TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thirdridge Archive

View 1 posts and 162 comments by thirdridge on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
37

thirdridge/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

That's why women deceptively chant lies to socially construct the pretense of their own goodness. And half of that work goes toward the slandering of the entire male sex. Can't have science ruining all their efforts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 06:03 AM
0

Top 10 reasons there will never be pleasure bots for women: 1. You can't shit test a robot. 2. You can't emotionally abuse a robot. 3. You can't shame or manipulate a robot. 4. You can't ask a robot if you look fat. 5. You can't make a robot pay attention to you. 6. You can't bankrupt a robot. 7. You can't no-fault divorce a robot. 8. You can't pregnancy entrap a robot. 9. You can't slander or falsely accuse a robot. 10. You can't take away a robot's 'rights.' In essence, women can't spitefully …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:50 AM
3

A few years ago (before onlyfans blew up), feminists were framing sex dolls as a kind of dangerous surrogate oppression of all women and wanted them to be banned. So OP didn't make up this scenario; it depicts what women have been doing. Nice gaslighting attempt lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:45 AM
0

Who said men here want women to like them? I've developed an actual disgust response towards women's attention over the last few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:41 AM
15

Exactly. All women view men poorly and dedicate an extraordinary amount of neuro-economy towards the slandering of men; it was so obvious when I was in college. That's why I've reveled in being single for the last five years. Looking forward to another five years!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:34 AM
6

True that. I'd never put my life on the line for my country or for the women around me. They're both equally as misandric and can get fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:19 AM
14

Statistically speaking, female rulers start more wars than male rulers. And it's classic victim blaming to say that men are somehow less victimized due to a male leader conscripting them. On top of that, it's often by majority female vote that these men are elected into political offices.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:15 AM
1

Men are victims of sexual violence far more than women are: infant male circumcision, groin shots, female-on-male rape (45% of the cases of heterosexual rape according to CDC data 2011-15), and pregnancy entrapment. Sex dolls are a must for lowering sexual and reproductive violence towards men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 04:52 AM
-2

It ain't a sad state when it's a just state. It's the future women deserve.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 12:18 PM
1

All feminist women should be castrated. The amount of cruelty they have inflicted upon men and boys is incomprehensible. Why can't women just get their own damned gender under control like men have done with their own gender? Pathetic.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 12:08 PM
1

Just be grateful that men don't act like women by promoting infant female circumcision. 9 out of every 10 single mothers in the US sexually torture, permanently mutilate, and sexually groom their baby boys by defusing, crushing, and severing 50% of their penile skin. You, as a female, are beyond privileged to have your body respected by men enough to have an equivalent surgical operation illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 11:24 AM
1

On paraphilias, you said females are regarded as more pathological than males. But the cited study states: "Female subjects were significantly less pathologized and overall less stigmatized in terms of exhibitionistic, frotteuristic, sexual sadistic and pedophilic behavior."
/r/MensRights04/11/22 12:08 PM
3

Yap, but keep in mind that this statement: Equality does not mean you get what you want, it actually means about half the time you don't if there are two different camps of views on the issue. assumes that men are as self-entitled as women. If we actually had equality, women would not be getting what they want the vast majority of the time, because men are less entitled than women are.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 12:18 AM
7

men are complicit in this Don't blame men for having been slandered, shamed, rejected, vilified, constantly baited, and brainwashed by women into denigrating their own maleness. Men that are 'complicit' in this are merely victims of a lifetime of multi-scale feminine violence.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:27 PM
1

This is why men and boys should always aim towards non-interaction with all women at all times. You don't interact with kleptoparasites unless absolutely necessary.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:10 PM
8

That's what every woman means when they talk about equality: bare minimum for male survival (if even that), with everything else contributing to unlimited female rights and privileges.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:04 PM
8

It's not a matter of using items. No one gives a free pass to the weaker man in male-on-male violence. There's no reason why the same shouldn't apply to male-female violence.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 02:59 PM
3

I think gamma bias would more accurately be described as half gynocentrism and half misandry. Magnifying women's issues and achievements while minimizing negative female traits and behaviors is gynocentrism. Minimizing men's issues and achievements while magnifying negative male traits and behaviors is misandry. Edit: Maybe I got that wrong... makes more sense like this: gynocentrism: Magnifying(minimizing) women's(men's) issues and achievements. misandry: Magnifying(minimizing) men's(women's) n…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:15 AM
2

I'd say women use their higher agency ratio to satiate their drive for hyper-consumption – which again is not just economic but also political and cultural. Women are the primary consumers of men's production, women are the primary generators of demand for government authority, and it's women that primarily consume culture through absorption and transmission of memetic ideations. They also use their agency ratio to feel 'safe' through evasion of responsibility while at the same time gaining auth…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:05 AM
0

She's damn lucky I haven't strapped her down and cut off her clitoral hood (homologous to the foreskin) so she can actually feel what she did to me and live with the same consequences. There's no other way I can get justice for what was done to me.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:10 PM
3

You believed there were 'health factors' in cutting up the genitals of baby boys because you believed all the misandric propaganda that boys are disgusting and totally incompetent when it comes to cleanliness. Saying that it's for health is no excuse. It's just as dehumanizing to baby boys because of all the misandric assumptions that lead you to think that barbaric interventions should take place. As a potential future father, would you ever circumcise an infant daughter of yours when it's enti…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:01 PM
6

The best I've come up with is the 'agency ratio gap.' It's a ratio of your actual agency to the agency you are perceived to have. Women have an agency ratio that is far higher than 1 (perceptual hypoagency) while for men it's much less than 1 (perceptual hyperagency). This causes people to assign less personal and social responsibility to women, which leads to an accountability gap. If social norms are violated, or expectations are not met, or a crime is committed by someone with a low agency ra…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:43 PM
1

Yes, I am certain. Had I been born female, by her own words she would never have torturously cut off the clitoral hood of a baby girl for 'hygienic' purposes. So she had me sexually tortured and permanently mutilated because of a cosmetic fetish, which is the case with most mothers. Nine out of ten single mothers circumcise their baby boys as of 2013 and the primary reason they give is cosmetics. Almost all women are male baby mutilators. The only reason you think otherwise is because women are …
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:08 PM
1

If only all other women were this honest about their seething misandry.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:08 PM
6

I'd say gamma bias can explain systemic misandry but it isn't a causal model, so it's not 'responsible' for it. You can tell because it doesn't actually solve for the problem of lessening that discrimination, other than by countering the biases directly. Decent article though... thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 11:52 AM
4

Already did this to my mother. She circumcised me at birth. I haven't talked to that vile baby mutilator in over a year now.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 11:18 AM
1

There are many religious rituals that only nick the clitoral hood or remove some of the labia. Yet they are completely banned in all western countries. Misandric women like you just like to marginalize and excuse non-consensual male circumcision by classifying all female genital mutilation as the most invasive type.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 11:02 PM
–

I take it you haven't heard the endless stories of men getting cut up and burned in their sleep by their partners and then getting arrested when they call the police. Only 3 in every 1000 men in the United States who weren't forcibly circumcised ever elect to get circumcised. A lot of people commit suicide... according to you, that justifies me being a murderer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 05:08 PM
–

I also think that's the case. The amount of pain and trauma that male infants go through is unimaginable; it's nauseating to think about. Most men never come to terms with it and instead try to justify what was done to them by shrugging it off or even allowing it to be done to their sons.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 05:02 PM
–

According to NISVS, 79-84% of made to penetrate (envelopment) victims are victimized by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:58 PM
–

Yet another commenter that didn't read the cited studies at all. Whether rape is a gendered issue or not isn't determined by your 'guess'.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:54 PM
–

"You almost never hear about a woman beating up a guy and raping him, or a domestic abuse case leading to a guy being killed." Because it goes against the cultural narrative of men always abusing women. So of course any instance of it will not be broadcasted. ​ "laugh it off when a guy gets "raped" by a woman ... She doesn't have game, she has a weakness that was exploited." This is a classic assumption of female hypoagency that OP is talking about. ​ "it seems like men all over have it (genital…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:50 PM
–

In each case, I was making a correction to their erroneous view of a particular issue being female specific. And I was in no way rebuking the fact that women were/are victimized. But they couldn't even accept that their problem is not a gendered issue. It's nothing other than a deep-rooted misandry in women that I've failed to see any analog of in men. Never met any man that's framed a female-specific or gender-neutral human rights issue as being only male-specific.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:46 PM
–

Every women I've brought this up to in-person has a visceral reaction against even acknowledging it. Can't say the same for men acknowledging women's struggles. Men's rights activists have been active since the industrial revolution, but they're incapable of breaking into the cultural firewalls of society because women have maintained an absolute hegemony on how people think of gender equality. Men don't expect women to do the work. Women just need to stop being so controlling and manipulative o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:27 PM
6

Single moms pregnancy-entrap men so they can get free money from the state. I'll start blaming men when they're actually given the same reproductive rights that women have. Until then, responsibility lies with whoever has rights, which is women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:20 AM
1

Single moms use their children as mules to get paid by the state. Can't say the same for fathers. That's why single moms pregnancy entrap men and then push them out of their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:18 AM
1

Seems like there's a lot of semantic confusion here. I think you may be trying to delineate negative rights from positive rights. A negative right is the collective responsibility/obligation of all other people to prevent any intentional mitigation of your life, liberty, and property. In the US the lingo is that they are 'God given' and 'unalienable'. Sounds to me like every person deserves negative rights, unless he/she attempts to abdicate another person's negative rights. When you say we dese…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:22 PM
1

I see. But that's not sufficient evidence to conclude that the lifespan gap is entirely a social construct. A counter-possibility is that men are allowed to go homeless more easily than women, so the homeless women that exist are on average in more dire mental condition than the average for men which drops their life expectancy within the homeless demographic. I forget where I read this, but the telomeres at the end of our chromosomes unravel at an equal pace in both men and women. So if the sam…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 07:55 PM
2

men who live in the streets in the UK outlive their female equivalents. This contradicts your own source. The page for 2020 states the following: Most homeless deaths registered in 2020 were among men (604 estimated deaths; 87.8% of the total), consistent with previous years.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 11:48 AM
7

If gender relations were flipped in the United States, then we would forcibly circumcise most female infants, ban all male circumcision, and celebrate male genital mutilation day. We'd have all women, and only women, sign up for the draft and consider the resulting sea of female body bags normal. Men would be able to rape a woman, or deceive her, into getting pregnant, then force her to carry it to term. He would automatically get full custody and determine if she can see her child or if she nee…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 11:28 AM
9

Only ~6% of reported rapes are proven to be true in the UK (meaning they result in a conviction). You assume that a rape report which isn't proven to be false, is automatically true. This is a 2010 study from the UK. 37% of reported rapes are credible enough to be prosecuted. Only 18% of those result in a conviction. 0.37 * 0.18 = 0.066. https://opsvaw.as.uky.edu/sites/default/files/07_Rape_Prosecution.pdf
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:15 PM
3

Then we should give rapist women zero consideration. If she conceived by forcing or coercing a man or boy, then he'll determine whether it's aborted or not. If it isn't aborted, then she'll forfeit custody at birth and pay him child support for 18 years.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:09 PM
19

You are the second woman that I've ever heard acknowledge the existence of a matriarchy in western society. The first was Esther Vilar in the 1970's in her book The Polygamous Sex. She said something like "The western world is a matriarchy wherein men role-play as patriarchs. Without this show, the matriarchy would be impossible."
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:01 AM
3

By only condemning the practice and ignoring the studies we give them validation. I concede that this is true (see my other comment).
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:14 AM
3

On further thought, perhaps I'm being vain in thinking one must be chosen over the other. It would be beneficial to have both types of arguments, despite feeling so lowly when I read something that tries to convince people that males should have the right to life by arguing about technicalities of hygiene.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 05:10 AM
2

What better defense is there against these studies than the obvious truth that they are entirely irrelevant in the face of one's right to not be mutilated against his will?
/r/MensRights25/08/21 04:48 AM
1

In response to your first point, I think that regardless of what we designate the implied definitions of circumcision and MGM to be, there should always be a linguistic indication of it being non-consensual, in the cases where consent was not present. The word 'circumcision' on its own I feel doesn't capture this, but MGM does. If I use the word 'circumcision', then I'd preface it with 'non-consensual'.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:58 PM
1

no way to ignore them as then there isn't anything to discuss I heavily disagree with this. If we ignore the studies, then the discussion can only be about whether a society should allow the torture and mutilation of babies. At this point I feel like I'm belaboring on a rather simple principle. If the removal of the clitoral hood at birth, for example, had a wide range of net benefits that were proved and no one was able to debunk them, it wouldn't matter one iota. Because as a society we have c…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 10:29 PM
3

I understand that mutilation is not defined by consent. What I'm saying is that we start using the two terms of circumcision and MGM as if there exists that distinction in definitions. The terminology we most commonly use will inevitably mold how we think. When it comes to pro-MGM people using arguments of sexual competency as justification, I don't doubt that most if not all of those arguments they make are invalid. But even so, I see it as pointless to descend into any argument over studies or…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:03 PM
3

If you believe that society is "just waking up to women's issues" then please read The Privileged Sex by Martin Van Creveld. Women have always been more privileged than men concerning the most basic facets of human life and dignity. This includes matters like upbringing, economic labor, social welfare, judicial treatment, military requirements, and overall well being / quality of life. The lie that women were oppressed for all of history is an aspect of feminist historical revision.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:19 AM
2

What's even more telling is the reason behind those facts. Men choose to economically provide for women to a far higher degree than women chose to economically provide for men. The root cause of the gender wage gap is a gender generosity gap. So men have been receiving widespread shame for decades because they are more generous than women.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:34 AM
1

It's the usual kafka trap that SJWs (and women) employ so often. If you want a person to be seen as guilty of something but don't have the evidence to back the claim, then just assert that a person's denial of the claim is evidence of guilt.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:22 AM
8

That's because parents expect their sons to die for them. It's why my mom holds this same opinion, and it's why she was fine with me being mutilated (circumcised) at birth. The lack of concern for the most fundamental human right - the right to life - of boys and men is written on the wall, and it's upheld most recklessly by women. I'd never trust my mom with my own life.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:33 PM
1

"PurplePillDebate is a neutral community to discuss sex and gender issues." Talking about public perception is kind of the point. If you're not cut out for it, then don't take it out on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 07:16 PM
1

This isn't the public sphere...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 07:01 PM
0

If the primary mode of communication on a topic is comedic, then it means the topic is probably too shameful to talk about normally.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 06:58 PM
2

Men joke about it more often. Humor is an effective cover for shame. That's why sexual shame can lead to apparent hypersexualization.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 06:56 PM
0

Where exactly do I ever refer to my habits? It sounds like you're pretty uncomfortable even talking about the subject in a detached, objective way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 06:54 PM
0

I have four paragraphs of supporting evidence of the double standard. What evidence do you disagree with? (assuming you read it)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 06:51 PM
1

I suppose it's a bit like male professional athletes that will let themselves shed a few tears once when they've reached the absolute peak of the athletic hierarchy. They know that everyone else sees the tears as something other than weakness at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 06:41 PM
2

Rape, sexual assault, and sexual harassment of men also goes largely unreported in the United States for various other reasons. It's a complex subject that I think is best handled by just pointing to differentials in legal treatment.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 06:34 PM
5

There's going to be a civil gender war after we figure out how to create synthetic muscle fibers and have Moores law run for a little longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/21 10:05 AM
2

This is not a critique. You literally just repeated what I stated in my second paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:35 PM
2

That's exactly what I covered in the second paragraph of my response. The statistics "say otherwise" because women consider those 'soft poly' relations to be relationships while men don't. Then take into account the average age gap in partners which makes young men less likely to be single than young women. The stats don't actually corroborate the general statement that "Women are not less likely to be single." It's a concrete mathematical fact, one that can be most easily proved with graph theo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 10:32 PM
21

Women are not less likely to be single. Men and women are about 50-50 in number and the vast majority of relationships are monogamous and heterosexual. For every women that is in a relationship, there is obviously a man in a relationship (that same relationship). So men and women are equally likely to be single. It gets complicated, however, when sexual relationships become more 'liquid' (serial monogamy, fuck buddies, hookup culture) due to uneven distributions of sexual intimacy. Men (and almo…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 07:43 PM
1

Hate often masquerades as indifference. And what all forms of feminism have in common is that they forcefully ignore genuine men's issues.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 07:19 PM
19

I'm sure this is just the comforting reply he needed...
/r/MensRights11/04/21 06:09 AM
2

Speaking in terms of averages... Women are actually more agreeable than men. Women are also more experiential-minded (emotion/amalgamation/intuition) compared to men who are more rational-minded (logic/compartmentalization/cognition). This is based on the framework of cognitive-experiential self theory. The wiki page (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive-experiential_self-theory) cites a review study of five other studies, saying "Research has consistently found that women tend to rely more on experi…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 07:16 AM
14

Perfectly reveals that accusations of sexual criminality, whether false or not, are often weighed in proportion to how much they serve an unrelated end. When true, they may be proportionally ignored; when false, they are proportionally magnified. It would be nice if family courts could actually wrap their heads around this.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 06:26 AM
3

Sources? The thing is we are also told that this is the case in the United States when it comes to rape and sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:06 PM
2

No marriage, no children, no cohabitation. I'm fine with relationships though.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 10:24 AM
3

Car crashes, assuming you have insurance, can only cripple one aspect of your life. And it's something that society recognizes and sponsors recoveries from. Can't say the same about all the shit that can and often does go wrong with individual gender relations.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 12:00 AM
3

It's status quo in that it's widely allowed and therefore establishes the benchmark for what passes as motherly love. So culturally this isn't a 'failure' of motherly love.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:56 PM
4

I think the underdog complex describes SJWs better.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:35 PM
1

Sounds like status quo motherly love to me - women using slander to get as much custody as possible, then running their children's psyches into the ground after they've isolated them from their father.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:24 PM
3

Don't wait till it happens to you to be done with females.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:20 PM
2

I can see how that could happen even when the allegations are false, but not revealing to anyone at work that you're straight still gives you more protection. When you're bringing complaints against women to HR, they'll ask you why you think you're being harassed, and just by saying "I think it's because of my sexual orientation" she'll (it's always a she) assume you're gay and actually take the complaint seriously.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 07:30 PM
9

concerning for the continued health of said societies Our society is anything but healthy when it comes to gender relations. Shaming men for actually focusing on their own needs (and their own self-preservation) in the face of society's pathological gynocentrism is what's underhanded. If you want men to contribute to society then maybe you should focus on addressing the horrendous amounts of reproductive and financial privileges that women are given by our legal systems in relation to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/21 01:22 AM
1

hellooo? moderators?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 11:40 PM
4

Saying that marriage is a zero-sum game for men is extremely generous.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:22 PM
3

the girl was a little off She was way off. It's wrong that you were sexually assaulted but next time don't let a psychopathic/loose woman into your house. I hope everything works out for you.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 07:48 PM
8

Despite all the hyperbolizing, this is mostly true. Everything the state demands is backed by a gun to your head. And the state will not admit any rationale for excuses when it comes to men, despite relentlessly doing so for women. This not only applies to what the law is, but especially in how the law is applied. When you sign a marriage contract, you are marrying the state. The total absence of reproductive choice for men should be enough for men to question any sexual involvement with women. …
/r/MensRights06/04/21 07:34 PM
3

I'm sorry you're in that mental state of yours. I'm not depressed but there have been times when I've gotten consistently down. Can't remember where I heard this: "if you want to be depressed, think about the past; if you want to be anxious, think about the future." The fear induced by anxiety leads to inaction which causes depression. Envy can also be a factor. Envy is jealousy of another person's happiness, regardless if that happiness is real or imaginary, and regardless if the person is real…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:33 AM
3

They're called political parties, and they weren't meant to exist in the United States. Making democratic/republic political systems immune to mass bifurcations in people's political opinions and passions is basically an insolvable problem.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:07 AM
4

Because the more the wife tries to enforce a decision to get her husband to leave, the more her husband is considered an abuser.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:51 PM
8

She and a female teacher then publicly chastise him because after the divorce he had a one night stand with a teacher from the school his son goes to (whom he didn't even know was a teacher) and (GASP!) he didn't call her back after that night.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:49 PM
66

only 18 per cent of women in the force are employed in senior positions ... we still strive for more female representation across the ranks. They will always find one female representation 'problem' within increasingly atomized groups within a workforce in order to further global sexual discrimination policies. “This is really important progress and one I am committed to building upon in the future.” - Chief Constable Kier Pritchard It's funny how they don't even notice the fact that a standard …
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:05 AM
0

There was heavy financial codependency in the case you referenced. It's not a matter of sleeping with each other, just don't spend any money on her. Besides, women on average have less excuses than men to not support themselves financially because they now have their colloquial 'pussy passes' in all areas of education and work. There should be no shame in putting your foot down when it comes to maintaining financial reciprocity.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 01:15 AM
14

Totally agree. But single motherhood gives the government an incredible amount of legal and financial power over the lives of everyone. The amount of incentive the government has for creating single motherhood makes it a pipe dream for it to be reversed. And any politician that tries to reverse it would be perceived as the opposite of a gentleman due to his total lack of chivalry. Read https://css.cua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/stephen-baskerville-freedom-and-the-family.pdf for a review of w…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 10:44 PM
1

I'm really sorry that happened to you and am glad you're finding some semblance of identity. My previous comment was a little confusing. I meant to say that my envy disappeared due to a sense of moral disgust that gradually increased over time. The disgust is directed at the dynamic between men and women so in a way I also have moral disgust for men in their relation to women. I don't have much envy for women because of both their actions (using their privileges for evil-doing) and sentiments (e…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 07:48 AM
21

Might as well promote gendercide of all females then. #KillAllWomen /s
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:55 AM
35

This is obviously a comment meant to provoke. But I have to point out that the only valid female parallel for male infant circumcision is the cutting off of the labia and clitoral hoods of female infants before they are a day old for the sake of hygiene technicalities and the ascetic preferences of men.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:36 AM
16

Username checks out...
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:23 AM
-2

It would still be just as wrong if it were downgrading males and upgrading females.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:31 PM
2

Judging by how hasty and hysterical all this is, I can't help but think this is all a ploy to insert more confusion and hatred between men and women. And if some kind of discriminatory measure does get passed, to drastically increase men's general indifference towards the women around them and eventual increase the raping and slaughtering of women. That will then be used to justify more discriminatory measures.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:28 PM
1

No one knows if the killer is a man or a woman. A male officer is just the prime suspect right now.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:21 PM
2

Good point; I forgot about the existence of ecofeminism.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:56 PM
3

The number of victims should be normalized relative to the size of their respective groups, so percentages should be used here. You mentioned that men are far less likely to report. That is true, but they are also far less likely to interpret a sexual crime as a crime even if it seriously harmed them. Also you said a greater percentage of perps are women. This would be true if the crimes being said to have happened all occurred in the military, but the highlight of the study said 'in their lifet…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:49 AM
1

experienced a sexual crime in their lifetime Your numbers assume these sexual violations all occurred in the military.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:44 AM
12

"Altruistic impulses" A hilarious combination of patriarchy theory and pseudo sexual dimorphism.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:39 AM
1

Assuming envy means envy of women, and dysphoria means gender dysphoria, then yea I've definitely felt similar things in the past. I had some gender dysphoria when I was young (before I was about 10 years old). I didn't have any sisters but I'd always go for girl toys like horses and dolls if they were ever around. Have a lot of memories of my parents subtly judging me haha. Also had the jealousy from feeling like I always needed to prove myself but girls not so much. It was when I started getti…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:28 AM
5

Lol cucklords is a good word for them, especially because the 'lord' denotes a sense of hierarchy. They're just doing it to gain social capital which is what we're all wired to do. Except their hierarchy is inverted cause getting to the top means they'll end up buried by 50 ft of self-hatred, with a social circle of wholesomely abusive women and mindlessly subservient men.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:50 AM
2

These are the very helpful links listed in the sidebar of this subreddit. Listing them here in case you can't see them for some reason. FAQ: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq Reference Book of Men's Issues: https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main Difference between MRM and Feminism: http://archive.vn/1v7BH
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:29 AM
1

Yes, but there could be obvious misunderstandings. Has he not expressed, either verbally or physically (like pushing her away), that he doesn't want her to do any of that? If it's the case that he hasn't, then it can be easy for the teachers to just misconstrue it as two kids getting somewhat affectionate in class. There's not enough information in the post to discern it.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:21 AM
15

Since you think this is the 'right kinda idea', what would be the right kinda execution to you?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:09 AM
3

Read through the reference book of men's issues: www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main Here's the subsections of that book that answer your questions. For suicide: https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main#wiki_4._suicide For criminal justice: https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main#wiki_1._discrimination_in_the_criminal_justice_system For rape, which includes the UK problem you mentioned: https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main#wiki_4._rape_laws_excluding_male_victims
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:59 AM
1

This fits within the definition of sexual assault as per Wikipedia: "Sexual assault is an act in which a person intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent." Stroking hair... idk that's ambiguous as to sexual intent. But grabbing the inside of your upper thigh is a rather objective example of sexual assault. If you've told her to stop and she hasn't, then don't hold back on filing a complaint.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:52 AM
3

Whether or not the male-only draft is discontinued is of little consequence. Last time it was used was for Vietnam, and if it was used again, then most young men would gladly be imprisoned instead. The NOW, a highly misandrist organization that has actively fought against legislation to help men and boys, is joining the lawsuit only as a mode of virtue signalling. Again, the ideological/political motives have changed and so have the modalities of the moral subjugation of males. And gynocentrism …
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:44 AM
7

I've been snooping around on this subreddit for about a month now and I don't recall ever seeing a post that actually characterized women as the enemy. They instead characterize the social and legal structures that we are living under as the enemy. And these structures hold the most unjust of consequences when a man is in some way connected/associated with a woman. Pointing to examples of deplorable female behavior that went entirely excused in order to point this out is not misogyny. Coming up …
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:12 AM
3

They are on the wrong side of history I disagree with this. The United States has morally traumatized/subjugated young men for the last century at least. This was largely done through military conscription or the ever-prevalent threat of conscription. If you don't present your own life as a sacrifice, then you will be socially ostracized. There will be no glory for you, and with no glory comes zero female affection. This relentless demonization of male moral authority and male sexual power is ju…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:37 PM
4

That 'game playing' is concerning. If she's making sexual advances but your reciprocation is turned down then it's obviously manipulation. She's keeping you in the wings in order to exploit you at a more opportunistic moment. For now, you're just being used for attention and a feeling of false comfort; she's thinking you'll white knight for her. I'd stop pushing for dates. Don't reciprocate her sexual advances and instead turn down her advances. If she can't use you for attention then she's less…
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:57 PM
1

I'd agree that feminism/SJWs just use the concept of moral relativism as a gateway to absolutist ideologies. Similar to how they use the concept of multiculturalism (which supposedly says that the inherent worth of all cultures is the same) to just trash the culture of all of western civilization. What I mean by moral relativism is it's formal definition which basically states that nobody is objectively right or wrong (not even more right than wrong) when it comes to any moral or ethical judgeme…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 11:10 PM
1

You actually stated the relation yourself: "to be free ... constraints like morals ... must be torn down". So you also think that moral relativism is one of the requirements of absolute freedom. We're just confusing each other with differing jargon.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:34 PM
2

Nothing in my comment suggests cruelty or even impoliteness. Read it closer if that was your takeaway. And the threat of violence in a woman's mind is pretty much always there. What I'm saying is don't let that threat completely dissipate by being suggestive/submissive, light-voiced, unopinionated, etc.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 09:22 PM
1

I've noticed some things too, and I've hardly ever watched anime. They weren't this bad, but still. Anime and cartoons in general don't just distort but amplify the relational dynamics between people in real world. Points 1 and 2 have obvious parallels to real life. Point 3 is more subtle. Perhaps its the popular negative perception of the male body (bland/disgusting compared to female body) being projected onto their character traits.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:36 PM
4

believes men oppress women believes women were historically more oppressed than men fails to acknowledge the existence or importance of men's issues interprets everything men do as oppression, or as sexual harassment complains about there being 'glass ceilings' looks down on men / feels she's more deserving of men she's the important one (all about her needs in a relationship) Being a non-feminist or even an anti-feminist is simply not enough.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:17 PM
12

More here: https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main#wiki_1._attitudes_towards_male_victims_of_domestic_violence
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:04 PM
28

This is copied from an older post made by someone else on this subreddit. Apologies for forgetting which user it was. ------------------------- How about we look at gender neutral domestic violence data instead of studies looking for violence against women? Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:02 PM
14

She used to tell me on how men are trash and abusive from all the posts she found on reddit. Females are pathetically receptive to the kind of hatred that pervades subreddits like r/ Feminism, TwoXChromosomes, and FemaleDatingStrategy. She literally gave you the reddest red flag you could get and you're still in the relationship? I'd suggest getting video evidence of her physical abuse and then getting out of there. You need evidence to hold over her in case she tries accusing you of something f…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 05:29 AM
1

Freedom entails moral relativism. The two are not distinct from one another. I agree that freedom, or rather certain categories of freedom, is the more general problem.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 04:02 AM
30

Proverbs 21:19 - Better to live in a desert than with a quarrelsome and nagging wife. Proverbs was written in the 2nd millennium BCE. The nagging wife is an eternal problem lol
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:43 AM
7

Multiple studies cited here for the US, UK, and Canada: http://empathygap.uk/?p=1993#_Toc498111528 I don't know much about psychology so I kinda understand it in my own way. Each person needs to feel some amount of protection (security from external threats), especially when young. If that need isn't being met, then a person first looks inwards to see if it's something about themselves. If something is found then it becomes an insecurity which causes a person to adapt in a way that makes them hi…
/r/MensRights01/03/21 12:20 AM
64

The nagging wife is one of the oldest archetypes in existence. This kind of abuse has certainly been exacerbated by the predominance of women in homes and schools that the industrial revolution brought. And even more so by the gynocentrism and misandry of feminism. But this has always been a fact of the female psyche. It's an embarrassment that after so many millennia, men still haven't gotten their psychological shit together when it comes to combating this kind of abuse.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 09:29 PM
9

My mom did/does this to my dad all the time. You'd think his name is 'barn animal' by now. A couple years ago my mom asked when I planned on settling down with a girl (meaning get married) and flatly told her never because I'd never want to be my dad.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 09:03 PM
13

You need to go on strike, and start berating her the same way she does to you. That's the best way to get an empathy-less woman to treat you like a human again. If the marriage shatters because of the strike, then it's her fault.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 09:00 PM
17

That's interesting because the majority of convicted male rapists were sexually violated by adult women when they were boys. So after being seriously victimized, there's a good chance that a man will rail towards either extreme defensiveness or extreme offensiveness. Defensiveness attracts perpetrators. Offensiveness seeks out victims.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 07:40 PM
43

Stories like this are 100% welcome. We appreciate them. I've never been through anything like this, but my brother and a close friend have been falsely accused by women so I can't help but think about protective measures. When it comes to using my behaviors to socially protect myself from women that I need to be around, there's two general options: self-feminization and self-masculinization. In my experience, women just aren't impressed, and can even have pointless contempt for men that are subm…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 07:16 PM
7

Maybe it's just how you phrased that, but you assumed that the reason why males ('non-females') are affected is because females were/are oppressed and over time it has caused a concomitant oppression of men as a kind of aftereffect. This is actually one of the many flawed presumptions of 'patriarchy theory' which under-girds feminism's absolute neglect of men's issues. It leads people to assume that any oppression of males must be a mere corollary of female oppression... thereby keeping the focu…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 06:34 AM
9

Oh shit... that's straight inhuman. That'd mess anyone up for the rest of their lives. I'm sorry that happened to you. Not trying to equate your experience with anyone else's, but we're all getting tossed about in one way or another by this grand experiment of lifting practically every social restriction on sexuality and familial structure. We're creating widespread problems that will probably result in a heavy governmental institutionalization of child rearing because people are valuing moral r…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 01:49 AM
17

Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia are actually quite shitty for single men. Almost all spaces are segregated into 'singles' and 'families' except single women are considered 'daughters' so they're part of 'the family'. Family spaces are decent but singles spaces are bare minimum. In restaurants, for example, single men eat standing up or on the floor because there's no seating or tables while everyone else eats in a segregated space that has furniture. This is just one example out of thousands …
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:28 AM
11

Take a hint from the title of this post: "I am a woman who despises feminism". Are you disappointed that the content of this post wasn't about something else?
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:17 AM
20

Glorious rant. Don't agree with everything but that's fine. Except for one thing: I don't want men to be victimized the way women were 100s of years ago Women have almost always, by every practical measure of well-being, been privileged over men. Societal ignorance when it comes to this is maintained by the pre-packaged gender-based grievances that we are constantly fed. I could go off citing historical stats or whatever, but it's a large subject and it receives the comprehensive treatment it de…
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:11 AM
2

true but 'cattypat' ain't my girlfriend lol
/r/MensRights27/02/21 10:02 AM
3

exploit (transitive verb) - to employ to the greatest possible advantage Part of the employment is giving to the other person, which is always for the sake of getting from them, even if it's just the fulfillment of an ill-formed personal identity. Doesn't matter how 'transcendent' the love is. Exploit is in fact a perfect word.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:26 AM
1

men's rights movement
/r/MensRights27/02/21 04:14 AM
2

Force them to back up what they're saying with studies, and to preemptively cite your own studies. Also don't hold back with shaming them for not giving a shit about male suffering if they denounce MRAs in any way. I don't have anything that you could use but the 'Discrimination in divorce/family courts' section of the Reference Book of Men's Issues is a good place to start (https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main#wiki_3._discrimination_in_divorce.2Ffamily_courts). Not much in the way of statis…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 02:04 AM
3

Well that was perplexing. Funny how quick they are to stereotype MRAs. It was never mentioned how many fathers won't even try to get custody because either (a) their lawyer breaks it to them how stacked against the father it is (legally and financially), or (b) they're afraid of false accusation if they do pursue joint custody.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:50 PM
1

The field of medicine is fast becoming the equivalent of the field of early education. You must deal with patients that are female, and that comes with an increasing amount of instability. The hatred for men that women are inculcated into today leaves any man's well-being vulnerable in these professional domains. And I think the more female-dominated medicine becomes, the worse it will get for male doctors. Female in-group bias won't change.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:32 PM
2

I want it.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:19 PM
3

Female attraction towards men is exploitative in nature. If she's into your intelligence, it's because of what she imagines that intelligence can bring her if it's "properly directed". But then again, men's attraction towards women is also exploitative, just in very different ways. So I think your comment is largely true (but not 'always') when there is sexual attraction involved.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:13 PM
7

This sounds like a MGTOW thing but really it's a MGTOW, MRM, and (theoretically) feminist thing. Because it demands the kind of self-respect that keeps you from being used/exploited by women; reacting to any female behavior as if was coming from a man. Overall this is needed to lessen gender discrimination against men - hence why it's an MRM thing. I say it's a feminist thing because they supposedly have beef with benevolent sexism. On paper this is fine, but in real life women often perceive a …
/r/MensRights26/02/21 11:04 PM
2

Promulgation and receptivity to the kind of fear mongering that paints all men as dangerous by default is a product of institutional misandry. And it is being regurgitated by you. Being scared that you will be injured or killed... in a bar... if you turn down a man's approach... lol what feminist cesspool did you come from?
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:39 PM
1

Men are killed far more often by men than women are. And when it comes to the frequency of sexual assault, sexual coercion, and rape, the sexes are nearly the same if you're not in feminist la la land. What you're saying is the equivalent of me (a man) excusing my absence of boundaries with all other men because I'm afraid I'll be killed. Then saying that anyone who argues against that is just blindly blaming men. The idiocy here is unreal.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:25 PM
2

I agree. What I disagree with is the mode of operation that you suggested in the post. That we should use SJW tactics to achieve this. And besides, if those were all men working instead, we can't expect much change if the laws concerning the granting of child custody and support are not also changed.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 11:40 AM
2

This is so true. Overconsumption of a particular class of stories or situations can create a hyperreality for us. It ends up modulating our emotions and thought patterns towards something that is unwarranted when measured against the true sparsity with which these situations actually occur in reality.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 11:23 AM
2

It is amusingly common for gay men to be emotional lap-dogs for women. So when you hear a gay guy bitching about men, just know that he's probably acting as a woman's bitching proxy.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:56 AM
9

Perhaps that is because women are notorious for not even clearly communicating their boundaries and just assuming that men know them. And women tend to have more outlandish expectations when it comes to romantic partners due to courtly love and the princess culture we're in. So even if a man is decent, a woman is more likely to view him negatively because he doesn't meet her expectations. Nearly every man that has ever dated has also had at least one negative experience with a woman where he fel…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:47 AM
12

Regardless of the accuracy of that percentage, gender quotas and/or 'infiltration' is not the answer. It will largely amount to wasted resources, and a discrediting of the men's rights movement. Educating young men about how poorly the legal system will treat them in relation to women, and how countless women will invariably use that to their advantage, is the answer. The more that men create strict rules and standards of conduct to protect themselves, and the more that men make an effort to hav…
/r/MensRights25/02/21 08:09 AM
2

Because with presumed guilt, you must be proven innocent beyond any doubt. And even with a video, there can still be the doubt that she was coerced beforehand, even days before hand in such a way that she was forced to act entirely normal during sex. Presumed guilt leaves your innocence entirely up to the bias of the jury. There's also the incremental predication of consent. I know this is the case in Australia where a woman can simply remove consent during sex, even if it's just prior to or dur…
/r/MensRights23/02/21 07:11 PM
9

You can't. Not even with a video recording. Which is why presumed innocence is so important because ultimately, it is our only safeguard. One can only be considered guilty if it is proven beyond any doubt by objective evidence, with none of the details of the accusation being false. This presumed innocence is gone now for college campuses and workplaces. I feel it's only a matter of time before it becomes ubiquitous in the US, as it has in Sweden and Denmark. On top of this, what really bites is…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 03:13 AM
4

You forgot to mention unconscious rapes, which can either be due to excessive drinking, or a date rape drug. Not only can you obviously be penetrated, but erection and ejaculation still work all the same in those scenarios. You asked, "how is this possible?", but the fact that you're even asking that means you under the spell of the "women are wonderful" effect. Also, "Can feminism do this and still call itself feminism?". I think the fact that feminism causes and enforces this bias in research …
/r/MensRights20/02/21 11:59 PM
1

That comment is just plain embarrassing. Please educate yourself by reading the Reference Book of Men's Issues (https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main). It contains information not only on men's wide-ranging lack of rights compared to women, but also cultural problems as well.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 01:03 PM
13

it takes away rights from the mother It takes away a privilege of the mother, in order to grant a right to the father. Being able to kill a fetus without the father's permission is a privilege. Having the agency to prevent the mother from killing your child is a right. and gives someone else control over her body Every woman must be made responsible for her own ovaries. Just as we make men responsible for their own testes. Women have over 40 forms of contraception available to them; they will gr…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 12:06 AM
0

I am male, and have been anti-feminist since the very first week of a class that I took 4 years ago called "gender and sexuality". I had a great high school and college friend, who didn't have a pushy bone in his body, falsely accused of rape. He didn't receive any punishment, thank God, but it changed him. He was never the same since, and I wasn't able to keep him from slowly drifting away in his growing distrust of society. It's really disheartening to be in an online place where everyone is s…
/r/MensRights18/02/21 02:04 AM
0

You left out the second half. I said "could never have possibly happened according to the accusation", which is more easily proved. This is the case of evidence of the accusation being false. If there is no evidence of accusation being false, and insufficient evidence of accusation being true, then the courts and public opinion should consider him entirely innocent AND not punish the accuser because it's not proven that she lied. You really need to read my earlier comments more closely. I never …
/r/MensRights18/02/21 12:35 AM
1

(2/2) I should probably also add that a man can be preemptively treated as a criminal both by the courts and by public opinion. The latter, however, can't be controlled by the law; but it can be mitigated with the law by requiring the accuser's name to be public, just as the accused name is, and by punishing accusers who's testimonies are proven to be false (in the same way that the accused would be punished). The more society sees how serious of a crime false accusation is, and how often it is …
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:15 PM
0

(1/2) Not at all. I guess I wasn't clear enough. No one should be treated as a criminal until they're actually proven guilty beyond any doubt. This answers your 2nd question. As for the 1st and 3rd questions, there's more than just the two categories of there being proof of the accusation, and no proof of the accusation. There is also proof of the accusation being false. Just because there is no proof of the accusation doesn't mean the accusation is false; it just means it can't be considered tr…
/r/MensRights17/02/21 06:59 PM
1

I think gynocentrism has far more roots than evolutionary psychology. I can't remember who it was (maybe Paul Elam?), but he quite discerningly places the blame on the following three events: 1) Courtly love established the moral superiority of females, along with their perpetual victimhood. It pedestalizes women, treating them as queens by default while hot swapping to and from damsels whenever convenient. This reduced men to servants by default, and then either a villain or hero whenever a dam…
/r/MensRights17/02/21 02:40 AM
1

A slur is something that is disparaging or insulting. To merge the concept of condescension with maleness in a single word is a clear insult to male identity.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 12:03 AM
10

Liked what she said. As menial as these things may seem, I think they can heavily influence how we view the sexual agency of males. It makes us believe that male sexual choice can practically never be usurped, even for a boy. This then leads to lack of rights and weird inconsistencies in our laws; like fathers convicted of rape not being able to qualify for child custody or child support, while mothers convicted of rape qualify for both. This leads to an increase in the numbers of boys that are …
/r/MensRights16/02/21 10:38 PM
0

Someone shouldn't be jailed just because there's no proof. That's just a failure to prove their accusation true, rather than proving their accusation false. If it is proven false, then I completely agree with you. Another problem has less to do with rights and more to do with cultural misandry and gynocentrism. It psychologically prevents us from seriously considering, right off the bat, that a woman/girl is straight lying. Because to do that is to recognize how slimy females can be when given t…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 10:08 PM
1

No doubt this is how our justice system should work. If the accusation is proven false, then giving a false accuser the same punishment as what the accused would have gotten if the accusation had been proven true is actually a legal principle from the book of Deuteronomy: 15One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses. 16If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse …
/r/MensRights16/02/21 09:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter