even some of the male feminists are starting to feel that the hate has gone too far.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 09:08 PM
27

"Who run the world? Girls." What happened to the Patriarchy?
/r/MensRights04/03/18 04:00 PM

I've seen that one before, not long ago ... Anyway, one low effort social media rant is enough for a day.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 08:07 AM
3

Seeing you made an account just to reply to this person, why not post something while you're here?
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:27 AM
3

Only on social media, unless it's posted by a celebrity. It's just one more drop in a pool of piss. Of course, there's nothing wrong with criticising it. But we should keep it in perspective.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:19 PM
1

Yes, but even so the headline draws a long bow. It's just not worth it.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:18 PM
5

Second from the top on the front page right now. :)
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:04 PM

This is The Onion. It's not real.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:02 PM

Please bear in mind that this is just a random social media rant, and does not represent the opinion of all women or sane people in general.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:30 PM

Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:19 PM
8

I'm not being defensive!!!
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:29 AM
7

I've been warned by mods not to "spam" the sub with Global Gender Gap Index figures You've posted these repeatedly to make a point. The UN Global Gender Gap Index is not a credible source. It is designed so as to show all instances where women's conditions are better than those of men as perfect equality - therefore it is incapable of acknowledging instances where men are behind.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 06:34 AM

Stop posting this bullshit. It's not men's rights and it's not factual.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 12:09 AM

Friendly reminder that if you keep on spamming this UN shit you will probably get banned again.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 10:04 PM

/r/MensRightsBoxes also has a lot of good info.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:16 PM
1

Actually don't post it now. I noticed that someone already did.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:09 PM
1

You could just not bother trying to cross-post. Just start a new post and put this in the link box: http://www.wyff4.com/article/claim-of-sex-assault-at-clemson-frat-house-was-untrue-deputies-say/19042711 Then use "Claim of sex assault at Clemson frat house was untrue, deputies say" as the title. You can still do it now.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:07 PM

This is an old, old repost and it has nothing to do with feminism or men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:01 PM
1

Of all the posts, this one breaks a reddit rule that can get our sub banned. Just fix it and move on.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:31 PM

if someone can find contact details. Sorry, but asking for contact details, even in a nice way, is against reddit doxxing rules - so I have removed your post. Please delete the last sentence and post again.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:21 PM

This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 02:50 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:44 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:02 AM
0

There's no actual evidence that this guy was even arrested, let alone what the reason might have been.
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 08:01 AM

There's no actual evidence that this guy was even arrested, let alone what the reason might have been. Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 07:57 AM

Last five days, or it won't be paid!
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:28 PM

This is not what we are about.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:16 PM

We have seen several requests for help in setting up men's clubs in educational institutions. Ideally, they could help each other by passing on experiences and advice. MHRAconnect is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. Creating and maintaining a project for activism in the education system would do a great deal to boost the positive recognition of men's issues. Someone needs to step up and do it, though. I can't because…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:11 PM

Sorry, but this is a repost.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 11:02 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:58 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:55 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:49 PM

Sorry, but this is a repost and has been removed. It also has a real name and address on it.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:47 PM
98

Because feminism is all about hating men.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:19 PM

Unfortunately, having a question that asks for a name is unacceptable - even if it's optional.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:11 PM
2

I apologise for my comment being a bit too harsh. This is actually a good post overall. It's always good to put it out there and present our case. I just thought his argument wasn't strong enough to warrant saying that he destroyed his opponent. I also have a personal peeve for the "destroyed" phraseology which is often used in a similar context.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:46 AM
1

arguing with a fool is a surest sign you belong in the group Actually there is a good reason to argue with a fool sometimes. This is when there is an audience watching or listening. Your words will have no effect on the fool, but they may persuade some of the silent listeners.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:12 AM
4

I don't think she was "destroyed". It's more like a draw. Also, "destroyed" is not the right word to use for this. Being destroyed means actually dead, blown to bits, that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:41 AM

Sorry, but this is not a men's rights issue. Also, using "reverse the sexes" in the title is cliche and needless. Everyone here already knows how to do that.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 12:38 AM
12

That is a brilliant summation. Feminists seem to be unable to consider men as individuals. Would you be willing to make a post out of that? I'm looking for a new sticky. ;)
/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:17 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 11:10 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:48 PM
4

Posts by young accounts are held for moderator approval.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 10:41 AM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:56 AM
10

The problem is that feminists only acknowledge the issues in the comic, which are just a tiny portion of men's issues overall. This enables them to pretend they are addressing men's problems, when in reality they are only addressing a limited area as defined by themselves under patriarchy theory. It is also a way of conveniently blaming men for their own problems. The majority of men's issues left out by this approach. Even worse, many of the problems faced by men are either directly or indirect…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:41 AM
14

It addresses only those concerns that are approved by feminists. I am far more concerned by the effect on boys and men of the constant hatred and shaming for their gender that comes from feminists in academia, the media and government.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 10:54 PM

This belongs on /r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 05:05 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:53 AM
3

Try /r/AskMen?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 08:11 AM
1

you condemn people for not commentating Really? Where do I condemn anyone?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:02 AM
1

You can just post that on this subreddit if you want.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:49 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:48 AM
4

The article quoted several people, most of whom were in favour and only one who was negative. Most importantly, it provided direct links to the subreddit so that readers can see for themselves. I'd be very happy if more articles about the MRM were like this one. Comments are open, by the way.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:47 AM
6

I think the article was quite fair. It quoted several people, most of whom were in favour and only one who was negative. Most importantly, it provided direct links to the subreddit so that readers can see for themselves. I'd be very happy if more articles about the MRM were like this one.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:46 AM

Someone reported that this link redirects to a site with viral ads and crypto miners. It does redirect to bloomberg.com, but I didn't see any problems there. However, I'm not a security expert so be careful.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:36 AM

This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:18 PM

This is suitable for /r/MGTOW, not here.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:49 AM
11

I haven't been there lately. Anyway, it's in the memeosphere now; it could turn up anywhere.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:26 PM
1

That's why a good title is needed. In any case, this imaged is all about that guy's fetish. He's getting off on the public humiliation.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:31 PM
2

It was posted for the sake of the historical information it contains. And because it gives me a schadenboner to see Michael Moore being humiliated like this.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:29 PM
5

It comes with all its context, as far as I know. Everyone can take away from it the parts they want.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:25 PM
10

Sorry. I waited a few hours for you to repost it, but you didn't. If it's any consolation, I did actually see it somewhere else before you posted it. Probably on r/mgtow or /r/KotakuInAction.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:23 PM
8

I actually was a feminist, until I realised that feminism was all about female supremacy.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:16 PM

Removed because there is no source for the image. Who is this woman, and what is the story? Please provide context or a source for this, and post again.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 05:41 PM
40

This link was originally posted here by u/TheBatManBadMan with a non-descriptive title.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:56 PM
24

Sex doll makers set to launch 6ft tall model made for women with rippling muscles and brooding looks Is there a version made for women who don't have rippling muscles and brooding looks?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:55 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:43 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:42 AM
117

The op-ed just reduced him to his gender, so he understands now. Next!
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:54 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 05:00 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:44 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:39 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:38 AM
3

Please take a minute to check your title for mistakes before posting. :)
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:54 PM
1

Because you posted this already.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 06:04 AM

Here is an official response to this thread: I'm a mod of the subreddit in question. I used to post here frequently. I've commented on men in the family court system and college rape "courts", and female teachers raping boys many times. Dig through my history. You'll see I'm on your side. The thread was removed first by Automod because it received a large number of reports by the kind of people you're talking about. That's how the Automod is set up. We have to go in and check out the reports the…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:05 AM

Repost removed.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:03 AM
2

https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/springer/pa/2012/00000003/00000002/art00002 http://www.oneinthree.com.au/
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:55 PM
36

Don't let it dishearten you. Increased attacks are a sign that we're making progress. A few years ago, nobody outside a small group of Internet users even knew there was a men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:51 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:57 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 10:21 AM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:15 AM
2

That's actually pretty close to what I did with this post. A moderator post is automatically brought to OP's attention, where he can read the advice for future reference. I only delete the posts if they're new enough to have had few readers, or if the title is really blatant clickbait. A synopsis isn't needed for people who click on the link, and I can't change the title. If I could change post titles, I'd do it myself and save the trouble of posting these notes.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:14 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:36 PM
11

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:34 PM
3

And feminism is just about misandry if judged by its actions.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:17 PM
58

What makes this article even worse is the fact that women on average live about seven tears longer than men do. So if they retire at the same age, women get a longer retirement period.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 12:38 PM
3

I consider it education rather than pandering, but we'll just have to disagree.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:55 AM
5

I'm sorry, but I can't agree with you on this point. The text is a standard introduction intended for posting if a thread gets to r/all. When this happens, we are visited by thousands of people who have never been exposed to men's rights, or who have only heard smears about us. Such occasions are important opportunities to state our positions directly to an audience that contains many who would be willing to listen. Bringing our message to potentially open minds is more important than maintainin…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:27 AM
7

The difference between what a movement calls itself and what it actually does is immense. If feminism is equal rights, then men's rights activists are feminists - and most people who call themselves feminists are not.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:01 AM
8

The difference between what a movement calls itself and what it actually does is immense. If feminism is equal rights, then men's rights activists are feminists - and most people who call themselves feminists are not.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:00 AM
4

Why is it disagreeable? In what way is it "a plea to the insane"? Can you suggest any changes or improvements?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:53 AM
2

I just wish he'd bothered to at least comb his hair for that video. The photo really makes him look like a ranting street person.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:16 AM
6

Roever lost custody of her three kids in 2016 for making 'false claims' about their father Colour me surprised. :/
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:30 AM
3

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:25 AM

Yes it is, and this has been posted before. :) Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboa…
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:24 AM

Removed because the link doesn't point to the article (It points to the front page).
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:42 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 11:38 PM

You say that you regularly attend feminist diversity seminars and meetings where men's rights issues get a positive reaction. You haven't yet identified which seminars and meetings these are. Could you please list a few, with their webpages and the locations and times of their meetings? Then our subscribers could attend and see the openness for themselves.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:49 PM
1

Which groups, specifically? If you name a few meetings you've attended, then other subscribers can visit them and see if things are as you say.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:44 PM

I'm not sure if this is the right subreddit, but in any case your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but do…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:51 AM
2

By now it's too late to post this as a comment. Just make it a text post tomorrow by leaving out the cartoon. The main post is always the best place for whatever you want to say anyway, since then everyone can read it.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:48 AM
3

More feminism.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:37 PM
2

I think the logo we already use for this sub is very good. It's simple and it sums up our goals. Logos should be easy to remember.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:33 PM
6

Well, good luck then. I admire your attitude.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:31 PM
12

My reputation doesn't matter to me, I'll sacrifice my reputation for the truth any day. There's no need to publish your name. You could just reveal it after we win. :) I've stickied your post so people can give you ideas. I'm glad you've already joined MHRAconnect - my spam might be working. It needs to be spammed a lot, because it will only become really useful when it's a crowd.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:27 PM
1

It's not a problem. It just needs a bit more description, like "Mother spends 7/ of child support on herself". Actually, now that I look at it, my proposed title sucks. The original one was better. I've restored your post. Sorry for the inconvenience.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:17 PM
2

It's hard to believe that's even real. But then there are some pretty horrible people in the world.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:35 PM
3

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:34 PM

Comments are open on the article. Put your word in!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:16 PM
-3

I find them tedious and annoying on this sub. We already know all about the double standard. It's a good argument to make in appropriate circumstances, when debating with someone over a specific issue. But here it's pretty much just clickbait/virtue signalling. I think we should do away with titles like that.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:08 PM
8

The survey assumes that feminist theories of society are correct. It is worded in such a way that answers will tend to confirm the hypothesis, regardless of whether individuals answering it fall into the expected categories or not. By assuming that feminist definitions and perceptions of society are correct, it will fail to uncover the many real phenomena that contradict feminist views. In other words, this research may get you a degree, but you won't learn anything from it. On the other hand, i…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 01:55 PM
8

Not everyone has a great reddit client, or a big screen. We have 170,000 subscribers; please consider the needs of others.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:54 PM
1

Or someone else got ahold of the two pictures and made up a caption. In any case we can't rally use an image that claims to be fake.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:52 AM
5

You said you would expand on this in the comments. Where is the expansion?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:49 AM
1

Okay.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:43 AM

The picture itself says it's fake.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:42 AM
1

Having an affair is not illegal. This is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:07 AM
1

I'm intrigued. What features do you consider such a bunch of ideologically opposed subs to have in common? Our mod policy is indeed quite loose by reddit standards. So loose that many people think we don't have one. We do remove some posts and ban some redditors, but I guess they're not missed all that much. :) I'd like to see your opinion about why this works for us and not for many others, too. I have my own guesses, but feedback from others is important.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:47 AM
3

No worries. I can just be a bit perfectionistic at times. :) You won't have a post removed for having a few caps. It just works better without too many.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:36 AM
8

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:32 AM
5

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 10:16 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:55 PM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:32 AM
4

That one's on my wishlist now!
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:11 AM
3

I'd love it if you started one. You could ask for volunteer helpers here, and organise it as a project on MHRAconnect. And I could sticky it again. :)
/r/MensRights18/02/18 07:04 AM
8

A lot, indeed. AMR has 18 moderators for a sub with fewer than 10,000 subscribers. That's one mod for each 520 users. We have 8 mods for over 170,000 subscribers. That's one mod for each 21,250 users. That means AMR has 40 times as many mods per user as MensRights does. One of the typical characteristics of feminist subs is the huge number of moderators relative to users. I suspect this is so they can quickly find and ban dissenting views.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:52 AM
7

I have no idea why that happened. I've restored it anyway.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:40 AM
5

I'll put in a good word for Liar, Liar - practically an expose of the Family Court in comedy form. Also on the topic of lies, True Lies has a character who points out the dangers of marriage (though there's a reconciliation at the end). Good war movies can be a treasure trove. They Were Expendable, Saving Private Ryan, Dunkirk and more. u/goodbeertimes reminded me of Gran Torino, with Clint Eastwood teaching the art of manhood. For martial arts fans, Ip Man is an amazing film based on a true sto…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 03:58 AM

Removed because advocating violence is against the rules of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:05 AM

Can you post this again without the word "bitch"? It makes the post look juvenile.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:59 AM
2

OK
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:54 AM
3

Is it fake?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:47 AM
2

Oh yeah, that's a classic. It should be copied widely in case the university takes it down one day.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:40 AM

I'm just going to pause this because I need to consult the other mods and check that this kickstarter is genuine. Posts that ask for money must be approved by the mods. You can contact all of us by clicking here.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:39 AM
342

We could email them and ask for it ...
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:32 PM
2

That's a good point. Does anyone have better ideas?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:28 PM
2

Nevertheless it exists and is propagated widely. It won't go away if we choose to ignore it. We need a rebuttal, whether this one or something else.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:27 PM
1

Removed because a missing word "know" makes the post confusing. Please try again, and read it twice. :)
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:07 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:04 PM
3

Is it really an issue who she chooses to invite to a private party? She's paying for it herself.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:19 PM
4

Except that it's actually true.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:17 PM
10

They wouldn't even be alive if not for the organisations and technology created by men. If men disappeared tomorrow, within days there would be no electricity, no running water, no fresh food, no public transport, and so on. 99% of people living in cities would die within weeks. Feminists are overwhelmingly city women who would be among the first to go. Masculinity may cause women some problems, but it also supports their very existence in a very fundamental way.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:04 PM
8

You could always delete and repost. But I don't think it's a very good point to make, and here's why.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:54 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:52 PM
6

I've made a post relevant to this.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:49 PM
5

I don't think this is a good counter-argument to feminist ideas about "toxic masculinity". They can simply reply that it was toxic masculinity that caused the shootings in the first place We need a better counter-point. Mine is that this is the dark side of men's genius - men are both the very best and the very worst of humans. Without this, we would still be living in grass huts.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:37 PM
2

There have been some extracts posted here, and it looks to be for real. At least, the instructions given would actually work.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:18 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:56 PM

This post has been removed because it's fake. You should check when you see something really wacky. :)
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:37 PM
17

But we should hope it gets widely publicised. It shows that there really is a war on men.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:53 AM
5

Someone already did it: http://archive.is/r67rm
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:51 AM
41

I hope they don't take it down. It's such a great piece of evidence that men are being deliberately targeted.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:24 AM
5

Thanks!
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:20 AM
1

Who wants to buy it and write the first Amazon review?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:45 AM

Congratulations! You might consider joining MHRAconnect if you haven't already. You could start a group to discuss how to start groups like yours, and what resources are available - so that others can learn from your experience. Thank you for your activism - and courage.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:41 AM
15

If you stated that the statistic is about male abuse by females in the title of your post, more people would be able to find it. You can easily delete and repost with a more descriptive title. :)
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:29 AM
1

I suggest you make this comment into a post of its own. It deserves wider viewership.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:15 AM
5

> political consultant and strategist John Mykytyshyn If you can get him to say his name backwards, he returns to the Fifth Dimension.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 07:08 AM
5

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. [There's a reason most words are in lowercase](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 06:51 AM
11

The title of your post does not say enough about its subject. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. In future, such posts may be removed. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:46 PM
1

Because I can't change your posts. You could have already reposted it twice in the time you've spent complaining.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 08:00 AM
2

Huh. I have no idea what's going on. I'll restore it now.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:58 AM
1

My intention was to point out that "HAH" is not a useful title. Just using the first sentence of your post as the title would have been okay. You can post it again with a title that indicates what is in your post.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:48 AM
1

Removed because this post seems to be broken. It's just a link that points back to itself. If you were trying to make a text post, then you shouldn't put anything in the URL field.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 06:43 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:29 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:26 AM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:27 AM
3

So many ALLCAPS make your POST look SENSATIONALISTIC and SILLY! Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a re…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:44 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:42 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 09:40 PM
2

That's normal when a post hits r/all.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:58 PM

Removed because there is no source for the image. Please provide context or a source for this, and post again.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 01:43 PM
6

I can't change it either. If you want to, you can just remove the existing post and make a new one. If reddit asks whether you want to make a repost, say yes.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:30 AM
53

This would have been much better if you'd left "fat" out of the title. It makes us look petty and distracts from the main issue.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:20 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 10:51 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:19 AM

Removed for editorialised title (first sentence).
/r/MensRights13/02/18 12:14 AM
2

It's the way that it's saved. Saving a jpeg as another jpeg will degrade the quality every time. A lossless format like GIF or PNG should be used whenever copying images, text or screencaps from a webpage.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:18 PM
1

You can ask for a second opinion if you want.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:25 AM
13

Brilliant response that deserves wider coverage. I just wish that the people who shared these knew how to copy images without blurring them.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:11 AM

Sorry, but posts that may be seen as encouraging violence are not allowed on this subreddit. Maybe try r/sjwhate
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:02 AM

I advise all activists to join MHRAconnect which is a site designed for organizing projects such as this. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:10 AM
1

We have Automoderator set to filter direct links to Twitter, for reasons. I've approved this one.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:47 AM

Hello and welcome to /r/MensRights. If you are not a subscriber, please take a moment to understand what you are seeing. This subreddit is about the issues faced by men in our society. We welcome healthy debate and you won't be banned merely for disagreement. It is common here to reject feminist ideology, but that doesn't mean we hate women or oppose equal rights. Rather, we seek to expand those equal rights to include men. These are some of the best discussions we've had. There is also a docume…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:48 PM

Crappy satire mag. Don't link it.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:45 PM
2

Nah, the mods think so too.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:34 PM
1

This belongs in r/mgtow.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:32 PM

You should probably post this in r/mgtow or r/relationships.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:26 PM

Removed due to broken link. Please use archive sites to prevent this.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:25 AM
3

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:23 AM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:20 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:20 AM
2

Try /r/findareddit
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:46 AM
5

You're certainly welcome here, but you might be able to get better advice elsewhere. Are there any subreddits for ADHD people to support each other?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:33 PM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:25 PM
1

It's a general rule on reddit (that most seem to ignore).
/r/MensRights10/02/18 01:11 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:00 PM
3

Can you suggest a more useful alternative?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:50 PM
2

I suggest that you join MHRAconnect and start a project there. It's small right now, but active members will build it up. When you sign up, please browse the other projects to see if you are interested.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:41 PM
1

You'd actually get a lot more views if your title said it was women gloating about domestic violence against their boyfriends. If you can just cover the face of the first woman and host it on imgur.com with a direct link, it would be a much more effective post.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:59 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:42 PM

Removed because title is excessively editorialised. Titles should stick to the content of the link. If you want to express a detailed opinion, use a text post.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:34 PM

Stickied because this is a good way to spread the word about all the other men's rights issues as well as intactivism. Making stickers is another possibility. While buying the material advertised at the link may put some money in OP's pocket, it's not compulsory. In fact, you could make your own designs instead!
/r/MensRights08/02/18 07:57 AM

Removed for clickbait title.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:30 AM
1

Although the link was posted earlier, I thought it really deserved to have this title.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:54 AM
3

'We are utiulizing [sic] womxn to be more imclusive [sic] of the diversity within the category of womxn.' That really should be the whole title. Please repost this with that title, because you found it. If you don't, I'll post it. ;)
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:04 AM

Removed because link is broken and title is uninformative. Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don'…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:12 PM
1

Most people will skim the article or just read the title. We have to bear them in mind, otherwise we'll have well meaning MRAs citing it as fact and being discredited.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:56 PM
7

This would be easier to understand if you put an F in front of all the bits that were said by the feminist.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:22 PM

This is a fake article by a well known troll.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:48 PM
1

No worries.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:35 AM

I'm sorry to have to do this, but I have to remove this post. Under our rules, posts like this are banned, and there is a good reason for that. The reason is that every time someone puts up a post about being banned from a feminist subreddit, some of our members go over there and make trouble. Then they get shadowbanned - example - and the admins get mad at our subreddit. We don't want any of that. So posts about being banned from /r/feminism or any other subreddit are against our rules. You mig…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 03:31 AM
1

I don't have any control over what others read and think for themselves. I only regulate the content of this subreddit in accordance with its rules. Hence, your post is not acceptable here, but I'm sure there are other places such as /r/MGTOW that would appreciate it.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:45 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:22 AM
1

You can appeal my decision to the moderators as a group. I wasn't completely sure myself, and a second opinion would be a good thing.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:38 AM

Don't link to subs with pictures of exposed genitals without a warning. Removed for unmarked NSFW link. Also, one incident almost fifty years ago does not indicate a growing trend. Do you have any statistics to back your claim?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:22 PM
1

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:13 PM

This is not a subreddit for hating on women, so your post has been removed. You may find it more suited to /r/MGTOW.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:09 PM

Removed because suggesting or supporting violence is against group rules. You can repost everything except for the last paragraph.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:18 AM
1

Sorry, but this is not a men's rights issue. Perhaps /r/CringeAnarchy would be more appropriate.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:52 PM
3

Wasn't the whole "strong women" meme a feminist creation in the first place?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:09 PM
5

I suggest that you join MHRAconnect and start a project there. This could be a general resource for people starting clubs at school.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:03 PM

This sounds like a post for /r/raisedbynarcissists.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 06:42 AM
6

The main motives were interesting to me. Gain is one of seven motives that characterise the solved homicides I analysed. The others were jealousy, revenge, conviction/hate, concealment, love, and thrill
/r/MensRights03/02/18 01:55 AM

Removed because feminists don't say that.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 01:41 AM
4

One disturbing feature of the current witch hunt is the erasure of history. In this case, an accused actors murals have been erased from the walls of the high school which proudly displayed them not long ago. It's only one case in a trend of erasure. Those accused of assault are having their past and present scrubbed out of existence by institutions keen to toe the feminist line. Stalin had the most powerful secret police force in the world, and hundreds of prison camps to enforce his edicts of …
/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:50 AM
9

It might be a bit of a reach, but this article hits a good point: It's difficult to hate someone who is a friend. I know that SJWs usually push away old friends who don't share their bigoted values - but could it work the other way around? Are there any feminists who, like Cassie Jaye, gave up their enmity to the MRM after in-depth conversations? How would it be possible to find a common meeting ground where such interactions could take place?
/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:33 AM

Removed because you got the title wrong. It's supposed to be "36 types of Anti-Feminist".
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:07 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:02 AM
1

If you put something about a school shooting by a female in the title, your post would probably get many more views.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:17 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:16 AM
2

I'm still waiting for your answer to my question. How, exactly, could a society implement a right to have sex in practice? The test of ideas is in their practical application.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:40 AM
3

A glass of water is not sentient. It can neither consent, nor not consent. What exactly is it that you are proposing as a right to sex? How would it work in practice? I am genuinely interested in how a society could institute a right to sex without violating anyone's consent. The only way I can think of would be through the supply of government funded sexual services - but even then there may be a few individuals who nobody would take on.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:47 PM
2

You certainly have the right to engage in sex. Everyone does. But in order to fulfil that right, you need a consenting partner. You have no right to demand consent from anyone.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:36 PM
2

Nobody in this thread is saying that they're contemplating suicide. It's a general discussion, not a cry for help.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:33 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 11:29 PM
2

I suggest that you expand on this and make it a point on its own. Just please don't imply in any way that anyone has a right to sex.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:06 PM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:54 PM
9

Appreciation of men used to be built into society. After five decades of feminism, it has mostly been removed, and replaced with shaming of men. The long term consequences are yet to unfold.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:55 AM
1

Instructions for changing the words are in my post. You can't change an existing title, so you will have to create a new post.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:49 AM
2

It probably won't too go far, because this is the only post promoting his subreddit that OP will be allowed to make. Once is an announcement, many times is spam.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:42 AM

Note to commenters: Suggestions of illegal or violent activities are against our rules and will not be tolerated.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:37 AM
5

The point of arguing with people like these is not to change their minds, but to win over the audience. If there's no audience, then it's an opportunity to practice - and have your own beliefs tested. Either way, you did the right thing.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:28 AM

Please don't use ALLCAPS in titles. It detracts from the readability of the front page. Changing from allcaps to lowercase doesn't change the meaning of the title. It's exactly the same, just better looking and easier to read. Lowercase letters vary more in shape. Some are taller than others, some go below the line. This makes them easier to recognise at a glance, and reduces reading fatigue. It's also nicer to look at. There's a reason most words are in lowercase. Web pages are available that m…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:19 AM
1

Far more strict and quick to act. They will ban you for any deviation from their ideology at all.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:04 PM
4

We are fond of free speech, but there are some limits. u/ee4m has got to the point where he's just spamming off topic posts and so has been banned for a week. If he keeps shitposting after that, the ban may be made permanent.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:40 PM
1

No, the other two are women who die from different causes.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:32 PM

Apparently they decided they weren't one after all. They deleted their own account and all the comments on it. The remaining comments from MRAs show that we don't bite (too hard) and so I've left the thread up.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:46 AM

Your post has been removed because its title does not inform readers about the link. This forces people to click and read before they can decide whether they are interested. If everyone did this, the subreddit would become unusable. So please don't do it. Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people. When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are a…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:29 AM
1

To be honest, there are some people on this subreddit who don't accept the reality of transsexualism. You might get a hard time from some of them. We have a far wider range of acceptable speech than some other subreddits. But if you're the type who doesn't get upset by mean words on the Internet, you should be okay. We hold diversity of ideas as a greater good than inoffensiveness. Should you chose to stay, then welcome aboard!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:21 AM

Not really a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 05:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter