TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thowaway_throwaway Archive

View 28 posts and 149 comments by thowaway_throwaway on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
717

Generalthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights14/02/20 11:08 PM
457

Marriage/Childrenthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:50 PM
131

Edu./Occu.thowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:48 PM
122

Legal Rightsthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:02 PM
90

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:59 PM
83

Feminismthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:14 PM
76

Activism/Supportthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights08/01/20 02:41 PM
72

Edu./Occu.thowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights31/10/19 05:16 PM
49

Feminismthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:33 AM
41

thowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:22 PM
39

Feminismthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights14/03/20 10:01 PM
36

Feminismthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights05/07/20 02:54 AM
31

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights13/01/20 02:42 AM
30

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:14 AM
27

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights22/03/20 09:33 PM
24

Feminismthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights14/04/20 11:21 PM
20

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights02/09/19 09:28 PM
19

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:04 AM
14

thowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights21/02/20 02:36 AM
14

Generalthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights16/04/20 12:05 AM
9

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights07/11/19 06:08 AM
9

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:14 AM
8

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights29/12/19 08:34 AM
6

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights18/10/19 08:46 AM
4

Social Issuesthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:38 PM
1

thowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:02 AM
1

thowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:52 PM
1

Discriminationthowaway_throwaway/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Note - sure it's unprofessional to comment on a woman getting chopped into bits in a US military base in such a way, but maybe she just got a bit emotional? Yes, the lynch mob after her is also being emotional. But that's just a good reason why you shouldn't join lynch mobs - they usually are emotional (and thus prone to making mistakes), but mobs are really bad at stepping back and correcting things.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 03:03 AM
6

I think the idea is to spend a few years together to not rush things, then be able to have a health kid or two, and still have plenty of room for error (starting a new relationship if it doesn't work out, time if having a kid just isn't that easy, time if ooops we gotta save for a house, etc). If the expectation is that everyone just fucks around till the last minute, then where's the time to actually see if the Mr Right relationship is actually going anywhere, if there needs to be time to sort …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/05/20 09:59 PM
1

Note - most video games can be classified as either hunting / chasing games, fighting games, resource management games, or social simulation games. The former two are more male dominated AFAIK (whereas games like The Sims, which are resource management / social simulation games tend to be more gender neutral in audience numbers).
/r/MensRights16/04/20 12:08 AM
3

I think the book is kinda a step forward given the low quality of the existing narrative. Accurately describing part of a problem is better than inaccurately describing it ("It's all about Power and Control because muh Patriarchy!").
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:37 AM
2

Yeah, they want to have their cake and eat it. If emotional abuse and general toxicity is abuse, then women are just as bad in those areas. If punching out people is all that matters, then sure men are worse, but stop whinging about all the rest.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 01:10 AM
2

Toxic men are a greater physical threat than toxic women if they start throwing punches, that's the main differentiating point I think.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:32 AM
6

In intimate relationships, in order to have a coercive control situation take hold, you’ve got to have established love and trust. A lot of survivors talk about being ‘love-bombed’ in the beginning of the relationship, where their partner was just obsessed with them, was the most affectionate, interested person they’d ever been with. During that period of intimate relationships one of the things that happens is that we have to divulge secrets. We have to divulge our most intimate details in orde…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 11:22 PM
1

Male power lifters are obese according to their BMI Lü Xiaojun competed with a BMI under 25. While there's a few people who have bigger muscles than Lu (and some of them are technically obese) they don't exist in great numbers.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:22 AM
2

I said most cooking. Most of the cooking that people do at home is not real work, it's just fucking around and very gradually cooking an overly elaborate meal that appeals to exactly one person (the cook).
/r/MensRights23/03/20 04:20 AM
3

Fixing the internet. If you want to include trivial hobby shit (like decorating and most cooking) then building gaming rigs and decorating man-caves would count.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 03:14 AM
5

You probably do it the way you want it to be done. If a couple are together, then one of them gets to do it they way they want done, and the other does nothing. So they can both feel resentful if they want.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:16 AM
8

My neighbour spends about 12 hours cooking every week. Every weekend, he preps a roast, prepares hot coals, puts it in his BBQ, and smokes it for hours. He'll also grill everything he can during the week. I don't think this is because he's being oppressed by his wife. And while I'm sure his wife kinda benefits from it, she probably wouldn't be much less happy if she was spending more time cooking food that she preferred to eat.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 11:45 PM
11

It seems the "bikini" was Harley Quinn in shorts and fishnets, and the "not even human" one was the Major from Ghost in the Shell (I guess it's really debatable how human she is).
/r/MensRights15/03/20 01:59 PM
1

When women (note - statistics show they're the ones who rely on husbands) earn less ...
/r/MensRights14/03/20 09:54 PM
1

Either they're complete idiots, or they know that listed qualifications are (in most cases) aspirational - as evidenced by the fact that plenty of people get jobs when they don't tick every single box. It's like if a lot of women say on dating profiles "Only message me if you're over 6'". Don't be an incel and complain about it - they are probably open to guys who don't quite match everything they ask for (as long as they 'click'), and at worst they can just politely say no. As I hope you unders…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 10:28 AM
0

So women are like incels, and don't bother trying very hard because they might possibly get rebuffed a few times?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 09:13 AM
16

This is also bad for women. Domestic violence research and policy is hampered by the fact that radical feminist harassed most of the less nutty people out of the sphere - https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it
/r/MensRights08/03/20 02:53 AM
0

They're actually pretty conflicted on it. A fair few deleted posts too, IIRC.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 12:51 AM
13

Previous discussion on LWMA (and Menslib if you're into that kind of thing) - https://np.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/fcuc5y/boys_dont_cry_study_suggests_mothers_not_fathers/
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:51 PM
13

So apparently feminists would rather throw gay men under the bus (creating some highly inaccurate stereotype of gay men being violent) than admit women can be violent.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:07 PM
0

I'm not some weird self-hating American. I'm not even an American. So I'm not sure what this "biggest raping nation" thing is about .... the US has never been perfect but their actions here seem understandable (if selfish, but military strategy is always kinda selfish).
/r/MensRights04/03/20 03:18 PM
-1

They're occupying Japan. They want to tame this beast, which had raped its way across most of Asia, and killed quite a few of their own soldiers. So they promote more effeminate role models, rather than tough manly men. I'm not saying it's a great decision, but it's hardly "satanic".
/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:46 PM
1

There's two main types of posters there: Niceguy incel men (or guys with very few relationships because they're niceguys) who want to distance themselves from toxic nice guys. They have some weird cultish obsession by some book by a PhD guy about how being nice isn't really nice. This sounds really deep if you have fuck all education, but anyone who's done any psychology, economics, philosophy, theology, or anthropology (or just thought hard about any of these) is well aware of the "no true self…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:32 PM
2

Name a good female comedian. Now name a good male comedian.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 02:21 PM
1

Read the article if you want to be offended.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 07:43 AM
2

I think the website was very careful to technically tell the truth (most male victims of homicide were killed by other men), but they made it look like they were talking about domestic homicide (implying there's a plague of gay men killing each other, which it is actually very rare).
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:01 AM
1

LoL, the homophobic "the 123rd includes a hell of a lot of gay men. ie the abusers are still men" myth comes up again - https://np.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/f6yxlz/queensland_police_spark_anger_with_open_mind/fi8i0ng/ IIRC some feminist site cropped up advertising "truths and myths of dv". It had some line like "While men are 1 in 3 deaths, the majority of men who are killed are killed by other men", i.e. "it's those violent degenerate homosexuals". NOT FUCKING TRUE! 1/3 of dv deaths are m…
/r/MensRights21/02/20 03:01 AM
0

Reminder - The Guardian (hardly an alt-right publication) has even attacked the way feminists terrorise other researchers (e.g. psychiatrists, criminologists, drug abuse experts, etc) who don't bend the knee and elevate "patriarchy" as the main cause of domestic violence - https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/19/australians-are-being-told-that-gender-inequality-is-the-root-cause-of-domestic-violence-but-is-it I wonder who the biggest victims are, when society is lied to about the causes …
/r/MensRights21/02/20 02:39 AM
4

Assault vehicle.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:25 PM
9

There's a huge crossover between FDS, PinkPillFeminism, and the TERF subs. They're often angry man-hating butch women who wish they were lesbians. They hate men (often their ex-husband who changed genders partly to get away from them) so much that they're willing to get kicked out of mainstream feminist spaces just because they want to hate everyone with a Y Chromosome. They often wish they were lesbians, because they don't realise that the root cause of most of their failed relationships is act…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:54 PM
19

Wokeness has this underlying Tinkerbell Jesus faith that what people say and think is what really matters, not what people actually do. I guess this is partly because the theory is all developed in a corner of academia where saying and thinking stuff is more important than actually doing stuff.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/20 09:22 PM
0

They don’t usually care enough to take action, they care about the social currency they are able to collect for their words, and gestures. YOU CAN CRITICISE THE SOCIETY AND LIVE IN IT! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/20 09:19 PM
5

It's worth noting that women are most likely to get injured in a relationship where they are initiating physical violence - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1858633/ Even if you don't care about men, women shouldn't be allowed to hit men because it's a huge risk factor in violence against women. Of course, certain feminists (go onto MensLib for a few examples) will claim there's no such thing as bidirectional abuse - if Chris Rock beats the shit out of Rhianna because she attacked hi…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:30 AM
1

Libfem is a branch of radfem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_feminism Radical feminists view society as fundamentally a patriarchy in which men dominate and oppress women. Radical feminists seek to abolish the patriarchy in order to "liberate everyone from an unjust society by challenging existing social norms and institutions." This includes opposing the sexual objectification of women, raising public awareness about such issues as rape and violence against women, and challenging the con…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/20 03:17 AM
9

People on this sub are so terrified of approaching women IRL they call it "blue pill". I'd expect the median squat here is under about 80kg (160lb), about 70% body mass.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/20 03:08 AM
53

A lot of domestic violence advocates are self-identified 'victims'. The majority of 'victims' of domestic violence are part of the problem, most violence is reciprocal (two people who hit each other), and some are just outright abusers playing DARVO (Deny the behavior, Attack the individual doing the confronting, and Reverse the roles of Victim and Offender such that the perpetrator assumes the victim role and turns the true victim into an alleged offender). And let's be honest, a lot of public …
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:06 PM
1

If I spit in someone's face, they should be committed to non-violence and not hit me. But if I walked around spitting in people's face I'd expect a few people to fall short of some perfect moral standard (hell I'd be living proof that not everyone is perfect).
/r/MensRights31/01/20 08:49 PM
3

Just a drink bottle marketed as a "pre-workout shaker bottle", with a wide mouth to allow easy cleaning.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 09:17 PM
5

Arellano told police Hardin hit her over the head with a “pre-workout shaker bottle” as she moved from the door and she fell to the ground. He continued to hit her over the head with the bottle and then his fist, according to court documents. I wonder if this brutal attack will be collaborated by forensics. She looks OK in the mugshot, but I'm sure she didn't in any way lie about the attack (even if it seems a bit odd that she claims she didn't mean to pull the trigger and the gun just went off …
/r/MensRights30/01/20 08:59 PM
5

After getting full custody she changed her mind because she couldn't handle it.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:21 AM
12

Robin Williams made a movie about this, and IIRC towards the end of the movie they had a court case where the judge thought it was kinda crazy to be doing this.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 03:34 AM
7

My previous non-answer: Freud is a lot like Marx. A smart guy who had a lot of insightful stuff to say at the time, but he also (quite intentionally and deliberately) founded a rather dumb movement that caused his work (including stuff with no real basis in reality) to long outlive its usefulness. OK, an actual answer .... Freud was an early Evo-Psych guy. He was a trained neuro-scientist and a fan of Darwin, and made a nice attempt at bringing this to psychology before going off into the deep e…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 03:25 AM
1

Deleted, I just realised it's a CMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 03:01 AM
16

Many men here want to have sex with as many women as possible, for as little effort as possible, but also find the idea of settling down with a woman who has had a high number of sexual partners unfair or undesirable. I want a higher wage for myself and I want the lower prices that a high minimum wage would make impossible. This makes me selfish, not stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 02:55 AM
24

They've also pushed for a lower bar. If you only count severe injuries, then men are a larger fraction. If you count every act of physical violence, it's probably at least 50/50.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:42 AM
1

Unreddit to discourage brigaiding (it's mostly a pro-free-speech sub, there wasn't a bunch of deleted comments).
/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:15 AM
2

There's still shady shit that happens where it's legal. As I understand it (note I am in no way that well informed) some girls have an abusive partner. Some have a dodgy immigration status (there's occasional busts with say a madam from China holding the passports of a bunch of underpaid Thai workers). Many have an addiction. I guess it's a lot like the restaurant business? No different to the US, other than the women / security can call the cops if a client causes issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 12:10 AM
2

If someone is only capable of being attracted to one person, run the other way, because sooner or later you won't be that one person.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/20 12:06 AM
1

TwoX is a big sub with a big mainstream female userbase. Most women are OK, despite what TRP or feminists might make you think.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:04 AM
1

Women prefer a 10/10 chad but will eventually settle for less. Incels aren't in the running though, because they got rejected a few times (not really that uncommon to get rejected a number of times, especially when you're younger and many women are still holding out for Chad) then they give up and whine about black pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 01:16 AM
2

bareback (no condom) bj.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 01:08 AM
3

If prostitution were legal, hiring one wouldn't require any balls. Buying a sex doll is legal, but I'd say it does require a lot of balls. Not speaking from personal experience (I actually don't know if I'd be game to buy one).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 12:38 AM
-2

90% of incels could get a girlfriend if they had the balls to hire a prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/20 12:18 AM
6

and then realizes: "With 10% per child, if a man has 3 kids then his odds of one of them not being his own are roughly 1-(0.9)3 = 27.1%" This is assuming that some women aren't serial cheaters.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:53 PM
3

If women get together and publish a clear and unambiguous set of signals to send, and all agree never to lie with them, fine. Otherwise men just don't know. Women will send weird signals because not all women are the same. Women will lie with signal because the whole purpose of signals is they are ambiguous. "Of course I like you, that's why I was pretending to totally uninterested" can actually happen. Men can't fix that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 10:36 PM
1

If you count them on your fingers you'll see women's disadvantages outnumber men's considerably. Finger counting isn't a great way to sum things up, because not all issues are equal. And that's assuming that the issues were studied in an unbiased way. The reality is, the vast majority of people who study these issues are feminists, who are mostly interested in finding issues that hurt women (even minor ones like manspreading or office temperatures).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 10:04 PM
3

Reality, if you don't work on yourself, you can't get anything decent. Period. Yes, not really knowing how to ask a woman on a date CLEARLY means someone is completely broken, and probably needs to be institutionalised, they're just garbage. Whereas every guy who knows how to ask a woman on a date is some ubermensh with a near-perfect life. (this is sarcasm) Not every problem requires "working on yourself". It might be useful to say "hmmm, I messed up because I'm a little more risk adverse (or w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 09:59 PM
3

Minimal skills is all you really need. You just have to not shoot yourself in the foot, then it's all just whether or not there's chemistry. And I doubt you build much frame on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 01:08 PM
22

Yep, and men don't have to care that women deal with inept guys hitting on them building up enough experience to actually know how to get a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:23 AM
1

Realistically, most women have sky-high expectations. This talk about how incels will only accept a 10/10 is kinda projection. Women don't want to settle (unless they already have), so probably no. This is why PUA type shit is important - guys need to sweep in before a woman can really take stock and make a warts-and-all assessment, because women will always think "Hmmm, not quite the perfect guy" if they know a guy too well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:11 AM
15

TRP: "You need to develop your frame first" NiceGuys: "You need to deal with your issues first" Reality: You don't need to be a perfect person to get a date, and to get a date you just need to approach. TRP and NiceGuys are overrun by losers who are trying to avoid biting the bullet and actually just approaching women. "I gotta become an alpha first, I gotta build my confidence, I gotta have frame, I gotta lift, I gotta really become an alpha and then after that I can try with the m'ladyfolk".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 11:08 AM
3

Look at how stupid guys can be trying to get a date, then magnify this by the lack of experience (and lack of peer advice) most girls have, and it's not too surprising if they sometimes do really stupid things.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 09:51 AM
1

SDO might also explain why females as a group maintain dominance over men. That page just proves that group bias can be a thing (and IIRC women have a stronger bias against men than men have against women). Any place where there's severe disadvantages. I'm not even saying this means only women need some support in new areas. Men might too (like biased custody laws, etc.). But as I already said, on balance, I think it's pretty clear men have fewer disadvantages than women. For instance, any woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 09:48 AM
1

What if I told you "what-aboutism" is not a counter-argument? What if I further told you that the so-called stereotypes towards men do not carry nearly the same negative impact or implications into professional and personal growth that they do for women? I'd ask where your evidence is. Here you can even read more about how the so-called "benevolent" stereotypes of women still have detrimental impact here. (Another poster who was disagreeing with me and clearly ignorant of what he was talking abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/20 06:06 AM
1

Gender biased math teachers negatively impact the performance of young girls in the classroom Go look at Figure 1 - the bias towards women in literature is stronger than the bias towards men in math. Is that not an issue? IIRC some people suggest that this strong bias against men in non-STEM subjects (where biased teachers can be far more discriminatory when it comes to grades) encourages men to focus on STEM, perhaps reinforcing the idea that men are better at STEM (because it's the subject whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 03:25 PM
9

PUAs: "Sociopaths do well with women, at least in terms of getting into their pants, here's a few tricks they use" TRP: "That's cheating, you actually have to BE the sociopath" Then they ride the carousel for a bit, realise it's all kinda hollow, and suddenly they have an epiphany and are now tradcons (just like Stacey).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/20 11:41 AM
2

Surprise witness at the end - the woman who he was with at the bar (the friend agreed it was her) who turns out to be his cousin.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 08:48 PM
15

when a girl adjust her boobs right in a boys face he is going to like it 90% of the time Only if the woman is attractive. It's like rules 1 and 2. Do an unsafe image search for 'ugly topless woman' if you want to prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 12:51 AM
2

PinkPill Feminism and Female Dating Strategy are mostly trolls or TERFs.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:53 PM
3

I haven't read it all yet, but here's a little prediction - richer men can afford the child support tax, poorer men can't afford it so they become deadbeats if the tax is too high. White upper-middle-class feminists probably don't feel this is a major issue.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:29 PM
4

abuse treat with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly. If someone thinks you're being cruel, they think you're being abusive. But simply being a meanie shouldn't be illegal. It's subjective. It's sometimes a good thing. And making it illegal would have hugely negative consequences - meanies would just become cry-bullies accusing the other one of being a meanie.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:13 PM
2

It's abuse but not violence. Abuse is always going to be subjective, and should be considered a personal matter - just don't hang out with assholes. Violence is a criminal matter.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:07 PM
-1

Looks, personality, etc. The difference between "average" guys and "chad" is usually not that chad is actually better, it's just marketing and sales - 'game'. (Incels tend to disagree because learning to improve their "game" means improving something in their lives and they're against that). "Chad" is all the things TRP guys wish they were - attractive, good at 'game', successful, etc - they're not actually real people. The real guys who get laid a lot are mostly doing it because they have good …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 06:35 AM
3

56% of marriages also ended due to porn addiction HaHa, bull. There was a study that showed that new porn watchers have a higher divorce rate. Men who start watching porn are twice as likely to divorce. Women who start watching porn are three times as likely to divorce. But even if the numbers add up to 56% (and you'd be assuming that non-new porn viewers are similarly at risk - very unlikely IMO), I'd guess this is correlational. If a couple is already splitting up, they're way more likely to l…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 06:07 AM
1

The best way to get advice on the internet is to give bad advice, then someone will correct you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/20 05:15 AM
5

While it usually takes two to tango, on of them can be a worse person. OTOH, there's a third option no-one has thought of. The Royals might actually want a bit of Royal news that isn't Prince Andrew allegedly fucking kids. I can imagine them having a family war-room meeting, discussing whether anyone had some big plans that could distract the press for a while. Harry has always been a source of scandals (and the family doesn't need any more of those) so axing him makes a fair bit of sense - they…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 08:55 AM
2

Men don't know how to get a date. Women aren't worth pursuing anymore. Men aren't worth saying "yes" to. Women are getting better at saying "no". There's now better alternatives. Take your pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 08:38 AM
2

That was aimed at married redpill, who I suspect have a lot of relationship issues. The whole idea makes zero sense. But yeah ... you can make a long-term partner feel dread but it's a dumb idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 10:32 AM
2

If I wanted to hang out with a bunch of bitter guys whinging about their wives I'd go to MensRights, at least they're not all just writing fanfic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/20 10:27 AM
5

She's not scared you'll leave, she's just annoyed that the other women are trying it. If you were being manipulative and suggesting that you're probably going to cheat on her, she'd either desperately try to save the marriage by making you happier, or leave. Either way, it would not be good for the long-term stability of the marriage, it's something that would work better if you didn't actually value the relationship (a lot of TRP is like that).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:57 PM
1

It doesn't prevent you, it just makes it harder. To the extent that you have free will (why else are you bothering to argue?) you can make choices. People with depression are ambivalent. They choose to stay comfortable but depressed. Then they change their minds and choose to improve things. Then they backslide. They flip flop. Eventually they can work they way into a better place, but it's not quick to permanently change their situation. Women can get a date with just a few hours work. It doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:33 PM
1

Would you invite RooshV to meet your parents?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:18 PM
1

No it doesn't. If you're actually depressed and don't want it, I'm sure you've made some effort to change your situation. A lot of people with depression backslide a lot though, because it can't just be fixed in a few hours, so it can take a lot more time and effort to fix it than just swiping a few times on Tinder and going on a date or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 09:04 PM
1

in my experience... there is never the one who is happy I did You can get better at reading signals. This takes experience and you'll upset a few women's feelings (not that this really matters, it's a minor annoyance to them and you have the right to approach as long as you're not an asshole about it).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 08:45 AM
2

Are depressed people voluntarily depressed? If they could radically change their situation just by following a few simple instructions for a few hours, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 08:40 AM
2

A lot of people just lie on the internet. TRP: "Dude I'm like totally crushing it, spinning plates, no they're not all on drugs or single mothers or fat or all 3, not all of them". TBP: "Any guy who's not a TOTAL LOSER can get a girlfriend no trouble, as long as he respects the m'ladies and works on himself and doesn't write offensive things anonymously on the internet". Women: "Women don't date assholes, they date genuinely nice and good men who really have pure hearts, don't ask about my exs t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 04:02 AM
2

I doubt they actually follow their own advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 02:56 AM
7

I'm pretty sure most of FDS is encouraging other women to take themselves out of the market (by being awful) so they can either screw over men (they're mostly man-haters) or have less competition. I'm not sure how any sane women would listen to them though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 02:42 AM
2

Let's say a bunch of men are selling clothes at a market. They see a woman try on 30 different jackets from different vendors but still isn't happy. Are they really going to bother calling out to try and attract her as a customer? She's just going to be a time-waster. It's pretty sexist to not see how it's similar for women. Women might like a guy with a little bit of experience (lady bits are harder to work with, guys can't just lie back and make sexy noises) but they don't like a manslut unles…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 02:06 AM
2

You're being illogical. Let's say 3% of men are in relationships, and that 1% are "high value alphas" (or whatever you want to call it) and 2% are "average guys". Just because the majority of guys in a relationship a average doesn't mean average guys are doing OK, maybe 90% of average guys are single. OK so we need real numbers. Half of young people (18-34) are single - https://www.inquirer.com/news/dating-match-millennials-marriage-study-single-half-20190322.html If half of men don't have a lon…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 01:51 AM
1

Learning where the line is means being a bit of an asshole at times, until you figure stuff out. Nice guys won't figure this out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 10:14 PM
1

IF she's fine with it, yes. Otherwise, no. Learning where the line is takes experience. That means not being nice, and pushing the boundaries, and eventually figuring things out. If a guy is too nice / timid they'll never figure it out. I guess being an over the top asshole means you'd never learn where the line is too, but that doesn't matter so much to the guy (they'll score sometimes and be a creep other times).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 10:13 PM
1

I asked if being sexually aggressive / assertive is OK. You weren't sure. Grabbing an ass in a nightclub might be perfectly fine, if the girl is OK with it. Let's assume they've already flirted a bit or whatever, the guy has read the signals. And flirting has to be OK too, right? Guys have to read the signals and make the first moves. Sometimes they have to take risks. If not, they end up as nice guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 03:56 PM
2

So anonymously whinging on the internet is something that's really pivotal that women pick up on, but grabbing ass at a nightclub is maybe OK or not, dunno, depends on the context. Maybe that's what nice guys whinge about - the society is saying "don't harass the m'ladies" yet pushing boundaries is how most guys have to act if they want to get laid. Of course, 99% of niceguys (the subreddit) posts are just a Tinder match "Hey wanna smash". "No". "FUCK YOU WHORE I'M A NICE GUY" (how is this reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 03:47 PM
2

OK, so is acting entitled good behaviour or not? Or you don't know either?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 03:42 PM
2

The whole "Men only want one thing and its disgusting" meme is suppose to be A JOKE. And if women could actually encourage good behavior in men, r/NiceGuys wouldnt be a thing. How would you define "good behaviour in men"? Is being sexually aggressive / assertive (there's a very thin line) good behaviour?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 03:39 PM
3

So are you anywhere close to as buff as Tom Brady or David Beckham? Or are you just trolling? Tom Brady and David Beckham are in the top 1% of men in terms of physique. Going to the gym regularly might eventually get most guys to a similar level.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 11:12 AM
8

Sorry, I missed a word. You mean, women like guys who look like they spend 4 days a week at the gym while taking steroids, rather than guys who look like they spend 7 days a week at the gym while abusing steroids, human growth hormone, and insulin and a 10,000 calorie diet to bulk as much as humanly possible. Happy? Most professional entertainers (e.g. Chris Brown, most actors who aren't character actors) go to the gym and use steroids. Looking good is a large part of their job. David Beckham mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 11:01 AM
1

FDS is an insanely ill-advised foray of females to mirror men's behavior and try to beat them at their own game IIRC a lot of FDS are Gender Critical (TERF) crazies trying to um ... I dunno ... trigger male redditors because they hate men? They think that women will believe them and they want women to make things hard for men because they hate men?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 10:14 AM
19

I always see women drooling over skinny guys like Ansel Elgort, Chris Brown and David Beckham without any love shown for Arnold Schwarzenegger, John Cena and Wladimir Klitschko You mean, women guys who look like they spend 4 days a week at the gym on steroids, vs guys who look like they spend 7 days a week at the gym on steroids, human growth hormone, and insulin and a 10,000 calorie diet to bulk as much as humanly possible. This is like saying "Why do girls diet? Guys like a woman who looks lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 10:07 AM
3

Also meth. If we are to take the word of some of the posters here that they are not call center workers a lot of the guys here have substance abuse problems. Gen X / early Millenials with ADHD medication.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 06:58 AM
1

The "blue pill" attitude to dating presupposes that both partners are and should approach a relationship in good faith and work toward mutual benefit. The reality is, just a few bad actors (a few men who act sleazy, and a few women who reward this) means assuming good faith gets expensive for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 03:53 AM
8

How about - stuff that's already happening will continue to happen, but more people will talk about it. Am I a prophet?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 03:50 AM
3

So you organised a bunch of stuff for yourself (I'm guessing it was all stuff you want to do) and your husband was happy to go along with it. I thought it would be fun Yep, it's stuff you want to do. I asked him if he'd want to go. He would! Maybe there's a language problem? When men say they want to go on an outing a woman has suggested but don't seem to care about the details, they mean that they don't hate the idea and want to make the woman happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 01:23 AM
3

Women are slut-shamed when they get laid. Men are slut-shamed when they don't get laid. For some reason society is OK with the later (maybe because misandry is a big thing?).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 01:13 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 09:17 PM
3

He's probably better (knowledge wise) on warfare in the Medieval period than Lindy. He's not as funny though (unless you really like cringe humor). And Lindy's the type of guy who can do a really entertaining video on pretty much any historical topic in a single take with no preparation (look at how few takes he does - it's pretty clear he just has a few key points he wants to talk about then just does a slick video in a single take with no real script).
/r/MensRights13/01/20 05:23 AM
3

Or they both knew it was irresponsible and the nanny state should penalise them both (much like if two drunk drivers hit each other). I wouldn't really think it's such a big issue that the police would need to be involved though.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:57 AM
15

Broke: MGM and FGM are both wrong. Woke: FGM is worse because it can be worse depending on the case. Bespoke: So by traditionalist / feminist logic, FGM is OK if they are just trimming the beef curtains, her future husband will thank them!
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:52 AM
1

Daily Mail Right-wing tabloids walk a thin line between news and satire and the readers know it, whereas left-wing infotainment needs a laugh track to let the audience know that it's totally satire even though they treat it like real news.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:50 AM
10

HEMA often has women compete in open tournaments. Untrained men are far better than untrained women (for the most part) because of physique and more fighting experience (most boys play games that have similar hand-eye co-ordination). At the extreme top end, men have a slight edge and will dominate. A 5% difference (arbitrary number) makes the most difference at the extreme bottom (0%) and the extreme top (getting to 100%). But in the vast intermediate range, women do OK. A bit of training rapidl…
/r/MensRights13/01/20 04:24 AM
1

I kinda prefer his castles stuff, except the bits where he tries to make machicolations (basically murder holes on battlements) a meme.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 03:00 AM
7

Australia? IIRC this is for statistical purposes (very common for government jobs to have this), unless the job is something very specific (e.g. it's a diversity officer job). Odds are that the hiring manager won't even see it. It's used so they can report the findings for statistical purposes, it's not something they actually give a shit about (in almost every case).
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:26 AM
5

If she's forgotten, flop it out to remind her. This is a great Thanksgivings trick (I'm assuming OP is American).
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:23 AM
4

I think you're forgetting about the large overlap between "femcels" and feminists.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 09:15 PM
8

They want to show that circumcision is gross and uncool. I think the outfit serves its purpose.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:37 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanaticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism
/r/MensRights08/01/20 10:42 PM
2

If more women then men were fishermen, feminists would claim weekend fishing trips are housework.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:57 AM
20

If you look at the data, there's often a large standard deviation. A lot of women are hobbyist cooks (often self-described "foodies"). Spending 8 hours a week shopping in farmers markets, spending hours preparing some Instagram-perfect meal. There's women who spend a half hour a week vacuuming like a normal person, and women who redecorate the house every weekend. Similarly, "household maintenance" is a big thing on the account of men, and this can also be driven by hobbyists. The main differenc…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:55 AM
5

Feminist honeypot. "So do you feel angry? Would you be able to resist if she attacked you? What did you do to set this off? OMG you're the abuser you need preventative counselling!"
/r/MensRights30/12/19 08:00 AM
2

It's all part of the one wider issue which treats women as dependents (e.g. children or pets), not adults.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 07:40 AM
7

At the end of the relationship i grew tired of her and the lack of attention she gave me so i cheated on her. Female hypo-agency treats women as children. Men are seen as misogynistic if they dump a woman, even if she's a total bitch. And there's sure as hell no "yasss kween" attitude if a guy dumps a woman who's just not on his level, that would be super-problematic. Society is so keen on protecting women that it creates a situation where men treat them like shit because they see the woman as a…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 07:39 AM
7

They're mostly TERFs, the feminists who hate men so much even other feminists can't stand them.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 10:50 PM
3

Let's say, hypothetically, men are socially pressured to not leave bad relationships. Not to dump toxic women, and certainly not to leave a woman just because she's not on his level.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 10:46 PM
6

Sort of. Yes there's some quote by bell hooks. It's like saying "sin hurts the sinner", it's an argument in favour of a belief, not an argument as to how believers should act. Let's strip feminism down to two key statements: Men are (on average) better off and more powerful. Men use their privileged position to maintain this power as a group. All (or at least the vast majority of) gender differences are caused by this system (and either make men better off like more pay, or are some 'collateral …
/r/MensRights29/12/19 09:33 PM
4

So now we're gender essentialists and are not against double standards?
/r/MensRights29/12/19 08:50 AM
1

Wife is sick and went to bed early. I'm really excited that I get to play video games and drink beer all night.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 08:45 AM
1

If you have a large, powerful dog like a German Shepard you train it not to be violent. If you then have a couple of them in a room they don't tend to fight. If you have a small yappy dog like a Corgi you don't care, so if you put two Corgis in a room it can get very ugly.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 01:09 PM
1

Because men are conditioned by society to not hit women. That's the dumb thing about feminism. They assume that society is all the problem, when society is working overtime to ensure that men (who are naturally kinda dangerous) do NOT every lose their shit and hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 09:22 AM
1

Also, popular culture is a thing. The Honeymooners (1955) had Ralph "pow right in the kisser" Kramden. The Simpsons had Homer Simpson. Now there's Big Bang Theory. Feminism tends to look at them and say "look at what was considered realistic and acceptable", but these are TV shows that deliberately portrayed people behaving in unrealistic and unacceptable ways because it's more entertaining. OK, you can over-simplify the other way. TV shows portrayed both unrealistic and realistic traits. They p…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:17 AM
1

So virtually anyone who kills them-self while living in a developed nation is just nuts?
/r/MensRights28/11/19 09:24 AM
2

Also - the clonazepam thing. Peterson was on clonazepam (to deal with anxiety due to his wife's cancer). His opponents like to point out that he only started to speak out against feminist fanaticism in media and academia after he started the medication. I think there's something to this. Criticising radical feminism is something that causes a massive amount of blowback. He knew he'd be shat on by disingenuous bullies. Sure he gets a big fan club but he's also likely to eventually get taken down …
/r/MensRights23/10/19 08:14 PM
1

Or it's because everyone knows Boris gets more death threats than her.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 01:15 PM
1

It's Australia. 12 months probation for the first offence is pretty standard if you don't actually kill anyone, because prison doesn't help the poor offender commit fewer crimes.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 12:53 PM
1

I'd expect the vast majority of men don't give a shit, and only value appearance and maybe personality.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 12:51 PM
1

Everything is 'manipulation'. Whether it's wrong depends on whether you had the right to make the threat. "Sleep with me or I'll get you fired" - you don't (or shouldn't) have the right to try and get someone fired for no real cause. "This relationship isn't going to work out if you're not interested in sex" is perfectly fine - you have every right to walk out of a relationship that's not working for you.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 12:20 PM
-2

Well at least she wasn't the CONVICTED RAPIST BROCK TURNER lol.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 09:12 AM
1

If a physically weak man went around harassing / slapping people, it would be obvious that he needs to be punished for his own good before someone snaps and causes him serious harm. People who minimise female violence against males ("he's not at risk because if he fights back he'll win!") are accepting the risk that the man will eventually hit back.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 09:47 PM
1

I don't buy it. Economy - male mental health goes to shit when there's no jobs. Yes, there's MRA issues here (male disposability) but that's not a new thing. Mental "health" awareness. Everyone seems to talk about mental illness, but not mental health. Look at any discussion and it's all "anxiety" or "triggers" or whatever, not anything useful or productive. It's like if we tried to cure obesity by putting up pictures of fat people eating donuts everywhere, people would just be reminded of donut…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 09:44 PM
2

Many or even most of the victims calculated that Gersen was their true enemy. “Much more than I expected, they were asking me: ‘Why are you ruining my life? My life is fine. I wanted my husband to be taken in for the night. But I wanted to control what happened.’” Reddit has a hate-boner for Russia making minor one-off domestic violence (e.g. a slap) essentially a misdemeanour. The reason they did it is because victims are more likely to call the police if it's going to result in something that'…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 07:17 AM
2

Every "cure" feminism has tried to administer has just ended up worsening the situation, because nothing they've done acknowledges men's issues, men's humanity or attempts to properly reach out to men in any way. The problem is they're ideological nuts. As annoying as a lot of sociology types are ('we have to look through all 25 different possible lenses that the 25 different conference attendees have identified as key factors because that's better than figuring out a root cause') at least they …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 08:15 AM
3

I'm not sure if that's a very feminist comment, or a very un-feminist comment.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:51 PM
25

When you're privileged, losing that privilege feels like oppression. I guess society has been getting more equal for the last century?
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:40 PM
1

SSRIs are not bad drugs. To beat depression, you have to become more capable of doing shit. SSRIs make you more capable of doing shit, but in a small number of cases that shit is something drastic and undesirable. It's not people in the absolute depths of depression who are most in danger, it's the people who are just starting to get a bit better.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:20 PM
1

A lot of mass shooters are basically suicidal. They've given up on life, and just want to quit it in a slightly more dramatic fashion. If you want to stop mass shooters, make sure all men want to live.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:16 PM
-16

Paranoid dipshits who don't leave their basement / echo chamber.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:12 PM
3

Lesbian relationships are uncommon (most people are straight) but IIRC yes they are more violent. However there's less of the extreme high-end violence. Women typically aren't able to kill another adult or even cause major injury. It really depends on where you put the bar. Hospital visits, murder, slaps. But if you consider it a problem to be dealt with by society, you want to look at where it starts and it can be low-level violence that escalates.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 09:10 PM
10

IIRC some studies suggest that the most common form of domestic violence is a woman hitting a man who then gets mad and hits back. Sure, the guy is probably a turd (birds of a feather do tend to flock together) but he's also got very few options. If he's poor then there's no-where else to go. If there's kids she'll get them. If he calls the cops he might end up in cuffs. Obviously there's other scenarios. But if society stands by while a woman hits a man, then it shouldn't be surprised if that w…
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:59 PM
3

Yeah, the vast majority of violent criminals have some sob story which they claim justifies their behaviour. While it can be a factor, there's plenty of people with sob stories who behaved far better.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter