TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thotisms_speaks Archive

View 1 post and 116 comments by thotisms_speaks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Debatethotisms_speaks/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:26 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Those aren't the same women complaining about OnlyFans.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:52 AM
6

You're talking about two wildly different groups of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 09:36 PM
1

>Women shouldn’t expect men to pay for their dates or prefer men who do. And yet we will continue to do so, whether or not you think it's "fair."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:49 PM
2

Your comparisons are not apt. Criminalizing abortion and jailing people who perform or receive them is forcing your will on others. Harassment is forcing your will on others. Saying "no" to a date is an exercise in autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 02:49 PM
0

Egalitarianism doesn't mean abolishing gender roles. Those will exist as long as sexual dimorphism does. You're free not to date women who want you to pay for dates, but you're competing with men willing to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 03:20 AM
5

Why bother asking a question if you're going to dismiss every answer? Multiple women gave you well thought-out explanations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 06:12 PM
2

I don't think it would change anything. I've never dated men for their salary, but I don't date chronically unemployed men either. Part of the reason I avoid that is because they can't pull their own weight with rent, but also because frequently being out of a job generally indicates lower executive functioning skills and sometimes a disagreeable personality or substance abuse issues. So money itself wouldn't be an issue, but lack of achievement would still be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 06:10 PM
1

Nice Chris Rock quote. Dogs certainly aren't loved conditionally judging by how many of them are in shelters, on the street, or abused/neglected in homes. Dog owners have expectations of dogs such as affection, play, learning tricks, behaving a certain way, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 02:28 PM
1

No, we don't. I'm saying something completely different than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 01:22 PM
3

I haven't found this to be true myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:06 PM
1

It's awfully convenient that every one of the things women offers male partners is just what they're supposed to do, but a man offering material resources is an unreasonable expectation. A man's resources are linked to who he is as a person - his health, intelligence, and work ethic all contribute to having more resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:06 PM
5

This does not address my statement that men typically want emotional support, domestic labor, and sexual access from women. Oftentimes they also want the woman to gestate and help raise their children. Everyone expects reciprocation in most relationships they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:30 PM
3

What does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:21 PM
4

What does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 02:21 PM
44

It is because you're painting men as hopeless romantics who just want love whereas that doesn't factor in for women at all. The reality is people fall in love but still have expectations for their romantic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:26 AM
57

Men also value what women can do for them but it's more in terms of emotional support, domestic labor, and sexual access. Men don't love selflessly or unconditionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:23 AM
–

The least attractive man I dated ended up being the most abusive, and I later found out he was DMing other women while we were together. Being unattractive made him more desperate for any female attention at all and didn't stop him from trying to cheat, he was just unsuccessful at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:54 AM
2

I moved out when I was 20 because I didn't get along with my parents. Going to a guy's house when I knew his mother and father were milling around and I would have to bump into them and make conversation would annoy the shit out of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:23 AM
7

An Australian man was sentenced to a maximum of 11 years ago for killing his partner. He beat her over the head with a metal dumbbell and stabbed her over 50 times. Some of those wounds were inflicted after she was already dead. The attack occurred in a fit of drug-induced paranoid psychosis. It sounds like they just have a weak legal system and are overeager to consider mitigating factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:10 PM
21

Alimony is only paid out in 10% of cases compared to 25% in the 1960s. That number is probably going to continue trending downward as women earn more. Your ex-wife does not automatically get "half your stuff" - you split marital assets and that only applies to anything acquired after the marriage. Why not sign a prenuptial agreement, anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 11:51 PM
–

Sorry to hear that. If your only options are impossible you should get used to the idea of being without a partner. Good luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 10:21 PM
–

It's good to know your limitations.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 10:13 PM
–

Meeting potential dates in person is challenging even for normie men. A lot of people meet their partners at work or school because you spend a lot of time around each other. If that's not an option, I'd try someplace with a lot of nerdy women who are likely to be neurodivergent. There are groups for board games and tabletop likes like DnD on meetup.com. Maybe try that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:53 PM
3

What does that prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 05:27 PM
7

45% of women are the equal or primary breadwinner in their household.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 04:44 PM
26

You care so much you want to put the burden of this very important societal issue on people who aren't you, specifically women. This is about you wanting to punish women for being women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:20 AM
27

Sounds like you don't care enough about the future of boys in our country to sacrifice and live on a lower wage. Sad!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:38 AM
31

Your argument here is that women should be willing to "take the hit" for the sake of the children, but men need to be bribed with artificially high salaries. If men care about the future of boys in their society, why can't they take the hit and become teachers even if it means *gasp* being paid as much as a woman? Of course that's assuming the premise of your post is even correct in the first place. As the children get older, the male-female ratio for teachers increases. That wouldn't be the cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 01:49 AM
1

I didn't say there was anything wrong with dresses, although they are impractical in certain contexts and some women just don't like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:21 AM
1

There's nothing wrong with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:19 AM
3

Can you afford property taxes and bills in addition to your other costs of living once your parents are gone? What happens if your parents have to sell to pay for a nursing home or medical bills?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 01:00 PM
3

I'm a little confused. You mentioned in another post your goal is to own a house in West Virginia, but if the house is "already in [your] name" that means your name is already on the deed and you partly own it. Which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 12:31 PM
3

In theory you could date a woman living a similar lifestyle, but she might be looking to move out of her parents' house too, in which case you're competing with men who have their own homes or can afford to split rent. What's going to happen to you when your parents die or have to move into a nursing home?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 06:18 AM
–

The suffragettes were in dresses and bonnets and had no interest in changing that - they wanted the right to vote, they didn't want women to go to war. Abolishing gender roles CAN be part of feminism, but it's not necessary and sometimes might even be antithetical. >And thus you’re gonna keep selecting for the least conscientious, high libido, high body count men That might be the case for cold approaches, which most women don't respond well to anyway. You don't have to be a fuckboy to ask out s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:26 PM
2

That just means the majority of young men have.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 08:04 AM
1

That only applies to cold approaches. Most women wouldn't be interested in a stranger flirting with them in public no matter how nice he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 07:33 AM
0

Men don't get to decide what feminism is
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 07:29 AM
3

If we're talking anecdotes, my great-grandmother met my great-grandmother when he pulled her over for a traffic infraction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadie_Hawkins_Day
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 07:29 AM
2

I'm just explaining to you that men approaching women doesn't have to be a stranger catcalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:53 AM
3

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:52 AM
4

You're just spewing nonsequiturs at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:51 AM
3

You're all over the place, mate. Women are physically capable of changing tires.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:02 AM
3

When was it 100%?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:00 AM
1

All I read here was that 55% of men are still approaching women!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:50 AM
5

I'd change a man's tire if he needed help. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:48 AM
5

>The issue on your end is now what? From the feminine perspective if men no longer approach what are you going to do? Only low quality men cat call, none really approach so how are you hoping to meet a mate? I met my boyfriends and husband in mutual social circles, become acquainted with them, and they approached me soon after. I think this is actually pretty common.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:44 AM
1

There's a schism. Some are all for the total abolition of them, while others think they're acceptable as long as they're the woman's choice. The former school are the minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:31 AM
5

It's interesting that you'd compare a platonic favor to a member of your community to initiating a romantic/sexual relationship, but yeah, you're not obligated to do shit for strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:40 PM
3

I am inclined to agree with you. Given personal choice, most women won't approach men romantically.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:34 PM
4

Feminism was never about abolishing gender roles, it was about attaining rights for women. The suffragettes wanted to vote, but they were still wearing dresses. And the fact is, women won't approach men if they don't have to. Men as a whole are not going to boycott approaching women, so there's no reason for us to change that behavior no matter how much certain men suggest that it's TRUE EQUALITY.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:58 PM
9

>I find it interesting how so many women I dealt with had high expectations for other men (the other men had to take them on dates ,pay bills ,etc) and i didn't have to do none of that to have sex with them or get blowjobs. It sounds like these women wanted you as a FWB but didn't consider you relationship material. >I find it interesting how other men get less sex doing more meanwhile men who don't even do the bare minimum can get more sex because of attraction. What's so interesting about it? …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 07:45 AM
2

>A woman can be born in trailer park, be 80iq and fail at school but if she wins the genetic lotto she's worth millions. This is not a common scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 03:35 PM
1

Rich men can easily marry attractive women in their economic bracket. There is no evidence that wealthy men are marrying poor women en masse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:42 PM
0

Not sure how that's relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:24 PM
9

In the real world, people generally marry within their own socioeconomic bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:15 PM
54

In the real world, people generally marry within their own socioeconomic bracket. Rich men aren't actually committing long-term to McDonald's wagies. I think the guys parroting this are usually just LARPing - they're not particularly successful themselves but still fantasize they're in a position to reject a boss babe for a cashier. And of course they'd prefer a young economically insecure woman for a relationship. What really gets me is how these same guys complain about gold diggers and alimon…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 10:20 AM
1

Do you think they were Venmo'ing me out of the kindness of their hearts? They wanted something in particular. If you think being a prostitute is easy, there's plenty of demand for male providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:35 PM
1

I wasn't even old enough to drink when I was "exploiting" men old enough to be my father. Don't infantilize these guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 09:55 PM
1

If we're talking about me specifically, I have a straight job at a hospital.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 09:15 PM
1

Egalitarianism doesn't mean we ignore sexual dimorphism, and most women aren't living their lives in a way that maximizes flouting gender roles just for the sake of it. Asking out men is high risk and oftentimes low reward. There's simply no need for us to do it, and women aren't going to start engaging in behavior that doesn't benefit us just because men think it's a package deal women agreed to when they asked for the right to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:19 PM
2

Most women wouldn't entertain a true cold approach. They're a perfect stranger you know has romantic intentions before you've determined if you're even comfortable being around him. It's high risk and potentially low reward. It makes sense for us to discourage this behavior as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 05:10 PM
0

This is an emotional response with no substance to it. The majority of women participate in the labor force - 60% of American women work as of 2023. There's not enough filthy rich simps out there for every average American woman. This fantasy world isn't just demonstrably false, the logistics of it aren't possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 04:13 PM
1

I mean he's technically right even if the word "after" is doing some heavy lifting. Like saying an 96 year-old died "after" getting the COVID vaccine in 2020.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:42 PM
3

Yeah, it makes me think that you're either being disingenuous or you just copied and pasted something.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:38 PM
1

There aren't enough millionaires with yachts to go around for every woman, even if you're only counting women in major metropolitan areas. That would involve dozens of women each vying for his attention in the hopes that he'll commit to them, which isn't really a good deal for them. Instagram isn't reality. Of course if you only acknowledge the existence of Instagram sex workers carefully curating their image to attract wealthy clients, you're going to think every woman can just marry a tech bro…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 12:13 PM
8

Urban liberal areas are almost always going to require a higher income, so of course the women you selected for by excluding most poor people is going to be privileged. There is still an underclass of women in places like NYC and LA, though... you probably just don't notice them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:21 AM
27

She died 14 years after the book, there's no evidence that was the cause. She was a gay woman suffering from chronic depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:19 AM
1

I have never agreed to hang out with someone who cold approached me. We would have to have something in common that drew them to me. If he knows nothing about me other than what I look like, it's not worth the time, effort, and risk of going on a date. We both know he wants a romantic and sexual relationship, and it's uncomfortable being subject to seduction techniques from a stranger.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 02:52 AM
2

I don't need to know the exact sex acts any of my partners have engaged in previously, so I wouldn't date him mainly because sharing this information isn't compatible with my own relationship style.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:49 AM
8

It's like when people question the validity of movements against police brutality by asking why Black people don't protest against violence in their own community. They do - it's just that the people asking this question are only interested in distracting from the matter at hand and don't actually give a shit about "Black-on-Black crime" enough to learn about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 01:03 PM
8

>Can someone point me to left leaning efforts that try to combat, say, islamic oppression? Or other kinds of oppression going on in certain asian regions? Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 12:49 PM
9

They want the best of both worlds, which isn't horrible on its own - people want what's good for them even if it's ultimately infeasible. Some of them don't realize the implications of a housewife with no skills or education re-entering the workforce after a divorce. Others do, and they prefer it that way. They think their wives should be reliant on their goodwill to keep living the lifestyle they're accustomed to, and wives who refuse to toe the line or even leave rightfully deserve to live in …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 11:20 PM
4

We've all heard of dread game before. This is kind of like negging in the sense that it's done because it's gotten results in the past - but it only works on emotionally unstable women. Women with something going for them will either refuse to play the game altogether and walk away, or end up with other men because they think you're in an open relationship. This isn't just cruel, it's self-defeating.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:33 PM
4

You mentioned dating apps, where there are far more men than women and there's a slant towards casual relationships. There's really no reason not to swipe on any guy who looks good when there's no effort or risk involved. "Fat" covers a pretty wide spectrum of body types depending on who you're talking to as well. Your fat is another man's thicc, and even if they also like slender women, the fatter body might still be perfectly acceptable to them if they like the woman or she's their best option…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 01:08 AM
1

What exactly do you want the feminists to do? If women don't apply for those jobs, there won't be "female representation" in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 12:38 AM
1

Being a prostitute absolutely can be a job. It's the primary or only income for many people. There is plenty of demand for male prostitutes from male customers. Women already have a right to be septic tank cleaners, so why would we march for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:28 PM
3

>You don't see women marching in the streets because there aren't enough "female septic tank cleaners." But when it's a high profile high paying job then you start seeing the outrage. Women aren't marching in the streets for more male representation in dangerous low-status jobs either - we don't want more male streetwalking prostitutes, we want nobody to have to suffer those conditions at all. Seek equality in freedom, not equality in oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:43 PM
1

Try quoting the whole sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:30 AM
-6

It's not that men are disposable, they're just good at warfare and women aren't. The state also recognizes that drafting women (especially of breeding age) would not be good for society's survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:22 AM
-4

I actually agree. Men talking about the draft is the equivalent of women talking about sexual homicide or death in childbirth when those things are exceedingly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:14 AM
-7

Yes, because all they have to do is register.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:10 AM
4

Why don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:08 AM
2

Modern warfare doesn't require infantry enough to justify throwing untrained and unwilling men into the military. Even if it wouldn't be a massively unpopular political decision, military command doesn't want to deal with people who don't want to be there.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:01 AM
-1

I think that's a good point I hadn't considered. I would consider it different because Black people unilaterally had fewer rights than White people across the board. When men were still being drafted, it was seen as a tradeoff - you have more rights than women but also more responsibilities. However I would still say that the Selective Service was a relic and not relevant to any racial debate since it's not being utilized for a draft.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:58 PM
2

A lot of things could happen. A war could break out and men could be drafted, but the law also could be changed to include women. Hypotheticals aren't useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:55 PM
3

Yes. Women can vote and go to school now so those issues aren't relevant to modern feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 11:52 PM
–

"Not all guys want to fuck models... some of them want to rape dozens of children!" is a crazy argument to make. Extremely wealthy and powerful men aren't good to use as examples here anyway. If I'm at a restaurant and only have $20 I'll order the entree that I like best, but if I have unlimited money I'm buying my favorite entree plus every appetizer that appeals to me or piques my curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 04:26 AM
28

This just sounds like a lack of accountability on your part. If you're having unprotected sex with strangers because you're afraid they won't date you again otherwise, it's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:00 AM
3

Your language suggests that this isn't the case. "Even" fat women, as if the idea of fat women being respected is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 05:28 PM
1

That's not true - a woman has to pay for a child in her care, or owe child support if the father or another relative is caring for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 12:20 AM
7

Child support is meant to reimburse the primary caregiver for expenses related to providing for the child's needs. It's not for the child to just have. That's not the point. Men can also be the primary caregiver, it just doesn't work out that way most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:13 AM
17

In theory anyone could put a baby in one of those infant drop boxes without the consent of one or both parents, so when a baby is discovered in one, the state makes an effort to ensure neither parent is looking for them before they make the baby free for adoption. I imagine it isn't an easy process, but if you impregnated a woman and the baby suddenly disappeared, you could contact the state and have a DNA test done if you suspected the baby was in foster care.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 03:10 AM
11

And if the child falls below a poverty threshold, take it away. Just as you would do with adoption. If nobody adopts them, taxpayer is still on the hook.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:30 PM
13

We figured it out, that's why it's law.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:43 PM
8

That has nothing to do with the OP or the person you're replying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:42 PM
13

"I still don’t see how that overrides a man’s right to choice." Because what you're proposing overrides my choice as a taxpayer. Why should I have to pay for a child's needs and not the people who conceived them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:41 PM
13

As a man you have the right to use contraception and abort any pregnancies you have in case the contraception fails, same as women. If a woman chooses to keep the child you conceived with her and you denounce your financial responsibility, that burden is passed on to the taxpayers who had nothing to do with the conception of that child. Whereas a child given up for adoption is the sole responsibility of their adoptive parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:32 PM
19

This is more of a problem with enforcement of the law than law itself. I've known women who said they never got a dime in child support even when they were entitled to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:25 PM
4

Adoption is inherently traumatic for children even when they're a newborn and smoothly transition to loving adoptive parents. It's only preferable when the primary caregiver outright won't or can't care for the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 08:24 PM
10

You'd still be forcing financial contributions from the mother if she's primary caregiver. The whole idea of child support is to reimburse the primary caregiver for spending their own money on the child's needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 07:45 PM
66

You aren't required to have contact with your children. You are required to pay for their needs via child support. A child's needs don't go away just because their father won't provide for them - the burden is just shifted to the taxpayers which includes other men. Why should men have to fund children that aren't theirs? That's not freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 07:17 PM
8

His wife was following his wishes. I really don't know what you expect from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 05:19 AM
13

>We have this inborn instinct to sacrifice and then feel glad in improving a woman's condition. Contradicts >so many millions of men are not just hesitant to approach women, but actively avoid them, and prefer being single with occasional sex - no strings attached.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:18 AM
11

A woman on the Titanic, Ida Straus, died because she refused to leave her husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:17 AM
20

Talk is cheap. Almost all men will say they would, but how often does it happen in practice? It's more likely for a man to kill his female partner than sacrifice his life for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 11:47 PM
8

That's also bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 10:53 PM
24

There's no such thing as unconditional love, except *maybe* parents and their offspring. Everyone wants a partner who will improve their own life in some way. That doesn't preclude loving the person. Many women will stay with men who actively make their lives worse. I can't really parse 3 or 4 so I won't address those. The majority of men have not been to war or died for their families or a random kid. It's not really fair to act as though you should be judged by the actions of extraordinary men…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 10:49 PM
–

If the general public lusts over a certain person, that person cannot be "objectively" undesirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 12:22 AM
1

I've been hearing "give the good guy a chance" rhetoric for years. The problem is a lot of shy nice guys wanted to be the bad boy all along but just never got the the chance. They're seething with resentment from years of rejection. Once they get comfortable with you the bad guy comes out. They're also not necessarily less likely to cheat because if they do get a little attention from another woman they're going to want to take full advantage of it since they might not get another chance for awh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:51 PM
4

I've been hearing "give the good guy a chance" rhetoric for years. The problem is a lot of shy nice guys wanted to be the bad boy all along but just never got the the chance. They're seething with resentment from years of rejection. Once they get comfortable with you the bad guy comes out. They're also not necessarily less likely to cheat because if they do get a little attention from another woman they're going to want to take full advantage of it since they might not get another chance for awh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:31 PM
2

It is easy for them, what do you mean? Amber dated a woman because she's bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 03:43 AM
2

You want me to cite Twitter threads of men saying they "still would" Amber Heard? https://cagedladies.com/featured-ladies/ Also check out the show Love After Lockup
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 02:01 AM
3

Amber Heard absolutely still has men thirsting after her. Women in prison have male penpals sending gifts and waiting for their release so they can move in together. Men say "would" about female teachers arrested for raping students.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:01 AM
22

>Marred 15+ years with two children. You couldn't be more wrong. Then how have you "lost count" of all the OF models who started blue-balling their husbands out of nowhere?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 07:00 PM
2

If high-earning women are rare, how can it be a problem for society if they don't date men who earn less?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:35 PM
–

The desire women have for higher-earning partners can largely be attributed to the fact that for a long time women were reliant on their male partner's income for survival, even if they were working class and had a job. This is something society is still adjusting to. Women will have to change their expectations or be alone. I don't think women refusing to date men who earn less is as prevalent as you're suggesting, though, and it wouldn't be much of an issue if that was true across the board - …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 02:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter