TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

False rape accusations take yet another life – national media silent

JohnKimble111

February 16, 2021
194 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://hequal.wordpress.com/2021/02/16/false-rape-accusations-take-yet-another-life-national-media-silent/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title False rape accusations take yet another life – national media silent
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 194
Comments 42
Date February 16, 2021 5:57 AM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lkxbbs/false_rape_accusations_take_yet_another_life/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/false-rape-accusations-take-yet-another-life.834141
https://theredarchive.com/post/834141
Red Pill terms in post
false rape accusation
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Toxic Masculinity

5904 upvotes
March 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]ipwr85 44 points45 points46 points 5 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

The false accuser is allowed to remain anonymous and will never face any punishment of any kind.

[–]SultanSoSupreme 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing ever happens to women who make a single false rape accusation, it takes 15 men to be falsely accused before the police actually take action against the liar. For example the serial-liar Jemma Baele case:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-47738892

[+]ObviousObservationz -29 points-28 points-27 points 5 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Thats because there is no evidence this was a false accusation. There was not enough evidence to convict him, that doesn't mean the accuser is lying about the incident.

[–]IronJohnMRA 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

The presumption of innocence applies to defendants, not prosecution witnesses or criminal complainants.

[+]ObviousObservationz -22 points-21 points-20 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I see. So if a woman comes forward with an allegation, it is on her to prove it with hard evidence or else she is a false accuser. Sounds like a great justice system. I wonder why more men and women dont come forward...

[–]CrimsonKnight76 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

A man killed himself and you're more worried about people not needing hard evidence when accusing someone of something terrible, which doesn't make any sense and it sounds more like guilty until proven innocent which is probably why he took his own life, he had no way of defending himself because there was no evidence against him, just weak allegations. Wtf is wrong with you?

[–]ObviousObservationz -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I believe we shouldn't convict men or women in the trial of public opinion. I can't for the life if me see why people don't agree with that.

Who in their right mind thinks we can assume someone is a criminal without evidence or a trial?

The stigma of accusation caused a man to take his life and the response is to accuse someone else? With no evidence or trial? Why are people okay with that? Its blatantly hypocritical and goes against everything this group claims to stand for.

But I'm the bad guy because I don't want someone else's life to be ruined by baseless accusations and public opinion.

[–]0mnica 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps its because the justice system is being used by vindictive, evil, women to enact revenge or punishment on men by accusing them of false rape/assault.

But we don't talk about that because we must believe all women and no woman would ever do that because its wrong.

[–]CrimsonKnight76 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ok i'm glad your sort of on the same page but

I don't want someone else's life to be ruined by baseless accusations and public opinion.

That is exactly what happened to the man when she chose to accuse him. Regardless of being proven innocent it took almost everything away from him as well as hanging over him like a shadow. She destroyed that mans life, she should be held accountable

[–]ObviousObservationz 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But its ENTIRELY possible that all she did was a report a very real crime. And you want to punish her for that?

If a 12 year old boy says his female teacher raped him. And there is not enough evidence to convict the teacher. Should the boy be punished? There is no evidence he lied. Just not enough evidence to convict the teacher.

Everyone would be scared to report a rape if we punished people just because they didn't come forward with hard proof.

[–]CrimsonKnight76 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's fair enough, but what about the innocent victims

Edit: they both have the chance to be innocent victims, how do you deal with that?

2nd edit: punishing them both or not punishing either means someone doesn't get what they deserve, should trials not be made public until the final verdict

[–]ASexualSloth 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If a teacher raped a 12 year old boy, she'd maybe go to a soft jail for a few months, get to keep her teaching license, and if she gets knocked up by the kid, she can sue him for back child support the day he turns 18.

The problem is that men accused of sexual misconduct if any kind now are deemed immediately guilty, thanks to the believe all women MeToo slogan. The law is a problem, but not nearly as big of a problem as the culture surrounding it. That gets lost sometimes because people just get really upset over this obvious injustice that is so incredibly common.

[–]ThiccBoyChampa 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Yeah thats how it works, do you really think you should be able to arrest someone for up to 10 years based on nothing more than someone's word? As it is you can still lie and ruin someone's entire career to the point of them killing themselves and now you want more? Thats fucked. You need evidence otherwise you easily could be lying, which happens alot btw. So yeah you need evidence.

[–]ObviousObservationz -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

So you're advice to the many males that are being sexually assaulted is to shut up and not tell anyone unless they can prove it.

Yikes....

[–]ThiccBoyChampa 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well you can't just put someone away for 10 years based on absolutely nothing but your word, you need evidence, and unfortunately if men and women dont have evidence and they've actually been raped then they're screwed, it sucks but you can't just take someone at their word, because guess what? There are liers and they've ruined it for all the people who have actually been raped. God do you hear yourself? You literally are advocating for people to get put in prison for 10 years based on nothing but someone's word.

[–]ObviousObservationz -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No I'm not. I'm advocating for not accusing someone of a false accusation with no evidence to support that accusation. I believe in innocent until proven guilty. Which is why I'm against calling this person a false accused without evidence. I've said that countless times in this thread.

[–]ThiccBoyChampa 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Again mens lives and careers and future careers are being ruined based on nothing more then "he raped me" with no evidence which alot of the time is because of some petty vindictive woman is upset and she knows she'll be believed over the man just because, with absolutely no evidence. Thats why it should be the accused with the view of inoccent until proven guilty over that of the accuser because there is serious damage being done from just the accusation alone.

[–]ObviousObservationz -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think everyone should be innocent until proven guilty. And everyone should report crimes that happen to them regardless of evidence. Society just needs to be better about not jumping to conclusions.

People should not have assumed this man was a rapist and the people on this sub should not have assumed this woman was a false accuser.

Both labels were unfair but I was downvoted into oblivion for pointing that out.

[–]Greg_W_Allan 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No point reporting. It was legal because a woman did it.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Look, I completely understand the point you are trying to make... but, that said, this is exactly what should happen here. If you make the claim, it is up to YOU to prove that claim. The presumption of innocence exists because, quite simply, it is the best and most moral way to attaining justice in all circumstances - not to mention that it is the most logical way to getting to truth.

Now, this does not mean that if someone is found not guilty of a crime that they didn't do that crime. There have been plenty of people who have been found not gulity of a crime and actually did it (ie: OJ), this is why people aren't found innocent. At the same time because someone is found not guilty of a crime this doesn't mean that the person making the claim is lying. The same is true for the opposite situation... because someone is found guilty of a crime doesn't mean that they did the crime.

Unfortunately eyewitness testimony, which forms the backbone of the vast majority of rape cases, is seen as one of the weakest forms of evidence there is. It is only deployed to supplement stronger evidence as well as to pull on the heartstrings of the jury. This is because despite eyewitness testimony being seen as concrete evidence it, in fact, is not conrete in the slightest. It is incredibly unreliable and significantly prone to manipulation. When you factor into account the time between the crime having occured and the testimony being taken down / delivered plus all of the witness coaching that goes on in police interview and pre-trial nonsense - this just becomes blatantly clear.

Because the vast majority of rape cases hinge solely upon eyewitness testimony this means that, unfortunately, the vast majority of rape cases are inadmissable. There is simply not enough evidence to go off - the evidence presented is not strong enough to warrant conviction. Which is, I know, heartbreaking - but it is what it is. So, to answer your question, yes if someone comes forward with a rape claim they must provide hard evidence to prove that it occured.

At the end of the day I'd rather guilty people walking free than innocent people serving time for crimes they didn't commit.

[–]iloveyoubutyou 28 points29 points30 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

That's so awful. She should face charges for manslaughter.

[–]AreYou4RealM8 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Driving someone to suicide has been manslaughter in the past. We won't ever know for sure if she was raped but we know she killed him when she reported the crime without evidence.

If women don't have evidence, they shouldn't come forward. Too many lives have been ruined. If we jail a few women that come forward without proof, the lesson will be learned pretty quickly. No better place to start than this woman who ended up killing someone.

[–]thirdridge -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Someone shouldn't be jailed just because there's no proof. That's just a failure to prove their accusation true, rather than proving their accusation false. If it is proven false, then I completely agree with you.

Another problem has less to do with rights and more to do with cultural misandry and gynocentrism. It psychologically prevents us from seriously considering, right off the bat, that a woman/girl is straight lying. Because to do that is to recognize how slimy females can be when given this kind of power.

[–]superpanther112 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

If there is no proof why should a woman be allowed to make an accusation as horrendous as rape? If there is no proof why do we arrest the accused immediately on a mere claim and throw him in jail? Are you saying no proof of rape means not to punish a woman for false accusation and to treat a man like a criminal until he clears his name. Disgusting!

[–]thirdridge 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

(2/2)

I should probably also add that a man can be preemptively treated as a criminal both by the courts and by public opinion. The latter, however, can't be controlled by the law; but it can be mitigated with the law by requiring the accuser's name to be public, just as the accused name is, and by punishing accusers who's testimonies are proven to be false (in the same way that the accused would be punished).

The more society sees how serious of a crime false accusation is, and how often it is done, the less they will fixate on the imagined guilt of the accused.

[–]thirdridge -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

(1/2)

Not at all. I guess I wasn't clear enough. No one should be treated as a criminal until they're actually proven guilty beyond any doubt. This answers your 2nd question.

As for the 1st and 3rd questions, there's more than just the two categories of there being proof of the accusation, and no proof of the accusation. There is also proof of the accusation being false. Just because there is no proof of the accusation doesn't mean the accusation is false; it just means it can't be considered true. In order for the accusation to be considered false, and therefore punish the accuser, there must be evidence that shows that the crime could never have possibly happened according to the accusation.

[–]superpanther112 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You just said in the last lines that for the accusation to be considered false it must be proven that "The crime could never have POSSIBLY happened." What if it is possible but a man didn't do it and there is not a shred of evidence that he did it. By your sick logic, the man still goes to prison. This is exactly what happened in the Central Park 5 case and Raymond Towler's case to name just a few. In the Central Park 5 case, the innocent men were treated so gruesomely by the law that the real rapist stepped up and confessed to the crime. Just let that sink in!

[–]thirdridge -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

You left out the second half. I said "could never have possibly happened according to the accusation", which is more easily proved. This is the case of evidence of the accusation being false.

If there is no evidence of accusation being false, and insufficient evidence of accusation being true, then the courts and public opinion should consider him entirely innocent AND not punish the accuser because it's not proven that she lied.

You really need to read my earlier comments more closely. I never say what you are claiming I've said.

[–]superpanther112 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You still dont get it. Why should the law look for a "possibility" of rape in order to punish a man for actual rape. Obviously, the man is going to be tried "according to the accusation" so there is no point in your first line unless you intend to change it now.

I take it you are either a female and/or a feminist. Either way, you dont have to worry about any of this. The world is on your side.

[–]thirdridge -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I am male, and have been anti-feminist since the very first week of a class that I took 4 years ago called "gender and sexuality". I had a great high school and college friend, who didn't have a pushy bone in his body, falsely accused of rape. He didn't receive any punishment, thank God, but it changed him. He was never the same since, and I wasn't able to keep him from slowly drifting away in his growing distrust of society.

It's really disheartening to be in an online place where everyone is supposed to approach this issue with a fair analytical mindset, but instead just be called disgusting for trying to come up with a complete solution that gets misinterpreted.

If we can't agree on this issue then I just hope it doesn't get in the way of us coming to an agreement on everything else that's covered by this community.

[–]superpanther112 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your idea of "fair" and "solution" has made me sick. I am just glad I didn't had you as a friend when I was falsely accused of rape. Also, by your own logic, I can still think of you as a "possible" feminist.

[–]Hua89 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think the punishment for false accusations should be equal to punishment for actual rape.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree... but first it has to be proven as a false rape accusation.

[–]thirdridge 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No doubt this is how our justice system should work. If the accusation is proven false, then giving a false accuser the same punishment as what the accused would have gotten if the accusation had been proven true is actually a legal principle from the book of Deuteronomy:

15One witness is not enough to convict anyone accused of any crime or offense they may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses. 16If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse someone of a crime, 17the two people involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the Lord before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. 18The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against a fellow Israelite, 19then do to the false witness as that witness intended to do to the other party. You must purge the evil from among you. 20The rest of the people will hear of this and be afraid, and never again will such an evil thing be done among you.

A couple other things:

* Two witnesses are needed for the accusation to even be considered. A witness is any independent source of information, human or not.

* The accuser must take to the stand in order to make an accusation. No hiding behind 'rape shield' laws.

[–]superpanther112 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some disgusting people here are supporting the false accuser even after he is proved innocent. Shame on you ObviousObservationz thirdridge

[+]ObviousObservationz -12 points-11 points-10 points 5 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

There is ZERO evidence that this was a false accusation. A not guilty verdict is not the same thing as a false accusation.

Assuming as much is no different than assuming someone is guilty without a trial.

Edit: here come the downvotes because I believe in innocent until proven guilty for men AND women.

[–]ThiccBoyChampa 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See this makes sense however mens lives and careers are literally ruined based on nothing more than "he raped me" with no evidence. So there's alot of damage being done from a rape claim with no evidence.

[–]IronJohnMRA 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Edit: here come the downvotes because I believe in innocent until proven guilty for men AND women.

Stop complaining. You post a comment you know people will not like, you get downvoted. Crying about this fact won't change it.

[–]ObviousObservationz -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. I figured it was just worth pointing out the hypocrisy of people complaining about innocent until proven guilty while simultaneously declaring a woman guilty with no evidence or trial to support that accusation.

But I guess people were already aware of the hypocrisy. They just don't care.

[–]ICherishThis 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What should be happening in the case of a rape accusation, is that the court should immediately hide the identities of every party involved and punish those who do reveal them.

This man took his life because, on top of other tragedies, he was accused of rape, he could still feel the stigma of being a rapist despite not being one and that fucked up his life so he was pushed to the edge and over it.

If only those involved knew about it, he could go back to living his life without worrying about everyone making him a pariah.

[–]ObviousObservationz -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That may be the most logical solution. That said, if that were the case Cosby and weinstein would be free men.

There's no right answer. But accusing women of false allegations without evidence is not a solution and people here doing it are part of the problem.

[–]Andreyu44 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Go back to simping on r/twoxchromosmes

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter